Representation and Outcomes of Individuals With Schizophrenia Seen in Everyday Practice Who Are Ineligible for Randomized Clinical Trials

Efficacy and safety of GLP1-ras compared to SGLT2is and DPP-4is in individuals with schizophrenia and diabetes: A Danish nationwide target-trial emulation study

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have suggested that glucagon-like-peptide-1-receptor-agonists (GLP1-ras) may offer neuroprotective and cardiovascular benefits. However, concerns have been raised about potential adverse effects of GLP1-ras including depression and suicidal ideation. This target-trial-emulation study aims to examine the effects of GLP1-ras treatment on psychiatric hospital admission and all-cause mortality in individuals with schizophrenia.

METHODS

We used the Danish nationwide registers to identify all individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and who were treated with metformin (Glucophage). Among these, we identified those who initiated second-line treatment for type-2-diabetes with one of the following glucose-lowering drugs: GLP1-ras, sodium-glucose-cotransporter-2-inhibitors(SGLT2is), or dipeptidyl-peptidase-4-inhibitors(DPP-4is). We then compared the hazard rate ratios(HRR) for psychiatric admission and all-cause mortality between the different treatment arms using a Cox-proportional-hazards model, adjusting for covariates to minimize confounding.

RESULTS

We included 354 individuals with schizophrenia(47 % female, mean age 43.8 years) and type-2-diabetes who initiated treatment with a second-line GLD. Of these, 71, 197, and 86 initiated treatment with GLP1-ras, DPP-4is, and SGLT2is respectively. We found no difference in the risk of psychiatric admission between the three treatment arms. In the fully adjusted model, treatment with DPP-4is and SGLT2is analysed as a compound exposure, was not associated with a significant reduced risk of psychiatric admission, with a HRR of 0.78(95 %-CI:0.38-1.59), when compared to GLP1-ras. Only 5 deaths occurred during follow-up, making a comparison of all-cause mortality between the treatment arms unfeasible.

CONCLUSION

We observed no difference in the risk of psychiatric admission or all-cause mortality for individuals with schizophrenia treated with GLP1-ras compared to SGLT2is and DPP-4is.

Exploring the implicit meanings of 'cultural diversity': a critical conceptual analysis of commonly used approaches in medical education

Existing approaches to cultural diversity in medical education may be implicitly based on different conceptualisations of culture. Research has demonstrated that such interpretations matter to practices and people concerned. We therefore sought to identify the different conceptualisations espoused by these approaches and investigated their implications for education. We critically reviewed 52 articles from eight top medical education journals and subjected these to a conceptual analysis. Via open coding, we looked for references to approaches, their objectives, implicit notions of culture, and to implementation practices. We iteratively developed themes from the collected findings. We identified several approaches to cultural diversity teaching that used four different ways to conceptualise cultural diversity: culture as 'fixed patient characteristic', as 'multiple fixed characteristics', as 'dynamic outcome impacting social interactions', and as 'power dynamics'. We discussed the assumptions underlying these different notions, and reflected upon limitations and implications for educational practice. The notion of 'cultural diversity' challenges learners' communication skills, touches upon inherent inequalities and impacts how the field constructs knowledge. This study adds insights into how inherent inequalities in biomedical knowledge construction are rooted in methodological, ontological, and epistemological principles. Although these insights carry laborious implications for educational implementation, educators can learn from first initiatives, such as: standardly include information on patients' multiple identities and lived experiences in case descriptions, stimulate more reflection on teachers' and students' own values and hierarchical position, acknowledge Western epistemological hegemony, explicitly include literature from diverse sources, and monitor diversity-integrated topics in the curriculum.

Real-world studies in psychiatry: insights into antipsychotic-associated breast cancer risk and their broader implications

Real-world studies provide valuable insights into long-term outcomes across diverse populations. Here, we contextualise recent findings on the association between antipsychotic use and breast cancer risk in women with schizophrenia. We discuss clinical implications and the strengths and limitations of real-world studies in psychiatry. We conclude with future perspectives.

