Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels

Cholesterol as an independent predictor of outcome after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The debate on the role of high serum cholesterol levels in cardiovascular disease or chronic vascular rejection in kidney-transplanted patients has not yet been settled.

METHODS

We studied the influence of serum cholesterol at 1 year after transplantation on the failure risk in all 676 kidney graft recipients who survived with a functioning graft. Other variables included in this analysis were donor/recipient age and gender, original disease, race, number of HLA-A and -B mismatches, previous transplants, postmortal or living-related transplantation, and transplantation year. At 1 year after transplantation, we included: serum cholesterol, serum creatinine, proteinuria, and hypertension.

RESULTS

In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, serum cholesterol at 1 year after transplantation turned out to be an important, independent variable influencing all end points (adjusted for all other variables in the model). The influence on graft failure censored for death was log-linear, and there was interaction with serum creatinine at 1 year. The adverse effect of elevated serum cholesterol levels on the graft failure rate decreased with increasing serum creatinine levels. The influence of serum cholesterol on the rate ratio (RR) for patient failure was linear too, and here there was interaction with recipient age. The negative influence of serum cholesterol on the RR for patient failure decreased with increasing recipient age. The risk for over-all graft failure was influenced by increasing serum cholesterol levels, and there was interaction with recipient age. Because recipient age had interaction with donor age and serum creatinine, the influence of all four variables together on the RR was estimated. It is shown that whereas the RR for over-all graft failure in young recipients of a renal transplant increases significantly with higher cholesterol levels, there is very little influence on the RR of elderly recipients. The risk increases proportionally with increasing serum creatinine levels.

CONCLUSION

Serum cholesterol levels have an independent influence on graft, patient, and over-all graft failure.

Advances in the approach to acute coronary syndromes

Acute coronary syndromes is a new term that encompasses the many permutations of acute ischemic heart disease. Management guidelines can help steer clinicians through diagnosis and facilitate rational selection of therapy from the myriad of available treatments.

Effect of statin therapy on restenosis after coronary stent implantation

The effect of statins on the development of restenosis and clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation was assessed in a retrospective analysis of 525 consecutive patients. Baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics did not differ between 258 patients with and 267 patients without statin therapy. Statin therapy was associated with a significantly (p<0.04) improved survival free of myocardial infarction and a significant reduction in repeat target vessel revascularization procedures (27.9% vs. 36.7%, p<0.05) during 6-month follow-up. Minimal lumen diameter was significantly larger (1.98+/-0.88 vs. 1.78+/-0.88 mm, p = 0.01), late lumen loss was significantly less (0.64+/-0.8 vs. 0.8+/-0.8 mm, p = 0.032), and net gain significantly increased (1.2+/-0.88 vs. 0.98+/- 0.92 mm, p = 0. 009) in patients receiving statin therapy. Dichotomous angiographic restenosis (> or =50%) rates were significantly lower, with 25.4% in the statin group compared with 38% in the no-statin group (p<0.005). Multivariate analysis identified statin therapy (p = 0.005), minimal lumen diameter immediately after stenting (p = 0.02), and stent length (p = 0.02) as independent predictors for subsequent restenosis development. Thus, statin therapy is associated with reduced recurrence rates and improved clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation.

Use of statins and blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients with hypercholesterolemia

High serum cholesterol has been frequently reported in patients with arterial hypertension in whom it might influence the blood pressure control. The aim of this study was to compare the extent of blood pressure changes in 41 patients with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, taking antihypertensive drugs and treated for 3 months with statins (HC-S; pravastatin or simvastatin) and compared with matched controls with high (HC-D; 44) or normal serum cholesterol (NC-D; 45) undergoing antihypertensive treatment combined with dietary treatment alone. After 3 months of follow-up, a greater reduction of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure values was observed in HC-S patients (ASBP/DBP, -11.3 +/-3/-10.6 +/- 2%) when compared with both HC-D (deltaSBP/DBP, -6.6 +/- 2/-6.1 +/- 2%; p < 0.05) and NC-D (deltaSBP/DBP, -6.9 +/- 2/-6.8 +/- 1.5%; p < 0.05). In statin-treated patients, a slight linear relation has been found between the percentage changes in DBP and those in plasma total cholesterol (R = 0.37, p = 0.043), whereas no relation was found with SBP changes (R =0.11; p = 0.35). In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that the use of statins in combination with antihypertensive drugs can improve blood pressure control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and high serum cholesterol levels. The additional blood pressure reduction observed in patients treated with statins is clinically relevant and only partially related to the lipid-lowering effect.

Non-lipid-related effects of statins

The beneficial effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) on coronary events have generally been attributed to their hypocholesterolaemic properties. However, as mevalonate and other intermediates of cholesterol synthesis (isoprenoids) are necessary for cell proliferation and other important cell functions, effects other than cholesterol reduction may explain the pharmacological properties of statins. In the present review, we discuss the current knowledge on the nonlipid-related effects of statins, with a special emphasis on their potential benefits in different diseases, such as atherosclerosis and cancer. The mechanism(s) responsible for their favourable properties are also reviewed.

