351
|
Pi J, Long Y, Huang N, Cheng Y, Zheng H. A sandwich immunoassay for detection of Aβ1-42 based on quantum dots. Talanta 2016; 146:10-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2015] [Revised: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 08/13/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
352
|
Vos SJB, Fagan AM. Alzheimer's disease biomarker states. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:25-6. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00335-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2015] [Accepted: 11/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
353
|
Masdeu JC, Pascual B. Genetic and degenerative disorders primarily causing dementia. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2016; 135:525-564. [PMID: 27432682 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53485-9.00026-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Neuroimaging comprises a powerful set of instruments to diagnose the different causes of dementia, clarify their neurobiology, and monitor their treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depicts volume changes with neurodegeneration and inflammation, as well as abnormalities in functional and structural connectivity. MRI arterial spin labeling allows for the quantification of regional cerebral blood flow, characteristically altered in Alzheimer's disease, diffuse Lewy-body disease, and the frontotemporal dementias. Positron emission tomography allows for the determination of regional metabolism, with similar abnormalities as flow, and for the measurement of β-amyloid and abnormal tau deposition in the brain, as well as regional inflammation. These instruments allow for the quantification in vivo of most of the pathologic features observed in disorders causing dementia. Importantly, they allow for the longitudinal study of these abnormalities, having revealed, for instance, that the deposition of β-amyloid in the brain can antecede by decades the onset of dementia. Thus, a therapeutic window has been opened and the efficacy of immunotherapies directed at removing β-amyloid from the brain of asymptomatic individuals is currently being tested. Tau and inflammation imaging, still in their infancy, combined with genomics, should provide powerful insights into these disorders and facilitate their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Masdeu
- Department of Neurology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Belen Pascual
- Department of Neurology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
354
|
Adamczuk K, Schaeverbeke J, Vanderstichele HMJ, Lilja J, Nelissen N, Van Laere K, Dupont P, Hilven K, Poesen K, Vandenberghe R. Diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid Aβ ratios in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 2015; 7:75. [PMID: 26677842 PMCID: PMC4683859 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-015-0159-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2015] [Accepted: 10/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In this study of preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) we assessed the added diagnostic value of using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ ratios rather than Aβ42 in isolation for detecting individuals who are positive on amyloid positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS Thirty-eight community-recruited cognitively intact older adults (mean age 73, range 65-80 years) underwent (18)F-flutemetamol PET and CSF measurement of Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, Aβ1-38, and total tau (ttau). (18)F-flutemetamol retention was quantified using standardized uptake value ratios in a composite cortical region (SUVRcomp) with reference to cerebellar grey matter. Based on a prior autopsy validation study, the SUVRcomp cut-off was 1.57. Sensitivities, specificities and cut-offs were defined based on receiver operating characteristic analysis with CSF analytes as variables of interest and (18)F-flutemetamol positivity as the classifier. We also determined sensitivities and CSF cut-off values at fixed specificities of 90 % and 95 %. RESULTS Seven out of 38 subjects (18 %) were positive on amyloid PET. Aβ42/ttau, Aβ42/Aβ40, Aβ42/Aβ38, and Aβ42 had the highest accuracy to identify amyloid-positive subjects (area under the curve (AUC) ≥ 0.908). Aβ40 and Aβ38 had significantly lower discriminative power (AUC = 0.571). When specificity was fixed at 90 % and 95 %, Aβ42/ttau had the highest sensitivity among the different CSF markers (85.71 % and 71.43 %, respectively). Sensitivity of Aβ42 alone was significantly lower under these conditions (57.14 % and 42.86 %, respectively). CONCLUSION For the CSF-based definition of preclinical AD, if a high specificity is required, our data support the use of Aβ42/ttau rather than using Aβ42 in isolation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Adamczuk
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Institute of Neuroscience and Disease, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Jolien Schaeverbeke
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Institute of Neuroscience and Disease, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | - Johan Lilja
- GE Healthcare, Björkgatan 30, 751 25, Uppsala, Sweden.
- Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Natalie Nelissen
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Institute of Neuroscience and Disease, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Patrick Dupont
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Institute of Neuroscience and Disease, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Kelly Hilven
- Laboratory for Neuroimmunology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Koen Poesen
- Laboratory for Molecular Neurobiomarker Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Laboratory Medicine, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Institute of Neuroscience and Disease, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Neurology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
355
|
Galasko D. Expanding the Repertoire of Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: Targeted and Non-targeted Approaches. Front Neurol 2015; 6:256. [PMID: 26733934 PMCID: PMC4680926 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The first biofluid markers developed for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) used targeted approaches for discovery. These initial biomarkers were directed at key protein constituents of the hallmark brain lesions in AD. Biomarkers for plaques targeted the amyloid beta protein (Aβ) and for tangles, the microtubule-associated protein tau. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of Aβ and tau have excellent diagnostic utility and can be used to monitor aspects of therapeutic development. Recent research has extended our current concepts of AD, which now include a slow buildup of pathology during a long pre-symptomatic period, a complex cascade of pathological pathways in the brain that may accelerate once symptoms develop, the potential of aggregated proteins to spread across brain pathways, and interactions with vascular and other age-associated brain pathologies. There are many potential roles for biomarkers within this landscape. A more diverse set of biomarkers would provide a better picture of the staging and state of pathological events in the brain across the stages of AD. The aim of this review is to focus on methods of biomarker discovery that may help to expand the currently accepted biomarkers. Opportunities and approaches for targeted and non-targeted (or −omic) biomarker discovery are highlighted, with examples from recent studies. How biomarker discoveries can be developed and integrated to become useful tools in diagnostic and therapeutic efforts is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Galasko
- Department of Neurosciences, Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of California, San Diego , La Jolla, CA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
356
|
Contreras JA, Goñi J, Risacher SL, Sporns O, Saykin AJ. The Structural and Functional Connectome and Prediction of Risk for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep 2015; 2:234-245. [PMID: 27034914 PMCID: PMC4809258 DOI: 10.1007/s40473-015-0056-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The human connectome refers to a comprehensive description of the brain's structural and functional connections in terms of brain networks. As the field of brain connectomics has developed, data acquisition, subsequent processing and modeling, and ultimately the representation of the connectome have become better defined and integrated with network science approaches. In this way, the human connectome has provided a way to elucidate key features of not only the healthy brain but also diseased brains. The field has quickly evolved, offering insights into network disruptions that are characteristic for specific neurodegenerative disorders. In this paper, we provide a brief review of the field of brain connectomics, as well as a more in-depth survey of recent studies that have provided new insights into brain network pathologies, including those found in Alzheimer's disease (AD), patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and finally in people classified as being "at risk". Until the emergence of brain connectomics, most previous studies had assessed neurodegenerative diseases mainly by focusing on specific and dispersed locales in the brain. Connectomics-based approaches allow us to model the brain as a network, which allows for inferences about how dynamic changes in brain function would be affected in relation to structural changes. In fact, looking at diseases using network theory gives rise to new hypotheses on mechanisms of pathophysiology and clinical symptoms. Finally, we discuss the future of this field and how understanding both the functional and structural connectome can aid in gaining sharper insight into changes in biological brain networks associated with cognitive impairment and dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joey A. Contreras
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Medical Neuroscience Program, Stark Neuroscience Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Joaquín Goñi
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Medical Neuroscience Program, Stark Neuroscience Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Shannon L. Risacher
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Medical Neuroscience Program, Stark Neuroscience Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Olaf Sporns
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Andrew J. Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Medical Neuroscience Program, Stark Neuroscience Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University Network Science Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
357
|
Wisse LEM, Butala N, Das SR, Davatzikos C, Dickerson BC, Vaishnavi SN, Yushkevich PA, Wolk DA. Suspected non-AD pathology in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 2015; 36:3152-3162. [PMID: 26422359 PMCID: PMC4641774 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2015] [Revised: 07/29/2015] [Accepted: 08/31/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
We aim to better characterize mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients with suspected non-Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology (SNAP) based on their longitudinal outcome, cognition, biofluid, and neuroimaging profile. MCI participants (n = 361) from ADNI-GO/2 were designated "amyloid positive" with abnormal amyloid-beta 42 levels (AMY+) and "neurodegeneration positive" (NEU+) with abnormal hippocampal volume or hypometabolism using fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. SNAP was compared with the other MCI groups and with AMY- controls. AMY-NEU+/SNAP, 16.6%, were older than the NEU- groups but not AMY- controls. They had a lower conversion rate to AD after 24 months than AMY+NEU+ MCI participants. SNAP-MCI participants had similar amyloid-beta 42 levels, florbetapir and tau levels, but larger white matter hyperintensity volumes than AMY- controls and AMY-NEU- MCI participants. SNAP participants performed worse on all memory domains and on other cognitive domains, than AMY-NEU- participants but less so than AMY+NEU+ participants. Subthreshold levels of cerebral amyloidosis are unlikely to play a role in SNAP-MCI, but pathologies involving the hippocampus and cerebrovascular disease may underlie the neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E M Wisse
- Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Nirali Butala
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sandhitsu R Das
- Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Section of Biomedical Image Analysis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bradford C Dickerson
- Psychiatric Neuroimaging Division, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Frontotemporal Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | | | - Paul A Yushkevich
- Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David A Wolk
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
358
|
Jagust W. Is amyloid-β harmful to the brain? Insights from human imaging studies. Brain 2015; 139:23-30. [PMID: 26614753 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the amyloid-β protein associated with the Alzheimer's disease plaque has been detectable in living people for over a decade, its importance in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease is still debated. The frequent presence of amyloid-β in the brains of cognitively healthy older people has been interpreted as evidence against a causative role. If amyloid-β is crucial to the development of Alzheimer's disease, it should be associated with other Alzheimer's disease-like neurological changes. This review examines whether amyloid-β is associated with other biomarkers indicative of early Alzheimer's disease in normal older people. The preponderance of evidence links amyloid-β to functional change, progressive brain atrophy, and cognitive decline. Individuals at greatest risk of decline seem to be those with evidence of both amyloid-β and findings suggestive of neurodegeneration. The crucial question is thus how amyloid-β is related to brain degeneration and how these two processes interact to cause cognitive decline and dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Jagust
- School of Public Health and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA
| |
Collapse
|
359
|
Rhodius-Meester HF, Koikkalainen J, Mattila J, Teunissen CE, Barkhof F, Lemstra AW, Scheltens P, Lötjönen J, van der Flier W. Integrating Biomarkers for Underlying Alzheimer’s Disease in Mild Cognitive Impairment in Daily Practice: Comparison of a Clinical Decision Support System with Individual Biomarkers. J Alzheimers Dis 2015; 50:261-70. [PMID: 26577521 DOI: 10.3233/jad-150548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hanneke F.M. Rhodius-Meester
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Centre, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jussi Mattila
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tampere, Finland
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Lab and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical Centre, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Afina W. Lemstra
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Centre, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Centre, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jyrki Lötjönen
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tampere, Finland
| | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Centre, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
360
|
