Adjuvant therapy for resectable colorectal carcinoma with fluorouracil administered by portal vein infusion. A study of the Mayo Clinic and the North Central Cancer Treatment Group

Efficacy of various adjuvant chemotherapy methods in preventing liver metastasis from potentially curative colorectal cancer: A systematic review network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

PURPOSE

Various chemotherapy administration methods have been used to prevent liver metastasis (LM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of these different methods in preventing LM in CRC patients who underwent curative surgery.

METHOD

A systematic search of randomized controlled trials reporting the efficacy of various adjuvant chemotherapy methods in patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative surgery was conducted. The primary outcome was the LM rate.

RESULTS

This network meta-analysis included 19 studies reporting on 12,588 participants, comparing portal vein infusion chemotherapy (PVIC) versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) versus systematic chemotherapy (SC) versus surgery alone. The HAIC group had the lowest LM rate when compared to the other three groups (odds ratio [OR] of PVIC vs. HAIC: 1.86; OR of SC vs. HAIC: 1.98; and HAIC vs. surgery alone: 0.43). The LM rate did not differ significantly between PVIC, SC, and surgery alone. The recurrence rates were lower for PVIC and HAIC than for surgery alone (the ORs for PVIC and HAIC were 0.73 [95% CI: 0.58-0.92] and 0.45 [95% CI: 0.26-0.77]). The mortality rates of patients undergoing PVIC and HAIC were lower than that of patients undergoing surgery alone (the ORs for PVIC and HAIC were 0.77 [95% CI: 0.64-0.93] and 0.49 [95% CI: 0.24-0.98]). Anastomotic leakage, cardiopulmonary leakage, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, oral ulceration, wound infection, or ileus did not differ significantly between the four groups. PVIC showed the highest hepatic toxicity rate compared to those for SC, HAIC, and surgery alone.

CONCLUSION

HAIC might be a satisfactory method for preventing LM in patients with CRC undergoing curative surgery.

Comparative Efficacy of Preoperative, Postoperative, and Perioperative Treatments for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Several treatment strategies are used for management of resectable colorectal liver metastases. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare preoperative, postoperative, or perioperative treatments, identifying the optimal approach. Methods: We searched reports of randomized controlled trials through the relevant databases. The primary outcome criterion was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome measure was disease-free survival (DFS). We calculated the hazard ratio (HR) with the 95% credible interval (Crl) of the time-to-event data. Rank probabilities were evaluated by the probability of treatment rankings. Multiple treatment comparisons based on a Bayesian network integrated the efficacy of all included approaches. Results: Twenty-two eligible randomized controlled trials with 6,115 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. One treatment that resulted in a significant improvement in OS compared with surgery alone was hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) plus postoperative chemotherapy (CT) [HR = 0.74 with 95% Crl: (0.60, 0.94)]. With regard to the secondary outcome measure, three approaches that led to a significant improvement in DFS compared with surgery alone were HAI plus postoperative CT [HR = 1.44 with 95% Crl: (1.19, 1.75)], postoperative CT [HR = 1.14 with 95% Crl: (1.01, 1.29)], preoperative hepatic and regional arterial chemotherapy (PHRAC) plus preoperative CT [HR = 1.41 with 95% Crl: (1.03, 1.89)]. According to the results for the rank probabilities of the 11 treatments, the combination of HAI and bevacizumab plus postoperative CT showed the highest probability of benefitting OS, and PHRAC plus preoperative CT was most likely to benefit DFS. Conclusions: The combination of HAI and bevacizumab plus postoperative CT exhibited the greatest odds of being the most effective treatment for improving OS, and PHRAC plus preoperative CT exhibited the greatest odds of improving DFS. Further clinical studies are needed and justified.

Feasibility of Intraportal Chemotherapy with Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Immediately after Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Metastases

Background

About 50% of recurrence after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer remain confined to the liver. Adjuvant locoregional treatments could reduce the failure rate, but these treatments have been scantily investigated. Experimental models have shown that both intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) and intraportal chemotherapy (IPC) in adjuvant setting were able to reduce metastatic growth, but IPC should be initiated in the immediate postoperative period.

Aims

To evaluate the feasibility of immediate postoperative IPC of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus folinic acid (FA) in a consecutive series of patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods

Forty-three consecutive patients underwent hepatic resection. The first 25 (Control Group = CG) received only surgery; the latter 18 (Treated Group = TG) were candidate to postoperative IPC of 5-FU 750 mg/m2 plus FA 20 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 8 days. One patient was not treated owing to bleeding, thus only 17 received the treatment.

Results

Postoperative morbidity was 14%, equally distributed in both groups. Biochemical hepatic parameters of TG were not statistically different from those of CG. Five patients (29%) developed systemic toxicity: one hematologic grade 4; 3 mucositis grade 3 and one allergic erythema. Three of these patients had been treated by systemic chemotherapy less than one year before.

Discussion

IPC of 5-FU plus FA in the immediate postoperative period has not yet been tested. The schedule we have investigated neither affected the postoperative outcome, nor influenced hepatic function and regeneration. Systemic toxicity was evident and severe mainly in patients already pretreated by systemic chemotherapy. In these patients, however, toxicity did not affect further outcome. This study confirms the feasibility of immediate intraportal chemotherapy after hepatic resection.

Medical Management of Colorectal Carcinomas

Current information on the medical treatment of colorectal cancer was reviewed after a search of the literature through Medline. Publications from 1984 to present were surveyed. Appropriate adjuvant therapy increases overall survival and disease-free intervals. The treatment modalities of unresectable or metastatic tumors are disappointing, with at best 40% of patients experiencing short-lasting responses. Whenever possible, patients with advanced colorectal cancer should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Colorectal Cancer: What has Changed in Diagnosis and Treatment over the Last 50 Years?

Aims and background

This overview focuses on what has changed in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer over the last 50 years.

Methods

The most important international registers (SEER, European and Italian) as well as the literature have been consulted. Furthermore, many prognostic factors are analyzed with the aim to understand the reasons why 5-year survival has improved over the last two decades.

Results

Since the biologic characteristics of the tumor cannot be changed, improved survival must be supported by concomitant multiple factors, such as earlier diagnosis (as given by a more informed educational behavior and the advent of screening) as well as the wide use of colonoscopy and the technical improvement of surgical and medical treatment. However, it seems that the greatest improvement in survival is limited to 5-year controls, whereas long-term survival does not appear to show any significant improvement.

Conclusions

We can hypothesize that our efforts have just delayed the inevitable end: death. Nevertheless, further research should be done to confirm this hypothesis, perhaps in the field of molecular biology, which may also be the right approach to understanding the biologic aggressiveness of each tumor.