Lipid management and control of other coronary risk factors in the postmenopausal woman

This review identifies coronary heart disease (CHD) as the leading cause of mortality among postmenopausal women and highlights the well-documented problem of underrecognition and undertreatment of women who are at risk for or who already have CHD. This undertreatment encompasses both preventive care (i.e., drug treatment for lipid management) and more invasive treatments (e.g., revascularization procedures). Preventive interventions to reduce dyslipidemia and control other coronary risk factors can lessen CHD mortality and morbidity in the postmenopausal woman.

Benefits of lipid lowering on vascular reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease and average cholesterol levels: a mechanism for reducing clinical events?

BACKGROUND

The favorable effects of lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol on reducing clinical events in patients with coronary disease have been well established. The mechanisms responsible for this benefit, however, have not been fully understood. This study examined the impact of lipid-lowering therapy on endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity in a subgroup of patients after myocardial infarction with average cholesterol levels who participated in the Cholesterol Recurrent Events (CARE) study to determine whether an effect on endothelial function is a viable mechanism for the observed reduction in clinical events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Participants were recruited from among volunteers in the CARE trial at 2 university-based outpatient cardiology clinics. Patients were randomly assigned to pravastatin or placebo. Plasma lipids were measured at baseline and semiannually thereafter. During the final 6 months of the trial, vasoreactivity was assessed by change in ultrasound-determined brachial artery diameter in response to blood pressure cuff-induced ischemia (endothelium-dependent) and to nitroglycerin, a direct vasodilator. Differences in response were examined between the 2 randomized groups. The relation between change in LDL-cholesterol from baseline to year 5 and the magnitude of endothelium-dependent vasodilation also was examined. There was significantly greater endothelium-dependent vasodilation observed in the pravastatin group compared with the placebo group (13% vs 8%, P =.0002), with no difference between the groups in their response to the endothelium-independent vasodilator nitroglycerin. The magnitude of the endothelium-dependent vasodilation was significantly correlated with the percent change in LDL-cholesterol from baseline to final visit (r = 0.49, P =.015).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the use of pravastatin in patients after myocardial infarction with average cholesterol levels is associated with greater endothelium-dependent vasodilation compared with those who received placebo. The magnitude of this vasodilatory response is correlated to the reduction in LDL-cholesterol. This improvement in endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity may be a likely mechanism, at least in part, for the reduction in recurrent clinical events observed and reported in the CARE study.

Ethnicity and risk factors for coronary heart disease in diabetes mellitus

INTRODUCTION

The Framingham equation can be used to predict the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and so to target risk factor intervention. Reservations have been applied to its use in south Asian populations since the high CHD mortality in this group may not be accounted for by traditional risk factors.

METHODS

We applied the Framingham equation to 1826 patients with diabetes of whom 1215 were of white Caucasian and 611 south Asian origin. Having calculated the 10-year CHD risks the contribution of risk factors were compared between ethnic groups.

RESULTS

Mean 10-year CHD risk was the same in the two ethnic groups (20.7 vs. 21.5%, white Caucasian vs. south Asian men and 16.5 vs. 15.9%, white Caucasian vs. south Asian women). However, the risk factor profile was different between the two groups. Mean total cholesterol was lower in south Asians (5.23 vs. 5.41 mmol/l, south Asian vs. white Caucasian men (p = 0.01) and 5.38 vs. 5.68 mmol/l, south Asian vs. white Caucasian women (p < 0.001)). HDL cholesterol levels were also lower (median HDL cholesterol 0.94 vs. 1.11 mmol/l, south Asian vs. white Caucasian men (p < 0.001) and 1.07 vs. 1.3 mmol/l, south Asian vs. white Caucasian women (p < 0.0001)) leading to higher total: HDL cholesterol ratios (5.48 vs. 4.78, south Asian vs. white Caucasian men (p = 0.032) and 4.91 vs. 4.26, south Asian vs. white Caucasian women (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Calculated 10-year CHD risks are the same in south Asian and white Caucasian diabetic patients but the factors contributing to this risk differ. Different management of these risk factors may account for the higher mortality from CHD in those of south Asian origin.

Cardiovascular disease prevention practices by U.S. Physicians for patients with diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Cardiovascular diseases account for the majority of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We describe patterns of cardiovascular disease primary prevention practices used for patients with diabetes by U.S. office-based physicians.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We analyzed a representative sample of 14,038 visits from the 1995 and 1996 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (NAMCS), including 1,489 visits by patients with diabetes. Physicians completed visit forms describing diagnoses, demographics, services provided, and current medications. Diabetes was defined by diagnostic codes; patients with ischemic heart disease or younger than 30 years were excluded. We estimated national visit volumes by extrapolation using NAMCS sampling weights. Independent determinants of prevention practices were evaluated using multiple logistic regression. Actual visits sampled translated into an estimated 407 million office visits in 1995 and 1996, of which 44.8 million (11%) were by patients with diabetes. Overall, patients with diabetes received more cardiovascular disease prevention services than patients without diabetes, including cholesterol reduction (8% vs 5%, P <.001) and exercise counseling (22% vs 13%, P <.001), blood pressure measurement (82% vs 72%, P <.001), and aspirin prescription (5% vs 2%, P <.001). Patients with diabetes and hyperlipidemia were more likely to receive lipid-lowering medications than patients without these diagnoses (67% vs 51%, P =.007), but those who had diabetes and hypertension or who smoked were no more likely than those without to receive antihypertensive medications or smoking cessation counseling, respectively. These effects persisted in multiple logistic regression analyses controlling for potential confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diabetes visiting U.S. physicians in 1995 and 1996 received somewhat more cardiovascular disease prevention services than patients without diabetes. Absolute rates of services, however, remained lower than desired based on national recommendations. Current evidence suggests that wider implementation of these recommendations can be expected to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes.

