Hepatitis C viral infection in liver transplantation

REFINE: a randomized trial comparing cyclosporine A and tacrolimus on fibrosis after liver transplantation for hepatitis C

REFINE was a 12-month, prospective, open-label study in 356 patients receiving de novo liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis, randomized to cyclosporine A (CsA) or tacrolimus with (i) no steroids, IL-2 receptor antibody induction and mycophenolic acid, or (ii) slow steroid tapering. The primary analysis population based on availability of liver biopsies comprised 165 patients (88 CsA, 77 tacrolimus). There was no difference in the primary endpoint, fibrosis stage ≥2 at 12 months, which occurred in 63/88 CsA-treated patients (71.6%) and 52/77 tacrolimus-treated patients (67.5%) (odds ratio [OR] 1.11; 95% CI 0.56, 2.21; p = 0.759). Similarly, no significant between-group difference occurred at month 24 (OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.47, 2.80; p = 0.767). Among steroid-free patients, fibrosis score ≥2 was significantly less frequent with CsA versus tacrolimus at month 12 (7/37 [18.9%] vs. 16/38 [42.1%]; p = 0.029). HCV viral load was similar in both the tacrolimus- and CsA-treated cohorts. Mean blood glucose was significantly higher with tacrolimus from day 15 onward. Biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss and death were similar. These results showed no differences in posttransplant HCV-induced liver fibrosis between patients treated with CsA or tacrolimus in steroid-containing regimens, whereas CsA in steroid-free protocols was associated with reduced severity of fibrosis progression at 1 year posttransplant.

Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection post liver transplantation: impact of choice of calcineurin inhibitor

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection following liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C is universal. After LT, hepatitis C is associated with accelerated fibrosis progression and reduced graft and patient survival. Furthermore, responses to antiviral therapy in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus post-transplant are consistently sub-optimal. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) like cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus continue to dominate immunosuppressive regimens in this population; however, there is still uncertainty as to whether either offers an advantage in terms of patient outcomes. Although tacrolimus demonstrates improved efficacy in the general LT population, differences have begun to emerge between these agents regarding diabetogenic potential, antiviral activity, and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C. This review critically evaluates the existing literature, providing an overview of the reported differences, concluding that despite conflicting evidence, a potential benefit of CsA in patients with hepatitis C is supported by the data and warrants further investigation. Future studies examining the role of CNIs in hepatitis C virus-positive LT recipients are required to accurately examine the effects of CNIs on outcomes such as fibrosis progression, survival, and effects on response to antiviral therapy, to provide robust information that allows clinicians to make an informed choice concerning which CNI is best for their patients.

Results of a two-center study comparing hepatic fibrosis progression in HCV-positive liver transplant patients receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus

A 2-center retrospective analysis was performed in 60 patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related disease (cyclosporine in 20, tacrolimus in 40). Mean (±SEM) follow-up was 23.6 ± 22.5 and 22.3 ± 13.7 months in patients receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus, respectively. Clinically indicated biopsies were performed in 15/20 cyclosporine patients (75%) and 22/40 tacrolimus patients (55%; P = .17). The Ishak fibrosis score was significantly lower in cyclosporine-treated patients versus tacrolimus-treated patients (mean 1.7 ± 0.4 vs 3.1 ± 0.4; P = .023), as was percentage of fibrosis grade Ishak ≥4 (7% vs 41%; P = .028). The mean time to moderate fibrosis (Ishak score ≥3) was 38.2 ± 15.1 months in cyclosporine patients (4/15) and 23.5 ± 12.6 months in tacrolimus patients (14/22); the difference was not statistically significant (P = .09). This retrospective study suggests that cyclosporine-based immunosuppression is associated with less severe hepatic fibrosis in HCV-positive liver transplant recipients compared with tacrolimus-based regimens, but a larger prospective comparative trial is necessary to confirm these findings.

The natural history of hepatitis C cirrhosis after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C after liver transplantation leads to graft cirrhosis in up to 30% of patients within 5 years, but limited data exist regarding the clinical course of cirrhosis after transplantation. The aims of this study were to report the natural history of hepatitis C cirrhosis after liver transplantation and to identify risk factors for decompensation and survival. Hepatitis C patients underwent protocol liver biopsies yearly after liver transplantation. After cirrhosis was identified by biopsy, the outcomes of interest were the development of decompensation, death, or retransplantation for hepatitis C. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis was used to determine survival and risk factors for decompensation and mortality. Out of 502 liver transplants performed for hepatitis C, 88 patients (18%) had cirrhosis within 3.7 years. Seventy-one patients were compensated at diagnosis. The cumulative probability of decompensation 1 year after cirrhosis was 30%. A Model for End-Stage Liver disease score >or= 16 was predictive of decompensation and poor survival, whereas successful interferon treatment was found to reduce this risk (relative risk = 0.05). Once decompensation occurred, 1-year survival was 46%. In conclusion, the results confirm an accelerated natural history of hepatitis C cirrhosis after liver transplantation and demonstrate poor survival after decompensation. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease can stratify risk for decompensation and survival, whereas successful antiviral therapy may be protective.

Liver transplantation: Yesterday, today and tomorrow

With the advances in technical skills, management of postoperative complications and improvements in immunosuppressive drugs, liver transplantation is the standard treatment for many patients with chronic liver disease. Today, shortage of donor organs seems to be the major limiting factor for the application of liver transplantation. This review focuses on five issues that are challenging to clinical practice of liver transplantation and relevant to gastroenterologists. These include living donor liver transplantation, recurrent viral hepatitis, non-heart-beating donors, hepatocellular carcinoma, and ABO incompatible liver transplantation. Living donor and non-heart beating donor transplantations were initiated as a solution to increase the donor organ pool and it is expected that there will be an increase in the number of these donors. Recurrent hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation are among major problems and ongoing research in these diseases may lead to better outcomes in these recipients.

