Total vascular exclusion for major hepatectomy in patients with abnormal liver parenchyma

Perioperative analysis of laparoscopic liver resection with different methods of hepatic inflow occlusion

BACKGROUND

During liver resection, bleeding remains the most important challenge. A reduction in blood loss and avoiding the need for a blood transfusion are important objectives for liver surgeons today. The authors compared the intra- and postoperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resections under intermittent total pedicle occlusion (IPO), hemihepatic vascular occlusion (HVO), and selective vascular occlusion (SVO).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted of patient data from 41 cases of laparoscopic liver resection in three groups of patients under different occlusion methods, including 15 cases of IPO, 15 cases of HVO, and 11 cases of SVO. The advantages and disadvantages of the various methods were compared, as well as blood loss, operation time, changes in postoperative liver function, and complications.

RESULTS

There was no operative death in any of the 41 patients. Generally, there was no significant difference among the three groups in blood loss, clamping time, or operative time. After the operation, the effect on liver function for the HVO and SVO groups was significantly less severe than that for the IPO group (P<.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was mainly related to IPO and the larger amount of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Both HVO and SVO are feasible in laparoscopic hepatectomy and have the advantage of reducing liver remnant ischemia injury and modality rate over IPO. HVO is easy to do for left lateral lobe or resection of the left half of the liver. SVO is suitable for right lobe resection.

Blood Loss and Massive Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Major Oncological Surgery: What Do We Know?

Patients with solid malignancies who were not candidates for tumor resections in the past are now presenting for extensive oncological resections. Cancer patients are at risk for thromboembolic complications due to an underlying hypercoagulable state; however, some patients may have an increased risk for bleeding due to the effects of chemotherapy, the administration of anticoagulant drugs, tumor-related fibrinolysis, tumor location, tumor vascularity, and extent of disease. A common potential complication of all complex oncological surgeries is massive intra- and postoperative hemorrhage and the subsequent risk for massive blood transfusion. This can be anticipated or unexpected. Several surgical and anesthesia interventions including preoperative tumor embolization, major vessel occlusion, hemodynamic manipulation, and perioperative antifibrinolytic therapy have been used to prevent or control blood loss with varying success. The exact incidence of massive blood transfusion in oncological surgery is largely unknown and/or underreported. The current literature mostly consists of purely descriptive observational studies. Thus, recommendation regarding specific perioperative intervention cannot be made at this point, and more research is warranted.

Risk factors influencing postoperative outcomes of major hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma for patients with underlying liver diseases

BACKGROUND

Major hepatic resection of more than three segments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a high-risk operation, especially in patients with co-existing underlying liver diseases. The present study evaluated risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality after major hepatic resection in HCC patients with underlying liver diseases.

METHODS

Perioperative data of 305 HCC patients with underlying liver diseases who underwent major hepatic resection were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

The overall morbidity rate was 37.0% (n = 113), caused by pleural effusion (n = 56), ascites (n = 43), subphrenic effusion/infection (n = 23), hepatic dysfunction (n = 22), bile leakage (n = 10), respiratory infection (n = 7), incision infection (n = 7), intra-abdominal hemorrhage (n = 5), and others. The hospital mortality rate was 2.6% (n = 8), primarily caused by liver failure (4/8). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative platelet count <100 × 10(9)/l (P = 0.006), and increased intraoperative blood loss (≥ 800 ml) (P = 0.008) were independent risk factors of postoperative morbidity, and that preoperative prothrombin time >14 s (P = 0.015) and preoperative platelet count <100 × 10(9)/l (P = 0.007) were independent risk factors for significant hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful preoperative selection of patients in terms of the Child-Pugh classification and decrease of intraoperative blood loss are important measures to reduce postoperative morbidity after major hepatic resection in HCC patients with underlying liver diseases. Moreover, we should be aware that preoperative platelet count is independently associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality for those patients following major hepatic resection.

Liver resection under total vascular exclusion with or without preceding Pringle manoeuvre

BACKGROUND

Adequate control of bleeding is crucial during liver resection. This study analysed the safety and efficacy of hepatectomy under total hepatic vascular exclusion (THVE) in patients with tumours encroaching or infiltrating the hepatic veins and/or the inferior vena cava (IVC).

METHODS

All patients undergoing liver resection with THVE between January 2000 and July 2006 were identified from a prospectively collected database containing 2400 patients. Data on patient demographics, surgical procedure and outcome were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients scheduled for liver resection under THVE were identified, 77 with malignant tumours and ten with benign disease. THVE could not be used in two patients (2 per cent) owing to haemodynamic intolerance during trial clamping. Seventeen patients received simultaneous clamping of the portal triad and vena cava, and 68 had portal triad clamping followed by concomitant portal and vena cava clamping. The mean(s.d.) duration of THVE was 28.3(7.5) and 18.7(5.2) min respectively. Overall postoperative complication and operative mortality rates were 53 and 2 per cent respectively. Mean(s.d.) hospital stay was 16.8(4.7) days.

CONCLUSION

Major hepatic resection for tumours encroaching on the hepatic veins or IVC can be carried out under THVE with reasonable morbidity and mortality.

Predictors and prognostic significance of operative complications in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent hepatic resection

AIMS

The morbidity rate of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains high. To clarify predictors and the prognostic significance of operative complications in patients with HCC, we conducted a comparative retrospective analysis of 291 patients with HCC who underwent hepatic resection.

