The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Extent of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction and All-cause and Cardiovascular Mortality Benefit: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Lipid-modifying agents steadily lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with the aim of reducing mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine whether all-cause or cardiovascular (CV) mortality effect size for lipid-lowering therapy varied according to the magnitude of LDL-C reduction. Electronic databases were searched, including PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov , from inception to December 31, 2019. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials that compared lipid-modifying agents (statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK-9 inhibitors) versus placebo, standard or usual care or intensive versus less-intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy in adults, with or without known history of CV disease with a follow-up of at least 52 weeks. All-cause and CV mortality as primary end points, myocardial infarction, stroke, and non-CV death as secondary end points. Absolute risk differences [ARD (ARDs) expressed as incident events per 1000 person-years], number needed to treat (NNT), and rate ratios (RR) were assessed. Sixty randomized controlled trials totaling 323,950 participants were included. Compared with placebo, usual care or less-intensive therapy, active or more potent lipid-lowering therapy reduced the risk of all-cause death [ARD -1.33 (-1.89 to -0.76); NNT 754 (529-1309); RR 0.92 (0.89-0.96)]. Intensive LDL-C percent lowering was not associated with further reductions in all-cause mortality [ARD -0.27 (-1.24 to 0.71); RR 1.00 (0.94-1.06)]. Intensive LDL-C percent lowering did not further reduce CV mortality [ARD -0.28 (-0.83 to 0.38); RR 1.02 (0.94-1.09)]. Our findings indicate that risk reduction varies across subgroups and that overall NNTs are high. Identifying patient subgroups who benefit the most from LDL-C levels reduction is clinically relevant and necessary.

Impacts of ezetimibe on risks of various types of cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Ezetimibe is a widely used medication to reduce the plasma cholesterol level, particularly low-density lipoprotein level. However, its impact on cancer remains controversial. Here, its impacts on risks of various types of cancers were meta-analyzed.

METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched and randomized controlled trials with followed up for at least 24 weeks were selected and included. The experimental group was defined as those patients treated with ezetimibe alone or with other medications, and the control group was defined as those who received a placebo or the matched medication. The number of new cancer cases or cancer-related deaths was extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.3).

RESULTS

Nine trials enrolling 35 222 patients were included in the analyses. Compared with the control group, ezetimibe increased the number of new intestine cancer patients [relative risk (RR), 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.67; P  = 0.03] and had a trend to increase the number of new breast cancer patients (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.98-1.98; P  = 0.07). There was no significant difference in new hepatobiliary cancer, prostate cancer, skin cancer or cancer of other sites. Ezetimibe did not significantly increase the risk of new cancer in total (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96-1.11; P  = 0.38), cancer-related death (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.98-1.26; P  = 0.10) or cancer events (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.97-1.12; P  = 0.30). In terms of lipid-lowering effect, ezetimibe significantly reduced total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

CONCLUSION

Ezetimibe may increase the risk of intestine cancer and has a trend of increasing the risk of breast cancer. There is no evidence to support that it increases or decreases the risk of other types.

Current Understanding on the Role of Lipids in Macrophages and Associated Diseases

Lipid metabolism is the major intracellular mechanism driving a variety of cellular functions such as energy storage, hormone regulation and cell division. Lipids, being a primary component of the cell membrane, play a pivotal role in the survival of macrophages. Lipids are crucial for a variety of macrophage functions including phagocytosis, energy balance and ageing. However, functions of lipids in macrophages vary based on the site the macrophages are residing at. Lipid-loaded macrophages have recently been emerging as a hallmark for several diseases. This review discusses the significance of lipids in adipose tissue macrophages, tumor-associated macrophages, microglia and peritoneal macrophages. Accumulation of macrophages with impaired lipid metabolism is often characteristically observed in several metabolic disorders. Stress signals differentially regulate lipid metabolism. While conditions such as hypoxia result in accumulation of lipids in macrophages, stress signals such as nutrient deprivation initiate lipolysis and clearance of lipids. Understanding the biology of lipid accumulation in macrophages requires the development of potentially active modulators of lipid metabolism.

Lipid-Lowering Trials Are Not Representative of Patients Managed in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Exclusion Criteria

Background Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) might not be representative of the real-world population because of unreasonable exclusion criteria. We sought to determine which groups of patients are excluded from RCTs that included lipid-lowering therapy. Methods and Results We retrieved all trials from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration and systematically searched for large (≥1000 participants) lipid-lowering therapy RCTs, defined as statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors. We predefined groups: older adults (>70 or >75 years), women, non-Whites, chronic kidney failure, heart failure, immunosuppression, cancer, dementia, treated thyroid disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mental illness, atrial fibrillation, multimorbidity (≥2 chronic diseases), and polypharmacy. We counted the number of RCTs excluding patients of the predefined groups and meta-analyzed the prevalence of included patients to obtain pooled estimates with a random-effects model. We included 42 RCTs (298 605 patients). Eighty-one percent of trials excluded patients with severe and 76% those with moderate kidney failure. Seventy-one percent of trials excluded groups of women, 64% excluded patients with moderate to severe heart failure, 64% those with immunosuppressant conditions, 48% those with cancer, 29% those with dementia, and 29% of trials excluded older adults. The pooled prevalence for patients >70 years of age was 25% (95% CI, 0%-49%), 11% (3%-18%) for >75 years of age, and 51% (38%-63%) for multimorbidity. Conclusions The majority of lipid-lowering therapy trials excluded patients with common diseases, such as moderate-to-severe kidney disease or heart failure or with immunosuppression. Underrepresenting certain populations, including women and older adults, might lead to limited transportability of study results and uncertainty on possible side-effects and efficacy in these groups. Future trials should promote diversity in the recruitment strategies and improve equity in cardiovascular research. Registration URL: ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique Identifier: CRD42021253909.

Antidyslipidemia Pharmacotherapy in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The benefits and safety of antidyslipidemia pharmacotherapy in patients with chronic kidney disease were not well defined so the latest evidence was summarized by this work.

METHODS

This systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) included searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to 28 February 2022, for randomized controlled trials of any antilipidaemic medications administered to adults with chronic kidney disease [CKD: defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m² not undergoing transplantation], using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool to assess the certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

55 trials and 30 works of them were included in our systematic review and NMA, respectively. In comparisons with no antidyslipidemia therapy or placebo, proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type 9 inhibitors plus statin (PS) was the most effective drug regimen for reducing all-cause mortality (OR 0.62, 95% CI [0.40, 0.93]; GRADE: moderate), followed by moderate-high intensity statin (HS, OR 0.76, 95% CI [0.60, 0.93]; I² = 66.9%; GRADE: moderate). PS, HS, low-moderate statin (LS), ezetimibe plus statin (ES), and fibrates (F) significantly decreased the composite cardiovascular events. The subgroup analysis revealed the null effect of statins on death (OR 0.92, 95% CI [0.81, 1.04]) and composite cardiovascular events (OR 0.94, 95% CI [0.82, 1.07]) in dialysis patients.

CONCLUSION

In nondialysis CKD patients, statin-based therapies could significantly and safely reduce all-cause death and major composite cardiovascular events despite the presence of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL-c levels. Aggressive medication regimens, PS and HS, appeared to be more effective, especially in patients with established CAD.

The Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Individuals With Primary Glomerular Diseases

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with various primary glomerular diseases. In a population-level cohort of adults with primary glomerular disease, we sought to describe the risk of CVD compared with the general population and the impact of traditional and kidney-related risk factors on CVD risk.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Adults with membranous nephropathy (n = 387), minimal change disease (n = 226), IgA nephropathy (n = 759), and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (n = 540) from a centralized pathology registry in British Columbia, Canada (2000-2012).

EXPOSURE

Traditional CVD risk factors (diabetes, age, sex, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, prior CVD) and kidney-related risk factors (type of glomerular disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], proteinuria).