IUPHAR review: Moving beyond dopamine-based therapeutic strategies for schizophrenia

In the following we comprehensively review approaches to treating schizophrenia that do not primarily involve dopamine antagonism or partial agonism. Following 70 years of broadly similar dopamine D2 receptor antagonist/partial agonist drugs, Cobenfy™ was approved as a novel antipsychotic in September 2024. Cobenfy™ is a combination formulation of xanomeline, a muscarinic cholinergic M1/M4 receptor agonist and trospium, a peripherally restricted muscarinic antagonist included to offset peripheral side effects of xanomeline. This approval has reinvigorated optimism in the field and raised important questions for the future direction of antipsychotic drug development. We review therapeutic strategies beyond dopamine that have been and are currently being investigated to address whether there are a sufficient number of novel approaches to maintain the momentum of this breakthrough and question why it has taken so long. The current pipeline of late-stage compounds is low and potentially constrained by historical setbacks and challenges in clinical trial design for schizophrenia. This success rate has future potential to improve given the range of biomarkers in development designed to enable greater precision in future clinical trials. Cobenfy™ approval demonstrates that with combination formulations designed to improve side effect profiles and optimised clinical trial design it is possible to generate tolerable and efficacious treatment options for patients beyond a solely dopaminergic framework. We conclude that advances in understanding the neurobiology of schizophrenia, while not complete, has generated a diverse and well justified pool of potentially novel and repurpose-ready approaches, with mechanisms beyond simple dopamine D2 antagonism/partial agonism.

Frequency, correlates and outcomes of Benzodiazepine use during Cariprazine treatment: A pooled post-hoc analysis from four 6-week, placebo-controlled trials in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia

Given the frequent prescription of benzodiazepines (BZDs) as adjunctive treatment to antipsychotics, this study aimed to uncover how BZD use affects treatment outcomes with cariprazine (CAR). This post-hoc analysis used pooled data from four placebo-controlled trials in patients with acute schizophrenia. Efficacy evaluations involved changes from baseline to Week 6 on PANSS Total Score, Marder Positive Factor Score, Excitement Component Subscale Score, and Marder Anxiety Single Item Score. Safety evaluations focused on extrapyramidal symptoms and akathisia. Comparisons were made between CAR alone vs. placebo (PLB) alone; CAR+BZD vs. PLB+BZD; CAR alone vs. CAR+BZD; and PLB alone vs. PLB+BZD. Data from 1643 patients were analysed (CAR only=943; CAR+BZD=132; PLB only=475; PLB+BZD=93). CAR alone yielded significantly greater improvement on all measures than PLB alone. CAR+BZD yielded significantly greater improvements in overall schizophrenia symptoms than PLB+BZD. CAR alone showed greater improvements in overall, positive, and anxiety symptoms compared to CAR+BZD. PLB alone yielded significantly greater improvements in positive and anxiety symptoms than PLB+BZD. Anxiety and agitation were the leading reasons for BZD administration. CAR was associated with more akathisia and EPS in both the non-BZD and BZD-user groups than PLB. The results support the superior efficacy of CAR with or without BZD co-treatment for total and positive symptoms of schizophrenia compared to PLB with or without BZD use. These findings suggest BZDs should be used for emergent symptoms like anxiety or agitation, rather than core schizophrenia symptoms.

Perspectives on Precision Psychiatry Using Antipsychotics in the Management of Bipolar Disorder

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Precision medicine is not just hype. Instead, it represents a high bar for developing more effective, safer, and better-tolerated therapies in medicine, without exception in psychiatry, including bipolar disorder (BD). A burgeoning body of narrative reviews and perspective papers has already appraised the boundaries of precision medicine in BD.

METHODS

This brief perspective follows a narrative, critical approach focusing explicitly on the antipsychotic management of BD using precision approaches.

RESULTS

While most controversies align with those previously appraised in BD's overall precision medicine approach, specific insights are provided herein.

CONCLUSIONS

Beyond other implications and the strengthened call for valid diagnostic coding systems, the implementation of shared decision-making tools and pharmacogenomics studies focusing on persons with BD are particularly warranted.