METHODS

Operative complications included hyperbilirubinemia, ascites, hemorrhage, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, bile leakage and abscess formation, renal failure, wound infection, and pleural effusion. Predictors of operative complications and their prognostic value for long-term survival were studied by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Mortality and morbidity rates were 7.2% and 42.6%. The main operative complications were ascites (n = 30), intraabdominal abscess (n = 25), hyperbilirubinemia (n = 19), wound infection (n = 16), pleural effusion (n = 10) and intraabdominal hemorrhage (n=9). By a multivariate logistic regression model, Child-Pugh class B and increased operative blood loss (> or = 1200ml) were independent predictors of postoperative complications. Among 243 patients without operative death, the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with operative complications (34.3%) than in those without these complications (48.7%). By the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, the presence of operative complications was an independent predictor of poor overall survival as well as presence of portal invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

Child-Pugh class B and operative blood loss > or = 1200ml were independent predictors of complications after hepatic resection for HCC. Long-term survival is poorer in patients with postoperative complications. Decreasing operative blood loss may result in fewer postoperative complications and better long-term survival of HCC patients.

Liver resection with selective hepatic vascular exclusion: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience on the safety and efficacy of hepatic resection under selective hepatic vascular exclusion (SHVE).

METHODS

SHVE was used in 246 consecutive patients undergoing major or complex liver resection in our center. Preoperative demographic and clinical data, details of the surgical procedure, pathologic diagnosis, postoperative course, and complications were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

From January 2000 to July 2007, liver resections were performed under SHVE in 246 patients; total SHVE, right partial SHVE, and left partial SHVE in 145, 54, and 47 patients, respectively. SHVE was converted to total hepatic vascular exclusion in 3 patients because the tumor invaded the wall of the inferior vena cava. Hemodynamic tolerance to SHVE was excellent, with only a slight increase in systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance during clamping. There were no deaths and the morbidity rate was 24.8%. The mean hospital stay was 9.6 days (range, 8-18).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that SHVE was safe, efficacious, and it was applicable to liver tumors which were near, but had not invaded into the inferior vena cava.

Mesenteric lymphatic ducts ligation decreases the degree of gut-induced lung injury in a portal vein occlusion and reperfusion canine model

BACKGROUND

Whether the mesenteric lymphatic system could serve as a route of transport by which gut-derived inflammatory mediators contribute to the induction of remote organ injuries is uncertain. We therefore made a gut-induced lung injury canine model by portal vein occlusion and reperfusion (PV O/R) and studied the role of mesenteric lymphatic ducts ligation (ML) to gut-induced lung injury with this model.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighteen mongrel dogs were divided into control, PV O/R, and PV O/R + ML groups. Cytokines and endotoxin levels in the portal vein and lymph from thoracic duct in different groups were tested. The permeability, myeloperoxidase activity, and histopathological investigation of intestine and lung were evaluated.

RESULTS

Cytokines and endotoxin levels in the portal vein were significantly increased in experimental groups compared with control group (P < 0.05), and that in the lymph from thoracic duct were significantly increased in PV O/R group compared with control and PV O/R + ML group (P < 0.05). Lung permeability and MPO activity in PV O/R group were significantly higher than those in control and PV O/R + ML group (P < 0.05); intestinal permeability in experimental groups were significantly higher with respect to control group. The lung injury score in PV O/R group was significantly higher than those in control and PV O/R + ML group (P < 0.05) and the intestinal injury scores in experimental groups were significantly higher than control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The gut-induced lung injury canine model made by PV O/R is successful, and mesenteric lymphatic ducts ligation decreases the degree of gut-induced lung injury in this model.

Selective hepatic vascular exclusion and Pringle maneuver: a comparative study in liver resection

OBJECTIVE

Most liver resections require champing of the hepatic pedicle (Pringle maneuver) to avoid excessive blood loss. But Pringle maneuver cannot control backflow bleeding of the hepatic vein. Resection of liver tumors involving hepatic veins may cause massive hemorrhage or air embolism from injuries of the hepatic vein. Although total hepatic vascular exclusion (THVE) can prevent bleeding of the hepatic vein effectively, it also may result in systemic hemodynamic disturbance because of the clamped inferior vena cava (IVC). SHVE, a new technique, can control the inflow and outflow of the liver without clamping the vena cava. We compared the effects of selective hepatic vascular exclusion (SHVE) and Pringle maneuver in resection of liver tumors involving the junction of the hepatic vein.

METHODS

From January 2000 to October 2005, 2100 patients with liver tumors had undergone liver resections in our department. Among them, tumors of 235 cases adhered to or were close to the junction of one or more hepatic veins. Both SHVE and Pringle maneuver were used to control blood loss during hepatectomy. These 235 cases were divided into two groups: Pringle maneuver group (110) from January 2000 to December 2002 and SHVE group (125) from January 2003 to October 2005. Data were analyzed regarding the intraoperative and postoperative courses of the patients. In the SHVE group, total SHVE (clamping the porta hepatis and all major hepatic veins) was used in 69 cases and partial SHVE (clamping the porta hepatic and one or two hepatic veins) in 56 cases. There were three methods in hepatic veins occlusion: ligating with suture, encircling and occluding with tourniquets and clamping with Satinsky clamps.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups regarding the age, gender, tumor size, cirrhosis and HBsAg rate, ischemia time and operating time. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements were significantly decreased in the SHVE group. Hepatic veins rupture with massive blood loss occurred in 14 and air embolism in three during the tumor resection, but there was no massive blood loss and air embolism in the SHVE group due to hepatic vein occlusion. Postoperative bleeding, reoperation, liver failure and mortality rate were higher, and ICU stay and hospital stay were longer in the Pringle group than those in the SHVE group.