OUTCOME

A composite CVD outcome of coronary artery, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular events, and death due to myocardial infarction or stroke.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Subdistribution hazards models to evaluate the outcome risk with non-CVD death treated as a competing event. Standardized incidence rates (SIR) calculated based on the age- and sex-matched general population.

RESULTS

During a median 6.8 years of follow-up, 212 patients (11.1%) experienced the CVD outcome (10-year risk, 14.7% [95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%]). The incidence rate was high for the overall cohort (24.7 per 1,000 person-years) and for each disease type (range, 12.2-46.1 per 1,000 person-years), and was higher than that observed in the general population both overall (SIR, 2.46 [95% CI, 2.12-2.82]) and for each disease type (SIR range, 1.38-3.98). Disease type, baseline eGFR, and proteinuria were associated with a higher risk of CVD and, when added to a model with traditional risk factors, led to improvements in model fit (R² of 14.3% vs 12.7%), risk discrimination (C-statistic of 0.81 vs 0.78; difference, 0.02 [95% CI, 0.01-0.04]), and continuous net reclassification improvement (0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.6]).

LIMITATIONS

Ascertainment of outcomes and comorbidities using administrative data.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with primary glomerular disease have a high absolute risk of CVD that is approximately 2.5 times that of the general population. Consideration of eGFR, proteinuria, and type of glomerular disease may improve risk stratification of CVD risk in these individuals.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Patients with chronic kidney disease are known to be at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular risk in patients with primary glomerular diseases is poorly understood because these conditions are rare and require a kidney biopsy for diagnosis. In this study of 1,912 Canadian patients with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy, minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and membranous nephropathy, the rate of cardiovascular events was 2.5 times higher than in the general population and was high for each disease type. Consideration of disease type, kidney function, and proteinuria improved the prediction of cardiovascular events. In summary, our population-level study showed that patients with primary glomerular diseases have a high cardiovascular risk, and that inclusion of kidney-specific risk factors may improve risk stratification.

Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)

People with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for kidney failure, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and premature mortality. Recent clinical trials support new approaches to treat diabetes and CKD. The 2022 American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes and the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease each provide evidence-based recommendations for management. A joint group of ADA and KDIGO representatives reviewed and developed a series of consensus statements to guide clinical care from the ADA and KDIGO guidelines. The published guidelines are aligned in the areas of CKD screening and diagnosis, glycemia monitoring, lifestyle therapies, treatment goals, and pharmacologic management. Recommendations include comprehensive care in which pharmacotherapy that is proven to improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes is layered on a foundation of healthy lifestyle. Consensus statements provide specific guidance on use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, metformin, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, and a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. These areas of consensus provide clear direction for implementation of care to improve clinical outcomes of people with diabetes and CKD.

2022 Taiwan lipid guidelines for primary prevention

Elevated circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major risk factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Early control of LDL-C to prevent ASCVD later in life is important. The Taiwan Society of Lipids and Atherosclerosis in association with the other seven societies developed this new lipid guideline focusing on subjects without clinically significant ASCVD. In this guideline for primary prevention, the recommended LDL-C target is based on risk stratification. A healthy lifestyle with recommendations for foods, dietary supplements and alcohol drinking are described. The pharmacological therapies for LDL-C reduction are recommended. The aim of this guideline is to decrease the risk of ASCVD through adequate control of dyslipidemia in Taiwan.

[Nephrological management and drug dosing in patients with rheumatic diseases and renal insufficiency]

BACKGROUND

In patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and renal insufficiency there are two challenges for physicians: to adapt the antirheumatic medication to the renal function and to carry out a nephroprotective treatment that prevents long-term deterioration of renal function and reduces the elevated cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

A literature search (in PubMed) was carried out and the current state of knowledge on nephroprotective treatment strategies and the treatment of rheumatic diseases in the presence of renal insufficiency was collated, evaluated and summarized.

RESULTS

Lifestyle interventions, especially the cessation of smoking and drug treatment strategies form the basis of nephroprotection including the control of diabetes mellitus with metformin, sodium glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) analogues and control of hypertension with blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), hyperlipidemia, hyperphosphatemia and metabolic acidosis. The SGLT2 inhibitors are also effective for nondiabetic nephropathy. The elevated cardiovascular risk is further reduced by effective control of inflammatory rheumatic activity. Numerous conventional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, especially methotrexate and the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors baricitinib and filgotinib, must mostly be adapted to the renal function. In contrast, biologics can be given in standard doses with the exception of anakinra. The increased cardiovascular risk currently limits the use of tofacitinib in patients with renal insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

The antirheumatic medication should be modified and a complex nephroprotective treatment concept is mandatory in the management of patients with rheumatic disease and renal insufficiency, that in the best-case scenario can be guaranteed by a close interdisciplinary cooperation of rheumatologists and nephrologists.

Emerging Evidence on Coronary Heart Disease Screening in Kidney and Liver Transplantation Candidates: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association: Endorsed by the American Society of Transplantation

Coronary heart disease is an important source of mortality and morbidity among kidney transplantation and liver transplantation candidates and recipients and is driven by traditional and nontraditional risk factors related to end-stage organ disease. In this scientific statement, we review evidence from the past decade related to coronary heart disease screening and management for kidney and liver transplantation candidates. Coronary heart disease screening in asymptomatic kidney and liver transplantation candidates has not been demonstrated to improve outcomes but is common in practice. Risk stratification algorithms based on the presence or absence of clinical risk factors and physical performance have been proposed, but a high proportion of candidates still meet criteria for screening tests. We suggest new approaches to pretransplantation evaluation grounded on the presence or absence of known coronary heart disease and cardiac symptoms and emphasize multidisciplinary engagement, including involvement of a dedicated cardiologist. Noninvasive functional screening methods such as stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy have limited accuracy, and newer noninvasive modalities, especially cardiac computed tomography-based tests, are promising alternatives. Emerging evidence such as results of the 2020 International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease trial emphasizes the vital importance of guideline-directed medical therapy in managing diagnosed coronary heart disease and further questions the value of revascularization among asymptomatic kidney transplantation candidates. Optimizing strategies to disseminate and implement best practices for medical management in the broader end-stage organ disease population should be prioritized to improve cardiovascular outcomes in these populations.

Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease: Results from the KNOW-CKD Study

As the relation between serum non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (nHDL) level and renal outcomes has never been investigated in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) yet, we here aimed to unveil the association of nHDL with CKD progression. A total of 2152 patients with non-dialysis CKD at stages 1 to 5 from the KNOW-CKD study were categorized into the tertile (i.e., 1st (T1), 2nd (T2), and 3rd (T3) tertiles) by nHDL, and were prospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the composite renal event, defined as a composite of decline of kidney function or onset of end-stage renal disease. Kaplan–Meier survival curves analysis demonstrated that the cumulative incidence of the composite renal event was significantly increased in T1 and T3, compared to T2 (p = 0.028, by Log-rank test). Cox regression analysis revealed that both T1 (adjusted hazard ratio 1.309, 95% confidence interval 1.074–1.595) and T3 (adjusted hazard ratio 1.272, 95% confidence interval 1.040–1.556) are associated with significantly increased risk of a composite renal event, compared to T2. The restricted cubic spline plot demonstrated a non-linear, U-shaped association between nHDL and the risk of a composite renal event. In conclusion, both low and high serum nHDL levels are associated with increased risk of CKD progression.