Lim YY, Villemagne VL, Laws SM, Pietrzak RH, Snyder PJ, Ames D, Ellis KA, Harrington K, Rembach A, Martins RN, Rowe CC, Masters CL, Maruff P. APOE and BDNF polymorphisms moderate amyloid β-related cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Mol Psychiatry 2015; 20:1322-8. [PMID: 25288138 PMCID: PMC4759101 DOI: 10.1038/mp.2014.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2014] [Revised: 07/29/2014] [Accepted: 08/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Accumulation of β-amyloid (Aβ) in the brain is associated with memory decline in healthy individuals as a prelude to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Genetic factors may moderate this decline. We examined the role of apolipoprotein E (ɛ4 carrier[ɛ4(+)], ɛ4 non-carrier[ɛ4(-)]) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF(Val/Val), BDNF(Met)) in the extent to which they moderate Aβ-related memory decline. Healthy adults (n=333, Mage=70 years) enrolled in the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle study underwent Aβ neuroimaging. Neuropsychological assessments were conducted at baseline, 18-, 36- and 54-month follow-ups. Aβ positron emission tomography neuroimaging was used to classify participants as Aβ(-) or Aβ(+). Relative to Aβ(-)ɛ4(-), Aβ(+)ɛ4(+) individuals showed significantly faster rates of cognitive decline over 54 months across all domains (d=0.40-1.22), while Aβ(+)ɛ4(-) individuals showed significantly faster decline only on verbal episodic memory (EM). There were no differences in rates of cognitive change between Aβ(-)ɛ4(-) and Aβ(-)ɛ4(+) groups. Among Aβ(+) individuals, ɛ4(+)/BDNF(Met) participants showed a significantly faster rate of decline on verbal and visual EM, and language over 54 months compared with ɛ4(-)/BDNF(Val/Val) participants (d=0.90-1.02). At least two genetic loci affect the rate of Aβ-related cognitive decline. Aβ(+)ɛ4(+)/BDNF(Met) individuals can expect to show clinically significant memory impairment after 3 years, whereas Aβ(+)ɛ4(+)/BDNF(Val/Val) individuals can expect a similar degree of impairment after 10 years. Little decline over 54 months was observed in the Aβ(-) and Aβ(+) ɛ4(-) groups, irrespective of BDNF status. These data raise important prognostic issues in managing preclinical AD, and should be considered in designing secondary preventative clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Y Lim
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia,Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA,Department of Neurology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - V L Villemagne
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia,Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - S M Laws
- Centre of Excellence for Alzheimer's Disease Research and Care, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia,Sir James McCusker Alzheimer's Disease Research Unit, Hollywood Private Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia,Co-operative Research Centre for Mental Health
| | - R H Pietrzak
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - P J Snyder
- Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA,Department of Neurology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - D Ames
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, St. Vincent's Health, University of Melbourne, Kew, VIC, Australia,National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - K A Ellis
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia,National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - K Harrington
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - A Rembach
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - R N Martins
- Centre of Excellence for Alzheimer's Disease Research and Care, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - C C Rowe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia,Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - C L Masters
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia,Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Kenneth Myer Building, Genetics Lane, Royal Parade, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia. E-mail:
| | - P Maruff
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia,CogState Ltd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
361
|
Stomrud E, Minthon L, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Hansson O. Longitudinal cerebrospinal fluid biomarker measurements in preclinical sporadic Alzheimer's disease: A prospective 9-year study. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA: DIAGNOSIS, ASSESSMENT & DISEASE MONITORING 2015; 1:403-11. [PMID: 27239521 PMCID: PMC4879483 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2015.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Ascertainment of the pattern and temporal change of biomarkers in preclinical (asymptomatic) sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD) will increase knowledge about early pathogenesis and facilitate interventional therapeutic trials. Methods In this prospective longitudinal study, repeated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collections and cognitive evaluations were performed in cognitively healthy elderly individuals during a 9-year period. Results Low CSF β-amyloid (Aβ)42 levels predicted subsequent development of clinical AD 9 years later. Noteworthy, one-third of individuals with pathologically low baseline Aβ42 levels remained cognitively intact during follow-up. No further decrease in Aβ42 was seen in those with low levels already at baseline. Discussion CSF Aβ42 predicts sporadic AD at least 9 years before dementia onset and has plateaued already at this time. However, many individuals can harbor brain amyloid accumulation over a decade without signs of cognitive deterioration, which could implicate how CSF biomarkers are used to identify preclinical AD in future interventional therapeutic trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Stomrud
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Lennart Minthon
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
362
|
Mattsson N, Carrillo MC, Dean RA, Devous MD, Nikolcheva T, Pesini P, Salter H, Potter WZ, Sperling RS, Bateman RJ, Bain LJ, Liu E. Revolutionizing Alzheimer's disease and clinical trials through biomarkers. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA: DIAGNOSIS, ASSESSMENT & DISEASE MONITORING 2015; 1:412-9. [PMID: 27239522 PMCID: PMC4879481 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2015.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The Alzheimer's Association's Research Roundtable met in May 2014 to explore recent progress in developing biomarkers to improve understanding of disease pathogenesis and expedite drug development. Although existing biomarkers have proved extremely useful for enrichment of subjects in clinical trials, there is a clear need to develop novel biomarkers that are minimally invasive and that more broadly characterize underlying pathogenic mechanisms, including neurodegeneration, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction. These may include blood-based assays and new neuropsychological testing protocols, as well as novel ligands for positron emission tomography imaging, and advanced magnetic resonance imaging methodologies. In addition, there is a need for biomarkers that can serve as theragnostic markers of response to treatment. Standardization remains a challenge, although international consortia have made substantial progress in this area and provide lessons for future standardization efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Mattsson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Sweden
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +46-(0)-40-33-50-36; Fax: +46-(0)-40-33-56-57.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hugh Salter
- AztraZeneca, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | - Enchi Liu
- Janssen Research and Development, LLC., San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
363
|
Jack CR, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Knopman DS, Mielke MM, Vemuri P, Lowe V, Senjem ML, Gunter JL, Reyes D, Machulda MM, Roberts R, Petersen RC. Different definitions of neurodegeneration produce similar amyloid/neurodegeneration biomarker group findings. Brain 2015; 138:3747-59. [PMID: 26428666 PMCID: PMC4655341 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In a cross-sectional imaging study of 1331 cognitively non-impaired subjects aged 50–89, Jack et al. assess the consequences of defining neurodegeneration in five different ways on demographic associations with neurodegeneration, and on amyloidosis and neurodegeneration biomarker status by age. Different neurodegeneration measures provide similar but not completely redundant information. We recently demonstrated that the frequencies of biomarker groups defined by the presence or absence of both amyloidosis (A+) and neurodegeneration (N+) changed dramatically by age in cognitively non-impaired subjects. Our present objectives were to assess the consequences of defining neurodegeneration in five different ways on the frequency of subjects classified as N+, on the demographic associations with N+, and on amyloidosis and neurodegeneration (A/N) biomarker group frequencies by age. This was a largely cross-sectional observational study of 1331 cognitively non-impaired subjects aged 50–89 drawn from a population-based study of cognitive ageing. We assessed demographic associations with N+, and A/N biomarker group frequencies by age where A+ was defined by amyloid PET and N+ was defined in five different ways: (i) abnormal adjusted hippocampal volume alone; (ii) abnormal Alzheimer’s disease signature cortical thickness alone; (iii) abnormal fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography alone; (iv) abnormal adjusted hippocampal volume or abnormal fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; and (v) abnormal Alzheimer’s disease signature cortical thickness or abnormal fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. For each N+ definition, participants were assigned to one of four biomarker groups; A−N−, A+N−, A−N+, or A+N+. The three continuous individual neurodegeneration measures were moderately correlated (rs = 0.42 to 0.54) but when classified as normal or abnormal had only weak agreement (κ = 0.20 to 0.29). The adjusted hippocampal volume alone definition classified the fewest subjects as N+ while the Alzheimer’s disease signature cortical thickness or abnormal fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography definition classified the most as N+. Across all N+ definitions, N+ subjects tended to be older, more often male and APOE4 carriers, and performed less well on functional status and learning and memory than N− subjects. For all definitions of neurodegeneration, (i) the frequency of A−N− was 100% at age 50 and declined monotonically thereafter; (ii) the frequency of A+N− increased from age 50 to a maximum in the mid-70s and declined thereafter; and3 (iii) the frequency of A−N+ (suspected non-Alzheimer’s pathophysiology) and of A+N+ increased monotonically beginning in the mid-50s and mid-60s, respectively. Overall, different neurodegeneration measures provide similar but not completely redundant information. Despite quantitative differences, the overall qualitative pattern of the A−N−, A+N−, A−N+, and A+N+ biomarker group frequency curves by age were similar across the five different definitions of neurodegeneration. We conclude that grouping subjects by amyloidosis and neurodegeneration status (normal/abnormal) is robust to different imaging definitions of neurodegeneration and thus is a useful way for investigators throughout the field to communicate in a common classification framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clifford R Jack
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Heather J Wiste
- 2 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Stephen D Weigand
- 2 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - David S Knopman
- 3 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Michelle M Mielke
- 2 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Prashanthi Vemuri
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Val Lowe
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Matthew L Senjem
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Gunter
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Denise Reyes
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Mary M Machulda
- 4 Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Rosebud Roberts
- 2 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Ronald C Petersen
- 3 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
364
|
Kester MI, Teunissen CE, Sutphen C, Herries EM, Ladenson JH, Xiong C, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Morris JC, Holtzman DM, Fagan AM. Cerebrospinal fluid VILIP-1 and YKL-40, candidate biomarkers to diagnose, predict and monitor Alzheimer's disease in a memory clinic cohort. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2015; 7:59. [PMID: 26383836 PMCID: PMC4574487 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-015-0142-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 08/14/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Introduction We examined the utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins, Chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1 or YKL-40), a putative marker of inflammation, and Visinin-like protein-1 (VILIP-1), a marker for neuronal injury, for diagnostic classification and monitoring of disease progression in a memory clinic cohort. Methods CSF levels of YKL-40 and VILIP-1 were measured in 37 cognitively normal, 61 Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and 65 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients from the memory clinic-based Amsterdam Dementia Cohort who underwent two lumbar punctures, with minimum interval of 6 months and a mean(SE) interval of 2.0(0.1) years. Mean(SE) cognitive follow-up was 3.8 (0.2) years. ANOVA was used to compare baseline differences of log-transformed CSF measures. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate disease progression as a function of CSF tertiles. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate longitudinal change over time. All analyses were sex and age adjusted. Results Baseline levels of YKL-40, but not VILIP-1, were higher in MCI and AD patients compared to cognitively normal individuals (mean (SE) pg/mL, 304 (16) and 288 (12) vs. 231 (16), p = 0.03 and p = 0.006). Baseline levels of both YKL-40 and VILIP-1 in MCI predicted progression to AD (HR 95 % CI = 3.0 (1.1–7.9) and 4.4 (1.5–13.0), respectively, for highest vs. lowest tertile). YKL-40 increased longitudinally in patients with MCI and AD (mean (SE) pg/mL per year, 8.9 (3.0) and 7.1 (3.1), respectively), but not in cognitively normal individuals, whereas levels of VILIP-1 increased only in MCI (mean (SE), 10.7 (2.6) pg/mL per year). Conclusions CSF levels of YKL-40 may have utility for discriminating between cognitively normal individuals and patients with MCI or AD. Increased levels of both YKL-40 and VILIP-1 may be associated with disease progression. These CSF biomarkers should be considered for future evaluation in the characterization of the natural history of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje I Kester
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, PO box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Courtney Sutphen
- The Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA. .,Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA. .,Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA.
| | - Elizabeth M Herries
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA.
| | - Jack H Ladenson
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA.
| | - Chengjie Xiong
- The Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA. .,Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA.