CONCLUSION

SHVE is much more effective than Pringle maneuver in controlling intraoperative bleeding. It can prevent massive blood loss and air embolism from hepatic veins rupture and can reduce the postoperative complication rate and mortality rate. Clamping the hepatic veins with Satinsky clamps is much safer and easier than ligating with suture and occluding with tourniquets.

The effect of hepatic vascular inflow occlusion on liver tissue pH, carbon dioxide, and oxygen partial pressures: defining the optimal clamp/release regime for intermittent portal clamping

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of hepatic vascular inflow occlusion (Pringle maneuver) and reperfusion during liver resection are not defined. The aim of this study was to describe the changes that occur in liver tissue pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (P(L)CO(2)), and partial pressure of oxygen (P(L)O(2)) and by using the P(L)CO(2) as a predictor of hepatocellular damage define the optimal clamp/release regime for intermittent portal clamping during liver resection.

METHODS

Continuous pH, P(L)CO(2), and P(L)O(2) measurements were obtained using a Paratrend multi-parameter sensor (Diametrics Medical Inc., Roseville, MN) in 13 patients undergoing elective partial liver resection. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo a 10-min clamp/5-min release regime (group 1) or a 20-min clamp/10-min release regime (group 2).

RESULTS

In group 1 (n = 6) P(L)CO(2) increased and pH decreased significantly after 10 min of clamping and returned to baseline within 5 min of reperfusion. In group 2 (n = 7) the P(L)CO(2) increased and pH decreased significantly after 10 min of clamping, with a further significant change after 20 min. Following 10 min of reperfusion, pH and P(L)CO(2) had not returned to baseline. P(L)O(2) did not change significantly with either intermittent portal clamping regime.

CONCLUSIONS

A reperfusion of 5 min is sufficient to restore the P(L)CO(2) and liver tissue pH to normal after 10 min of clamping, but more than 10 min of reperfusion is required after 20 min of clamping. To minimize hepatic ischemia during liver resection, a 10-min clamp/5-min release regime should be used.

Total Vascular Exclusion Safely Facilitates Liver Specific Gene Transfer by the HVJ (Sendai Virus)-Liposome Method in Rats

BACKGROUND

Most virus mediated transfection systems are efficient; however, their highly immunogenic properties do tend to cause clinical problems. HVJ-liposome vector is a hybrid vector consisting of liposome and inactivated sendai virus (hemagglutinating virus of Japan HVJ), which has been reported to be have a low immunogenicity, while it can also be repeatedly administered. To enhance the transfection efficiency, especially in the liver, we investigated the efficacy of total vascular exclusion (TVE) during the portal vein injection (PVI) of the vectors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

beta-galactosidase and luciferase expression were used as reporter genes. Wistar rats were injected with HVJ-liposome through PVI without TVE (PVI group, n = 10) or PVI with TVE (PVI + TVE group, n = 10). The control rats were infused with equal volumes of saline through the portal vein (control group n = 12). The transfection efficiencies were assessed by beta-galactosidase staining and a luciferase assay. Biochemical and histological analyses were performed to evaluate the tissue toxicity after gene transfer.

RESULTS

The reporter genes expression in the liver dramatically increased after PVI + TVE in comparison to after PVI alone (1.2 x 10(5)versus 1.5 x 10(4) RLU/mg protein, P < 0.05 according to a luciferase assay). Notably, the extrahepatic "leaky" transgene expression could be minimized by PVI + TVE, whereas the general condition remained unchanged according to both the biochemical parameters and histological findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data indicate that PVI + TVE may thus facilitate the liver-specific gene delivery using the HVJ-liposome method and this modality might also be applicable to other gene transfer systems.

Ischemic preconditioning for major liver resection under vascular exclusion of the liver preserving the caval flow: a randomized prospective study

BACKGROUND

Two randomized prospective studies suggested that ischemic preconditioning (IP) protects the human liver against ischemia-reperfusion injury after hepatectomy performed under continuous clamping of the portal triad. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether IP protects the human liver against ischemia-reperfusion injury after hepatectomy under continuous vascular exclusion with preservation of the caval flow.

STUDY DESIGN

Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups: with (n=30; preconditioning group) and without (n=30; control group) IP (10 minutes of portal triad clamping and 10 minutes of reperfusion) before major hepatectomy under vascular exclusion of the liver preserving the caval flow. Serum concentrations of aspartate transferase, alanine transferase, glutathione-S-transferase, and bilirubin and prothrombin time were regularly determined until discharge and at 1 month. Morbidity and mortality were determined in both groups.

RESULTS

Peak postoperative concentrations of aspartate transferase were similar in the groups with and without IP (851 +/- 1,733 IU/L and 427 +/- 166 IU/L respectively, p=0.2). A similar trend toward a higher peak concentration of alanine transferase and glutathione-S-transferase was indeed observed in the preconditioning group compared with the control group. Morbidity and mortality rates and lengths of ICU and hospitalization stays were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

IP does not improve liver tolerance to ischemia-reperfusion after hepatectomy under vascular exclusion of the liver with preservation of the caval flow. This maneuver does not improve postoperative liver function and does not affect morbidity or mortality rates. The clinical use of IP through 10 minutes of warm ischemia in this technique of hepatectomy is not currently recommended.

