Patients Treated with Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Have Long-Term Rates of Death, Stroke, and Dementia Similar to Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Background—

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AFCA) is an established therapeutic option for rhythm control in symptomatic patients. Its efficacy and safety among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction is based on small populations, and data concerning long-term outcome are limited. We performed this meta-analysis to assess safety and long-term outcome of AFCA in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, to evaluate predictors of recurrence and impact on left ventricular function.

Methods and Results—

A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies including patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction undergoing AFCA were included. Twenty-six studies were selected, including 1838 patients. Mean follow-up was 23 (95% confidence interval, 18–40) months. Overall complication rate was 4.2% (3.6%–4.8%). Efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm at follow-up end was 60% (54%–67%). Meta-regression analysis revealed that time since first atrial fibrillation ( P =0.030) and heart failure ( P =0.045) diagnosis related to higher, whereas absence of known structural heart disease ( P =0.003) to lower incidence of atrial fibrillation recurrences. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved significantly during follow-up by 13% ( P <0.001), with a significant reduction of patients presenting an ejection fraction <35% ( P <0.001). N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide blood levels decreased by 620 pg/mL ( P <0.001).

Conclusions—

AFCA efficacy in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function improves when performed early in the natural history of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. AFCA provides long-term benefits on left ventricular function, significantly reducing the number of patients with severely impaired systolic function.

[Long-term results of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: cure or just palliation?]

Knowing the pitfalls when evaluating the long-term results after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation enables a critical analysis of the outcome presented in numerous studies on this topic. Nevertheless, catheter ablation is a long-term successful and safe therapeutic procedure for symptomatic atrial fibrillation, especially for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. In patients with persistent symptomatic atrial fibrillation, the decision for ablation has to be made with caution due to a higher recurrence rate and higher likelihood for multiple procedures.

Preserving Cognitive Function in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Its prevalence increases with increasing age, and is one of the leading causes of thromboembolism, including ischemic stroke. The prevalence of cognitive dysfunction also increases with increasing age. Although several studies have shown a strong correlation between AF and cognitive dysfunction in patients with and without overt stroke, a direct causative link has yet to be established. Rhythm vs rate control and anticoagulation regimens have been extensively investigated, particularly with the introduction of the novel anticoagulants. With catheter ablation becoming more prevalent for the management of AF and the ongoing development of various new energy sources and catheters, an additional thromboembolism risk is introduced. As cognitive dysfunction decreases the patient's ability to self-care and manage a complex disease such as AF, this increases the burden to our healthcare system. Therefore as the prevalence of AF increases in the general population, it becomes more imperative that we strive to optimize our methods to preserve cognitive function. This review gives an overview of the current evidence behind the association of AF with cognitive dysfunction, and discusses the most up-to-date medical and procedural treatment strategies available for decreasing thromboembolism associated with AF and its treatment, which may lead to preserving cognitive function.

Monitoring Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation

Although catheter ablation is an effective treatment for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF), there is no consensus on the definition of success or follow-up strategies. Symptoms are the major motivation for undergoing catheter ablation in patients with AF, however it is well known that reliance on perception of AF by patients after AF ablation results in an underestimation of recurrence of the arrhythmia. Because symptoms of AF occurrence may be misleading, a reliable assessment of rhythm outcome is essential for the definition of success in both clinical care and research trials. Continuous rhythm monitoring over long periods of time is superior to intermittent recording using external monitors to detect the presence of AF episodes and to quantify the AF burden. Today, new devices implanted subcutaneously using a minimally invasive technique have been developed for continuous AF monitoring. Implantable devices keep detailed information about arrhythmia recurrences and might allow identification of very brief episodes of AF, the significance of which is still uncertain. In particular, it is not known whether there is any critical value of daily AF burden that has a prognostic significance. This issue remains an area of active discussion, debate and investigation. Further investigation is required to determine if continuous AF monitoring with implantable devices is effective in reducing stroke risk and facilitating maintenance of sinus rhythm after AF ablation.

Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke: A Neurologic Perspective

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia in the United States. The incidence and prevalence of AF are increasing as the population ages and associated risk factors become more prevalent. Stroke is the most severe complication of AF. Various risk stratification schemes to guide therapy and the associated risk of bleeding are described. AF is also associated with cognitive decline, which may be secondary to recurrent microemboli; microbleeds secondary to anticoagulation therapy, or progression of vascular risk factors associated with AF. Prolonged monitoring can be performed to detect AF in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke: Increasing Stroke Risk with Intervention

This article focuses on the important newly recognized appreciation for the paradoxic increase in stroke and transient ischemic attack as a result of intervention meant to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) with the hope of decreasing stroke risk in the long term. The impact of silent cerebral lesions has recently been identified as a potentially major limitation, and the risks with AF ablation, as well as the present understanding of how risk can be minimized, are explained. This article provides a platform for newer study, changes in the way procedures are done, and possibly vascular-based stroke-reduction strategies.