Simultaneous Assessment of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Marine Mollusc-Derived Brominated Indoles in an In Vivo Model for Early Stage Colon Cancer

The acute apoptotic response to genotoxic carcinogens animal model has been extensively used to assess the ability of drugs and natural products like dietary components to promote apoptosis in the colon and protect against colorectal cancer (CRC). This work aimed to use this model to identify the main chemopreventative agent in extracts from an Australian mollusc Dicathais orbita, while simultaneously providing information on their potential in vivo toxicity. After 2 weeks of daily oral gavage with bioactive extracts and purified brominated indoles, mice were injected with the chemical carcinogen azoxymethane (AOM; 10 mg/kg) and then killed 6 hours later. Efficacy was evaluated using immunohistochemical and hematoxylin staining, and toxicity was assessed via hematology, blood biochemistry, and liver histopathology. Comparison of saline- and AOM-injected controls revealed that potential toxic side effects can be interpreted from blood biochemistry and hematology using this short-term model, although AOM negatively affected the ability to detect histopathological effects in the liver. Purified 6-bromoisatin was identified as the main cancer preventive agent in the Muricidae extract, significantly enhancing apoptosis and reducing cell proliferation in the colonic crypts at 0.05 mg/g. There was no evidence of liver toxicity associated with 6-bromoisatin, whereas 0.1 mg/g of the brominated indole tyrindoleninone led to elevated aspartate aminotransferase levels and a reduction in red blood cells. As tyrindoleninone is converted to 6-bromoisatin by oxidation, this information will assist in the optimization and quality control of a chemopreventative nutraceutical from Muricidae. In conclusion, preliminary data on in vivo safety can be simultaneously collected when testing the efficacy of new natural products, such as 6-bromoisatin from Muricidae molluscs for early stage prevention of colon cancer.

Raltitrexed and the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Objective. Colorectal cancer is the second largest cause of death from malignant disease in Western countries. Although surgical resection is the preferred treatment in early disease, chemotherapy has an important role to play both as an adjunct to surgery and in the palliation of advanced disease. For many years 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the only cyto toxic drug with significant activity in this condition and, recently, considerable effort has been directed toward enhancing its activity and finding better, alternative agents. Recently, raltitrexed (Tomudex; Zeneca Pharmaceuticals), the first of a new class of cytotoxic drugs, the selective, direct, thymidylate synthase inhibitors, received its first regulatory ap proval for the first-line treatment of advanced colo rectal cancer. The purpose of this review is to con sider the efficacy, toxicity, and resource implications of using this new antineoplastic agent, alongside developments that have been made in the more effective use of fluoropyrimidines, and the place of drug treatment in the management of colorectal cancer.

Data Sources. A variety of sources were used, including manual and on-line (Medline and Pharm- line) literature searching. Approved and other drug names were used as primary search terms, linked with colorectal cancer where limitation was required. The medical information department of Zeneca Pharma ceuticals also was used where appropriate.

Study Selection. Particular attention was di rected to randomized clinical trials, but nonrandom ized and preclinical studies were considered where appropriate.

Conclusions. Although colorectal cancer is in herently resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy, such treatment now has an established role as an adjunct to surgery and in the palliation of advanced disease. The optimum 5-FU- based regimen has yet to be estab lished with certainty, although in advanced disease a four-times-weekly, 5-day regimen of 5-FU and low- dose folinic acid is probably the best of those fully evaluated to date. Raltitrexed seems to be as effective as this combination while having definite advantages in terms of toxicity and the resources required for its preparation and administration, although it remains to be seen to what extent these and other resource benefits will be offset by its higher cost and how its efficacy and tolerability will compare with other 5-FU- based regimens in ongoing clinical trials.

The clinical utility of the combination of T stage and venous invasion to predict survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine the clinical utility of improved detection of venous invasion (VI) in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND

VI is a feature of colorectal cancer (CRC) progression. Elastica staining can be used to improve detection of VI and correspondingly its prediction of patient survival.

METHODS

A single-center, observational study of pathology variables, including detection of VI by staining for elastica, using 631 stage I to III CRC specimens, collected from 1997 to 2009 (176 analyzed retrospectively and 455 analyzed prospectively), was performed.

RESULTS

VI was detected in 56% of patients with CRC. Over a median follow-up period of 73 months, 238 patients died (134 from cancer). On multivariate analysis, VI by elastica staining was associated with a shorter survival duration, independent of other pathology features, in all cases [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.94, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.33-6.65, P < 0.001] and in node-negative cases (HR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.81-6.97; P < 0.001). In the absence of elastica-detected VI, with the exception of T stage, no other pathology features were associated with survival time. Therefore, the combination of T stage and VI (TVI) on survival was examined. Five-year cancer mortality could be stratified between 100% and 54% for patients with node-negative tumors and between 100% and 33% for patients with node-positive tumors. In all cases, the TVI had similar predictive value as that of T stage and node status (TNM). In node-negative disease, TVI had superior predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study have prompted the development of a novel tumor staging system based on TVI. The TVI has clinical utility, especially in node-negative disease, in predicting outcome following curative resection for CRC.

Association of obesity with DNA mismatch repair status and clinical outcome in patients with stage II or III colon carcinoma participating in NCCTG and NSABP adjuvant chemotherapy trials

PURPOSE

Although the importance of obesity in colon cancer risk and outcome is recognized, the association of body mass index (BMI) with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

BMI (kg/m(2)) was determined in patients with TNM stage II or III colon carcinomas (n = 2,693) who participated in randomized trials of adjuvant chemotherapy. The association of BMI with MMR status and survival was analyzed by logistic regression and Cox models, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 427 (16%) tumors showed deficient MMR (dMMR), and 630 patients (23%) were obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)). Obesity was significantly associated with younger age (P = .021), distal tumor site (P = .012), and a lower rate of dMMR tumors (10% v 17%; P < .001) compared with normal weight. Obesity remained associated with lower rates of dMMR (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.79; P < .001) after adjusting for tumor site, stage, sex, and age. Among obese patients, rates of dMMR were lower in men compared with women (8% v 13%; P = .041). Obesity was associated with higher recurrence rates (P = .0034) and independently predicted worse disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.64; P = .0010) and overall survival (OS), whereas dMMR predicted better DFS (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.74; P < .001) and OS. The favorable prognosis of dMMR was maintained in obese patients.

CONCLUSION

Colon cancers from obese patients are less likely to show dMMR, suggesting obesity-related differences in the pathogenesis of colon cancer. Although obesity was independently associated with adverse outcome, the favorable prognostic impact of dMMR was maintained among obese patients.

DNA mismatch repair status and colon cancer recurrence and survival in clinical trials of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15% of colorectal cancers develop because of defective function of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system. We determined the association of MMR status with colon cancer recurrence and examined the impact of 5-fluorouracil (FU)-based adjuvant therapy on recurrence variables.

METHODS

We included stage II and III colon carcinoma patients (n = 2141) who were treated in randomized trials of 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy. Tumors were analyzed for microsatellite instability by polymerase chain reaction and/or for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry to determine deficient MMR (dMMR) or proficient MMR (pMMR) status. Associations of MMR status and/or 5-FU-based treatment with clinicopathologic and recurrence covariates were determined using χ(2) or Fisher Exact or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariable Cox models, with the latter adjusted for covariates. Tumors showing dMMR were categorized by presumed germline vs sporadic origin and were assessed for their prognostic and predictive impact. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

In this study population, dMMR was detected in 344 of 2141 (16.1%) tumors. Compared with pMMR tumors, dMMR was associated with reduced 5-year recurrence rates (33% vs 22%; P < .001), delayed TTR (P < .001), and fewer distant recurrences (22% vs 12%; P < .001). In multivariable models, dMMR was independently associated with delayed TTR (hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.56 to 0.91, P = .005) and improved DFS (P = .035) and OS (P = .031). In stage III cancers, 5-FU-based treatment vs surgery alone or no 5-FU was associated with reduced distant recurrence for dMMR tumors (11% vs 29%; P = .011) and reduced recurrence to all sites for pMMR tumors (P < .001). The dMMR tumors with suspected germline mutations were associated with improved DFS after 5-FU-based treatment compared with sporadic tumors where no benefit was observed (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with dMMR colon cancers have reduced rates of tumor recurrence, delayed TTR, and improved survival rates, compared with pMMR colon cancers. Distant recurrences were reduced by 5-FU-based adjuvant treatment in dMMR stage III tumors, and a subset analysis suggested that any treatment benefit was restricted to suspected germline vs sporadic tumors.