Long-term outcomes in liver transplant patients with hepatic C infection receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine

Choice of calcineurin inhibitor may be a contributing factor to deteriorating patient and graft survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV). In our multicenter, open-label LIS2T study, de novo liver transplant patients stratified by HCV status were randomized to cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Follow-up data were obtained in an observational study of 95 patients. Mean follow-up was 34 and 37 months, respectively, for cyclosporine-treated (n = 47) and tacrolimus-treated (n = 48) patients. In patients not receiving antiviral therapy, 22 of 31 given cyclosporine (72%) and 24 of 29 given tacrolimus (83%) had biochemical recurrence of HCV. In 68 patients with at least one biopsy, histological evidence of HCV-related hepatitis was present in 27 of 31 (87%) cyclosporine-treated patients and 37 of 37 (100%) tacrolimus-treated patients (P = .02, chi-square test). Three-year actuarial risk of fibrosis stage 2 was 66% with cyclosporine and 90% with tacrolimus; for fibrosis stage 3 or 4 it was 46% and 80%, respectively. Three graft losses were attributed to HCV recurrence in cyclosporine-treated patients and six in tacrolimus-treated patients. Tacrolimus may be associated with increased risk of histological HCV disease recurrence compared to cyclosporine.

Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors with respect to the outcome of HCV recurrence after liver transplantation: results of a meta-analysis

A controversy exists over whether the outcome of a hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infection-related liver transplant differs based on the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) used. We have performed a systematic review and a subsequent meta-analysis evaluating tacrolimus (Tac)-based vs. cyclosporine A-based immunosuppression in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Searches were conducted to locate randomized controlled trials comparing Tac vs. cyclosporine A. Data on HCV liver transplant recipients were obtained, independently of whether the study was specifically designed for patients with this disease or not. A fixed effects model was used for statistical pooling of the relative risks (RR) for the different outcomes. A total of 5 articles (366 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant differences between Tac-based vs. cyclosporine A-based therapies were not found for mortality (P = 0.11; RR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.08), graft survival (P = 0.37; RR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61-1.21), biopsy-proven acute rejection (P = 0.65; RR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.61-1.36), corticoresistant acute rejection (P = 0.26; RR = 2.25; 95% CI, 0.55-9.29), and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (P = 0.92; RR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.41-2.26). In 1 study, no differences were detected regarding severe fibrosis at 1 yr. In conclusion, patient and graft survivals in HCV-positive liver transplant patients are similar independently of the CNI selected as basic immunosuppressant. Unfortunately, data on the severity of recurrence and effect on viremia are scarce. Well-designed randomized prospective studies are needed to determine whether there are differences between the 2 CNIs regarding these specific variables.

12-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial in de novo liver transplant recipients (LIS2T) comparing cyclosporine microemulsion (C2 monitoring) and tacrolimus

The LIS2T study was an open-label, multicenter study in which recipients of a primary liver transplant were randomized to cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) (Neoral) (n = 250) (monitoring of blood concentration at 2 hours postdose) C2 or tacrolimus (n = 245) (monitoring of trough drug blood level [predose]) C0 to compare efficacy and safety at 3 and 6 months and to evaluate patient status at 12 months. All patients received steroids with or without azathioprine. At 12 months, 85% of CsA-ME patients and 86% of tacrolimus patients survived with a functioning graft (P not significant). Efficacy was similar in deceased- and living-donor recipients. Significantly fewer hepatitis C-positive patients died or lost their graft by 12 months with CsA-ME (5/88, 6%) than with tacrolimus (14/85, 16%) (P < 0.03). Recurrence of hepatitis C virus in liver grafts was similar in each group. Based on biopsies driven by clinical events, the mean time to histological diagnosis of hepatitis C virus recurrence was significantly longer with CsA-ME (100 +/- 50 days) than with tacrolimus (70 +/- 40 days) (P < 0.05). Median serum creatinine at 12 months was 106 mumol/L with CsA-ME and with tacrolimus. More patients who were nondiabetic at baseline received antihyperglycemic therapy in the tacrolimus group at 12 months (13% vs. 5%, P < 0.01). Of patients who were diabetic at baseline, more tacrolimus-treated individuals required anti-diabetic treatment at 12 months (70% vs. 49%, P = 0.02). Treatment for de novo or preexisting hypertension or hyperlipidemia was similar in both groups. In conclusion, the efficacy of CsA-ME monitored by blood concentration at 2 hours postdose and tacrolimus in liver transplant patients is equivalent to 12 months, and renal function is similar. More patients required antidiabetic therapy with tacrolimus regardless of diabetic status at baseline.

Combined treatment with pegylated interferon (alpha-2b) and ribavirin in the acute phase of hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The efficacy and safety of treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2b (Peg-Intron, 1.5 microg/kg) and ribavirin (400-800 mg) in the acute phase of recurrent HCV after LT is presented.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (17 men) transplanted for HCV-associated cirrhosis (genotype 1b) were treated for at least 6 months and compared with 24 consecutive transplant patients (16 men) without antiviral therapy (controls).