Comparison of the activity and disposition of the novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor, SCH58235, and its glucuronide, SCH60663

Previous studies described the metabolism-based discovery of a potent, selective inhibitor of intestinal absorption of cholesterol, SCH58235 (Ezetimibe). Here we demonstrate that the phenolic glucuronide (SCH60663) of SCH58235, was more potent at inhibiting cholesterol absorption in rats than SCH58235, when administered by the intraduodenal route. To understand the increased potency of the glucuronide, the metabolism and distribution of SCH58235 and SCH60663 were studied in bile duct-cannulated rats. One minute after intraduodenal delivery of SCH58235, significant levels of compound were detected in portal plasma; >95% was glucuronidated, indicating that the intestine was metabolizing SCH58235 to its glucuronide. When intraduodenally delivered as SCH58235, the compound was glucuronidated, moved through the intestinal wall, into portal plasma, through the liver, and into bile. However, when delivered as SCH60663, >95% of the compound remained in the intestinal lumen and wall, which may explain its increased potency. Significant inhibition of cholesterol absorption and glucuronidation of SCH58235 occurred when SCH58235 was intravenously injected into bile duct-cannulated rats. Autoradiographic analysis demonstrated that drug related material was located throughout the intestinal villi, but concentrated in the villus tip. These data indicate that (a) SCH58235 is rapidly metabolized in the intestine to its glucuronide; (b) once glucuronidated, the dose is excreted in the bile, thereby delivering drug related material back to the site of action and (c) the glucuronide is more potent than the parent possibly because it localizes to the intestine. Taken together, these data may explain the potency of SCH58235 in the rat (ID(50) = 0.0015 mg kg(-1)) and rhesus monkey (ID(50) = 0.0005 mg kg(-1)).

[Coronary risk and prescription in primary care patients with hypercholesterolemia]

OBJECTIVE

In patients with hypercholesterolaemia determinate the prevalence of high coronary risk (CR), study the lipid lowering treatment applied and determinate if there is any change in CR after a period of treatment.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

EMPLACEMENT

Primary care.

PATIENTS

583 patients with hypercholesterolaemia both sex, older than 25 years registered in chronic mobility, randomized selected.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

Applying the Framingham coronary multivariate risk method we estimate high CR > 20%. Patients with a previous history of cardiovascular event, were treated in a 50%, more frequently younger subjects, rising 220 mg/dl of final cholesterol level. Patients without any cardiovascular event known, the 32.5% (28.0-36.7%) have a CR > 20%. Subjects with high CR have 4.9 (3.0-8.2) more probability if receiving treatment than the others with lower risk. The lipid-lowering treatment is explained in a 67% because the high CR and the family history of coronary event. After at least one year period there is a reduction in those with high CR (difference relative of proportions 28.7% [20.4-37.1]).

Using thresholds based on risk of cardiovascular disease to target treatment for hypertension: modelling events averted and number treated

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the impact of using thresholds based on absolute risk of cardiovascular disease to target drug treatment to lower blood pressure in the community.

DESIGN

Modelling of three thresholds of treatment for hypertension based on the absolute risk of cardiovascular disease. 5 year risk of disease was estimated for each participant using an equation to predict risk. Net predicted impact of the thresholds on the number of people treated and the number of disease events averted over 5 years was calculated assuming a relative treatment benefit of one quarter.

SETTING

Auckland, New Zealand.

PARTICIPANTS

2158 men and women aged 35-79 years randomly sampled from the general electoral rolls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Predicted 5 year risk of cardiovascular disease event, estimated number of people for whom treatment would be recommended, and disease events averted over 5 years at different treatment thresholds.

RESULTS

46 374 (12%) Auckland residents aged 35-79 receive drug treatment to lower their blood pressure, averting an estimated 1689 disease events over 5 years. Restricting treatment to individuals with blood pressure >/=170/100 mm Hg and those with blood pressure between 150/90-169/99 mm Hg who have a predicted 5 year risk of disease >/=10% would increase the net number for whom treatment would be recommended by 19 401. This 42% relative increase is predicted to avert 1139/1689 (68%) additional disease events overall over 5 years compared with current treatment. If the threshold for 5 year risk of disease is set at 15% the number recommended for treatment increases by <10% but about 620/1689 (37%) additional events can be averted. A 20% threshold decreases the net number of patients recommended for treatment by about 10% but averts 204/1689 (12%) more disease events than current treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing treatment guidelines that use treatment thresholds based on absolute risk could significantly improve the efficiency of drug treatment to lower blood pressure in primary care.