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, PO box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, PO box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - John C Morris
- The Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA. .,Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA. .,Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA.
| | - David M Holtzman
- The Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA. .,Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA. .,Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA.
| | - Anne M Fagan
- The Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA. .,Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA. .,Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8111, St Louis, 63110, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
365
|
Baldeiras I, Santana I, Leitão MJ, Ribeiro MH, Pascoal R, Duro D, Lemos R, Santiago B, Almeida MR, Oliveira CR. Cerebrospinal fluid Aβ40 is similarly reduced in patients with Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Alzheimer's Disease. J Neurol Sci 2015; 358:308-16. [PMID: 26388316 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2015] [Revised: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 09/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have been increasingly studied for dementia diagnosis, however the accuracy to distinguish between different forms of dementia is still unsatisfactory. In this study, the added value of another CSF Aβ-peptide (Aβ40), along with the core CSF markers t-Tau, p-Tau, and Aβ42, in the discrimination between two large dementia groups of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD; n=107), Alzheimer's Disease (AD; n=107) and non-demented subjects (n=33) was evaluated. In FTLD, t-Tau and p-Tau were significantly increased in relation to controls, but lower than in AD, while Aβ42 was similar in FTLD and controls, but higher than in AD. Equally reduced Aβ40 levels were seen in both dementia groups, and therefore the combination of Aβ40 with core CSF biomarkers optimally discriminated FTLD and AD patients from controls. Aβ42 and t-Tau were selected as the best biomarker subset to differentiate FTLD from AD, with no added value of Aβ40 to the model. Diagnostic accuracy between FTLD and AD was still sub-optimal, with a significant percentage (23%) of FTLD patients, in particularly women, carrying an ApoE-ε4 allele, showing a CSF-AD biomarkers profile. Although CSF Aβ40 does not appear to have an additional value in the distinction between FTLD and AD, it increases the discrimination between subjects with dementia from controls. A CSF-AD biomarker profile can be seen in patients with a clinical phenotype of FTLD, reinforcing the need for autopsy confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inês Baldeiras
- Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal; Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Isabel Santana
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal; Neurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal
| | - Maria João Leitão
- Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal; Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Maria Helena Ribeiro
- Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal; Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Rui Pascoal
- Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal
| | - Diana Duro
- Neurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal
| | - Raquel Lemos
- Neurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal
| | | | | | - Catarina Resende Oliveira
- Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal; Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
366
|
Alzheimer Disease Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers Moderate Baseline Differences and Predict Longitudinal Change in Attentional Control and Episodic Memory Composites in the Adult Children Study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2015; 21:573-83. [PMID: 26416094 PMCID: PMC4610253 DOI: 10.1017/s1355617715000776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive measures that are sensitive to biological markers of Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology are needed to (a) facilitate preclinical staging, (b) identify individuals who are at the highest risk for developing clinical symptoms, and (c) serve as endpoints for evaluating the efficacy of interventions. The present study assesses the utility of two cognitive composite scores of attentional control and episodic memory as markers for preclinical AD pathology in a group of cognitively normal older adults (N = 238), as part of the Adult Children Study. All participants were given a baseline cognitive assessment and follow-up assessments every 3 years over an 8-year period, as well as a lumbar puncture within 2 years of the initial assessment to collect cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and amyloid tracer Pittsburgh compound-B scan for amyloid imaging. Results indicated that attentional control was correlated with levels of Aβ42 at the initial assessment whereas episodic memory was not. Longitudinally, individuals with high CSF tau exhibited a decline in both attention and episodic memory over the course of the study. These results indicate that measures of attentional control and episodic memory can be used to evaluate cognitive decline in preclinical AD and provide support that CSF tau may be a key mechanism driving longitudinal cognitive change.
Collapse
|
367
|
Grossman M. Integrated multimodal imaging in neurodegenerative disease. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14:973-5. [PMID: 26318838 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00182-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2015] [Accepted: 07/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Murray Grossman
- Department of Neurology and Penn Frontotemporal Degeneration Center, 2 Gibson, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
368
|
Adamczuk K, Schaeverbeke J, Nelissen N, Neyens V, Vandenbulcke M, Goffin K, Lilja J, Hilven K, Dupont P, Van Laere K, Vandenberghe R. Amyloid imaging in cognitively normal older adults: comparison between (18)F-flutemetamol and (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 43:142-151. [PMID: 26260650 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3156-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Accepted: 07/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preclinical, or asymptomatic, Alzheimer's disease (AD) refers to the presence of positive AD biomarkers in the absence of cognitive deficits. This research concept is being applied to define target populations for clinical drug development. In a prospective community-recruited cohort of cognitively intact older adults, we compared two amyloid imaging markers within subjects: (18)F-flutemetamol and (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B (PIB). METHODS In 32 community-recruited cognitively intact older adults aged between 65 and 80 years, we determined the concordance between binary classification based on (18)F-flutemetamol versus (11)C-PIB according to semiquantitative assessment (standardized uptake value ratio in composite cortical volume, SUVRcomp) and, alternatively, according to visual reads. We also determined the correlation between (18)F-flutemetamol and (11)C-PIB SUVR and evaluated how this was affected by the reference region chosen (cerebellar grey matter versus pons) and the use of partial volume correction (PVC) in this population. RESULTS Binary classification based on semiquantitative assessment was concordant between (18)F-flutemetamol and (11)C-PIB in 94 % of cases. Concordance of blinded binary visual reads between tracers was 84 %. The Spearman correlation between (18)F-flutemetamol and (11)C-PIB SUVRcomp with cerebellar grey matter as reference region was 0.84, with a slope of 0.98. Correlations in neocortical regions were significantly lower with the pons as reference region. PVC improved the correlation in striatum and medial temporal cortex. CONCLUSION For the definition of preclinical AD based on (18)F-flutemetamol, concordance with (11)C-PIB was highest using semiquantitative assessment with cerebellar grey matter as reference region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Adamczuk
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Institute of Neuroscience and Disease, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jolien Schaeverbeke
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Institute of Neuroscience and Disease, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Natalie Nelissen
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, OX3 7JX, Oxford, UK
| | - Veerle Neyens
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Institute of Neuroscience and Disease, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mathieu Vandenbulcke
- Old Age Psychiatry Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Lilja
- GE Healthcare, Björkgatan 30, 753 23, Uppsala, Sweden
- Uppsala University, Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kelly Hilven
- Laboratory for Neuroimmunology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Dupont
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Institute of Neuroscience and Disease, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Institute of Neuroscience and Disease, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven Institute of Neuroscience and Disease, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Neurology Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
369
|
Shi L, Zhao L, Wong A, Wang D, Mok V. Mapping the Relationship of Contributing Factors for Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease. Sci Rep 2015; 5:11259. [PMID: 26190794 PMCID: PMC4507140 DOI: 10.1038/srep11259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2014] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
While detecting and validating correlations among the contributing factors to the preclinical phase of Alzheimer’s disease (pAD) has been a focus, a potent meta-analysis method to integrate current findings is essential. The entity-relationship diagram with nodes as entities and edges as relationships is a graphical representation that summarizes the relationships among multiple factors in an intuitive manner. Based on this concept, a new meta-analysis approach with this type of diagram is proposed to summarize research about contributing factors of pAD and their interactions. To utilize the information for enriched visualization, width and color of the edges are encoded with reporting times, number of pAD subjects, correlation coefficient, and study design (cross-sectional or longitudinal). The proposed Probabilistic Entity-Relationship Diagram (PERD) demonstrated its effectiveness in this research for studying pAD. Another kind of diagram with occurrence order for some factors was also proposed to provide sequential information of the factors. In addition, PERD could potentially develop into an online application named PERD-online, which would help researchers to pool findings on the same relationships and guide further tests to validate uncertain relationships in PERD. PERD as a generic graphical meta-analysis tool can also be applied in studying other multifactorial diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Shi
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR.,Chow Yuk Ho Center of Innovative Technology for Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Lei Zhao
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Adrian Wong
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Defeng Wang
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR.,Research Center for Medical Image Computing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Vincent Mok
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
370
|
Valls-Pedret C, Sala-Vila A, Serra-Mir M, Corella D, de la Torre R, Martínez-González MÁ, Martínez-Lapiscina EH, Fitó M, Pérez-Heras A, Salas-Salvadó J, Estruch R, Ros E. Mediterranean Diet and Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175:1094-1103. [PMID: 25961184 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 567] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Oxidative stress and vascular impairment are believed to partly mediate age-related cognitive decline, a strong risk factor for development of dementia. Epidemiologic studies suggest that a Mediterranean diet, an antioxidant-rich cardioprotective dietary pattern, delays cognitive decline, but clinical trial evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether a Mediterranean diet supplemented with antioxidant-rich foods influences cognitive function compared with a control diet. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Parallel-group randomized clinical trial of 447 cognitively healthy volunteers from Barcelona, Spain (233 women [52.1%]; mean age, 66.9 years), at high cardiovascular risk were enrolled into the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea nutrition intervention trial from October 1, 2003, through December 31, 2009. All patients underwent neuropsychological assessment at inclusion and were offered retesting at the end of the study. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomly assigned to a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extravirgin olive oil (1 L/wk), a Mediterranean diet supplemented with mixed nuts (30 g/d), or a control diet (advice to reduce dietary fat). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Rates of cognitive change over time based on a neuropsychological test battery: Mini-Mental State Examination, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Animals Semantic Fluency, Digit Span subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Verbal Paired Associates from the Wechsler Memory Scale, and the Color Trail Test. We used mean z scores of change in each test to construct 3 cognitive composites: memory, frontal (attention and executive function), and global. RESULTS Follow-up cognitive tests were available in 334 participants after intervention (median, 4.1 years). In multivariate analyses adjusted for confounders, participants allocated to a Mediterranean diet plus olive oil scored better on the RAVLT (P = .049) and Color Trail Test part 2 (P = .04) compared with controls; no between-group differences were observed for the other cognitive tests. Similarly adjusted cognitive composites (mean z scores with 95% CIs) for changes above baseline of the memory composite were 0.04 (-0.09 to 0.18) for the Mediterranean diet plus olive oil, 0.09 (-0.05 to 0.23; P = .04 vs controls) for the Mediterranean diet plus nuts, and -0.17 (-0.32 to -0.01) for the control diet. Respective changes from baseline of the frontal cognition composite were 0.23 (0.03 to 0.43; P = .003 vs controls), 0.03 (-0.25 to 0.31), and -0.33 (-0.57 to -0.09). Changes from baseline of the global cognition composite were 0.05 (-0.11 to 0.21; P = .005 vs controls) for the Mediterranean diet plus olive oil, -0.05 (-0.27 to 0.18) for the Mediterranean diet plus nuts, and -0.38 (-0.57 to -0.18) for the control diet. All cognitive composites significantly (P < .05) decreased from baseline in controls. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In an older population, a Mediterranean diet supplemented with olive oil or nuts is associated with improved cognitive function. TRIAL REGISTRATION isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN35739639.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinta Valls-Pedret
- Lipid Clinic, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aleix Sala-Vila
- Lipid Clinic, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercè Serra-Mir
- Lipid Clinic, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dolores Corella
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Rafael de la Torre
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Cardiovascular and Nutrition Research Group, Institut de Recerca Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Ángel Martínez-González
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Elena H Martínez-Lapiscina
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Fitó
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Cardiovascular and Nutrition Research Group, Institut de Recerca Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Pérez-Heras
- Lipid Clinic, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jordi Salas-Salvadó
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Human Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan, Institut d'Investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