Vascular control during hepatectomy: review of methods and results

The various techniques of hepatic vascular control are presented, focusing on the indications and drawbacks of each. Retrospective and prospective clinical studies highlight aspects of the pathophysiology, indications, and morbidity of the various techniques of hepatic vascular control. Newer perspectives on the field emerge from the introduction of ischemic preconditioning and laparoscopic hepatectomy. A literature review based on computer searches in Index Medicus and PubMed focuses mainly on prospective studies comparing techniques and large retrospective ones. All methods of hepatic vascular control can be applied with minimal mortality by experienced surgeons and are effective for controlling bleeding. The Pringle maneuver is the oldest and simplest of these methods and is still favored by many surgeons. Intermittent application of the Pringle maneuver and hemihepatic occlusion or inflow occlusion with extraparenchymal control of major hepatic veins is particularly indicated for patients with abnormal parenchyma. Total hepatic vascular exclusion is associated with considerable morbidity and hemodynamic intolerance in 10% to 20% of patients. It is absolutely indicated only when extensive reconstruction of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is warranted. Major hepatic veins/ and limited IVC reconstruction has been also achieved under inflow occlusion with extraparenchymal control of major hepatic veins or even using the intermittent Pringle maneuver. Ischemic preconditioning is strongly recommended for patients younger than 60 years and those with steatotic livers. Each hepatic vascular control technique has its place in liver surgery, depending on tumor location, underlying liver disease, patient cardiovascular status, and, most important, the experience of the surgical and anesthesia team.

A critical evaluation of hepatic resection in cirrhosis: optimizing patient selection and outcomes

Hepatic resection has long been the mainstay of treatment of primary liver cancers, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because of the high incidence of cirrhosis in patients with HCC, the use of resection was initially limited by the ability of the cirrhotic liver to sustain the surgical insult and the mass reduction. Today, hepatectomy in cirrhosis is undergoing a remarkable evolution. Although surgical and anesthetic improvements have increased the safety of this option, the rapid development of alternative therapies has decreased the need for it. Local excision for small HCC is likely to be replaced by image-guided, percutaneous ablative techniques. Furthermore, total replacement of a cirrhotic liver may be a more effective long-term cure than resection. Unquestionably, resection remains the optimal approach for patients with large tumors and healthy underlying liver function. The role of rapidly evolving new approaches will remain the subject of intensive inquiry in the years to come. In this report, we have attempted to clarify current practice with respect to the evaluation, selection, and technique of resection in cirrhosis, and identify areas of active inquiry.

Multiple gene differential expression patterns in human ischemic liver: Safe limit of warm ischemic time

AIM: To investigate the multiple gene differential expression patterns in human ischemic liver and to produce the evidence about the hepatic ischemic safety time.

METHODS: The responses of cells to hepatic ischemia and hypoxia at hepatic ischemia were analyzed by cDNA microarrary representing 4000 different human genes containing 200 apoptotic correlative genes.

RESULTS: There were lower or normal expression levels of apoptotic correlative genes during the periods of hepatic ischemia for 0-15 min, the maintenance homostatic genes were expressed significantly higher at the same time. But at the hepatic ischemia for 30 min, the expression levels of maintenance homeostatic genes were down-regulated, the expressions of many apoptotic correlative genes and nuclear transcription factors were activated and up-regulated.

CONCLUSION: HIF-1, APAF-1, PCDC10, FBX5, DFF40, DFFA XIAP, survivin may be regarded as the signal genes to judge the degree of hepatic ischemic-hypoxic injure, and the apoptotic liver cell injury due to ischemia in different time limits. The safe limit of human hepatic warm ischemic time appears to be generally less then 30 min.

Anesthetic considerations during liver surgery

This article demonstrates the broad range of considerations that affect the outcome of patients undergoing hepatectomy. The progressive improvements in survival, despite the increasing complexity of the surgery, area testament to advances in both surgery and anesthesia. The key elements include careful patient selection, appropriate monitoring, and mechanical and pharmacologic protection of the liver and other vital organs.

Intermittent inflow occlusion in living liver donors: impact on safety and remnant function

Clamping of the portal triad accomplishes complete inflow occlusion. This maneuver is commonly used during liver surgery to minimize blood loss but is not widely used in living donors undergoing resection for liver transplantation. We compared outcomes in living donors who underwent resection with and without inflow occlusion. We reviewed data on 2 nonsimultaneous living liver donor cohorts. The first 20 donors (group 1) underwent resection without inflow occlusion. In the next 15 donors (group 2), inflow occlusion was used during parenchymal transection, using cycles of 10-15 minutes occlusion and 6 minutes reperfusion. In donors, we recorded type of resection; ischemia times; blood loss; transfusions; peak ALT, AST, bilirubin, and INR in the first 5 days; hospital length of stay (LOS), and major complications. In recipients, we recorded peak ALT. In group 1, 19 of 20 donors underwent right hepatectomy. In group 2, 8 donors underwent right hepatectomy, and 7 donors had left lobectomies. Total ischemic time ranged from 16-49 minutes (mean, 31 +/- 9 minutes). In group 1, two donors received a total of 5 U of allogeneic blood. In group 2, no donor required transfusion. Mean peak ALT was significantly higher in group 1 (521 +/- 336 U/L) than group 2 (322 +/- 162 U/L; P = 0.03). Mean INR was significantly higher in group 1 (1.8 +/- 0.2) vs. group 2 (1.5 +/- 0.2; P = 0.001). There were 4 major complications in group 1 (incisional hernia, transient liver failure, biliary stricture, and biliary leak) and no major intraoperative or postoperative complications in group 2. Mean LOS was significantly longer in group 1 (7.9 +/- 2.9 days) than group 2 (6.2 +/- 1.1 days; P = 0.04). Mean peak ALT in recipients trended lower in group 2. In conclusion, inflow occlusion was associated with reduced blood loss and less ischemic injury to hepatic remnants in the donors and the grafts in the recipients. These benefits were associated with a diminished incidence of major complications and shorter LOS. Inflow occlusion should be an essential part of living donor hepatectomy.

