Effect of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Clinical Management of Acutely Ill Infants With Suspected Genetic Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Measuring health-related quality of life in children with suspected genetic conditions: validation of the PedsQL proxy-report versions

PURPOSE

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of children with suspected genetic conditions is important for understanding the effect of interventions such as genomic sequencing (GS). The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) is a widely used generic measure of HRQoL in pediatric patients, but its psychometric properties have not yet been evaluated in children undergoing diagnostic GS.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed caregivers at the time of their child's enrollment into GS research studies as part of the Clinical Sequencing Evidence Generating Research (CSER) consortium. To evaluate structural validity of the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales and PedsQL Infant Scales parent proxy-report versions, we performed a confirmatory factor analysis of the hypothesized factor structure. To evaluate convergent validity, we examined correlations between caregivers' reports of their child's health, assessed using the EQ VAS, and PedsQL scores by child age. We conducted linear regression analyses to examine whether age moderated the association between caregiver-reported child health and PedsQL scores. We assessed reliability using Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

We analyzed data for 766 patients across all PedsQL age group versions (1-12 months through 13-18 years). Model fit failed to meet criteria for good fit, even after modification. Neither age group (categorical) nor age (continuous) significantly moderated associations between PedsQL scores and caregiver-reported child health. Cronbach's alphas indicated satisfactory internal consistency for most PedsQL scales.

CONCLUSION

The PedsQL Generic Core Scales and Infant Scales may be appropriate to measure HRQoL in pediatric patients with suspected genetic conditions across a wide age range. While we found evidence of acceptable internal consistency and preliminary convergent validity in this sample, there were some potential problems with structural validity and reliability that require further attention.

Genome Sequencing is Critical for Forecasting Outcomes following Congenital Cardiac Surgery

While genome sequencing has transformed medicine by elucidating the genetic underpinnings of both rare and common complex disorders, its utility to predict clinical outcomes remains understudied. Here, we used artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to explore the predictive value of genome sequencing in forecasting clinical outcomes following surgery for congenital heart defects (CHD). We report results for a cohort of 2,253 CHD patients from the Pediatric Cardiac Genomics Consortium with a broad range of complex heart defects, pre- and post-operative clinical variables and exome sequencing. Damaging genotypes in chromatin-modifying and cilia-related genes were associated with an elevated risk of adverse post-operative outcomes, including mortality, cardiac arrest and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The impact of damaging genotypes was further amplified in the context of specific CHD phenotypes, surgical complexity and extra-cardiac anomalies. The absence of a damaging genotype in chromatin-modifying and cilia-related genes was also informative, reducing the risk for adverse postoperative outcomes. Thus, genome sequencing enriches the ability to forecast outcomes following congenital cardiac surgery.

Comparison of different genetic testing modalities applied in paediatric patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) are monogenic in some cases, however, there are still no clear guidelines on genetic testing in the clinical practice of SRNS in children.

METHODS

Three hundred thirty-two children were diagnosed with SRNS, and all children underwent genetic testing, including gene panels and/or whole-exome/genome sequencing (WES/WGS), during treatment. We analysed the relationship between clinical manifestation and genotype, and compared different genetic testing methods' detection rates and prices.

RESULTS

In this study, 30.12% (100/332) of children diagnosed with SRNS had monogenic causes of the disease. With 33.7% (122/332) of children achieving complete remission, 88.5% (108/122) received steroids combined with tacrolimus (TAC). In detectability, WES increased by 8.69% (4/46) on gene panel testing, while WGS increased by 4.27% (5/117) on WES, and WES was approximately 1/7 of the price of WGS for every further 1% increase in pathogenicity.

CONCLUSIONS

We verified that steroids combined with TAC were the most effective option in paediatric SRNS. In detection efficiency, we found that WGS was the highest, followed by WES. The panel was the lowest, but the most cost-effective method when considering the economic-benefit ratio, and thus it should be recommended first in SRNS.

Time to diagnosis in rapid exome/genome sequencing in the clinical inpatient setting

Exome and genome sequencing are clinically available, with many laboratories offering expedited testing (e.g., "rapid" and "ultra-rapid"). With the increase in uptake of expedited testing, there is a need for the development of inpatient protocols for best practices based on real-life data. A retrospective 2-year review (October 2019-November 2021) of the utilization of rapid exome and genome sequencing for inpatient cases at a tertiary care center using a utilization management tracking database with subsequent chart review was performed. Thirty-three expedited "rapid/priority" exome/genome tests were performed clinically. The average total turnaround time (TAT) was 17.88 days (5-43 days) with an average TAT of 13.97 days (3-41 days) for the performing laboratory. There were 5 positive diagnostic results (15.2%), 3 likely positive diagnostic results (9%), 2 noncontributory results (6%), and 26 nondiagnostic results (69.7%). Real-life data suggest that there is an approximately 3.91-day lag in getting samples to the performing laboratory. Although laboratories may advertise their expected TAT, a number of factors can potentially impact the actual time from test order placement to communication of the results for clinical use. Understanding the points of delay will enable the development of internal protocols and policies to improve time to diagnosis.

Universal Exome Sequencing in Critically Ill Adults: A Diagnostic Yield of 25% and Race-Based Disparities in Access to Genetic Testing

Numerous studies have underscored the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of exome or genome sequencing in critically ill pediatric populations. However, an equivalent investigation in critically ill adults remains conspicuously absent. We retrospectively analyzed whole exome sequencing (WES) data available through the PennMedicine Biobank (PMBB) from all 365 young adult patients, aged 18-40 years, with intensive care unit (ICU) admissions at the University of Pennsylvania Health System who met inclusion criteria for our study. For each participant, two Medical Genetics and Internal Medicine-trained clinicians reviewed WES reports and patient charts for variant classification, result interpretation, and identification of genetic diagnoses related to their critical illness. Of the 365 individuals in our study, 90 (24.7%) were found to have clearly diagnostic results on WES; an additional 40 (11.0%) had a suspicious variant of uncertain significance (VUS) identified; and an additional 16 (4.4%) had a medically actionable incidental finding. The diagnostic rate of exome sequencing did not decrease with increasing patient age. Affected genes were primarily involved in cardiac function (18.8%), vascular health (16.7%), cancer (16.7%), and pulmonary disease (11.5%). Only half of all diagnostic findings were known and documented in the patient chart at the time of ICU admission. Significant disparities emerged in subgroup analysis by EHR-reported race, with genetic diagnoses known/documented for 63.5% of White patients at the time of ICU admission but only for 28.6% of Black or Hispanic patients. There was a trend towards patients with undocumented genetic diagnoses having a 66% increased mortality rate, making these race-based disparities in genetic diagnosis even more concerning. Altogether, universal exome sequencing in ICU-admitted adult patients was found to yield a new definitive diagnosis in 11.2% of patients. Of these diagnoses, 76.6% conferred specific care-altering medical management recommendations. Our study suggests that the diagnostic utility of exome sequencing in critically ill young adults is similar to that observed in neonatal and pediatric populations and is age-independent. The high diagnostic rate and striking race-based disparities we find in genetic diagnoses argue for broad and universal approaches to genetic testing for critically ill adults. The widespread implementation of comprehensive genetic sequencing in the adult population promises to enhance medical care for all individuals and holds the potential to rectify disparities in genetic testing referrals, ultimately promoting more equitable healthcare delivery.

Exome and genome sequencing in a heterogeneous population of patients with rare disease: Identifying predictors of a diagnosis

PURPOSE

Exome (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) are increasingly being utilized for individuals with rare and undiagnosed diseases; however, guidelines on their use remain limited. This study aimed to identify factors associated with diagnosis by ES and/or GS in a heterogeneous population of patients with rare and undiagnosed diseases.