Anticoagulation Issues in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation are anticoagulated before, during, and following their procedure to reduce the serious risk of a thromboembolic complication. Despite this well established recommendation, there remains debate about the optimal nature of anticoagulation and a continuing evolution in practice patterns. This article addresses issues related to anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation ablation focusing on the preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural periods.

Illustrated Atlas of Post-AF Ablation Cerebral Abnormalities

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias and relates to high morbidity and mortality due to thromboembolic events, especially ischemic stroke. During the last 15 years, transcatheter ablation has emerged as an effective therapeutic option to treat AF but carries a risk of possible complications. The occurrence of cerebrovascular accidents, both symptomatic and silent, is one of the most frequent and severe. Transcatheter AF ablation entails a relevant risk of silent cerebral ischemia detected by means of magnetic resonance imaging, and many efforts have been directed to improve the safety of this procedure.

Effect of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation on Morbidity and Mortality

Background—

This study examined the effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) on reducing morbidity and mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods and Results—

A retrospective cohort of patients with AF without prior stroke or heart failure (HF) who underwent RFA between 2003 and 2009 was identified using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance claims database. Outpatients with AF who met the same enrollment criteria but did not receive RFA were matched (≤1:20) by hospitals and dates to serve as controls. Outcomes of interest were death, stroke, or hospitalization for HF. A proportional hazard Cox regression model adjusted by propensity scores (based on age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, comorbidities, medications, and medical resource utilization) was applied to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval. A total of 846 patients with AF who received RFA and 11 324 matched AF controls were included, with a mean follow-up of 3.74 and 3.96 years, respectively. RFA was associated with a lower hazard for stroke (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.35–0.94; P =0.026). The reduction in the hazard for death and HF did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–1.23; P =0.451 and hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.55–1.12; P =0.185, respectively). Additional analysis using death as a competing risk showed similar results for stroke and HF.

Conclusions—

RFA did not reduce mortality or hospitalization for HF during the immediate 3.5-year follow-up. Although a beneficial effect on stroke prevention associated with RFA was suggested, residual confounding attributable to unmeasured factors remains a concern.

Improving ablation strategies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. The contemporary management of AF is centered on symptomatic improvement, as well as reduction in the AF associated morbidity and mortality. For many highly symptomatic patients catheter ablation offers an efficacious means to maintaining sinus rhythm when antiarrhythmic drugs have been ineffective, are contraindicated or cannot be tolerated. Over the past 15 years, catheter ablation has moved from an 'experimental therapy' to the standard of care for the maintenance of sinus rhythm. Unfortunately, while the results of ablation are unequivocally superior to medical therapy, recognized limitations of the contemporary AF ablation procedures have spurred several developments designed to improve the efficacy of the index ablation procedure, while limiting adverse events. The purpose of this review is to discuss the procedural refinements, and technological innovations proposed to outcomes of patients undergoing a percutaneous catheter ablation procedure for AF.

Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation - Long-term Follow-up of Cardiovascular Events

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was around 1.5 per 1000 person-years in Taiwan. Systemic thromboembolism is the most severe complication of AF. Risk stratification and adequate thromboembolism prophylaxis is the cornerstone of treatment in AF patients. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is powerful in selecting "truly low-risk" patients who are not necessary to receive anticoagulation therapies. It is also useful in predicting thromboembolic events and mortality for patients undergoing AF ablation. Recently, more and more biomarkers and imaging parameters were reported to be associated with adverse events in AF patients. How could these biomarkers and imaging tools change the current strategy of stroke prevention in AF deserves further investigations.

Exploring the Potential Role of Catheter Ablation in Patients with Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: Should We Move away from Symptom Relief?

Although silent atrial fibrillation (AF) accounts for a significant proportion of patients with AF, asymptomatic patients have been excluded from AF ablation trials. This population presents unique challenges to disease management. Recent evidence suggests that patients with asymptomatic AF may have a different risk profile and even worse long-term outcomes compared to patients with symptomatic AF. For the same reasons they might be more prone to side-effects of antiarrhythmic drugs, including pro-arrhythmias. The poor correlation between symptoms and AF demonstrated in several studies should caution physicians against making clinical decisions depending on symptoms. Although current guidelines recommend AF ablation only in patients with symptoms, more attention should be paid to the AF burden and a rhythm control strategy has the potential to improve morbidity and mortality in AF patients. However, limited data exist regarding the use of catheter ablation for asymptomatic AF patients. As ablation techniques have improved, AF ablation has become more widespread and complication rate decreased. As a result, referrals of asymptomatic patients for catheter ablation of AF are on the rise. In this review we discuss the many unresolved questions concerning the role of the ablative approach in asymptomatic patients with AF.