Optimising care of acute myocardial infarction: results of a regional quality improvement project

The effects of a quality improvement intervention were evaluated in a before-after time-series study of 649 consecutive patients suffering acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the West Moreton Health District over 2.5 years from March 1996 through to August 1998. After a 6-month baseline period, clinical practice guidelines were issued followed by sequential feedback to providers of clinical indicator data over a 1-year period. Resultant changes in practice were then evaluated during a 12-month post-intervention period. The proportion of eligible patients receiving early thrombolysis, lipid-lowering drugs and cardiac rehabilitation increased, respectively, from 30.8 to 70.0% (P = 0.001), from 23.4 to 56.4% (P = 0.003), and from 23.6 to 54.3% (P = 0.003). The in-hospital death rate, incidence of postinfarct angina and mean length of stay decreased, respectively, from 15.8 to 8.6% (P = 0.02), from 30.1 to 14.3% (P < 0.001), and from 7.4 to 6.3 days (P = 0.001). Despite the absence of control groups, the present study suggested that clinical guidelines combined with feedback of clinical indicators were useful in improving quality of care.

Modern adjunctive pharmacotherapy of myocardial infarction

During acute myocardial infarction (MI), aspirin, beta-adrenergic antagonists and oral angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors should be used as an adjunct to reperfusion therapy. Medications upon discharge from the hospital should include aspirin and a beta-blocker. An ACE inhibitor should also be prescribed unless the ejection fraction is > 45%. Particular indications for an ACE inhibitor are an anterior MI, congestive heart failure, ejection fraction < 45% and mitral regurgitation. beta-blockers, when given to patients treated with ACE inhibitors, appear to produce an additional benefit compared with an ACE inhibitor alone. Based on the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) and Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) trials, a statin should also be given to subjects with low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels above 125 mg/dl, independent of total cholesterol levels. Therapy should be administered in an attempt to reduce the LDL-cholesterol level to 90-100 mg/dl (2.3-2.6 mM/l). In patients with normal or low levels on initial evaluation, screening for lipid abnormalities should be deferred for 2 months since acute phase responses and passive hepatic congestion can cause spuriously normal levels. Calcium channel blockers, nitrates, lidocaine, anti-arrhythmic drugs and i.v. magnesium should not be administered routinely after acute MI and their use should be restricted to selected settings.

Efficacy and tolerability of fluvastatin and bezafibrate in patients with hyperlipidemia and persistently high triglyceride levels

Hyperlipidemia is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Lipid-lowering therapy has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality in these patients. Combination therapy with a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor and a fibric-acid derivative has been reported to be more efficacious to reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides but may be associated with an increased risk of myositis. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of fluvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, alone and in combination with bezafibrate, a fibric-acid derivative. In a randomized controlled trial with 454 hypercholesterolemic patients (mean cholesterol, 8.6 +/- 1.6 mM), fluvastatin (20 mg/day) significantly lowered total plasma cholesterol levels (-12.5%; p < 0.0001 vs. placebo), LDL cholesterol (-14%; p < 0.0001), and triglycerides (-4%; p = 0.05). A small increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels (3%, NS) also was observed. Combination therapy with fluvastatin and bezafibrate (400 mg/day) in 71 patients with persistent hypertriglyceridemia during treatment with the statin resulted in a more pronounced reduction in triglyceride (-47%; p < 0.0001) and total cholesterol levels (-15%; p < 0.0001) than did fluvastatin alone. Furthermore, the additional bezafibrate significantly increased HDL cholesterol (+5%; p < 0.001). No significant increases in creatine phosphokinase levels or in frequency of myalgia were observed. In summary, fluvastatin decreases both cholesterol and triglyceride levels. In patients with persistent hypertriglyceridemia, combination therapy with fluvastatin and bezafibrate may be safely used to lower triglyceride and cholesterol levels more efficiently.

Cholesterol, stroke risk, and stroke prevention

Serum cholesterol traditionally has been considered a poor predictor of total stroke risk; however, it is associated positively with ischemic stroke risk and associated negatively with hemorrhagic stroke risk. Although studies failed to demonstrate stroke reduction using older cholesterol-lowering medications, recent study of the statin class of medications shows both consistent stroke and other cardiovascular benefits. Ischemic stroke and coronary heart disease share similar underlying mechanisms, likely explaining much of the therapeutic benefit from statins. Current research is directed at further determining groups of patients most likely to benefit from lipid reduction in stroke prevention. In the interim, patients with established atherosclerosis should be treated with a statin to achieve a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level less than 100 mg/dL.

Pravastatin compared to bezafibrate in the treatment of dyslipidemia in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Both HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fibric acid derivates are used for the treatment of dyslipidemia in Type 2 diabetes patients. The aim of this study was to compare the lipid lowering effect of 40 mg pravastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, and 400 mg bezafibrate, a fibric acid derivate, on serum lipids, lipoproteins and lipoprotein composition in 45 (22 men and 23 women) dyslipidemic, insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes patients.

METHOD

The study used a double-blind, cross-over design.