Extended hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: is it justified?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of extended hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Hepatic resection is a well-established treatment for HCC in cirrhotic patients with preserved liver function and limited disease. However, the role of extended hepatic resection (more than four segments) for HCC in cirrhotic patients has not been elucidated.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2000, 45 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed cirrhosis underwent right or left extended hepatectomy for HCC (group A). Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of these patients were compared with 161 patients with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent hepatic resection of a lesser extent in the same period (group B). All clinicopathologic and follow-up data were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Group A patients had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss, longer operation time, and longer hospital stay than group B. However, the two groups were similar in overall morbidity and hospital mortality. There were no significant differences in the incidence of liver failure or other complications. The resection margin width was similar between the two groups. Despite significantly larger tumor size in group A compared with group B, long-term survival was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended hepatic resection for HCC can be performed in selected cirrhotic patients with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival that are comparable to those of lesser hepatic resection. Extended hepatectomy for large HCC extending from one lobe to the other or central HCC critically related to the hepatic veins is justifiable in cirrhotic patients with preserved liver function and adequate liver remnant.

Extended hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: is it justified?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of extended hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Hepatic resection is a well-established treatment for HCC in cirrhotic patients with preserved liver function and limited disease. However, the role of extended hepatic resection (more than four segments) for HCC in cirrhotic patients has not been elucidated.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2000, 45 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed cirrhosis underwent right or left extended hepatectomy for HCC (group A). Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of these patients were compared with 161 patients with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent hepatic resection of a lesser extent in the same period (group B). All clinicopathologic and follow-up data were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Group A patients had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss, longer operation time, and longer hospital stay than group B. However, the two groups were similar in overall morbidity and hospital mortality. There were no significant differences in the incidence of liver failure or other complications. The resection margin width was similar between the two groups. Despite significantly larger tumor size in group A compared with group B, long-term survival was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended hepatic resection for HCC can be performed in selected cirrhotic patients with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival that are comparable to those of lesser hepatic resection. Extended hepatectomy for large HCC extending from one lobe to the other or central HCC critically related to the hepatic veins is justifiable in cirrhotic patients with preserved liver function and adequate liver remnant.

Resection of liver tumors: technical aspects

The resection of primary and secondary liver tumors has become accepted as the only curative therapy that can be offered to patients with these cancers. Technical advances made over the last two decades have improved the ability of the surgeon to perform these procedures with decreased morbidity. This article reviews hepatic anatomy, the preoperative evaluation of patients and various technical aspects involved in liver resections. The latter includes the role of intraoperative ultrasound and techniques of vascular occlusion and hepatic parenchymal dissection.

Total versus selective hepatic vascular exclusion in major liver resections

BACKGROUND

Total hepatic vascular exclusion (THVE) and selective hepatic vascular exclusion (SHVE) are two effective techniques for bleeding control in major hepatic resections. Outcomes of the two procedures were compared.

METHODS

Patients undergoing major liver resection were randomly allocated to the THVE and SHVE groups. Intraoperative hemodynamic changes and the postoperative course of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

During vascular clamping, the THVE group showed a significant elevation in pulmonary vascular resistance, systemic vascular resistance, intrapulmonary shunts, and a significant reduction in cardiac index, compared with the SHVE group (P <0.05). Patients undergoing THVE received more crystalloids and blood, showed more severe liver, renal and pancreatic dysfunction, and had a longer hospital stay than the SHVE group (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques are equally effective in bleeding control in major liver resections. THVE is associated with cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic alterations and may be not tolerated by some patients. SHVE is well tolerated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter hospitalization time.

Liver resection with repair of major hepatic veins

BACKGROUND

Liver resections for tumors adjacent to major hepatic veins often require reconstruction of venous wall defects. We describe a new operative approach that facilitates repair of major hepatic veins during hepatectomies.

METHODS

In 3 cases of liver tumors, the resection line had to include partially the wall of the right hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein and left hepatic vein of the preserved liver. The procedure was carried out by employing portal triad clamping combined with extrahepatic occlusion of the hepatic veins. Venous grafts for vascular repair were harvested from the inferior mesenteric vein.

RESULTS

In all 3 patients, histology showed tumor-free resection margins. Follow-up of 32 to 42 months revealed no recurrence and excellent liver function.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of selective hepatic vascular exclusion with venous repair techniques, facilitates extensive liver resections in patients with tumors adjacent to the major hepatic veins and maximizes preservation of healthy liver tissue.

Ressecções hepáticas com oclusão vascular aferente: análise de fatores de risco

OBJETIVO: O controle da perda sangüínea nas cirurgias de ressecção hepática está associado à diminuição dos índices de morbimortalidade. As técnicas para minimizar a hemorragia transoperatória são aquelas associadas à redução do fluxo sangüíneo ao fígado, através da oclusão vascular aferente (manobra de Pringle) ou exclusão vascular total do órgão. O objetivo deste estudo foi o de avaliar uma série de hepatectomias parciais com oclusão do fluxo sangüíneo aferente, em pacientes portadores de doenças benignas e malignas. MÉTODOS: Foram analisadas 60 hepatectomias em 59 pacientes com clampeamento do pedículo hepático quanto a possíveis fatores de risco para morbidade e mortalidade, a relação entre o tempo de isquemia hepática e a variação das transaminases, tempo de protrombina e bilirrubinas, e destes, com a evolução pós-operatória. RESULTADOS: A prevalência de complicações pós-operatórias foi de 43,3% e a mortalidade de 6,7%. O fator de risco significativo para mortalidade foi tempo cirúrgico mais prolongado. Para a morbidade pós-operatória, os fatores de risco foram idade acima de 60 anos, cirurgia por neoplasia maligna, parênquima hepático anormal, perda sangüínea necessitando reposição de mais de uma unidade de sangue e outra cirurgia abdominal concomitante. Na análise multivariada por regressão logística, estes fatores de risco foram reduzidos para parênquima hepático anormal. CONCLUSÕES: O tempo de isquemia não apresentou relação com a morbimortalidade pós-operatória. A variação das transaminases foi mais acentuada nos casos com maior tempo de isquemia, porém essas retornaram aos níveis pré-operatórios em aproximadamente uma semana. A variação das transaminases não foi diferente entre os pacientes com e sem morbidade pós-operatória.

