Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis

A Population-Based Study of the Incidence and Survival of Anorectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common type of primary gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor, but GISTs arising in the anus and rectum are rare. This study aimed to undertake a population-based analysis of the incidence, patient demographics, and survival of patients with anorectal GIST compared with patients with GIST arising from other sites based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database.

Material/Methods

The SEER database was used to identify all patients diagnosed with GIST and patients diagnosed with anorectal GIST from 2000 to 2015. The incidence of GIST, baseline clinical and demographic data, tumor stage, and patient survival data were analyzed, including overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

A total of 277 patients with anorectal GIST were identified, with an incidence of 0.018 per 100,000. The incidence of GIST arising from other sites was 0.719 per 100,000. The median age at diagnosis for anorectal GIST was 57.5 years (range, 26–92 years), median tumor size was 6.55 cm (range, 0.6–20 cm), and surgery, but not chemotherapy, improved OS and CSS. Patients with anorectal GIST had a mean 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS of 91.1%, 82.5%, 75.2%, and 58.5%, respectively. Patients with GIST arising at other sites had a mean 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS of 88.3%, 76.4%, 66.5%, and 46.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

Anorectal GIST is a rare tumor that has a better outcome compared with GISTs arising at other sites in the gastrointestinal tract.

An unusual cause of gastrointestinal bleed in patients with liver cirrhosis

Acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in cirrhosis has been classically linked to variceal rupture, although peptic ulcer and portal hypertensive gastropathy-related bleed are not uncommon. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumour and may also present as UGI bleed; however, there are no reports of GIST presenting as UGI bleed in patients with cirrhosis. Here, we report three cases of GIST who had presented with UGI bleed and were successfully managed with surgical excision and are tolerating imatinib without recurrence.

Tailored management of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common human sarcoma and can form along the entire gastrointestinal tract. Over the last 20 years, considerable advances have been made in our understanding of the biology of GISTs. The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has provided effective medical therapy for the first time. In fact, given that GIST typically is driven by either a KIT or PDGFRA gene mutation, it has become a paradigm of targeted molecular therapy. In addition, diagnostic and surgical techniques have been refined. Here, the critical aspects of primary GISTs and how they are now managed with an integrated approach are summarized. Treatment plans are developed based on specific pathologic and molecular features of the tumor. The authors outline the general principles of therapy and highlight some of the nuances. Particular focus is given to diagnosis, surgical considerations, and the use of preoperative and postoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Identification of phenothiazine as an ETV1‑targeting agent in gastrointestinal stromal tumors using the Connectivity Map

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are gastrointestinal tract sarcomas that commonly contain a mutation in the tyrosine kinases, KIT and platelet‑derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA). Imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib are all effective tyrosine kinase inhibitors; however, acquired resistance is inevitable. The E26 variant 1 (ETV1) pathway has been found to be a key downstream effector of KIT and is therefore a reasonable therapeutic target for this disease. In this study, we explored the potential agents targeting ETV1 in GISTs by uploading an ETV1 knockout gene signature of GIST cell lines to the pattern‑matching software 'Connectivity Map'. The activity and mechanisms of identified agents were examined using an in vitro model. Four drugs were identified: Suberanilohydroxamic acid and trichostatin [two histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs)] and trifluoperazine and thioridazine (two phenothiazine‑class drugs). Western blot analysis demonstrated that all four drugs had ETV1‑downregulating effects. As HDACIs have been previously studied in GISTs, we focused on phenothiazine. Phenothiazine was found to exert cytotoxicity and to induce apoptosis and autophagy in GISTs. Treatment with phenothiazine had little effect on the KIT/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, but instead upregulated extracellular‑signal‑regulated kinase (ERK) activity. A combination of phenothiazine and a MEK inhibitor had a synergistic cytotoxic effect on GISTs. Western blot analysis indicated that ELK1 and early growth response 1 (EGR1) were activated/upregulated following phenothiazine treatment, and the MEK inhibitor/phenothiazine combination downregulated the ERK/ELK1/EGR1 pathway, resulting in diminished autophagy, as well as enhanced apoptosis. On the whole, the findings of this study established phenothiazine as a novel class of therapeutic agents in GIST treatment and demonstrate that a combination of phenothiazine and MEK inhibitor has great potential for use in the treatment of GISTs.

Mechanism of Resistance in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Imatinib has revolutionized the treatment of GIST since this drug is able to inhibit tumoral growth by blocking the activity of receptor tyrosine kinases, KIT or PDGFRA, that in these tumors are constitutively activated because of the presence of mutations that alters their catalytic activity. However, despite this enormous improvement in the RFS and OS and in the quality of life of GIST patients, imatinib is not able to eradicate the disease: recurrences occur and acquired resistance is a common event which develops during targeted treatments. Several mechanisms have been demonstrated to be responsible for tumoral growth reactivation which is due to the reactivation of the altered KIT/PDGFRA receptors, no more blocked by the drug. Secondary point mutations are generally observed in the regrowing tumors, and it has been demonstrated that they alter the architectural structure of the site in which the interaction between the drug and the receptor happens. Other mechanisms causing drug resistance have been investigated, indicating that many aspects need to be still explicated and fully understood in order to define a strategy able to fight definitively GIST growth.

[Multiple gastrointestinal stromal masses in the small bowel detected in a patient with peritonitis]

We here report a case of multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in the small bowel detected in a patient with peritonitis. The peculiarity of this case study is the intraoperative detection of multifocal small bowel tumor masses, suggesting gastrointestinal stromal tumors on postoperative CT scan. Tumor couldn't be suspected clinically on the basis of peritonitis.