RESULTS

Pravastatin treatment was more effective in reducing total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, LDL-triglycerides, LDL-ApoB and LDL/HDL-cholesterol ratio (all p<0.001 between groups) and total/HDL-cholesterol and ApoA1/LDL-ApoB ratios (both p<0.01) and always induced a decrease in LDL-cholesterol concentrations and LDL/HDL-cholesterol ratio irrespective of baseline triglyceride concentration. Bezafibrate was more effective in increasing HDL-cholesterol (p<0.01 between groups), ApoA1 lipoprotein and decreasing triglycerides (both p<0.001 between groups) but induced an increase in LDL-cholesterol concentration particularly in patients with baseline triglyceride concentrations exceeding 2.0 mmol/l. With bezafibrate treatment the LDL-cholesterol/LDL-ApoB ratio showed a tendency to rise, suggesting a change in the LDL particle composition to a less small and dense form, while pravastatin treatment induced a decrease in this ratio suggesting a change in the LDL particle to a more dense form. With pravastatin treatment a small rise in HbA(1c) was observed.

CONCLUSION

Pravastatin treatment is superior in lowering cholesterol-enriched lipoprotein subpopulations and improving cardiovascular risk factors. Bezafibrate is more effective in raising HDL-cholesterol and alters LDL particle composition to a more favorable form.

CME Paper: Hormone Replacement Therapy for Prevention or Treatment of Atherosclerosis in Postmenopausal Women: Promises, Controversies, and Clinical Trials

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among men and women in the U.S. and other developed societies. However, myocardial infarction and stroke are uncommon in women until their sixth decade and beyond. Clinicians have long suspected that the delay of a decade or more in cardiovascular disease expression in women relative to men is due to the protective effects of estrogen prior to menopause. Reports from population based observational studies of the favorable effects of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality have led to enthusiasm for widespread use of estrogen by postmenopausal women for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. In support of the antiatherogenic potential of estrogen are studies in postmenopausal women showing favorable effects on lipoprotein levels, fibrinolysis, and vascular function. However, a secondary prevention trial in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease showed no cardiovascular benefit of hormone replacement therapy. Ongoing clinical trials and options to conventional hormone replacement therapy for cardiovascular protection will be discussed in this review. (c)2000 by CVRR, Inc.

Cholesterol reduction and stroke occurrence: an overview of randomized clinical trials

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of more than 6 months duration to describe how fatal and nonfatal strokes are related to cholesterol lowering and to the type of intervention. A total of 41 individual trials including approximately 80,000 subjects and followed for an average of about 4 years were included in the overview. There was a 16% (95% CI, 7-25%) reduction in risk of stroke among treated patients compared to control patients (test for heterogeneity, p = 0.76). When trials that used different interventions were separately examined, a significant reduction in stroke occurrence was observed only for those using statins as active treatment (risk reduction 23%; 95% CI 13-33%). A variance-weighted regression analysis of the logarithmic odds ratios for stroke incidence against the percentage of cholesterol reduction indicated that a reduction of fatal and nonfatal stroke can be obtained for a cholesterol reduction of 9% (95% CI 6.8-13.6%). The combined data of primary and secondary prevention trials indicate that a large reduction of blood cholesterol, achievable with statin drugs, can reduce the incidence of stroke.

Diabetic dyslipidaemia

Dyslipidaemia is an important component of the metabolic syndrome observed in patients with type 2 diabetes, and is characterized by moderate hypertriglyceridaemia and low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations. Dyslipidaemia contributes to increased vascular risk and is therefore a good target for therapeutic intervention in the form of glycaemic control, lifestyle measures and hypolipidaemic drugs. It is proposed that lipid abnormalities in type 2 diabetes are secondary consequences of insulin resistance. Any approach that lowers insulin resistance would be anticipated to have a beneficial effect on dyslipidaemia, but in many cases patients with type 2 diabetes fail to achieve normal lipidaemia through diet, exercise and glycaemic control. Subgroup analyses of major clinical trials suggests that lipid-lowering therapy reduces CHD risk in patients with diabetes, but trials performed specifically in populations of patients with diabetes are ongoing. Until then, patients with type 2 diabetes who have established CHD or high individual risk already warrant aggressive lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy. In the author's view, when ongoing studies are complete it is likely that most patients with type 2 diabetes will be prescribed lipid-lowering drugs.

Raising low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is an important target of therapy

Recent clinical trials in patients with coronary heart disease indicate, for the very first time, that increasing low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol significantly reduces the cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients whose only lipid abnormality was low HDL with normal levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides. These data provide a compelling scientific basis for a more targeted and segmental approach to managing patients with dyslipidemia, where decreasing elevated levels of LDL cholesterol and increasing low levels of HDL cholesterol should comprise dual targets of pharmacotherapy.

Prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal mucosal injury: risk factors for serious complications

BACKGROUND

1-2% of all patients under non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy are exposed to serious upper gastrointestinal complications. The policy of prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal mucosal injury by using misoprostol or suppressing acid secretion is still a matter of debate.

AIMS

To discuss the effectiveness of prophylaxis of a gastrointestinal complication during non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment, according to the number and relevance of risk factors.

PATIENTS

A total of 8.843 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, admitted to the widest prospective multicentre mega-trial, on 6-month complication prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers.

METHODS

The results are presented in terms of the number of patients to be treated (number needed to treat) in order to prevent one serious upper gastrointestinal complication, and corrected for the number of patients, that receiving the prophylaxis therapy, would lead to one additional withdrawal (number needed to harm).