Comparing PANSS-6 and PANSS-30 for clinical and functional outcomes in first-episode psychosis: A 2-year follow-up in a Spanish cohort

Assessing clinical symptoms in First Episode Psychosis (FEP) is essential for guiding treatment decisions and predicting outcomes. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) is widely used for this purpose; however, its length limits feasibility in routine clinical practice. The PANSS-6, a shorter version, represents a promising alternative, though its performance in FEP populations remains underexplored. This study evaluated the predictive abilities of PANSS-30 and PANSS-6 for clinical remission, functional remission, and relapse over a 2-year follow-up in a Spanish cohort of 193 FEP patients. Data were derived from the PEPs Project, with PANSS-30 assessments conducted at baseline and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months; PANSS-6 scores were calculated from PANSS-30 at the same visits. Clinical remission, functional remission, and relapse were defined using established criteria. Logistic regression and ROC-AUC analyses assessed predictive and discriminatory performance. Agreement between the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) for PANSS-30 and PANSS-6 remission criteria was near-perfect at 1 and 2 years (κ ≥ 0.98). PANSS-6 demonstrated stronger predictive associations and similar discriminatory performance to PANSS-30 for clinical and functional remission, while its performance for relapse over two years was similar. In conclusion, the PANSS-6 is a reliable and efficient tool for assessing clinical outcomes in FEP, offering similar predictive accuracy to PANSS-30 while being more practical for routine use due to its shorter administration time.

Real-world effectiveness of pharmacological maintenance treatment of bipolar depression: a within-subject analysis in a Swedish nationwide cohort

BACKGROUND

Long-term add-on antidepressant use for bipolar depression remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate primarily the association between psychopharmacological treatments and hospitalisation (ie, hospital admission) for bipolar depression, and secondarily the association between psychopharmacological treatments and hospitalisation for bipolar mania and somatic reasons in a registry-based national Swedish cohort.

METHODS

In this within-subject analysis, people diagnosed with bipolar disorder were identified from Swedish nationwide registers of inpatient and specialised outpatient care, sickness absence, and disability pension between Jan 1, 2006, and Dec 31, 2021. Data for hospitalisations, and antidepressant, antipsychotic, and mood stabiliser medication use were also retrieved from national databases. Treatment periods were modelled using the PRE2DUP method. Data were analysed with a within-individual design with stratified Cox Regression models, to eliminate selection bias when calculating adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CIs. The main outcome was hospitalisation due to depression and secondary outcomes were mania-related and somatic hospitalisations to address the risk-benefit ratio of antidepressant treatment. The reference was non-use of antidepressant, antipsychotic, and mood stabiliser medications. We also did head-to-head comparisons (ie, comparing different drug use periods within the same individual against each other) between medications to obtain results on comparative effectiveness while minimising confounding by indication. Ethnicity data were not available. People with related lived experience were involved in the research and writing process.

FINDINGS

The study cohort included 105 495 individuals (mean age 44·2 years, SD 18·8; 65 607 [62·2%] women and 39 888 [37·8%] men). In medication class-based analyses, a higher risk of depression-related hospitalisation was associated with the use of antidepressant only (aHR 1·25, 95% CI 1·16-1·34), antipsychotic only (1·39, 1·24-1·55), antidepressant-antipsychotic combination (1·28, 1·18-1·39), and antipsychotic-mood stabiliser combination treatment (1·13, 1·03-1·24). By contrast, use of mood stabilisers only (0·89, 0·81-0·98) was associated with lower risk. For specific monotherapies, only lithium was associated with lower depression-related hospitalisation risk (0·75, 0·67-0·85). No specific antidepressant monotherapy was associated with reduced depression-related hospitalisation, while several antidepressants and antipsychotics were related to an increased risk. In head-to-head comparisons, lithium monotherapy was associated with a superior outcome compared with antidepressant monotherapy (0·59, 0·51-0·68), antipsychotic monotherapy (0·54, 0·44-0·66), lamotrigine monotherapy (0·69, 0·53-0·91), and quetiapine monotherapy (0·54, 0·41-0·71). Lithium was associated with the lowest risk of somatic hospitalisation (0·86, 0·80-0·93) when compared with non-use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilisers. Finally, antidepressant-only treatment (1·22, 1·03-1·44) was associated with increased risk of mania-related hospitalisation and other monotherapies and combinations were associated with a lower risk.

INTERPRETATION

Since medications are typically started when depressive symptoms re-emerge, all treatments might appear less effective than they actually are when the reference is non-use of medication. Lithium was the only specific monotherapy with significantly reduced risk of depression-related hospitalisations when compared with non-use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilisers, and with more than 30% lower risk than any antidepressant, any antipsychotic, quetiapine, or lamotrigine monotherapy in the head-to-head analysis. Lithium was also associated with the lowest risk of somatic hospitalisation. Our findings supported the use of lithium as the mainstay of treatment in bipolar disorder.