Using biology to guide the treatment of sarcomas and aggressive connective-tissue tumours

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies that arise from cells of a mesenchymal origin. Surgery forms the mainstay of the treatment of most patients with localized sarcoma and might be followed or preceded by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. In the metastatic setting, systemic treatments tend to improve survival and control symptoms. However, the adverse events and sometimes disappointing outcomes associated with these empirical approaches to treatment indicate a need for new approaches. The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled more targeted treatment of many malignancies based on the presence of specific alterations. NGS analyses of sarcomas have revealed the presence of many alterations that can be targeted using therapies that are already used in patients with other forms of cancer. In this Review, we describe the genomic alterations considered to define specific nosological subgroups of sarcoma and whose contribution to oncogenesis provides a biological rationale for the use of a specific targeted therapy. We also report several less successful examples that should guide researchers and clinicians to better define the extent to which the identification of driver molecular alterations should influence the development of novel treatments.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach and Esophagus

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arise anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract, most commonly as a result of c-kit or PDGFRA proto-oncogene mutations. Surgical resection is an important component of treatment. However, molecular profiling of GISTs has provided many insights into adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy options. Imatinib, the most frequently studied medical therapy, has been shown in numerous studies to provide benefit to patients in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. Interval imaging is an important component of the treatment of GISTs and national surveillance recommendations should be followed.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

A 69-year-old man presented with a rectal mass that was noted on physical examination. Flexible sigmoidoscopy confirmed the presence of a well-defined mass 3 cm from the anal verge (). Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis identified a 5.8-cm heterogeneous mass with intersphincteric extension. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography revealed no evidence of distant metastatic disease. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration revealed a noncircumferential submucosal hypoechoic mass () with pathology significant for spindle cells staining positive for CD117, consistent with a GI stromal tumor (GIST). The patient received 5 months of neoadjuvant imatinib with great response () and subsequently underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgical resection. He continues on adjuvant imatinib and is currently without signs of recurrence at 18 months postprocedure; he is undergoing restaging CT chest/abdomen/pelvis and surveillance flexible sigmoidoscopy every 6 months.

Colonic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Population-Based Analysis of Incidence and Survival

Objectives

The incidence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) located in the colon is rare. Current studies mainly focus on case reports for colonic GISTs. Therefore, a population-based analysis was useful to guide the clinical treatment strategy.

Methods

The patients were selected from 2000 to 2015 based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, incidence, treatment, and survival were retrieved for analysis.

Results

249 cases of colonic GISTs were collected. The male-female ratio was close to 1 : 1 (male 51.41%, female 48.59%). Most cases were Caucasians (70.28%), and African Americans accounted for 19.68%. Age of diagnosis ranged from 21 to 93 years with a median (mean) age of 67.5 (65.56). The incidence was rare, only 0.018 per 100,000. It had an annual percentage change (APC = -0.7728) without statistical significance (P = 0.5127) while the incidence of other GISTs increased from 2000 to 2015, with an annual percentage change of 3.9% (P = 0.0001). Surgery was associated with better prognosis whereas chemotherapy did not impact the survival rate.

Conclusion

Colonic GIST is a rare solid tumor, and the incidence is stable. The entity has a poorer prognosis than other GISTs. Surgery improved the survival rate, while chemotherapy did not.

Prognostic value of tumor necrosis in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is currently no consensus regarding the influence of tumor necrosis on the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the prognostic role of tumor necrosis in patients with GIST.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched from their inception to March 2018. Studies reporting data on the relationship between tumor necrosis and GIST prognosis were eligible. The measure of the effect of interest was the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This study has been registered in the Prospero (number CRD42018096036).

RESULTS

In total, 18 studies including 2320 patients were identified. The total odds of tumor necrosis were associated with a poor GIST prognosis (OR = 5.54, 95% CI = 4.39-6.99). Subgroup analysis of different observed outcomes indicated that tumor necrosis was associated with a decreased disease-free survival (OR = 7.08, 95% CI = 4.78-10.49), recurrence-free survival (OR = 3.96, 95% CI = 2.48-6.32), and overall survival (OR = 4.29, 95% CI = 2.02-9.13). In addition, any tumor site, tumor size, follow-up time, ethnicity, different outcomes of GIST, and different degrees of positive staining of immunohistochemical markers subgroups showed a significantly increased risk of a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor necrosis may likely predict a poorer prognosis for GIST. However, further well-designed prospective studies with large sample size are required in the future.

Establishment and Verification of Prognostic Nomograms for Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A SEER-Based Study

With gastrointestinal tract as the origin, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is recognized as the very widespread mesenchymal tumor. A precise prognostic model of survival is required to guide the treatment options of patients with GIST. This study was designed to map the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of GIST patients. According to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database, we acquired the data of 6,713 patients with GIST who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2014. We randomly separated the patients into training (n = 4,699) and validation (n = 2,014) groups. To assess the prognostic impact of multiple clinical parameters, the Kaplan-Meier approach and the Cox proportional hazards regression model were adopted, where essential prognostic variables were combined to create nomograms. The consistency index and curve of calibration had been adopted to assess nomogram discrimination ability and prediction accuracy. A multifactor analysis of the training cohort showed that age, gender, size of tumor, location, and primary surgery were remarkably related to survival, and these variables were applied to create nomograms. The nomogram demonstrated excellent accuracy in estimating 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS, with a C-index of 0.740 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.723-0.757) for OS and 0.743 (95% CI, 0.718-0.768) for CSS. In the validation cohort, the nomogram-predicted C-index was 0.741 for OS (95%CI, 0.717-0.765) and 0.746 (95%CI, 0.713-0.779) for CSS. All calibration curves showed good consistency between predicted and actual survival. A new nomogram was created and verified to predict the OS and CSS of patients with GIST. These new prognostic models can help enhance the accuracy of survival outcome predictions, thus facilitating to provide constructive therapeutic suggestions.

Malignancies associated with GIST: a retrospective study with molecular analysis of KIT and PDGFRA

PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common soft tissue tumors of the GI tract. Studies have been published reporting additional neoplasms in GIST patients. This study aimed to evaluate possible associations of mutation type, morphology, and clinical aspects of GISTs.

METHODS

All cases of GIST were identified from our pathology files. Coding exons of KIT and PDGFRA in GISTs with additional malignancies were sequenced.

RESULTS

A total of 70 of 188 (37%) retrieved patients with confirmed diagnosis of GIST showed at least one additional malignant neoplasm. Fifty of these GISTs were located in the stomach (71%), 8 in the small intestine (11%), 5 in the colon/rectum (7%), and 7 cases (6.2%) were of undetermined sites of origin. The distribution of identified mutations was similar to that described in GISTs without secondary malignancies. A total of 37 of 57 cases (65%) showed mutations in the KIT gene exon 11, 3 (5%) cases in exon 9, and 1 (2%) case in exon 13. Nine tumors (16%) had mutations of the PDGFRA gene. KIT and PDGFRA wild-type status were found in seven cases (12%). Most of the secondary neoplasms were located within the GI tract (34%), in the urogenital system (24%), or the breast/female genital tract (20%).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the high rate of additional malignant tumors in GIST patients. GIST features in these cases are very similar to those with sole GIST.