Liver resections with or without pedicle clamping

BACKGROUND

Decreasing operative bleeding during liver resection, and thus extent of transfusions, has become a main criterion to evaluate operative results of hepatectomies. Hepatic pedicle clamping (HPC) is widely used for this purpose. The aim of the study was to evaluate safety, efficacy, technique, and contraindications of HPC during liver resections, comparing results of resections performed with or without HPC.

METHODS

Data from 245 liver resections were analyzed. In all, 125 resections were performed with HPC (group A), continuous in 100 cases and intermittent in 25 cases. The average duration of ischemia in group A was 39 +/- 20 minutes (range 7 to 107). In 20 cases (16%) ischemia was prolonged for 60 minutes or more. A total of 120 resections were performed without HPC (group B). Major resections were 53.6% in group A (67 cases) and 38.3% in group B (46 cases). Cirrhosis was present in 36 cases, 19 in group A and 17 in group B.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was nil. Postoperative mortality was 2.9%, morbidity 22.4%. Percentage of transfused cases (34.4% versus 60.0%; P <0.001) and number of blood units per transfused case (2 +/- 1 versus 4 +/- 3; P <0.001) were lower in group A versus group B. Similar figures were found by considering only major resections. Postoperative blood chemistries did not show important differences between the two groups, and postoperative alterations were related more to extent and complexity of the operation than to length of HPC.

CONCLUSIONS

HPC during liver resection is a safe and effective technique. This is demonstrated in a context where HPC is used continuously in most cases, intermittently in cases with impaired liver function and for more prolonged ischemia, and avoided in cases with limited bleeding, jaundice, and simultaneous bowel anastomoses.

Liver resection without total vascular exclusion: hazardous or beneficial? An analysis of our experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate retrospectively the safety and radicality of liver resection performed without total vascular exclusion (TVE).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

TVE is recommended for safe liver surgery, at least in the case of resection of the paracaval portion of the liver. However, it has some drawbacks because of its invasiveness.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively evaluated 329 of 471 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection from October 1994 to October 1999. All of these patients had tumors involving segments 1, 7, or 8 or the cranial portion of segment 4, or underwent major hepatectomies that required exposure of the inferior vena cava (IVC), the main trunks of the hepatic veins, or both. Sixty-four patients underwent resection that included segment 1, with or without the reconstruction of the IVC, the hepatic vein, or both.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-four of 329 procedures were done under intermittent warm ischemia; no clamping methods were used in 6. TVE was never needed. There were no postoperative 30-day deaths. The complication rate was 25.5%, and only 2.1% had major complications. Only 13 (3.9%) patients required whole blood transfusion. Part of the wall of the IVC was resected in six patients, and the hepatic veins were reconstructed in four. Surgical clearance was achieved in all patients undergoing surgery for a tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that liver surgery performed without TVE is safe and effective even in aggressive procedures for liver tumors involving the cavohepatic junction. Therefore, TVE should be further restricted to exceptional patients.

Recent advances in hepatic resection

Hepatic surgery has emerged over the last three decades and has proven to be a safe and effective treatment for primary and secondary malignancies, as well as for benign diseases of the liver. During the past 10 years, several major advances have been made in 1) surgical technique with the advent of portal pedicle ligation maneuvers and the implementation of mechanical staplers, 2) intraoperative management with the development of low central venous pressure anesthesia, and 3) surgical technology with the innovation of laparoscopy for staging of patients with cancer and performing minimally invasive liver resection. We present a summary of our experience with these advances.

Total vascular exclusion for liver resections: pros and cons

Dramatic improvements in morbidity and mortality rates following liver resections have been reported in the past decade. Consequently, the indications for hepatectomy are becoming more liberal. Many techniques of liver resection with or without vascular clamping have been reported with excellent clinical results. Total vascular exclusion (TVE) of the liver during parenchymal transection has been advocated susceptible to increase the resectability of tumors that might not be safely approached by other techniques. Cirrhotic livers are probably more vulnerable to ischemic injury related to TVE than normal livers. The indications and technical and metabolic aspects of the technique are reviewed.

Liver resection using total vascular exclusion, scalpel division of the parenchyma, and a simple compression technique for hemostasis and biliary control

Recent improvements in perioperative morbidity and long-term outcome following liver surgery have led surgeons to attempt larger and more technically challenging liver resections. Total vascular exclusion (TVE) of the liver during resection has been proposed as a technique that will facilitate these difficult resections while minimizing blood loss. Total vascular exclusion is performed by obtaining complete isolation of the vascular pedicle of the liver. Once the hepatic vein is clamped, rapid resections may be performed with a loss of only the blood volume contained within the liver itself. Safe performance of total vascular exclusion of the liver requires a thorough understanding of hepatic anatomy, patient selection criteria, and the physiologic changes incurred by hepatic exclusion and subsequent ischemia and reperfusion. The following report discusses these issues, gives a detailed description of the steps involved in obtaining safe total vascular exclusion, and presents a technique using rapid parenchymal excision with a scalpel and capsular compression to obtain hemostasis and prevent bile leaks. We briefly discuss our experience with 144 consecutive resections in which this technique was used.

Lesão de isquemia e reperfusão hepáticas em cães: estudos histológicos sobre necrose hepatocítica, conteúdo de glicogênio hepático e contagem tecidual de polimorfonucleares

No transplante hepático, a fisiopatologia da lesão de isquemia e reperfusão do fígado não é completamente conhecida. Várias preparações experimentais têm sido usadas para estudos de tal lesão. Para tal fim, no presente trabalho, um modelo modificado foi proposto e avaliado. Vinte cães mestiços, pesando 15,25 ± 1,21 kg, sob anestesia geral, foram distribuídos em dois grupos de investigação: 1. Grupo Teste (n = 10) - os animais foram submetidos a desvascularização de 70% da massa hepática, por período de noventa minutos, seguida de revascularização do fígado. Durante o período de isquemia, a descompressão venosa esplâncnica foi realizada através dos lobos caudado e lateral direito; 2. Grupo Controle (n = 10) - os cães foram submetidos a operação simulada. Em todos os animais foram realizadas biópsias do fígado. O método foi avaliado através de determinações de Necrose Hepatocítica (NH), Conteúdo de Glicogênio Hepático (CGH) e Contagem Tecidual de Polimorfonucleares (CTPMN), realizadas aos cinco minutos antes da isquemia (To) cinco minutos antes da reperfusão (T1) e uma hora (T2) e cinco horas (T3) após a reperfusão. Os resultados permitiram concluir com uma confiança de 95% que: I. Houve aumento progressivo de intensidade de NH e diminuição do CGH durante os estágios de isquemia e de reperfusão hepáticas; 2. Não foi comprovada diferença significativa na CTPMN entre os grupos investigados. As alterações histológicas verificadas são indicativas de NH efetiva, decorrente de isquemia e reperfusão do fígado.

Utility of technetium-99m-labeled-galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy for estimating the hepatic functional reserve

Technetium-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-galactosyl-human serum albumin (Tc-GSA) is a receptor binding agent, specific for asialoglycoprotein receptor, that resides exclusively on the plasma membrane of mammalian hepatocytes. The usefulness of Tc-GSA for estimating the hepatic functional reserve was retrospectively evaluated in patients undergoing a hepatic resection. Tc-GSA scintigraphy was performed in 35 patients before hepatectomy, and the hepatic uptake ratio (LHL15) was calculated. The LHL15 was then compared with the findings of conventional liver function tests, the indocyanine green retention rate in 15 minutes (ICG R15), and histologic activity index (HAI) score. Significant correlations were observed between the LHL15 and values of ICG R15, prothrombin time activity, serum levels of total bilirubin, hyaluronic acid, and values of HAI score. Ratios of LHL15 to preoperative liver volume (LHL-V) correlated well with the regenerative rates of the residual liver after major hepatectomy. In addition, patients with more than 0.76 of LHL-V value had no complications in postoperative course, whereas those with less than 0.73 had several complications due to hepatic dysfunction. Tc-GSA scintigraphy thus appears to be a useful diagnostic tool for evaluating functioning mass of the liver and the values of LHL-V seems to be able to demonstrate regenerative activity in the residual liver after hepatectomy.

Major hepatic resection without blood transfusion: experience with total vascular exclusion

Thirty consecutive, major liver resections performed with total vascular exclusion in both non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients were analysed retrospectively. The patients' ages ranged from 6 months to 80 years. Ten were Asians and five had cirrhosis associated with chronic hepatitis B or C. There was no perioperative death and the mean hospital stay was 6 days for adults and 9.2 days for children. The average vascular exclusion or warm ischaemia time was 25 min (range 10-55 min) and the average intraoperative blood volume given was 275 mL (range 0-3000 mL) packed red blood cells. Sixty per cent required no intraoperative blood transfusion. The mean total bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase were 1.0 mg/dL (range 0.3-2.3 mg/dL) and 84 IU/L (range 14-306 IU/L) when measured prior to discharge at postoperative day 4-7. In our experience, total vascular exclusion is invaluable in major or difficult liver resections, especially lesions adjacent to the hepatic veins and vena cava. It is associated with a low blood transfusion requirement and a low incidence of complications. It further obviates the need for dissection of the porta hepatis and its associated risks. Total vascular exclusion time of 30 min appears to be well tolerated, even in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared the intra- and postoperative course of patients undergoing liver resections under continuous pedicular clamping (CPC) or intermittent pedicular clamping (IPC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Reduced blood loss during liver resection is achieved by pedicular clamping. There is controversy about the benefits of IPC over CPC in humans in terms of hepatocellular injury and blood loss control in normal and abnormal liver parenchyma.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients undergoing liver resections were included in a prospective randomized study comparing the intra- and postoperative course under CPC (n = 42) or IPC (n = 44) with periods of 15 minutes of clamping and 5 minutes of unclamping. The data were further analyzed according to the presence (steatosis >20% and chronic liver disease) or absence of abnormal liver parenchyma.

RESULTS

The two groups of patients were similar in terms of age, sex, nature of the liver tumors, results of preoperative assessment, proportion of patients undergoing major or minor hepatectomy, and nature of nontumorous liver parenchyma. Intraoperative blood loss during liver transsection was significantly higher in the IPC group. In the CPC group, postoperative liver enzymes and serum bilirubin levels were significantly higher in the subgroup of patients with abnormal liver parenchyma. Major postoperative deterioration of liver function occurred in four patients with abnormal liver parenchyma, with two postoperative deaths. All of them were in the CPC group.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical controlled study clearly demonstrated the better parenchymal tolerance to IPC over CPC, especially in patients with abnormal liver parenchyma.