RESULTS

At completion of treatment, 14/24 treated patients (58%) achieved HCV-RNA negativity, compared to none of controls (P<0.0001). Sustained virological response (SVR) occurred in 8/23 treated patients (34.7%) who reached week 24 after treatment and none of controls (P<0.005). At 12 weeks after treatment, 15/24 patients (62.5%) had an early virological response (EVR) (seven tested HCV-RNA negative). SVR was associated with absence of corticosteroid bolus administration (P=0.01), presence of EVR (P=0.002) and absence of cytomegalovirus infection (P=0.001). Haematological adverse effects included anaemia, 17/24 cases (71%) and leukopenia, 23/24 cases (96%). One patient presented mild acute rejection that resolved by adjusting immunosuppressive dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in the acute phase of HCV reinfection yielded an EVR of 62.5% and a SVR of 34.7%. The combination was safe, with a low rate of therapy withdrawal.

Management of hepatitis C virus infection in the setting of liver transplantation

1. Posttransplantation recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection is a universal phenomenon with a highly variable natural history. 2. Approximately 10% to 25% of hepatitis C virus- infected recipients of liver allografts will develop cirrhosis within 5 years' after transplantation. 3. The 1-year actuarial risk of hepatic decompensation after recurrence of cirrhosis approximates 42%. 4. Some of the factors associated with aggressive recurrence include donor and recipient age, recent year of transplantation, recipient gender and race, the use of antithymocyte globulin, and high dose of corticosteroids. 5. Highly aggressive recurrent hepatitis C virus infection leading to cirrhosis fares poorly after retransplantation in the presence of hyperbilirubinemia and renal failure, with a 1-year survival of approximately 40%. 6. Elevated serum aminotransferases are a poor indicator or recurrent disease. 7. Current sustained virological response after combination pegylated alpha interferon and ribavirin treatment is approximately 25%. 8. There is no consensus on initiation time point, duration of treatment, or dosage. Given immunosuppression, at least 48 weeks of therapy is a reasonable approach. 9. Treatment for 48 weeks is cost effective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for men aged 55 years is $29,100 per life-year saved.

Analysis of a successful HCV-specific CD8+ T cell response in patients with recurrent HCV-infection after orthotopic liver transplantation

Virus-specific CD8+ T cells play a major role in antiviral immune defenses; their significance in the transplant setting, however, is unclear. In the present study, we asked whether hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific CD8+ T cells were detectable in the presence of an immunosuppressive treatment and whether the HCV-specific CD8+ T cell response correlates with treatment outcome in patients who receive interferon (IFN)-alpha / ribavirin therapy after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx). Liver- and blood-derived T cell lines of 21 patients after OLTx were studied before, at the end of, and after antiviral treatment. Virus-specific IFN-gamma production in response to a panel of previously identified HCV-specific epitopes restricted by the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I molecules A2, A3, B7, B35, and B44 of structural and nonstructural HCV protein was determined by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay. Before treatment, only low numbers of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells were detectable. In 6 patients with a sustained virological response, a significant, multispecific, and sustained CD8+ T cell response was detectable, which was mainly found in the peripheral blood. Nonresponders and transient responders showed undetectable, weak, or transient HCV-specific CD8+ T cell responses. (Sustained responders vs. transient and nonresponders: Wilcoxon rank-signed test; P < .01). In conclusion, our data indicate that despite immunosuppression, HCV-specific CD8+ T cells are detectable in patients with recurrent HCV infection after OLTx and that a significant, multispecific, and long-lasting HCV-specific CD8+ T cell response contributes to viral elimination.

The natural history and outcome of liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus-infected recipients

1. Recurrence of hepatitis C infection is universal and immediate after liver transplantation. 2. Graft and patient survival is reduced in liver transplantation recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus infection compared with hepatitis C virus-negative recipients. 3. The natural history of chronic hepatitis C is accelerated after liver transplantation compared with nontransplantation chronic hepatitis C; 20% to 40% of patients progress to allograft cirrhosis within 5 years, compared with less than 5% of nontransplantation patients. 4. The rate of fibrosis progression is not uniform and may change over time. 5. The rate of progression from cirrhosis to decompensation is accelerated after liver transplantation. The rate of decompensation is >40% at 1 year and >60% at 3 years, compared with <5% and <10%, respectively, in immunocompetent patients. 6. The rate of progression from decompensation to death is also accelerated after liver transplantation. The 3-year survival is <10% after the onset of hepatitis C virus-related allograft failure, compared with 60% after decompensation in immunocompetent patients.

Antiviral treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation: association of a strong, multispecific, and long-lasting CD4+ T cell response with HCV-elimination

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infection after liver transplantation (OLTx) could develop an early, multispecific, preferentially intrahepatic CD4+ T cell response. We asked now whether there is a correlation between the HCV-specific CD4+ T cell response and treatment outcome in patients who receive interferon (IFN)-alpha/ribavirin.

METHODS

Liver- and blood-derived T cell lines of 20 patients were studied in parallel before, under, at the end and after antiviral treatment. Virus-specific IFN-gamma production at a single cell level to HCV-proteins (core, non-structural protein (NS)3/4, NS5) was determined by enzyme-linked immunospot assay.

RESULTS

In 6/7 non-responders a weak HCV-specific CD4+ T cell response was detectable. All six sustained responders developed a strong, at NS3/4 and NS5 directed and long-lasting CD4+ T cell response which was mainly detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. This reaction was significantly stronger: (1) in the responders than in the non-responders; and (2) within the responders at the end of treatment than before (P<0.03). Seven transient-responders showed a weak and/or transient HCV-specific CD4+ T cell response.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with recurrent HCV-infection after OLTx, who receive antiviral treatment, a strong, at NS3/4 and NS5 directed and long-lasting CD4+ T cell response is associated with HCV-elimination whereas no or a weak/transient response is associated with treatment failure.

