Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer

Adjuvant systemic therapies in women with breast cancer: an audit of clinical practice in Italy

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines, consensus conferences and experts' opinion are rarely promptly transferred to patient care. We audited prescriptions of adjuvant systemic therapies for Italian breast cancer patients and compared them with recommendations of an International Consensus Panel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Disease characteristics and adjuvant therapies for 768 breast cancer patients referred to 87 Italian centers from 16 to 23 March 2000 were evaluated for adherence to the published recommendations.

RESULTS

Endocrine therapy was not prescribed for 102 of 541 patients (19%) with endocrine-responsive disease and for 22 of 45 patients (49%) with unknown hormonal receptor status. Instead, endocrine therapy was prescribed for 22 of 182 patients (12%) with endocrine-unresponsive disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed for 98% of the patients. The type of chemotherapy was the cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil regimen for 453 of 754 (60%), while 253 of 754 (34%) received an anthracycline-based regimen. The proportion of patients with anthracyclines increased with the number of involved axillary nodes and grading, and decreased with age. Endocrine therapy was administered to 482 of 768 (63%) and was mainly represented by an antiestrogen.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of adherence to evidence-based guidelines for adjuvant treatment of Italian breast cancer patients was as high as 19%. It might be wise for national health authorities to promote education on life-saving procedures, like adjuvant systemic treatments, in cancer medicine.

Evaluation of immunohistochemistry and multiple-level sectioning in sentinel lymph nodes from patients with breast cancer

CONTEXT

Previous investigations on sentinel lymph node biopsies have demonstrated their importance in nodal staging of patients with breast cancer. However, sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer is currently a controversial procedure and continues to provoke debate.

OBJECTIVES

We designed our study to determine the usefulness of a standard protocol for evaluating sentinel lymph node metastases and to assess the value of sentinel node biopsy as the only procedure in nodal staging in breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 84 breast cancer patients with sentinel node biopsies, who also underwent axillary dissection, was conducted using a standard protocol (3 levels of immunohistochemical stains for keratin and 2 levels of hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stains on the first 3 negative lymph nodes).

RESULTS

Hematoxylin-eosin staining identified 20 patients (23.8%) with sentinel node metastases. The remaining 64 negative patients (76.1%) were tumor free on sentinel lymph nodes at level 1 HE. Additional immunohistochemical stains for keratin and HE stains on specimens from these 64 patients showed an additional 5 patients (7.8%) to be positive for lymph node micrometastases (<2 mm). The total percentage of cases with sentinel lymph node metastases detected by HE staining and immunohistochemistry was 29.7%. Of the remaining 59 cases that were negative on HE and immunohistochemistry, axillary dissection revealed 3 cases that had metastases in the axillary lymph nodes. The false-negative rate was 10.7%. The concordance rate between sentinel lymph nodes and axillary lymph nodes was 96.4%. The sensitivity was 89% and specificity was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemistry and multiple-level sectioning increased detection of metastases by 7.8% in sentinel lymph nodes. Caution should be used in accepting sentinel node biopsy alone as the only procedure for staging due to a high false-negative rate (10.7%). A predictive value of 96.4% confirms that sentinel lymph node biopsy is most likely to contain metastatic carcinoma. Sentinel lymph node examination with the protocol we describe, combined with axillary dissection, increased the yield of metastatic disease by identifying 8 additional cases of nodal metastatic disease (an increase of 28%), as compared to standard axillary nodal dissection and single-section sentinel lymph node examination alone.

Older age predicts a decline in adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for patients with breast carcinoma: evidence from a tertiary care cohort of chemotherapy-eligible patients

BACKGROUND

The appropriate use of adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly women with breast carcinoma remains controversial. Efficacy data in women age >/= 70 years are scarce, resulting in a lack of clear guidelines for patients in this age group. Although several studies have demonstrated decreasing use of chemotherapy with age, none specifically examined its use in an elderly cohort of patients who were deemed eligible for such therapy based on consensus guidelines, simultaneously examining the impact of comorbidity and previous history of malignant disease on these recommendations.

METHODS

The authors examined adjuvant chemotherapy use among chemotherapy-eligible patients age > or = 50 years who were evaluated in a tertiary care cancer center. Associations between patient age and 1) physician recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy, 2) recommended treatment regimen, and 3) patient acceptance of the treatment plan recommended were examined, adjusting for the impact of aggressive tumor characteristics, medical comorbidity, previous history of malignant disease, and features of the treatment setting.

RESULTS

Of the 208 chemotherapy-eligible patients who were studied, 74% overall were recommended chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was recommended to 92% of women age 50-59 years compared with 77% of women age 60-69 years and 23% of women age > or = 70 years. Increasing age was associated strongly with a decreasing likelihood of receiving a recommendation in favor of chemotherapy. After adjusting for estrogen receptor status, previous history of malignant disease, comorbidity score, and prognostic group, the odds of receiving a recommendation in favor of chemotherapy fell by 22% per year or 91% per 10-year interval, and the rate of decline did not change significantly at age > or = 70 years. We found no age-related differences in either the drug regimens recommended or patient acceptance rates for adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Age was associated strongly and independently with physician recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy among a group of older women who were eligible specifically for such therapy. Medical comorbidity and a history of previous malignant disease did not alter this correlation significantly, although the latter was a significant predictor of chemotherapy use. Further studies clearly are needed to determine the underlying reasons for this strong age effect and to explore strategies that will optimize the utilization of this potentially curative therapy in the elderly.

Biphenotypic acute leukemia following intensive adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: case report and review of the literature

The risk of secondary leukemia in breast cancer patients who receive adjuvant chemotherapy is an open question. We describe the case a 38-year-old woman who developed acute leukemia 18 months after completion of intense adjuvant chemotherapy with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support and chest wall irradiation. The diagnosis of biphenotypic T-cell acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was based on morphologic and immunophenotypic criteria. Chromosomal analysis of blasts revealed multiple trisomies and tetrasomies. The patient failed to respond to induction and salvage chemotherapy and died 4 months later. This case of acute leukemia occurred in a cohort of 65 high-risk breast cancer patients who were given intense adjuvant chemotherapy during the last 5 years in our hospital. This is the first case reported in the literature of acute leukemia following intense adjuvant chemotherapy with continuous prophylactic G-CSF, which is an actively investigated therapeutic strategy. Vigilance and investigation are needed to determine the leukemogenic potential of intense adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. A brief review of the literature that deals with acute leukemia that develops after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer and with secondary biphenotypic acute leukemia is presented.

Adjuvant hormonal therapy

Recently, the guidelines for adjuvant hormonal therapy for primary breast cancer were presented at the National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference in November 2000 and at the 7th International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer in February 2001. Adjuvant hormonal therapy should be offered basically to all patients with tumors expressing estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR), assessed by immunohistochemistry. The consensus statements recommended 5 years of tamoxifen as standard hormonal therapy for both premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with ER and/or PR positive tumors. Ovarian ablation or suppression of ovarian function combined with tamoxifen is a treatment of choice for premenopausal patients with high-risk endocrine-responsive tumors. The selection of hormonal therapies and their combination with chemotherapy should be decided according to the assessment of risk of relapse, side effects, and patients' condition and preference.