Pleomorphic Sarcomas: The State of the Art

This article focuses on pleomorphic sarcomas, which are malignant mesenchymal tumors with complex genetic background at the root of their morphologic pleomorphism. They are poorly differentiated tumors that may retain different lines of differentiation, sometimes correlating with clinicopathological or prognostic features. Accurate diagnosis in this group of tumors relies on adequate sampling due to their heterogeneity and assessment with both microscopy and large panels of immunohistochemistry. Molecular analyses have a limited role in their diagnosis as opposed to translocation-related sarcomas but may provide theranostic and important prognostic information in the future.

Management of low rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with neoadjuvant therapy and transanal excision: a rare case report and review of the literature

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. However, rectal GISTs represent only 5% of this category. We report a case of a rectal GIST treated with local excision after neoadjuvant therapy.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old male patient presented with anal bleeding. Colonoscopy revealed a mass located 5 cm from the anal verge. Histological examination showed a GIST with immunohistochemical positivity for CD117 and CD34. Transanal local excision was performed after neoadjuvant therapy.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for GISTs with unfavorable localization may facilitate local excision and avoid complications of more demanding operations.

PRE-OPERATIVE GASTRIC GIST DOWNSIZING: THE IMPORTANCE OF NEOADJUVANT THERAPY

Introduction:

Gastric gastrointestinal tumors (GIST) are a rare and usually asymptomatic neoplasm that can present as abdominal mass in more advanced scenarios. Since surgical resection is the main aspect of the treatment, locally advanced tumors require multivisceral resection and, therefore, higher postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Objective:

To perform a review the literature on the topic, with emphasis on the neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods:

Literature review on the Medline database using the following descriptors: gastrointestinal stromal tumors, neoadjuvant therapy, imatinib mesylate and molecular targeted therapy.

Results:

Surgical resection remains the cornerstone for the treatment of GISTs; however, tyrosine kinase inhibitors have improved survival as an adjuvant therapy. More recently, neoadjuvant therapy have been described in the treatment of locally advanced tumors in order to avoid multivisceral resection.

Conclusion:

Despite surgical resection remains as the most important aspect of the treatment of GISTs, adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown to both improve survival and resectability, respectively.

Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring of a Patient with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor by Next-Generation Sequencing and Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay of a PDGFRA Mutation in Plasma-Derived Cell-Free Tumor DNA

In patients with a suspected malignancy, standard-of care management currently includes histopathologic examination and analysis of tumor-specific molecular abnormalities. Herein, we present a 77-year-old patient with an abdominal mass suspected to be a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) but without the possibility to collect a tumor biopsy. Cell-free DNA extracted from a blood sample was analyzed for the presence of mutations in GIST-specific genes using next generation sequencing. Furthermore, liquid biopsies were used to monitor the levels of mutant DNA copies during treatment with a tumor-specific mutation droplet digital PCR assay that correlated with the clinical and radiological response. Blood-based testing is a good alternative for biopsy-based testing. However, it should only be applied when biopsies are not available or possible to obtain because overall, in only 50%-85% of the cell-free plasma samples is the known tumor mutation detected.

Smooth Muscle Transcriptome Browser: offering genome-wide references and expression profiles of transcripts expressed in intestinal SMC, ICC, and PDGFRα+ cells

Transcriptome data on the quantitative numbers of transcriptional variants expressed in primary cells offer essential clues into specific cellular functions and biological processes. We have previously collected transcriptomes from primary smooth muscle cells (SMC), interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), and PDGFRα+ cells (fibroblast-like cells) isolated from murine jejunal and colonic smooth muscle and/or mucosal tissues as well as transcriptomes from the associated tissues (jejunal smooth muscle, colonic smooth muscle, and colonic mucosa). In this study, we have built the Smooth Muscle Transcriptome Browser (SMTB), https://med.unr.edu/physio/transcriptome , a web-based, graphical user interface that offers genetic references and expression profiles of all transcripts expressed at both the cellular (SMC, ICC, and PDGFRα+ cells) and tissue level (smooth muscle and mucosal tissue). This browser brings new insights into the cellular and biological functions of the cell types in gastrointestinal smooth muscle biology.

Cost-utility analysis of adjuvant imatinib treatment in patients with high risk of recurrence after gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) resection in Thailand

Background

Many patients develop tumour recurrence within a few years after undergoing surgical resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Adjuvant imatinib treatment is recommended for patients with high risk of GIST recurrence as it can improve recurrence-free survival and overall survival of patients. This study aims to assess the cost-utility of adjuvant imatinib in patients with high risk of GIST recurrence after surgery compared with no adjuvant therapy in Thailand.

Methods

A Markov model was developed to estimate lifetime costs and outcomes of using adjuvant imatinib treatment and other treatment alternatives if recurrence occurred compared with the current situation of no adjuvant therapy in high-risk patients after surgery. A 1-month cycle length was deployed in the model. Transition probabilities were derived from literature review. Costs were collected and calculated for the year 2014 from a societal perspective. Future costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess parameter uncertainties.

Results

Three years of adjuvant imatinib treatment followed by imatinib treatment and best supportive care if recurrence occurred after or during adjuvant therapy, respectively, was the best option as it produced more health outcomes (1.23 life years (LYs) and 1.16 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)) compared to no adjuvant therapy while yielding the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 1,648,801 Thai Baht (THB) per QALY gained. Three years of adjuvant imatinib treatment followed by sunitinib treatment if recurrence occurred had an ICER of 2,608,264 THB per QALY gained compared to the best option, while other options were dominated. A one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the utility of patients receiving adjuvant imatinib had the greatest effect on the model, followed by the discount rate and probability of GIST recurrence.

Conclusions

Adjuvant imatinib treatment improved the health benefits of patients with high risk of GIST recurrence. However, in the Thai context, it was not cost-effective at the current price.

Effects of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on proliferation, apoptosis, and migration of gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to investigate the proliferation and migration capability of human gastrointestinal stromal tumor line GIST-T1 after exposure to different pressures and times of CO₂ pneumoperitoneum.

METHODS

We established simulated CO₂ pneumoperitoneum environment in vitro and divided the human GIST cell GIST-T1 into open control group, 8 mmHg CO₂ pneumoperitoneum treatment group and 15 mmHg CO₂ pneumoperitoneum treatment group. Each group was divided into two subgroups respectively cultured for 1 h and 3 h. pH value of cell culture, cell growth curve, and cell cycle distribution of each group was measured. By application of scratch healing tests and Transwell chamber experiments, mobility ratio and number of cells through 8 µm membranes were measured to assess the migration ability of cells in each group after intervention.