DNA mismatch repair status and colon cancer recurrence and survival in clinical trials of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15% of colorectal cancers develop because of defective function of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system. We determined the association of MMR status with colon cancer recurrence and examined the impact of 5-fluorouracil (FU)-based adjuvant therapy on recurrence variables.

METHODS

We included stage II and III colon carcinoma patients (n = 2141) who were treated in randomized trials of 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy. Tumors were analyzed for microsatellite instability by polymerase chain reaction and/or for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry to determine deficient MMR (dMMR) or proficient MMR (pMMR) status. Associations of MMR status and/or 5-FU-based treatment with clinicopathologic and recurrence covariates were determined using χ(2) or Fisher Exact or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariable Cox models, with the latter adjusted for covariates. Tumors showing dMMR were categorized by presumed germline vs sporadic origin and were assessed for their prognostic and predictive impact. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

In this study population, dMMR was detected in 344 of 2141 (16.1%) tumors. Compared with pMMR tumors, dMMR was associated with reduced 5-year recurrence rates (33% vs 22%; P < .001), delayed TTR (P < .001), and fewer distant recurrences (22% vs 12%; P < .001). In multivariable models, dMMR was independently associated with delayed TTR (hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.56 to 0.91, P = .005) and improved DFS (P = .035) and OS (P = .031). In stage III cancers, 5-FU-based treatment vs surgery alone or no 5-FU was associated with reduced distant recurrence for dMMR tumors (11% vs 29%; P = .011) and reduced recurrence to all sites for pMMR tumors (P < .001). The dMMR tumors with suspected germline mutations were associated with improved DFS after 5-FU-based treatment compared with sporadic tumors where no benefit was observed (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with dMMR colon cancers have reduced rates of tumor recurrence, delayed TTR, and improved survival rates, compared with pMMR colon cancers. Distant recurrences were reduced by 5-FU-based adjuvant treatment in dMMR stage III tumors, and a subset analysis suggested that any treatment benefit was restricted to suspected germline vs sporadic tumors.

Regional hepatic chemotherapies in the treatment of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver

The liver is the most common site of metastatic spread of colorectal cancer (CRC). Liver may be the only site of spread in as many as 30% to 40% of patients with advanced disease and can be treated with regional therapies directed toward their liver tumors. Surgery is currently the only potentially curative treatment, with a 5-year survival rate as high as 30% to 40% in selected patients. However, fewer than 25% of cases are candidates for curative resection. A number of other locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency or microwave ablation, cryotherapy, and chemotherapy, may be offered to patients with unresectable but isolated liver metastases. However, for most patients with metastatic spread beyond the liver, systemic chemotherapy rather than regional therapy is a more appropriate option. We review the status of various regional hepatic chemotherapies in the treatment of colorectal metastases to the liver in the light of the available, published prospective, randomized trials; this discipline has not yet been properly applied to the burgeoning use of locally ablative techniques. The regional strategies reviewed include portal venous infusion (PVI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), intra-arterial chemotherapy (hepatic arterial infusion [HAI]), chemoembolization, and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT).

Effect of lymph node retrieval rates on the utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Failing to meet the benchmark of 12 lymph nodes in resection specimens is an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer.

METHODS

Among consecutive eligible patients with pathologic stage II colon cancer treated at eight NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers between September 1, 2005 and February 19, 2008, we analyzed receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, with less than 12 versus 12+ lymph nodes removed and examined the primary explanatory variable of interest.

RESULTS

Among 258 patients, 46% received adjuvant chemotherapy. An oxaliplatin-containing regimen was used 67% of the time. Younger age (<50 years, P < 0.001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.007), and higher T stage (P = 0.007) were independently associated with adjuvant chemotherapy use. There was significant inter-institutional variability in practice with the proportion receiving treatment ranging from 17% to 64% (P < 0.05). Notably, presence of less than 12 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen was a strong predictor of treatment (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy use after resection of stage II colon cancer is common, but by no means standard practice at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) institutions. More attention to achieving the recommended benchmark for lymph node dissection has the potential to decrease exposure to the toxicity of adjuvant treatment.

Targeting the extracellular signature of metastatic colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of tumor death, a consequence primarily of the spreading of malignant cells to liver and lung. Despite a range of interventions for liver metastases, the present knowledge of few specific molecular targets may contribute to late diagnosis and poorly effective therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To review the most innovative methodology employed to profile the signature(s) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and to address diagnostic/therapeutic agents.

METHODS

A broad range Medline search was conducted, with particular attention to the search terms 'liver metastasis signature', in combination with 'targeting' and 'nanotechnology'.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Studies aimed at the discovery of molecular signatures of cancers and metastasis are ongoing; the future of cancer/metastasis targeting is nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery.

Adjuvant perioperative portal vein or peripheral intravenous chemotherapy for potentially curative colorectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The perioperative use of a single course adjuvant portal vein infusion chemotherapy in patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer has been shown to significantly improve overall survival but did not reduce the occurrence of liver metastases (SAKK 40/81) [Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Lancet 345(8946):349-353, 1995]. The objective of the present prospective, three-arm randomized multicenter trial was to assess whether peripheral venous administration of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C decreases the occurrence of liver metastases as well as prolongs disease-free and overall survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stages I-III colorectal cancer patients (n = 753) were randomized to receive either surgery alone (control arm), surgery plus postoperative portal venous infusion of 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) plus heparin given for 24 hours for seven consecutive days plus mitomycin C 10 mg/m(2) given on the first day (arm 2), or surgery and the same chemotherapy regimen administered by peripheral venous route (arm 3).

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival for the three treatment groups were 65% (control group), 60% (portal vein infusion, hazard ratio 1.18, p = 0.23), and 64% (intravenous infusion, hazard ratio 1.04, p = 0.76); the 5-year overall survival was 72% (control group), 69% (portal vein infusion, hazard ratio 1.21, p = 0.2), and 74% (intravenous infusion, hazard ratio 1.03, p = 0.86), respectively. A significant accumulation of early deaths were observed in the portal vein infusion group (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The present prospective randomized multicenter trial provides compelling evidence that short-term perioperative chemotherapy does not improve disease-free and overall survival in patients with potentially curative colorectal cancer. In contrary, the chemotherapy regimen administered in the present investigation seems to have potentially harmful effects, a finding which should be carefully considered in the planning of future trials. Postoperative short-term administration of 5-FU plus mitomycin C either through portal infusion or a central venous catheter is not recommended for routine use in patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer.

Mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma: influence of mucin expression (Muc1, 2 and 5) on clinico-pathological features and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Mucinous component is associated with distinct clinical and pathological features and poor survival in colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in outcomes of patients with mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma according to the type of mucin expressed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemistry was performed in all tumors of patients who underwent radical surgery between 1998 and 2003 with mucinous colorectal cancer using antibodies against MUC1, 2, and 5. Correlation between immunoexpression and clinical, pathological features and survival was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 418 patients treated in this period, only 35 had a mucinous adenocarcinoma. Of these, 25 were positive for 1 or more mucin expression. MUC2 expression correlated with tumor site and depth of penetration, while MUC5 expression correlated to tumor site. Overall survival was significantly worse for patients with MUC2 expression, and disease-free survival was significantly worse for patients with MUC1 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Mucin expression may have significant correlation to specific clinical-pathological features and survival of patients with mucinous-type colorectal adenocarcinoma. These differences may reflect distinct molecular mechanisms involved in carcinogenesis of mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer is potentially curable by surgery. Although adjuvant chemotherapy benefits patients with stage III disease, there is uncertainty of such benefit in stage II colon cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed to better define the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy for patients with stage II colon cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of adjuvant therapy on overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage II colon cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Ovid MEDLINE (1986-2007), EMBASE (1980-2007), and EBM Reviews - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( to 2007) were searched using the medical headings "colonic neoplasms", "colorectal neoplasms", "adjuvant chemotherapy", "adjuvant radiotherapy" and "immunotherapy", and the text words "colon cancer" and "colonic neoplasms". In addition, proceedings from the annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology (1996 to 2004) as well as personal files were searched for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials or meta-analyses containing data on stage II colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant therapy versus surgery alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

:Three reviewers summarized the results of selected studies. The main outcomes of interest were overall and disease-free survival, however, data on toxicity and treatment delivery were also recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

With regards to the effect of adjuvant therapy on stage II colon cancer, the pooled relative risk ratio for overall survival was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.88, 1.05). With regards to disease-free survival, the pooled relative risk ratio was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.75, 0.92).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no improvement in overall survival in the pooled analysis, we did find that disease-free survival in patients with stage II colon cancer was significantly better with the use of adjuvant therapy. It seems reasonable to discuss the benefits of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with those stage II patients who have high risk features, including obstruction, perforation, inadequate lymph node sampling or T4 disease. The co-morbidities and likelihood of tolerating adjuvant systemic chemotherapy should be considered as well. There exists a need to further define which high-risk features in stage II colon cancer patients should be used to select patients for adjuvant therapy. Also, researchers must continue to search for other therapies which might be more effective, shorter in duration and less toxic than those available today.

Systemic treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common noncutaneous malignancy in the United States and the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death. Over the past 12 years, significant progress has been made in the systemic treatment of this malignant condition. Six new chemotherapeutic agents have been introduced, increasing median overall survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from less than 9 months with no treatment to approximately 24 months. For patients with stage III (lymph node positive) colon cancer, an overall survival benefit for fluorouracil-based chemotherapy has been firmly established, and recent data have shown further efficacy for the inclusion of oxaliplatin in such adjuvant treatment programs. For patients with stage II colon cancer, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial, but may be appropriate in a subset of individuals at higher risk for disease recurrence. Ongoing randomized clinical trials are evaluating how best to combine currently available therapies, while smaller studies are evaluating new agents, with the goal of continued progress in prolonging life among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and increasing cure rates among those with resectable disease.

Preoperative hepatic and regional arterial chemotherapy in the prevention of liver metastasis after colorectal cancer surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether preoperative hepatic and regional arterial chemotherapy is able to prevent liver metastasis and improve overall survival in patients receiving curative colorectal cancer resection.

METHODS

Patients with stage II or stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) were randomly assigned to receive preoperative hepatic and regional arterial chemotherapy (PHRAC group, n = 110) or surgery alone (control group, n = 112). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, whereas the secondary endpoints included liver metastasis-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in overall morbidity between PHRAC and Control groups. During the follow-up period (median, 36 months), the median liver metastasis time for patients with stage III CRC was significantly longer in the PHRAC group (16 +/- 3 months vs. 8 +/- 1 months, P = 0.01). In stage III patients, there was also significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the incidence of liver metastasis (20.6% vs. 28.3%, P = 0.03), 3-year disease-free survival (74.6% vs. 58.1%, P = 0.0096), 3-year overall survival (87.7% vs. 75.7%, P = 0.020), and the median survival time (40.1 +/- 4.6 months vs. 36.3 +/- 3.2 months, P = 0.03). In the PHRAC arm, the risk ratio of recurrence was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.51-0.79, P = 0.0002), of death was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.32-0.67; P = 0.009), and of liver metastasis was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.52-0.86; P = 0.02). In contrast, PHRAC seemed to be no benefit for stage II patients. Toxicities, such as hepatic toxicity and leukocyte decreasing, were mild and could be cured with medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative hepatic and regional arterial chemotherapy, in combination with surgical resection, could be able to reduce and delay the occurrence of liver metastasis and therefore improve survival rate in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

Effect of 5-Fluorouracil plus Interferon on the Integrity of Colonic Anastomoses Covering with Fibrin Glue

BACKGROUND

It has been well established that the immediate postoperative intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapeutic agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) after curative colon resection for colon cancer destroys disseminated cancer cells and inhibits micrometastases but also inhibits anastomotic healing. On the other hand, the application of fibrin glue constitutes a physical barrier around the anastomosis and may prevent anastomotic leakage. The purpose of this experimental study was to determine the effect of 5-FU plus interferon (IFN)-alpha-2a on the integrity of colonic anastomoses covered with fibrin glue when injected intraperitoneally immediately after colon resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty rats were randomized to one of four groups. After resection of a 1-cm segment of the transverse colon, an end-to-end sutured anastomosis was performed. Rats of the control and the fibrin glue groups were injected with 6 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) solution intraperitoneally. Rats in the 5-FU + IFN and the 5-FU + IFN + fibrin glue groups received 5-FU plus IFN intraperitoneally. The colonic anastomoses of the rats in the fibrin glue and in the 5-FU + IFN + fibrin glue groups were covered with fibrin glue. All rats were sacrificed on the 8th postoperative day, and the anastomoses were examined macroscopically. The bursting pressure measurements were recorded, and the anastomoses were graded histologically.

RESULTS

Only the 5-FU + IFN group had anastomoses rupture, and the rupture rate (33%) in this group was significantly greater than in the other groups, where there were no ruptures (P = 0.015). The adhesion formations score was, on average, significantly higher in rats of the 5-FU + IFN group compared with the control group (P = 0.006) and the 5-FU + IFN + fibrin glue group (P = 0.010). Bursting pressures were significantly lower in the control group when compared to the fibrin glue and 5-FU + IFN + fibrin glue group (P < 0.001). Rats in the 5-FU + IFN + fibrin glue group developed significantly more marked neoangiogenesis than rats in the other groups. Inflammatory cell infiltration, collagen deposition, and fibroblast activity did not differ significantly among the four groups (P = 0.856, P = 0.192 and P = 0.243, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The immediate postoperative intraperitoneal administration of 5-FU plus IFN impairs colonic healing. However, when the colonic anastomoses were covered with fibrin glue, the injection of 5-FU plus IFN had no adverse effects on the integrity of the anastomoses.

Can biliary carcinoembryonic antigen identify colorectal cancer patients with occult hepatic metastases?

BACKGROUND

Twenty-five percent of radically treated colorectal cancer patients already have occult hepatic metastases (OHM) that will later be observed during postoperative follow-up. Instrumental examinations, i.e., intraoperative ultrasound or Doppler perfusion index, have not improved diagnosis. As carcinoembyonic antigen (CEA) levels are useful to reveal hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, determination of CEA in the bile rather than the blood may allow preclinical diagnosis of OHM thanks to the reduced volume of bile.

