Association Between Anti-CD20 Therapies and COVID-19 Severity Among Patients With Relapsing-Remitting and Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

De-escalating and discontinuing disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis

The development of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been highly successful in recent decades. It is now widely accepted that early initiation of DMTs after disease onset is associated with a better long-term prognosis. However, the question of when and how to de-escalate or discontinue DMTs remains open and critical. This topic was discussed during an international focused workshop organized by the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) in 2023. The aim was to review the current evidence on the rationale for, and the potential pitfalls of, treatment de-escalation in MS. Several clinical scenarios emerged, mainly driven by a change in the benefit-risk ratio of DMTs over the course of the disease and with ageing. The workshop also addressed the issue of de-escalation by the type of DMT used and in specific situations, including pregnancy and paediatric onset MS. Finally, we provide practical guidelines for selecting appropriate patients, defining de-escalation and monitoring modalities and outlining unmet needs in this field.

Interferon-β treatment reverses the detrimental effect of B-cell depletion therapy on respiratory virus infection

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are critical for managing autoimmunity such as multiple sclerosis (MS), yet concerns exist regarding their impact on viral infections. B-cell depletion (α-CD20) and IFN-β are 2 DMTs with seemingly opposing effects on viral infections. Pre-vaccine COVID-19 data linked B-cell depletion to worse outcomes, while IFN-β is believed to offer protection to viral infection. The mechanisms underlying the interactions between these DMTs and infection have yet to be fully elucidated. Our goal was to determine the modulatory effects of α-CD20 and IFN-β, administered individually or in combination, during acute respiratory viral infections in mice. In our study, B-cell depletion was achieved by administering α-CD20 antibodies 3 times every 5 days, starting 7 days before influenza A virus (IAV) infection. IFN-β was administered on days 1 and 2 p.i. α-CD20 administered alone exacerbated infection outcomes. At day 9 postinfection, mice treated with α-CD20 had elevated viral RNA, accompanied by greater weight loss, impaired viral clearance, heightened myeloid cell infiltration in the lungs, and elevated systemic inflammatory cytokines in the blood. Notably, T-cell responses to IAV were not inhibited by α-CD20. IFN-β monotherapy failed to confer significant protection against viral infection, but when combined with α-CD20, it reversed the exacerbated effects of B-cell depletion by reducing viral load, improving morbidity, limiting neutrophil infiltration, and restoring cytokine homeostasis. These findings suggest IFN-β's capacity to counteract the deleterious impacts of α-CD20 on respiratory viral infections, offering potential treatment strategies for autoimmune diseases during viral outbreaks.

Early combined therapy for COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients: a promising approach against viral persistence and drug resistance

Immunocompromised (IC) patients face significant challenges in managing COVID-19 due to their heightened susceptibility to severe illness, persistent infections, and the potential development of drug resistance. Studies indicate that IC patients, particularly those with hematologic malignancies (HM), hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTR), or solid organ transplants (SOTR), experience higher mortality rates and worse outcomes compared to the general population, even post-vaccination. The persistence of the virus in these patients, combined with its rapid mutation, further complicates treatment. Recent evidence supports the use of combined neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) as a more effective approach to viral clearance, reducing mortality, and preventing relapses. However, the rise of resistant variants, especially to mAbs, and concerns about the safety of prolonged or intensive therapies pose ongoing challenges. Monotherapies often fail short to address these issues, highlighting the need for early combined therapy (ECT) with mAbs and DAAs. ECT has shown promise in managing COVID-19 in IC individuals by targeting multiple stages of the viral lifecycle, reducing viral load, and clearing infections at earlier stages, which helps mitigate the risks of severe disease and drug resistance. Continued research is essential to refine these treatment protocols, especially as the virus evolves. Although further studies are needed, current findings suggest that ECT may become the standard of care for managing COVID-19 in severely IC patients, offering better clinical outcomes and hindering viral persistence.

Efficacy and Safety of Obinutuzumab in Active Lupus Nephritis

BACKGROUND

Obinutuzumab, a humanized type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, provided significantly better renal responses than placebo in a phase 2 trial involving patients with lupus nephritis receiving standard therapy.

METHODS

In a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned adults with biopsy-proven active lupus nephritis in a 1:1 ratio to receive obinutuzumab in one of two dose schedules (1000 mg on day 1 and at weeks 2, 24, 26, and 52, with or without a dose at week 50) or placebo. All patients received standard therapy with mycophenolate mofetil, along with oral prednisone at a target dose of 7.5 mg per day by week 12 and 5 mg per day by week 24. The primary end point was a complete renal response at week 76, defined by a urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio of less than 0.5 (with protein and creatinine both measured in milligrams), an estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 85% of the baseline value, and no intercurrent event (i.e., rescue therapy, treatment failure, death, or early trial withdrawal). Key secondary end points at week 76 included a complete renal response with a prednisone dose of 7.5 mg per day or lower between weeks 64 and 76 and a urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio lower than 0.8 without an intercurrent event.

RESULTS

A total of 271 patients underwent randomization; 135 were assigned to the obinutuzumab group (combined dose schedules) and 136 to the placebo group. A complete renal response at week 76 was observed in 46.4% of the patients in the obinutuzumab group and 33.1% of those in the placebo group (adjusted difference, 13.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 24.8; P = 0.02). A complete renal response at week 76 with a prednisone dose of 7.5 mg per day or lower between weeks 64 and 76 was observed in more patients in the obinutuzumab group than in the placebo group (42.7% vs. 30.9%; adjusted difference, 11.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.6 to 23.2; P = 0.04), and a urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio lower than 0.8 without an intercurrent event was more common with obinutuzumab than with placebo (55.5% vs. 41.9%; adjusted difference, 13.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.0 to 25.4; P = 0.02). No unexpected safety signals were identified. More serious adverse events, mainly infections and events related to coronavirus disease 2019, occurred with obinutuzumab than with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults with active lupus nephritis, obinutuzumab plus standard therapy was more efficacious than standard therapy alone in providing a complete renal response. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; REGENCY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04221477.).

Extended-interval dosing of rituximab/ocrelizumab is associated with a reduced decrease in IgG levels in multiple sclerosis

The potential benefits of extended-interval dosing (EID) of rituximab (RTX) or ocrelizumab (OCR) in mitigating the reduction of immunoglobulin levels and decreasing the risk of infection in persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS) remain largely unknown. We retrospectively analyzed two structured data collections including pwRRMS who were prescribed RTX/OCR using different interval dosing regimens, a 6-month standard-interval dosing (SD) or EID. The SD and EID cohorts included 88 and 271 pwRRMS, respectively, with a mean (SD) treatment duration of 3.5 (1.3) and 4.4 (1.5) years, and a mean (SD) interval between infusions of 6.4 (1.7) and 19.2 (11.9) months. After RTX/OCR initiation, the two cohorts did not differ in time to first relapse (p ​= ​0.83), time to first sustained accumulation of disability (p ​= ​0.98) and incidence of MRI activity (p ​= ​0.91). The time to first severe infectious event (SIE) was shorter in the SD cohort (p ​= ​0.005). The effect of treatment duration on reduction of serum IgG level was lower in the EID cohort (Estimate ​= ​0.15 ​g/L per year of follow-up, 95 ​% CI -0.06, -0.23, p ​= ​0.001). In the entire patient group, higher serum IgG levels at the last infusion were associated with a lower risk of SIE between two visits (HR ​= ​0.77 per g/L of serum IgG; 95 ​% CI: 0.66-0.91; p ​= ​0.006). This study suggests that EID of RTX/OCR may reduce the risk of serum IgG decline in pwRRMS without a loss of efficacy and may mitigate the risk of severe infections. These results must be confirmed by future randomized studies.

MS treatment trends before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the German MS Register

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic affected healthcare management for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), leading to alterations in disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) due to concerns about COVID-19 outcomes and vaccine efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare DMT prescription patterns in PwMS before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

PwMS from the German MS Register, between 2019 and 2024, either newly diagnosed (Cohort A) or who discontinued or switched DMT (Cohort B), were analyzed over a follow-up period of 3 months. Data from the pre-pandemic period were compared to early-, late-, and post-pandemic periods. DMTs were categorized as medium efficacy (meDMT) or high efficacy (heDMT).

RESULTS

In Cohort A (n = 1810), pre-pandemic 46% had no DMT within 3 months of diagnosis, 39% received meDMT, and 15% heDMT (7.5% B cell-depleting therapies (BCD)). heDMT use increased during later periods ("early" 19%, "late" 29%, "post" 41%), with a shift toward BCD. In cohort B (n = 4246), pre-pandemic 47% paused DMT, 19% switched to meDMT, and 34% to heDMT (17% BCD). heDMT use also rose during the pandemic ("early" 37%, "late" 47%, "post" 48%), with increased BCD use.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no delays in DMT initiation or resumption during the pandemic with a notable increase in heDMT and BCD use, reflecting growing confidence in these treatment options.

Profile of Ofatumumab in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: Design, Development and Place in Therapy

Targeting B cells through monoclonal antibodies against CD20 has emerged as a highly effective strategy in managing disease activity in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. This efficacy was initially demonstrated with rituximab and further affirmed with ocrelizumab. Ofatumumab is the first fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) approved for the treatment of MS. It is characterized by its convenient self-administered regimen of once-monthly subcutaneous injections. Its human antibody nature contributes to a significantly lower risk of immunogenicity compared to rituximab. Clinical trials have consistently shown its effectiveness in significantly reducing annualized relapse rates, MRI-detected lesion activity, and disability progression when compared to teriflunomide, a standard therapy for MS. Additionally, ofatumumab exhibits a manageable tolerability profile, with adverse events primarily comprising infections and injection-related reactions. This review describes ofatumumab pharmacology, core clinical trial data and clinical efficacy in addition to safety issues.

COVID-19 Vaccination Response in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Ofatumumab in the United States: A Medical Record Review

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data are required to provide a greater understanding of the impact of ofatumumab on the ability to mount an effective immune response following the receipt of approved COVID-19 vaccinations. This retrospective real-world analysis aimed to describe the humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccination during ofatumumab treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Data from patients with MS treated with ofatumumab who were fully vaccinated against COVID-19 infection were abstracted from medical charts at four clinical sites in the USA. Patient characteristics and humoral response were summarized descriptively. Differences in humoral response were documented on the basis of vaccination status during ofatumumab treatment (i.e., after full vaccination and after booster vaccination) and prior disease-modifying treatment (DMT) exposure (i.e., DMT naïve, prior anti-CD20/sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P] therapy, prior non-anti-CD20/S1P therapy). The sample size precluded formal statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included. The mean (standard deviation) duration of ofatumumab treatment upon data collection was 20.4 (4.6) months (treatment ongoing for 35 [92%] patients). Definitive humoral response after full vaccination was documented for 34 patients, of whom 20 (60%) were seropositive. Definitive humoral response after booster vaccination was documented among five patients, of whom three (60%) were seropositive. Among patients who were DMT naïve prior to ofatumumab (n = 15), 73% were seropositive; among patients exposed to prior anti-CD20/S1P therapy (n = 14), 33% were seropositive; and among patients exposed to prior non-anti-CD20/S1P therapy (n = 9), 56% were seropositive. Patients naïve to DMT had been living with an MS diagnosis for a shorter duration than those experienced with DMTs.

CONCLUSION

Patients with MS receiving ongoing treatment with ofatumumab can mount a positive humoral response to a COVID-19 vaccination. Prior treatment with anti-CD20 or S1P DMTs may be a risk factor for lower humoral response.

Secondary organising pneumonia associated to COVID-19 infection in patients with central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating diseases treated with anti-CD20 therapies

BACKGROUND

Organizing pneumonia (OP), an interstitial lung disease, has been observed in patients with inflammatory demyelinating diseases (IDDs) treated with anti-CD20, particularly after COVID-19, but data are limited.

AIM

To provide a detailed characterization of COVID-19-associated OP in IDD patients treated with anti-CD20.

METHODS

Bi-centric retrospective cohort study including patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), aquaporin-4-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4 + NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) who received anti-CD20 and were diagnosed with COVID-19-associated OP between March 2020 and October 2023.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included (mean age 46.8 years; 52.6% female; 63% rituximab, 37% ocrelizumab). Sixteen had MS, two MOGAD, and one AQP4 + NMOSD. Intermittent fever was the predominant symptom. Hospitalization occurred in all but one patient, without fatalities. Chest CT consistently showed OP patterns. Thirteen patients had positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage. Treatments included corticosteroids, antivirals, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent plasma. Fourteen patients postponed infusions; nine resumed post-recovery (median 11.9 months), two switched due to hypogammaglobulinemia, and three stopped. After a mean follow-up of 1.5 years, lung abnormalities and clinical manifestations resolved in 18 patients; however, 13 experienced long-COVID.

CONCLUSIONS

In anti-CD20-treated patients with recurrent fever and distinctive CT features, COVID-19-associated OP should be considered.

Challenges in Diagnosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia under Ocrelizumab and De-Risking Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis-The Elephant Is (Still) in the Room

Severe SARS-CoV-2 infections may still be observed in people bearing risk factors, such as the use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which are adopted in several autoimmune disorders including multiple sclerosis (MS). COVID-19 diagnosis is routinely based on nasopharyngeal swab testing, but suboptimal sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection compared to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) may lead to misdiagnosis in some cases. Such diagnostic issues were described in a few MS patients receiving anti-CD20 mAbs, including middle-aged people and lacking information on subsequent MS therapeutic management, a debated topic as no evidence-based guidance on de-risking strategies is currently available. Here, we report the case of a young MS patient who developed severe COVID-19 pneumonia under treatment with the anti-CD20 mAb ocrelizumab, and who was finally diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 by BAL despite repeatedly negative nasopharyngeal swabs. Ocrelizumab was then discontinued, and treatment with a sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor modulator was started, followed by maintenance of clinical and radiological MS stability. Challenges in diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia in people without risk factors other than immunomodulatory treatment are hence discussed, as well as potential strategies for de-risking MS therapies. The latter topic is increasingly debated based on raising concerns for potential long-term safety issues of high-efficacy treatments, including anti-CD20 mAbs.

Serum NfL and GFAP are weak predictors of long-term multiple sclerosis prognosis: A 6-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) are promising biomarkers that might be associated with clinical and radiological markers of multiple sclerosis (MS) severity. However, it is not known whether they can accurately identify patients at risk of disability progression in the medium and long term.

OBJECTIVES

We wanted to determine the association between sNfL and sGFAP, Expanded Disability Status Scale score changes, and conversion to secondary progressive MS (SPMS) in a cohort of 133 patients with relapsing remitting MS.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected at inclusion to measure SNfL and sGFAP by single molecule array and their prognostic value was assessed using a linear mixed model.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 37 patients (27.8 % of 133) experienced disability progression and 12 patients (9.0 %) converted to SPMS during the follow-up (mean follow-up duration: 6.4 years). Only sNfL (p = 0.03) was associated with conversion to SPMS, and neither SNfL nor sGFAP was associated with disability progression.

CONCLUSION

Serum NfL and GFAP do not seem to accurately predict MS outcome in the long term. More studies are needed to determine how serum biomarkers, associated with other clinical and MRI biomarkers, might be used to improve MS prognostication.

A multi-centre longitudinal study analysing multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy prescribing patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic raised concern amongst clinicians that disease-modifying therapies (DMT), particularly anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and fingolimod, could worsen COVID-19 in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This study aimed to examine DMT prescribing trends pre- and post-pandemic onset.

METHODS

A multi-centre longitudinal study with 8,771 participants from MSBase was conducted. Two time periods were defined: pre-pandemic (March 11 2018-March 10 2020) and post-pandemic onset (March 11 2020-11 March 2022). The association between time and prescribing trends was analysed using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression. DMT initiation refers to first initiation of any DMT, whilst DMT switches indicate changing regimen within 6 months of last use.

RESULTS

Post-pandemic onset, there was a significant increase in DMT initiation/switching to natalizumab and cladribine [(Natalizumab-initiation: OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.39-2.13; switching: OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.40-1.98), (Cladribine-initiation: OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.09-1.87; switching: OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.41-1.98)]. Anti-CD20mAb initiation/switching decreased in the year of the pandemic, but recovered in the second year, such that overall odds increased slightly post-pandemic (initiation: OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.49; Switching: OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29. Initiation/switching of fingolimod, interferon-beta, and alemtuzumab significantly decreased [(Fingolimod-initiation: OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.73; switching: OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.41-0.58), (Interferon-gamma-initiation: OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.41-0.57; switching: OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99), (Alemtuzumab-initiation: OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.48; switching: OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.44)].

CONCLUSIONS

Post-pandemic onset, clinicians preferentially prescribed natalizumab and cladribine over anti-CD20 mAbs and fingolimod, likely to preserve efficacy but reduce perceived immunosuppressive risks. This could have implications for disease progression in pwMS. Our findings highlight the significance of equitable DMT access globally, and the importance of evidence-based decision-making in global health challenges.

COVID-19 and multiple sclerosis: challenges and lessons for patient care

During the COVID-19 pandemic, people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and their healthcare providers have faced unique challenges related to the interaction between SARS-CoV-2, underlying neurological disease and the use of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). Key concerns arose, primarily related to the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 infection could trigger the initial demyelinating event or exacerbate disease activity. Another major concern was the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, especially for patients undergoing specific treatments that could weaken their antibody responses. In the post-infection phase, identifying long COVID in patients with MS has been complicated due to the large overlap between post-infection sequelae and MS symptoms. In addition, disruptions in health and rehabilitation services have made it difficult for MS patients to access care. This Series article explores current evidence on the interaction between MS and SARS-CoV-2, identifies the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic in the care of patients with MS, and discusses the significant adoption of digital health solutions, including telemedicine and new technology-based rehabilitation approaches. Based on lessons learned, recommendations and future directions are offered for managing patients with MS, rethinking healthcare systems and improving health outcomes in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era.

Anti-RBD Antibody Levels and IFN-γ-Specific T Cell Response Are Associated with a More Rapid Swab Reversion in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis after the Booster Dose of COVID-19 Vaccination

This study investigated the incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections (BIs) and the time to swab reversion in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) after the booster dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. We enrolled 64 PwMS who had completed the three-dose mRNA vaccine schedule and had never experienced COVID-19 before. Among the 64 PwMS, 43.8% had BIs with a median time since the third vaccine dose of 155 days. BIs occurred more frequently in ocrelizumab-treated patients (64.7%). Patients with a relapsing-remitting MS course showed a reduced incidence of BIs compared with those with a primary-progressive disease (p = 0.002). Having anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibodies represented a protective factor reducing the incidence of BIs by 60% (p = 0.042). The majority of BIs were mild, and the only severe COVID-19 cases were reported in patients with a high Expanded Disability Status Scale score (EDSS > 6). The median time for a negative swab was 11 days. Notably, fingolimod-treated patients take longer for a swab-negativization (p = 0.002). Conversely, having anti-RBD antibodies ≥ 809 BAU/mL and an IFN-γ-specific T cell response ≥ 16 pg/mL were associated with a shorter time to swab-negativization (p = 0.051 and p = 0.018, respectively). In conclusion, the immunological protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection may differ among PwMS according to DMTs.

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Responses in Anti-CD20-Treated Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients Show Immunosenescence in Antigen-Specific B and T Cells

Clinical, pathological, and imaging evidence in multiple sclerosis (MS) shows that inflammation starts early and progresses with age. B cells play a central role in this process, contributing to cytokine production, defective regulatory functions, and abnormal immunoglobulin production, even in the central nervous system. Anti-CD20 (aCD20) therapies, which deplete CD20+ B cells, are largely used in the treatment of both relapsing remitting (RR) and progressive (PR) forms of MS. Although effective against MS symptoms and lesions detectable by magnetic resonance imaging, aCD20 therapies can reduce the immune response to COVID-19 vaccination. By using high-parameter flow cytometry, we examined the antigen-specific (Ag+) immune response six months post-third COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in MS patients with RR and PR forms on aCD20 therapy. Despite lower Ag+ B cell responses and lower levels of anti-SARS-CoV2, both total and neutralizing antibodies, RR and PR patients developed strong Ag+ T cell responses. We observed similar percentages and numbers of Ag+ CD4+ T cells and a high proportion of Ag+ CD8+ T cells, with slight differences in T cell phenotype and functionality; this, however, suggested the presence of differences in immune responses driven by age and disease severity.

Antiviral therapies for the management of persistent coronavirus disease 2019 in immunocompromised hosts: A narrative review

Antiviral agents with activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have played a critical role in disease management; however, little is known regarding the efficacy of these medications in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunocompromised patients, particularly in the management of persistent SARS-CoV-2 positivity. This narrative review discusses the management of persistent coronavirus disease 2019 in immunocompromised hosts, with a focus on antiviral therapies. We identified 84 cases from the literature describing a variety of approaches, including prolonged antiviral therapy (n = 11), combination antivirals (n = 13), and mixed therapy with antiviral and antibody treatments (n = 60). A high proportion had an underlying haematologic malignancy (n = 67, 80%), and were in receipt of anti-CD20 agents (n = 51, 60%). Success was reported in 70 cases (83%) which varied according to the therapy type. Combination therapies with antivirals may be an effective approach for individuals with persistent SARS-CoV-2 positivity, particularly those that incorporate treatments aimed at increasing neutralizing antibody levels. Any novel approaches taken to this difficult management dilemma should be mindful of the emergence of antiviral resistance.

Early use of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis in the United States: benefits, barriers, and strategies for encouraging adoption

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by progressive neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration from disease onset that, if left untreated, can result in the accumulation of irreversible neurological disability. Early intervention with high-efficacy therapies (HETs) is increasingly recognized as the best strategy to delay or mitigate disease progression from the earliest stages of the disease and to prevent long-term neurodegeneration. Although there is growing clinical and real-world evidence supporting early HET intervention, foregoing this strategy in favor of a traditional escalation approach prioritizing lower-efficacy disease-modifying therapies remains a common approach in clinical practice. This review explores potential health care professional- and patient-related barriers to the early use of HETs in patients with MS in the United States. Barriers can include regulatory and reimbursement restrictions; knowledge gaps and long-term safety concerns among health care professionals; and various individual, cultural, and societal factors affecting patients. Potential strategies for overcoming these barriers and encouraging early HET use are proposed.

COVID-19 Infection in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with Rituximab Compared to Natalizumab and Healthy Controls: A Real-World Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) undergoing various immunomodulating therapies can vary. Individuals on B-cell therapy, such as rituximab, may be more susceptible to infection compared to those treated with natalizumab.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and severity of COVID-19 infection in patients receiving rituximab, natalizumab, and healthy controls.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentric study included data derived from a centralized MS registry of four centers in South India. Data of patients on rituximab and natalizumab recruited between 2020 February and 2022 December were extracted from the registry and analyzed. The outcomes studied were the occurrence of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, death, post-COVID-19 relapses, and post-vaccine relapses. These outcomes were compared between the treatment groups and the matched controls.

RESULTS

COVID-19 infection occurred in 49.1% (26/53) of those on rituximab, 19.2% (5/26) of those on natalizumab, and 11.5% (6/52) of healthy controls. In addition, 8/53 (15.1%) in the rituximab group and 1/26 (3.8%) in the natalizumab group were hospitalized. All 6/52 (11.5%) in the control group had mild infection, and none were hospitalized. No deaths occurred in any group. On statistical analysis, the occurrence of COVID-19 infection in the rituximab group was significantly higher when compared to natalizumab ( P = 0.0141) and healthy controls ( P < 0.001). Hospitalizations were significantly higher in the rituximab group when compared to healthy controls ( P < 0.006).

CONCLUSION

MS patients treated with rituximab were more likely to experience COVID-19 infection compared to those treated with natalizumab and healthy controls. Hospitalization was more frequently seen in patients treated with rituximab compared to healthy controls.

COVID-19 outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis: Understanding changes from 2020 to 2022

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic studies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) have focused on the first waves of the pandemic until early 2021.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to extend these data from the onset of the pandemic to the global coverage by vaccination in summer 2022.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter observational study analyzed COVISEP registry data on reported COVID-19 cases in pwMS between January 2020 and July 2022. Severe COVID-19 was defined as hospitalization or higher severity.

RESULTS

Among 2584 pwMS with confirmed/highly suspected COVID-19, severe infection rates declined from 14.6% preomicron wave to 5.7% during omicron wave (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [1.25-1.64] per 10 years), male sex (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = [1.51-2.67]), obesity (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = [1.52-3.68]), cardiac comorbidities (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = [1.46-3.83]), higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = [1.43-3.06] for EDSS 3-5.5 and OR = 4.53, 95% CI = [3.04-6.75] for EDSS ⩾6), and anti-CD20 therapies (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = [1.85-3.87]) as risk factors for COVID-19 severity. Vaccinated individuals experienced less severe COVID-19, whether on (risk ratio (RR) = 0.64, 95% CI = [0.60-0.69]) or off (RR = 0.32, 95% CI = [0.30-0.33]) anti-CD20.

DISCUSSION

In pwMS, consistent risk factors were anti-CD20 therapies and neurological disability, emerging as vital drivers of COVID-19 severity regardless of wave, period, or vaccination status.

Prognostic indicators for hospitalization and ICU admission in people with multiple sclerosis and COVID-19: an analysis of the COVID-19 in MS global data sharing initiative dataset

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the symptoms and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) on disease-modifying therapies using data from the COVID-19 in multiple sclerosis (MS) Global Data Sharing Initiative dataset.

METHODS

The open-access COVID-19 in MS Global Data Sharing Initiative dataset was obtained through credentialed access using PhysioNet. The variables analyzed included BMI, symptoms of COVID-19, age, current use of disease-modifying therapy (DMT), efficacy of DMT, comorbidities, hospitalization status, and type of MS. A linear regression analysis was completed. Data analysis and visualization were completed using STATA v15, R-Studio v1.1.447, Python v3.8, and its associated libraries, including NumPy, Pandas, and Matplotlib.

RESULTS

A total of 1141 participants were included in the analysis. 904 women and 237 men were diagnosed with MS. Among the pwMS included in the study; 208 (19.54%) had a suspected infection with COVID-19 and only 49 (5.25%) were confirmed. Any COVID-19 symptom was present in 360 individuals. The commonly reported DMT agents included dimethyl fumarate (12.71%) and fingolimod (10.17%). 101 in total (8.85%) reported not using any DMT. Factors associated with hospitalization and/or admission to the ICU included having any comorbidity (P=0.01), neuromuscular disorder (P=0.046), hypertension (P=0.005), chronic kidney disease (P<0.001), and immunodeficiency (P=0.003). The type of MS, the duration of the disease, and high-efficacy DMT therapy did not have a statistically significant influence on hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the importance of comorbidities, especially neuromuscular disorders, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and immunodeficiencies, as possible prognostic indicators for worse outcomes of COVID-19 in pwMS. On the contrary, the type of MS, the duration of the disease, and the efficacy of disease-modifying therapy did not significantly affect the severity of the symptoms of COVID-19 in this cohort.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of anti-CD20 treatments in patients with COVID-19: an assessment of severe illness and mortality outcomes

BACKGROUND

The use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab and ocrelizumab, has emerged as a matter of concern, in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to summarize the overall evidence on the pre-admission/pre-diagnosis use of anti-CD20 among patients with COVID-19 with regards to mortality and severe illness outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature search with no language restriction was performed in electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and preprint servers (medRxiv, Research Square, SSRN), to identify eligible studies published up to June 13, 2023. The outcomes of interest were the development of severe illness and all-cause mortality. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled odds ratio for outcomes of interest using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies relative to non-use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, at 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed significantly increased odds for development of severe illness (pooled odds ratio 2.95; 95% confidence interval 2.30, 3.78; n = 534,349) and significantly increased odds for mortality (pooled odds ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval 1.37, 3.35; n = 333,462) with the use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, relative to non-use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, in patients with COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare practitioners should exercise caution when prescribing these anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies during the COVID-19 pandemic to patients who are indicated for these agents, particularly those with underlying conditions like multiple sclerosis or rheumatoid arthritis.