FUNDING

The Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, FORTE (grant number 2021-01079).

Evaluating ADHD medication trial representativeness: a Swedish population-based study comparing hypothetically trial-eligible and trial-ineligible individuals

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ADHD medications often use strict eligibility criteria, potentially limiting generalisability to patients in real-world clinical settings. We aimed to identify the proportion of individuals with ADHD who would be ineligible for medication RCTs and evaluate differences in treatment patterns and clinical and functional outcomes between RCT-eligible and RCT-ineligible individuals.

METHODS

We used multiple Swedish national registries to identify individuals with ADHD, aged at least 4 years at the age of diagnosis, initiating pharmacological treatment between Jan 1, 2007, and Dec 31, 2019, with follow-up up to Dec 31, 2020. Hypothetical RCT ineligibility was established using exclusion criteria from the international MED-ADHD dataset, including 164 RCTs of ADHD medications. Cox models evaluated differences in medication switching and discontinuation within 1 year between eligible and ineligible individuals. Quasi-Poisson models compared eligible and ineligible individuals on rates of psychiatric hospitalisations, injuries or accidents, and substance use disorder within 1 year of initiating ADHD medications. People with lived experience of ADHD were not involved in the research and writing process.

FINDINGS

Of 189 699 individuals included in the study cohort (112 153 men and boys [59%] and 77 546 women and girls [41%]; mean age 21·52 years [SD 12·83; range 4-68]) initiating ADHD medication, 53% (76 477 [74%] of 103 023 adults [aged >17 years], 12 658 [35%] of 35 681 adolescents [aged 13-17 years], and 10 643 [21%] of 50 995 children [aged <13 years]) would have been ineligible for RCT participation. Ethnicity data were not available. Ineligible individuals had a higher likelihood of treatment switching (hazard ratio 1·14, 95% CI 1·12-1·16) and a decreased likelihood of medication discontinuation (0·96, 0·94-0·98) compared with eligible individuals. Individuals ineligible for RCTs had significantly higher rates of psychiatric hospitalisations (ncidence rate ratio 9·68, 95% CI 9·57-9·78) and specialist care visits related to substance use disorder (14·78, 14·64-14·91), depression (6·00, 5·94-6·06), and anxiety (11·63, 11·56-11·69).

INTERPRETATION

Individuals ineligible for ADHD medication trials face higher risks of adverse outcomes. This study provides the first empirical evidence for the limited generalisability of ADHD RCTs to real-world clinical populations, by applying eligibility criteria extracted from a comprehensive dataset of RCTs to a large real-world cohort. Triangulating evidence from RCTs and real-world studies is crucial to inform rigorous evidence-based treatment guidelines.

FUNDING

National Institute of Healthcare and Research, European Union's Horizon 2020, and Swedish Research Council.

Clinical Trials Studying Suicide Risk Reduction: Who is Excluded From Participation

OBJECTIVE

The use of exclusion criteria in clinical trials can cause research participants to differ markedly from clinical populations, which negatively impacts generalizability of results. This study identifies and quantifies common and recurring exclusion criteria in clinical trials studying suicide risk reduction, and estimates their impact on eligibility among a clinical sample of adults in an emergency department with high suicide risk.

METHOD

Recent trials were identified by searching PubMed (terms suicide, efficacy, effectiveness, limited to clinical trials in prior 5 years). Common exclusion criteria were identified using Qualitative Content Analysis. A retrospective chart review examined a one-month sample of all adults receiving psychiatric evaluation in a large urban academic emergency department.

RESULTS

The search yielded 27 unique clinical trials studying suicide risk reduction as a primary or secondary outcome. After research fundamentals (e.g. informed consent, language fluency), the most common exclusion criteria involved psychosis (77.8%), cognitive problems (66.7%), and substance use (63.0%). In the clinical sample of adults with high suicide risk (N = 232), psychosis exclusions would exclude 53.0% of patients and substance use exclusions would exclude 67.2% of patients. Overall, 5.6% of emergency psychiatry patients would be eligible for clinical trials that use common exclusion criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent clinical trials studying suicide risk reduction have low generalizability to emergency psychiatry patients with high suicide risk. Trials enrolling persons with psychosis and substance use in particular are needed to improve generalizability to this clinical population.

Comparative cardiometabolic safety and effectiveness of aripiprazole in people with severe mental illness: A target trial emulation

BACKGROUND

There is limited and conflicting evidence on the comparative cardiometabolic safety and effectiveness of aripiprazole in the management of severe mental illness. We investigated the hypothesis that aripiprazole has a favourable cardiometabolic profile, but similar effectiveness when compared to olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted an observational emulation of a head-to-head trial of aripiprazole versus olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in UK primary care using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. We included adults diagnosed with severe mental illness (i.e., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and other non-organic psychoses) who were prescribed a new antipsychotic between 2005 and 2017, with a 2-year follow-up to 2019. The primary outcome was total cholesterol at 1 year (cardiometabolic safety). The main secondary outcome was psychiatric hospitalisation (effectiveness). Other outcomes included body weight, blood pressure, all-cause discontinuation, and mortality. Analyses adjusted for baseline confounders, including sociodemographics, diagnoses, concomitant medications, and cardiometabolic parameters. We included 26,537 patients (aripiprazole, n = 3,573, olanzapine, n = 8,554, quetiapine, n = 8,289, risperidone, n = 6,121). Median (IQR) age was 53 (42-67) years, 55.4% were female, 82.3% White, and 18.0% were diagnosed with schizophrenia. Patients prescribed aripiprazole had similar total cholesterol levels after 1 year to those prescribed olanzapine (adjusted mean difference [aMD], -0.03, 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.02, p = 0.261), quetiapine (aMD, -0.03, 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.03, p = 0.324), and risperidone (aMD, -0.01, 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.05, p = 0.707). However, there was evidence that patients prescribed aripiprazole had better outcomes on other cardiometabolic parameters, such as body weight and blood pressure, especially compared to olanzapine. After additional adjustment for prior hospitalisation, patients prescribed aripiprazole had similar rates of psychiatric hospitalisation as those prescribed olanzapine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.91, 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.01, p = 0.078), quetiapine (aHR, 0.94, 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.04, p = 0.230), or risperidone (aHR, 1.01, 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.12, p = 0.854).

CONCLUSIONS

Data from our large, powered, diverse, real-world target trial emulation sample, followed over 2 years, suggest that adults diagnosed with severe mental illness prescribed aripiprazole have similar total cholesterol 1 year after first prescription compared to those prescribed olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone. However, patients prescribed aripiprazole had better outcomes on some other cardiometabolic parameters, and there was little evidence of differences in effectiveness. Our findings inform a common clinical dilemma and contribute to the evidence base for real-world clinical decision-making on antipsychotic choice for patients diagnosed with severe mental illness.

A 10-Year Longitudinal Study of Brain Cortical Thickness in People with First-Episode Psychosis Using Normative Models

BACKGROUND

Clinical forecasting models have potential to optimize treatment and improve outcomes in psychosis, but predicting long-term outcomes is challenging and long-term follow-up data are scarce. In this 10-year longitudinal study, we aimed to characterize the temporal evolution of cortical correlates of psychosis and their associations with symptoms.

DESIGN

Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from people with first-episode psychosis and controls (n = 79 and 218) were obtained at enrollment, after 12 months (n = 67 and 197), and 10 years (n = 23 and 77), within the Thematically Organized Psychosis (TOP) study. Normative models for cortical thickness estimated on public MRI datasets (n = 42 983) were applied to TOP data to obtain deviation scores for each region and timepoint. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores were acquired at each timepoint along with registry data. Linear mixed effects models assessed effects of diagnosis, time, and their interactions on cortical deviations plus associations with symptoms.

RESULTS

LMEs revealed conditional main effects of diagnosis and time × diagnosis interactions in a distributed cortical network, where negative deviations in patients attenuate over time. In patients, symptoms also attenuate over time. LMEs revealed effects of anterior cingulate on PANSS total, and insular and orbitofrontal regions on PANSS negative scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This long-term longitudinal study revealed a distributed pattern of cortical differences which attenuated over time together with a reduction in symptoms. These findings are not in line with a simple neurodegenerative account of schizophrenia, and deviations from normative models offer a promising avenue to develop biomarkers to track clinical trajectories over time.

Glucagon-like peptide agonists for weight management in antipsychotic-induced weight gain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Managing body weight in patients with antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) is challenging. Besides lifestyle interventions, pharmacological interventions may contribute to weight loss. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect on weight loss and adverse effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists in patients with AIWG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis of blinded and open-label randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials and cohort studies that evaluated treatment with GLP-1 in patients with AIWG, regardless of psychiatric diagnosis. PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Primary outcome measures were changes in body weight and BMI. Secondary outcomes were changes in adverse effects and severity of psychopathology due to GLP-1 agonists.

RESULTS

Only data for exenatide and liraglutide could be included, that is, five RCTs and one cohort study. For exenatide the mean weight loss was -2.48 kg (95% Confidence Interval (CI) -5.12 to +0.64; p = 0.07), for liraglutide the mean weight loss was -4.70 kg (95% CI -4.85 to -4.56; p < 0.001). The mean change in BMI was -0.82 (95% CI -1.56 to -0.09; p = 0.03) in the exenatide groups and -1.52 (95% CI -1.83 to -1.22; p < 0.001) in the liraglutide groups. Exenatide and liraglutide did not adversely affect psychopathology. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea.

CONCLUSION

The GLP-1 agonists exenatide and liraglutide are promising drugs for inducing weight loss in patients with AIWG. The adverse effects are acceptable, and the addition of GLP-1 does not increase the severity of psychopathology. However, more research is needed.

Prevalence, correlates, tolerability-related outcomes, and efficacy-related outcomes of antipsychotic polypharmacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic polypharmacy remains a clinical reality, despite an increased risk of adverse events and little evidence of additional efficacy compared with antipsychotic monotherapy. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of antipsychotic polypharmacy prevalence, trends, and correlates across mental disorders.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from Jan 1, 2009 to April 30, 2024, for any original study (observational and interventional) reporting antipsychotic polypharmacy prevalence in populations with mental disorders or use of antipsychotics, regardless of age or diagnosis. Relevant studies before May 1, 2009, were identified from two previous systematic reviews of antipsychotic polypharmacy prevalence. Pooled antipsychotic polypharmacy prevalence was estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. Using subgroup and mixed-effects meta-regression analyses, we sought to identify relevant correlates of antipsychotic polypharmacy. People with lived experience were not involved in the project. This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022329953).

FINDINGS

We analysed 517 studies with 599 individual timepoints reporting on 4 459 149 individuals (mean age 39·5 years [range 6·4-86·3]; data on sex and ethnicity were infrequently reported). Most studies included patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs; k=270, 52%). Overall, 24·8% (95% CI 22·9-26·7) of the populations received antipsychotic polypharmacy, ranging from 33·2% (30·6-36·0) in people with SSDs to 5·2% (4·0-6·8) in people with dementia. Antipsychotic polypharmacy prevalence varied by region from 15·4% (95% CI 12·9-18·2) in North America to 38·6% (27·7-50·6) in Africa. Overall antipsychotic polypharmacy prevalence increased significantly from 1970 to 2023 (β=0·019, 95% CI 0·009-0·029; p=0·0002) and was higher in adults than in children and adolescents (27·4%, 95% CI 25·2-29·8 vs 7·0%, 4·7-10·3; p<0·0001) and among inpatients than among outpatients (31·4%, 27·9-35·2 vs 19·9%, 16·8-23·3; p<0·0001). Compared with antipsychotic monotherapy, antipsychotic polypharmacy was associated with an increased risk of relapse (relative risk [RR] 1·42, 95% CI 1·04-1·93; p=0·028), psychiatric hospitalisation (1·24, 1·12-1·38; p<0·0001), worse global functioning (standardised mean difference [SMD] -0·31, 95% CI -0·44 to -0·19; p<0·0001), and more adverse events, including extrapyramidal symptoms (RR 1·63, 95% CI 1·13-2·36; p=0·0098), dystonia (5·91, 1·20-29·17; p=0·029), anticholinergic use (1·91, 1·55-2·35; p<0·0001), higher side-effect scores (SMD 0·33, 95% CI 0·24-0·42; p<0·0001), longer corrected QT interval (0·24, 0·23-0·26; p<0·0001), and greater all-cause mortality risk (RR 1·19, 95% CI 1·00-1·41; p=0·047).