RESULTS

Cell culture pH value of each subgroup in CO₂ group decreased significantly after exposed in CO₂ pneumoperitoneum (P < 0.01). The proliferation of GIST-T1 cells in 15 mmHg CO₂ group was significantly inhibited early (1-2 days) (P < 0.05) and the proliferation of GIST-T1 cells in 8 mmHg CO₂ 1 h subgroup and 15 mmHg CO₂ 1 h subgroup was increased significantly late (4-6 days) (P < 0.05) after the interventions of CO₂ pneumoperitoneum. The percentage of cells in G0-G1 phase increased, the percentage of S phase cells decreased (P < 0.01) in 1-h subgroup and 3-h subgroup of 15 mmHg CO₂ group 24 h after exposure to CO₂. The percentage of cells in S phase increased in 1-h subgroup of 8 mmHg CO₂ group and decreased in 3-h subgroup of 15 mmHg CO₂ group 72 h after exposure to CO₂. In the Transwell chamber experiment, the cell number through 8-µm membrane increased significantly (P < 0.01) in 3-h subgroup of CO₂ group compared to that in 3-h subgroup of control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine pressure and duration of CO₂ pneumoperitoneum used in clinic did not promote the proliferation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, but had a potential risk of increasing postoperative recurrence and distant metastasis.

What is the appropriate duration of adjuvant imatinib mesylate treatment for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors classified according to the strict definition of tumor rupture?

In gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), rupture is a high-risk feature; however, "tumor rupture" is inconsistently defined, and its prognostic value remains controversial.Six hundred ninety-one patients undergoing surgery for primary nonmetastatic GISTs from 2003 to 2015 at our institution were enrolled. The strict definitions of "tumor rupture" according to the Kinki GIST Study Group (KGSG) were used.The median follow-up time was 64 months. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in the entire group were 79.3% and 84.1%, respectively. According to the KGSG's definition, tumor rupture occurred only in 24 (3.5%) of 691 patients. For all 691 patients, multivariable analysis showed that tumor rupture, according to KGSG's definition, is one of the independently prognostic factors for both RFS and OS. Twenty-four patients with tumor rupture were further analyzed. Receiving IM for more than 3 years was significantly associated with improved RFS and OS in GISTs patients with tumor rupture.Tumor rupture according to KGSG's definition was an independent predictive factor associated with GIST patient prognosis. More importantly, for GISTs with tumor rupture according to the KGSG's strict definition, receiving IM treatment for ≥3 years should be considered.

The influence of marital status on the survival of patients with operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A SEER-based study

BACKGROUND

Marital status has been demonstrated as a predictive factor for prognosis in diverse malignancies, but its role in the survival of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains unclear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was aimed to investigate the impact of marital status on the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of operable GIST cases, by using data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. In total, 6582 GIST patients between 1973 and 2013 were identified from SEER database.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated the marital status as an independent predictive factor for survival. Married group had better 5-year OS and CSS than unmarried group (OS: 79.2% vs 71.3%, P < .001; CSS: 88.9% vs 84.8%, P < .001). And compared to married, divorced/separated, and single group, widowed group had the lowest 5-year OS and CSS (61.3% and 82.2%). Further subgroup analyses validated the relationship between marital status and survival among all SEER stages and different age groups. And additional sensitivity analyses according to other clinicopathological features confirmed that married cases had higher survival rate than unmarried cases.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, marriage could be a protective prognostic factor for survival, and widowed patients had a higher risk of death.

Coexistence of Gastric Cancer and Multiple Small Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Report of a Unique Case and Review of the Literature

Background

In recent years, the synchronous occurrence of tumors of different histotypes arising in the same organ has been reported more frequently in the literature. The simultaneous development of adenocarcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has been documented rarely.

Summary

The coexistence of primary gastric adenocarcinoma and GIST has been detected incidentally on gastric mucosa, serosa or occasionally intramurally, at surgery, or gastroscopy for other reasons. We present a case of a 79-year-old male patient who underwent surgery for an advanced gastric carcinoma, where multiple nodules of GIST were incidentally discovered during the work-up of his gastrectomy specimen.

Key Message

GISTs range from small "low-risk" tumors to sarcomas. Small GISTs are found incidentally during unrelated surgery or autopsy. Multiple GISTs are extremely rare and usually associated with hereditary diseases.

Practical Implications

In any case of gastrointestinal neoplasm, the surgeon and pathologist should be alert to perform a thorough investigation. Our case could provide further awareness and insight into the entity of concurrent tumors.

Efficacy and Tolerability of 5-Year Adjuvant Imatinib Treatment for Patients With Resected Intermediate- or High-Risk Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: The PERSIST-5 Clinical Trial

Importance

Three years of adjuvant imatinib mesylate therapy is associated with reduced recurrence rates and improved overall survival in patients with high-risk primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) compared with patients who receive 1 year of treatment. The impact of a longer duration of therapy is unknown.

Objective

To determine whether adjuvant treatment for primary GIST with imatinib for 5 years is tolerable and efficacious.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial (Postresection Evaluation of Recurrence-free Survival for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors With 5 Years of Adjuvant Imatinib [PERSIST-5]) included adult patients with primary GIST (expressing KIT) at 21 US institutions who underwent a macroscopically complete resection and were at intermediate or high risk of recurrence, defined as primary GIST at any site measuring 2 cm or larger with 5 or more mitoses per 50 high-power field or nongastric primary GIST measuring 5 cm or larger. Data were collected from August 5, 2009, through December 20, 2016.

Interventions

Imatinib, 400 mg once daily, orally for 5 years or until discontinuation of therapy because of progression or intolerance.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary end point was overall survival.

Results

Of the 91 patients enrolled, 48 (53%) were men with a median age of 60 years (range, 30-90 years). Median tumor size was 6.5 cm (range, 2.3-30.0 cm). Median treatment duration was 55.1 months (range, 0.5-60.6 months); 46 patients (51%) completed 5 years of imatinib therapy. Estimated 5-year RFS was 90% (95% CI, 80%-95%), and overall survival was 95% (95% CI, 86%-99%). Recurrence was noted in 7 patients: 1 had disease recur while receiving imatinib (PDGFRA D842V mutation) and died; 6 had disease recur after discontinuation of imatinib therapy. Two additional deaths were unrelated to treatment or tumor progression. Forty-five patients (49%) stopped treatment early because of patient choice (10 [21%]), adverse events (15 [16%]), or other (11 [12%]). All 91 patients experienced at least 1 adverse event, and 17 (19%) experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this first adjuvant trial, to our knowledge, of patients with resected primary GIST who received 5 years of imatinib therapy, no patient with imatinib-sensitive mutations had disease recur during therapy. For patients in whom disease recurred, recurrence was within 2 years of discontinuation of imatinib therapy. Approximately half of the patients discontinued treatment early, most commonly because of patient choice, thus emphasizing the importance of close clinical monitoring to continue imatinib treatment for patients at appropriate risk.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00867113.