Adjuvant radiation therapy following mastectomy for breast cancer

Many randomized clinical trials have been performed to address the effectiveness of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) to regional lymph nodes with or without chest wall irradiation. Although these studies have confirmed the usefulness of RT to reduce loco-regional recurrence, the benefit of postoperative RT for survival remains controversial. Recent prospective trials of PMRT in combination with systemic chemotherapy clearly demonstrated the benefit of this combined adjuvant therapy for both locoregional recurrence and survival outcomes. Based upon this new evidence, guidelines and recommendations for PMRT in the management of breast cancer have been proposed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and by the International Consensus Panel at the International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer in St. Gallen. PMRT is recognized as a standard adjuvant treatment for patients with more than 4 positive axillary nodes in these guidelines and recommendations. This re-appraisal of PMRT has not attracted much attention in Japan so far. Clinical studies are needed to determine how to best incorporate PMRT in the multimodal treatment of node-positive breast cancer.

Invasion factors uPA/PAI-1 and HER2 status provide independent and complementary information on patient outcome in node-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

The independent clinical relevance of invasion factors urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)/PAI-1 and HER2 status was evaluated in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients (N = 118) without adjuvant systemic therapy after long-term follow-up of more than 10 years (median, 126 months).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Levels of uPA and its inhibitor PAI-1 were prospectively measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in primary tumor tissue extracts. HER2 gene amplification (HER2_AMP) was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; Ventana Medical Systems HER-2/neu probe; Tucson, AZ), and HER2 protein overexpression (HER2_EXP) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC; Oncogene Science antibody Ab-3; Cambridge, MA) on parallel-cut formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections.

RESULTS

uPA/PAI-1 was high (either one or both factors were high) in 44% of the tumors. HER2_AMP was detected by FISH in 33% of the patients, and HER2_EXP was found by IHC in 44% of the patients. In a multivariate analysis of established and tumor-biologic prognostic factors, uPA/PAI-1 was the only independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival ([DFS]; P <.001; relative risk [RR], 8.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4 to 20.4). Although HER2_AMP and HER2_EXP did not reach significance for DFS, they were significant for overall survival (OS), even in multivariate analysis (HER2_AMP: P =.004; RR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5 to 9.2; HER2_EXP: P =.009; RR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4 to 8.7).

CONCLUSION

After long-term follow-up, uPA/PAI-1 levels in primary tumor tissue reliably and strongly indicate an aggressive course of disease in lymph node-negative breast cancer independent of HER2 status. The particular prognostic effect of HER2 status on OS may reflect its ability to predict resistance to systemic therapy.

A population-based study on variations in the use of adjuvant systemic therapy on postmenopausal patients with early stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

To assess adherence to treatment recommendations regarding adjuvant systemic therapy of postmenopausal patients with early stage breast cancer.

METHODS

A population-based cohort of women from Eastern Thuringia/Germany with first diagnosis of breast cancer in 1995-2000 was studied. The use of adjuvant therapy was assessed separately for patients with positive and negative nodal status fitting polytomous logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 396 women with positive lymph nodes and 832 with negative lymph nodes, 92.9% and 87.3% received an adjuvant systemic treatment, respectively. Age, comorbidity, hormone receptor status, histological grading, and additionally, in nodal positives, the number of involved lymph nodes, were associated with treatment patterns. Age had the strongest impact on treatment decision. Older women more often received hormone- or no adjuvant therapy. However, 26.3% of the women with lymph node involvement and positive hormone receptor status received no hormone therapy, whereas 35.7% of women with negative hormone receptor status received hormone therapy.

CONCLUSION

The number of patients with adjuvant systemic therapy is high in women with positive and those with negative lymph nodes, reflecting adherence to the recommendations. Better outcome could be expected if hormone therapy was used adequately in receptor positives. Further follow-up is required to monitor the outcome and changes in adherence to treatment recommendations.

Association between extent of axillary lymph node dissection and patient, tumor, surgeon, and hospital factors in patients with early breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with breast cancer is crucial for accurate staging, provides excellent regional tumor control, and is included in the standard of care for the surgical treatment of breast cancer. However, the extent of ALND varies, and the extent of dissection and the number of lymph nodes that comprise an optimal axillary dissection are under debate. Despite conflicting evidence, several studies have shown that improved survival is correlated with more lymph nodes removed in both node-negative and node-positive patients. The purpose of this study is to determine which patient, tumor, surgeon, and hospital characteristics are associated with the number of nodes excised in early breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A random sample of 938 women with node-negative breast cancer was drawn from the Ontario Cancer Registry and the data supplemented with chart reviews. The extent of axillary dissection was studied by examining the number of nodes examined in relation to the patient, tumor, surgeon, and hospital factors.

RESULTS

The mean number of lymph nodes excised was 9.8 (SD = 4.8; range, 1-31), and 49% of patients had >/=10 nodes excised. Lower patient age was associated with the excision of more lymph nodes (>/=10 nodes: 63% of patients <40 years vs. 38% of patients >/=80 years). Surgeon academic affiliation and surgery in a teaching hospital were highly correlated with each other and were significantly associated with the excision of >/=10 nodes. The number of nodes excised was not associated with any tumor factors, nor with the breast operation performed. These results were confirmed with multivariable models.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the number of lymph nodes found in the pathologic specimen can be influenced by factors other than surgical technique (e.g., number of nodes present, specimen handling, and pathologic examination), this study shows significant variation of this variable and an association with several patient and surgeon/hospital factors. This variation and the association with survival warrant further study and effort at greater consistency.

Efficacy of UFT plus Tamoxifen for Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Tamoxifen plus UFT for???Estrogen-Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a prospective multicentre, collaborative randomised study on postoperative adjuvant therapy in patients with stage II primary breast cancer to evaluate the effect of a combination of tegafur and uracil (UFT) on tamoxifen (TAM) plus mitomycin (MM) in patients with estrogen-receptor-positive [ER(+)] breast cancer and TAM on UFT + MM in patients with estrogen-receptor-negative [ER(-)] breast cancer.

METHODS

MM (13 mg/m(2)) was intravenously administered on the day of surgery for all patients, after which patients with ER(+) were randomised to TAM 20 mg/day (treatment A) or TAM 20 mg/day and UFT 400 mg/day (treatment B). Patients who were ER(-) were randomly allocated UFT 400 mg/day (treatment C) or TAM 20 mg/day and UFT 400 mg/day (treatment D). TAM and UFT were administered orally for 2 years, starting on day 14 after surgery.

ENDPOINTS

5-year disease-free survival (5y DFS), 5-year overall survival (5y OS), and safety.

RESULTS

The study commenced in November 1988 and the data cut-off was May 1997 after follow-up of the last patient for 5 years. A total of 765 patients with stage II breast cancer were enrolled. 436 patients with ER(+) [group A: 213, group B: 223] and 317 patients with ER(-) [group C: 162, group D: 155] breast cancer were eligible for this study. The rate of 5y DFS was 83.1% for group A and 90.7% for group B (p = 0.020). There was a significant difference in 5y DFS between the two groups among postmenopausal and positive lymph node metastases patients. The incidence of adverse reactions was 4% for group A and 18% for group B (p < 0.05). The rate of 5y DFS was 77.1% for group C and 85.5% for group D (p = 0.063). The rate of 5y OS was 84.7% for group C and 89.8% for group D (p = 0.216). The incidence of adverse reactions was 18% in group C and 11% in group D (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

UFT in combination with TAM + MM showed higher efficacy than TAM + MM as a postoperative combination therapy for breast cancer in patients with ER(+) breast cancer. A trend was observed in favour of the addition of TAM to UFT + MM in postmenopausal and lymph node metastases-negative patients with ER(-) breast cancer.