Comparing Simvastatin Monotherapy V/S Simvastatin-Ezetimibe Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia: A Meta-Analysis and Review

Longstanding hyperlipidemia can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. Statins are currently the mainstay of treatment in hyperlipidemia. Combination therapy of statin with ezetimibe is only indicated for severe hypercholesterolemia and very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) population. There is a paucity of studies comparing statin monotherapy vs combination therapy with ezetimibe. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis of the existing literature and compare the effectiveness of statin monotherapy with statin-ezetimibe combination therapy in the management of hyperlipidemia. A systematic electronic search of the scientific literature was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus. Only randomized controlled trials comparing simvastatin monotherapy vs simvastatin-ezetimibe combination therapy between the years 2000 and 2021 and published in English language were included. Fifteen studies were included in the final analysis. The main outcomes that were compared were a reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Our study showed that combination therapy led to a higher reduction of LDL-C (Mean difference: -20.22(-26.38, -14.07); P<0.0001) compared to monotherapy with a statin alone. There was no significant difference in the reduction of HDL-C values (Mean difference: -0.07(-0.45,0.32); P-0.04) between the two groups. Our study indicates that the combination therapy of simvastatin and ezetimibe is more effective in reduction of LDL-C levels compared to simvastatin monotherapy alone. Currently, guidelines recommend combination therapy only for severe hypercholesterolemia and high-risk ASCVD patients, more studies are needed to study the effectiveness of simvastatin-ezetimibe combination therapy in low-risk ASCVD population.

Statin use before and after the KDIGO Lipids in chronic kidney disease guideline: A population-based interrupted time series analysis

In November 2013, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Clinical Practice Guideline for Lipid Management in Chronic Kidney Disease was published, recommending statins for all individuals 50 years or older with an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min/1.73 m² to lower the risk of major cardiovascular events. We quantified the prevalence of statin use among the target population before and after the guideline publication in a large Danish cohort of individuals with an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min/1.73 m² , to investigate the effect of the guideline, but found no difference in the prevalence of statin use prior to and after the guideline publication.

Evolving Strategies in the Treatment of Anaemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: The HIF-Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 10% of the worldwide population; anaemia is a frequent complication. Inadequate erythropoietin production and absolute or functional iron deficiency are the major causes. Accordingly, the current treatment is based on iron and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). Available therapy has dramatically improved the management of anaemia and the quality of life. However, safety concerns were raised over ESA use, especially when aiming to reach near-to-normal haemoglobin levels with high doses. Moreover, many patients show hypo-responsiveness to ESA. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) were developed for the oral treatment of anaemia in CKD to overcome these concerns. They simulate the body's exposure to moderate hypoxia, stimulating the production of endogenous erythropoietin. Some molecules are already approved for clinical use in some countries. Data from clinical trials showed non-inferiority in anaemia correction compared to ESA or superiority for placebo. Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitors may also have additional advantages in inflamed patients, improving iron utilisation and mobilisation and decreasing LDL-cholesterol. Overall, non-inferiority was also shown in major cardiovascular events, except for one molecule in the non-dialysis population. This was an unexpected finding, considering the lower erythropoietin levels reached using these drugs due to their peculiar mechanism of action. More data and longer follow-ups are necessary to better clarifying safety issues and further investigate the variety of pathways activated by HIF, which could have either positive or negative effects and could differentiate HIF-PHIs from ESAs.

The presence and impact of multimorbidity clusters on adverse outcomes across the spectrum of kidney function

BACKGROUND

Multimorbidity (the presence of two or more chronic conditions) is common amongst people with chronic kidney disease, but it is unclear which conditions cluster together and if this changes as kidney function declines. We explored which clusters of conditions are associated with different estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) and studied associations between these clusters and adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Two population-based cohort studies were used: the Stockholm Creatinine Measurements project (SCREAM, Sweden, 2006-2018) and the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank (SAIL, Wales, 2006-2021). We studied participants in SCREAM (404,681 adults) and SAIL (533,362) whose eGFR declined lower than thresholds (90, 75, 60, 45, 30 and 15 mL/min/1.73m²). Clusters based on 27 chronic conditions were identified. We described the most common chronic condition(s) in each cluster and studied their association with adverse outcomes using Cox proportional hazards models (all-cause mortality (ACM) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)).

RESULTS

Chronic conditions became more common and clustered differently across lower eGFR categories. At eGFR 90, 75, and 60 mL/min/1.73m², most participants were in large clusters with no prominent conditions. At eGFR 15 and 30 mL/min/1.73m², clusters involving cardiovascular conditions were larger and were at the highest risk of adverse outcomes. At eGFR 30 mL/min/1.73m², in the heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and diabetes cluster in SCREAM, ACM hazard ratio (HR) is 2.66 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.31-3.07) and MACE HR is 4.18 (CI 3.65-4.78); in the heart failure and atrial fibrillation cluster in SAIL, ACM HR is 2.23 (CI 2.04 to 2.44) and MACE HR is 3.43 (CI 3.22-3.64). Chronic pain and depression were common and associated with adverse outcomes when combined with physical conditions. At eGFR 30 mL/min/1.73m², in the chronic pain, heart failure and myocardial infarction cluster in SCREAM, ACM HR is 2.00 (CI 1.62-2.46) and MACE HR is 4.09 (CI 3.39-4.93); in the depression, chronic pain and stroke cluster in SAIL, ACM HR is 1.38 (CI 1.18-1.61) and MACE HR is 1.58 (CI 1.42-1.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Patterns of multimorbidity and corresponding risk of adverse outcomes varied with declining eGFR. While diabetes and cardiovascular disease are known high-risk conditions, chronic pain and depression emerged as important conditions and associated with adverse outcomes when combined with physical conditions.

Aspirin for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Mortality, Cardiovascular Disease, and Kidney Failure in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study

Rationale and Objective

Chronic kidney disease is a risk enhancing factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality, and the role of aspirin use is unclear in this population. We investigated the risk and benefits of aspirin use in primary and secondary prevention of CVD in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study.

Study Design

Prospective observational cohort.

Setting & Participants

3,664 Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort participants.

Exposure

Aspirin use in patients with and without preexisting CVD.

Outcomes

Mortality, composite and individual CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease), kidney failure (dialysis and transplant), and major bleeding.

Analytical Approach

Intention-to-treat analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to examine associations of time varying aspirin use.

Results

The primary prevention group was composed of 2,578 (70.3%) individuals. Mean age was 57 ± 11 years, 46% women, 42% Black, and 47% had diabetes. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Median follow-up was 11.5 (IQR, 7.4-13) years. Aspirin was not associated with all-cause mortality in those without preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD) (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.7-1.01; P = 0.06) or those with CVD (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.02, P = 0.08). Aspirin was not associated with a reduction of the CVD composite in primary prevention (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.77-1.23; P = 0.79) and in secondary prevention because the original study design was not meant to study the effects of aspirin.

Limitations

This is not a randomized controlled trial, and therefore, causality cannot be determined.

Conclusions

Aspirin use in chronic kidney disease patients was not associated with reduction in primary or secondary CVD events, progression to kidney failure, or major bleeding.

Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)

People with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for kidney failure, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and premature mortality. Recent clinical trials support new approaches to treat diabetes and CKD. The 2022 American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes and the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease each provide evidence-based recommendations for management. A joint group of ADA and KDIGO representatives reviewed and developed a series of consensus statements to guide clinical care from the ADA and KDIGO guidelines. The published guidelines are aligned in the areas of CKD screening and diagnosis, glycemia monitoring, lifestyle therapies, treatment goals, and pharmacologic management. Recommendations include comprehensive care in which pharmacotherapy that is proven to improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes is layered on a foundation of healthy lifestyle. Consensus statements provide specific guidance on use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, metformin, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, and a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. These areas of consensus provide clear direction for implementation of care to improve clinical outcomes of people with diabetes and CKD.

Hyperlipidemia and mortality in patients on peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

New lipid-lowering therapy at the start of dialysis and measurement of lipid parameters over the follow-up period is not recommended in dialysis patients, which seems unappropriated in clinical practice. We aimed to examine the effect of hyperlipidemia on mortality in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed, including 2939 incident CAPD patients from five dialysis facilities between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The association between hyperlipidemia at the start of CAPD and all-cause mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Of 2939 with a median age of 50.0 (interquartile range, 39.0-61.0), 1697 (57.7%) were men, 533 (18.1%) had hyperlipidemia, 549 (18.7%) had diabetes mellitus, 1915 (65.2%) had hypertension, and 410 (14.0%) had a history of CVD. During the median follow-up period of 35.1 months, 519 (17.7%) died, including 402 (16.7%, 47.4/1000 patient-years) in the non-hyperlipidemia group and 117 (22.0%, 71.1/1000 patient-years) in the hyperlipidemia group. Over the overall follow-up period, patients with hyperlipidemia had an equally high risk of all-cause mortality throughout follow-up as those without hyperlipidemia ([HR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83 to 1.31). However, from the 48-month follow-up onwards, hyperlipidemia was associated with a 2.26 (95% CI 1.49 to 3.43)-time higher risk of all-cause mortality than non-hyperlipidemia. Hypertension modified the association between hyperlipidemia and all-cause mortality (P for interaction < 0.001). A significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality was observed among patients with hypertension (HR 2.27, 95%CI 1.44-3.58).