To transplant or not to transplant recurrent hepatitis C and liver failure

In summary, re-OLT accounts for 10% of all OLTs performed and is associated with significantly increased resource use, and decreased survival compared with primary OLT. After transplantation into an HCV-infected recipient, infection of the allograft by HCV is invariable. As patients survive longer after liver transplantation, it is likely that allograft failure related to HCV recurrence will occur. Results of re-OLT for HCV are inferior to those of primary grafting, paralleling the results for retransplantation for other indications. Many studies have demonstrated that HCV infection significantly impairs patient and allograft survival after liver retransplantation, regardless of etiology of allograft failure. Patient survival rates with HCV infection are 57% to 65% at 1 year, as compared with 65% to 82% among patients without HCV infection. Experience with retransplantation is limited, however, and studies are difficult to interpret because of small sample sizes and lack of uniform definitions of survival, HCV recurrence, and allograft failure. Similar to outcomes after retransplantation for non-HCV related indications, the most common causes of death are sepsis and multi-organ failure. The high mortality associated with retransplantation has not universally been caused by recurrent disease, however recent studies have demonstrated that re-recurrent HCV occurs and the natural history is similar, if not more accelerated, after the second transplant. HCV infection may, in fact, increase mortality in a group of patients already predisposed to an inferior outcome. Preoperative serum creatinine and bilirubin have been consistently associated with survival after retransplantation and favorable results are attainable with strict selection criteria. The increasing use of expanded donor criteria, in particular, LRLT, raises important practical and ethical issues with regards to the HCV-positive transplant recipient and will become a challenge to the transplant community as a whole. With the donor morbidity and mortality associated with LRLT currently estimated at 32% and 0.3%, respectively, one must determine how much risk is acceptable to the donor in relation to the outcome in the recipient. This is especially true in HCV-infected recipients, in whom HCV re-recurrence may occur in the second allograft and lead to accelerated failure. LRLT, however, would not deplete the organ pool and would lead to the use of scarce cadaveric organs to patients who are awaiting primary liver transplantation. Despite inferior outcomes, a better tactic may be to consider retransplantation for recurrent HCV in those whose primary transplant was a LDLT, as the initial allograft did not deplete the donor pool. Given the shortage of donor organs and the increasing number of patients with HCV-induced allograft cirrhosis, identifying ways to improve allograft survival in HCV-infected patients represents an important focus for further research. Additional studies are needed to further explore the mechanisms underlying the reduction in survival and to identify which HCV-positive individuals are at greatest risk for poor survival. Studies are beginning to emerge that demonstrate that HCV recurrence can be modified with combination antiviral therapy and that the HCV virus can be eliminated. Additional longitudinal prospective studies are needed to assess the exact impact of HCV on survival after retransplantation, the effects of the newer immunosuppressive agents such as sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil on HCV, the use of preemptive antiviral therapy on HCV eradication and fibrosis modification, and the appropriateness of expanded donor criteria. Until we have longer follow-up and greater experience with the HCV-positive recipient with allograft failure, retransplantation should be considered a viable option for highly selected patients, particularly in patients in whom renal failure and severe hyperbilirubinemia have not occurred.

Prevalence of hepatitis C in a drug using and non-using welfare population

CONTEXT

Drug use is a primary route for the transmission of the Hepatitis C virus (HCV). A substantial proportion of welfare recipients have been shown to be substance abusers. In addition, federal legislation has imposed limits on the number of months individuals may receive benefits and has mandated most recipients to participate in a 'work activity' in exchange for benefits. HCV symptoms may inhibit welfare recipients' ability to seek and maintain employment.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of HCV in a sample of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) recipients and the effects of HCV antibody seropositivity on employability.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The sample for this study consisted of 380 individuals participating in a longitudinal study of employment patterns among TANF recipients in Houston, TX, funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Private interviews regarding welfare receipt, employment, and drug use were conducted at intake into the study and at 4-month intervals for one year. Participants agreed to a one-time blood test. Blood samples were tested for the presence of HCV antibodies by enzyme linked immunoassay.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Employment status over time by HCV antibody status.

RESULTS

Overall, 12% of all participants tested positive for the presence of HCV antibodies. A significantly greater proportion of chronic drug users (31%) than non-drug users (4%) tested positive for the presence of Hepatitis C antibodies. Those who tested positive for hepatitis C had significantly lower rates of employment.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential infection with Hepatitis C may constitute an employment barrier for many welfare recipients.

Natural history of recurrent hepatitis C

1. After liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis, recurrence of infection is universal, with development of histological hepatitis in the majority of patients. 2. The natural history of recurrent hepatitis C is highly variable. Although 30% to 50% of patients develop posttransplantation viremia with minimal liver injury, 10% to 30% progress to cirrhosis after a median of 5 years. 3. Progression of hepatitis C is accelerated in immunocompromised liver transplant recipients compared with immunocompetent patients, both before and after the development of compensated cirrhosis. 4. HCV-related disease progression is faster in patients who underwent transplantation in recent years compared with those who underwent transplantation earlier. 5. HCV infection significantly impairs patient and allo-graft survival after liver transplantation. 6. Several variables, including donor age, degree of immunosuppression, viral load either pretransplantation or early posttransplantation, timing of recurrence, and early histological findings, are implicated in the outcome of hepatitis C posttransplantation.

Outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis C

Recurrence of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is universal. The published studies suggest that the short-term outcome is good in these patients, but the long-term prognosis remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with HCV undergoing OLT in a single center and to analyze the risk factors associated with poor outcome. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcome of 58 OLT patients with proven HCV who underwent OLT between February 1990 and April 1997 at our institution. The median follow-up time was 36.9 months. Recurrent posttransplant HCV hepatitis was confirmed by liver biochemistry, histology, and persistent HCV RNA in the serum. The patient and graft survival of patients with HCV was compared to that of 42 primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and 41 primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients transplanted during the same period. Following OLT, biochemical evidence of recurrent HCV hepatitis was absent in 46%. Forty percent of patients had recurrent HCV hepatitis and 14% had clinical evidence of recurrent HCV. Thirty-one patients were on cyclosporine, 22 patients on tacrolimus, and 5 patients had cyclosporine switched to tacrolimus or vice versa. The recurrence rate of HCV chronic hepatitis was similar in patients who had cyclosporine (35.5%) or tacrolimus (45.5%) based immunosuppression. Eleven patients (19%) died and five patients (8.6%) were retransplanted for chronic rejection (two), mismatch (one), or primary graft nonfunction (two). The cumulative patient survival rates of one, three, and five years were 94.8%, 84.1%, and 62.2%, respectively. The severity of liver disease progressed with time; 8% of patients developed cirrhosis within two years. The survival rate did not show any relation between HCV recurrence and the type of immunosuppression. In conclusion, although the survival of patients with HCV was not statistically significant compared to those with PBC or PSC, there was a trend towards a lower five-year survival in HCV.

Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab, a chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, in combination with azathioprine-containing triple therapy in liver transplant recipients

Acute graft rejection remains a major problem among additional sequelae in liver transplant recipients. Basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody with high affinity for the CD25 chain of the interleukin-2 receptor, has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients. This single-arm, open-label, multicenter study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis in adult patients undergoing first elective liver transplantation. One hundred one patients (70 hepatitis C virus [HCV]-negative patients, 31 HCV-positive patients) were administered basiliximab, 20 mg, by intravenous bolus injection the day of transplantation (day 0) and day 4. In addition, all patients were administered triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine. The efficacy of basiliximab was assessed by conventional parameters, and tolerability was assessed by the incidence of adverse events, infections, and laboratory test result abnormalities. At 6 months, the incidence of first acute biopsy-confirmed rejection episodes was 22.8%. Rejections were more frequent in the HCV-positive (29.0%) than HCV-negative subgroup (20.0%; P =.441). No rejection episode was graded histologically as severe, and no patient required antibody therapy for the management of acute rejection. Ten patients (9.9%) required treatment with tacrolimus for acute rejection episodes. Patient and graft survival rates at 12 months were 90.1% and 88.1%, respectively. Basiliximab caused no injection-site reactions, anaphylaxis, or cytokine release syndrome. Five malignancies were reported at 12 months: of these, three malignancies predated transplantation surgery. Compared with earlier studies, the addition of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis to triple immunosuppressive therapy provides increased efficacy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection episodes, with no clinically significant increase in adverse events.

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus in liver transplant recipients: risk factors, temporal relationship with hepatitis C virus allograft hepatitis, and impact on mortality

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest an association between diabetes mellitus and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Our aim was to determine (1) the prevalence and determinants of new onset posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in HCV (+) liver transplant (OLT) recipients, (2) the temporal relationship between recurrent allograft hepatitis and the onset of PTDM, and (3) the effects of antiviral therapy on glycemic control.

METHODS

Between January of 1991 and December of 1998, of 185 OLTs performed in 176 adult patients, 47 HCV (+) cases and 111 HCV (-) controls were analyzed. We reviewed and analyzed the demographics, etiology of liver failure, pretransplant alcohol abuse, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, and clinical characteristics of both groups. In HCV (+) patients, the development of recurrent allograft hepatitis and its therapy were also studied in detail.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pretransplant diabetes was similar in the two groups, whereas the prevalence of PTDM was significantly higher in HCV (+) than in HCV (-) patients (64% vs. 28%, P=0.0001). By multivariate analysis, HCV infection (hazard ratio 2.5, P=0.001) and methylprednisolone boluses (hazard ratio 1.09 per bolus, P=0.02) were found to be independent risk factors for the development of PTDM. Development of PTDM was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio 3.67, P<0.0001). The cumulative mortality in HCV (+) PTDM (+) versus HCV (+) PTDM (-) patients was 56% vs. 14% (P=0.001). In HCV (+) patients with PTDM, we could identify two groups based on the temporal relationship between the allograft hepatitis and the onset of PTDM: 13 patients developed PTDM either before or in the absence of hepatitis (group A), and 12 concurrently with the diagnosis of hepatitis (group B). In gr. B, 11 of 12 patients received antiviral therapy. Normalization of liver function tests with improvement in viremia was achieved in 4 of 11 patients, who also demonstrated a marked improvement in their glycemic control.

CONCLUSION

We found a high prevalence of PTDM in HCV (+) recipients. PTDM after OLT was associated with significantly increased mortality. HCV infection and methylprednisolone boluses were found to be independent risk factors for the development of PTDM. In approximately half of the HCV (+) patients with PTDM, the onset of PTDM was related to the recurrence of allograft hepatitis. Improvement in glycemic control was achieved in the patients who responded to antiviral therapy.

Management of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection is almost universal in patients transplanted for HCV-related cirrhosis. The medium-term survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is similar to other transplanted patients, but the long-term survival remains uncertain. The prevention and an effective treatment of progressive liver disease are the primary aims in HCV recurrence. Interferon and ribavirin, as monotherapy or in combination, have been tried to treat or prevent HCV recurrence. Preliminary studies suggest a better chance of initial HCV clearance and better results in preventing HCV recurrence with combination therapy. IFN or ribavirin, as monotherapy, may normalize liver enzymes, but only gives rise to a transient virological response, without histological improvement. Combination IFN and ribavirin may be able to prevent progression of HCV-related graft disease, but indications and duration of treatment need further evaluation. No clear association between type and dose of immunosuppressive and outcome of post-transplant HCV recurrence has been found. Strategies to minimize the effects of immunosuppressive drugs include dose reduction of all agents and the selective discontinuation of individual agents. Initial immunosuppression with a single drug may inhibit or delay the severe fibrosis, and further investigation with a single immunosuppressive regimen to evaluate the outcome of recurrent hepatitis C should be performed. The recent evidence that mycophenolate may have an antiviral effect needs a clinical confirmation. Retransplantation survival is better with early retransplantation, and for indications not directly related to viral recurrence.