| | - Ramon Estruch
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Emilio Ros
- Lipid Clinic, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Ciber Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
371
|
Papp KV, Amariglio RE, Mormino EC, Hedden T, Dekhytar M, Johnson KA, Sperling RA, Rentz DM. Free and cued memory in relation to biomarker-defined abnormalities in clinically normal older adults and those at risk for Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia 2015; 73:169-75. [PMID: 26002757 PMCID: PMC4479270 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2015] [Revised: 04/08/2015] [Accepted: 04/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Furthering our understanding of the relationship between amyloidosis (Aβ), neurodegeneration (ND), and cognition is imperative for early identification and early intervention of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the subtle cognitive decline differentially associated with each biomarker-defined stage of preclinical AD has yet to be fully characterized. Recent work indicates that different components of memory performance (free and cued recall) may be differentially specific to memory decline in prodromal AD. We sought to examine the relationship between free and cued recall paradigms, in addition to global composites of memory, executive functioning, and processing speed in relation to stages of preclinical AD. METHODS A total of 260 clinically normal (CN) older adults (CDR=0) from the Harvard Aging Brain study were grouped according to preclinical AD stages including Stage 0 (Aβ-/ND-), Stage 1 (Aβ+/ND-), Stage 2 (Aβ+/ND+), and suspected non-Alzheimer's associated pathology (SNAP; Aβ-/ND+). General linear models controlling for age, sex, and education were used to assess for stage-based performance differences on cognitive composites of executive functioning, processing speed, and memory in addition to free and cued delayed recall on the Selective Reminding Test (SRT) and Memory Capacity Test (MCT). RESULTS Global memory performance differed between preclinical stages with Stage 2 performing worse compared with Stage 0. When examining free and cued paradigms by memory test, only the MCT (and not the SRT) revealed group differences. More specifically, Stage 1 was associated with decrements in free recall compared with Stage 0 while Stage 2 was associated with decrements in both free and cued recall. There was a trend for the SNAP group to perform worse on free recall compared with Stage 0. Finally, there was no association between preclinical stage and global composites of executive functioning or processing speed. CONCLUSIONS Clinically normal older adults with underlying evidence of amyloidosis and neurodegeneration exhibit subtle, yet measurable differences in memory performance, but only on a challenging associative test. The sensitivity of free vs. cued memory paradigms may be dependent on preclinical stage such that reduced free recall is associated with amyloidosis alone (Stage 1) while a decline in cued recall may represent progression to amyloidosis and neurodegeneration (Stage 2). These findings may have practical applications for clinical assessment and clinical trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn V Papp
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Rebecca E Amariglio
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Mormino
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Trey Hedden
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Maria Dekhytar
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Keith A Johnson
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Reisa A Sperling
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Dorene M Rentz
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
372
|
Coart E, Barrado LG, Duits FH, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Teunissen CE, van der Vies SM, Burzykowski T. Correcting for the Absence of a Gold Standard Improves Diagnostic Accuracy of Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2015; 46:889-99. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-142886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Els Coart
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Leandro García Barrado
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Flora H. Duits
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E. Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia M. van der Vies
- Department of Pathology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tomasz Burzykowski
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
373
|
Toledo JB, Bjerke M, Chen K, Rozycki M, Jack CR, Weiner MW, Arnold SE, Reiman EM, Davatzikos C, Shaw LM, Trojanowski JQ. Memory, executive, and multidomain subtle cognitive impairment: clinical and biomarker findings. Neurology 2015; 85:144-53. [PMID: 26085606 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2014] [Accepted: 03/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We studied the biomarker signatures and prognoses of 3 different subtle cognitive impairment (SCI) groups (executive, memory, and multidomain) as well as the subjective memory complaints (SMC) group. METHODS We studied 522 healthy controls in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Cutoffs for executive, memory, and multidomain SCI were defined using participants who remained cognitively normal (CN) for 7 years. CSF Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers, composite and region-of-interest (ROI) MRI, and fluorodeoxyglucose-PET measures were compared in these participants. RESULTS Using a stringent cutoff (fifth percentile), 27.6% of the ADNI participants were classified as SCI. Most single ROI or global-based measures were not sensitive to detect differences between groups. Only MRI-SPARE-AD (Spatial Pattern of Abnormalities for Recognition of Early AD), a quantitative MRI pattern-based global index, showed differences between all groups, excluding the executive SCI group. Atrophy patterns differed in memory SCI and SMC. The CN and the SMC groups presented a similar distribution of preclinical dementia stages. Fifty percent of the participants with executive, memory, and multidomain SCI progressed to mild cognitive impairment or dementia at 7, 5, and 2 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that (1) the different SCI categories have different clinical prognoses and biomarker signatures, (2) longitudinally followed CN subjects are needed to establish clinical cutoffs, (3) subjects with SMC show a frontal pattern of brain atrophy, and (4) pattern-based analyses outperform commonly used single ROI-based neuroimaging biomarkers and are needed to detect initial stages of cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon B Toledo
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (J.B.T., M.B., L.M.S., J.Q.T.), and Department of Psychiatry (S.E.A.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Banner Alzheimer's Institute (K.C., E.M.R.), Phoenix, AZ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (M.R., C.D.), Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (C.R.J.), Rochester, MN; and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases (M.W.W.), Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco
| | - Maria Bjerke
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (J.B.T., M.B., L.M.S., J.Q.T.), and Department of Psychiatry (S.E.A.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Banner Alzheimer's Institute (K.C., E.M.R.), Phoenix, AZ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (M.R., C.D.), Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (C.R.J.), Rochester, MN; and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases (M.W.W.), Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco
| | - Kewei Chen
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (J.B.T., M.B., L.M.S., J.Q.T.), and Department of Psychiatry (S.E.A.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Banner Alzheimer's Institute (K.C., E.M.R.), Phoenix, AZ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (M.R., C.D.), Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (C.R.J.), Rochester, MN; and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases (M.W.W.), Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco
| | - Martin Rozycki
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (J.B.T., M.B., L.M.S., J.Q.T.), and Department of Psychiatry (S.E.A.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Banner Alzheimer's Institute (K.C., E.M.R.), Phoenix, AZ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (M.R., C.D.), Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (C.R.J.), Rochester, MN; and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases (M.W.W.), Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco
| | - Clifford R Jack
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (J.B.T., M.B., L.M.S., J.Q.T.), and Department of Psychiatry (S.E.A.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Banner Alzheimer's Institute (K.C., E.M.R.), Phoenix, AZ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (M.R., C.D.), Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (C.R.J.), Rochester, MN; and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases (M.W.W.), Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco
| | - Michael W Weiner
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (J.B.T., M.B., L.M.S., J.Q.T.), and Department of Psychiatry (S.E.A.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Banner Alzheimer's Institute (K.C., E.M.R.), Phoenix, AZ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (M.R., C.D.), Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (C.R.J.), Rochester, MN; and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases (M.W.W.), Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco
| | - Steven E Arnold
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (J.B.T., M.B., L.M.S., J.Q.T.), and Department of Psychiatry (S.E.A.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Banner Alzheimer's Institute (K.C., E.M.R.), Phoenix, AZ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (M.R., C.D.), Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (C.R.J.), Rochester, MN; and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases (M.W.W.), Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco
| | - Eric M Reiman
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (J.B.T., M.B., L.M.S., J.Q.T.), and Department of Psychiatry (S.E.A.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Banner Alzheimer's Institute (K.C., E.M.R.), Phoenix, AZ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (M.R., C.D.), Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (C.R.J.), Rochester, MN; and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases (M.W.W.), Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (J.B.T., M.B., L.M.S., J.Q.T.), and Department of Psychiatry (S.E.A.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Banner Alzheimer's Institute (K.C., E.M.R.), Phoenix, AZ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (M.R., C.D.), Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (C.R.J.), Rochester, MN; and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases (M.W.W.), Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco
| | - Leslie M Shaw
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (J.B.T., M.B., L.M.S., J.Q.T.), and Department of Psychiatry (S.E.A.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Banner Alzheimer's Institute (K.C., E.M.R.), Phoenix, AZ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (M.R., C.D.), Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (C.R.J.), Rochester, MN; and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases (M.W.W.), Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco
| | - John Q Trojanowski
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Institute on Aging, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (J.B.T., M.B., L.M.S., J.Q.T.), and Department of Psychiatry (S.E.A.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Banner Alzheimer's Institute (K.C., E.M.R.), Phoenix, AZ; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (M.R., C.D.), Philadelphia, PA; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (C.R.J.), Rochester, MN; and Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases (M.W.W.), Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center/University of California San Francisco.
| | | |
Collapse
|
374
|
Musiek ES, Holtzman DM. Three dimensions of the amyloid hypothesis: time, space and 'wingmen'. Nat Neurosci 2015; 18:800-6. [PMID: 26007213 PMCID: PMC4445458 DOI: 10.1038/nn.4018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 531] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2014] [Accepted: 03/23/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The amyloid hypothesis, which has been the predominant framework for research in Alzheimer's disease (AD), has been the source of considerable controversy. The amyloid hypothesis postulates that amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) is the causative agent in AD. It is strongly supported by data from rare autosomal dominant forms of AD. However, the evidence that Aβ causes or contributes to age-associated sporadic AD is more complex and less clear, prompting criticism of the hypothesis. We provide an overview of the major arguments for and against the amyloid hypothesis. We conclude that Aβ likely is the key initiator of a complex pathogenic cascade that causes AD. However, we argue that Aβ acts primarily as a trigger of other downstream processes, particularly tau aggregation, which mediate neurodegeneration. Aβ appears to be necessary, but not sufficient, to cause AD. Its major pathogenic effects may occur very early in the disease process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik S Musiek
- Department of Neurology, Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, and Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - David M Holtzman
- Department of Neurology, Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, and Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
375
|
Almeida RP, Schultz SA, Austin BP, Boots EA, Dowling NM, Gleason CE, Bendlin BB, Sager M, Hermann BP, Zetterberg H, Carlsson C, Johnson S, Asthana S, Okonkwo OC. Effect of Cognitive Reserve on Age-Related Changes in Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol 2015; 72:699-706. [PMID: 25893879 PMCID: PMC4639566 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although advancing age is the strongest risk factor for the development of symptomatic Alzheimer disease (AD), recent studies have shown that there are individual differences in susceptibility to age-related alterations in the biomarkers of AD pathophysiology. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether cognitive reserve (CR) modifies the adverse influence of age on key cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of AD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cross-sectional cohort of 268 individuals (211 in a cognitively normal group and 57 in a cognitively impaired group) from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention and the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center participated in this study. They underwent lumbar puncture for collection of CSF samples, from which Aβ42, total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) were immunoassayed. In addition, we computed t-tau/Aβ42 and p-tau/Aβ42 ratios. Cognitive reserve was indexed by years of education, with 16 or more years taken to confer high reserve. Covariate-adjusted regression analyses were used to test whether the effect of age on CSF biomarkers was modified by CR. The study dates were March 5, 2010, to February 13, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cerebrospinal fluid levels of Aβ42, t-tau, p-tau, t-tau/Aβ42, and p-tau/Aβ42. RESULTS There were significant age × CR interactions for CSF t-tau (β [SE] = -6.72 [2.84], P = .02), p-tau (β [SE] = -0.71 [0.27], P = .01), t-tau/Aβ42 (β [SE] = -0.02 [0.01], P = .02), and p-tau/Aβ42 (β [SE] = -0.002 [0.001], P = .004). With advancing age, individuals with high CR exhibited attenuated adverse alterations in these CSF biomarkers compared with individuals with low CR. This attenuation of age effects by CR tended to be more pronounced in the cognitively impaired group compared with the cognitively normal group. There was evidence of a dose-response relationship such that the effect of age on the biomarkers was progressively attenuated given additional years of schooling. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In a sample composed of a cognitively normal group and a cognitively impaired group, higher CR was associated with a diminution of age-related alterations in CSF biomarkers of AD. This suggests one pathway through which CR might favorably alter lifetime risk for symptomatic AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo P. Almeida
- Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, Brazil
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Stephanie A. Schultz
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Benjamin P. Austin
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Elizabeth A. Boots
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - N. Maritza Dowling
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Carey E. Gleason
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Barbara B. Bendlin
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Mark Sager
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Bruce P. Hermann
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
- University of London Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cindy Carlsson
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Sterling Johnson
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Sanjay Asthana
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Ozioma C. Okonkwo
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
376
|
Hassenstab J, Ruvolo D, Jasielec M, Xiong C, Grant E, Morris JC. Absence of practice effects in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology 2015; 29:940-8. [PMID: 26011114 DOI: 10.1037/neu0000208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe how practice effects influence cognitive trajectories and determine if a reduction in practice effects is a potential marker of Stage-III preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHOD Participants included 263 older adults who were cognitively normal at baseline (i.e., had a Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] of 0; Morris, 1993) and returned for an average of 9.5 annual visits. Participants completed standard tests of episodic memory, visuospatial ability, semantic memory, and executive function. Progressors (n = 66) converted to CDR > 0 with a diagnosis of symptomatic AD after a minimum of 3 visits and stable participants (n = 197) never progressed to CDR > 0. Practice effects, defined as the slope of performance across Visits 1-3, were compared between groups and used within subjects to predict risk of conversion. Change-point models that accounted for retest were contrasted with linear models that ignored retest. RESULTS The stable group showed practice effects on episodic-memory measures (β = 0.14, SE = .02, p < .0001) but the progressor group did not (β = 0.03, SE = .03, p = .343). Across all participants, practice effects on episodic-memory tests were associated with a decreased risk of progression to AD as indicated by the subdistribution hazards model (SHR; Fine & Gray, 1999); SHR = .110, 95% CI [.032, .384], p = .001). Finally, use of change-point models dramatically altered rate-of-change estimates compared with models that ignored practice. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that preclinical AD is marked by a reduction in practice effects in episodic memory and that the magnitude of gain from retesting is inversely related to progression risk. Assessment of practice effects may be a face-valid indicator of Stage-III preclinical AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Hassenstab
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
| | - David Ruvolo
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
| | - Mateusz Jasielec
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
| | - Chengjie Xiong
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
| | - Elizabeth Grant
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
| | - John C Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
| |
Collapse
|
377
|
Jansen WJ, Ossenkoppele R, Knol DL, Tijms BM, Scheltens P, Verhey FRJ, Visser PJ, Aalten P, Aarsland D, Alcolea D, Alexander M, Almdahl IS, Arnold SE, Baldeiras I, Barthel H, van Berckel BNM, Bibeau K, Blennow K, Brooks DJ, van Buchem MA, Camus V, Cavedo E, Chen K, Chetelat G, Cohen AD, Drzezga A, Engelborghs S, Fagan AM, Fladby T, Fleisher AS, van der Flier WM, Ford L, Förster S, Fortea J, Foskett N, Frederiksen KS, Freund-Levi Y, Frisoni GB, Froelich L, Gabryelewicz T, Gill KD, Gkatzima O, Gómez-Tortosa E, Gordon MF, Grimmer T, Hampel H, Hausner L, Hellwig S, Herukka SK, Hildebrandt H, Ishihara L, Ivanoiu A, Jagust WJ, Johannsen P, Kandimalla R, Kapaki E, Klimkowicz-Mrowiec A, Klunk WE, Köhler S, Koglin N, Kornhuber J, Kramberger MG, Van Laere K, Landau SM, Lee DY, de Leon M, Lisetti V, Lleó A, Madsen K, Maier W, Marcusson J, Mattsson N, de Mendonça A, Meulenbroek O, Meyer PT, Mintun MA, Mok V, Molinuevo JL, Møllergård HM, Morris JC, Mroczko B, Van der Mussele S, Na DL, Newberg A, Nordberg A, Nordlund A, Novak GP, Paraskevas GP, Parnetti L, Perera G, Peters O, Popp J, Prabhakar S, Rabinovici GD, Ramakers IHGB, Rami L, Resende de Oliveira C, Rinne JO, Rodrigue KM, Rodríguez-Rodríguez E, et alJansen WJ, Ossenkoppele R, Knol DL, Tijms BM, Scheltens P, Verhey FRJ, Visser PJ, Aalten P, Aarsland D, Alcolea D, Alexander M, Almdahl IS, Arnold SE, Baldeiras I, Barthel H, van Berckel BNM, Bibeau K, Blennow K, Brooks DJ, van Buchem MA, Camus V, Cavedo E, Chen K, Chetelat G, Cohen AD, Drzezga A, Engelborghs S, Fagan AM, Fladby T, Fleisher AS, van der Flier WM, Ford L, Förster S, Fortea J, Foskett N, Frederiksen KS, Freund-Levi Y, Frisoni GB, Froelich L, Gabryelewicz T, Gill KD, Gkatzima O, Gómez-Tortosa E, Gordon MF, Grimmer T, Hampel H, Hausner L, Hellwig S, Herukka SK, Hildebrandt H, Ishihara L, Ivanoiu A, Jagust WJ, Johannsen P, Kandimalla R, Kapaki E, Klimkowicz-Mrowiec A, Klunk WE, Köhler S, Koglin N, Kornhuber J, Kramberger MG, Van Laere K, Landau SM, Lee DY, de Leon M, Lisetti V, Lleó A, Madsen K, Maier W, Marcusson J, Mattsson N, de Mendonça A, Meulenbroek O, Meyer PT, Mintun MA, Mok V, Molinuevo JL, Møllergård HM, Morris JC, Mroczko B, Van der Mussele S, Na DL, Newberg A, Nordberg A, Nordlund A, Novak GP, Paraskevas GP, Parnetti L, Perera G, Peters O, Popp J, Prabhakar S, Rabinovici GD, Ramakers IHGB, Rami L, Resende de Oliveira C, Rinne JO, Rodrigue KM, Rodríguez-Rodríguez E, Roe CM, Rot U, Rowe CC, Rüther E, Sabri O, Sanchez-Juan P, Santana I, Sarazin M, Schröder J, Schütte C, Seo SW, Soetewey F, Soininen H, Spiru L, Struyfs H, Teunissen CE, Tsolaki M, Vandenberghe R, Verbeek MM, Villemagne VL, Vos SJB, van Waalwijk van Doorn LJC, Waldemar G, Wallin A, Wallin ÅK, Wiltfang J, Wolk DA, Zboch M, Zetterberg H. Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2015; 313:1924-38. [PMID: 25988462 PMCID: PMC4486209 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.4668] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1170] [Impact Index Per Article: 117.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Cerebral amyloid-β aggregation is an early pathological event in Alzheimer disease (AD), starting decades before dementia onset. Estimates of the prevalence of amyloid pathology in persons without dementia are needed to understand the development of AD and to design prevention studies. OBJECTIVE To use individual participant data meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of amyloid pathology as measured with biomarkers in participants with normal cognition, subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). DATA SOURCES Relevant biomarker studies identified by searching studies published before April 2015 using the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases and through personal communication with investigators. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they provided individual participant data for participants without dementia and used an a priori defined cutoff for amyloid positivity. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Individual records were provided for 2914 participants with normal cognition, 697 with SCI, and 3972 with MCI aged 18 to 100 years from 55 studies. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Prevalence of amyloid pathology on positron emission tomography or in cerebrospinal fluid according to AD risk factors (age, apolipoprotein E [APOE] genotype, sex, and education) estimated by generalized estimating equations. RESULTS The prevalence of amyloid pathology increased from age 50 to 90 years from 10% (95% CI, 8%-13%) to 44% (95% CI, 37%-51%) among participants with normal cognition; from 12% (95% CI, 8%-18%) to 43% (95% CI, 32%-55%) among patients with SCI; and from 27% (95% CI, 23%-32%) to 71% (95% CI, 66%-76%) among patients with MCI. APOE-ε4 carriers had 2 to 3 times higher prevalence estimates than noncarriers. The age at which 15% of the participants with normal cognition were amyloid positive was approximately 40 years for APOE ε4ε4 carriers, 50 years for ε2ε4 carriers, 55 years for ε3ε4 carriers, 65 years for ε3ε3 carriers, and 95 years for ε2ε3 carriers. Amyloid positivity was more common in highly educated participants but not associated with sex or biomarker modality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among persons without dementia, the prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology as determined by positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid findings was associated with age, APOE genotype, and presence of cognitive impairment. These findings suggest a 20- to 30-year interval between first development of amyloid positivity and onset of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willemijn J Jansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands3Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the
| | - Dirk L Knol
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Betty M Tijms
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frans R J Verhey
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands2Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience
| | - Pauline Aalten
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Center for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Daniel Alcolea
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ina S Almdahl
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Steven E Arnold
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Inês Baldeiras
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Center University of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kristen Bibeau
- GlaxoSmithKline, Worldwide Epidemiology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - David J Brooks
- Division of Neuroscience, Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark A van Buchem
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent Camus
- CHRU de Tours, CIC INSERM 1415, INSERM U930, and Université François Rabelais de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Enrica Cavedo
- Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine, IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy20Sorbonne University, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 06, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A) and Institut
| | - Kewei Chen
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Gael Chetelat
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), U1077, Caen, France
| | - Ann D Cohen
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sebastiaan Engelborghs
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Anne M Fagan
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Tormod Fladby
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Adam S Fleisher
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, Arizona27Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana28Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands6Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lisa Ford
- Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, New Jersey
| | - Stefan Förster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technischen Universitaet München, Munich, Germany
| | - Juan Fortea
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yvonne Freund-Levi
- Department of Geriatrics, Institution of NVS, Section of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine, IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy88Memory Clinic and LANVIE-Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging, University Hospitals, and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lutz Froelich
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Tomasz Gabryelewicz
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kiran Dip Gill
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Department of Biochemistry, Research Block-A, Chandigarh, India
| | - Olymbia Gkatzima
- Third Department of Neurology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - Timo Grimmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitaet München, Munich, Germany
| | - Harald Hampel
- AXA Research Fund and UPMC ChairSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 06, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer and INSERM U1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Département de Neurologie, Hôpital
| | - Lucrezia Hausner
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sabine Hellwig
- Center of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Lianna Ishihara
- GlaxoSmithKline, Worldwide Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology and Neurology, United Kingdom
| | - Adrian Ivanoiu
- Memory Clinic and Neurochemistry Laboratory, Saint Luc University Hospital, Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - William J Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley
| | - Peter Johannsen
- Memory Clinic, Danish Dementia Research Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ramesh Kandimalla
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Department of Biochemistry, Research Block-A, Chandigarh, India46Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Elisabeth Kapaki
- First Department of Neurology, Neurochemistry Unit and Cognitive and Movement Disorders Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - William E Klunk
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sebastian Köhler
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Milica G Kramberger
- Center for Cognitive Impairments, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Susan M Landau
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley
| | - Dong Young Lee
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mony de Leon
- School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York University, New York
| | - Viviana Lisetti
- Section of Neurology, Center for Memory Disturbances, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Alberto Lleó
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karine Madsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Wolfgang Maier
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Jan Marcusson
- Geriatric Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Niklas Mattsson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Alexandre de Mendonça
- Institute of Molecular Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Olga Meulenbroek
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Philipp T Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mark A Mintun
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Vincent Mok
- Lui Che Woo Institute of Innovative Medicine, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, IDIBAPS, Clinic University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hanne M Møllergård
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - John C Morris
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Barbara Mroczko
- Department of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics, Leading National Research Centre in Bialystok (KNOW), Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Stefan Van der Mussele
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Duk L Na
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Andrew Newberg
- Myrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University and Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- Dept NVS, Center for Alzheimer, Translational Alzheimer Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, and Geriatric Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Arto Nordlund
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Gerald P Novak
- Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, New Jersey
| | - George P Paraskevas
- First Department of Neurology, Neurochemistry Unit and Cognitive and Movement Disorders Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Lucilla Parnetti
- Section of Neurology, Center for Memory Disturbances, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gayan Perera
- Roche Products, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom69Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver Peters
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Berlin, German Center for Neurodegenrative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
| | - Julius Popp
- Department of Psychiatry, Service of Old Age Psychiatry and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Leenaards Memory Centre, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sudesh Prabhakar
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Department of Neurology, Nehru Hospital, Chandigarh, India
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Inez H G B Ramakers
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lorena Rami
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, IDIBAPS, Clinic University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Juha O Rinne
- Turku PET Centre and Division of Clinical Neurosciences Turku, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | | | - Catherine M Roe
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Uros Rot
- Center for Cognitive Impairments, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Christopher C Rowe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eckart Rüther
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Páscual Sanchez-Juan
- Neurology Service, Universitary Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Isabel Santana
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Center University of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Marie Sarazin
- Neurologie de la Mémoire et du Langage, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Université Paris 5, Paris, France
| | - Johannes Schröder
- Sektion Gerontopsychiatrie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sang W Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Femke Soetewey
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Luiza Spiru
- Department of Geriatrics-Gerontology-Gerontopsychiatry, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Hanne Struyfs
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Magda Tsolaki
- Third Department of Neurology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marcel M Verbeek
- Departments of Neurology and Laboratory Medicine, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Victor L Villemagne
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephanie J B Vos
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Linda J C van Waalwijk van Doorn
- Departments of Neurology and Laboratory Medicine, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Wallin
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Åsa K Wallin
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - David A Wolk
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Marzena Zboch
- Alzheimer Center, Wroclaw Medical University, Scinawa, Poland
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden87UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
378
|
PART, a distinct tauopathy, different from classical sporadic Alzheimer disease. Acta Neuropathol 2015; 129:757-62. [PMID: 25778618 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-015-1407-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2015] [Revised: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 03/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
379
|
Gordon BA, Zacks JM, Blazey T, Benzinger TLS, Morris JC, Fagan AM, Holtzman DM, Balota DA. Task-evoked fMRI changes in attention networks are associated with preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarkers. Neurobiol Aging 2015; 36:1771-9. [PMID: 25708908 PMCID: PMC4417039 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2014] [Revised: 01/21/2015] [Accepted: 01/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
There is a growing emphasis on examining preclinical levels of Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related pathology in the absence of cognitive impairment. Previous work examining biomarkers has focused almost exclusively on memory, although there is mounting evidence that attention also declines early in disease progression. In the current experiment, 2 attentional control tasks were used to examine alterations in task-evoked functional magnetic resonance imaging data related to biomarkers of AD pathology. Seventy-one cognitively normal individuals (females = 44, mean age = 63.5 years) performed 2 attention-demanding cognitive tasks in a design that modeled both trial- and task-level functional magnetic resonance imaging changes. Biomarkers included amyloid β42, tau, and phosphorylated tau measured from cerebrospinal fluid and positron emission tomography measures of amyloid deposition. Both tasks elicited widespread patterns of activation and deactivation associated with large task-level manipulations of attention. Importantly, results from both tasks indicated that higher levels of tau and phosphorylated tau pathologies were associated with block-level overactivations of attentional control areas. This suggests early alteration in attentional control with rising levels of AD pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian A Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis
- Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis
| | - Jeffrey M Zacks
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis
- Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis
| | - Tyler Blazey
- Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis
| | - Tammie LS Benzinger
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis
- Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis
- Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis
| | - John C Morris
- Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis
| | - Anne M Fagan
- Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis
- The Hope Center for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Washington University in St. Louis
| | - David M Holtzman
- Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis
- Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis
- The Hope Center for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Washington University in St. Louis
| | - David A Balota
- Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis
- Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis
| |
Collapse
|
380
|
Perna L, Wahl HW, Mons U, Saum KU, Holleczek B, Brenner H. Cognitive impairment, all-cause and cause-specific mortality among non-demented older adults. Age Ageing 2015; 44:445-51. [PMID: 25468013 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afu188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2014] [Accepted: 10/29/2014] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND cognitive impairment is widespread among older adults even in the absence of dementia, but very little is known about the association between cognitive impairment not due or not yet converted to dementia and mortality. The association between cognitive impairment and mortality contributes to assessing cognitive impairment-related risk constellation in old age in the absence of manifest dementia. OBJECTIVE to assess the impact of cognitive impairment on all-cause and cause-specific mortality among non-demented older adults and to explore the nature of the association between cognitive impairment and mortality. DESIGN an observational cohort study (ESTHER study; 2000-present). SETTING German state of Saarland. SUBJECTS a subsample of 1,622 participants aged ≥70 with measurement of cognitive function through the Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) and exclusion of a possible dementia diagnosis at both COGTEL baseline (2005-08) and over the mortality follow-up (2005-13). RESULTS during an average follow-up of 6.1 years, 231 participants (14.2%) died. Participants with low COGTEL total scores had ∼60% increased mortality compared with participants with higher COGTEL total scores in Cox regression models adjusting for a wide range of possible confounders (hazard ratio = 1.62; confidence interval 1.13-2.33). Dose-response analyses with restricted cubic splines indicate a monotonic inverse relationship between cognitive function and mortality. CONCLUSION cognitive impairment in the absence of manifest dementia is an important independent predictor of mortality, especially among men. The administration of cognitive tests among older adults may provide relevant information for patient care and treatment decisions. SOURCES OF FUNDING financial sponsors played no role in the design, execution, analysis and interpretation of data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Perna
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) - Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Werner Wahl
- Department of Psychological Aging Research, Institute of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Hauptstrasse 47-51-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ute Mons
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) - Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kai-Uwe Saum
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) - Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Holleczek
- Saarland Cancer Registry, Präsident Baltz Straβe 5-66119 Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) - Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
381
|
Insel PS, Mattsson N, Mackin RS, Kornak J, Nosheny R, Tosun-Turgut D, Donohue MC, Aisen PS, Weiner MW. Biomarkers and cognitive endpoints to optimize trials in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2015; 2:534-47. [PMID: 26000325 PMCID: PMC4435707 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2015] [Revised: 02/08/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To find the combination of candidate biomarkers and cognitive endpoints to maximize statistical power and minimize cost of clinical trials of healthy elders at risk for cognitive decline due to Alzheimer's disease. METHODS Four-hundred and twelve cognitively normal participants were followed over 7 years. Nonlinear methods were used to estimate the longitudinal trajectories of several cognitive outcomes including delayed memory recall, executive function, processing speed, and several cognitive composites by subgroups selected on the basis of biomarkers, including APOE-ε4 allele carriers, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (Aβ 42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau), and those with small hippocampi. RESULTS Derived cognitive composites combining Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS)-cog scores with additional delayed memory recall and executive function components captured decline more robustly across biomarker groups than any measure of a single cognitive domain or ADAS-cog alone. Substantial increases in power resulted when including only participants positive for three or more biomarkers in simulations of clinical trials. INTERPRETATION Clinical trial power may be improved by selecting participants on the basis of amyloid and neurodegeneration biomarkers and carefully tailoring primary cognitive endpoints to reflect the expected decline specific to these individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip S Insel
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases San Francisco, California ; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, California
| | - Niklas Mattsson
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases San Francisco, California ; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, California ; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg Mölndal, Sweden
| | - R Scott Mackin
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases San Francisco, California ; Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, California
| | - John Kornak
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, California
| | - Rachel Nosheny
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases San Francisco, California
| | - Duygu Tosun-Turgut
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases San Francisco, California ; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, California
| | - Michael C Donohue
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California San Diego, California ; Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, California
| | - Paul S Aisen
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, California
| | - Michael W Weiner
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases San Francisco, California ; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
382
|
Barthel H, Seibyl J, Sabri O. The role of positron emission tomography imaging in understanding Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Rev Neurother 2015; 15:395-406. [DOI: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1023296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
383
|
Chouraki V, Beiser A, Younkin L, Preis SR, Weinstein G, Hansson O, Skoog I, Lambert JC, Au R, Launer L, Wolf PA, Younkin S, Seshadri S. Plasma amyloid-β and risk of Alzheimer's disease in the Framingham Heart Study. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 11:249-57.e1. [PMID: 25217292 PMCID: PMC4362883 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2014] [Revised: 06/05/2014] [Accepted: 07/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plasma amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide levels have been examined as a low-cost accessible marker for risk of incident Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia, but results have varied between studies. We reassessed these associations in one of the largest, prospective, community-based studies to date. METHODS A total of 2189 dementia-free, Framingham Study participants aged >60 years (mean age, 72 ± 8 years; 56% women) had plasma Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40 measured and were followed prospectively (mean, 7.6 ± 3.0 years) for dementia/AD. RESULTS Increased plasma Aβ1-42 levels were associated with lower risk of dementia (Aβ1-42: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80 [0.71‒0.90], P < .001; Aβ1-42-to-Aβ1-40 ratio: HR = 0.86 [0.76‒0.98], P = .027) and AD (Aβ1-42: HR = 0.79 [0.69‒0.90], P < .001; Aβ1-42-to-Aβ1-40 ratio: HR = 0.83 [0.72‒0.96], P = .012). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that lower plasma Aβ levels are associated with risk of incident AD and dementia. They encourage further evaluation of plasma Aβ levels as a biomarker for risk of developing clinical AD and dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Chouraki
- The Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Alexa Beiser
- The Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sarah Rosner Preis
- The Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Galit Weinstein
- The Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ingmar Skoog
- Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Research Unit, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Jean-Charles Lambert
- Inserm UMR 744, Lille, France; Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France; Institut Pasteur de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Rhoda Au
- The Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lenore Launer
- Laboratory of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Philip A Wolf
- The Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sudha Seshadri
- The Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
384
|
Lewczuk P, Mroczko B, Fagan A, Kornhuber J. Biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a current perspective. Adv Med Sci 2015; 60:76-82. [PMID: 25579841 DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2014.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2014] [Revised: 09/12/2014] [Accepted: 11/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A growing body of evidence supports the application of the neurochemical dementia diagnostics (NDD) biomarkers for the diagnosis of dementing conditions. Biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) were recently classified as these reflecting amyloid β pathology (decreased CSF concentrations of Aβ42 and/or positive Aβ PET scan) and these reflecting neurodegeneration (increased CSF Tau concentrations, decreased uptake of FDG on FDG-PET, and cerebral atrophy on structural MRI). Particularly important seems the role of the biomarkers in the early diagnosis of AD, as the first pathophysiologic events observable in the CSF and amyloid β-PET occur years and perhaps decades before the onset of the earliest clinical symptoms. Therefore, the NDD tools enable the diagnosis of AD already in the early preclinical stage. This review summarizes pathophysiology underlying the CSF biomarkers, following a discussion of their role in the current guidelines for the diagnostic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Lewczuk