Perioperative outcomes of major hepatic resections under low central venous pressure anesthesia: blood loss, blood transfusion, and the risk of postoperative renal dysfunction

BACKGROUND

We have previously demonstrated that maintenance of a low central venous pressure (LCVP) combined with extrahepatic control of venous outflow reduced the overall blood loss during major hepatic resections. This study examined the overall outcomes and, in particular, renal morbidity associated with a large series of consecutive major liver resections performed with this approach. In addition, the rationale for the anesthetic management to maintain LCVP was carefully reviewed.

STUDY DESIGN

All major hepatectomies performed between December 1991 and April 1997 were reviewed. The prospective Hepatobiliary Surgical Service database was merged with the Memorial Hospital Laboratory and Blood Bank databases to yield the nature of the operation, blood loss, blood product transfusions, outcomes, and levels of preoperative, postoperative, and discharge serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen.

RESULTS

A total of 496 LCVP-assisted major liver resections were performed, with no intraoperative deaths and an in-hospital mortality rate of 3.8%. The median blood loss was 645 mL. Sixty-seven percent of the patients did not require perioperative blood transfusion during surgery and the immediate 12 hours after surgery. The median number of blood transfusions was 2. Only 3% of the patients experienced a persistent and clinically significant increase in serum creatinine possibly attributable to the anesthetic technique. Renal failure directly attributable to the anesthetic technique did not occur.

CONCLUSIONS

Major resection with LCVP allowed easy control of the hepatic veins before and during parenchymal transection. The anesthetic technique, designed to maintain LCVP during the critical stages of hepatic resection, not only helped to minimize blood loss and mortality but also preserved renal function.

Total vascular exclusion of the liver for the resection of lesions in contact with the vena cava or the hepatic veins

BACKGROUND

This study reviews experience with total vascular exclusion of the liver (TVE), for the resection of tumours in contact with the hepatic veins or the vena cava.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out of 366 hepatic resections performed over 13 years. Forty-one patients (11 per cent) were operated under TVE.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were operated for malignancy and 17 for benign disease. Major hepatectomy was performed in 26 patients and minor hepatectomy in 15. The technique allowed vascular repair in eight patients. Median intraoperative blood transfusion was 2 (range 0-26) units; 14 patients required none. Median duration of TVE was 29 (range 5-58) min. No deaths occurred. Significant complications occurred in ten patients. Morbidity was related to the malignant nature of the lesion, duration of surgery and volume of blood transfusion, but not to duration of TVE.

CONCLUSION

TVE facilitates resection of critically located hepatic lesions with safety and minimal blood loss. Within the limits of 1 h, prolonged TVE does not increase morbidity.

Portal triad clamping or hepatic vascular exclusion for major liver resection. A controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared operative course of patients undergoing major liver resections under portal triad clamping (PTC) or under hepatic vascular exclusion (HVE).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Reduced blood loss during liver resection is achieved by PTC or HVE. Specific complications and postoperative hepatocellular injury mediated with two procedures have not been compared.

METHODS

Fifty-two noncirrhotic patients undergoing major liver resections were included in a prospective randomized study comparing both the intraoperative and postoperative courses under PTC (n = 24) or under HVE (n = 28).

RESULTS

The two groups were similar at entry, but eight patients were crossed over to the other group during resection. In the HVE group, hemodynamic intolerance occurred in four (14%) patients. In the PTC group, pedicular clamping was not efficient in four patients, including three with involvement of the cavohepatic intersection and one with persistent bleeding due to tricuspid insufficiency. Intraoperative blood losses and postoperative enzyme level reflecting hepatocellular injury were similar in the two groups. Mean operative duration and mean clampage duration were significantly increased after HVE. Postoperative abdominal collections and pulmonary complications were 2.5-fold higher after HVE but without statistical significance, whereas the mean length of postoperative hospital stay was longer after HVE.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that both methods of vascular occlusion are equally effective in reducing blood loss in major liver resections. The HVE is associated with unpredictable hemodynamic intolerance, increased postoperative complications with a longer hospital stay, and should be restricted to lesions involving the cavo-hepatic intersection.

Anatomical hepatectomy for resection or transplantation

BACKGROUND

Anatomical resection has become the basis for the treatment of hepatic tumors recognizing the portal-based intrahepatic architecture of the liver. In transplantation, these principles have been applied to the creation of partial liver grafts used to treat pediatric recipients with grafts from adult donors. In this study we reviewed the results of application of these techniques in 60 patients undergoing major hepatectomy and in 47 liver transplants in children.

METHODS

Records of patients undergoing resection and children undergoing transplantation were reviewed. A descriptive study was performed characterizing the methods and results achieved using anatomic hepatectomy. Outcomes analyzed included surgical morbidity and survival.

RESULTS

Sixty consecutive patients underwent major hepatectomy without operative mortality (60 days). Complications occurred in 26% of patients, requiring reoperation in 2 cases (3%); median hospital stay was 8.5 days. Of 47 liver transplants in children, 57% utilized partial grafts, and living donors were used in 15 cases. Actual patient survival is 91% 1-36 months after surgery. No patient deaths were due to technical graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Major hepatic surgery can be accomplished with low mortality applying portal-based anatomy. Surgical precision is made possible by vascular isolation for hepatectomy and operative ultrasonography. These principles are essential for successful use of partial liver grafts in children.