Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with clopidogrel

New recommendations from the 1999 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association acute myocardial infarction guidelines

OBJECTIVE

To review literature relating to significant changes in drug therapy recommendations in the 1999 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for treating patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

DATA SOURCES

1999 ACC/AHA AMI guidelines, English-language clinical trials, reviews, and editorials researching the role of drug therapy and primary angioplasty for AMI that were referenced in the guidelines were included. Additional data published in 2000 or unpublished were also included if relevant to interpretation of the guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

The articles selected influence AMI treatment recommendations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Many clinicians and health systems use the ACC/AHA AMI guidelines to develop treatment plans for AMI patients. This review highlights important changes in AMI drug therapy recommendations by reviewing the results of recent clinical trials. Insights into evolving drug therapy strategies that may impact future guideline development are also described.

CONCLUSIONS

Several changes in drug therapy recommendations were included in the 1999 AMI ACC/AHA guidelines. There is emphasis on administering fibrin-specific thrombolytics secondary to enhanced efficacy. Selection between fibrin-specific agents is unclear at this time. Low response rates to thrombolytics have been noted in the elderly, women, patients with heart failure, and those showing left bundle-branch block on the electrocardiogram. These patient groups should be targeted for improved utilization programs. The use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in non-ST-segment elevation MI was emphasized. Small trials combining reduced doses of thrombolytics with GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors have shown promise by increasing reperfusion rates without increasing bleeding risk, but firm conclusions cannot be made until the results of larger trials are known. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials suggest lower mortality rates for primary PCI when compared with thrombolysis alone. However, primary PCI, including coronary angioplasty, is only available at approximately 13% of US hospitals, making thrombolysis the preferred strategy for most patients. Clopidogrel has supplanted ticlopidine as the recommended antiplatelet agent for patients with aspirin allergy or intolerance following reports of a better safety profile. The recommended dose of unfractionated heparin is lower than previously recommended, necessitating a separate nomogram for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Routine use of warfarin, either alone or in combination with aspirin, is not supported by clinical trials; however, warfarin remains a choice for antithrombotic therapy in patients intolerant to aspirin. Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers continue to be recommended, and emphasis is placed on improving rates of early administration (during hospitalization), even in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction. New recommendations for drug treatment of post-AMI patients with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and/or elevated triglycerides are included, with either niacin or gemfibrozil recommended as an option. Supplementary antioxidants are not recommended for either primary or secondary prevention of AMI, with new data demonstrating lack of efficacy vitamin E in primary prevention. Estrogen replacement therapy or hormonal replacement therapy should not be initiated solely for prevention of cardiovascular disease, but can be continued in cardiovascular patients already taking long-term therapy for other reasons. Bupropion has been added as a new treatment option for smoking cessation. As drug therapy continues to evolve in treating AMI, more frequent updates of therapy guidelines will be necessary.

Novel platelet inhibitors

Platelet-inhibitory drugs are of proven benefit to individuals who suffer from atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Despite substantial effort to identify more potent platelet-inhibitory agents, aspirin, an irreversible inhibitor of platelet cyclooxygenase activity, remains the standard against which other drugs are judged. Drugs that appear to be at least as efficacious as aspirin in specific clinical settings include the thienopyridines ticlopidine and clopidogrel, specific inhibitors of ADP-stimulated platelet function, and the phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor cilostazol. Ligand binding to the platelet integrin alphaIIbbeta3 (GPIIb-IIIa), a prerequisite for platelet thrombus formation, has been a prominent target for drug development. Currently, three types of alphaIIbbeta3 antagonists are available: the monoclonal antibody Fab fragment abciximab, cyclic peptides based on the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) or related amino acid motifs, and RGD-based peptidomimetics. The efficacy of each type of alphaIIbbeta3 antagonist in the setting of acute coronary artery disease has been confirmed in multicenter clinical trials.

von Willebrand factor and von Willebrand factor-cleaving metalloprotease activity in Escherichia coli O157:H7-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) usually occurs after infection with Shiga toxin-producing bacteria. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, a disorder with similar clinical manifestations, is associated with deficient activity of a circulating metalloprotease that cleaves von Willebrand factor at the Tyr842-Met843 peptide bond in a shear stress-dependent manner. We analyzed von Willebrand factor-cleaving metalloprotease activity and the status of von Willebrand factor in 16 children who developed HUS after Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection and in 29 infected children who did not develop this complication. Von Willebrand factor-cleaving metalloprotease activity was normal in all subjects, but von Willebrand factor size was decreased in the plasma of each of 16 patients with HUS. The decrease in circulating von Willebrand factor size correlated with the severity of thrombocytopenia and was proportional to an increase in von Willebrand factor proteolytic fragments in plasma. Immunohistochemical studies of the kidneys in four additional patients who died of HUS demonstrated glomerular thrombi in three patients, and arterial and arteriolar thrombi in one patient. The glomerular thrombi contained fibrin but little or no von Willebrand factor. A decrease in large von Willebrand factor multimers, presumably caused by enhanced proteolysis from abnormal shear stress in the microcirculation, is common in HUS.

Multilink Stent Promotes Less Platelet and Leukocyte Adhesion Than a Traditional Stainless Steel Stent

BACKGROUND

Platelet and leukocyte deposition onto metallic struts can be a crucial factor in the outcome of a coronary stenting procedure. By means of an in vitro, closed-loop circulation model, we aimed to assess blood-stent interaction patterns for a new stainless steel stent (MultiLink, Guidant Nederland BV, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands).

METHODS

The effect of MultiLink (n=20) on blood cells and blood activation was studied by biochemical assays. Platelet and leukocyte adhesion to MultiLink were studied by immunofluorocytometric assays (anti-GpIIIa [CD 61] and anti-CD11b labeled antibodies, respectively), and by scanning electron microscopy. MultiLink was compared with empty circuits (n=20) and to the Palmaz Schatz stent (n=20). Experiments were performed both in the presence and in the absence of an antiplatelet agent (15 microg/mL of indomethacin).

RESULTS

No significant effect on blood cells and blood activation was demonstrated for MultiLink. Antiplatelet treatment significantly reduced platelet adhesion to MultiLink (from 3.78+/-1.28 to 2.23+/-0.57 x 10(6) count per second [cps]/stent) but not to the Palmaz Schatz stent (from 4.11+/-0.31 to 5.02+/-1.29 x 10(6) cps/stent)(P=0.011). Leukocyte adhesion to MultiLink was significantly less than adhesion to the Palmaz Schatz stent (7.95+/-1.59 vs. 9.16+/-1.36 x 10(6) cps/stent, respectively; P=0.016), regardless of the presence of antiplatelet treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with a traditional stainless steel stent, MultiLink seems to have features of improved hemocompatibility, and single antiplatelet treatment is proposed as the treatment of choice to prevent platelet deposition.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS): the new thinking

TTP and HUS are two disorders with many similarities. Though their first descriptions appeared at different time in history, there has been a trend among physicians to consider them as the same clinical entity. However, in recent years new research findings on the pathophysiology of TTP and HUS have revealed some differences between the two disorders. In this paper, we will review the current approaches to the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of TTP and HUS, as well as therapeutic strategies. We will also summarize the recent advances in three areas in the study of the pathophysiology of TTP and HUS, namely the newly discovered von Willebrand factor multimer-cleaving protease, endothelial cell apoptosis induced by serum from patients with TTP and atypical HUS and the activation of complement system. Since distinguishing and differentiating between TTP and HUS may help to develop more effective therapies targeted at key steps of the disease development, we will discuss possible ways of reclassifying the TTP-HUS disorders. In the end, we also present our views on possible future development.

Adjunctive therapies in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes

Survival after myocardial infarction has been improving steadily in recent decades, in part because of more effective adjunctive medical therapies. However, the issue of underutilization of effective medical therapies remains. Adjunctive therapy for acute myocardial infarction should include aspirin, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and lipid-lowering agents, all of which improve survival in the treatment and secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. This review presents the current knowledge supporting the use of specific adjunctive pharmacologic agents and also discusses the current status of other agents that are emerging or controversial.

Antithrombotic drugs for secondary stroke prophylaxis

Stroke is the third most common cause of adult mortality in the United States. Antithrombotic agents form the mainstay of stroke prevention. Aspirin produces a modest reduction in the risk of second stroke and is widely recommended for initial therapy. The thienopyridines ticlopidine and clopidogrel are alternatives for secondary prevention in patients who do not respond to or cannot take aspirin. They are no more effective than aspirin and have been associated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. The combination of aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole has several mechanisms of action and an additive effect on reducing stroke risk compared with either agent alone. A 2-fold increase in risk reduction and favorable safety profile suggest that the combination can serve as first-line prophylaxis against a second stroke.

Management of the first-time transient ischaemic attack

The assessment and management of patients with a suspected transient ischaemic attack of the brain or eye is a daily task in busy emergency departments. They are common, affecting about 50 per 100,000 population each year. Conditions which mimic a transient ischaemic attack are even more common (e.g. migraine aura, partial seizures, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, hysteria). This comprehensive review outlines an approach to the management of this complex and challenging problem.

Clinical use of new antithrombotic therapies for medical management of acute coronary syndromes

Prevention and management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are focal points of interest among health care providers. Acute coronary syndromes is an all-encompassing term that refers to unstable angina, non-Q wave myocardial infarction, and Q wave myocardial infarction. These syndromes are usually the result of atherosclerotic plaque rupture leading to thrombus formation in a coronary artery. Heparin and aspirin are traditional antithrombotic treatments. They typically are administered with antiischemic therapies and often with fibrinolytic agents for patients with ST segment elevation associated with acute myocardial infarction. Although aspirin and heparin are important, they have significant limitations that have prompted development of newer antithrombotic approaches. Adenosine diphosphate inhibitors have been evaluated as either alternatives or adjunctive treatment to aspirin. Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors, low-molecular-weight heparins, and direct thrombin inhibitors have been studied as concurrent therapy with, or as alternatives to, heparin.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunctive abciximab and clopidogrel in a patient with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura

The use of the antiplatelet agents abciximab and clopidogrel is now accepted therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention. We present a case in which these agents were used in a patient with idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura and a platelet count of 40x10(9)/l undergoing primary multivessel coronary stenting. This case shows that unstable coronary syndromes can occur in patients with thrombocytopaenia and that antiplatelet agents may be used safely in this context.

Antiplatelet agents in stroke prevention. combination therapy: present and future

Platelets contribute to arterial thrombosis by multiple mechanisms that promote blood clotting, favor vasoconstriction, activate the procoagulant capacity of endothelium, and stimulate inflammation. These activities are augmented by turbulent blood flow. Classic antiplatelet therapy with aspirin to prevent occlusive stroke offers significant clinical benefit (20-25% risk reduction), yet is less effective than in prevention of coronary artery occlusion (up to 50% risk reduction of myocardial infarction in unstable angina). Since aspirin's antiplatelet effects are limited to blocking a single metabolic pathway - namely inhibition of thromboxane A(2) formation -, and aspirin fails to alter platelet adhesion, other antiplatelet agents that target ADP receptors, platelet surface glycoproteins (such as the GPIIb/IIIa complex), or platelet-dependent thrombin generation offer additional clinical benefits by blocking additional separate pathways or the final common pathway of platelet activation. Combinations of antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin/dipyridamole, aspirin/clopidogrel, or aspirin/GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors, have recently been tested for improved efficacy in clinical trials. Soluble recombinant CD39, an ecto-ADPase, protects against stroke in animal models by metabolizing released ADP/ATP to antiplatelet derivatives. In general, combinations of antiplatelet agents promise greater efficacy than single drugs in preventing stroke, since interactions among different antiplatelet mechanisms can be synergistic. However, such combinations may also increase the risk of bleeding, so that precise understanding of risk/benefit ratios that address the possibility of intracranial as well as gastrointestinal bleeding will require careful monitoring in large clinical trials of patients at risk of stroke, with particular attention to the elderly.

Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke

Antithrombotic and thrombolytic agents form the cornerstone of stroke prevention and treatment. Large, randomized trials have also highlighted the effectiveness and safety of early and continuous antiplatelet therapy in reducing atherothrombotic stroke recurrence. Aspirin is the antiplatelet treatment standard against which several other antiplatelet agents (ticlopidine, clopidogrel, aspirin-dipyridamole) have been shown to be more effective. The prevention of cardioembolic stroke is best accomplished with oral anticoagulation, barring any contraindications. The thrombolytic agent, rt-PA, improves outcome in ischemic stroke patients treated within 3 hours of onset. The risk-benefit ratio is narrow because of an increased risk for bleeding but studies do not support a higher risk in the geriatric population.

Comparison of effects of clopidogrel versus ticlopidine on platelet function in patients undergoing coronary stent placement

Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin administered as a loading dose of 450 mg reveals an accelerated antiplatelet effect in the early hours after first administration in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.

Evidence-based treatment of patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease

The results of trials that study patients with defined lesions (atrial fibrillation without valvular heart disease, various severities of carotid artery stenosis in the neck, intracranial artery stenosis) are very helpful for clinicians caring for patients with those conditions. On the other hand, trials that group all patients with brain ischemia together are not very helpful. Modern technology now makes it possible to define quickly and safely: (1) the location, nature, and severity of causative cerebrovascular, cardiac, and aortic lesions; (2) blood constituents and coagulability; and, (3) the presence, location, and severity of ischemic brain damage. As in all medicine, treatment should be aimed at the cause of disease, not the time course and severity of present damage. Clearly, more trials are needed in patients who have been studied thoroughly using modern technology. Until then, clinicians must understand the context of the trial data to determine if the results are applicable to Mr. or Ms. Jones, and the patients sitting before them in the office or in the hospital bed.

Choices in medical management for prevention of acute ischemic stroke

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Although advances are being made in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, its prevention is equally as important. Identification and management of risk factors are essential. Medical therapy is also helpful in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. There are currently four platelet-antiaggregating agents used to prevent ischemic stroke: aspirin, aspirin plus dipyridamole, clopidogrel, and ticlopidine. The relevant studies proving their efficacy are noted, as are some of their similarities and differences. The use of warfarin is also discussed.

Antithrombotic therapy in cardiac stent patients

The use of coronary stents has made a significant impact on immediate angiographic results of coronary angioplasty as well as on the more important incidence of restenosis and the need for repeat procedures. This could not have been accomplished without adjuvant antithrombotic therapy directed predominantly at platelet function. Antiplatelet agents have significantly reduced the complications and improved the long-term outcome following coronary stent placement. This paper reviews the evolution of adjuvant antithrombotic therapy following stent placement, the agents currently used and future directions being investigated.

Interventional procedures in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of death in the United States. There is evidence that primary (direct) percutaneous intervention (PCI) may improve survival and reduce morbidity in patients with acute MI.

METHODS

We present a concise, comprehensive, evidence-based literature review of modern techniques of primary PCI in patients with acute MI. A comparison to thrombolytic therapy, especially in selected patient subgroups is made. Rescue angioplasty is also addressed. Adjunctive pharmacology, economic implications, and feasibility of implementation are discussed. A brief discussion of experimental therapies is included.

RESULTS

Primary PCI is an acceptable alternative to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute MI and may result in superior outcomes in select patient populations, especially the elderly, patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery, those with congestive heart failure, and those in cardiogenic shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials support the use of primary PCI as first-line therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Patients in whom thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated or known to have reduced efficacy are also excellent candidates for this therapy. Ongoing advancements in equipment and adjunctive therapies continue to enhance delivery of this treatment as well as improve patient outcome.

Ticlopidine versus oral anticoagulation for coronary stenting

BACKGROUND

A 2-4 week course of ticlopidine plus aspirin following coronary stenting is considered effective in preventing thrombotic occlusion of the stented vessel and safe in regards to bleeding and peripheral vascular complications. However, rare, although potentially life-threatening haematological complications have been reported with this drug regimen.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticlopidine plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulants after coronary stenting

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase from 1991 to June 1999; references from trials and experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing ticlopidine plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulants (either with or without aspirin) after elective or bail out coronary stenting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers assessed trial quality and compiled data on outcomes including: total mortality, non fatal myocardial infarction and revascularization occurring within the first 30 days after hospitalization, stent thrombosis on angiography, major and minor bleeding, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials (n=2436 patients) were included. Ticlopidine plus aspirin compared to oral anticoagulants significantly reduced the risk of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction and revascularization at 30 days, combined negative events (mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization at 30 days) (RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.25-0.69; NNT for 30 days: 22; 95% CI: 14-45), and major bleeding (RR in high quality studies: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.79). Ticlopidine plus aspirin compared to oral anticoagulants significantly increased the risk of eutropenia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia (RR 5; 95% CI: 1.08-13.07; NNT for 30 days: 142; 95% CI: 76-1000). Ticlopidine plus aspirin vs oral anticoagulation did not affect all cause mortality. Ticlopidine plus aspirin significantly reduced the risk of stent thrombosis (angiography) which was seen only on studies with blinded outcome assessment (RR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.03-0.60; NNT for 30 days: 33; 95% CI:16-166). Minor bleeding was reported only in one study and no studies recorded thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Ticlopidine plus aspirin after coronary stenting is effective in reducing the risk of the revascularization, non fatal myocardial infarction and bleeding complications when compared with oral anticoagulants. No effect is observed on total mortality. However, the haematological side effects of ticlopidine are still a matter of concern, and strict monitoring of blood-cell counts is recommended. Physicians should also be aware of the possibility of rare although potentially life-threatening complications such as TTP

Cilostazol: treatment of intermittent claudication

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology and clinical utility of cilostazol, an antiplatelet and vasodilator agent approved for the management of intermittent claudication.

DATA SOURCES

Primary literature on cilostazol was identified from a comprehensive MEDLINE literature search (1980-February 2000). Selected meeting abstracts and manufacturer literature were also used as source material. Indexing terms included cilostazol, intermittent claudication, platelet inhibitors, and restenosis.

STUDY SELECTION

Human clinical, pharmacokinetic and randomized comparative trials performed in the US and Asia were reviewed. Selected in vitro, ex vivo, and animal studies were evaluated when human data were not available.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Intermittent claudication, defined as reproducible discomfort of a muscle group induced by exercise and relieved by rest, is the most common clinical manifestation of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Cilostazol, a specific inhibitor of cyclic adenosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase in platelets and vascular smooth-muscle cells, is a potent antiplatelet agent and vasodilator that reduces vascular proliferation and has lipid-lowering effects in vivo. Recent multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trials have led to approval of cilostazol by the Food and Drug Administration for relief of intermittent claudication in patients with stable PAD. Cilostazol doubled walking distances and improved quality of life compared with placebo in these studies. One trial found that cilostazol was more effective than pentoxifylline, the only alternative pharmacologic therapy for claudication. Although frequent (approximately 50%) minor adverse effects, including headache, diarrhea, and palpitations, may occur in clinical practice, cilostazol has not been associated with major adverse events or increased mortality. Small, nonblind studies suggest that cilostazol may prove useful in preventing thrombosis and restenosis following percutaneous coronary interventions, although these remain unlabeled uses.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique combination of antiplatelet, vasodilatory, and antiproliferative effects of cilostazol appear to make it an attractive agent for use in patients with PAD. Clinical trials demonstrating a significant improvement in walking distances with cilostazol therapy suggest that it will be an important tool in improving symptoms and quality of life in patients with intermittent claudication.

Antiplatelet medications and their indications in preventing and treating coronary thrombosis

Platelets play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, and complications following percutaneous coronary intervention. Three classes of platelet-inhibiting drugs, aspirin, thienopyridines and platelet glycoprotein IIb/ IIIa inhibitors, are now commonly used for the prevention and treatment of disorders of coronary artery thrombosis. For the last several decades aspirin has been the sole option for antiplatelet therapy in the treatment and prevention of the manifestations of cardiovascular disease. However, a wider selection of antiplatelet agents, including the thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) and the platelet glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, are now available and provide clinicians with the opportunity to potentially improve upon the previous gold standard of aspirin. This review summarizes these drugs and the scientific data that have led to their use in primary and secondary prevention, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Medical therapy of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction

Management of acute coronary syndromes has been the focus of increased interest in recent years. This has come about with the recognition that the majority of patients who present to the hospital with chest pain have unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). Further, sensitive biochemical markers of myocardial necrosis, such as troponin and creatine kinase, have improved early diagnosis. Markers of inflammation such as C-reactive protein (CRP), although not in wide clinical practice, may provide an early and important marker of prognosis. The current approach to management of acute coronary syndromes is careful risk stratification so as to select appropriate medical therapies and to guide the clinician to appropriate interventions such as angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Established therapies such as aspirin, heparin, intravenous nitrates, and, in selected patients, beta blockers or calcium antagonists, are being used concomitantly with, or are being supplanted by, newer therapies such as low-molecular-weight heparins and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The role of hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) in patients with acute coronary syndromes is being investigated and shows promise.

Antithrombotic therapy in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: focus on antiplatelet agents

Pharmacologic advances in the use of antithrombotic agents have paralleled the technologic innovations used in patients undergoing coronary interventions. The recognition of the central role of platelets in the development of complications related to coronary interventions led to the investigation and subsequent routine use of several antiplatelet agents as adjuvants to coronary intervention. Thus, the oral agents aspirin and either ticlopidine or clopidogrel are routinely administered after coronary stenting. Intravenous glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists have been extensively studied and reduce adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary interventions, especially those receiving intracoronary stents. Despite the growing use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists, much information remains unknown as to the proper dosing and the effects these agents have on other elements of the hemostatic and vascular systems.

Results of the Ticlid or Plavix Post-Stents (TOPPS) trial: do they justify the switch from ticlopidine to clopidogrel after coronary stent placement?

In the Ticlid or Plavix Post-Stents (TOPPS) trial, 1016 patients undergoing successful coronary stent placement were randomized to receive aspirin and either ticlopidine or clopidogrel. In this trial, the dosages and regimens of ticlopidine and clopidogrel resembled more closely those used in most catheterization laboratories than did the two previous randomized trials comparing ticlopidine and clopidogrel. The results of the TOPPS trial support the current practice of substituting ticlopidine for clopidogrel in stent patients.

Is clopidogrel superior to aspirin in secondary prevention of vascular disease?

The cornerstone in clinical evidence of the relative efficacy of thienopyridines (clopidogrel, ticlopidine) versus aspirin in the secondary prevention of vascular disease is the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events trial. This trial showed a modest benefit in the reduction of vascular events by clopidogrel. The results differed according to qualifying disorder: myocardial infarction, -3.7%; ischaemic stroke, +7.3%; and peripheral arterial disease, +23.8% (P = 0.042). Similar results were found for ticlopidine after brain ischaemia. The safety of clopidogrel appears to be similar to that of aspirin and better than that of ticlopidine. However, the recent report of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in association with clopidogrel causes concern.