A Rare Case of a Ruptured Metastatic Hepatic Lesion from a Jejunal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Treated by Arterial Embolization

Patient: Male, 68

Final Diagnosis: Ruptured metastatic hepatic lesion from a jejunal GIST

Symptoms: Abdominal discomfort • hypotension

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Relationship between R1 resection, tumour rupture and recurrence in resected gastrointestinal stromal tumour

Background

According to guidelines, adjuvant treatment or re-excision should be considered after R1 resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). However, the prognostic significance of R1 resection is uncertain and tumour rupture confounds its assessment. Here, the impact of positive margins was examined and related to rupture in a population-based cohort.

Methods

Patients undergoing surgery for non-metastatic GIST since 2000 were identified in the sarcoma database of Oslo University Hospital. Margins were coded according to the residual tumour (R) classification and tumour rupture defined according to the Oslo criteria.

Results

Among 410 patients, there were 47 who underwent R1 resection and 52 had tumour rupture. The relative risk of R1 resection with rupture was 3·55 (95 per cent c.i. 2·09 to 6·03; P &lt; 0·001). In patients without rupture, there was no difference in estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival after R0 versus R1 resection (87·6 versus 93 per cent; hazard ratio (HR) 0·71, 95 per cent c.i. 0·17 to 2·98; P = 0·638); nor was there any difference among patients with rupture (37 versus 31 per cent; HR 1·31, 0·68 to 2·54; P = 0·420). In multivariable analysis, tumour rupture but not R1 resection was independently associated with recurrence. Twenty-four patients at very low, low or intermediate risk did not receive adjuvant imatinib after R1 resection and remained recurrence-free.

Conclusion

Positive resection margins are strongly associated with tumour rupture. R1 resection does not independently influence prognosis. Adjuvant imatinib may not be justified after R1 resection in the absence of tumour rupture or other high-risk features.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: clinicopathological characteristics and pathologic prognostic analysis

Objective

This study aimed to understand clinicopathological characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and correlation between pathologic features and clinical outcome.

Methods

We used 76 cases diagnosed as primary GISTs during January 2007 to July 2017 at Army Institute of Pathology, Thailand. Clinical, survival, and pathological data were collected and analyzed.

Results

Ages of the patients ranged from 15 to 88 years (M:F = 1:1). The most common presentation was gastrointestinal bleeding (39.7%). The most common site was the stomach (64.5%). Tumor size ranged from 0.6 to 25.5 cm (average 8.78 cm). Histologic types were spindle cell type (75%), mixed spindled-epithelioid type (17.1%), and epithelioid type (7.9%). The majority of histologic subtype was diffuse hypercellularity (67.1%). Tumor necrosis was found in 38.1% and 80% showed low mitotic counts. Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (27.6%) are low-risk category according to Miettinen and Lasota’s algorithm. Metastasis was found in 27.7%, mostly occurs within 2 years, and is correlated with tumor size > 10 cm (P = 0.023), non-spindle cell histologic type (P = 0.027), mitotic count > 5/5mm² (P = 0.000), myxoid change (P = 0.011), and mucosal invasion (P = 0.002). Recurrence was found in 8.1%, mostly occurs within 7 years, and correlated with myxoid change (P = 0.045).

Conclusion

We found that most of GISTs show spindle cell type and low-risk category. Metastasis was correlated with tumor size > 10 cm, non-spindle cell histologic type, mitotic count > 5/5mm², myxoid change, and mucosal invasion. Recurrence was correlated with myxoid change.

KIT exon 11 and PDGFRA exon 18 gene mutations in gastric GIST: proposal of a short panel for predicting therapeutic response

Background

GIST is the most common mesenchymal tumor of gastrointestinal tract and is more frequent in stomach. Its main mutations affect KIT and PDGFRA genes. Full genetic analysis panels are currently used to study mutations in GIST and other tumors. Considering that in gastric GIST KIT gene mutations in exon 11 are sensitive to IM whereas PDGFRΑ gene mutations in exon 18 (D842V) are resistant to the same drug, the aim of this study is to focus on these two molecular targets as a short alternative panel for predicting therapeutic response in gastric GIST which might optimize resources.

Methods

The genotypes of 38 cases of primary GIST were determined by performing bidirectional DNA sequencing.

Results

Exon 11 of KIT gene showed mutations in 65.3% and the exon 18 of PDGFRA gene showed 9% of cases. So it was possible to determine a subgroup of tumors which presented mutations in KIT exon 11 and PDGFRA exon 18.

Conclusion

Considering all of the foregoing analyzed globally, the application of short panel has impact on the cost and time of release of results to the physician, allowing a rapid approach to patients eligible for treatment with the target therapy.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of primary appendiceal stromal tumors

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) account for less than 1% of all gastrointestinal tumors. The biological behaviors of GISTs vary from benign to malignant. GISTs are common in the stomach (55.6%) and small intestine (31.8%), but rarely in the rectum, colon (6%), and other sites (5.5%). Currently, the majority of published reports of primary appendiceal stromal tumors (PASTs) are case reports or case series.

Methods

The PASTs described in this study were identified from a literature review (23 cases) and our center (one case). The relationship between PAST gross types and clinicopathological factors was analyzed and summarized. At the same time, the study also analyzed the related risk factors and survival of PASTs and GISTs.

Results

Twenty-four cases of PASTs were compared with 254 cases of GISTs from our center. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the two groups in tumor size (P < 0.001), histological type (P = 0.013), CD34 expression (P < 0.001), and DOG-1 expression (P < 0.001). Disease-free survival (DFS) analysis of 11 cases of PASTs and 227 cases of GISTs found that a comparison of 3-year and 5-year DFS was not statistically significant (P = 0.894 and P = 0.846, respectively). In the DFS multivariate analysis, tumor mucosal ulceration, tumor size, and NIH risk classification were independent prognostic factors in 3-year and 5-year DFS.