CONCLUSION

Among CAPD patients, hyperlipidemia at the beginning of CAPD was associated with a high risk of long-term mortality. Hypertension may mediate the association. Our findings suggested that long-term lipid-lowering treatment should be used in those patients with hyperlipidemia.

Adherence to multidisciplinary care in a prospective chronic kidney disease cohort is associated with better outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The Renal Healthcare Program Uruguay (NRHP-UY) is a national, multidisciplinary program that provides care to chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. In this study, we report the global results of CKD patient outcomes and a comparison between those treated at the NRHP-UY Units, with those patients who were initially included in the program but did not adhere to follow up.

METHODS

A cohort of not-on dialysis CKD patients included prospectively in the NRHP-UY between October 1st 2004 and September 30th 2017 was followed-up until September 30th 2019. Two groups were compared: a) Nephrocare Group: Patients who had at least one clinic visit during the first year on NRHP-UY (n = 11174) and b) Non-adherent Group: Patients who were informed and accepted to be included but had no subsequent data registered after admission (n = 3485). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee and all patients signed an informed consent. Outcomes were studied with Logistic and Cox´s regression analysis, Fine and Gray competitive risk and propensity-score matching tests.

RESULTS

14659 patients were analyzed, median age 70 (60-77) years, 56.9% male. The Nephrocare Group showed improved achievement of therapeutic goals, ESKD was more frequent (HR 2.081, CI 95%1.722-2.514) as planned kidney replacement therapy (KRT) start (OR 2.494, CI95% 1.591-3.910), but mortality and the combined event (death and ESKD) were less frequent (HR 0.671, CI95% 0.628-0.717 and 0.777, CI95% 0.731-0.827) (p = 0.000) compared to the Non-adherent group. Results were similar in the propensity-matched group: ESKD (HR 2.041, CI95% 1.643-2.534); planned kidney replacement therapy (KRT) start (OR 2.191, CI95% 1.322-3.631) death (HR 0.692, CI95% 0.637-0.753); combined event (HR 0.801, CI95% 0.742-0.865) (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary care within the NRHP-UY is associated with timely initiation of KRT and lower mortality in single outcomes, combined analysis, and propensity-matched analysis.

The Contribution of Lipotoxicity to Diabetic Kidney Disease

Lipotoxicity is a fundamental pathophysiologic mechanism in diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and is now increasingly recognized in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) pathogenesis. This review highlights lipotoxicity pathways in the podocyte and proximal tubule cell, which are arguably the two most critical sites in the nephron for DKD. The discussion focuses on membrane transporters and lipid droplets, which represent potential therapeutic targets, as well as current and developing pharmacologic approaches to reduce renal lipotoxicity.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers.

METHODS

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development.

RESULTS

This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.

Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Attainment and Outcomes in Dialysis-Requiring Versus Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease in the ISCHEMIA-CKD Trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis (CKD G5D) have worse cardiovascular outcomes than patients with advanced nondialysis CKD (CKD G4-5: estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/[min·1.73m2]). Our objective was to evaluate the relationship between achievement of cardiovascular guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) goals and clinical outcomes for CKD G5D versus CKD G4-5.

METHODS

This was a subgroup analysis of ISCHEMIA-CKD (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease) participants with CKD G4-5 or CKD G5D and moderate-to-severe myocardial ischemia on stress testing. Exposures included dialysis requirement at randomization and GDMT goal achievement during follow-up. The composite outcome was all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Individual GDMT goal (smoking cessation, systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL, statin use, aspirin use) trajectory was modeled. Percentage point difference was estimated for each GDMT goal at 24 months between CKD G5D and CKD G4-5, and for association with key predictors. Probability of survival free from all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction by GDMT goal achieved was assessed for CKD G5D versus CKD G4-5.

RESULTS

A total of 415 CKD G5D and 362 CKD G4-5 participants were randomized. Participants with CKD G5D were less likely to receive statin (-6.9% [95% CI, -10.3% to -3.7%]) and aspirin therapy (-3.0% [95% CI, -5.6% to -0.6%]), with no difference in other GDMT goal attainment. Cumulative exposure to GDMT achieved during follow-up was associated with reduction in all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.87-0.90]; per each GDMT goal attained over 60 days), irrespective of dialysis status.

CONCLUSIONS

CKD G5D participants received statin or aspirin therapy less often. Cumulative exposure to GDMT goals achieved was associated with lower incidence of all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction in participants with advanced CKD and chronic coronary disease, regardless of dialysis status.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT01985360.

Lipidic profiles of patients starting peritoneal dialysis suggest an increased cardiovascular risk beyond classical dyslipidemia biomarkers

Patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and an atherogenic lipid profile generated by exposure to high glucose dialysis solutions. In the general population, the reduction of classic lipids biomarkers is associated with improved clinical outcomes; however, the same results have not been seen in PD population, a lack of data this study aims to fulfill. Single-center prospective observational study of a cohort of CKD patients who started renal replacement therapy with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. The differences in the lipid profile and analytical variables before and 6 months after the start of peritoneal dialysis were analyzed. Samples were analyzed on an Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography system. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in this study. Their mean age was 57.9 ± 16.3 years. A total of 157 endogenous lipid species of 11 lipid subclasses were identified. There were significant increases in total free fatty acids (p < 0.05), diacylglycerides (p < 0.01), triacylglycerides, (p < 0.01), phosphatidylcholines (p < 0.01), phosphatidylethanolamines (p < 0.01), ceramides (p < 0.01), sphingomyelins (p < 0.01), and cholesterol esters (p < 0.01) from baseline to 6 months. However, there were no differences in the classical lipid markers, neither lysophosphatidylcholines, monoacylglycerides, and sphingosine levels. 6 months after the start of the technique, PD patients present changes in the lipidomic profile beyond the classic markers of dyslipidemia.

Statin uses in adults with non-dialysis advanced chronic kidney disease: Focus on clinical outcomes of infectious and cardiovascular diseases

Background: Statins are commonly used for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Observational studies reported the effects on sepsis prevention and mortality improvement. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for CVD and infectious diseases. Limited information is available for statin use in patients with non-dialysis CKD stage V.

Method: The retrospective observational study included patients with non-dialysis CKD stage V, with either de novo statin use or none. Patients who were prior statin users and had prior cardiovascular events were excluded. The key outcomes were infection-related hospitalization, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (non-fatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, or non-fatal stroke), and all-cause mortality. The data were retrieved from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) from January 2001 to December 2019. Analyses were conducted with Cox proportional hazard regression models in the propensity score matching (PSM) cohort.

Result: A total of 20,352 patients with CKD stage V were included (1,431 patients were defined as de novo statin users). After PSM, 1,318 statin users were compared with 1,318 statin non-users. The infection-related hospitalization (IRH) rate was 79.3 versus 94.3 per 1,000 person-years in statin users and statin non-users, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74–0.93, p = 0.002]. The incidence of MACE was 38.9 versus 55.9 per 1,000 person-years in statin users and non-users, respectively (HR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.62–0.83, p < 0.001). The all-cause mortality did not differ between statin users and non-users, but statin users had lower infection-related mortality than non-users (HR, 0.59; 95% CI 0.38–0.92, p = 0.019).

