1
|
Pandrowala SA, Kapoor D, Kunte A, Chopde A, Puranik A, Dev ID, Parghane R, Basu S, Ramaswamy A, Ostwal V, Chaudhari VA, Bhandare MS, Shrikhande SV. Factors Predicting Prognosis in Metastatic Grade 1 Gastro-entero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024; 55:1220-1228. [PMID: 38874852 PMCID: PMC11347461 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01077-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) has steadily increased. These tumors are considered relatively indolent even when metastatic. What determines survival outcomes in such situations is understudied. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained NET clinic database, to include patients of metastatic grade 1 GEP-NET, from January 2018 to December 2021, to assess factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Of the 589 patients of GEP-NET treated during the study period, 100 were grade 1, with radiological evidence of distant metastasis. The median age was 50 years, with 67% being men. Of these, 15 patients were observed, while 85 patients received treatment in the form of surgery (n = 32), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (n = 50), octreotide LAR (n = 22), and/or chemotherapy (n = 4), either as a single modality or multi-modality treatment. The median (PFS) was 54.5 months. The estimated 3-year PFS and 3-year overall survival rates were 72.3% (SE 0.048) and 93.4% (SE 0.026), respectively. On Cox regression, a high liver tumor burden was the only independent predictor of PFS (OR 3.443, p = 0.014). The 5-year OS of patients with concomitant extra-hepatic disease was significantly lower than that of patients with liver-limited disease (70.7% vs. 100%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION A higher burden of liver disease is associated with shorter PFS in patients with metastatic grade I GEP-NETs. The OS is significantly lower in patients with associated extrahepatic involvement. These parameters may justify a more aggressive treatment approach in metastatic grade 1 GEP-NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saneya A Pandrowala
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Deeksha Kapoor
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Aditya Kunte
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Amit Chopde
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Ameya Puranik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Indraja Devidas Dev
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Rahul Parghane
- Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Sandip Basu
- Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Anant Ramaswamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Vikas Ostwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Vikram A Chaudhari
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Manish S Bhandare
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Russo A, DiPeri T, Dumitra T, Tseng J, Pletcher E, Justo M, Chen C, Nissen N, Amersi F, Gong J, Hendifar A, Gangi A. Impact of primary tumor resection in the management of metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowel and pancreas. J Neuroendocrinol 2024; 36:e13399. [PMID: 38760997 DOI: 10.1111/jne.13399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
Patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) often present with advanced disease. Primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of unresectable metastatic disease is controversial. Most studies evaluating the impact of PTR on overall survival (OS) have been performed using large population-based databases, with limited treatment related data. This study aims to determine whether PTR improves OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NET. This is a retrospective single-institution study of patients with metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NET between 1978 and 2021. The primary outcome was OS. The secondary outcome was PFS. Chi-squared tests and Cox regression were used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses (MVA). OS and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Between 1978 and 2021, 505 patients presented with metastatic NET, 151 of whom had well-differentiated GEP-NET. PTR was performed in 31 PNET and 77 SBNET patients. PTR was associated with improved median OS for PNET (136 vs. 61 months, p = .003) and SBNET (not reached vs. 79 months, p<.001). On MVA, only higher grade (HR 3.70, 95%CI 1.49-9.17) and PTR (HR 0.21, 95%CI 0.08-0.53) influenced OS. PTR resulted in longer median PFS for patients with SBNET (46 vs. 28 months, p = .03) and a trend toward longer median PFS for patients with PNET (20 vs. 13 months, p = .07). In patients with metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NET, PTR is associated with improved OS and may be associated with improved PFS and should be considered in a multidisciplinary setting. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Russo
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Timothy DiPeri
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Teodora Dumitra
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Joshua Tseng
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Eric Pletcher
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Monica Justo
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Courtney Chen
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Nicholas Nissen
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Farin Amersi
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Jun Gong
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Oncology, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Andrew Hendifar
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Oncology, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Alexandra Gangi
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O’Rorke M, Chrischilles E. Making progress against rare cancers: A case study on neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer 2024; 130:1568-1574. [PMID: 38244195 PMCID: PMC11177581 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
In April 2023, the National Cancer Institute offered a roadmap for cancer research to achieve Cancer Moonshot goals. To reach these goals requires making progress for all cancers, not just those that are most common. Achieving progress against rare cancers, as well as common cancers, requires involvement of large clinical research networks. In 2020, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) launched an initiative on Conducting Rare Disease Research using PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. The purpose of this commentary is to introduce the broader community of cancer researchers to the PCORnet NET-PRO study (comparing the effects of different treatment approaches for neuroendocrine tumors on patient-reported outcomes) thereby demonstrating how researchers can use the PCORnet infrastructure to conduct large-scale patient-centered studies of rare cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael O’Rorke
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoogenkamp DS, de Wit-van der Veen LJ, Huizing DMV, Tesselaar MET, van Leeuwaarde RS, Stokkel MPM, Lam MGEH, Braat AJAT. Advances in Radionuclide Therapies for Patients with Neuro-endocrine Tumors. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:551-561. [PMID: 38598035 PMCID: PMC11062977 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01521-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide insights into the role of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and an overview of possible strategies to combine PRRT with locoregional and systemic anticancer treatments. RECENT FINDINGS Research on combining PRRT with other treatments encompasses a wide variety or treatments, both local (transarterial radioembolization) and systemic therapies, chemotherapy (i.e., capecitabine and temozolomide), targeted therapies (i.e., olaparib, everolimus, and sunitinib), and immunotherapies (e.g., nivolumab and pembrolizumab). Furthermore, PRRT shows promising first results as a treatment prior to surgery. There is great demand to enhance the efficacy of PRRT through combination with other anticancer treatments. While research in this area is currently limited, the field is rapidly evolving with numerous ongoing clinical trials aiming to address this need and explore novel therapeutic combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise S Hoogenkamp
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence NKI-AVL, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/UMC Utrecht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda J de Wit-van der Veen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence NKI-AVL, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/UMC Utrecht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne M V Huizing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence NKI-AVL, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/UMC Utrecht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- ENETS Center of Excellence NKI-AVL, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/UMC Utrecht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel S van Leeuwaarde
- ENETS Center of Excellence NKI-AVL, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/UMC Utrecht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Endocrinology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence NKI-AVL, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/UMC Utrecht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- ENETS Center of Excellence NKI-AVL, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/UMC Utrecht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- ENETS Center of Excellence NKI-AVL, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/UMC Utrecht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Albertelli M, Petolicchio C, Brasili S, Pogna A, Boschetti M, Luciano G, Campana D, Gay S, Veresani A, Ferone D, Vera L. Impact of Vitamin D Deficiency on Tumor Aggressiveness in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Nutrients 2023; 15:3771. [PMID: 37686803 PMCID: PMC10490039 DOI: 10.3390/nu15173771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The role of vitamin D (25(OH)D) in the pathogenesis and outcome of several conditions, including autoimmune diseases, diabetes and cancers is largely described in the literature. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of 25(OH)D deficit in a cohort of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in comparison to a matched healthy control group and to analyze the possible role of 25(OH)D as a prognostic factor for NENs in terms of biological aggressiveness, tumor progression and survival. Methods: From 2009 to 2023, 172 patients with NENs (99 females; median age, 63 years) were included in the study. Serum 25(OH)D levels were defined as deficient if ≤20 ng/mL. The possible associations between 25(OH)D levels and disease grading, staging, ki67%, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were considered. Results: NEN patients had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels compared to controls (p < 0.001) regardless of the primary origin. Patients with 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL had a significantly higher ki67 index (p = 0.02) compared to the ones with 25(OH)D levels above 20 ng/mL. Patients with disease progression were found to have a significantly lower 25(OH)D at baseline (p = 0.02), whereas PFS and OS were not significantly influenced by 25(OH)D. Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent among NENs and is associated with higher ki67 and disease progression. Our study highlights the importance of monitoring 25(OH)D levels in patients with NENs, as its deficiency appeared to be linked to the worst biological tumor aggressiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Albertelli
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genova, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (M.A.); (C.P.); (S.B.); (M.B.); (A.V.)
- Endocrinology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (S.G.); (L.V.)
| | - Cristian Petolicchio
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genova, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (M.A.); (C.P.); (S.B.); (M.B.); (A.V.)
| | - Sara Brasili
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genova, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (M.A.); (C.P.); (S.B.); (M.B.); (A.V.)
| | - Andrea Pogna
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genova, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (M.A.); (C.P.); (S.B.); (M.B.); (A.V.)
| | - Mara Boschetti
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genova, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (M.A.); (C.P.); (S.B.); (M.B.); (A.V.)
- Endocrinology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (S.G.); (L.V.)
| | - Giorgio Luciano
- CNR SCITEC “Giulio Natta” Scitec Istituto per Studio delle Science e Tecnologie Chimiche, 16149 Genova, Italy;
| | - Davide Campana
- Bologna ENETS Center of Excellence, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Stefano Gay
- Endocrinology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (S.G.); (L.V.)
| | - Alessandro Veresani
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genova, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (M.A.); (C.P.); (S.B.); (M.B.); (A.V.)
| | - Diego Ferone
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genova, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (M.A.); (C.P.); (S.B.); (M.B.); (A.V.)
- Endocrinology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (S.G.); (L.V.)
| | - Lara Vera
- Endocrinology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (S.G.); (L.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gålne A, Enqvist O, Sundlöv A, Valind K, Minarik D, Trägårdh E. AI-based quantification of whole-body tumour burden on somatostatin receptor PET/CT. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 2023; 7:14. [PMID: 37544941 PMCID: PMC10404578 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-023-00172-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Segmenting the whole-body somatostatin receptor-expressing tumour volume (SRETVwb) on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images is highly time-consuming but has shown value as an independent prognostic factor for survival. An automatic method to measure SRETVwb could improve disease status assessment and provide a tool for prognostication. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method to detect and quantify SRETVwb and total lesion somatostatin receptor expression (TLSREwb) from [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC/TATE PET/CT images. METHODS A UNet3D convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to train an AI model with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC/TATE PET/CT images, where all tumours were manually segmented with a semi-automatic method. The training set consisted of 148 patients, of which 108 had PET-positive tumours. The test group consisted of 30 patients, of which 25 had PET-positive tumours. Two physicians segmented tumours in the test group for comparison with the AI model. RESULTS There were good correlations between the segmented SRETVwb and TLSREwb by the AI model and the physicians, with Spearman rank correlation coefficients of r = 0.78 and r = 0.73, respectively, for SRETVwb and r = 0.83 and r = 0.81, respectively, for TLSREwb. The sensitivity on a lesion detection level was 80% and 79%, and the positive predictive value was 83% and 84% when comparing the AI model with the two physicians. CONCLUSION It was possible to develop an AI model to segment SRETVwb and TLSREwb with high performance. A fully automated method makes quantification of tumour burden achievable and has the potential to be more widely used when assessing PET/CT images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anni Gålne
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
- WCMM Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Olof Enqvist
- Eigenvision AB, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Sundlöv
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristian Valind
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- WCMM Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund, Sweden
| | - David Minarik
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- WCMM Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Elin Trägårdh
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- WCMM Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Papantoniou D, Grönberg M, Thiis-Evensen E, Sorbye H, Landerholm K, Welin S, Tiensuu Janson E. Treatment efficacy in a metastatic small intestinal neuroendocrine tumour grade 2 cohort. Endocr Relat Cancer 2023; 30:e220316. [PMID: 36629395 PMCID: PMC9986391 DOI: 10.1530/erc-22-0316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (Si-NET) are often studied as a uniform group. Proliferation index Ki-67 influences prognosis and determines tumour grade. We hypothesized that Si-NET grade 2 (G2) tumours, which have a higher Ki-67 than G1 tumours, might benefit less from established treatments for metastatic disease. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 212 patients with metastatic Si-NET G2 treated in two Swedish hospitals during 20 years (2000-2019). Median cancer-specific survival on first-line somatostatin analogues (SSA) was 77 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months when SSA was given as monotherapy and 19 months for all patients receiving first-line SSA. PFS after SSA dose escalation was 6 months in patients with radiological progression. Treatment efficacies of SSA and peptide receptor radionuclide treatment (PRRT) were studied separately in patients with Ki-67 of 3-5%, 5-10% and 10-20%. For SSA, PFS was significantly shorter at higher Ki-67 levels (31, 18 and 10 months, respectively), while there was only a minor difference in PFS for PRRT (29, 25 and 25 months). Median PFS for sequential treatment with interferon-alpha (IFNα), everolimus and chemotherapy was 6, 5 and 9 months. IFNα seemed to be effective in tumours with low somatostatin-receptor expression. In conclusion, established treatments appeared effective in Si-NET G2, despite their higher proliferation index compared to G1 tumours. However, efficacy of SSA but not PRRT was reduced at higher Ki-67 levels. SSA dose escalation provided limited disease stabilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Papantoniou
- Department of Medical Sciences, Endocrine Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Malin Grönberg
- Department of Medical Sciences, Endocrine Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Espen Thiis-Evensen
- Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Deptartment of Organ Transplant, Oslo, Norway
| | - Halfdan Sorbye
- Haukeland Hospital, Deptartment of Oncology, Bergen, Norway
- University of Bergen, Deptartment of Clinical Medicine, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kalle Landerholm
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Staffan Welin
- Department of Medical Sciences, Endocrine Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Eva Tiensuu Janson
- Department of Medical Sciences, Endocrine Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors, with variable presentation based on the location of origin and degree of metastatic spread. There are no randomized control trials to guide surgical management; however, surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for most gastroenteropancreatic NETs based on retrospective studies. Metastatic disease is common at the time of presentation, particularly in the liver. There is a role for cytoreduction for improvement of both symptoms and survival. Robust prospective randomized data exists to support the use of medical therapies to improve progression-free and overall survival in patients with advanced, metastatic, and unresectable NETs.
Collapse
|
9
|
Moore EC, Ioannou L, Ruseckaite R, Serpell J, Ahern S. Hereditary Endocrine Tumor Registries. J Endocr Soc 2022; 7:bvac194. [PMID: 36632485 PMCID: PMC9825730 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvac194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Endocrine neoplasia syndromes are phenotypically complex, and there is a misconception that they are universally rare. Genetic alterations are increasingly recognized; however, true prevalence is unknown. The purpose of a clinical registry is to monitor the quality of health care delivered to a specified group of patients through the collection, analysis, and reporting of relevant health-related information. This leads to improved clinical practice, decision-making, patient satisfaction, and outcome. Objective This review aims to identify, compare, and contrast active registries worldwide that capture data relevant to hereditary endocrine tumors (HETs). Methods Clinical registries were identified using a systematic approach from publications (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE) peer consultation, clinical trials, and web searches. Inclusion criteria were hereditary endocrine tumors, clinical registries, and English language. Exclusion criteria were institutional audits, absence of clinical data, or inactivity. Details surrounding general characteristics, funding, data fields, collection periods, and entry methods were collated. Results Fifteen registries specific for HET were shortlisted with 136 affiliated peer-reviewed manuscripts. Conclusion There are few clinical registries specific to HET. Most of these are European, and the data collected are highly variable. Further research into their effectiveness is warranted. We note the absence of an Australian registry for all HET, which would provide potential health and economic gains. This review presents a unique opportunity to harmonize registry data for HET locally and further afield.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwina C Moore
- Correspondence: Edwina C. Moore, MBBS (HONS), BMedSci, Peninsula Private Hospital, 525 McClelland Dr, Ste 16, Langwarrin, VIC, 3199, Australia.
| | - Liane Ioannou
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia
| | - Rasa Ruseckaite
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia
| | - Jonathan Serpell
- Department of Breast, Endocrine and General Surgery, Alfred Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia
| | - Susannah Ahern
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gubbi S, Vijayvergia N, Yu JQ, Klubo-Gwiezdzinska J, Koch CA. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors. Horm Metab Res 2022; 54:795-812. [PMID: 35878617 PMCID: PMC9731788 DOI: 10.1055/a-1908-7790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) occur in various regions of the body and present with complex clinical and biochemical phenotypes. The molecular underpinnings that give rise to such varied manifestations have not been completely deciphered. The management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) involves surgery, locoregional therapy, and/or systemic therapy. Several forms of systemic therapy, including platinum-based chemotherapy, temozolomide/capecitabine, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy have been extensively studied and implemented in the treatment of NETs. However, the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy as an option in the management of NETs has only recently garnered attention. Till date, it is not clear whether ICI therapy holds any distinctive advantage in terms of efficacy or safety when compared to other available systemic therapies for NETs. Identifying the characteristics of NETs that would make them (better) respond to ICIs has been challenging. This review provides a summary of the current evidence on the value of ICI therapy in the management of ICIs and discusses the potential areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sriram Gubbi
- Endocrinology, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda,
United States
| | | | - Jian Q Yu
- Nuclear Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United
States
| | - Joanna Klubo-Gwiezdzinska
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
| | - Christian A. Koch
- Medicine/Endocrinology, The University of Tennessee Health
Science Center, Memphis, United States
- Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United
States
- Correspondence Prof. Christian A. Koch, FACP,
MACE Fox Chase Cancer
CenterMedicine, 333 Cottman
AvePhiladelphia19111-2497United
States215 728 2713
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen H, Li Z, Hu Y, Xu X, Ye Z, Lou X, Zhang W, Gao H, Qin Y, Zhang Y, Chen X, Chen J, Tang W, Yu X, Ji S. Maximum Value on Arterial Phase Computed Tomography Predicts Prognosis and Treatment Efficacy of Sunitinib for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 30:2988-2998. [PMID: 36310316 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12693-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was designed to assess the computed tomography maximum (CTmax) value on pretherapeutic arterial phase computed tomography (APCT) images to predict pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) recurrence and clarify its role in predicting the outcome of tumour therapy. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 250 surgical patients and 24 nonsurgical patients with sunitinib-based treatment in our hospital from 2008 to 2019. CT images were assessed, the maximum value was defined as "CTmax," and recurrence-free survival (RFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between a high-CTmax group and a low-CTmax group among patients who underwent surgical resection or nonsurgical, sunitinib-based treatment according to the CTmax cutoff value. RESULTS In ROC curve analysis, a CTmax of 108 Hounsfield units, as the cutoff value, achieved an AUC of 0.796 in predicting recurrence. Compared with the low-CTmax group, the high-CTmax group had a longer RFS (p < 0.001). Low CTmax was identified as an independent factor for RFS (p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis; these results were confirmed using the internal validation set. The CTmax value was significantly correlated with the microvascular density (MVD) value (p < 0.001) and the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) score (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the high-CTmax group had a better PFS than the low-CTmax group among the sunitinib treatment group (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS The tumour CTmax on APCT might be a potential and independent indicator for predicting recurrence in patients who have undergone surgical resection and assessing the efficacy of sunitinib for patients with advanced metastatic pNETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haidi Chen
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Li
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuheng Hu
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaowu Xu
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zeng Ye
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Lou
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wuhu Zhang
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Heli Gao
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Qin
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, China
| | - Xuemin Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Tang
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Xianjun Yu
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Shunrong Ji
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Courault P, Deville A, Habouzit V, Gervais F, Bolot C, Bournaud C, Levigoureux E. Amino Acid Solutions for 177Lu-Oxodotreotide Premedication: A Tolerance Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215212. [PMID: 36358631 PMCID: PMC9657593 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The co-infusion of amino acid solutions during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy reduces the tubular reabsorption of 177Lu-oxodotreotide, thus minimizing nephrotoxicity. In our nuclear medicine department, the patients received two different types of amino acid perfusion over time: a commercial solution (CS) containing 10% amino acids, and a 2.5% lysine−arginine (LysArg) hospital preparation, produced by a referral laboratory. The aim of the present study was to analyze the tolerance of the two amino acid solutions. Methods: The patient files were analyzed and double-checked. The study parameters comprised the gender, age, primary tumor site, type of amino acid perfusion, adverse events (AE) and WHO AE grades, antiemetic premedication, creatinine, and serum potassium level. Results: From February 2016 to February 2019, 76 patients were treated, for a total 235 cycles. AEs occurred in 71% of the CS cycles (n = 82/116), versus 18% (n = 21/119) in the LysArg group (p < 0.0001). In the CS group, the AEs were mostly WHO grade 4 (n = 24/82), and mostly grade 1 in the LysArg group (n = 13/21). Poisson regression showed a higher risk of AE overall and of grades 3 and 4 in the females and with CS. The mean creatinine clearance was identical before and after the PRRT cycles, whichever amino acid perfusion was used. Conclusions: The lysine−arginine preparation showed better tolerance than the commercial solution. The change to LysArg reduced the antiemetic premedication from four molecules to one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Courault
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 69677 Bron, France
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR5292, INSERM U1028, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69677 Bron, France
| | - Agathe Deville
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 69677 Bron, France
| | - Vincent Habouzit
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 69677 Bron, France
| | - Frédéric Gervais
- Service de Pharmacie, Groupement Hospitalier Centre, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Claire Bolot
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 69677 Bron, France
| | - Claire Bournaud
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 69677 Bron, France
| | - Elise Levigoureux
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 69677 Bron, France
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR5292, INSERM U1028, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69677 Bron, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bai R, Li W, Cui J. Potential new applications of immunotherapy for neuroendocrine neoplasms: immune landscape, current status and future perspectives. Cancer Biol Med 2022; 19:j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0489. [PMID: 36245210 PMCID: PMC9755960 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a highly heterogeneous class of tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells and peptidergic neurons. After failure of first-line treatment, patients have poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be a powerful means of increasing therapeutic efficacy for such patients, but ICIs alone have low response rates and short disease control durations in most NENs and may be effective for only a portion of the population. ICIs combined with other immunotherapies, targeted therapies, or cytotoxic drugs have achieved some efficacy in patients with NENs and are worthy of further exploration to assess their benefits to the population. In addition, accumulating experimental and clinical evidence supports that the interaction between neuroendocrine and immune systems is essential to maintain homeostasis, and assessment of this broad neuroendocrine-immune correlation is essential for NEN treatment. In this review, we summarize the immune microenvironment characteristics, advances in immunotherapy, predictive biomarkers of ICI efficacy for NENs, and the effects of common endocrine hormones on the immune system, highlighting possible new application areas for this promising treatment in neglected NENs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rilan Bai
- Cancer Center, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Wenqian Li
- Cancer Center, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Jiuwei Cui
- Cancer Center, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Armentano DPD, Monteiro MR, Aguiar PN, Tsukamoto JS, Pio RB, Arakelian R, Araujo RLC, Usón PLS. Laboratory variables as predictors of progression in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in different lines of antineoplastic treatments. EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO 2022; 20:eAO6985. [PMID: 35674592 PMCID: PMC9165565 DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022ao6985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To determine the association of red cell blood counts, and liver panel tests to predict outcomes in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who underwent systemic antineoplastic treatments. Methods: Patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in systemic treatment were assessed according to laboratory tests within the same period. Progression free survival was determined by the period between the beginning of treatment and the date of progression. We used conditional models (PWP model) to verify the association between laboratory tests and tumor progression. The level of significance used was 5%. Results: A total of 30 treatments given to 17 patients in the intention-to-treat population were evaluated. Treatment included octreotide, lanreotide, everolimus, lutetium, and chemotherapy. We had statistically significant results in chromogranin A, neutrophils and platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio. The risk of progression increases by 2% with the addition of 100ng/mL of chromogranin A (p=0.034), 4% with the increase of 100 neutrophil units (p=0.006), and 21% with the addition of 10 units in platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (p=0.002). Conclusion: Chromogranin A, neutrophils and platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio were associated with disease progression during systemic treatment in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are necessary to validate our findings.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bartolomei M, Berruti A, Falconi M, Fazio N, Ferone D, Lastoria S, Pappagallo G, Seregni E, Versari A. Clinical Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Clinical Practice: A Formal Consensus Exercise. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102501. [PMID: 35626105 PMCID: PMC9140035 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Well-structured international guidelines are currently available regarding the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). However, in relation to the multiplicity of treatments and the relative rarity and heterogeneity of NENs, there are many controversial issues in which clinical evidence is insufficient and for which expert opinion can be of help. A group of experts selected 14 relevant topics and formulated relative statements concerning controversial issues in several areas on diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic strategies, and patient follow-up. Specific statements have also been formulated regarding patient management on radioligand therapy (RLT), as well as in the presence of co-morbidities or bone metastases. All the statements were drafted, discussed, modified, and then approved. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) method was used to obtain consensus. The results of this paper can facilitate the clinical approach of patients with NENs in daily practice in areas where there is scarcity or absence of clinical evidence. Abstract Many treatment approaches are now available for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). While several societies have issued guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of NENs, there are still areas of controversy for which there is limited guidance. Expert opinion can thus be of support where firm recommendations are lacking. A group of experts met to formulate 14 statements relative to diagnosis and treatment of NENs and presented herein. The nominal group and estimate-talk-estimate techniques were used. The statements covered a broad range of topics from tools for diagnosis to follow-up, evaluation of response, treatment efficacy, therapeutic sequence, and watchful waiting. Initial prognostic characterization should be based on clinical information as well as histopathological analysis and morphological and functional imaging. It is also crucial to optimize RLT for patients with a NEN starting from accurate characterization of the patient and disease. Follow-up should be patient/tumor tailored with a shared plan about timing and type of imaging procedures to use to avoid safety issues. It is also stressed that patient-reported outcomes should receive greater attention, and that a multidisciplinary approach should be mandatory. Due to the clinical heterogeneity and relative lack of definitive evidence for NENs, personalization of diagnostic–therapeutic work-up is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirco Bartolomei
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Presidio Ospedaliero Arcispedale Sant’Anna di Cona, 44124 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Alfredo Berruti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, Medical Oncology, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreas Surgical Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita Salute University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Nicola Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologya and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Diego Ferone
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Università di Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy;
| | - Secondo Lastoria
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Pappagallo
- School of Clinical Methodology IRCCS “Sacred Heart–Don Calabria” Hospital; 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy;
| | - Ettore Seregni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20132 Milano, Italy;
| | - Annibale Versari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Papamichail M, Pizanias M, Heaton ND, M P, M P, Nd H. Minimizing the risk of small-for-size syndrome after liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:113-133. [PMID: 34961675 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary and secondary liver tumors are not always amenable to resection due to location and size. Inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) may prevent patients from having a curative resection or may result in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality from complications related to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). DATA SOURCES This comprehensive review analyzed the principles, mechanism and risk factors associated with SFSS and presented current available options in the evaluation of FLR when planning liver surgery. In addition, it provided a detailed description of specific modalities that can be used before, during or after surgery, in order to optimize the conditions for a safe resection and minimize the risk of SFSS. RESULTS Several methods which aim to reduce tumor burden, preserve healthy liver parenchyma, induce hypertrophy of FLR or prevent postoperative complications help minimize the risk of SFSS. CONCLUSIONS With those techniques the indications of radical treatment for patients with liver tumors have significantly expanded. The successful outcome depends on appropriate patient selection, the individualization and modification of interventions and the right timing of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Papamichail
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK.
| | - Michail Pizanias
- Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK
| | - Nigel D Heaton
- Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Papamichail M
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Pizanias M
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Heaton Nd
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, UK; Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF, UK; Department of Liver Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings Health Partners at King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Li J, Cheng Y, Bai C, Xu J, Shen L, Li J, Zhou Z, Li Z, Chi Y, Yu X, Li E, Xu N, Liu T, Lou W, Bai Y, Yuan X, Wang X, Yuan Y, Chen J, Guan S, Fan S, Su W. Treatment-related adverse events as predictive biomarkers of efficacy in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors treated with surufatinib: results from two phase III studies. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100453. [PMID: 35344750 PMCID: PMC9058866 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background No validated biomarkers currently exist for predicting the efficacy outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with antiangiogenic therapy. We aimed to evaluate the association between treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and efficacy outcomes of surufatinib in patients with advanced NET. Patients and methods We included patients with NET treated with surufatinib in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials (SANET-p and SANET-ep) in this study. The main exposure was the presence of any of the TRAEs including hypertension, proteinuria, and hemorrhage in the first 4 weeks of surufatinib treatment. The primary outcome of the study was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). PFS outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. Blinded independent image review committee (BIIRC) assessments and 4-week landmark analysis were also performed as supportive evaluations. Results During the study period, a total of 242 patients treated with surufatinib were included in the analysis, and 164 (68%) patients had at least one of hypertension, proteinuria, and hemorrhage in the first 4 weeks of treatment. The presence of TRAEs in the first 4 weeks was associated with prolonged median PFS [11.1 versus 9.2 months; HR 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97; P = 0.036]. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the presence of TRAEs was also significantly associated with longer PFS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.97; P = 0.035). Similar results were obtained in the BIIRC assessments and 4-week landmark analysis. Conclusions Treatment-related hypertension, proteinuria, and hemorrhage could be potential biomarkers to predict antitumor efficacy of surufatinib in patients with advanced NET. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT02589821; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02589821 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02588170; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02588170 Treatment-related hypertension, proteinuria, or hemorrhage is associated with longer survival in NETs. The association is confirmed by the BIIRC assessments and 4-week landmark analysis. TRAEs can be biomarkers to predict antitumor efficacy in patients with NET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Y Cheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - C Bai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - J Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - L Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
| | - J Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Z Zhou
- Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Z Li
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Y Chi
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - X Yu
- Department of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - E Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - N Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - T Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - W Lou
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Y Bai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - X Yuan
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - X Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Y Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - J Chen
- Department of Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - S Guan
- Department of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs, HUTCHMED, Shanghai, China
| | - S Fan
- Department of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs, HUTCHMED, Shanghai, China
| | - W Su
- Department of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs, HUTCHMED, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kohno S. Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Literature Review. CANCER DIAGNOSIS & PROGNOSIS 2022; 2:115-125. [PMID: 35399177 PMCID: PMC8962810 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
This review aimed to highlight the characteristics and surgical treatments of tumours, and answer questions regarding the assessment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and optimal therapy. NENs comprise tumours that can produce hormones and cause a secretory syndrome. The diagnostic method and accuracy differ depending on the site of occurrence; hence, the relevant scientific society has created NEN treatment guidelines for each organ. Gastroenteric pancreatic (GEP) NENs have been unified and classified together according to the 2019 World Health Organization classification. Treatment is based on complete tumour resection, and when metastatic or primary lesions cannot be completely resected, lesions and symptoms are treated. Except for surgery for NENs, chemotherapy, molecularly targeted drugs, transarterial chemoembolization, etc., have also been confirmed as treatments. GEP NEN treatment methods will continue to advance and change because of surgery and other advances in treatment and diagnostic methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuzo Kohno
- Department of Surgery, The Jikei University Katsushika Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kjaer J, Clancy TE, Thornell A, Andersson N, Hellman P, Crona J, Welin S, Sulciner M, Powell B, Brais L, Astone K, Baddoo W, Doherty G, Chan JA, Norlén O, Stålberg P. Benefit of Primary Tumor Resection in Stage IV, Grade 1 and 2, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2022; 3:e151. [PMID: 37600107 PMCID: PMC10431300 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the association of primary tumor resection in stage IV pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NET) and survival in a propensity-score matched study. Background Pan-NET are often diagnosed with stage IV disease. The oncologic benefit from primary tumor resection in this scenario is debated and previous studies show contradictory results. Methods Patients from 3 tertiary referral centers from January 1, 1985, through December 31, 2019: Uppsala University Hospital (Uppsala, Sweden), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden), and Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, USA) were assessed for eligibility. Patients with sporadic, grade 1 and 2, stage IV pan-NET, with baseline 2000-2019 were divided between those undergoing primary tumor resection combined with oncologic treatment (surgery group [SG]), and those who received oncologic treatment without primary tumor resection (non-SG). A propensity-score matching was performed to account for the variability in the extent of metastatic disease and comorbidity. Primary outcome was overall survival. Results Patients with stage IV Pan-NET (n = 733) were assessed for eligibility, 194 were included. Patients were divided into a SG (n = 65) and a non-SG (n = 129). Two isonumerical groups with 50 patients in each group remained after propensity-score matching. The 5-year survival was 65.4% (95% CI, 51.5-79.3) in the matched SG and 47.8% (95% CI, 30.6-65.0) in the matched non-SG (log-rank, P = 0.043). Conclusions Resection of the primary tumor in patients with stage IV Pan-NET and G1/G2 grade was associated with prolonged overall survival compared to nonoperative management. A surgically aggressive regime should be considered where resection is not contraindicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefine Kjaer
- From the Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Anders Thornell
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Niklas Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Hellman
- From the Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Joakim Crona
- Department of Medical sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Staffan Welin
- Department of Medical sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Megan Sulciner
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Brittany Powell
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lauren Brais
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Kristina Astone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - William Baddoo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Gerhard Doherty
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer A. Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Olov Norlén
- From the Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Peter Stålberg
- From the Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lee L, Ramos-Alvarez I, Jensen RT. Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051250. [PMID: 35267558 PMCID: PMC8909561 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tumor resistance, both primary and acquired, is leading to increased complexity in the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs, which would be greatly helped by reliable prognostic/predictive factors. The importance in identifying resistance is being contributed to by the increased array of possible treatments available for treating resistant advanced disease; the variable clinical course as well as response to any given treatment approach of patients within one staging or grading system, the advances in imaging which are providing increasing promising results/parameters that correlate with grading/outcome/resistance, the increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis providing promising prognostic markers, all of which can contribute to selecting the best treatment to overcome resistance disease. Several factors have been identified that have prognostic/predictive value for identifying development resistant disease and affecting overall survival (OS)/PFS with various nonsurgical treatments of patients with advanced panNENs. Prognostic factors identified for patients with advanced panNENs for both OS/PFSs include various clinically-related factors (clinical, laboratory/biological markers, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors. Particularly important prognostic factors for the different treatment modalities studies are the recent grading systems. Most prognostic factors for each treatment modality for OS/PFS are not specific for a given treatment option. These advances have generated several controversies and new unanswered questions, particularly those related to their possible role in predicting the possible sequence of different anti-tumor treatments in patients with different presentations. Each of these areas is reviewed in this paper. Abstract Purpose: Recent advances in the diagnosis, management and nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have led to an emerging need for sensitive and useful prognostic factors for predicting responses/survival. Areas covered: The predictive value of a number of reported prognostic factors including clinically-related factors (clinical/laboratory/imaging/treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological/classification/grading), and molecular factors, on therapeutic outcomes of anti-tumor medical therapies with molecular targeting agents (everolimus/sunitinib/somatostatin analogues), chemotherapy, radiological therapy with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or liver-directed therapies (embolization/chemoembolization/radio-embolization (SIRTs)) are reviewed. Recent findings in each of these areas, as well as remaining controversies and uncertainties, are discussed in detail, particularly from the viewpoint of treatment sequencing. Conclusions: The recent increase in the number of available therapeutic agents for the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs have raised the importance of prognostic factors predictive for therapeutic outcomes of each treatment option. The establishment of sensitive and useful prognostic markers will have a significant impact on optimal treatment selection, as well as in tailoring the therapeutic sequence, and for maximizing the survival benefit of each individual patient. In the paper, the progress in this area, as well as the controversies/uncertainties, are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingaku Lee
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
- National Kyushu Cancer Center, Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatology, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan
| | - Irene Ramos-Alvarez
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
| | - Robert T. Jensen
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-301-496-4201
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Herring B, Jang S, Whitt J, Goliwas K, Aburjania Z, Dudeja V, Ren B, Berry J, Bibb J, Frost A, Chen H, Rose JB, Jaskula-Sztul R. Ex Vivo Modeling of Human Neuroendocrine Tumors in Tissue Surrogates. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:710009. [PMID: 35002949 PMCID: PMC8734644 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.710009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Few models exist for studying neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and there are mounting concerns that the currently available array of cell lines is not representative of NET biology. The lack of stable patient-derived NET xenograft models further limits the scientific community's ability to make conclusions about NETs and their response to therapy in patients. To address these limitations, we propose the use of an ex vivo 3D flow-perfusion bioreactor system for culturing and studying patient-derived NET surrogates. Herein, we demonstrate the utility of the bioreactor system for culturing NET surrogates and provide methods for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic agents on human NET cell line xenograft constructs and patient-derived NET surrogates. We also demonstrate that patient-derived NET tissues can be propagated using the bioreactor system and investigate the near-infrared (NIR) dye IR-783 for its use in monitoring their status within the bioreactor. The results indicate that the bioreactor system and similar 3D culture models may be valuable tools for culturing patient-derived NETs and monitoring their response to therapy ex vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendon Herring
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Samuel Jang
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Jason Whitt
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Kayla Goliwas
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Zviadi Aburjania
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Vikas Dudeja
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Bin Ren
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Joel Berry
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - James Bibb
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Andra Frost
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Herbert Chen
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - John Bart Rose
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Renata Jaskula-Sztul
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Safety and Efficacy of Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Elderly Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246290. [PMID: 34944910 PMCID: PMC8699207 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We compared the safety and efficacy of targeted radionuclide therapy between elderly (79 years old and older) and disease-matched younger patients (between 60 and 70 years of age) with metastatic neuroendocrine tumour (NET). To our knowledge, this is the first paper addressing this important clinical question of the outcome of radionuclide therapy in this particularly vulnerable population. We found that targeted radionuclide therapy did not cause increased side effects in the elderly NET population, while toxicity remains modest and comparable in both groups. We also find that survival (after adjusting for differences in life expectancy) is not inferior for the elderly compared to younger NET patients. Abstract Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a well-established treatment in somatostatin receptor-expressing neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). The safety and efficacy of PRRT in >79 years old patients (EP) have not been systematically investigated. All patients with inoperable/metastatic/progressive G1/G2 NET, >79 years (EP), treated with PRRT at the University Hospital of Basel between 2006 and 2018, were enrolled in this retrospective matched cohort study. Each patient was manually matched with ≥1 younger patient (YP = 60–70 years). The primary endpoint was toxicity. Toxicity (subacute, long-term) was graded according to the criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0. All toxicity grades ≥ 3, or whose delta (Δ) to baseline were ≥2, were considered significant. The odds ratio (OR) for developing toxicity was tested for non-inferiority of EP vs. YP. Clinical response to PRRT and overall survival (OS) were assessed as secondary outcome measures. Forty-eight EP and 68 YP were enrolled. Both cohorts were balanced regarding median time since diagnosis, tumour location, grading, treatment scheme, and baseline biochemical parameters, except for eGFR (EP: 61 ± 16 vs. YP: 78 ± 19; mL/min/1.73 m2). Twenty-two grade ≥ 3 or Δ ≥ 2 subacute hematotoxicities occurred in 10 EP (10.3% of cycles) and 37 in 19 YP (11.6% of cycles; p = NS). Long-term grade ≥ 3 renal toxicity occurred in 7 EP and 2 YP (p = NS). The median OS was 3.4 years (EP) vs. 6.0 years (YP), HR: 1.50 [0.75, 2.98], p = NS. PRRT is a valid therapeutic option in elderly NET patients with similar toxicity and non-inferior survival compared to matched younger patients.
Collapse
|
23
|
Walter MA, Nesti C, Spanjol M, Kollár A, Bütikofer L, Gloy VL, Dumont RA, Seiler CA, Christ ER, Radojewski P, Briel M, Kaderli RM. Treatment for gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 11:CD013700. [PMID: 34822169 PMCID: PMC8614639 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013700.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several available therapies for neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) have demonstrated efficacy in randomised controlled trials. However, translation of these results into improved care faces several challenges, as a direct comparison of the most pertinent therapies is incomplete. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the safety and efficacy of therapies for NETs, to guide clinical decision-making, and to provide estimates of relative efficiency of the different treatment options (including placebo) and rank the treatments according to their efficiency based on a network meta-analysis. SEARCH METHODS We identified studies through systematic searches of the following bibliographic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (Ovid); and Embase from January 1947 to December 2020. In addition, we checked trial registries for ongoing or unpublished eligible trials and manually searched for abstracts from scientific and clinical meetings. SELECTION CRITERIA We evaluated randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more therapies in people with NETs (primarily gastrointestinal and pancreatic). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data to a pre-designed data extraction form. Multi-arm studies were included in the network meta-analysis using the R-package netmeta. We separately analysed two different outcomes (disease control and progression-free survival) and two types of NET (gastrointestinal and pancreatic NET) in four network meta-analyses. A frequentist approach was used to compare the efficacy of therapies. MAIN RESULTS We identified 55 studies in 90 records in the qualitative analysis, reporting 39 primary RCTs and 16 subgroup analyses. We included 22 RCTs, with 4299 participants, that reported disease control and/or progression-free survival in the network meta-analysis. Precision-of-treatment estimates and estimated heterogeneity were limited, although the risk of bias was predominantly low. The network meta-analysis of progression-free survival found nine therapies for pancreatic NETs: everolimus (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.46]), interferon plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.80]), everolimus plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.57]), bevacizumab plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.89]), interferon (HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.94]), sunitinib (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.67]), everolimus plus bevacizumab plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.83]), surufatinib (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.76]), and somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.77]); and six therapies for gastrointestinal NETs: 177-Lu-DOTATATE plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.26]), everolimus plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.12 [95%CI, 0.03 to 0.54]), bevacizumab plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.94]), interferon plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.93]), surufatinib (HR, 0.33 [95%CI, 0.12 to 0.88]), and somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.76]), with higher efficacy than placebo. Besides everolimus for pancreatic NETs, the results suggested an overall superiority of combination therapies, including somatostatin analogues. The results indicate that NET therapies have a broad range of risk for adverse events and effects on quality of life, but these were reported inconsistently. Evidence from this network meta-analysis (and underlying RCTs) does not support any particular therapy (or combinations of therapies) with respect to patient-centred outcomes (e.g. overall survival and quality of life). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The findings from this study suggest that a range of efficient therapies with different safety profiles is available for people with NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A Walter
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Diagnostic Department, University Hospitals Geneva (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Nesti
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marko Spanjol
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Diagnostic Department, University Hospitals Geneva (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Attila Kollár
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Bütikofer
- Clinical Trials Unit, Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Viktoria L Gloy
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca A Dumont
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Diagnostic Department, University Hospitals Geneva (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian A Seiler
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Emanuel R Christ
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Basel University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Piotr Radojewski
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Diagnostic Department, University Hospitals Geneva (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Briel
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Reto M Kaderli
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rinke A, Auernhammer CJ, Bodei L, Kidd M, Krug S, Lawlor R, Marinoni I, Perren A, Scarpa A, Sorbye H, Pavel ME, Weber MM, Modlin I, Gress TM. Treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia, are we on the way to personalised medicine? Gut 2021; 70:1768-1781. [PMID: 33692095 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (GEPNEN) comprises clinically as well as prognostically diverse tumour entities often diagnosed at late stage. Current classification provides a uniform terminology and a Ki67-based grading system, thereby facilitating management. Advances in the study of genomic and epigenetic landscapes have amplified knowledge of tumour biology and enhanced identification of prognostic and potentially predictive treatment subgroups. Translation of this genomic and mechanistic biology into advanced GEPNEN management is limited. 'Targeted' treatments such as somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radiotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are treatment options but predictive tools are lacking. The inability to identify clonal heterogeneity and define critical oncoregulatory pathways prior to therapy, restrict therapeutic efficacy as does the inability to monitor disease status in real time. Chemotherapy in the poor prognosis NEN G3 group, though associated with acceptable response rates, only leads to short-term tumour control and their molecular biology requires delineation to provide new and more specific treatment options.The future requires an exploration of the NEN tumour genome, its microenvironment and an identification of critical oncologic checkpoints for precise drug targeting. In the advance to personalised medical treatment of patients with GEPNEN, clinical trials need to be based on mechanistic and multidimensional characterisation of each tumour in order to identify the therapeutic agent effective for the individual tumour.This review surveys advances in NEN research and delineates the current status of translation with a view to laying the basis for a genome-based personalised medicine management of advanced GEPNEN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Rinke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Infectiology, University Hospital Marburg and Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Christoph J Auernhammer
- Department of Internal Medicine IV and Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM), Ludwig Maximilian University, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark Kidd
- Wren Laboratories, Branford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sebastian Krug
- Clinic for Internal Medicine I, Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany
| | - Rita Lawlor
- Applied Research on Cancer Centre, Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Ilaria Marinoni
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Aurel Perren
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Applied Research on Cancer Centre, Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Halfdan Sorbye
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Marianne Ellen Pavel
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Endocrinology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias M Weber
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Endocrinology, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Irvin Modlin
- Gastroenterological and Endoscopic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Thomas M Gress
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Infectiology, University Hospital Marburg and Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Frankel AE, Yip WC, Naik E, Hasselbalch HC. Response to pegylated interferon in a COVID-19 positive male with metastatic jejunal neuroendocrine tumor treated with everolimus. Clin Case Rep 2021; 9:e04218. [PMID: 34136234 PMCID: PMC8190516 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.4218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
A 61-year-old male on everolimus had chronic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Addition of pegylated interferon cleared viral RNA and supports combination therapy with everolimus plus interferon for COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur E. Frankel
- Department of MedicineWest Palm Beach VA Medical CenterWest Palm BeachFLUSA
| | - Wai C. Yip
- Department of MedicineWest Palm Beach VA Medical CenterWest Palm BeachFLUSA
| | - Eknath Naik
- Department of MedicineWest Palm Beach VA Medical CenterWest Palm BeachFLUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mirallas O, Saoudi N, Gómez-Puerto D, Riveiro-Barciela M, Merino X, Auger C, Landolfi S, Blanco L, Garcia-Burillo A, Molero X, Salcedo-Allende MT, Capdevila J. Acquired hepatocerebral degeneration in a metastatic neuroendocrine tumor long-term survivor — an update on neuroendocrine neoplasm’s treatment: A case report. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:611-619. [PMID: 34131474 PMCID: PMC8173341 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i5.611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic small bowel low-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have a good prognosis. Surgery is the only curative treatment; however, this may induce advanced liver disease, particularly in long-term survivor patients. Acquired hepatocerebral degeneration or Parkinsonism in cirrhosis is characterized by rapidly progressive extrapyramidal symptoms in patients with advanced liver disease.
CASE SUMMARY A 70-year-old man presented to the emergency department with diminished consciousness and disorientation, and was diagnosed with hepatic encephalopathy. The patient was diagnosed in 1993 with a metastatic small bowel NET, for which he twice underwent hepatic surgery, with metastatic resection in 1993 and a right hepatectomy in 2002 to remove two hepatic metastases. In 2003, the patient started first-line chemotherapy and in 2004 started the first of three consecutive biological treatments, followed by radio-molecular therapy, achieving stable disease for 14 years. Disease progression was identified and he underwent an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, in 2019 advanced liver disease was identified. We diagnosed the development of acquired hepatocerebral degeneration, an unusual long-term side effect after multiple hepatic procedures.
CONCLUSION The importance of regular and ongoing surveillance in long-term NET survivors who undergo hepatic procedures should be integrated into the therapeutic management plan, as some of these negative outcomes could be prevented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oriol Mirallas
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona 08035, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Nadia Saoudi
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona 08035, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Diego Gómez-Puerto
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona 08035, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Mar Riveiro-Barciela
- Liver Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08035, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Xavier Merino
- Radiodiagnostic Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona 08035, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Cristina Auger
- Radiodiagnostic Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona 08035, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Stefania Landolfi
- Pathology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona 08035, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Laia Blanco
- Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Transplantation Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona 08034, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Amparo Garcia-Burillo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona 08035, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Xavier Molero
- Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Transplantation Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona 08034, Catalunya, Spain
| | | | - Jaume Capdevila
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona 08035, Catalunya, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Activity and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14050476. [PMID: 34067837 PMCID: PMC8155858 DOI: 10.3390/ph14050476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have widened the therapeutic scenario of different cancer types. Phase I/II trials have been designed to evaluate the role of ICIs both as single agents and in combination in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), but as yet no randomized controlled phase III trials have been carried out. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published could help to reduce the biases of single-phase II trials. Efficacy data were obtained on 636 patients. Pooled percentages of the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 10% (95% CI: 6-15%, I2 = 67%, p < 0.1) and 42% (95% CI: 28-56%, I2 = 93%, p < 0.1), respectively. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.6-5.4; I2 = 96%, p < 0.1) and median overall survival (mOS) was 11 months (95% CI 4.8-21.1; I2 = 98%, p < 0.1). Among the ICIs used as single agents, the anti-PD1 toripalimab achieved the highest ORR. Combination regimens were superior to monotherapy, e.g., the ICI combination nivolumab + ipilimumab, and the ICI + anti-angiogenetic combination atezolizumab + bevacizumab, both of which warrant further investigation. Promising efficacy and a good safety profile of ICIs represent a valid opportunity for expanding the therapeutic landscape of NENs. Predictive biomarkers are needed to identify the most suitable candidates for these regimens.
Collapse
|
28
|
Aktypis C, Spei ME, Yavropoulou M, Wallin G, Koumarianou A, Kaltsas G, Kassi E, Daskalakis K. Cardiovascular Toxicities Secondary to Biotherapy and Molecular Targeted Therapies in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092159. [PMID: 33946147 PMCID: PMC8124890 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A broad spectrum of novel targeted therapies with prime antitumor activity and/or ample control of hormonal symptoms together with an overall acceptable safety profile have emerged for patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). In this systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis, the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched to assess and compare the safety profile of NEN treatments with special focus on the cardiovascular adverse effects of biotherapy and molecular targeted therapies (MTTs). Quality/risk of bias were assessed using GRADE criteria. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in patients with metastatic NENs, including medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) were included. A total of 3695 articles and 122 clinical trials registered in clinicaltrials.gov were screened. We included sixteen relevant RCTs comprising 3408 unique patients assigned to different treatments compared with placebo. All the included studies had a low risk of bias. We identified four drug therapies for NENs with eligible placebo-controlled RCTs: somatostatin analogs (SSAs), tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Grade 3 and 4 adverse effects (AE) were more often encountered in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors and TKI (odds ratio [OR]: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.87-3.12 and OR: 3.41, 95% CI: 1.46-7.96, respectively) as compared to SSAs (OR:0.77, 95% CI: 0.47-1.27) and TPH inhibitors (OR:0.77, 95% CI: 0.35-1.69). MTOR inhibitors had the highest risk for serious cardiac AE (OR:3.28, 95% CI: 1.66-6.48) followed by TKIs (OR:1.51, 95% CI: 0.59-3.83). Serious vascular AE were more often encountered in NEN patients treated with mTOR inhibitors (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 0.64-4.64) and TKIs (OR:1.64, 95% CI: 0.35-7.78). Finally, patients on TKIs were at higher risk for new-onset or exacerbation of pre-existing hypertension (OR:3.31, 95% CI: 1.87-5.86). In conclusion, SSAs and TPH inhibitors appear to be safer as compared to mTOR inhibitors and TKIs with regards to their overall toxicity profile, and cardiovascular toxicities in particular. Special consideration should be given to a patient-tailored approach with anticipated toxicities of targeted NEN treatments together with assessment of cardiovascular comorbidities, assisting clinicians in treatment selection and early recognition/management of cardiovascular toxicities. This approach could improve patient compliance and preserve cardiovascular health and overall quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charalampos Aktypis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School of National & Kapodistrian University, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Maria-Eleni Spei
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.-E.S.); (M.Y.); (G.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Maria Yavropoulou
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.-E.S.); (M.Y.); (G.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Göran Wallin
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 85 Örebro, Sweden;
| | - Anna Koumarianou
- Hematology-Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124 62 Athens, Greece;
| | - Gregory Kaltsas
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.-E.S.); (M.Y.); (G.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Eva Kassi
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.-E.S.); (M.Y.); (G.K.); (E.K.)
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Kosmas Daskalakis
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.-E.S.); (M.Y.); (G.K.); (E.K.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 85 Örebro, Sweden;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +46-737510629
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Petit C, Lacas B, Pignon JP, Le QT, Grégoire V, Grau C, Hackshaw A, Zackrisson B, Parmar MKB, Lee JW, Ghi MG, Sanguineti G, Temam S, Cheugoua-Zanetsie M, O'Sullivan B, Posner MR, Vokes EE, Cruz Hernandez JJ, Szutkowski Z, Lartigau E, Budach V, Suwiński R, Poulsen M, Kumar S, Ghosh Laskar S, Mazeron JJ, Jeremic B, Simes J, Zhong LP, Overgaard J, Fortpied C, Torres-Saavedra P, Bourhis J, Aupérin A, Blanchard P. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: an individual patient data network meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:727-736. [PMID: 33862002 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00076-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised, controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown the survival benefit of concomitant chemoradiotherapy or hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. However, the relative efficacy of these treatments is unknown. We aimed to determine whether one treatment was superior to the other. METHODS We did a frequentist network meta-analysis based on individual patient data of meta-analyses evaluating the role of chemotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH-NC]) and of altered fractionation radiotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH]). Randomised, controlled trials that enrolled patients with non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer between Jan 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 2016, were included. We used a two-step random-effects approach, and the log-rank test, stratified by trial to compare treatments, with locoregional therapy as the reference. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. The global Cochran Q statistic was used to assess homogeneity and consistency and P score to rank treatments (higher scores indicate more effective therapies). FINDINGS 115 randomised, controlled trials, which enrolled patients between Jan 1, 1980, and April 30, 2012, yielded 154 comparisons (28 978 patients with 19 253 deaths and 20 579 progression events). Treatments were grouped into 16 modalities, for which 35 types of direct comparisons were available. Median follow-up based on all trials was 6·6 years (IQR 5·0-9·4). Hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (HFCRT) was ranked as the best treatment for overall survival (P score 97%; hazard ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·51-0·77] compared with locoregional therapy). The hazard ratio of HFCRT compared with locoregional therapy with concomitant chemoradiotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy (CLRTP) was 0·82 (95% CI 0·66-1·01) for overall survival. The superiority of HFCRT was robust to sensitivity analyses. Three other modalities of treatment had a better P score, but not a significantly better HR, for overall survival than CLRTP (P score 78%): induction chemotherapy with taxane, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by locoregional therapy (ICTaxPF-LRT; 89%), accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (82%), and ICTaxPF followed by CLRT (80%). INTERPRETATION The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that further intensifying chemoradiotherapy, using HFCRT or ICTaxPF-CLRT, could improve outcomes over chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. FUNDINGS French Institut National du Cancer, French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and Fondation ARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Petit
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France
| | - Benjamin Lacas
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Pignon
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France
| | - Quynh Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Cai Grau
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, Cancer Institute, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Mahesh K B Parmar
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ju-Whei Lee
- ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maria Grazia Ghi
- Oncology Unit 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Stéphane Temam
- Service de Cancérologie Cervico-faciale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Maurice Cheugoua-Zanetsie
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marshall R Posner
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Everett E Vokes
- Section of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Zbigniew Szutkowski
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Center, Marie Curie-Sklodowska Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Eric Lartigau
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rafal Suwiński
- Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Clinic and Teaching Hospital, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Michael Poulsen
- Radiation Oncology Services, Mater Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Shaleen Kumar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Sarbani Ghosh Laskar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | - John Simes
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Center, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Lai-Ping Zhong
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Pedro Torres-Saavedra
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France; Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Anne Aupérin
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fernandez CJ, Agarwal M, Pottakkat B, Haroon NN, George AS, Pappachan JM. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A clinical snapshot. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13. [PMID: 33796213 PMCID: PMC7993001 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i3.231&set/a 886074439+803088391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Our understanding about the epidemiological aspects, pathogenesis, molecular diagnosis, and targeted therapies of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have drastically advanced in the past decade. Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs originate from the enteroendocrine cells of the embryonic gut which share common endocrine and neural differentiation factors. Most NENs are well-differentiated, and slow growing. Specific neuroendocrine biomarkers that are used in the diagnosis of functional NENs include insulin, glucagon, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, gastrin, somatostatin, adrenocorticotropin, growth hormone releasing hormone, parathyroid hormone-related peptide, serotonin, histamine, and 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid (5-HIAA). Biomarkers such as pancreatic polypeptide, human chorionic gonadotrophin subunits, neurotensin, ghrelin, and calcitonin are used in the diagnosis of non-functional NENs. 5-HIAA levels correlate with tumour burden, prognosis and development of carcinoid heart disease and mesenteric fibrosis, however several diseases, medications and edible products can falsely elevate the 5-HIAA levels. Organ-specific transcription factors are useful in the differential diagnosis of metastasis from an unknown primary of well-differentiated NENs. Emerging novel biomarkers include circulating tumour cells, circulating tumour DNA, circulating micro-RNAs, and neuroendocrine neoplasms test (NETest) (simultaneous measurement of 51 neuroendocrine-specific marker genes in the peripheral blood). NETest has high sensitivity (85%-98%) and specificity (93%-97%) for the detection of gastrointestinal NENs, and is useful for monitoring treatment response, recurrence, and prognosis. In terms of management, surgery, radiofrequency ablation, symptom control with medications, chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapies are all considered as options. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, but depends on factors including age of the individual, location, stage, grade, functional status, and the heredity of the tumour (sporadic vs inherited). Medical management is helpful to alleviate the symptoms, manage inoperable lesions, suppress postoperative tumour growth, and manage recurrences. Several molecular-targeted therapies are considered second line to somatostatin analogues. This review is a clinical update on the pathophysiological aspects, diagnostic algorithm, and management of GEP NENs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelius J Fernandez
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pilgrim Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston PE21 9QS, United Kingdom
| | - Mayuri Agarwal
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pilgrim Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston PE21 9QS, United Kingdom
| | - Biju Pottakkat
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry 605006, India
| | - Nisha Nigil Haroon
- Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury P3E 2C6, Ontario, Canada
| | - Annu Susan George
- Department of Medical Oncology, VPS Lakeshore Hospital, Cochin 682040, Kerala, India
| | - Joseph M Pappachan
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, PR2 9HT, Preston, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road M13 9PL, Manchester Metropolitan University, All Saints Building M15 6BH, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fernandez CJ, Agarwal M, Pottakkat B, Haroon NN, George AS, Pappachan JM. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A clinical snapshot. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:231-255. [PMID: 33796213 PMCID: PMC7993001 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i3.231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Our understanding about the epidemiological aspects, pathogenesis, molecular diagnosis, and targeted therapies of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have drastically advanced in the past decade. Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs originate from the enteroendocrine cells of the embryonic gut which share common endocrine and neural differentiation factors. Most NENs are well-differentiated, and slow growing. Specific neuroendocrine biomarkers that are used in the diagnosis of functional NENs include insulin, glucagon, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, gastrin, somatostatin, adrenocorticotropin, growth hormone releasing hormone, parathyroid hormone-related peptide, serotonin, histamine, and 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid (5-HIAA). Biomarkers such as pancreatic polypeptide, human chorionic gonadotrophin subunits, neurotensin, ghrelin, and calcitonin are used in the diagnosis of non-functional NENs. 5-HIAA levels correlate with tumour burden, prognosis and development of carcinoid heart disease and mesenteric fibrosis, however several diseases, medications and edible products can falsely elevate the 5-HIAA levels. Organ-specific transcription factors are useful in the differential diagnosis of metastasis from an unknown primary of well-differentiated NENs. Emerging novel biomarkers include circulating tumour cells, circulating tumour DNA, circulating micro-RNAs, and neuroendocrine neoplasms test (NETest) (simultaneous measurement of 51 neuroendocrine-specific marker genes in the peripheral blood). NETest has high sensitivity (85%-98%) and specificity (93%-97%) for the detection of gastrointestinal NENs, and is useful for monitoring treatment response, recurrence, and prognosis. In terms of management, surgery, radiofrequency ablation, symptom control with medications, chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapies are all considered as options. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment, but depends on factors including age of the individual, location, stage, grade, functional status, and the heredity of the tumour (sporadic vs inherited). Medical management is helpful to alleviate the symptoms, manage inoperable lesions, suppress postoperative tumour growth, and manage recurrences. Several molecular-targeted therapies are considered second line to somatostatin analogues. This review is a clinical update on the pathophysiological aspects, diagnostic algorithm, and management of GEP NENs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelius J Fernandez
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pilgrim Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston PE21 9QS, United Kingdom
| | - Mayuri Agarwal
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pilgrim Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston PE21 9QS, United Kingdom
| | - Biju Pottakkat
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry 605006, India
| | - Nisha Nigil Haroon
- Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury P3E 2C6, Ontario, Canada
| | - Annu Susan George
- Department of Medical Oncology, VPS Lakeshore Hospital, Cochin 682040, Kerala, India
| | - Joseph M Pappachan
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, PR2 9HT, Preston, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road M13 9PL, Manchester Metropolitan University, All Saints Building M15 6BH, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Borga C, Businello G, Murgioni S, Bergamo F, Martini C, De Carlo E, Trevellin E, Vettor R, Fassan M. Treatment personalization in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:29. [PMID: 33641005 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00825-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The clinical scenario of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) is continuously changing due to significant improvements in the definition of their molecular landscapes and the introduction of innovative therapeutic approaches. Many efforts are currently employed in the integration of the genetics/epigenetics and clinical information. This is leading to an improvement of tumor classification, prognostic stratification and ameliorating the management of patients based on a personalized approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Borga
- Surgical Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Gianluca Businello
- Surgical Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Sabina Murgioni
- Unit of Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesca Bergamo
- Unit of Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Chiara Martini
- Endocrine-Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Eugenio De Carlo
- Endocrine-Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Trevellin
- Endocrine-Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Roberto Vettor
- Endocrine-Metabolic Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Matteo Fassan
- Surgical Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wedin M, Mehta S, Angerås-Kraftling J, Wallin G, Daskalakis K. The Role of Serum 5-HIAA as a Predictor of Progression and an Alternative to 24-h Urine 5-HIAA in Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. BIOLOGY 2021; 10:biology10020076. [PMID: 33494283 PMCID: PMC7909826 DOI: 10.3390/biology10020076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary 5-hydroxyinoloacetic acid (5HIAA) is the breakdown product of serotonin and it is traditionally measured in 24-h urinary samples in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). 5HIAA measurement in patient serum has recently become available and has started replacing the traditional method in many centers, as it is more convenient and often preferred by patients. In this prospective, single center study, we aimed to investigate the clinical utility of serum 5HIAA for diagnostic purposes and disease surveillance in a cohort of patients with well-differentiated NENs. Our analysis confirmed an association between serum 5HIAA and the presence of liver metastases, as well as the extent of liver tumor involvement, demonstrating that the biomarker becomes positive in advanced disease stages. However, there was no evident association between a change in serum 5HIAA and change in disease status. Additionally, with respect to diagnostic purposes as compared to urinary 5HIAA testing, there was a substantial agreement between the two methods. In conclusion, serum 5HIAA performs well compared to urinary testing for diagnostic purposes but does not seem adequate as a solo biomarker of disease progression. Abstract Our aim was to investigate the clinical utility of serum 5HIAA for disease surveillance and diagnostic purposes in a cohort of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (WD-NENs). Forty-eight patients with WD-NENs and concurrent serum and urinary 5HIAA testing, as well as CT/MRI imaging, were included. Analysis of matching-pairs did not reveal any association between RECIST 1.1 responses and changes in serum 5HIAA levels (p = 0.673). In addition, no correlation was evident between RECIST 1.1 responses and >10%, >25% or >50% changes in serum 5HIAA levels (Fisher’s exact test p = 0.380, p > 0.999, and p > 0.999, respectively). The presence of liver metastases and extensive liver tumor involvement were associated with higher serum 5HIAA levels (p = 0.045 and p = 0.041, respectively). We also confirmed a strong linear correlation between the measurements of serum and urine 5HIAA (n = 24, r = 0.791, p < 0.0001). The concordance rate of serum and urinary 5HIAA positivity at standardized laboratory cut-offs was 75%. In patients with normal renal function tests, the concordance between the two methods was as high as 89%, and a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 88.9%, respectively, was evident (Cohen’s kappa coefficient = 0.685). In conclusion, serum 5HIAA performs well compared to urinary testing for diagnostic purposes, mainly in advanced disease stages, and corresponds well to liver tumor burden. However, it is not adequate to predict tumor progression.
Collapse
|
34
|
Treatment of Advanced Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuro-Endocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13020358. [PMID: 33561087 PMCID: PMC7835931 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The most effective and safest approach for the treatment of advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP–NENs) remains unknown. A systematic review was done to clarify this point. A network meta-analysis was used to overcome the multiarm problem. Our study confirmed that somatostatin analogs (SSAs) alone remain the best choice for well-differentiated GEP–NENs. 177Lu-Dotatate plus SSA is a valid alternative for midgut NENs since it has been shown to be slightly more efficacious but yielding a higher risk for toxicity than SSAs. Abstract Several new therapies have been approved to treat advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP–NENs) in the last twenty years. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more therapies for unresectable GEP–NENs. Network metanalysis was used to overcome the multiarm problem. For each arm, we described the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival and grade 3–4 of toxicity. We included nine studies involving a total of 2362 patients and 5 intervention arms: SSA alone, two IFN-α plus SSA, two Everolimus alone, one Everolimus plus SSA, one Sunitinib alone, one 177Lu-Dotatate plus SSA, and one Bevacizumab plus SSA. 177Lu-Dotatate plus SSA had the highest probability (99.6%) of being associated with the longest PFS. This approach was followed by Sunitinib use (64.5%), IFN-α plus SSA one (53.0%), SSA alone (46.6%), Bevacizumab plus SSA one (45.0%), and Everolimus ± SSA one (33.6%). The placebo administration had the lowest probability of being associated with the longest PFS (7.6%). Placebo or Bevacizumab use had the highest probability of being the safest (73.7% and 76.7%), followed by SSA alone (65.0%), IFN-α plus SSA (52.4%), 177Lu-Dotatate plus SSA (49.4%), and Sunitinib alone (28.8%). The Everolimus-based approach had the lowest probability of being the safest (3.9%). The best approaches were SSA alone or combined with 177Lu-Dotatate.
Collapse
|
35
|
Wang XM, Zhang XR, Li ZH, Zhong WF, Yang P, Mao C. A brief introduction of meta-analyses in clinical practice and research. J Gene Med 2021; 23:e3312. [PMID: 33450104 PMCID: PMC8243934 DOI: 10.1002/jgm.3312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
With the explosive growth of medical information, it is almost impossible for healthcare providers to review and evaluate all relevant evidence to make the best clinical decisions. Meta‐analyses, which summarize all existing evidence and quantitatively synthesize individual studies, have become the best available evidence for informing clinical practice. This article introduces the common methods, steps, principles, strengths and limitations of meta‐analyses and aims to help healthcare providers and researchers obtain a basic understanding of meta‐analyses in clinical practice and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Meng Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xi-Ru Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhi-Hao Li
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wen-Fang Zhong
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Pei Yang
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chen Mao
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
April-Monn SL, Wiedmer T, Skowronska M, Maire R, Schiavo Lena M, Trippel M, Di Domenico A, Muffatti F, Andreasi V, Capurso G, Doglioni C, Kim-Fuchs C, Gloor B, Zatelli MC, Partelli S, Falconi M, Perren A, Marinoni I. Three-Dimensional Primary Cell Culture: A Novel Preclinical Model for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Neuroendocrinology 2021; 111:273-287. [PMID: 32241015 DOI: 10.1159/000507669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Molecular mechanisms underlying the development and progression of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are still insufficiently understood. Efficacy of currently approved PanNET therapies is limited. While novel treatment options are being developed, patient stratification permitting more personalized treatment selection in PanNET is yet not feasible since no predictive markers are established. The lack of representative in vitro and in vivo models as well as the rarity and heterogeneity of PanNET are prevailing reasons for this. In this study, we describe an in vitro 3-dimensional (3-D) human primary PanNET culture system as a novel preclinical model for more personalized therapy selection. We present a screening platform allowing multicenter sample collection and drug screening in 3-D cultures of human primary PanNET cells. We demonstrate that primary cells isolated from PanNET patients and cultured in vitro form islet-like tumoroids. Islet-like tumoroids retain a neuroendocrine phenotype and are viable for at least 2 weeks in culture with a high success rate (86%). Viability can be monitored continuously allowing for a per-well normalization. In a proof-of-concept study, islet-like tumoroids were screened with three clinically approved therapies for PanNET: sunitinib, everolimus and temozolomide. Islet-like tumoroids display varying in vitro response profiles to distinct therapeutic regimes. Treatment response of islet-like tumoroids differs also between patient samples. We believe that the presented human PanNET screening platform is suitable for personalized drug testing in a larger patient cohort, and a broader application will help in identifying novel markers predicting treatment response and in refining PanNET therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Leonhard April-Monn
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tabea Wiedmer
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Renaud Maire
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Mafalda Trippel
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Annunziata Di Domenico
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Francesca Muffatti
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Andreasi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Doglioni
- Unit of Pathology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Università Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Beat Gloor
- Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Maria Chiara Zatelli
- Section of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Università Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Università Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - Aurel Perren
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ilaria Marinoni
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland,
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tawfik B, Ray D, Moynihan M, Princic N. Costs of treatment change following first-line somatostatin analog monotherapy among patients with neuroendocrine tumors. J Med Econ 2021; 24:1337-1345. [PMID: 34763589 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2005374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study describes treatment characteristics and healthcare costs prior to and following treatment change from somatostatin analog (SSA) monotherapy among a privately-insured NET patient population in the US. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed NET and treated with SSA monotherapy were retrospectively identified in IBM MarketScan claims between 1/1/2014 and 3/31/2019. NET treatment change was captured ≥30 days after the SSA start date (earliest new treatment = index date). Healthcare costs (reimbursed amount in 2019 dollars) were reported for 1, 3, and 6 months pre- and post-index intervals. RESULTS A total of 305 patients were identified (mean age: 58 years; female: 52%; metastatic disease: 49%). Most patients started on octreotide (81%) vs. lanreotide (19%). Common treatment changes included alternate SSA (38%), targeted therapy (30%), or chemotherapy (23%). Total costs increased on average by $13,272 between the month preceding and following treatment change (p < .001), with the highest increase among patients changing to targeted therapy ($19,677, p < .001) vs. an alternate SSA ($10,240, p < .001) or chemotherapy ($4,057, p = .155). The trajectory in mean cost difference using a 1, 3, and 6-month time period followed an increasing trend for patients who changed to targeted therapy (Δ$19,677, Δ$34,856, Δ$58,387) but was flat for patients who changed to the alternate SSA (Δ$10,240, Δ$10,026, Δ$11,727). CONCLUSIONS Higher total healthcare costs were observed following treatment change from first-line SSA. Switching to the alternate SSA was associated with a fixed, one-time cost; whereas, switching to targeted therapy was associated with both an initial switching cost and a persistent monthly increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Tawfik
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - David Ray
- Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tirosh A, Killian JK, Petersen D, Zhu YJ, Walker RL, Blau JE, Nilubol N, Patel D, Agarwal SK, Weinstein LS, Meltzer P, Kebebew E. Distinct DNA Methylation Signatures in Neuroendocrine Tumors Specific for Primary Site and Inherited Predisposition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105:5876017. [PMID: 32706863 PMCID: PMC7456345 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation signature of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) by primary tumor site and inherited predisposition syndromes von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). METHODS Genome-wide DNA methylation (835 424 CpGs) of 96 NET samples. Principal components analysis (PCA) and unsupervised hierarchical clustering analyses were used to determine DNA methylome signatures. RESULTS Hypomethylated CpGs were significantly more common in VHL-related versus sporadic and MEN1-related NETs (P < .001 for both comparisons). Small-intestinal NETs (SINETs) had the most differentially methylated CpGs, either hyper- or hypomethylated, followed by duodenal NETs (DNETs) and pancreatic NETs (PNETs, P < .001 for all comparisons). There was complete separation of SINETs on PCA, and 3 NETs of unknown origin clustered with the SINET samples. Sporadic, VHL-related, and MEN1-related PNETs formed distinct groups on PCA, and VHL clustered separately, showing pronounced DNA hypomethylation, while sporadic and MEN1-related NETs clustered together. MEN1-related PNETs, DNETs, and gastric NETs each had a distinct DNA methylome signature, with complete separation by PCA and unsupervised clustering. Finally, we identified 12 hypermethylated CpGs in the 1A promoter of the APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) gene, with higher methylation levels in MEN1-related NETs versus VHL-related and sporadic NETs (P < .001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS DNA CpG methylation profiles are unique in different primary NET types even when occurring in MEN1-related NETs. This tumor DNA methylome signature may be utilized for noninvasive molecular characterization of NETs, through DNA methylation profiling of biopsy samples or even circulating tumor DNA in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Tirosh
- Endocrine Oncology Bioinformatics Lab and NET Service, Endocrine Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Centre, Tel Hashomer and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Metabolic Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
- Correspondence and Reprint Requests: Amit Tirosh, MD, Endocrine Oncology Bioinformatics Lab, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. E-mail:
| | | | - David Petersen
- Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Yuelin Jack Zhu
- Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Robert L Walker
- Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jenny E Blau
- Metabolic Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
| | - Naris Nilubol
- Endocrine Oncology Branches, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Dhaval Patel
- Endocrine Oncology Branches, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sunita K Agarwal
- Metabolic Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
| | - Lee Scott Weinstein
- Metabolic Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
| | - Paul Meltzer
- Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Electron Kebebew
- Department of Surgery and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Falconi M, Fazio N, Ferone D, Versari A. Use of octreotide long acting repeatable (LAR) as second-line therapy in advanced neuroendocrine tumors in different clinical settings: an Italian Delphi survey. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21:2317-2324. [PMID: 32990061 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1810237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Somatostatin receptor ligands including octreotide LAR are first-line therapy in locally advanced or metastatic NETs that are nonresectable and well differentiated and are recommended as first-line therapy in functioning and in G1/low G2 nonfunctioning NETs. However, several questions remain that are not adequately addressed in current guidelines regarding its use in clinical scenarios in which the tumor progresses. These include use of nonconventional doses or schedules of octreotide LAR in tumors with hormonal symptoms or showing clinical-radiological progression, administration in combination with everolimus, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and chemotherapy, following first-line treatment with octreotide LAR. METHODS An expert panel was gathered to obtain consensus using Delphi methodology on a series of statements regarding further administration of octreotide LAR after its use in first-line therapy in these settings in patients who experience disease progression. RESULTS Consensus was reached for 8 of the 10 statements proposed in the above clinical scenarios; consensus was not achieved for two statements. CONCLUSIONS The present statements aim to fill current gaps in treatment guidelines by providing recommendations based on expert consensus in clinical settings in which patients progress following first-line therapy with octreotide LAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, ENETS Center of Excellence, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS , Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS , Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Ferone
- Endocrinology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino , Genoa, Italy.,Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI) and Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Research (CEBR), University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy
| | - Annibale Versari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia , Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tsoli M, Spei ME, Wallin G, Kaltsas G, Daskalakis K. Association of a Palliative Surgical Approach to Stage IV Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082246. [PMID: 32796714 PMCID: PMC7464632 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of primary tumor resection in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) and unresectable distant metastases remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effect of palliative primary tumor resection (PPTR) on overall survival (OS) in this setting. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases up to January 2020 and used the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) criteria to assess quality/risk of bias. A total of 5661 articles were screened. In 10 studies, 5551 unique patients with stage IV PanNEN and unresectable metastases were included. The five-year OS for PanNEN patients undergoing PPTR in stage IV was 56.6% vs. 23.9% in the non-surgically treated patients (random effects relative risk (RR): 1.70; 95% CI: 1.53–1.89). Adjusted analysis of pooled hazard ratios (HR) confirmed longer OS in PanNEN patients undergoing PPTR (random effects HR: 2.67; 95% CI: 2.24–3.18). Cumulative OS analysis confirmed an attenuated survival benefit over time. The complication rate of PPTR was as high as 27%. In conclusion, PPTR may exert a survival benefit in stage IV PanNEN. However, the included studies were subject to selection bias, and special consideration should be given to PPTR anchored to a multimodal treatment strategy. Further longitudinal studies are warranted, with long-term follow-up addressing the survival outcomes associated with surgery in stage IV disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Tsoli
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.T.); (M.-E.S.); (G.K.)
| | - Maria-Eleni Spei
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.T.); (M.-E.S.); (G.K.)
| | - Göran Wallin
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 85 Örebro, Sweden;
| | - Gregory Kaltsas
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.T.); (M.-E.S.); (G.K.)
| | - Kosmas Daskalakis
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Endocrine Unit, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.T.); (M.-E.S.); (G.K.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 85 Örebro, Sweden;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +46-737510629
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Walter MA, Spanjol M, Kollár A, Bütikofer L, Gloy VL, Dumont RA, Seiler CA, Christ ER, Radojewski P, Briel M, Kaderli RM. Treatment for gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a network meta-analysis. Hippokratia 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A Walter
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Diagnostic Department; University Hospitals Geneva (HUG); Geneva Switzerland
| | - Marko Spanjol
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Diagnostic Department; University Hospitals Geneva (HUG); Geneva Switzerland
| | - Attila Kollár
- Department of Medical Oncology; Bern University Hospital, University of Bern; Bern Switzerland
| | - Lukas Bütikofer
- Clinical Trials Unit, Bern, University of Bern; Bern Switzerland
| | - Viktoria L Gloy
- Department of Clinical Research; University Hospital Basel and University of Basel; Basel Switzerland
| | - Rebecca A Dumont
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Diagnostic Department; University Hospitals Geneva (HUG); Geneva Switzerland
| | - Christian A Seiler
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine; Bern University Hospital, University of Bern; Bern Switzerland
| | - Emanuel R Christ
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; Basel University Hospital, University of Basel; Basel Switzerland
| | - Piotr Radojewski
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Diagnostic Department; University Hospitals Geneva (HUG); Geneva Switzerland
| | - Matthias Briel
- Department of Clinical Research; University Hospital Basel and University of Basel; Basel Switzerland
| | - Reto M Kaderli
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine; Bern University Hospital, University of Bern; Bern Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Survival in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumours of the Small Intestine: Nomogram Validation and Predictors of Survival. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9082502. [PMID: 32756529 PMCID: PMC7464451 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumours of the small intestine (SI-NETs) are rare and heterogeneous. There is an unmet need for prognostication of disease course and to aid treatment strategies. A previously developed nomogram based on clinical and tumour characteristics aims to predict disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with a SI-NET. We aimed to validate the nomogram and identify predictors of survival. Four hundred patients with a grade 1 or 2 SI-NET were included, between January 2000 and June 2016. Predicted 5- and 10-year survival was compared to actual DSS. Multivariable analysis identified predictors for actual DSS. We found that in low-, medium- and high-risk groups 5-year nomogram DSS vs. actual DSS was 0.86 vs. 0.82 (p < 0.001), 0.52 vs. 0.71 (p < 0.001) and 0.26 vs. 0.53 (p < 0.001), respectively. Ten-year nomogram DSS vs. actual DSS was 0.68 vs. 0.69 (p < 0.001), 0.40 vs. 0.50 (p < 0.001) and 0.20 vs. 0.35 (p < 0.001), respectively. Age, WHO-performance score of 2, Ki-67 index ≥10, unknown primary tumour, CgA > 6x ULN and elevated liver tests were identified as independent predictors for a worse DSS. This shows that the nomogram was able to differentiate, but underestimated DSS for patients with a SI-NET. Improvement of prognostication incorporating new emerging biomarkers is necessary to adequately estimate survival.
Collapse
|
43
|
Tsoli M, Alexandraki K, Xanthopoulos C, Kassi E, Kaltsas G. Medical Treatment of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Horm Metab Res 2020; 52:614-620. [PMID: 32108932 DOI: 10.1055/a-1110-7251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumours that arise mainly in the gastrointestinal or pulmonary system. Most NENs are well-differentiated and may obtain prolonged survival besides the presence of metastatic disease; however, a subset (poorly differentiated NENs) may display a truly aggressive behaviour exhibiting a poor prognosis. The recently developed classification systems along with advances in functional imaging have helped stratify patients to the administration of appropriate therapeutic options. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment of NENs, but in recent decades there has been a considerable evolution of medical treatments that are used for locally advanced or metastatic disease not amenable to surgical resection. Long acting somatostatin analogues are the main therapeutic modality for patients with functioning and well-differentiated low grade NENs exhibiting symptomatic control and mainly stabilisation of tumour growth. Other systemic treatments include chemotherapy, molecular targeted agents, interferon-α, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and immunotherapy. In addition, new agents such as telotristat may be used for the control of symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. The choice and/or sequence of therapeutic agents should be individualized according to tumour origin and differentiation, disease burden, presence of clinical symptoms and patients' performance status in the context of a multidisciplinary approach. Recent advances in the molecular pathogenesis of NENs set the field for a more personalised treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Tsoli
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Krystallenia Alexandraki
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Xanthopoulos
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Eva Kassi
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Department of Biological Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Gregory Kaltsas
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ramírez-Rentería C, Ferreira-Hermosillo A, Marrero-Rodríguez D, Taniguchi-Ponciano K, Melgar-Manzanilla V, Mercado M. An Update on Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: From Mysteries to Paradigm Shifts. Arch Med Res 2020; 51:765-776. [PMID: 32654882 DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Although neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) were once thought to be rare and mostly "benign" diseases, they are now being redefined in light of recently discovered molecular information. NENs constitute a spectrum of variably differentiated neoplasms, ranging from well-differentiated tumors with a protracted course over many years to very aggressive neuroendocrine carcinomas. Although the majority of NEN are non-functional lesions, some of these tumors, do produce a hormonal hypersecretion syndrome. Their reappraisal has led scientist to unveil previously unknown oncogenic pathways and connections that resulted in a new category in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and a revised version of the World Health Organization Classification (WHO 2018). Complex diseases like NEN require a multidisciplinary approach that includes the perspectives of endocrinologists, medical and surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, imaging specialists and pathologists. There are currently virtually thousands of ongoing trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of several molecular targeted therapies. The purpose of this review was to critically evaluate recent information regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of NEN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Ramírez-Rentería
- Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Endocrinas. Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Aldo Ferreira-Hermosillo
- Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Endocrinas. Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Daniel Marrero-Rodríguez
- Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Endocrinas. Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Keiko Taniguchi-Ponciano
- Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Endocrinas. Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Virgilio Melgar-Manzanilla
- Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Endocrinas. Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Moisés Mercado
- Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Endocrinas. Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Medaer E, Verslype C, Van Cutsem E, Dekervel J, Clement PM, Nackaerts K, Laenen A, Gheysens O, Goffin K, Jentjens S, Van Laere K, Deroose CM. Influence of pretreatment with everolimus or sunitinib on the subacute hematotoxicity of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:644-651. [PMID: 32036716 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1723161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a validated treatment for somatostatin receptor overexpressing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The NETTER-1 trial demonstrated a pronounced positive effect on progression-free-survival compared to high dose somatostatin analogs (SSAs), with a strong tendency toward overall survival benefit. Our aim was to investigate the influence of pretreatment with everolimus and/or sunitinib on subacute hematotoxicity of PRRT. To assess the influence of prior treatment with everolimus/sunitinib might be of clinical relevance due to the link between short-term hematotoxicity and increased incidence of late hematotoxicity.Material and methods: Our single-center retrospective study enrolled all patients treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT (1-4 cycles of 7.4 GBq), between November 2013 and July 2018. Patients were assigned to two groups according to their pretreatment: no targeted agents (N = 41), or targeted agents (everolimus, sunitinib or both; N = 41). The end point was subacute hematotoxicity, defined as the nadir value between the first administration until 3 months after the last administration, using the CTCAE 4.03 classification. The impact of splenectomy was also explored.Results: Eighty percent of patients had a primary gastroenteropancreatic NET. No statistically significant differences in severe subacute hematotoxicity were seen in the pretreated group vs. the naive group for hemoglobin (grade 3/4: 12% vs. 22%), neither for leucocytes (grade 3/4: 10% vs. 7%), neutrophils (grade 3/4: 5% vs. 7%), lymphocytes (grade 3/4: 49% vs. 37%) and platelets (grade 3/4: 15% vs. 15%). Furthermore, we observed significantly lower toxicity for total white blood cells, lymphocytes and platelets in the subgroup that had splenectomy (N = 12). Limitations of this study include the potential bias in lack of use of targeted agents in patients more susceptible to toxicity, and the limited number of patients and events.Conclusions: In a patient cohort with NET pretreated with everolimus and/or sunitinib, we could not demonstrate a significant effect of prior/pretreatment with everolimus and/or sunitinib on the subacute hematotoxicity of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Medaer
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chris Verslype
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eric Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Dekervel
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paul M. Clement
- General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Annouschka Laenen
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olivier Gheysens
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sander Jentjens
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe M. Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Pobłocki J, Jasińska A, Syrenicz A, Andrysiak-Mamos E, Szczuko M. The Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Digestive Tract: Diagnosis, Treatment and Nutrition. Nutrients 2020; 12:E1437. [PMID: 32429294 PMCID: PMC7284837 DOI: 10.3390/nu12051437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Nuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of rare neoplasms originating from dispersed neuroendocrine cells, mainly of the digestive and respiratory tract, showing characteristic histology and immunoprofile contributing to classification of NENs. Some NENs have the ability to produce biogenic amines and peptide hormones, which may be associated with clinical syndromes like, e.g., the carcinoid syndrome caused by unmetabolized overproduced serotonin, hypoglycemic syndrome in case of insulinoma, or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome accompanying gastrinoma. Diagnostics for these include ultrasound with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Different nuclear medicine procedures can also be used, like somatostatin analogues scintigraphy (SRS) and 68Ga-Dota-Peptide PET/CT, as well as biochemical methods to determine the level of general neuroendocrine markers, such as chromogranin A (CgA), 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (5-HIAA), synaptopfysin and cell type-specific peptide hormones, and neurotransmitters like gastrin, insulin, serotonin, and histamine. NENs influence the whole organism by modulating metabolism. The treatment options for neuroendocrine neoplasms include surgery, somatostatin analogue therapy, radionuclide therapy, chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapies, alpha-interferon therapy, and inhibitors of serotonin production. In the case of hypersensitivity to biogenic amines, a diet that limits the main sources of amines should be used. The symptoms are usually connected with histamine, tyramine and putrescine. Exogenic sources of histamine are products that take a long time to mature and ferment. Patients with a genetic insufficiency of the diamine oxidase enzyme (DAO), and those that take medicine belonging to the group of monoamine oxidases (MAO), are particularly susceptible to the negative effects of amines. Diet plays an important role in the initiation, promotion, and progression of cancers. As a result of the illness, the consumption of some nutrients can be reduced, leading to nutritional deficiencies and resulting in malnutrition. Changes in metabolism may lead to cachexia in some patients suffering from NENs. The aim of this narrative review was to advance the knowledge in this area, and to determine possibilities related to dietary support. The authors also paid attention to role of biogenic amines in the treatment of patients with NENs. We can use this information to better understand nutritional issues faced by patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs), and to help inform the development of screening tools and clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub Pobłocki
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1str, 70-252 Szczecin, Poland; (J.P.); (A.S.); (E.A.-M.)
| | - Anna Jasińska
- Department of Human Nutrition and Metabolomic, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Broniewskiego 24 str, 71-460 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Anhelli Syrenicz
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1str, 70-252 Szczecin, Poland; (J.P.); (A.S.); (E.A.-M.)
| | - Elżbieta Andrysiak-Mamos
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1str, 70-252 Szczecin, Poland; (J.P.); (A.S.); (E.A.-M.)
| | - Małgorzata Szczuko
- Department of Human Nutrition and Metabolomic, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Broniewskiego 24 str, 71-460 Szczecin, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gangi A, Manguso N, Gong J, Crystal JS, Paski SC, Hendifar AE, Tuli R. Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors with Liver-only Metastases: Benefit of Primary Tumor Resection. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4525-4532. [PMID: 32394299 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08510-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNET) remains controversial. The benefits of resecting the primary tumor are not clear and advocated only for select patients. This study aimed to determine whether resection of the primary MNET in patients with untreated liver-only metastases has an impact on survival. METHODS This retrospective study reviewed data of the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 for patients with liver-only metastatic MNETs and compared those who received resection of their primary MNET with those who did not. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) after adjustment for patient, demographic, and tumor-related factors. RESULTS The study identified 1952 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 18-90 years). The median primary tumor size was 2.4 cm (range, 0.1-20 cm). Of these patients, 1295 (66%) underwent resection of the primary tumor and 667 (34%) did not. The patients who underwent resection were younger (median age, 63 vs 65 years; p < 0.001) and had smaller primary tumors (median, 2.3 vs 3.0 cm; p < 0.001). The patients with clinical T1 or T2 tumors were significantly less likely to undergo resection than those with stage T3 or T4 tumors (58.5% vs 89.7%; p < 0.001). The median follow-up period was 43 months (range, 1-83 months). In the entire cohort, 483 deaths occurred, with a 5-year OS of 61%. The 5-year OS rate was 49% for the patients who underwent resection and 66% for those who did not (p < 0.001). When the patients were grouped according to T stage, no OS difference between resection and no resection for stages T1 (p = 0.07) and T2 (p = 0.40) was identified. However, the 5-year OS rate was significantly better for the resected patient cohort with T3 (67.5% vs 37.2%; p < 0.001) or T4 (59.8% vs 21.5%; p < 0.001) tumors. CONCLUSIONS The patients with treatment-naïve liver-only metastatic MNET had improved OS when the primary tumor was resected, particularly those with clinical stage T3 or T4 tumors. These patients may benefit from surgical resection of their primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Gangi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Nicholas Manguso
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jun Gong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Malignancies, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jessica S Crystal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shirley C Paski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew E Hendifar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Malignancies, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Richard Tuli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bongiovanni A, Liverani C, Recine F, Fausti V, Mercatali L, Vagheggini A, Spadazzi C, Miserocchi G, Cocchi C, Di Menna G, De Vita A, Severi S, Nicolini S, Ibrahim T. Phase-II Trials of Pazopanib in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasia (mNEN): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:414. [PMID: 32318336 PMCID: PMC7154093 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Several phase-II trials have been designed to evaluate tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), in particular, pazopanib in neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN), but its efficacy has not yet been demonstrated in a randomised-controlled Phase III trial. A systematic review of the published clinical trials of metastatic NEN patients could reduce the possible bias of single phase II studies. The present systematic review focuses on the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with metastatic and locally advanced NEN. Methods: A systematic search in the major databases Medline/PubMed, Cochrane and Embase and in supplementary material from important international Meetings was performed to identify publications on pazopanib for the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasia. English language was defined as a restriction. Four authors of the present review independently performed the study selection, assessed the risk of bias and extracted study data. Four published clinical trials and 2 abstracts were identified. One trial was excluded because the topic was Von-Hippel Landau disease and one abstract was eliminated because of the lack of information on meeting proceedings. Results: In all of the trials pazopanib was orally administered at a dose of 800 mg daily continuously with a 28-day cycle. The intention-to-treat population for efficacy was composed of 230 patients with a median age of 62 years. The partial response rate was 10.7% (95% confidence interval 2.6-20.5). The rate for stable disease was 79.6% (range: 61.7-92.1%) with a disease control rate (DCR) of 90.3%. Progressive disease was reported in 9.7% (range 5.2-17.6) of patients. No complete responses were observed. Median progression-free survival was 11.6 months (95% CI: 9.2-13.9). Overall survival from all the trials was 24.6 (95% CI: 18.7-40.8) months. Severe adverse events (grade III-IV) included hypertension 31%, 16% increase in AST/ALT, diarrhoea 10% and fatigue 10%. Conclusions: Pazopanib monotherapy achieved a DCR of 90.3% in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasia, with an overall response rate comparable to other TKIs and mTOR inhibitors and a safety profile similar to that of drugs of the same class.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Bongiovanni
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Chiara Liverani
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Federica Recine
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Valentina Fausti
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Laura Mercatali
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vagheggini
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Chiara Spadazzi
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Giacomo Miserocchi
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Claudia Cocchi
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Giandomenico Di Menna
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Alessandro De Vita
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Stefano Severi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Silvia Nicolini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Toni Ibrahim
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abou Jokh Casas E, Pubul Núñez V, Anido-Herranz U, del Carmen Mallón Araujo M, del Carmen Pombo Pasín M, Garrido Pumar M, Cabezas Agrícola JM, Cameselle-Teijeiro JM, Hilal A, Ruibal Morell Á. Evaluation of 177Lu-Dotatate treatment in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and prognostic factors. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:1513-1524. [PMID: 32308351 PMCID: PMC7152518 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i13.1513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 177Lu peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a recently approved therapy in Spain that has been demonstrated to be a well-tolerated therapy for positive somatostatin receptor advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
AIM To determine the impact of PRRT on quality of life, radiologic and metabolic response, overall survival, prognostic factors and toxicity.
METHODS Thirty-six patients treated with 177Lu-PRRT from 2016 to 2019 were included. The most frequent location of the primary tumor was the gastrointestinal tract (52.8%), pancreas (27.8%), and nongastropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (11.1%). The liver was the most common site of metastasis (91.7%), followed by distant nodes (50.0%), bone (27.8%), peritoneum (25.0%) and lung (11.1%). Toxicity was evaluated after the administration of each dose. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by two parameters: stable disease and disease progression in response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 criterion and prognostic factors were tested.
RESULTS From 36 patients, 55.6% were men, with a median age of 61.1 ± 11.8 years. Regarding previous treatments, 55.6% of patients underwent surgery of the primary tumor, 100% of patients were treated with long-acting somatostatin analogues, 66.7% of patients were treated with everolimus, 27.8% of patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and 27.8% of patients were treated with interferon. One patient received radioembolization, three patients received chemoembolization, six patients received chemotherapy. Hematological toxicity was registered in 14 patients (G1-G2: 55.5% and G3: 3.1%). Other events presented were intestinal suboclusion in 4 cases, cholestasis in 2 cases and carcinoid crisis in 1 case. The median follow-up time was 3 years. Currently, 24 patients completed treatment. Nineteen are alive with stable disease, two have disease progression, eight have died, and nine are still receiving treatment. The median overall survival was 12.5 mo (95% confidence interval range: 9.8–15.2), being inversely proportional to toxicity in previous treatments (P < 0.02), tumor grade (P < 0.01) and the presence of bone lesions (P = 0.009) and directly proportional with matching lesion findings between Octreoscan and computed tomography pre-PRRT (P < 0.01), , primary tumor surgery (P = 0.03) and metastasis surgery (P = 0.045). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, a high Ki67 index (P = 0.003), a mismatch in the lesion findings between Octreoscan and computed tomography pre-PRRT (P < 0.01) and a preceding toxicity in previous treatments (P < 0.05) were risk factors to overall survival.
CONCLUSION Overall survival was inversely proportional to previous toxicity, tumor grade and the presence of bone metastasis and directly proportional to matching lesion findings between Octreoscan and computed tomography pre-PRRT and primary tumor and metastasis surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estephany Abou Jokh Casas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Santiago de Compostela´s University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela 15706, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Virginia Pubul Núñez
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Santiago de Compostela´s University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela 15706, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Urbano Anido-Herranz
- Department of Oncology, Santiago de Compostela´s University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela 15706, A Coruña, Spain
| | - María del Carmen Mallón Araujo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Santiago de Compostela´s University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela 15706, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Maria del Carmen Pombo Pasín
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Santiago de Compostela´s University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela 15706, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Miguel Garrido Pumar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Santiago de Compostela´s University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela 15706, A Coruña, Spain
| | - José Manuel Cabezas Agrícola
- Department of Endocrinology, Santiago de Compostela´s University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | - Ashraf Hilal
- Department of Statistics, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15706, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Álvaro Ruibal Morell
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Santiago de Compostela´s University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela 15706, A Coruña, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yang B, Chen HY, Zhang XY, Pan Y, Lu YF, Yu RS. The prognostic value of multidetector CT features in predicting overall survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Eur J Radiol 2020; 124:108847. [PMID: 31991300 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the prognostic value of multidetector CT in predicting overall survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). METHOD Seventy-one patients pathologically diagnosed with PNETs were retrospectively included. The clinical and imaging information was evaluated by two radiologists. The difference between well-differentiated and poorly differentiated PNETs was analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were created to determine the risk factors for overall survival. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with log-rank tests were used among different subgroups of patients with PNETs. RESULTS In the whole cohort, the median survival was 36 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 84.8 %. Patients with poorly differentiated PNETs were more likely to present with symptoms, abnormal tumor markers, larger diameters, irregular shapes, ill-defined margins, invasion into nearby tissues, liver and lymph node metastases, and lower enhancement ratio than those with well-differentiated PNETs (P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, lymph node metastases (hazard ratio: 21.52, P = 0.009) and a portal enhancement ratio less than 1.02 (hazard ratio: 30.89, P = 0.024) were significant factors for overall survival. Overall survival decreased with an ill-defined margin, irregular shape, poor differentiation, grade 3 disease, nonfunctional status, abnormal tumor marker levels, invasion into nearby tissues, lymph node and liver metastases, and lower enhancement ratio (log-rank P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Poorly differentiated PNETs were more aggressiveness than well-differentiated PNETs. Lymph node metastases and a portal enhancement ratio < 1.02 were independent prognostic factors for worse overall survival outcomes in patients with PNETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Yang
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Prison Center Hospital (Zhejiang Youth Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Yan Chen
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xue-Yan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Institute of Occupational Diseases, Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yao Pan
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuan-Fei Lu
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ri-Sheng Yu
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|