METHODS

One hundred radically treated colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in the study. Bile was withdrawn from the gallbladder intraoperatively and biliary CEA levels determined using an immuno-enzymatic method (normal value 0-5 ng/ml). Eighty-nine fully evaluable patients were followed up for three years postoperatively to monitor hepatic metastases. Preoperative blood CEA, lymph node metastases and biliary CEA were compared in order to assess which procedure was more efficient in identifying patients who would develop hepatic metastases.

RESULTS

Eleven of the 89 evaluable patients developed hepatic metastases: 9/11 presented elevated biliary CEA levels (mean: 12.73; range: 5.1-26.2); 8/11 had high preoperative blood CEA values; and 9/11 were at anatomopathological stage N+. In the 78 patients who did not develop hepatic metastases, biliary CEA was within normal limits in 73/78, preoperative blood CEA was normal in 60/78, and 58/78 patients were at anatomopathological stage N-. Hence, the sensitivity of biliary CEA was 81.8%, specificity was 93.6%, and diagnostic accuracy was 92.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Determination of biliary CEA seems to be more efficient in identifying patients presenting OHM who require frequent clinical examinations or adjuvant cancer treatment.

Prognostic effect of perioperative change of serum carcinoembryonic antigen level: a useful tool for detection of systemic recurrence in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients even with the same stage of rectal cancer varies widely. We analyzed the capability of perioperative change of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level for predicting recurrence and survival in rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

We reviewed 631 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for stage II or III rectal cancer. Patients were categorized into three groups according to their serum CEA concentrations on the seventh day before and on the seventh day after surgery: group A, normal CEA level (<or=5 ng/mL) in both periods; group B, increased preoperative and normal postoperative CEA; and group C, continuously increased CEA in both periods. The prognostic relevance of the CEA group was investigated by analyses of recurrence patterns and survival.

RESULTS

Stage III patients showed higher systemic recurrence (P = .001) and worse 5-year survival rates (P < .0001) for group C than for groups A and B. On multivariate analysis, the CEA group was a significant predictor for recurrence (P < .001; relative risk, 2.740; 95% confidence interval, 1.677-4.476) and survival (P = .001; relative risk, 2.174; 95% confidence interval, 1.556-3.308).

CONCLUSIONS

The perioperative serum CEA change was a useful prognostic indicator to predict for systemic recurrence and survival in stage III rectal cancer patients.

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer--an overview of current management for surgeons

BACKGROUND

The role of systemic chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer has been re-evaluated with the advent of newer agents. The results of published trials are reviewed in this article and the protocols of some of the major ongoing trials outlined.

METHODS

A medline based literature search was performed for articles relating to clinical trials using systemic chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer in the advanced and adjuvant setting. Additional original papers were obtained from citations in those identified by the initial search.

RESULTS

The combination of irinotecan or oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy regimens for advanced cancer demonstrates better response rates when compared with 5-FU and folinic acid (FA). Although this translates into a modest survival benefit, it may increase resectability rates in patients with hepatic metastasis. Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III cancer has been established to improve long-term survival although it is benefit for patients with stage II disease remains less clear.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of the various combinations of chemotherapeutic agents that are most effective and the clinical situations for which they are best suited is ongoing and will improve the current outlook for those with colorectal cancer.

Colon cancer

Colon cancer is one of the leading tumours in the world and is considered among the big killers, together with lung, prostate and breast cancer. In the recent years very important advances occurred in the field of treatment of this frequent disease: adjuvant chemotherapy was demonstrated to be effective, chiefly in stage III patients, and surgery was optimized in order to achieve the best results with a low morbidity. Several new target-oriented drugs are under evaluation and some of them (cetuximab and bevacizumab) have already exhibited a good activity/efficacy, mainly in combination with chemotherapy. The development of updated recommendations for the best management of these patients is crucial in order to obtain the best results, not only in clinical research but also in everyday practice. This report summarizes the most important achievements in this field and provides the readers useful suggestions for their professional practice.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Recommendations on Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer

Purpose

To address whether all medically fit patients with curatively resected stage II colon cancer should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy as part of routine clinical practice, to identify patients with poor prognosis characteristics, and to describe strategies for oncologists to use to discuss adjuvant chemotherapy in practice.

Methods

An American Society of Clinical Oncology Panel, in collaboration with the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guideline Initiative, reviewed pertinent information from the literature through May 2003.

Results

A literature-based meta-analysis found no evidence of a statistically significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II patients.

Recommendations

The routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for medically fit patients with stage II colon cancer is not recommended. However, there are populations of patients with stage II disease that could be considered for adjuvant therapy, including patients with inadequately sampled nodes, T4 lesions, perforation, or poorly differentiated histology.

Conclusion

Direct evidence from randomized controlled trials does not support the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II colon cancer. Patients and oncologists who accept the relative benefit in stage III disease as adequate indirect evidence of benefit for stage II disease are justified in considering the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, particularly for those patients with high-risk stage II disease. The ultimate clinical decision should be based on discussions with the patient about the nature of the evidence supporting treatment, the anticipated morbidity of treatment, the presence of high-risk prognostic features on individual prognosis, and patient preferences. Patients with stage II disease should be encouraged to participate in randomized trials.

Adjuvant therapy for stage II colon cancer: a systematic review from the Cancer Care Ontario Program in evidence-based care's gastrointestinal cancer disease site group

PURPOSE

To develop a systematic review that would address the following question: Should patients with stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy?

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken to locate randomized controlled trials comparing adjuvant therapy to observation.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven trials and 11 meta-analyses were included. The evidence for stage II colon cancer comes primarily from a trial of fluorouracil plus levamisole and a meta-analysis of 1,016 patients comparing fluorouracil plus folinic acid versus observation. Neither detected an improvement in disease-free or overall survival for adjuvant therapy. A recent pooled analysis of data from seven trials observed a benefit for adjuvant therapy in a multivariate analysis for both disease-free and overall survival. The disease-free survival benefits appeared to extend to stage II patients; however, no P values were provided. A meta-analysis of chemotherapy by portal vein infusion has also shown a benefit in disease-free and overall survival for stage II patients. A meta-analysis was conducted using data on stage II patients where data were available (n = 4,187). The mortality risk ratio was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.01; P =.07).

CONCLUSION

There is preliminary evidence indicating that adjuvant therapy is associated with a disease-free survival benefit for patients with stage II colon cancer. These benefits are small and not necessarily associated with improved overall survival. Patients should be made aware of these results and encouraged to participate in active clinical trials. Additional investigation of newer therapies and more mature data from the presently available trials should be pursued.

Healing of colon anastomoses covered with fibrin glue after immediate postoperative intraperitoneal administration of 5-fluorouracil

PURPOSE

The aim of this experimental study was to investigate whether covering the colonic anastomoses with fibrin glue can protect the colonic healing from the adverse effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), when it is injected intraperitoneally immediately after colon resection.

METHODS

Sixty-four rats were randomized to one of four groups. After resection of a 1-cm segment of the transverse colon, an end-to-end sutured anastomosis was performed. Rats of the control group and the fibrin glue group were injected with 6 ml of solution 0.9 percent NaCl intraperitoneally. Rats in the 5-FU and the 5-FU + fibrin glue groups received 5-FU intraperitoneally. The colonic anastomoses of the rats in the fibrin glue group and in the 5-FU + fibrin glue group were covered with fibrin glue. All rats were killed on the 8th postoperative day and the anastomoses were examined macroscopically. The bursting pressure measurements were recorded and the anastomoses were graded histologically.

RESULTS

The leakage rate of the anastomoses was significantly higher in the rats of the 5-FU group than in those of the fibrin glue group and those of the 5-FU + fibrin glue group (37.5 percent vs. 0 percent, P = 0.020). The adhesion formation score was significantly higher in rats of the 5-FU group than in the other groups. Bursting pressures were also significantly lower in the 5-FUgroup than in the other groups ( P < 0.001). Rats in the 5-FU + fibrin glue group developed significantly more marked neoagiogenesis than rats in the other groups. Rats in the 5-FU + fibrin glue group also presented significantly more fibroblast activity than those in the 5-FU group. ( P = 0.004)

CONCLUSIONS

The immediate postoperative, intraperitoneal administration of 5-FU inhibited wound healing. However, when the colonic anastomoses were covered with fibrin glue, the injection of 5-FU had no adverse effects on the healing of the anastomoses.

Regional chemotherapeutic techniques for liver tumors: current knowledge and future directions

After a rather long period of stagnation, intra-arterial therapeutic approaches for treating liver tumors are currently progressing rapidly. These new modalities will increase the resectability of initially unresectable liver tumors after dramatic responses. At the same time, resectability rates are increasing with the assistance of local ablative physical treatments such as radiofrequency, resulting in an improvement of patients' median survival rates and quality of life.

Prophylactic hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for the prevention of liver metastasis in patients with colon carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The liver is the most frequent site of recurrence after curative resection in patients with colon carcinoma. For liver metastasis, a high response rate can be achieved with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy. In the current study, the authors administered 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as adjuvant chemotherapy by HAI to patients with colon carcinoma without liver metastases and studied its effects on recurrence in the liver and survival.

METHODS

A total of 316 patients with preoperative Stage II or Stage III colon carcinoma (according to the 1997 revision of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system) were randomly assigned to receive surgery plus 3-week continuous HAI of 5-FU or surgery alone. There were 305 eligible patients, of whom the 119 patients assigned to the HAI arm actually received 5-FU. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, whereas the secondary endpoints were overall survival and liver metastasis-free survival. Analysis was by intent to treat.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences noted in morbidity between the two treatment arms. During the follow-up period (median, 59.0 months), the incidence of liver metastasis was significantly decreased in the HAI arm whereas there were no significant differences reported between the 2 arms with regard to the frequency of metastasis at other sites. In the HAI arm, the risk ratio for recurrence was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.24-0.64; P=0.0002), the risk ratio for death was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.21-0.67; P=0.0009), and the risk ratio for liver metastasis was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.22-0.66; P=0.0005). These differences were found to be significant only for patients with Stage III disease. Toxicities were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

A schedule of 3-week HAI of 5-FU given as adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with Stage III colon carcinoma appeared to contribute to a significant decrease in the frequency of liver metastases and was associated with an improved survival rate.

Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil infusion in colorectal cancer (AXIS)

Background

Postoperative portal vein infusion (PVI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a well tolerated and widely applicable treatment for colorectal cancer that might have an enormous public health impact, even if it produced survival benefits of just a few per cent. Very large trials are required to detect such differences, and the Adjuvant X-ray and 5-FU Infusion Study (AXIS) is the largest such trial yet reported.

Methods

Consenting patients with presumed colorectal cancer were randomized to surgery with or without 7 days of PVI (1 g 5-FU plus 5000 units heparin in 1 litre 5 per cent dextrose infused over each 24-h period). In addition, patients with rectal cancer could be randomized to radiotherapy or no radiotherapy to be given either before or after surgery.

Results

Between November 1989 and December 1997, 3583 patients were randomized with respect to PVI. The survival hazard ratios (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.)) in all patients randomized and in the curatively resected subgroup (71·2 per cent of patients) were 1·00 (0·92 to 1·11) and 0·94 (0·83 to 1·06) respectively. Tests for heterogeneity suggested a greater treatment benefit for patients with colonic cancer than for patients with rectal cancer with respect to disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0·79 versus 1·03; P = 0·07), and there was a non-significant trend with respect to overall survival (hazard ratio 0·87 versus 1·03; P = 0·17). No survival benefit was seen in the 761 patients randomized with respect to radiotherapy; although not statistically significant, the impact on local recurrence rates was similar to that reported in the literature.

Conclusion

No overall benefit of PVI was established in AXIS when colonic and rectal cancers were considered together, but the evidence suggesting a differential treatment effect according to site of cancer in AXIS was strongly supported by a meta-analysis incorporating the previous trials. Combining the data gave hazard ratios of 0·82 and 1·00 for colonic and rectal tumours respectively (test for interaction, P = 0·024), equating to an absolute survival benefit for patients with colonic cancer of 5·8 (95 per cent c.i. 2·8 to 8·5) per cent, a level close to that seen for prolonged systemic therapy.

Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Colon cancers with high-frequency microsatellite instability have clinical and pathological features that distinguish them from microsatellite-stable tumors. We investigated the usefulness of microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil in stage II and stage III colon cancer.

METHODS

Tumor specimens were collected from patients with colon cancer who were enrolled in randomized trials of fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Microsatellite instability was assessed with the use of mononucleotide and dinucleotide markers.

RESULTS

Of 570 tissue specimens, 95 (16.7 percent) exhibited high-frequency microsatellite instability. Among 287 patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy, those with tumors displaying high-frequency microsatellite instability had a better five-year rate of overall survival than patients with tumors exhibiting microsatellite stability or low-frequency instability (hazard ratio for death, 0.31 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.72]; P=0.004). Among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, high-frequency microsatellite instability was not correlated with increased overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.07 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 1.86]; P=0.80). The benefit of treatment differed significantly according to the microsatellite-instability status (P=0.01). Adjuvant chemotherapy improved overall survival among patients with microsatellite-stable tumors or tumors exhibiting low-frequency microsatellite instability, according to a multivariate analysis adjusted for stage and grade (hazard ratio for death, 0.72 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.99]; P=0.04). By contrast, there was no benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the group with high-frequency microsatellite instability.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy benefited patients with stage II or stage III colon cancer with microsatellite-stable tumors or tumors exhibiting low-frequency microsatellite instability but not those with tumors exhibiting high-frequency microsatellite instability.

Investigation of the prognostic and predictive value of thymidylate synthase, p53, and Ki-67 in patients with locally advanced colon cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the value of thymidylate synthase (TS), Ki-67, and p53 as prognostic markers in patients with Dukes' B2 and C colon carcinoma.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of TS, Ki-67, and p53 in 465 patients with Dukes' B2 (220 patients) or Dukes' C (245 patients) colon carcinoma. Patients represent a nonrandom subset obtained from five randomized phase III trials and were treated with either surgery alone (151 patients) or surgery plus fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (314 patients). All three markers were assayed using immunohistochemical techniques.

RESULTS

With a minimum follow-up of 5 years, our retrospective analysis failed to demonstrate a consistent and significant association between TS, Ki-67, or p53 and either disease-free survival or overall survival. Exploratory analyses did not reveal a convincing explanation for these results that are in conflict with the published literature. Notable interactions were observed. In particular, high Ki-67 levels were associated with increased (decreased) survival in patients with low (high) TS intensity. Patients whose tumors stained positively for p53 seemed to benefit substantially from the use of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those who were not treated (P =.05).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective investigation failed to demonstrate a significant association between TS, Ki-67, or p53 staining and clinical outcome.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent cancers in the world, especially in occidental countries. The primary curative therapy is surgical resection of the tumour. Within the last 15 years, appropriately powered prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that adjuvant post-operative chemotherapy should be the standard treatment for stage III cancers (node-positive disease). 5-Fluorouracil(5FU)/levamisole was used in the early 1990s but has now been replaced by 5FU/leucovorin. The recommended duration of treatment is 6 months. Combining levamisole with 5FU/leucovorin does not improve efficacy. In patients with stage II colon cancer it is still unclear whether adjuvant chemotherapy is effective. In an attempt to define groups of stage II cases that may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, considerable efforts have been made to determine molecular genetic factors (tumour-ploidy and mutations or alterations in oncogenes and tumour-suppressor genes). Regional therapy (particularly portal vein infusion) is one of the other therapeutic strategies still considered to be investigational. Current clinical trials are evaluating the role of non-fluorinated pyrimidine agents in an adjuvant setting.

The role of adjuvant therapy after liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases

Intrahepatic recurrence is common after major resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases to the liver. In this review, the available data on different adjuvant therapies from systemic chemotherapy to regional approaches by direct perfusion of chemotherapeutic agents via the hepatic artery and portal vein will be discussed. Intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapy is another form of regional therapy. Novel approaches with immunotherapy and trials of neoadjuvant therapy in association with resection of CRC hepatic metastases have also been reported. The purpose of this review is to outline these various strategies and their role in combination with resection of CRC liver metastases. Although improved hepatic disease-free survival has been demonstrated with some strategies, overall survival is minimally affected and recurrence of metastatic disease at distant sites is still a major problem. Therefore, future directions should incorporate the use of new systemic agents effective against CRC metastases. Identification of subgroups through clinical features, molecular markers, proteins, or specific tumor properties may also help to individualize treatment.

Review article: non-systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer-portal vein, hepatic arterial and intraperitoneal approaches

Loco-regional chemotherapy, an alternative to systemic chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer, has been evaluated in both adjuvant and palliative settings. The rationale for loco-regional delivery is to achieve higher dose concentrations of drugs at the tumour site or at the most common sites of tumour recurrence, while limiting systemic exposure and associated toxicity. Adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy and palliative hepa-tic arterial chemotherapy have been most extensively investigated. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has also been studied as an adjuvant treatment after complete resection of colorectal cancer or cytoreductive surgery in patients with established peritoneal carcinomatosis. The results obtained have been disappointing, and none of these procedures can be considered as a standard therapeutic option today. However, methodological difficulties were encountered in most published studies, and the investigated schedules and doses may not have been optimal. New combinations of cytotoxic drugs and new indications are currently under consideration. Promising results have recently been published for adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy and hepatic arterial chemotherapy following surgical resection of hepatic metastases, but additional well-designed multicentre phase III trials are needed to determine the true benefits of these treatment modalities and to address the issues of cost and quality of life.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer

Colon cancer remains the third most common cancer, and cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Greater public awareness and acceptance of screening programs have contributed significantly to increasingly earlier detection of colon cancer and decreased mortality. Advances made in the understanding of this disease, both in terms of its clinical behavior and molecular pathogenesis, have translated into major improvements in its therapy. Several large randomized trials during the last two decades have helped the oncology community forge a successful multi-modality treatment strategy against colon cancer. These studies have defined the role of adjuvant therapy for colon cancer after curative surgery. Despite all the advances, a large number of patients continue to succumb to this disease, and the search for better therapies is still necessary. In this article, we discuss the evolution and the current state of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer and briefly review new developments.

Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer at the turn of the century: European and US perspectives

BACKGROUND

Despite early scepticism, several studies of systemic adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy demonstrated significant benefits in high-risk colon cancer. As many clinical investigations have since been conducted in this setting, a comprehensive literature review was undertaken to clarify the role of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

Current and future adjuvant treatment approaches in colorectal cancer were reviewed, and differences in the present-day North American and European practices were highlighted.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

5-FU plus leucovorin for six months is generally considered the 'standard' adjuvant treatment in Dukes' stage C (stage II) colon cancer. Large-scale international trials of other strategies are required to provide further advances in treatment outcome. Following the lead of the USA Intergroup trials, a recently initiated cooperative effort, the Pan-European Trials in Adjuvant Colon Cancer (PETACC), may serve as a European model for such investigations. In T3 and/or lymph-node positive rectal cancer, postoperative (chemo)radiotherapy in the USA is considered the adjuvant treatment of choice. However, most European investigators have advocated for preoperative intensive short-course irradiation instead. Randomized trials in this area are ongoing. In the near future, new drugs for the treatment of colorectal cancer may lead to tailored therapies.

Adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy for Dukes B2 and C colorectal cancer also receiving systemic treatment: results of a multicenter randomized trial. Groupe Régional d'Etude du Cancer Colo-Rectal (Belgium)

In a randomized trial, the authors evaluated the possible adjuvant activity of intraportal chemotherapy (with 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2/day in continuous infusion for 7 days and mitomycin C 10 mg/m2 at day 7) administered after surgery to half of the patients who underwent a full resection for Dukes B2 or C colorectal cancer. The procedure appeared manageable and safe. Two hundred and sixty patients were initially randomized, among whom 173 were finally considered as fully evaluable after having completed six courses of systemic chemotherapy. The reasons for withdrawal were basically tumoral ones and patients or doctors compliance. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years, no difference could be observed in the patients evolution assessed as relapses or deaths rate, or as relapse-free (at 5 years: 68% in the portal treatment group versus 70% in the control group) or overall survival (at 5 years: 76 versus 74%). The frequency of hepatic metastases (21 versus 18%) was also similar in both groups.

Microsatellite instability and 8p allelic imbalance in stage B2 and C colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) and allelic imbalance involving chromosome arms 5q, 8p, 17p, and 18q are genetic alterations commonly found in colorectal cancer. We investigated whether the presence or absence of these genetic alterations would allow stratification of patients with Astler-Coller stage B2 or C colorectal cancer into favorable and unfavorable prognostic groups.

METHODS

Tumors from 508 patients were evaluated for MSI and allelic imbalance by use of 11 microsatellite markers located on chromosome arms 5q, 8p, 15q, 17p, and 18q. Genetic alterations involving each of these markers were examined for associations with survival and disease recurrence. All P values are two-sided.

RESULTS

In univariate analyses, high MSI (MSI-H), i.e., MSI at 30% or more of the loci examined, was associated with improved survival (P =.02) and time to recurrence (P =.01). The group of patients whose tumors exhibited allelic imbalance at chromosome 8p had decreased survival (P =.02) and time to recurrence (P =.004). No statistically significant associations with survival or time to recurrence were observed for markers on chromosome arms 5q, 15q, 17p, or 18q. In multivariate analyses, MSI-H was an independent predictor of improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31-0.82; P =.006) and time to recurrence (HR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.24-0.74; P =.003), and 8p allelic imbalance was an independent predictor of decreased survival (HR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.25-2.83; P =. 002) and time to recurrence (HR = 2.07; 95% CI = 1.32-3.25; P =.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients whose tumors exhibited MSI-H had a favorable prognosis, whereas those with 8p allelic imbalance had a poor prognosis; both alterations served as independent prognostic factors. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an association between 8p allelic imbalance and survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

Adjuvant portal-vein infusion of fluorouracil and heparin in colorectal cancer: a randomised trial. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group, the Gruppo Interdisciplinare Valutazione Interventi in Oncologia, and the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of regional adjuvant chemotherapy, via portal-vein infusion (PVI), after resection of colorectal cancer. We undertook a randomised controlled multicentre trial to investigate the efficacy of PVI (500 mg/m2 fluorouracil plus 5000 IU heparin daily for 7 days).

METHODS

1235 of about 1500 potentially eligible patients were randomly assigned surgery plus PVI or surgery alone (control). The patients were followed up for a median of 63 months, with yearly screening for recurrent disease. The primary endpoint was survival; analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

619 patients in the control group and 616 in the PVI group met eligibility criteria. 164 (26%) control-group patients and 173 (28%) PVI-group patients died. 5-year survival did not differ significantly between the groups (73 vs 72%; 95% Cl for difference -6 to 4). The control and PVI groups were also similar in terms of disease-free survival at 5 years (67 vs 65%) and the number of patients with liver metastases (79 vs 77%).

INTERPRETATION

PVI of fluorouracil, at a dose of 500 mg/m2 for 7 days, cannot be recommended as the sole adjuvant treatment for high-risk colorectal cancer after complete surgical excision. However, these results cannot eliminate a small benefit when PVI is used at a higher dosage or in combination with mitomycin.

Adjuvant therapy for resectable rectal and colonic cancer

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of rectal and colonic carcinoma remains substantial despite apparently curative surgery. Adjuvant therapy has been applied to improve prognosis.

METHODS

This review evaluates the use of adjuvant therapy in the management of resectable rectal and colonic carcinoma. It assesses critically the evidence supporting the addition of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and other treatment modalities to optimal surgery.

RESULTS

In the case of rectal tumours, preoperative is more effective than postoperative radiotherapy; It can significantly reduce the incidence of local tumour recurrence. A number of trials have tended towards showing a survival advantage and a recent large randomized trial has shown a significant improvement in survival in patients with Dukes C tumours. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy is associated with a survival benefit and is standard therapy in the USA, although it is associated with increased toxicity. The effectiveness of preoperative chemoradiotherapy is currently being investigated. Postoperative fluorouracil-containing chemotherapy has resulted in a survival advantage in patients with Dukes C colonic tumours; such therapy may be administered either systemically or intraportally. The evidence of benefit with rectal tumours is more limited. Immunotherapy has been studied to a limited extent and the use of a tumour-directed monoclonal antibody has produced a survival advantage in a single trial.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative radiotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy can produce a survival advantage in patients with Dukes C rectal carcinoma and reduce local recurrence. Postoperative fluorouracil-containing chemotherapy can produce a survival advantage in those with Dukes C colonic cancer. The optimal use and combination of adjuvant therapy remains uncertain.

[Recent advances in adjuvant chemotherapy in colonic cancers]

Carcinoma of the large bowel is one of the most common malignant disease. In France, 15,000 died each year from the metastatic or locoregional progression of this cancer. In the past, effective surgical adjuvant therapy has been an elusive goal with no evidence of benefit from chemotherapy or immunotherapy. However, a meta-analysis published in 1988 showed that one-year adjuvant chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) containing regimens may slightly improve survival. Accelerated progress has been made since 1990: in colon cancer with regional nodal metastasis (stage C tumor), therapy with combined 5-FU and levamisole has resulted in a 33% reduction in the death rate. Controlled clinical trials demonstrated improved tumor response rates when the combination of 5-FU and leucovorin was compared with single-agent 5-FU in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recent results indicate that this combination is effective in preventing tumor relapse and improving survival in patients with high risk colon cancer (especially stage C tumor). The comparison of 5-FU and leucovorin to 5-FU and levamisole is ongoing; the preliminary results of these controlled trials showed that 6 months of adjuvant therapy with 5-FU and leucovorin is as effective as the standard 12 months 5-FU and levamisole regimen and less toxic. No clear adjuvant benefit has been established in patients with Dukes' stage B2 colon cancer. The lack of statistical power of the trials and the 80% overall survival rate of these patients may explain these negative results. Almost all the specialists of these tumors considered that it is possible to select patients who are at sufficiently high risk of recurrence so that treatment can be justified. These patients are those who presented initially with tumor perforation or obstruction, adherence to or invasion of adjacent organs, young patients. Clinical trials suggest a survival benefit from the direct portal administration of the 5-FU in the immediate post-operative period, although the magnitude of the effect is less than that seen in the systemic therapy trials.

Adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer: present and future perspectives

In recent years, adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer has advanced considerably. This article reviews these advances and provides an update of the most recent and ongoing trials. In 1990, adjuvant therapy became the "standard of care" for patients with Stage III colon cancer (Dukes C) in the United States. Recent clinical trial data indicate that adjuvant treatment may also be effective in patients with Stage II (Dukes B2) colon cancer. The combination of 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin may slightly improve survival (5-10 percent) compared with the standard 5-fluorouracil plus levamisole combination. The three-drug regimen (5-fluorouracil plus levamisole plus leucovorin) is more toxic, with no superior effect on survival. Intraportal chemotherapy, although it may significantly improve patient survival, does not decrease the frequency of liver metastases. However, it is still a promising form of adjuvant therapy owing to its short treatment period and relatively equivalent effects in survival compared with that of systemic therapy. For patients with Stage II or Stage III rectal cancer, postoperative systemic 5-fluorouracil plus radiation therapy plus protracted venous 5-fluorouracil infusion is the most effective postoperative adjuvant regimen. However, results from several studies show that preoperative radiation alone or chemoradiation for advanced local rectal cancers might also be effective while also improving resectability, decreasing morbidity, and increasing the chance that a sphincter-sparing procedure may be performed. The role of leucovorin in rectal cancer remains to be determined. Immune therapies with agents such as interferon-alpha-2a, monoclonal antibody 17-1A, and autologous tumor vaccines are being assessed and could further improve survival.

Final results of a phase III clinical trial on adjuvant intraportal infusion with heparin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in resectable colon cancer (EORTC GITCCG 1983-1987). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group

In this phase III clinical trial conducted by the Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (GITCCG-EORTC), we evaluated the effect of adjuvant intraportal infusion of heparin (HEP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on overall survival, disease-free survival and time to progression in patients with resectable colon cancer. From January 1983 to June 1987, 235 patients were randomised from 14 institutions in seven European countries: 79 patients made up the control group (control): 72 the portal vein infusion group given heparin alone (5000 IU daily x 7 consecutive days) (HEP); 84 the portal vein infusion group given heparin (5000 IU daily x 7 consecutive days) and 5-FU (500 mg/m2 daily x 7 consecutive days) (HEP/5-FU); 34 patients were considered ineligible. The 199 patients considered eligible were well balanced for age, sex, Karnofsky index, tumour location, surgery, surgical procedure and Dukes' stage. Four patients (2 control, 1 HEP, 1 HEP/5-FU) died of surgical complications. No differences were observed between control group and treatment groups (HEP, HEP/5-FU) for postoperative complications and number of hospitalisation days. Severe toxicity (grade 3-4, WHO) was found in 12% of patients in the HEP group and 8% in the HEP/5-FU group. After a median follow-up of 9 years, disease progression was reported in 40% of patients in the control group, 40% in the HEP group and 29% in the HEP/5-FU group. Five-year survival, time to progression and disease-free survival were 69%, 58% and 56%, respectively, in the control arm, 61%, 58% and 56% in the HEP arm, and 71%, 69% and 65% in the HEP/5-FU arm. Based on all randomised patients, the effect of treatment was not statistically significant with respect to any of the endpoints. It is confirmed that intraportal 5-FU infusion is safe and has a tolerable toxicity, but cannot be considered standard treatment for patients with resectable colon cancer.