1
|
Jalali A. Informing evidence-based medicine for opioid use disorder using pharmacoeconomic studies. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024; 24:599-611. [PMID: 38696161 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2350561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The health and economic consequences of inadequately treated opioid use disorder (OUD) are substantial. Healthcare systems in the United States (US) and other countries are facing a growing healthcare crisis due to opioids. Although effective medications for OUD exist, relying solely on clinical information is insufficient for addressing the opioid crisis. AREAS COVERED In this review, the role of pharmacoeconomic studies in informing evidence-based medication treatment for OUD is discussed, with a particular emphasis on the US healthcare system, where the economic burden is significantly higher than the global average. The scope/objective of pharmacoeconomics as a distinct scientific research program is briefly defined, followed by a discussion of existing evidence informed by data from systematic reviews, in addition to a convenience sample of recently published pharmacoeconomic studies and protocols. The review also explores the need for methodological advancements in the field. EXPERT OPINION Despite the potential of pharmacoeconomic research in shaping evidence-based medicine for OUD, significant challenges limiting its real-world application remain. How to address these challenges are explored, including how to combine cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses to address the needs of the healthcare system as a whole and specific stakeholders interested in adopting new OUD treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Jalali
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Division of Comparative Effectiveness & Outcomes Research, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim K, Liu G, Dick AW, Choi SW, Agbese E, Corr TE, Hsuan C, Wright MS, Park S, Velott D, Leslie DL. Timing of treatment for opioid use disorder among birthing people. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024; 161:209289. [PMID: 38272119 PMCID: PMC11090704 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of pregnant women with opioid use disorder (OUD) has increased over time. Although effective treatment options exist, little is known about the extent to which women receive treatment during pregnancy and at what stage of pregnancy care is initiated. METHODS Using a national private health insurance claims database, we identified women aged 13-49 who gave birth in 2006-2019 and had an OUD or nonfatal opioid overdose (NFOO) diagnosis during the year prior to or at delivery. We then identified women who received their first OUD treatment prior to or during pregnancy. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated how rates and timing of the initial OUD treatment changed over time. Furthermore, we examined factors associated with early initiation of OUD treatment among birthing people. RESULTS Of the 7057 deliveries from 6747 women with OUD or NFOO, 63.3 % received any OUD treatment. Rates of OUD treatment increased from 42.9 % in 2006 to 69 % in 2019. Of those treated, in 2006, 54.5 % received their first treatment prior to conception and 24.2 % initiated care during the 1st trimester. In 2019, 68.9 % received their first treatment prior to conception, and 15.1 % initiated care during the 1st trimester. The percentage of women who were first treated in the 2nd trimester or later decreased from 21.2 % in 2006 to 16.1 % in 2019. Factors associated with early treatment initiation include being 25 years or older (age 25-34: aOR, 1.51, 95 % CI, 1.28-1.78; age 35-49: aOR, 1.82, 95 % CI, 1.39-2.37), living in urban areas (aOR, 1.28; 95 % CI, 1.05-1.56), having pre-existing behavioral health comorbidities such as anxiety disorders (aOR, 1.8; 95 % CI, 1.40-2.32), mood disorders (aOR, 1.63; 95 % CI, 1.02-2.61), and substance use disorder other than OUD (aOR, 2.56; 95 % CI, 2.03-3.32). CONCLUSION Overall, rates of OUD treatment increased over time, and more women initiated OUD treatment prior to conception. Despite these improvements, over one-third of pregnant women with OUD/NFOO either received no treatment or did not initiate care until the 3rd trimester in 2019. Future research should examine barriers to OUD treatment initiation among pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyungha Kim
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
| | - Guodong Liu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Sung W Choi
- School of Public Affairs, The Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, PA, USA
| | - Edeanya Agbese
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Tammy E Corr
- Department of Pediatrics, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Charleen Hsuan
- Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Megan S Wright
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA; Penn State Law, University Park, PA, USA; Department of Humanities, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Sujeong Park
- School of Public Affairs, The Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, PA, USA
| | - Diana Velott
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Douglas L Leslie
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eckhardt A, Waller DE, Shull S, Lovejoy TI, Morasco BJ, Gordon AJ, Wyse JJ. "They Ask Questions, But They Don't Want the Answers"-Perceptions of Clinical Communication Among Veterans Discontinuing Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder. Subst Use Addctn J 2024:29767342241251761. [PMID: 38767274 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241251761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) discontinue treatment prematurely, increasing their risk of opioid-related overdose and death. While patient-centered care is considered the gold standard in treating chronic illness, it may be practiced less frequently in the context of OUD care. Patient-provider communication can influence patients' care experiences, potentially having an impact on treatment retention and care decision-making. METHODS This study was conducted at the VA Portland Health Care System from March 2021 to April 2022. We conducted qualitive interviews with patients who had discontinued buprenorphine for the treatment of OUD within the past year. Coding and analysis were guided by inductive qualitative content analysis. Retrospective medical record review identified clinical and demographic characteristics of participants. RESULTS Twenty patients completed an interview. Participant age ranged from 28 to 74 years (median 63 years). Ninety percent of participants were white and 90% male. Many participants expressed frustration and feelings of disempowerment in OUD care processes. Patients with a history of long-term prescribed opioid use frequently expressed stigmatizing views of OUD, and perceptions of disagreement with providers over diagnosis and care choices. Elderly patients and those with multiple comorbidities expressed confusion over significant aspects of their care, as well as difficulty navigating treatment logistics like appointment requirements and medication dose changes. Some patients reported later restarting buprenorphine in new settings, and described feeling respected and involved in care decisions as a facilitator for continuing treatment. CONCLUSIONS Prioritizing patient-centered communication in OUD treatment could improve the patient experience and potentially support treatment retention. Subgroups of OUD patients, such as those with a history of long-term prescribed opioid use, elderly patients with multiple comorbidities, or those who express stigmatizing medication views, could particularly benefit from tailored communication strategies that address their individual concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Eckhardt
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Dylan E Waller
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sarah Shull
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Travis I Lovejoy
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Benjamin J Morasco
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Adam J Gordon
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge and Advocacy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jessica J Wyse
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ramdin C, Zembrzuska M, Zembrzuski K, Nelson L. Layperson knowledge on naloxone and medications for opioid use disorder in an urban population: a cross sectional survey study. J Addict Dis 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38764149 DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2024.2353431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES There has been little research in an urban population regarding knowledge of harm reduction measures and treatment options. The objective of our study was to evaluate knowledge and perceptions of harm reduction measures and types of treatment available for opioid use disorder among patients and family in an urban emergency department (ED) waiting room. METHODS We conducted a single center, cross-sectional survey study that occurred between September 2021 and August 2022. A convenience sample of patients and family members that were above 18 and English speaking were recruited by research assistants. Participants were assessed on knowledge and preferences around drug treatment options and harm reduction. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using the Freeman-Halton/Kruskall-Wallis/Mann-Whitney U tests. p-Values were reported at the 0.05 significance level. RESULTS We collected 200 responses. Of these, 104 people had a connection to someone with a substance use disorder (SUD) and 50 had an SUD. Of those who had a connection to someone with SUD, 63 had heard of naloxone (60.6%, CI: [50.5, 69.9]). Fewer than 60% of respondents in each group had heard of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) (p = 0.46) and fewer than 50% thought that among people who use drugs that they knew would be interested in receiving treatment (p = 0.10). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Our study found that among people who came to an urban emergency department, there was a lack of awareness of harm reduction and MOUD. Interventions should be put into place to educate on the importance of MOUD and harm reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Ramdin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | | | - Krzysztof Zembrzuski
- School of Medicine, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA
| | - Lewis Nelson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hammerslag LR, Talbert J, Slavova S, Lei F, Freeman PR, Marks KR, Fanucchi LC, Walsh SL, Lofwall MR. Utilization of long-acting injectable monthly depot buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) in Kentucky, before and after COVID-19 related buprenorphine access policy changes. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024:209391. [PMID: 38740189 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAI-bup) formulations have advantages over transmucosal buprenorphine (TM-bup), but barriers may limit their utilization. Several policies shifted during the COVID-19 pandemic to promote buprenorphine access. The federal government expanded telemedicine treatment for opioid use disorder and Kentucky (KY) Medicaid lifted prior authorization requirements (PAs) for LAI-bup (i.e., Sublocade®). This retrospective cohort study evaluated changes in LAI-bup access, utilization, and retention before and after these policy changes in KY. METHODS Individual-level TM-bup and LAI-bup dispensing record data from KY's prescription drug monitoring program examined LAI-bup utilization and retention, without a >30-day gap in coverage, for patients starting a new episode of LAI-bup treatment. Two key time periods were examined: pre-policy changes (Apr 1, 2019 - Dec 31, 2019) and post-policy changes (Apr 1, 2020 - Dec 31, 2020). Data on PA requests among Medicaid managed care organizations and availability of LAI-bup Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS)-certified pharmacies were also obtained. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis compared pre- versus post-policy period treatment discontinuation. RESULTS The number of patients initiating LAI-bup increased from 211 to 481 over the two periods. By the end of the post-policy period, 24.3 % of eligible patients were retained on LAI-bup, versus 12.5 % in the pre-policy change period. The adjusted hazard ratio, comparing discontinuation during the post- versus pre-policy change periods, was 0.70 (95 % confidence interval: 0.55-0.89). There were also more REMS-certified pharmacies and providers in the post-policy change period. CONCLUSIONS LAI-bup access, utilization, and retention increased after several policy changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey R Hammerslag
- Institute for Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States of America.
| | - Jeffery Talbert
- Institute for Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Svetla Slavova
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Feitong Lei
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Patricia R Freeman
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Katherine R Marks
- Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Laura C Fanucchi
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States of America; Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States of America; Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States of America; Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barbosa C, Dowd WN, Buell N, Allaire B, Bobashev G. Simulated impact of medicaid expansion on the economic burden of opioid use disorder in North Carolina. Int J Drug Policy 2024; 128:104449. [PMID: 38733650 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid use disorder (OUD) imposes significant costs on state and local governments. Medicaid expansion may lead to a reduction in the cost burden of OUD to the state. METHODS We estimated the health care, criminal justice and child welfare costs, and tax revenue losses, attributable to OUD and borne by the state of North Carolina in 2022, and then estimated changes in the same domains following Medicaid expansion in North Carolina (adopted in December 2023). Analyses used existing literature on the national and state-level costs attributable to OUD to estimate individual-level health care, criminal justice, and child welfare system costs, and lost tax revenues. We combined Individual-level costs and prevalence estimates to estimate costs borne by the state before Medicaid expansion. Changes in costs after expansion were computed based on a) medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) access for new enrollees and b) shifting of responsibility for some health care costs from the state to the federal government. Monte Carlo simulation accounted for the impact of parameter uncertainty. Dollar estimates are from the 2022 price year, and costs following the first year were discounted at 3 %. RESULTS In 2022, North Carolina incurred costs of $749 million (95 % credible interval [CI]: $305 M-$1,526 M) associated with OUD (53 % in health care, 36 % in criminal justice, 7 % in lost tax revenue, and 4 % in child welfare costs). Expanding Medicaid lowered the cost burden of OUD incurred by the state. The state was predicted to save an estimated $72 million per year (95 % CI: $6 M-$241 M) for the first two years and $30 million per year (95 % CI: -$28 M-$176 M) in subsequent years. Over five years, savings totaled $224 million (95 % CI: -$47 M-$949 M). CONCLUSION Medicaid expansion has the potential to decrease the burden of OUD in North Carolina, and policymakers should expedite its implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Barbosa
- Health Economics Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
| | - William N Dowd
- Health Economics Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Naomi Buell
- Health Economics Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Benjamin Allaire
- Advanced Methods Development, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Georgiy Bobashev
- Center for Data Science, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jaffe K, Slat S, Chen L, Macleod C, Bohnert A, Lagisetty P. Perceptions around medications for opioid use disorder among a diverse sample of U.S. adults. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024; 163:209361. [PMID: 38703949 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) including methadone (MMT), buprenorphine (BUP), and naltrexone (NTX) are safe and effective. However, there are significant negative perceptions surrounding MOUD, creating barriers to uptake. While research on MOUD stigma has largely focused on provider and patient experiences, fewer studies have explored MOUD perceptions among the general public. Given that MOUD stigma expressed by social ties surrounding individuals with OUD can influence treatment choices, we assessed MOUD perceptions among U.S. adults to determine how beliefs impacted treatment preference. We further explored how MOUD perceptions may be amplified among racialized groups with histories of experiencing drug-related discrimination. METHODS The study collected survey data from a diverse sample of U.S. adults (n = 1508) between October 2020 and January 2021. The survey measured knowledge of MOUD and non-medication treatments, relative agreement with common MOUD perceptions, and treatment preferences. Multinomial logistic regression analysis tested associations with treatment preference, stratified by race/ethnicity. RESULTS Descriptive results indicated that across groups, many respondents (66.8 %) had knowledge of MOUD, but believed MOUD was a "substitute" for opioids and had some degree of concern about misuse. Multivariable results showed knowledge of non-medication treatments was positively associated with MOUD preference among White (MMT OR = 3.16, 95 % CI = 1.35-7.39; BUP OR = 2.69, CI = 1.11-6.47), Black (MMT OR = 3.91, CI = 1.58-9.69), and Latino/a (MMT OR = 5.12, CI = 1.99-13.2; BUP OR = 3.85, CI = 1.5-9.87; NTX OR = 4.51, CI = 1.44-14.06) respondents. Among White respondents, we identified positive associations between MOUD experience and buprenorphine preference (OR = 4.33, CI = 1.17-16.06); non-medication treatment experience and preference for buprenorphine (OR = 2.86, CI = 1.03-7.94) and naltrexone (OR = 3.17, CI = 1.08-9.28). Concerns around misuse of methadone were negatively associated with methadone preference among White (OR = 0.65, CI = 0.43-0.98) and Latino/a (OR = 0.49, CI = 0.34-0.7), and concerns around misuse of buprenorphine was negatively associated with preference for MOUD among White (MMT OR = 0.62, CI = 0.39-0.99; BUP OR = 0.48, CI = 0.3-0.77; NTX OR = 0.6, CI = 0.36-0.99) and Latino/a (BUP OR = 0.59, CI = 0.39-0.89) respondents. CONCLUSIONS This analysis offers critical insights into treatment perceptions beyond the patient population, finding that negative beliefs around MOUD are common and negatively associated with preferences for medication-based treatment. These findings highlight implications for public support of evidence-based treatment and lay the groundwork for future interventions addressing public stigma toward MOUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Jaffe
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Stephanie Slat
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Liying Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Colin Macleod
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Amy Bohnert
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; VA Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Pooja Lagisetty
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; VA Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sugarman OK, Saloner B, Richards TM, Lasser EC, Heath T, Idries S, Weiner JP, Bandara S. Association of buprenorphine retention and subsequent adverse outcomes following non-fatal overdose: An analysis using statewide linked Maryland databases. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 258:111281. [PMID: 38599134 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients receiving buprenorphine after a non-fatal overdose have lower risk of future nonfatal or fatal overdose, but less is known about the relationship between buprenorphine retention and the risk of adverse outcomes in the post-overdose year. OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between the total number of months with an active buprenorphine prescription (retention) and the odds of an adverse outcome within the 12 months following an index non-fatal overdose. MATERIALS AND METHODS We studied a cohort of people with an index non-fatal opioid overdose in Maryland between July 2016 and December 2020 and at least one filled buprenorphine prescription in the 12-month post-overdose observation period. We used individually linked Maryland prescription drug and hospital admissions data. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine buprenorphine retention and associated odds of experiencing a second non-fatal overdose, all-cause emergency department visits, and all-cause hospitalizations. RESULTS Of 5439 people, 25% (n=1360) experienced a second non-fatal overdose, 78% had an (n=4225) emergency department visit, and 37% (n=2032) were hospitalized. With each additional month of buprenorphine, the odds of experiencing another non-fatal overdose decreased by 4.7%, all-cause emergency department visits by 5.3%, and all-cause hospitalization decreased by 3.9% (p<.0001, respectively). Buprenorphine retention for at least nine months was a critical threshold for reducing overdose risk versus shorter buprenorphine retention. CONCLUSIONS Buprenorphine retention following an index non-fatal overdose event significantly decreases the risk of future overdose, emergency department use, and hospitalization even among people already on buprenorphine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia K Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, United States.
| | - Brendan Saloner
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, United States
| | - Thomas M Richards
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, United States; Johns Hopkins Center for Population Health IT, United States
| | - Elyse C Lasser
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, United States; Johns Hopkins Center for Population Health IT, United States
| | | | | | - Jonathan P Weiner
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, United States; Johns Hopkins Center for Population Health IT, United States
| | - Sachini Bandara
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, United States; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Mental Health, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meyerson BE, Treiber D, Brady BR, Newgass K, Bondurant K, Bentele KG, Samorano S, Arredondo C, Stavros N. Dialing for doctors: Secret shopper study of Arizona methadone and buprenorphine providers, 2022. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024; 160:209306. [PMID: 38296033 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Methadone and buprenorphine are effective and safe treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD) and also reduce overdose and all-cause mortality. Identifying and reaching providers of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has proven difficult for prospective patients and researchers. OBJECTIVES To assess the accuracy of government-maintained lists of Arizona (AZ) providers prescribing MOUD, and the extent to which these providers are accessible for treatment. METHODS A two-phase study used a listing of 2376 AZ MOUD providers obtained from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Phase 1 assessed the accuracy of the listing using internet confirmatory research from May-October 2022. Phase 2 used the resulting list of 838 providers to assess provider availability, type of MOUD treatment provided, and accepted payment through secret shopper calls between November 16 and 30, 2022. RESULTS Just over half (52.2 %, n = 1240) of providers were removed from the original listing during Phase 1. One quarter (25.9 %) were no longer in practice. Among the 833 eligible for the secret shopper Phase 2 study, 36.6 % (n = 307) were reached and identified as providing MOUD. A vast majority (88.1 %) of MOUD providers indicating treatment type were accepting new patients, however methadone was identified far more frequently than was likely permitted or provided for OUD. Providers were 5.5 times more likely to accept new patients if they accepted cash payment for services, and 4.9 times more likely if they accepted Medicaid. Rural areas remained underserved. CONCLUSIONS The active population of MOUD providers is far smaller than surmised. DEA and SAMHSA provider listings are not sufficiently accurate for survey research sampling. Other means of representative sampling will need to be devised, and trusted lists of providers for prospective patients should be promoted, publicly available, and regularly maintained for accuracy. Providers that offer treatment should assure that public-facing staff have basic information about the practice, the treatment offered, and conditions for taking new patients. Concerted efforts must assure rural access at the most local levels to reduce patient travel burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B E Meyerson
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, AZ, United States of America; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, United States of America; Comprehensive Center for Pain and Addiction, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
| | - D Treiber
- Sonoran Prevention Works, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board, AZ, United States of America
| | - B R Brady
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, AZ, United States of America; Comprehensive Center for Pain and Addiction, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, United States of America; School of Interdisciplinary Health Programs, College of Health and Human Services, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, United States of America
| | - K Newgass
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, AZ, United States of America; Southwest Recovery Alliance, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America; Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board, AZ, United States of America
| | - K Bondurant
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, AZ, United States of America; Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board, AZ, United States of America
| | - K G Bentele
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, AZ, United States of America; Southwest Institute for Research on Women, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America
| | - S Samorano
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, AZ, United States of America; Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board, AZ, United States of America
| | - C Arredondo
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board, AZ, United States of America; El Rio Community Health Center, Tucson, AZ, United States of America
| | - N Stavros
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board, AZ, United States of America; Community Medical Services, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Villamil VI, Underwood N, Cremer LJ, Rooks-Peck CR, Jiang X, Guy GP. Barriers to retention in medications for opioid use disorder treatment in real-world practice. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024; 160:209310. [PMID: 38331319 PMCID: PMC11060890 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) are an effective method to treat persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). Longer treatment times are associated with better health outcomes, yet treatment retention rates remain low. This study aimed to assess patient characteristics and experiences associated with retention in treatment. METHODS Data were from an observational cohort study of OUD treatments. Among persons receiving buprenorphine or methadone, log-binomial regression models assessed the relationship between patient characteristics and experiences and three retention outcomes: retention in any OUD treatment, retention in the index treatment (OUD treatment being administered at the time when patients were screened for study eligibility), and 6-month retention in the index treatment. RESULTS Individuals being treated with methadone at the start of the study compared to those treated with buprenorphine were more likely to remain in their same index treatment at the 18-month follow-up (aPR = 1.35; 95 % CI = 1.11-1.65), and to have remained on their index treatment for 6-months or longer (aPR = 1.22; 95 % CI = 1.14-1.32), but were not significantly more likely to remain in any OUD treatment overall. Individuals residing five miles or less from treatment were more likely to have been retained in any OUD treatment (aPR = 1.06; 95 % CI = 1.00-1.12), to remain in their index treatment at the 18-month follow-up (aPR = 1.21; 95 % CI = 1.08-1.36), and to have remained in their index treatment for 6 months or more (aPR = 1.08; 95 % CI = 1.02-1.13). Individuals without health insurance were less likely to be retained in any OUD treatment (aPR = 0.86; 95 % CI = 0.78-0.95). CONCLUSION The prevalence of retention in any OUD treatment was higher for individuals residing five miles or less from treatment. These findings expand on previous studies that have shown distance to and location of treatment sites can impact treatment access and retention. Lack of health insurance was also associated with lower retention in any OUD treatment in this study. Given the high burden associated with overdose deaths, it is important to understand and address barriers to retention in treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa I Villamil
- Division of Overdose Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States of America.
| | - Natasha Underwood
- Division of Overdose Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States of America
| | - Laura J Cremer
- Division of Overdose Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States of America
| | - Cherie R Rooks-Peck
- Division of Overdose Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States of America
| | - Xinyi Jiang
- Division of Overdose Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States of America
| | - Gery P Guy
- Division of Overdose Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Butelman ER, Huang Y, Cathomas F, Gaudreault PO, Roussos P, Russo SJ, Goldstein RZ, Alia-Klein N. Serum cytokine and inflammatory markers in individuals with heroin use disorder: potential biomarkers for diagnosis and disease severity. medRxiv 2024:2024.04.29.24306559. [PMID: 38746340 PMCID: PMC11092731 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.29.24306559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Opioid use disorders cause major morbidity and mortality, and there is a pressing need for novel mechanistic targets and biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis. Exposure to mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists causes changes in cytokine and inflammatory protein networks in peripheral blood, and also in brain glia and neurons. Individuals with heroin use disorder (iHUD) show dysregulated levels of several cytokines in blood. However, there is limited data on a comprehensive panel of such markers in iHUD versus healthy controls (HC), especially as a multi-target biomarker. We used a validated proximity extension assay for relative quantification of 92 cytokines and inflammatory proteins in serum of iHUD on medication assisted therapy (MAT; n=21), versus HC (n=24). Twenty-nine targets showed significant group differences (primarily iHUD>HC), surviving multiple comparison correction (p=0.05). This included 19 members of canonical cytokine families, including specific chemokines, interleukins, growth factors, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related proteins. For dimensionality reduction, data from these 19 cytokines were entered into a principal component (PC) analysis, and PC1 scores were iHUD>HC (p<0.0001). A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis yielded an AUROC=91.7% (p<0.0001). This PC1 score remained a positive predictor of being in the HUD group in a multivariable logistic regression, which included demographic/clinical variables. Overall, this study shows a panel of cytokines that differ significantly between iHUD and HC, and provides a multi-target "cytokine biomarker score" for potential diagnostic purposes, and examination of disease severity.
Collapse
|
12
|
Sidlak A, Dibble B, Dhaliwal M, Bottone P, Marino R, Henry L, Howell J. Analysis of rising cases of adolescent opioid use presentations to the emergency department and their management. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 258:111136. [PMID: 38518662 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to answer the question of how adolescents (ages 12-17 years old) with opioid-related presentations are currently managed in the ED. The two main outcomes were the proportion of visits where naloxone and buprenorphine were both used and prescribed, and the rate of revisits to the emergency department in the six months following ED presentation. METHODS This was a multi-center retrospective cross-sectional study. We studied patients presenting to the ED who were 12-17 years old with an opioid-related presentation. RESULTS Two-hundred and thirty-one patients were identified out of 571 encounters screened. Of these presentations, 77/231 (33%) were girls and 154/231 (67%) were boys. The majority of patients were Latino (64%; n=147); 26% were white (n=59), 6% were middle eastern or Arab (14), and 4% were black (10). Incidence of opioid use disorder per 100,000 presentations increased by 2800% from 2014 to 2022 (21/100,000 +/- 10 [2014] to 600/100,000 +/- 50 [2022]). A plurality of cases was related to opioid withdrawal (42%; 97). On discharge from the ED, 29% of patients received naloxone. For patients in withdrawal, 4% received a prescription for buprenorphine. Twenty-nine percent of patients had a return to the ED in the six months following initial visit. CONCLUSIONS Adolescent opioid-related presentations to the ED are rapidly increasing. Increasing ED presentations, compounded by a high 6-month revisit rate, pose a management challenge amid limited outpatient resources for this population. Opioid agonist therapy and naloxone are not routinely provided. Increasing the use of both are two ways to improve the quality of care for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Sidlak
- Inova Fairfax Hospital, Emergency Department, Falls Church, VA, United States.
| | - Brent Dibble
- Inova Fairfax Hospital, Emergency Department, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Mannet Dhaliwal
- University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Paul Bottone
- Children's Hospital of Pennsylvania, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Ryan Marino
- University Hospitals, Division of Toxicology and Addiction Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Linda Henry
- Inova Fairfax Hospital, Medicine Service Line, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - John Howell
- Inova Fairfax Hospital, Emergency Department, Falls Church, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ledlie S, Tadrous M, Bayoumi AM, McCormack D, Cheng C, Besharah J, Munro C, Gomes T. Trends in opioid toxicities among people with and without opioid use disorder and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada: A population-based analysis. Int J Drug Policy 2024; 127:104392. [PMID: 38522177 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Across Canada, the COVID-19 pandemic occurred amidst an ongoing drug toxicity crisis. Although elevated rates of substance-related harms have been observed nationally, it remains unknown if the pandemic state of emergency led to disproportionate increases in opioid toxicities among people with opioid use disorder (OUD) compared to those without. METHODS We conducted a population-based repeated cross-sectional time series analysis of fatal and non-fatal opioid toxicities between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2021, in Ontario, Canada. We used interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models to examine the impact of the pandemic on monthly rates of opioid toxicities per 100,000 Ontario residents stratified by people with and without OUD. RESULTS We identified 80,296 opioid toxicities of which 53.5 % occurred among people with OUD. Among 52,052 unique individuals, 60.5 % were male and 46.2 % were 25-44 years old. Between January 2014 and December 2021, the rate of opioid toxicities increased from 2.6 to 10.5 per 100,000 (rate ratio [RR]=4.07). The magnitude of this increase differed among people with OUD (0.8 to 7.4 per 100,000; RR=9.35) and without OUD (1.8 to 3.1 per 100,000; RR=1.74). We observed a significant ramp increase in the overall rate of opioid toxicities following the declaration of the pandemic emergency in March 2020 (+0.19 per 100,000 monthly, 95 % CI: 0.029, 0.36, p = 0.021). In a stratified analysis, we found a similar ramp increase among people with OUD (+0.19 per 100,000 monthly, 95 % CI: 0.10, 0.28, p < 0.001); however, this was not observed among people without OUD (p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS The rate of opioid toxicities accelerated across Ontario following the pandemic-related state of emergency, with the majority of this increase among people with OUD. The important differences observed among people with OUD compared with those without, highlights the critical need for improved access to harm reduction and treatment interventions among this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaleesa Ledlie
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Mina Tadrous
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada; Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ahmed M Bayoumi
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of General Internal Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Clare Cheng
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jes Besharah
- Ontario Drug Policy Research Network Lived Experience Advisory Group, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Charlotte Munro
- Ontario Drug Policy Research Network Lived Experience Advisory Group, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tara Gomes
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Englander H, Thakrar AP, Bagley SM, Rolley T, Dong K, Hyshka E. Caring for Hospitalized Adults With Opioid Use Disorder in the Era of Fentanyl: A Review. JAMA Intern Med 2024:2818022. [PMID: 38683591 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Importance The rise of fentanyl and other high-potency synthetic opioids across US and Canada has been associated with increasing hospitalizations and unprecedented overdose deaths. Hospitalization is a critical touchpoint to engage patients and offer life-saving opioid use disorder (OUD) care when admitted for OUD or other medical conditions. Observations Clinical best practices include managing acute withdrawal and pain, initiating medication for OUD, integrating harm reduction principles and practices, addressing in-hospital substance use, and supporting hospital-to-community care transitions. Fentanyl complicates hospital OUD care. Fentanyl's high potency intensifies pain, withdrawal, and cravings and increases the risk for overdose and other harms. Fentanyl's unique pharmacology has rendered traditional techniques for managing opioid withdrawal and initiating buprenorphine and methadone inadequate for some patients, necessitating novel strategies. Further, co-use of opioids with stimulants drugs is common, and the opioid supply is unpredictable and can be contaminated with benzodiazepines, xylazine, and other substances. To address these challenges, clinicians are increasingly relying on emerging practices, such as low-dose buprenorphine initiation with opioid continuation, rapid methadone titration, and the use of alternative opioid agonists. Hospitals must also reconsider conventional approaches to in-hospital substance use and expand clinicians' understanding and embrace of harm reduction, which is a philosophy and set of practical strategies that supports people who use drugs to be safer and healthier without judgment, coercion, or discrimination. Hospital-to-community care transitions should ensure uninterrupted access to OUD care after discharge, which requires special consideration and coordination. Finally, improving hospital-based addiction care requires dedicated infrastructure and expertise. Preparing hospitals across the US and Canada to deliver OUD best practices requires investments in clinical champions, staff education, leadership commitment, community partnerships, quality metrics, and financing. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this review indicate that fentanyl creates increased urgency and new challenges for hospital OUD care. Hospital clinicians and systems have a central role in addressing the current drug crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honora Englander
- Section of Addiction Medicine in General Internal Medicine and the Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | - Ashish P Thakrar
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Sarah M Bagley
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Kathryn Dong
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Elaine Hyshka
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pasman E, Lee G, Singer S, Burson N, Agius E, Resko SM. Attitudes toward medications for opioid use disorder among peer recovery specialists. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2024:1-10. [PMID: 38640497 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2024.2332597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Background: Peer recovery specialists (PRSs) are substance use service providers with lived experience in recovery. Although a large body of research demonstrates the efficacy of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), emerging research suggests PRSs' attitudes toward MOUD are ambivalent or mixed. Few studies have quantitatively assessed factors influencing PRSs' attitudes.Objectives: This study identifies personal and professional characteristics associated with attitudes toward MOUD among PRSs.Methods: PRSs working at publicly funded agencies in Michigan completed a self-administered web-based survey (N = 266, 60.5% women). Surveys assessed socio-demographics, treatment and recovery history, attitudes toward clients, and attitudes toward MOUD. Multiple linear regression was used to identify factors associated with attitudes toward MOUD.Results: A minority of PRSs (21.4%) reported a history of treatment with MOUD, while nearly two-thirds reported current 12-step involvement (62.5%). Compared to PRSs without a history of MOUD treatment, PRSs who had positive (b = 4.71, p < .001) and mixed (b = 3.36, p = .010) experiences with MOUD had more positive attitudes; PRSs with negative experiences with MOUD had less positive attitudes (b = -3.16, p = .003). Current 12-step involvement (b = -1.63, p = .007) and more stigmatizing attitudes toward clients (b = -.294, p < .001) were associated with less positive attitudes toward MOUD. Black PRSs had less positive attitudes than White PRSs (b = -2.50, p = .001), and women had more positive attitudes than men (b = 1.19, p = .038).Conclusion: PRSs' attitudes toward MOUD varied based on the nature of their lived experience. Findings highlight considerations for training and supervising PRSs who serve individuals with opioid use disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Pasman
- Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Guijin Lee
- Department of Counseling and Human Development Services, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Samantha Singer
- School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Nick Burson
- School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Elizabeth Agius
- School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Stella M Resko
- School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Merrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weber AN, Trebach J, Brenner MA, Thomas MM, Bormann NL. Managing Opioid Withdrawal Symptoms During the Fentanyl Crisis: A Review. Subst Abuse Rehabil 2024; 15:59-71. [PMID: 38623317 PMCID: PMC11016949 DOI: 10.2147/sar.s433358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF) is a significant contributor to the increasing rates of overdose-related deaths. Its high potency and lipophilicity can complicate opioid withdrawal syndromes (OWS) and the subsequent management of opioid use disorder (OUD). This scoping review aimed to collate the current OWS management of study populations seeking treatment for OWS and/or OUD directly from an unregulated opioid supply, such as IMF. Therefore, the focus was on therapeutic interventions published between January 2010 and November 2023, overlapping with the period of increasing IMF exposure. A health science librarian conducted a systematic search on November 13, 2023. A total of 426 studies were screened, and 173 studies were reviewed at the full-text level. Forty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Buprenorphine and naltrexone were included in most studies with the goal of transitioning to a long-acting injectable version. Various augmenting agents were tested (buspirone, memantine, suvorexant, gabapentin, and pregabalin); however, the liberal use of adjunctive medication and shortened timelines to initiation had the most consistently positive results. Outside of FDA-approved medications for OUD, lofexidine, gabapentin, and suvorexant have limited evidence for augmenting opioid agonist initiation. Trials often have low retention rates, particularly when opioid agonist washout is required. Neurostimulation strategies were promising; however, they were developed and studied early. Precipitated withdrawal is a concern; however, the rates were low and adequately mitigated or managed with low- or high-dose buprenorphine induction. Maintenance treatment continues to be superior to detoxification without continued management. Shorter induction protocols allow patients to initiate evidence-based treatment more quickly, reducing the use of illicit or non-prescribed substances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joshua Trebach
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Marielle A Brenner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Nicholas L Bormann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wurcel AG, Suzuki J, Schranz AJ, Eaton EF, Cortes-Penfield N, Baddour LM. Strategies to Improve Patient-Centered Care for Drug Use-Associated Infective Endocarditis: JACC Focus Seminar 2/4. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83:1338-1347. [PMID: 38569764 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Drug use-associated infective endocarditis (DUA-IE) is a major cause of illness and death for people with substance use disorder (SUD). Investigations to date have largely focused on advancing the care of patients with DUA-IE and included drug use disorder treatment, decisions about surgery, and choice of antibiotics during the period of hospitalization. Transitions from hospital to outpatient care are relatively unstudied and frequently a key factor of uncontrolled infection, continued substance use, and death. In this paper, we review the evidence supporting cross-disciplinary care for people with DUA-IE and highlight domains that need further clinician, institutional, and research investment in clinicians and institutions. We highlight best practices for treating people with DUA-IE, with a focus on addressing health disparities, meeting health-related social needs, and policy changes that can support care for people with DUA-IE in the hospital and when transitioning to the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alysse G Wurcel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Joji Suzuki
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Asher J Schranz
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ellen F Eaton
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Larry M Baddour
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jones BLH, Geier M, Neuhaus J, Coffin PO, Snyder HR, Soran CS, Knight KR, Suen LW. Withdrawal during outpatient low dose buprenorphine initiation in people who use fentanyl: a retrospective cohort study. Harm Reduct J 2024; 21:80. [PMID: 38594721 PMCID: PMC11005253 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-00998-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Buprenorphine is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD); however, buprenorphine initiation can be complicated by withdrawal symptoms including precipitated withdrawal. There has been increasing interest in using low dose initiation (LDI) strategies to reduce this withdrawal risk. As there are limited data on withdrawal symptoms during LDI, we characterize withdrawal symptoms in people with daily fentanyl use who underwent initiation using these strategies as outpatients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with OUD using daily fentanyl who were prescribed 7-day or 4-day LDI at 2 substance use disorder treatment clinics in San Francisco. Two addiction medicine experts assessed extracted chart documentation for withdrawal severity and precipitated withdrawal, defined as acute worsening of withdrawal symptoms immediately after taking buprenorphine. A third expert adjudicated disagreements. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS There were 175 initiations in 126 patients. The mean age was 37 (SD 10 years). 71% were men, 26% women, and 2% non-binary. 21% identified as Black, 16% Latine, and 52% white. 60% were unstably housed and 75% had Medicaid insurance. Substance co-use included 74% who used amphetamines, 29% cocaine, 22% benzodiazepines, and 19% alcohol. Follow up was available for 118 (67%) initiations. There was deviation from protocol instructions in 22% of these initiations with follow up. 31% had any withdrawal, including 21% with mild symptoms, 8% moderate and 2% severe. Precipitated withdrawal occurred in 10 cases, or 8% of initiations with follow up. Of these, 7 had deviation from protocol instructions; thus, there were 3 cases with follow up (3%) in which precipitated withdrawal occurred without protocol deviation. CONCLUSIONS Withdrawal was relatively common in our cohort but was mostly mild, and precipitated withdrawal was rare. Deviation from instructions, structural barriers, and varying fentanyl use characteristics may contribute to withdrawal. Clinicians should counsel patients who use fentanyl that mild withdrawal symptoms are likely during LDI, and there is still a low risk for precipitated withdrawal. Future studies should compare withdrawal across initiation types, seek ways to support patients in initiating buprenorphine, and qualitatively elicit patients' withdrawal experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L H Jones
- Medical Student Center, UCSF School of Medicine, 533 Parnassus Avenue, S-245, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Michelle Geier
- San Francisco Department of Public Health, 101 Grove Street, San Francisco, CA, 94102, USA
| | - John Neuhaus
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Phillip O Coffin
- San Francisco Department of Public Health, 101 Grove Street, San Francisco, CA, 94102, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Hannah R Snyder
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 995 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA
| | - Christine S Soran
- Division of General Internal Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA
- Division of Substance Abuse and Addiction Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA
| | - Kelly R Knight
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 490 Illinois Street, 7th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Leslie W Suen
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA
- Division of Substance Abuse and Addiction Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bergman AA, Oberman RS, Taylor SL, Kranke B, Chang ET. Prescribing and Acceptance of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in VA Primary Care: Veteran and Provider Perspectives. J Gen Intern Med 2024:10.1007/s11606-024-08703-z. [PMID: 38587730 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08703-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) such as buprenorphine/naloxone can effectively treat OUD and reduce opioid-related mortality, but they remain underutilized, especially in non-substance use disorder settings such as primary care (PC). OBJECTIVE To uncover the factors that can facilitate successful prescribing of MOUD and uptake/acceptance of MOUD by patients in PC settings in the Veterans Health Administration. DESIGN Semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews with 77 providers (e.g., primary care providers, hospitalists, nurses, addiction psychiatrists) and 22 Veteran patients with experience taking MOUD. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically using a combination a priori/inductive approach. KEY RESULTS Providers and patients shared their general perceptions and experiences with MOUD, including high satisfaction with buprenorphine/naloxone with few side effects and caveats, although some patients reported drawbacks to methadone. Both providers and patients supported the idea of prescribing MOUD in PC settings to prioritize patient comfort and convenience. Providers described individual-level barriers (e.g., time, stigma, perceptions of difficulty level), structural-level barriers (e.g., pharmacy not having medications ready, space for inductions), and organizational-level barriers (e.g., inadequate staff support, lack of nursing protocols) to PC providers prescribing MOUD. Facilitators centered on education and knowledge enhancement, workflow and practice support, patient engagement and patient-provider communication, and leadership and organizational support. The most common barrier faced by patients to starting MOUD was apprehensions about pain, while facilitators focused on personal motivation, encouragement from others, education about MOUD, and optimally timed provider communication strategies. CONCLUSIONS These findings can help improve provider-, clinic-, and system-level supports for MOUD prescribing across multiple settings, as well as foster communication strategies that can increase patient acceptance of MOUD. They also point to how interprofessional collaboration across service lines and leadership support can facilitate MOUD prescribing among non-addiction providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia A Bergman
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street, Los Angeles, CA, 91343, USA.
| | - Rebecca S Oberman
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street, Los Angeles, CA, 91343, USA
| | - Stephanie L Taylor
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street, Los Angeles, CA, 91343, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bridget Kranke
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street, Los Angeles, CA, 91343, USA
| | - Evelyn T Chang
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street, Los Angeles, CA, 91343, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lai B, Oesterle T, Kelpin S, Morrison E, Elegbede A, Warner N. Chronic pain and opioid use disorder workshop for medical students: a biopsychosocial and multidisciplinary approach. Pain Med 2024; 25:306-309. [PMID: 37951592 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Lai
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905-0002, United States
| | - Tyler Oesterle
- Division of Addiction Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Sydney Kelpin
- Corewell Health Bariatrics, Grand Rapids, MI 49546, United States
| | - Eleshia Morrison
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Audrey Elegbede
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Nafisseh Warner
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Andraka-Christou B, Golan OK, Williams M, Buksbaum S, Gordon AJ, Stein BD. A Systematic Review of State Office-Based Buprenorphine Treatment Laws Effective During 2022: Counseling, Dosage, and Visit Frequency Requirements. Subst Use Addctn J 2024; 45:278-291. [PMID: 38288697 DOI: 10.1177/29767342231223721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Buprenorphine is among the most effective treatments for opioid use disorder. Even though the federal government recently eliminated the waiver requirement and patient limits applicable to office-based buprenorphine treatment (OBBT), among other settings, some states may still have policies imposing requirements on OBBT providers not required by federal law. METHODS We collected statutes and regulations from 50 US states and the District of Columbia (ie, 51 jurisdictions) between August 11 and November 30, 2022 using the Nexis Uni legal database and search terms related to OBBT counseling, dosage, and/or frequency of visits. We then used template analysis, a mixed deductive-inductive qualitative method, to analyze legal content. RESULTS Ten jurisdictions (20%) in 2022 had an OBBT counseling, dosage, and/or visit frequency requirement. Four jurisdictions had at least one law in each OBBT policy category examined. One-fifth of jurisdictions have OBBT policies not required under federal law. Five of these jurisdictions are among those with the highest overdose death rates per capita, according to publicly available data from 2021. Some OBBT requirements could potentially limit clinician interest in offering buprenorphine treatment or result in inadequate care (eg, if dosage limitations are too low.). CONCLUSIONS Even though a federal waiver is no longer required for OBBT, our results suggests that at least some jurisdictions have other OBBT requirements, such as counseling, dosage, and/or frequency requirements. Given the severity of the ongoing opioid overdose crisis, policymakers should carefully consider the extent to which OBBT requirements are evidence based.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Andraka-Christou
- School of Global Health Management and Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | - Michelle Williams
- Legal Studies Department, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Scott Buksbaum
- Legal Studies Department, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Adam J Gordon
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Aksu S, Soyata AZ, Şeker S, Akkaya G, Yılmaz Y, Kafalı T, Evren C, Umut G. Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training improves decision making and executive functions in opioid use disorder: a triple-blind sham-controlled pilot study. J Addict Dis 2024; 42:154-165. [PMID: 36861945 DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2023.2168991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a chronic disorder with a considerable amount of morbidity and mortality. Despite remarkable improvement achieved by maintenance programs, an array of treatment goals were still unmet. Mounting evidence suggests that transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) improves decision making and cognitive functions in addictive disorders. tDCS paired with a decision making task was depicted to diminish impulsivity as well. The present study aimed to assess the effect of tDCS combined with cognitive training (CT) in OUD for the first time. In this triple-blind randomized sham-controlled pilot study, 38 individuals with OUD from the Buprenorphine-Naloxone Maintenance Therapy program were administered 20-minutes of 2 mA active/sham tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with concomitant cognitive training. A selected test battery evaluating decision making under risk and ambiguity as well as executive functions, verbal fluency and working memory was utilized before and after the intervention. Greater improvements were observed in decision making under ambiguity (p = 0.016), set shifting ability and alternating fluency while no improvements were observed in decision making under risk in the active group, compared to sham. Deficits of decision making and executive functions have a pivotal role in the perpetuation and the relapse of the OUD. Alleviation of these impairments brought tDCS/CT forth as an expedient neuroscientifically-grounded treatment option that merits further exploration in OUD, Trial registration: NCT05568251.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serkan Aksu
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
- Department of Physiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Zihni Soyata
- Psychiatry Outpatient Clinic, Başakşehir State Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Sercan Şeker
- Department of Physiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gözde Akkaya
- Department of Child Development, Istanbul Topkapı University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yasemin Yılmaz
- Department of Psychology, İstanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tuğba Kafalı
- Department of Psychology, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Cüneyt Evren
- Department of Psychology, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gökhan Umut
- Research, Treatment and Training Center for Alcohol and Substance Dependence (AMATEM), Bakirkoy Training and Research Hospital for Psychiatry Neurology and Neurosurgery, Turkey, Istanbul
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chatterjee A, Baker T, Rudorf M, Walt G, Stotz C, Martin A, Kinnard EN, McAlearney AS, Bosak J, Medley B, Pinkhover A, Taylor JL, Samet JH, Lunze K. Mobile treatment for opioid use disorder: Implementation of community-based, same-day medication access interventions. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024; 159:209272. [PMID: 38128649 PMCID: PMC10947870 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) are lifesaving, but <20 % of individuals in the US who could benefit receive them. As part of the NIH-supported HEALing Communities Study (HCS), coalitions in several communities in Massachusetts and Ohio implemented mobile MOUD programs to overcome barriers to MOUD receipt. We defined mobile MOUD programs as units that provide same-day access to MOUD at remote sites. We aimed to (1) document the design and organizational structure of mobile programs providing same-day or next-day MOUD, and (2) explore the barriers and facilitators to implementation as well as the successes and challenges of ongoing operation. METHODS Program staff from five programs in two states (n = 11) participated in semi-structured interviews. Two authors conducted thematic analysis of the transcripts based on the domains of the social-ecological model and the semi-structured interview guide. RESULTS Mobile MOUD units sought to improve immediate access to MOUD ("Our answer is pretty much always, 'Yes, we'll get you started right here, right now,'"), advance equity ("making sure that we have staff who speak other languages, who are on the unit and have some resources that are in different languages,"), and decrease opioid overdose deaths. Salient program characteristics included diverse staff, including staff with lived experience of substance use ("She just had that personal knowledge of where we should be going"). Mobile units offered harm reduction services, broad medical services (in particular, wound care), and connection to transportation programs and incorporated consistency in service provision and telemedicine access. Implementation facilitators included trusting relationships with partner organizations (particularly pharmacies and correctional facilities), nuanced understanding of local politics, advertising, protocol flexibility, and on-unit prescriber hours. Barriers included unclear licensing requirements, staffing shortages and competing priorities for staff, funding challenges due to inconsistency in grant funding and low reimbursement ("It's not really possible that billing in and of itself is going to be able to sustain it"), and community stigma toward addiction services generally. CONCLUSIONS Despite organizational, community, and policy barriers, participants described mobile MOUD units as an innovative way to expand access to life-saving medications, promote equity in MOUD treatment, and overcome stigma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avik Chatterjee
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Trevor Baker
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Maria Rudorf
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Galya Walt
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Caroline Stotz
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Anna Martin
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | | | - Ann Scheck McAlearney
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Julie Bosak
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Bethany Medley
- Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Allyson Pinkhover
- Brockton Neighborhood Health Center, Brockton, MA, United States of America; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Jessica L Taylor
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey H Samet
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Karsten Lunze
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America; Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rajagopal S, Westra J, Raji MA, Wilkes D, Kuo YF. Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder During COVID-19: Retrospective Study of Commercially Insured Patients from 2019-2022. Am J Prev Med 2024; 66:635-644. [PMID: 37979624 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study assesses disparities in medications for opioid use disorder in adults with opioid use disorder and examines the associations between state-level COVID-19 lockdown and telehealth policies and medications for opioid use disorder utilization rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS This retrospective cohort study of 396,872 adults with opioid use disorder analyzed monthly medications for opioid use disorder utilization rates between January 2019 and June 2022 using data from Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Primary outcome measure was monthly medications for opioid use disorder utilization rates. Variables of interest were patients' demographics and state-level characteristics (telehealth policies for controlled substance prescribing, COVID-19 lockdown policy, and registered buprenorphine providers/100,000). In multivariable analyses, time trend was grouped into four time periods: before COVID-19, early COVID-19, early vaccine, and Omicron-related COVID-19 surge and thereafter. RESULTS Medications for opioid use disorder rates increased from a 1.2% change in slope monthly on a log scale to 2% monthly from February 2021 to October 2021, after which the utilization rate increased to a lesser degree. Women had 28% lower odds of receiving medications for opioid use disorder than men; Hispanic, Black, and Asian patients had 40%, 34%, and 32% lower odds of receiving medications for opioid use disorder than White patients, respectively. These sex and racial disparities persisted throughout the pandemic. Regional medications for opioid use disorder rate differences, mediated by buprenorphine providers/100,000 state population, decreased during the pandemic. States with telehealth policies for controlled substance prescribing had greater percentages of patients on medications for opioid use disorder (11.7%) than states without such policies (10.4%). CONCLUSIONS Monthly medications for opioid use disorder rates increased during the pandemic, with higher rates in men, White individuals, and residents of the Northeast region. States with policies permitting telehealth prescribing of controlled substances also had higher medications for opioid use disorder rates, supporting a future expansion of medications for opioid use disorder-related telehealth to improve access to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpa Rajagopal
- John Sealy School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Jordan Westra
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Mukaila A Raji
- Division of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Sealy Center On Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Denise Wilkes
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Yong-Fang Kuo
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Division of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Sealy Center On Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Peddireddy SR, Livingston MD, Young AM, Freeman PR, Ibragimov U, Komro KA, Lofwall MR, Oser CB, Staton M, Cooper HLF. Willingness to utilize a mobile treatment unit in five counties at the epicenter of the US rural opioid epidemic. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024; 159:209262. [PMID: 38103835 PMCID: PMC10947911 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION US federal policies are evolving to expand the provision of mobile treatment units (MTUs) offering medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Mobile MOUD services are critical for rural areas with poor geographic access to fixed-site treatment providers. This study explored willingness to utilize an MTU among a sample of people who use opioids in rural Eastern Kentucky counties at the epicenter of the US opioid epidemic. METHODS The study analyzed Cross-sectional survey data from the Kentucky Communities and Researchers Engaging to Halt the Opioid Epidemic (CARE2HOPE) study covering five rural counties in the state. Logistic regression models investigated the association between willingness to utilize an MTU providing buprenorphine and naltrexone and potential correlates of willingness, identified using the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations. RESULTS The analytic sample comprised 174 people who used opioids within the past six months. Willingness to utilize an MTU was high; 76.5 % of participants endorsed being willing. Those who had recently received MOUD treatment, compared to those who had not received any form of treatment or recovery support services, had six-fold higher odds of willingness to use an MTU. However, odds of being willing to utilize an MTU were 73 % lower among those who were under community supervision (e.g., parole, probation) and 81 % lower among participants who experienced an overdose within the past six months. CONCLUSIONS There was high acceptability of MTUs offering buprenorphine and naltrexone within this sample, highlighting the potential for MTUs to alleviate opioid-related harms in underserved rural areas. However, the finding that people who were recently under community supervision or had overdosed were significantly less willing to seek mobile MOUD treatment suggest barriers (e.g., stigma) to mobile MOUD at individual and systemic levels, which may prevent improving opioid-related outcomes in these rural communities given their high rates of criminal-legal involvement and overdose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Snigdha R Peddireddy
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, USA.
| | - Melvin D Livingston
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, USA
| | - April M Young
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Patricia R Freeman
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Umedjon Ibragimov
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, USA
| | - Kelli A Komro
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, USA
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Carrie B Oser
- Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky College of Arts & Sciences, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Michele Staton
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Hannah L F Cooper
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rosenfield MN, Beaudoin FL, Gaither R, Hallowell BD, Daly MM, Marshall BDL, Chambers LC. Association between comorbid chronic pain or prior hospitalization for mental illness and substance use treatment among a cohort at high risk of opioid overdose. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024; 159:209273. [PMID: 38113996 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic pain and serious mental illness increase risk of opioid use, and opioid use can exacerbate both conditions. Substance use disorder (SUD) treatment can be lifesaving, but chronic pain and serious mental illness may make recovery challenging. We evaluated the association between current chronic pain and prior hospitalization for mental illness and 90-day SUD treatment engagement, among emergency department (ED) patients at high risk of opioid overdose. METHODS We conducted a cohort analysis of 648 ED patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial in Rhode Island. We linked baseline study data on chronic pain and prior hospitalization for mental illness to statewide administrative data on state-licensed treatment programs (including methadone) and buprenorphine treatment via prescription. We defined treatment engagement as initiation of a state-licensed treatment program, transfer between state-licensed programs/providers, or a buprenorphine prescription (re-)fill. We used modified Poisson models to estimate the association between each baseline comorbidity and treatment engagement within 90 days following the ED visit, adjusted for a priori potential confounders. In an exploratory analysis, models were stratified by baseline treatment status. RESULTS The mean age of participants was 37 years; 439 (68 %) were male, and 446 (69 %) had been recently unhoused. Overall, 278 participants (43 %) engaged in treatment within 90 days of the ED visit. Participants with prior hospitalization for mental illness were more likely to engage in treatment than those without (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] = 1.24, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-1.53), although this association was only among those already accessing treatment at baseline (ARR = 1.58, 95 % CI = 1.10-2.27). Chronic pain was not associated with 90-day treatment engagement overall (ARR = 1.12, 95 % CI = 0.91-1.38) or within baseline treatment subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Among ED patients at high risk of opioid overdose and accessing treatment at baseline, those with prior hospitalization for mental illness (but not chronic pain) were more likely to engage in treatment following the ED visit, which may reflect disproportionate initiation of additional treatment programs, transfer between programs/providers, or ongoing buprenorphine treatment. Touchpoints within the medical system should be leveraged to ensure that everyone, including those with serious mental illness, can access high-quality SUD treatment at the desired intensity level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maayan N Rosenfield
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Francesca L Beaudoin
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Rachel Gaither
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States
| | | | - Mackenzie M Daly
- Rhode Island Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Brandon D L Marshall
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Laura C Chambers
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Regenstreif L, Kahan M. More data on opioid diversion is needed. Drug Alcohol Rev 2024. [PMID: 38532597 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mel Kahan
- Substance Use Service, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bartholomew TS, Plesons M, Serota DP, Alonso E, Metsch LR, Feaster DJ, Ucha J, Suarez E, Forrest DW, Chueng TA, Ciraldo K, Brooks J, Smith JD, Barocas JA, Tookes HE. Project CHARIOT: study protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study of comprehensive tele-harm reduction for engagement of people who inject drugs in HIV prevention services. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2024; 19:21. [PMID: 38528570 PMCID: PMC10964520 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-024-00447-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who inject drugs (PWID) remain a high priority population under the federal Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative with 11% of new HIV infections attributable to injection drug use. There is a critical need for innovative, efficacious, scalable, and community-driven models of healthcare in non-stigmatizing settings for PWID. We seek to test a Comprehensive-TeleHarm Reduction (C-THR) intervention for HIV prevention services delivered via a syringe services program (SSP). METHODS The CHARIOT trial is a hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation study using a parallel two-arm randomized controlled trial design. Participants (i.e., PWID; n = 350) will be recruited from a syringe services program (SSP) in Miami, Florida. Participants will be randomized to receive either C-THR or non-SSP clinic referral and patient navigation. The objectives are: (1) to determine if the C-THR intervention increases engagement in HIV prevention (i.e., HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis; PrEP or medications for opioid use disorder; MOUD) compared to non-SSP clinic referral and patient navigation, (2) to examine the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the C-THR intervention, and (3) to assess the barriers and facilitators to implementation and sustainment of the C-THR intervention. The co-primary outcomes are PrEP or MOUD engagement across follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. For PrEP, engagement is confirmed by tenofovir on dried blood spot or cabotegravir injection within the previous 8 weeks. For MOUD, engagement is defined as screening positive for norbuprenorphine or methadone on urine drug screen; or naltrexone or buprenorphine injection within the previous 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes include PrEP adherence, engagement in HCV treatment and sustained virologic response, and treatment of sexually transmitted infections. The short and long term cost-effectiveness analyses and mixed-methods implementation evaluation will provide compelling data on the sustainability and possible impact of C-THR on comprehensive HIV prevention delivered via SSPs. DISCUSSION The CHARIOT trial will be the first to our knowledge to test the efficacy of an innovative, peer-led telehealth intervention with PWID at risk for HIV delivered via an SSP. This innovative healthcare model seeks to transform the way PWID access care by bypassing the traditional healthcare system, reducing multi-level barriers to care, and meeting PWID where they are. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05897099. Trial registry name: Comprehensive HIV and Harm Prevention Via Telehealth (CHARIOT). Registration date: 06/12/2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler S Bartholomew
- Division of Health Services Research and Policy, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| | - Marina Plesons
- Division of Health Services Research and Policy, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - David P Serota
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Elizabeth Alonso
- Division of Health Services Research and Policy, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Lisa R Metsch
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel J Feaster
- Biostatistics Division, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jessica Ucha
- Division of Health Services Research and Policy, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Edward Suarez
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - David W Forrest
- Department of Anthropology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Teresa A Chueng
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Katrina Ciraldo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jimmie Brooks
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Justin D Smith
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Joshua A Barocas
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Hansel E Tookes
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pytell JD, Binswanger IA. Addressing Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care: Revisiting Core Primary Care Principles to Confidently Initiate Treatment. J Gen Intern Med 2024:10.1007/s11606-024-08727-5. [PMID: 38519747 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08727-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jarratt D Pytell
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
- Institute of Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Ingrid A Binswanger
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Institute of Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Colorado Permanente Medical Group, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kan E, Baldwin LM, Mooney LJ, Saxon AJ, Zhu Y, Hser YI. Medication-based treatment among rural, primary care patients diagnosed with opioid use disorder and alcohol use disorder. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024:209339. [PMID: 38513976 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Opioid and alcohol use disorders are increasingly being addressed in primary care, yet how medications to treat these disorders are prescribed in rural regions is unknown. METHODS We determined prevalence, types, and duration of medication prescription for opioid and/or alcohol use disorder among adult patients in rural primary clinics. The sample included 1874 adult patients who visited one of six rural primary care sites in the Northeastern and Northwestern United States at least once from October 2019 to January 2021 and had a diagnosis code for opioid use disorder (OUD), alcohol use disorder (AUD), or co-occurring opioid and alcohol use disorder (OUD + AUD) during that time. RESULTS Patients with OUD + AUD were more likely to be prescribed medication for at least one of these disorders (85.3 %) than patients with OUD only (63.7 %) or AUD only (10.3 %). Further, the OUD + AUD group had the highest number of days on medication (M = 264.7), followed by OUD only (M = 220.5), then the AUD only group (M = 62.5). Only 8.8 % of patients with OUD + AUD were prescribed naltrexone or medication for OUD + AUD to treat both substance use disorders. CONCLUSIONS Medications for treating AUD as well as OUD are available, but few patients with OUD + AUD and even fewer with AUD received pharmacological treatment for AUD. The current work highlights the need for rural clinicians to consider medications for AUD as an important treatment method for patients with AUD only or OUD + AUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Kan
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
| | - Laura-Mae Baldwin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Larissa J Mooney
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Saxon
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Yuhui Zhu
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Yih-Ing Hser
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wyse JJ, Eckhardt A, Waller D, Gordon AJ, Shull S, Lovejoy TI, Mackey K, Morasco BJ. Patients' Perspectives on Discontinuing Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder. J Addict Med 2024:01271255-990000000-00296. [PMID: 38498620 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Buprenorphine and other medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) are recommended as standard of care in the treatment of OUD and are associated with positive health and addiction-related outcomes. Despite benefits, discontinuation is common, with half of patients discontinuing in the first year of treatment. Addressing OUD is a major clinical priority, yet little is known about the causes of medication discontinuation from the patient perspective. METHODS From March 2021 to April 2022, we conducted qualitative interviews with patients who had discontinued buprenorphine for the treatment of OUD within the past 12 months. Eligible participants were selected from 2 Veterans Health Administration Health Care Systems in Oregon. Coding and analysis were guided by conventional qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Twenty participants completed an interview; 90% were White and 90% were male, and the mean age was 54.2 years. Before discontinuation, participants had received buprenorphine for 8.3 months on average (range, 1-40 months); 80% had received buprenorphine for less than 12 months. Qualitative analysis identified the following themes relating to discontinuation: health system barriers (eg, logistical hurdles, rules and policy violations), medication effects (adverse effects; attributed adverse effects, lack of efficacy in treating chronic pain) and desire for opioid use. Patient description of decisions to discontinue buprenorphine could be multicausal, reflecting provider or system-level barriers in interaction with patient complexity or medication ambivalence. CONCLUSIONS Study results identify several actionable ways OUD treatment could be modified to enhance patient retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica J Wyse
- From the Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR (JJW, AE, DW, SS, TIL, KM, BJM); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR (JJW); Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT (AJG); Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT (AJG); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (TIL, BJM); and VA Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center, Portland, OR (TIL)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Burke KN, Krawczyk N, Li Y, Byrne L, Desai IK, Bandara S, Feder KA. Barriers and facilitators to use of buprenorphine in state-licensed specialty substance use treatment programs: A survey of program leadership. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024; 162:209351. [PMID: 38499248 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including buprenorphine, reduce overdose risk and improve outcomes for individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, historically, most non-opioid treatment program (non-OTP) specialty substance use treatment programs have not offered buprenorphine. Understanding barriers to offering buprenorphine in specialty substance use treatment settings is critical for expanding access to buprenorphine. This study aims to examine program-level attitudinal, financial, and regulatory factors that influence clients' access to buprenorphine in state-licensed non-OTP specialty substance use treatment programs. METHODS We surveyed leadership from state-licensed non-OTP specialty substance use treatment programs in New Jersey about organizational characteristics, including medications provided on- and off-site and percentage of OUD clients receiving any type of MOUD, and perceived attitudinal, financial, and regulatory barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine. The study estimated prevalence of barriers and compared high MOUD reach (n = 36, 35 %) and low MOUD reach (n = 66, 65 %) programs. RESULTS Most responding organizations offered at least one type of MOUD either on- or off-site (n = 80, 78 %). However, 71 % of organizations stated that fewer than a quarter of their clients with OUD use any type of MOUD. Endorsement of attitudinal, financial, and institutional barriers to buprenorphine were similar among high and low MOUD reach programs. The most frequently endorsed government actions suggested to increase use of buprenorphine were facilitating access to long-acting buprenorphine (n = 95, 96 %), education and stigma reduction for clients and families (n = 95, 95 %), and financial assistance to clients to pay for medications (n = 90, 90 %). CONCLUSIONS Although non-OTP specialty substance use programs often offer clients access to MOUD, including buprenorphine, most OUD clients do not actually receive MOUD. Buprenorphine uptake in these settings may require increased financial support for programs and clients, more robust education and training for providers, and efforts to reduce the stigma associated with medication among clients and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn N Burke
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.
| | - Noa Krawczyk
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1(st) Ave, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
| | - Yuzhong Li
- New York University School of Global Public Health, 708 Broadway, New York, NY 10003, United States of America
| | - Lauren Byrne
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America
| | - Isha K Desai
- George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Ave NW #2, Washington, DC 20037, United States of America
| | - Sachini Bandara
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America
| | - Kenneth A Feder
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Xu KY, Gertner AK, Greenfield SF, Williams AR, Grucza RA. Treatment setting and buprenorphine discontinuation: an analysis of multi-state insurance claims. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2024; 19:17. [PMID: 38493109 PMCID: PMC10943881 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-024-00450-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Potential differences in buprenorphine treatment outcomes across various treatment settings are poorly characterized in multi-state administrative data. We thus evaluated the association of opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment setting and insurance type with risk of buprenorphine discontinuation among commercial insurance and Medicaid enrollees initiated on buprenorphine. METHODS In this observational, retrospective cohort study using the Merative MarketScan databases (2006-2016), we analyzed buprenorphine retention in 58,200 US adults with OUD. Predictor variables included insurance status (Medicaid vs commercial) and treatment setting, operationalized as substance use disorder (SUD) specialty treatment facility versus outpatient primary care physicians (PCPs) versus outpatient psychiatry, ascertained by linking physician visit codes to buprenorphine prescriptions. Treatment setting was inferred based on timing of prescriber visit claims preceding prescription fills. We estimated time to buprenorphine discontinuation using multivariable cox regression. RESULTS Among enrollees with OUD receiving buprenorphine, 26,168 (45.0%) had prescriptions from SUD facilities without outpatient buprenorphine treatment, with the remaining treated by outpatient PCPs (n = 23,899, 41.1%) and psychiatrists (n = 8133, 13.9%). Overall, 50.6% and 73.3% discontinued treatment at 180 and 365 days respectively. Buprenorphine discontinuation was higher among enrollees receiving prescriptions from SUD facilities (aHR = 1.03[1.01-1.06]) and PCPs (aHR = 1.07[1.05-1.10]). Medicaid enrollees had lower buprenorphine retention than those with commercial insurance, particularly those receiving buprenorphine from SUD facilities and PCPs (aHR = 1.24[1.20-1.29] and aHR = 1.39[1.34-1.45] respectively, relative to comparator group of commercial insurance enrollees receiving buprenorphine from outpatient psychiatry). CONCLUSION Buprenorphine discontinuation is high across outpatient PCP, psychiatry, and SUD treatment facility settings, with potentially lower treatment retention among Medicaid enrollees receiving care from SUD facilities and PCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Y Xu
- Department of Psychiatry, Health and Behavior Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Renard Hospital 3007A, 4940 Children's Place, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Alex K Gertner
- University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Shelly F Greenfield
- Division of Women's Mental Health and Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arthur Robin Williams
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard A Grucza
- Advanced Health Data Institute, Department of Health and Outcomes Research, Department of Family/Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Best CS, Matheson C, Robertson J, Ritchie T, Cowden F, Dumbrell J, Duncan C, Kessavalou K, Woolston C, Schofield J. Association between benzodiazepine coprescription and mortality in people on opioid replacement therapy: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e074668. [PMID: 38485490 PMCID: PMC10941108 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between opioid replacement therapy (ORT) and benzodiazepine (BZD) coprescription and all-cause mortality compared with the prescription of ORT alone. DESIGN Population-based cohort study. SETTING Scotland, UK. PARTICIPANTS Participants were people prescribed ORT between January 2010 and end of December 2020 aged 18 years or above. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES All-cause mortality, drug-related deaths and non-drug related deaths. SECONDARY OUTCOME ORT continuous treatment duration. ANALYSIS Cox regression with time-varying covariates. RESULTS During follow-up, 5776 of 46 899 participants died: 1398 while on coprescription and 4378 while on ORT only. The mortality per 100 person years was 3.11 during coprescription and 2.34 on ORT only. The adjusted HR for all-cause mortality was 1.17 (1.10 to 1.24). The adjusted HR for drug-related death was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.24) and the hazard for death not classified as drug-related was 1.19 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.30). CONCLUSION Coprescription of BZDs in ORT was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, although with a small effect size than the international literature. Coprescribing was also associated with longer retention in treatment. Risk from BZD coprescription needs to be balanced against the risk from illicit BZDs and unplanned treatment discontinuation. A randomised controlled trial is urgently needed to provide a clear clinical direction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04622995.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - James Robertson
- Muirhouse Medical Group, Edinburgh, UK
- University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joe Schofield
- School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh College of Humanities and Social Science, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Evans VD, Arenas A, Shinozuka K, Tabaac BJ, Beutler BD, Cherian K, Fasano C, Muir OS. Psychedelic Therapy: A Primer for Primary Care Clinicians-Ketamine. Am J Ther 2024; 31:e155-e177. [PMID: 38518272 DOI: 10.1097/mjt.0000000000001721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ketamine, an arylcyclohexylamine dissociative anesthetic agent, has evolved into a versatile therapeutic. It has a rapid-onset, well-understood cardiovascular effects and a favorable safety profile in clinical use. Its enantiomeric compound, esketamine, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2019 for both treatment-resistant depression and major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY Research indicates dose-dependent impacts on cognition, particularly affecting episodic and working memory following both acute administration and chronic use, albeit temporarily for the former and potentially persistent for the latter. Alongside acute risks to cardiovascular stability, ketamine use poses potential liver toxicity concerns, especially with prolonged or repeated exposure within short time frames. The drug's association with "ketamine cystitis," characterized by bladder inflammation, adds to its profile of physiological risks. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES Data demonstrate a single intravenous infusion of ketamine exhibits antidepressant effects within hours (weighted effect size averages of depression scores (N = 518) following a single 0.5 mg/kg infusion of ketamine is d = 0.96 at 24 hours). Ketamine is also effective at reducing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom severity following repeated infusions (Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale scores: -11.88 points compared with midazolam control). Ketamine also decreased suicidal ideation in emergency settings (Scale for Suicidal Ideation scores: -4.96 compared with midazolam control). Through its opioid-sparing effect, ketamine has revolutionized postoperative pain management by reducing analgesic consumption and enhancing recovery. LIMITATIONS Many studies indicate that ketamine's therapeutic effects may subside within weeks. Repeated administrations, given multiple times per week, are often required to sustain decreases in suicidality and depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Ketamine's comprehensive clinical profile, combined with its robust effects on depression, suicidal ideation, PTSD, chronic pain, and other psychiatric conditions, positions it as a substantial contender for transformative therapeutic application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viviana D Evans
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Alejandro Arenas
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Kenneth Shinozuka
- Centre for Eudaimonia and Human Flourishing, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Burton J Tabaac
- University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV
- Department of Neurology, Carson Tahoe Health, Carson City, NV
| | - Bryce D Beutler
- University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Kirsten Cherian
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | | | - Owen S Muir
- Fermata Health, Brooklyn, NY; and
- Acacia Clinics, Sunnyvale, CA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Atluru S, Bruehlman AK, Vaughn P, Schauberger CW, Smid MC. Naltrexone Compared With Buprenorphine or Methadone in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143:403-410. [PMID: 38227945 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although naltrexone is an evidence-based medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), few data are available with use in pregnancy. Our objective was to assess outcomes of pregnant individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) taking naltrexone compared with those taking methadone or buprenorphine. DATA SOURCES We undertook a systematic review using electronic database search (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo), conference proceedings, and trial registries including ClinicalTrials.gov . METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION We conducted an electronic search of research articles through May 2023 for randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort, and retrospective cohort studies of naltrexone (oral, implant, or extended release) compared with methadone or buprenorphine (sublingual or extended release) among pregnant individuals with OUD. After double review of all articles, we abstracted obstetric (primary outcome: gestational age at delivery), neonatal (primary outcome: neonatal abstinence syndrome [NAS]), and substance use outcomes. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Five studies met eligibility criteria; four were retrospective cohort studies, and one was a prospective cohort study. Four studies included data on gestational age at delivery (weeks) with no difference detected between the two groups in any study (mean difference ranging -0.20, 95% CI, -1.49-1.09 to 0.8, 95% CI, -0.15 to 1.75). Three studies included data on NAS with all studies detecting a lower risk in the naltrexone group compared with methadone or buprenorphine (relative risk ranging from 0.08, 95% CI, 0.01-1.16 to 0.15, 95% CI, 0.06-0.36). Most studies (four of five) had a moderate or high potential for selection bias primarily driven by small sample size and lack of controlling for confounders. CONCLUSION Although the evidence base is limited, available data suggest that naltrexone use in pregnancy is a reasonable MOUD option with reassuring perinatal outcomes. To enhance confidence in this conclusion and to assess substance use outcomes, further comparative studies of pregnant people with OUD taking naltrexone and other MOUD types are needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO, 42017074249.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sreevalli Atluru
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, and the Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, and Addiction Medical Services, Onalaska, Wisconsin; the Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, and the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah; and the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Krichbaum M, Fernandez D, Singh-Franco D. Barriers and Best Practices on the Management of Opioid Use Disorder. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2024; 38:56-73. [PMID: 38100521 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2290565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Opioids refer to chemicals that agonize opioid receptors in the body resulting in analgesia and sometimes, euphoria. Opiates include morphine and codeine; semi-synthetic opioids include heroin, hydrocodone, oxycodone, and buprenorphine; and fully synthetic opioids include tramadol, fentanyl and methadone. In 2021, an estimated 5.6 million individuals met criteria for opioid use disorder. This article provides an overview of the pharmacology of heroin and non-prescription fentanyl (NPF) and its synthetic analogues, and summarizes the literature related to the management of opioid use disorder, overdose, and withdrawal. This is followed by a description of barriers to treatment and best practices for management with a discussion on recent updates and their potential impact on this patient population. This is followed by a description of barriers to treatment and best practices for management with a discussion on recent updates and their potential impact on this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Krichbaum
- Clinical Manager-Pain Management and Palliative Care, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Devada Singh-Franco
- Associate Professor, Pharmacy Practice, Nova Southeastern University, Health Professions Division, Barry and Judy Silverman College of Pharmacy, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess nationwide trends in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnoses and pharmacotherapy among patients with opioid use disorder and ADHD and to examine factors predicting receipt of stimulant medications among patients receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs). METHODS A claims-based database of commercially insured patients ages 13-64 was used to conduct two analyses: an annual cross-sectional study of 387,980 patients diagnosed as having opioid use disorder (2007-2017) to estimate the prevalence of ADHD diagnoses and pharmacotherapy, and a retrospective cohort study of 158,591 patients receiving MOUDs to test, with multivariable regression, the association between patient characteristics and receipt of stimulant medication. RESULTS From 2007 to 2017, the prevalence of ADHD diagnoses increased from 4.6% to 15.1% and the rate of ADHD pharmacotherapy increased from 42.6% to 51.8% among patients with opioid use disorder. Among all patients receiving MOUDs, 10.5% received at least one prescription stimulant during the study period. Female sex; residence in the southern United States; and ADHD, mood, and anxiety disorder diagnoses were associated with increased likelihood of stimulant receipt. Stimulant use disorder and other substance use disorder diagnoses were associated with decreased likelihood of stimulant receipt. CONCLUSIONS ADHD diagnoses and pharmacotherapy among patients with opioid use disorder have increased. A minority of patients with ADHD and taking MOUDs received a stimulant. Further study is needed of the benefits and risks of ADHD pharmacotherapy for patients with opioid use disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Woo Park
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Park); Department of Psychiatry, Boston Medical Center, and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston (Baul, Yule); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston (Morgan); Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Wilens)
| | - Tithi D Baul
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Park); Department of Psychiatry, Boston Medical Center, and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston (Baul, Yule); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston (Morgan); Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Wilens)
| | - Jake R Morgan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Park); Department of Psychiatry, Boston Medical Center, and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston (Baul, Yule); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston (Morgan); Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Wilens)
| | - Timothy E Wilens
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Park); Department of Psychiatry, Boston Medical Center, and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston (Baul, Yule); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston (Morgan); Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Wilens)
| | - Amy M Yule
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Park); Department of Psychiatry, Boston Medical Center, and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston (Baul, Yule); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston (Morgan); Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Wilens)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dai Z, Abate MA, Winstanley E, Kraner JC, Lundstrom E, Mock AR, Smith GS. Quantifying a potential protective effect of buprenorphine on fatality risk during acute fentanyl exposures. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024; 158:209252. [PMID: 38070651 PMCID: PMC10947934 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Buprenorphine is an important therapy for opioid use disorder and may also reduce the risk of fatal overdoses in fentanyl exposures. However, the role of buprenorphine in reducing this risk has not been quantified. This cross-sectional study examined the association between buprenorphine presence, decedent characteristics, and other factors with the predicted fentanyl concentrations in overdose deaths. METHODS The study identified unintentional fentanyl overdose decedents (n = 3036) from the West Virginia Forensic Drug Database, 2011 through mid-2020. The main outcome was fentanyl concentrations in overdose deaths in the presence and absence of buprenorphine. A multiple linear regression model examined the association of fentanyl concentrations with buprenorphine presence based on the concentrations of the parent drug buprenorphine (B) and its metabolite norbuprenorphine (N), adjusting for demographics, toxicological characteristics (presence of multiple opioids, benzodiazepines, stimulants, marijuana, and alcohol), and comorbidities. We used a B/N concentration ratio < 1 as an indirect indicator of longer-term buprenorphine exposure prior to drug overdose death. RESULTS The median fentanyl concentration was 65 % higher when buprenorphine was present (N = 168) vs. absent (N = 2868) (0.028 vs. 0.017 μg/mL, p < 0.001). In the multivariable model, statistically significant associations occurred between buprenorphine presence and increased fentanyl concentrations (+28.7 %) with a B/N ratio < 1. Obesity, male sex, alcohol presence, and comorbid cardiovascular diseases were statistically significantly associated with lower (-11.3 % to -20.7 %) fentanyl concentrations, whereas marijuana presence and a history of substance use disorder were associated with statistically significant higher fentanyl concentrations (+8.8 % to +31.3 %). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that sustained or longer-term buprenorphine intake might exert some protective effect on fatalities resulting from fentanyl exposure as documented by the association of higher fentanyl blood concentrations with buprenorphine presence among fatal drug overdoses. As fentanyl availability and overdose rates increase nationally, buprenorphine is a vital tool for effective opioid use disorder treatment that might also reduce the risk of fatality in an acute fentanyl exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Dai
- West Virginia University Health Affairs Institute, 64 Medical Center Dr., Morgantown, WV 26505, United States of America.
| | - Marie A Abate
- West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Morgantown, 64 Medical Center Dr., WV 26505, United States of America.
| | - Erin Winstanley
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, 64 Medical Center Dr., WV 26505, United States of America.
| | - James C Kraner
- West Virginia Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, 619 Virginia Street West, Charleston, WV 25302, United States of America
| | - Eric Lundstrom
- West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown, 64 Medical Center Dr., WV 26505, United States of America.
| | - Allen R Mock
- West Virginia Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, 619 Virginia Street West, Charleston, WV 25302, United States of America.
| | - Gordon S Smith
- West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown, 64 Medical Center Dr., WV 26505, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Williams EC, Frost MC, Danner AN, Lott AMK, Achtmeyer CE, Hood CL, Malte CA, Saxon AJ, Hawkins EJ. "The Only Reason I Am Willing to Do It at All": Evaluation of VA's SUpporting Primary care Providers in Opioid Risk reduction and Treatment (SUPPORT) Center. J Addict Med 2024:01271255-990000000-00284. [PMID: 38385548 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is effective and recommended for outpatient settings. We implemented and evaluated the SUpporting Primary care Providers in Opioid Risk reduction and Treatment (SUPPORT) Center-a quality improvement partnership to implement stepped care for MOUD in 2 Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care (PC) clinics. METHODS SUPPORT provided a dedicated clinical team (nurse practitioner prescriber and social worker) and stepped care ([1] identification, assessment, referral; [2] MOUD induction; [3] stabilization; and [4] maintenance supporting PC providers [PCPs] to initiate and/or sustain treatment) coupled with ongoing internal facilitation (consultation, trainings, informatics support). Qualitative interviews with stakeholders (PCPs and patients) and meeting notes identified barriers and facilitators to implementation. Electronic health record and patient tracking data measured reach, adoption, and implementation outcomes descriptively. RESULTS SUPPORT's implementation barriers included the need for an X-waiver, VA's opioid tapering policies, patient and PCP knowledge gaps and PCP discomfort, and logistical compatibility and sustainability challenges for clinics. SUPPORT's dedicated clinical staff, ongoing internal facilitation, and high patient and PCP satisfaction were key facilitators. SUPPORT (January 2019 to September 2021) trained 218 providers; 63 received X-waivers, and 23 provided MOUD (10.5% of those trained). SUPPORT provided care to 167 patients, initiated MOUD for 33, and provided education and naloxone to 72 (all = 0 in year before launch). CONCLUSIONS SUPPORT reached many PCPs and patients and resulted in small increases in MOUD prescribing and high levels of stakeholder satisfaction. Dedicated clinical staff was key to observed successes. Although resource-intensive, SUPPORT offers a potential model for outpatient MOUD provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Williams
- From the Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D), Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-centered and Value-driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA), Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA (ECW, MCF, AND, AMKL, CAM, EJH); Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA (ECW, MCF); Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA (AND, AMKL, CEA, CLH, CAM, AJS, EJH); and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA (AJS, EJH)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dickson-Gomez J, Krechel S, Ohlrich J, Montaque HDG, Weeks M, Li J, Havens J, Spector A. "They make it too hard and too many hoops to jump": system and organizational barriers to drug treatment during epidemic rates of opioid overdose. Harm Reduct J 2024; 21:52. [PMID: 38413972 PMCID: PMC10900746 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-00964-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The United States is currently facing an opioid overdose crisis. Research suggests that multiple interventions are needed to reduce overdose deaths including increasing access and retention to medications to treat opioid use disorders (MOUD, i.e., methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone) and increasing the distribution and use of naloxone, a medication that can reverse the respiratory depression that occurs during opioid overdoses. However, barriers to MOUD initiation and retention persist and discontinuations of MOUD carry a heightened risk of overdose. Many times, MOUD is not sought as a first line of treatment by people with opioid use disorder (OUD), many of whom seek treatment from medically managed withdrawal (detox) programs. Among those who do initiate MOUD, retention is generally low. The present study examines the treatment experiences of people who use opioids in three states, Connecticut, Kentucky, and Wisconsin. METHODS We conducted in-depth interviews with people who use opioids in a rural, urban, and suburban area of three states: Connecticut, Kentucky and Wisconsin. Data analysis was collaborative and key themes were identified through multiple readings, coding of transcripts and discussion with all research team members. RESULTS Results reveal a number of systemic issues that reduce the likelihood that people initiate and are retained on MOUD including the ubiquity of detox as a first step in drug treatment, abstinence requirements and requiring patients to attend group treatment. MOUD-related stigma was a significant factor in the kinds of treatment participants chose and their experiences in treatment. CONCLUSIONS Interventions to reduce MOUD stigma are needed to encourage MOUD as a first course of treatment. Eliminating abstinence-based rules for MOUD treatment may improve treatment retention and decrease overdose risk.
Collapse
|
42
|
Moffitt T, Fallin-Bennett A, Fanucchi L, Walsh SL, Cook C, Oller D, Ross A, Gallivan M, Lauckner J, Byard J, Wheeler-Crum P, Lofwall MR. The development of a recovery coaching training curriculum to facilitate linkage to and increase retention on medications for opioid use disorder. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1334850. [PMID: 38425462 PMCID: PMC10903364 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1334850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) decreases opioid overdose risk and is the standard of care for persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). Recovery coach (RC)-led programs and associated training curriculums to improve outcomes around MOUD are limited. We describe our comprehensive training curriculum including instruction and pedagogy for novel RC-led MOUD linkage and retention programs and report on its feasibility. Methods–pedagogy and training development The Kentucky HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM) Communities Study (HCS) created the Linkage and Retention RC Programs with a local recovery community organization, Voices of Hope-Lexington. RCs worked to reduce participant barriers to entering or continuing MOUD, destigmatize and educate on MOUD and harm reduction (e.g., safe injection practices), increase recovery capital, and provide opioid overdose education with naloxone distribution (OEND). An extensive hybrid (in-person and online, both synchronous and asynchronous), inclusive learning-focused curriculum to support the programs (e.g., motivational interviewing sessions, role plays, MOUD competency assessment, etc.,) was created to ensure RCs developed the necessary skills and could demonstrate competency before deployment in the field. The curriculum, pedagogy, learning environment, and numbers of RCs trained and community venues receiving a trained RC are reported, along with interviews from three RCs about the training program experience. Results The curriculum provides approximately 150 h of training to RCs. From December 2020 to February 2023, 93 RCs and 16 supervisors completed the training program; two were unable to pass a final competency check. RCs were deployed at 45 agencies in eight Kentucky HCS counties. Most agencies (72%) sustained RC services after the study period ended through other funding sources. RCs interviewed reported that the training helped them better explain and dispel myths around MOUD. Conclusion Our novel training and MOUD programs met a current unmet need for the RC workforce and for community agencies. We were able to train and deploy RCs successfully in these new programs aimed at saving lives through improving MOUD linkage and retention. This paper addresses a need to enhance the training requirements around MOUD for peer support specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor Moffitt
- University of Kentucky, Substance Use Priority Research Area, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Amanda Fallin-Bennett
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
- Voices of Hope, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Laura Fanucchi
- College of Medicine, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- College of Medicine, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
- Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Christopher Cook
- University of Kentucky, Substance Use Priority Research Area, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Devin Oller
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Anna Ross
- Voices of Hope, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Molly Gallivan
- University of Kentucky, Substance Use Priority Research Area, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - John Lauckner
- University of Kentucky, Substance Use Priority Research Area, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Jeremy Byard
- Arthur Street Hotel, Louisville, KY, United States
| | | | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- College of Medicine, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
- Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wai JM, Blevins D, Hunt T, Gilbert L, Campbell ANC, Levin FR, El-Bassel N, Nunes E. An Approach to Enhancing Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in the HEALing Communities Study. Psychiatr Serv 2024:appips20230159. [PMID: 38347814 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
The HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-term) Communities Study (HCS) aims to test the effectiveness of the Communities That HEAL intervention in decreasing opioid overdose deaths in 67 communities across four U.S. states. This intervention enlists a collaborative team of researchers, academic experts, and community coalitions to select and implement interventions from a menu of evidence-based practices, including medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). The HCS's New York team developed an integrated network systems (INS) approach with a mapping tool to coach coalitions in the selection of strategies to enhance medication treatment. With the INS approach, community coalitions develop a map of service delivery venues in their local county to better engage people with medication treatment wherever this need arises. The map is structured around core services that can provide maintenance MOUD and satellite services, which include all settings where people with opioid use disorder are encountered and can be identified, possibly given medication, and referred to core programs for ongoing MOUD care. This article describes the rationale for the INS mapping tool, with a discussion framed by the consolidated framework for implementation research, and provides a case example of its application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Wai
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Wai, Blevins, Campbell, Levin, Nunes); School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York City (Hunt, Gilbert, El-Bassel)
| | - Derek Blevins
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Wai, Blevins, Campbell, Levin, Nunes); School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York City (Hunt, Gilbert, El-Bassel)
| | - Tim Hunt
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Wai, Blevins, Campbell, Levin, Nunes); School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York City (Hunt, Gilbert, El-Bassel)
| | - Louisa Gilbert
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Wai, Blevins, Campbell, Levin, Nunes); School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York City (Hunt, Gilbert, El-Bassel)
| | - Aimee N C Campbell
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Wai, Blevins, Campbell, Levin, Nunes); School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York City (Hunt, Gilbert, El-Bassel)
| | - Frances R Levin
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Wai, Blevins, Campbell, Levin, Nunes); School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York City (Hunt, Gilbert, El-Bassel)
| | - Nabila El-Bassel
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Wai, Blevins, Campbell, Levin, Nunes); School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York City (Hunt, Gilbert, El-Bassel)
| | - Edward Nunes
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Wai, Blevins, Campbell, Levin, Nunes); School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York City (Hunt, Gilbert, El-Bassel)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Stopka TJ, Babineau DC, Gibson EB, Knott CE, Cheng DM, Villani J, Wai JM, Blevins D, David JL, Goddard-Eckrich DA, Lofwall MR, Massatti R, DeFiore-Hyrmer J, Lyons MS, Fanucchi LC, Harris DR, Talbert J, Hammerslag L, Oller D, Balise RR, Feaster DJ, Soares W, Zarkin GA, Glasgow L, Oga E, McCarthy J, D’Costa L, Chahine R, Gomori S, Dalvi N, Shrestha S, Garner C, Shadwick A, Salsberry P, Konstan MW, Freisthler B, Winhusen J, El-Bassel N, Samet JH, Walsh SL. Impact of the Communities That HEAL Intervention on Buprenorphine-Waivered Practitioners and Buprenorphine Prescribing: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the HCS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e240132. [PMID: 38386322 PMCID: PMC10884876 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Buprenorphine significantly reduces opioid-related overdose mortality. From 2002 to 2022, the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA 2000) required qualified practitioners to receive a waiver from the Drug Enforcement Agency to prescribe buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder. During this period, waiver uptake among practitioners was modest; subsequent changes need to be examined. Objective To determine whether the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention increased the rate of practitioners with DATA 2000 waivers and buprenorphine prescribing. Design, Setting, and Participants This prespecified secondary analysis of the HEALing Communities Study, a multisite, 2-arm, parallel, community-level, cluster randomized, open, wait-list-controlled comparison clinical trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of the CTH intervention and was conducted between January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2023, in 67 communities in Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio, accounting for approximately 8.2 million adults. The participants in this trial were communities consisting of counties (n = 48) and municipalities (n = 19). Trial arm randomization was conducted using a covariate constrained randomization procedure stratified by state. Each state was balanced by community characteristics including urban/rural classification, fatal opioid overdose rate, and community population. Thirty-four communities were randomized to the intervention and 33 to wait-list control arms. Data analysis was conducted between March 20 and September 29, 2023, with a focus on the comparison period from July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022. Intervention Waiver trainings and other educational trainings were offered or supported by the HEALing Communities Study research sites in each state to help build practitioner capacity. Main Outcomes and Measures The rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver (overall, and stratified by 30-, 100-, and 275-patient limits) per 100 000 adult residents aged 18 years or older during July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022, were compared between the intervention and wait-list control communities. The rate of buprenorphine prescribing among those waivered practitioners was also compared between the intervention and wait-list control communities. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Results A total of 8 166 963 individuals aged 18 years or older were residents of the 67 communities studied. There was no evidence of an effect of the CTH intervention on the adjusted rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver (adjusted relative rate [ARR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94-1.14) or the adjusted rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver who actively prescribed buprenorphine (ARR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.10). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, the CTH intervention was not associated with increases in the rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver or buprenorphine prescribing among those waivered practitioners. Supporting practitioners to prescribe buprenorphine remains a critical yet challenging step in the continuum of care to treat opioid use disorder. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111939.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J. Stopka
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Erin B. Gibson
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles E. Knott
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Debbie M. Cheng
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Villani
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jonathan M. Wai
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Derek Blevins
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - James L. David
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Dawn A. Goddard-Eckrich
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | - Richard Massatti
- Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Columbus
| | | | | | - Laura C. Fanucchi
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | | | | | - Lindsey Hammerslag
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | - Devin Oller
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | - Raymond R. Balise
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Daniel J. Feaster
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - William Soares
- UMass Chan Medical School–Baystate, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Gary A. Zarkin
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - LaShawn Glasgow
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Emmanuel Oga
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - John McCarthy
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Lauren D’Costa
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Rouba Chahine
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Steve Gomori
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Netrali Dalvi
- Office of Prescription Monitoring and Drug Control, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston
| | - Shikhar Shrestha
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Aimee Shadwick
- RecoveryOhio, Office of Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, Columbus
| | - Pamela Salsberry
- Health Behavior and Health Promotion, Ohio State University, Columbus
| | | | | | - John Winhusen
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Nabila El-Bassel
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Jeffrey H. Samet
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kaufman MJ, Meloni EG, Qrareya AN, Paronis CA, Bogin V. Effects of inhaled low-concentration xenon gas on naltrexone-precipitated withdrawal symptoms in morphine-dependent mice. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 255:110967. [PMID: 38150894 PMCID: PMC10841182 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid withdrawal symptoms (OWS) are highly aversive and prompt unprescribed opioid use, which increases morbidity, mortality, and, among individuals being treated for opioid use disorder (OUD), recurrence. OWS are driven by sympathetic nervous system (SNS) hyperactivity that occurs when blood opioid levels wane. We tested whether brief inhalation of xenon gas, which inhibits SNS activity and is used clinically for anesthesia and diagnostic imaging, attenuates naltrexone-precipitated withdrawal-like signs in morphine-dependent mice. METHODS Adult CD-1 mice were implanted with morphine sulfate-loaded (60 mg/ml) minipumps and maintained for 6 days to establish morphine dependence. On day 7, mice were given subcutaneous naltrexone (0.3 mg/kg) and placed in a sealed exposure chamber containing either 21% oxygen/balance nitrogen (controls) or 21% oxygen/added xenon peaking at 30%/balance nitrogen. After 10 minutes, mice were transferred to observation chambers and videorecorded for 45 minutes. Videos were scored in a blind manner for morphine withdrawal behaviors. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVAs testing for treatment and sex effects. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Xenon-exposed mice exhibited fewer jumps (P = 0.010) and jumping suppression was detectible within the first 10-minute video segment, but no sex differences were detected. Brief inhalation of low concentration xenon rapidly and substantially attenuated naltrexone-precipitated jumping in morphine-dependent mice, suggesting that it can inhibit OWS. If xenon effects translate to humans with OUD, xenon inhalation may be effective for reducing OWS, unprescribed opioid use, and for easing OUD treatment initiation, which could help lower excess morbidity and mortality associated with OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc J Kaufman
- Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA 02478, USA.
| | - Edward G Meloni
- Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA 02478, USA
| | - Alaa N Qrareya
- University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, Faser Hall Room 331, University, MS 38677, USA
| | - Carol A Paronis
- Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA 02478, USA
| | - Vlad Bogin
- Nobilis Therapeutics, Inc., US Bancorp Tower, 111 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 3150, Portland, OR 97204, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Banks ML, Sprague JE. The dopamine 3 receptor as a candidate biomarker and therapeutic for opioid use disorder. Addict Biol 2024; 29:e13369. [PMID: 38380709 PMCID: PMC10883601 DOI: 10.1111/adb.13369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Here, we present recent studies suggesting that specific DRD3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, e.g. rs324029 and rs2654754) might serve as prognostic biomarkers for opioid use disorder (OUD). Additionally, preclinical studies with novel dopamine 3 receptor (D3R) partial agonists and antagonists have been evaluated as candidate OUD therapeutics and have shown a reduced risk of cardiovascular toxicity compared with the original D3R antagonist. From these findings, we argue that DRD3 SNPs could serve as a diagnostic tool for assessing OUD risk and that more research is warranted examining the D3R as a safe and effective therapeutic target for treating OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L. Banks
- Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Jon E. Sprague
- The Ohio Attorney General's Center for the Future of Forensic ScienceBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Austin EJ, O'Brien QE, Ruiz MS, Ratzliff AD, Williams EC, Koch U. Patient and Provider Perspectives on Processes of Engagement in Outpatient Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: A Scoping Review. Community Ment Health J 2024; 60:330-339. [PMID: 37668745 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-023-01175-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
Effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is available, but patient engagement is central to achieving care outcomes. We conducted a scoping review to describe patient and provider-reported strategies that may contribute to patient engagement in outpatient OUD care delivery. We searched PubMed and Scopus for articles reporting patient and/or provider experiences with outpatient OUD care delivery. Analysis included: (1) describing specific engagement strategies, (2) mapping strategies to patient-centered care domains, and (3) identifying themes that characterize the relationship between engagement and patient-centered care. Of 3,222 articles screened, 30 articles met inclusion criteria. Analysis identified 14 actionable strategies that facilitate patient engagement and map to all patient-centered care domains. Seven themes emerged that characterize interpersonal approaches to OUD care engagement. Interpersonal interactions between patients and providers play a pivotal role in encouraging engagement throughout OUD treatment. Future research is needed to further evaluate promising engagement strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth J Austin
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 351621, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
- Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C, USA.
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C, USA.
| | - Quentin E O'Brien
- Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C, USA
| | - Monica S Ruiz
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C, USA
| | - Anna D Ratzliff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions (AIMS) Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Emily C Williams
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 351621, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ulrich Koch
- Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Buchholz C, Bell LA, Adatia S, Bagley SM, Wilens TE, Nurani A, Hadland SE. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder for Youth: Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives. J Adolesc Health 2024; 74:320-326. [PMID: 37815763 PMCID: PMC10842045 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.08.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical trial data support use of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in adolescents and young adults ("youth"), but qualitative data are lacking on the acceptability and importance of MOUD to youth, caregivers, and clinicians. We assessed how these stakeholders viewed the role of MOUD in treatment and recovery. METHODS We recruited youth aged from 15 to 25 years with opioid use disorder who had received buprenorphine, naltrexone, or methadone and caregivers from a primary care-based youth addiction treatment program. We also recruited clinicians with addiction expertise from social work, nursing, pediatrics, internal medicine, and psychiatry. We conducted semistructured interviews assessing special considerations for MOUD use in youth. Three coders performed inductive and deductive thematic analysis of transcripts. RESULTS Among 37 participants, including 15 youth (age range, 17-25 years), nine caregivers, and 13 clinicians, we identified three themes. (1) Medications support recovery in the short term: Youth described MOUD as beneficial in managing withdrawal symptoms. Notably, some youth and caregivers preferred to limit MOUD duration. (2) Medication adherence is affected by type of medication, dosing regimen, and route of administration. Participants endorsed long-acting, injectable MOUD for ease of use and youth's ability to continue engagement in "normal activities" without daily medication. (3) Caregiver involvement can support medication decisions and adherence. Youth and some clinicians described the need to assess caregiver involvement before incorporating them into treatment; caregivers and other clinicians described caregivers as critical in supporting accountability. DISCUSSION MOUD is evidence-based, and its provision should be developmentally responsive and youth- and family-centered, incorporating caregivers when appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor Buchholz
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Mass General for Children, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lauren A Bell
- Department of Pediatrics-Section of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Safina Adatia
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sarah M Bagley
- Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Timothy E Wilens
- Pediatric Psychopharmacology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alykhan Nurani
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Scott E Hadland
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Mass General for Children, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Goodman-Meza D, Goto M, Salimian A, Shoptaw S, Bui AAT, Gordon AJ, Goetz MB. Impact of Potential Case Misclassification by Administrative Diagnostic Codes on Outcome Assessment of Observational Study for People Who Inject Drugs. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae030. [PMID: 38379573 PMCID: PMC10878055 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Initiation of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) within the hospital setting may improve outcomes for people who inject drugs (PWID) hospitalized because of an infection. Many studies used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to identify PWID, although these may be misclassified and thus, inaccurate. We hypothesized that bias from misclassification of PWID using ICD codes may impact analyses of MOUD outcomes. Methods We analyzed a cohort of 36 868 cases of patients diagnosed with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia at 124 US Veterans Health Administration hospitals between 2003 and 2014. To identify PWID, we implemented an ICD code-based algorithm and a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm for classification of admission notes. We analyzed outcomes of prescribing MOUD as an inpatient using both approaches. Our primary outcome was 365-day all-cause mortality. We fit mixed-effects Cox regression models with receipt or not of MOUD during the index hospitalization as the primary predictor and 365-day mortality as the outcome. Results NLP identified 2389 cases as PWID, whereas ICD codes identified 6804 cases as PWID. In the cohort identified by NLP, receipt of inpatient MOUD was associated with a protective effect on 365-day survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, .29-.81; P < .01) compared with those not receiving MOUD. There was no significant effect of MOUD receipt in the cohort identified by ICD codes (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, .77-1.30; P = .99). Conclusions MOUD was protective of all-cause mortality when NLP was used to identify PWID, but not significant when ICD codes were used to identify the analytic subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Goodman-Meza
- Division of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Greater Los Angeles Veterans Health Administration, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michihiko Goto
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Anabel Salimian
- Division of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Steven Shoptaw
- Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Alex A T Bui
- Medical & Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Adam J Gordon
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Matthew B Goetz
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Greater Los Angeles Veterans Health Administration, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Calcaterra SL, Saunders S, Grimm E, Maki-Gianani E, Keniston A, Wold A, Bonaguidi A. In-Hospital Methadone Enrollment: a Novel Program to Facilitate Linkage from the Hospital to the Opioid Treatment Program for Vulnerable Patients with Opioid Use Disorder. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:385-392. [PMID: 37715094 PMCID: PMC10897082 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08411-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Methadone ameliorates opioid withdrawal among hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). To continue methadone after hospital discharge, patients must enroll in an opioid treatment program (OTP) per federal regulations. Uncontrolled opioid withdrawal is a barrier to linkage from hospital to OTP. AIM Describe a federally compliant In-Hospital Methadone Enrollment Team (IN-MEET) that enrolls hospitalized patients with OUD into an OTP with facilitated hospital to OTP linkage. SETTING Seven hundred-bed university hospital in Aurora, CO. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION A physician dually affiliated with a hospital's addiction consultation service and a community OTP completes an in-hospital, face-to-face medical assessment required by federal law and titrates methadone to comfort. An OTP-affiliated nurse with hospital privileges completes a psychosocial evaluation and provides case management by arranging transportation and providing weekly telephone check-ins. PROGRAM EVALUATION METRICS IN-MEET enrollments completed, hospital to OTP linkage, and descriptive characteristics of patients who completed IN-MEET enrollments compared to patients who completed community OTP enrollments. RESULTS Between April 2019 and April 2023, our team completed 165 IN-MEET enrollments. Among a subset of 73 IN-MEET patients, 56 (76.7%) presented to the OTP following hospital discharge. Compared to community OTP enrolled patients (n = 1687), a higher percentage of IN-MEET patients were older (39.7 years, standard deviation [SD] 11.2 years vs. 36.1 years, SD 10.6 years) and were unhoused (n = 43, 58.9% vs. n = 199, 11.8%). Compared to community OTP enrolled patients, a higher percentage of IN-MEET patients reported heroin or fentanyl as their primary substance (n = 53, 72.6% vs. n = 677, 40.1%), reported methamphetamine as their secondary substance (n = 27, 37.0% vs. n = 380, 22.5%), and reported they injected their primary substance (n = 46, 63.0% vs. n = 478, 28.3%). CONCLUSION IN-MEET facilitates hospital to OTP linkage among a vulnerable population. This model has the potential to improve methadone access for hospitalized patients who may not otherwise seek out treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan L Calcaterra
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Scott Saunders
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Eric Grimm
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Angela Keniston
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Angi Wold
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Angela Bonaguidi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|