Development and Validation of a Novel Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Composite Model to Estimate Risks of Mortality

Minimal residual disease monitoring in acute myeloid leukemia: Focus on MFC-MRD and treatment guidance for elderly patients

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is distinguished by clonal growth of myeloid precursor cells, which impairs normal hematopoiesis. Minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to the residual leukemia cells that persist after chemotherapy. Patients who test positive for MRD have a higher likelihood of experiencing a recurrence, regardless of the specific chemotherapy approach used. Multi-parameter flow cytometry (MFC), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) are commonly employed techniques for identifying MRD. In the context of AML, patients are frequently monitored for measurable residual disease via multi-parameter flow cytometry (MFC-MRD). In order to explore recent advancements in AML and MRD diagnosis, an extensive search of the PubMed database was conducted, focusing on relevant research in the past 20 years. This review aims to examine various MRD monitoring methods, the optimal time points for assessment, as well as different specimen types used. Additionally, it underscores the significance of MFC-MRD assessment in guiding the treatment of elderly AML.

Association between Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase Level and 30-day Mortality in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage with Acute Leukemia in the Induction Phase: A Cohort Study

Objectives  This study aimed to identify the association between lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and 30-day mortality in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) with acute leukemia during the induction phase. Methods  This cohort study included patients with acute leukemia with ICH during induction. We evaluated serum LDH levels upon admission. Multivariable Cox regression analyzed the LDH 30-day mortality association. Interaction and stratified analyses based on factors like age, sex, albumin, white blood cell count, hemoglobin level, and platelet count were conducted. Results  We selected 91 patients diagnosed with acute leukemia and ICH. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 61.5%, with 56 of the 91 patients succumbing. Among those with LDH levels ≥ 570 U/L, the mortality rate was 74.4% (32 out of 43), which was higher than the 50% mortality rate of the LDH < 570 U/L group (24 out of 48) ( p  = 0.017). In our multivariate regression models, the hazard ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals for Log2 and twice the upper limit of normal LDH were 1.27 (1.01, 1.58) and 2.2 (1.05, 4.58), respectively. Interaction analysis revealed no significant interactive effect on the relationship between LDH levels and 30-day mortality. Conclusions  Serum LDH level was associated with 30-day mortality, especially in patients with LDH ≥ 570 U/L.

Survival difference between secondary and de novo acute myeloid leukemia by age, antecedent cancer types, and chemotherapy receipt

BACKGROUND

This study compared the survival of persons with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) to those with de novo AML (dnAML) by age at AML diagnosis, chemotherapy receipt, and cancer type preceding sAML diagnosis.

METHODS

Data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 17 Registries were used, which included 47,704 individuals diagnosed with AML between 2001 and 2018. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare AML-specific survival between sAML and dnAML. Trends in 5-year age-standardized relative survival were examined via the Joinpoint survival model.

RESULTS

Overall, individuals with sAML had an 8% higher risk of dying from AML (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.11) compared to those with dnAML. Disparities widened with younger age at diagnosis, particularly in those who received chemotherapy for AML (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.10-1.19). In persons aged 20-64 years and who received chemotherapy, HRs were greatest for those with antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.83-2.28), ovarian cancer (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.19-3.08), head and neck cancer (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.02-2.36), leukemia (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12-1.89), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.20-1.69). Among those aged ≥65 years and who received chemotherapy, HRs were highest for those with antecedent cervical cancer (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.15-5.10) and myelodysplastic syndrome (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19-1.38). The 5-year relative survival improved 0.3% per year for sAML slower than 0.86% per year for dnAML. Consequently, the survival gap widened from 7.2% (95% CI, 5.4%-9.0%) during the period 2001-2003 to 14.3% (95% CI, 12.8%-15.8%) during the period 2012-2014.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant survival disparities exist between sAML and dnAML on the basis of age at diagnosis, chemotherapy receipt, and antecedent cancer, which highlights opportunities to improve outcomes among those diagnosed with sAML.

Establishment and validation of a gene mutation-based risk model for predicting prognosis and therapy response in acute myeloid leukemia

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant clonal proliferative disease of hematopoietic system. Despite tremendous progress in uncovering the AML genome, only a small number of mutations have been incorporated into risk stratification and used as therapeutic targets. In this research, we performed to construct a predictive prognosis risk model for AML patients according to gene mutations.

Methods

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology was utilized to detect gene mutation from 118 patients. mRNA expression profiles and related clinical information were mined from TCGA and GEO databases. Consensus cluster analysis was applied to obtain molecular subtypes, and differences in clinicopathological features, prognosis, and immune microenvironment of different clusters were systematically compared. According to the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between clusters, univariate and LASSO regression analysis were applied to identify gene signatures to build a prognostic risk model. Patients were classified into high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) groups according to the median risk score (RS). Differences in prognosis, immune profile, and therapeutic sensitivity between two groups were analyzed. The independent predictive value of RS was assessed and a nomogram was developed.

Results

NGS detected 24 mutated genes, with higher mutation frequencies in CBL (63 %) and SETBP1 (49 %). Two clusters exhibited different immune microenvironments and survival probability (p = 0.0056) were identified. A total of 444 DEGs were screened in two clusters, and a mutation-associated risk model was constructed, including MPO, HGF, SH2B3, SETBP1, HLA-DRB1, LGALS1, and KDM5B. Patients in LR had a superior survival time compared to HR. Predictive performance of this model was confirmed and the developed nomogram further improved the applicability of the risk model with the AUCs for predicting 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rate were 0.829, 0.81 and 0.811, respectively. HR cases were more sensitive to erlotinib, CI-1040, and AZD6244.

Conclusion

These findings supplemented the understanding of gene mutations in AML, and constructed models had good application prospect to provide effective information for predicting prognosis and treatment response of AML.

The ISTH DIC-score predicts early mortality in patients with non-promyelocitic acute myeloid leukemia

Coagulation disorders frequently complicate the clinical course of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. This study examined the frequency and prognostic significance, with regards of early mortality, of the presence of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) at AML diagnosis and its correlation with clinical and biological characteristics. A retrospective analysis of 351 newly diagnosed non-promyelocytic AML patients was conducted, utilizing the 2018 ISTH DIC-Score criteria to evaluate the presence of overt DIC at AML onset. The study cohort had a median age of 65 years with a predominance of male gender (59 %). Overt DIC was present in 21 % of cases and was associated with advanced age, comorbidities, poor performance status, hyperleukocytosis, LDH levels, NPM1 mutations, expression of CD33 and CD4, and lack of expression of CD34. With a median follow-up of 72 months (3-147 months), the 6-year overall survival (OS) was 17.4 %, with patients having overt DIC showing significantly poorer outcomes (7.2 % compared to 20.3 % of those without DIC, p < 0.001). Patients with overt DIC showed markedly high early mortality rates at 30 (42.5 % vs 8 %), 60 (49.3 % vs 16.9 %), and 120 days (64.4 % vs 25.6 %) from disease onset. In multivariate analysis overt DIC retained its independent prognostic value for early mortality. In conclusion, the prevalence and clinical relevance of DIC in non-promyelocytic AML is not negligible, underlining its potential as an unfavorable prognostic marker. In newly diagnosed patients with AML, early recognition and measure to counteract coagulation disturbances might help mitigate the elevated mortality risk associated with DIC.

Treating acute myelogenous leukemia in patients aged 70 and above: Recommendations from the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment is challenging in older patients. There is a lack of evidence-based recommendations for older patients ≥70, a group largely underrepresented in clinical trials. With new treatment options being available in recent years, recommendations are needed for these patients. As such the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) assembled a task force to review the evidence specific to treatment and outcomes in this population of patients ≥70 years. Six questions were selected by the expert panel in domains of (1) baseline assessment, (2) frontline therapy, (3) post-remission therapy, (4) treatment for relapse, (5) targeted therapies, and (6) patient reported outcome/function and enhancing treatment tolerance. Information from current literature was extracted, combining evidence from systematic reviews/meta-analyses, decision models, individual trials targeting these patients, and subgroup data. Accordingly, recommendations were generated using a GRADE approach upon reviewing current evidence by consensus of the whole panel. It is our firm recommendation and hope that direct evidence should be generated for patients aged ≥70 as a distinct group in high need of improvement of their survival outcomes. Such studies should integrate information from a geriatric assessment to optimize external validity and outcomes.