Adjuvant therapy of breast cancer with docetaxel-containing combination (TAC)

The adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer changed in the past two decades. Docetaxel containing regimens are highly active in metastatic breast cancer. A logical approach was their incorporation into trials of early breast cancer adjuvant therapy. The authors present the Hungarian interim analysis and experience with the BCIRG 001 randomized, multicentric, phase III clinical trial comparing TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) and FAC (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) in the adjuvant treatment of node positive breast cancer patients. The results are presented compared to the international data. Three Hungarian centers - Szt. Margit Hospital, Budapest, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Petz Aladár Hospital, Gyôr - participated in the international trial. Between June 1997 and June 1999, 61 patients with node positive breast cancer were enrolled in the study after the surgery. Thirty-four patients were randomized to TAC (75/50/500 mg/m2 6xq3wk) and 27 patients were randomized to FAC (500/50/500 mg/m2 6x q3wk) chemotherapy, with prospective stratification by node (1-3, 4+). Patients with hormone receptor positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years after the chemotherapy. Radiotherapy was performed after the 6th cycle of chemotherapy. 33 months of follow up was performed. In both arms the hematological toxicity was more frequent. The TAC group showed a higher incidence of neutropenia (76%) compared to the FAC (22%), as well as a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia (26 % versus none), without grade 3-4 infection and there was no cases of septic death. More grade 3-4 nausea and vomiting was observed in the FAC group. At three years follow up, results indicated improvement in disease-free survival (88% vs. 76%) in favour of TAC, and similar tendency was observed in the case of overall survival (97% vs. 88%). Based on the international data analysis TAC was superior to FAC chemotherapy, the results show statistically significant differences between the two arms. This benefit with TAC was seen regardless of hormone receptor status. Additional follow up data will evaluate the role of TAC in the adjuvant setting of early breast cancer treatment.

Population-based assessment of hospitalizations for toxicity from chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer

PURPOSE

There are no population-based data on hospitalization rate for toxicity from breast cancer chemotherapy, and even large clinical trials often do not report this information. Medicare data, linked to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) tumor registries, are now used to assess rates of hospitalization for chemotherapy-related toxicity in a population-based setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 35,060 women diagnosed with stages I through IV breast cancer aged >or= 65 from 1991 through 1996 were identified from the SEER-Medicare linked program and studied. Patients were defined as being hospitalized for adverse effects of chemotherapy if there was a Medicare inpatient claim for neutropenia, fever, thrombocytopenia, or adverse effect of systemic therapy less than 7 months after diagnosis of breast cancer.

RESULTS

More than 9% of women with breast cancer who received chemotherapy were admitted with the diagnosis of neutropenia, fever, thrombocytopenia, or adverse effect of systemic therapy, compared with 0.5% of women with breast cancer who did not receive chemotherapy. The rates for stage I to IV were 6.3%, 8.1%, 12.3%, and 13.2% in those treated with chemotherapy, and 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.7%, and 1.5% in women not treated with chemotherapy. The hospitalization rates for adverse effects increased significantly with comorbidity score and varied more than two-fold across the nine SEER areas but did not vary by age. Use of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy agents was associated with greater odds of these toxicities (eg, odds ratio, 2.53 for neutropenia; 95% confidence interval, 1.97 to 3.26).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the feasibility of using Medicare data to assess rates of hospitalization for serious toxicity associated with cancer chemotherapy. Rates in actual practice were higher than those reported in clinical trials and did not vary by age.

Advanced age and adjuvant tamoxifen prescription in early-stage breast carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant tamoxifen is recommended for all women with estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinoma without regard for age. We investigated age-dependent variations in adjuvant tamoxifen prescription patterns in a cohort of women 80 years of age and older.

METHODS

We studied 92 women diagnosed at four U.S. sites with primary, early-stage breast carcinoma. Each woman consented to a medical record review and participated in two telephone interviews. We compared the proportion of tamoxifen prescriptions received by women 85-92 years of age with those received by women 80-84 years of age. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were generated using generalized estimating equations. Confounding by demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics was assessed.

RESULTS

Before adjustment, patients 85-92 years of age were 28% less likely to receive a tamoxifen prescription compared with patients 80-84 years of age (RR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.91). In this sample, patients not prescribed tamoxifen had substantially more comorbidity. After adjusting the crude finding for comorbidity, the RR was 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.93). In addition, the oldest patients and those not prescribed tamoxifen were significantly less likely to be married or have living children. After adjusting the crude finding for these two factors, the RR was 0.75 (95% CI 0.59-0.95). There was no confounding by the other demographic, disease, or treatment covariates assessed.

CONCLUSION

Given the increasing longevity of the oldest old, undertreatment with adjuvant tamoxifen may put older breast carcinoma patients at an increased risk of disease recurrence and breast carcinoma mortality.

Controversies in the adjuvant systemic therapy of endocrine-non-responsive breast cancer

Treatment of breast cancer requires a fully integrated multidisciplinary management as well as an ongoing dialogue with laboratory scientists. The growing amount of data generated by randomized clinical trials need to be interpreted by the clinicians and discussed with patients, so that treatment decisions might be better individualized. In early breast cancer, three consensus panels have been developed to help with this task: the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group or Oxford Overview, the NIH Consensus Conference on Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer and the St. Gallen International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Nevertheless, even these panels leave us with a good deal of uncertainty about the optimal adjuvant systemic treatment of the disease, especially when it is classified as "endocrine non-responsive". The two most problematic issues regarding the management of endocrine non-responsive breast cancer are: (1) which fit woman should not be treated, with two major "to treat or not to treat" dilemmas, (a) women above 70 years of age, where available evidence is scant and co-morbid conditions more often come into the equation of benefit/risk, and (b) women who have very small invasive tumours (<1 cm); and (2) what is the optimal chemotherapy regimen (type, doses, schedule, timing and duration). The aim of this review is to examine these controversial issues. Two difficult clinical cases, which are representative of those frequently encountered in daily practice, will also be presented and discussed, with the help of a panel of 48 breast cancer experts from different regions of the world.

Will we need lymph node dissection at all in the future?

Traditionally in the treatment of primary breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) plays an important role. However, a substantial and increasing percentage of patients appear to have no nodal involvement and have been subjected to ALND unnecessarily. The first reason to perform an ALND is axillary nodal staging. After reviewing the literature, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients an adequately conducted lymphatic mapping by sentinel node procedure is equal to ALND for this purpose. The second reason to perform an ALND is to establish the extent of nodal involvement, which might have an impact on adjuvant treatment recommendations. However, there is no evidence available that patients with extensive nodal involvement (= 4 positive nodes) benefit more from adjuvant systemic treatment (either standard or high dose) in terms of reduction of odds of recurrence and mortality compared to patients with limited nodal involvement and optimally administered so-called standard adjuvant treatment. The third reason to perform an ALND is to ensure axillary tumor control. Reviewing the different treatment options, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients axillary control after axillary radiotherapy appears to be similar to axillary control after ALND. In clinically overt axillary involvement, ALND (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy) may result in an improved regional control. In the near future, ALND will not be the standard of care but will be reserved for those patients with proven axillary lymph node involvement. In microscopic disease, radiotherapy may be an alternative with equal control and less morbidity.