Conclusion:De novo use of statin in patients with non-dialysis CKD stage V reduced the incidence of cardiovascular events, hospitalization, and mortality for infectious disease. The study results reinforced the benefits of statin in a wide range of patients with renal impairment before maintenance dialysis.

Association of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels During Statin Treatment With Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease

Background The benefit of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in chronic kidney disease populations remains unclear. This study evaluated the cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease with different LDL-C levels during statin treatment. Methods and Results There were 8500 patients newly diagnosed as having stage 3 chronic kidney disease under statin treatment who were identified from the Chang Gung Research Database and divided into 3 groups according to their first LDL-C level after the index date: <70 mg/dL, 70 to 100 mg/dL, and >100 mg/dL. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Compared with the LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL group, the 70≤LDL-C<100 mg/dL group exhibited significantly lower risks of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (6.8% versus 8.8%; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.64-0.91]), intracerebral hemorrhage (0.23% versus 0.51%; SHR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.25-0.77]), and new-onset end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis (7.6% versus 9.1%; SHR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.91]). By contrast, the LDL-C <70 mg/dL group exhibited a marginally lower risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (7.3% versus 8.8%; SHR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65-1.02]) and a significantly lower risk of new-onset end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis (7.1% versus 9.1%; SHR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.67-0.85]). Conclusions Among patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease, statin users with 70≤LDL-C<100 mg/dL and with LDL-C <70 mg/dL had similar beneficial effect in the reduction of risks of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and new-onset end-stage renal disease compared with those with LDL-C >100 mg/dL. Moreover, the 70≤LDL-C<100 mg/dL group seemed to have a lowest risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, although the incidence was low.

Cardiovascular Disease Assessment Prior to Kidney Transplantation

Cardiovascular disease is highly prevalent and the leading cause of mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, and kidney transplantation. However, kidney transplantation offers improved survival and quality of life, with an overall reduction in cardiovascular disease events; therefore, it remains the optimal treatment choice for those with advanced kidney disease. Pretransplantation cardiovascular assessment is performed prior to wait-listing and at routine intervals with the principal goal of screening for asymptomatic cardiac disease, intervening when necessary to improve long-term patient and allograft survival. Current clinical practice guidelines are based on expert opinion, with a lack of high-quality evidence to guide standardized screening practices. Recent studies support de-escalation in screening with avoidance of preemptive revascularization in asymptomatic patients, but they fail to provide clear guidance on how best to assess the cardiovascular fitness of this high-risk group. Herein we summarize current practice guidelines, discuss key study findings, highlight the role of optimal medical therapy, and evaluate future directions for cardiovascular disease assessment in this population.

Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease: Results from KNOW-CKD Study

As non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels account for all atherogenic lipoproteins, serum non-HDL-C level has been suggested to be a marker for cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification. Therefore, to unveil the association of serum non-HDL-C levels with CV outcomes in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD), the patients at stages 1 to 5 (n = 2152) from the Korean Cohort Study for Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (KNOW-CKD) were prospectively analyzed. The subjects were divided into quintiles by serum non-HDL-C level. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or non-fatal CV events. The median duration of follow-up was 6.940 years. The analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model unveiled that the composite CV event was significantly increased in the 5th quintile (adjusted hazard ratio 2.162, 95% confidence interval 1.174 to 3.981), compared to that of the 3rd quintile. A fully adjusted cubic spline model depicted a non-linear, J-shaped association between non-HDL-C and the risk of a composite CV event. The association remained robust in a series of sensitivity analyses, including the analysis of a cause-specific hazard model. Subgroup analyses reveled that the association is not significantly altered by clinical conditions, including age, gender, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and albuminuria. In conclusion, high serum non-HDL-C level increased the risk of adverse CV outcomes among the patients with ND-CKD. Further studies are warranted to define the optimal target range of non-HDL-C levels in this population.

Real-World Evidence Evaluation on the Lipid Profile, Therapeutic Goals, and Safety of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe (Trezete®) in Dyslipidemia Patients

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. The combination of statins and cholesterol-absorption inhibitors promotes the decrease in risk factors, such as high concentrations of LDL (low-density lipoproteins). The aim of the study was to evaluate changes in the lipid profile and the effect on therapeutic goals, as well as the safety of dyslipidemia patients treated with Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe (Trezete®).

Materials and Methods

A real-world evidence study was conducted with retrospective data collection through a review of clinical records from dyslipidemia patients treated with Trezete® in routine medical practice. Clinical records included results of biochemical markers before treatment and at least one follow up between weeks 8 and 16.

Results

The study included 103 patients' clinical records (55.4% men) with a mean age of 56.0 ± 13.0 years. More than 57% of the patients had mixed dyslipidemia and a median disease progression of 3.1 (IQR, 1.5; 9.1) years. Regarding LDL concentrations, 72.8% of the patients achieved therapeutic goals according to cardiovascular risk (CVR), which was statistically significant. Similarly, 94.1% achieved goals for total cholesterol (<200 mg/dL) and 56.0% for triglycerides (<150 mg/dL), a p value <0.001. No cardiovascular events were observed.

Conclusion

Trezete® shows an important clinical impact on CVR-related target markers during the treatment of dyslipidemia patients. It is relevant to mention that a significant percentage of patients achieved therapeutic goals during the first months of treatment. Fixed-dose combination therapy has shown to be as safe as monotherapy treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04862962.

Prevalence of statin intolerance: a meta-analysis

AIMS

Statin intolerance (SI) represents a significant public health problem for which precise estimates of prevalence are needed. Statin intolerance remains an important clinical challenge, and it is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. This meta-analysis estimates the overall prevalence of SI, the prevalence according to different diagnostic criteria and in different disease settings, and identifies possible risk factors/conditions that might increase the risk of SI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched several databases up to 31 May 2021, for studies that reported the prevalence of SI. The primary endpoint was overall prevalence and prevalence according to a range of diagnostic criteria [National Lipid Association (NLA), International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP), and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS)] and in different disease settings. The secondary endpoint was to identify possible risk factors for SI. A random-effects model was applied to estimate the overall pooled prevalence. A total of 176 studies [112 randomized controlled trials (RCTs); 64 cohort studies] with 4 143 517 patients were ultimately included in the analysis. The overall prevalence of SI was 9.1% (95% confidence interval 8.0-10%). The prevalence was similar when defined using NLA, ILEP, and EAS criteria [7.0% (6.0-8.0%), 6.7% (5.0-8.0%), 5.9% (4.0-7.0%), respectively]. The prevalence of SI in RCTs was significantly lower compared with cohort studies [4.9% (4.0-6.0%) vs. 17% (14-19%)]. The prevalence of SI in studies including both primary and secondary prevention patients was much higher than when primary or secondary prevention patients were analysed separately [18% (14-21%), 8.2% (6.0-10%), 9.1% (6.0-11%), respectively]. Statin lipid solubility did not affect the prevalence of SI [4.0% (2.0-5.0%) vs. 5.0% (4.0-6.0%)]. Age [odds ratio (OR) 1.33, P = 0.04], female gender (OR 1.47, P = 0.007), Asian and Black race (P < 0.05 for both), obesity (OR 1.30, P = 0.02), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.26, P = 0.02), hypothyroidism (OR 1.37, P = 0.01), chronic liver, and renal failure (P < 0.05 for both) were significantly associated with SI in the meta-regression model. Antiarrhythmic agents, calcium channel blockers, alcohol use, and increased statin dose were also associated with a higher risk of SI.

CONCLUSION

Based on the present analysis of >4 million patients, the prevalence of SI is low when diagnosed according to international definitions. These results support the concept that the prevalence of complete SI might often be overestimated and highlight the need for the careful assessment of patients with potential symptoms related to SI.

