Concordance Between Different Amyloid Immunoassays and Visual Amyloid Positron Emission Tomographic Assessment

Performance of plasma biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of dementia in a Brazilian cohort

Despite remarkable progress in the biomarker field in recent years, local validation of plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia is still lacking in Latin America. In this longitudinal cohort study of 145 elderly Brazilians, we assess the diagnostic performance of plasma biomarkers, based on clinical diagnosis and CSF biomarker positivity. Follow-up data of up to 4.7 years were used to determine performance in predicting diagnostic conversions. Participants were clinically categorized as cognitively unimpaired (n = 49), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (n = 29), AD (n = 38), Lewy body dementia (n = 22), or vascular dementia (n = 7). Plasma Tau, Aβ40, Aβ42, NfL, GFAP, pTau231, pTau181 and pTau217 were measured on the SIMOA HD-X platform. Plasma pTau217 showed excellent performance determining CSF biomarker status in the cohort, either alone (ROC AUC = 0.94, 95% CI: [0.88-1.00]) or as a ratio to Aβ42 (ROC AUC = 0.98, 95% CI: [0.94-1.00]). This study comprises an initial step towards local validation and adoption of dementia biomarkers in Brazil.

Concordance between the updated Elecsys cerebrospinal fluid immunoassays and amyloid positron emission tomography for Alzheimer's disease assessment: findings from the Apollo study

OBJECTIVES

The Apollo study was designed to support the clinical performance verification of the adjusted cutoffs of the Elecsys® β-Amyloid(1-42) (Aβ42) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) II, β-Amyloid(1-40) (Aβ40) CSF, Phospho-Tau (181P) (pTau) CSF and Total-Tau (tTau) CSF immunoassays (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd) for measuring fresh CSF samples, and assess the concordance of the Elecsys CSF pTau/Aβ42, tTau/Aβ42 and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios, as well as Aβ42 alone, with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) visual read status.

METHODS

The primary study endpoint was to assess the concordance of the Elecsys CSF ratios and Aβ42 alone with amyloid PET visual read status using fresh CSF samples collected from individuals with subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment, handled with a new routine-use pre-analytical procedure and measured with the Elecsys CSF immunoassays. The sample stability after 1- to 13-week storage at -20 °C was also investigated in an exploratory analysis.

RESULTS

Of 108 screened individuals, 91 met the eligibility criteria, of whom 44.0 % were amyloid PET-positive and 56.0 % amyloid PET-negative. Positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement, respectively, were 0.800 and 0.882 for pTau/Aβ42, 0.775 and 0.902 for tTau/Aβ42, and 0.950 and 0.824 for Aβ42/Aβ40. For Aβ42, PPA was 0.975 and negative likelihood ratio was 0.039. Overall, 33 samples (36.3 %) were frozen at -20 °C for 1-13 weeks. All concentration recoveries were within 100 ± 10 % when stored at -20 °C for ≤8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Elecsys CSF ratios and Aβ42 alone may be reliable alternatives to amyloid PET for identifying amyloid positivity in clinical practice.

Considerations in the clinical use of amyloid PET and CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease

Amyloid-β (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are now established tools in the diagnostic workup of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and their use is anticipated to increase with the introduction of new disease-modifying therapies. Although these biomarkers are comparable alternatives in research settings to determine Aβ status, biomarker testing in clinical practice requires careful consideration of the strengths and limitations of each modality, as well as the specific clinical context, to identify which test is best suited for each patient. This article provides a comprehensive review of the pathologic processes reflected by Aβ-PET and CSF biomarkers, their performance, and their current and future applications and contexts of use. The primary aim is to assist clinicians in making better-informed decisions about the suitability of each biomarker in different clinical situations, thereby reducing the risk of misdiagnosis or incorrect interpretation of biomarker results. HIGHLIGHTS: Recent advances have positioned Aβ PET and CSF biomarkers as pivotal in AD diagnosis. It is crucial to understand the differences in the clinical use of these biomarkers. A team of experts reviewed the state of Aβ PET and CSF markers in clinical settings. Differential features in the clinical application of these biomarkers were reviewed. We discussed the role of Aβ PET and CSF in the context of novel plasma biomarkers.

Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid and Tau PET: A Report from the Alzheimer's Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup

The Alzheimer's Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened a multidisciplinary workgroup to update appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and to develop AUC for tau PET. Methods: The workgroup identified key research questions that guided a systematic literature review on clinical amyloid/tau PET. Building on this review, the workgroup developed 17 clinical scenarios in which amyloid or tau PET may be considered. A modified Delphi approach was used to rate each scenario by consensus as "rarely appropriate," "uncertain," or "appropriate." Ratings were performed separately for amyloid and tau PET as stand-alone modalities. Results: For amyloid PET, 7 scenarios were rated as appropriate, 2 as uncertain, and 8 as rarely appropriate. For tau PET, 5 scenarios were rated as appropriate, 6 as uncertain, and 6 as rarely appropriate. Conclusion: AUC for amyloid and tau PET provide expert recommendations for clinical use of these technologies in the evolving landscape of diagnostics and therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease.

Updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid and tau PET: A report from the Alzheimer's Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup

INTRODUCTION

The Alzheimer's Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened a multidisciplinary workgroup to update appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and to develop AUC for tau PET.

METHODS

The workgroup identified key research questions that guided a systematic literature review on clinical amyloid/tau PET. Building on this review, the workgroup developed 17 clinical scenarios in which amyloid or tau PET may be considered. A modified Delphi approach was used to rate each scenario by consensus as "rarely appropriate," "uncertain," or "appropriate." Ratings were performed separately for amyloid and tau PET as stand-alone modalities.

RESULTS

For amyloid PET, seven scenarios were rated as appropriate, two as uncertain, and eight as rarely appropriate. For tau PET, five scenarios were rated as appropriate, six as uncertain, and six as rarely appropriate.

DISCUSSION

AUC for amyloid and tau PET provide expert recommendations for clinical use of these technologies in the evolving landscape of diagnostics and therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease.

HIGHLIGHTS

A multidisciplinary workgroup convened by the Alzheimer's Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging updated the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and to develop AUC for tau PET. The goal of these updated AUC is to assist clinicians in identifying clinical scenarios in which amyloid or tau PET may be useful for guiding the diagnosis and management of patients who have, or are at risk for, cognitive decline These updated AUC are intended for dementia specialists who spend a significant proportion of their clinical effort caring for patients with cognitive complaints, as well as serve as a general reference for a broader audience interested in implementation of amyloid and tau PET in clinical practice.

Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and their current use in clinical research and practice

While blood-based tests are readily available for various conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and common cancers, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative diseases lack an early blood-based screening test that can be used in primary care. Major efforts have been made towards the investigation of approaches that may lead to minimally invasive, cost-effective, and reliable tests capable of measuring brain pathological status. Here, we review past and current technologies developed to investigate biomarkers of AD, including novel blood-based approaches and the more established cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging biomarkers of disease. The utility of blood as a source of AD-related biomarkers in both clinical practice and interventional trials is discussed, supported by a comprehensive list of clinical trials for AD drugs and interventions that list biomarkers as primary or secondary endpoints. We highlight that identifying individuals in early preclinical AD using blood-based biomarkers will improve clinical trials and the optimization of therapeutic treatments as they become available. Lastly, we discuss challenges that remain in the field and address new approaches being developed, such as the examination of cargo packaged within extracellular vesicles of neuronal origin isolated from peripheral blood.

The CORCOBIA study: Cut-off points of Alzheimer's disease CSF biomarkers in a clinical cohort

INTRODUCTION

The analysis of the core biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is recommended in the clinical units where it is available. Because of the absence of universal validated values, the determination of specific cut-off points for each center and its population is recommended. The main objective of the CORCOBIA study was to determine the cut-off points of core AD CSF biomarkers for several centers (Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona and Hospital General de Granollers), which work with the same reference laboratory (Laboratori de Referència de Catalunya).

METHODS

Prospective study including cognitively unimpaired individuals (CU, n = 42), subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI, n = 35) and patients with dementia due to Alzheimer's Disease (AD, n = 48), in whom clinical and neuropsychological assessment, neuroimaging, APOE genotyping and lumbar puncture to analyse amyloid beta peptides (Aβ42, Aβ40), total tau (tTau) and phosphorylated Tau (pTau181) using the Lumipulse G600II (Fujirebio) was performed. The values of sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), predictive values and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated, determining the cut-off point according to the Youden index by comparing the CU and AD groups.

RESULTS

The resulting cut-offs and their AUC were the following: Aβ42 750 pg/mL (AUC 0.809); Aβ42/Aβ40 0.062 (AUC 0.78); pTau181 69.85 pg/mL (AUC 0.81); tTau 522.0 pg/mL (AUC 0.79); Aβ42/tTau 1.76 (AUC 0.86); Aβ42/pTau181 10.25 (AUC 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

The determination of cut-off points of core AD CSF biomarkers for the participating centers allows a better diagnostic accuracy. The ratio CSF Aβ42/pTau181 shows the highest AUC and better balance between sensitivity and specificity.

CSF complement proteins are elevated in prodromal to moderate Alzheimer's disease patients and are not altered by the anti-tau antibody semorinemab

INTRODUCTION

Growing evidence suggests a role for neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We investigated complement pathway activity in AD patient cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and evaluated its modulation by the anti-tau antibody semorinemab.

METHODS

Immunoassays were applied to measure CSF complement proteins C4, factor B (FB), C3 and their cleavage fragments C4a, C3a, and factor Bb (Bb) in AD patients and a separate cognitively unimpaired (CU) cohort.

RESULTS

All measured CSF complement proteins were increased in AD versus CU subjects, with C4a displaying the most robust increase. Finally, semorinemab did not have a significant pharmacodynamic effect on CSF complement proteins.

DISCUSSION

Elevated levels of CSF C4a, C4, C3a, C3, Bb, and FB are consistent with complement activation in AD brains. Despite showing a reduction in CSF soluble tau species, semorinemab did not impact complement protein levels or activity. Further studies are needed to determine the value of complement proteins as neuroinflammation biomarkers in AD.

HIGHLIGHTS

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) complement proteins C4a, C3a, Bb, C4, C3, and factor B levels were increased in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients compared to a separate cognitively unimpaired (CU) cohort. Baseline CSF complement protein levels were correlated with neuro-axonal degeneration and glial activation biomarkers in AD patients. The investigational anti-tau antibody semorinemab did not impact CSF complement protein levels or activity relative to the placebo arm.

Amyloid PET detects the deposition of brain Aβ earlier than CSF fluid biomarkers

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the relationship between amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) and Aβ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers will define their potential utility in Aβ treatment. Few population-based or neuropathologic comparisons have been reported.

METHODS

Participants 50+ years with Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers (phosphorylated tau [p-tau]181/Aβ42, n = 505, and Aβ42/40, n = 54) were included from the Mayo Clinic Study on Aging. From these participants, an autopsy subgroup was identified (n = 47). The relationships of Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers were assessed cross-sectionally in all participants and longitudinally in autopsy data.

RESULTS

Cross-sectionally, more participants were Aβ PET+ versus Aβ CSF- than Aβ PET- versus Aβ CSF+ with an incremental effect when using Aβ PET regions selected for early Aβ deposition. The sensitivity for the first detection of Thal phase ≥ 1 in longitudinal data was higher for Aβ PET (89%) than p-tau181/Aβ42 (64%).

DISCUSSION

Aβ PET can detect earlier cortical Aβ deposition than Aβ CSF biomarkers. Aβ PET+ versus Aβ CSF- findings are several-fold greater using regional Aβ PET analyses and in peri-threshold-standardized uptake value ratio participants.

HIGHLIGHTS

Amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) has greater sensitivity for Aβ deposition than Aβ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in early Aβ development. A population-based sample of participants (n = 505) with PET and CSF tests was used. Cortical regions showing early Aβ on Aβ PET were also used in these analyses. Neuropathology was used to validate detection of Aβ by Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers.

Cholinesterase inhibitor use in amyloid PET-negative mild cognitive impairment and cognitive changes

BACKGROUND

Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are prescribed for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and sometimes for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) without knowing underlying pathologies and its effect on cognition. We investigated the frequency of ChEI prescriptions in amyloid-negative MCI and their association with cognitive changes in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort.

METHODS

We included participants with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET)-negative MCI from the ADNI. We analyzed the associations of ChEI use with cognitive changes, brain volume, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) total tau (t-tau), hyperphosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181), and p-tau181/t-tau ratio.

RESULTS

ChEIs were prescribed in 27.4% of amyloid PET-negative MCI and were associated with faster cognitive decline, reduced baseline hippocampal volume and entorhinal cortical thickness, and a longitudinal decrease in the frontal lobe cortical thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between ChEI use and accelerated cognitive decline may stem from underlying pathologies involving reduced hippocampal volume, entorhinal cortical thickness and faster frontal lobe atrophy. We suggest that ChEI use in amyloid PET-negative MCI patients might need further consideration, and studies investigating the causality between ChEI use and cognitive decline are warranted in the future.

Harmonizing tau positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's disease: The CenTauR scale and the joint propagation model

INTRODUCTION

Tau-positron emission tomography (PET) outcome data of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) cannot currently be meaningfully compared or combined when different tracers are used due to differences in tracer properties, instrumentation, and methods of analysis.

METHODS

Using head-to-head data from five cohorts with tau PET radiotracers designed to target tau deposition in AD, we tested a joint propagation model (JPM) to harmonize quantification (units termed "CenTauR" [CTR]). JPM is a statistical model that simultaneously models the relationships between head-to-head and anchor point data. JPM was compared to a linear regression approach analogous to the one used in the amyloid PET Centiloid scale.

RESULTS

A strong linear relationship was observed between CTR values across brain regions. Using the JPM approach, CTR estimates were similar to, but more accurate than, those derived using the linear regression approach.

DISCUSSION

Preliminary findings using the JPM support the development and adoption of a universal scale for tau-PET quantification.

HIGHLIGHTS

Tested a novel joint propagation model (JPM) to harmonize quantification of tau PET. Units of common scale are termed "CenTauRs". Tested a Centiloid-like linear regression approach. Using five cohorts with head-to-head tau PET, JPM outperformed linearregressionbased approach. Strong linear relationship was observed between CenTauRs values across brain regions.

Biological effects of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol in Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

Sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol (PB and TURSO) is hypothesized to mitigate endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, two of many mechanisms implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology.

METHODS

The first-in-indication phase 2a PEGASUS trial was designed to gain insight into PB and TURSO effects on mechanistic targets of engagement and disease biology in AD. The primary clinical efficacy outcome was a global statistical test combining three endpoints relevant to disease trajectory (cognition [Mild/Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score], function [Functional Activities Questionnaire], and total hippocampal volume on magnetic resonance imaging). Secondary clinical outcomes included various cognitive, functional, and neuropsychiatric assessments. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers spanning multiple pathophysiological pathways in AD were evaluated in participants with both baseline and Week 24 samples (exploratory outcome).

RESULTS

PEGASUS enrolled 95 participants (intent-to-treat [ITT] cohort); cognitive assessments indicated significantly greater baseline cognitive impairment in the PB and TURSO (n = 51) versus placebo (n = 44) group. Clinical efficacy outcomes did not significantly differ between treatment groups in the ITT cohort. CSF interleukin-15 increased from baseline to Week 24 within the placebo group (n = 34). In the PB and TURSO group (n = 33), reductions were observed in core AD biomarkers phosphorylated tau-181 (p-tau181) and total tau; synaptic and neuronal degeneration biomarkers neurogranin and fatty acid binding protein-3 (FABP3); and gliosis biomarker chitinase 3-like protein 1 (YKL-40), while the oxidative stress marker 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) increased. Between-group differences were observed for the Aβ42/40 ratio, p-tau181, total tau, neurogranin, FABP3, YKL-40, interleukin-15, and 8-OHdG. Additional neurodegeneration, inflammation, and metabolic biomarkers showed no differences between groups.

DISCUSSION

While between-group differences in clinical outcomes were not observed, most likely due to the small sample size and relatively short treatment duration, exploratory biomarker analyses suggested that PB and TURSO engages multiple pathophysiologic pathways in AD.

Highlights

Proteostasis and mitochondrial stress play key roles in Alzheimer's disease (AD).Sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol (PB and TURSO) targets these mechanisms.The PEGASUS trial was designed to assess PB and TURSO effects on biologic AD targets.PB and TURSO reduced exploratory biomarkers of AD and neurodegeneration.Supports further clinical development of PB and TURSO in neurodegenerative diseases.

Amyloid-β in Alzheimer's disease: Structure, toxicity, distribution, treatment, and prospects

Amyloid-β (Aβ) is a pivotal biomarker in Alzheimer's disease (AD), attracting considerable attention from numerous researchers. There is uncertainty regarding whether clearing Aβ is beneficial or harmful to cognitive function. This question has been a central topic of research, especially given the lack of success in developing Aβ-targeted drugs for AD. However, with the Food and Drug Administration's approval of Lecanemab as the first anti-Aβ medication in July 2023, there is a significant shift in perspective on the potential of Aβ as a therapeutic target for AD. In light of this advancement, this review aims to illustrate and consolidate the molecular structural attributes and pathological ramifications of Aβ. Furthermore, it elucidates the determinants influencing its expression levels while delineating the gamut of extant Aβ-targeted pharmacotherapies that have been subjected to clinical or preclinical evaluation. Subsequently, a comprehensive analysis is presented, dissecting the research landscape of Aβ across the domains above, culminating in the presentation of informed perspectives. Concluding reflections contemplate the supplementary advantages conferred by nanoparticle constructs, conceptualized within the framework of multivalent theory, within the milieu of AD diagnosis and therapeutic intervention, supplementing conventional modalities.

Assessment of the Correlation and Diagnostic Accuracy between Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers: A Comparison of the Lumipulse and Simoa Platforms

We compared the clinical and analytical performance of Alzheimer's disease (AD) plasma biomarkers measured using the single-molecule array (Simoa) and Lumipulse platforms. We quantified the plasma levels of amyloid beta 42 (Aβ42), Aβ40, phosphorylated tau (Ptau181), and total tau biomarkers in 81 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 30 with AD, and 16 with non-AD dementia. We found a strong correlation between the Simoa and Lumipulse methods. Concerning the clinical diagnosis, Simoa Ptau181/Aβ42 (AUC 0.739, 95% CI 0.592-0.887) and Lumipulse Aβ42 and Ptau181/Aβ42 (AUC 0.735, 95% CI 0.589-0.882 and AUC 0.733, 95% CI 0.567-0.900) had the highest discriminating power. However, their power was significantly lower than that of CSF Aβ42/Aβ40, as measured by Lumipulse (AUC 0.879, 95% CI 0.766-0.992). Simoa Ptau181 and Lumipulse Ptau181/Aβ42 were the markers most consistent with the CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 status (AUC 0.801, 95% CI 0.712-0.890 vs. AUC 0.870, 95% CI 0.806-0.934, respectively) at the ≥2.127 and ≥0.084 cut-offs, respectively. The performance of the Simoa and Lumipulse plasma AD assays is weaker than that of CSF AD biomarkers. At present, the analysed AD plasma biomarkers may be useful for screening to reduce the number of lumbar punctures in the clinical setting.

Characteristics of discordance between amyloid positron emission tomography and plasma amyloid-β 42/40 positivity

Various plasma biomarkers for amyloid-β (Aβ) have shown high predictability of amyloid PET positivity. However, the characteristics of discordance between amyloid PET and plasma Aβ42/40 positivity are poorly understood. Thorough interpretation of discordant cases is vital as Aβ plasma biomarker is imminent to integrate into clinical guidelines. We aimed to determine the characteristics of discordant groups between amyloid PET and plasma Aβ42/40 positivity, and inter-assays variability depending on plasma assays. We compared tau burden measured by PET, brain volume assessed by MRI, cross-sectional cognitive function, longitudinal cognitive decline and polygenic risk score (PRS) between PET/plasma groups (PET-/plasma-, PET-/plasma+, PET+/plasma-, PET+/plasma+) using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. Additionally, we investigated inter-assays variability between immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry method developed at Washington University (IP-MS-WashU) and Elecsys immunoassay from Roche (IA-Elc). PET+/plasma+ was significantly associated with higher tau burden assessed by PET in entorhinal, Braak III/IV, and Braak V/VI regions, and with decreased volume of hippocampal and precuneus regions compared to PET-/plasma-. PET+/plasma+ showed poor performances in global cognition, memory, executive and daily-life function, and rapid cognitive decline. PET+/plasma+ was related to high PRS. The PET-/plasma+ showed intermediate changes between PET-/plasma- and PET+/plasma+ in terms of tau burden, hippocampal and precuneus volume, cross-sectional and longitudinal cognition, and PRS. PET+/plasma- represented heterogeneous characteristics with most prominent variability depending on plasma assays. Moreover, IP-MS-WashU showed more linear association between amyloid PET standardized uptake value ratio and plasma Aβ42/40 than IA-Elc. IA-Elc showed more plasma Aβ42/40 positivity in the amyloid PET-negative stage than IP-MS-WashU. Characteristics of PET-/plasma+ support plasma biomarkers as early biomarker of amyloidopathy prior to amyloid PET. Various plasma biomarker assays might be applied distinctively to detect different target subjects or disease stages.

Where Should I Draw the Line: PET-Driven, Data-Driven, or Manufacturer Cut-Off?

Background

The optimal cut-off for Alzheimer's disease (AD) CSF biomarkers remains controversial.

Objective

To analyze the performance of cut-off points standardized by three methods: one that optimized the agreement between 11C-Pittsburgh compound B PET (a-PET) and CSF biomarkers (Aβ1-42, pTau, tTau, and Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio) in our population, called PET-driven; an unbiased cut-off using data from a healthy research cohort, called data-driven, and that provided by the manufacturer. We also compare changes in ATN classification.

Methods

CSF biomarkers measured by the LUMIPULSE G600II platform and qualitative visualization of amyloid positron emission tomography (a-PET) were performed in all the patients. We established a cut-off for each single biomarker and Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio that optimized their agreement with a-PET using ROC curves. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Overall Percent of Agreement are assessed using a-PET or clinical diagnosis as gold standard for every cut-off. Also, we established a data-driven cut-off from our cognitively unimpaired cohort. We then analyzed changes in ATN classification.

Results

One hundred and ten patients were recruited. Sixty-six (60%) were a-PET positive. PET-driven cut-offs were: pTau > 57, tTau > 362.62, Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 < 0.069. For a single biomarker, pTau showed the highest accuracy (AUC 0.926). New PET-driven cut-offs classified patients similarly to manufacturer cut-offs (only two patients changed). However, 20 patients (18%) changed when data-driven cut-offs were used.

Conclusions

We established our sample's best CSF biomarkers cut-offs using a-PET as the gold standard. These cut-offs categorize better symptomatic subjects than data-driven in ATN classification, but they are very similar to the manufacturer's.

Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers: Moving from CSF to Plasma for Reliable Detection of Amyloid and tau Pathology

BACKGROUND

Development of validated biomarkers to detect early Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathology is needed for therapeutic AD trials. Abnormal concentrations of "core" AD biomarkers, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta1-42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau correlate well with neuroimaging biomarkers and autopsy findings. Nevertheless, given the limitations of established CSF and neuroimaging biomarkers, accelerated development of blood-based AD biomarkers is underway.

CONTENT

Here we describe the clinical significance of CSF and plasma AD biomarkers to detect disease pathology throughout the Alzheimer continuum and correlate with imaging biomarkers. Use of the AT(N) classification by CSF and imaging biomarkers provides a more objective biologically based diagnosis of AD than clinical diagnosis alone. Significant progress in measuring CSF AD biomarkers using extensively validated highly automated assay systems has facilitated their transition from research use only to approved in vitro diagnostics tests for clinical use. We summarize development of plasma AD biomarkers as screening tools for enrollment and monitoring participants in therapeutic trials and ultimately in clinical care. Finally, we discuss the challenges for AD biomarkers use in clinical trials and precision medicine, emphasizing the possible ethnocultural differences in the levels of AD biomarkers.

SUMMARY

CSF AD biomarker measurements using fully automated analytical platforms is possible. Building on this experience, validated blood-based biomarker tests are being implemented on highly automated immunoassay and mass spectrometry platforms. The progress made developing analytically and clinically validated plasma AD biomarkers within the AT(N) classification scheme can accelerate use of AD biomarkers in therapeutic trials and routine clinical practice.

Operationalizing selection criteria for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease: Biomarker and clinical considerations

Alzheimer's disease (AD) staging criteria lack standardized, empirical description. Well-defined AD staging criteria are an important consideration in protocol design, influencing a more standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria and defining what constitutes meaningful differentiation among the stages. However, many trials are being designed on the basis of biomarker features and the two need to be coordinated. The Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable (AARR) Spring 2021 meeting discussed the implementation of preclinical AD staging criteria, and provided recommendations for how they may best be incorporated into clinical trials research. Discussion also included what currently available tools for global clinical trials may best define populations in preclinical AD trials, and if are we able to differentiate preclinical from clinical stages of the disease. Well-defined AD staging criteria are key to improving early detection, diagnostics, clinical trial enrollment, and identifying statistically significant clinical changes, and researchers discussed how emerging blood biomarkers may help with more efficient screening in preclinical stages.

Different associations between amyloid-βeta 42, amyloid-βeta 40, and amyloid-βeta 42/40 with soluble phosphorylated-tau and disease burden in Alzheimer's disease: a cerebrospinal fluid and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography study

BACKGROUND

Despite the high sensitivity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta (Aβ)42 to detect amyloid pathology, the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (amyR) better estimates amyloid load, with higher specificity for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, whether Aβ42 and amyR have different meanings and whether Aβ40 represents more than an Aβ42-corrective factor remain to be clarified. Our study aimed to compare the ability of Aβ42 and amyR to detect AD pathology in terms of p-tau/Aβ42 ratio and brain glucose metabolic patterns using fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET).

METHODS

CSF biomarkers were analyzed with EUROIMMUN ELISA. We included 163 patients showing pathological CSF Aβ42 and normal p-tau (A + T -  = 98) or pathological p-tau levels (A + T +  = 65) and 36 control subjects (A - T -). A + T - patients were further stratified into those with normal (CSFAβ42 + /amyR -  = 46) and pathological amyR (CSFAβ42 + /amyR +  = 52). We used two distinct cut-offs to determine pathological values of p-tau/Aβ42: (1) ≥ 0.086 and (2) ≥ 0.122. FDG-PET patterns were evaluated in a subsample of patients (n = 46) and compared to 24 controls.

RESULTS

CSF Aβ40 levels were the lowest in A - T - and in CSFAβ42 + /amyR - , higher in CSFAβ42 + /amyR + and highest in A + T + (F = 50.75; p < 0.001), resembling CSF levels of p-tau (F = 192; p < 0.001). We found a positive association between Aβ40 and p-tau in A - T - (β = 0.58; p < 0.001), CSFAβ42 + /amyR - (β = 0.47; p < 0.001), and CSFAβ42 + /amyR + patients (β = 0.48; p < 0.001) but not in A + T + . Investigating biomarker changes as a function of amyR, we observed a weak variation in CSF p-tau (+ 2 z-scores) and Aβ40 (+ 0.8 z-scores) in the normal amyR range, becoming steeper over the pathological threshold of amyR (p-tau: + 5 z-scores, Aβ40: + 4.5 z-score). CSFAβ42 + /amyR + patients showed a significantly higher probability of having pathological p-tau/Aβ42 than CSFAβ42 + /amyR - (cut-off ≥ 0.086: OR 23.3; cut-off ≥ 0.122: OR 8.8), which however still showed pathological values of p-tau/Aβ42 in some cases (cut-off ≥ 0.086: 35.7%; cut-off ≥ 0.122: 17.3%) unlike A - T - . Accordingly, we found reduced FDG metabolism in the temporoparietal regions of CSFAβ42 + /amyR - compared to controls, and further reduction in frontal areas in CSFAβ42 + /amyR + , like in A + T + .

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological p-tau/Aβ42 and FDG hypometabolism typical of AD can be found in patients with decreased CSF Aβ42 levels alone. AmyR positivity, associated with higher Aβ40 levels, is accompanied by higher CSF p-tau and widespread FDG hypometabolism.

Cognitive effects of Lewy body pathology in clinically unimpaired individuals

α-Synuclein aggregates constitute the pathology of Lewy body (LB) disease. Little is known about the effects of LB pathology in preclinical (presymptomatic) individuals, either as isolated pathology or coexisting with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology (β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau). We examined the effects of LB pathology using a cerebrospinal fluid α-synuclein-seed amplification assay in 1,182 cognitively and neurologically unimpaired participants from the BioFINDER study: 8% were LB positive, 26% Aβ positive (13% of those were LB positive) and 16% tau positive. LB positivity occurred more often in the presence of Aβ positivity but not tau positivity. LB pathology had independently negative effects on cross-sectional and longitudinal global cognition and memory and on longitudinal attention/executive function. Tau had cognitive effects of a similar magnitude, but these were less pronounced for Aβ. Participants with both LB and AD (Aβ and tau) pathology exhibited faster cognitive decline than those with only LB or AD pathology. LB, but not AD, pathology was associated with reduced sense of smell. Only LB-positive participants progressed to clinical LB disease over 10 years. These results are important for individualized prognosis, recruitment and choice of outcome measures in preclinical LB disease trials, but also for the design of early AD trials because >10% of individuals with preclinical AD have coexisting LB pathology.

Optimal combinations of CSF biomarkers for predicting cognitive decline and clinical conversion in cognitively unimpaired participants and mild cognitive impairment patients: A multi-cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Our objective was determining the optimal combinations of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for predicting disease progression in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative diseases.

METHODS

We included 1,983 participants from three different cohorts with longitudinal cognitive and clinical data, and baseline CSF levels of Aβ42, Aβ40, phosphorylated tau at threonine-181 (p-tau), neurofilament light (NfL), neurogranin, α-synuclein, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), YKL-40, S100b, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) (Elecsys NeuroToolKit).

RESULTS

Change of modified Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (mPACC) in cognitively unimpaired (CU) was best predicted by p-tau/Aβ42 alone (R2 ≥ 0.31) or together with NfL (R2  = 0.25), while p-tau/Aβ42 (R2 ≥ 0.19) was sufficient to accurately predict change of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients. P-tau/Aβ42 (AUC ≥ 0.87) and p-tau/Aβ42 together with NfL (AUC ≥ 0.75) were the best predictors of conversion to AD and all-cause dementia, respectively.

DISCUSSION

P-tau/Aβ42 is sufficient for predicting progression in AD, with very high accuracy. Adding NfL improves the prediction of all-cause dementia conversion and cognitive decline.

An accurate fully automated panel of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

There is a great need for fully automated plasma assays that can measure amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology and predict future Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia.

METHODS

Two cohorts (n = 920) were examined: Panel A+ (n = 32 cognitively unimpaired [CU], n = 106 mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and n = 89 AD) and BioFINDER-1 (n = 461 CU, n = 232 MCI). Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181, two p-tau217 variants, ApoE4 protein, neurofilament light, and GFAP were measured using Elecsys prototype immunoassays.

RESULTS

The best biomarker for discriminating Aβ-positive versus Aβ-negative participants was Aβ42/Aβ40 (are under the curve [AUC] 0.83-0.87). Combining Aβ42/Aβ40, p-tau181, and ApoE4 improved the AUCs significantly (0.90 to 0.93; P< 0.01). Adding additional biomarkers had marginal effects (ΔAUC ≤0.01). In BioFINDER, p-tau181, p-tau217, and ApoE4 predicted AD dementia within 6 years in CU (AUC 0.88) and p-tau181, p-tau217, and Aβ42/Aβ40 in MCI (AUC 0.87).

DISCUSSION

The high accuracies for Aβ pathology and future AD dementia using fully automated instruments are promising for implementing plasma biomarkers in clinical trials and clinical routine.

Contribution of clinical information to the predictive performance of plasma β-amyloid levels for amyloid positron emission tomography positivity

Background

Early detection of β-amyloid (Aβ) accumulation, a major biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), has become important. As fluid biomarkers, the accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ for predicting Aβ deposition on positron emission tomography (PET) has been extensively studied, and the development of plasma Aβ is beginning to receive increased attention recently. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether APOE genotypes, age, and cognitive status increase the predictive performance of plasma Aβ and CSF Aβ levels for Aβ PET positivity.

Methods

We recruited 488 participants who underwent both plasma Aβ and Aβ PET studies (Cohort 1) and 217 participants who underwent both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ and Aβ PET studies (Cohort 2). Plasma and CSF samples were analyzed using ABtest-MS, an antibody-free liquid chromatography-differential mobility spectrometry-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method and INNOTEST enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits, respectively. To evaluate the predictive performance of plasma Aβ and CSF Aβ, respectively, logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed.

Results

When predicting Aβ PET status, both plasma Aβ42/40 ratio and CSF Aβ42 showed high accuracy (plasma Aβ area under the curve (AUC) 0.814; CSF Aβ AUC 0.848). In the plasma Aβ models, the AUC values were higher than plasma Aβ alone model, when the models were combined with either cognitive stage (p &lt; 0.001) or APOE genotype (p = 0.011). On the other hand, there was no difference between the CSF Aβ models, when these variables were added.

Conclusion

Plasma Aβ might be a useful predictor of Aβ deposition on PET status as much as CSF Aβ, particularly when considered with clinical information such as APOE genotype and cognitive stage.

Protein fibril length in cerebrospinal fluid is increased in Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) associated proteins exist in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This paper evidences that protein aggregate morphology distinctly differs in CSF of patients with AD dementia (ADD), mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI AD), with subjective cognitive decline without amyloid pathology (SCD) and with non-AD MCI using liquid-based atomic force microscopy (AFM). Spherical-shaped particles and nodular-shaped protofibrils were present in the CSF of SCD patients, whereas CSF of ADD patients abundantly contained elongated mature fibrils. Quantitative analysis of AFM topographs confirms fibril length is higher in CSF of ADD than in MCI AD and lowest in SCD and non-AD dementia patients. CSF fibril length is inversely correlated with CSF amyloid beta (Aβ) 42/40 ratio and CSF p-tau protein levels (obtained from biochemical assays) to predict amyloid and tau pathology with an accuracy of 94% and 82%, respectively, thus identifying ultralong protein fibrils in CSF as a possible signature of AD pathology.

Test-retest variability of plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease and its effects on clinical prediction models

INTRODUCTION

The effect of random error on the performance of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) must be determined before clinical implementation.

METHODS

We measured test-retest variability of plasma amyloid beta (Aβ)42/Aβ40, neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217 and simulated effects of this variability on biomarker performance when predicting either cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ status or conversion to AD dementia in 399 non-demented participants with cognitive symptoms.

RESULTS

Clinical performance was highest when combining all biomarkers. Among single-biomarkers, p-tau217 performed best. Test-retest variability ranged from 4.1% (Aβ42/Aβ40) to 25% (GFAP). This variability reduced the performance of the biomarkers (≈ΔAUC [area under the curve] -1% to -4%) with the least effects on models with p-tau217. The percent of individuals with unstable predicted outcomes was lowest for the multi-biomarker combination (14%).

DISCUSSION

Clinical prediction models combining plasma biomarkers-particularly p-tau217-exhibit high performance and are less effected by random error. Individuals with unstable predicted outcomes ("gray zone") should be recommended for further tests.

CSF Aβ42 and Aβ42/Aβ40 Ratio in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementias

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) may manifest with atypical phenotypes, resembling behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS), phenotypes which typically have an underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau proteinopathy (FTLD-tau), such as Pick's disease, corticobasal degeneration (CBD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), or FTLD with TDP-43 proteinopathy (FTLD-TDP). CSF biomarkers total and phosphorylated tau (τ_T and τ_P-181), and amyloid beta with 42 and 40 amino acids (Aβ₄₂ and Aβ₄₀) are biomarkers of AD pathology. The primary aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Aβ₄₂ to Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio in: (a) differentiating ADD vs. frontotemporal dementias; (b) patients with AD pathology vs. non-AD pathologies; (c) compare biomarker ratios and composite markers to single CSF biomarkers in the differentiation of AD from FTD; Methods: In total, 263 subjects were included (ADD: n = 98; bvFTD: n = 49; PSP: n = 50; CBD: n = 45; controls: n = 21). CSF biomarkers were measured by commercially available ELISAs (EUROIMMUN). Multiple biomarker ratios (Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀; τ_T/τ_P-181; τ_T/Aβ₄₂; τ_P-181/Aβ₄₂) and composite markers (t-tau: τ_T/(Aβ₄₂/Aβ40); p-tau: τ_P-181/(Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀) were calculated. ROC curve analysis was performed to compare AUCs of Aβ₄₂ and Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio and relevant composite markers between ADD and FTD, as defined clinically. BIOMARKAPD/ABSI criteria (abnormal τ_T, τ_P-181 Aβ₄₂, and Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio) were used to re-classify all patients into AD pathology vs. non-AD pathologies, and ROC curve analysis was repeated to compare Aβ₄₂ and Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀; Results: Aβ₄₂ did not differ from Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio in the differentiation of ADD from FTD (AUCs 0.752 and 0.788 respectively; p = 0.212). The τ_T/Aβ₄₂ ratio provided maximal discrimination between ADD and FTD (AUC:0.893; sensitivity 88.8%, specificity 80%). BIOMARKAPD/ABSI criteria classified 60 patients as having AD pathology and 211 as non-AD. A total of 22 had discrepant results and were excluded. Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio was superior to Aβ₄₂ in the differentiation of AD pathology from non-AD pathology (AUCs: 0.939 and 0.831, respectively; p < 0.001). In general, biomarker ratios and composite markers were superior to single CSF biomarkers in both analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio is superior to Aβ₄₂ in identifying AD pathology, irrespective of the clinical phenotype. CSF biomarker ratios and composite markers provide higher diagnostic accuracy compared to single CSF biomarkers.

How far is the goal of applying β-amyloid in cerebrospinal fluid for clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with standardization of measurements?

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) β-amyloid (Aβ) is important for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the cohort distributions and cut-off values have large variation across different analytical assays, kits, and laboratories. In this review, we summarize the cut-off values and diagnostic performance for CSF Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40, and explore the important effect factors. Based on the Alzheimer's Association external quality control program (AAQC program), the peer group coefficient of variation of manual ELISA assays for CSF Aβ1-42 was unsatisfied (>20%). Fully automated platforms with better performance have recently been developed, but still not widely applied. In 2020, the certified reference material (CRM) for CSF Aβ1-42 was launched; however, the AAQC 2021-round results did not show effective improvements. Thus, further development and popularization of CRM for CSF Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40 are urgently required. Standardizing the diagnostic procedures of AD and related status and the pre-analytical protocols of CSF samples, improving detection performance of analytical assays, and popularizing the application of fully automated platforms are also important for the establishment of uniform cut-off values. Moreover, each laboratory should verify the applicability of uniform cut-off values, and evaluate whether it is necessary to establish its own population- and assay-specific cut-off values.

Association Between Dietary Habits in Midlife With Dementia Incidence Over a 20-Year Period

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Dementia cases are expected to triple during the next 30 years, highlighting the importance of finding modifiable risk factors for dementia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether adherence to conventional dietary recommendations or to a modified Mediterranean diet are associated with a subsequent lower risk of developing all-cause dementia, Alzheimer disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), or with future accumulation of AD-related β-amyloid (Aβ) pathology.

METHODS

Baseline examination in the prospective Swedish population-based Malmö Diet and Cancer Study took place in 1991-1996 with a follow-up for incident dementia until 2014. Nondemented individuals born 1923-1950 and living in Malmö were invited to participate. Thirty thousand four hundred forty-six were recruited (41% of all eligible). Twenty-eight thousand twenty-five had dietary data and were included in this study. Dietary habits were assessed with a 7-day food diary, detailed food frequency questionnaire, and 1-hour interview. Main outcomes were incident all-cause dementia, AD, or VaD determined by memory clinic physicians. Secondary outcome was Aβ-accumulation measured using CSF Aβ42 (n = 738). Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations between diet and risk of developing dementia (adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, smoking, physical activity, and alcohol).

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent were women, and the mean (SD) age was 58.1 (7.6) years. One thousand nine hundred forty-three (6.9%) were diagnosed with dementia (median follow-up, 19.8 years). Individuals adhering to conventional dietary recommendations did not have lower risk of developing all-cause dementia (hazard ratio [HR] comparing worst with best adherence, 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.08), AD (HR 1.03, 0.85-1.23), or VaD (HR 0.93, 0.69-1.26). Neither did adherence to the modified Mediterranean diet lower the risk of developing all-cause dementia (HR 0.93 0.75-1.15), AD (HR 0.90, 0.68-1.19), or VaD (HR 1.00, 0.65-1.55). The results were similar when excluding participants developing dementia within 5 years or those with diabetes. No significant associations were found between diet and abnormal Aβ accumulation, conventional recommendations (OR 1.28, 0.74-2.24) or modified Mediterranean diet (OR 0.85, 0.39-1.84).

DISCUSSION

In this 20-year follow-up study, neither adherence to conventional dietary recommendations nor to modified Mediterranean diet were significantly associated with subsequent reduced risk for developing all-cause dementia, AD dementia, VaD, or AD pathology.

Identification of the Aβ37/42 peptide ratio in CSF as an improved Aβ biomarker for Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

Identifying CSF-based biomarkers for the β-amyloidosis that initiates Alzheimer's disease (AD) could provide inexpensive and dynamic tests to distinguish AD from normal aging and predict future cognitive decline.

METHODS

We developed immunoassays specifically detecting all C-terminal variants of secreted amyloid β-protein and identified a novel biomarker, the Aβ 37/42 ratio, that outperforms the canonical Aβ42/40 ratio as a means to evaluate the γ-secretase activity and brain Aβ accumulation.

RESULTS

We show that Aβ 37/42 can distinguish physiological and pathological status in (1) presenilin-1 mutant vs wild-type cultured cells, (2) AD vs control brain tissue, and (3) AD versus cognitively normal (CN) subjects in CSF, where 37/42 (AUC 0.9622) outperformed 42/40 (AUC 0.8651) in distinguishing CN from AD.

DISCUSSION

We conclude that the Aβ 37/42 ratio sensitively detects presenilin/γ-secretase dysfunction and better distinguishes CN from AD than Aβ42/40 in CSF. Measuring this novel ratio alongside promising phospho-tau analytes may provide highly discriminatory fluid biomarkers for AD.

Fully automated and highly specific plasma β-amyloid immunoassays predict β-amyloid status defined by amyloid positron emission tomography with high accuracy

Background

Clinicians, researchers, and patients alike would greatly benefit from more accessible and inexpensive biomarkers for neural β-amyloid (Aβ). We aimed to assess the performance of fully automated plasma Aβ immunoassays, which correlate significantly with immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry assays, in predicting brain Aβ status as determined by visual read assessment of amyloid positron emission tomography (PET).

Methods

The plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was measured using a fully automated immunoassay platform (HISCL series) in two clinical studies (discovery and validation studies). The discovery and validation sample sets were retrospectively and randomly selected from participants with early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) identified during screening for the elenbecestat Phase 3 program.

Results

We included 197 participants in the discovery study (mean [SD] age 71.1 [8.5] years; 112 females) and 200 in the validation study (age 70.8 [7.9] years; 99 females). The plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio predicted amyloid PET visual read status with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.941 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.910–0.973) and 0.868 (95% CI 0.816–0.920) in the discovery and validation studies, respectively. In the discovery study, a cutoff value of 0.102 was determined based on maximizing the Youden Index, and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated to be 96.0% (95% CI 90.1–98.9%) and 83.5% (95% CI 74.6–90.3%), respectively. Using the same cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity in the validation study were calculated to be 88.0% (95% CI 80.0–93.6%) and 72.0% (95% CI 62.1–80.5%), respectively.

Conclusions

The plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio measured using the HISCL series achieved high accuracy in predicting amyloid PET status. Since our blood-based immunoassay system is less invasive and more accessible than amyloid PET and cerebrospinal fluid testing, it may contribute to the diagnosis of AD in routine clinical practice.

Gray matter network properties show distinct associations with CSF p-tau 181 levels and amyloid status in individuals without dementia

Gray matter networks are altered with amyloid accumulation in the earliest stage of AD, and are associated with decline throughout the AD spectrum. It remains unclear to what extent gray matter network abnormalities are associated with hyperphosphorylated-tau (p-tau). We studied the relationship of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau181 with gray matter networks in non-demented participants from the European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia (EPAD) cohort, and studied dependencies on amyloid and cognitive status. Gray matter networks were extracted from baseline structural 3D T1w MRI. P-tau181 and abeta were measured with the Roche cobas Elecsys System. We studied the associations of CSF biomarkers levels with several network's graph properties. We further studied whether the relationships of p-tau 181 and network measures were dependent on amyloid status and cognitive stage (CDR). We repeated these analyses for network properties at a regional level, where we averaged local network values across cubes within each of 116 areas as defined by the automated anatomical labeling (AAL) atlas. Amyloid positivity was associated with higher network size and betweenness centrality, and lower gamma, clustering and small-world coefficients. Higher CSF p-tau 181 levels were related to lower betweenness centrality, path length and lambda coefficients (all p < 0.01). Three-way interactions between p-tau181, amyloid status and CDR were found for path length, lambda and clustering (all p < 0.05): Cognitively unimpaired amyloid-negative participants showed lower path length and lambda values with higher CSF p-tau181 levels. Amyloid-positive participants with impaired cognition demonstrated lower clustering coefficients in association to higher CSF p-tau181 levels. Our results suggest that alterations in gray matter network clustering coefficient is an early and specific event in AD.

A Review of Application of Aβ42/40 Ratio in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Alzheimer’s Disease

The number of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and non-Alzheimer’s disease (non-AD) has drastically increased over recent decades. The amyloid cascade hypothesis attributes a vital role to amyloid-β protein (Aβ) in the pathogenesis of AD. As the main pathological hallmark of AD, amyloid plaques consist of merely the 42 and 40 amino acid variants of Aβ (Aβ 42 and Aβ 40). The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker Aβ 42/40 has been extensively investigated and eventually integrated into important diagnostic tools to support the clinical diagnosis of AD. With the development of highly sensitive assays and technologies, blood-based Aβ 42/40, which was obtained using a minimally invasive and cost-effective method, has been proven to be abnormal in synchrony with CSF biomarker values. This paper presents the recent progress of the CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio and plasma Aβ 42/40 for AD as well as their potential clinical application as diagnostic markers or screening tools for dementia.

Biofluid-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease-related pathologies: An update and synthesis of the literature

The past few years have seen an explosion in sensitive and specific assays for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related disorders, as well as some novel assays based on pathological seed-induced protein misfolding in patient samples. Here, I review this exciting field that promises to transform dementia diagnostics and disease monitoring. I discuss data on biomarkers for amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau pathology, neurodegeneration, and glial activation, mention the most promising biomarkers for α-synuclein and TDP-43 pathology, and highlight the need for further research into common co-pathologies. Finally, I consider practical aspects of blood-based biomarker-supported AD diagnostics and emphasize the importance of biomarker interpretation in a full clinical context.

Dementia Prevention Research Clinic: a longitudinal study investigating factors influencing the development of Alzheimer's disease in Aotearoa, New Zealand

Aotearoa New Zealand's population is ageing. Increasing life expectancy is accompanied by increases in prevalence of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and ageing-related disorders. The multicentre Dementia Prevention Research Clinic longitudinal study aims to improve understanding of AD and dementia in Aotearoa, in order to develop interventions that delay or prevent progression to dementia. Comprising research clinics in Auckland, Christchurch and Dunedin, this multi-disciplinary study involves community participants who undergo biennial investigations informed by international protocols and best practice: clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging, lifestyle evaluations, APOE genotyping, blood collection and processing. A key research objective is to identify a 'biomarker signature' that predicts progression from mild cognitive impairment to AD. Candidate biomarkers include: blood proteins and microRNAs, genetic, neuroimaging and neuropsychological markers, health, cultural, lifestyle, sensory and psychosocial factors. We are examining a range of mechanisms underlying the progression of AD pathology (e.g. faulty blood-brain barrier, excess parenchymal iron, vascular dysregulation). This paper will outline key aspects of the Dementia Prevention Research Clinic's research, provide an overview of data collection, and a summary of 266 participants recruited to date. The national outreach of the clinics is a strength; the heart of the Dementia Prevention Research Clinics are its people.

Classifying mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease by constructing a 14-gene diagnostic model

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are two neurodegenerative diseases. Most patients with MCI will develop AD. Early detection of AD and MCI is a crucial issue in terms of secondary prevention. Therefore, more diagnostic models need to be developed to distinguish AD patients from MCI patients.

METHODS

In our research, the expression matrix and were screened from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. A 14-gene diagnostic model was constructed with lasso logistic analysis. The efficiency and accuracy of diagnostic model have also been validated. In order to clarify the expression differences of 14 genes in health donor, AD and MCI, the blood samples of patients and healthy individuals were collected. The mRNA expression of the 14 genes in blood sample were detected. The SH-SY5Y cell injury model was constructed and biological function of POU2AF1 and ANKRD22 in SH-SY5Y have been proved.

RESULTS

We obtained 16 genes which have an area under curve (AUC) ≥0.6. After that, a diagnostic model based on 14 genes was constructed. Validation in independent cohort showed that the diagnostic model has a good diagnostic efficiency. The expressions of 6 genes in AD patients were significantly lower than those in healthy individuals and MCI patients, while the expressions of 8 genes in AD patients were significantly higher than those in healthy individuals and MCI patients. In in vitro experiments, we found that two key genes POU2AF1 and ANKRD22 could regulate neuronal development by regulating cell viability and IL-6 expression.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic model established in this study has a good diagnose efficiency. Most of these genes in diagnostic model also showed diagnostic value in AD patients. This research also can help doctors make better diagnosis for the treatment and prevention of AD.

Microglial Activation, Tau Pathology, and Neurodegeneration Biomarkers Predict Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer's Disease Continuum

Purpose

Biomarkers used for predicting longitudinal cognitive change in Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum are still elusive. Tau pathology, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration are the leading candidate predictors. We aimed to determine these three aspects of biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma to predict longitudinal cognition status using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort.

Patients and Methods

A total of 430 subjects including, 96 cognitive normal (CN) with amyloid β (Aβ)-negative, 54 CN with Aβ-positive, 195 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with Aβ-positive, and 85 AD with amyloid-positive (Aβ-positive are identified by CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 < 0.138). Aβ burden was evaluated by CSF and plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio; tau pathology was evaluated by CSF and plasma phosphorylated-tau (p-tau181); microglial activation was measured by CSF soluble TREM2 (sTREM2) and progranulin (PGRN); neurodegeneration was measured by CSF and plasma t-tau and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); cognition was examined annually over the subsequent 8 years using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognition 13-item scale (ADAS13) and Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE). Linear mixed-effects models (LME) were applied to assess the correlation between biomarkers and longitudinal cognition decline, as well as their effect size on the prediction of longitudinal cognitive decline.

Results

Baseline CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was decreased in MCI and AD compared to CN, while CSF p-tau181 and t-tau increased. Baseline CSF sTREM2 and PGRN did not show any differences in MCI and AD compared to CN. Baseline brain volumes (including the hippocampal, entorhinal, middle temporal lobe, and whole-brain) decreased in MCI and AD groups. For the longitudinal study, there were significant interaction effects of CSF p-tau181 × time, plasma p-tau181 × time, CSF sTREM2 × time, and brain volumes × time, indicating CSF, and plasma p-tau181, CSF sTREM2, and brain volumes could predict longitudinal cognition deterioration rate. CSF sTREM2, CSF, and plasma p-tau181 had similar medium prediction effects, while brain volumes showed stronger effects in predicting cognition decline.

Conclusion

Our study reported that baseline CSF sTREM2, CSF, and plasma p-tau181, as well as structural MRI, could predict longitudinal cognitive decline in subjects with positive AD pathology. Plasma p-tau181 can be used as a relatively noninvasive reliable biomarker for AD longitudinal cognition decline prediction.

Establishing In-House Cutoffs of CSF Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers for the AT(N) Stratification of the Alzheimer Center Barcelona Cohort

Background: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) increasingly incorporates CSF biomarkers. However, due to the intrinsic variability of the immunodetection techniques used to measure these biomarkers, establishing in-house cutoffs defining the positivity/negativity of CSF biomarkers is recommended. However, the cutoffs currently published are usually reported by using cross-sectional datasets, not providing evidence about its intrinsic prognostic value when applied to real-world memory clinic cases. Methods: We quantified CSF Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, t-Tau, and p181Tau with standard INNOTEST^® ELISA and Lumipulse G^® chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) performed on the automated Lumipulse G600II. Determination of cutoffs included patients clinically diagnosed with probable Alzheimer’s disease (AD, n = 37) and subjective cognitive decline subjects (SCD, n = 45), cognitively stable for 3 years and with no evidence of brain amyloidosis in 18F-Florbetaben-labeled positron emission tomography (FBB-PET). To compare both methods, a subset of samples for Aβ1-42 (n = 519), t-Tau (n = 399), p181Tau (n = 77), and Aβ1-40 (n = 44) was analyzed. Kappa agreement of single biomarkers and Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 was evaluated in an independent group of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia patients (n = 68). Next, established cutoffs were applied to a large real-world cohort of MCI subjects with follow-up data available (n = 647). Results: Cutoff values of Aβ1-42 and t-Tau were higher for CLEIA than for ELISA and similar for p181Tau. Spearman coefficients ranged between 0.81 for Aβ1-40 and 0.96 for p181TAU. Passing–Bablok analysis showed a systematic and proportional difference for all biomarkers but only systematic for Aβ1-40. Bland–Altman analysis showed an average difference between methods in favor of CLEIA. Kappa agreement for single biomarkers was good but lower for the Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio. Using the calculated cutoffs, we were able to stratify MCI subjects into four AT(N) categories. Kaplan–Meier analyses of AT(N) categories demonstrated gradual and differential dementia conversion rates (p = 9.815⁻²⁷). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models corroborated these findings, demonstrating that the proposed AT(N) classifier has prognostic value. AT(N) categories are only modestly influenced by other known factors associated with disease progression. Conclusions: We established CLEIA and ELISA internal cutoffs to discriminate AD patients from amyloid-negative SCD individuals. The results obtained by both methods are not interchangeable but show good agreement. CLEIA is a good and faster alternative to manual ELISA for providing AT(N) classification of our patients. AT(N) categories have an impact on disease progression. AT(N) classifiers increase the certainty of the MCI prognosis, which can be instrumental in managing real-world MCI subjects.

Treatment effects on event-related EEG potentials and oscillations in Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) is the most diffuse neurodegenerative disorder belonging to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in old persons. This disease is provoked by an abnormal accumulation of amyloid-beta and tauopathy proteins in the brain. Very recently, the first disease-modifying drug has been licensed with reserve (i.e., Aducanumab). Therefore, there is a need to identify and use biomarkers probing the neurophysiological underpinnings of human cognitive functions to test the clinical efficacy of that drug. In this regard, event-related electroencephalographic potentials (ERPs) and oscillations (EROs) are promising candidates. Here, an Expert Panel from the Electrophysiology Professional Interest Area of the Alzheimer's Association and Global Brain Consortium reviewed the field literature on the effects of the most used symptomatic drug against ADD (i.e., Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors) on ERPs and EROs in ADD patients with MCI and dementia at the group level. The most convincing results were found in ADD patients. In those patients, Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors partially normalized ERP P300 peak latency and amplitude in oddball paradigms using visual stimuli. In these same paradigms, those drugs partially normalize ERO phase-locking at the theta band (4-7 Hz) and spectral coherence between electrode pairs at the gamma (around 40 Hz) band. These results are of great interest and may motivate multicentric, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled clinical trials in MCI and ADD patients for final cross-validation.

Detecting amyloid positivity in early Alzheimer's disease using combinations of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau

INTRODUCTION

We studied usefulness of combining blood amyloid beta (Aβ)42/Aβ40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217, and neurofilament light (NfL) to detect abnormal brain Aβ deposition in different stages of early Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

Plasma biomarkers were measured using mass spectrometry (Aβ42/Aβ40) and immunoassays (p-tau217 and NfL) in cognitively unimpaired individuals (CU, N = 591) and patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, N = 304) from two independent cohorts (BioFINDER-1, BioFINDER-2).

RESULTS

In CU, a combination of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau217 detected abnormal brain Aβ status with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 to 0.86. In MCI, the models including p-tau217 alone or Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau217 had similar AUCs (0.86-0.88); however, the latter showed improved model fit. The models were implemented in an online application providing individualized risk assessments (https://brainapps.shinyapps.io/PredictABplasma/).

DISCUSSION

A combination of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau217 discriminated Aβ status with relatively high accuracy, whereas p-tau217 showed strongest associations with Aβ pathology in MCI but not in CU.

Connecting Cohorts to Diminish Alzheimer's Disease (CONCORD-AD): A Report of an International Research Collaboration Network

Longitudinal observational cohort studies are being conducted worldwide to understand cognition, biomarkers, and the health of the aging population better. Cross-cohort comparisons and networks of registries in Alzheimer's disease (AD) foster scientific exchange, generate insights, and contribute to the evolving clinical science in AD. A scientific working group was convened with invited investigators from established cohort studies in AD, in order to form a research collaboration network as a resource to address important research questions. The Connecting Cohorts to Diminish Alzheimer's Disease (CONCORD-AD) collaboration network was created to bring together global resources and expertise, to generate insights and improve understanding of the natural history of AD, to inform design of clinical trials in all disease stages, and to plan for optimal patient access to disease-modifying therapies once they become available. The network brings together expertise and data insights from 7 cohorts across Australia, Europe, and North America. Notably, the network includes populations recruited through memory clinics as well as population-based cohorts, representing observations from individuals across the AD spectrum. This report aims to introduce the CONCORD-AD network, providing an overview of the cohorts involved, reporting the common assessments used, and describing the key characteristics of the cohort populations. Cohort study designs and baseline population characteristics are compared, and available cognitive, functional, and neuropsychiatric symptom data, as well as the frequency of biomarker assessments, are summarized. Finally, the challenges and opportunities of cross-cohort studies in AD are discussed.

Amyloid-driven disruption of default mode network connectivity in cognitively healthy individuals

Cortical accumulation of amyloid beta is one of the first events of Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology, and has been suggested to follow a consistent spatiotemporal ordering, starting in the posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus and medio-orbitofrontal cortex. These regions overlap with those of the default mode network, a brain network also involved in memory functions. Aberrant default mode network functional connectivity and higher network sparsity have been reported in prodromal and clinical Alzheimer’s disease. We investigated the association between amyloid burden and default mode network connectivity in the preclinical stage of Alzheimer’s disease and its association with longitudinal memory decline. We included 173 participants, in which amyloid burden was assessed both in CSF by the amyloid beta 42/40 ratio, capturing the soluble part of amyloid pathology, and in dynamic PET scans calculating the non-displaceable binding potential in early-stage regions. The default mode network was identified with resting-state functional MRI. Then, we calculated functional connectivity in the default mode network, derived from independent component analysis, and eigenvector centrality, a graph measure recursively defining important nodes on the base of their connection with other important nodes. Memory was tested at baseline, 2- and 4-year follow-up. We demonstrated that higher amyloid burden as measured by both CSF amyloid beta 42/40 ratio and non-displaceable binding potential in the posterior cingulate cortex was associated with lower functional connectivity in the default mode network. The association between amyloid burden (CSF and non-displaceable binding potential in the posterior cingulate cortex) and aberrant default mode network connectivity was confirmed at the voxel level with both functional connectivity and eigenvector centrality measures, and it was driven by voxel clusters localized in the precuneus, cingulate, angular and left middle temporal gyri. Moreover, we demonstrated that functional connectivity in the default mode network predicts longitudinal memory decline synergistically with regional amyloid burden, as measured by non-displaceable binding potential in the posterior cingulate cortex. Taken together, these results suggest that early amyloid beta deposition is associated with aberrant default mode network connectivity in cognitively healthy individuals and that default mode network connectivity markers can be used to identify subjects at risk of memory decline.

Mass spectrometry-based methods for robust measurement of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in biological fluids

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia affecting 60%-70% of people afflicted with this disease. Accurate antemortem diagnosis is urgently needed for early detection of AD to enable reliable estimation of prognosis, intervention, and monitoring of the disease. The National Institute on Aging/Alzheimer's Association sponsored the 'Research Framework: towards a biological definition of AD', which recommends using different biomarkers in living persons for a biomarker-based definition of AD regardless of clinical status. Fluid biomarkers represent one of key groups of them. Since cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is in direct contact with brain and many proteins present in the brain can be detected in CSF, this fluid has been regarded as the best biofluid in which to measure AD biomarkers. Recently, technological advancements in protein detection made possible the effective study of plasma AD biomarkers despite their significantly lower concentrations versus to that in CSF. This and other challenges that face plasma-based biomarker measurements can be overcome by using mass spectrometry. In this review, we discuss AD biomarkers which can be reliably measured in CSF and plasma using targeted mass spectrometry coupled to liquid chromatography (LC/MS/MS). We describe progress in LC/MS/MS methods' development, emphasize the challenges, and summarize major findings. We also highlight the role of mass spectrometry and progress made in the process of global standardization of the measurement of Aβ42/Aβ40. Finally, we briefly describe exploratory proteomics which seek to identify new biomarkers that can contribute to detection of co-pathological processes that are common in sporadic AD.

The Amyloid-β Pathway in Alzheimer's Disease

Breakthroughs in molecular medicine have positioned the amyloid-β (Aβ) pathway at the center of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology. While the detailed molecular mechanisms of the pathway and the spatial-temporal dynamics leading to synaptic failure, neurodegeneration, and clinical onset are still under intense investigation, the established biochemical alterations of the Aβ cycle remain the core biological hallmark of AD and are promising targets for the development of disease-modifying therapies. Here, we systematically review and update the vast state-of-the-art literature of Aβ science with evidence from basic research studies to human genetic and multi-modal biomarker investigations, which supports a crucial role of Aβ pathway dyshomeostasis in AD pathophysiological dynamics. We discuss the evidence highlighting a differentiated interaction of distinct Aβ species with other AD-related biological mechanisms, such as tau-mediated, neuroimmune and inflammatory changes, as well as a neurochemical imbalance. Through the lens of the latest development of multimodal in vivo biomarkers of AD, this cross-disciplinary review examines the compelling hypothesis- and data-driven rationale for Aβ-targeting therapeutic strategies in development for the early treatment of AD.

Associations of Fully Automated CSF and Novel Plasma Biomarkers With Alzheimer Disease Neuropathology at Autopsy

OBJECTIVE

To study CSF biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD) analyzed by fully automated Elecsys immunoassays compared to neuropathologic gold standards and to compare their accuracy to plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau181) measured with a novel single molecule array method.

METHODS

We studied antemortem Elecsys-derived CSF biomarkers in 45 individuals who underwent standardized postmortem assessments of AD and non-AD neuropathologic changes at autopsy. In a subset of 26 participants, we also analyzed antemortem levels of plasma p-tau181 and neurofilament light (NfL). Reference biomarker values were obtained from 146 amyloid-PET-negative healthy controls (HC).

RESULTS

All CSF biomarkers clearly distinguished pathology-confirmed AD dementia (n = 27) from HC (area under the curve [AUC] 0.86-1.00). CSF total tau (t-tau), p-tau181, and their ratios with β-amyloid1-42 (Aβ1-42) also accurately distinguished pathology-confirmed AD from non-AD dementia (n = 8; AUC 0.94-0.97). In pathology-specific analyses, intermediate to high Thal amyloid phases were best detected by CSF Aβ1-42 (AUC [95% confidence interval] 0.91 [0.81-1]), while intermediate to high scores for Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease neuritic plaques and Braak tau stages were best detected by CSF p-tau181 (AUC 0.89 [0.79-0.99] and 0.88 [0.77-0.99], respectively). Optimal Elecsys biomarker cutoffs were derived at 1,097, 229, and 19 pg/mL for Aβ1-42, t-tau, and p-tau181. In the plasma subsample, both plasma p-tau181 (AUC 0.91 [0.86-0.96]) and NfL (AUC 0.93 [0.87-0.99]) accurately distinguished those with pathology-confirmed AD (n = 14) from HC. However, only p-tau181 distinguished AD from non-AD dementia cases (n = 4; AUC 0.96 [0.88-1.00]) and showed a similar, although weaker, pathologic specificity for neuritic plaques (AUC 0.75 [0.52-0.98]) and Braak stage (AUC 0.71 [0.44-0.98]) as CSF p-tau181.

CONCLUSION

Elecsys-derived CSF biomarkers detect AD neuropathologic changes with very high discriminative accuracy in vivo. Preliminary findings support the use of plasma p-tau181 as an easily accessible and scalable biomarker of AD pathology.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that fully automated CSF t-tau and p-tau181 measurements discriminate between autopsy-confirmed AD and other dementias.

Challenges in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic Work-Up: Amyloid Biomarker Incongruences

BACKGROUND

Discordance among amyloid biomarkers is a challenge to overcome in order to increase diagnostic accuracy in dementia.

OBJECTIVES

1) To verify that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (AβR) better agrees with Amyloid PET (Amy-PET) results compared to CSF Aβ42; 2) to detect differences among concordant positive, concordant negative, and discordant cases, basing the concordance definition on the agreement between CSF AβR and Amy-PET results; 3) to define the suspected underlying pathology of discordant cases using in vivo biomarkers.

METHOD

We retrospectively enrolled 39 cognitively impaired participants in which neuropsychological tests, apolipoprotein E genotype determination, TC/MRI, FDG-PET, Amy-PET, and CSF analysis had been performed. In all cases, CSF analysis was repeated using the automated Lumipulse method. In discordant cases, FDG-PET scans were evaluated visually and using automated classifiers.

RESULTS

CSF AβR better agreed with Amy-PET compared to CSF Aβ42 (Cohen's K 0.431 versus 0.05). Comparisons among groups did not show any difference in clinical characteristics except for age at symptoms onset that was higher in the 6 discordant cases with abnormal CSF AβR values and negative Amy-PET (CSF AβR+/AmyPET-). FDG-PET and all CSF markers (Aβ42, AβR, p-Tau, t-Tau) were suggestive of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in 5 of these 6 cases.

CONCLUSION

1) CSF AβR is the CSF amyloid marker that shows the better level of agreement with Amy-PET results; 2) The use of FDG-PET and CSF-Tau markers in CSFAβR+/Amy-PET-discordant cases can support AD diagnosis; 3) Disagreement between positive CSF AβR and negative Amy-PET in symptomatic aged AD patients could be due to the variability in plaques conformation and a negative Amy-PET scan cannot be always sufficient to rule out AD.

Transitioning from cerebrospinal fluid to blood tests to facilitate diagnosis and disease monitoring in Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasingly prevalent worldwide, and disease-modifying treatments may soon be at hand; hence, now, more than ever, there is a need to develop techniques that allow earlier and more secure diagnosis. Current biomarker-based guidelines for AD diagnosis, which have replaced the historical symptom-based guidelines, rely heavily on neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling. While these have greatly improved the diagnostic accuracy of AD pathophysiology, they are less practical for application in primary care, population-based and epidemiological settings, or where resources are limited. In contrast, blood is a more accessible and cost-effective source of biomarkers in AD. In this review paper, using the recently proposed amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration [AT(N)] criteria as a framework towards a biological definition of AD, we discuss recent advances in biofluid-based biomarkers, with a particular emphasis on those with potential to be translated into blood-based biomarkers. We provide an overview of the research conducted both in CSF and in blood to draw conclusions on biomarkers that show promise. Given the evidence collated in this review, plasma neurofilament light chain (N) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau; T) show particular potential for translation into clinical practice. However, p-tau requires more comparisons to be conducted between its various epitopes before conclusions can be made as to which one most robustly differentiates AD from non-AD dementias. Plasma amyloid beta (A) would prove invaluable as an early screening modality, but it requires very precise tests and robust pre-analytical protocols.