New treatment opportunities for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia and the increasing importance of frailty assessment - An oncogeriatric perspective

With the introduction of targeted chemotherapy drugs, a new age of treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has begun. The promotion of the azacitidine+venetoclax combination regimen to first line of treatment in patients deemed ineligible for intensive chemotherapy marks the first of many novel combination regimens becoming part of national treatment guidelines. We review recent phase II and III clinical trials and conclude that these novel regimens offer significant increases in response rates, remission rates, and overall survival. The incidence of adverse events, the accrued time toxicity, and the healthcare costs, however, are increasing as well. Compared with clinical trials, older patients in the real world frequently present with an inferior baseline health status, which is associated with an increased risk of experiencing side effects. The key to reaping the maximum benefit of the new agents and their combination regimens therefore lies in sufficient attention being given to a patients' preexisting comorbidities, potential frailty, and quality of life. A systematic collaboration between hemato-oncologists and geriatricians can be a potent first step towards addressing the increased treatment intensity patients with AML experience under the novel regimens. In this narrative review article we provide an overview of recent and ongoing clinical trials, highlight encountered adverse events, discuss frailty assessment options, and outline an oncogeriatic care path for older patients with AML.

A Markov analysis of azacitidine and venetoclax vs induction chemotherapy for medically fit patients with AML

ABSTRACT

Although induction chemotherapy (IC) is the standard of care in medically fit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), limited retrospective data indicate that patients at adverse-risk may benefit from azacytidine and venetoclax (aza-ven). Our goal was to perform a Markov decision analysis to determine whether IC or aza-ven is the optimal induction regimen in this population. Using the TreeAge software, Markov models were created for adverse-risk and intermediate-risk cohorts. A systematic review of the literature informed the transition probabilities and utilities included in the analyses. Our primary outcome was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained over 5 years after diagnosis. Overall, patients at adverse risk treated with IC gained 1.4 QALYs, compared with 2.0 QALYs in patients treated with aza-ven. Patients at adverse risk treated with IC and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), IC, aza-ven and allo-SCT, or aza-ven gained 2.1, 1.5, 3.0, and 1.9 QALYs, respectively. Meanwhile, patients at intermediate risk treated with IC gained 2.0 QALY, compared with 1.7 QALY in patients treated with aza-ven. Patients at intermediate risk treated with IC and allo-SCT, IC, aza-ven and allo-SCT, and aza-ven gained 2.7, 2.3, 2.6, and 1.8 QALYs, respectively. We have demonstrated that medically fit patients with newly diagnosed adverse-risk AML may benefit from treatment with aza-ven over those treated with IC, whereas IC remains the preferred approach for patients at intermediate risk. Our work challenges the use of the European LeukemiaNet risk classification for patients treated with aza-ven and highlights the need for prospective investigation into aza-ven as induction therapy for medically fit patients.

Determining treatment tolerance and fitness for intensive chemotherapy in older adults with AML: a call to action

ABSTRACT

Determining fitness for intensive chemotherapy in an older adult with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an unanswered age-old question. Geriatric assessment captures any variation in multidimensional health, which can influence treatment tolerance. A prospective study is necessary to validate fitness criteria, determine whether geriatric assessment-based fitness performs superiorly to other criteria, and what components of geriatric assessment are associated with treatment tolerance. A validation study should enroll diverse patients from both academic and community centers and patients receiving intensive and lower-intensity chemotherapy. Geriatric assessment should include at minimum measures of comorbidity burden, cognition, physical function, and emotional health, which in previous smaller studies have shown to be associated with mortality in AML. These assessments should be completed before or within a few days of initiation of chemotherapy to reduce the influence of chemotherapy on the assessment results. Treatment tolerance has been measured by rates of toxicities in patients with solid malignancies; however, during the initial treatment of AML, rates of toxicities are very high regardless of treatment intensity. Early mortality, frequently used in previous studies, can provide a highly consequential and easily identifiable measure of treatment tolerance. The key end point to assess treatment tolerance, thus, should include early mortality. Other end points may include decline in function and quality of life and treatment modifications or cessation due to toxicities. Validating fitness criteria can guide treatment selection and supportive care interventions and are crucial to guide fitness-based trial eligibility, inform the interpretation of trial results, and facilitate drug labeling.

Development and Validation of a Concise Objectifiable Risk Evaluation Score for Non-Relapse Mortality after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

We aimed to develop a concise objectifiable risk evaluation (CORE) tool for predicting non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). A total of 1120 adult patients who had undergone allo-HCT at our center between 2013 and 2020 were divided into training, first, and second validation cohorts. Objectifiable, patient-related factors impacting NRM in univariate and multivariate analyses were: serum albumin, serum creatinine, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), heart function (LVEF), lung function (VC, FEV1), and patient age. Hazard ratios were assigned points (0-3) based on their impact on NRM and summed to the individual CORE HCT score. The CORE HCT score stratified patients into three distinct low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with two-year NRM rates of 9%, 22%, and 46%, respectively, and OS rates of 73%, 55%, and 35%, respectively (p < 0.001). These findings were confirmed in a first and a second recently treated validation cohort. Importantly, the CORE HCT score remained informative across various conditioning intensities, disease-specific subgroups, and donor types, but did not impact relapse incidence. A comparison of CORE HCT vs. HCT Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) in the second validation cohort revealed better performance of the CORE HCT score with c-statistics for NRM and OS of 0.666 (SE 0.05, p = 0.001) and 0.675 (SE 0.039, p < 0.001) vs. 0.431 (SE 0.057, p = 0.223) and 0.535 (SE 0.042, p = 0.411), respectively. The CORE HCT score is a concise and objectifiable risk evaluation tool for adult patients undergoing allo-HCT for malignant disease. External multicenter validation is underway.

Geriatric Assessment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous disease that affects mostly older adults with varying baseline health and functional status. Treatment options have expanded for older adults, ranging from less intensive chronic therapies to intensive induction strategies with curative intent. Despite this, outcomes remain poor with advancing age due to underlying disease biology and variability in treatment tolerance. Reliance on chronological age alone, however, increases risks of both over- and under-treatment. Strategies to better characterize fitness in the context of therapy are needed to optimize decision-making and enhance clinical trial design.

SUMMARY

Geriatric assessment (GA) is a series of validated tools that evaluate multiple health and functional domains of an older adult including physical function, comorbidities, cognition, nutrition, psychological health, and social support. While studies of GA in AML remain limited, current evidence shows that it is feasible to perform GA among older adults starting therapy for AML. GA measures including those assessing physical function, cognition, and mood are associated with mortality and toxicity in both intensive and less intensive treatment settings.

KEY MESSAGES

In this review, we discuss the existing evidence to support use of GA in AML and highlight implications for clinical practice and future research.

Low-dose decitabine for previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy aged 65 years or older: a prospective study based on comprehensive geriatric assessment

Background

The outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged ⩾65 years is poor. Effective treatment options are limited for patients with AML who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose decitabine in previously untreated patients with AML aged ⩾65 years who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment.

Design

We performed a prospective, multicenter, open-label, and non-randomized study.

Methods

Patients were enrolled at four centers in Beijing between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2020. They were treated with decitabine at a dose of 6 mg/m2 for 10 days. The treatment was repeated every 28 days for one cycle for a total of six cycles. The primary endpoint of our study was overall survival (OS) at the end of the first year after enrolment. The secondary endpoints included overall response rate, leukemia-free survival, relapse rate, treatment-related mortality (TRM), quality of life, safety, and transfusion dependence. Patients were continuously monitored for toxicity.

Results

Overall, 47 patients (30 males and 17 females) participated in this study. The median age of the enrolled patients was 78 (range, 65-90) years. The median follow-up time was 22.2 (range, 4.6-38.8) months. Fifteen (31.9%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), 11 (23.4%) patients achieved partial remission, 3 (6.4%) patients achieved hematological improvement only, and 18 (38.3%) patients did not achieve remission. The median time to obtain CR was 2 months. The median CR was 8.5 months. Of the patients, 36 (76.6%) patients completed six cycles of treatment with low-dose decitabine, and the 1-year OS was 36.1%. According to instrumental activities of daily living scales, age, comorbidities, and albumin (IACA) scores, the median survival was 11.2 months in the unfit group and 6 months in the frail group. The 1-year OS rates in the unfit and frail groups were 49.2% and 23.4%, respectively. Grade ⩾3 non-hematological toxicity was observed in 70.2% (33/47) of the patients. TRM occurred in three patients. No early deaths occurred after treatment.

Conclusion

In newly diagnosed older patients with AML whose IACA assessment was unfit or frail for standard chemotherapy, treatment with low-dose decitabine demonstrated clinical activity and good security in our study.

Association of CDSS score and 60-day mortality in Chinese patients with non-APL acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective cohort study

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematological malignancy, and is one of the triggers of DIC, the latter is an essential factor in the early death of patients with AML. However, the timely identification of DIC remains a challenge. The Chinese DIC Scoring System (CDSS) is a common consensus widely used in China; but, there are few reports on its application in patients with AML. We undertake this retrospective cohort study to investigate the association between CDSS score and 60-day mortality. CDSS scores were evaluated after admission. The outcome was all-cause 60-day mortality. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Survival curves were plotted by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses. Subgroup analyses were stratified by relevant effect covariates. A total of 570 consecutive patients with primary AML were included. We found an association between a 39% increase in 60-day mortality and a 1 point increase in CDSS score (HR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.25-1.54), which was associated with a 189% increase in 60-day mortality in CDSS scores ≥ 6 compared with that in the CDSS scores < 6 (HR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.91-4.38). After adjusting for all potential con-founders, a 27% and a 198% increase were observed (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.61; HR = 2.98, 95% CI 1.24-7.19), respectively. There is association between 60-day mortality and CDSS score in patients with AML. These findings may help hematologists in making informed treatment decisions.

Evolving trends and outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia including allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have historically been poor. Given advances in low-intensity therapy (LIT) and stem cell transplantation (SCT), we performed a retrospective single-center study to evaluate the contemporary outcomes of this population. We reviewed all patients ≥60 years with newly diagnosed AML between 2012 and 2021 and analyzed treatment and SCT-related trends and outcomes. We identified 1073 patients with a median age of 71 years. Adverse clinical and cytomolecular findings were frequent within this cohort. In total, 16% of patients were treated with intensive chemotherapy, 51% with LIT alone, and 32% with LIT plus venetoclax. The composite complete remission rate with LIT plus venetoclax was 72%, which was higher than with LIT alone (48%, p < .0001) and comparable to intensive chemotherapy (74%, p = .6). The median overall survival (OS) with intensive chemotherapy, LIT, and LIT plus venetoclax was 20.1, 8.9, and 12.1 months, respectively. 18% of patients received SCT. SCT rates were 37%, 10%, and 22% in patients treated with intensive chemotherapy, LIT, and LIT plus venetoclax, respectively. The 2-year OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse, and CI of treatment-related mortality with frontline SCT (n = 139) were 59%, 52%, 27%, and 22%, respectively. By landmark analysis, patients undergoing frontline SCT had superior OS (median 39.6 vs. 21.4 months, p < .0001) and RFS (30.9 vs. 12.1 months, p < .0001) compared with responding patients who did not. Outcomes in older patients with AML are improving with more effective LIT. Measures should be pursued to increase access to SCT in older patients.

Real-world effectiveness of intensive chemotherapy with 7&3 versus venetoclax and hypomethylating agent in acute myeloid leukemia

Intensive chemotherapy with cytarabine and anthracycline (7&3) remains the standard therapy for patients medically fit for induction, but the assessment of fitness remains controversial. Venetoclax and hypomethylating agent (ven/HMA) combination therapy has improved outcomes in unfit patients but no prospective study has assessed ven/HMA versus 7&3 as initial therapy in older, fit patients. Given no studies and expectation of ven/HMA use in patients outside of trial criteria, we evaluated retrospective outcomes among newly diagnosed patients. A nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived database and the University of Pennsylvania EHR identified 312 patients receiving 7&3 and 488 receiving ven/HMA who were 60-75 years old without history of organ failure. Ven/HMA patients were older and more likely to have secondary AML, adverse cytogenetics, and adverse mutations. Median overall survival (OS) for patients receiving intensive chemotherapy was 22 versus 10 months for ven/HMA (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.60). Controlling for measured baseline characteristic imbalances reduced survival advantage by half (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.94). A sub-group of patients with equipoise, likelihood at least 30%-70% of receiving either treatment, had similar OS outcomes (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75-1.6). Regarding safety outcomes, 60-day mortality was higher for ven/HMA (15% vs. 6% at 60 days) despite higher documented infections and febrile neutropenia for 7&3. In this multicenter real-word dataset, patients selected for intensive chemotherapy had superior OS but a large group had similar outcomes with ven/HMA. Prospective randomized studies, controlling for both measured and unmeasured confounders, must confirm this outcome.

The use of prognostic models in allogeneic transplants: a perspective guide for clinicians and investigators

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) can cure many hematologic diseases, but it carries the potential risk of increased morbidity and mortality rates. Prognostic evaluation is a scientific entity at the core of care for potential recipients of HCT. It can improve the decision-making process of transplant vs no transplant, help choose the best transplant strategy and allows for future trials targeting patients' intolerances to transplant; hence, it ultimately improves transplant outcomes. Prognostic models are key for appropriate actuarial outcome estimates, which have frequently been shown to be better than physicians' subjective estimates. To make the most accurate prognostic evaluation for HCT, one should rely on >1 prognostic model. For relapse and relapse-related mortality risks, the refined disease risk index is currently the most informative model. It can be supplemented with disease-specific models that consider genetic mutations as predictors in addition to information on measurable residual disease. For nonrelapse mortality and HCT-related morbidity risks, the HCT-comorbidity index and Karnofsky performance status have proven to be the most reliable and most accepted by physicians. These can be supplemented with gait speed as a measure of frailty. Some other global prognostic models might add additional prognostic information. Physicians' educated perceptions can then put this information into context, taking into consideration conditioning regimen and donor choices. The future of transplant mandates (1) clinical investigators specifically trained in prognostication, (2) increased reliance on geriatric assessment, (3) the use of novel biomarkers such as genetic variants, and (4) the successful application of novel statistical methods such as machine learning.

Optimizing Treatment Options for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients with Comorbidities

Traditionally, the goal of AML therapy has been to induce remission through intensive chemotherapy, maintain long-term remission using consolidation therapy, and achieve higher rates of a cure by allogeneic transplantation in patients with a poor prognosis. However, for the elderly patients and those with comorbidities, the toxicity often surpasses the therapeutic benefits of intensive chemotherapy. Consequently, low-intensity therapies, such as the combination of a hypomethylating agent with venetoclax, have emerged as promising treatment options for elderly patients. Given the rise of low-intensity therapies as the leading treatment option for the elderly, it is increasingly important to consider patients' age and comorbidities when selecting a treatment option. The recently proposed comorbidity-based risk stratification for AML allows prognosis stratification not only in patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy, but also in those receiving low-intensity chemotherapy. Optimizing treatment intensity based on such risk stratification is anticipated to balance treatment efficacy and safety, and will ultimately improve the life expectancy for patients with AML.

Outcome of patients with newly diagnosed AML admitted to the ICU, including preemptive admission - a multi-center study

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can lead to life-threatening complications that may require intensive care unit (ICU) management. It has been advocated that early preemptive (ePE) ICU admission, before the onset of organ failure, could benefit some high-risk patients such as those with hyperleukocytosis. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the outcome of newly diagnosed AML patients who required ICU admission in five academic centers with a special focus on patients with an ePE admission strategy, i.e., those transferred to the ICU without any organ failure (modified SOFA score ≤ 2 [omitting thrombocytopenia] and no life-sustaining intervention in the first 24 h following ICU admission) before the start of induction therapy. Between January 2017 and December 2019, 428 patients were included among which 101 were admitted to the ICU. Among patients requiring life-sustaining interventions (n = 83), 18 (22%) died while in the ICU but ICU survivors had the same survival as those not admitted to the ICU. Patients with an ePE admission (n = 18) had more comorbidities and high-risk disease features such as hyperleukocytosis but required no life-sustaining interventions while in the ICU. In a subgroup analysis of patients with hyperleukocytosis ≥ 50 G/l at diagnosis (n = 85), patients not admitted to the ICU and those admitted with an ePE strategy had similar outcomes. This study provides encouraging results about ICU outcome in AML patients during induction therapy but the potential benefit of an ePE strategy must be confirmed prospectively.

Prediction of survival with lower intensity therapy among older patients with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model for survival in older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were treated with lower-intensity chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

The authors reviewed all older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML who received lower-intensity chemotherapy from 2000 until 2020 at their institution. A total of 1462 patients were included. They were divided (3:1 basis) into a training (n = 1088) and a validation group (n = 374).

RESULTS

In the training cohort of 1088 patients (median age, 72 years), the multivariate analysis identified 11 consistent independent adverse factors associated with survival: older age, therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, existence of previous myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasms, poor performance status, pulmonary comorbidity, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of infection at diagnosis, and therapy not containing venetoclax. The 3-year survival rates were 52%, 24%, 10%, and 1% in favorable, intermediate, poor, and very poor risk, respectively. This survival model was validated in an independent cohort. In a subset of patients in whom molecular mutation profiles were performed in more recent times, adding the mutation profiles after accounting for the effects of previous factors identified IDH2 (favorable), NPM1 (favorable), and TP53 (unfavorable) mutations as molecular prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

The proposed survival model with lower-intensity chemotherapy in older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML may help to advise patients on their expected outcome, to propose different strategies in first complete remission, and to compare the results of different existing or future investigational therapies.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Lower intensity therapy can be considered for older patients to avoid severe toxicities and adverse events. However, survival prediction in AML was commonly developed in patients who received intensive chemotherapy. In this study, we have proposed a survival model to guide therapeutic approach in older patients who received lower-intensity therapy.

Outcomes in Patients with FLT3-Mutated Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Underwent Transplantation in the Phase 3 ADMIRAL Trial of Gilteritinib versus Salvage Chemotherapy

The fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib improved the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial. In this study, we assessed survival and relapse rates of patients in the ADMIRAL trial who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), as well as safety outcomes in patients who received post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy. ADMIRAL was a global phase 3 randomized controlled trial that enrolled adult patients with FLT3-mutated R/R AML. Patients with R/R AML who harbored FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations in the juxtamembrane domain or D835/I836 point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain were randomized (2:1) to gilteritinib (120 mg/day) or to preselected high- or low-intensity salvage chemotherapy (1 or 2 cycles). Patients in the gilteritinib arm who proceeded to HSCT could receive post-transplantation gilteritinib maintenance therapy if they were within 30 to 90 days post-transplantation and had achieved composite complete remission (CRc) with successful engraftment and no post-transplantation complications. Adverse events (AEs) during HSCT were recorded in the gilteritinib arm only. Survival outcomes and the cumulative incidence of relapse were assessed in patients who underwent HSCT during the trial. Treatment-emergent AEs were evaluated in patients who restarted gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy. Patients in the gilteritinib arm underwent HSCT more frequently than those in the chemotherapy arm (26% [n = 64] versus 15% [n = 19]). For all transplantation recipients, 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 68% and 47%, respectively. Despite a trend toward longer OS after pretransplantation CRc, post-transplantation survival was comparable in the 2 arms. Patients who resumed gilteritinib after HSCT had a low relapse rate after pretransplantation CRc (20%) or CR (0%). The most common AEs observed with post-transplantation gilteritinib therapy were increased alanine aminotransferase level (45%), pyrexia (43%), and diarrhea (40%); grade ≥3 AEs were related primarily to myelosuppression. The incidences of grade ≥III acute graft-versus-host disease and related mortality were low. Post-transplantation survival was similar across the 2 study arms in the ADMIRAL trial, but higher remission rates with gilteritinib facilitated receipt of HSCT. Gilteritinib as post-transplantation maintenance therapy had a stable safety and tolerability profile and was associated with low relapse rates. Taken together, these data support a preference for bridging therapy with gilteritinib over chemotherapy in transplantation-eligible patients.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation vs Standard Consolidation Chemotherapy in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The ideal postremission strategy in intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) has been a matter of debate.

Objective

To explore the optimal therapy for patients with intermediate-risk AML after first complete remission.

Design, Settings, and Participants

This investigator-initiated, open-label, 2-armed, phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessed patients at 16 hospitals in Germany from February 2, 2011, until July 1, 2018. Key eligibility criteria included cytogenetically defined intermediate-risk AML according to Medical Research Council classification, first CR or CR with incomplete blood cell count recovery after conventional induction therapy, age of 18 to 60 years, and availability of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or unrelated donor. A detailed statistical analysis plan was written and finalized on July 7, 2020. Data were exported for analysis on April 13, 2021.

Interventions

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or high-dose cytarabine for consolidation and salvage HCT only in case of relapse. Strata for randomization included age (18-40 vs 41-60 years), NPM1 and CEBPA variation status, and donor type (unrelated vs related).

Main Outcomes and Measures

End points included overall-survival as the primary outcome and disease-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, treatment-related mortality, and quality of life measured according to the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey as secondary outcomes.

Results

A total of 143 patients (mean [SD] age, 48.2 [9.8] years; 81 [57%] male) with AML who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were randomized. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the probability of survival at 2 years was 74% (95% CI, 62%-83%) after primary allogeneic HCT and 84% (95% CI, 73%-92%) after consolidation chemotherapy (P = .22). Disease-free survival after HCT at 2 years was 69% (95% CI, 57%-80%) compared with 40% (95% CI, 28%-53%) after consolidation chemotherapy (P = .001). Allogeneic HCT during the first CR was associated with a cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years of 20% (95% CI, 13%-31%) compared with 58% (95% CI, 47%-71%; P < .001). Nonrelapse mortality at 2 years after primary allogeneic HCT was 9% (95% CI, 5%-19%) and 2% (95% CI, 0%-11%) after consolidation chemotherapy (P = .005). Similar outcomes were observed when analyses were confined to the 96 patients at intermediate risk according to the European Leukemia Network classification. Most importantly, all 41 patients relapsing after consolidation chemotherapy (36 hematologic, 4 molecular, and 1 extramedullary) proceeded to allogeneic HCT. No significant differences in health-related quality of life measures were observed between groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

Primary allogeneic HCT during first CR was not associated with superior overall survival compared with consolidation chemotherapy in patients 60 years or younger with intermediate-risk AML during the first CR and an available donor.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01246752.

Assessing eligibility for treatment in acute myeloid leukemia in 2023

INTRODUCTION

Age has historically been considered the main criterion to determine eligibility for intensive chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but age alone can no longer be considered an absolute indicator in determining which patients should be defined as unfit. Assessment of fitness for a given treatment today serves an important role in tailoring therapeutic options.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the main options used in real life to define eligibility for intensive and nonintensive chemotherapy in patients with AML, with a main focus on the Italian SIE/SIES/GITMO Consensus Criteria. Other published real-life experiences are also reviewed, analyzing the correlation between these criteria and short-term mortality, and thus expected outcomes.

EXPERT OPINION

Assessment of fitness is mandatory at diagnosis to tailor treatment to the greatest degree possible, evaluating the patient's individual profile. This is especially relevant when considering the availability of newer, less toxic therapeutic regimens, which have shown promising results in patients with AML who are older or considered unfit for intensive treatment. Fitness assessment is now a fundamental part of AML management and a critical step that can potentially influence outcomes and not just predict them.

Combining the HCT-CI, G8, and AML-Score for Fitness Evaluation of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single Center Analysis

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is essential before intensive induction chemotherapy and subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this context, we investigated the capacity of three scores for frailty prediction.

METHODS

At diagnosis, 197 patients were clinically evaluated for appropriate treatment intensity. In parallel and independently, the G8-score, the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Index (HCT-CI) and the AML-score for CR were determined for each patient and analyzed with respect to overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The G8-score and the HCT-CI were able to significantly separate "fit" from "unfit" patients, <0.001 and p = 0.008. In univariate Cox models, the predictive role for OS was confirmed: for the G8-score (HR: 2.35, 95% CI 1.53-3.60, p < 0.001), the HCT-CI (HR: 1.91, 95% CI 1.17-3.11, p = 0.009) and the AML-score (HR: 5.59, 95% CI 2.04-15.31, p = 0.001), the latter was subsequently used to verify the cohort. In the multivariate Cox model, the results were confirmed for the G8- (HR: 2.03, p < 0.001) and AML-score (HR: 3.27, p = 0.001). Of interest, when combining the scores, their prediction capacity was significantly enhanced, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The G8-, the HCTCI and the AML-score represent valid tools in the frailty assessment of elderly AML patients at diagnosis.

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide is a prognostic marker for response to intensive chemotherapy, early death, and overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia

Patient-related factors are of prognostic importance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Likewise, cardiac disorders may limit the tolerance of intensive therapy. Little is known about the prognostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). We analyzed NT-proBNP levels at diagnosis in 312 AML patients (median age: 61 years; range 17-89 years) treated with 3 + 7-based induction-chemotherapy and consolidation with up to four cycles of intermediate or high-dose ARA-C. NT-proBNP levels were elevated in 199 patients (63.8%), normal (0-125 pg/ml) in 113 (36.2%), and highly elevated (>2000 pg/ml) in 20 patients (6.4%). Median NT-proBNP levels differed significantly among patients with complete remission (153.3 pg/ml), no remission (225.9 pg/ml), or early death (735.5 pg/ml) (p = .002). In multivariate analysis, NT-proBNP, age, and the 2009 European LeukemiaNet (ELN-2009) classification were independent predictors of outcome after induction chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) differed significantly between patients with normal, moderately elevated, and highly elevated NT-proBNP (p < .001). These differences were observed in all patients and in patients <60 years but not in those ≥60 years. In multivariate analysis, NT-proBNP, age, and ELN-2009 remained independent prognostic variables for OS (p < .01). Together, NT-proBNP is an independent prognostic factor indicating the risk of induction failure, early death, and reduced OS in patients with AML.

Moving toward individualized target-based therapies in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease at the genetic level. The field of AML therapy is increasingly shifting away from uniform approaches based solely on intensive chemotherapy (such as '7 + 3') toward personalized therapy. The treatment of AML can now be individualized based on patient characteristics and cytogenetic/molecular disease features. In this review, we provide a comprehensive updated summary of personalized, target-directed therapy in AML. We first discuss the selection of intensive versus low-intensity treatment approaches based on the patient's age and/or comorbidities. We follow with a detailed review of specific molecularly defined AML subtypes that benefit from the addition of targeted agents. In this context, we highlight the urgent need for novel therapies in tumor protein p53 (TP53)-mutated AML. We then propose approaches to optimize AML therapy in patients without directly actionable mutations. We conclude with a discussion on the emerging role of using measurable residual disease to modify therapy based on the quality of response.

Update on current treatments for adult acute myeloid leukemia: to treat acute myeloid leukemia intensively or non-intensively? That is the question

For several decades, the treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been a dichotomous choice between intensive chemotherapy strategies with curative intent and non-intensive options including supportive care. Patients' age and fitness, as well as comorbidities, primarily influenced this choice. However, the therapeutic armamentarium is evolving, so that there are highly effective and increasingly specific drugs, fitting the mutational profile of a patient's leukemia. There is now a spectrum of treatment options that are less intense and can be administered in an outpatient setting and to a substantial extent are equally or even more effective than standard intensive therapy. We are, therefore, witnessing a radical change in the treatment landscape of AML. In this review, we examine the current treatment options for patients with AML, considering the molecular spectrum of the disease on the background of patient-related factors.

Referral to and receipt of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Recent data have shown improved outcomes in selected older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Nonetheless, practice patterns for referring and performing HSCT vary. We aimed to evaluate referral, utilization, and reasons for not referring/proceeding to HSCT in older adults with AML.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single center retrospective analysis of patients aged ≥60 years diagnosed with AML evaluating rates of HSCT referral and utilization. Fisher's exact test was used to compare rates of referral and utilization across age groups and years of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Median age of the 97 patients was 70 years (range 61-95); 30% (29/97) were referred for HSCT and of these, 69% (20/29) received HSCT. Common documented reasons (can be multiple) for not referring were performance status (n = 21), advanced age (n = 16), patient refusal (n = 15), refractory disease (n = 14), and prohibitive comorbidity (n = 6). Among patients who were referred but did not receive HSCT (n = 9/29), documented reasons for not proceeding with HSCT were refractory disease (n = 5), advanced age (n = 2), and prohibitive comorbidity (n = 2). HSCT referral and utilization rates significantly decreased with age (p < 0.01) but were generally stable over time from 2014 to 2017 (p = 0.40 for referral and p = 0.56 for utilization).

DISCUSSION

Despite improvements in supportive care and HSCT techniques, HSCT referral and utilization rates remained low among older adults with AML but stable over time.

Prognosis of older patients with newly diagnosed AML undergoing antileukemic therapy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The prognostic value of age and other non-hematological factors in predicting outcomes in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing antileukemic therapy is not well understood. We performed a systematic review to determine the association between these factors and mortality and health-related quality of life or fatigue among these patients.

METHODS

We searched Medline and Embase through October 2021 for studies in which researchers quantified the relationship between age, comorbidities, frailty, performance status, or functional status; and mortality and health-related quality of life or fatigue in older patients with AML receiving antileukemic therapy. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, conducted random-effects meta-analyses, and assessed the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

We included 90 studies. Meta-analysis showed that age (per 5-year increase, HR 1.16 95% CI 1.11-1.21, high-quality evidence), comorbidities (Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index: 3+ VS less than 3, HR 1.60 95% CI 1.31-1.95, high-quality evidence), and performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/ World Health Organization (ECOG/WHO): 2+ VS less than 2, HR 1.63 95% CI 1.43-1.86, high-quality evidence; ECOG/WHO: 3+ VS less than 3, HR 2.00 95% CI 1.52-2.63, moderate-quality evidence) were associated with long-term mortality. These studies provided inconsistent and non-informative results on short-term mortality (within 90 days) and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

High-quality or moderate-quality evidence support that age, comorbidities, performance status predicts the long-term prognosis of older patients with AML undergoing antileukemic treatment.

Predicting In-Hospital Mortality After Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy: Through Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms

PURPOSE

Despite careful patient selection, induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with a considerable risk for treatment-related mortality (5%-20%). We evaluated machine learning (ML) algorithms trained using factors available at the time of admission for AML therapy to predict death during the hospitalization.

METHODS

We included AML discharges with age > 17 years who received inpatient chemotherapy from State Inpatient Database from Arizona, Florida, New York, Maryland, Washington, and New Jersey for years 2008-2014. The primary objective was to predict inpatient mortality in patients undergoing chemotherapy using covariates present before initiation of chemotherapy. ML algorithms logistic regression (LR), decision tree, and random forest were compared.

RESULTS

29,613 hospitalizations for patients with AML were included in the analysis each with 4,177 features. The median age was 58.9 (18-101) years, 13,689 (53.7%) were male, and 20,203 (69%) were White. The mean time from admission to chemotherapy was 3 days (95% CI, 2.9 to 3.1), and 2,682 (9.1%) died during the hospitalization. Both LR and random forest models achieved an area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.78, whereas decision tree achieved an AUC of 0.70. The baseline LR model with age yielded an AUC of 0.62. To clinically balance and minimize false positives, we selected a decision threshold of 0.7 and at this threshold, 51 of our test set of 5,923 could have potentially averted treatment-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

Using readily accessible variables, inpatient mortality of patients on track for chemotherapy to treat AML can be predicted through ML algorithms. The model also predicted inpatient mortality when tested on different data representations and paves the way for future research.

Association between serum albumin and 60-day mortality in Chinese Hakka patients with non-APL acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the main type of adult leukemia, and 60-day mortality is a vital clinical problem that doctors have to face at the begin with treatment. Studies on the association between serum albumin and 60-day mortality from AML (non-APL) are limited.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, ALB was measured after admission in all patients diagnosed with primary AML from Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital of Nanchang University between January 2013 and May 2021. The outcome was all-cause, 60-day mortality. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

This study included 394 primary AML patients. The overall 60-day mortality was 28.9% (114/394); it was 43.1% (56/130), 27.5% (36/131), and 16.5% (22/133) for ALB quantile1 (Q, < 34.5 g/L), quantile 2 (Q2, 34.5-38.5 g/L), and quantile 3 (Q3, ≥ 38.6 g/L), respectively (P = 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, we found an association between a 6% decrease in 60-day mortality rate and a 1 g/L increase in ALB level (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.99, P = 0.015), which was associated with 38 and 70% decreases in 60-day mortality rates in Q2 (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30-0.86, P = 0.012) and Q3 (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.2 5-0.90, P = 0.022), respectively, compared with that in Q1. Similar results were obtained after subgrouping based on an ALB level of 35 g/L (HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.88, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum albumin was significantly associated with 60-day mortality of primary AML, which has important clinical significance. Further investigation is warranted.

Survival, response rates, and post-transplant outcomes in patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia aged 60-75 treated with high intensity chemotherapy vs. lower intensity targeted therapy

The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved several oral, targeted therapies for the treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in recent years. These agents are approved in patients with relapsed/refractory disease or as frontline therapy in patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy based on age, performance status, or comorbidities. They are also being increasingly utilized frontline in patients of all ages and fitness levels through clinical trials and off label prescribing, but comparative treatment outcomes associated with intensive versus targeted therapy have not been extensively studied. We conducted a single center, retrospective analysis to address the impact of treatment intensity on survival in patients with AML aged 60-75 at diagnosis. This study included 127 patients, 73 of whom received high intensity chemotherapy at any point during treatment (any HiC) and 54 of whom received only low intensity targeted therapy (LITT only). Overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation did not differ significantly between the any HiC and LITT only groups (hazard ratio (HR) for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.09; P=0.11). The only three variables that were independently associated with superior OS were lower European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk classification, TP53 unmutated status, and receipt of transplant. Our data suggest that baseline genomic features and receipt of transplant are more important than treatment intensity in predicting survival in this patient population. They also highlight the vital role of transplant in older patients with AML regardless of treatment intensity utilized for remission induction. Larger studies are needed to further address this question, including prospective randomized trials.

Updates on the Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia is a heterogeneous disease defined by a large spectrum of genetic aberrations that are potential therapeutic targets. New targeted therapies have changed the landscape for a disease with poor outcomes. They are more effective than standard chemotherapy with a good safety profile. For "fit patients" in first-line, the combination of gemtuzumab ozogamicin or midostaurin with intensive chemotherapy or Vyxeos is now considered the "standard of care" for selected patients. On the other hand, for "unfit patients", azacitidine-venetoclax has been consolidated as a frontline treatment, while other combinations with magrolimab or ivosidenib are in development. Nevertheless, global survival results, especially in relapsed or refractory patients, remain unfavorable. New immunotherapies or targeted therapies, such as Menin inhibitors or sabatolimab, represent an opportunity in this situation. Future directions will probably come from combinations of different targeted therapies ("triplets") and maintenance strategies guided by measurable residual disease.

Machine Learning–Based Exploratory Clinical Decision Support for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated With 7 + 3 Type Chemotherapy or Venetoclax/Azacitidine

PURPOSE

There are currently limited objective criteria to help assist physicians in determining whether an individual patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is likely to do better with induction with either standard 7 + 3 chemotherapy or targeted therapy with venetoclax plus azacitidine. The study goal was to address this need by developing exploratory clinical decision support methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Univariable and multivariable analysis as well as comparison of a range of machine learning (ML) predictors were performed using cohorts of 120 newly diagnosed 7 + 3-treated AML patients compared with 101 venetoclax plus azacitidine–treated patients.

RESULTS

A variety of features in the two patient cohorts were identified that may potentially correlate with short- and long-term outcomes, toxicities, and other considerations. A subset of these diagnostic features was then used to develop ML-based predictors with relatively high areas under the curve of short- and long-term outcomes, hospital stays, transfusion requirements, and toxicities for individual patients treated with either venetoclax/azacitidine or 7 + 3.

CONCLUSION

Potential ML-based approaches to clinical decision support to help guide individual patients with newly diagnosed AML to either 7 + 3 or venetoclax plus azacitidine induction therapy were identified. Larger cohorts with separate test and validation studies are necessary to confirm these initial findings.

Comparison of scoring systems evaluating suitability for intensive chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia-a Grand Ouest Against Leukemia (GOAL) study

Several scoring systems have been developed to assess suitability of individual patients for intensive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy. We sought to compare the performance of these scores in a cohort of 428 consecutive adults with AML who received conventional induction chemotherapy in five academic centers in France. All scoring systems identified a subset of patients with increased 28 and 56-day mortality although the prediction accuracy was overall limited with C-statistics of ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 Overall survival (OS) prediction was more limited and restricted to scoring systems that include AML-related parameters. The outcome of 104 patients (24%) considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy based on criteria used in recent randomized trials was similar to that of the other 324 patients (28-day mortality, odds ratio [OR] = 1.88, P = 0.2; 56-day mortality, OR = 1.71, P = 0.21; event-free survival, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08, P = 0.6; OS, HR = 1.25, P = 0.14) with low discrimination (C-statistic: 0.57, 0.56, 0.50, and 0.52 for 28-day, 56-day mortality, EFS, and OS, respectively). Together, our findings indicate that the accuracy of currently available approaches to identify patients at increased risk of early mortality and shortened survival after intensive AML therapy is relatively limited. Caution regarding the use of available scoring systems should be warranted in clinical decision-making.

A scoring system for AML patients aged 70 years or older, eligible for intensive chemotherapy: a study based on a large European data set using the DATAML, SAL, and PETHEMA registries

In a context of therapeutic revolution in older adults with AML, it is becoming increasingly important to select patients for the various treatment options by taking account of short-term efficacy and toxicity as well as long-term survival. Here, the data from three European registries for 1,199 AML patients aged 70 years or older treated with intensive chemotherapy were used to develop a prognostic scoring system. The median follow-up was 50.8 months. In the training set of 636 patients, age, performance status, secondary AML, leukocytosis, and cytogenetics, as well as NPM1 mutations (without FLT3-ITD), were all significantly associated with overall survival, albeit not to the same degree. These factors were used to develop a score that predicts long-term overall survival. Three risk-groups were identified: a lower, intermediate and higher-risk score with predicted 5-year overall survival (OS) probabilities of ≥12% (n = 283, 51%; median OS = 18 months), 3-12% (n = 226, 41%; median OS = 9 months) and <3% (n = 47, 8%; median OS = 3 months), respectively. This scoring system was also significantly associated with complete remission, early death and relapse-free survival; performed similarly in the external validation cohort (n = 563) and showed a lower false-positive rate than previously published scores. The European Scoring System ≥70, easy for routine calculation, predicts long-term survival in older AML patients considered for intensive chemotherapy.

Prediction of survival with intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Progress with intensive chemotherapy and supportive care measures has improved survival in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Predicting outcome helps in treatment decision making. We analyzed survival as the treatment endpoint in 3728 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with intensive chemotherapy from 1980 to 2021. We divided the total study group (3:1 basis) into a training (n = 2790) and a validation group (n = 938). The associations between survival and 27 characteristics were investigated. In the training cohort, the multivariate analysis identified 12 consistent adverse prognostic variables independently associated with worse survival: older age, therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, worse performance status, cardiac comorbidity, leukocytosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of infection at diagnosis except fever of unknown origin. We categorized patients into four prognostic groups, favorable (7%), intermediate (43%), poor (39%), and very poor (11%) with estimated 5-year survival rates of 69%, 36%, 13%, and 3% respectively (p < .001). The predictive model was validated in an independent cohort. In a subset of patients with molecular mutation profiles, adding the mutation profiles after accounting for the effects of previous factors identified NPM1 (favorable), PTPN11, and TP53 (both unfavorable) mutations as molecular prognostic factors. The new proposed predictive model for survival with intensive chemotherapy in patients with AML is robust and can be used to advise patients regarding their prognosis, to modify therapy in remission (e.g., proposing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission), and to compare outcome and benefits on future investigational therapies.

Real-world effectiveness of CPX-351 vs venetoclax and azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia

CPX-351 and venetoclax and azacitidine (ven/aza) are both indicated as initial therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older adults. In the absence of prospective randomized comparisons of these regimens, we used retrospective observational data to evaluate various outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed AML receiving either CPX-351 (n=217) or ven/aza (n=439). This study used both a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database and the University of Pennsylvania EHR. Our study includes 217 patients who received CPX-351 and 439 who received venetoclax/azacitidine. Ven/aza patients were older, more likely to be treated in the community, and more likely to have a diagnosis of de novo AML. Other baseline covariates were not statistically significantly different between the groups. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 12 months and did not differ based upon therapy (13 months for CPX-351 versus 11 months for ven/aza, HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71-1.08, p = 0.22). Overall survival was similar across multiple sensitivity analyses. Regarding safety outcomes, early mortality was similar (10% vs. 13% at 60 days). However, documented infections were higher with CPX-351 as were rates of febrile neutropenia. Hospital length of stay, including any admission prior to next cycle of therapy, was more than twice as long for CPX-351. In this large multi-center real word dataset, there was no statistically significant difference in OS. Prospective randomized studies with careful attention to side effects, quality of life, and impact on transplant outcomes are needed in these populations.

Integrating geriatric assessment and genetic profiling to personalize therapy selection in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Survival benefit associated with intensive over low-intensity chemotherapy in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is controversial. Geriatric assessment and genetic risk categories correlate with survival following intensive chemotherapy in older adults with AML and can guide treatment selection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a single-center trial, we integrated both geriatric assessment, and genetic risk categories to personalize selection of intensive versus low-intensity chemotherapy in older adults ≥60 years with AML (NCT03226418). In the present report, we demonstrate feasibility of this approach.

RESULTS

Broad eligibility criteria and co-management of patients with community oncologists allowed enrollment of 45% of all patients with AML treated at our center during the study period. The median time from enrollment to therapy initiation was two days (range 0-9). Over half of the trial patients had a score of ≥3 on hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index, impairment in physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Three fit patients received intensive chemotherapy, whereas other patients received low-intensity chemotherapy. Mortality at 30 days from diagnosis was 3.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-18.3%) and at 90 days was 29.6% (95% CI 15.9-48.5%). One-year overall survival was 66% (95% CI 60-87%).

DISCUSSION

Our data demonstrate the feasibility of integrating geriatric assessment in precision oncology trials to define fitness for intensive chemotherapy. Broad eligibility criteria and academic-community collaboration can expand access to clinical trials.

Geriatric assessment for older adults receiving less intensive therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: Report of CALGB 361101

Baseline geriatric assessment measures are associated with survival among older AML patients treated with nonintensive chemotherapy.

Baseline global quality of life is associated with survival among older AML patients treated with nonintensive chemotherapy.

Geriatric assessment (GA) predicts survival among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated intensively. We evaluated the predictive utility of GA among older adults treated with low-intensity therapy on a multisite trial. We conducted a companion study (CALGB 361101) to a randomized phase 2 trial (CALGB 11002) of adults ≥60 years and considered “unfit” for intensive therapy, testing the efficacy of adding bortezomib to decitabine therapy. On 361101, GA and quality of life (QOL) assessment was administered prior to treatment and every other subsequent cycle. Relationships between baseline GA and QOL measures with survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazards models. One-hundred sixty-five patients enrolled in CALGB 11002, and 96 (52%) of them also enrolled in 361101 (median age, 73.9 years). Among participants, 85.4% completed ≥1 baseline assessment. In multivariate analyses, greater comorbidity (hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index >3), worse cognition (Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration score >4), and lower European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer global QOL scores at baseline were significantly associated with shorter overall survival (P < .05 each) after adjustment for Karnofsky Performance Status, age, and treatment arm. Dependence in instrumental activities of daily living and cognitive impairment were associated with 6-month mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 3.5; confidence interval [CI], 1.2-10.4; and HR, 3.1; CI, 1.1-8.6, respectively). GA measures evaluating comorbidity, cognition, and self-reported function were associated with survival and represent candidate measures for screening older adults planned to receive lower-intensity AML therapies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01420926 (CALGB 11002).

Development and Validation of a Novel Prognostic Model for Overall Survival in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Integrating Tumor Burden and Comorbidities

Background

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a highly heterogeneous disease with enormously variable outcomes. It remains to be a major challenge to conduct a more precise estimation of the survival of MM patients. The existing stratifications attached less importance to the prognostic significance of comorbidities. In the present study, we aimed to develop and validate a novel and simple prognostic stratification integrating tumor burden and comorbidities measured by HCT-CI.

Method

We retrospectively enrolled 385 consecutive newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients in Xijing Hospital from January 2013 to December 2020. The cohort between January 2016 and December 2020 was selected as development cohort (N = 233), and the cohort between January 2013 and December 2015 was determined as validation cohort (N = 152). By using LASSO analysis and univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses, we developed the MM-BHAP model in the way of nomogram composed of β2-MG, HCT-CI, ALB, and PBPC. We internally and externally validated the MM-BHAP model and compared it with ISS stage and R-ISS stage.

Results

The MM-BHAP model was superior to the ISS stage and partially better than the R-ISS stage according to time-dependent AUC, time-dependent C-index, DCA, IDI, and continuous NRI analyses. In predicting OS, only the MM-BHAP stratification clearly divided patients into three groups while both the ISS stage and R-ISS stage had poor classifications in patients with stage I and stage II. Moreover, the MM-BHAP stratification and the R-ISS stage performed well in predicting PFS, but not for the ISS stage. Besides, the MM-BHAP model was also applied to the patients with age ≤65 or age >65 and with or without HRCA and could enhance R-ISS or ISS classifications.

Conclusions

Our study offered a novel simple MM-BHAP stratification containing tumor burden and comorbidities to predict outcomes in the real-world unselected NDMM population.

Age is no barrier for adults undergoing HCT for AML in CR1: contemporary CIBMTR analysis

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) has a median age at diagnosis of 67 years. The most common curative therapy remains an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), yet it is complicated by treatment-related mortality (TRM) and ongoing morbidity including graft versus host disease (GVHD) that may impact survival, particularly in older patients. We examined the outcomes and predictors of success in 1,321 patients aged 60 years and older receiving a HCT for AML in first complete remission (CR1) from 2007–2017 and reported to the CIBMTR. Outcomes were compared in three age cohorts (60–64; 65–69; 70+). With median follow-up of nearly 3 years, patients aged 60–64 had modestly, though significantly better OS, DFS and lower TRM than those either 65–69 or 70+; cohorts with similar outcomes. Three-year OS for the 3 cohorts was 49.4%, 42.3%, and 44.7% respectively (p=0.026). TRM was higher with increasing age, cord blood as graft source and HCT-CI score of ≥ 3. Conditioning intensity was not a significant predictor of OS in the 60–69 cohort with 3-year OS of 46% for RIC and 49% for MAC (p=0.38); MAC was rarely used over age 70. There was no difference in the relapse rate, incidence of Grade III/IV acute GVHD, or moderate-severe chronic GVHD across the age cohorts. After adjusting for other predictors, age had a small effect on OS and TRM. High-risk features including poor cytogenetics and measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to HCT were each significantly associated with relapse and accounted for most of the adverse impact on OS and DFS. Age did not influence the incidence of either acute or chronic GVHD; while graft type and associated GVHD prophylaxis were most important. These data suggest that age alone is not a barrier to successful HCT for AML in CR1 and should not exclude patients from HCT. Efforts should focus on minimizing residual disease and better donor selection.

A Phenogenetic Axis that Modulates Clinical Manifestation and Predicts Treatment Outcome in Primary Myeloid Neoplasms

Although the concept of "myeloid neoplasm continuum" has long been proposed, few comparative genomics studies directly tested this hypothesis. Here we report a multi-modal data analysis of 730 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with primary myeloid neoplasm, along with 462 lymphoid neoplasm cases serving as the outgroup. Our study identified a "Pan-Myeloid Axis" along which patients, genes, and phenotypic features were all aligned in sequential order. Utilizing relational information of gene mutations along the Pan-Myeloid Axis improved prognostic accuracy for complete remission and overall survival in adult patients of de novo acute myeloid leukemia and for complete remission in adult patients of myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts. We submit that better understanding of the myeloid neoplasm continuum might shed light on how treatment should be tailored to individual diseases.

Significance

The current criteria for disease diagnosis treat myeloid neoplasms as a group of distinct, separate diseases. This work provides genomics evidence for a "myeloid neoplasm continuum" and suggests that boundaries between myeloid neoplastic diseases are much more blurred than previously thought.

Validation of AML-score in Older Adults Receiving CPX-351 Intensive Induction Chemotherapy for Treatment of Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

The AML-Score has been validated in patients receiving traditional induction chemotherapies but not CPX-351. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate, among patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia who received intensive induction with CPX-351, if the AML-Score associates with (1) complete remission (CR) and (2) early mortality (EM) within 60 days of induction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We abstracted demographic and clinical data from consecutive patients receiving CPX-351 at Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital between September 2017 and November 2020. We used descriptive statistics and receiver operating curves to evaluate the relationship between AML-Score and rates of CR and EM.

RESULTS

In total, 40 patients were included. 27 (67.5%) were male, 27 (67.5%) were white, 36 (90.0%) were not Hispanic or Latino, and 29 (72.5%) were aged ≥60 years. Twenty-seven patients (67.5%) had a CR, and 4 (10%) experienced EM. Observed rates of CR and EM generally increased with increasing predicted risk. The area under the curve was 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.90) for CR and 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.96) for EM.

CONCLUSION

The AML-Score tool trends in the correct direction for predicting CR and EM, and thus may facilitate oncologist prognostication and treatment planning for patients receiving CPX-351. However, its clinical utility is limited by its underestimation of the risk of CR and overestimation of the risk of EM. Further validation in a larger cohort is needed to calculate accurate point estimates of CR and EM risk in this population.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with AML unfit for first-line intensive chemotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma 2022;63:928-938. [PMID: 35147482 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.2002321]

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) predominantly affects the elderly, and prognosis declines with age. Induction chemotherapy plus consolidation therapy is standard of care for fit patients; options for unfit patients include hypomethylating agents (HMA), low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), targeted therapies, and best supportive care (BSC). This retrospective chart review evaluated clinical outcomes in unfit patients with AML who initiated first-line treatment or BSC 01/01/2015-12/31/2018. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and response rates were assessed. Of 1762 patients, 1310 received systemic therapies: 809 HMA, 199 LDAC, and 302 other therapies; 452 received BSC. Median OS was 9.9, 7.9, 5.4, and 2.5 months for HMA, LDAC, other, and BSC, respectively. Median PFS was 7.5, 5.3, 4.1, and 2.1 months for HMA, LDAC, other, and BSC, respectively; median TTF was 4.9, 2.1, 2.2, and 2.1 months, respectively. Our findings highlight the unmet need for novel therapies for unfit patients.

Early platelet elevation after complete remission as a prognostic marker of favourable outcomes in favourable- and intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukaemia: A retrospective study

Objectives

Platelet (PLT) recovery after chemotherapy is associated with the prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This study aimed to explore the prognostic significance of early high PLT values in patients with de novo non‐M3 AML who achieved first complete remission (CR).

Methods

A total of 206 patients with de novo non‐M3 AML were analysed in this retrospective study. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal PLT cut‐off. The overall survival (OS) and relapse‐free survival (RFS) were assessed using Kaplan‐Meier and Cox regression analyses.

Results

312×10⁹/L was confined as the cut‐off of the PLT count. The estimated 3‐year OS of patients with high PLT was higher than that of their counterparts (72.3% vs. 34.6%, p = 0.001). In subgroup analysis, patients with high PLT had better OS in the favourable‐ and intermediate‐risk (non‐adverse‐risk) AML (p = 0.001). The estimated 3‐year RFS for the high and low PLT groups was 75.1% and 45.7% respectively (p = 0.078). Multivariate analyses revealed that high PLT count was an independent favourable variable for OS (HR = 0.264, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR = 0.375, p = 0.011) in the non‐adverse‐risk group.

Conclusion

Our results showed that early high PLT count recovery at first CR in non‐adverse‐risk AML patients is a positive prognostic marker for survival outcomes.

Prediction of early (4-week) mortality in acute myeloid leukemia with intensive chemotherapy

The progress with intensive chemotherapy and supportive care measures has improved survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Given the recent development of effective low intensity therapies, an optimal decision on the therapy intensity may improve survival through the avoidance of early mortality. We reviewed the outcome of 3728 patients with newly diagnosed AML who received intensive chemotherapy between August 1980 and May 2020. Intensive chemotherapy was defined as a cumulative cytarabine dose ≥ 700 mg/m² during induction therapy. We divided the whole cohort into a training and validation group at a 3:1 ratio. The population was divided into a training (2790 patients) and a validation cohort (938 patients). The median age was 55 years (range, 15-99). Among them, 442 patients (12%) had core-binding factor AML. Binary logistic regression identified older age, worse performance status, hyperbilirubinemia, elevated creatinine, hyperuricemia, cytogenetic abnormalities other than CBF and -Y, and pneumonia as adverse prognostic factors for an early 4-week mortality. This risk classification for early mortality was verified in the validation cohort of patients. In the validation cohort of more recently treated patients from 2000 to 2017, the 4-week mortality rates with intensive chemotherapy were 2%, 14%, and 50% in the low-, high-, and very high-risk group, respectively. The mortality rates with low intensity therapies were 3%, 9%, and 20%, respectively. The risk classification guides treatment intensity by the assessment of age, frailty, organ dysfunction, cytogenetic abnormality, and infection to avoid early mortality.

OUP accepted manuscript

As in younger patients, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) offers the best chance for durable remission in older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, defining the best treatment strategy (and in particular, whether or not to proceed to alloHSCT) for elderly patients with AML remains a difficult decision for the hematologist, since potential toxicity of conditioning regimens, risks of graft-versus-host disease, impaired immune reconstitution and the need for prolonged immunosuppression may be of major concern in these vulnerable patients with complex needs. Hopefully, significant progress has been made over the past decade in alloHSCT for elderly patients and current evidence suggests that chronological age per se (between 60 and 75) is not a reliable predictor of outcome after alloHSCT. Here, we review the current state of alloHSCT in elderly patients with AML and also discuss the different approaches currently being investigated to improve both accessibility to as well as success of alloHSCT in these patients.

Long-term survival after intensive chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents in AML patients aged 70 years and older: a large patient data set study from European registries

The outcome of acute myeloid leukemia patients aged 70 years or older is poor. Defining the best treatment option remains controversial especially when choosing between intensive chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents. We set up a multicentric European database collecting data of 3 700 newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients ≥70 years. The primary objective was to compare overall survival in patients selected for intensive chemotherapy (n = 1199) or hypomethylating agents (n = 1073). With a median follow-up of 49.5 months, the median overall survival was 10.9 (95% CI: 9.7–11.6) and 9.2 months (95% CI: 8.3–10.2) with chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents, respectively. Complete remission or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery was 56.1% and 19.7% with chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents, respectively (P < 0.0001). Treatment effect on overall survival was time-dependent. The Royston and Parmar model showed that patients treated with hypomethylating agents had a significantly lower risk of death before 1.5 months of follow-up; no significant difference between 1.5 and 4.0 months, whereas patients treated with intensive chemotherapy had a significantly better overall survival from four months after start of therapy. This study shows that intensive chemotherapy remains a valuable option associated with a better long-term survival in older AML patients.

Association between serum lactate dehydrogenase and 60-day mortality in Chinese Hakka patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A cohort study

Background

There is evidence that a high level of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is associated with poorer overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but its link to 60‐day mortality of AML remains unclear.

Methods

All patients newly diagnosed with AML were included in this cohort study. LDH was measured for the first time after admission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore the association between serum LDH and 60‐day mortality. Interaction and stratified analyses were conducted including age, sex, albumin, glucose, myoglobin, and standard chemotherapy.

Results

Three hundred and seventy‐one patients ≥15 years of age, who were newly diagnosed with AML, were consecutively selected. The total prevalence of 60‐day mortality was 27.2% (101/371), while it was 32.1% (42/131) and higher than in the LDH ≥570U/L compared with the LDH<570U/L, with the prevalence of 24.6% (59/240); however, the difference was not statistically significant. In multivariate regression models, odd ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for Log₂ and twice limit of normal (ULN) of LDH were 1.46 (1.0, 2.14) and 2.76 (1.24, 6.16), respectively. Interaction analysis revealed no interactive role in the association between LDH concentration and 60‐day mortality.

Conclusions

Serum LDH level was associated with 60‐day mortality, especially for the patients with LDH ≥570U/L.