Quality of breast cancer care: what do we know?

PURPOSE

To critically review studies that describe patterns of care for breast cancer patients and to examine the data sources used for case identification and determining patterns of care.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE database (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) in August 2001 for studies of breast cancer care published from January 1985 to June 2001. Thirty-eight articles, describing 32 studies, met the inclusion criteria for this review.

RESULTS

According to the patterns of care literature, approximately 10% of women do not have an axillary lymph node dissection, 11% to 26% do not have their hormone receptor status reported, 20% do not receive radiation after breast-conserving surgery, and 30% to 70% of women with lymph node-positive breast cancer are not prescribed tamoxifen. Twenty-five (78%) of the studies relied on cancer registries for case identification. Cancer registries (47%) and the medical record (38%) were the most frequent sources of data on process of care. Twenty percent of the articles reported using more than one data source to determine patterns of care.

CONCLUSION

Although more patterns of care research has taken place in breast cancer than in any other oncologic condition, we found the available data had many limitations. These limitations highlight the challenges of quality-of-care research. To track changes in the quality of cancer care that may result from our rapidly transforming health care system, we need reliable data on the quality of current practice.

Tamoxifen, radiation therapy, or both for prevention of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after lumpectomy in women with invasive breast cancers of one centimeter or less

PURPOSE

This trial was prompted by uncertainty about the need for breast irradiation after lumpectomy in node-negative women with invasive breast cancers of </= 1 cm, by speculation that tamoxifen (TAM) might be as or more effective than radiation therapy (XRT) in reducing the rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in such women, and by the thesis that both modalities might be more effective than either alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After lumpectomy, 1,009 women were randomly assigned to TAM (n = 336), XRT and placebo (n = 336), or XRT and TAM (n = 337). Rates of IBTR, distant recurrence, and contralateral breast cancer (CBC) were among the end points for analysis. Cumulative incidence of IBTR and of CBC was computed accounting for competing risks. Results with two-sided P values of.05 or less were statistically significant.

RESULTS

XRT and placebo resulted in a 49% lower hazard rate of IBTR than did TAM alone; XRT and TAM resulted in a 63% lower rate than did XRT and placebo. When compared with TAM alone, XRT plus TAM resulted in an 81% reduction in hazard rate of IBTR. Cumulative incidence of IBTR through 8 years was 16.5% with TAM, 9.3% with XRT and placebo, and 2.8% with XRT and TAM. XRT reduced IBTR below the level achieved with TAM alone, regardless of estrogen receptor (ER) status. Distant treatment failures were infrequent and not significantly different among the groups (P =.28). When TAM-treated women were compared with those who received XRT and placebo, there was a significant reduction in CBC (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.95; P =.039). Survival in the three groups was 93%, 94%, and 93%, respectively (P =.93).

CONCLUSION

In women with tumors </= 1 cm, IBTR occurs with enough frequency after lumpectomy to justify considering XRT, regardless of tumor ER status, and TAM plus XRT when tumors are ER positive.

Prognostic and predictive factors in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer

The selection of systemic adjuvant therapy should be based on the appropriate prognostic and predictive factors. The established prognostic factors currently used in cases of primary breast cancer include axillary lymph node involvement, histologic subtype, tumor size, nuclear or histologic grade, estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status and proliferative index. Adjuvant chemotherapy has had an impact on the management of node-positive breast cancer, while the St. Gallen recommendations were established for postoperative adjuvant therapy for node-negative breast cancer. However, there is some contention regarding the histological (or nuclear) grading systems among different pathologists. With regard to biological measurements, the most useful prognostic/predictive factors are hormone receptor status and HER-2 overexpression. ER and PR status can be used to establish the necessity of hormone therapy in the adjuvant setting. If the anti-HER-2 antibody and/or antiangiogenic agents are introduced into the adjuvant setting in the near future, determination of these factors is also recommended.

Management of women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Increasing incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) confronts patients and clinicians with optimal treatment decisions. This multidisciplinary study investigates therapeutic modalities of DCIS in daily practice and provides recommendations on how to increase quality of care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All women (n = 116) with unilateral DCIS recorded in the Geneva Cancer Registry from 1995 to 1999 were considered. Information concerned patient and tumor characteristics, treatment and outcome. Factors linked to therapy were determined using a case-control approach. Cases were women with treatment of interest and controls other women on the study.

RESULTS

Most DCIS cases (62%) were discovered by mammography screening. Ninety (78%) women had breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 18 (16%) mastectomy and seven (6%) bilateral mastectomy. Eight (7%) patients had tumor-positive margins, 18 (16%) lymph node dissection and two (1.7%) chemotherapy. Twenty-five per cent of women with BCS had no radiotherapy, three had radiotherapy after mastectomy. Less than 50% underwent breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Method of discovery, multifocality, tumor localization, size and differentiation were linked to the use of BCS or lymph node dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of important disparities in DCIS management, recommendations are made to increase quality of care, in particular to prevent axillary dissection or bilateral mastectomy and to increase the use of radiotherapy after BCS.

Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: recommendations for management based on consensus review and recent clinical trials

Determining the optimal individual adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer patients is a challenging undertaking because it requires translating data from clinical trials that have involved thousands of patients into a highly individualized, risk-adjusted approach for the patient at hand. Choosing adjuvant therapy for women with breast cancer includes consideration of four issues: A) evaluation of risk of relapse; B) extrapolation of results from clinical trials; C) therapeutic ratio, and D) the patient's preferences following a thorough discussion with her physician. Data from recently completed phase III adjuvant trials and worldwide consensus conferences document the benefits of adjuvant therapy in improving disease-free survival and overall survival for patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer >1.0 cm in size. The benefits of hormonal therapy are clear, but limited to patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Anthracyclines lead to improved outcomes compared with nonanthracycline regimens. Taxanes appear to improve disease-free survival in patients with node-positive disease, although longer follow-up is required to assess their impact on overall survival. Some countries have reported a reduction in the mortality rate from breast cancer over the past several years. The improved survival rate is due, at least in part, to the use of adjuvant systemic therapy. Ongoing studies are evaluating targeted therapies, with the potential of remarkably improving patient outcome.

Ethics in sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: an open question

The sentinel node concept agrees with the modern principles of surgical oncology in breast cancer, which are related to lymphatic dissection, accurate axillary study, and less traumatic surgery. After publication of many series, it has proven its capacity to correctly stage axilla and select patients who need axillary dissection. The Brazilian Society of Senology established the current norms for its practice. However, the transportation of new surgical techniques from research to practice always occurs with some ethical dilemmas related to its introduction in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to analyze the ethical challenges of the sentinel node technique and problems with its implementation.

Traditional and newer pathologic factors

There has long been a pressing clinical need to identify prognostic and predictive factors for patients with breast cancer. Although numerous candidate biological and molecular markers have been identified during the last two decades, traditional factors such as lymph node status, tumor size, histologic type, histologic grade, and hormone receptor status remain the most useful indicators of prognosis and therapeutic response. A major obstacle to the translation of research advances into clinically useful prognostic and predictive markers has been the considerable methodologic variability used in the evaluation of the newer markers. It is now generally accepted that, to be useful in patient management, a putative prognostic or predictive marker must have clinical importance, independence, significance, and standardization with regard to methods, interpretation, and reporting. It is hoped that recognition and adoption of these criteria will serve to clarify the value of newer biologic and molecular markers.