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen and Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Barbara Mroczko
- Department of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland; Department of Biochemical Diagnostics, University Hospital in Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Anne Fagan
- The Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen and Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
385
|
Vos SJB, Verhey F, Frölich L, Kornhuber J, Wiltfang J, Maier W, Peters O, Rüther E, Nobili F, Morbelli S, Frisoni GB, Drzezga A, Didic M, van Berckel BNM, Simmons A, Soininen H, Kłoszewska I, Mecocci P, Tsolaki M, Vellas B, Lovestone S, Muscio C, Herukka SK, Salmon E, Bastin C, Wallin A, Nordlund A, de Mendonça A, Silva D, Santana I, Lemos R, Engelborghs S, Van der Mussele S, Freund-Levi Y, Wallin ÅK, Hampel H, van der Flier W, Scheltens P, Visser PJ. Prevalence and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease at the mild cognitive impairment stage. Brain 2015; 138:1327-38. [PMID: 25693589 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awv029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 260] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2014] [Accepted: 12/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Three sets of research criteria are available for diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: the International Working Group-1, International Working Group-2, and National Institute of Aging-Alzheimer Association criteria. We compared the prevalence and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease at the mild cognitive impairment stage according to these criteria. Subjects with mild cognitive impairment (n = 1607), 766 of whom had both amyloid and neuronal injury markers, were recruited from 13 cohorts. We used cognitive test performance and available biomarkers to classify subjects as prodromal Alzheimer's disease according to International Working Group-1 and International Working Group-2 criteria and in the high Alzheimer's disease likelihood group, conflicting biomarker groups (isolated amyloid pathology or suspected non-Alzheimer pathophysiology), and low Alzheimer's disease likelihood group according to the National Institute of Ageing-Alzheimer Association criteria. Outcome measures were the proportion of subjects with Alzheimer's disease at the mild cognitive impairment stage and progression to Alzheimer's disease-type dementia. We performed survival analyses using Cox proportional hazards models. According to the International Working Group-1 criteria, 850 (53%) subjects had prodromal Alzheimer's disease. Their 3-year progression rate to Alzheimer's disease-type dementia was 50% compared to 21% for subjects without prodromal Alzheimer's disease. According to the International Working Group-2 criteria, 308 (40%) subjects had prodromal Alzheimer's disease. Their 3-year progression rate to Alzheimer's disease-type dementia was 61% compared to 22% for subjects without prodromal Alzheimer's disease. According to the National Institute of Ageing-Alzheimer Association criteria, 353 (46%) subjects were in the high Alzheimer's disease likelihood group, 49 (6%) in the isolated amyloid pathology group, 220 (29%) in the suspected non-Alzheimer pathophysiology group, and 144 (19%) in the low Alzheimer's disease likelihood group. The 3-year progression rate to Alzheimer's disease-type dementia was 59% in the high Alzheimer's disease likelihood group, 22% in the isolated amyloid pathology group, 24% in the suspected non-Alzheimer pathophysiology group, and 5% in the low Alzheimer's disease likelihood group. Our findings support the use of the proposed research criteria to identify Alzheimer's disease at the mild cognitive impairment stage. In clinical settings, the use of both amyloid and neuronal injury markers as proposed by the National Institute of Ageing-Alzheimer Association criteria offers the most accurate prognosis. For clinical trials, selection of subjects in the National Institute of Ageing-Alzheimer Association high Alzheimer's disease likelihood group or the International Working Group-2 prodromal Alzheimer's disease group could be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J B Vos
- 1 Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans Verhey
- 1 Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lutz Frölich
- 2 Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- 3 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- 4 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre (UMG), Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Maier
- 5 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Oliver Peters
- 6 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eckart Rüther
- 7 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Flavio Nobili
- 8 Clinical Neurophysiology Service, Department of Neurosciences, Ophthalmology and Genetics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Morbelli
- 9 Nuclear Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- 10 IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy 11 University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- 12 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mira Didic
- 13 Service de Neurologie et Neuropsychologie, Pôle de neurosciences cliniques, AP-HM Timone, Aix Marseille Université, INS UMR_S 1106, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- 14 Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Research, VU University Medical CentRE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew Simmons
- 15 Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Science, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- 16 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Neurocenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Patrizia Mecocci
- 18 Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Magda Tsolaki
- 19 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Memory and Dementia Center, 3rd Department of Neurology, "G Papanicolaou" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Bruno Vellas
- 20 UMR INSERM 1027, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Simon Lovestone
- 21 University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, UK
| | - Cristina Muscio
- 10 IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy 22 Fondazione Europea Ricerca Biomedica (FERB), Centro di Eccellenza Alzheimer, Ospedale Briolini, Gazzaniga, Bergamo, Italy 23 Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
- 16 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Neurocenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Eric Salmon
- 24 Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, CHU Liège, Belgium 25 Cyclotron Research Centre, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Christine Bastin
- 25 Cyclotron Research Centre, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Anders Wallin
- 26 Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute for Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Arto Nordlund
- 26 Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute for Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Alexandre de Mendonça
- 27 Institute of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Dina Silva
- 27 Institute of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Isabel Santana
- 28 Department of Neurology, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Raquel Lemos
- 29 Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Sebastiaan Engelborghs
- 30 Reference Centre for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), Laboratory of Neurochemistry and Behaviour, Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium 31 Department of Neurology and Memory Clinic, Hospital Network Antwerp, Middelheim and Hoge Beuken, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Stefan Van der Mussele
- 30 Reference Centre for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), Laboratory of Neurochemistry and Behaviour, Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Yvonne Freund-Levi
- 32 Department of Neurobiology, Caring Sciences and Society (NVS), Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Geriatric Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Åsa K Wallin
- 33 Lund University, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund, Sweden
| | - Harald Hampel
- 34 Centre des Maladies Cognitives et Comportementales, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Paris, France; Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, AP-HP, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Wiesje van der Flier
- 35 Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- 35 Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- 1 Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands 35 Alzheimer Centre and Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
386
|
Insights into cognitive aging and Alzheimer’s disease using amyloid PET and structural MRI scans. Clin Transl Imaging 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-015-0110-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
387
|
Caroli A, Prestia A, Galluzzi S, Ferrari C, van der Flier WM, Ossenkoppele R, Van Berckel B, Barkhof F, Teunissen C, Wall AE, Carter SF, Schöll M, Choo IH, Grimmer T, Redolfi A, Nordberg A, Scheltens P, Drzezga A, Frisoni GB. Mild cognitive impairment with suspected nonamyloid pathology (SNAP): Prediction of progression. Neurology 2015; 84:508-15. [PMID: 25568301 PMCID: PMC4336071 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2014] [Accepted: 10/08/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate predictors of progressive cognitive deterioration in patients with suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathology (SNAP) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS We measured markers of amyloid pathology (CSF β-amyloid 42) and neurodegeneration (hippocampal volume on MRI and cortical metabolism on [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET) in 201 patients with MCI clinically followed for up to 6 years to detect progressive cognitive deterioration. We categorized patients with MCI as A+/A- and N+/N- based on presence/absence of amyloid pathology and neurodegeneration. SNAPs were A-N+ cases. RESULTS The proportion of progressors was 11% (8/41), 34% (14/41), 56% (19/34), and 71% (60/85) in A-N-, A+N-, SNAP, and A+N+, respectively; the proportion of APOE ε4 carriers was 29%, 70%, 31%, and 71%, respectively, with the SNAP group featuring a significantly different proportion than both A+N- and A+N+ groups (p ≤ 0.005). Hypometabolism in SNAP patients was comparable to A+N+ patients (p = 0.154), while hippocampal atrophy was more severe in SNAP patients (p = 0.002). Compared with A-N-, SNAP and A+N+ patients had significant risk of progressive cognitive deterioration (hazard ratio = 2.7 and 3.8, p = 0.016 and p < 0.001), while A+N- patients did not (hazard ratio = 1.13, p = 0.771). In A+N- and A+N+ groups, none of the biomarkers predicted time to progression. In the SNAP group, lower time to progression was correlated with greater hypometabolism (r = 0.42, p = 0.073). CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the notion that patients with SNAP MCI feature a specific risk progression profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Caroli
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Annapaola Prestia
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Samantha Galluzzi
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Clarissa Ferrari
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bart Van Berckel
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Charlotte Teunissen
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anders E Wall
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stephen F Carter
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michael Schöll
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Il Han Choo
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Timo Grimmer
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Redolfi
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Philip Scheltens
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- From the Medical Imaging Unit (A.C.), Biomedical Engineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo; LENITEM-Laboratory of Epidemiology Neuroimaging and Telemedicine (A.P., S.G., C.F., A.R., G.B.F.), IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (W.M.v.d.F., R.O., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (B.V.B., F.B.), and Neurochemistry Laboratorium and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.T.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; PET-Center (A.E.W.), Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University; Alzheimer Neurobiology Center (S.F.C., M.S., I.H.C., A.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre (S.F.C.), University of Manchester, UK; MedTech West (M.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neuropsychiatry (I.H.C.), School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (T.G.), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Muenchen, Germany; Department of Geriatric Medicine (A.N.), Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Nuclear Medicine (A.D.), University of Cologne, Germany; and Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry (G.B.F.), University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
388
|
Thal DR, Walter J, Saido TC, Fändrich M. Neuropathology and biochemistry of Aβ and its aggregates in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol 2015; 129:167-82. [PMID: 25534025 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1375-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 215] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2014] [Revised: 12/09/2014] [Accepted: 12/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by β-amyloid plaques and intraneuronal τ aggregation usually associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Both β-amyloid plaques and CAA deposits contain fibrillar aggregates of the amyloid β-peptide (Aβ). Aβ plaques and CAA develop first in neocortical areas of preclinical AD patients and, then, expand in a characteristic sequence into further brain regions with end-stage pathology in symptomatic AD patients. Aβ aggregates are not restricted to amyloid plaques and CAA. Soluble and several types of insoluble non-plaque- and non-CAA-associated Aβ aggregates have been described. Amyloid fibrils are products of a complex self-assembly process that involves different types of transient intermediates. Amongst these intermediate species are protofibrils and oligomers. Different variants of Aβ peptides may result from alternative processing or from mutations that lead to rare forms of familial AD. These variants can exhibit different self-assembly and aggregation properties. In addition, several post-translational modifications of Aβ have been described that result, for example, in the production of N-terminal truncated Aβ with pyroglutamate modification at position 3 (AβN3pE) or of Aβ phosphorylated at serine 8 (pSer8Aβ). Both AβN3pE and pSer8Aβ show enhanced aggregation into oligomers and fibrils. However, the earliest detectable soluble and insoluble Aβ aggregates in the human brain exhibit non-modified Aβ, whereas AβN3pE and pSer8Aβ are detected in later stages. This finding indicates the existence of different biochemical stages of Aβ aggregate maturation with pSer8Aβ being related mainly to cases with symptomatic AD. The conversion from preclinical to symptomatic AD could thereby be related to combined effects of increased Aβ concentration, maturation of aggregates and spread of deposits into additional brain regions. Thus, the inhibition of Aβ aggregation and maturation before entering the symptomatic stage of the disease as indicated by the accumulation of pSer8Aβ may represent an attractive treatment strategy for preventing disease progression.