Conclusion

In this study, there was no significance in the survival of patients with appendix and gastric stromal tumors, which we hypothesized to be associated with the low sample size and incomplete follow-up records. Based on this, we conclude that the prognosis of primary appendiceal stromal tumors may be better than gastric tumors, but this needs to be confirmed in further prospective studies.

Surgical and medical management of small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A report of the Dutch GIST registry

BACKGROUND

A cohort of 201 patients with small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated between January 1st, 2009 and December 31st, 2016 in five GIST expertise centers in the Netherlands was analyzed. Goal of this study was to describe the clinical, surgical and pathological characteristics of this rare subpopulation of GIST patients, registered in the Dutch GIST registry.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes and risk factors of patients with small bowel GIST who underwent surgery or treated with systemic therapy were analyzed. A classification was made based on disease status at diagnosis (localized vs. metastasized).

RESULTS

201 patients with small bowel GIST were registered of which 138 patients (69%) were diagnosed with localized disease and 63 patients (31%) with metastatic disease. Approximately 19% of the patients had emergency surgery, and in 22% GIST was an accidental finding. In patients with high risk localized disease, recurrence occurred less often in patients who received adjuvant treatment (4/32) compared to patients who did not (20/31, p < 0.01). Disease progression during palliative imatinib treatment occurred in 23 patients (28%) after a median of 20.7 (range 1.8-47.1) months. Ongoing response was established in 52/82 patients on first line palliative treatment with imatinib after a median treatment time of 30.6 (range 2.5-155.3) months.

CONCLUSION

Patients with small-bowel GIST more frequently present with metastatic disease when compared to patients with gastric GIST in literature. We advocate for Prospective registration of these patients and investigate the use of surgery in patients with limited metastatic disease.

Retrospective evaluation of toceranib phosphate (Palladia®) use in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of dogs

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are uncommon intestinal neoplasms in the dog. Literature regarding adjunctive therapy for GISTs in dogs is sparse. High‐risk GISTs in humans respond to tyrosine kinase inhibition in the adjuvant setting.

Objectives

To review cases of toceranib phosphate use in dogs with GISTs and provide initial assessment of possible biological activity. A secondary aim was to evaluate patient and tumor characteristics for possible prognostic value.

Animals

Twenty‐seven dogs with confirmed GISTs based on histopathology and immunohistochemistry treated with toceranib.

Methods

Retrospective study in which cases of toceranib use in dogs with GIST were solicited using the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Oncology and Small Animal Internal Medicine listservs.

Results

Five of 7 dogs with gross disease experienced clinical benefit (71%; 3 complete responses, 1 partial response, 1 stable disease). These included 2 dogs with durable responses after toceranib discontinuation. Median progression‐free interval (PFI) in dogs with gross disease was 110 weeks (range, 36‐155 weeks). Median PFI in dogs with microscopic disease was 67 weeks (range, 9‐257 weeks). Metastasis at diagnosis (P = 0.04) and high mitotic index (P < 0.001) were associated with shorter PFI in toceranib‐treated dogs.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Biological activity of toceranib is evident in dogs with gross disease. Metastasis of GIST at diagnosis, as well as high tumor mitotic index, was associated with shorter PFI in toceranib‐treated dogs. Larger studies are needed to define postsurgical risk and refine the use of toceranib in dogs with gross and microscopic GIST.

A 4-month-old boy with gastrointestinal stromal tumor of mesocolon

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are very uncommon in pediatric patients, and they are distinct clinical-pathological and molecular deviations from their adult counterparts. Most pediatric GISTs lack the c-kit or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) genes mutations. To date, there is no published standard guidelines available for the best treatment of pediatric GISTs, especially for infant GIST. Therefore, we report a case of 4-month-old infant with GIST of mesocolon without KIT/PDGFRA mutation. We also review the clinical, biological, and genetic features of pediatric GISTs and re-think several questions that could affect clinical practice.

Importance of Early Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach: Our 5-Year, Single-Center Experience

Objective:

The aim of this study was to investigate clinicopathologic characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of patients who underwent surgery with a diagnosis of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the stomach.

Methods:

In this single center study, the data of a total of 42 patients diagnosed with a GIST of the stomach in our center between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age was 60.6 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.47/1. Patients presented with various complaints (21 patients had stomach pain,14 patients were asymptomatic, 3 patients had hemorrhage, 2 patients had heartburn and acidity,1 patient had intumescence,1 patient had nausea and vomiting), and all patients underwent surgery. The initial diagnosis was made with endoscopy in 19 patients, with computed tomography in 21 patients, and with magnetic resonance imaging in 2 patients. Local excision or wedge resection was performed in 27 patients, whereas subtotal gastrectomy was performed in 15 patients.

Results:

The mean tumor diameter was 5.66 cm. Pathologically, 25 patients had very low, 5 patients had low, 6 patients had moderate, and 6 patients had high-grade malignancy. The patients with moderate- to high-grade malignancy received imatinib. Liver metastasis occurred in 2 patients. The mean follow-up was 33 months. The mean disease-free survival time was 31.72 months, and the mean disease-specific (n = 2) survival time was 31.25 months. All patients including metastatic ones were still alive.

Conclusions:

Our study results show that frequent use of imaging studies and increased use of endoscopic scans for various reasons may increase the rate of incidentally detected gastric stromal tumors. High rates of disease-free survival can be achieved in GIST patients who are in the low-risk group due to the early diagnosis.

Comparing the long-term outcomes among patients with stomach and small intestine gastrointestinal stromal tumors: An analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common sarcoma arising from the gastrointestinal tract. Data regrading long-term prognosis based on tumor location (stomach vs small intestine) are mixed, so we aimed to analyze their outcomes using a large national oncology database.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for cases of stomach and small intestine GIST between the years 2004 and 2014. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors related to survival were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of 18 900 total patients, those with small intestine GIST had larger median tumor size (6.2 cm; interquartile range [IQR], 3.8 to 10.0 vs stomach: 5.0 cm; IQR, 3.0 to 9.0; P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of tumors with ≥5 mitoses/50 HPF (29.3% vs stomach: 24.2%; P < 0.001). Unadjusted median overall survival (OS) was longer for patients with stomach GIST (10.3 years) as compared to small intestine GIST (9.4 years) (P = 0.01). After controlling for patient and tumor-related factors, however, OS did not differ between stomach and small intestine GIST (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.61; P = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with small intestine GIST more commonly have larger, high mitotic rate tumors, but despite these worse prognostic features, tumor location did not independently impact OS.