Factors used to select adjuvant therapy of breast cancer in the United States: an overview of age, race, and socioeconomic status

Age, race, and socioeconomic status all play a role in decisions regarding breast cancer adjuvant therapy. Increasing age remains the major risk factor for breast cancer, while in very young women breast cancer may have a poorer prognosis, even when adjusted for disease stage and other variables. More than half of all new breast cancers in the United States occur in women older than 65 years. Because of the higher frequency of coexisting (comorbid) serious illness in older women, the benefits of adjuvant therapy get smaller as age increases. Adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen and/or chemotherapy can statistically significantly improve survival in older women, but older women are less likely to receive chemotherapy and are less likely to be offered participation in clinical trials. Efforts are now under way to overcome age bias among health care providers and to develop clinical trials focusing on older patients. Breast cancer mortality is higher in African-Americans than in white Americans. Although the biologic characteristics of breast cancer are worse in African-Americans, major differences in survival are related to socioeconomic factors and access to care. When matched for disease stage and other major clinical and biologic variables, African-American and white patients have similar survival rates. Few data are available on the effects of adjuvant treatment on early breast cancer outcomes in Hispanic Americans and Asian-Americans. Poverty and lack of insurance are surrogates for poor outcomes; major efforts are needed to guarantee all Americans high-quality cancer care.

Prognostic and predictive role of proliferation indices in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer

In breast cancer, proliferative activity represents one of the biologic processes most thoroughly investigated for its association with tumor progression. In addition to the mitotic activity component of pathologic grading systems, several proliferation indices have provided independent information on prognosis and response to specific treatments in large retrospective studies. Recently, results from treatment protocols prospectively planned to test the clinical utility of proliferative activity have indicated that tumor cell proliferation markers identify two subsets among patients with lymph node-negative cancers: 1) those at a very low risk of relapse and 2) those who will benefit from regimens including antimetabolites. Future efforts should compare the prognostic accuracy of different proliferation markers, confirm preliminary evidence of a relationship between proliferation and response to specific systemic treatments, and standardize assay techniques to facilitate their transfer to general oncology practice.

Adjuvant therapy for very young women with breast cancer: need for tailored treatments

Breast cancer rarely occurs in women below the age of 35 years. Data from various sources indicate that diagnosis at such an age is associated with a dire prognosis mainly because of a more aggressive presentation. Although the effect of chemotherapy for premenopausal patients is substantial, recent evidence on 2233 patients suggested that very young women with endocrine-responsive tumors had a statistically significantly higher risk of relapse than older premenopausal patients with such tumors. In contrast, results for younger and older premenopausal patients were similar if their tumors were classified as endocrine nonresponsive. Information from studies on 7631 patients who were treated with chemotherapy alone in trials of three major U.S. cooperative groups showed a similar interaction between the effect of age and steroid hormone receptor status of the primary tumor. Better treatments for very young patients are required and may involve ovarian function suppression in addition to other endocrine agents in patients with endocrine responsive tumors and a more precise investigation of chemotherapy and its timing, duration, and intensity in those with endocrine nonresponsive tumors. Very young women with this disease are faced with personal, family, professional, and quality-of-life issues, which further complicate the phase of treatment decision making. The development of more effective therapies for younger patients requires tailored treatment investigations and cannot rely on information predominantly contributed from older premenopausal women.

Who should not receive chemotherapy? Data from American databases and trials

The demonstration of the effectiveness of chemotherapy in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, regardless of estrogen receptor (ER) status, raises the question of whether all breast cancer patients should receive chemotherapy. Several patient groups with such a favorable long-term prognosis that they will obtain an extremely small benefit from chemotherapy can be identified. They include patients with lymph node-negative tumors of 1 cm or less in size, those with grade 1 tumors between 1.1 and 2.0 cm in size, and those with tumors of favorable histologic type (tubular and mucinous) up to 3 cm in size. A patient subgroup in which it is not clear that the benefits of chemotherapy routinely exceed the risks is postmenopausal women with ER-positive, lymph node-negative cancers receiving tamoxifen. There is a wide variation in prognosis in this group, and chemotherapy should be reserved for those at high risk of recurrence. Finally, no benefit for chemotherapy in women aged 70 years and older has been identified. The high rate of death from causes other than breast cancer may negate small survival benefits, and after adjustment for quality of life, the duration of treatment exceeds the gain in life expectancy.

Prognostic role of serum CA15.3 in 362 node-negative breast cancers. An old player for a new game

The aims of the present investigation were to evaluate the association between serum CA15.3 levels and other biological and clinical variables and its prognostic role in patients with node-negative breast cancer. We evaluated 362 patients operated upon primary breast cancer from 1982 to 1992 (median follow-up 69 months). Serum CA15.3 was measured by an immunoradiometric assay. The association between variables was investigated by a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and the prognostic role of CA15.3 on relapse-free survival (RFS) was investigated by Cox regression models adjusting for age, oestrogen receptor (ER), tumour stage, and ER x age interaction, with both the likelihood ratio test and Harrell's c statistic. The prognostic contribution of CA 15.3 was highly significant. Log relative hazard of relapse was constant until approximately 10 (U/ml) of CA15.3 and increased thereafter with increasing marker levels. CA15.3 showed a significant contribution using as a cut-off point a value of 31 U/ml. However, the contribution to the model of the marker as a continuous variable is much greater. From these findings, we can conclude that: (i) CA15.3 is a prognostic marker in node-negative breast cancer; (ii) its relationship with prognosis is continuous, with the risk of relapse increasing progressively from approximately 10 U/ml.

Use of the St Gallen classification for patients with node-negative breast cancer may lead to overuse of adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The 1998 St Gallen classification was devised to guide clinicians in the use of adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early breast cancer. In this study, the classification was applied to a historical group of patients with node-negative breast cancer who were treated without adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

The St Gallen classification was applied to 421 women with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy alone between 1979 and 1994. Primary tumour characteristics were reviewed centrally.

RESULTS

When the most stringent version of the St Gallen classification was applied (grade 2 or 3 tumours classified as "high risk"), only 10 per cent of patients were "low risk", with a 10-year distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) rate of 100 per cent, and 15 per cent were at "intermediate risk" (10-year DRFS rate of 94 per cent). The high-risk group (75 per cent of women) had a 10-year DRFS rate of 77 per cent (P < 0.01). If the St Gallen classification had been applied to all patients in this series who were aged less than 70 years, up to 91 per cent would have been recommended to have chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The St Gallen classification is an inaccurate measure of prognosis for patients with node-negative breast cancer and should be used with caution.

Trends in, and predictors of, breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy for breast cancer in Connecticut, 1988-1997

PURPOSE

To describe the trends in, and predictors of, use of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) vs. mastectomy and use of post-BCS radiotherapy (RT), from 1988 through 1997 among residents of Connecticut.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data on surgical and RT procedures for 16,676 women diagnosed with early-stage (localized to the breast or with regional lymph node involvement) invasive breast cancer in 1988-1997 were obtained from the population-based Connecticut Tumor Registry.

RESULTS

Use of BCS (vs. mastectomy) increased over time and was lower for patients with nodal involvement or larger tumors. The absence of RT facilities at the hospital of first admission was negatively associated with BCS but not with post-BCS RT. Post-BCS RT was low among patients diagnosed at age 80+ years but increased over time only in this age group.

CONCLUSION

Absence of RT at the hospital may be a deterrent to BCS. The temporal increase in post-BCS RT among patients diagnosed at age > or =80 years suggests changes in physicians' attitudes and/or patient preferences that require further study.

High BRCA2 mRNA expression predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer patients

The prognostic significance of BRCA2 mRNA levels in tumor tissues was studied in sporadic breast cancer patients. BRCA2 mRNA levels were determined by real-time PCR. Histologic grade III tumors showed significantly (p = 0.001) higher BRCA2 mRNA levels (0.828 +/- 0.102 BRCA2/beta-glucuronidase mRNA ratio, mean +/- SE) than histologic grade I and II tumors (0.438 +/- 0.055) and estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors (0.773 +/- 0.102) showed a nonsignificant (p = 0.072) trend toward an increase in BRCA2 mRNA levels compared to ER-positive tumors (0.541 +/- 0.079). Other clinicopathologic parameters, such as menopausal status, lymph node status and tumor size, were not significantly associated with BRCA2 mRNA levels. Patients with high BRCA2 mRNA levels showed a significantly (p = 0.006) lower 5-year disease free survival rate (63%) than those with low levels (94%). Lymph node metastases, ER negativity and high histologic grade were also significantly (p < 0.05) associated with poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that BRCA2 mRNA levels were a significant prognostic factor, being independent of the other conventional prognostic factors. Our results suggest that BRCA2 mRNA levels might serve as a clinically useful prognostic factor in breast cancer patients.

Antiaromatase agents: evolving role in adjuvant therapy

The goal of adjuvant hormonal therapy is to prevent breast cancer recurrence. Standard therapy with tamoxifen has shown great value in the adjuvant setting; however, its tolerability profile can render it unsuitable for some patients. The aromatase inactivator, exemestane, and the 2 aromatase inhibitors, letrozole and anastrozole, have been shown to be equivalent or superior to tamoxifen with respect to multiple endpoints in patients with metastatic breast cancer. With tolerability profiles that are similar to, and in many cases, more acceptable than that of tamoxifen, and efficacy potentially superior to tamoxifen, studies using the antiaromatase agents as adjuvant therapy are currently ongoing. These trials will answer some important questions, such as the order in which adjuvant hormonal therapies are selected to maximize efficacy, whether the antiaromatase agents show improved tolerability, and whether combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy.

The value of adjuvant treatment in young women with breast cancer

The postoperative management of breast cancer is an ever-changing field. Young patients, in particular, have attracted recent interest as it has become apparent that age alone is a poor prognostic indicator for breast cancer. Adjuvant therapies indisputably delay breast cancer recurrence and save lives, and should be considered for all young patients. Chemotherapy is increasingly being considered appropriate for all women under the age of 35 years, regardless of other risk factors, but poses the particularly difficult problem of infertility for these young women. As the additional benefits of anthracyclines and taxanes in the adjuvant setting become clear, chemotherapy regimens are also becoming increasingly intensive and the risk of myocardial damage and leukaemia should not be ignored. The benefits of chemotherapy need to be weighed against the possible dangers, and therapy should be individualised according to cancer pathology and patient circumstance. Tamoxifen should be given for 5 years to all women whose cancer is estrogen receptor positive, regardless of whether the patient has received chemotherapy. If chemotherapy is not given, the addition of luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists to tamoxifen in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancers appears to be beneficial. The addition of LHRH agonists to chemotherapy and tamoxifen is currently being evaluated in randomised trials. Radiotherapy should be given after breast conservation surgery, and should include the axilla if nodes are involved and the axilla has not been surgically cleared. Chest wall radiotherapy should be considered following mastectomy in young women considered at high risk of local recurrence, but the long-term morbidity and mortality of local radiation therapy, which is increased in young women, needs to be considered.

The limited incorporation of economic analyses in clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Because there is increasing concern that economic data are not used in the clinical guideline development process, our objective was to evaluate the extent to which economic analyses are incorporated in guideline development.

METHODS

We searched medline and HealthSTAR databases to identify English-language clinical practice guidelines (1996-1999) and economic analyses (1990-1998). Additional guidelines were obtained from The National Guidelines Clearinghouse Internet site available at http://www.guideline.gov. Eligible guidelines met the Institute of Medicine definition and addressed a topic included in an economic analysis. Eligible economic analyses assessed interventions addressed in a guideline and predated the guideline by 1 or more years. Economic analyses were defined as incorporated in guideline development if 1) the economic analysis or the results were mentioned in the text or 2) listed as a reference. The quality of economic analyses was assessed using a structured scoring system.

RESULTS

Using guidelines as the unit of analysis, 9 of 35 (26%) incorporated at least 1 economic analysis of above-average quality in the text and 11 of 35 (31%) incorporated at least 1 in the references. Using economic analyses as the unit of analysis, 63 economic analyses of above-average quality had opportunities for incorporation in 198 instances across the 35 guidelines. Economic analyses were incorporated in the text in 13 of 198 instances (7%) and in the references in 18 of 198 instances (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Rigorous economic analyses may be infrequently incorporated in the development of clinical practice guidelines. A systematic approach to guideline development should be used to ensure the consideration of economic analyses so that recommendations from guidelines may impact both the quality of care and the efficient allocation of resources.

Primary breast cancer therapy in six regions of Germany

Studies from six regions of Germany (Aachen (W1), Dresden (E1), Jena (E2), Marburg (W2), Munich (W3), and Stuttgart (C1)) have been compared to verify and assess the quality of healthcare using breast cancer as an example. All of the data collection was carried out in comprehensive cancer centres and is population-based, with the exception of C1. Classic prognostic factors and the initial treatment of 8661 women with breast cancer, diagnosed between 1996 and 1998, were examined. Primary therapy, breast conserving therapy (BCT), and the use of subsequent local radiation and/or systemic therapy (chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) were analysed. BCT was performed on 39.3-57.7% of patients. By pT-category, the proportion of BCT in the six regions were as follows: for pTis between 37.8 and 64.3%, for pT1 between 51.7 and 71.5%, for pT2 between 25.9 and 51.1%, for pT3 between 0 and 13.1% and for pT4 between 0 and 15.2%. Multivariate analyses, adjusted for age and biological factors, showed a significant influence of the treating hospital on the mastectomy rate. The use of radiotherapy after BCT (80%) was quite homogeneous in the six regions. The application of radiotherapy after mastectomy, however, varied between 10.4 and 32.2%. In all regions, for premenopausal patients, the use of adjuvant systemic therapy almost reflected the St. Gallen-Consensus recommendations. In contrast, post-menopausal women with positive lymph nodes were not always treated according to these standards. In all regions, age had an influence on the administration of treatment: elderly breast cancer patients received less BCT, less radiotherapy and less adjuvant therapy than recommended in the St. Gallen-Consensus. Feedback of the results was made available to each hospital, providing a comparative summary of patient care that could be used by the participating hospitals for self-assessment and quality-control.

Clinical relevance of invasion factors urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 for individualized therapy decisions in primary breast cancer is greatest when used in combination

PURPOSE

A strong prognostic impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) as individual factors is well established in breast cancer. The improvement in clinical risk assessment gained by combining these factors is evaluated here.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

uPA and PAI-1 levels were prospectively measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in tumor tissue extracts of 761 patients with primary breast cancer.

RESULTS

In the clinically important subgroup of node-negative patients without adjuvant systemic therapy (n = 269; median follow-up, 60 months), the clinical value of testing both uPA and PAI-1 is demonstrated. The criterion either or both high identifies with high sensitivity the patients at high relapse risk while keeping more than half in the low-risk group. uPA/PAI-1 is the strongest predictor of disease-free survival and overall survival; patients with high uPA/PAI-1 have an increased relapse risk (P <.001; relative risk, 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 to 9.1), in particular for early relapse. Even within risk groups stratified by established criteria (nodal or menopausal status, tumor size, grade, or steroid hormone receptors), uPA/PAI-1 provides significant risk group discrimination. In the whole collective, the significant interaction between uPA/PAI-1 and adjuvant systemic therapy suggests a benefit from adjuvant therapy in high-risk patients as defined by uPA/PAI-1.

CONCLUSION

The clinical relevance of the two tumor-invasion factors uPA and PAI-1 is greatest when they are used in combination. The particular combination of uPA and PAI-1 (both low v either or both high) is superior to either factor alone and supports risk-adapted individualized therapy decisions.

The worldwide perspective in the adjuvant treatment of primary lymph node positive breast cancer

Adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer has experienced major changes in the last 25 years. Since the mid 1970s when cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease-free and overall survival, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy has become common practice worldwide. Anthracyclines have long been considered to be among the most active available agents to treat breast cancer and they have become a core component of adjuvant regimens. Anthracycline-containing polychemotherapy regimens provide a significant benefit over CMF. Regimens containing epirubicin are associated with a significant prolongation in relapse-free and overall survival rates compared with standard therapies including CMF. Epirubicin-taxane combinations are highly active in treating metastatic breast cancer and do not appear to be associated with any pharmacokinetic interactions. Epirubicin is a unique anthracycline whose introduction to the US market represents a significant advance in breast cancer treatment. Ongoing research efforts are focusing on combining anthracyclines with taxanes in an effort to continue to improve outcomes following adjuvant therapy.

Very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer: features of disease at presentation

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer rarely occurs in young women. Our knowledge about disease presentation, prognosis and treatment effects are largely dependent upon older series.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated biological features and stage at presentation for 1427 consecutive premenopausal patients aged < or = 50 years with first diagnosis of invasive breast cancer referred to surgery at the European Institute of Oncology from April 1997 to August 2000. A total of 185 patients (13%) were aged < 35 years ('very young') and 1242 (87%) were aged 35-50 years ('less young'). The expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PgR), presence of vascular invasion (VI), grading (G), expression of Ki-67, HER2/neu overexpression, pathological stage according to TNM staging system (pTNM), pathological tumor size and number of axillary lymph node involvement were evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared with less young patients, the very young patient group had a higher percentage of tumors classified as ER negative (P < 0.001), PgR negative (P = 0.001), higher expression of Ki-67 > or = 20% of cells stained; 62.2% versus 53%, (P < 0.001), vascular or lymphatic invasion (48.6% versus 37.3%, P = 0.006), and pathological grade 3 (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between the two groups for pT, pathological tumor size (pN) and number of positive lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that compared with less young premenopausal patients, very young women have a greater chance of having an endocrine-unresponsive tumor, and are more likely to present with a higher grade, more extensively proliferating and vessel invading disease. Pathological tumor size, nodal status and number of positive axillary lymph-nodes have a similar distribution among the younger and the older cohorts, thus not supporting previous data indicating more advanced disease in younger patients at diagnosis of operable disease.

Bisphosphonates in the treatment of bone metastases

Bone metastases are one of the most common problematic complications of advanced cancers. In addition to causing significant pain, bone metastases often result in fractures and debilitation. Stimulation of osteoclast activity by factors secreted by tumor cells is believed be the primary mechanism of bone destruction. Bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast-related bone resorption, and have become standard therapy in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy and postmenopausal osteoporosis. More recently, bisphosphonates have been shown to decrease pain and skeletal fractures associated with bone metastases. Structural changes in bisphosphonates influence their relative potency as well as other potentially beneficial effects such as inhibition of tumor growth factors, alteration of adhesion molecules, and apoptosis of tumor cells.

Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer

Breast cancer patients with the same stage of disease can have markedly different treatment responses and overall outcome. The strongest predictors for metastases (for example, lymph node status and histological grade) fail to classify accurately breast tumours according to their clinical behaviour. Chemotherapy or hormonal therapy reduces the risk of distant metastases by approximately one-third; however, 70-80% of patients receiving this treatment would have survived without it. None of the signatures of breast cancer gene expression reported to date allow for patient-tailored therapy strategies. Here we used DNA microarray analysis on primary breast tumours of 117 young patients, and applied supervised classification to identify a gene expression signature strongly predictive of a short interval to distant metastases ('poor prognosis' signature) in patients without tumour cells in local lymph nodes at diagnosis (lymph node negative). In addition, we established a signature that identifies tumours of BRCA1 carriers. The poor prognosis signature consists of genes regulating cell cycle, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. This gene expression profile will outperform all currently used clinical parameters in predicting disease outcome. Our findings provide a strategy to select patients who would benefit from adjuvant therapy.

The management of menopausal sequelae in patients with breast cancer

The use of chemotherapy and tamoxifen for young women with breast cancer results in premature menopause in a significant number of patients. Early menopause has serious vasomotor, psychological, genitourinary, cardiac and skeletal effects. Psychopharmacological and herbal preparations are widely used for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms. The incidence of psychological and depressive illness following the menopause in women with breast cancer is significantly higher than seen with the natural menopause. Targeting this population of patients for early diagnosis and psychiatric intervention is recommended. Local vaginal moisturising or oestrogen cream would help to alleviate some of the urogenital symptoms. Patients whose treatment included Anthracycline chemotherapy or radiation to the heart and those with a history of heart disease, should be monitored closely for latecardiac complications. Early menopause is the major risk factor for the development of osteoporosis. Weight bearing exercise, bisphosphonate or calcitonin therapy are all useful in treating osteoporosis. Should a woman with a history of breast cancer be given hormone replacement therapy is one of the most controversial issues in the oncology field. There are no published prospective randomised studies on the subject. The available data suggests an increase of 5% of breast cancer related events when hormone replacement therapy is given to women with breast cancer. However, in certain situations, this could be given after a detailed explanation and documentation. The patient and physician should balance the severity of symptoms against the increased breast cancer related events and the final decision should be left to the patient.

Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary operable breast cancer results in better overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival rates and whether preoperative chemotherapy permits more breast-conserving surgery procedures than postoperative chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six hundred ninety-eight breast cancer patients (T1c, T2, T3, T4b, N0 to 1, and M0) were enrolled onto a randomized phase III trial that compared four cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide administered preoperatively versus the same regimen administered postoperatively (the first cycle administered within 36 hours after surgery). Patients were followed up for OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional recurrence (LRR).

