Women's clinical preventive services in the United States: who is doing what?

An Assessment of Clinician Knowledge of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Insights from a Multidisciplinary Survey Study

Background/Objectives: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating skin disease primarily diagnosed through clinical examination. Despite its characteristic clinical features, HS remains under-recognized and frequently misclassified, especially by non-dermatologist clinicians. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HS across various specialties, identify knowledge gaps, and inform targeted educational strategies to reduce diagnostic delays. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted during multidisciplinary scientific conferences, enrolling 655 clinicians including dermatologists, gynecologists, urologists, general surgeons, and general practitioners. Participants were presented with clinical images representing HS lesions at Hurley stages I-III and responded to open-ended and closed-ended diagnostic questions. Data were analyzed to assess diagnostic accuracy and compare recognition patterns across specialties. Results: The recognition of HS varied significantly by specialty and disease stage. For Hurley stage III axillary disease, correct identification was highest among dermatologists (96.56%) compared to general practitioners (48.91%), gynecologists (31.25%), urologists (40%), and general surgeons (63.64%). In a Hurley II genital case in a male patient, only 34.5% diagnosed HS, while 25.65% suggested furunculosis and 16.18% venereal granuloma. For a Hurley I genital case in a female patient, 29.92% diagnosed HS, with furunculosis (23.36%) and steatocystoma multiplex (14.35%) as common misdiagnoses. A Hurley III buttock case was correctly identified by only 29.77% of participants. Conclusions: This large, first-of-its-kind global survey highlights substantial gaps in HS recognition, particularly among non-dermatologist clinicians. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted, multidisciplinary educational interventions to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce delays, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes in HS.

Qualitative analysis of patient and key informant interviews to inform integration of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis services into gynecology care in Alabama

BACKGROUND

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is low among Southern, Black cis-gender women (CGW). Gynecology clinics are well-positioned to integrate PrEP services as a component of sexual and reproductive healthcare for CGW.

OBJECTIVES

Identify key determinants to PrEP implementation into routine gynecologic care.

DESIGN

Qualitative, in-depth interviews (IDIs).

METHODS

We conducted IDIs with key informants (i.e., physicians, nurses, medical assistants) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with patients accessing care in a gynecology clinic serving under- and uninsured women in Alabama. IDIs explored individual-, setting-, and process-level factors that may impact PrEP care implementation in a clinic serving approximately 3000 women yearly, 64% of whom are Black women.

RESULTS

Ten key informants participated in individual IDIs (median age 33.5, range 24-58 years, 80% female); 20 women participated in either 1 of 4 FGDs (n = 8) or an individual IDI (n = 12); median age 32, range 19-44. The following themes emerged: (1) patient- and provider-level stigmas related to sexuality, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and HIV limit discussions about sexual health and HIV prevention. (2) Providers report limited knowledge about prescribing and monitoring PrEP, which is reflected in patient's observations that providers do not routinely initiate discussions about HIV prevention or PrEP. (3) Providers utilize a more risk-based approach to PrEP counseling; patients expect non-targeted, comprehensive sexual health information. (4) Structural and social barriers will be challenges to implementing PrEP in routine gynecological care. (5) Patients and providers support a clinic-wide approach to integration of PrEP into gynecology clinics.

CONCLUSION

Discussions around sexual health and STIs are limited in routine gynecologic care, but patients expect comprehensive counseling from knowledgeable providers. Additional provider training may increase comfort discussing and providing PrEP. These findings will inform development of implementation strategies to integrate PrEP care into gynecologic services.

Integrated Care for Persons With Persistent Gynecologic Conditions

Persons with persistent gynecologic conditions frequently cope with complex biopsychosocial challenges and benefit from integrated behavioral health evaluation and treatment within gynecologic practices. Integrated care refers to the provision of behavioral health services within a health care setting which contributes to improved patient, provider, and practice outcomes, however, has not been commonly provided in traditional gynecologic practices. Several models of integrated behavioral health are reviewed. Each model holds specific applications in primary and specialty gynecology settings and may enhance the gynecologic patient experience. This article reviews current research supporting integrated care and describes implementation, funding, and evaluation to improve patient outcomes.

Women's sexual health improvement: sexual quality of life and pelvic floor muscle assessment in asymptomatic women

Introduction

Problems related to the quality of sexual life in gynecological practice are usually neglected. This study aimed to highlight the significance of this area of concern and evaluate the usefulness of tools, such as patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and pelvic floor examination, to improve women's sexual wellbeing and to identify predictors of poor quality of sexual life during the well-woman annual visit.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was designed to examine 300 healthy women to determine whether the sexual quality of life (SQOL) questionnaire (on electronic devices) and pelvic floor muscle assessment (the vulva, anus, muscles, and periurethral (VAMP) protocol) of asymptomatic women during the annual bimanual examination (BME) help differentiate patients who would benefit from discussing sexual problems with a gynecologist. Dyspareunia was an exclusion criterion.

Results

The majority of subjects experienced high sexual wellbeing (82.0% with SQOL score of ≥84), with a mean of 85.7 points. SQOL scores were lower for psychiatric disorders or symptoms (37.0% of subjects), although they did not correlate with age, BMI, parity, contraception use, history of vulvovaginal symptoms, neurosurgical/orthopedic problems, and rectal, bowel, or bladder symptoms. Patients with dyspareunia (16.0% of participants, although they denied it during the face-to-face consultation) had a 3.6 times higher prevalence of low or moderate quality of sexual life. The VAMP protocol score was low in asymptomatic women, 33.0% met positive criteria (VAMP+, NRS ≥3) for pelvic floor dysfunction (overactivity), although at borderline levels. VAMP+ was positively correlated with chronic pain and genitourinary symptoms, but neither with dyspareunia nor incontinence, and was unrelated to the SQOL score (p = 0.151).

Conclusion

Women's sexual health is a global health priority. Finding a way to start a discussion with an asymptomatic patient is crucial to increasing patients' interest in disclosing a sexual health problem to be resolved. PROs or simple questions about sexual wellbeing direct the discussion mainly toward the at-risk group for sexual deterioration: those with mental health problems and women with dyspareunia. Dyspareunia is considered a predictor of decreased quality of sexual life, a major sexual disorder that should not be overlooked. Gynecological consultation should resolve concerns, identify the problem, and refer for professional sexual care if still needed.

Women's Clinical Preventive Services: Closing the Gaps and Implementing in Practice

Evidence-based clinical preventive services have the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality and optimize health. The Affordable Care Act mandates coverage without cost-sharing for several clinical preventive services. The Women's Preventive Services Initiative (WPSI) has worked to and continues to identify gaps in recommended preventive services for women. The WPSI Well-Woman Chart and the accompanying Clinical Summary Tables can be used at the point of care to ensure women are offered and receive all the preventive services recommended for their age and circumstance.

State-level clustering in PrEP implementation factors among family planning clinics in the Southern United States

Background

Availability of PrEP-providing clinics is low in the Southern U.S., a region at the center of the U.S. HIV epidemic with significant HIV disparities among minoritized populations, but little is known about state-level differences in PrEP implementation in the region. We explored state-level clustering of organizational constructs relevant to PrEP implementation in family planning (FP) clinics in the Southern U.S.

Methods

We surveyed providers and administrators of FP clinics not providing PrEP in 18 Southern states (Feb-Jun 2018, N = 414 respondents from 224 clinics) on these constructs: readiness to implement PrEP, PrEP knowledge/attitudes, implementation climate, leadership engagement, and available resources. We analyzed each construct using linear mixed models. A principal component analysis identified six principal components, which were inputted into a K-means clustering analysis to examine state-level clustering.

Results

Three clusters (C1-3) were identified with five, three, and four states, respectively. Canonical variable 1 separated C1 and C2 from C3 and was primarily driven by PrEP readiness, HIV-specific implementation climate, PrEP-specific leadership engagement, PrEP attitudes, PrEP knowledge, and general resource availability. Canonical variable 2 distinguished C2 from C1 and was primarily driven by PrEP-specific resource availability, PrEP attitudes, and general implementation climate. All C3 states had expanded Medicaid, compared to 1 C1 state (none in C2).

Conclusion

Constructs relevant for PrEP implementation exhibited state-level clustering, suggesting that tailored strategies could be used by clustered states to improve PrEP provision in FP clinics. Medicaid expansion was a common feature of states within C3, which could explain the similarity of their implementation constructs. The role of Medicaid expansion and state-level policies on PrEP implementation warrants further exploration.

Development of a predictive model for identifying women vulnerable to HIV in Chicago

INTRODUCTION

Researchers in the United States have created several models to predict persons most at risk for HIV. Many of these predictive models use data from all persons newly diagnosed with HIV, the majority of whom are men, and specifically men who have sex with men (MSM). Consequently, risk factors identified by these models are biased toward features that apply only to men or capture sexual behaviours of MSM. We sought to create a predictive model for women using cohort data from two major hospitals in Chicago with large opt-out HIV screening programs.

METHODS

We matched 48 newly diagnosed women to 192 HIV-negative women based on number of previous encounters at University of Chicago or Rush University hospitals. We examined data for each woman for the two years prior to either their HIV diagnosis or their last encounter. We assessed risk factors including demographic characteristics and clinical diagnoses taken from patient electronic medical records (EMR) using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We created a multivariable logistic regression model and measured predictive power with the area under the curve (AUC). In the multivariable model, age group, race, and ethnicity were included a priori due to increased risk for HIV among specific demographic groups.

RESULTS

The following clinical diagnoses were significant at the bivariate level and were included in the model: pregnancy (OR 1.96 (1.00, 3.84)), hepatitis C (OR 5.73 (1.24, 26.51)), substance use (OR 3.12 (1.12, 8.65)) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) chlamydia, gonorrhoea, or syphilis. We also a priori included demographic factors that are associated with HIV. Our final model had an AUC of 0.74 and included healthcare site, age group, race, ethnicity, pregnancy, hepatitis C, substance use, and STI diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our predictive model showed acceptable discrimination between those who were and were not newly diagnosed with HIV. We identified risk factors such as recent pregnancy, recent hepatitis C diagnosis, and substance use in addition to the traditionally used recent STI diagnosis that can be incorporated by health systems to detect women who are vulnerable to HIV and would benefit from preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

Feasibility of Lipid Screening During First Trimester of Pregnancy to Identify Women at Risk of Severe Dyslipidemia

Background Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, especially when disease presents at a young age. Despite national screening guidelines to perform a lipid profile test in children and young adults, many reproductive-age women have not undergone lipid screening. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of lipid screening during the first trimester of pregnancy as a strategy to increase lipid screening rates among women receiving prenatal care. Methods and Results A nonfasting lipid panel was incorporated into routine prenatal care among obstetricians at a single academic clinic. Educational materials and a clinical referral pathway were developed for patients with abnormal results. Over 6 months, 445 patients had a first prenatal care visit. Of the 358 patients who completed laboratory testing, 236 (66%) patients completed lipid testing. Overall, 59 (25%) patients had abnormal results. One patient with previously undiagnosed suspected familial hypercholesterolemia was identified. Barriers to ordering lipid tests included the burden of reviewing additional laboratory results and uncertainty about patient counseling. Conclusions Implementation of nonfasting lipid screening as part of routine prenatal care during the first trimester is feasible and may play a crucial role in timely diagnosis and management of lipid disorders in women of reproductive age. Future work should focus on optimizing health system workflow to minimize burden on clinical staff and facilitate follow-up with appropriate specialists.

Associations Between Preconception Glycemia and Preterm Birth: The Potential Role of Health Care Access and Utilization

Background: Preconception diabetes is strongly associated with adverse birth outcomes. Less is known about the effects of elevated glycemia at levels below clinical cutoffs for diabetes. In this study, we estimated associations between preconception diabetes, prediabetes, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) on the risk of preterm birth, and evaluated whether associations were modified by access to or utilization of health care services. Materials and Methods: We used data from Add Health, a US prospective cohort study with five study waves to date. At Wave IV (ages 24-32), glucose and HbA1c were measured. At Wave V (ages 32-42), women with a live birth reported whether the baby was born preterm. The analytic sample size was 1989. Results: The prevalence of preterm birth was 13%. Before pregnancy, 6.9% of women had diabetes, 23.7% had prediabetes, and 69.4% were normoglycemic. Compared to the normoglycemic group, women with diabetes had 2.1 (confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.5-2.9) times the risk of preterm birth, while women with prediabetes had 1.3 (95% CI: 1.0, 1.7) times the risk of preterm birth. There was a nonlinear relationship between HbA1c and preterm birth such that risk of preterm birth emerged after HbA1c = 5.7%, a standard cutoff for prediabetes. The excess risks of preterm birth associated with elevated HbA1c were four to five times larger among women who reported unstable health care coverage and among women who used the emergency room as usual source of care. Conclusion: Our findings replicate prior research showing strong associations between preconception diabetes and preterm birth, adding that prediabetes is also associated with higher risk. Policies and interventions to enhance access and utilization of health care among women before pregnancy should be examined.

Preventive care visits with OB/GYNs and generalist physicians among reproductive-age women with chronic conditions

OBJECTIVE

To examine services delivered during preventive care visits among reproductive-age women with and without chronic conditions by physician specialty.

DATA SOURCES

National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (2011-2018).

STUDY DESIGN

We examined provision of specific services during preventive care visits by physician specialty among reproductive-age female patients, overall and among women with five common chronic conditions (diabetes, hypertension, depression, hyperlipidemia, and asthma).

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

The sample included preventive visits to OB/GYNs or generalist physicians where the patient was female, age 18-44, and not pregnant.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

In OB/GYN preventive visits, reproductive health services were more likely to be provided, while non-reproductive health services were less likely to be provided, both among reproductive-age female patients overall and among those with chronic conditions. For example, pap tests were provided in 44.5% of OB/GYN preventive visits (95% CI: 40.6-48.4) and in 21.4% of generalist preventive visits (95% CI: 17.2-26.6). Lipid testing was provided in 2.8% of OB/GYN preventive visits (95% CI: 1.7-3.9) and in 30.3% of generalist preventive visits (95% CI: 26.1-34.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the full range of care received in preventive visits across settings could guide recommendations to optimize where reproductive-age women with chronic conditions seek care.

Maternity care clinician inclusion in Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations

BACKGROUND

Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) are increasingly common, but the network breadth for maternity care is not well described. The inclusion of maternity care clinicians in Medicaid ACOs has significant implications for access to care for pregnant people, who are disproportionately insured by Medicaid.

PURPOSE

To address this, we evaluate obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYN), maternal-fetal medicine specialists (MFM), certified nurse midwives (CNM), and acute care hospital inclusion in Massachusetts Medicaid ACOs.

METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

Using publicly available provider directories for Massachusetts Medicaid ACOs (n = 16) from December 2020 -January 2021, we quantify obstetrician-gynecologists, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, CNMs, and acute care hospital with obstetric department inclusion in each Medicaid ACO. We compare maternity care provider and acute care hospital inclusion across and within ACO type. For Accountable Care Partnership Plans, we compare maternity care clinician and acute care hospital inclusion to ACO enrollment.

RESULTS

Primary Care ACO plans include 1185 OB/GYNs, 51 MFMs, and 100% of Massachusetts acute care hospitals, but CNMs were not easily identifiable in the directories. Across Accountable Care Partnership Plans, a mean of 305 OB/GYNs (median: 97; range: 15-812), 15 MFMs (Median: 8; range: 0-50), 85 CNMs (median: 29; range: 0-197), and half of Massachusetts acute care hospitals (median: 23.81%; range: 10%-100%) were included.

CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Substantial differences exist in maternity care clinician inclusion across and within ACO types. Characterizing the quality of included maternity care clinicians and hospitals across ACOs is an important target of future research. Highlighting maternal healthcare as a key area of focus for Medicaid ACOs-including equitable access to high-quality obstetric providers-will be important to improving maternal health outcomes.

Double, Triple, and Quadruple Jeopardy: Entering Pregnancy With Two or More Multimorbid Diagnoses and Increased Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity and Postpartum Readmission

INTRODUCTION

Multimorbidity, the presence of two or more chronic disease diagnoses, is associated with an increased risk of mortality and high health care costs in the general population and older adults. However, little evidence is available about the prevalence and impact of multimorbidity in obstetric populations. The goal of this analysis was to estimate the association between multimorbidity and severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and 90-day postpartum readmission in an obstetric cohort in Atlanta, Georgia.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of livebirths and stillbirths at Grady Memorial Hospital, from October 2015 to April 2021. To determine preexisting chronic conditions, we linked information on births to inpatient diagnoses within the prior year. Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of two or more chronic disease diagnoses at birth or within the prior year. We conducted multivariable log binomial regression to estimate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the crude and adjusted (for age, race/ethnicity, parity, and insurance) association between multimorbidity (two or more chronic conditions vs. zero or one) and SMM (at or within 42 days after birth) or 90-day postpartum readmission for any reason.

RESULTS

Of 14,225 included births, 10.1% were to patients with multimorbidity. Overall, SMM complicated 7.5% of births, and the 90-day readmission rate was 2.4%. Both SMM and readmission were more common among women with multimorbidity (SMM, 18.6% among women with multimorbidity compared with 6.3% without; 90-day readmission, 5.4% compared with 2.1%). Adjusting for potential confounders, multimorbidity was associated with increased risk of SMM (adjusted risk ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.5-3.0) and readmission (adjusted risk ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals entering pregnancy with two or more chronic diseases were at an increased risk of SMM and postpartum readmission compared with individuals with one or zero chronic disease diagnoses.

Mother-Infant Dyad program in primary care: evidence-based postpartum care following gestational diabetes

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a common complication of pregnancy, is associated with a 10-fold increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared to the general population. Evidence-based guidelines recommend that patients with GDM receive postpartum care for T2DM risk reduction including an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 4-12 weeks after delivery, yet half of patients with GDM did not return for their postpartum visits by 12 weeks postpartum. Additionally, only 10% utilize primary care within 12 months of delivery and one-third of GDM patients receive timely postpartum OGTT.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the Mother-Infant Dyad postpartum primary care program provides a framework to link well-child visits with postpartum primary care visits to increase postpartum clinical interactions promoting longitudinal care, such as postpartum visit attendance and T2DM screening.

STUDY DESIGN

All patients with a diagnosis of GDM that received care at a postpartum mother-infant dyad program at a Midwestern academic medical center internal medicine and pediatrics primary care clinic were enrolled. Clinic level data was obtained by baseline and 6-month post-enrollment surveys and chart review. A comparison population was identified from Medicaid claims data using propensity score matching to enable a comparison of program participants' outcomes to a population comprised of similar individuals diagnosed with GDM that received care at sites not participating in the Dyad program. Our primary outcome was completion of T2DM screening in the 4-12 week postpartum period. The secondary outcomes were postpartum visit attendance with a prenatal provider, and prediabetes diagnoses.

RESULTS

A total of 75 mother-infant dyads were seen by the clinic. Of the enrolled women, 43% were Non-Hispanic White and 30% were Non-Hispanic Black; mean age was 30.75 years. The matched comparison group (n = 62) had a mean age of 30.75 years, were 43% Non-Hispanic White and 30% Non-Hispanic Black. Women who participated in the program were more likely to receive T2DM screenings than women who did not participate (87 vs. 79%, p<.001) and complete postpartum visits (95 vs. 58%, respectively; p<.001). Additionally, a higher rate of new prediabetes diagnoses was observed (12 vs. 6%, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The Mother-Infant Dyad postpartum primary care program improved T2DM screenings and postpartum visit attendance. In addition, a greater proportion of Dyad program participants experienced new prediabetes diagnoses that those in the comparison group. Our findings suggest that the dyad care model, in which women with GDM engage in postpartum primary care concurrent with well-child visits, can improve longitudinal postpartum care after a GDM diagnosis.

Primary Care and Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Services in Publicly Funded Family Planning Clinics in the Southern United States

BACKGROUND

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is underutilized by US women. Cost and resource concerns are barriers to PrEP delivery in settings that see men. Family planning clinics may be ideal PrEP delivery settings for women, but as they are not uniform in their clinical services, cost and resource concerns may vary.

OBJECTIVE

We examined factors that influence perceptions of costs and resources related to PrEP delivery in Title X-funded family planning clinics in Southern states, which overlaps with high HIV-burden areas.

DESIGN

We conducted a web-based survey among a convenience sample of clinicians and administrators of Title X clinics across 18 Southern states (DHHS regions III, IV, VI). We compared cost- and resource-related survey items and other clinic- and county-level variables between clinics by whether their clinics also provided other primary care services. We analyzed interviews for cost and resource themes.

PARTICIPANTS

Title X clinic staff in the South.

KEY RESULTS

Among 283 unique clinics, a greater proportion of clinics that also provided primary care currently provided PrEP compared with those that did not provide primary care (27.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.06), but this difference was not statistically significant. Among 414 respondents in clinics that were not providing PrEP, those in clinics with primary care services were more likely to respond that they had the necessary financial resources (p < 0.01) and staffing (p < 0.01) for PrEP implementation compared to those without primary care services. In interviews, respondents differed on concerns about costs of labs and staffing based on whether their clinic had concomitant primary care services or not.

CONCLUSIONS

Among publicly funded Southern family planning clinics, current PrEP provision was higher among clinics with concomitant primary care. Among clinics not providing PrEP, those with concomitant primary care services have lower perceived cost and resource barriers and therefore may be optimal for expanding PrEP among women.

Interconception Care for Primary Care Providers: Consensus Recommendations on Preconception and Postpartum Management of Reproductive-Age Patients With Medical Comorbidities

Severe maternal morbidity and mortality continue to increase in the United States, largely owing to chronic and newly diagnosed medical comorbidities. Interconception care, or care and management of medical conditions between pregnancies, can improve chronic disease control before, during, and after pregnancy. It is a crucial and time-sensitive intervention that can decrease maternal morbidity and mortality and improve overall health. Despite these potential benefits, interconception care has not been well implemented by the primary care community. Furthermore, there is a lack of guidelines for optimizing preconception chronic disease, risk stratifying postpartum chronic diseases, and recommending general collaborative management principles for reproductive-age patients in the period between pregnancies. As a result, many primary care providers, especially those without obstetric training, are unclear about their specific role in interconception care and may be unsure of effective methods for collaborating with obstetric care providers. In particular, internal medicine physicians, the largest group of primary care physicians, may lack sufficient clinical exposure to medical conditions in the obstetric population during their residency training and may feel uncomfortable in caring for these patients in their subsequent practice.

The objective of this article is to review concepts around interconception care, focusing specifically on preconception care for patients with chronic medical conditions (eg, chronic hypertension, chronic diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, venous thromboembolism, and obesity) and postpartum care for those with medically complicated pregnancies (eg, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, excessive gestational weight gain, peripartum cardiomyopathy, and peripartum mood disorders). We also provide a pragmatic checklist for preconception and postpartum management.

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Implementation in Family Planning Services Across the Southern United States: Findings from a Survey Among Staff, Providers and Administrators Working in Title X-Funded Clinics

To improve women's access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in family planning (FP) clinics, we examined readiness to provide PrEP, and barriers and facilitators at the clinic level to integrate PrEP services into Title X-funded FP clinics across the Southern US. Title X-funded FP clinics across DHHS regions III (Mid-Atlantic), IV (Southeast), and VI (Southwest), comprising the Southern US. From February to June, 2018, we conducted a web-based, geographically targeted survey of medical staff, providers and administrators of Title X-funded FP clinics in DHHS regions III (Mid-Atlantic), IV (Southeast), and VI (Southwest). Survey items were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to assess constructs relevant to PrEP implementation. One-fifth of 283 unique Title X clinics across the South provided PrEP. Readiness for PrEP implementation was positively associated with a climate supportive of HIV prevention, leadership engagement, and availability of resources, and negatively associated with providers holding negative attitudes about PrEP's suitability for FP. The Title X FP network is a vital source of sexual health care for millions of individuals across the US. Clinic-level barriers to providing PrEP must be addressed to expand onsite PrEP delivery in Title X FP clinics in the Southern US.

Exploring the heterogeneity of factors that may influence implementation of PrEP in family planning clinics: a latent profile analysis

BACKGROUND

Title X-funded family planning clinics have been identified as optimal sites for delivery of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. However, PrEP has not been widely integrated into family planning services, especially in the Southern US, and data suggest there may be significant implementation challenges in this setting. Because Title X clinics vary greatly in provider-, organizational-, and systems-level characteristics, there is likely variation in capacity to implement PrEP across clinics.

METHODS

We conducted a survey from February to June 2018 among providers and administrators of non-PrEP-providing Title X-funded clinics across 18 southern states. Survey items were designed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to assess constructs relevant to PrEP implementation. To explore the heterogeneity of CFIR-related implementation determinants and identify distinct sub-groups of Title X clinics, a latent profile analysis was conducted using nine CFIR constructs: complexity, relative advantage, cost, attitudes, implementation climate, compatibility, leadership engagement, available resources, and cosmopolitanism. We then conducted a multi-level analysis (accounting for nesting of participants within clinics) to test whether group membership was associated with readiness for implementation of PrEP, controlling for key sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Four hundred and fourteen healthcare providers/administrators from 227 non-PrEP-providing Title X clinics participated in the study. We identified six sub-groups of clinics that each had distinct patterns of PrEP implementation determinants. Clinic sub-groups included "Highest Capacity for Implementation", "Favorable Conditions for Implementation", "Mixed Implementation Context", "Neutral Implementation Context", "Incompatible Setting for Implementation", and "Resource-Strained Setting". Group membership was related to numerous provider-level (i.e., ability to prescribe medication) and clinic-level (i.e., provision of primary care) characteristics. In comparison to the "Neutral" group (which held neutral perceptions across the implementation determinants), the "Highest Capacity" and "Favorable Conditions" groups had significantly higher levels of implementation readiness, and the "Resource-Strained" group had a significantly lower level of implementation readiness.

CONCLUSIONS

Latent profile analyses can help researchers understand how implementation readiness varies across healthcare settings, promoting tailoring of implementation strategies to unique contexts.

Educating Trainees to Manage Pregnant Women With Obesity: A Primer

This review is intended to outline essential resources for trainees in order to optimize education on the care of pregnant patients with obesity. Addressing provider biases, exploring ethical considerations of care and streamlining screening and counseling of patients with obesity will provide an excellent framework for our trainees to care for women with obesity from preconception to postpartum care and beyond.

Models of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care Used in Title X Family Planning Clinics in the Southern U.S

PURPOSE

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is underutilized by adolescent and young adult women, especially in the Southern U.S. Family planning (FP) clinics are potentially ideal PrEP delivery sites for adolescent and young adult women, but little is known about their PrEP services. We describe models of PrEP care in Title X FP clinics in the South and explore clinic resources that are needed to facilitate PrEP provision.

METHODS

Providers and administrators from 38 clinics participated in qualitative interviews. We assessed five steps of PrEP care: (1) HIV risk assessment; (2) PrEP education; (3) laboratory testing; (4) PrEP prescription; and (5) PrEP monitoring.

RESULTS

Among 38 clinics, 23 conducted at least one step and were classified into three models. Model 1 (n = 8) and Model 2 (n = 4) clinics provided up to Steps 1 and 2, respectively, but referred to an external PrEP provider. Model 3 clinics (n = 11) conducted all steps. Few barriers were identified for Step 1; using an HIV risk assessment tool was a key facilitator. PrEP educational materials facilitated Step 2; clinics not providing education believed they could easily do so with training and educational resources. Funding- and staff-related resource barriers were noted for Steps 3-5, including costs of laboratory tests and lack of time for longitudinal visits.

CONCLUSIONS

PrEP-providing publicly funded FP clinics in the Southern U.S. use referral services for many steps of PrEP care, which introduce patient burden. Increasing onsite PrEP services will require addressing concerns related to training, educational materials, cost, and staffing.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Screening for and Awareness of High Cholesterol Among Pregnant Women Receiving Prenatal Care

Background Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women, with younger women being disproportionately affected by traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as dyslipidemia. Despite recommendations for lipid screening in early adulthood and the risks associated with maternal dyslipidemia during pregnancy, many younger women lack access to and utilization of early screening. Accordingly, our objective was to assess the prevalence of and disparities in lipid screening and awareness of high cholesterol as an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factor among pregnant women receiving prenatal care. Methods and Results We invited 234 pregnant women receiving prenatal care at 1 of 3 clinics affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania Health System to complete our survey. A total of 200 pregnant women (86% response rate) completed the survey. Overall, 59% of pregnant women (mean age 32.2 [±5.7] years) self-reported a previous lipid screening and 79% of women were aware of high cholesterol as an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factor. Stratified by racial/ethnic subgroups, non-Hispanic Black women were less likely to report a prior screening (43% versus 67%, P=0.022) and had lower levels of awareness (66% versus 92%, P<0.001) compared with non-Hispanic White women. Non-Hispanic Black women were more likely to see an obstetrician/gynecologist for their usual source of non-pregnancy care compared with non-Hispanic White women (18% versus 5%, P=0.043). Those seeing an obstetrician/gynecologist for usual care were less likely to report a prior lipid screening compared with those seeing a primary care physician (29% versus 63%, P=0.007). Conclusions Significant racial/ethnic disparities persist in lipid screening and risk factor awareness among pregnant women. Prenatal care may represent an opportunity to enhance access to and uptake of screening among younger women and reduce variations in accessing preventive care services.

Diagnosis and management of hidradenitis suppurativa in women

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory disease that disproportionately affects women of childbearing age. Hidradenitis suppurativa is characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, draining dermal tunnels, and scarring with a predilection for intertriginous sites, such as the axilla, groin, and breast regions. Delay in diagnosis and treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa often results in long-term sequelae leading to significant morbidity, and rarely mortality, in these patients. This clinical opinion suggests that obstetrician-gynecologists are uniquely poised to recognize early signs of hidradenitis suppurativa during routine well-woman examinations and initiate treatment or referral to dermatology. Herein, we provide clinical pearls for obstetrician-gynecologists caring for female patients with hidradenitis suppurativa, including strategies for comprehensive management and recommendations to improve the comfort of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa during examinations.

Regional Variations in Maternal Mortality and Health Workforce Availability in the United States

BACKGROUND

Skilled, high-quality health providers and birth attendants are important for reducing maternal mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether U.S. regional variations in maternal mortality rates relate to health workforce availability.

DESIGN

Comparison of regional variations in maternal mortality rates and women's health provider rates per population and identification of a relationship between these measures.

SETTING

U.S. health system.

PARTICIPANTS

Women of child-bearing age and women's health providers, as captured in federal data sources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Census Bureau, and Health Resources and Services Administration.

MEASUREMENTS

Regional-to-national rate ratios for maternal mortality and women's health provider availability, calculated per population for women of reproductive age. Provider availability was examined across occupations (obstetrician-gynecologists, internal medicine physicians, family medicine physicians, certified nurse-midwives), in service-based categories (birth-attending and primary care providers), and across the entire women's health workforce (all studied occupations).

RESULTS

Maternal deaths per population increased nationally from 2009 to 2017 and, in 2017, were significantly higher in the South and lower in the Northeast (P < 0.001) than nationally. The occupational composition and per-population availability patterns of the women's health workforce varied regionally in 2017. The South had the lowest availability in the nation for nearly every health occupation and category studied, and the Northeast had the highest. This exploratory analysis suggests that subnational levels of provider availability across a region may be associated with higher maternal mortality rates.

LIMITATIONS

No causal relationship was established. Nationally representative maternal mortality and health workforce data sources have well-known limitations. Low numbers of observations limit statistical analyses.

CONCLUSION

Regional variations in maternal mortality rates may relate to the availability of birth-attending and primary care providers.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Integration Into Family Planning Services at Title X Clinics in the Southeastern United States: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Hybrid Type I Effectiveness Implementation Study (Phase 2 ATN 155)

Background

Adolescent and young adult women (AYAW), particularly racial and ethnic minorities, in the Southern United States are disproportionately affected by HIV. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective, scalable, individual-controlled HIV prevention strategy that is grossly underutilized among women of all ages and requires innovative delivery approaches to optimize its benefit. Anchoring PrEP delivery to family planning (FP) services that AYAW already trust, access routinely, and deem useful for their sexual health may offer an ideal opportunity to reach women at risk for HIV and to enhance their PrEP uptake and adherence. However, PrEP has not been widely integrated into FP services, including Title X–funded FP clinics that provide safety net sources of care for AYAW. To overcome potential implementation challenges for AYAW, Title X clinics in the Southern United States are uniquely positioned to be focal sites for conceptually informed and thoroughly evaluated PrEP implementation science studies.

Objective

The objective of this study is two-fold: to evaluate multilevel factors associated with the level of PrEP adoption and implementation (eg, PrEP screening, counseling, and prescription) within and across 3 FP clinics and to evaluate PrEP uptake, persistence, and adherence among female patients in these clinics over a 6-month follow-up period.

Methods

Phase 2 of Planning4PrEP (Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions 155) is a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness implementation study to be conducted in three clinics in Metro Atlanta, Georgia, United States. Guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework, this study will prepare clinics for PrEP integration via clinic-wide trainings and technical assistance and will develop clinic-specific PrEP implementation plans. We will monitor and evaluate PrEP implementation as well as female patient PrEP uptake, persistence, and adherence over a 6-month follow-up period.

Results

Phase 2 of Planning4PrEP research activities began in February 2018 and are ongoing. Qualitative data analysis is scheduled to begin in Fall 2020.

Conclusions

This study seeks to evaluate factors associated with the level of PrEP adoption and implementation (eg, PrEP screening, counseling, and prescription) within and across 3 FP clinics following training and implementation planning and to evaluate PrEP uptake, persistence, and adherence among female patients over a 6-month follow-up period. This will guide future strategies to support PrEP integration in Title X–funded clinics across the Southern United States.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04097834; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04097834

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/18784

A quality improvement collaborative increased preventive education and screening rates for women at high-risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care settings

AIMS

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) rates continue to increase across women of reproductive age in the United States. The Ohio Type 2 Diabetes Learning Collaborative aimed to improve education and screening for T2DM among women aged 18-44years at high risk for developing T2DM.

METHODS

Fifteen primary care practices across Ohio participated in a 12-month quality improvement (QI) collaborative, which included monthly calls to share best practices, one-on-one QI coaching, and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Monthly, practices submitted data on three outcome measures on preventive education and three measures on clinical screening for T2DM.

RESULTS

Increases across each of the three preventive education rates (range of percent increase: 53.6% - 60.0%) and each of the three screening rates for T2DM (15.0% - 19.4%) were observed. Specifically, screening rates for high-risk women with two or more risk factors for T2DM (excluding gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)) increased by 16.8% (60.5%-77.3%) while rates for T2DM among women with a history of GDM increased by 15.0% (75.0 - 90.0).

CONCLUSIONS

A quality improvement collaborative increased preventive education and screening rates for women at high-risk for T2DM in primary care settings.

Feasibility and Utility of a Cardiovascular Risk Screening Tool in Women Undergoing Routine Gynecology Evaluation

Background

The goals of this multicenter survey were to examine the prevalence and patient awareness of cardiovascular risk factors, and the association between history of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO—including gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, and preeclampsia) and prevalence of cardiovascular risks among women presenting to outpatient obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN) clinics.

Materials and Methods

We surveyed 2,946 female patients attending 16 outpatient OB/GYN clinics across the United States between January 2010 and January 2012. Main outcome measures were self-reported cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms such as angina and dyspnea.

Results

Mean age of the patients was 51 ± 13.6 years. Cardiovascular risks and symptoms were highly prevalent (86.0% and 40.1%, respectively). Many patients did not know if they had common risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or diabetes (18.4%, 32.0%, and 17.9%, respectively). Women with a history of APO were slightly more likely to be aware of common risk factors, including abnormal blood pressure (17% vs. 18.6%), high cholesterol (31.7% vs. 32%), and obesity/elevated body mass index (43.9% vs. 49.7%). Compared with patients with no history of APO, patients with APO (n = 380, 12.9%) were more likely to have risk factors (89.5% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.002) and symptoms (45.5% vs. 39.3%, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Awareness of cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms among all women surveyed in this study was poor, although awareness for some risk factors was relatively higher among patients with APO. This study demonstrates the feasibility of cardiovascular assessment in OB/GYN clinics using a simple questionnaire and its potential role for early recognition and timely intervention.

Program Evaluation of an Integrated Behavioral Health Clinic in an Outpatient Women's Health Clinic: Challenges and Considerations

Many women receive their regular check-ups and preventive care through a women's health clinic, including their behavioral health needs. Most of these clinics have not yet developed the capacity to adequately manage behavioral health concerns. We describe our clinical experience integrating behavioral health services into a women's health clinic. In one year, 108 women (54% White, M_age= 35) were referred for behavioral health treatment 47% were identified using a screening questionnaire, 51% were referred by their women's health provider and 2% were self-referred. The most common presenting concerns were anxiety (52%) and depressive symptoms (48%). Sixty-one (56%) patients completed an intake assessment, of whom 33 (54%) engaged in follow-up treatment (M = 3.7 treatment sessions, SD = 3.0). Behavioral health screening and treatment appears to be feasible and effective within a women's health setting. Further research is needed to overcome barriers to referrals and treatment engagement in this population.

Exploring Family-Medicine Providers' Perspectives on Group Care Visits for Maternal and Infant Nutrition Education

OBJECTIVE

Explore current maternal and infant nutrition education practices and family medicine primary care providers' views on a group care model to deliver nutrition education to mother-infant dyads.

DESIGN

In-depth interviews.

SETTING

Family medicine clinics in 1 Midwestern US hospital system.

PARTICIPANTS

Family medicine primary care providers (n = 17) who regularly see infants during well-baby visits.

PHENOMENON OF INTEREST

Current maternal and infant nutrition education practices; views on ideal way to deliver nutrition education to mother-infant dyads; feedback on group care model to deliver nutrition education to mother-infant dyads.

ANALYSIS

Audio recordings transcribed verbatim and coded using conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

Family medicine primary care providers are limited in the ability to provide maternal and infant nutrition education and desire a different approach. Group care was the preferred method; it was shared most frequently as the ideal approach to nutrition education delivery and participants reacted favorably when presented with this model. However, there were many concerns with group care (eg, moderating difficult conversations, program implementation logistics, sufficient group volume, and interruption in patient-provider relationship).

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Family medicine primary care providers desire a different approach to deliver nutrition education to mother-infant dyads in clinic. A group care model may be well-accepted among family medicine primary care providers but issues must be resolved before implementation. These results could inform future group care implementation studies and influence provider buy-in.

Lipids and Women's Health: Recent Updates and Implications for Practice

The obstetrician/gynecologist frequently serves as the primary care physician for women. Specialty-specific guidelines vary in screening recommendations for lipid disorders; women's health practitioners often follow recommendations to screen at age 45 in the absence of other risk factors. However, 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines recommend screening at age 21 to capture those at risk of cardiovascular disease and allow for early intervention with lifestyle and, in the most severe cases, evidence-based statins. We discuss the care of women who primarily benefit from screening: those with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), those with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) or polycystic ovary syndrome, and those with hypertriglyceridemia. Those with FH have elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from birth and a propensity for premature coronary heart disease. Early recognition of FH can allow risk-reducing interventions, as well as identification of additional affected relatives. Early detection of metabolic variables, such as in the MetS and hypertriglyceridemia, can lead to an enhanced focus on physical activity and heart-healthy diet. Finally, we discuss a practical approach to lipid management and review concerns regarding drug safety. Our objective is to provide a current overview of cardiovascular risk factor optimization that women's health practitioners can use in identifying and/or treating patients at risk for cardiovascular disease and diabetes.

Current Knowledge of Obesity Treatment Guidelines by Health Care Professionals

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess health care professionals' knowledge of evidence-based guidelines for the nonsurgical treatment of obesity.

METHODS

A nationally representative sample of internists, family practitioners, obstetricians/gynecologists, and nurse practitioners completed a web-based survey between June 9 and July 1, 2016 (n = 1,506).

RESULTS

Only 16% of respondents indicated that obesity counseling should be provided approximately twice monthly in an individual or group setting for at least 6 months, in accordance with United States Preventive Services Task Force and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines. Only 15% of respondents identified BMI ≥ 27 kg/m² with an obesity-associated comorbid condition as the appropriate indication to prescribe pharmacotherapy for patients. Two-thirds of respondents indicated that it is appropriate to continue long-term pharmacotherapy under conditions inconsistent with evidence-based guidelines, with nearly one-quarter indicating that obesity medications should never be prescribed beyond 3 months regardless of weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that provider understanding of appropriate clinical care for obesity is inconsistent with evidence-based recommendations. As coverage for behavioral counseling services and pharmacotherapy expands, it is imperative that health care professionals understand how to effectively leverage these treatment modalities to optimize health outcomes for patients with obesity.

Referral gynecological ambulatory clinic: principal diagnosis and distribution in health services

BACKGROUND

The association between gynecological diagnoses and their distribution in the health sectors provides benefits in the field of women's health promotion and in medical and interdisciplinary education, along with rationalization according to level of care complexity. Thus, the objective is analyze the clinical-demographic characteristics, main diagnoses in gynecological ambulatory care, and their distribution in health services.

METHOD

This is a research project of retrospective audit study design with a chart review of data from 428 women treated at University Ambulatory Clinic of Women's Health, the facility in gynecology and training for Family and Community Medical Residents, São Paulo, Brazil, from 2012 to 2014. Clinical and demographic information, gynecological diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases), and distribution of health services (primary, secondary, and tertiary) were described.

RESULTS

The female patients present non-inflammatory disorders of the female genital tract (81.07%, n = 347) and diseases of the urinary system (22.66%, n = 97) among the gynecological diagnoses. The chances of having benign breast disease and non-inflammatory disorders of the female genital tract during the reproductive period corresponds to being 3.61 (CI 1.00-16.29) and 2.56 times (CI 1.58-4.16) higher, respectively, than during the non-reproductive period. The non-inflammatory disorders of the female genital tract (93.33%, n = 28) are most related to the tertiary sector. The distribution in health services was the following: 71.30% (n = 305) in the primary sector, 21.70% (n = 93) in the secondary sector and 7% (n = 30) in the tertiary sector.

CONCLUSION

The studied women presented non-inflammatory disorders of the female genital tract and diseases of the urinary system as determined by gynecological diagnoses. Low-assistance complexity followed in most cases.

Young Women's Perceptions Regarding Communication with Healthcare Providers About Breast Cancer, Risk, and Prevention

BACKGROUND

Women younger than 45 years old have lower rates of breast cancer, but higher risk of recurrence and mortality after a cancer diagnosis. African American women are at risk for early onset and increased mortality; Ashkenazi Jewish women are at risk for genetic mutations leading to breast and ovarian cancer. Although younger women are encouraged to talk to doctors about their family history, little is known about these discussions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2015, 167 women aged 18-44 years participated in 20 focus groups segmented by geographic location, age, race/ethnicity, and family history of breast and ovarian cancer. Transcript data were analyzed using NVivo 10 software.

RESULTS

Although the majority of women talked to their doctor about breast and ovarian cancer, these conversations were brief and unsatisfying due to a lack of detail. Topics included family history, breast cancer screening, and breast self-examination. Some women with and without family history reported that healthcare providers offered screening and early detection advice based on their inquiries. However, few women took action or changed lifestyle behaviors with the intent to reduce risk as a result of the conversations.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversations with young women revealed missed opportunities to: enhance patient-provider communication and increase knowledge about breast cancer screening and surveillance for higher risk patients. Physicians, allied health professionals, and the public health community can better assist women in getting accurate and timely information about breast and ovarian cancer, understanding their family history to determine risk, and increasing healthy behaviors.

Obesity and Tobacco Cessation Toolkits: Practical Tips and Tools to Save Lives

Both obesity and smoking are public health burdens that together contribute to approximately one third of the deaths annually in the United States. In 2015, under the direction of Dr. Mark DeFrancesco, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened two workgroups with the purpose of creating toolkits that bring together information that the obstetrician-gynecologist can use to address these preventable health problems. An Obesity Prevention and Treatment Workgroup and a Tobacco and Nicotine Cessation Workgroup developed toolkits on Obesity Prevention and Treatment (www.acog.org/ObesityToolkit)andTobaccoandNicotineCessation(www.acog.org/TobaccoToolkit). The toolkits contain specific talking points, counseling methods, and algorithms to address these health concerns in a supportive, efficient, and effective manner. By including these methods in practice, clinicians can help prevent the tragedy of early deaths caused by obesity, tobacco, and nicotine use.

The Ohio Gestational Diabetes Postpartum Care Learning Collaborative: Development of a Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Systems of Care for Women

Objectives To improve clinical practice and increase postpartum visit Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) screening rates in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods We recruited clinical sites with at least half of pregnant patients enrolled in Medicaid to participate in an 18-month quality improvement (QI) project. To support clinical practice changes, we developed provider and patient toolkits with educational and clinical practice resources. Clinical subject-matter experts facilitated a learning network to train sites and promote discussion and learning among sites. Sites submitted data from patient chart reviews monthly for key measures that we used to provide rapid-cycle feedback. Providers were surveyed at completion regarding toolkit usefulness and satisfaction. Results Of fifteen practices recruited, twelve remained actively engaged. We disseminated more than 70 provider and 2345 patient toolkits. Documented delivery of patient education improved for timely GDM prenatal screening, reduction of future T2DM risk, smoking cessation, and family planning. Sites reported toolkits were useful and easy to use. Of women for whom postpartum data were available, 67 % had a documented postpartum visit and 33 % had a postpartum T2DM screen. Lack of information sharing between prenatal and postpartum care providers was are barriers to provision and documentation of care. Conclusions for Practice QI and toolkit resources may improve the quality of prenatal education. However, postpartum care did not reach optimal levels. Future work should focus on strategies to support coordination of care between obstetrical and primary care providers.

Preventive Care in Women's Health

Specialists in general obstetrics and gynecology are key providers of primary care in women. They diagnose and provide the initial management of many medical conditions unrelated to reproductive health. Most importantly they can impact the overall health of patients through incorporating preventive approaches in the annual well-woman visit. This article defines preventive care and identifies leading causes of mortality in women. A framework for identifying key elements of the well-woman examination is summarized. Examples of prevention are provided, which focus on major health care issues that affect adult women.

Rethinking the Well Woman Visit: A Scoping Review to Identify Eight Priority Areas for Well Woman Care in the Era of the Affordable Care Act

PURPOSE

The annual pap smear for cervical cancer screening, once a mainstay of the well woman visit (WWV), is no longer recommended for most low-risk women. This change has led many women and their health care providers to wonder if they should abandon this annual preventive health visit altogether. Changing guidelines coinciding with expanded WWV coverage for millions of American women under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act have created confusion for health care consumers and care givers alike. Is there evidence to support continued routine preventive health visits for women and, if so, what would ideally constitute the WWV of today?

METHODS

A scoping review of the literature was undertaken to appraise the current state of evidence regarding a wide range of possible elements to identify priority areas for the WWV.

FINDINGS

A population health perspective taking into consideration the reproductive health needs of women as well as the preventable and modifiable leading causes of death and disability was used to identify eight domains for the WWV of today: 1) reproductive life planning and sexual health, 2) cardiovascular disease and stroke, 3) prevention, screening, and early detection of cancers, 4) unintended injury, 5) anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and suicidal intent, 6) intimate partner violence, assault, and homicide, 7) lower respiratory disease, and 8) arthritis and other musculoskeletal problems.

CONCLUSIONS

The WWV remains a very important opportunity for prevention, health education, screening, and early detection and should not be abandoned.

A population-based study of US women's preferred versus usual sources of reproductive health care

OBJECTIVE

We characterized US women's preferred and usual sources of reproductive health care.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were drawn from the Women's Health Care Experiences and Preferences Study, an Internet survey of 1078 women aged 18-55 years randomly sampled from a national probability panel. We described and compared women's preferred and usual sources of care (women's health specialists including obstetricians-gynecologists and family-planning clinics, primary care, other) for Papanicolaou/pelvic examination, contraception, and sexually transmitted infection (STI) services using χ(2), logistic regression, and kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Among women reporting health service utilization (n = 984, 92% overall; 77% Papanicolaou/pelvic; 33% contraception; 8% STI), women's health specialists were the most used sources of care for Papanicolaou/pelvic (68%), contraception (74%), and STI (75%) services. Women's health specialists were also the most preferred care sources for Papanicolaou/pelvic (68%), contraception (49%), and STI (35%) services, whereas the remainder of women preferred primary care/other sources or not to get care. Differences in preferred and usual care sources were noted across sociodemographic groups, including insurance status and income level (P < .05). Preference for women's health specialists was the strongest predictor of women's health specialist utilization for Papanicolaou/pelvic (adjusted odds ratio, 48.8; 95% confidence interval, 25.9-91.8; P < .001) and contraceptive (adjusted odds ratio, 194.5; 95% confidence interval, 42.3-894.6; P < .001) services. Agreement between preferred and usual-care sources was high for Papanicolaou/pelvic (85%, kappa, 0.63) and contraception (86%; kappa, 0.64) services; disagreement (range, 15-22%) was associated with insurance, employment, income, race, and religion (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Women's preferences for and use of women's health specialists for reproductive health care has implications for efforts to define the role of obstetricians-gynecologists and family planning clinics in current health systems.

Contraceptive service needs of women with young children presenting for pediatric care

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study is to characterize the need for contraceptive services and contraceptive method use among women with young children presenting to child health clinics. A secondary objective is to characterize the factors, including access to care and health needs, that exist in this population and to evaluate their association with contraceptive method use.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study of women with children under age 36 months presenting to four child health practices in the Baltimore, Maryland, area. Participating women completed a survey to assess desire for pregnancy, contraceptive method use and related characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 238 participants (82%) were in need of contraceptive services (fertile and not desiring pregnancy). Overall, 59 (25%) of women in need were not using a contraceptive method (unmet need) and 79 (33%) were using a highly effective method (implant or intrauterine device). Factors associated with lower odds of unmet need for contraceptive services included attendance at a routine postpartum visit and visiting a healthcare provider to discuss contraception after pregnancy. Approximately half of index pregnancies were unintended and this was the only health factor associated with greater odds of using of a highly effective contraceptive method.

CONCLUSIONS

Most women presenting with young children for pediatric care indicated that they were not currently trying to become pregnant and reported current methods of pregnancy prevention that ranged from none to highly effective. Women who had not sought postpregnancy contraceptive care were more likely to have unmet need for contraceptive services.

IMPLICATIONS

Child health clinics may be a novel site for providing contraceptive care to women with children as part of a strategy to reduce unplanned pregnancies.

Ohio primary health care providers' practices and attitudes regarding screening women with prior gestational diabetes for type 2 diabetes mellitus--2010

INTRODUCTION

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with a 7-fold increased lifetime risk for developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Early diagnosis of type 2 diabetes is crucial for preventing complications. Despite recommendations for type 2 diabetes screening every 1 to 3 years for women with previous diagnoses of GDM and all women aged 45 years or older, screening prevalence is unknown. We sought to assess Ohio primary health care providers' practices and attitudes regarding assessing GDM history and risk for progression to type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

During 2010, we mailed surveys to 1,400 randomly selected Ohio family physicians and internal medicine physicians; we conducted analyses during 2011-2013. Overall responses were weighted to adjust for stratified sampling. Chi-square tests compared categorical variables.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 34% (380 eligible responses). Among all respondents, 57% reported that all new female patients in their practices are routinely asked about GDM history; 62% reported screening women aged 45 years or younger with prior GDM every 1 to 3 years for glucose intolerance; and 42% reported that screening for type 2 diabetes among women with prior GDM is a high or very high priority in their practice.

CONCLUSION

Because knowing a patient's GDM history is the critical first step in the prevention of progression to type 2 diabetes for women who had GDM, suboptimal screening for both GDM history and subsequent glucose abnormalities demonstrates missed opportunities for identifying and counseling women with increased risk for type 2 diabetes.