RESULTS

The base-line risk for a complication strongly depended on the number and relevance of risk factors: history of peptic ulcer disease, of gastrointestinal bleeding, of cardiovascular disease, and age. In the general study population, the relative risk reduction of gastrointestinal complications with misoprostol was 40%: thus the number needed to treat to prevent 1 event was 250 in the experimental period (6 months) or 125 when normalized at one-year treatment (1 year number needed to treat]. When considering the prophylaxis gain in intermediate (risk 1-2%) or high risk subjects (patients with a probability of an event over 2%, for the presence of 1 important risk factor or multiple factors), the 1-year number needed to treat rapidly drops from about 100 to about 17. The number needed to harm for one withdrawal was 18. The number needed to treat corrected for withdrawals in order to avoid major complications rises from 125 to 132 in the general population of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users; from 102 to 105 in subjects at intermediate risk, such as patients with history of cardiovascular disease; in the groups at high risk, from 26 to 27 (patients with history of peptic ulcer disease), and from 16 to 17 (patients with history of peptic ulcer disease, cardiovascular disease and aged over 65 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at intermediate and high risk for complications from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers should be considered for prophylaxis. In this group of patients, misoprostol prevention of severe complications is effective, and its clinical relevance similar to that of other preventive measures in medical practice.

Safety profile of atorvastatin-treated patients with low LDL-cholesterol levels

Data pooled from 21 atorvastatin clinical trials have been analyzed to establish the safety of reducing low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels below currently recommended minimum targets in hypercholesterolemic patients. Safety data for atorvastatin-treated patients with at least one LDL-C value < or =80 mg/dl (2.1 mmol/l) (n = 319) during treatment (mean LDL-C level throughout treatment was 91 mg/dl [2.4 mmol/l]) were compared to those from all atorvastatin-treated patients (n = 2502) and patients treated with lovastatin, simvastatin or pravastatin (n = 742). The frequency of treatment-associated adverse events (AEs) in the atorvastatin LDL-C < or =80 mg/dl (2.1 mmol/l) subgroup (24%) was comparable to the frequencies observed for all atorvastatin-treated patients (20%) and for patients receiving the other statins (24%). Patient withdrawals due to treatment-associated AEs (constipation, dyspepsia and flatulence being the most common) were consistent and low across treatment groups. No treatment-associated deaths occurred in any group. Safety data for 21 atorvastatin-treated patients with LDL-C < or =50 mg/dl (1.3 mmol/l) were also analyzed and found to be similar to all atorvastatin-treated patients and patients treated with the other statins. While recognizing the short-term nature of the data (all patients who received atorvastatin were treated for < or =1 year and approximately 30% were treated for < or =6 months), this analysis suggests that reducing LDL-C levels below 80 (2.1 mmol/l) or 50 mg/dl (1.3 mmol/l) with atorvastatin does not alter its safety profile, as measured by frequency of AEs, which remains similar to those of other statins.

Basic mechanisms of stroke prevention with lipid-lowering therapy

Cholesterol-lowering therapy has not been considered an important risk factor for stroke; however, lipid-lowering therapies reduce cerebrovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). The basic mechanisms of cerebrovascular protection have emphasized reduced atheroemboli from the left ventricle and aortic arch, delayed carotid artery disease progression, stabilization of vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaque, and improvement in cerebral blood flow.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: proposed revisions. International Cardiology Forum

BACKGROUND

In 1994, the United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research issued clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. In the past 5 years, rapid progress has been made in the management of patients with unstable coronary syndromes, yet current guidelines do not necessarily reflect these advances.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An international forum of cardiology investigators reviewed existing guidelines and discussed areas in which the diagnosis and treatment of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction should be modified. It was agreed that there is sufficient evidence to recommend the following changes: (1) use of serum cardiac markers should be expanded to include troponin I and T levels as diagnostic and prognostic tools; (2) low-molecular-weight heparins should replace unfractionated heparin as antithrombotic agents; (3) new classes of antiplatelet agents are recommended in addition to aspirin; and (4) the use of cholesterol-lowering drugs is appropriate in the long-term management of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from clinical trials within the last 5 years requires that significant changes be made to existing guidelines for the diagnosis and management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. The recommendations detailed should be considered in the creation and implementation of updated guidelines.

Rationale and design of the Cardiac Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program at the University of California Los Angeles

Despite clear and consistent clinical-trial evidence that secondary-prevention medical therapies reduce mortality in patients with established coronary artery disease, these therapies are underutilized in patients receiving conventional care. To address this issue, a Cardiac Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program (CHAMP) focused on initiation of aspirin, cholesterol-lowering medication (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A [HMG-CoA] reductase inhibitor titrated to achieve low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol < 100 mg/dL), beta-blocker, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor therapy in conjunction with diet and exercise counseling before hospital discharge in patients with established coronary artery disease was designed and implemented at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center starting in 1994. This treatment program was based on the hypothesis that initiation of therapy in the hospital setting would result in higher utilization rates both at the time of discharge and during longer-term follow-up. Implementation of this program involved the use of a focused treatment guideline, standardized admission orders, educational lectures by local thought leaders, and tracking/reporting of treatment rates. To assess the impact of the program, treatment rates and clinical outcome were compared in patients discharged in the 2-year periods before and after CHAMP was implemented. Hospital-based treatment protocols such as CHAMP have the potential to significantly increase treatment utilization of therapies previously demonstrated to improve survival and thus substantially improve the outcome of the 2 million patients diagnosed and hospitalized each year with coronary artery disease.