Cardiovascular Risk Stratification and Appropriate Use of Statins in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease According to Different Strategies

INTRODUCTION

Different strategies were proposed to stratify cardiovascular risk and assess the appropriate use of statins in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

AIM

(1) To apply two strategies on the management of lipids in patients with CKD, analyzing what proportion of patients received lipid-lowering treatment and how many patients without statin therapy would be candidates for receiving them; (2) to identify how many patients achieve the lipid goals.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed. Patients aged between 18 to 70 years and CKD with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m² (without hemodialysis) were included. The indications for statin therapy according to 2019 ESC/EAS and 2013 KDIGO guidelines were analyzed as well as the achievement of LDL-C goals.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients were included. According to ESC/EAS guidelines, 62.3 and 37.7% of the population was classified at high or very high cardiovascular risk. In total, 52% of patients received statins. Applying the 2013 KDIGO and the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, 92.4 and 95.8% of the population without lipid-lowering treatment were eligible for statin therapy, respectively. Globally, only 9.1 and 10.6% of the patients with high or very high risk achieved the suggested lipid goals.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of patients with CKD showed considerable cardiovascular risk and were eligible for statin therapy according to the two strategies evaluated. However, observed statin use was deficient and current lipid goals were not achieved in most cases.

Safety of Statins and Nonstatins for Treatment of Dyslipidemia

This article reviews the safety of statins and non-statin medications for management of dyslipidemia. Statins have uncommon serious adverse effects: myopathy/ rhabdomyolysis, which resolve with statin discontinuation, and diabetes, usually in people with risk factors for diabetes. The CVD benefit of statins far exceeds the risk of diabetes. Statin myalgia, without CK elevation, is likely caused by muscle symptoms with another etiology, or the nocebo effect. Notable adverse effects of non-statin medicines include injection site reactions (alirocumab, evolocumab, inclisiran), increased uric acid and gout (bempedoic acid), atrial fibrillation/flutter (omega-3-fatty acids), and myopathy in combination with a statin (gemfibrozil).

Triglycerides-glucose index and the risk of cardiovascular events in persons with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with high rates of cardiovascular events. We here explored whether the recently described triglycerides-glucose index (TyG) predicted the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in these patients.

Methods

This observationa study was undertaken of 1142 persons with CKD and free from diabetes and 460 controls from the prospective NEFRONA study. The study exposure was the TyG index at cohort inclusion. The study outcome was MACE (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke and hospitalization for unstable angina). Covariates included demographics, comorbidities, lipid profile, renal function and glycaemic control. Cox regression models evaluated the association between TyG index and 4-point MACE in patients with CKD.

Results

TyG was higher [median 8.63 (interquartile range 8.32-8.95)] in patients with CKD compared with controls (P < 0.001). TyG increased across albuminuria categories but was similar for glomerular filtration rate categories among patients with CKD stages 3-5. During 46 ± 13 months of follow-up, 49 (4.3%) MACE were registered. TyG predicted the occurrence of MACE {hazard ratio (HR) 1.95 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-3.40] per TyG unit increase; and HR 2.29 (95% CI 1.24-4.20] for TyG values above the median of 8.63 units}. Sensitivity analysis for subgroups of participants according to age, kidney function, body mass index and imaging evidence of atherosclerosis yielded similar results, as did adjusted analysis. Neither triglycerides nor glucose alone was associated with MACE.

Conclusions

The TyG index is associated with the occurrence of major cardiovascular events in persons free from diabetes with non-dialysis dependent CKD.

Statins decrease overall mortality and cancer related mortality but are underutilized in NAFLD: a longitudinal analysis of 12,538 individuals

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease. NAFLD is associated with dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular mortality remains the leading cause of death. While statins are the first-line therapy in hyperlipidemia, their utilization has been suboptimal. Hence, we examined the use of statins in NAFLD and mortality.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Analysis was performed with the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 1999 to 2018. Longitudinal outcomes were assessed with survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of 12,538 NAFLD patients, 6,452 were indicated for hyperlipidemia treatment. Statin usage was highest among high-risk individuals (44.28%) and lowest among low-risk individuals (8.48%). The risk of overall (HR: 0.87, CI: 0.76 to 0.99, p = 0.04) and cancer-related (SHR: 0.73, CI: 0.54 to 0.99, p = 0.04) mortality was significantly lower in NAFLD patients with statins. There was no significant decrease in cardiovascular-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

Over concerns of hepatotoxicity and lack of evidence in reducing mortality events, statins remain underutilized in NAFLD. However, statin use was associated with a significant reduction in overall and cancer-related mortality. The lack of reduction in cardiovascular disease mortality is likely a selection bias of patients, where individuals with higher risk are more likely to receive treatment.

Lipid-lowering treatment intensity, persistence, adherence and goal attainment in patients with coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

To examine patterns of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) use, and persistence and adherence among patients with coronary heart disease and their associations with lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment.

METHODS

Observational study among 26,768 patients who had suffered a myocardial infarction or had been revascularized in Stockholm during 2012 to 2018, and followed up through 2019. Outcomes included initiation of LLT, discontinuation, re-initiation, adherence to treatment and LDL-C goal attainment according to the European dyslipidaemia guidelines from 2011 and 2016 (mainly LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L).

RESULTS

82% of patients commenced or continued LLT within 90 days after discharge. Of those, 71% were dispensed an LLT prescription within 30 days (62% of them for high-intensity LLT). High-intensity LLT prescribing increased over time, from 12% in 2012 to 78% in 2018. During a median follow-up of 3 (IQR 2-5) years 73% continued to fill prescriptions for a statin, 26.3% temporarily or permanently discontinued, and 0.5% changed to non-statin LLT. Only 1.3% discontinued statin treatment permanently. Throughout observation, about 80% of patients showed good statin adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%). LDL-C target attainment was 52% the first year and <50% during subsequent years. LDL-C goal attainment was highest among patients receiving high-intensity statin treatment and showing good treatment adherence.

CONCLUSION

In secondary prevention for patients with established coronary heart disease, the proportion of LDL-C target attainment was low throughout the time period of the study, despite increasing use of high-intensity LLT and good treatment persistence and adherence.

Association of Statin Therapy With Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Limb Outcomes in Patients With End-stage Kidney Disease and Peripheral Artery Disease Receiving Maintenance Dialysis

IMPORTANCE

Controversy exists regarding whether statin therapy has benefits for patients with kidney failure, and the consequences of statin therapy for patients with kidney failure and concomitant peripheral artery disease (PAD) are particularly uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of statin therapy with cardiovascular (CV) and limb outcomes among patients with kidney failure and concomitant PAD and dyslipidemia who are receiving long-term maintenance dialysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 20 731 patients with kidney failure receiving long-term maintenance dialysis who were diagnosed with PAD and dyslipidemia between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013, were identified, and 10 767 patients met study criteria. Data were analyzed from June 8, 2021, to June 2, 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were all-cause death and the composite of endovascular therapy (EVT) and amputation. Other outcomes of interest included CV events (CV death, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure), major adverse limb events (new-onset claudication, new-onset critical limb ischemia, EVT, and nontraumatic amputation), and all-cause readmission. All outcomes were examined at 1 year and 3 years of follow-up. To minimize selection bias, propensity score matching on a 1:1 ratio was performed among patients receiving statin therapy (statin group) and patients not receiving statin therapy (nonstatin group). A defined daily dose (DDD) approach was used to evaluate whether the association of statin therapy with the risk of primary outcomes was dose dependent.