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 56 months, there was no significant difference in terms of OS (hazards ratio, 1.16; P =.38), PFS (hazards ratio, 1.15; P =.27), and time to LRR (hazards ratio, 1.13; P =.61). Fifty-seven patients (23%) were downstaged by the preoperative chemotherapy, whereas 14 patients (18%) underwent mastectomy and not the planned breast-conserving therapy.

CONCLUSION

The use of preoperative chemotherapy yields similar results in terms of PFS, OS, and locoregional control compared with conventional postoperative chemotherapy. In addition, preoperative chemotherapy enables more patients to be treated with breast-conserving surgery. Because preoperative chemotherapy does not improve disease outcome compared with postoperative chemotherapy, future trials should involve quality-of-life studies to investigate whether patients will benefit from this treatment modality.

Micro-metastases in axillary lymph nodes: an increasing classification and treatment dilemma in breast cancer due to the introduction of the sentinel lymph node procedure

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy will increasingly replace axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for staging in breast cancer. For daily practice, examination of the SN by serial sectioning (SS) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) is being promoted. Use of these techniques may result into stage migration due to the increased detection of micro-metastases. The consequence may be overshooting of patients with adjuvant therapy, as the prognostic relevance of (small) micro-metastases and isolated tumor cells is unclear.

METHODS

The prognostic impact of micro-metastases is determined by reviewing ALND studies with a follow up of at least 5 years, including more than 100 patients, before the SN era. Furthermore, studies in which conventionally haematoxylin-eosin (H&E) negative SNs are investigated for occult metastases by SS and/or IHC are reviewed.

RESULTS

In only one of eight studies, occult metastases were an independent risk factor for reduced survival. The outcome is dependent on the size of the nodal metastasis. IHC and SS as used in the SN procedure indeed induce a shift from pNO to pN1a (according to TNM).

CONCLUSION

By the thorough pathologic examination of the SN, isolated tumor cells and micro-metastases are more frequently detected. We propose to classify small micro-metastases (<0.5 mm) in a separate pN1a(min) category (min for minimal) to prevent stage migration. As the prognostic relevance of isolated tumor cells and (small) micrometastases has not been proven, the value of adjuvant therapy can be questioned for patients with otherwise good prognostic factors.

A vision for the future?

Systemic adjuvant therapy is recommended immediately following surgical removal of the primary tumour in the majority of patients with early breast cancer, to prevent the recurrence of distant metastases. Significant progress has been made in the development and evaluation of endocrine therapies for systemic adjuvant therapy. In pre- and perimenopausal women, ovarian ablation has proven to be a valuable treatment option, though not always desirable for young patients. Thus, reversible medical ovarian suppression with a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist, such as goserelin (Zoladex), may provide an attractive alternative for such patients. International trials have indicated that goserelin provides an important addition to the choice of adjuvant therapies now available to pre- and perimenopausal patients. For postmenopausal patients, it is hoped that the ATAC (Arimidex, tamoxifen, alone or in combination) trial will reveal whether or not the benefits of anastrozole (Arimidex) observed in advanced disease, where it has proven to be well tolerated and at least as effective as tamoxifen in recent trials, will translate to the early setting to provide further management options for these patients. On the horizon is yet another exciting endocrine agent, ICI 182,780 (Fulvestrant), which has also been shown to be as effective as anastrozole in advanced disease. In terms of the future, these agents are likely to provide additional valuable treatment choices for early breast cancer across the patient spectrum.

Relationship of sentinel and axillary level I-II lymph nodes to tangential fields used in breast irradiation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the volume of nodal irradiation associated with breast-conserving therapy, we defined the anatomic relationship of sentinel lymph nodes and axillary level I and II lymph nodes in patients receiving tangential breast irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis of 65 simulation fields in women with breast cancer treated with sentinel lymph node surgery and 39 women in whom radiopaque clips demarcated the extent of axillary lymph node dissection was performed. We measured the relationship of the surgical clips to the anatomic landmarks and calculated the percentage of prescribed dose delivered to the sentinel lymph node region.

RESULTS

A cranial field edge 2.0 cm below the humeral head the sentinel lymph node region was included or at the field edge in 95% of the cases and the entire extent of axillary I and II dissection in 43% of the axillary dissection cases. In the remaining 57%, this field border encompassed an average of 80% of cranial/caudal extent of axillary level I and II dissection. In 98.5% of the cases, all sentinel lymph nodes were anterior to the deep field edge and 71% were anterior to the chest wall-interface, whereas 61% of the axillary dissection cohort had extension deep to the chest wall-lung interface. If the deep field edge had been set 2 cm below the chest wall-lung interface, the entire axillary dissection would have been included in 82% of the cases, and the entire sentinel lymph node would have been covered with a 0.5-cm margin. The median dose to the sentinel lymph node region was 98% of the prescribed dose.

CONCLUSIONS

By extending the cranial border to 2 cm below the humeral head and 2 cm deep to the chest wall-lung interface, the radiotherapy fields used to treat the breast can include the sentinel lymph node region and most of axillary levels I and II.

Value of sentinel lymphonodectomy in head and neck cancer patients without evidence of lymphogenic metastatic disease

OBJECTIVE

Only few communications deal with the value of sentinel node (SN) biopsy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Based on the results of 38 investigated patients with clinically N0-neck the feasibility of SN biopsy in HNSCC is critically discussed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight previously untreated patients with clinically N0-neck were staged by intraoperative SN biopsy. After intraoperative identification of the hottest node (SN(1)) and further less tracer accumulating lymph nodes (SN(2), SN(3)), patients were treated by different types of neck dissection (ND), adjusted to the location and extent of the primary tumour. Postoperatively the histologic results of the SN(1-3) and the entire ND specimen were compared.

RESULTS

The stage of cervical metastatic disease was demonstrated by a disease-free SN(1) in 32 patients. In five patients an isolated metastasis could be proven in the intraoperatively identified SN(1), while in the remaining patient an isolated metastasis was found in the SN(2).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative SN biopsy seems to be valuable for the detection of occult lymph node metastases in HNSCC. This method might help to limit the extent of ipsilateral ND, if used as an intraoperative staging procedure to investigate the first draining tracer accumulating lymph nodes (SN(1-3)).

Improved survival after one course of perioperative chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients. long-term results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Trial 10854

The aim of this study was to examine whether one course of perioperative polychemotherapy yields better results in terms of survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control than surgery alone in early stage breast cancer. From 1986 to 1991, 2795 patients with stage I/II breast cancer were randomised to receive either one perioperative course of an anthracycline-containing chemotherapeutic regimen within 36 h after surgery or surgery alone. Patients were followed-up for overall survival, PFS and locoregional recurrence. The median follow-up period at time of the analysis was 11 years. PFS and locoregional control were significantly better (P=0.025 and P=0.004, respectively) in the perioperative chemotherapy arm. Node-negative patients seemed to benefit most from the perioperative FAC. Patients who received perioperative chemotherapy and locoregional therapy alone had significantly better overall survival rates than patients who received locoregional therapy alone (P=0.004). Patients who received additional systemic therapy did not seem to benefit from one course of perioperative chemotherapy (P=0.65). One course of perioperative polychemotherapy does improve PFS and locoregional control in early stage breast cancers. This effect is still present after 11 years of follow-up.