Hepatitis C-induced hepatic allograft injury is associated with a pretransplantation elevated viral replication rate

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) allograft infection after liver transplantation follows a variable but accelerated course compared with the nontransplantation population. Predictors of outcome and mechanisms of reinfection remain elusive. The accelerated HCV-induced allograft injury associated with a 10- to 20-fold increase in serum viral quantity posttransplantation was hypothesized to be the result of elevated intrahepatic viral replication rates. Patients (N = 23) with HCV-induced end-stage liver disease who underwent liver transplantation between October 1995 and December 1998 were prospectively studied. HCV-induced allograft injury was defined by posttransplantation persistent biochemical hepatitis or allograft fibrosis not explained by other diagnoses. Liver biopsies (N = 92) were obtained by protocol and when clinically indicated. Negative-strand HCV RNA (putative intermediate for replication) was detected by a strand-specific reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay and semiquantatively compared with constitutively expressed 18S rRNA. Recipients with increased pretransplantation replication were at increased risk for the development of posttransplantation biochemical hepatitis (P =.03), an increased rate of allograft fibrosis (P =.006), and increased mortality rate (40.0% vs. 0.0%; P =.02). There was no correlation with quantities of genomic HCV RNA in the serum with relative intrahepatic viral replication either before or after liver transplantation. The relative rate of HCV replication within the allograft was not elevated in the posttransplantation period compared with that seen within the explanted liver. Accelerated allograft injury caused by HCV may be predicted by viral replication rates within the explanted liver. The stable intrahepatic replication rate after transplantation suggests that elevated serum viral loads are the result of decreased viral clearance, possibly secondary to immunosuppressive therapy.

Intragraft localization of activated nuclear factor kappaB in recurrent hepatitis C virus disease following liver transplantation

Nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) is activated during viral infection and is central to the regulation of host immune responses. The NF-kappaB activation status and its morphological sources were assessed by immunohistochemistry in allograft biopsy specimens of orthotopic liver transplantation patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV). Hepatocellular NF-kappaB immunostaining was detected in HCV cases compared with controls (nontransplant: P <.001; transplant: P =.006), which correlated with the number of NF-kappaB positive hepatocytes (P =.007) and contrasted to the absent to weak staining of controls (nontransplant: P =.001; transplant: P =.009). Enhanced NF-kappaB staining of cytokeratin 19-positive bile ducts and proliferating ductules in the HCV group was in contrast to controls. Intense NF-kappaB immunoreactivity was detected in CD68-positive Kupffer cells and macrophages of all HCV specimens compared with a few controls (nontransplant: P <.001; transplant: P =.001) and contrasted to the weak staining of controls (nontransplant: P <.001; transplant: P =.001). NF-kappaB-positive immunoreactivity correlated with the number of T cell receptor (TCR) alpha/beta-positive lymphocytes (P <.001), which was not observed in controls. In those HCV cases showing evidence of necroinflammatory activity (grade) and individual features of portal inflammation, periportal inflammation/piecemeal necrosis, lobular inflammation, and fibrosis (stage), higher NF-kappaB staining intensity scores within bile ducts, proliferating ductules, hepatocytes (piecemeal necrosis: P =.016; stage: P =.030), and lymphocytes (stage: P =.044) and increased number of NF-kappaB-positive cells within bile ducts, proliferating ductules (grade, lobular inflammation, piecemeal necrosis, stage: P =.022), hepatocytes, and lymphocytes were observed. Increased staining intensity and frequency of NF-kappaB-positive cells were similarly observed in HCV-positive allografts obtained from patients under tacrolimus- compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. These data implicate an immunoregulatory role of intragraft NF-kappaB activation in the pathogenesis and progression of posttransplantation HCV disease recurrence.

Prevalence of hepatitis C virus-associated mixed cryoglobulinemia after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with mixed cryoglobulinemia and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. After orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), isolated cases of HCV-associated mixed cryoglobulinemia have been reported. We determined the prevalence and clinical characteristics of mixed cryoglobulinemia in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients at our institution. Between January 1991 and February 1998, a total of 191 OLTs were performed in 178 patients. Among these transplant recipients, 53 patients (29.8%) had positive serological test results for HCV infection by second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We studied 31 HCV-positive (HCV+) and 21 HCV-negative (HCV-) transplant recipients (control group). Renal and liver function studies were performed, and cryoglobulin, rheumatoid factor, C3, C4, and serum HCV RNA levels and genotype were determined. Results were compared using unpaired Student's t-test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Six patients in the HCV+ group (19%) had mixed cryoglobulins present at the time of evaluation compared with none in the HCV- group (P =. 036). The only parameter associated with cryoglobulins in the HCV+ group was rheumatoid factor (P <.01). In 3 HCV+ patients with cryoglobulins, extrarenal signs of cryoglobulinemia were present. Glomerulonephritis was found in 4 HCV+ patients. Two patients with purpura and cryoglobulinemia had reduced clinical manifestations after antiviral therapy. In conclusion, mixed cryoglobulinemia was found in approximately 20% of the HCV+ liver transplant recipients. The presence of purpura or glomerulonephritis suggests HCV-associated mixed cryoglobulinemia, a clinical syndrome that may respond favorably to antiviral therapy.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt after adult liver transplantation: experience in eight patients

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS) has become an effective treatment for the complications of portal hypertension. We assessed the feasibility and outcome of TIPS in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

During the period from December 1992 to January 1998, eight adults presenting recurrent hepatitis C virus (five patients) and hepatitis B virus (one patient) infection, veno-occlusive disease (one patient), and secondary biliary cirrhosis (one patient) had TIPS because of refractory ascites (five patients), bleeding esophageal varices (one patient), refractory hepatic hydrothorax (one patient), retransplantation (two patients), and redo-biliary surgery (one patient).

RESULTS

In two patients, the procedure was difficult due to cavo-caval implantation. Ascites, hydrothorax, and variceal bleeding were controlled in all patients. Moderate to severe encephalopathy developed in four patients; two patients had worsening of their existing encephalopathy. Three of five patients treated with cyclosporine needed a drastic dose reduction due to the development of severe side effects. No long-term survivor developed shunt stenosis or occlusion. Two patients did moderately well at 6 and 14 months, respectively; the former died due to chronic rejection while waiting for a retransplantation. Three did well at 14, 36, and 28 months, respectively; the latter patient died of liver failure 32 months after TIPS. One jaundiced patient died after 1.5 months due to necrotic pancreatitis. Two patients died after 4 and 8.5 months, respectively, due to liver failure; the latter was doing well until 7 months after TIPS.

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS is feasible in transplant recipients in cases of decompensated allograft cirrhosis, of allograft veno-occlusive disease or when retransplantation or redo-biliary surgery are scheduled in the presence of portal hypertension. At transplantation, the surgeon should keep in mind the eventuality of a later TIPS procedure. Close immunosuppression monitoring is warranted because modified metabolization of cyclosporine (and probably tacrolimus) may cause serious side effects.

The efficacy of prophylactic interferon alfa-2b in preventing recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Clinical recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation can lead to cirrhosis, liver failure, and death. In patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis C, we assessed the efficacy of interferon alfa-2b (IFN) in preventing recurrent hepatitis. We randomized 86 patients to either an IFN group (3 MU three times a week starting within 2 weeks after transplantation and continued for 1 year) or a control (no IFN) group. Recurrence, the primary end point, was diagnosed on biopsy performed at 1 year or for abnormal biochemistries. HCV RNA levels were measured by branched-chain DNA (bcDNA) assay and arbitrarily defined as low, moderate, or high (< 10 x 10(5), 10-100 x 10(5), or > 100 x 10(5) Eq/mL, respectively). Data on 30 IFN patients and 41 no-IFN patients who survived > or = 3 months were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 669 +/- 228 days for IFN patients and 594 +/- 254 days for no-IFN patients. IFN patients were less likely to develop recurrent hepatitis (8 IFN vs. 22 no-IFN patients, P = .017, log rank analysis). IFN and 1-month HCV RNA level were independent predictors of recurrence. IFN reduced the risk of recurrence by a factor of 0.4 (P = .04, Cox proportional hazards model); HCV RNA level > 100 x 10(5) Eq/mL at 1 month after transplantation increased the risk by a factor of 3.1 (P = .01). Low, moderate, and high viral levels at 1 and 3 months were associated with significantly different rates of recurrence in IFN patients (P = .05 at 1 month and P = .003 at 3 months) but not in untreated patients (P = .28 at 1 month and P = .25 at 3 months). In patients with two or more rejections, the risk of recurrence was increased by a factor of 2.17 (P = .05). On 47 1-year biopsies (24 IFN; 23 no IFN), piecemeal necrosis was more common in untreated patients (P < .02). One- and 2-year patient survival, respectively, was 96% and 96% with IFN and 91.2% and 87.2% without (P = NS). Prophylactic IFN reduced the incidence of recurrent hepatitis after transplant. Although IFN was most effective in patients with low HCV RNA levels, we also noted an effect in patients with moderate levels. IFN did not prevent viremia, suggesting that it may work through alternative mechanisms.

Risk factors for recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C is a frequent complication after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis, but risk factors related to its development remain ill defined. Twenty-three patients receiving a primary liver graft for hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis and with an assessable biopsy performed at least 6 months after liver transplantation were studied retrospectively. The end point of this study was to look for risk factors associated with the development of histologic hepatitis C in the graft. Thirty-six major variables were studied, and those reaching significance by univariate analysis were included in a multivariate analysis. Eighteen patients (78%) developed posttransplant hepatitis C. On univariate analysis, six variables showed significant predictive value: increased immunosuppression for treatment of acute rejection; pretransplant hepatocellular carcinoma; cumulative doses of prednisone at 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation; and mean blood trough levels of cyclosporine in the first 6 months posttransplantation. On multivariate analysis, two variables retained independent statistical significance as predictors of hepatitis C recurrence, namely receipt of antirejection therapy (P = .0087) and lower mean cyclosporine levels in the first 6 months after transplantation (P = .0134). Therefore, recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation seems to be at least partially related to posttransplantation immunosuppressive therapy.

Tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy versus tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prolongs allograft survival in experimental animals, prevents acute rejection in humans, and has recently been approved for use in renal transplantation in combination with cyclosporine. Tacrolimus (Prograf) has been shown to be effective for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in liver transplantation. However, there has been limited experience with the combination of tacrolimus and MMF in liver transplantation.