Renal Dysfunction, Stroke Risk Scores (CHADS 2 , CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, and R 2 CHADS 2 ), and the Risk of Thromboembolic Events After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Background—

There are limited data on the predictive value of stroke risk scores for thromboembolic events (TEs) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Our objectives were to report the incidence of TEs after AF ablation in a large contemporary AF ablation cohort and to investigate the impact of renal dysfunction and the value of stroke risk stratification scores (CHADS 2 , CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, and R 2 CHADS 2 ) for predicting TE after AF ablation.

Methods and Results—

Using the Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry, we documented TEs in patients undergoing radiofrequency AF catheter ablation. TE was defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism. Study population (N=2069; 66% men; 60±10 years; 62% paroxysmal AF; mean CHADS 2 , 1.2±0.9; CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, 2.1±1.4; and R 2 CHADS 2 , 1.3±1.1) were followed up for a median 18 (Q1–Q3, 12–29) months (ie, 3078 patient-years). Overall, 31 TEs occurred, with 16 events within 30 days of ablation and 15 TEs (0.72%) during the follow-up period. On multivariate analysis, CHADS 2 ( P <0.001), R 2 CHADS 2 ( P <0.001), and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ( P =0.003) scores were independent predictors of TEs during follow-up, and AF recurrence conferred a nonsignificant trend for increased TE risk ( P =0.071–0.094). The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score further differentiated TE risk in patients with CHADS 2 and R 2 CHADS 2 0 to 1 (0.13% if CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc was 0–1 and 0.71% if CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc was >2) and had the best predictive value in patients with AF recurrences (c-index 0.894, P =0.022 versus CHADS 2 , P =0.031 versus R 2 CHADS 2 ).

Conclusions—

CHADS 2 , CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, and R 2 CHADS 2 scores were associated with TE risk. The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score differentiated TE risk in the low-risk strata based on CHADS 2 and R 2 CHADS 2 scores and may be superior in the subgroup with AF recurrences.

Atrial fibrillation as a risk factor for cognitive impairment: a semi-systematic review

It is unclear if atrial fibrillation (AF) is an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment. This review evaluates the available evidence and provides an overview of the association between AF and cognitive function. Electronic database searches, January 1990 to December 2012, identified 271 studies comparing the incidence of cognitive impairment and/or dementia in patients with/without AF. Cognitive function was diagnosed by a physician using the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) or other established diagnostic criteria. Studies with <20 participants and without direct comparison to controls in sinus rhythm were excluded. There were no restrictions on the basis of age, language or study design. Full texts of 11 studies were obtained. Eight studies (three cross-sectional, two case-control and three prospective cohorts) reported an association between cognitive decline and AF. Among cross-sectional studies, patients with AF had a 1.7 (95% CI 1.2-2.5) to 3.3 (95% CI 1.6-6.5) greater risk of cognitive impairment, and a 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.4-3.7) increased risk of dementia, compared to patients in sinus rhythm. There was marked heterogeneity in the design, size and quality of studies and reporting of the data which precluded formal meta-analysis. Eight studies reported an association between AF and cognitive impairment and/or dementia, but the magnitude of risk varied. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to establish whether AF is a risk factor for cognitive decline, utilizing objective measures of cognitive function and neuropsychological testing, and to investigate the potential benefit of anticoagulation on reducing cognitive impairment and development of dementia.

Silent Cerebral Embolism during Atrial Fibrillation Ablation:Pathophysiology, Prevention and Management

Although many efforts have been directed to improve atrial fibrillation transcatheter ablation safety, thromboembolism to the brain remains one of the major complications. In fact several studies have confirmed occurrence of silent cerebral embolic lesions by post-procedure magnetic resonance imaging. The present review will focus on the possible mechanisms leading to silent cerebral embolism in an attempt to provide recommendations holding the potential to reduce the incidence of this clinically relevant complication.

[Patient selection for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: from paroxysmal to chronic]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the arrhythmia that causes most arrhythmia-associated hospitalisations in the western world. In Germany it affects approximately 3 million people. The limited success rates of drug treatment stimulated an exploration of interventional treatment options for AF. As our knowledge on initiating triggers and perpetuating substrate of AF expanded, catheter ablation techniques have been developed. In this article we review the patient selection criteria according to the current guidelines, and discuss established and recently found risk factors for recurrences of AF and complications by catheter ablation that may influence current patient selection for catheter ablation of AF.

