Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults

Survey of awareness and beliefs about cancer (ABC) in Tehran Province, Iran

INTRODUCTION

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices are essential measures for planning and evaluating cancer control programs. Little is known about these in Iran.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based interview survey of adults aged 30-70 using the Farsi version of the Awareness and Beliefs about Cancer questionnaire in the capital province of Tehran, Iran, 2019. We calculated weighted estimates of levels of cancer knowledge, attitudes, and practices to allow for different selection probabilities and nonresponse. We used multivariate logistic regression to understand demographic factors associated with bowel, cervix, and breast screening practices.

RESULTS

We interviewed 736 men and 744 women. The mean number of recalled cancer warning signs was less than one; 57.7% could not recall any cancer warning signs. Participants recognized 5.6 out of 11 early cancer warning signs and 8.8 of 13 cancer risk factors. Most (82.7%) did not know that HPV infection was a cancer risk factor. Approximately, half had negative attitudes towards cancer treatment, but over 80% had positive attitudes towards the effectiveness of screening for improving survival. Colorectal, breast, and cervical screening rates were 24%, 42%, and 49%, respectively. Higher socioeconomic status increased the odds of taking up screening for cancer. Women aged 60-70 were less likely to report taking up breast and cervical screening than younger women.

DISCUSSION

The Iranian population has poor awareness and negative attitudes about cancer, and participation in screening programs is low. Public awareness and early detection of cancer should be promoted in Iran.

Racial Disparities in Sacral Neuromodulation for Idiopathic Fecal Incontinence

IMPORTANCE

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective treatment for fecal incontinence (FI). Previous studies found that Black women undergo SNM for urinary incontinence less than White women, but there is less known about racial disparities for FI.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed differences in Black and White patients' FI treatment; SNM counseling was the primary outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult non-Hispanic Black and White patients who received FI treatment at an academic institution from 2011 to 2021. Medical records were queried for treatments, testing, and treating specialties for a 2:1 age-matched cohort of White:Black patients.

RESULTS

Four hundred forty-seven women were included: 149 Black women and 298 age-matched White women. A total of 24.4% (109) of patients had documented SNM counseling, significantly fewer in Black patients (14.8% vs 29.2%, P < 0.001). A total of 5.1% (23) of patients received SNM, less frequent in Black patients (2.7% vs 6.4%, P = 0.003). Among patients with SNM counseling, there was no difference between cohorts. Black patients were less likely to be referred for physical therapy (59.7% vs 77.2%, P < 0.001), sphincter imaging (0.7% vs 5.7%, P = 0.011), and defecography (8.1% vs 17.1%, P = 0.009). Different specialties managed the 2 cohorts. Black patients were less likely to see urogynecology and colorectal surgery (21.5% vs 34.6%, P = 0.004; 9.4% vs 15.4%, P = 0.077). Patients seen by these surgeons were more likely to discuss SNM (48.6% vs 8.5%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There were differences between Black and White patients' FI treatment, including counseling about SNM. Multidisciplinary work is needed to provide equitable education for this life-altering condition.

United States-Based Colorectal Cancer Surgical Trials Lack Representation and Adequate Reporting of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Participants: Systematic Review and Regression Analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the established National Institute of Health Revitalization Act, which aims to include ethnic and racial minority representation in surgical trials, racial and ethnic enrollment disparities persist.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the proportion of patients from minority races and ethnicities that are included in colorectal cancer surgical trials and reporting characteristics.

DATA SOURCES

Search was performed using MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria included 1) trials performed in the United States between January 1, 2000, and May 30, 2022; 2) patients with colorectal cancer diagnosis; and 3) surgical intervention, technique, or postoperative outcome. Trials evaluating chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or other nonsurgical interventions were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Pooled proportion and regression analysis was performed to identify the proportion of patients by race and ethnicity included in surgical trials and the association of year of publication and funding source.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of trials reporting race and ethnicity and proportion of participants by race and ethnicity included in surgical trials.

RESULTS

We screened 10,673 unique publications, of which 80 were examined in full text. Fifteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Ten (66.7%) trials did not report race, 3 reported races as a proportion of White participants only, and 3 reported 3 or more races. There was no description of ethnicity in 11 (73.3%) trials, with 2 describing "non-Caucasian" as ethnicity and 2 describing only Hispanic ethnicity. Pooled proportion of White participants was 81.3%, of Black participants was 6.2%, of Asian participants was 3.6%, and of Hispanic participants was 3.5%.

LIMITATIONS

A small number of studies was identified that reported racial or ethnic characteristics of their participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Both race and ethnicity are severely underreported in colorectal cancer surgical trials. To improve outcomes and ensure the inclusion of vulnerable populations in innovative technologies and novel treatments, reporting must be closely monitored.

Perceived Economic Strain, Subjective Social Status, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Utilization in U.S. Men-A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Although socioeconomic status (SES) is fundamentally related to underutilization of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, the role of perceived economic strain and subjective social status with CRC screening is understudied. The aim of this study was to investigate whether greater perceived economic strain or lower subjective social status would decrease the odds of CRC screening uptake and being up-to-date with guideline-recommended CRC screening. We also explored interactions with household income and educational attainment. Cross-sectional survey-based data from men aged 45-75 years living in the United States (N = 499) were collected in February 2022. Study outcomes were ever completing a stool- or exam-based CRC screening test and being up-to-date with CRC screening. Perceived economic strain and subjective social status were the predictors. We conducted logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Greater perceptions of economic strain decreased odds of being up-to-date with CRC screening. Household income modified the association between perceived economic strain and completing a stool-based test; the association was stronger for men from lower-income households. In unadjusted models, higher subjective social status increased odds of completing an exam-based test and being up-to-date with CRC screening. Our findings suggest that experiencing economic strain may interfere with men's CRC screening decisions and may capture additional information about barriers to CRC screening utilization beyond those captured by income or education.

Patient Navigation Plus Tailored Digital Video Disc Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Low-Income and Minority Patients Who Did Not Attend a Scheduled Screening Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Up to 50% of people scheduled for screening colonoscopy do not complete this test and no studies have focused on minority and low-income populations. Interventions are needed to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening knowledge, reduce barriers, and provide alternative screening options. Patient navigation (PN) and tailored interventions increase CRC screening uptake, however there is limited information comparing their effectiveness or the effect of combining them.

PURPOSE

Compare the effectiveness of two interventions to increase CRC screening among minority and low-income individuals who did not attend their screening colonoscopy appointment-a mailed tailored digital video disc (DVD) alone versus the mailed DVD plus telephone-based PN compared to usual care.

METHODS

Patients (n = 371) aged 45-75 years at average risk for CRC who did not attend a screening colonoscopy appointment were enrolled and were randomized to: (i) a mailed tailored DVD; (ii) the mailed DVD plus phone-based PN; or (iii) usual care. CRC screening outcomes were from electronic medical records at 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to study intervention effects.

RESULTS

Participants randomized to tailored DVD plus PN were four times more likely to complete CRC screening compared to usual care and almost two and a half times more likely than those who were sent the DVD alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining telephone-based PN with a mailed, tailored DVD increased CRC screening among low-income and minority patients who did not attend their screening colonoscopy appointments and has potential for wide dissemination.

Investigating the role of county-level colorectal cancer screening rates on stage at diagnosis of colorectal cancer in rural Georgia

BACKGROUND

To examine the impact of county-level colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates on stage at diagnosis of CRC and identify factors associated with stage at diagnosis across different levels of screening rates in rural Georgia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis utilizing data from 2004 to 2010 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. The 2013 United States Department of Agriculture rural-urban continuum codes were used to identify rural Georgia counties. The 2004-2010 National Cancer Institute small area estimates for screening behaviors were applied to link county-level CRC screening rates. Descriptive statistics and multinominal logistic regressions were performed.

RESULTS

Among 4,839 CRC patients, most patients diagnosed with localized CRC lived in low screening areas; however, many diagnosed with regionalized and distant CRC lived in high screening areas (p-value = 0.009). In multivariable analysis, rural patients living in high screening areas were 1.2-fold more likely to be diagnosed at a regionalized and distant stage of CRC (both p-value < 0.05). When examining the factors associated with stage at presentation, Black patients who lived in low screening areas were 36% more likely to be diagnosed with distant diseases compared to White patients (95% CI, 1.08-1.71). Among those living in high screening areas, patients with right-sided CRC were 38% more likely to have regionalized disease (95% CI, 1.09-1.74).

CONCLUSION

Patients living in high screening areas were more likely to have a later stage of CRC in rural Georgia.

IMPACT

Allocating CRC screening/treatment resources and improving CRC risk awareness should be prioritized for rural patients in Georgia.

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines development: health equity update to standard operating procedure

INTRODUCTION

The SAGES Guidelines Committee creates evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Due to existing health disparities, recommendations made in these guidelines may have different impacts on different populations. The updates to our standard operating procedure described herein will allow us to produce well-designed guidelines that take these disparities into account and potentially reduce health inequities.

METHODS

This paper outlines updates to the SAGES Guidelines Committee Standard Operating Procedure in order to incorporate issues of heath equity into our guideline development process with the goal of minimizing downstream health disparities.

RESULTS

SAGES has developed an evidence-based, standardized approach to consider issues of health equity throughout the guideline development process to allow physicians to better counsel patients and make research recommendations to better address disparities.

CONCLUSION

Societies that promote guidelines within their organization must make an intentional effort to prevent the widening of health disparities as a result of their recommendations. The updates to the Guidelines Committee Standard Operating Procedure will hopefully lead to increased attention to these disparities and provide specific recommendations to reduce them.

Estimated Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening-Eligible Population in the US

This cross-sectional study estimates the number of average-risk colorectal cancer screening–eligible individuals in the US since the US Preventive Services Task Force updated its recommendations in 2021.

Evaluating Social Determinants of Health Related to Cancer Survivorship and Quality of Care

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health posit that negative outcomes are influenced by individuals living in underserved and underresourced neighborhoods.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines a cancer diagnosis, race/ethnicity, age, geographic location (residence), education, and social economic status factors at disease onset and treatment.

METHODS

A multivariable PO regression analysis was run for quality of care at testing or diagnosis, and quality of care at treatment and the quality of received care compared with another person.

RESULTS

Participants are representative of the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS) of adults diagnosed with breast (n = 263), prostate (n = 195), lung (n = 46), colorectal (n = 105), or other cancers (n = 526). This study includes cancer survivors who completed the SCCS Baseline and Cancer Navigation Surveys in urban (73.13%) and rural (26.87%) areas. White participants reported a higher quality of received care for testing or diagnosis and care for treatment compared with Black participants. Participants with high school or equivalent education (odds ratio, 1.662; 95% confidence interval, 1.172-2.356; P = .0044) or some college or junior college education (odds ratio, 1.970; 95% confidence interval, 1.348-2.879; P = .0005) were more likely to report a better level of quality of received care for treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCCS represents individuals who are historically underrepresented in cancer research. The results of this study will have broad implications across diverse communities to reduce disparities and inform models of care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses are positioned to evaluate the quality of population health and design and lead interventions that will benefit underserved and underresourced communities.

Racial disparities in the relationship of regional socioeconomic status and colorectal cancer survival in the five regions of Georgia

INTRODUCTION

The study's purpose was to examine 5-year colorectal cancer (CRC) survival rates between White and Black patients. We also determined whether regional socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with CRC survival between White and Black patients in the Clayton, West Central, East Central, Southeast, and Northeast Georgia public health districts.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the 1975 to 2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. The 2015 United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Services county typology codes were used to identify region-level SES with persistent poverty, low employment, and low education. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression were performed.

RESULTS

Among 10,876 CRC patients (31.1% Black patients), 5-year CRC survival rates were lower among Black patients compared to White patients (65.4% vs. 69.9%; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, White patients living in regions with persistent poverty had a 1.1-fold increased risk of CRC death (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00-1.25) compared to those living in non-persistent poverty regions. Among Black patients, those living in regions with low education were at a 1.2-fold increased risk of CRC death (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01-1.40) compared to those living in non-low education regions.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Black patients demonstrated lower CRC survival rates in Georgia compared to their White counterparts. White patients living in regions with persistent poverty, and Black patients living in regions with low education had an increased risk of CRC death. Our findings provide important evidence to all relevant stakeholders in allocating health resources aimed at CRC early detection and prevention and timely referral for CRC treatment by considering the patient's regional SES in Georgia.

Machine Learning as a Tool for Early Detection: A Focus on Late-Stage Colorectal Cancer across Socioeconomic Spectrums

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of various machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting late-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses against the backdrop of socio-economic and regional healthcare disparities.

METHODS

An innovative theoretical framework was developed to integrate individual- and census tract-level social determinants of health (SDOH) with sociodemographic factors. A comparative analysis of the ML models was conducted using key performance metrics such as AUC-ROC to evaluate their predictive accuracy. Spatio-temporal analysis was used to identify disparities in late-stage CRC diagnosis probabilities.

RESULTS

Gradient boosting emerged as the superior model, with the top predictors for late-stage CRC diagnosis being anatomic site, year of diagnosis, age, proximity to superfund sites, and primary payer. Spatio-temporal clusters highlighted geographic areas with a statistically significant high probability of late-stage diagnoses, emphasizing the need for targeted healthcare interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

This research underlines the potential of ML in enhancing the prognostic predictions in oncology, particularly in CRC. The gradient boosting model, with its robust performance, holds promise for deployment in healthcare systems to aid early detection and formulate localized cancer prevention strategies. The study's methodology demonstrates a significant step toward utilizing AI in public health to mitigate disparities and improve cancer care outcomes.

County-level colorectal cancer screening rates on colorectal cancer survival in the state of Georgia: Does county-level rurality matter?

PURPOSE

Investigating CRC screening rates and rurality at the county-level may explain disparities in CRC survival in Georgia. Although a few studies examined the relationship of CRC screening rates, rurality, and/or CRC outcomes, they either used an ecological study design or focused on the larger population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis utilizing data from the 2004-2010 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. The 2013 United States Department of Agriculture rural-urban continuum codes and 2004-2010 National Cancer Institute small-area estimates for screening behaviors were used to identify county-level rurality and CRC screening rates. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression were performed.

RESULTS

Among 22,160 CRC patients, 5-year CRC survival rates were lower among CRC patients living in low screening areas in comparison with intermediate/high areas (69.1% vs. 71.6% /71.3%; p-value = 0.030). Patients living in rural high-screening areas also had lower survival rates compared to non-rural areas (68.2% vs. 71.8%; p-value = 0.009). Our multivariable analysis demonstrated that patients living in intermediate (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98) and high-screening (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99) areas were at 8%-9% reduced risk of CRC death. Further, non-rural CRC patients living in intermediate and high CRC screening areas were 9% (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-0.99) and 10% (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99) less likely to die from CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower 5-year survival rates were observed in low screening and rural high-screening areas. Living in intermediate/high CRC screening areas was negatively associated with the risk of CRC death. Particularly, non-rural patients living in intermediate/high-screening areas were 8%-9% less likely to die from CRC. Targeted CRC screening resources should be prioritized for low screening and rural communities.

Social Deprivation and End-of-Life Care Use Among Adults With Cancer

PURPOSE

Socioeconomic differences are partially responsible for racial inequities in cancer outcomes, yet the association of area-level socioeconomic disadvantage and race with end-of-life (EOL) cancer care quality is poorly understood.

METHODS

This retrospective study used electronic medical records from an academic health system to identify 33,635 adults with cancer who died between 2013 and 2019. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined associations between decedent characteristics and EOL care, including emergency department (ED) visits, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, palliative care consultation (PCC), hospice order, and in-hospital deaths. Social deprivation index was used to measure socioeconomic disadvantages.

RESULTS

Racially minoritized decedents had higher odds of ICU stay than the least deprived White decedents (eg, other race Q3: aOR, 2.06 [99% CI, 1.26 to 0.3.39]). White and Black decedents from more deprived areas had lower odds of ED visit (White Q3: aOR, 0.382 [99% CI, 0.263 to 0.556]; Black Q3: aOR, 0.566 [99% CI, 0.373 to 0.858]) than least deprived White decedents. Compared with White decedents living in least deprived areas, racially minoritized decedents had higher odds of receiving PCC and hospice order, whereas White decedents in most deprived areas had lower odds of PCC (aOR, 0.727 [99% CI, 0.592 to 0.893]) and hospice order (aOR, 0.845 [99% CI, 0.724 to 0.986]). Greater deprivation was associated with greater odds of hospital death relative to least deprived White decedents, but only among minoritized decedents (eg, Black Q4: aOR, 2.16 [99% CI, 1.82 to 2.56]).

CONCLUSION

Area-level socioeconomic disadvantage is not uniformly associated with poorer EOL cancer care, with differences among decedents of different racial groups.

Disparities in Cancer Incidence across Income Levels in South Korea

BACKGROUND

Recent nationwide studies of disparities in cancer incidence by income are scarce in Korea. This study investigated such disparities in cancer incidence and the stage at cancer diagnosis across income groups in Korea.

METHODS

This study utilized data from a national cancer database, specifically focusing on cases recorded in the year 2018. Income levels were categorized into quintiles according to the insurance premium paid in addition to the Medicaid benefit. The slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII) were used to measure absolute and relative differences in cancer incidence by income. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the risk of a distant stage at cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

The total number of cases of incident cancer was 223,371 (men: 116,320, women: 107,051) with shares of the total of 29.5% (5Q), 20.4% (4Q), 16.0% (3Q), 13.5% (2Q), 15.6% (1Q), and 5% (Medicaid). The most common cancer type was thyroid cancer, followed by gastric and colorectal cancers. The age-standardized incidence rate for all cancers was lowest in the highest income group, but the SII was not statistically significant (SII: -35.7), and the RII was -0.07. Colorectal and cervical cancers had lower incidence rates for higher income groups, while thyroid and prostate cancers had higher incidence rates for higher income groups. The odds ratio for a distant stage at diagnosis for all cancers increased for lower income groups relative to 5Q.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in cancer incidence in a Korean population differed by cancer type, and lower income was a significant predictor of a distant stage at diagnosis for cancers overall. These results emphasize the need for further study of the underlying causes of disparities in cancer incidence and the stage at diagnosis, as well as the need for interventions to mitigate these disparities.

Impact of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on incident and prevalent esophageal cancer in patients with Barrett's esophagus

The impact of race/ethnicity (RE) or socioeconomic status (SES) on progression from Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal cancer (EC) is not well established. We aimed to evaluate the association between demographic factors and SES on EC diagnosis in an ethnically diverse BE cohort. Patients aged 18-63 with incident BE diagnosed in October 2015-March 2020 were identified in the Optum Clinformatics DataMart Database. Patients were followed until the diagnosis of prevalent EC <1 year or incident EC ≥1 year from BE diagnosis, or until the end of their continuous enrollment period. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine associations between demographics, SES factors, BE risk factors, and EC. Demographics of the 12,693 patients included mean age of BE diagnosis 53.0 (SD 8.5) years, 56.4% male, 78.3% White/10.0% Hispanic/6.4% Black/3.0% Asian. The median follow-up was 26.8 (IQR 19.0-42.0) months. In total, 75 patients (0.59%) were diagnosed with EC (46 [0.36%] prevalent EC; 29 [0.23%] incident EC), and 74 patients (0.58%) developed high-grade dysplasia (HGD) (46 [0.36%] prevalent HGD; 28 [0.22%] incident HGD). Adjusted HR (95% CI) for prevalent EC comparing household net worth ≥$150,000 vs. <$150,000 was 0.57 (0.33-0.98). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) for prevalent and incident EC comparing non-White vs. White patients were 0.93 (0.47-1.85) and 0.97 (0.21-3.47), respectively. In summary, a lower SES, captured by the household net worth, was associated with prevalent EC. There was no significant difference in prevalent or incident EC among White vs. non-White patients. EC progression in BE may be similar among racial/ethnic groups, but SES disparities may impact BE outcomes.

Type 2 Diabetes and Colorectal Cancer Risk

Importance

Type 2 diabetes and colorectal cancer (CRC) disproportionately burden indviduals of low socioeconomic status and African American race. Although diabetes is an emerging CRC risk factor, associations between diabetes and CRC in these populations are understudied.

Objective

To determine if diabetes is associated with CRC risk in a cohort representing understudied populations.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study uses data from the prospective Southern Community Cohort Study in the US, which recruited from 2002 to 2009 and completed 3 follow-up surveys by 2018. Of about 85 000 participants, 86% enrolled at community health centers, while 14% were enrolled via mail or telephone from the same 12 recruitment states. Participants with less than 2 years of follow-up, previous cancer diagnosis (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) at enrollment, missing enrollment diabetes status, diabetes diagnosis before age 30, and without diabetes at enrollment with no follow-up participation were excluded. Data were analyzed from January to September 2023.

Exposures

Physician-diagnosed diabetes and age at diabetes diagnosis were self-reported via survey at enrollment and 3 follow-ups.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Diabetes diagnosis was hypothesized to be positively associated with CRC risk before analysis. Incident CRC was assessed via state cancer registry and National Death Index linkage. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were obtained via Cox proportional hazard models, using time-varying diabetes exposure.

Results

Among 54 597 participants, the median (IQR) enrollment age was 51 (46-58) years, 34 786 (64%) were female, 36 170 (66%) were African American, and 28 792 (53%) had income less than $15 000 per year. In total, 289 of 25 992 participants with diabetes developed CRC, vs 197 of 28 605 participants without diabetes. Diabetes was associated with increased CRC risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.21-1.79). Greater associations were observed among participants without colonoscopy screening (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.16-3.67) and with smoking history (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.14-2.31), potentially due to cancer screening differences. Greater associations were also observed for participants with recent diabetes diagnoses (diabetes duration <5 years compared with 5-10 years; HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.77-3.67), possibly due to recent screening.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study where the majority of participants were African American with low socioeconomic status, diabetes was associated with elevated CRC risk, suggesting that diabetes prevention and control may reduce CRC disparities. The association was attenuated for those who completed colonoscopies, highlighting how adverse effects of diabetes-related metabolic dysregulation may be disrupted by preventative screening.

Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening using the 5As framework: A systematic review of US studies

Despite clear evidence that regular screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and the availability of multiple effective screening options, CRC screening continues to be underutilized in the US. A systematic literature search of four databases - Ovid, Medline, EBSCHOhost, and Web of Science - was conducted to identify US studies published after 2017 that reported on barriers and facilitators to CRC screening adherence. Articles were extracted to categorize relevant CRC screening barriers or facilitators that were assessed against CRC screening outcomes using the 5As dimensions: Access, Affordability, Acceptance, Awareness, Activation. Sixty-one studies were included. Fifty determinants of screening within the 5As framework and two additional dimensions including Sociodemographics and Health Status were identified. The Sociodemographics, Access, and Affordability dimensions had the greatest number of studies included. The most common factor in the Access dimension was contact with healthcare systems, within the Affordability dimension was insurance, within the Awareness dimension was knowledge CRC screening, within the Acceptance dimension was health beliefs, within the Activation dimension was prompts and reminders, within the Sociodemographics dimension was race/ethnicity, and among the Health Status dimension was chronic disease history. Among all studies, contact with healthcare systems, insurance, race/ethnicity, age, and education were the most common factors identified. CRC screening barriers and facilitators were identified across individual, clinical, and sociocontextual levels. Interventions that consider multilevel strategies will most effectively increase CRC screening adherence.

Hyperlocal disparities in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: An ecological study of social vulnerability in Miami-Dade county

Neighborhoods have been identified as important determinants of health-related outcomes, but limited research has assessed the influence of neighborhood context along the cancer continuum. This study used census tract-level data from the United States Census Bureau and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to characterize Miami-Dade County census tracts (n = 492) into social vulnerability clusters and assess their associated breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening participation rates. We identified disparities by social vulnerability cluster in cancer screening participation rates. Further investigation of geographic disparities in social vulnerability and cancer screening participation could inform equity-focused cancer control efforts.

Associations of Albumin and BMI with Colorectal Cancer Risk in the Southern Community Cohort Study: a Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Obesity may increase colorectal cancer (CRC) risk through mechanisms of increased inflammation. Although BMI is the most used adiposity indicator, it may less accurately measure adiposity in Black populations. Herein, we investigate associations between BMI, low albumin as an inflammation biomarker, and CRC risk in a racially diverse cohort.

METHODS

Participant data arise from 71,141 participants of the Southern Community Cohort Study, including 724 incident CRC cases. Within the cohort, 69% are Black. Blood serum albumin concentrations, from samples taken at enrollment, were available for 235 cases and 567 controls. Controls matched by age, sex, and race were selected through incidence density sampling. Cox proportional hazards calculated BMI and CRC risk associations (hazard ratios [HRs]; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]. Conditional logistic regression calculated albumin and CRC risk associations (odds ratios [ORs]; 95%CIs).

RESULTS

Underweight, but not overweight or obese, compared to normal BMI was associated with increased CRC risk (HR:1.75, 95%CI:1.00-3.09). Each standard deviation increase of albumin was associated with decreased CRC risk, particularly for those who self-identified as non-Hispanic Black (OR: 0.56, 95%CI:0.34-0.91), or female (OR:0.54, 95%CI:0.30-0.98), but there was no evidence for interaction by these variables (p-interactions > 0.05). Moreover, albumin concentration was lower in Black than White participants. Mediation analysis suggested that the relation between albumin and CRC was not mediated by BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Null associations of overweight/obesity with CRC risk demonstrates limited utility of BMI, especially among Black populations. Low albumin may indicate CRC risk. In Black individuals, albumin may better predict adiposity related risks than BMI.

Perceived economic pressure and colorectal cancer-related perceptions among U.S. males (aged 45-75)

PURPOSE

To examine whether a greater perception of economic pressure would be associated with more-negative attitudes, greater perceived barriers, and lower subjective norms regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC screening among males aged 45-75 years.

METHODS

We recruited 492 self-identified males aged 45-75 years living in the United States. We operationalized perceived economic pressure as a latent factor with three subscales: can't make ends meet, unmet material needs, and financial cutbacks. Our dependent variables were attitudes toward CRC and CRC screening, perceived barriers to completing a CRC screening exam, and subjective norms regarding CRC screening (e.g., how others value CRC screening). We tested a hypothesized model using structural equation modeling with maximum-likelihood estimation, adjusting for covariates, and made post-hoc modifications to improve model fit.

RESULTS

Greater perceived economic pressure was associated with more-negative attitudes toward CRC and CRC screening (β = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.37,0.57) and with greater perceived barriers to CRC screening (β = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.34), but was not significantly associated with subjective norms (β = 0.07, 95% CI: - 0.05, 0.19). Perceived economic pressure was an indirect pathway by which lower-income and younger age were associated with more-negative attitudes and greater perceived barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is one of the first to show that, among males, perceived economic pressure is associated with two social-cognitive mechanisms (i.e., negative attitudes, greater perceived barriers) that are known to influence CRC screening intent and, ultimately, CRC screening completion. Future research on this topic should employ longitudinal study designs.

Associations of Race, Ethnicity, and Social Determinants of Health With Colorectal Cancer Screening

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of recommended colorectal cancer screening exist; however, the impact of social determinants of health on such disparities has not been recently studied in a national cohort.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether social determinants of health attenuate racial disparities in receipt of colorectal cancer screening.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional telephone survey of self-reported race and ethnicity and up-to-date colorectal cancer screening. Associations between race/ethnicity and colorectal cancer screening were tested before and after adjustment for demographics, behavioral factors, and social determinants of health.

SETTING

This was a nationally representative telephone survey of US residents in 2018.

PATIENTS

The patients included were US residents aged 50 to 75 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was up-to-date colorectal cancer screening status, according to 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.

RESULTS

This study included 226,106 respondents aged 50 to 75 years. Before adjustment, all minority racial and ethnic groups demonstrated a significantly lower odds of screening than those of non-Hispanic white respondents. After adjustment for demographics, behavioral factors, and social determinants of health, compared to non-Hispanic white respondents, odds of screening were found to be increased among non-Hispanic black respondents (OR, 1.10; p = 0.02); lower but attenuated among Hispanic respondents (OR, 0.73; p < 0.001), non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Native respondents (OR, 0.85; p = 0.048), and non-Hispanic respondents of other races (OR, 0.82; p = 0.01); and lower but not attenuated among non-Hispanic Asian respondents (OR, 0.68; p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

Recall bias, participant bias, and residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjustment for social determinants of health reduced racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening among all minority racial and ethnic groups except non-Hispanic Asian individuals; however, other unmeasured confounders likely exist. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B977 .

ASOCIACIN DE RAZA, ETNICIDAD Y DETERMINANTES SOCIALES DE LA SALUD CON LA DETECCIN DEL CNCER COLORRECTAL

ANTECEDENTES: Existen disparidades raciales y étnicas en la recepción de las pruebas recomendadas de detección de cáncer colorrectal; sin embargo, el impacto de los determinantes sociales de la salud en dichas disparidades no se ha estudiado recientemente en una cohorte nacional.OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si los determinantes sociales de la salud atenúan las disparidades raciales en la recepción de pruebas de detección del cáncer colorrectal.DISEÑO: Encuesta telefónica transversal de raza y etnia autoinformada y detección actualizada de cáncer colorrectal. Las asociaciones entre la raza/etnicidad y la detección del cáncer colorrectal se probaron antes y después del ajuste por demografía, factores conductuales y determinantes sociales de la salud.ESCENARIO: Esta fue una encuesta telefónica representativa a nivel nacional de los residentes de EE. UU. en 2018.PACIENTES: Los pacientes eran residentes de EE. UU. de 50 a 75 años.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Estado actualizado de detección de cáncer colorrectal, según las recomendaciones del Grupo de Trabajo de Servicios Preventivos de EE. UU. de 2008.RESULTADOS: Este estudio incluyó a 226.106 encuestados de 50 a 75 años. Antes del ajuste, todos los grupos étnicos y raciales minoritarios demostraron probabilidades significativamente más bajas de detección en comparación con los encuestados blancos no hispanos. Después del ajuste por demografía, factores conductuales y determinantes sociales de la salud, en comparación con los encuestados blancos no hispanos, las probabilidades de detección aumentaron entre los encuestados negros no hispanos (OR 1,10, p = 0,02); más bajo pero atenuado entre los encuestados hispanos (OR 0,73, p < 0,001), los encuestados indios americanos/nativos de Alaska no hispanos (OR 0,85, p = 0,048) y los encuestados no hispanos de otras razas (OR 0,82, p = 0,01); y menor pero no atenuado entre los encuestados asiáticos no hispanos (OR 0,68, p < 0,001).LIMITACIONES: Sesgo de recuerdo y sesgo de participante, así como confusión residual.CONCLUSIONES: El ajuste para los determinantes sociales de la salud redujo las disparidades raciales y étnicas en la detección del cáncer colorrectal entre todos los grupos étnicos y raciales minoritarios, excepto las personas asiáticas no hispanas; sin embargo, es probable que existan otros factores de confusión no medidos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B977 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Racial Differences in Aging-Related Deficits Among Older Adults With Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite the known influences of both race- and aging-related factors in colorectal cancer outcomes and mortality, limited literature is available on the intersection between race and aging-related impairments.

OBJECTIVE

To explore racial differences in frailty and geriatric deficit subdomains among patients with colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective study using data from the Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation registry.

SETTINGS

A comprehensive cancer center in the Deep South.

PATIENTS

Older adults (aged ≥60 years) with colorectal cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Measure of frailty and geriatric assessment subdomains of physical function, functional status, cognitive complaints, psychological function, and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

Black patients lived in areas with a higher social vulnerability index compared to White patients (0.69 vs 0.49; p < 0.01) and had limited social support more often (54.5% vs 34.9%; p = 0.01). After adjustment for age, cancer stage, comorbidities, and social vulnerability index, Black patients were found to have a higher rate of frailty than White patients (adjusted OR 3.77; 95% CI, 1.76-8.18; p = 0.01). In addition, Black patients had more physical limitations (walking 1 block: adjusted OR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.02-3.69; p = 0.04), functional limitations (activities of daily living: adjusted OR 3.21; 95% CI, 1.42-7.24; p = 0.01), and deficits in health-related quality of life (poor global self-reported health: adjusted OR 2.45; 95% CI, 1.23-5.13; p = 0.01). Similar findings were shown after stratification by stage I to III vs IV.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study at a single institution.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older patients with colorectal cancer, Black patients were more likely to be frail than White patients, with deficits observed specifically in physical function, functional status, and health-related quality of life. Geriatric assessment may provide an important tool in addressing racial inequities in colorectal cancer.

DIFERENCIAS RACIALES EN LOS DFICITS RELACIONADOS CON EL ENVEJECIMIENTO ENTRE ADULTOS MAYORES CON CNCER COLORRECTAL

ANTECEDENTES: A pesar de las influencias conocidas de los factores relacionados con la raza y el envejecimiento en los resultados y la mortalidad del cáncer colorectal, hay muy poca literatura sobre la intersección entre los impedimentos relacionados con la raza y el envejecimiento.OBJETIVO: El objetivo era explorar las diferencias raciales en los subdominios de fragilidad y déficit geriátrico entre los pacientes con cáncer colorectal.DISEÑO: Estudio retrospectivo utilizando datos del registro Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation.AJUSTES: Un centro oncológico integral en el Sur Profundo.PACIENTES: Adultos mayores (≥60 años) con cáncer colorrectal de raza Negra o Blanca.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Medida compuesta de fragilidad y subdominios de evaluación geriátrica de función física, estado funcional, quejas cognitivas, función psicológica y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud.RESULTADOS: De los 304 pacientes incluidos, el 21,7% (n = 66) eran negros y la edad media era de 69 años. Los pacientes negros vivían en áreas con un índice de vulnerabilidad social (SVI) más alto en comparación con los pacientes blancos (SVI 0,69 vs 0,49; p < 0,01) y con mayor frecuencia tenían apoyo social limitado (54,5% vs 34,9%; p = 0,01). Después de ajustar por edad, estadio del cáncer, comorbilidades y SVI, los pacientes de raza negra tenían una mayor tasa de fragilidad en comparación con los pacientes de raza blanca (ORa 3,77, IC del 95%: 1,76-8,18; p = 0,01). Además, los pacientes negros tenían más limitaciones físicas (caminar 1 cuadra: ORa 1,93, IC 95% 1,02-3,69; p = 0,04), limitaciones funcionales (actividades de la vida diaria: ORa 3,21, IC 95% 1,42-7,24; p = 0,01 ) y déficits en la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (mala salud global autoinformada: ORa 2,45, IC 95% 1,23-5,13; p = 0,01). Las quejas cognitivas y las funciones psicológicas no difirieron según la raza (p > 0,05). Se mostraron hallazgos similares después de la estratificación por estadio I-III frente a IV.LIMITACIONES: Estudio retrospectivo en una sola institución.CONCLUSIONES: Entre los pacientes mayores con cáncer colorrectal, los pacientes negros tenían más probabilidades que los pacientes blancos de ser frágiles, observándose déficits específicamente en la función física, el estado funcional y la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud. La evaluación geriátrica puede proporcionar una herramienta importante para abordar las desigualdades raciales en el cáncer colorrectal.

[Socioeconomic status and cecal adenocarcinoma mortality risk: an American population-based analysis]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and disease mortality in patients with cecal adenocarcinoma in America through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End results (SEER) database.

METHODS

The SEER database was queried for patients with cecal adenocarcinoma in America diagnosed from 2011 to 2015. Factor analysis, cluster analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used for data analysis. Five social security factors were identified: factor 1, economic and educational disadvantage; factor 2, characteristics related to immigration (language isolation and foreign birth); factor 3, high relocation rate in the county; factor 4, high intra-state relocation rate; and factor 5, high domestic relocation rate. Five clusters defined by SES were identified.

RESULTS

The number of all-cause deaths among 17 185 patients was 5948, and the number of survivors was 11, 237. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, with cluster 1 (low poverty rate and high education level) as the reference, the hazard ratio (HR) of cluster 3 (high intra-county mobility rate) was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.04-1.21, P < 0.05), and the risk was 13% higher than that of cluster 1. The HR of cluster 4 (low language isolation, foreign birth, housing overcrowding, and intra-country mobility rates) was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07- 1.24, P < 0.001) with a 15% higher risk than cluster 1. The HR of cluster 5 (economic and educational disadvantages, immigration-related characteristics, and low intra-country mobility) was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03-1.20, P < 0.01) with a 11% higher risk. The factors related to SES indicators were based on the mortality of patients with cecal adenocarcinoma, indicating that low economic and education levels are risk factors for cecal adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Low socioeconomic status is associated with an increased risk of death in patients with cecal adenocarcinoma in the United States and show different distribution patterns based on population. Improving health insurance policies and strengthening psychotherapy can provide guidance for improving prognosis f cecal adenocarcinoma patients.

The role of area-level socioeconomic disadvantage in racial disparities in cancer incidence in metropolitan Detroit

BACKGROUND

Neighborhood deprivation is associated with both race and cancer incidence, but there is a need to better understand the effect of structural inequities on racial cancer disparities. The goal of this analysis was to evaluate the relationship between a comprehensive measure of neighborhood-level social disadvantage and cancer incidence within the racially diverse population of metropolitan Detroit.

METHODS

We estimated breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer incidence rates using Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System and US decennial census data. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) using Census Bureau's American Community Survey data at the Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMA) level. Associations between ADI at time of diagnosis and cancer incidence were estimated using Poisson mixed-effects models adjusting for age and sex. Attenuation of race-incidence associations by ADI was quantified using the "mediation" package in R.

RESULTS

ADI was inversely associated with incidence of breast cancer for both non-Hispanic White (NHW) and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women (NHW: per-quartile RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96; NHB: per-quartile RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98) and with prostate cancer incidence only for NHW men (per-quartile RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.97). ADI was positively associated with incidence of lung cancer for NHWs and NHBs (NHW: per-quartile RR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21; NHB: per-quartile RR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.25-1.51) and incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) only among NHBs (per-quartile RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21). ADI significantly attenuated the relationship between race and hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (proportion attenuated = 8.5%, 95% CI 4.1-16.6%) and CRC cancer (proportion attenuated = 7.3%, 95% CI 3.7 to 12.8%), and there was a significant interaction between race and ADI for lung (interaction RR = 1.22, p < 0.0001) and prostate cancer (interaction RR = 1.09, p = 0.00092).

CONCLUSIONS

Area-level socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with risk of common cancers in a racially diverse population and plays a role in racial differences in cancer incidence.

Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Factors as Determinants of Cachexia Incidence and Outcomes in a Retrospective Cohort of Patients With Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer

PURPOSE

Cachexia is a paraneoplastic syndrome of unintentional adipose and muscle tissue wasting with severe impacts to functionality and quality of life. Although health inequities across minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups are known, the role of these factors in cachexia progression is poorly characterized. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between these determinants and cachexia incidence and survival in patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer.

METHODS

Through retrospective chart review from a prospective tumor registry, we established a cohort of 882 patients with gastroesophageal or colorectal cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2013. Patient race, ethnicity, private insurance coverage, and baseline characteristics were evaluated through multivariate, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses to determine associations with cachexia incidence and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

When controlling for potentially confounding covariates (age, sex, alcohol and tobacco history, comorbidity score, tumor site, histology, and stage), Black (odds ratio [OR], 2.447; P < .0001) and Hispanic (OR, 3.039; P < .0001) patients are at an approximately 150% and 200%, respectively, greater risk of presenting with cachexia than non-Hispanic White patients. Absence of private insurance coverage was associated with elevated cachexia risk (OR, 1.439; P = .0427) compared to privately insured patients. Cox regression analyses with previously described covariates and treatment factors found Black race (hazard ratio [HR], 1.304; P = .0354) to predict survival detriments, while cachexia status did not reach significance (P = .6996).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that race, ethnicity, and insurance play significant roles in cachexia progression and related outcomes that are not accounted for by conventional predictors of health. Disproportionate financial burdens, chronic stress, and limitations of transportation and health literacy represent targetable factors for mitigating these health inequities.

Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Women in the Rural US: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Women living in rural areas have lower rates of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening compared with women living in urban settings.

Objective

To assess the comparative effectiveness of (1) a mailed, tailored digital video disc (DVD) intervention; (2) a DVD intervention plus telephonic patient navigation (DVD/PN); and (3) usual care with simultaneously increased adherence to any breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening that was not up to date at baseline and to assess cost-effectiveness.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial recruited and followed up women from rural Indiana and Ohio (community based) who were not up to date on any or all recommended cancer screenings. Participants were randomly assigned between November 28, 2016, and July 1, 2019, to 1 of 3 study groups (DVD, DVD/PN, or usual care). Statistical analyses were completed between August and December 2021 and between March and September 2022.

Intervention

The DVD interactively assessed and provided messages for health beliefs, including risk of developing the targeted cancers and barriers, benefits, and self-efficacy for obtaining the needed screenings. Patient navigators counseled women on barriers to obtaining screenings. The intervention simultaneously supported obtaining screening for all or any tests outside of guidelines at baseline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Receipt of any or all needed cancer screenings from baseline through 12 months, including breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Binary logistic regression was used to compare the randomized groups on being up to date for all and any screenings at 12 months.

Results

The sample included 963 women aged 50 to 74 years (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [6.3] years). The DVD group had nearly twice the odds of those in the usual care group of obtaining all needed screenings (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; 95% CI, 1.02-3.43; P = .048), and the odds were nearly 6 times greater for DVD/PN vs usual care (OR, 5.69; 95% CI, 3.24-10.5; P < .001). The DVD/PN intervention (but not DVD alone) was significantly more effective than usual care (OR, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.60-6.28; P < .001) for promoting at least 1 (ie, any) of the needed screenings at 12 months. Cost-effectiveness per woman who was up to date was $14 462 in the DVD group and $10 638 in the DVD/PN group.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial of rural women who were not up to date with at least 1 of the recommended cancer screenings (breast, cervical, or colorectal), an intervention designed to simultaneously increase adherence to any or all of the 3 cancer screening tests was more effective than usual care, available at relatively modest costs, and able to be remotely delivered, demonstrating great potential for implementing an evidence-based intervention in remote areas of the midwestern US.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02795104.

Patient Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Barriers to Barrett's Esophagus Screening

INTRODUCTION

Most patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) do not have a previous diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE), demonstrating a failure of current screening practices. An understanding of patient attitudes and barriers is essential to develop and implement interventions to improve BE screening adherence.

METHODS

We conducted a Web-based survey of patients aged >50 years with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease at 3 academic medical centers and 1 affiliated safety net health systems. Survey domains included patient characteristics, endoscopy history, familiarity with screening practices, perceived BE/EAC risk, and barriers to screening.

RESULTS

We obtained a response rate of 22.6% (472/2,084) (74% men, mean age 67.9 years). Self-identified race and ethnicity of participants was 66.5% non-Hispanic White, 20.0% non-Hispanic Black, 13.4% other race, and 7.1% Hispanic. Screening for BE was recommended in only 13.2%, and only 5.3% reported previous screening. Respondents had notable gaps in knowledge about screening indications; only two-thirds correctly identified BE risk factors and only 19.5% believed BE screening was needed for gastroesophageal reflux disease. More than 1 in 5 respondents believed they would get BE (31.9%) or EAC (20.2%) but reported barriers to screening. Compared with White respondents, more Black respondents were concerned about getting BE/EAC and interested in screening but report higher barriers to screening.

DISCUSSION

Patients at risk for BE, particularly racial and ethnic minorities, are worried about developing EAC but rarely undergo screening and have poor understanding of screening recommendations.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities Among Race: A Zip Code Level Analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can prevent disease by early identification. Existing disparities in CRC screening have been associated with factors including race, socioeconomic status, insurance, and even geography. Our study takes a deeper look into how social determinants related to zip code tabulation areas affect CRC screenings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of CRC screenings by race at a zip code level, evaluating for impactful social determinant factors such as the social deprivation index (SDI). We used publicly available data from CDC 500 Cities Project (2016-2019), PLACES Project (2020), and the American Community Survey (2019). We conducted multivariate and confirmatory factor analyses among race, income, health insurance, check-up visits, and SDI.

RESULTS

Increasing the tertile of SDI was associated with a higher likelihood of being Black or Hispanic, as well as decreased median household income (P < .01). Lower rates of regular checkup visits were found in the third tertile of SDI (P < .01). The multivariate analysis showed that being Black, Hispanic, lower income, being uninsured, lack of regular check-ups, and increased SDI were related to decreased CRC screening. In the confirmatory factor analysis, we found that SDI and access to insurance were the variables most related to decreased CRC screening.

CONCLUSION

Our results reveal the top 2 factors that impact a locality's CRC screening rates are the social deprivation index and access to health care. This data may help implement interventions targeting social barriers to further promote CRC screenings within disadvantaged communities and decrease overall mortality via early screening.

Detection rates of adenomas, advanced adenomas, and colorectal cancers among the opportunistic colonoscopy screening population: a single-center, retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective in reducing CRC incidence and mortality. The aim of this study was to retrospectively determine and compare the detection rate of adenomas, advanced adenomas (AAs) and CRCs, and the number needed to screen (NNS) of individuals in an average-risk Chinese population of different ages and genders.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study performed at the Institute of Health Management, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital. Colonoscopy results were analyzed for 53,152 individuals finally enrolled from January 2013 to December 2019. The detection rate of adenomas, AAs, or CRCs was computed and the characteristics between men and women were compared using chi-squared test.

RESULTS

The average age was 48.8 years (standard deviation [SD], 8.5 years) for men and 50.0 years (SD, 9.0 years) for women, and the gender rate was 66.27% (35,226) vs . 33.73% (17,926). The detection rates of adenomas, AAs, serrated adenomas, and CRCs were 14.58% (7750), 3.09% (1641), 1.23% (653), and 0.59% (313), respectively. Men were statistically significantly associated with higher detection rates than women in adenomas (17.20% [6058/35,226], 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.74-17.53% vs . 9.44% [1692/17,926], 95% CI 8.94-9.79%, P  < 0.001), AAs (3.72% [1309], 95% CI 3.47-3.87% vs . 1.85% [332], 95% CI 1.61-2.00%, P  < 0.001), and serrated adenomas (1.56% [548], 95% CI 1.43-1.69% vs . 0.59% [105], 95% CI 0.47-0.70%, P  < 0.001). The detection rate of AAs in individuals aged 45 to 49 years was 3.17% (270/8510, 95% CI 2.80-3.55%) in men and 1.69% (69/4091, 95% CI 1.12-1.86%) in women, and their NNS was 31.55 (95% CI 28.17-35.71) in men and 67.11 (95% CI 53.76-89.29) in women. The NNS for AAs in men aged 45 to 49 years was close to that in women aged 65 to 69 years (29.07 [95% CI 21.05-46.73]).

CONCLUSIONS

The detection rates of adenomas, AAs, and serrated adenomas are high in the asymptomatic population undergoing a physical examination and are associated with gender and age. Our findings will provide important references for effective population-based CRC screening strategies in the future.

Rates of Follow-up Colonoscopy After a Positive Stool-Based Screening Test Result for Colorectal Cancer Among Health Care Organizations in the US, 2017-2020

IMPORTANCE

Noninvasive stool-based screening tests (SBTs) are effective alternatives to colonoscopy. However, a positive SBT result requires timely follow-up colonoscopy (FU-CY) to complete the colorectal cancer screening paradigm.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate FU-CY rates after a positive SBT result and to assess the association of the early COVID-19 pandemic with FU-CY rates.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This mixed-methods cohort study included retrospective analysis of deidentified administrative claims and electronic health records data between June 1, 2015, and June 30, 2021, from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse and qualitative, semistructured interviews with clinicians from 5 health care organizations (HCOs). The study population included data from average-risk primary care patients aged 50 to 75 years with a positive SBT result between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020, at 39 HCOs.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the FU-CY rate within 1 year of a positive SBT result according to patient age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance type, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and prior SBT use.

RESULTS

This cohort study included 32 769 individuals (16 929 [51.7%] female; mean [SD] age, 63.1 [7.1] years; 2092 [6.4%] of Black and 28 832 [88.0%] of White race; and 825 [2.5%] of Hispanic ethnicity). The FU-CY rates were 43.3% within 90 days of the positive SBT result, 51.4% within 180 days, and 56.1% within 360 days (n = 32 769). In interviews, clinicians were uniformly surprised by the low FU-CY rates. Rates varied by race, ethnicity, insurance type, presence of comorbidities, and SBT used. In the Cox proportional hazards regression model, the strongest positive association was with multitarget stool DNA use (hazard ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.57-1.68] relative to fecal immunochemical tests; P < .001), and the strongest negative association was with the presence of comorbidities (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59-0.71] for a CCI of >4 relative to 0; P < .001). The early COVID-19 pandemic was associated with lower FU-CY rates.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that FU-CY rates after a positive SBT result for colorectal cancer screening were low among an average-risk population, with the median HCO achieving a 53.4% FU-CY rate within 1 year. Socioeconomic factors and the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with lower FU-CY rates, presenting opportunities for targeted intervention by clinicians and health care systems.

Colorectal cancer screening in a safety-net health system: The intersectional impact of race, ethnicity, language, and mental health

Though rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening continue to improve with increased advocacy and awareness, there are numerous disparities that continue to be defined within different health systems and populations. We aimed to define associations between patients' socio-demographic characteristics and CRC screening in a well-resourced safety-net health system. A retrospective review was performed from 2018 to 2019 of patients between 50 and 75-years-old who had a primary care visit within the last two years. Numerous patient characteristics were extracted from the medical record, including self-reported race, self-reported ethnicity, insurance, preferred language, severe mental health diagnoses (SMHD), and substance use disorder (SUD). Multivariate logistic regression assessed characteristics associated with CRC screening. Of 22,145 included patients, 16,065 (72.5%) underwent CRC screening. <40% of the population was White or of North American/European ethnicity and 38% had limited English proficiency. Hispanic patients had the highest screening rate while White patients had the lowest among races (78.1% vs 68.5%, respectively). White patients had higher rates of SMHD and SUD (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, most other races (Black, Asian, and Hispanic), ethnicities, and languages had significantly higher odds of screening, ranging from 20% to 55% higher, when White, North American/European, English-speakers are used as reference. In a well-resourced safety-net health system, patients who were non-White, non-North American/European, and non-English-speaking, had higher odds of CRC screening. This data from a unique health system may better guide screening outreach and implementation strategies in historically under-resourced communities, leading to strategies for equitable colorectal cancer screening.

The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population

AIM

The United States Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF) recently recommended lowering the age for average-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening from 50 to 45 years. While initiating screening at age 45 versus 50 provides a greater opportunity for CRC early detection and prevention, the full profile of benefits, risks, and cost-effectiveness of expanding the screen-eligible population requires further evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The costs and clinical outcomes for screening at age 45 for triennial multi-target stool DNA [mt-sDNA], and other non-invasive stool-based modalities (annual fecal immunochemical test [FIT] and annual fecal-occult blood test [FOBT]), were estimated using the validated CRC-AIM microsimulation model over a lifetime horizon. Test sensitivity and specificity inputs were based on 2021 USPSTF modeling analyses; adherence rates were based on published real-world data and the costs of the screening test, follow-up colonoscopies, complications, and CRC care were included. Outcomes are reported from the perspective of a United States payer as clinical, life-years gained (LYG), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER); stool-based and follow-up colonoscopy adherence ranges were explored in one-way, probabilistic and threshold analyses.

RESULTS

When compared to initiation of CRC screening at age 45 versus 50, all modalities reduced both the incidence of and mortality from CRC and increased LYG. Initiating CRC screening at age 45 was cost-effective with an ICER of $59,816 and $35,857 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for mt-sDNA versus FIT and FOBT, respectively. In the threshold analyses, at equivalent rates to stool-based screening, mt-sDNA was always cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY versus FIT and FOBT.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiating average-risk CRC screening at age 45 instead of age 50 increases the estimated clinical benefit by reducing disease burden while remaining cost-effective. Among stool-based screening modalities, mt-sDNA provides the most clinical benefit in a Commercial and Medicare population.

Systematic Review of Colorectal Cancer Screening-Related Apps

Background: In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in men and women combined. The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends that average risk adults have regular CRC screening to detect and prevent CRC. Despite published CRC screening guidelines, national CRC screening rates remain suboptimal. With the exponential increase in technology use and device ownership, many mobile health applications (apps) have been developed to improve health outcomes. There is great potential for smartphone or tablet apps to help improve CRC screening uptake, with the ultimate goal of reducing CRC morbidity and mortality. To date, there are no systematic reviews that have examined the publicly available, free apps that are related to CRC screening, and therefore, the quality and the content of these apps remain unknown. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to systematically review smartphone and tablet apps that could be used to improve CRC screening uptake. Methods: Apps available on the Google Play and Apple App stores that were compatible with smartphones and tablets were reviewed. Of the 2,790 apps reviewed, 20 met inclusion criteria. Results: Of the 20 apps that met inclusion criteria, most were informational in nature. Approximately half of the apps focused on colonoscopies and did not discuss other CRC screening options. Furthermore, more than half of the apps did not include video/audio content and the majority of the apps did not provide navigation support (e.g., reminders, instructions, maps). Conclusions: There are multiple free, publicly available apps that may encourage CRC screening uptake. Despite their promise, there is a paucity of empirical evidence evaluating the efficacy and usability of these apps. Future research efforts can evaluate the content, usability, accessibility, and potential impact of these apps.

Analysis of delay in adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection has been the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines regarding the optimal timing of AC for rectal cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of AC timing on overall survival for rectal cancer.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2016 was queried for primary clinical stage II or III rectal cancer patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery and AC. Patients were grouped based on AC initiation: early ≤ 4 weeks, intermediate 4-8 weeks, and delayed ≥ 8 weeks. The primary outcome was overall survival.

RESULTS

We identified 8722 patients, of which 905 (10.4%) received early AC, 4621 (53.0%) intermediate AC, and 3196 (36.6%) delayed AC. Pathological lymph-node metastasis (ypN +) was positive in 73% of early AC, 74% intermediate AC, and 63% delayed AC (p < 0.05). The 5-year survival probability was 71.1% (95% CI 68-74%) for early AC, 73.2% (95% CI 72-75%) intermediate AC, and 65.8% (95% CI 64-68%) delayed AC (p < 0.001). Using Cox proportional hazard modeling, patients undergoing delayed AC had an associated decreased survival compared to patients receiving early AC (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.028-1.353, p = 0.018) or intermediate AC (HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.179-1.395, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Delay in AC administration may be associated with decreased 5-year survival. Compared to early or intermediate AC, patients in the delayed AC group were observed to have increased risk of death, despite having lower proportions with ypN + disease. Patients with higher socioeconomic and education status were more likely to receive early chemotherapy.

Small-Area Geographic and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer in Cyprus

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of death and morbidity worldwide. To date, the relationship between regional deprivation and CRC incidence or mortality has not been studied in the population of Cyprus. The objective of this study was to analyse the geographical variation of CRC incidence and mortality and its possible association with socioeconomic inequalities in Cyprus for the time period of 2000-2015. This is a small-area ecological study in Cyprus, with census tracts as units of spatial analysis. The incidence date, sex, age, postcode, primary site, death date in case of death, or last contact date of all alive CRC cases from 2000-2015 were obtained from the Cyprus Ministry of Health's Health Monitoring Unit. Indirect standardisation was used to calculate the sex and age Standardise Incidence Ratios (SIRs) and Standardised Mortality Ratios (SMRs) of CRC while the smoothed values of SIRs, SMRs, and Mortality to Incidence ratio (M/I ratio) were estimated using the univariate Bayesian Poisson log-linear spatial model. To evaluate the association of CRC incidence and mortality rate with socioeconomic deprivation, we included the national socioeconomic deprivation index as a covariate variable entering in the model either as a continuous variable or as a categorical variable representing quartiles of areas with increasing levels of socioeconomic deprivation. The results showed that there are geographical areas having 15% higher SIR and SMR, with most of those areas located on the east coast of the island. We found higher M/I ratio values in the rural, remote, and less dense areas of the island, while lower rates were observed in the metropolitan areas. We also discovered an inverted U-shape pattern in CRC incidence and mortality with higher rates in the areas classified in the second quartile (Q2-areas) of the socioeconomic deprivation index and lower rates in rural, remote, and less dense areas (Q4-areas). These findings provide useful information at local and national levels and inform decisions about resource allocation to geographically targeted prevention and control plans to increase CRC screening and management.

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in the presentation and management of pediatric thyroid cancer

OBJECTIVES

Disparities across race and socioeconomic status (SES) in cancer treatment exist for many malignancies. Disadvantaged groups have repeatedly been shown to receive sub-optimal treatment. This study intends to analyze racial and SES disparities in the presentation and management of pediatric thyroid cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective national database study of children who underwent thyroidectomy for thyroid papillary, medullary, and follicular carcinoma between 2007 and 2016 was conducted using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors of 1) tumor stage/size at diagnosis and 2) treatment modalities.

RESULTS

1942 children were analyzed. The average tumor size at presentation was 20 mm for White patients, 26 mm for Non-White patients, and 27 mm for Hispanic patients (p < 0.001). Stage of disease differed significantly by race/ethnicity (p < 0.001) with Non-White and Hispanic patients having more distant disease than White patients at presentation. On multivariable regression, Hispanic patients (OR 1.41, 95%CI 1.06-1.87, p = 0.017) were more likely to be diagnosed at later stages. Non-White (OR 2.03, 1.50-2.73, p < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (OR 1.57, 1.19-2.07, p = 0.002) had larger tumors at diagnosis than White patients after controlling for other SES factors.

CONCLUSIONS

SES disparities exist in pediatric thyroid cancer. Non-White and Hispanic patients are more likely to present with larger tumors and distant disease as compared to White patients. Understanding and intervening on these SES disparities is essential to improve outcomes.

Association Between Socioeconomic and Insurance Status and Delayed Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Cancers

INTRODUCTION

Association between socioeconomic status (SES) and stage at diagnosis in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is poorly described. Relationship between low SES and stage at diagnosis as well as the mediating role of insurance status (IS) was examined.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for esophageal, gastric, liver, biliary, pancreatic, colon, and rectal cancers diagnosed in 2012-2016. Relationship between census-tract SES index quintiles and late diagnosis (distant disease at diagnosis) was examined. Uni and multivariable logistic regressions were performed. Mediation analyses were conducted to determine the degree to which IS (private/Medicare versus Medicaid/uninsured) mediates the relationship between SES and late diagnosis of cancer.

RESULTS

Analysis included 236,713 adult patients from 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results areas. In univariable analysis, lowest SES quintile was significantly associated with late diagnosis for all cancers except gastric and biliary cancers. In multivariable analysis controlling for age, gender, marital status and race, this association remained significant for liver (odds ratio (OR) 1.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.58]), pancreatic (OR 1.13 [95% CI 1.06-1.21]), and rectal (OR 1.31 [95% CI 1.20-1.42]) cancers. Further controlling for IS showed the largest effect size reduction for rectal cancer (OR 1.18 [95% CI 1.09-1.29]), with IS mediating 36.5% (P < 0.0001) of SES effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Low SES is an independent risk factor for late diagnosis in liver, pancreas, and rectal cancers. Insurance is not a critical mediator of difference by SES for most GI cancers, with the exception of rectal cancer. Further research is needed to understand factors beyond IS that can account for SES differences in late diagnosis for GI cancers. Insurance related differences for rectal cancer deserves further attention.

MUSCLE DEPLETED OBESITY IN INDIVIDUALS SCREENED FOR COLORECTAL CÂNCER

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most incident cancer in the world and the second leading cause of cancer death. Significant decreases in incidence and mortality can be achieved by reducing risk factors and adhering to healthy lifestyle recommendations, as well as screening for the disease.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical nutritional profile of individuals at medium risk screened for CRC residing in the city of Piranhas/Alagoas.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study conducted from September to October 2020, with individuals at medium risk for CRC, of both sexes and aged between 50 and 70 years old. Participants were screened for CRC with fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and colonoscopy. Personal, socioeconomic, clinical, lifestyle and nutritional assessment data were collected. The latter was performed using anthropometric data (weight, height, arm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness), body composition (bioimpedance) and physical examination. Descriptive analysis of data frequencies and dichotomization according to the presence or absence of overweight was performed, followed by comparison of means and medians and frequencies by chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

In total, 82 people agreed to undergo the clinical nutritional assessment, most of them female (56.1%; n=46), adults (56.1%; n=46), with a mean age of 59.02 years (±6.30 SD). Pre-cancerous lesions were identified in 54.5% (n=42) of those screened, 52.4% (n=43) were smokers or former smokers, and 65.9% (n=54) did not practice scheduled physical activity. Nutritional assessment showed that 64.6% (n=53) were overweight according to body mass index. On the other hand, the muscle mass, % arm muscle circumference adequacy and body muscle mass (kg) markers showed that 32.9% (n=27) and 47.6% (n=39) of the subjects were muscle depleted, respectively. Above all, overweight participants had, in parallel, lower muscle mass (P<0.05), suggesting sarcopenic obesity in this population.

CONCLUSION

Obesity is one of the main risk factors for CRC; when concomitant with sarcopenia, it favors worse health outcomes. In this context, evidence shows the need to assess muscle composition in people with obesity, especially through other methods of assessing body composition. Our results add to the evidence on the importance of the population being guided about screening and adherence to healthy lifestyle recommendations, especially strategies aimed at weight control and the practice of physical activity.

Economic Pressure and Intention to Complete Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Among U.S. Men

Although men's lives can be saved by colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, its utilization remains below national averages among men from low-income households. However, income has not been consistently linked to men's CRC screening intent. This study tested the hypothesis that men who perceive more economic pressure would have lower CRC screening intent. Cross-sectional data were collected via an online survey in February 2022. Men (aged 45-75 years) living in the U.S. (N = 499) reported their CRC screening intent (outcome) and their perception of their economic circumstances (predictors). Adjusted binary and ordinal logistic analyses were conducted. All analyses were conducted in March 2022. Men who perceived greater difficulty paying bills or affording the type of clothing or medical care they needed (i.e., economic strain) were less likely to have CRC screening intent (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.93). This association was no longer significant when prior screening behavior was accounted for (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.10). Contrary to our hypothesis, men who reported more financial cutbacks were more likely to report wanting to be screened for CRC within the next year (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.11). This is one of the first studies to demonstrate that men's perceptions of their economic circumstances play a role in their intent to complete early-detection screening for CRC. Future research should consider men's perceptions of their economic situation in addition to their annual income when aiming to close the gap between intent and CRC screening uptake.

Sociocultural Factors, Access to Healthcare, and Lifestyle: Multifactorial Indicators in Association with Colorectal Cancer Risk

Black Americans of low socioeconomic status (SES) have higher colorectal cancer incidence than other groups in the United States. However, much of the research that identifies colorectal cancer risk factors is conducted in cohorts of high SES and non-Hispanic White participants. Adult participants of the Southern Community Cohort Study (N = 75,182) were followed for a median of 12.25 years where 742 incident colorectal cancers were identified. The majority of the cohort are non-Hispanic White or Black and have low household income. Cox models were used to estimate HRs for colorectal cancer incidence associated with sociocultural factors, access to and use of healthcare, and healthy lifestyle scores to represent healthy eating, alcohol intake, smoking, and physical activity. The association between Black race and colorectal cancer was consistent and not diminished by accounting for SES, access to healthcare, or healthy lifestyle [HR = 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI),1.10-1.63]. Colorectal cancer screening was a strong, risk reduction factor for colorectal cancer (HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.78), and among colorectal cancer-screened, Black race was not associated with risk. Participants with high school education were at lower colorectal cancer risk (HR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98). Income and neighborhood-level SES were not strongly associated with colorectal cancer risk. Whereas individual health behaviors were not associated with risk, participants that reported adhering to ≥3 health behaviors had a 19% (95% CI, 1-34) decreased colorectal cancer risk compared with participants that reported ≤1 behaviors. The association was consistent in fully-adjusted models, although HRs were no longer significant. Colorectal cancer screening, education, and a lifestyle that includes healthy behaviors lowers colorectal cancer risk. Racial disparities in colorectal cancer risk may be diminished by colorectal cancer screening.

PREVENTION RELEVANCE

Colorectal cancer risk may be reduced through screening, higher educational attainment and performing more health behaviors. Importantly, our data show that colorectal cancer screening is an important colorectal cancer prevention strategy to eliminate the racial disparity in colorectal cancer risk. See related Spotlight, p. 561.

County-Level Social Vulnerability and Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US, 2018

IMPORTANCE

Area-level factors have been identified as important social determinants of health (SDoH) that impact many health-related outcomes. Less is known about how the social vulnerability index (SVI), as a scalable composite score, can multidimensionally explain the population-based cancer screening program uptake at a county level.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the geographic variation of US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)-recommended breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates and the association between county-level SVI and the 3 screening rates.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based cross-sectional study used county-level information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's PLACES and SVI data sets from 2018 for 3141 US counties. Analyses were conducted from October 2021 to February 2022.

EXPOSURES

Social vulnerability index score categorized in quintiles.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was county-level rates of USPSTF guideline-concordant, up-to-date breast, cervical, and colorectal screenings. Odds ratios were calculated for each cancer screening by SVI quintile as unadjusted (only accounting for eligible population per county) or adjusted for urban-rural status, percentage of uninsured adults, and primary care physician rate per 100 000 residents.

RESULTS

Across 3141 counties, county-level cancer screening rates showed regional disparities ranging from 54.0% to 81.8% for breast cancer screening, from 69.9% to 89.7% for cervical cancer screening, and from 39.8% to 74.4% for colorectal cancer screening. The multivariable regression model showed that a higher SVI was significantly associated with lower odds of cancer screening, with the lowest odds in the highest SVI quintile. When comparing the highest quintile of SVI (SVI-Q5) with the lowest quintile of SVI (SVI-Q1), the unadjusted odds ratio was 0.86 (95% posterior credible interval [CrI], 0.84-0.87) for breast cancer screening, 0.80 (95% CrI, 0.79-0.81) for cervical cancer screening, and 0.72 (95% CrI, 0.71-0.73) for colorectal cancer screening. When fully adjusted, the odds ratio was 0.92 (95% CrI, 0.90-0.93) for breast cancer screening, 0.87 (95% CrI, 0.86-0.88) for cervical cancer screening, and 0.86 (95% CrI, 0.85-0.88) for colorectal cancer screening, showing slightly attenuated associations.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, regional disparities were found in cancer screening rates at a county level. Quantifying how SVI associates with each cancer screening rate could provide insight into the design and focus of future interventions targeting cancer prevention disparities.

Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population

Introduction

A suspected diagnosis of cancer through an emergency department (ED) visit is associated with poor clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the rate at which ED patients attend cancer screenings for lung, colorectal (CRC), and breast cancers based on national guidelines set forth by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study. Patients were randomly approached in the Eskenazi Hospital ED between August 2019–February 2020 and were surveyed to determine whether they would be eligible and had attended lung, CRC, and breast cancer screenings, as well as their awareness of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Patients who were English-speaking and ≥18 years old, and who were not critically ill or intoxicated or being seen for acute decompensated psychiatric illness were offered enrollment. Enrolled subjects were surveyed to determine eligibility for lung, colorectal, and breast cancer screenings based on guidelines set by the USPSTF. No cancer screenings were actually done during the ED visit.

Results

A total of 500 patients were enrolled in this study. More participants were female (54.4%), and a majority were Black (53.0%). Most participants had both insurance (80.2%) and access to primary care (62.8%). Among the entire cohort, 63.0% identified as smokers, and 62.2% (140/225) of the 50- to 80-year-old participants qualified for lung cancer screening. No patients were screened for lung cancer in this cohort (0/225). Only 0.6% (3/500) were aware that LDCT was the preferred method for screening. Based on pack years, 35.5% (32/90) of the patients who were 40–49 years old and 6.7% (6/90) of those 30–39 years old would eventually qualify for screening. Regarding CRC screening, 43.6% (218/500) of the entire cohort was eligible. However, of those patients only 54% (118/218) had been screened. Comparatively, 77.7% (87/112) of the eligible females had been screened for breast cancer, but only 54.5% (61/112) had been screened in the prior two years.

Conclusion

Many ED patients are not screened for lung/colorectal/breast cancers even though many are eligible and have reported access to primary care. This study demonstrates an opportunity and a need to address cancer screening in the ED.

Incidence and Survival Rates of Cutaneous Melanoma in South Korea Using Nationwide Health Insurance Claims Data

PURPOSE

Melanoma incidence is rising worldwide along with the associated personal and socioeconomic health expenditures. We investigated the incidence and survival-rate patterns of melanoma in South Korea using nationwide data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with melanoma between 2004 and 2017, based on National Health Insurance (NHI) claims data in South Korea. The incidence, prevalence, and survival rate were analyzed along with baseline demographic characteristics. We collected solar irradiation dose (SID) and healthcare ranking score (HRS) according to the administrative district from the Korea Meteorological Administration and Korea Health Promotion Institute. The incidence and survival rates were assessed using Pearson's correlation, the Kaplan-Meier estimation, multiple linear regression, and multiple logistic regression methods.

RESULTS

Twenty-five thousand, five hundred ninety-one patients with melanoma were diagnosed during the study period. The age-standardized incidence of melanoma steadily increased from 2004 to 2017 from 2.6 to 3.0/100,000/yr. The incidence of melanoma increased with significantly higher income (p < 0.05). The prevalence followed a similar pattern as the incidence. According to multivariate analysis, HRS significantly influenced the incidence of melanoma in high sun-exposed sites (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in annual mortality. Women had a higher 5-year survival rate than men (78.4% vs. 72.8%). Mortality by the administrative district was highly correlated with HRS.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of melanoma is increasing in South Korea. A low HRS is associated with both higher incidence and mortality. The findings of this study could be utilized as a guideline for treating melanoma patients.

Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Care for Black Patients: Barriers and Solutions

Racial disparities in colorectal cancer for Black patients have led to a significant mortality difference when compared to White patients, a gap which has remained to this day. These differences have been linked to poorer quality insurance and socioeconomic status in addition to lower access to high-quality health care resources, which are emblematic of systemic racial inequities. Disparities impact nearly every point along the colorectal cancer care continuum and include barriers to screening, surgical care, oncologic care, and surveillance. These critical faults are the driving forces behind the mortality difference Black patients face. Health care systems should strive to correct these disparities through both cultural competency at the provider level and public policy change at the national level.

Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer in proximity to an emergency department visit

A suspected diagnosis of cancer in the emergency department (ED) may be associated with poor outcomes, related to health disparities, however data are limited. This is a retrospective observational cohort of the Indiana State Department of Health Cancer Registry, and the Indiana Network for Patient Care. First time cancer diagnoses appearing in the registry between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. Cases identified as patients who had an ED visit in the 6 months before their cancer diagnosis; controls had no preceding ED visits. The primary outcome was mortality, comparing ED-associated mortality to non-ED-associated. 134,761 first-time cancer patients were identified, including 15,432 (11.5%) cases. The mean age was same at 65, more of the cases were Black than the controls (12.4% vs 7.4%, P < .0001) and more were low income (36.4%. vs 29.3%). The top 3 ED-associated cancer diagnoses were lung (18.4%), breast (8.9%), and colorectal cancers (8.9%), whereas the controls were breast (17%), lung (14.9%), and prostate cancers (10.1%). Cases observed an over three-fold higher mortality, with cumulative death rate of 32.9% for cases vs 9.0% for controls (P < .0001). Regression analysis predicting mortality, controlling for many confounders produced an odds ratio of 4.12 (95% CI 3.72-4.56 for cases). This study found that an ED visit within 6 months prior to the first time of ICD-coded cancer is associated with Black race, low income and an overall three-fold increased adjusted risk of death. The mortality rates for ED-associated cancers are uniformly worse for all cancer types. These data suggest that additional work is needed to reduce disparities among ED-associated cancer diagnoses.

Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Survival Differences and Potential Geographic Determinants Among Men and Women in Utah

By 2030, early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is expected to become the leading cancer-related cause of death for people age 20 to 49. To improve understanding of this phenomenon, we analyzed the geographic determinants of EOCRC in Utah by examining county-level incidence and mortality. We linked data from the Utah Population Database to the Utah Cancer Registry to identify residents (age 18-49) diagnosed with EOCRC between 2000 and 2020, and we used spatial empirical Bayes smoothing to determine county-level hotspots. We identified 1,867 EOCRC diagnoses (52.7% in male patients, 69.2% in non-Hispanic White patients). Ten counties (34%) were classified as hotspots, with high EOCRC incidence or mortality. Hotspot status was unrelated to incidence rates, but non-Hispanic ethnic-minority men (incidence rate ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.91), Hispanic White men and women (incidence rate ratio, 2.24; 95% CI, 2.00-2.51), and Hispanic ethnic-minority men and women (incidence rate ratio, 4.59; 95% CI, 3.50-5.91) were more likely to be diagnosed with EOCRC. After adjustment for income and obesity, adults living in hotspots had a 31% higher hazard for death (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.69). Survival was poorest for adults with a late-stage diagnosis living in hotspots (chi square (1) = 4.0; p = .045). Adults who were married or who had a life partner had a lower hazard for death than single adults (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.92). The risk for EOCRC is elevated in 34% of Utah counties, warranting future research and interventions aimed at increasing screening and survival in the population age 18 to 49.

Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Cancer Screening Behavior: Evidence from Japan

Although Japan has a well-established cancer screening program and has implemented several initiatives to increase screening rates, levels of cancer screening can be further improved. Based on a rational decision-making framework, this study examines the role of financial literacy and financial education, which measure peoples' knowledge about investment and savings, respectively, in improving cancer screening rates in Japan. The main data were extracted from Osaka University's Preference Parameters Study for 2011. The dependent variable was the number of cancer screenings while the two main independent variables were financial literacy and financial education. Ordered probit regression models were run to test the association between financial literacy, financial education, and the number of cancer screenings. The results showed a positive relationship between financial education and cancer screening behavior in Japan, while no significant association was observed between financial literacy and screening behavior. Furthermore, according to findings stratified by three age groups, the positive association between financial education and cancer screening behavior was particularly evident in 50- to 59-year-olds, while the effects of other demographic, socioeconomic, and risky health behavior variables were not consistent. It is imperative that implementation of more financial education programs is an effective intervention to encourage cancer screening behavior in Japanese populations.

Socioeconomic status and use of obesogenic and anti-obesity medications in the United States: A population-based study

Background

The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend the avoidance of medications that may cause weight gain (i.e., obesogenic medications) in individuals with overweight or obesity. Obesity disproportionately affects people with lower socioeconomic status (SES); however, it is unknown whether the use of obesogenic medications differs by SES.

Methods

We included adults with overweight or obesity and used prescription medications from 2009-2018 of the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We examined the associations between a composite measure of SES and use of obesogenic medications and anti-obesity medications. The composite SES included <high school education (1 point), household income below federal poverty level (1 point), no insurance (2 points), and public health insurance only (1 point). We defined 3 composite SES groups (0 [high], 1 [intermediate], and ≥2 points [low]).

Findings

Among 10,673 US adults with overweight or obesity, 20.0% had low SES. Use of obesogenic medications was common (37.7%). Low (vs. high) SES was associated with greater obesogenic medication use, independent of demographic characteristics, prescription medication burden, and comorbidities (OR 1.3 [1.2-1.5]). Among 12,133 eligible participants, utilization of anti-obesity medications was very low overall (0.5%) and within all SES groups (low 0.27%, intermediate 0.71, and high 0.65%).

Interpretation

Our findings highlight common and modifiable risk factors for obesity. Clinicians should screen patient medications for those that may cause weight gain and increase adoption of anti-obesity medications, especially among adults living in low SES.

Funding

The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (R01DK115534, K24HL155861, and K01DK121825).

The "Classification Pendulum" of Stage I Colorectal Cancer: A National Level Analysis of the Survival Difference Between T1 and T2 Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classifies nonmetastatic, node-negative colorectal cancers invading the submucosa (T1) and muscularis propria (T2) as stage I tumors without additional subclassification.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare survival of T1N0M0 versus T2N0M0 colorectal cancers and to investigate factors associated with decreased survival.

DESIGN

This was an analysis of 2 large population-based data sets.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted analyzing data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result program and the National Cancer Database.

PATIENTS

Adult patients undergoing major resection without additional therapy for stage I colorectal cancer were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall and disease-specific survival for T1 versus T2 cancers were measured. Subgroup analyses by tumor location (colon versus rectum) were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 30,228 (36.4% T1 and 63.6% T2) and 41,670 (41.1% T1 and 58.9% T2) patients were identified in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database and the National Cancer Database. The 5-year overall survival rates were 87.1% and 86.2% for patients with T1 versus 82.7% and 80.7% for patients with T2 (p < 0.001) in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database and the National Cancer Database. The 10-year overall survival rates were 71.3% and 66.3% for patients with T1 versus 62.2% and 57.2% for patients with T2 tumors (p < 0.001) in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database and the National Cancer Database. The 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival for colorectal cancer in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database was 97.0% (T1) versus 95.2% (T2) and 94.1% (T1) versus 90.3% (T2). Black race (HR = 1.26 and 1.65 for overall survival and disease-specific survival in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database; HR = 1.20 for overall survival in the National Cancer Database) was associated with worse survival.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by intrinsic biases related to large administrative data sets.

CONCLUSIONS

Within stage I colorectal cancer, T2 tumors have decreased overall survival and disease-specific survival as compared with T1 cancers. This survival difference may justify revising the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system to include the subclassification of stage Ia (T1N0M0) and stage Ib (T2N0M0). See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B659.

LA CLASIFICACIN PNDULO PARA EL CNCER COLORRECTAL EN ESTADIO I UN ANLISIS A NIVEL NACIONAL DE LA DIFERENCIA DE SOBREVIDA ENTRE EL CNCER COLORRECTAL T Y T

ANTECEDENTES:La octava edición del American Joint Committee on Cancer, clasifica los cánceres colorrectales no metastásicos con ganglios negativos, que invaden la submucosa (T1) y la muscularis propia (T2) como tumores en estadio I sin subclasificación adicional.OBJETIVO:El objetivo del estudio fue comparar la sobrevida de los cánceres colorrectales T1N0M0 versus T2N0M0 e investigar los factores asociados con la disminución de la sobrevida.DISEÑO:Análisis de dos grandes conjuntos de datos poblacionales.MARCO:El estudio se realizó analizando datos del Programa de Epidemiología de Vigilancia y Resultados Finales (SEER) y la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer.PACIENTES:Pacientes adultos en los cuales se realizó una resección mayor sin terapia adicional por cáncer colorrectal en estadio I.PRINCIPALES VARIABLES ANALIZADAS:Sobrevida global y específica de la enfermedad para los cánceres T1 versus T2. Se realizó un análisis de subgrupos según la ubicación del tumor (colon versus recto).RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 30.228 (36,4% T1 y 63,6% T2) y 41.670 (41,1% T1 y 58,9% T2) pacientes en las bases de datos SEER y la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer, respectivamente. La sobrevida global a 5 años fue del 87,1% y el 86,2% para los pacientes con T1 frente al 82,7% y el 80,7% de los pacientes con T2 (p < 0,001) en el SEER y la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer, respectivamente. La sobrevida global a 10 años fue del 71,3% y el 66,3% para los pacientes con T1 frente al 62,2% y el 57,2% de los pacientes con tumores T2 (p < 0,001) en el SEER y la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer, respectivamente. La sobrevida específica de la enfermedad a 5 y 10 años para el cáncer colorrectal en el SEER fue del 97,0% (T1) frente al 95,2% (T2) y del 94,1% (T1) frente al 90,3% (T2), respectivamente. La grupo étnico afroamericano se asoció con una sobrevida menor (Hazard Ratio -HR 1,26 y 1,65 para la sobrevida general y sobrevida específica de la enfermedad-SEER; HR 1,20 para la sobrevida general-Base de de Datos Nacional del Cáncer).LIMITACIONES:Sesgos intrínsecos relacionados con el análisis de grandes conjuntos de datos.CONCLUSIONES:Dentro del cáncer colorrectal en estadio I, los tumores T2 han disminuido la sobrevida general y la sobrevida específica de la enfermedad, en comparación con los cánceres T1. Esta diferencia de sobrevida puede justificar la revisión del sistema de estadificación del American Joint Committee on Cancer para incluir la subclasificación del estadio Ia (T1N0M0) y el estadio Ib (T2N0M0). Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B659.