RESULTS

Among 20 731 patients with kidney failure and concomitant PAD and dyslipidemia receiving long-term maintenance dialysis, 10 767 patients (5593 women [51.9%]; mean [SD] age, 68.5 [11.5] years; all of Taiwanese ethnicity) met the predetermined study criteria; of those, 3597 patients were receiving statin therapy, and 7170 were not. A total of 6470 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [11.3] years; 3359 women [51.9%]) were included in the 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort, with 3235 patients in each group (statin and nonstatin). The incidence and risk of CV and all-cause death were significantly lower in the statin group vs the nonstatin group at 3 years of follow-up (CV death: 611 patients [18.9%] vs 685 patients [21.2%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.77-0.96]; P = .008; all-cause death: 1078 patients [33.3%] vs 1138 patients [35.2%]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.84-0.996]; P = .04). Statin use was also associated with a significantly lower incidence and risk of the composite adverse limb outcome of EVT and amputation at 3 years of follow-up (314 patients [9.7%] vs 361 patients [11.2%]; subdistribution HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.73-0.99]; P = .04). Results of subgroup analyses were consistent with those of the primary analysis across all subgroup variables. In the adjusted dose-response analysis, the risk reduction associated with statin use increased in a dose-dependent manner for both all-cause death (HR: 0.95 for DDD <0.50, 0.92 for DDD 0.50-0.99, 0.85 for DDD 1.00-1.49, and 0.79 for DDD ≥1.50; P = .002 for trend) and the composite outcome of EVT and amputation (subdistribution HR: 0.79 for DDD <0.50, 0.78 for DDD 0.50-0.99, 0.82 for DDD 1.00-1.49, and 0.58 for DDD ≥1.50; P = .002 for trend) compared with no statin therapy; however, not all findings in the DDD analysis were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, statin therapy was associated with reductions in the risk of all-cause death, CV death, and the composite adverse limb outcome of EVT and amputation. These findings suggest that statin therapy may have protective CV and limb benefits for patients with kidney failure and concomitant PAD who are receiving long-term maintenance dialysis.

Soluble α-klotho and heparin modulate the pathologic cardiac actions of fibroblast growth factor 23 in chronic kidney disease

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 23 is a phosphate-regulating hormone that is elevated in patients with chronic kidney disease and associated with cardiovascular mortality. Experimental studies showed that elevated FGF23 levels induce cardiac hypertrophy by targeting cardiac myocytes via FGF receptor isoform 4 (FGFR4). A recent structural analysis revealed that the complex of FGF23 and FGFR1, the physiologic FGF23 receptor in the kidney, includes soluble α-klotho (klotho) and heparin, which both act as co-factors for FGF23/FGFR1 signaling. Here, we investigated whether soluble klotho, a circulating protein with cardio-protective properties, and heparin, a factor that is routinely infused into patients with kidney failure during the hemodialysis procedure, regulate FGF23/FGFR4 signaling and effects in cardiac myocytes. We developed a plate-based binding assay to quantify affinities of specific FGF23/FGFR interactions and found that soluble klotho and heparin mediate FGF23 binding to distinct FGFR isoforms. Heparin specifically mediated FGF23 binding to FGFR4 and increased FGF23 stimulatory effects on hypertrophic growth and contractility in isolated cardiac myocytes. When repetitively injected into two different mouse models with elevated serum FGF23 levels, heparin aggravated cardiac hypertrophy. We also developed a novel procedure for the synthesis and purification of recombinant soluble klotho, which showed anti-hypertrophic effects in FGF23-treated cardiac myocytes. Thus, soluble klotho and heparin act as independent FGF23 co-receptors with opposite effects on the pathologic actions of FGF23, with soluble klotho reducing and heparin increasing FGF23-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Hence, whether heparin injections during hemodialysis in patients with extremely high serum FGF23 levels contribute to their high rates of cardiovascular events and mortality remains to be studied.

Trajectory of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with chronic kidney disease and its association with cardiovascular disease

Background

The role of longitudinal temporal trends in LDL-C in cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes is unclear. This study categorized the long-term LDL-C trajectory and determined its association with the incidence of atherosclerotic CVD in patients with CKD according to diabetes status and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Methods

The risk of atherosclerotic CVD was estimated in 137,127 Taiwanese patients with CKD using six LDL-C trajectory classes determined by the latent class mixed model as optimal, near optimal, above optimal, borderline, sustained high, and declined high over 5 years.

Results

The risk of CVD was higher in the sustained high LDL-C [>160 mg/dL over time; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.45–1.94], declined high LDL-C (>160 to <100 mg/dL; aHR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.11–1.38), and borderline LDL-C (approximately 140 mg/dL over time; aHR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.07–1.26) groups than in the optimal LDL-C group (<100 mg/dL over time). There was no such association in patients with an eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m². Persistent diabetes was associated with a 1.15–2.47-fold increase in CVD in patients with high LDL-C (>120 mg/dL).

Conclusion

The LDL-C trajectory pattern was associated with the phenotype of CVD risk. The degree of risk varied according to eGFR and diabetes status. A stable low LDL-C over time was potentially beneficial for prevention of CVD. Intensive lipid management and periodic assessment of LDL-C is essential to reduce the risk of CVD in patients with CKD and diabetes.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Mortality in Peritoneal Dialysis

Background

In dialysis patients, lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) did not provide benefits, which seemed implausible in clinical practice. We hypothesized a U-shaped association between LDL-C and mortality in dialysis patients.

Methods

In this multi-center retrospective real-world cohort study, 3,565 incident Chinese peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients between January 1, 2005, and May 31, 2020, were included. The associations between baseline LDL-C and mortality were examined using cause-specific hazard models.

Results

Of 3,565 patients, 820 died, including 415 cardiovascular deaths. As compared with the reference range (2.26-2.60 mmol/L), both higher levels of LDL-C (&gt; 2.60 mmol/L) and lower levels of LDL-C (&lt; 2.26 mmol/L) were associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR],1.35, 95% confidence index [CI], 1.09-1.66; HR 1.36, 95%CI, 1.13-1.64) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.31, 95% CI, 1.10-1.72; HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.22-2.19). Malnutrition (albumin &lt; 36.0 g/L) modified the association between LDL-C and cardiovascular mortality (P for interaction = 0.01). A significantly increased risk of cardiovascular mortality was observed among patients with malnutrition and lower levels of LDL-C (HR 2.96, 95%CI 1.43-6.12) or higher levels of LDL-C (HR 2.81, 95%CI 1.38-5.72).

Conclusion

Low and high levels of LDL-C at the start of PD procedure were associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risks. Malnutrition may modify the association of LDL-C with cardiovascular mortality.

A Modern Approach to Dyslipidemia

Lipid disorders involving derangements in serum cholesterol, triglycerides, or both are commonly encountered in clinical practice and often have implications for cardiovascular risk and overall health. Recent advances in knowledge, recommendations, and treatment options have necessitated an updated approach to these disorders. Older classification schemes have outlived their usefulness, yielding to an approach based on the primary lipid disturbance identified on a routine lipid panel as a practical starting point. Although monogenic dyslipidemias exist and are important to identify, most individuals with lipid disorders have polygenic predisposition, often in the context of secondary factors such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. With regard to cardiovascular disease, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is essentially causal, and clinical practice guidelines worldwide have recommended treatment thresholds and targets for this variable. Furthermore, recent studies have established elevated triglycerides as a cardiovascular risk factor, whereas depressed high-density lipoprotein cholesterol now appears less contributory than was previously believed. An updated approach to diagnosis and risk assessment may include measurement of secondary lipid variables such as apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a), together with selective use of genetic testing to diagnose rare monogenic dyslipidemias such as familial hypercholesterolemia or familial chylomicronemia syndrome. The ongoing development of new agents-especially antisense RNA and monoclonal antibodies-targeting dyslipidemias will provide additional management options, which in turn motivates discussion on how best to incorporate them into current treatment algorithms.

New Therapeutic Approaches in Treatment of Dyslipidaemia—A Narrative Review

Dyslipidaemia is a well-known risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries. As a consequence, the medical community has been dealing with this problem for decades, and traditional statin therapy remains the cornerstone therapeutic approach. However, clinical trials have observed remarkable results for a few agents effective in the treatment of elevated serum lipid levels. Ezetimibe showed good but limited results when used in combination with statins. Bempedoic acid has been thoroughly studied in multiple clinical trials, with a reduction in LDL cholesterol by approximately 15%. The first approved monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of dyslipidaemia, PCSK9 inhibitors, are currently used as second-line treatment for patients with unregulated lipid levels on statin or statin combination therapy. A new siRNA molecule, inclisiran, demonstrates great potential, particularly concerning compliance, as it is administered twice yearly and pelacarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide that targets lipoprotein(a) and lowers its levels. Volanesorsen is the first drug that was designed to target chylomicrons and lower triglyceride levels, and olezarsen, the next in-line chylomicron lowering agent, is currently being researched. The newest possibilities for the treatment of dyslipidaemia are ANGPTL3 inhibitors with evinacumab, already approved by the FDA, and EMA for the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia. This article provides a short summary of new agents currently used or being developed for lipid lowering treatment.