Collapse
|
389
|
Mar J, Soto-Gordoa M, Arrospide A, Moreno-Izco F, Martínez-Lage P. Fitting the epidemiology and neuropathology of the early stages of Alzheimer's disease to prevent dementia. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2015; 7:2. [PMID: 25713598 PMCID: PMC4338563 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-014-0079-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2014] [Accepted: 10/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Recent research on biomarkers has made possible the diagnosis of pre-dementia and even preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD), thus providing the ideal context for prevention. The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of the early stages of AD by fitting neuropathologic and epidemiological data to assess the feasibility of prevention programs. Methods The study addressed primarily the construction of a discrete event simulation model of the stages of dementia. Age was included in the mathematical functions to combine the two competitive risks that determine the epidemiology of AD, that is, time to onset of dementia and time until death by other causes. Subsequently, this model was calibrated to reproduce the prevalence of pathological findings associated with AD. The beginning of the preclinical stage was taken to coincide with Thal phase 1 deposition of amyloid-beta. The duration of the prodromal stage, marked by mild cognitive impairment, was based on a 10% annual conversion rate from this level of impairment to dementia. The validation of prevalence figures also permitted estimation of the incidence and duration of preclinical and prodromal stages. Results In Spain, half of the nearly 10 million people aged more than 60 years are in the early stages of AD; 35.9% are in a preclinical stage, and up to 14.2% are in a prodromal stage. However, dementia will develop in only 38% of this population. The weighted mean time to dementia was 22.0 years from the start of Thal phase 1 and 9.0 years from the start of phase 2. Results of simulation models showed a lack of correlation between clinical and pathological classifications. Conclusions These findings raise questions about the feasibility of drug-based prevention strategies. Currently, screening programs with biomarkers in the early stages of AD cannot be applied to the half of the general population older than 60 years. Hence, intensive research is needed regarding risk factors, so that more affordable strategies may be planned. More efficient criteria are also needed to select those subjects with mild cognitive impairment who have an increased probability of positive screening for biomarkers (prodromal stage). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13195-014-0079-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Mar
- Clinical Management Unit, Alto Deba Hospital, Avenida Navarra 16, Mondragon, 20500 Spain ; Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Avenida Navarra 16, Mondragon, 20500 Spain
| | - Myriam Soto-Gordoa
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Avenida Navarra 16, Mondragon, 20500 Spain ; AP-OSI Research Unit, Alto Deba Hospital, Avenida Navarra 16, Mondragon, 20500 Spain
| | - Arantzazu Arrospide
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Avenida Navarra 16, Mondragon, 20500 Spain ; AP-OSI Research Unit, Alto Deba Hospital, Avenida Navarra 16, Mondragon, 20500 Spain
| | - Fermín Moreno-Izco
- Department of Neurology, Donostia Hospital, C/ Dr Beguiristain s/n, Donostia-San Sebastián, 20014 Spain
| | - Pablo Martínez-Lage
- Fundación CITA-Alzheimer Fundazioa, Pº Mikeletegi 71, Donostia-San Sebastián, 20009 Spain
| |
Collapse
|
390
|
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and a lack of effective prevention or disease-modifying therapies are global challenges with devastating personal, social and economic consequences. The amyloid β (Aβ) hypothesis posits that cerebral β-amyloidosis is a critical early event in AD pathogenesis. However, failed clinical trials of Aβ-centric drug candidates have called this hypothesis into question. Whereas we acknowledge that the Aβ hypothesis is far from disproven, we here re-visit the links between Aβ, tau and neurodegeneration. We review the genetics, epidemiology and pathology of sporadic AD and give an updated account of what is currently known about the molecular pathogenesis of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, S-431 80 Mölndal, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
391
|
De Strooper B, Chávez Gutiérrez L. Learning by Failing: Ideas and Concepts to Tackle γ-Secretases in Alzheimer's Disease and Beyond. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2015; 55:419-37. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bart De Strooper
- VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Center for Human Genetics, Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, KU Leuven, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium; ,
| | - Lucía Chávez Gutiérrez
- VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Center for Human Genetics, Laboratory for the Research of Neurodegenerative Diseases, KU Leuven, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium; ,
| |
Collapse
|
392
|
Prasad H, Rao R. The Na+/H+ exchanger NHE6 modulates endosomal pH to control processing of amyloid precursor protein in a cell culture model of Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem 2015; 290:5311-27. [PMID: 25561733 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.602219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Early intervention may be key to safe and effective therapies in patients with Alzheimer disease. Endosomal dysfunction is an early step in neurodegeneration. Endosomes are a major site of production of Aβ peptide from the processing of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by clipping enzymes (β- and γ-secretases). The β-secretase enzyme BACE1 requires acidic lumen pH for optimum function, and acid pH promotes Aβ aggregation. The Na(+)/H(+) exchanger NHE6 provides a leak pathway for protons, limiting luminal acidification by proton pumps. Like APP, NHE6 expression was induced upon differentiation of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells and localized to an endosomal compartment. Therefore, we investigated whether NHE6 expression altered APP localization and processing in a stably transfected cell culture model of human APP expression. We show that co-expression with NHE6 or treatment with the Na(+)/H(+) ionophore monensin shifted APP away from the trans-Golgi network into early and recycling endosomes in HEK293 cells. NHE6 alkalinized the endosomal lumen, similar to monensin, and significantly attenuated APP processing and Aβ secretion. In contrast, Aβ production was elevated upon NHE6 knockdown. We show that NHE6 transcript and protein levels are lowered in Alzheimer brains relative to control. These findings, taken together with emerging genetic evidence linking endosomal Na(+)/H(+) exchangers with Alzheimer disease, suggest that proton leak pathways may regulate Aβ generation and contribute to disease etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hari Prasad
- From the Department of Physiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
| | - Rajini Rao
- From the Department of Physiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
| |
Collapse
|
393
|
Hampel H, Schneider LS, Giacobini E, Kivipelto M, Sindi S, Dubois B, Broich K, Nisticò R, Aisen PS, Lista S. Advances in the therapy of Alzheimer's disease: targeting amyloid beta and tau and perspectives for the future. Expert Rev Neurother 2014; 15:83-105. [PMID: 25537424 DOI: 10.1586/14737175.2015.995637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Worldwide multidisciplinary translational research has led to a growing knowledge of the genetics and molecular pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) indicating that pathophysiological brain alterations occur decades before clinical signs and symptoms of cognitive decline can be diagnosed. Consequently, therapeutic concepts and targets have been increasingly focused on early-stage illness before the onset of dementia; and distinct classes of compounds are now being tested in clinical trials. At present, there is a growing consensus that therapeutic progress in AD delaying disease progression would significantly decrease the expanding global burden. The evolving hypothesis- and evidence-based generation of new diagnostic research criteria for early-stage AD has positively impacted the development of clinical trial designs and the characterization of earlier and more specific target populations for trials in prodromal as well as in pre- and asymptomatic at-risk stages of AD.
Collapse
|
394
|
Arangalage D, Ederhy S, Dufour L, Joffre J, Van der Vynckt C, Lang S, Tzourio C, Cohen A. Relationship between cognitive impairment and echocardiographic parameters: a review. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014; 28:264-74. [PMID: 25532969 DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
With >24 million people affected worldwide, dementia is one of the main public health challenges modern medicine has to face. The path leading to dementia is often long, with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, and preceded by a long preclinical phase. Previous studies have demonstrated that clinical strokes and covert vascular lesions of the brain contribute to the risk for developing dementia. Although it is not yet known whether preventing such lesions reduces the risk for dementia, it is likely that starting preventive measures early in the course of the disease may be beneficial. Echocardiography is a widely available, relatively inexpensive, noninvasive imaging modality whereby morphologically or hemodynamically derived parameters may be integrated easily into a risk assessment model for dementia. The aim of this review is to analyze the information that has accumulated over the past two decades on the prognostic value of echocardiographic factors in cognitive impairment. The associations between cognitive impairment and echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular systolic and diastolic indices, left atrial morphologic parameters, cardiac output, left ventricular mass, and aortic root diameter, have previously been reported. In the light of these studies, it appears that echocardiography may help further improve currently used risk assessment models by allowing detection of subclinical cardiac abnormalities associated with future cognitive impairment. However, many limitations, including methodologic heterogeneity and the observational designs of these studies, restrict the scope of these results. Further prospective studies are required before integrating echocardiography into a preventive strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitri Arangalage
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; University Paris 6, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Ederhy
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Laurie Dufour
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; University Paris 6, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - Jérémie Joffre
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Clélie Van der Vynckt
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; University Paris 6, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - Sylvie Lang
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Tzourio
- INSERM Research Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics (U897), Team Neuroepidemiology, and University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Ariel Cohen
- Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; University Paris 6, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
395
|
Hu WT, Watts KD, Shaw LM, Howell JC, Trojanowski JQ, Basra S, Glass JD, Lah JJ, Levey AI. CSF beta-amyloid 1-42 - what are we measuring in Alzheimer's disease? Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2014; 2:131-9. [PMID: 25750918 PMCID: PMC4338954 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2014] [Revised: 11/19/2014] [Accepted: 11/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To characterize biological and technical factors which influence cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker levels, including the presence of apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele, AD diagnosis, Aβ-binding proteins, sample processing, and preanalytical handling. Methods CSF was collected from 140 subjects with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, AD, and non-AD dementia. CSF levels of beta-amyloid 1–42 (Aβ42), total Tau (t-Tau), and Tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-Tau181) were analyzed following the standard and modified protocols. CSF levels of apoJ, apoE, albumin, and α-synuclein were measured in a subgroup (n = 69), and their effects on measured AD biomarker levels were also determined in vitro using human CSF samples. Results CSF Aβ42 levels measured using the AD Neuro-imaging Initiative (ADNI) protocol (which we call suspended Aβ42 or susAβ) were lower than total measurable CSF Aβ42 in all groups, and on average represents 57% of the latter. Logistic regression analysis showed this proportion (% susAβ) to be directly correlated with CSF Aβ42 and apoJ levels, but inversely correlated with CSF t-Tau levels. Finally, we showed in vitro that increasing apoE and apoJ levels directly increased % susAβ. Conclusion CSF susAβ levels are influenced by biological and technical factors, and may represent a marker of Aβ susceptible to lipoprotein-mediated clearance. Clinical trials should include total measurable Aβ42 and susAβ to better inform outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William T Hu
- Department of Neurology, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kelly D Watts
- Department of Neurology, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Leslie M Shaw
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer C Howell
- Department of Neurology, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia
| | - John Q Trojanowski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sundeep Basra
- Department of Neurology, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jonathan D Glass
- Department of Neurology, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia
| | - James J Lah
- Department of Neurology, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Allan I Levey
- Department of Neurology, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia ; Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Emory University Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
396
|
Morris J, Katz S, Peters KR. Interview with Dr John Morris, 28 February 2013. DEMENTIA 2014; 14:335-42. [PMID: 25502353 DOI: 10.1177/1471301214562142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
397
|
Abstract
Alzheimer disease (AD) and Parkinson disease (PD) are the most common neurodegenerative disorders. For both diseases, early intervention is thought to be essential to the success of disease-modifying treatments. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can reflect some of the pathophysiological changes that occur in the brain, and the number of CSF biomarkers under investigation in neurodegenerative conditions has grown rapidly in the past 20 years. In AD, CSF biomarkers are increasingly being used in clinical practice, and have been incorporated into the majority of clinical trials to demonstrate target engagement, to enrich or stratify patient groups, and to find evidence of disease modification. In PD, CSF biomarkers have not yet reached the clinic, but are being studied in patients with parkinsonism, and are being used in clinical trials either to monitor progression or to demonstrate target engagement and downstream effects of drugs. CSF biomarkers might also serve as surrogate markers of clinical benefit after a specific therapeutic intervention, although additional data are required. It is anticipated that CSF biomarkers will have an important role in trials aimed at disease modification in the near future. In this Review, we provide an overview of CSF biomarkers in AD and PD, and discuss their role in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
398
|
Ma L, Chen J, Wang R, Han Y, Zhang J, Dong W, Zhao Z, Liu Y, Chu X. Alzheimer-associated urine neuronal thread protein level increases with age in a healthy Chinese population. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21:2118-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2014] [Revised: 04/17/2014] [Accepted: 04/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
399
|
Affiliation(s)
- Clifford R Jack
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
400
|
Crary JF, Trojanowski JQ, Schneider JA, Abisambra JF, Abner EL, Alafuzoff I, Arnold SE, Attems J, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW, Gearing M, Grinberg LT, Hof PR, Hyman BT, Jellinger K, Jicha GA, Kovacs GG, Knopman DS, Kofler J, Kukull WA, Mackenzie IR, Masliah E, McKee A, Montine TJ, Murray ME, Neltner JH, Santa-Maria I, Seeley WW, Serrano-Pozo A, Shelanski ML, Stein T, Takao M, Thal DR, Toledo JB, Troncoso JC, Vonsattel JP, White CL, Wisniewski T, Woltjer RL, Yamada M, Nelson PT. Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging. Acta Neuropathol 2014; 128:755-66. [PMID: 25348064 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1349-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1057] [Impact Index Per Article: 96.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2014] [Revised: 09/26/2014] [Accepted: 09/28/2014] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
We recommend a new term, "primary age-related tauopathy" (PART), to describe a pathology that is commonly observed in the brains of aged individuals. Many autopsy studies have reported brains with neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) that are indistinguishable from those of Alzheimer's disease (AD), in the absence of amyloid (Aβ) plaques. For these "NFT+/Aβ-" brains, for which formal criteria for AD neuropathologic changes are not met, the NFTs are mostly restricted to structures in the medial temporal lobe, basal forebrain, brainstem, and olfactory areas (bulb and cortex). Symptoms in persons with PART usually range from normal to amnestic cognitive changes, with only a minority exhibiting profound impairment. Because cognitive impairment is often mild, existing clinicopathologic designations, such as "tangle-only dementia" and "tangle-predominant senile dementia", are imprecise and not appropriate for most subjects. PART is almost universally detectable at autopsy among elderly individuals, yet this pathological process cannot be specifically identified pre-mortem at the present time. Improved biomarkers and tau imaging may enable diagnosis of PART in clinical settings in the future. Indeed, recent studies have identified a common biomarker profile consisting of temporal lobe atrophy and tauopathy without evidence of Aβ accumulation. For both researchers and clinicians, a revised nomenclature will raise awareness of this extremely common pathologic change while providing a conceptual foundation for future studies. Prior reports that have elucidated features of the pathologic entity we refer to as PART are discussed, and working neuropathological diagnostic criteria are proposed.
Collapse
|