A cohort study of prognostic factors associated with recurrence or metastasis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of stomach

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. The major risk factors of recurrence and metastasis are mitotic index and tumor size. This study investigates the risk of recurrence and metastasis in solely gastric GIST. The primary outcome is to evaluate risk of recurrence and metastasis. The secondary outcome is to analyse survival rates of patients who have recurrence and metastasis after curative resection.

Method

A cohort of patients who underwent curative resection of gastric GIST between January 2006 to December 2016 was reviewed. The diagnosis was confirmed with positive CD34, DOG1 or KIT (CD117) immunohistochemistry. Risk factors of recurrence and metastasis were analyzed.

Results

Sixty-eight patients who received curative resection and diagnosed as gastric GIST were included in this study. Twenty (29.41%) had recurrence or metastasis. The median follow up time was 31.95 months. The mostcommon type of surgery was partial gastric resection. There were statistically-significant differences between mitotic index 6 HPF or 6 HPF in tumor size 0-5 cm, 5-10 cm and 10 cm and the risk of recurrence or metastasis (p-value 0.036). In tumors sized 6-10 cm, patients with mitotic index 6 HPF had longer survival than patients with mitotic index 6 HPF (p-value 0.0147).

Conclusion

The factor that determines the outcome of recurrence or metastasis in solely gastric GIST is high mitotic index count. Patients who have abdominal pain may be suspected as advanced disease. The type of operation and tumor size are not associated with recurrence or metastasis.

•

The factor that determines the outcome of recurrence or metastasis in gastric GIST is high mitotic index count more than 6.

•

Patients who have abdominal pain may be suspected as advanced disease.

•

The tumor size are not associated with recurrence or metastasis.

•

The overall survival did not depend on the tumor size, in contrast, the overall survival depends on the mitotic index.

Radiotherapy for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

OBJECTIVE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, which frequently cause intraabdominal metastases. The current standard of care is surgery for localized cases, and adjuvant imatinib is recommended for tumors with a high risk of recurrence. To date, radiotherapy has not been commonly accepted as a part of multimodality treatment approach other than palliation. However, recently published case reports and some small series suggest that radiotherapy is a valuable option for controlling locally progressive, drug-resistant disease. The aim of this review is to provide a viewpoint from a radiation oncologist concerning the management of GISTs, especially rectal GIST, and clarify the role and technical aspects of radiotherapy in the treatment approach.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search in PubMed using the keywords "radiotherapy for rectal GIST" and "rectal GIST" was undertaken. The literature search included the related articles after 1995.

STUDY SELECTION

The main articles including rectal GIST case reports and GIST series containing rectal cases were the primary references.

RESULTS

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. However, to date, radiotherapy is included in the multidisciplinary treatment strategy of rectal GISTs in some circumstances with palliative, adjuvant, or definitive intent using different treatment doses and fields.

CONCLUSIONS

Recently reported long-term local control rates indicate that GIST is a radiosensitive disease. This makes radiotherapy a valuable alternative in GIST management with curative intent, especially in patients who (1) cannot tolerate or are resistant to chemotherapy agents, (2) have an unresectable disease, (3) have a gross or microscopic residual disease after surgery, and (4) have a recurrent disease.

Pediatric gastrointestinal stromal tumors-a review of diagnostic modalities

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are exceedingly rare tumors in the pediatric population, as a result many clinicians either may never see this diagnosis or will encounter it only a few times throughout their careers. It is imperative in the pediatric population to follow appropriate steps to ensure a swift diagnosis and referral to specialized centers that are equipped with the multidisciplinary teams accustomed to treating rare diseases. This review aims to discuss the most recent data available on the diagnostic modalities utilized in cases of suspected Pediatric GIST.

Adult Intussusception due to Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Rare Case Report, Comprehensive Literature Review, and Diagnostic Challenges in Low-Resource Countries

We present a rare case of gastrogastric intussusception due to gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and the largest comprehensive literature review of published case reports on gastrointestinal (GI) intussusception due to GIST in the past three decades. We found that the common presenting symptoms were features of gastrointestinal obstruction and melena. We highlight the diagnostic challenges faced in low-resource countries. Our findings emphasize the importance of early clinical diagnosis in low-resource settings in order to guide timely management. In addition, histological analysis of the tumor for macroscopic and microscopic characteristics including mitotic index and c-Kit/CD117 status should be obtained to guide adjuvant therapy with imatinib mesylate. Periodic follow-up to access tumor recurrence is fundamental and should be the standard of care.

Tumor rupture of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors during endoscopic resection: a risk factor for peritoneal metastasis?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. Up to the present time, complete surgical excision has been the standard treatment for primary GISTs greater than 2 cm. It is well known that tumor rupture during surgery is an independent risk factor for peritoneal metastasis; however, it is not known whether the risk of peritoneal metastasis increases in cases where the tumor is ruptured during endoscopic resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 A total of 195 patients treated for GIST between January 2014 and December 2016 in our hospital were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups according to whether the tumor was ruptured during endoscopic resection. The rate of peritoneal metastasis in patients in the two groups who also suffered perforation was investigated from the follow-up results.

RESULTS

 Approximately 55.4 % of all patients were female and the average age of the study group was 59.0 ± 10.3 years. Of the 195 patients, the tumors in 27 were ruptured and the remaining 168 patients underwent en bloc resection. There was no statistically significant difference in gender or age between the two groups. The median tumor size (maximum diameter) in all patients was 1.5 cm (0.3 - 5.0 cm): 2.5 cm (0.8 - 5.0 cm) and 1.4 cm (0.3 - 4.0 cm) in the tumor rupture group and en bloc resection group, respectively ( P  < 0.001). Most of the tumors were located in the gastric fundus. At a median follow-up of 18.7 ± 10.2 months, neither tumor recurrence (liver metastasis, peritoneal metastasis, local recurrence) nor mortality related to GISTs were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

 Tumor rupture during endoscopic resection of gastric GISTs may not be a risk factor for peritoneal metastasis.

Submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection for extraluminal tumors: a novel endoscopic method for en bloc resection of predominant extraluminal growing subepithelial tumors or extra-gastrointestinal tumors (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The management of subepithelial tumors with a predominant extraluminal growth pattern or extra-GI tumors can be challenging and traditionally requires a surgical resection that is not only invasive but may carry a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel endoscopic technique termed submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection for extraluminal tumors (STER-ET).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients who underwent STER-ET for GI subepithelial tumors with a predominant extraluminal growth pattern or extra-GI tumors located at the level of cardia or the proximal part of the lesser curvature of the stomach seen on cross-sectional imaging between January 2016 and March 2017.

RESULTS

Eight patients underwent STER-ET. The mean (± standard deviation) tumor size was 2.8 ± 0.6 cm and 2.3 ± 0.8 cm in longest and shortest dimension, respectively. The average procedure time was 67 ± 4.4 minutes. The rates of curative en bloc resection and en bloc retrieval was 100% and 87.5%, respectively. On final histology, 6 tumors were GI stromal tumors, 1 was a schwannoma, and 1 was a foregut cyst. Five patients had capnoperitoneum during the procedure and required abdominal decompression. One patient had a small mucosotomy successfully treated with a hemostatic clip. There were no major adverse events or deaths. The median length of hospital stay was 3 days. There was no residual tumor on surveillance imaging after a mean follow-up period of 10.0 ± 2.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

STER-ET is a novel technique that appears to be safe and effective in achieving a curative resection for GI subepithelial tumors with a predominantly extraluminal growth pattern or extraluminal tumors in a selected group of patients. However, larger studies are required to validate our finding.

Role of PLK1 signaling pathway genes in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

In previous studies by the authors, aurora kinase A (AURKA) was demonstrated as an independent poor prognostic marker for the recurrence of localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and for the progression of advanced GISTs. In the present study, the prognostic effect of genes involved in cell cycle regulation in GISTs was further examined. Leading edge analysis in gene set enrichment analysis was used to identify the most common genes in the top 10 enriched gene sets of high-risk patients with GISTs in a Japanese study. The obtained gene list was uploaded to the Pathway Interaction Database to search for critical pathways. Selected genes within the pathway were subsequently verified through immunohistochemistry (IHC) in another cohort of patients. A total of 5 genes in 'PLK1 signaling events,' namely AURKA, polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), cell division cycle 25C (CDC25C), budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles (BUB1), and targeting protein for Xklp2 (TPX2), were identified for subsequent study. Among the Japanese cohort, all 5 genes, except BUB1, were significant prognostic factors for poor recurrence-free survival (RFS). Among 141 patients enrolled for the IHC study, all 5 genes exhibited variable expression patterns. In the association study, only AURKA exhibited significant overexpression in non-gastric tumors. Although all 5 genes were considered as risk factors for poor RFS based on a univariate analysis, only the mitotic count and expression levels of CDC25C, BUB1, and TPX2 retained prognostic effects in the multivariate analysis. The PLK1 signaling pathway is crucial in the disease progression of GISTs. Genes within this pathway may serve as predictive markers for adjuvant therapy.

Comprehensive molecular screening by next generation sequencing reveals a distinctive mutational profile of KIT/PDGFRA genes and novel genomic alterations: results from a 20-year cohort of patients with GIST from north-western Greece

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are mesenchymal neoplasms that usually carry an activating mutation in KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) genes with predictive and prognostic significance. We investigated the extended mutational status of GIST in a patient population of north-western Greece in order to look at geopraphic/genotypic distinctive traits.

Patient and methods

Clinicopathological and molecular data of 38 patients diagnosed from 1996 to 2016 with GIST in the region of Epirus in Greece were retrospectively assessed. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumours were successfully analysed for mutations in 54 genes with oncogenic potential. Next generation sequencing was conducted by using the Ion AmpliSeqCancer Hotspot Panel V.2 for DNA analysis (Thermofisher Scientific).

Results

Among 38 tumours, 24 (63.16%) and seven (18.42%) of the tumours harboured mutations in the KIT and PDGFRA genes, respectively, while seven (18.42%) tumours were negative for either KIT or PDGFRA mutation. No mutations were detected in five (13.16%) cases. Concomitant mutations of BRAF and fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) genes were observed in two patients with KIT gene mutation. Two patients with KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GIST had mutations in either KRAS or phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) genes. There was no significant survival difference regarding the exonic site of mutation in either KIT or PDGFRA gene. The presence of a mutation in pathway effectors downstream of KIT or PDGFRA, such as BRAF, KRAS or PIK3CA, was associated with poor prognosis. Adverse prognosticators were also high mitotic index and the advanced disease status at diagnosis.

Conclusions

We report comparable incidence of KIT and PDGFRA mutation in patients with GIST from north-western Greece as compared with cohorts from other regions. Interestingly, we identified rare mutations on RAS, BRAF and PIK3CA genes in patients with poor prognosis.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) presenting in the liver: Diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic issues

CONTEXT

Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GIST) presenting in the liver are exceedingly rare and raise difficult diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

METHODS

We report on two cases of liver E-GIST with different clinical presentations. We describe their clinical and imaging features, their histopathological and molecular characteristics, their treatment and their course.

RESULTS

The first case was that of a 56-year-old male presenting with a 10-cm liver mass; the initial diagnosis, made in 1986 from a biopsy sample, was leiomyosarcoma; liver transplantation was performed in 1987; no extra-hepatic tumor was found; the course was uneventful until 1999, when tumor recurrence was diagnosed along the initial biopsy route; after reevaluation of available material, the definitive pathological diagnosis was GIST; imatinib treatment resulted in major response; the patient died of end-stage kidney disease 22 years after the initial diagnosis and 9 years after tumor recurrence. The second case is that of a 59-year-old female presenting with a 23-cm abdominal mass connected to the liver; on biopsy, the tumor was diagnosed as epithelioid GIST with exon 11 KIT mutation; imatinib treatment resulted in stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of E-GIST must be for any sarcoma presenting in the liver and confirmed by immunohistochemical and molecular techniques. Treatment might require aggressive strategies, which can be successful despite apparently adverse histoprognostic factors.

Non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is an accepted method of laparoscopic wedge resection, which is minimally invasive, for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). We established a type of LECS achieving a full-thickness resection, non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS), in an effort to prevent exposure of the peritoneal cavity to gastric intraluminal contents. We employed this surgical technique in 28 gastric GIST patients. We failed to complete NEWS in the initial two patients and in one patient with a large tumor (40 mm × 35 mm), but otherwise carried out the procedure successfully. Although a learning effect is speculated to occur, based on a decreasing trend in the operation time, the median operation time was 184 minutes showing that NEWS is still a time-consuming method. No significant differences were recognized in tumor size or location, except near the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), nor in the cross-sectional circumference. NEWS is feasible and appears to be a good option, especially for small GISTs with mucosal ulceration rendering full-thickness enucleation by opening of the gastric wall unfeasible.