Atrial fibrillation is associated with reduced brain volume and cognitive function independent of cerebral infarcts

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with cognitive decline independent of stroke, suggesting additional effects of AF on the brain. We aimed to assess the association between AF and brain function and structure in a general elderly population.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional analysis of 4251 nondemented participants (mean age, 76 ± 5 years) in the population-based Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study. Medical record data were collected for the presence, subtype, and time from first diagnosis of AF; 330 participants had AF. Brain volume measurements, adjusted for intracranial volume, and presence of cerebral infarcts were determined with magnetic resonance imaging. Memory, speed of processing, and executive function composites were calculated from a cognitive test battery. In a multivariable linear regression model, adjustments were made for demographic factors, cardiovascular risk factors, and cerebral infarcts.

RESULTS

Participants with AF had lower total brain volume compared with those without AF (P<0.001). The association was stronger with persistent/permanent than paroxysmal AF and with increased time from the first diagnosis of the disease. Of the brain tissue volumes, AF was associated with lower volume of gray and white matter hyperintensities (P<0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively), but not of white matter hyperintensities (P = 0.49). Participants with AF scored lower on tests of memory.

CONCLUSIONS

AF is associated with smaller brain volume, and the association is stronger with increasing burden of the arrhythmia. These findings suggest that AF has a cumulative negative effect on the brain independent of cerebral infarcts.

Patient preferences at ten years following initial diagnosis of atrial fibrillation: the Belgrade Atrial Fibrillation Study

BACKGROUND

Many atrial fibrillation (AF) patients have a poor understanding of the management of this condition. We investigated patient attitudes towards AF and a potential invasive treatment following an average 10-year period of prospective rhythm control in a cohort of newly diagnosed AF patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective registry-based study. At the regular annual visit in 2007, patients were asked at random to answer several AF-related questions.

RESULTS

Of 390 patients, 277 (71.0%) reported symptom reduction over time, but only 45 (11.5%) reported that they had "got used" to AF; 201 patients (51.5%) stated they would always prefer sinus rhythm, and 280 (71.2%) would accept an invasive AF treatment. Independent predictors for choosing an invasive procedure were younger age, impaired career/working capacity, and male gender (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that most AF patients prefer sinus rhythm and would readily accept an invasive procedure if it offered the possibility of a cure for their AF.

[Prevention of vascular dementia. Evidence and practice]

During recent years, increasing knowledge has been obtained from clinical studies about the impact that vascular factors have on cognitive function and dementia. Due to demographic reasons and still insufficient control of all vascular risk factors, dementia and associated problems are of increasing importance and will have impact on economical and social development in most countries. The incidence of cognitive impairment and dementia will increase exponentially. As long as no causal therapy for dementia exists, diagnosis and control of risk factors for dementia will need much more attention. Hypertension is not only the most important risk factor for stroke that often leads to dementia but also for silent brain infarcts, which are also associated with onset of dementia. Uncontrolled hypertension is associated with cognitive impairment and sufficient control of hypertension in middle-aged patients can reduce the risk of dementia in older ages. Nevertheless, treatment of all other risk factors (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation) is important to reduce the onset of not only vascular but also Alzheimer dementia.

Sequelae After AF Ablation: Efficacy and Safety go Hand in Hand

Although nowadays performed on a routine basis, catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is associated with the potential for major complications. Improving the safety remains therefore an important challenge. This article summarizes the different types of complications associated with AF ablation grouping them into clinically overt major complications, subclinical injury and permanent injury. Furthermore, it describes the potential predictors for complications and highlights the dynamic interplay between efficacy and safety.

Atrial fibrillation, stroke, and quality of life

Contemporary management of atrial fibrillation imposes many challenges, particularly in the setting of our aging population. In addition to well-recognized consequences, such as stroke and mortality, emerging evidence relates atrial fibrillation to elevated risk of dementia, posing further therapeutic challenges. As the incidence of atrial fibrillation rises with age, the balance of controlling stroke risk and limiting major hemorrhage on anticoagulation has become increasingly critical in elderly patients. Appreciation of more extensive risk factors has made it possible to identify patients at very low risk of thromboembolism and higher risk of bleeding. However, practice guidelines in the United States and abroad have occasionally divergent viewpoints regarding how to best manage patients in various risk strata. Options for stroke prevention have expanded with novel antithrombotics and promising mechanical alternatives to anticoagulation, which may be at least as effective in preventing stroke without increasing bleeding risk. Catheter ablation has demonstrated impressive success at preventing atrial fibrillation recurrence in selected patients, and has the potential to further improve outcomes. In addition, the role of antiplatelet medications in patients deemed unsuitable for anticoagulation has been better clarified, although novel agents require further study to assess their impact on thromboembolism. High-bleeding risks associated with the concomitant use of multiple antithrombotics remains a major obstacle in patients with indications for both antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy.