Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy in children

Cost-effectiveness of gasless laparoscopy as a means to increase provision of minimally invasive surgery for abdominal conditions in rural North-East India

Laparoscopic surgery, a minimally invasive technique to treat abdominal conditions, has been shown to produce equivalent safety and efficacy with quicker return to normal function compared to open surgery. As such, it is widely accepted as a cost-effective alternative to open surgery for many abdominal conditions. However, access to laparoscopic surgery in rural North-East India is limited, in part due to limited equipment, unreliable supplies of CO₂ gas, lack of surgical expertise and a shortage of anaesthetists. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of gasless laparoscopy as a means to increase provision of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for abdominal conditions in rural North-East India. A decision tree model was developed to compare costs, evaluated from a patient perspective, and health outcomes, disability adjusted life years (DALYs), associated with gasless laparoscopy, conventional laparoscopy or open abdominal surgery in rural North-East India. Results indicate that MIS (performed by conventional or gasless laparoscopy) is less costly and produces better outcomes, fewer DALYs, than open surgery. These results were consistent even when gasless laparoscopy was analysed using least favourable data from the literature. Scaling up provision of MIS through increased access to gasless laparoscopy would reduce the cost burden to patients and increase DALYs averted. Based on a sample of 12 facilities in the North-East region, if scale up was achieved so that all essential surgeries amenable to laparoscopic surgery were performed as such (using conventional or gasless laparoscopy), 64% of DALYS related to these surgeries could be averted, equating to an additional 454.8 DALYs averted in these facilities alone. The results indicate that gasless laparoscopy is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to open surgery for abdominal conditions in rural North-East India and provides a possible bridge to the adoption of full laparoscopic services.

72nd Southwestern Surgical Congress Claude H. Organ, Jr. memorial lecture: Rise ofacutecareroboticsurgery forcommonemergencygeneralsurgeryconditions

Dr. Claude Organ rose above poverty, racism, and untold insurmountable odds to become a masterful surgeon and revered leader in numerous academic and professional circles. But it's his impact on surgical education and his philosophy to "teach, give back, and keep advancing" that inspired this lecture. Acute care robotic surgery (ACRS) utilizes the strengths of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) for a high-volume population of emergency general surgery (EGS) patients. The future benefits of ACRS may include improvements in resident training, patient safety, and outcomes. General surgery residencies that have a robust ACRS program are likely to be more competitive than those without.

Quality of Life in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery. Cost-Utility Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy

Background: Economic evaluation in health care is becoming increasingly important. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LAp) is one of the most frequent minimally invasive procedures in the pediatric population. The increased costs of this approach in any indication could be justified by proving its cost-utility in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We aim to perform a cost-utility analysis between open and LAp (open appendectomy [OAp] and LAp). Materials and Methods: We included the data of children operated for acute noncomplicated appendicitis, who agreed to answer a validated quality of life (QoL) questionnaire. Costs were calculated for each patient. We established a threshold for cost-effectiveness (λ) of 20,000 to 30,000€ per quality adjusted life year (QALY) according to previous research. Results: A total of 53 patients were included. Overall mean costs in the OAp were 758.98€ and in the LAp 1525.50€. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 18,000€/QALY, under the threshold of cost-effectiveness, therefore favoring the laparoscopic approach as it improves HRQoL despite the costs. Conclusions: Economic evaluation studies in Pediatric Surgery are scarce and rarely measure outcomes in terms of QoL. This information is important in the decision-making process for institutions and health-care professionals. Our results encourage the use of laparoscopy in pediatric appendectomy to improve HRQoL in our patients.

National Trends and Disparities in the Diffusion of Laparoscopic Surgery for Children in the United States

Background: Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard of care for many surgical treatments. The diffusion of laparoscopy has been investigated for adult patient populations but is still unknown for pediatric populations. This study sought to describe national trends in diffusion of laparoscopic surgery for common pediatric conditions and identify disparities in use of laparoscopic surgery. Study Design: A retrospective analysis of serial cross-sectional data was performed using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Kids' Inpatient Database from 1997 to 2016. Pediatric patients (ages ≤18) undergoing appendectomy, cholecystectomy, fundoplication, or inguinal hernia repair were identified. The diffusion of laparoscopy for each procedure was measured using the proportion of laparoscopic surgeries over years. Results: National trends demonstrate increases in the use of laparoscopy for children over the past two decades from 13.4% to 88.7% for appendectomy, from 82.6% to 94.9% for cholecystectomy, from 7.4% to 77.4% for fundoplication, and from 1.5% to 23.5% for repair of inguinal hernia (P < .001). Disparities in diffusion of laparoscopy were found from various pediatric populations, and the disparities varied by specific procedures and years. In particular, the proportion of laparoscopic appendectomy in 1997 was 11.3% at urban teaching hospitals and was 13.9% at rural hospitals (P = .01), while the proportions in 2016 increased to 90.8% at urban teaching hospitals versus 71.3% at rural hospitals (P < .001). Conclusions: Laparoscopy has become the standard surgical care for common pediatric surgical conditions. Widening disparities in use of laparoscopic surgery for pediatric populations appear between urban teaching hospitals and rural hospitals.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Ladd Procedures and Risk Factors for Conversion

Background: Malrotation is a common congenital anomaly that can lead to bowel obstruction and ischemia if not corrected with a Ladd procedure. Controversy exists between open and laparoscopic approaches. We sought to compare postoperative outcomes and determine risk factors for conversion to an open procedure. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)-Pediatric was used to identify patients undergoing Ladd procedures from 2013 to 2018. Propensity score matching was used to account for differences in patient characteristics between open and laparoscopically treated cohorts. Chi-square tests and adjusted logistic regression analysis were used to determine patient outcomes differences between treatment groups and factors associated with conversion. Results: A total of 2437 patients were identified, 1889 (77.5%) open, 548 (22.5%) laparoscopic, and 193 (35.2%) laparoscopic converted to open. Patients undergoing laparoscopic compared with open procedures had shorter length of stay (5 versus 7 days, P < .001) and lower overall complication rates (13.1% versus 18.1%, P = .025), despite longer operative times (108.9 versus 93.7 minutes, P < .001). Patients requiring conversion were more likely to be younger, have an urgent/emergent case, sepsis/septic shock, and nutritional support requirement. Conclusions: After risk adjustment, laparoscopic Ladd procedure is associated with decreased complications and minimal operative time increases compared with an open approach. Risk factors associated with conversion should be considered during operative planning.

Surgical tray reduction for cost saving in pediatric surgical cases: A qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND

Standardization of surgical instrument trays and doctor preference cards (DPC) are known to reduce the cost of adult surgical cases. The practice in pediatric surgery may be more complex owing to a wide range of patient age, leading to difficulty with practice implementation and loss of potential financial savings, which underscore the importance of the review of this topic.

METHODS

A systematic review of pediatric surgical tray standardization and cost-effectiveness was performed. Original and review articles from 2000 to 2018 were extracted from MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane, and an electronic search through Scopus. After screening by inclusion and exclusion criteria, articles were selected and reviewed.

RESULTS

Five articles were included. On average, discontinuation of disposable instruments and standardization of equipment resulted in a removal of 40%-70% of surgical instruments per set. This yielded a cost savings of 20% (an average US $200), with no intraoperative complications or perceived safety issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardization of operating room (OR) doctor preference cards (DPC) and surgical instrument trays in pediatric surgical cases result in lower operative supply costs without impacting OR time or safety.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

What surgical approach would provide better outcomes in children and adolescents undergoing cholecystectomy? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

There is a lack of evidence on the surgical approach for children and adolescents undergoing cholecystectomy. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy in children and/or adolescents.

Main body

A search was conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane and Embase from inception to October 2018. We included comparative studies investigating outcomes following robotic-assisted, laparoscopic and/or open cholecystectomy in children and/or adolescents. The outcomes of interest included post-operative complication rate, operation time, length of hospital stay, post-operative pain and conversion to open procedure. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect models.

Twenty-one studies were included involving 927 children and/or adolescents. All, but one, compared outcomes between laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. The great majority of the included studies presented a low risk of bias. Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy had less post-operative complications (RR: 0.57; 95%CI 0.35 to 0.94), reduced length of hospital stay (MD − 3.73; 95%CI − 4.88 to − 2.59), but longer operative time (MD 26.61; 95%CI 9.35 to 43.86) when compared to open cholecystectomy. The average conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy was 7% across studies.

Conclusions

The current evidence suggested that laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children and/or adolescents is safe resulting in lower rates of postoperative complications and length of stay, but longer operative times, when compared to the open approach.

PROSPERO registration

CRD42017067641

Level of evidence

Level III

Introducing a reserve waiting list initiative for elective general surgery at a District General Hospital

Cancelled operations represent a significant burden on the National Health Service in terms of theatre efficiency, financial implications and lost training opportunities. Moreover, they carry considerable physical and psychological effects to patients and their relatives. Evidence has shown that up to 93% of cancelled operations are due to patient-related factors. An analysis at our District General Hospital revealed that approximately 18 operations are cancelled on the day of surgery each month. This equates to 27 hours of allocated operating time valued by the trust as £67 500, not being used effectively. This retrospective quality improvement report aims to reduce unused theatre time due to cancelled elective operations in general surgery theatres-thereby improving theatre efficiency and patient care. To ascertain the baseline number of cancelled operations, an initial review of theatre cases was undertaken. Further review was then completed after implementation of two improvements-a short notice surgical waiting list and fast track pre-assessment clinics. The results showed that implementation of the reserve surgical waiting list reduced unused operating time by an average of 2.25 hours per month. By further adding in the fast track preassessment clinic, these figures increased to an average of 11.5 hours over the next 3 months. This precipitated a reutilisation of otherwise wasted theatre time. Economic impact of this time amounts around £28 750 a month, after implementation of both improvements. Simple protocol changes can lead to large improvements in the efficient running of theatres. The resultant change has improved patient satisfaction, led to greater training opportunities and improved theatre efficiency. Extrapolation of our results show better usage of previously underused theatre time, to the equivalent worth of £345 000. Further implementation of these improvements in other surgical specialities and hospitals would be beneficial.

Laparoscopic Splenectomy: Has It Become the Standard Surgical Approach in Pediatric Patients?

BACKGROUND

Splenectomy is often required in the pediatric population as part of the treatment of hematologic disorders and can be performed laparoscopically or open. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic (LS) and open (OS) splenectomies using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIP-P) data set.

METHODS

The NSQIP-P data set was used to identify children who underwent elective splenectomy between January 2012 and December 2016. Thirty-day outcomes between OS and LS, and LS alone and concurrent LS and cholecystectomy were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Most of the splenectomies (91%) were performed laparoscopically. There was no difference in overall complications between OS (n = 60) and LS (n = 613), although OS had a higher risk of perioperative transfusion (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.52-6.69). LS was associated with a shorter median hospital length of stay (2 versus 4 d, P < 0.001) and similar mean operative times compared to OS (120 versus 133 min, P = 0.559). There was no difference in outcomes of children undergoing LS versus LS and concurrent cholecystectomy (n = 129).

CONCLUSIONS

LS has become the standard approach for elective splenectomies in the pediatric population and has minimal morbidity, and when indicated, concurrent cholecystectomies do not increase the risk of complications.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

III.

Advanced minimal access surgery in infants weighing less than 3kg: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Minimal access surgery (MAS) has gained popularity in infants less than 5kg, however, significant challenges still arise in very low weight infants.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all infants weighing less than 3kg who underwent an advanced MAS or equivalent open procedure from 2009 to 2016. Advanced case types included Nissen fundoplication, duodenal atresia repair, Ladd procedure, congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair, esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair, diaphragmatic plication, and pyloric atresia repair. A comparative analysis was performed between the MAS and open cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 45 advanced MAS cases and 17 open cases met the inclusion criteria. Gestational age and age at operation were similar between the cohorts, while infants who underwent open procedures had significantly lower weight at operation (p=0.003). There were no deaths within 30days related to surgery in either group. Only 3 MAS cases required unintended conversion to open. There were 2 (4.4%) postoperative complications related to surgery in the MAS cohort and 2 (11.8%) in the open cohort.

CONCLUSION

Advanced MAS may be performed in infants weighing less than 3kg with low mortality, acceptable rates of conversion, and similar rates of complications as open procedures.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognosis study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Transrectal guidance of the ovaries reduces operative time during bovine laparoscopic ovariectomy

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of transrectal guidance of the ovaries by an assistant on operative time during bovine laparoscopic ovariectomy. Twenty four clinically healthy Holstein dairy cows were divided randomly into two groups. In the transrectal guidance group, an assistant grasped the ovaries via the transrectal route and pulled them to a position where they could be visualized with a camera. On the other hand, the control group was operated without guidance. The time required to remove both ovaries in the guidance group was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.01). We concluded that laparoscopic ovariectomy with transrectal guidance of the ovaries can substantially shorten operative time, thereby greatly contributing to animal welfare and to reducing the burden on the operator.

Prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic vs. open pyeloplasty in children: Single centre contemporary evaluation comparing two procedures over a 1-year period

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopy in pediatric urological surgery continues to gradually gain acceptance. Since economic implications are of increasing importance in our cost-containment environment, few studies have compared the expense associated with open to laparoscopic approaches. We present a prospective comparative cost-analysis between the laparoscopic (LP) and open pediatric pyeloplasty (OP).

METHODS

Over a period of a year (2007-2008), 54 consecutives pyeloplasties were performed. The "traditional" OP was performed in 33 patients and the remaining 21 children underwent LP. Costs were prospectively collected for each group and divided based on amounts incurred by all different departments involved: nursing, laboratory, diagnostic imaging, pharmacy and operative room.

RESULTS

Overall, the average cost for a LP was CDN$6240 compared to CDN$5079 for an OP with a median hospital stay of 2 days (range OP: 1-18, LP: 1-7). The main difference was found in operative room expenses (OP: $2508 vs. LP: $3925). The higher cost could not be solely explained by the use of disposable items, which only subtracts $335 per procedure (23.6% of the cost difference between OP and LP). Length of time spent in the operating room was 1.2 hours longer for the LP and appears to be the main factor explaining the cost difference.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that at our institution, pediatric LP is more expensive than OP. This cost difference is mainly due to operating room time. For cost-containment purposes, efforts aimed at increasing efficiency in the operating room may help equalize both approaches.

Quality assessment of economic evaluation studies in pediatric surgery: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To assess economic evaluation studies (EES) in pediatric surgery and to identify potential factors associated with high-quality studies.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify EES in pediatric surgery published between 1 June 1993 and 30 June 2013. Assessment criteria are derived from the Drummond checklist. A high quality study was defined as a Drummond score ≥7. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with high quality studies.

RESULTS

119 studies were included. 43.7% (n=52) of studies were full EES. Cost-effectiveness analysis was the most frequent (61.5%) type of full EES. Only 31.6% of studies had a Drummond score ≥7 and 73% of these were full EES. The factors associated with high quality were identification of costs (OR: 14.08; 95% CI: 3.38-100; p<0.001), estimation of utility value (OR: 8.13; 95% CI: 2.02-43.47; p=0.005) and study funding (OR: 3.50; 95% CI: 1.27-10.10; p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

This review shows that the number and the quality of EES are low despite the increasing number of studies published in recent years. In the current context of budget constraints, our results should encourage pediatric surgeons to focus more on EES.

A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open Nissen fundoplication in children under two years of age

AIMS

The surgery of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in modern pediatric surgical practice. Any differences in perioperative and long-term clinical outcomes following laparoscopic (LN) or open Nissen (ON) fundoplication have not been comprehensively described in young children. This randomized, prospective study examines outcomes following LN versus ON in children<2 years of age.

METHODS

Four surgeons at a single institution enrolled patients under 2 years of age that required surgical management of GERD, who were then randomized to LN or ON between 2005 and 2012. A universal surgical dressing was employed for blinding. Analgesia and enteral feeding pathways were standardized. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay. Perioperative outcomes and long-term follow up were collected as secondary outcomes and used to compare groups.

RESULTS

Of 39 enrolled patients, 21 were randomized to ON and 18 to LN. Length of postoperative hospital stay, time of advancement to full enteral feeds, and analgesic requirements were not significantly different between treatment cohorts. The LN group experienced longer median operating times (173 vs 91 min, P<0.001) and higher surgical charges ($4450 vs $2722, P=0.002). The incidence of post-discharge complications did not differ significantly between the groups at last follow-up (median 42 months).

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized trial comparing postoperative outcomes following LN vs ON did not detect statistically significant differences in short- or long-term clinical outcomes between these approaches. LN was associated with longer surgical time and higher operating room costs. The benefits, risks, and costs of laparoscopy should be carefully considered in clinical pediatric surgical practice.

Status of Day Care Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Developing Countries

The practice of laparoscopic appendectomy as an ambulatory surgery is uncommon even in apex institutes, more so in developing countries, despite proven feasibility. To promote this practice in the developing countries like ours, we attempted to find the safety and cost effectiveness in such institutions which have limited resources. Thirty cases of symptomatic appendicitis were tried for same day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomies. The results were encouraging with 87% patients discharged on the same day and 13% on the next day in the early morning. Among the next day discharged cases, only 03% stayed for medical reasons (nausea, vomiting, and pain) while 10% stayed as their attendants declined to leave (social reasons), even though they were medically eligible for discharge from the hospital. There were no significant postoperative complications except tolerable pain in all patients and mild to moderate nausea/vomiting in 80%. There was no readmission. The mean length of hospital stay was 11.20 hrs. At the time of discharge all patients were highly satisfied. We concluded that routine same day discharge is safe and feasible after appendectomies in developing countries, with social decline as the main hurdle which can be improved by proper communication.

Short communication: a comparison of 2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs following the first stage of a 2-stage fistulation surgery in dry dairy cows

Postoperative pain and its management following fistulation surgery in cattle are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to compare 2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) as potential postoperative pain management treatments following the first stage of a 2-stage fistulation surgery. A randomized complete block design trial was conducted in dry Holstein cows (n=10) following fistulation surgery. Ketoprofen (3mg/kg of body weight i.m.) was administered on the day of surgery and 24 h later, whereas meloxicam (0.5 mg/kg of body weight s.c.) was administered once only on the day of surgery. Outcomes evaluated at 0, 2, 9, 24, 26, and 33 h postsurgery were heart rate, respiration rate, rectal temperature, and infrared temperature around the surgical site. Outcomes evaluated on the day of surgery and d 1 following surgery and compared with the average for the 4d before surgery were lying activity (total lying time, total time spent lying on the left side, and percentage of time lying on the left side) and feed intake. A difference was observed in dry matter intake on d 1 but this effect was not different on d 0 compared with presurgical averages. A difference was observed in time spent lying on the left side and a difference was observed in heart rate following the first stage of fistulation surgery compared with presurgical averages. The infrared temperature readings around the surgical site were significantly greater in the hours following surgery compared with presurgical averages. The respiration rate increased over time after 24h postsurgery compared with presurgical values. Although it was clear that the surgery is painful, the drug effects were more difficult to explain. On d 0 and 1, the meloxicam-treated cows ate 3 kg more but spent 101 min/d less time lying on their left side compared with ketoprofen-treated cows. The first stage of a 2-stage fistulation surgery was considered painful based on changes in heart rate, respiration rate, infrared temperature readings, dry matter intake, and time spent lying on the left side. It is clear that left flank surgery is painful and that NSAID can improve outcomes associated with that pain, but we cannot make recommendations as to which NSAID to choose based on these results.

Pediatric minimally invasive surgery: laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in infants and children

This article discusses the potential benefits and challenges of minimally invasive surgery for infants and small children, and discusses why pediatric minimally invasive surgery is not yet the surgical default or standard of care. Minimally invasive methods offer advantages such as smaller incisions, decreased risk of infection, greater surgical precision, decreased cost of care, reduced length of stay, and better clinical information. But none of these benefits comes without cost, and these costs, both monetary and risk-based, rise disproportionately with the declining size of the patient. In this review, we describe recent progress in minimally invasive surgery for infants and children. The evidence for the large benefits to the patient will be presented, as well as the considerable, sometimes surprising, mechanical and physiological challenges surgeons must manage.

Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006-2008

BACKGROUND

The benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) remain undefined as compared to open appendectomy (OA) in children, particularly in cases of perforated appendicitis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of LA versus OA in perforated and nonperforated appendicitis in children.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we evaluated the clinical data of children (<18 years old) who underwent LA and OA from 2006 to 2008. Incidental and elective appendectomies were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 212,958 children underwent urgent appendectomy in the United States during these years. The overall rate of perforated appendicitis was 27.7, and 56.9% of all cases were performed laparoscopically. In nonperforated cases, LA was associated with comparable overall complication rate (LA: 2.56 vs. OA: 2.66%; p = 0.26), shorter length of hospital stay (LOS, LA: 1.6 vs. OA: 2.0 days; p < 0.01), comparable mortality (LA: 0.01 vs. OA: 0.02%; p = 0.25); and higher hospital charges (LA: $20,328 vs. OA: $16,830; p < 0.01) compared to OA. In perforated cases, LA had a lower overall complication rate (LA: 16.03 vs. OA: 18.07%; p < 0.01), shorter LOS (LA: 5.1 vs. OA: 5.8 days; p < 0.01), lower mortality (LA: 0.0% versus OA: 0.06%; p < 0.01), and similar hospital charges (LA: $33,361 versus OA: $33, 662; p = 0.71) compared to OA.

CONCLUSIONS

LA is safe in children with acute perforated and nonperforated appendicitis, and is associated with shorter hospital stay than OA. The laparoscopic approach is associated with lower morbidity and mortality in perforated cases. However, in nonperforated cases, these benefits are modest and are associated with higher hospital charges.

A prospective study of safety and satisfaction with same-day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This study examines the safety and patient satisfaction in discharging children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LapAppy) for acute appendicitis on the day of surgery.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, data were collected prospectively for 158 consecutive patients undergoing LapAppy for simple appendicitis. Time from operation to discharge and complications were analyzed. At follow-up, parents completed a satisfaction survey. The Student t test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 158 children ranging from age 2 to 19 years (mean, 12 years) over a 6-month period. Single-port, single-instrument LapAppy was possible in 152 patients (96%). Eighty percent of patients (n = 126) were discharged on the day of surgery, a mean of 4.8 hours postoperatively (range, 1-12 hours). Of the remaining 32, 24 (75%) were admitted because the operation ended too late for postoperative discharge; 3 (9%), for medical reasons; and 5 (16%), when the families declined to leave. One hundred nine parents (87%) whose children went home postoperatively stated that they were happy with the expeditious discharge, whereas 17 (13%) felt nervous. In addition, 116 parents (92%) stated that, in retrospect, same-day discharge was preferable, whereas 10 parents (8%) were not sure that it was the best decision. None, however, would insist on admission if faced with the situation again. There were no major complications and no significant difference in the rate of umbilical wound infections for same-day discharge patients (2%) and admitted patients (3%).

CONCLUSION

Routine same-day discharge after pediatric LapAppy for acute appendicitis is safe, with good parent satisfaction.

Fast-track surgery of the colon in children

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to present the "fast-track" experience in children who underwent colon resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-six children who underwent laparoscopic colon resection were prospectively included in the study. Anomalies of colon innervation and inflammatory bowel disease represented the main surgical indications.

RESULTS

Left colon/sigmoid resection was performed in 37, total colon resection was done in 5, and right colon resection in 4 children. Total colon resection was always associated to ileostomy. Anastomosis was performed in 41 cases. Patients were postoperatively monitored for pain, return to normal activity, feeding, bowel movements, and complications. Stool passage and oral feeding were started on postoperative day 1, and all patients were discharged before postoperative day 4. One child was readmitted the day after discharge because of an anastomotic leak. No other major complications were recorded.

DISCUSSION

Minimally invasive surgery is safe and effective in pediatric colonic surgery and allows a fast recovery time (fast-track).

Lessons learned from the first 109 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in a single pediatric surgery center

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a frequent operation in adults but is seldom performed in children. A retrospective review of 109 consecutive patients who underwent LC over an 11-year period was performed to see what lessons were learned from this experience.

METHODS

From January 1996 to January 2007, a total of 109 patients were referred to our unit to undergo LC. Nine adult patients were excluded from the analysis. The remaining 100 pediatric patients form the basis of this report. Isolated cholecystectomies were performed using a four-trocar technique, with a fifth trocar added for cases in which splenectomy was required. One patient with main bile duct dilatation at preoperative echography underwent peroperative cholangiography.

RESULTS

We recorded three anatomic anomalies (3%), two involving the bile duct and one the cystic artery. We recorded four minor problems during surgery: In one case there was failure of the tip of reusable scissors, and in three cases there was a small perforation of the gallbladder during the dissection step. We recorded four (4%) postoperative complications, which required redo surgery: one patient with bleeding from the cystic artery; one case of dislocation of clips positioned on the cystic duct; and two patients with lesions of the main bile duct that had not been detected during surgery. The treatment consisted in choledojejunostomy on postoperative day 7 in one case and suture of the choledocus on a stent positioned using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography on postoperative day 5 in the second case. Both biliary complications occurred in patients more than 14 years of age. We also recorded one umbilical granuloma.

CONCLUSIONS

LC is an effective procedure in children. On the basis of our experience, it seems that major complications can occur even with experienced surgeons, and they are more frequent in teenagers. Biliary or vascular anomalies of the gallbladder are encountered in about 3% of patients.

Postoperative bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children: a 15-year experience

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to determine and evaluate the incidence of postoperative bowel obstruction (PBO) after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The medical files of children who have undergone an appendectomy, either via the laparoscopic or open approach, at our department from 1992 until 2007 were reviewed. Collected data included age at appendectomy, initial surgical approach, time interval to PBO, and type of definitive treatment. The incidences of PBO after laparoscopic and open appendectomy were compared with the chi(2) analysis.

RESULTS

From the 1684 children who were found, 1371 had nonperforated appendicitis and 313 had perforated appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 954 patients of the nonperforated group and in 221 of the perforated group. Open appendectomy was performed in 417 and 92 patients of the 2 groups, respectively. Overall, the incidence of PBO development was 2.2%. In the laparoscopic appendectomy population, a significantly low incidence of 1.19% of PBO development was detected, compared with the 4.51% of the open appendectomy group (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic appendectomy diminishes the potential of PBO development. The overall incidence of PBO is not related to the severity of the disease but only to the initial operative approach.

The effects of laparoscopic surgery and nosocomial infections on the cost of care: evidence from three common surgical procedures

OBJECTIVE

To examine the cost of care for laparoscopic versus open surgery and the added cost of nosocomial infections for three common surgical procedures: cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and appendectomy.

METHODS

The Cardinal Health database repository was utilized to extract reimbursement data for laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and appendectomy surgical procedures. Utilizing a 22-hospital sample and a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant clinical data extraction technique, the Cardinal Health database repository produced a Nosocomial Infection Marker to identify and track nosocomial infection rates for these procedures. ICD-9 codes were utilized to identify 10,731 patients who had undergone these procedures between September 2004 and December 2006. Multivariable linear regression models were estimated to isolate the effects of laparoscopic versus open surgery and nosocomial infections on the cost of care.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces the overall cost of care for cholecystectomies, hysterectomies, and appendectomies. Controlling for the cost of nosocomial infection, incremental cost savings from laparoscopic versus open surgery for all three procedures average $1608. Cholecystectomy has the largest savings ($3299), followed by hysterectomy ($1385) and appendectomy ($1032). These cost savings in part reflect that patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures have shorter lengths of stay. In contrast, nosocomial infection increases costs substantially for each surgery type, raising costs for cholecystectomy by $4794, hysterectomy by $4528, and appendectomy by $6108.

CONCLUSION

The cost of care for laparoscopic surgery is lower than open surgery for cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and appendectomy. This conclusion is based on actual hospital reimbursement data.

Diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is it cost-effective in the current era?

INTRODUCTION

For patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer, diagnostic laparoscopy may identify liver and peritoneal metastases that are difficult to detect with other staging modalities. The aim of this study was to utilize a population-based pancreatic cancer database to assess the cost effectiveness of preoperative laparoscopy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from a state cancer registry were linked with primary medical record data for years 1996-2003. De-identified patient records were reviewed to determine the role and findings of laparoscopic exploration. Average hospital and physician charges for laparotomy, biliary bypass, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and laparoscopy were determined by review of billing data from our institution and Medicare data for fiscal years 2005-2006. Cost-effectiveness was determined by comparing three methods of utilization of laparoscopy: (1) routine (all patients), (2) case-specific, and (3) no utilization.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Of 298 potentially resectable patients, 86 underwent laparoscopy. The prevalence of unresectable disease was 14.1% diagnosed at either laparotomy or laparoscopy. The mean charge per patient for routine, case-specific, and no utilization of laparoscopy was $91,805, $90,888, and $93,134, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cost analysis indicates that the case-specific or routine use of laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer does not add significantly to the overall expense of treatment and supports the use of laparoscopy in patients with known or suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Improved outcomes for laparoscopic appendectomy compared with open appendectomy in the pediatric population

INTRODUCTION

The appendectomy is a common emergent surgical procedure in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to examine our institution's experience and outcomes in the appendectomy in the pediatric population early in our transition from open surgery to a predominantly laparoscopic approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied all pediatric patients (age 20 years) that underwent an appendectomy at a tertiary care center over 2 years. The data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, operative details, outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-three consecutive patients, with a mean age of 9.5 (3.9) years, were included in the study. Forty-four laparoscopic and 179 open appendectomies were performed. Two of the laparoscopic cases were converted to open appendectomies. Significant differences were seen between the two groups, with longer operative times (P < 0.0001) and lower estimated blood loss (P = 0.007) in the laparoscopic group. Operative times improved significantly for the laparoscopic group as the surgeons became more experienced (P = 0.03). The laparoscopic group used intravenous pain medication for a shorter time (0.8 vs. 1.9 days; P = 0.0003) and had a shorter postoperative hospital length of stay (2.2 vs. 3.4 days; P = 0.004). The laparoscopic group had fewer wound infections (2.3% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.3), intra-abdominal abscesses (4.5% vs. 5.6%; P = 0.8), and postoperative ileus (0% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.3), although these differences did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic appendectomy procedure is a safe alternative to open appendectomy in pediatric patients and results in shorter hospital stays with less postoperative pain.

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparative study of 2,332 cases

AIM

The laparoscopic treatment of paediatric appendicitis remains controversial, especially in the presence of complications. This study evaluated the outcomes of open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) by analysing the data from a multicentre study.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed a series of 2,332 appendectomies (1,506 LA and 826 OA) performed in children and adolescents (median age 8 years) in 9 different centres of paediatric surgery. For the patients operated using laparoscopy, an IN procedure was employed in 921 (61.2%), an OUT procedure in 571 (37.9%) and a MIXED procedure in 14 (0.9%). In the open surgery, a McBurney incision was adopted in 795 patients (96.4%).

RESULTS

Median duration of surgery was 40 minutes for LA and 45 minutes for OA. Median hospital stay was 3 days (LA) and 4.3 days (OA) in case of simple appendicitis and 5.2 days (LA) and 8.3 days (OA) in case of peritonitis. Complications were recorded in 124 LA cases (8.2%) and 65 OA cases (7.9%). The conversion rate in laparoscopy was only 1.6% (25 cases). The statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test, and the main significant difference that emerged was the length of hospital stay, which was in favour of laparoscopy compared with open surgery (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that in clinical settings where laparoscopic surgical expertise and equipment are available and affordable, LA seems to be an effective and safe alternative to OA. Three out 9 centres participating in our survey perform LA in all patients with a suspicion of appendicitis. Our study shows that laparoscopy significantly reduces hospital stay in case of appendicitis and peritonitis and presents an extremely low conversion rate (1.6%) to open surgery. Laparoscopic transumbilical appendectomy (37.9%) in our series seems to be a simple option, even for less-skilled laparoscopic surgeons.

Cost analysis of ligature versus stapling techniques of laparoscopic appendectomy in children

BACKGROUND

Although longer operative times and specialized instrumentation render laparoscopic appendectomies (LA) more expensive to perform than open appendectomies, the documented advantages of the laparoscopic approach have led many surgeons to prefer it. LAs are currently performed using either the ligature or the stapling technique. The decision as to which technique to employ is currently based on the surgeon's personal preference rather than on a knowledge of comparative costs. In light of the pressures for cost containment, we evaluated data from both laparoscopic methods to determine which was more effective based on cost and patient outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 55 pediatric patients who underwent LA by either the ligature or stapling technique at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (Cincinnati, OH) between March 2000 and March 2001. Comparative data on operating room cost, operative time, length of hospital stay, and readmission owing to complications were obtained for all LA cases.

RESULTS

The cost of LA performed using the stapling technique was significantly higher than the cost of LA using the ligature technique. Overall, a 37% reduction in operating room cost was seen for ligature versus stapling LA. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the other variables measured.

CONCLUSIONS

The ligation technique has appeal in residency training situations owing to the greater skill set that is needed for tissue handling and manipulation when using this technique. Our data suggest that LA performed using a ligation technique may also be less costly than the stapling technique and, therefore, should be considered as an appropriate surgical option.

Is there a changing trend in surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a pathological process in infants manifesting as poor weight gain, signs of esophagitis, persistent respiratory symptoms and changes in neurobehaviour. It is currently estimated that approximately one in every 350 children will experience severe symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux necessitating surgical treatment. Surgery for GORD is currently one of the common major operations performed in infants and children. Most of the studies found favour laparoscopic approach which has surpassed open antireflux surgery as the gold standard of surgical management for GORD. However, it must be interpreted with caution due to the limitation of the studies, especially the small number of subject included in these studies. This review reports the changing trends in the surgical treatment of GORD in children.

A Financial Analysis of Pediatric Laparoscopic Versus Open Fundoplication

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) is rapidly replacing open fundoplication (OF) for correcting symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in infants and children. In this study, we compared various clinical and financial parameters to determine if one technique is superior.

METHODS

With Institutional Review Board approval, charts and charge data for 50 consecutive patients undergoing elective LF or OF were reviewed in 2003 and 2004 (n = 100). Clinical variables evaluated included gender, age, weight, length of stay (LOS), operating time (OT), and time to initial (IF) and full (FF) feedings. Financial charges that were reviewed included anesthesia, central supply and sterilization, equipment, operating suite, hospital room and board, pharmacy, and total charges.

RESULTS

The groups were equally matched in relation to gender, age, and weight. The table below illustrates the statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between the groups. Favoring LNF LOS (1.2 vs. 2.9 days) IF (7.3 vs. 27.9 hours) FF (21.8 vs. 42.9 hours) Equipment ($1,006 vs. $1,609) Hospital Room ($1,290 vs. $2,847) Pharmacy ($180 vs. $461), Favoring OF OT (77 vs. 91 minutes) Anesthesia ($389 vs. $475) Central Supply and Sterilization ($1,367 vs. $2,515) Operating Suite ($4,058 vs. $5,142) Total charges were similar (LF, $11,449; OF, $11,632).

CONCLUSIONS

Interestingly, although there were statistical differences in every charge category, total charges for LF and OF did not differ significantly. Thus, traditionally higher expenses from longer OT for LF seem to be offset by financial benefits, such as shorter LOS, reduced discomfort as evidenced by lower narcotic charges, and earlier IF/FF.

Factors affecting innovation in pediatric surgery: hospital type and appendectomies

BACKGROUND

There are little data on whether patient or hospital characteristics affect utilization of innovative surgical techniques in children, especially with respect to laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), whose benefit over existing treatment remains unproven. This study examines the patterns of LA using a national database, focusing on variations in care between children's and general hospitals.

METHODS

Using data from the 2000 Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project Kid's Inpatient Database for patients aged 5 to 20 years with a discharge diagnosis of appendectomy, we analyzed the relationship between LA and patient demographic and hospital characteristic variables.

RESULTS

The Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project Kid's Inpatient Database included 50,825 pediatric appendectomies (26% LA) representing 97,205 cases in the nation. Children's hospitals and children's units were significantly more likely to provide LA (36% and 28%, respectively) than general hospitals (25%). Higher LA rates were also associated with greater patient age, female sex, nonperforated appendicitis, private insurance, and white patient race. The children's hospital effect compared to general hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-2.38) and all other relationships remained significant in the multivariate model.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of LA is significantly higher in children's hospitals. Children's hospitals appear more likely to adopt innovative surgical procedures, such as LA, even when clear benefit over standard treatment has not yet emerged.

Is one-day hospitalization after open pyeloplasty possible and safe?

OBJECTIVES

A critical pathway was developed to determine whether open pyeloplasty could be performed in preadolescent and adolescent children with ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction with patients safely discharged after a 1-day hospitalization.

METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive children who underwent open dismembered pyeloplasty for the treatment of UPJ obstruction and followed a critical pathway for preoperative education, operative management, and postoperative care were evaluated. The patients received a caudal anesthetic for preventive analgesia unless not technically possible and postoperative ketorolac (Toradol) unless contraindicated. A child was required to fulfill five strict criteria to be discharged from the hospital.

RESULTS

The 26 patients with UPJ obstruction consisted of 18 boys and 8 girls (age range 2.4 months to 16.7 years). Of the 26 patients, 24 (92%) were discharged on the first postoperative day, with a mean length of hospitalization of 1.1 days (range 1 to 3). All patients younger than 6 years of age (19 patients) were discharged on the first postoperative day. Of the 25 patients who received a caudal block, 24 (96%) were discharged on the first postoperative day. All patients tolerated the procedure well without major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study, to our knowledge, to describe a detailed critical pathway for open pyeloplasty to treat UPJ obstruction. This enabled all children younger than 6 years of age and more than 90% of all patients to be discharged uniformly on the first postoperative day.

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to use meta-analysis to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a pediatric population.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Meta-analysis is a statistical tool that can be used to evaluate the literature in both qualitative and quantitative ways, accounting for variations in characteristics that can influence overall estimate of outcomes of interest. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in a pediatric population has not previously been performed.

METHODS

Comparative studies published between 1992 and 2004 of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children were included. Endpoints were postoperative pyrexia, ileus, wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess formation, operative time, and postoperative hospital stay.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies including 6477 children (43% laparoscopic, 57% open) were included. Wound infection was significantly reduced with laparoscopic versus open appendectomy (1.5% versus 5%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.75), as was ileus (1.3% versus 2.8%; OR = 0.5, 95% CI, 0.29-0.86). Intra-abdominal abscess formation was more common following laparoscopic surgery, although this was not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis of randomized trials did not reveal significant difference between the 2 techniques in any of the 4 complications. Operative time was not significantly longer in the laparoscopic group, and postoperative stay was significantly shorter (weighted mean difference, -0.48; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.31). Sensitivity analysis identified lowest heterogeneity when only randomized studies were considered, followed by prospective, recent, and finally large studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that laparoscopic appendectomy in children reduces complications. However, we also see the need for further high-quality randomized trials comparing the 2 techniques, matched not only for age and sex but also for obesity and severity of appendicitis.

Laparoscopic surgery in adult cattle

Laparoscopy in cattle is a promising tool for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The lower cost of the materials available in addition to the possibility of an intervention on an animal that is sedated does not entail more costs than an exploratory laparotomy. The application of this tool during abdominal explorations and biopsies allows the avoidance of invasive and often useless surgical interventions and even with the diagnosis and prognosis of certain conditions. Surgical techniques currently are limited to abomasopexies; however, never-ceasing progress and improvements in human surgery are expected to affect the future of bovine surgery. With the advancements in the multimedia technology used by universities, the use of laparoscopy as a pedagogic tool definitely has a promising future. Endoscopic exploration of the thorax is possible using the same material as for laparoscopy. In addition, diagnostic and biopsy applications are useful. The use of the laparoscope in different body cavities and for different applications would make the purchase of the required materials more cost-effective.

Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively whether laparoscopic (LA) and open appendectomy (OA) are equally safe and feasible in the treatment of pediatric appendicitis.

METHODS

A total of 517 children with acute appendicitis were randomly assigned to undergo LA or OA appendectomy, based on the schedule of the attending surgeon on call. Patient age, sex, postoperative diagnosis, operating time, level of training of surgical resident, length of postoperative hospitalization, and minor and major postoperative complications were recorded. Chi-square analysis and the Student t-test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In all, 376 OA and 141 LA were performed. The two groups were comparable in terms of patient demographics and the incidence of perforated appendicitis. The operative time was also similar (47.3 +/- 19.7 vs 49.9 +/- 12.9 min). The overall incidence of minor or major complications was 11.2% in the OA group and 9.9% in the LA group.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients with appendicitis can safely be offered laparoscopic appendectomy without incurring a greater risk for complications. Nevertheless, a higher (but not significantly higher) abscess rate was found in patients with perforated appendicitis who underwent laparoscopy.

In-line image projection accelerates task performance in laparoscopic appendectomy

BACKGROUND

In laparoscopy, the monitor usually is placed at or above eye level across from the operating surgeon. Position of the endoscopic image at hand level has been shown in a laboratory model to facilitate task performance. The authors tested the hypothesis that in-line image projection reduced operating time for a standardized procedure.

METHODS

Children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy were assigned randomly according to video image position: (1) at the top of the laparoscopy tower in front of the surgeon ("overhead") or (2) on a screen placed on the patient's abdomen ("in-line"). Operating time was recorded for each operation, and patients were stratified according to severity of appendicitis and training level of the operating surgeon. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t, chi2 tests, and analysis of variance with post-hoc Fisher test (P <.05. significant).

RESULTS

One hundred eight children, aged 2 to 17 years, underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy during a 26-month period. Fifty-four were assigned to the in-line projection screen and 54 to the overhead monitor. Operating time was significantly shorter (P =.013) when in-line projection was used (46.8 +/- 10.2 v. 52.2 +/- 15.1 minutes with overhead monitor). By analysis of variance (ANOVA) the only factors that significantly affected operating time were use of in-line projection (P =.030), severity of appendicitis (P =.002), and training level of the operating surgeon (P =.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Placing the endoscopic image in the same field as the surgeon's hands decreases operating time by 10%, even for procedures that, like appendectomy, do not require complex suturing skills. This decrease in operating time occurs independently of the surgeon's level of proficiency or the degree of difficulty of the operation.

Use of laparoscopic splenectomy in developing countries: analysis of cost and strategies for reducing cost

BACKGROUND

In general, laparoscopic surgery is more expensive than open surgery. However, recent reports showed lower overall cost.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Fourteen patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) and 15 patients open splenectomy (OS). Patients were evaluated with regard to blood loss, complication rate, length of hospital stay, operative time, presence of accessory spleens, hospital cost, and total cost. For the OS group, there was no laparoscopic instrument cost, and the total cost was equal to the hospital cost. In the LS group, total cost was calculated by adding the hospital cost to the cost of laparoscopic instruments.

RESULTS

The postoperative hospitalization was shorter in the LS group than the OS group (3.4 vs. 7.5 days), but the operating time was significantly longer for the LS group. The mean hospital cost was calculated as US $1,055 in the LS group and $1,664 in the OS group. The overall total cost was $1,664 for the OS group and $2,064 for the LS group. In the LS group, less morbidity and shorter postoperative hospital stay resulted in lower hospital cost.

CONCLUSION

The cost for laparoscopic instruments is the main factor responsible for the high total cost of LS. Resterilization of disposable laparoscopic instruments is feasible and a more economic way of treatment compared with splenectomy with totally disposable laparoscopic instruments and has costs comparable to those of open surgery.

Gastrointestinal problems in the handicapped child

Gastrointestinal issues are a major chronic problem in 80 to 90% of children with cerebral palsy and in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities who are at special risk of developing malnutrition because of uncoordinated swallowing, gastroesophageal reflux, and constipation. In addition to poor linear growth, there is a decrease in muscle strength and coordination, impaired cerebral function leading to decreased motivation and energy. Significant neurodevelopmental progress can be achieved with improved nutritional status. A multidisciplinary approach, with input from neurologists, gastroenterologists, nurses, occupational therapists, and dieticians, can make a major contribution to the medical wellbeing and quality of life of these children. Different neurological diseases ( eg, spinal dysraphism, syringomyelia, tethered cord syndromes) can give rise to gastrointestinal dysfunction and symptoms that may need different gastrointestinal or surgical management. The introduction of new drugs, including proton pump inhibitors and innovative endoscopic and surgical techniques in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease and constipation also may have an impact on the treatment of neurologically handicapped children in the future.

Technical advances in pediatric laparoscopy have had a beneficial impact on splenectomy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effects of recent technical advances on the safety and benefits of pediatric laparoscopic splenectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy from January 1998 to January 2000. Technical advances utilized during this period included the harmonic scalpel, a specialized flexible hilar retractor, a larger, wire-rimmed specimen bag, and lateral patient positioning.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic splenectomy was performed successfully on 18 patients aged 3 to 17 years (median, 9). The indications were hereditary spherocytosis (n = 10), idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (n = 5), and other (n = 3). Eight patients had concomitant procedures including cholecystectomy (n = 3), resection of an accessory spleen (n = 3), and other (n = 2). The median operating time, including the concomitant procedures, was 125 minutes (range, 70 to 235). Patients tolerated a regular diet on median postoperative day 1 (range, 1 to 3), and 16 were discharged home on or before postoperative day 2. None of the patients required blood product transfusion or conversion to an open technique. There were no complications, and all patients had returned to usual activity by 2 weeks.

CONCLUSION

With recent technological advances, the laparoscopic approach has become easy to perform, safe, and should be considered the procedure of choice for pediatric splenectomy.