METHODS

In this case control study, we reviewed data from 400 diagnosed and 400 undiagnosed randomly selected participants in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network, all of whom had undergone ES and/or GS. We analyzed factors associated with receiving a diagnosis by ES and/or GS.

RESULTS

Factors associated with a decreased odds of being diagnosed included adult symptom onset, singleton sequencing, and having undergone ES and/or GS before acceptance to the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (48%, 51%, and 32% lower odds, respectively). Factors that increased the odds of being diagnosed by ES and/or GS included having primarily neurological symptoms and having undergone prior chromosomal microarray testing (44% and 59% higher odds, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We identified several factors that were associated with receiving a diagnosis by ES and/or GS. This will ideally inform the utilization of ES and/or GS and help manage expectations of individuals and families undergoing these tests.

A Practical Guide to Whole Genome Sequencing in the NICU

The neonatal period is a peak time for the presentation of genetic disorders that can be diagnosed using whole genome sequencing (WGS). While any one genetic disorder is individually rare, they collectively contribute to significant morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs. As the cost of WGS continues to decline and becomes increasingly available, the ordering of rapid WGS for NICU patients with signs or symptoms of an underlying genetic condition is now feasible. However, many neonatal clinicians are not comfortable with the testing, and unfortunately, there is a dearth of geneticists to facilitate testing for every patient that needs it. Here, we will review the science behind WGS, diagnostic capabilities, limitations of testing, time to consider testing, test initiation, interpretation of results, developing a plan of care that incorporates genomic information, and returning WGS results to families.

Rapid genomic sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis and therapy in intensive care units: a review

Single locus (Mendelian) diseases are a leading cause of childhood hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality, and healthcare cost. Rapid genome sequencing (RGS), ultra-rapid genome sequencing (URGS), and rapid exome sequencing (RES) are diagnostic tests for genetic diseases for ICU patients. In 44 studies of children in ICUs with diseases of unknown etiology, 37% received a genetic diagnosis, 26% had consequent changes in management, and net healthcare costs were reduced by $14,265 per child tested by URGS, RGS, or RES. URGS outperformed RGS and RES with faster time to diagnosis, and higher rate of diagnosis and clinical utility. Diagnostic and clinical outcomes will improve as methods evolve, costs decrease, and testing is implemented within precision medicine delivery systems attuned to ICU needs. URGS, RGS, and RES are currently performed in <5% of the ~200,000 children likely to benefit annually due to lack of payor coverage, inadequate reimbursement, hospital policies, hospitalist unfamiliarity, under-recognition of possible genetic diseases, and current formatting as tests rather than as a rapid precision medicine delivery system. The gap between actual and optimal outcomes in children in ICUs is currently increasing since expanded use of URGS, RGS, and RES lags growth in those likely to benefit through new therapies. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that URGS, RGS, or RES should be considered in all children with diseases of uncertain etiology at ICU admission. Minimally, diagnostic URGS, RGS, or RES should be ordered early during admissions of critically ill infants and children with suspected genetic diseases.

Evidence review and considerations for use of first line genome sequencing to diagnose rare genetic disorders

Early use of genome sequencing (GS) in the diagnostic odyssey can reduce suffering and improve care, but questions remain about which patient populations are most amenable to GS as a first-line diagnostic test. To address this, the Medical Genome Initiative conducted a literature review to identify appropriate clinical indications for GS. Studies published from January 2011 to August 2022 that reported on the diagnostic yield (DY) or clinical utility of GS were included. An exploratory meta-analysis using a random effects model evaluated DY based on cohort size and diagnosed cases per cohort. Seventy-one studies met inclusion criteria, comprising over 13,000 patients who received GS in one of the following settings: hospitalized pediatric patients, pediatric outpatients, adult outpatients, or mixed. GS was the first-line test in 38% (27/71). The unweighted mean DY of first-line GS was 45% (12-73%), 33% (6-86%) in cohorts with prior genetic testing, and 33% (9-60%) in exome-negative cohorts. Clinical utility was reported in 81% of first-line GS studies in hospitalized pediatric patients. Changes in management varied by cohort and underlying molecular diagnosis (24-100%). To develop evidence-informed points to consider, the quality of all 71 studies was assessed using modified American College of Radiology (ACR) criteria, with five core points to consider developed, including recommendations for use of GS in the N/PICU, in lieu of sequential testing and when disorders with substantial allelic heterogeneity are suspected. Future large and controlled studies in the pediatric and adult populations may support further refinement of these recommendations.

Multi-center implementation of rapid whole genome sequencing provides additional evidence of its utility in the pediatric inpatient setting

Objective

Multi-center implementation of rapid whole genome sequencing with assessment of the clinical utility of rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS), including positive, negative and uncertain results, in admitted infants with a suspected genetic disease.

Study design

rWGS tests were ordered at eight hospitals between November 2017 and April 2020. Investigators completed a survey of demographic data, Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms, test results and impacts of results on clinical care.

Results

A total of 188 patients, on general hospital floors and intensive care unit (ICU) settings, underwent rWGS testing. Racial and ethnic characteristics of the tested infants were broadly representative of births in the country at large. 35% of infants received a diagnostic result in a median of 6 days. The most common HPO terms for tested infants indicated an abnormality of the nervous system, followed by the cardiovascular system, the digestive system, the respiratory system and the head and neck. Providers indicated a major change in clinical management because of rWGS for 32% of infants tested overall and 70% of those with a diagnostic result. Also, 7% of infants with a negative rWGS result and 23% with a variant of unknown significance (VUS) had a major change in management due to testing.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that the implementation of rWGS is feasible across diverse institutions, and provides additional evidence to support the clinical utility of rWGS in a demographically representative sample of admitted infants and includes assessment of the clinical impact of uncertain rWGS results in addition to both positive and negative results.

Implementation of rapid genomic sequencing in safety-net neonatal intensive care units: protocol for the VIrtual GenOme CenteR (VIGOR) proof-of-concept study

INTRODUCTION

Rapid genomic sequencing (rGS) in critically ill infants with suspected genetic disorders has high diagnostic and clinical utility. However, rGS has primarily been available at large referral centres with the resources and expertise to offer state-of-the-art genomic care. Critically ill infants from racial and ethnic minority and/or low-income populations disproportionately receive care in safety-net and/or community settings lacking access to state-of-the-art genomic care, contributing to unacceptable health equity gaps. VIrtual GenOme CenteR is a 'proof-of-concept' implementation science study of an innovative delivery model for genomic care in safety-net neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We developed a virtual genome centre at a referral centre to remotely support safety-net NICU sites predominantly serving racial and ethnic minority and/or low-income populations and have limited to no access to rGS. Neonatal providers at each site receive basic education about genomic medicine from the study team and identify eligible infants. The study team enrols eligible infants (goal n of 250) and their parents and follows families for 12 months. Enrolled infants receive rGS, the study team creates clinical interpretive reports to guide neonatal providers on interpreting results, and neonatal providers return results to families. Data is collected via (1) medical record abstraction, (2) surveys, interviews and focus groups with neonatal providers and (3) surveys and interviews with families. We aim to examine comprehensive implementation outcomes based on the Proctor Implementation Framework using a mixed methods approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is approved by the institutional review board of Boston Children's Hospital (IRB-P00040496) and participating sites. Participating families are required to provide electronic written informed consent and neonatal provider consent is implied through the completion of surveys. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and data will be made accessible per National Institutes of Health (NIH) policies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05205356/clinicaltrials.gov.

National Rapid Genome Sequencing in Neonatal Intensive Care

Importance

National implementation of rapid trio genome sequencing (rtGS) in a clinical acute setting is essential to ensure advanced and equitable care for ill neonates.

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility, diagnostic efficacy, and clinical utility of rtGS in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) throughout Israel.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective, public health care-based, multicenter cohort study was conducted from October 2021 to December 2022 with the Community Genetics Department of the Israeli Ministry of Health and all Israeli medical genetics institutes (n = 18) and NICUs (n = 25). Critically ill neonates suspected of having a genetic etiology were offered rtGS. All sequencing, analysis, and interpretation of data were performed in a central genomics center at Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Rapid results were expected within 10 days. A secondary analysis report, issued within 60 days, focused mainly on cases with negative rapid results and actionable secondary findings. Pathogenic, likely pathogenic, and highly suspected variants of unknown significance (VUS) were reported.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Diagnostic rate, including highly suspected disease-causing VUS, and turnaround time for rapid results. Clinical utility was assessed via questionnaires circulated to treating neonatologists.

Results

A total of 130 neonates across Israel (70 [54%] male; 60 [46%] female) met inclusion criteria and were recruited. Mean (SD) age at enrollment was 12 (13) days. Mean (SD) turnaround time for rapid report was 7 (3) days. Diagnostic efficacy was 50% (65 of 130) for disease-causing variants, 11% (14 of 130) for VUS suspected to be causative, and 1 novel gene candidate (1%). Disease-causing variants included 12 chromosomal and 52 monogenic disorders as well as 1 neonate with uniparental disomy. Overall, the response rate for clinical utility questionnaires was 82% (107 of 130). Among respondents, genomic testing led to a change in medical management for 24 neonates (22%). Results led to immediate precision medicine for 6 of 65 diagnosed infants (9%), an additional 2 (3%) received palliative care, and 2 (3%) were transferred to nursing homes.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this national cohort study, rtGS in critically ill neonates was feasible and diagnostically beneficial in a public health care setting. This study is a prerequisite for implementation of rtGS for ill neonates into routine care and may aid in design of similar studies in other public health care systems.

Clinical utility of early rapid genome sequencing in the evaluation of patients with differences of sex development

Establishing an early and accurate genetic diagnosis among patients with differences of sex development (DSD) is crucial in guiding the complex medical and psychosocial care they require. Genetic testing routinely utilized in clinical practice for this population is predicated upon physical exam findings and biochemical and endocrine profiling. This approach, however, is inefficient and unstandardized. Many patients with DSD, particularly those with 46,XY DSD, never receive a molecular genetic diagnosis. Rapid genome sequencing (rGS) is gaining momentum as a first-tier diagnostic instrument in the evaluation of patients with DSD given its ability to provide greater diagnostic yield and timely results. We present the case of a patient with nonbinary genitalia and systemic findings for whom rGS identified a novel variant of the WT1 gene and resulted in a molecular diagnosis within two weeks of life. This timeframe of diagnosis for syndromic DSD is largely unprecedented at our institution. Rapid GS expedited mobilization of a multidisciplinary medical team; enabled early understanding of clinical trajectory; informed planning of medical and surgical interventions; and guided individualized psychosocial support provided to the family. This case highlights the potential of early rGS in transforming the evaluation and care of patients with DSD.

Regulatory features aid interpretation of 3'UTR variants

Our ability to determine the clinical impact of variants in 3' untranslated regions (UTRs) of genes remains poor. We provide a thorough analysis of 3' UTR variants from several datasets. Variants in putative regulatory elements, including RNA-binding protein motifs, eCLIP peaks, and microRNA sites, are up to 16 times more likely than variants not in these elements to have gene expression and phenotype associations. Variants in regulatory motifs result in allele-specific protein binding in cell lines and allele-specific gene expression differences in population studies. In addition, variants in shared regions of alternatively polyadenylated isoforms and those proximal to polyA sites are more likely to affect gene expression and phenotype. Finally, pathogenic 3' UTR variants in ClinVar are up to 20 times more likely than benign variants to fall in a regulatory site. We incorporated these findings into RegVar, a software tool that interprets regulatory elements and annotations for any 3' UTR variant and predicts whether the variant is likely to affect gene expression or phenotype. This tool will help prioritize variants for experimental studies and identify pathogenic variants in individuals.

Lessons learned from rapid exome sequencing for 575 critically ill patients across the broad spectrum of rare disease

Introduction: Rapid exome sequencing (rES) has become the first-choice genetic test for critically ill patients, mostly neonates, young infants, or fetuses in prenatal care, in time-sensitive situations and when it is expected that the genetic test result may guide clinical decision making. The implementation of rES has revolutionized medicine by enabling timely identification of genetic causes for various rare diseases. The utilization of rES has increasingly been recognized as an essential diagnostic tool for the identification of complex and undiagnosed genetic disorders. Methods: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of our experiences with rES performed on 575 critically ill patients from various age groups (prenatal to adulthood), over a four-year period (2016-2019). These patients presented with a wide spectrum of rare diseases, including but not limited to neurological disorders, severe combined immune deficiency, and cancer. Results: During the study period, there was a significant increase in rES referrals, with a rise from a total of two referrals in Q1-2016 to 10 referrals per week in Q4-2019. The median turnaround time (TAT) decreased from 17 to 11 days in the period 2016-2019, with an overall median TAT of 11 days (IQR 8-15 days). The overall diagnostic yield for this cohort was 30.4%, and did not significantly differ between the different age groups (e.g. adults 22.2% vs children 31.0%; p-value 0.35). However, variability in yield was observed between clinical entities: craniofacial anomalies yielded 58.3%, while for three clinical entities (severe combined immune deficiency, aneurysm, and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism) no diagnoses were obtained. Discussion: Importantly, whereas clinical significance is often only attributed to a conclusive diagnosis, we also observed impact on clinical decision-making for individuals in whom no genetic diagnosis was established. Hence, our experience shows that rES has an important role for patients of all ages and across the broad spectrum of rare diseases to impact clinical outcomes.

Genomic medicine in neonatal care: progress and challenges

During the neonatal period, many genetic disorders present and contribute to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Genomic medicine-the use of genomic information in clinical care- has the potential to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in the neonatal period and improve outcomes for this population. Diagnostic genomic testing for symptomatic newborns, especially rapid testing, has been shown to be feasible and have diagnostic and clinical utility, particularly in the short-term. Ongoing studies are assessing the feasibility and utility, including personal utility, of implementation in diverse populations. Genomic screening for asymptomatic newborns has also been studied, and the acceptability and feasibility of such an approach remains an active area of investigation. Emerging precision therapies, with examples even at the "n-of-1" level, highlight the promise of precision diagnostics to lead to early intervention and improve outcomes. To sustainably implement genomic medicine in neonatal care in an ethical, effective, and equitable manner, we need to ensure access to genetics and genomics knowledge, access to genomic tests, which is currently limited by payors, feasible processes for ordering these tests, and access to follow up in the clinical and research realms. Future studies will provide further insight into enablers and barriers to optimize implementation strategies.

Genetic Diagnosis of Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders Using Whole Genome Sequencing

BACKGROUND

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) have diverse phenotypes. Their genetic diagnoses are often challenged by difficulties of targeting causative genes due to heterogeneous genetic etiologies. The objective of this study was to perform genetic diagnosis of children with NDDs using whole genome sequencing.

METHODS

This study included 78 pediatric patients with NDDs and their 152 family members for whole genome sequencing (WGS). All cases except one were families with at least two members. Seventy-five patients had previously undergone other genetic tests besides WGS. Detected variants were classified according to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

RESULTS

Among 78 probands, 26 patients were genetically diagnosed with NDDs through WGS, showing a diagnostic rate of 33.3%. Of them, 22 cases had de novo variants (DNVs) identified through trio analysis. Of these DNVs, half were novel variants. Three structural variants, including a multiexon deletion, a contiguous gene deletion involving 13 Mb, and a retrotransposon insertion, were revealed by WGS. All cases except one had defects in different genes, consistent with the phenotypically diverse nature of NDDs. In addition, three patients were inconclusive, two of them had one likely pathogenic variant in a gene associated with autosomal recessive disease and the other one had no clinical phenotypes associated with the detected DNV.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience demonstrates the advantage of WGS in the diagnosis of NDDs, including detection of copy number variations and also the advantage of trio sequencing for interpretation of DNVs.

Case report: Two unexpected cases of DGUOK-related mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome presenting with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia

Timely diagnosis of persistent neonatal hypoglycemia is critical to prevent neurological sequelae, but diagnosis is complicated by the heterogenicity of the causes. We discuss two cases at separate institutions in which clinical management was fundamentally altered by the results of molecular genetic testing. In both patients, critical samples demonstrated hypoketotic hypoglycemia and a partial glycemic response to glucagon stimulation, thereby suggesting hyperinsulinism (HI). However, due to rapid genetic testing, both patients were found to have deoxyguanosine kinase (DGUOK)-related mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, an unexpected diagnosis. Patients with this disease typically present with either hepatocerebral disease in the neonatal period or isolated hepatic failure in infancy. The characteristic features involved in the hepatocerebral form of the disease include lactic acidosis, hypoglycemia, cholestasis, progressive liver failure, and increasing neurologic dysfunction. Those with isolated liver involvement experience hepatomegaly, cholestasis, and liver failure. Although liver transplantation is considered, research has demonstrated that for patients with DGUOK-related mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome and neurologic symptoms, early demise occurs. Our report advocates for the prompt initiation of genetic testing in patients presenting with persistent neonatal hypoglycemia and for the incorporation of mitochondrial DNA depletion syndromes in the differential diagnosis of HI.

Parents' Views on Autopsy, Organ Donation, and Research Donation After Neonatal Death

Importance

Parents who experience neonatal loss have the option to participate in autopsy, organ donation, and research donation. However, clinicians are uncomfortable discussing autopsy and may not be aware of research and organ donation opportunities.

Objective

To capture the perspectives of parents who had experienced neonatal loss about autopsy, organ donation, and research donation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This qualitative study used virtual focus groups with parents who attended a local bereavement support group in the US. Participants were recruited from Helping After Neonatal Death, a support group with a local chapter. Participants self-selected from an email request if they met the following criteria: aged 18 years or older, English speaking, at least 6 months elapsed since neonatal death, and access to a video conference device with internet. Focus groups took place between April and September 2021. The recorded sessions were analyzed using a grounded theory-informed approach by the research team that included parents with experience of neonatal loss. Data were analyzed from December 2021 through December 2022.

Results

A total of 14 mothers engaged in the focus group; 9 (75%) were aged 30 to 39 years, and 8 (66%) were White. The mothers were overall well educated. The first main theme grew from the lived experience of neonatal loss, specifically the importance of offering all parents the option to donate, rather than prejudging who would or would not be interested. Parents of neonates who die have few opportunities to parent that child and make loving decisions for them. Participants emphasized that the conversation about autopsy, organ donation, and research donation, albeit difficult, can offer a meaningful parenting experience. A second main theme that emerged related to how organ or tissue donation could provide additional meaning to a child's life. These choices contributed to building a legacy to honor their child's memory, which also helped with grief and coping with their loss. A third theme included recommendations to clinicians and health systems for improving communication, including written information for parents and communication training for health care professionals.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this qualitative study, parents who experienced neonatal loss endorsed the importance of offering parents the choice of autopsy, organ donation, or research donation with skillful and empathetic communication. They provided practical recommendations to improve communication and empower families.

Newborn genetic screening is highly effective for high-risk infants: A single-centre study in China

Background

Newborn genetic screening (NBGS) is promising for early detection of genetic diseases in newborns. However, little is known about its clinical effectiveness in special groups like high-risk infants. To address this gap, we aimed to investigate the impact of NBGS on high-risk infants.

Methods

We screened 10 334 healthy newborns from the general maternity unit and 886 high-risk infants from the neonatal ward using both traditional newborn screening (tNBS) and NBGS, and collected clinical data from electronic medical records.

Results

We found that high-risk infants had a higher proportion of eutocia (P < 0.01) and prematurity (P < 0.01). For high-risk infants vs healthy newborns screened by tNBS, the primary screening positive rate was 3.84% vs 1.31%, the false positive rate (FPR) was 3.62% vs 1.18% (P < 0.001), and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 5.88% vs 8.27%. For NBGS vs tNBS in high-risk infants, the primary screening positive rate was 0.54% vs 3.68%, the FPR was 0.22% vs 3.47%, and the PPV was 60.00% vs 5.88%.

Conclusions

We found that combined newborn screening can effectively reduce the FPR caused by the high-risk symptoms and improve the PPV in high-risk infants, sufficient for more accurately showing the true status of the disease.

PDIVAS: Pathogenicity predictor for Deep-Intronic Variants causing Aberrant Splicing

BACKGROUND

Deep-intronic variants that alter RNA splicing were ineffectively evaluated in the search for the cause of genetic diseases. Determination of such pathogenic variants from a vast number of deep-intronic variants (approximately 1,500,000 variants per individual) represents a technical challenge to researchers. Thus, we developed a Pathogenicity predictor for Deep-Intronic Variants causing Aberrant Splicing (PDIVAS) to easily detect pathogenic deep-intronic variants.

RESULTS

PDIVAS was trained on an ensemble machine-learning algorithm to classify pathogenic and benign variants in a curated dataset. The dataset consists of manually curated pathogenic splice-altering variants (SAVs) and commonly observed benign variants within deep introns. Splicing features and a splicing constraint metric were used to maximize the predictive sensitivity and specificity, respectively. PDIVAS showed an average precision of 0.92 and a maximum MCC of 0.88 in classifying these variants, which were the best of the previous predictors. When PDIVAS was applied to genome sequencing analysis on a threshold with 95% sensitivity for reported pathogenic SAVs, an average of 27 pathogenic candidates were extracted per individual. Furthermore, the causative variants in simulated patient genomes were more efficiently prioritized than the previous predictors.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating PDIVAS into variant interpretation pipelines will enable efficient detection of disease-causing deep-intronic SAVs and contribute to improving the diagnostic yield. PDIVAS is publicly available at https://github.com/shiro-kur/PDIVAS .

Optimal Protocols and Management of Clinical and Genomic Data Collection to Assist in the Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Congenital Anomalies

Standardized protocols have been designed and developed specifically for clinical information collection and obtaining trio genomic information from infants affected with congenital anomalies (CA) and their parents, as well as securing human biological resources. The protocols include clinical and genomic information collection on multiple CA that were difficult to diagnose using pre-existing screening methods. We obtained human-derived resources and genomic information from 138 cases, including 45 families of infants with CA and their parent trios. For the clinical information collection protocol, criteria for target patient selection and a consent system for collecting and utilizing research resources are crucial. Whole genome sequencing data were generated for all participants, and standardized protocols were developed for resource collection and manufacturing. We recorded the phenotype information according to the Human Phenotype Ontology term, and epidemiological information was collected through an environmental factor questionnaire. Updating and recording of clinical symptoms and genetic information that have been newly added or changed over time are significant. The protocols enabled long-term tracking by including the growth and development status that reflect the important characteristics of newborns. Using these clinical and genetic information collection protocols for CA, an essential platform for early genetic diagnosis and diagnostic research can be established, and new genetic diagnostic guidelines can be presented in the near future.

Provision and availability of genomic medicine services in Level IV neonatal intensive care units

PURPOSE

To describe variation in genomic medicine services across level IV neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the United States and Canada.

METHODS

We developed and distributed a novel survey to the 43 level IV NICUs belonging to the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium, requesting a single response per site from a clinician with knowledge of the provision of genomic medicine services.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 74% (32/43). Although chromosomal microarray and exome or genome sequencing (ES or GS) were universally available, access was restricted for 22% (7/32) and 81% (26/32) of centers, respectively. The most common restriction on ES or GS was requiring approval by a specialist (41%, 13/32). Rapid ES/GS was available in 69% of NICUs (22/32). Availability of same-day genetics consultative services was limited (41%, 13/32 sites), and pre- and post-test counseling practices varied widely.

CONCLUSION

We observed large inter-center variation in genomic medicine services across level IV NICUs: most notably, access to rapid, comprehensive genetic testing in time frames relevant to critical care decision making was limited at many level IV Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium NICUs despite a significant burden of genetic disease. Further efforts are needed to improve access to neonatal genomic medicine services.

Precision medicine in rare diseases: What is next?

Molecular diagnostics is a cornerstone of modern precision medicine, broadly understood as tailoring an individual's treatment, follow-up, and care based on molecular data. In rare diseases (RDs), molecular diagnoses reveal valuable information about the cause of symptoms, disease progression, familial risk, and in certain cases, unlock access to targeted therapies. Due to decreasing DNA sequencing costs, genome sequencing (GS) is emerging as the primary method for precision diagnostics in RDs. Several ongoing European initiatives for precision medicine have chosen GS as their method of choice. Recent research supports the role for GS as first-line genetic investigation in individuals with suspected RD, due to its improved diagnostic yield compared to other methods. Moreover, GS can detect a broad range of genetic aberrations including those in noncoding regions, producing comprehensive data that can be periodically reanalyzed for years to come when further evidence emerges. Indeed, targeted drug development and repurposing of medicines can be accelerated as more individuals with RDs receive a molecular diagnosis. Multidisciplinary teams in which clinical specialists collaborate with geneticists, genomics education of professionals and the public, and dialogue with patient advocacy groups are essential elements for the integration of precision medicine into clinical practice worldwide. It is also paramount that large research projects share genetic data and leverage novel technologies to fully diagnose individuals with RDs. In conclusion, GS increases diagnostic yields and is a crucial step toward precision medicine for RDs. Its clinical implementation will enable better patient management, unlock targeted therapies, and guide the development of innovative treatments.

Panels, Exomes, Genomes, and More-Finding the Best Path Through the Diagnostic Odyssey

Selecting the ideal test to evaluate an individual with a suspected genetic disorder can be challenging. While several clinical testing options are available, no single test yet captures all potentially causative genetic variants. Thus, clinicians may order testing in a stepwise fashion, and what to order after non-diagnostic testing can be challenging to determine. Here, we provide an overview of commonly used clinical genetic tests, guidance on when they are best used, and what they may miss. We conclude with a discussion of how new technologies might be used to identify challenging variants and simplify clinical testing in the future.

Whole-Genome Sequencing Can Identify Clinically Relevant Variants from a Single Sub-Punch of a Dried Blood Spot Specimen

The collection of dried blood spots (DBS) facilitates newborn screening for a variety of rare, but very serious conditions in healthcare systems around the world. Sub-punches of varying sizes (1.5-6 mm) can be taken from DBS specimens to use as inputs for a range of biochemical assays. Advances in DNA sequencing workflows allow whole-genome sequencing (WGS) libraries to be generated directly from inputs such as peripheral blood, saliva, and DBS. We compared WGS metrics obtained from libraries generated directly from DBS to those generated from DNA extracted from peripheral blood, the standard input for this type of assay. We explored the flexibility of DBS as an input for WGS by altering the punch number and size as inputs to the assay. We showed that WGS libraries can be successfully generated from a variety of DBS inputs, including a single 3 mm or 6 mm diameter punch, with equivalent data quality observed across a number of key metrics of importance in the detection of gene variants. We observed no difference in the performance of DBS and peripheral-blood-extracted DNA in the detection of likely pathogenic gene variants in samples taken from individuals with cystic fibrosis or phenylketonuria. WGS can be performed directly from DBS and is a powerful method for the rapid discovery of clinically relevant, disease-causing gene variants.

Characteristics, Genetic Testing, and Diagnoses of Infants with Neonatal Encephalopathy Not Due to Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the presentation and evaluation of infants with neonatal encephalopathy (NE) not due to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (non-HIE NE) and to describe the genetic abnormalities identified.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of 193 non-HIE NE neonates admitted to a level IV NICU from 2015 through 2019. For changes in testing over time, Cochrane-Armitage test for trend was used with a Bonferroni-corrected P-value, and comparison between groups was performed using Fisher exact test.

RESULT

The most common symptom of non-HIE NE was abnormal tone in 47% (90/193). Ten percent (19/193) died prior to discharge, and 48% of survivors (83/174) required medical equipment at discharge. Forty percent (77/193) underwent genetic testing as an inpatient. Of 52 chromosomal studies, 54 targeted tests, and 16 exome sequences, 10%, 41%, and 69% were diagnostic, respectively, with no difference in diagnostic rates between infants with and without an associated congenital anomaly and/or dysmorphic feature. Twenty-eight genetic diagnoses were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Neonates with non-HIE NE have high rates of morbidity and mortality and may benefit from early genetic testing, even in the absence of other exam findings. This study broadens our knowledge of genetic conditions underlying non-HIE NE, which may enable families and care teams to anticipate the needs of the individual, allow early initiation of targeted therapies, and facilitate decisions surrounding goals of care.

Exploring collaboration models between geneticists and intensivists for implementing rapid genome sequencing in critical care settings

The availability of rapid genome sequencing (rGS) for children in a critical-care setting is increasing. This study explored the perspectives of geneticists and intensivists on optimal collaboration and division of roles when implementing rGS in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units (ICUs). We conducted an explanatory mixed methods study involving a survey embedded within an interview with 13 genetics and intensive care providers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded. Geneticists endorsed higher confidence in performing a physical exam and interpreting/communicating positive results. Intensivists endorsed highest confidence in determining whether genetic testing was appropriate, communicating negative results, and consenting. Major qualitative themes that emerged were: (1) concerns with both "genetics-led" and "intensivist-led" models with workflows and sustainability (2) shift the role of determining rGS eligibility to ICU medical professionals, (3) continued role of geneticists to assess phenotype, and (4) include genetic counselors (GCs) and neonatal nurse practitioners to enhance workflow and care. All geneticists supported shifting decisions regarding eligibility for rGS to the ICU team to minimize time cost for the genetics workforce. Exploring models of geneticist-led phenotyping, intensivist-led phenotyping for some indications, and/or inclusion of a dedicated inpatient GC may help offset the time burden of consenting and other tasks associated with rGS.

Meta-analysis of the diagnostic and clinical utility of exome and genome sequencing in pediatric and adult patients with rare diseases across diverse populations

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aims to compare the diagnostic and clinical utility of exome sequencing (ES) vs genome sequencing (GS) in pediatric and adult patients with rare diseases across diverse populations.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted to identify studies from 2011 to 2021.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-one studies across 31 countries/regions were eligible, featuring 50,417 probands of diverse populations. Diagnostic rates of ES (0.38, 95% CI 0.36-0.40) and GS (0.34, 95% CI 0.30-0.38) were similar (P = .1). Within-cohort comparison illustrated 1.2-times odds of diagnosis by GS over ES (95% CI 0.79-1.83, P = .38). GS studies discovered a higher range of novel genes than ES studies; yet, the rate of variant of unknown significance did not differ (P = .78). Among high-quality studies, clinical utility of GS (0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.90) was higher than that of ES (0.44, 95% CI 0.30-0.58) (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provides an important update to demonstrate the similar diagnostic rates between ES and GS and the higher clinical utility of GS over ES. With the newly published recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in noncoding regions of the genome and the trend of decreasing variant of unknown significance and GS cost, it is expected that GS will be more widely used in clinical settings.

Beyond the exome: What's next in diagnostic testing for Mendelian conditions

Despite advances in clinical genetic testing, including the introduction of exome sequencing (ES), more than 50% of individuals with a suspected Mendelian condition lack a precise molecular diagnosis. Clinical evaluation is increasingly undertaken by specialists outside of clinical genetics, often occurring in a tiered fashion and typically ending after ES. The current diagnostic rate reflects multiple factors, including technical limitations, incomplete understanding of variant pathogenicity, missing genotype-phenotype associations, complex gene-environment interactions, and reporting differences between clinical labs. Maintaining a clear understanding of the rapidly evolving landscape of diagnostic tests beyond ES, and their limitations, presents a challenge for non-genetics professionals. Newer tests, such as short-read genome or RNA sequencing, can be challenging to order, and emerging technologies, such as optical genome mapping and long-read DNA sequencing, are not available clinically. Furthermore, there is no clear guidance on the next best steps after inconclusive evaluation. Here, we review why a clinical genetic evaluation may be negative, discuss questions to be asked in this setting, and provide a framework for further investigation, including the advantages and disadvantages of new approaches that are nascent in the clinical sphere. We present a guide for the next best steps after inconclusive molecular testing based upon phenotype and prior evaluation, including when to consider referral to research consortia focused on elucidating the underlying cause of rare unsolved genetic disorders.

The Potential Impact of Preemptive Pharmacogenetic Genotyping in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of drugs with pharmacogenomic (PGx) guidelines from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium in early childhood.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational study of patients admitted to the neonatal intensive care (NICU) between 2005 and 2018 with at least 1 subsequent hospitalization at or after 5 years of age was performed to determine PGx drug exposure. Data regarding hospitalizations, drug exposures, gestational age, birth weight, and congenital anomalies and/or a primary genetic diagnosis were collected. Incidence of PGx drug and drug class exposures was determined and patient specific factors predictive of exposure were investigated.

RESULTS

During the study, 19 195 patients received NICU care and 4196 (22%) met study inclusion; 67% received 1-2, 28% 3-4, and 5% 5 or more PGx-drugs in early childhood. Preterm gestation, low birth weight (<2500 g), and the presence of any congenital anomalies and/or a primary genetic diagnosis were statistically significant predictors of Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium drug exposures (P < .01, P < .01, P < .01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Preemptive PGx testing in patients in the NICU could have a significant impact on medical management during the NICU stay and throughout early childhood.

Parent-Reported Clinical Utility of Pediatric Genomic Sequencing

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Genomic sequencing (GS) is increasingly used for diagnostic evaluation, yet follow-up care is not well understood. We assessed clinicians' recommendations after GS, parent-reported follow-up, and actions parents initiated in response to learning their child's GS results.

METHODS

We surveyed parents of children who received GS through the Clinical Sequencing Evidence Generating Research consortium ∼5 to 7 months after return of results. We compared the proportion of parents who reported discussing their child's result with a clinician, clinicians' recommendations, and parents' follow-up actions by GS result type using χ2 tests.

RESULTS

A total of 1188 respondents completed survey measures on recommended medical actions (n = 1187) and/or parent-initiated actions (n = 913). Most parents who completed recommended medical actions questions (n = 833, 70.3%) reported having discussed their child's GS results with clinicians. Clinicians made recommendations to change current care for patients with positive GS results (n = 79, 39.1%) more frequently than for those with inconclusive (n = 31, 12.4%) or negative results (n = 44, 11.9%; P < .001). Many parents discussed (n = 152 completed, n = 135 planned) implications of GS results for future pregnancies with a clinician. Aside from clinical recommendations, 13.0% (n = 119) of parents initiated changes to their child's health or lifestyle.

CONCLUSIONS

In diverse pediatric clinical contexts, GS results can lead to recommendations for follow-up care, but they likely do not prompt large increases in the quantity of care received.

Neonatal Thrombocytopenia as a Presenting Finding in de novo Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency

Thrombocytopenia is a common laboratory abnormality encountered in critically ill neonates. The broad differential for thrombocytopenia, and its association with potentially severe neonatal pathology, often presents a diagnostic dilemma prompting extensive evaluation. Hemolysis due to red cell enzymopathies is a rare cause of neonatal thrombocytopenia that is typically brief and self-limiting. Here, we present a case of thrombocytopenia, refractory to transfusion, associated with anemia and hyperbilirubinemia in a neonate with pyruvate kinase deficiency (PKD) arising from compound heterozygous PKLR mutations. The nature of the thrombocytopenia in this patient created considerable diagnostic uncertainty, which was ultimately resolved by whole-exome sequencing. This case emphasizes that inherited red cell defects, such as PKD, are important to consider in cases of neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Rapid Whole-Genomic Sequencing and a Targeted Neonatal Gene Panel in Infants With a Suspected Genetic Disorder

Importance

Genomic testing in infancy guides medical decisions and can improve health outcomes. However, it is unclear whether genomic sequencing or a targeted neonatal gene-sequencing test provides comparable molecular diagnostic yields and times to return of results.

Objective

To compare outcomes of genomic sequencing with those of a targeted neonatal gene-sequencing test.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Genomic Medicine for Ill Neonates and Infants (GEMINI) study was a prospective, comparative, multicenter study of 400 hospitalized infants younger than 1 year of age (proband) and their parents, when available, suspected of having a genetic disorder. The study was conducted at 6 US hospitals from June 2019 to November 2021.

Exposure

Enrolled participants underwent simultaneous testing with genomic sequencing and a targeted neonatal gene-sequencing test. Each laboratory performed an independent interpretation of variants guided by knowledge of the patient's phenotype and returned results to the clinical care team. Change in clinical management, therapies offered, and redirection of care was provided to families based on genetic findings from either platform.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end points were molecular diagnostic yield (participants with ≥1 pathogenic variant or variant of unknown significance), time to return of results, and clinical utility (changes in patient care).

Results

A molecular diagnostic variant was identified in 51% of participants (n = 204; 297 variants identified with 134 being novel). Molecular diagnostic yield of genomic sequencing was 49% (95% CI, 44%-54%) vs 27% (95% CI, 23%-32%) with the targeted gene-sequencing test. Genomic sequencing did not report 19 variants found by the targeted neonatal gene-sequencing test; the targeted gene-sequencing test did not report 164 variants identified by genomic sequencing as diagnostic. Variants unidentified by the targeted genomic-sequencing test included structural variants longer than 1 kilobase (25.1%) and genes excluded from the test (24.6%) (McNemar odds ratio, 8.6 [95% CI, 5.4-14.7]). Variant interpretation by laboratories differed by 43%. Median time to return of results was 6.1 days for genomic sequencing and 4.2 days for the targeted genomic-sequencing test; for urgent cases (n = 107) the time was 3.3 days for genomic sequencing and 4.0 days for the targeted gene-sequencing test. Changes in clinical care affected 19% of participants, and 76% of clinicians viewed genomic testing as useful or very useful in clinical decision-making, irrespective of a diagnosis.

Conclusions and Relevance

The molecular diagnostic yield for genomic sequencing was higher than a targeted neonatal gene-sequencing test, but the time to return of routine results was slower. Interlaboratory variant interpretation contributes to differences in molecular diagnostic yield and may have important consequences for clinical management.

Role of genomic medicine and implementing equitable access for critically ill infants in neonatal intensive care units

Genetic disorders are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. This population has immense potential to benefit from genomic medicine, as early precision diagnosis is critical to early personalized management. However, the implementation of genomic medicine in neonatology thus far has arguably worsened health inequities, and strategies are urgently needed to achieve equitable access to genomics in neonatal care. In this perspective, we demonstrate the utility of genomic sequencing in critically ill infants and highlight three key recommendations to advance equitable access: recruitment of underrepresented populations, education of non-genetics providers to empower practice of genomic medicine, and development of innovative infrastructure to implement genomic medicine across diverse settings.

Clinical Validation of Tagmentation-Based Genome Sequencing for Germline Disorders

Genome sequencing (GS) is a powerful clinical tool used for the comprehensive diagnosis of germline disorders. GS library preparation typically involves mechanical DNA fragmentation, end repair, and bead-based library size selection followed by adapter ligation, which can require a large amount of input genomic DNA. Tagmentation using bead-linked transposomes can simplify the library preparation process and reduce the DNA input requirement. Here we describe the clinical validation of tagmentation-based PCR-free GS as a clinical test for rare germline disorders. Compared with the Genome-in-a-Bottle Consortium benchmark variant sets, GS had a recall >99.7% and a precision of 99.8% for single nucleotide variants and small insertion-deletions. GS also exhibited 100% sensitivity for clinically reported sequence variants and the copy number variants examined. Furthermore, GS detected mitochondrial sequence variants above 5% heteroplasmy and showed reliable detection of disease-relevant repeat expansions and SMN1 homozygous loss. Our results indicate that while lowering DNA input requirements and reducing library preparation time, GS enables uniform coverage across the genome as well as robust detection of various types of genetic alterations. With the advantage of comprehensive profiling of multiple types of genetic alterations, GS is positioned as an ideal first-tier diagnostic test for germline disorders.

Whole genome sequencing diagnostic yield for paediatric patients with suspected genetic disorders: systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment

BACKGROUND

About 80% of the roughly 7,000 known rare diseases are single gene disorders, about 85% of which are ultra-rare, affecting less than one in one million individuals. NGS technologies, in particular whole genome sequencing (WGS) in paediatric patients suffering from severe disorders of likely genetic origin improve the diagnostic yield allowing targeted, effective care and management. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of WGS, with respect to whole exome sequencing (WES) and/or usual care, for the diagnosis of suspected genetic disorders among the paediatric population.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted querying relevant electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus from January 2010 to June 2022. A random-effect meta-analysis was run to inspect the diagnostic yield of different techniques. A network meta-analysis was also performed to directly assess the comparison between WGS and WES.

RESULTS

Of the 4,927 initially retrieved articles, thirty-nine met the inclusion criteria. Overall results highlighted a significantly higher pooled diagnostic yield for WGS, 38.6% (95% CI: [32.6 - 45.0]), in respect to WES, 37.8% (95% CI: [32.9 - 42.9]) and usual care, 7.8% (95% CI: [4.4 - 13.2]). The meta-regression output suggested a higher diagnostic yield of the WGS compared to WES after controlling for the type of disease (monogenic vs non-monogenic), with a tendency to better diagnostic performances for Mendelian diseases. The network meta-analysis showed a higher diagnostic yield for WGS compared to WES (OR = 1.54, 95%CI: [1.11 - 2.12]).

CONCLUSIONS

Although whole genome sequencing for the paediatric population with suspected genetic disorders provided an accurate and early genetic diagnosis in a high proportion of cases, further research is needed for evaluating costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of WGS and achieving an informed decision-making process.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This systematic review has not been registered.

A holistic approach to maximise diagnostic output in trio exome sequencing

Introduction

Rare genetic diseases are a major cause for severe illness in children. Whole exome sequencing (WES) is a powerful tool for identifying genetic causes of rare diseases. For a better and faster assessment of the vast number of variants that are identified in the index patient in WES, parental sequencing can be applied ("trio WES").

Methods

We assessed the diagnostic rate of routine trio WES including analysis of copy number variants in 224 pediatric patients during an evaluation period of three years.

Results

Trio WES provided a diagnosis in 67 (30%) of all 224 analysed children. The turnaround time of trio WES analysis has been reduced significantly from 41 days in 2019 to 23 days in 2021. Copy number variants could be identified to be causative in 10 cases (4.5%), underlying the importance of copy number variant analysis. Variants in three genes which were previously not associated with a clinical condition (GAD1, TMEM222 and ZNFX1) were identified using the matching tool GeneMatcher and were part of the first description of a new syndrome.

Discussion

Trio WES has proven to have a high diagnostic yield and to shorten the process of identifying the correct diagnosis in paediatric patients. Re-evaluation of all 224 trio WES 1-3 years after initial analysis did not establish new diagnoses. Initiating (trio) WES as a first-tier diagnostics including copy number variant detection should be considered as early as possible, especially for children treated in ICU, if a monogenetic disease is suspected.

Genetic testing for diffuse lung diseases in children

Newly developing genomic technologies are an increasingly important part of clinical care and thus, it is not only important to understand the technologies and their limitations, but to also interpret the findings in an actionable fashion. Clinical geneticists and genetic counselors are now an integral part of the clinical team and are able to bridge the complexities of this rapidly changing science between the bedside clinicians and patients. This manuscript reviews the terminology, the current technology, some of the known genetic disorders that result in lung disease, and indications for genetic testing with associated caveats. Because this field is evolving quickly, we also provide links to websites that provide continuously updated information important for integrating genomic technology results into clinical decision-making.

Ethical Considerations of Genome Sequencing for Pediatric Patients

Advancements in genetic testing in the healthcare setting, most recently genomic sequencing, has enhanced our ability to diagnose genetic conditions. These advances include increased accessibility and affordability of genomic technologies. With expanded use comes the potential for significant ethical challenges for clinicians, particularly considering the implications of testing a child for one condition and incidentally finding a different condition or health risk. In this focused review, we address various ethical considerations from informed consent to the rights of a child undergoing genetic testing.

Rapid exome sequencing as a first-tier test in neonates with suspected genetic disorder: results of a prospective multicenter clinical utility study in the Netherlands

The introduction of rapid exome sequencing (rES) for critically ill neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit has made it possible to impact clinical decision-making. Unbiased prospective studies to quantify the impact of rES over routine genetic testing are, however, scarce. We performed a clinical utility study to compare rES to conventional genetic diagnostic workup for critically ill neonates with suspected genetic disorders. In a multicenter prospective parallel cohort study involving five Dutch NICUs, we performed rES in parallel to routine genetic testing for 60 neonates with a suspected genetic disorder and monitored diagnostic yield and the time to diagnosis. To assess the economic impact of rES, healthcare resource use was collected for all neonates. rES detected more conclusive genetic diagnoses than routine genetic testing (20% vs. 10%, respectively), in a significantly shorter time to diagnosis (15 days (95% CI 10-20) vs. 59 days (95% CI 23-98, p < 0.001)). Moreover, rES reduced genetic diagnostic costs by 1.5% (€85 per neonate).

CONCLUSION

 Our findings demonstrate the clinical utility of rES for critically ill neonates based on increased diagnostic yield, shorter time to diagnosis, and net healthcare savings. Our observations warrant the widespread implementation of rES as first-tier genetic test in critically ill neonates with disorders of suspected genetic origin.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Rapid exome sequencing (rES) enables diagnosing rare genetic disorders in a fast and reliable manner, but retrospective studies with neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) indicated that genetic disorders are likely underdiagnosed as rES is not routinely used. • Scenario modeling for implementation of rES for neonates with presumed genetic disorders indicated an expected increase in costs associated with genetic testing.

WHAT IS NEW

• This unique prospective national clinical utility study of rES in a NICU setting shows that rES obtained more and faster diagnoses than conventional genetic tests. • Implementation of rES as replacement for all other genetic tests does not increase healthcare costs but in fact leads to a reduction in healthcare costs.

Current and potential methods to assess kidney structure and morphology in term and preterm neonates

After birth, the kidney structure in neonates adapt to the functional demands of extrauterine life. Nephrogenesis is complete in the third trimester, but glomeruli, tubuli, and vasculature mature with the rapidly increasing renal blood flow and glomerular filtration. In preterm infants, nephrogenesis remains incomplete and maturation is slower and may be aberrant. This structural and functional deficit has life-long consequences: preterm born individuals are at higher risk for chronic kidney disease and arterial hypertension later in life. This review assembles the literature on existing and potential methods to visualize neonatal kidney structure and morphology and explore their potential to longitudinally document the developmental deviation after preterm birth. X-rays with and without contrast, fluoroscopy and computed tomography (CT) involve relevant ionizing radiation exposure and, apart from CT, do not provide sufficient structural details. Ultrasound has evolved into a safe and noninvasive high-resolution imaging method which is excellent for longitudinal observations. Doppler ultrasound modes can characterize and quantify blood flow to and through the kidneys. Microvascular flow imaging has opened new possibilities of visualizing previously unseen vascular structures. Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging display renal structure and function in unprecedented detail, but are offset by the logistical challenges of the imaging procedure and limited experience with the new techniques in neonates. Kidney biopsies visualize structure histologically, but are too invasive and remain anecdotal in newborns. All the explored methods have predominantly been examined in term newborns and require further research on longitudinal structural observation in the kidneys of preterm infants.

Hospital-level variation in genetic testing in children's hospitals' neonatal intensive care units from 2016 to 2021

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine variation in genetic testing between neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across hospitals over time.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter large-scale retrospective cohort study using NICU discharge data from the Pediatric Hospital Information System database between 2016 and 2021. We analyzed the variation in the percentage of NICU patients who had any genetic testing across hospitals and over time. We used a multivariable multilevel logistic regression model to investigate the potential association between patient characteristics and genetic testing.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 207,228 neonates from 38 hospitals. Overall, 13% of patients had at least 1 genetic test sent, although this varied from 4% to 50% across hospitals. Over the study period, the proportion of patients tested increased, with the increase disproportionately borne by hospitals already testing high proportions of patients. On average, patients who received genetic testing had higher illness severity. Controlling for severity, however, only minimally reduced the degree of hospital-level variation in genetic testing.

CONCLUSION

The percentage of NICU patients who undergo genetic testing varies among hospitals and increasingly so over time. Variation is largely unexplained by differences in severity between hospitals. The degree of variation suggests that clearer guidelines for NICU genetic testing are warranted.

Variants in AQP11 may result in autosomal recessive bilateral cystic renal dysgenesis

Congenital renal cystic dysplasia is a rare disease that occurs in approximately 1 in 4000 children and is often discovered in the antenatal period by ultrasound. It is commonly associated with oligohydramnios in utero and/or renal insufficiency or failure in the postnatal period. Aquaporins are membrane proteins that serve as transport channels in the transfer of water or small solutes across cell membranes. They play a role in the development of renal cysts. Aquaporin 11 (AQP11) deficient mice develop polycystic kidney disease in utero due to disruption of polycystin-1. Here we describe a case of bilateral cystic kidney disease in a patient with novel compound heterozygous variants in AQP11: c.780G>T (p. Trp260Cys) and c.472C>T (p.Pro158Ser) (NM_173039.2) identified by whole genome sequencing. These findings suggest, for the first time, the potential role of AQP11 in congenital renal cystic dysplasia.

Reactive gene curation to support interpretation and reporting of a clinical genome test for rare disease: Experience from over 1,000 cases

Current standards in clinical genetics recognize the need to establish the validity of gene-disease relationships as a first step in the interpretation of sequence variants. We describe our experience incorporating the ClinGen Gene-Disease Clinical Validity framework in our interpretation and reporting workflow for a clinical genome sequencing (cGS) test for individuals with rare and undiagnosed genetic diseases. This "reactive" gene curation is completed upon identification of candidate variants during active case analysis and within the test turn-around time by focusing on the most impactful evidence and taking advantage of the broad applicability of the framework to cover a wide range of disease areas. We demonstrate that reactive gene curation can be successfully implemented in support of cGS in a clinical laboratory environment, enabling robust clinical decision making and allowing all variants to be fully and appropriately considered and their clinical significance confidently interpreted.

Beyond the exome: what's next in diagnostic testing for Mendelian conditions

Despite advances in clinical genetic testing, including the introduction of exome sequencing (ES), more than 50% of individuals with a suspected Mendelian condition lack a precise molecular diagnosis. Clinical evaluation is increasingly undertaken by specialists outside of clinical genetics, often occurring in a tiered fashion and typically ending after ES. The current diagnostic rate reflects multiple factors, including technical limitations, incomplete understanding of variant pathogenicity, missing genotype-phenotype associations, complex gene-environment interactions, and reporting differences between clinical labs. Maintaining a clear understanding of the rapidly evolving landscape of diagnostic tests beyond ES, and their limitations, presents a challenge for non-genetics professionals. Newer tests, such as short-read genome or RNA sequencing, can be challenging to order and emerging technologies, such as optical genome mapping and long-read DNA or RNA sequencing, are not available clinically. Furthermore, there is no clear guidance on the next best steps after inconclusive evaluation. Here, we review why a clinical genetic evaluation may be negative, discuss questions to be asked in this setting, and provide a framework for further investigation, including the advantages and disadvantages of new approaches that are nascent in the clinical sphere. We present a guide for the next best steps after inconclusive molecular testing based upon phenotype and prior evaluation, including when to consider referral to a consortium such as GREGoR, which is focused on elucidating the underlying cause of rare unsolved genetic disorders.

Breaking Barriers to Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing in Pediatrics: Michigan's Project Baby Deer

The integration of precision medicine in the care of hospitalized children is ever evolving. However, access to new genomic diagnostics such as rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS) is hindered by barriers in implementation. Michigan's Project Baby Deer (PBD) is a multi-center collaborative effort that sought to break down barriers to access by offering rWGS to critically ill neonatal and pediatric inpatients in Michigan. The clinical champion team used a standardized approach with inclusion and exclusion criteria, shared learning, and quality improvement evaluation of the project's impact on the clinical outcomes and economics of inpatient rWGS. Hospitals, including those without on-site geneticists or genetic counselors, noted positive clinical impacts, accelerating time to definitive treatment for project patients. Between 95-214 hospital days were avoided, net savings of $4155 per patient, and family experience of care was improved. The project spurred policy advancement when Michigan became the first state in the United States to have a Medicaid policy with carve-out payment to hospitals for rWGS testing. This state project demonstrates how front-line clinician champions can directly improve access to new technology for pediatric patients and serves as a roadmap for expanding clinical implementation of evidence-based precision medicine technologies.

SCIP: software for efficient clinical interpretation of copy number variants detected by whole-genome sequencing

Copy number variants (CNVs) represent major etiologic factors in rare genetic diseases. Current clinical CNV interpretation workflows require extensive back-and-forth with multiple tools and databases. This increases complexity and time burden, potentially resulting in missed genetic diagnoses. We present the Suite for CNV Interpretation and Prioritization (SCIP), a software package for the clinical interpretation of CNVs detected by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The SCIP Visualization Module near-instantaneously displays all information necessary for CNV interpretation (variant quality, population frequency, inheritance pattern, and clinical relevance) on a single page-supported by modules providing variant filtration and prioritization. SCIP was comprehensively evaluated using WGS data from 1027 families with congenital cardiac disease and/or autism spectrum disorder, containing 187 pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNVs identified in previous curations. SCIP was efficient in filtration and prioritization: a median of just two CNVs per case were selected for review, yet it captured all P/LP findings (92.5% of which ranked 1st). SCIP was also able to identify one pathogenic CNV previously missed. SCIP was benchmarked against AnnotSV and a spreadsheet-based manual workflow and performed superiorly than both. In conclusion, SCIP is a novel software package for efficient clinical CNV interpretation, substantially faster and more accurate than previous tools (available at https://github.com/qd29/SCIP , a video tutorial series is available at https://bit.ly/SCIPVideos ).