Effect of ramipril vs amlodipine on renal outcomes in hypertensive nephrosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial

Current perspectives and trends of the research on hypertensive nephropathy: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2023

Hypertensive nephropathy continues to be a major cause of end-stage renal disease and poses a significant global health burden. Despite the staggering development of research in hypertensive nephropathy, scientists and clinicians can only seek out useful information through articles and reviews, it remains a hurdle for them to quickly track the trend in this field. This study uses the bibliometric method to identify the evolutionary development and recent hotspots of hypertensive nephropathy. The Web of Science Core Collection database was used to extract publications on hypertensive nephropathy from January 2000 to November 2023. CiteSpace was used to capture the patterns and trends from multi-perspectives, including countries/regions, institutions, keywords, and references. In total, 557 publications on hypertensive nephropathy were eligible for inclusion. China (n = 208, 37.34%) was the most influential contributor among all the countries. Veterans Health Administration (n = 19, 3.41%) was found to be the most productive institution. Keyword bursting till now are renal fibrosis, outcomes, and mechanisms which are predicted to be the potential frontiers and hotspots in the future. The top seven references were listed, and their burst strength was shown. A comprehensive overview of the current status and research frontiers of hypertensive nephropathy has been provided through the bibliometric perspective. Recent advancements and challenges in hypertensive nephropathy have been discussed. These findings can offer informative instructions for researchers and scholars.

Dapagliflozin and Blood Pressure in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Albuminuria

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors decrease blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes, but the consistency and magnitude of blood pressure lowering with dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. We conducted a prespecified analysis of the DAPA-CKD trial to investigate the effect of dapagliflozin on systolic blood pressure (SBP) in patients with CKD, with and without type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A total of 4304 adults with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 25-75 mL/min/1.73m2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 200-5000 mg/g were randomized to either dapagliflozin 10 mg or placebo once daily; median follow-up was 2.4 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of sustained ≥50% eGFR decline, end-stage kidney disease, or death from a kidney or cardiovascular cause. Change in SBP was a prespecified outcome.

RESULTS

Baseline mean (SD) SBP was 137.1 mmHg (17.4). By Week 2, dapagliflozin compared to placebo reduced SBP by 3.6 mmHg (95% CI 2.8-4.4 mmHg), an effect maintained over the duration of the trial (2.9 mmHg, 2.3-3.6 mmHg). Time-averaged reductions in SBP were 3.2 mmHg (2.5-4.0 mmHg) in patients with diabetes and 2.3 mmHg (1.2-3.4 mmHg) in patients without diabetes. The time-averaged effect of dapagliflozin on diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was 1.0 mmHg (0.6-1.4 mmHg); 0.8 mmHg (0.4-1.3 mmHg) in patients with diabetes and 1.4 mmHg (0.7-2.1 mmHg) in patients without diabetes. Benefits of dapagliflozin on the primary composite and secondary endpoints were evident across the spectrum of baseline SBP and DBP.

CONCLUSION

In patients with CKD and albuminuria, randomization to dapagliflozin was associated with modest reductions in systolic and diastolic BP.

Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease Among US Adults With Hypertension, 1999 to 2018

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a major cause of end-stage renal disease. Assessing temporal trends in the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in hypertension could provide information for public health policies and plans.

METHODS

From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2018, a probability sample of adults aged ≥20 years was collected. The primary outcomes were classified according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate and urinary albumin. Trend tests were performed to assess age-standardized prevalence trends of CKD, albuminuria, and macroalbuminuria in US adults with hypertension.

RESULTS

A total of 23 120 US adults with hypertension were included in this study. The prevalence of any CKD, albuminuria, or macroalbuminuria in hypertension remained relatively stable. However, the age-standardized prevalence of stage 1 CKD in hypertension increased from 4.9% in 2003 to 2006 to 7.0% in 2015 to 2018 (P=0.0077 for trend). The age-standardized prevalence of stage 3b CKD in hypertension decreased from 2.9% in 2011 to 2014 to 2.1% in 2015 to 2018 (P=0.0350 for trend). A similar trend was observed for the age-standardized prevalence of stages 3 to 5 CKD in hypertension, which declined from 10.9% in 2011 to 2014 to 8.9% in 2015 to 2018 (P=0.0160 for trend).

CONCLUSIONS

Among US adults with hypertension, the prevalence of any CKD, albuminuria, and macroalbuminuria remained relatively stable from 1999 to 2018, whereas the hypertensive population showed an increasing trend in stage 1 CKD from 2003 to 2006 to 2015 to 2018 and a decreasing trend in the prevalence of stages 3 to 5 and 3b CKD from 2011 to 2014 to 2015 to 2018.

Acute Declines in Estimated GFR in Blood Pressure Target Trials and Risk of Adverse Outcomes

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Acute decreases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) occur commonly during intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering. Our objective was to determine the relationship between acute decreases in estimated GFR and patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Participants from 4 randomized controlled trials of intensive BP lowering in chronic kidney disease (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study, African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension, Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial, and Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial).

EXPOSURE

A 4-category exposure defined by the level of acute decrease in estimated GFR (defined as>15% vs≤15% between baseline and month 4) and the randomization to intensive versus usual BP control.

OUTCOMES

Risk of kidney replacement therapy (primary outcome), defined as the need for dialysis or transplant except in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial, which defined its kidney outcome as a composite occurrence of serum creatinine concentration>3.3mg/dL, kidney failure, or kidney replacement therapy.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Multivariable Cox models.

RESULTS

We included 4,473 individuals randomly assigned to intensive versus usual BP control who had a total of 351 kidney outcomes and 304 deaths during median follow-up durations of 22 and 24 months, respectively. Approximately 14% of participants exhibited an acute decrease in eGFR, 11.0% in the usual BP treatment arm and 17.8% in the intensive BP treatment arm. In adjusted models, compared with a≤15% eGFR decrease in the usual BP arm, a≤15% eGFR decrease in the intensive BP control arm was associated with lower risk of the kidney outcome (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.98). In contrast, a>15% decrease in eGFR was associated with a higher risk of the kidney outcome in the usual (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.80-3.38) and intensive BP treatment arms (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.45-2.73) compared with a≤15% decrease in the usual BP arm.

LIMITATIONS

Observational study, residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreases in eGFR of>15% in the usual and intensive BP treatment arms were associated with a higher risk of kidney outcomes compared with a≤15% decrease in the usual BP arm and may be a harbinger of adverse outcomes.

A nationwide cohort study comparing the effectiveness of diuretics and calcium channel blockers on top of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on chronic kidney disease progression and mortality

It is unknown whether initiating diuretics on top of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) is superior to alternative antihypertensive agents such as calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). For this purpose, we emulated a target trial in the Swedish Renal Registry 2007-2022 that included nephrologist-referred patients with moderate-advanced CKD and treated with RASi, who initiated diuretics or CCB. Using propensity score-weighted cause-specific Cox regression, we compared risks of major adverse kidney events (MAKE; composite of kidney replacement therapy [KRT], experiencing over a 40% eGFR decline from baseline, or an eGFR under 15 ml/min per 1.73m2), major cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke), and all-cause mortality. We identified 5875 patients (median age 71 years, 64% men, median eGFR 26 ml/min per 1.73m2), of whom 3165 started a diuretic and 2710 a CCB. After a median follow-up of 6.3 years, 2558 MAKE, 1178 MACE and 2299 deaths occurred. Compared to CCB, diuretic use was associated with a lower risk of MAKE (weighted hazard ratio 0.87 [95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.97]), consistent across single components (KRT: 0.77 [0.66-0.88], over 40% eGFR decline: 0.80 [0.71-0.91] and eGFR under 15ml/min/1.73m2: 0.84 [0.74-0.96]). The risks of MACE (1.14 [0.96-1.36]) and all-cause mortality (1.07 [0.94-1.23]) did not differ between therapies. Results were consistent when modeling the total time drug exposure, across sub-groups and a broad range of sensitivity analyses. Thus, our observational study suggests that in patients with advanced CKD, using a diuretic rather than a CCB on top of RASi may improve kidney outcomes without compromising cardioprotection.

Higher hemoglobin levels using darbepoetin alfa and kidney outcomes in advanced chronic kidney disease without diabetes: a prespecified secondary analysis of the PREDICT trial

BACKGROUND

In the primary analysis of the PREDICT trial, a higher hemoglobin target (11-13 g/dl) with darbepoetin alfa did not improve renal outcomes compared with a lower hemoglobin target (9-11 g/dl) in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) without diabetes. Prespecified secondary analyses were performed to further study the effects of targeting higher hemoglobin levels on renal outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 8-20 ml/min/1.73 m2 without diabetes were randomly assigned 1:1 to the high- and low-hemoglobin groups. The differences between the groups were evaluated for the following endpoints and cohort sets: eGFR and proteinuria slopes, assessed using a mixed-effects model in the full analysis set and the per-protocol set that excluded patients with off-target hemoglobin levels; the primary endpoint of composite renal outcome, evaluated in the per-protocol set using the Cox model.

RESULTS

In the full analysis set (high hemoglobin, n = 239; low hemoglobin, n = 240), eGFR and proteinuria slopes were not significantly different between the groups. In the per-protocol set (high hemoglobin, n = 136; low hemoglobin, n = 171), the high-hemoglobin group was associated with reduced composite renal outcome (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.96) and an improved eGFR slope (coefficient: + 1.00 ml/min/1.73 m2/year; 95% confidence interval: 0.38-1.63), while the proteinuria slope did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the per-protocol set, the high-hemoglobin group demonstrated better kidney outcomes than the low-hemoglobin group, suggesting a potential benefit of maintaining higher hemoglobin levels in patients with advanced CKD without diabetes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT01581073).

Retrospective analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), or diastolic failure, accounts for half of all HF cases and differs from HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Patients with HFpEF are typically older, female, and commonly seen with chronic kidney disease (CKD), one of the leading independent risk factors for mortality in these patients. Unfortunately, drugs that had shown significant improvements in mortality in HFrEF have not shown similar benefits in HFpEF. Recently, sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in HFrEF patients and slow down CKD progression. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of this drug class on mortality and risk of end stage renal disease in patients with HFpEF, which is currently unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analysed the Research Data Warehouse containing electronic health records from de-identified patients (n = 1 266 290) from the University of Mississippi Medical Center from 2013 to 2022. HFpEF patients had an average follow-up of 4 ± 2 years. Factors associated with increased all-cause mortality during HFpEF included age, male sex, and CKD. Interestingly, the only treatments associated with significant improvements in survival were angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and SGLT2i, regardless of CKD or diabetes status. Additionally, SGLT2i use was also associated with significant decrease in the risk of end stage renal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the use of SGLT2i in an HFpEF population with relatively high rates of hypertension, CKD, and black race and suggests that improvements in mortality may be through preserving kidney function.

Effect of Discontinuation of Renin Angiotensin-System Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RAS) inhibitors include angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors decrease proteinuria, progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and protect against heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular events. There is uncertainty about the appropriate time for discontinuing ARB and ACE inhibitor treatment in patients with low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In the present meta-analysis, we examined the effect of RAS inhibitor discontinuation on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced CKD compared to the continuation of RAS inhibitors. Two authors conducted electronic database searches in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) for relevant studies published from the inception of the databases to March 15th, 2023, using the following combination of keywords or key terms: "Renin-angiotensin-system," "angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors", "Angiotensin receptor blockers," and "advanced chronic kidney disease." Primary outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes assessed included all-cause mortality and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). A total of four studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed that cardiovascular events were significantly higher in patients in the discontinuation group compared to the continuation group (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.21-1.58), ESKD was also significantly higher in the discontinuation group (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.18-1.41). No significant differences were reported between the two groups in all-cause mortality. In conclusion, our meta-analysis provides evidence that continuation of RAS inhibitors could be beneficial in patients with advanced CKD, as it is associated with less risk of cardiovascular events and ESKD.

Risk improvement and adverse kidney outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: findings from KNOW-CKD

BACKGROUND

Many trials have attempted to slow the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by modifying specific risk factors, but without achieving satisfactory results. We aimed to evaluate the association between the degree of improvement in multiple risk factors and adverse kidney outcomes.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of 839 patients with CKD G3-G4. The main predictors were the number of improved risk factors between baseline and year one as follows: a decrease in proteinuria, systolic blood pressure, phosphate, and uric acid, and an increase in hemoglobin and bicarbonate from the baseline status to out of the target range. The primary outcome was a composite one, including CKD progression (50% decline in eGFR or kidney replacement therapy) and all-cause death.

RESULTS

Patients whose risk factors eventually improved had more unfavorable baseline profiles of the six considered factors. During 3097.8 person-years of follow-up (median 3.5 years per patient), the composite outcome occurred in 48.0% of patients (incidence rate, 13.0 per 100 person-years). Compared with an improvement of no risk factors, the adjusted HRs (95% CI) for improvement of 1 and ≥ 2 risk factors were 0.96 (0.76-1.22) and 0.53 (0.37-0.75), respectively. The association was not affected by diabetic status or CKD severity. Among the risk factors, proteinuria accounted for the greatest contribution to CKD progression.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CKD G3-G4, improvement in multiple factors was associated with a decreased risk of CKD progression, suggesting the importance of multifactorial risk management.

Intensive BP Control in Patients with CKD and Risk for Adverse Outcomes

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Although most guidelines recommend tightly controlling BP in patients with CKD, individuals with advanced kidney disease or severe albuminuria were not well-represented in trials examining the effect of this intervention on kidney outcomes. To examine the effect of intensive BP control on the risk of kidney outcomes in patients with CKD, the authors pooled individual-level data from seven trials. They found that overall, intensive BP control was associated with a 13% lower, but not significant, risk of a kidney outcome. However, the intervention's effect on the kidney outcome differed depending on baseline eGFR. Data from this pooled analysis suggested a benefit of intensive BP control in delaying KRT onset in patients with stages 4-5 CKD, but not necessarily in those with stage 3 CKD.

BACKGROUND

The effect of intensive BP lowering (to systolic BP of <120 mm Hg) on the risk of kidney failure requiring KRT remains unclear in patients with advanced CKD. Such patients were not well represented in trials evaluating intensive BP control.

METHODS

To examine the effect of intensive BP lowering on KRT risk-or when not possible, trial-defined kidney outcomes-we pooled individual-level data from seven trials that included patients with eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . We performed prespecified subgroup analyses to evaluate the effect of intensive BP control by baseline albuminuria and eGFR (CKD stages 4-5 versus stage 3).

RESULTS

Of 5823 trial participants, 526 developed the kidney outcome and 382 died. Overall, intensive (versus usual) BP control was associated with a lower risk of kidney outcome and death in unadjusted analyses but these findings did not achieve statistical significance. However, the intervention's effect on the kidney outcome differed depending on baseline eGFR ( P interaction=0.05). By intention-to-treat analysis, intensive (versus usual) BP control was associated with a 20% lower risk of the primary kidney outcome in those with CKD GFR stages 4-5, but not in CKD GFR stage 3. There was no interaction between intensive BP control and the severity of albuminuria for kidney outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from this pooled analysis of seven trials suggest a benefit of intensive BP control in delaying KRT onset in patients with stages 4-5 CKD but not necessarily with stage 3 CKD. These findings suggest no evidence of harm from intensive BP control, but also point to the need for future trials of BP targets focused on populations with advanced kidney disease.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2023_02_27_JASN0000000000000060.mp3.

Trends in using of antihypertensive medication among US CKD adults, NHANES 2001-2018

Objective

Blood pressure (BP) control rates among adult patients taking antihypertensive medications in the United States have not improved over the last decade. Many CKD adults require more than one class of antihypertensive agent to reach the BP target recommended by the guidelines. However, no study has quantified the proportion of adult CKD patients taking antihypertensive medication who are on monotherapy or combination therapy.

Methods

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data during 2001-2018 was used, including adults with CKD taking antihypertensive medication (age ≥ 20 years, n = 4,453). BP control rates were investigated under the BP targets recommended by the 2021 KDIGO, the 2012 KDIGO, and the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines.

Results

The percentages of uncontrolled BP among US adults with CKD taking antihypertensive medication were 81.4% in 2001-2006 and 78.2% in 2013-2018. The proportion of monotherapy of antihypertensive regimen were 38.6, 33.3, and 34.6% from 2001 to 2006, 2007-2012, and 2013-2018, with no obvious difference. Similarly, there was no significant change in percentages of dual-therapy, triple-therapy, and quadruple-therapy. Although proportion of CKD adults not treated with ACEi/ARB decreased from 43.5% in 2001-2006 to 32.7% in 2013-2018, treatment of ACEi/ARB among patients with ACR > 300 mg/g had no significant change.

Conclusion

The BP control rates among US adult CKD patients taking antihypertensive medications have not improved from 2001 to 2018. Mono-therapy accounted for about one third of adult CKD patients taking antihypertensive medication and not changed. Increasing antihypertensive medication combination therapy may help improve BP control in CKD adults in the United States.

The CARDINAL Trial of Bardoxolone Methyl in Alport Syndrome: When Marketing Interests Prevail over Patients Clinical Needs

CONTEXT

Alport syndrome (AS) is a hereditary chronic kidney disease (CKD) with X-linked, autosomal, and digenic patterns of transmission. Sieving dysfunction of the glomerular basement membrane caused by congenitally defective type IV collagen results in persistent proteinuria, hematuria, and progressive renal dysfunction. There are no disease-specific medications and treatment is based on conservative interventions in particular with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) inhibitors. Subject of Review: Evidence that AS is accompanied by glomerular and tubular inflammatory changes and that bardoxolone methyl exerts anti-inflammatory effects through suppression of NF-kB and activation of transcription of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory genes, provided a justification for the CARDINAL study, a prospective, randomized controlled trial testing the potential renoprotective effect of bardoxolone methyl in 157 adolescent or adult patients with AS. The authors concluded that bardoxolone methyl preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) relative to placebo at 48 and 100 weeks after randomization. However, exactly the same number of patients (n = 3) in each group developed kidney failure. Second Opinion: Despite alarming safety signals from previous trials in type 2 diabetics with CKD (increased hospitalizations for heart failure, fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, liver toxicity, and increased blood pressure and albuminuria), major marketing interests encouraged the drug manufacturer to pursue this line of research. Finding that type IV collagen gene mutations account for nearly one-third of cases of hereditary glomerulopathies implies that the population of potential target-patients could probably be much larger than estimated. Moreover, any new medication approved for AS might receive orphan drug designation which might be associated with shortened time to approval, monetary benefits, and a period of market exclusivity. In actual facts, CARDINAL failed to demonstrate any nephro-protective effect of bardoxolone methyl and found an increase in liver enzymes in 70 of the 77 (90.9%) bardoxolone-treated patients consistent with chronic liver toxicity. Indeed, in Zucker diabetic fatty rats treated with an analog of bardoxolone methyl, elevations of liver aminotransferases were associated with enhanced liver weight, severe and diffuse hepatocyte vacuolization, swelling, and degeneration. Moreover, bardoxolone-induced increase in eGFR was associated with a concomitant increase in geometric mean urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, a finding consistent with worsening glomerular hyperfiltration. Considering also the consequent increase in the biomechanical strain on the fragile Alport glomerular basement membrane, this hemodynamic effect is expected to translate into accelerated renal disease progression (consistently with evidence that a bardoxolone methyl analog worsened proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, and tubular damage in Zucker diabetic fatty rats). These concerns induced the Food and Drug Administration to reject the new drug application for bardoxolone methyl submitted by Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. with the proposed indication to slow CKD progression in AS patients 12 years of age and older. Thus, bardoxolone methyl is devoid of any nephro-protective effect and is associated with significant heart, liver, and renal toxicity in patients with CKD, including those with AS. Because of these safety signals, it should not be used in this clinical context. Research programs could explore the potential clinical applications, even outside the kidney field, of novel NF erythroid 2-like 2 modulators devoid of bardoxolone methyl toxicity.

2009 CKD-EPI glomerular filtration rate estimation in Black individuals outside the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is the most used equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR), with race being a factor thereof, increasing GFR by 16% in self-identified Black persons compared with non-Black persons. However, recent publications indicate that it might overestimate GFR for Black adults outside the USA. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the accuracy, evaluated by the percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR (P30), of the 2009 CKD-EPI equation in estimating GFR with and without the race coefficient in Black individuals outside the United States of America (USA).

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to 9 July 2022, with no language restriction, supplemented by manual reference searches. Studies that assessed the CKD-EPI P30 accuracy with or without the race coefficient in Black adults outside the USA with an adequate method of GFR measurement were included. Data were extracted by independent pairs of reviewers and were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

We included 11 studies, with a total of 1834 Black adults from South America, Africa and Europe. The race coefficient in the 2009 CKD-EPI equation significantly decreased P30 accuracy {61.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53-70%] versus 72.9% [95% CI 66.7-78.3%]; P = .03}.

Conclusions

Outside the USA, the 2009 CKD-EPI equation should not be used with the race coefficient, even though the 2009 CKD-EPI equation is not sufficiently accurate either way (<75%). Thus we endorse the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines to use exogenous filtration markers when this may impact clinical conduct.

Blood Pressure Control in Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the most common cause of end-stage kidney disease. Blood pressure (BP) control can reduce the risks of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity, mortality, and kidney disease progression. Recently, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines have suggested the implementation of a more intensive BP control with a target systolic BP (SBP) of <120 mmHg based on the evidence that the CV benefits obtained is outweighed by the kidney injury risk associated with a lower BP target. However, an extremely low BP level may paradoxically aggravate renal function and CV outcomes. Herein, we aimed to review the existing literature regarding optimal BP control using medications for DKD.

A comparative study of antihypertensive drugs prediction models for the elderly based on machine learning algorithms

Background

Globally, blood pressure management strategies were ineffective, and a low percentage of patients receiving hypertension treatment had their blood pressure controlled. In this study, we aimed to build a medication prediction model by correlating patient attributes with medications to help physicians quickly and rationally match appropriate medications.

Methods

We collected clinical data from elderly hypertensive patients during hospitalization and combined statistical methods and machine learning (ML) algorithms to filter out typical indicators. We constructed five ML models to evaluate all datasets using 5-fold cross-validation. Include random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), artificial neural network (ANN), and naive Bayes (NB) models. And the performance of the models was evaluated using the micro-F1 score.

Results

Our experiments showed that by statistical methods and ML algorithms for feature selection, we finally selected Age, SBP, DBP, Lymph, RBC, HCT, MCHC, PLT, AST, TBIL, Cr, UA, Urea, K, Na, Ga, TP, GLU, TC, TG, γ-GT, Gender, HTN CAD, and RI as feature metrics of the models. LightGBM had the best prediction performance with the micro-F1 of 78.45%, which was higher than the other four models.

Conclusion

LightGBM model has good results in predicting antihypertensive medication regimens, and the model can be beneficial in improving the personalization of hypertension treatment.

Metabolite profiling of CKD progression in the chronic renal insufficiency cohort study

BACKGROUNDMetabolomic profiling in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has the potential to identify novel biomarkers and provide insight into disease pathogenesis.METHODSWe examined the association between blood metabolites and CKD progression, defined as the subsequent development of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or estimated glomerular filtrate rate (eGFR) halving, in 1,773 participants of the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study, 962 participants of the African-American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK), and 5,305 participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.RESULTSIn CRIC, more than half of the measured metabolites were associated with CKD progression in minimally adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, but the number and strength of associations were markedly attenuated by serial adjustment for covariates, particularly eGFR. Ten metabolites were significantly associated with CKD progression in fully adjusted models in CRIC; 3 of these metabolites were also significant in fully adjusted models in AASK and ARIC, highlighting potential markers of glomerular filtration (pseudouridine), histamine metabolism (methylimidazoleacetate), and azotemia (homocitrulline). Our findings also highlight N-acetylserine as a potential marker of kidney tubular function, with significant associations with CKD progression observed in CRIC and ARIC.CONCLUSIONOur findings demonstrate the application of metabolomics to identify potential biomarkers and causal pathways in CKD progression.FUNDINGThis study was supported by the NIH (U01 DK106981, U01 DK106982, U01 DK085689, R01 DK108803, and R01 DK124399).

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for cardioprotection in chronic kidney disease: a step into the future

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) share major risk factors and mechanistic pathways for progression. Furthermore, either decreased glomerular filtration rate or increased albuminuria are major risk factors for cardiovascular events. Evidence from previous renal outcome trials in patients with proteinuric CKD showed that angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) effectively slow CKD progression, establishing these agents as fundamental CKD pharmacologic treatments. However, in all these trials and subsequent meta-analyses, ACEIs and ARBs did not significantly reduce cardiovascular events or mortality, indicating a high residual risk for CVD progression in individuals with CKD. In contrast to the above, several outcome trials with old and novel mineralocorticoid receptor-antagonists (MRAs) clearly suggest that these agents, apart from nephroprotection, offer important cardioprotection in this population. This article is an overview of previous and recent evidence on the effects of MRAs on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD attempting to highlight a pathway able to improve both cardiovascular and renal prognosis in this population.

Actual impact of angiotensin II receptor blocker or calcium channel blocker monotherapy on renal function in real-world patients

OBJECTIVE

This observational retrospective cohort study investigates the effect of antihypertensive therapy with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (dCCBs) monotherapy on renal function using longitudinal real-world health data of a drug-naive, hypertensive population without kidney disease.

METHODS

Using propensity score matching, we selected untreated hypertensive participants (n = 10 151) and dCCB (n = 5078) or ARB (n = 5073) new-users based on annual health check-ups and claims between 2008 and 2020. Participants were divided by the first prescribed drug.

RESULTS

The mean age was 51 years, 79% were men and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 78 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Blood pressure rapidly decreased by approximately 10% in both treatment groups. At the 1-year visit, eGFR levels decreased in the ARB group by nearly 2% but increased in the dCCB group by less than 1%. However, no significant difference was apparent in the annual eGFR change after the 1-year visit. The risk for composite kidney outcome (new-onset proteinuria or eGFR decline ≥30%) was lowest in the ARB group owing to their robust effect on preventing proteinuria: hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for proteinuria was 0.90 (0.78-1.05) for the dCCB group and 0.54 (0.44-0.65) for the ARB group, compared with that for the untreated group after ending follow-up at the last visit before changing antihypertensive treatment.

CONCLUSION

From the present findings based on the real-world data, ARBs can be recommended for kidney protection even in a primary care setting. Meanwhile, dCCB treatment initially increases eGFR with no adverse effects on proteinuria.

Workplace Outreach Program Improves Management of Chronic Kidney Disease

OBJECTIVE

Assess whether an employee outreach program improved management of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

Participants with suspected CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m 2 ) identified in employee health assessments in 2017 and 2018 were contacted by phone and offered physician consultation. Subsequent nephrologist visits at 11 months of follow up were compared between those who were (outreach group) and were not (control group) successfully contacted.

RESULTS

Most CKD risk factors at baseline were similar in outreach and control groups. At the end of the follow-up, outreach participants had more than 2-fold greater incidence of visiting a nephrologist compared with controls (HR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.2-4.2, P = 0.01), after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusions: Employee outreach program increased utilization of nephrologist care.

Longitudinal TNFR1 and TNFR2 and Kidney Outcomes: Results from AASK and VA NEPHRON-D

BACKGROUND

Higher baseline levels of soluble TNF receptors (TNFR1 and TNFR2) have been associated with progressive CKD. Whether longitudinal changes in these biomarkers of inflammation are also associated with worse kidney outcomes has been less studied.

METHODS

We evaluated associations of longitudinal changes in TNFR1 and TNFR2 with ESKD in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK; 38% female; 0% diabetes) and kidney function decline (first occurrence of ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 or ≥50% eGFR decline if randomization eGFR ≥60 or <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively; ESKD) in the Veterans Affairs Nephropathy in Diabetes trial (VA NEPHRON-D; 99% male; 100% diabetes) using Cox models. Biomarkers were measured from samples collected at 0-, 12-, and 24-month visits for AASK (serum) and 0- and 12-month visits for VA NEPHRON-D (plasma). Biomarker slopes (AASK) were estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Covariates included sociodemographic/clinical factors, baseline biomarker level, and kidney function.

RESULTS

There were 129 ESKD events over a median of 7.0 years in AASK (n=418) and 118 kidney function decline events over a median of 1.5 years in VA NEPHRON-D (n=754). In AASK, each 1 SD increase in TNFR1 and TNFR2 slope was associated with 2.98- and 1.87-fold higher risks of ESKD, respectively. In VA NEPHRON-D, each 1 SD increase in TNFR1 and TNFR2 was associated with 3.20- and 1.43-fold higher risks of kidney function decline, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among individuals with and without diabetes, longitudinal increases in TNFR1 and TNFR2 were each associated with progressive CKD, independent of initial biomarker level and kidney function.

Assessment of effects of antihypertensive agents on the quality of life in diabetic hypertensive patients

Background: Hypertension affects a significant number of population and many of these affected individuals have no symptoms. The present study was conducted to assess effects of antihypertensive agents on the quality of life in diabetic hypertensive patients. Materials & Methods: 96 diabetic hypertensive patients of both genders were randomly divided into 4 groups based on antihypertensive medicines- group I comprises those taking amlodipine (2.5–10 mg/day), group II taking ramipril (2.5–10 mg/day), group III taking telmisartan (40–80 mg/day) and group IV taking combination of ramipril (1.25–5 mg/day) and telmisartan (20–40 mg/day) (RT). Parameters such as blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, blood sugar level, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and QOLID-Punjabi version (PV) questionnaire at baseline and then at the 24th week of therapy. QoL of the patients was assessed by using the QOLID questionnaire Results: Group I had 12 males and 12 females, group II had 14 males and 10 females, group III had 15 males and 9 females and group IV had 10 males and 14 females.

Factors that lead to dialysis as the preferred treatment modality for patients with chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe forces that lead to dialysis as the preferred treatment modality for patients with chronic kidney disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although chronic dialysis is life-saving and the only option available for many individuals, treatment of the underlying causes of kidney disease and transplantation may be preferable options for many patients. Factors that favor dialysis instead of treatment of underlying kidney disease or transplantation include lack of proper diagnosis, lack of proper treatment of underlying kidney disease, poor compliance, lack of consideration for transplantation, early initiation of dialysis therapy, and financial incentives. New developments that may reverse this trend include genetic panels that improve diagnosis of kidney disease, new methods of transplantation, and legislation that will encourage kidney transplantation.

SUMMARY

By recognizing factors that favor dialysis over other therapies, nephrologists may be better able to provide care to their patients and prevent dialysis, researchers may be able to focus on research that will prevent the need for dialysis, and professional societies may work to prevent unneeded dialysis.

KDOQI US Commentary on the 2021 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in CKD

The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) convened a work group to review the 2021 KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guideline for the management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease (CKD). This commentary is the product of that work group and presents the recommendations and practice points from the KDIGO guideline in the context of US clinical practice. A critical addition to the KDIGO guideline is the recommendation for accurate assessment of blood pressure using standardized office blood pressure measurement. In the general adult population with CKD, KDIGO recommends a goal systolic blood pressure less than 120 mm Hg on the basis of results from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and secondary analyses of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes-Blood Pressure (ACCORD-BP) trial. The KDOQI work group agreed with most of the recommendations while highlighting the weak evidence base especially for patients with diabetes and advanced CKD.

Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension

BACKGROUND

This is the first update of a review published in 2010. While calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are often recommended as a first-line drug to treat hypertension, the effect of CCBs on the prevention of cardiovascular events, as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes, is still debated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether CCBs used as first-line therapy for hypertension are different from other classes of antihypertensive drugs in reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events.

SEARCH METHODS

For this updated review, the Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up to 1 September 2020: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2020, Issue 1), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted the authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work and checked the references of published studies to identify additional trials. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing first-line CCBs with other antihypertensive classes, with at least 100 randomised hypertensive participants and a follow-up of at least two years.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently selected the included trials, evaluated the risk of bias, and entered the data for analysis. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion. We contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

This update contains five new trials. We included a total of 23 RCTs (18 dihydropyridines, 4 non-dihydropyridines, 1 not specified) with 153,849 participants with hypertension. All-cause mortality was not different between first-line CCBs and any other antihypertensive classes. As compared to diuretics, CCBs probably increased  major cardiovascular events (risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.09, P = 0.03) and increased congestive heart failure events (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.51, moderate-certainty evidence). As compared to beta-blockers, CCBs reduced the following outcomes: major cardiovascular events (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.92), stroke (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.88, moderate-certainty evidence), and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99, low-certainty evidence). As compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, CCBs reduced stroke (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99, low-certainty evidence) and increased congestive heart failure (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.28, low-certainty evidence). As compared to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), CCBs reduced myocardial infarction (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.94, moderate-certainty evidence) and increased congestive heart failure (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.36, low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of hypertension, there is moderate certainty evidence that diuretics reduce major cardiovascular events and congestive heart failure more than CCBs. There is low to moderate certainty evidence that CCBs probably reduce major cardiovascular events more than beta-blockers. There is low to moderate certainty evidence that CCBs reduced stroke when compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and reduced myocardial infarction when compared to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), but increased congestive heart failure when compared to ACE inhibitors and ARBs. Many of the differences found in the current review are not robust, and further trials might change the conclusions. More well-designed RCTs studying the mortality and morbidity of individuals taking CCBs as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes are needed for patients with different stages of hypertension, different ages, and with different comorbidities such as diabetes.

Development of the simulation-based German albuminuria screening model (S-GASM) for estimating the cost-effectiveness of albuminuria screening in Germany

Background

Chronic kidney disease is often asymptomatic in its early stages but constitutes a severe burden for patients and causes major healthcare systems costs worldwide. While models for assessing the cost-effectiveness of screening were proposed in the past, they often presented only a limited view. This study aimed to develop a simulation-based German Albuminuria Screening Model (S-GASM) and present some initial applications.

Methods

The model consists of an individual-based simulation of disease progression, considering age, gender, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, albuminuria, glomerular filtration rate, and quality of life, furthermore, costs of testing, therapy, and renal replacement therapy with parameters based on published evidence. Selected screening scenarios were compared in a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Results

Compared to no testing, a simulation of 10 million individuals with a current age distribution of the adult German population and a follow-up until death or the age of 90 shows that a testing of all individuals with diabetes every two years leads to a reduction of the lifetime prevalence of renal replacement therapy from 2.5% to 2.3%. The undiscounted costs of this intervention would be 1164.10 € / QALY (quality-adjusted life year). Considering saved costs for renal replacement therapy, the overall undiscounted costs would be—12581.95 € / QALY. Testing all individuals with diabetes or hypertension and screening the general population reduced the lifetime prevalence even further (to 2.2% and 1.8%, respectively). Both scenarios were cost-saving (undiscounted, - 7127.10 €/QALY and—5439.23 €/QALY).

Conclusions

The S-GASM can be used for the comparison of various albuminuria testing strategies. The exemplary analysis demonstrates cost savings through albuminuria testing for individuals with diabetes, diabetes or hypertension, and for population-wide screening.

Treatments for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Literature Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Delaying disease progression and reducing the risk of mortality are key goals in the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD). New drug classes to augment renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors as the standard of care have scarcely met their primary endpoints until recently. This systematic literature review explored treatments evaluated in patients with CKD since 1990 to understand what contemporary data add to the treatment landscape. Eighty-nine clinical trials were identified that had enrolled patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate 13.9-102.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 29.9-2911.0 mg/g, with (75.5%) and without (20.6%) type 2 diabetes (T2D). Clinically objective outcomes of kidney failure and all-cause mortality (ACM) were reported in 32 and 64 trials, respectively. Significant reductions (P < 0.05) in the risk of kidney failure were observed in seven trials: five small trials published before 2008 had evaluated the RAAS inhibitors losartan, benazepril, or ramipril in patients with (n = 751) or without (n = 84-436) T2D; two larger trials (n = 2152-2202) published onwards of 2019 had evaluated the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors canagliflozin (in patients with T2D and UACR > 300-5000 mg/g) and dapagliflozin (in patients with or without T2D and UACR 200-5000 mg/g) added to a background of RAAS inhibition. Significant reductions in ACM were observed with dapagliflozin in the DAPA-CKD trial. Contemporary data therefore suggest that augmenting RAAS inhibitors with new drug classes has the potential to improve clinical outcomes in a broad range of patients with CKD.

Treatment With Lisinopril Prevents the Early Progression of Glomerular Injury in Obese Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rats Independent of Lowering Arterial Pressure

Recently, we reported that obese Dahl salt-sensitive leptin receptor mutant (SSLepRmutant) rats develop glomerular injury and progressive proteinuria prior to puberty. Moreover, this early progression of proteinuria was associated with elevations in GFR. Therefore, the current study examined whether treatment with lisinopril to reduce GFR slows the early progression of proteinuria in SSLepRmutant rats prior to puberty. Experiments were performed on 4-week-old SS and SSLepRmutant rats that were either treated with vehicle or lisinopril (20 mg/kg/day, drinking water) for 4 weeks. We did not observe any differences in MAP between SS and SSLepRmutant rats treated with vehicle (148 ± 5 vs. 163 ± 6 mmHg, respectively). Interestingly, chronic treatment with lisinopril markedly reduced MAP in SS rats (111 ± 3 mmHg) but had no effect on MAP in SSLepRmutant rats (155 ± 4 mmHg). Treatment with lisinopril significantly reduced proteinuria in SS and SSLepRmutant rats compared to their vehicle counterparts (19 ± 5 and 258 ± 34 vs. 71 ± 12 and 498 ± 66 mg/day, respectively). Additionally, nephrin excretion was significantly elevated in SSLepRmutant rats versus SS rats, and lisinopril reduced nephrin excretion in both strains. GFR was significantly elevated in SSLepRmutant rats compared to SS rats, and lisinopril treatment reduced GFR in SSLepRmutant rats by 30%. The kidneys from SSLepRmutant rats displayed glomerular injury with increased mesangial expansion and renal inflammation versus SS rats. Chronic treatment with lisinopril significantly decreased glomerular injury and renal inflammation in the SSLepRmutant rats. Overall, these data indicate that inhibiting renal hyperfiltration associated with obesity is beneficial in slowing the early development of glomerular injury and renal inflammation.

Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Difficult Equation

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health problem and is strongly associated with hypertension (HTN) and impaired quality of life. Managing HTN with agents that block the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) remains the gold standard, however there is a misleading impression that patients with impaired renal function or those receiving hemodialysis should not be treated with RAAS inhibitors. To date, only a few data in this field are available, given that this population subset is systematically excluded from many major clinical trials. The purpose of this review was to solve the difficult equation regarding the optimal use of RAAS blockade in patients with CKD.

The « race » correction in estimating glomerular filtration rate: an European point of view

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is currently a heated debate ongoing whether or not to use the race coefficient for black people in the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology-equation. The use of the race coefficient is thought by several American authors as a source of discrimination.

RECENT FINDINGS

It has recently been shown that the race coefficient is inaccurate in European and African black people. Therefore, it seems that the race correction is more a correction for black Americans, rather than for black in general. This 'correction' at the glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-level has been criticized, as it is misleading, and should be abandoned, as it has not been shown that GFR is different between black and white people. However, as differences in creatinine generation between black and white people might exist, a correction or adjustment, different for black and white people, at the creatinine level might be required, very similar to the different scaling of creatinine for males and females.

SUMMARY

The current debate on the race coefficient is particularly difficult because of the absence of good scientific data in black subjects and there lies the real discrimination in our opinion. We therefore call for future dedicated studies, both in Europe and USA.

Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension

BACKGROUND

This is the first update of a review published in 2010. While calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are often recommended as a first-line drug to treat hypertension, the effect of CCBs on the prevention of cardiovascular events, as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes, is still debated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether CCBs used as first-line therapy for hypertension are different from other classes of antihypertensive drugs in reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events.

SEARCH METHODS

For this updated review, the Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up to 1 September 2020: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2020, Issue 1), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted the authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work and checked the references of published studies to identify additional trials. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing first-line CCBs with other antihypertensive classes, with at least 100 randomised hypertensive participants and a follow-up of at least two years.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently selected the included trials, evaluated the risk of bias, and entered the data for analysis. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion. We contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

This update contains five new trials. We included a total of 23 RCTs (18 dihydropyridines, 4 non-dihydropyridines, 1 not specified) with 153,849 participants with hypertension. All-cause mortality was not different between first-line CCBs and any other antihypertensive classes. As compared to diuretics, CCBs probably increased  major cardiovascular events (risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.09, P = 0.03) and increased congestive heart failure events (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.51, moderate-certainty evidence). As compared to beta-blockers, CCBs reduced the following outcomes: major cardiovascular events (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.92), stroke (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.88, moderate-certainty evidence), and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99, low-certainty evidence). As compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, CCBs reduced stroke (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99, low-certainty evidence) and increased congestive heart failure (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.28, low-certainty evidence). As compared to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), CCBs reduced myocardial infarction (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.94, moderate-certainty evidence) and increased congestive heart failure (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.36, low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of hypertension, there is moderate certainty evidence that diuretics reduce major cardiovascular events and congestive heart failure more than CCBs. There is low to moderate certainty evidence that CCBs probably reduce major cardiovascular events more than beta-blockers. There is low to moderate certainty evidence that CCBs reduced stroke when compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and reduced myocardial infarction when compared to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), but increased congestive heart failure when compared to ACE inhibitors and ARBs. Many of the differences found in the current review are not robust, and further trials might change the conclusions. More well-designed RCTs studying the mortality and morbidity of individuals taking CCBs as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes are needed for patients with different stages of hypertension, different ages, and with different comorbidities such as diabetes.

Questioning the renoprotective role of L-type calcium channel blockers in chronic kidney disease using physiological modeling

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by the progressive functional loss of nephrons and hypertension (HTN). Some antihypertensive regimens attenuate the progression of CKD (blockers of the renin-angiotensin system). Although studies have suggested that calcium channel blocker (CCB) therapy mitigates the decline in renal function in humans with essential HTN, there are few long-term clinical studies that have determined the impact of CCBs in patients with hypertensive CKD. Dihydropyridine (DHP) or L-type CCBs preferentially vasodilate the afferent arteriole and have been associated with glomerular HTN and increases in proteinuria in animal models with low renal function. Small clinical studies in vulnerable populations with renal disease such as African Americans, children, and diabetics have also suggested that DHP CCBs exacerbate glomerular injury, which questions the renoprotective effect of this class of antihypertensive drug. We used an established integrative mathematical model of human physiology, HumMod, to test the hypothesis that DHP CCB therapy exacerbates pressure-induced glomerular injury in hypertensive CKD. Over a simulation of 3 yr, CCB therapy reduced mean blood pressure by 14-16 mmHg in HTN both with and without CKD. Both impaired tubuloglomerular feedback and low baseline renal function exacerbated glomerular pressure, glomerulosclerosis, and the decline in renal function during L-type CCB treatment. However, simulating CCB therapy that inhibited both L- and T-type calcium channels increased efferent arteriolar vasodilation and alleviated glomerular damage. These simulations support the evidence that DHP (L-type) CCBs potentiate glomerular HTN during CKD and suggest that T/L-type CCBs are valuable in proteinuric renal disease treatment.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our physiological model replicates clinical trial results and provides unique insights into possible mechanisms that play a role in glomerular injury and hypertensive kidney disease progression during chronic CCB therapy. Specifically, these simulations predict the temporal changes in renal function with CCB treatment and demonstrate important roles for tubuloglomerular feedback and efferent arteriolar conductance in the control of chronic kidney disease progression.

Clinical events and patient-reported outcome measures during CKD progression: findings from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) face risks of not only end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), cardiovascular disease (CVD) and death, but also decline in kidney function, quality of life (QOL) and mental and physical well-being. This study describes the multidimensional trajectories of CKD using clinical events, kidney function and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). We hypothesized that more advanced CKD stages would associate with more rapid decline in each outcome.

METHODS

Among 3939 participants enrolled in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study, we evaluated multidimensional disease trajectories by G- and A-stages of enrollment estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria, respectively. These trajectories included clinical events (ESKD, CVD, heart failure and death), eGFR decline and PROMs [kidney disease QOL (KDQOL) burden, effects and symptoms questionnaires, as well as the 12-item short form mental and physical component summaries]. We also evaluated a group-based multitrajectory model to group participants on the basis of longitudinal PROMs and compared group assignments by enrollment G- and A-stage.

RESULTS

The mean participant age was 58 years, 45% were women, mean baseline eGFR was 44 mL/min/1.73 m2 and median urine albumin:creatinine ratio was 52 mg/g. The incidence of all clinical events was greater and eGFR decline was faster with more advanced G- and A-stages. While baseline KDQOL and physical component measures were lower with more advanced G- and A-stage of CKD, changes in PROMs were inconsistently related to the baseline CKD stage. Groups formed on PROM trajectories were fairly distinct from existing CKD staging (observed agreement 60.6%) and were associated with the risk of ESKD, CVD, heart failure and death.

CONCLUSIONS

More advanced baseline CKD stage was associated with a higher risk of clinical events and faster eGFR decline, and was only weakly related to changes in patient-reported metrics over time.

When should we start and stop ACEi/ARB in paediatric chronic kidney disease?

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors (RAASi) are the mainstay therapy in both adult and paediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD). RAASi slow down the progression of kidney failure by optimization of blood pressure and reduction of proteinuria. Despite recommendations from published guidelines in adults, the evidence related to the use of RAASi is surprisingly scarce in children. Moreover, their role in advanced CKD remains controversial. Without much guidance from the literature, paediatric nephrologists may discontinue RAASi in patients with advanced CKD due to apparent worsening of kidney function, hyperkalaemia and hypotension. Current data suggest that this strategy may in fact lead to a more rapid decline in kidney function. The optimal approach in this clinical scenario is still not well defined and there are varying practices worldwide. We will in this review describe the existing evidence on the use of RAASi in CKD with particular focus on paediatric data. We will also address the use of RAASi in advanced CKD and discuss the potential benefits and harms. At the end, we will suggest a practical approach for the use of RAASi in children with CKD based on current state of knowledge.

Blood pressure control in patients with chronic kidney disease

Uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) can lead to serious adverse outcomes. To prevent the occurrence of cardiovascular events (CVEs), and end-stage kidney disease, achieving an optimal BP level is important. Recently, there has been a paradigm shift in the management of BP largely as a result of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), which showed a reduction in CVEs by lowering systolic BP to 120 mmHg. A lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) target has been accepted by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2021 guidelines. However, whether intensive control of SBP targeting < 120 mmHg is also effective in patients with CKD is controversial. Notably, this lower target SBP is associated with a higher risk of adverse kidney outcomes. Unfortunately, there have been no randomized controlled trials on this issue involving only patients with CKD, particularly those with advanced CKD. In this review, we discuss the optimal control of BP in patients with CKD in terms of reduction in death and CVEs as well as attenuation of CKD progression based on the evidence-based literature.

Sodium--glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for patients with diabetic and nondiabetic chronic kidney disease: a new era has already begun

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major issue of public health. Hypertension control and use of renin--angiotensin system (RAS) blockers are the cornerstones of treatment for CKD of any cause. However, even under optimal RAS blockade, many individuals will progress towards more advanced CKD. Within the past few years, evidence from cardiovascular outcome trials with sodium--glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors clearly suggested that these agents substantially delay CKD progression in patients with diabetes mellitus on top of standard-of-care treatment. The Canagliflozin-and-Renal-Events-in-Diabetes-with-Established-Nephropathy-Clinical-Evaluation (CREDENCE) study, showed that canagliflozin substantially reduced the risk of doubling of SCr, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or death from renal or cardiovascular causes in 4401 patients with diabetic CKD compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.70; 95% CI 0.59-0.82). Recently, the Study-to-Evaluate-the-Effect-of-Dapagliflozin-on-Renal-Outcomes-and-Cardiovascular-Mortality-in-Patients-With-Chronic-Kidney-Disease (DAPA-CKD), including 2510 patients with diabetic and 1803 with nondiabetic CKD, also showed an impressive reduction in the risk of ≥50% decline in eGFR, ESKD, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.51-0.72). The benefit was similar for patients with diabetic and nondiabetic CKD, including patients with glomerulonephritides. Following this conclusive evidence, relevant guidelines should accommodate their recommendations to implement treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors for patients with diabetic and nondiabetic CKD.

Mineralcorticoid receptor blockers in chronic kidney disease

There are many experimental data supporting the involvement of aldosterone and mineralcorticoid receptor (MR) activation in the genesis and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular damage. Many studies have shown that in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD, blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS) system with conversion enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) decreases proteinuria, progression of CKD and mortality, but there is still a significant residual risk of developing these events. In subjects treated with ACEi or ARBs there may be an aldosterone breakthrough whose prevalence in subjects with CKD can reach 50%. Several studies have shown that in CKD, the aldosterone antagonists (spironolactone, eplerenone) added to ACEi or ARBs, reduce proteinuria, but increase the risk of hyperkalemia. Other studies in subjects treated with dialysis suggest a possible beneficial effect of antialdosteronic drugs on CV events and mortality. Newer potassium binders drugs can prevent/decrease hyperkalemia induced by RAAS blockade, and may reduce the high discontinuation rates or dose reduction of RAAS-blockers. The nonsteroidal MR blockers, with more potency and selectivity than the classic ones, reduce proteinuria and have a lower risk of hyperkalemia. Several clinical trials, currently underway, will determine the effect of classic MR blockers on CV events and mortality in subjects with stage 3b CKD and in dialysis patients, and whether in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and CKD, optimally treated and with high risk of CV and kidney events, the addition of finerenone to their treatment produces cardiorenal benefits. Large randomized trials have shown that sodium glucose type 2 cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce mortality and the development and progression of diabetic and nondiabetic CKD. There are pathophysiological arguments, which raise the possibility that the triple combination ACEi or ARBs, SGLT2i and aldosterone antagonist provide additional renal and cardiovascular protection.

Cardiovascular Protection With Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Milestone Achieved

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease are intimately linked. They share major risk factors, including age, hypertension, and diabetes, and common pathogenetic mechanisms. Furthermore, reduced renal function and kidney injury documented with albuminuria are independent risk factors for cardiovascular events and mortality. In major renal outcome trials and subsequent meta-analyses in patients with CKD, ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors and ARBs (angiotensin II receptor blockers) were shown to effectively retard CKD progression but not to significantly reduce cardiovascular events or mortality. Thus, a high residual risk for cardiovascular disease progression under standard-of-care treatment is still present for patients with CKD. In contrast to the above, several outcome trials with SGLT-2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitors and MRAs (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) clearly suggest that these agents, apart from nephroprotection, offer important cardioprotection in this population. This article discusses existing evidence on the effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors and MRAs on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD that open new roads in cardiovascular protection of this heavily burdened population.

Identifying Clinical and Genomic Features Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease

We apply a pattern-based classification method to identify clinical and genomic features associated with the progression of Chronic Kidney disease (CKD). We analyze the African-American Study of Chronic Kidney disease with Hypertension dataset and construct a decision-tree classification model, consisting 15 combinatorial patterns of clinical features and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), seven of which are associated with slow progression and eight with rapid progression of renal disease among African-American Study of Chronic Kidney patients. We identify four clinical features and two SNPs that can accurately predict CKD progression. Clinical and genomic features identified in our experiments may be used in a future study to develop new therapeutic interventions for CKD patients.

How Should We Measure and Deal with Office Blood Pressure in 2021?

Arterial hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease worldwide. Office blood pressure measurements (OBPMs) are still recommended for diagnosis and follow-up by all major guidelines; however, the recommended procedures differ significantly. In analogy, major outcome studies usually apply OBPMs, again, with a variety of procedures. This variety of OBPM procedures complicates the comparability between studies and challenges daily clinical practice. In this narrative review, we compile the most recent recommendations for office blood pressure measurement together with the major limitations and strategies and how these could be overcome.

No evidence for brain renin-angiotensin system activation during DOCA-salt hypertension

Brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation is thought to mediate deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt hypertension, an animal model for human primary hyperaldosteronism. Here, we determined whether brainstem angiotensin II is generated from locally synthesized angiotensinogen and mediates DOCA-salt hypertension. To this end, chronic DOCA-salt-hypertensive rats were treated with liver-directed siRNA targeted to angiotensinogen, the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist valsartan, or the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone (n = 6-8/group). We quantified circulating angiotensinogen and renin by enzyme-kinetic assay, tissue angiotensinogen by Western blotting, and angiotensin metabolites by LC-MS/MS. In rats without DOCA-salt, circulating angiotensin II was detected in all rats, whereas brainstem angiotensin II was detected in 5 out of 7 rats. DOCA-salt increased mean arterial pressure by 19 ± 1 mmHg and suppressed circulating renin and angiotensin II by >90%, while brainstem angiotensin II became undetectable in 5 out of 7 rats (<6 fmol/g). Gene silencing of liver angiotensinogen using siRNA lowered circulating angiotensinogen by 97 ± 0.3%, and made brainstem angiotensin II undetectable in all rats (P<0.05 vs. non-DOCA-salt), although brainstem angiotensinogen remained intact. As expected for this model, neither siRNA nor valsartan attenuated the hypertensive response to DOCA-salt, whereas spironolactone normalized blood pressure and restored brain angiotensin II together with circulating renin and angiotensin II. In conclusion, despite local synthesis of angiotensinogen in the brain, brain angiotensin II depended on circulating angiotensinogen. That DOCA-salt suppressed circulating and brain angiotensin II in parallel, while spironolactone simultaneously increased brain angiotensin II and lowered blood pressure, indicates that DOCA-salt hypertension is not mediated by brain RAS activation.

Treating Home Versus Predialysis Blood Pressure Among In-Center Hemodialysis Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Observational studies have reported a U-shaped association between blood pressure (BP) before a hemodialysis session and death. In contrast, because a linear association between out-of-dialysis-unit BP and death has been reported, home BP may be a better target for treatment. To test the feasibility of this approach, we conducted a pilot trial of treating home versus predialysis BP in hemodialysis patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A 4-month, parallel, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS

50 prevalent hemodialysis patients in San Francisco and Seattle. Participants were randomly assigned using 1:1 block randomization, stratified by site.

INTERVENTIONS

To target home systolic BP (SBP) of 100-<140 mm Hg versus predialysis SBP of 100-<140mm Hg. Home and predialysis SBPs were ascertained every 2 weeks. Dry weight and BP medications were adjusted to reach the target SBP.

OUTCOMES

Primary outcomes were feasibility, adherence, safety. and tolerability.

RESULTS

50 of 70 (71%) patients who were approached agreed to participate. All enrollees completed the study except for 1 who received a kidney transplant. In the home BP treatment group, adherence to obtaining/reporting home BP was 97.4% (and consistent over the 4 months). There was no increased frequency of high (defined as SBP>200mm Hg; 0.2% vs 0%) or low (defined as<90mm Hg; 1.8% vs 1.2%) predialysis BP readings in the home versus predialysis treatment arms, respectively. However, participants in the home BP arm had higher frequency of fatigue (32% vs 16%).

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot trial demonstrates feasibility and high adherence to home BP measurement and treatment in hemodialysis patients. Larger trials to test the long-term feasibility, efficacy, and safety of home BP treatment in hemodialysis patients should be conducted.

FUNDERS

National Institutes of Health, Satellite Healthcare, and Northwest Kidney Centers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT03459807.

Hypertension Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in the Post-SPRINT Era

The management of high blood pressure (BP) is crucial for improving outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The updated Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2021 BP guideline proposes treating adults with CKD to a target systolic BP (SBP) of <120 mmHg based on the standardized office BP measurement. This suggestion is largely based on the finding of SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) that targeting an SBP of <120 mmHg versus <140 mmHg is beneficial for cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, regardless of the patient’s kidney disease status. However, extended follow-up studies of CKD trials showed that intensive versus usual BP control was associated with a lower risk of kidney failure in patients with, but not in those without, proteinuria. Similarly, a recent population-based study in Korea demonstrated that the optimal on-treatment BP for composite cardiorenal and mortality outcomes was left-shifted in adults with CKD, particularly in those with albuminuria, relative to that in patients without CKD. Moreover, in meta-analyses of randomized trials, more intensive versus standard BP control was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with CKD and albuminuria but not in those without CKD. Meanwhile, a 2020 Cochrane review reported that lower BP targets (≤135/85 mmHg), compared with standard targets (≤140/90 mmHg), resulted in a small reduction in cardiovascular events, an increase in other serious adverse events, and no reduction in total serious adverse events. Lowering SBP to <120 mmHg can potentially increase the risk of treatment-related adverse events beyond the cardioprotective benefits, and standardized BP measurement increases the burden on patients and resources. Thus, targeting a BP of <130/80 mmHg with appropriate office BP measurement can be an option in patients with CKD. The presence of albuminuria would need to be additionally considered to determine individualized BP targets.

Comparison of Different Types of Oral Adsorbent Therapy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase IV Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Oral adsorbents delay disease progression and improve uremic symptoms in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). DW-7202 is a newly developed oral adsorbent with high adsorptive selectivity for uremic toxins. We evaluated patient preference for and adherence to DW-7202 versus AST-120 therapy and compared treatment efficacy and safety in patients with pre-dialysis CKD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A seven-center, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover, active-controlled, phase IV clinical trial was conducted. Patients with stable CKD were randomly assigned to receive DW-7202 (capsule type) or AST-120 (granule type) for 12 weeks. The groups then switched to the other adsorbent and took it for the next 12 weeks. Patient preference was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine, cystatin C, and indoxyl sulfate (IS) levels.

RESULTS

Significantly more patients preferred DW-7202 than AST-120 (p<0.001). Patient adherence improved after switching from AST-120 to DW-7202; there was no apparent change in adherence after switching from DW-7202 to AST-120. Changes in eGFR and serum creatinine, cystatin C, and IS levels were not significantly different according to adsorbent type. There was also no significant difference in the incidences of adverse events during treatment with DW-7202 and AST-120.

CONCLUSION

DW-7202 can be considered as an alternative to AST-120 in patients who cannot tolerate or show poor adherence to granule type adsorbents. Further studies to evaluate factors affecting patient preferences and improved adherence are warranted (Clinical trial registration No. NCT02681952).

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use Among Hypertensive US Adults With Albuminuria

Since 2003, US hypertension guidelines have recommended ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors or ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers) as first-line antihypertensive therapy in the presence of albuminuria (urine albumin/creatinine ratio ≥300 mg/g). To examine national trends in guideline-concordant ACE inhibitor/ARB utilization, we studied adults participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2001 to 2018 with hypertension (defined by self-report of high blood pressure, systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic ≥90 mm Hg, or use of antihypertensive medications). Among 20 538 included adults, the prevalence of albuminuria ≥300 mg/g was 2.8% in 2001 to 2006, 2.8% in 2007 to 2012, and 3.2% in 2013 to 2018. Among those with albuminuria ≥300 mg/g, no consistent trends were observed for the proportion receiving ACE inhibitor/ARB treatment from 2001 to 2018 among persons with diabetes, without diabetes, or overall. In 2013 to 2018, ACE inhibitor/ARB usage in the setting of albuminuria ≥300 mg/g was 55.3% (95% CI, 46.8%-63.6%) among adults with diabetes and 33.4% (95% CI, 23.1%-45.5%) among those without diabetes. Based on US population counts, these estimates represent 1.6 million adults with albuminuria ≥300 mg/g currently not receiving ACE inhibitor/ARB therapy, nearly half of whom do not have diabetes. ACE inhibitor/ARB underutilization represents a significant gap in preventive care delivery for adults with hypertension and albuminuria that has not substantially changed over time.

Effects of antihypertensive agents on the quality of life in diabetic hypertensive patients: A prospective study

Background:

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic noncommunicable disease, and hypertension (HT) is the most common comorbidity which affects their quality of life (QoL).

Aim:

The aim of the study was to assess the effects of antihypertensive agents (viz., amlodipine, ramipril, telmisartan, and ramipril with telmisartan) on the blood pressure (BP) and QoL.

Methodology:

It was an open-labeled prospective intention-to-treat study done in diabetic hypertensive patients (CTRI/2016/10/007340). Patients were randomly assigned antihypertensive agents, namely, amlodipine, ramipril, telmisartan, and a combination of ramipril with telmisartan (RT) in four groups. They were evaluated for BP, blood sugar level, and QoL at baseline and 24^th week.

Results:

After 24 weeks of therapy, systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were significantly reduced in all groups. In amlodipine, there was a mean percentage fall of SBP by 15.85% (confidence interval [CI]: 21.38–28.13) and DBP by 11.22% (CI: 8.41–12.70); in ramipril – 14.4% (CI: 18.61–25.15) and 12.4% (CI 8.88–13.99); telmisartan – 18.4% (CI: 24.89–10.79) and 14.6% (CI 10.79–16.24); and in RT group, SBP 17.7% (CI: 23.38–29.18) and DBP 12.4% (CI: 9.05–13.02). QoL score increased by 30.56% (CI: 14.30–10.90), 30.94% (CI: 14.21–10.68), 28.07% (CI: 14.89–11.20), and 28.84% (CI: 15.49–11.77), in respective groups (P < 0.0001, each). However, they were nonsignificant between the study groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion:

Amlodipine, ramipril, telmisartan, and a combination of RT are equally effective to improve BP and QoL among diabetic hypertensive patients. However, amlodipine and telmisartan lacked in dry cough and more tolerable than the ramipril and RT therapy. Henceforth, amlodipine and telmisartan are better choice to control HT among DM patients.

[Mineralcorticoid receptor blockers in chronic kidney disease]

There are many experimental data supporting the involvement of aldosterone and mineralcorticoid receptor (MR) activation in the genesis and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular damage. Many studies have shown that in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD, blocking the renin- angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS) system with conversion enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) decreases proteinuria, progression of CKD and mortality, but there is still a significant residual risk of developing these events. In subjects treated with ACEi or ARBs there may be an aldosterone breakthrough whose prevalence in subjects with CKD can reach 50%. Several studies have shown that in CKD, the aldosterone antagonists (spironolactone, eplerenone) added to ACEi or ARBs, reduce proteinuria, but increase the risk of hyperkalemia. Other studies in subjects treated with dialysis suggest a possible beneficial effect of antialdosteronic drugs on CV events and mortality. Newer potassium binders drugs can prevent / decrease hyperkalemia induced by RAAS blockade, and may reduce the high discontinuation rates or dose reduction of RAAS-blockers. The nonsteroidal MR blockers, with more potency and selectivity than the classic ones, reduce proteinuria and have a lower risk of hyperkalemia. Several clinical trials, currently underway, will determine the effect of classic MR blockers on CV events and mortality in subjects with stage 3b CKD and in dialysis patients, and whether in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and CKD, optimally treated and with high risk of CV and kidney events, the addition of finerenone to their treatment produces cardiorenal benefits. Large randomized trials have shown that sodium glucose type 2 cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce mortality and the development and progression of diabetic and nondiabetic CKD. There are pathophysiological arguments, which raise the possibility that the triple combination ACEi or ARBs, SGLT2i and aldosterone antagonist provide additional renal and cardiovascular protection.

How should we measure blood pressure? Implications of the fourth blood pressure measurement in office blood pressure

According to the European Hypertension Guidelines regarding office blood pressure measurements (OBPMs), the mean between second/third or third/fourth OBPM should be taken if the first two readings differ by ≤10 or >10 mmHg, respectively. Our aim was to explore the value of the fourth OBPM and determine whether a simplified OBPM procedure is feasible without loss of quality. In this cross‐sectional study, four standard OBPMs were taken. The mean of the second/third OBPM (S2S3/D2D3) and third/fourth OBPM (S3S4/D3D4) for systolic/diastolic values was calculated. Correlation, agreement, and differences regarding BP classification were explored for the entire cohort and subsets with a difference between the first/second OBPM (S1S2/D1D2) ≤10 and >10 mmHg. Overall (n = 802) and for the subsets with an S1S2 (n = 596) and D1D2 (n = 742) difference ≤10 mmHg, S3S4/D3D4 was in median 0.5 mmHg lower than S2S3/D2D3, respectively (p < .0005 for all). In participants with an S1S2 (n = 206) and D1D2 (n = 60) difference >10 mmHg, S3S4/D3D4 differed numerically from S2S3/D2D3, respectively (p > .1 for all). Overall and for all subsets with an S1S2/D1D2 difference ≤10/>10 mmHg, less subjects were numerically classified as hypertensive with S3S4/D3D4 than with S2S3/D2D3 (p > .04), but BP reclassification occurred in both directions in 1.0%‐10.0%, depending on the cohort. In conclusion, the third/fourth OBPM results in lower BP values than the second/third measurement, regardless of the difference between first/second OBPM, whereby BP reclassifications occurred in both directions. Therefore, the cutoff of >10 versus ≤10mmHg difference between first/second OBPM to implement a fourth BPM harbors the risk of distorted results. We therefore recommend using the second/third BPM for standardized OBPM.

Trial registration: Registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02552030).

Antihypertensive Treatment in Kidney Transplant Recipients-A Current Single Center Experience

Arterial hypertension affects the survival of the kidney graft and the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of the recipient after kidney transplantation (KTx). Thus, antihypertensive treatment is necessary for a vast majority of these patients. Long-term data on antihypertensive drugs and their effects on allograft function after KTx is still limited, and further investigation is required. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 854 recipients who received a kidney transplant at our transplant center between 2007 and 2015 with regard to antihypertensive treatment and its influence on graft function and survival. 1-y after KTx, 95.3% patients were treated with antihypertensive therapy. Of these, 38.6% received mono- or dual-drug therapy, 38.0% received three to four drugs and 8.1% were on a regimen of ≥5 drugs. Beta-blockers were the most frequently used antihypertensive agents (68.1%). Neither the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (51.9%) and calcium channel blockers (51.5%), nor the use the use of loop diuretics (38.7%) affected allograft survival. Arterial hypertension and the number of antihypertensive agents were associated with unfavorable allograft outcomes (each p < 0.001). In addition to the well-known risk factors of cold ischemic time and acute rejection episodes, the number of antihypertensive drugs after one year, which reflects the severity of hypertension, is a strong predictor of unfavorable allograft survival.