Association of statin treatment with hepatocellular carcinoma risk in end-stage kidney disease patients with chronic viral hepatitis

Statin use in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients are not encouraged due to low cardioprotective effects. Although the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a frequently occurring cancer in East Asia, is elevated in ESKD patients, the relationship between statins and HCC is not known despite its possible chemopreventive effect. The relationship between statin use and HCC development in ESKD patients with chronic hepatitis was evaluated. In total, 6165 dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis B or C were selected from a national health insurance database. Patients prescribed with ≥ 28 cumulative defined daily doses of statins during the first 3 months after dialysis commencement were defined as statin users, while those not prescribed with statins were considered as non-users. Primary outcome was the first diagnosis of HCC. Sub-distribution hazard model with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate HCC risk considering death as competing risk. During a median follow-up of 2.8 years, HCC occurred in 114 (3.2%) statin non-users and 33 (1.2%) statin users. The HCC risk was 41% lower in statin users than in non-users (sub-distribution hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.81). The weighted incidence rate of HCC was lower in statin users than in statin non-users (incidence rate difference, - 3.7; 95% CI - 5.7 to - 1.7; P < 0.001). Incidence rate ratio (IRR) was also consistent with other analyses (IRR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.78; P < 0.001). Statin use was associated with a lower risk of incident HCC in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis B or C infection.

Acupuncture Combined with Traditional Chinese Medicine and Drug Therapy for the Treatment of Cerebral Infarction (Phlegm-Blood Stasis Syndrome) and Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Study

Carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) is one of the leading causes of cerebral infarction. Western medicine usually uses lipid-lowering drugs to stabilize plaques. Currently, studies reporting on drugs that can reduce plaques are lacking. Here, we performed a randomized controlled study to investigate the effectiveness of acupuncture combined with drug therapy (TCM and Western) to treat cerebral infarction (phlegm-blood stasis syndrome) and CAP. The control group was treated with atorvastatin calcium tablets (20 mg/d, po for 15 days). The treatment group received atorvastatin calcium tablets 20 mg, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) decoctions (two matured substance decoction plus peach kernel and Carthamus four substance decoction plus Chinese hawthorn fruit 20 g, gold theragran 20 g, and red yeast rice 3 g), and acupuncture therapy, once daily for 15 days as one treatment course. The patients' neurological deficit score, ultrasonic testing of the carotid artery, and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) were evaluated. Our findings showed no significant difference in the evaluated indices between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). However, compared with the control group after 15 days of treatment and within each group before and after treatment, the differences were significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, acupuncture combined with drug therapy demonstrated promising effectiveness in treating cerebral infarction (phlegm-blood stasis syndrome) and CAP.

The 2021-2022 position of Brazilian Diabetes Society on diabetic kidney disease (DKD) management: an evidence-based guideline to clinical practice. Screening and treatment of hyperglycemia, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia in the patient with DKD

BACKGROUND

Diabetic kidney disease is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This review is an authorized literal translation of part of the Brazilian Diabetes Society (SBD) Guidelines 2021-2022. This evidence-based guideline provides guidance on the correct management of Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD) in clinical practice.

METHODS

The methodology was published elsewhere in previous SBD guidelines and was approved by the internal institutional Steering Committee for publication. Briefly, the Brazilian Diabetes Society indicated 14 experts to constitute the Central Committee, designed to regulate methodology, review the manuscripts, and make judgments on degrees of recommendations and levels of evidence. SBD Renal Disease Department drafted the manuscript selecting key clinical questions to make a narrative review using MEDLINE via PubMed, with the best evidence available including high-quality clinical trials, metanalysis, and large observational studies related to DKD diagnosis and treatment, by using the MeSH terms [diabetes], [type 2 diabetes], [type 1 diabetes] and [chronic kidney disease].

RESULTS

The extensive review of the literature made by the 14 members of the Central Committee defined 24 recommendations. Three levels of evidence were considered: A. Data from more than 1 randomized clinical trial or 1 metanalysis of randomized clinical trials with low heterogeneity (I2 < 40%). B. Data from metanalysis, including large observational studies, a single randomized clinical trial, or a pre-specified subgroup analysis. C: Data from small or non-randomized studies, exploratory analyses, or consensus of expert opinion. The degree of recommendation was obtained based on a poll sent to the panelists, using the following criteria: Grade I: when more than 90% of agreement; Grade IIa 75-89% of agreement; IIb 50-74% of agreement, and III, when most of the panelist recommends against a defined treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

To prevent or at least postpone the advanced stages of DKD with the associated cardiovascular complications, intensive glycemic and blood pressure control are required, as well as the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blocker agents such as ARB, ACEI, and MRA. Recently, SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists have been added to the therapeutic arsenal, with well-proven benefits regarding kidney protection and patients' survival.

Signaling pathways of chronic kidney diseases, implications for therapeutics

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a chronic renal dysfunction syndrome that is characterized by nephron loss, inflammation, myofibroblasts activation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition. Lipotoxicity and oxidative stress are the driving force for the loss of nephron including tubules, glomerulus, and endothelium. NLRP3 inflammasome signaling, MAPK signaling, PI3K/Akt signaling, and RAAS signaling involves in lipotoxicity. The upregulated Nox expression and the decreased Nrf2 expression result in oxidative stress directly. The injured renal resident cells release proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines to recruit immune cells such as macrophages from bone marrow. NF-κB signaling, NLRP3 inflammasome signaling, JAK-STAT signaling, Toll-like receptor signaling, and cGAS-STING signaling are major signaling pathways that mediate inflammation in inflammatory cells including immune cells and injured renal resident cells. The inflammatory cells produce and secret a great number of profibrotic cytokines such as TGF-β1, Wnt ligands, and angiotensin II. TGF-β signaling, Wnt signaling, RAAS signaling, and Notch signaling evoke the activation of myofibroblasts and promote the generation of ECM. The potential therapies targeted to these signaling pathways are also introduced here. In this review, we update the key signaling pathways of lipotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, and myofibroblasts activation in kidneys with chronic injury, and the targeted drugs based on the latest studies. Unifying these pathways and the targeted therapies will be instrumental to advance further basic and clinical investigation in CKD.

NLA scientific statement on statin intolerance: a new definition and key considerations for ASCVD risk reduction in the statin intolerant patient

Although statins are generally well tolerated, statin intolerance is reported in 5-30% of patients and contributes to reduced statin adherence and persistence, as well as higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This Scientific Statement from the National Lipid Association was developed to provide an updated definition of statin intolerance and to inform clinicians and researchers about its identification and management. Statin intolerance is defined as one or more adverse effects associated with statin therapy which resolves or improves with dose reduction or discontinuation and can be classified as a complete inability to tolerate any dose of a statin or partial intolerance with inability to tolerate the dose necessary to achieve the patient-specific therapeutic objective. To classify a patient as having statin intolerance, a minimum of two statins should have been attempted, including at least one at the lowest approved daily dosage. This Statement acknowledges the importance of identifying modifiable risk factors for statin intolerance and recognizes the possibility of a "nocebo" effect (patient expectation of harm resulting in perceived side effects). To identify a tolerable statin regimen it is recommended that clinicians consider using several different strategies (e.g., different statin, dose, and/or dosing frequency). Non-statin therapy may be required for patients who cannot reach therapeutic objectives with lifestyle and maximal tolerated statin therapy. If so, therapies with outcomes data from randomized trials showing reduced cardiovascular events are favored. In high and very high risk patients who are statin intolerant, clinicians should consider initiating non-statin therapy while additional attempts are made to identify a tolerable statin in order to limit the time of exposure to elevated levels of atherogenic lipoproteins.