Effect of the Addition of Cetuximab to Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Radiation Therapy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer: The NRG Oncology RTOG 0436 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of concurrent programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor and definitive radiotherapy with immunonutrition support in esophageal squamous cell cancer: a phase II multicenter clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors, with China accounting for 50% of the world's total incidence. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) with platin-based dual-drug regimen is the standard treatment for inoperable, locally advanced esophageal cancer in patients with a good performance status. However, certain patients possess risk factors that heighten toxicity and reduce their tolerance to cCRT, thereby challenging the feasibility of standard treatment. This study evaluates an alternative therapeutic approach combining programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor (PD-1 inhibitor), definitive radiotherapy, and immunonutrition support for patients with unresectable non-metastatic esophageal cancer expressing PD-L1 who are intolerant to cCRT.

METHODS

This is a phase II, single-arm, multicenter clinical trial involving patients with histologically confirmed unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), who exhibit positive PD-L1 and are unsuitable for cCRT. Participants will receive a total radiotherapy dose of 50-60 Gy in 25-30 fractions, sintilimab (200 mg every three weeks), alongside, supplemented by enteral nutritional emulsion (600-1600 ml/day). The primary endpoint is the 1-year progression-free survival rate, with secondary endpoints including objective response rate, overall survival and incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This research has the potential to redefine treatment for inoperable ESCC patients who cannot tolerate conventional therapies. By evaluating a less toxic regimen that combines immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and nutritional support, we aim to determine if this approach can improve both survival rates and quality of life. The synergistic effects of immunonutrition support and PD-1 inhibitor will also be explored.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06342167.

X-ray-Sensitive Selenium Nanoparticles Enhance Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Radiotherapy through Activating P53/IGFBP3 Pathway by Regulating GPX2

Radiotherapy remains a crucial treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), although the development of radiation resistance and the occurrence of radiation-induced side effects pose significant clinical challenges. Selenium (Se) has obvious antitumor effects, but the sensitizing effect and mechanism of Se nanoparticles in ESCC radiotherapy remain to be determined. The aim of this study was to investigate which form of Se have superior sensitization of ESCC and to investigate how Se nanoparticles (LNT-SeNPs) can enhance the radiosensitivity of ESCC. Our findings indicate that LNT-SeNPs exhibit remarkable radiosensitizing activity with a higher safety index. These nanoparticles effectively inhibit cell growth, induce S-phase arrest, and promote apoptosis through increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Furthermore, analysis via the GEO database revealed the correlation between the selenoprotein GPX2 and the radiosensitivity of esophageal cancer. Further investigations demonstrate that LNT-SeNPs suppress GPX2 expression, leading to apoptosis in ESCC cells via the p53/IGFBP3 signaling pathway. In conclusion, this study elucidates that LNT-SeNPs can enhance the effectiveness of radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, providing valuable insights into the potential use of Se-based drugs as adjunctive therapy. These findings pave the way for future clinical applications aimed at improving therapeutic outcomes in patients undergoing radiotherapy for ESCC.

Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervical Esophagus: Systematic Review and Guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) is an uncommon malignancy accounting for <5% of all esophageal carcinomas. Treatment of CEC varies and is adapted from established regimens used for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or the lower esophageal and head and neck. The present systematic review and guidelines are intended to assist treatment decision making for patients with CEC based on the available evidence.

METHODS

Using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, and Study Design (PICOTS) framework, the evidence regarding treatment outcomes was assessed using Cochrane and PRISMA 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included prospective Phase II to III trials and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2013 and February 23, 2024 in the Ovid Medline database. These references were assessed through the American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) methodology. A systematic review PRISMA 2020 checklist confirmed the completion of essential elements. RAND-UCLA consensus methodology was used by the expert panel to rate the appropriateness of the treatment options.

RESULTS

ARS AUC recommendations include (1) larynx preservation using endoscopic resection (EMR or ESD) alone for the typical case with pT1a cN0 cM0 CEC, (2) definitive CRT for the typical case with cT1bN0M0 in patients who cannot undergo endoscopic resection, (3) larynx-preserving using definitive CRT (with or without induction chemotherapy) for the typical case with nonmetastatic locally advanced CEC (advanced T-stage tumors or involved lymph nodes), with surgery reserved for those patients with incomplete response or locoregional recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

This ARS AUC summary provides guidelines for the management of SCC of the cervical esophagus provides based on available evidence. Topics that warrant further investigation include optimization of (1) patient selection; (2) multimodality therapies including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted agents; (3) radiation dose, schedule, and treatment volume; and (4) supportive care for patients with CEC. Ongoing trials continue to improve outcomes for patients with CEC.

Safety and effectiveness of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a common malignancy in China, often diagnosed at an advanced stage, with poor prognosis. Standard treatments such as definitive chemoradiotherapy offer limited survival benefits. Recent advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have shown promise, but their effectiveness and safety in conjunction with radiotherapy for unresectable ESCC require further exploration.

AIM

To assess the safety and effectiveness of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced unresectable ESCC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 80 patients with locally advanced unresectable ESCC who underwent induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy, recruited from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. All patients received 2-4 cycles of chemotherapy plus programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor, were re-evaluated to be inoperable, then received definitive radiotherapy or CCRT. Primary endpoint was treatment safety and tolerance. SPSS 26.0 software was used for data analysis. Th Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven (46.3%) patients received CCRT and 43 (53.7%) received radiotherapy alone. The most common treatment-related adverse events included radiation esophagitis (32/80, 40.0%) and anemia (49/80, 61.3%), with 22 (27.5%) experiencing grade ≥ 3 adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. After median follow-up of 16.5 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.2 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 19.9 months. The 1-year and 2-year PFS and OS were 55.8% and 31.6%, and 67.5% and 44.1%, respectively. Patients with partial response had better outcomes than those with stable disease: 1-year PFS 69.4% vs 43.9% (P = 0.011) and OS 83.2% vs 48.8% (P = 0.007). Induction therapy effectiveness and immunotherapy maintenance were independent prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy combined with programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor followed by definitive radiotherapy or CCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC was safe and effective.

Current status and perspectives of esophageal cancer: a comprehensive review

Esophageal cancer (EC) continues to be a significant global health concern, with two main subtypes: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Prevention and changes in etiology, improvements in early detection, and refinements in the treatment have led to remarkable progress in the outcomes of EC patients in the past two decades. This seminar provides an in-depth analysis of advances in the epidemiology, disease biology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment landscape of esophageal cancer, focusing on the ongoing debate surrounding multimodality therapy. Despite significant advancements, EC remains a deadly disease, underscoring the need for continued research into early detection methods, understanding the molecular mechanisms, and developing effective treatments.

Case report: Long-term survival in synchronous double primary malignancies of lung adenocarcinomas and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy and SBRT combined with anti-PD-1

Background

The occurrence of multiple primary cancers has become common, and the treatment of such patients is very complex, so it is necessary to combine a variety of individualized treatment methods to achieve better treatment results.

Case description

This report describes a patient with double primary tumors of lung and esophageal cancer had more than 36 months survival with non-operation treatment. The patient diagnosed as lung adenocarcinomas (LADC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), was treated with albumin-bound paclitaxel, nedaplatin, and anti-programmed death 1 (anti-PD-1). The esophageal lesions achieved complete response (CR) after finishing two courses of induction chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-1 followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Radiation pneumonitis (RP) occurred one month after the completion of CRT. The pneumonia was relieved after dexamethasone and moxifloxacin treatment. Then, the lung lesion was treated with oral chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). As of July 2024, the patient has survived for more than 3 years after the above treatments, and the current efficacy evaluation is CR of esophageal lesions, PR of pulmonary lesions.

Conclusion

The multi-modality approach of systemic therapy combined with localized radiotherapy is an effective treatment in the patients of the double primary malignant tumors of LADC and ESCC. The safety and toxicity of radiotherapy for the thoracic double primary tumors demonstrate acceptability.

Radiotherapy combined with chemoimmunotherapy improves survival compared to chemoimmunotherapy alone as first-line treatment for oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with chemoimmunotherapy (RCIT) versus chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) alone as first-line treatment for oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OESCC) at initial diagnosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 140 patients newly diagnosed with OESCC who received RCIT or CIT as first-line treatment between June 2018 and December 2021. Among them, 76 patients were in the RCIT cohort and 64 patients in the CIT cohort. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to simulate random allocation.

RESULTS

After 1:1 PSM, 61 well-paired patients were selected. The median follow-up duration was 34.7 months (95%CI: 30.6-38.8 months). After PSM, the median PFS for the RCIT and CIT groups was 10.9 (95%CI: 9.4-12.4) months and 7.3 (95%CI: 6.0-8.7) months, respectively (P = 0.004). The median OS for the RCIT and CIT groups was 22.4 (95%CI: 17.5-27.4) months and 13.4 (95%CI: 10.9-15.9) months, respectively (P = 0.031). There were significant differences in PFS (median PFS: 12.9 vs. 8.6 vs. 7.3 months, P = 0.003) between the group receiving radiotherapy (RT) for all lesions, the group receiving RT for partial lesions, and the CIT group, while OS was on the threshold of significance (median OS: 29.4 vs. 17.3 vs. 13.4 months, P = 0.052). No significant differences in the incidence of grade 3 or higher (G3+) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed between the two groups. However, the incidence of G3+ pneumonitis (13.1% vs 1.6%, P = 0.038) were higher in the RCIT group compared to the CIT group.

CONCLUSION

RCIT as first-line treatment for OESCC was safe and efficacious. RCIT improved PFS/OS compared to CIT without increasing the overall high grade toxicity rate. However, the increased incidence of pneumonitis due to RT implementation cannot be disregarded.

Current landscape of targeted therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide and is primarily categorized into adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), with the predominant histological type varying by region. In Western countries, including the United States, adenocarcinoma is more prevalent, whereas in East Asian countries, SCC is more common, with it constituting 86% of cases in Japan. Although there has been an increasing trend of adenocarcinoma in Western populations, SCC still accounts for the majority of esophageal cancer cases globally. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment, however, targeted therapies including EGFR, FGFR, PI3K, or CDK4/6, despite showing preliminary efficacy signals, have not yet received regulatory approval. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown therapeutic efficacy and have been approved as a monotherapy or combination therapy for advanced esophageal SCC (ESCC). Although PD-L1 expression is the only clinically applicable biomarker for first-line therapy with ICIs in ESCC, responses to ICIs are various, and novel predictive biomarkers are under investigation. Furthermore, novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) hold promise for advanced ESCC. This review includes the current landscape and future perspectives of potential targeted therapy for advanced ESCC.

Optimization of radiation target volume for locally advanced esophageal cancer in the immunotherapy era

INTRODUCTION

Locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) has poor prognosis. Preliminary clinical studies have demonstrated the synergistic efficacy of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in EC. Adjusting the radiotherapy target volume to protect immune function favors immunotherapy. However, there is no clear consensus on the exact definition of the EC target volume.

AREAS COVERED

Preclinical studies have provided a wealth of information on immunotherapy combined with different radiotherapy modalities, and several clinical studies have evaluated the impact of immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy on locally advanced EC. Here, we illustrate the rational target volume delineation for radiotherapy in terms of patient prognosis, pattern of radiotherapy failure, treatment-related toxicities, tumor-draining lymph nodes, and systemic immunity and summarize the clinical trials of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in EC.

EXPERT OPINION

We recommend applying involved-field irradiation (IFI) instead of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for irradiated fields when immunotherapy is combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced EC. We expect that this target design will be evaluated in clinical trials to further explore more precise diagnostic modalities, long-term toxic responses, and quality of survival, and stratification factors for personalized treatment, and to provide more treatment benefits for patients.

Targeting esophageal carcinoma: molecular mechanisms and clinical studies

Esophageal cancer (EC) is identified as a predominant health threat worldwide, with its highest incidence and mortality rates reported in China. The complex molecular mechanisms underlying EC, coupled with the differential incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) across various regions, highlight the necessity for in-depth research targeting molecular pathogenesis and innovative treatment strategies. Despite recent progress in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, challenges such as drug resistance and the lack of effective biomarkers for patient selection persist, impeding the optimization of therapeutic outcomes. Our review delves into the molecular pathology of EC, emphasizing genetic and epigenetic alterations, aberrant signaling pathways, tumor microenvironment factors, and the mechanisms of metastasis and immune evasion. We further scrutinize the current landscape of targeted therapies, including the roles of EGFR, HER2, and VEGFR, alongside the transformative impact of ICIs. The discussion extends to evaluating combination therapies, spotlighting the synergy between targeted and immune-mediated treatments, and introduces the burgeoning domain of antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and multitarget-directed ligands. This review lies in its holistic synthesis of EC's molecular underpinnings and therapeutic interventions, fused with an outlook on future directions including overcoming resistance mechanisms, biomarker discovery, and the potential of novel drug formulations.

Landscape of epithelial cell subpopulations in the human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma microenvironment

Aims

We sought to reveal the landscape of epithelial cell subpopulations in the human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma microenvironment and investigate their parts on esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) development.

Background

Epithelial cells play an important role in the occurrence and development of ESCC through multiple mechanisms. While the landscape of epithelial cell subpopulations in ESCC, remains unclear.

Objective

Exploring the role of epithelial cell subpopulations in ESCC progression.

Methods

Seurat R package was used for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data filtering, dimensionality reduction, clustering and differentially expressed genes analysis. Cellmarker database was adopted for cell cluster annotation. Functional enrichment analysis was carried out by Gene Ontology (GO) analysis. InferCNV package was conducted for copy number variation (CNV) of epithelial cell subpopulations in all chromosomal regions. Pseudotime trajectory analysis was implemented for exploring differentiation trajectory of epithelial cells subgroups during the cancer progression. CellChat analysis was used for probing the interactions between epithelial cells and NK/T cells. cellular experiments were performed using Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR), Wound-Healing Assay and transwell.

Results

11 major cell subpopulations were identified in ESCC and adjunct tissues. Further reclassification of epithelial cells uncovered 4 subpopulations. Enrichment analysis revealed that highly expressed genes in 4 epithelial cell subpopulations were related to cell proliferation, immune response and angiogenesis. CNV analysis found that UBD + epithelial cells and GAS2L3+ epithelial cells had a higher proportion of CNV. Cell differentiation trajectories disclosed that KRT6C+ and GSTA1+ epithelial cells were in an intermediate state of differentiation, while UBD+ and GAS2L3+ epithelial cells are in an end state of differentiation during ESCC progression. Finally, we found that four epithelial cell subpopulations all inhibited NK/T cells through NECTIN2-TIGIT and CLEC2B-KLRB1. Low ATF3 and DDIT3 mRNA expression inhibited ESCC cell migration and invasion.

Conclusion

Here, we obtained a through epithelial cell atlas of ESCC at single-cell resolution, explored the role of epithelial cell in ESCC progression, and unveiled immunosuppressive signals to NK/T cells in promoting ESCC. Our findings expand the comprehension of epithelial cells and offer a theoretical guidance for future anti-epithelial cell treatment of ESCC.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in NRG Oncology RTOG 0436: a phase III trial evaluating the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation for esophageal cancer treated without surgery

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

NRG/RTOG 0436 evaluated cetuximab added to chemoradiation (CRT) for non-operative esophageal cancer management. PRO objectives assessed improvement in the FACT-Esophageal cancer subscale (ECS), version 4, with cetuximab, and if improved ECS correlated with clinical complete response (cCR).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients were randomized to cisplatin/paclitaxel/radiation ± cetuximab. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, with a 420 patient target, which also provided 82% power to detect ≥ 15 increase in the proportion of cetuximab patients with ECS improvement from baseline to 6-8 weeks post-CRT; α = 0.05, using a χ2 test. Improvement in ECS and its Swallowing and Eating Indices (SI, EI) was defined as 5, 4 and 2 point increases, respectively, from baseline to 6-8 weeks post-CRT. Univariate logistic regression assessed if cCR was associated with improved ECS.

RESULTS

This study was stopped early for not meeting a pre-specified OS endpoint and did not show survival benefit. Of 420 planned patients, 344 enrolled and 281 consented to PROs. ECS was completed by 261 (93%) at baseline, 173 (66%) 6-8 weeks post-CRT, and 117 (64%) at 1 year. At 6-8 weeks, patients receiving CRT + Cetuximab didn't have improved ECS; they experienced a lower proportion of improvement compared to standard CRT (37% vs. 53%; P = 0.04). The proportion of CRT patients with improvement in SI was 9% higher than with cetuximab, but not statistically significant (39% vs. 30%, P = 0.22). There was no association between treatment and EI. When examining ECS scores at 1 year by cCR vs. residual disease, a higher proportion of cCR patients improved, but not statistically significant (48% vs. 45%, P = 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of cetuximab to CRT for the nonoperative management of esophageal cancer did not improve PROs.

Treatment-related pneumonitis after thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the risk factors of treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) following thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD‑1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients with advanced ESCC who were treated with thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD‑1 mAbs. Among them, 56 patients received concurrent radiotherapy with anti-PD‑1 mAbs and 41 patients received sequential radiotherapy with anti-PD‑1 mAbs. The median prescribed planning target volume (PTV) dose was 59.4 Gy (range from 50.4 to 66 Gy, 1.8-2.2 Gy/fraction). Clinical characteristics, the percentage of lung volume receiving more than 5-50 Gy in increments of 5 Gy (V5-V50, respectively) and the mean lung dose (MLD) were analyzed as potential risk factors for TRP.

RESULTS

46.4% (45/97), 20.6% (20/97), 20.6% (20/97), 4.1% (4/97), and 1.0% (1/97) of the patients developed any grade of TRP, grade 1 TRP, grade 2 TRP, grade 3 TRP, and fatal (grade 5) TRP, respectively. Anti-PD‑1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy, V5, V10, V15, V25, V30, V35, V40 and MLD were associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Concurrent therapy (P = 0.010, OR = 3.990) and V5 (P = 0.001, OR = 1.126) were independent risk factors for grade 2 or higher TRP. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal V5 threshold for predicting grade 2 or higher TRP was 55.7%.

CONCLUSION

The combination of thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy with anti-PD‑1 mAbs displayed a tolerable pulmonary safety profile. Although the incidence of TRP was high, grade 1-2 TRP accounted for the majority. Anti-PD‑1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy and the lung V5 were significantly associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Therefore, it seems safer to control V5 below 55% in clinical, especially for the high-risk populations receiving concurrent therapy.

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy combined with fluorouracil-cisplatin plus cetuximab in operable, locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: Results of a phase I-II trial (FFCD-0505/PRODIGE-3)

Background

Radiotherapy combined with fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal cancer is associated with a 20-25% pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Cetuximab increases the efficacy of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck carcinomas. The aim of this phase I/II trial was to determine the optimal doses and the pCR rate with chemoradiotherapy (C-RT) plus cetuximab.

Methods

A 45-Gy radiotherapy regimen was delivered over 5 weeks. The phase I study determined the dose-limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose of 5FU-cisplatin plus cetuximab. The phase II trial aimed to exhibit a pCR rate > 20 % (25 % expected), requiring 33 patients (6 from phase I part plus 27 in phase II part). pCR was defined as ypT0Nx.

Results

The phase I study established the following recommended doses: weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m2 one week before, and 250 mg/m2 during radiotherapy); 5FU (500 mg/m2/day, d1-d4) plus cisplatin (40 mg/m2, d1) during week 1 and 5. In the phase II part, 32 patients received C-RT before surgery, 31 patients underwent surgery, and resection was achieved in 27 patients. A pCR was achieved in five patients (18.5 %) out of 27. After a median follow-up of 19 months, the median progression-free survival was 13.7 months, and the median overall survival was not reached.

Conclusions

Adding cetuximab to preoperative C-RT was toxic and did not achieve a pCR > 20 % as required. The recommended doses, determined during the phase I part, could explain these disappointing results due to a reduction in chemotherapy dose-intensity.

Trial registration

This trial was registered with EudraCT number 2006-004770-27.

An updated review of immunotherapy in esophageal cancer: PD-L1 footprint

Esophageal cancer is considered one of the most significant challenges to public health worldwide. While various therapeutic options exist for esophageal cancer, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, several adverse effects of these medications have been reported. Therefore, a new generation of therapeutic lines should be applied to minimize complications. In this regard, immunotherapy is a novel approach that aims to kill tumor cells directly by targeting them. Specifically, monoclonal antibodies can target specific markers of esophageal cancer tumor cells, keeping other normal cells safe. Multiple monoclonal antibodies optimized for esophageal cancer, such as pembrolizumab, ramucirumab, trastuzumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab, are available. On the other hand, esophageal cancer tumor cells express a specific inhibitory ligand and its receptor called programmed cell death, which can suppress T cell immune responses. This receptor provides an inhibitory signal, causing the highest expression of the PD-L1 ligand on tumor cells. The outcomes of this interaction lead to the suppression of the activation and function of T lymphocytes. Therefore, immunotherapy for esophageal cancer targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has shown a remarkable correlation with cancer care. This study presents a comprehensive review of the latest findings related to immunotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Combinatorial Approaches for Chemotherapies and Targeted Therapies With Radiation: United Efforts to Innovate in Patient Care

Combinatorial therapies consisting of radiation therapy (RT) with systemic therapies, particularly chemotherapy and targeted therapies, have moved the needle to augment disease control across nearly all disease sites for locally advanced disease. Evaluating these important combinations to incorporate more potent therapies with RT will aid our understanding of toxicity and efficacy for patients. This article discusses multiple disease sites and includes a compilation of contributions from expert Red Journal editors from each disease site. Leveraging improved systemic control with novel agents, we must continue efforts to study novel treatment combinations with RT.

Radiobiological analysis of VMAT treatment plan with flattened and flattening filter free photon beam: an EUD and TCP based comparative study

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric and radiobiological differences between 6MV flattened filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) using volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) technique for head and neck (H&N) cancer patients.

Materials and methods

Fifteen patients with H&N carcinoma were selected and treated with VMAT with FF (VMATFF) treatment plan. Retrospectively, additional VMAT treatment plans were developed using FFF beams (VMATFFF). Radiobiological parameters, such as equivalent uniform dose (EUD), tumor cure probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), were calculated using Niemierko's model for both VMATFF and VMATFFF. Correlation between dosimetric and radiobiological data were analyzed and compared.

Results

The conformity index (CI) was 0.975 ± 0.014 (VMATFF) and 0.964 ± 0. 019 (VMATFFF) with p ≥ 0.05. Statistically, there was an insignificant difference in the planning target volume (PTV) results for TCP (%) values, with values of 81.20 ± 0.88% (VMATFF) and 81.01 ± 0.92 (%) (VMATFF). Similarly, there was an insignificant difference in the EUD (Gy) values, which were 71.53 ± 0.33 Gy (VMATFF) and 71.46 ± 0.34 Gy (VMATFFF). The NTCP values for the spinal cord, left parotid, and right parotid were 6.54 × 10-07%, 8.04%, and 7.69%, respectively, in the case of VMATFF. For VMATFFF, the corresponding NTCP values for the spinal cord, parotids left, and parotid right were 3.09 × 10-07%, 6.57%, and 6.73%, respectively.

Conclusion

The EUD and Mean Dose to PTV were strongly correlated for VMATFFF. An increased mean dose to the PTV and greater TCP were reported for the VMATFF, which can enhance the delivery of the therapeutic dose to the target.

Neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer and esophageal cancer

As the major malignant tumors in the chest, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and esophageal cancer (EC) bring huge health burden to human beings worldwide. Currently, surgery is still the mainstay for comprehensive treatment for NSCLC and EC, but the prognosis is still poor as the results of cancer recurrence and distant metastasis. Neoadjuvant therapy refers to a single or combined treatment before surgery, aiming to improve the therapeutic effects of the traditional therapies. Unfortunately, the clinical outcomes and effects of neoadjuvant therapy are still controversial due to its apparent advantages and disadvantages, and different patients may respond differentially to the same scheme of neoadjuvant therapy, which makes it urgent and necessary to develop personalized scheme of neoadjuvant therapy for different individuals. Therefore, this review summarizes the novel schemes and strategies of neoadjuvant therapy, which may help to significantly improve of life quality of patients suffering from chest-related malignancies.

Radiation therapy, tissue radiosensitization, and potential synergism in the era of novel antibody-drug conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a therapeutic class of agents designed to selectively deliver cytotoxic payloads to cancer cells. With the increasingly positioning of ADCs in the clinical practice, combinations with other treatment modalities, including radiation therapy (RT), will open new opportunities but also challenges. This review evaluates ADC-RT interactions, examining therapeutic synergies and potential caveats. ADC payloads can be radiosensitizing, enhancing cytotoxicity when used in combination with RT. Antigens targeted by ADCs can have various tissue expressions, resulting in possible off-target toxicities by tissue radiosensitization. Notably, the HER-2-directed ADC trastuzumab emtansine has appeared to increase the risk of radionecrosis when used concomitantly with brain RT, as glial cells can express HER2, too. Other possible organ-specific effects are discussed, such as pulmonary and cardiac toxicities. The lack of robust clinical data on the ADC-RT combination raises concerns regarding specific side effects and the ultimate trade-off of toxicity and safety of some combined approaches. Clinical studies are needed to assess ADC-RT combination safety and efficacy.

HMGA1 drives chemoresistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by suppressing ferroptosis

Chemotherapy is a primary treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs is an important hurdle to effective treatment. Understanding the mechanisms underlying chemotherapy resistance in ESCC is an unmet medical need to improve the survival of ESCC. Herein, we demonstrate that ferroptosis triggered by inhibiting high mobility group AT-hook 1 (HMGA1) may provide a novel opportunity to gain an effective therapeutic strategy against chemoresistance in ESCC. HMGA1 is upregulated in ESCC and works as a key driver for cisplatin (DDP) resistance in ESCC by repressing ferroptosis. Inhibition of HMGA1 enhances the sensitivity of ESCC to ferroptosis. With a transcriptome analysis and following-up assays, we demonstrated that HMGA1 upregulates the expression of solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11), a key transporter maintaining intracellular glutathione homeostasis and inhibiting the accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA), thereby suppressing cell ferroptosis. HMGA1 acts as a chromatin remodeling factor promoting the binding of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) to the promoter of SLC7A11, and hence enhancing the transcription of SLC7A11 and maintaining the redox balance. We characterized that the enhanced chemosensitivity of ESCC is primarily attributed to the increased susceptibility of ferroptosis resulting from the depletion of HMGA1. Moreover, we utilized syngeneic allograft tumor models and genetically engineered mice of HMGA1 to induce ESCC and validated that depletion of HMGA1 promotes ferroptosis and restores the sensitivity of ESCC to DDP, and hence enhances the therapeutic efficacy. Our finding uncovers a critical role of HMGA1 in the repression of ferroptosis and thus in the establishment of DDP resistance in ESCC, highlighting HMGA1-based rewiring strategies as potential approaches to overcome ESCC chemotherapy resistance. Schematic depicting that HMGA1 maintains intracellular redox homeostasis against ferroptosis by assisting ATF4 to activate SLC7A11 transcription, resulting in ESCC resistance to chemotherapy.

Current and future on definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an aggressive and fatal disease that is usually diagnosed when the chances for surgical intervention has been missed. Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is the first choice of treatment for inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). Nevertheless, the local recurrence rate for esophageal cancer patients undergoing dCRT remains high at 40-60%, with a 5-year overall survival rate of solely 10-30%. Immunotherapy in combination with dCRT is a promising treatment for inoperable LA-ESCC, for that improved long-term survival is expected. The present review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolutionary trajectory of dCRT for LA-ESCC, delineates notable relevant clinical studies, addresses unresolved concerns regarding the combination of dCRT with immunotherapy, and highlights promising directions for future research. When dCRT is combined with immunotherapy, the following aspects should be carefully explored in the future studies, including the optimal irradiation dose, segmentation scheme, radiotherapy technique, timing, sequence and duration of radiotherapy, and the selection of chemotherapeutic and immunologic drugs. In addition, further investigations on the mechanisms of how dCRT combined with immunotherapy exerts synergistic anti-tumor effects and molecular biomarkers ensuring precise screening of ESCC patients are needed.

Nimotuzumab plus concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in unresectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): interim analysis from a Phase 3 clinical trial

BACKGROUND

This prospectively randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase 3 clinical trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety profile of nimotuzumab (nimo) plus concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive CCRT plus nimotuzumab or placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). In addition, interim analysis for short-term response rate was pre-defined.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were randomised into two groups. Eighty patients in the nimo group and eighty-two in the placebo group were evaluable. Three to six months after treatment, 26 (32.5%) patients achieved complete response (CR) in the nimo group, and 10 (12.2%) in the placebo group (P = 0.002). The ORR of the nimo group was significantly higher than the placebo group (93.8% vs. 72.0%, P < 0.001). The two groups' grade 3-5 adverse drug reactions were 11.1% vs. 10.9% (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Nimotuzumab, in combination with chemo-radiotherapy, increased the CRR and ORR with a good safety profile. The OS is needed to be followed and finally analysed.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02409186.

Update of latest data for combined therapy for esophageal cancer using radiotherapy and immunotherapy: A focus on efficacy, safety, and biomarkers

Esophageal cancer usually has a poor prognosis. Given the significant breakthrough with tumor immunotherapy, an increasing number of clinical studies have demonstrated that the combination of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may have a synergistic effect and good outcome in esophageal cancer. Clinical studies of immunoradiotherapy (iRT) for esophageal cancer have proliferated enormously from 2021 to the present. However, a summary of the efficacy and toxicity of combined therapy to guide esophageal cancer treatment in clinical practice is lacking. For this review, we integrate the latest data to analyze and assess the efficacy and safety of iRT for esophageal cancer. In addition, we discuss better predictive biomarkers, therapeutic options for specific populations, and other challenges to identify directions for future research design.

Radiotherapy remodels the tumor microenvironment for enhancing immunotherapeutic sensitivity

Cancer immunotherapy has transformed traditional treatments, with immune checkpoint blockade being particularly prominent. However, immunotherapy has minimal benefit for patients in most types of cancer and is largely ineffective in some cancers (such as pancreatic cancer and glioma). A synergistic anti-tumor response may be produced through the combined application with traditional tumor treatment methods. Radiotherapy (RT) not only kills tumor cells but also triggers the pro-inflammatory molecules' release and immune cell infiltration, which remodel the tumor microenvironment (TME). Therefore, the combination of RT and immunotherapy is expected to achieve improved efficacy. In this review, we summarize the effects of RT on cellular components of the TME, including T cell receptor repertoires, different T cell subsets, metabolism, tumor-associated macrophages and other myeloid cells (dendritic cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, neutrophils and eosinophils). Meanwhile, non-cellular components such as lactate and extracellular vesicles are also elaborated. In addition, we discuss the impact of different RT modalities on tumor immunity and issues related to the clinical practice of combination therapy.

The Inherited KRAS-variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC

PURPOSE

RTOG 0617 was a phase III randomized trial for patients with unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non-small cell lung cancer comparing standard-dose (60 Gy) versus high-dose (74 Gy) radiotherapy and chemotherapy, plus or minus cetuximab. Although the study was negative, based on prior evidence that patients with the KRAS-variant, an inherited germline mutation, benefit from cetuximab, we evaluated KRAS-variant patients in RTOG 0617.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

From RTOG 0617, 328 of 496 (66%) of patients were included in this analysis. For time-to-event outcomes, stratified log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression models were used. For binary outcomes, Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used. All statistical tests were two sided, and a P value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 17.1% (56/328) of patients had the KRAS-variant, and overall survival rates were similar between KRAS-variant and non-variant patients. However, there was a time-dependent effect of cetuximab seen only in KRAS-variant patients-while the hazard of death was higher in cetuximab-treated patients within year 1 [HR = 3.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-10.10, P = 0.030], death was lower from year 1 to 4 (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11-0.97, P = 0.043). In contrast, in non-variant patients, the addition of cetuximab significantly increased local failure (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11-2.28, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSION

Although an overall survival advantage was not achieved in KRAS-variant patients, there is potential impact of cetuximab for this genetic subset of patients. In contrast, cetuximab seems to harm non-variant patients. These findings further support the importance of genetic patient selection in trials studying the addition of systemic agents to radiotherapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

The KRAS-variant is the first functional, inherited miRNA-disrupting variant identified in cancer. Our findings support that cetuximab has a potentially beneficial impact on KRAS-variant patients treated with radiation. The work confirms prior evidence that KRAS-variant patients are a subgroup who are especially sensitive to radiation. These findings further support the potential of this class of variants to enable true treatment personalization, considering the equally important endpoints of response and toxicity.

Combine radiotherapy and immunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) have improved the survival of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. Radiotherapy is one of the common therapies to treat esophageal cancer. However, whether combination radiation therapy can increase the efficacy of immunotherapy is still up for debate. Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy has proven to be a reliable and effective treatment for tumors, and it can work in combination with immunotherapy to achieve better anti-tumor effects. This review aims to discuss the efficacy and safety of combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy to treat ESCC by stages as well as the optimum radiotherapy dose and target volume, with a summary of clinical trials in ESCC.

Cardiac Dose Predicts the Response to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Definitive concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) is the standard treatment for cervical esophageal cancer and non-surgical candidates. Initial treatment response affects survival; however, few validated markers are available for prediction. This study evaluated the clinical variables and chemoradiation parameters associated with treatment response. Between May 2010 and April 2016, 86 completed CCRT patients' clinical, dosimetric, and laboratory data at baseline and during treatment were collected. Cox regression analysis assessed the risk factors for overall survival (OS). A receiver operating characteristic curve with Youden's index was chosen to obtain the optimal cut-off value of each parameter. Treatment response was defined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v.1.1 at the first post-CCRT computed tomography scan. Responders had complete and partial responses; non-responders had stable and progressive diseases. Logistic regression (LR) was used to evaluate the variables associated with responders. The Cox regression model confirmed the presence of responders (n = 50) vs. non-responders (n = 36) with a significant difference in OS. In multivariate LR, cardiac dose-volume received ≥10 Gy; the baseline hemoglobin level, highest neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio during CCRT, and cumulative cisplatin dose were significantly associated with the responders. The initial clinical treatment response significantly determines disease outcome. Cardiac irradiation may affect the treatment response.

Combined Wee1 and EGFR inhibition reveals synergistic antitumor effect in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of the most common amplified and overexpressed oncogenes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), while the clinical efficacy of EGFR-targeted therapy in ESCC is dismal. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of dual blockage using monoclonal antibody against EGFR (Nimotuzumab) and an Wee1 inhibitor (AZD1775) in ESCC. We found that the mRNA and protein expression of EGFR and Wee1 were positively correlated in ESCC. Nimotuzumab-AZD1775 co-treatment inhibited tumor growth in PDX models with different drug susceptibility. Transcriptome sequencing and mass spectrometry analysis indicated that higher sensitive models showed enrichment of the PI3K/Akt or MAPK signaling pathway in Nimotuzumab-AZD1775 group compared with control group. In vitro experiments showed that the combination further inhibit PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways compared to their monotherapy as indicated by downregulation of pAKT, pS6, pMEK, pErk and p-p38 MAPK. Furthermore, AZD1775 potentiated Nimotuzumab's antitumor effect through inducing apoptosis. Meanwhile, the bioinformatics analysis suggests the POLR2A might be candidate molecule of EGFR/Wee1 downstream. In conclusion, our work uncovers that EGFR-mAb Nimotuzumab combined with Wee1 inhibitor AZD1775 elicited potentiated anticancer activity against ESCC cell line and PDXs partially through PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways blockade. These preclinical data raise the promising that ESCC patients may benefit from dual target EGFR and Wee1.

Efficacy of early PET-CT directed switch to carboplatin and paclitaxel based definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer who have a poor early response to induction cisplatin and capecitabine in the UK: a multi-centre randomised controlled phase II trial

Background

The utility of early metabolic response assessment to guide selection of the systemic component of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for oesophageal cancer is uncertain.

Methods

In this multi-centre, randomised, open-label, phase II substudy of the radiotherapy dose-escalation SCOPE2 trial we evaluated the role of ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) at day 14 of cycle 1 of three-weekly induction cis/cap (cisplatin (60 mg/m²)/capecitabine (625 mg/m² days 1-21)) in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) or adenocarcinoma (OAC). Non-responders, who had a less than 35% reduction in maximum standardised uptake value (SUV_max) from pre-treatment baseline, were randomly assigned to continue cis/cap or switch to car/pac (carboplatin AUC 5/paclitaxel 175 mg/m²) for a further induction cycle, then concurrently with radiotherapy over 25 fractions. Responders continued cis/cap for the duration of treatment. All patients (including responders) were randomised to standard (50Gy) or high (60Gy) dose radiation as part of the main study. Primary endpoint for the substudy was treatment failure-free survival (TFFS) at week 24. The trial was registered with International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number 97125464 and ClinicalTrials.govNCT02741856.

Findings

This substudy was closed on 1st August 2021 by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee on the grounds of futility and possible harm. To this point from 22nd November 2016, 103 patients from 16 UK centres had participated in the PET-CT substudy; 63 (61.2%; 52/83 OSCC, 11/20 OAC) of whom were non-responders. Of these, 31 were randomised to car/pac and 32 to remain on cis/cap. All patients were followed up until at least 24 weeks, at which point in OSCC both TFFS (25/27 (92.6%) vs 17/25 (68%); p = 0.028) and overall survival (42.5 vs. 20.4 months, adjusted HR 0.36; p = 0.018) favoured cis/cap over car/pac. There was a trend towards worse survival in OSCC + OAC cis/cap responders (33.6 months; 95%CI 23.1-nr) vs. non-responders (42.5 (95%CI 27.0-nr) months; HR = 1.43; 95%CI 0.67-3.08; p = 0.35).

Interpretation

In OSCC, early metabolic response assessment is not prognostic for TFFS or overall survival and should not be used to personalise systemic therapy in patients receiving dCRT.

Funding

Cancer Research UK.

A Review of Advances in Radiotherapy in the Setting of Esophageal Cancers

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer worldwide and is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related mortality. The paradigm has shifted to include a multimodality approach with surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy (including immunotherapy), and radiation therapy. Advances in radiotherapy through techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy and proton beam therapy have allowed for the more dose homogeneity and improved organ sparing. In addition, recent studies of targeted therapies and predictive approaches in patients with locally advanced disease provide clinicians with new approaches to modify multimodality treatment to improve clinical outcomes.

Improving outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer

The care of patients with oesophageal cancer or of individuals who have an elevated risk of oesophageal cancer has changed dramatically. The epidemiology of squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus has diverged over the past several decades, with a marked increase in incidence only for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Only in the past decade, however, have molecular features that distinguish these two forms of the disease been identified. This advance has the potential to improve screening for oesophageal cancers through the development of novel minimally invasive diagnostic technologies predicated on cancer-specific genomic or epigenetic alterations. Surgical techniques have also evolved towards less invasive approaches associated with less morbidity, without compromising oncological outcomes. With improvements in multidisciplinary care, advances in radiotherapy and new tools to detect minimal residual disease, certain patients may no longer even require surgical tumour resection. However, perhaps the most anticipated advance in the treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer is the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors, which harness and enhance the host immune response against cancer. In this Review, we discuss all these advances in the management of oesophageal cancer, representing only the beginning of a transformation in our quest to improve patient outcomes.

Perioperative Cetuximab with Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in Esogastric Adenocarcinoma: A Phase II Study

PURPOSE

While perioperative chemotherapy provides a survival benefit over surgery alone in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinomas, the results need to be improved. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative cetuximab combined with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received six cycles of cetuximab, cisplatin, and simplified LV5FU2 before and after surgery. The primary objective was a combined evaluation of the tumor objective response (TOR), assessed by computed tomography, and the absence of major toxicities resulting in discontinuation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) (45% and 90%, respectively).

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2013, 65 patients were enrolled. From 64 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint, 19 (29.7%) had a morphological TOR and 61 (95.3%) did not stop NCT prematurely due to major toxicity. Sixty patients (92.3%) underwent resection. Sixteen patients (/56 available, 28.5%) had histological responses (Mandard tumor regression grade ≤3). After a median follow-up of 44.5 months, median disease-free and overall survival were 24.4 [95% CI: 16.4-39.4] and 40.3 months [95% CI: 27.5-NA], respectively.

CONCLUSION

Adding cetuximab to the NCT regimen in operable G/GEJ adenocarcinomas is safe, but did not show enough efficacy in the present study to meet the primary endpoint (NCT01360086).

Association of Radiotherapy Duration With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated in NRG Oncology Trials: A Secondary Analysis of NRG Oncology Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

For many types of epithelial malignant neoplasms that are treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), treatment prolongation and interruptions have an adverse effect on outcomes.

Objective

To analyze the association between RT duration and outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer who were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was an unplanned, post hoc secondary analysis of 3 prospective, multi-institutional phase 3 randomized clinical trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 8501, RTOG 9405, and RTOG 0436) of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (formerly the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, RTOG, and Gynecologic Oncology Group). Enrolled patients with nonmetastatic esophageal cancer underwent definitive CRT in the trials between 1986 and 2013, with follow-up occurring through 2014. Data analyses were conducted between March 2022 to February 2023.

Exposures

Treatment groups in the trials used standard-dose RT (50 Gy) and concurrent chemotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The outcomes were local-regional failure (LRF), distant failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable models were used to examine the associations between these outcomes and both RT duration and interruptions. Radiotherapy duration was analyzed as a dichotomized variable using an X-Tile software to choose a cut point and its median value as a cut point, as well as a continuous variable.

Results

The analysis included 509 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [57-70] years; 418 males [82%]; and 376 White individuals [74%]). The median (IQR) follow-up was 4.01 (2.93-4.92) years for surviving patients. The median cut point of RT duration was 39 days or less in 271 patients (53%) vs more than 39 days in 238 patients (47%), and the X-Tile software cut point was 45 days or less in 446 patients (88%) vs more than 45 days in 63 patients (12%). Radiotherapy interruptions occurred in 207 patients (41%). Female (vs male) sex and other (vs White) race and ethnicity were associated with longer RT duration and RT interruptions. In the multivariable models, RT duration longer than 45 days was associated with inferior DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.77; P = .04). The HR for OS was 1.33, but the results were not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.99-1.77; P = .05). Radiotherapy duration longer than 39 days (vs ≤39 days) was associated with a higher risk of LRF (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.65; P = .01). As a continuous variable, RT duration (per 1 week increase) was associated with DFS failure (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28; P = .03). The HR for LRF 1.13, but the result was not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.99-1.28; P = .07).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study indicated that in patients with esophageal cancer receiving definitive CRT, prolonged RT duration was associated with inferior outcomes; female patients and those with other (vs White) race and ethnicity were more likely to have longer RT duration and experience RT interruptions. Radiotherapy interruptions should be minimized to optimize outcomes.

Toripalimab combined with definitive chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EC-CRT-001): a single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Toripalimab is a PD-1 inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, but its efficacy in locally advanced disease is unclear. We administered toripalimab with definitive chemoradiotherapy to patients with unresectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and aimed to investigate the activity and safety of this regimen, and potential biomarkers.

METHODS

EC-CRT-001 was a single-arm, phase 2 trial done at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (Guangzhou, China). Patients aged 18-70 years with untreated, unresectable, stage I-IVA oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, with an ECOG performance status of 0-2, and adequate organ and bone marrow function were eligible for inclusion. Patients received concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 fractions), chemotherapy (five cycles of weekly intravenous paclitaxel [50 mg/m²] and cisplatin [25 mg/m²]), and toripalimab (240 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 1 year, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity). The primary endpoint was the complete response rate at 3 months after radiotherapy by investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, quality of life (not reported here), and safety. All enrolled patients were included in the activity and safety analyses. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04005170; enrolment is completed and follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 12, 2019, and Jan 25, 2021, 42 patients were enrolled. The median age was 56 years (IQR 53-63), 39 (93%) of 42 patients had stage III or IVA disease, and 32 (76%) patients were male and 10 (24%) were female. 40 (95%) of 42 patients completed the planned chemoradiotherapy and 26 (62%; 95% CI 46-76) of 42 had a complete response. The median duration of response was 12·1 months (95% CI 5·9-18·2). After a median follow-up of 14·9 months (IQR 11·9-18·4), 1-year overall survival was 78·4% (95% CI 66·9-92·0) and 1-year progression-free survival was 54·5% (41·3-72·0). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse event was lymphopenia (36 [86%] of 42). One (2%) patient died from treatment-related pneumonitis.

INTERPRETATION

Combining toripalimab with definitive chemoradiotherapy provided encouraging activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and this regimen warrants further investigation.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China and Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangzhou.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel liposome plus cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

This single-center retrospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel liposome plus cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced ESCC treated with paclitaxel-liposome-based chemoradiotherapy between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with locally advanced ESCC were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 31.5 months. The median OS time was 38.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.1-45.1) months, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 84.6%, 64.1%, and 56.2%, respectively. The median PFS time was 32.1 (95% CI: 25.4-39.0) months, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 71.8%, 43.6%, and 43.6%, respectively. The most common Grade IV toxicity was neutropenia (30.8%) followed by lymphopenia (20.5%). There were no cases of Grade III/IV radiation pneumonia, and four patients (10.3%) had Grade III/IV esophagitis.

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiotherapy using paclitaxel liposome and cisplatin is a well-tolerated and effective treatment regimen for locally advanced ESCC.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 antibody plus chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cancer

Objective

To compare effects and adverse events of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibody combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and CRT alone as the initial treatment in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed locally advanced ESCC patients who received Anti-PD-1+CRT as initial treatment at 3 institutions. Primary outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) including immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

Results

At data cutoff, 81 patients were included (30 Anti-PD-1+CRT, 51 CRT). Median follow-up was 31.4 months. Anti-PD-1+CRT resulted in significant improvements in PFS (median, 18.6 vs. 11.8 months, HR 0.48 [95% CI, 0.29-0.80], P = 0.008), and OS (median, 27.7 vs. 17.4 months, HR 0.37 [95% CI, 0.22-0.63], P = 0.002), compared with CRT in ESCC. The ORR and DCR of patients treated with Anti-PD-1+CRT were also significantly higher than those treated with CRT (80.0% vs. 56.9%, P = 0.034), (100% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.023), respectively. Anti-PD-1+CRT had better durable response compared with CRT, with DoR (median,17.3 vs. 11.1 months, P = 0.022). Treatment-related adverse event incidence was similar between the two groups (any Grade, 93.3% vs. 92.2%; ≥Grade 3, 50.0% vs. 33.3%).

Conclusion

Anti-PD-1 plus chemoradiotherapy demonstrated promising antitumor activity and was well tolerated in locally advanced ESCC.

Potent molecular-targeted therapies for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a public health concern with a high mortality and disease burden worldwide. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a predominant histological subtype of EC that has unique etiology, molecular profiles, and clinicopathological features. Although systemic chemotherapy, including cytotoxic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, is the main therapeutic option for recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients, the clinical benefits are limited with poor prognosis. Personalized molecular-targeted therapies have been hampered due to the lack of robust treatment efficacy in clinical trials. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize the molecular profiles of ESCC based on the findings of pivotal comprehensive molecular analyses, highlighting potent therapeutic targets for establishing future precision medicine for ESCC patients, with the most recent results of clinical trials.

Radiotherapy plus camrelizumab affects peripheral CD8 T-cell differentiation subsets expressing PD-1, TIGIT, and CTLA-4 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Our previous phase Ib trial (NCT03222440) showed that radiotherapy plus the anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab is a safe and feasible first-line therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In this study, we divided peripheral CD8 T-cell differentiation subsets into 4 subpopulations (naive T cells, central memory T cells, effector memory T cells, and CD45RA+ effector memory T cells). We then investigated the influence of radiotherapy plus camrelizumab therapy on the proportions of the 4 subsets and their PD-1, TIGIT, and CTLA-4 expression as well as their proliferative activity and compared the effects with those of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Nineteen and 15 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received radiotherapy plus camrelizumab therapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy, respectively, were enrolled in this study. We isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from these patients before treatment and longitudinally after the delivery of 40 Gy radiotherapy. Flow cytometry was conducted to detect peripheral CD8 T-cell subsets and PD-1, TIGIT, CTLA-4, and Ki67 expression levels in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We found that radiotherapy plus camrelizumab therapy did not change the proportions of the 4 subsets or the expression of CTLA-4, but this therapy decreased PD-1 expression by the 4 subsets and TIGIT expression by effector memory T cells, as well as significantly enhanced the proliferative activity of CD8 T cells, whereas concurrent chemoradiotherapy produced different effects. In addition, we further identified peripheral biomarkers that potentially predict the outcome of radiotherapy plus camrelizumab therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Nimotuzumab in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Real-world Pragmatic Study

BACKGROUND

Concurrent or definitive chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Elderly patients could not tolerate the standard concurrent chemotherapy and were treated with radiotherapy because of weak physical status and multiple comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety profile of concurrent (chemo) radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab in elderly patients with ESCC were investigated.

METHODS

Eligible elderly (≥70 years) patients with locally advanced ESCC were enrolled in this prospective, real-world pragmatic study and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

Fifty-three elderly patients were enrolled. Thirty-two (60.4%) were treated with radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab (RT+N), and 21 (39.6%) with concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab (CRT+N). The median age was 75.8 years. Fourteen (56.0%) patients achieved a partial response, and 11 (44.0%) patients achieved stable disease at 3 months. The median follow-up duration was 24.4 (95%CI, 21.6-26.7) months. Median OS (mOS) was 27.0 (95%CI, 14.8-48.4) months. Median PFS (mPFS) was 22.6 (95%CI, 12.4-not reached) months. Higher mPFS (not reached vs. 12.0 months; p=0.022) and mOS (48.4 vs. 15.3 months; p=0.009) were observed in the CRT+N group compared with the RT+N group. Most adverse reactions were grade 1-2 (46, 86.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab was safe and well-tolerated in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC. ESCC patients treated with CRT+N could live longer.

Principle and progress of radical treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors in the digestive system in China and the world. Most patients are diagnosed as locally advanced or advanced stage. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. This study intends to summarize the evidence-based medical evidence of the treatment principle of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the selection of radiotherapy dose, the outline of radiotherapy target and the selection of chemotherapy scheme. As a result, the effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is equivalent to that of surgery for the radical treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In the era of immunization, it is recommended to use involved field irradiation. Fluorouracil plus cisplatin regimen is the standard chemotherapy regimen. FOLFOX regimen and paclitaxel plus fluorouracil regimen are optional concurrent chemotherapy regimens. The toxic and side effects of different chemotherapy regimens are different, which can be selected according to the actual situation of patients.

Role of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Specific CAR-T Cells in the Suppression of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

ESCC is a highly malignant tumor, and its morbidity and mortality in China account for more than 50% of the world's total rates. As effective treatments are lacking, the 5-year survival rate of patients does not exceed 30%. CAR-T-cell-based immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising cancer treatments; however, there are relatively fewer reports regarding its application for ESCC. In this study, we conducted large-sample whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA-seq analysis of patients with ESCC from China to examine the feasibility of EGFR-targeting CAR-T cells in the treatment of ESCC. We found much higher levels of EGFR gene amplification and overexpression in tumors than in the normal tissues, indicating that EGFR could be a promising target of CAR-T-cell-based immunotherapy in ESCC. Therefore, we tested EGFR-targeting CAR-T cells for lytic activity against ESCC cells as a model to establish cellular immunotherapy for ESCC. Five types of CAR-T cells targeting EGFR were constructed, two of which, CAR1-T and CAR2-T, showed a strong cytotoxicity against ESCC in in vitro and in vivo experiments. The results of this study suggest that CAR1-T and CAR2-T have the potential to be used for anti-ESCC immunotherapy in clinics.

Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Continued smoking after a diagnosis of cancer negatively impacts cancer outcomes, but the impact of tobacco on newer treatments options is not well established. Collecting and evaluating tobacco use in clinical trials may advance understanding of the consequences of tobacco use on treatment modalities, but little is known about the frequency of reporting and analysis of tobacco use in cancer cooperative clinical trial groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify cancer cooperative group clinical trials published from January 2017-October 2019. Eligible studies evaluated either systemic and/or radiation therapies, included ≥100 adult patients, and reported on at least one of: overall survival, disease/progression-free survival, response rates, toxicities/adverse events, or quality-of-life.

RESULTS

A total of 91 studies representing 90 trials met inclusion criteria with trial start dates ranging from 1995 to 2015 with 14% involving lung and 5% head and neck cancer patients. A total of 19 studies reported baseline tobacco use; 2 reported collecting follow-up tobacco use. Seven studies reported analysis of the impact of baseline tobacco use on clinical outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of baseline tobacco use: 7 reported never/ever status, 10 reported never/ex-smoker/current smoker status, and 4 reported measuring smoking intensity. None reported verifying smoking status or second-hand smoke exposure. Trials of lung and head and neck cancers were more likely to report baseline tobacco use than other disease sites (83% versus 6%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Few cancer cooperative group clinical trials report and analyze trial participants' tobacco use. Significant heterogeneity exists in reporting tobacco use. Routine standardized collection and reporting of tobacco use at baseline and follow-up in clinical trials should be implemented to enable investigators to evaluate the impact of tobacco use on new cancer therapies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in esophageal cancer: Clinical development and perspectives

Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The standard treatment for unresectable esophageal cancer is systemic chemotherapy. However, the survival benefit is limited, with a median overall survival of less than 10 months. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including programmed cell death-1 antibodies, has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for esophageal cancer. Since demonstrating promising efficacy with manageable safety in several clinical trials, ICIs has finally reached the point where they can be used in various tumor stages in the clinical setting. ICIs are most promising treatments that can be expected to improve the prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer now and in the future. This review outlines the mechanisms, results of clinical trials, and prospects for future studies of ICIs in esophageal cancer. It also discusses clinical questions and challenges in the therapeutic development of ICIs.

Dual-targeted near-infrared photoimmunotherapy for esophageal cancer and cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) play a significant role in tumor progression within the tumor microenvironment. Previously, we used near-infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT), a next-generation cancer cell-targeted phototherapy, to establish CAF-targeted NIR-PIT. In this study, we investigated whether dual-targeted NIR-PIT, targeting cancer cells and CAFs, could be a therapeutic strategy. A total of 132 cases of esophageal cancer were analyzed for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), and fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expression using immunohistochemistry. Human esophageal cancer cells and CAFs were co-cultured and treated with single- or dual-targeted NIR-PIT in vitro. These cells were co-inoculated into BALB/c-nu/nu mice and the tumors were treated with single-targeted NIR-PIT or dual-targeted NIR-PIT in vivo. Survival analysis showed FAP- or EGFR-high patients had worse survival than patients with low expression of FAP or EGFR (log-rank, P < 0.001 and P = 0.074, respectively), while no difference was observed in HER2 status. In vitro, dual (EGFR/FAP)-targeted NIR-PIT induced specific therapeutic effects in cancer cells and CAFs along with suppressing tumor growth in vivo, whereas single-targeted NIR-PIT did not show any significance. Moreover, these experiments demonstrated that dual-targeted NIR-PIT could treat cancer cells and CAFs simultaneously with a single NIR light irradiation. We demonstrated the relationship between EGFR/FAP expression and prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer and the stronger therapeutic effect of dual-targeted NIR-PIT than single-targeted NIR-PIT in experimental models. Thus, dual-targeted NIR-PIT might be a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment.

Current landscape of radiation oncology in esophageal cancer: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease that is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The overall treatment paradigm for esophageal cancer has changed considerably over the past decade. This narrative review aims to summarize the current landscape of radiation oncology for esophageal cancer.

Methods

A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed database and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed, focusing on studies published within the last 10 years. Our search queried "esophageal cancer [AND] neoadjuvant radiation" as well as "locally advanced esophageal cancer [AND] definitive radiation". Our search resulted in 298 total references. These were manually reviewed, and only 58 references were within our scope of interest ranging from 2012-2022.

Key Content and Findings

For resectable esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery has been defined as the standard of care over the past decade. In patients with incomplete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the benefit of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting has recently been established. Ongoing studies are examining whether perioperative chemotherapy may be equivalent to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma. For locally advanced esophageal cancer, recent studies have failed to show a benefit with radiation dose escalation in an unselected population, although the use of early positron emission tomography (PET) response to guide dose escalation is currently being studied. Other ongoing studies aiming to improve outcomes in locally advanced esophageal cancer involve using proton beam therapy to reduce toxicity and combining immunotherapy or targeted therapies with chemoradiation to amplify response.

Conclusions

Recent advances in radiation oncology may continue to improve outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer.

Pirfenidone for the prevention of radiation-induced lung injury in patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) is one of the most clinically-challenging toxicities and dose-limiting factors during and/or after thoracic radiation therapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). With limited effective protective drugs against RILI, the main strategy to reduce the injury is strict adherence to dose-volume restrictions of normal lungs. RILI can manifest as acute radiation pneumonitis with cellular injury, cytokine release and cytokine recruitment to inflammatory infiltrate, and subsequent chronic radiation pulmonary fibrosis. Pirfenidone inhibits the production of inflammatory cytokines, scavenges-free radicals and reduces hydroxyproline and collagen formation. Hence, pirfenidone might be a promising drug for RILI prevention. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in preventing RILI in patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is designed as a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, single-centre phase 2 trial and will explore whether the addition of pirfenidone during concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) could prevent RILI in patients with locally advanced ESCC unsuitable for surgery. Eligible participants will be randomised at 1:1 to pirfenidone and placebo groups. The primary endpoint is the incidence of grade >2 RILI. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of any grade other than grade >2 RILI, time to RILI occurrence, changes in pulmonary function after CCRT, completion rate of CCRT, disease-free survival and overall survival. The follow-up period will be 1 year. In case the results meet the primary endpoint of this trial, a phase 3 multicentre trial with a larger sample size will be required to substantiate the evidence of the benefit of pirfenidone in RILI prevention.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Union Hospital (No. 2021YF001-02). The findings of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, and national and international conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100043032.

Oral metronomic chemotherapy after definitive chemoradiation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Improving outcomes in locally advanced esophageal/GEJ squamous cell cancer (SCC) is an unmet need. We investigated the addition of oral metronomic chemotherapy (OMC) following definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a randomized open-label integrated phase II/III study in patients with SCC of esophagus/GEJ following definitive CRT who had no radiologic evidence of progression, and no endoscopically detected disease. Randomization was 1:1 to OMC (celecoxib 200 mg twice daily and methotrexate 15 mg/m² weekly) for 12 months or observation. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and toxicity. P ≤ 0.2 for PFS was required to proceed to phase III.

RESULTS

Between Jan 2016 and Dec 2019, we enrolled 151 patients for the phase II portion, 75 to OMC and 76 to observation. The tumor originated in the upper thoracic esophagus in 79% patients. Concurrent CRT consisted of median 63 Gy in a median of 35 fractions; concurrent chemotherapy was weekly paclitaxel + carboplatin in 91%. OMC was started at a median of 2.6 months (IQR 2.3-2.8) from CRT completion. Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred in 18 patients (24%) in the OMC arm and 9 (12%) in the observation arm; P = 0.071. Median PFS was 25 months (95% CI, 17-58) in the OMC arm and was not attained [NA] (95% CI, 25-NA) in the observation arm; HR, 1.51, 95% CI, 1-2; P = 0.073. Median OS was 36 months (95% CI, 23-NA) in the OMC arm, and not attained (95% CI, NA-NA) in the observation arm; HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1-2.9; P = 0.023.

CONCLUSION

Oral metronomic methotrexate and celecoxib in patients who have not progressed radiologically and have no endoscopic evidence of disease following radical CRT for locally advanced esophageal/GEJ SCC does not improve outcomes and may lower survival. [Funded by the TMC-Research Administration Council (TRAC); CHROME study (CHemoRadiotherapy followed by Oral Metronomic therapy in Esophageal cancer); ctri.nic.in number: CTRI/2015/09/006204].

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CTRI/2015/09/006204.