Strategies for implementing lipid-lowering therapy: pharmacy-based approach

A multidisciplinary program was designed to improve patient outcomes after an acute coronary event. The primary objective of the program was that lipid-lowering therapy be prescribed at the time of discharge for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) patients. Secondary objectives for this program were (1) a baseline lipid panel within the first 24 hours of admission and (2) documentation of discharge counseling for lipid-lowering therapy in the patient medical record. Improvements were reported for all 3 objectives. For the primary indicator, lipid-lowering therapy prescribed at discharge, the baseline value increased from 40% to 72-81%. The percentage of patients with a lipid panel within 24 hours of admission improved from a baseline of 13% to 38-71%. Overall, 28-77% of patient records contained documentation of lipid-lowering medication counseling after initiation of the program. This information should provide the necessary benchmarking data to maintain competitiveness in the dynamic healthcare environment. Overall, this program provides high-quality, cost-effective health care for the patient with established coronary artery disease.

Cholesterol management in the era of managed care

Several large controlled clinical trials have documented that cholesterol lowering causes a marked reduction in major coronary events in patients with established coronary heart disease. Cholesterol lowering thus joins other proven therapies for risk reduction in secondary prevention. The need to include cholesterol-lowering therapy in secondary prevention has been endorsed as a new practice measure in the Health Plan Employer Data Information Set. This endorsement ensures that managed care will get behind the effort to better control cholesterol in patients with coronary heart disease. The next issue is whether managed care will support cholesterol-lowering therapy in primary-prevention patients. The patients at highest risk for developing coronary heart disease are those with noncoronary forms of atherosclerotic disease, type 2 diabetes, multiple risk factors, and risk factors plus evidence of advanced subclinical atherosclerosis. Such patients can be said to have coronary heart disease risk equivalents. These patients should be good candidates for aggressive cholesterol management. A strong case can be made for managed-care support for this approach. Support for treatment of patients at lower risk may be open to some question, but the current guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program provide a strong rationale for cholesterol management for primary prevention in the medical setting.

Optimizing treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with coronary artery disease in the managed-care environment (the Rocky Mountain Kaiser Permanente experience)

Rocky Mountain Kaiser Permanente has taken aggressive steps to ensure optimal treatment of all modifiable cardiac risk factors, especially low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, in patients with coronary artery disease. In this article, we are presenting (1) the basic rationale for our approach, (2) the critical steps translating philosophy into practice, and (3) justification for all health plans to pursue a similar course. The continuum of physician-directed disease management systems that have evolved in our region-one administered by cardiology nurses in the perihospitalization period and the other by pharmacists in the long-term, outpatient setting-is then detailed. Although the relatively short duration that our comprehensive systems have been in place precludes any assessment of their impact on cardiac death, coronary artery disease events, or coronary artery disease procedure rates, the improvements in intermediate surrogate outcomes are promising. Virtually all surveyed patients participating in our management systems have been "very" or "extremely" satisfied with their experience. The LDL-cholesterol screening rate in the approximately 2,500 participants in the programs to date has reached 97%. Of these patients, 84% have LDL cholesterol <130 mg/dL and 48% <100 mg/dL, and only 15% of those few with LDL cholesterol >130 mg/dL (2.5% overall) are currently not receiving lipid-lowering therapy. The proportions of patients on aspirin/antiplatelet and beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction are 97% and 92%, respectively. The lipid-screening and treatment rates, especially, represent significant improvement from our own baseline, and compare favorably with outcomes from other practice settings. In conclusion, health maintenance organizations have tremendous incentive and the unique opportunity and ability to develop systems to better manage large numbers of individuals with coronary artery disease.

Relation between baseline and on-treatment lipid parameters and first acute major coronary events in the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS)

BACKGROUND

The Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) is the first primary-prevention study in a cohort with average total cholesterol (TC) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and below-average HDL cholesterol (HDL-C). Treatment with lovastatin (20 to 40 mg/d) resulted in a 25% reduction in LDL-C and a 6% increase in HDL-C, as well as a 37% reduction in risk for first acute major coronary event (AMCE), defined as fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or sudden cardiac death. This article describes the relation between baseline and on-treatment lipid and apolipoprotein (apo) parameters and subsequent risk for AMCEs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

With all available data from the entire 6605-patient cohort, a prespecified Cox backward stepwise regression model identified outcome predictors, and logistic regression models examined the relation between lipid variables and AMCE risk. Baseline LDL-C, HDL-C, and apoB were significant predictors of AMCE; only on-treatment apoB and the ratio of apoB to apoAI were predictive of subsequent risk; on-treatment LDL-C was not. When event rates were examined across tertiles of baseline lipids, a consistent benefit of treatment with lovastatin was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Persons with average TC and LDL-C levels and below-average HDL-C may obtain significant clinical benefit from primary-prevention lipid modification. On-treatment apoB, especially when combined with apoAI to form the apoB/AI ratio, may be a more accurate predictor than LDL-C of risk for first AMCE.

Biological basis for statin therapy in stroke prevention

Hypercholesterolemia has not been considered an important risk factor for stroke; however, statin therapy reduces stroke in coronary heart disease patients. Statins may provide cerebrovascular protection through various mechanisms that include a reduction in the incidence of embolic stroke from cardiac, aortic and carotid sites, stabilization of vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaque, and improvement in cerebral blood flow.