METHODS

This retrospective pilot study examined the results in 130 primary, consecutive, adult liver transplants under two separate immunosuppressive protocols. Patients in the study group received MMF (1 g p.o. b.i.d.), tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.), and a standard steroid taper. MMF was also tapered and then discontinued within 3 months of transplantation. A historical control received tacrolimus (0.15 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.) and the same steroid taper.

RESULTS

Pretransplant demographics, including creatinine, were not significantly different between the groups. The 6-month patient and graft survivals of 96.3% (control) versus 92.0% (study) were not significantly different. The incidence of acute rejection was 45.0% in the control group versus 26.0% in the study group (P = 0.03). The study group had a lower incidence of rejection (mean episodes/patient +/- SEM): 0.28+/-0.07 vs. 0.61+/-0.10 (P = 0.007). All of the study group members responded to high-dose steroids. In the control group, three patients required monoclonal antibody therapy and two patients required the addition of MMF. The incidence of cytomegalovirus was similar in the study group and the control group (13.8% vs. 10.0%, P = NS). Early renal function was better preserved in the tacrolimus/MMF group (mean creatinine +/- SEM): 1.09 mg/dl +/- 0.05 vs. 1.51 mg/dl +/- 0.08 at 30 days, P = 0.0001. The study design required dosing with less tacrolimus (mean mg/day +/- SEM), which was achieved at 1 week (23.2+/-0.7 vs. 13.5+/-0.5); 1 month (18.7+/-0.8 vs. 11.4+/-0.5); 3 months (14.5+/-0.6 vs. 9+/-0.5); and 6 months (11.6+/-0.6 vs. 8.2+/-0.6); P = 0.0001, for all time points.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with tacrolimus and MMF may significantly reduce the incidence of acute liver allograft rejection, allow a significant reduction in tacrolimus dosage, and decrease the incidence of nephrotoxicity. Long-term analysis will be necessary to assess any increased risk of opportunistic infections.

Ten years of liver transplantation: an evolving understanding of late graft loss

BACKGROUND

We undertook this study to understand the causes of late graft loss and long-term outcome in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) recipients.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 1174 consecutive OLT in 1045 adult patients who received liver grafts between April 1985 and August 1995 were reviewed. The causes of graft loss, pretransplant patient characteristics, and posttransplant events were analyzed in patients who survived at least 1 year after OLT, in an attempt to establish a link between these factors and graft loss.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-nine (17.9%) grafts were lost after the first year. Of these, 132 grafts were lost by death and 27 by retransplantation. Recipients who survived the first year (n=884) had 5- and 10-year survivals of 81.4% and 67.2%, respectively. Death with a functioning graft occurred in 97 (61%) patients. The main causes of late graft loss were recurrent disease (n=48), cardiovascular and cerebral vascular accidents (n=28), infections (n=24), and chronic rejection (n = 15). Pretransplant heart disease and diabetes were found to be significant risk factors for late graft loss due to cardiovascular diseases and cerebral vascular accidents.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of OLT patients who live beyond the first posttransplant year is excellent. Some patient characteristics may be associated with late graft loss. Compared with previous reports, this study shows an increased incidence of late graft loss secondary to recurrent diseases, de novo malignancies, cardiovascular diseases, and cerebral vascular accidents. Chronic rejection seems to be a less frequent cause of late graft loss. The prevention of recurrent disease and better immunosuppression may further improve these results.

Hepatitis C infection in transplantation

This review emphasizes the role of HCV in the transplant setting. Prolonged HCV infection results in end-stage liver disease and as such represents a common indication for liver transplantation. Recurrence of infection is almost universal after transplantation in those with viremia before transplantation. Acquired disease is uncommon but nevertheless important, particularly in organ populations in whom screening for infection is not routine. The natural history of post-transplantation disease suggests that the effect on graft or patient survival is minor, at least during short-term follow-up. Long-term follow-up is needed, as well as more detailed study of the factors contributing to severity of post-transplantation disease. Kidney transplant recipients are commonly infected with HCV prior to transplantation. HCV infection after transplantation is associated with an increased risk of liver disease and infectious complications, but its effect on survival is still controversial. Similarly, observations in recipients of other solid organ transplants, such as heart and lung, and bone marrow patients suggest that HCV infection usually is not a major cause of mortality in the first 5 to 10 years of follow-up. Many issues still need to be addressed. The most important is the identification of factors that contribute to disease progression. Finally, effective therapies to eradicate infection and prevent disease progression are awaited.

Nephrotic syndrome after liver transplantation in a patient with hepatitis C virus-associated glomerulonephritis

In recent years, hepatitis C virus infection has been reported to be typically associated with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and less frequently with membranous nephropathy. Treatment of hepatitis C with interferon-alpha can reduce viremia and improve renal disease. After liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus-associated liver failure, standard immunosuppressive protocols result in a significant increase in hepatitis C viremia. In this report we describe a patient with end-stage liver disease and biopsy-proven hepatitis C-associated glomerulonephritis who underwent liver transplantation. Within 1 month after transplantation, he developed a severe nephrotic syndrome that paralleled a marked increase in viremia. We discuss the possible pathogenic relationship between hepatitis C virus infection and the nephrotic syndrome that followed liver transplantation.

Cyclosporine and tacrolimus: the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy for solid organ transplantation

Orthotopic liver transplant is the only cure for end stage liver disease. Enormous progress has been made in the fields of graft and patient survival since the introduction of cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Scientists involved in basic and clinical research have dedicated their efforts to understanding the mechanisms of action and the side effects of these medications with the goal of finding the perfect balance between the well-being of the patient and the avoidance of rejection. A great deal of work has been done and now we can propose a variety of treatments suitable to different clinical scenarios. The introduction of new medications will offer even more options for the treatment of rejection in liver transplant patients.