Unstable Angina

The recent availability of novel antiplatelet and antithrombin agents has revolutionized the therapeutic options for intermediate- and high-risk unstable angina (UA). Current guidelines recommend aspirin, unfractionated heparin (UFH), and antianginal therapy. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and direct thrombin inhibitors have significant theoretical advantages and apparent clinical benefits compared with UFH and are good alternatives in selected patients. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition reduces the future risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and may reduce the incidence of death in patients with unstable angina. In particular, these drugs should be considered for use in combination with aspirin and UFH in patients undergoing an "early invasive" approach. Coronary revascularization plays an important role in high-risk patients and in those with refractory angina, but its routine application continues to be controversial. Issues regarding the use of LMWH in combination with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) are being addressed in clinical trials. Ideally, the incidence of serious cardiac events in patients with UA will continue to decrease with the ongoing search for potent drug combinations that achieve early control of intracoronary thrombosis.

Current concepts in secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is the leading cause of death around the globe. Advances in the field of cardiology have identified several effective treatments that have lead to decrease in mortality from this cause over the past 3 decades. The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature in regards to secondary prevention after acute MI. A search of MEDLINE through August of 1999 was carried out to identify any available publications on secondary prevention after MI. Evidence on the use of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions that was shown to be effective in improving morbidity and mortality was sought. Recommendations for the treatment of patients with acute MI are made based on existing evidence. Betablockers, aspirin and lipid-lowering agents for patients with low density lipoprotein-cholesterol > 130 mg% should be used for all patients following a MI. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are indicated for patients with congestive heart failure and/or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and are likely protective in most patients. Calcium channel blockers (Verapamil and Diltiazem) are indicated as second-line therapy for patients who have contraindications or are intolerant to betablockers. The routine prophylactic use of antiarrhythmic drugs to suppress ventricular ectopic beats should be avoided. Recommendations regarding diet, smoking cessation and achievement of ideal body weight should be an integral part of patient management. Referral for outpatient rehabilitation should also be strongly encouraged. Finally, adequate control of blood pressure and diabetes cannot be overemphasized. Adherence to these goals in patients with acute MI will lead to better long-term outcomes and reduction in cardiac death, recurrent MI, stroke, and need for coronary revascularization.

A novel telephone-based system for management of secondary prevention to a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < or = 100 mg/dl

Unfortunately, lipid-lowering drug therapy remains underutilized in clinical practice, and few secondary prevention patients achieve the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level (< or = 100 mg/dl) recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program. To improve patient management, a telephone-based computerized system primarily managed by dietitians was implemented in one of our cardiology clinics. Lipid results from all lipid and cardiology referrals and patients admitted to the cardiology service at 1 hospital are managed through this system. Patients are contacted via computer-generated postcards and the dietitians every 3 to 6 months. At baseline (September 1, 1994, through August 31, 1995; n = 1,969), 34% and 66% had LDL cholesterol < or = 100 and < or = 130 mg/dl, respectively. By September 1, 1997, to August 31, 1998 (n = 2,827), the proportion of patients with LDL cholesterol < or = 100 mg/dl had increased to 61%, and 89% had LDL cholesterol < or = 130 mg/dl. Statin use increased from 47% to 85% of patients. By 1997 to 1998, 74% and 40% of patients received statin doses that would, on average, produce a 34% and 41% reduction in LDL cholesterol, respectively. Whether a patient had LDL cholesterol < or = 100 mg/dl was not predicted by patient characteristics, drugs given, or by medication insurance coverage.

Current perspectives on statins

Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) are used widely for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. They inhibit HMG-CoA reductase competitively, reduce LDL levels more than other cholesterol-lowering drugs, and lower triglyceride levels in hypertriglyceridemic patients. Statins are well tolerated and have an excellent safety record. Clinical trials in patients with and without coronary heart disease and with and without high cholesterol have demonstrated consistently that statins reduce the relative risk of major coronary events by approximately 30% and produce a greater absolute benefit in patients with higher baseline risk. Proposed mechanisms include favorable effects on plasma lipoproteins, endothelial function, plaque architecture and stability, thrombosis, and inflammation. Mechanisms independent of LDL lowering may play an important role in the clinical benefits conferred by these drugs and may ultimately broaden their indication from lipid-lowering to antiatherogenic agents.

Re-emergence of fibrates in the management of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk

It is now widely accepted that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is not the only atherogenic component of the lipid profile and that abnormalities in the metabolism and plasma levels of triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) may lead to accelerated growth of atherosclerotic lesions. Fibrates are the drugs of first choice in the management of hypertriglyceridemia, and are also able to substantially raise HDL. The recently published Veterans Administration-High-density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial (VA-HIT) trial showed that fibrate treatment in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), low HDL, modestly elevated triglycerides, and normal LDL reduces the risk of a recurrent coronary event by 25%. A reasonable approach to the dyslipidemic patient with high CHD risk is to tailor the intervention to the specific lipoprotein abnormality. Under these assumptions fibrate therapy should become widespread, considering that the most common lipid alteration in CHD and patients with diabetes is low HDL and high triglycerides.