INTERPRETATION

The prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy has increased globally over the past 50 years and is particularly high in patients with SSDs. Prescription of antipsychotic polypharmacy is associated with greater illness severity and poorer outcomes than is antipsychotic monopharmacy but does not resolve these issues. Furthermore, antipsychotic polypharmacy is associated with higher side-effect burden, including all-cause mortality.

FUNDING

None.

The relational institution: an ethnographic study of recovery orientation and relational engagement on a psychiatric rehabilitation ward in London

BACKGROUND

In the UK, inpatient psychiatric rehabilitation services for complex psychosis aim to provide recovery-orientated treatment to patients, with the goal of supporting sustained stepdown into community living. The extent to which rehabilitation services uphold this recovery orientation is associated with better outcomes. However, few studies have been able to ascertain what promotes or prevents recovery orientation in inpatient settings.

METHODS

We conducted an ethnographic study of treatment on a National Health Service (NHS) psychiatric rehabilitation ward in London over six months during August 2022-February 2023. Data were collected through participant observation and semi-structured interviews with 9 patients and 14 staff members. Fieldnotes and interview transcripts were analysed using situational analysis.

RESULTS

Our analysis highlights the importance of what we term 'relational engagement' between staff and patients to nurture and sustain recovery-orientated treatment. This relational engagement was embodied through small acts of genuine human connection grounded in mutual acceptance and affective bonding; close attention to detail that communicated curiosity and respect; and recognition, appreciation, and encouragement of the slow and gradual progress that characterises recovery in complex psychosis. Yet, this relational engagement was often limited or foreclosed by the social environment of the ward and the wider institutional context. Limiting elements included the dominance of hospital logics geared towards high-throughput acute treatment and risk management; the presence of audit culture that led to a level of standardisation curtailing more genuine human connection; and staff demoralisation driven by events on and off the ward, including system-wide crises and more localised conflicts and disturbances. Some of these conflicts involved discrimination, most prominently anti-Black racism and homophobia, reflecting wider structural inequalities that characterise inpatient psychiatric populations and the healthcare workforce.

CONCLUSION

Relationships, often under-prioritised in mental health services, were a key cornerstone of recovery-orientated treatment on a psychiatric rehabilitation ward. The shaping of therapeutic relationships amounted to an active process of relational engagement, which may be afforded or constrained by complex social elements requiring careful consideration in inpatient psychiatry. These social elements go beyond more surface-level factors such as staff training, knowledge, or attitudes and may require structural and system-level interventions.

New Drug Treatments for Schizophrenia: A Review of Approaches to Target Circuit Dysfunction

Schizophrenia is a leading cause of global disease burden. Current drug treatments are associated with significant side effects and have limited efficacy for many patients, highlighting the need to develop new approaches that target other aspects of the neurobiology of schizophrenia. Preclinical, in vivo imaging, postmortem, genetic, and pharmacological studies have highlighted the key role of cortical GABAergic (gamma-aminobutyric acidergic)-glutamatergic microcircuits and their projections to subcortical dopaminergic circuits in the pathoetiology of negative, cognitive, and psychotic symptoms. Antipsychotics primarily act downstream of the dopaminergic component of this circuit. However, multiple drugs are currently in development that could target other elements of this circuit to treat schizophrenia. These include drugs for GABAergic or glutamatergic targets, including glycine transporters, D-amino acid oxidase, sodium channels, or potassium channels. Other drugs in development are likely to primarily act on pathways that regulate the dopaminergic system, such as muscarinic or trace amine receptors or 5-HT2A receptors, while PDE10A inhibitors are being developed to modulate the downstream consequences of dopaminergic dysfunction. Our review considers where new drugs may act on this circuit and their latest clinical trial evidence in terms of indication, efficacy, and side effects. Limitations of the circuit model, including whether there are neurobiologically distinct subgroups of patients, and future directions are also considered. Several drugs based on the mechanisms reviewed have promising clinical data, with the muscarinic agonist KarXT most advanced. If these drugs are approved for clinical use, they have the potential to revolutionize understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of schizophrenia.

The risk of diabetes and HbA1c deterioration during antipsychotic drug treatment: A Danish two-cohort study among patients with first-episode schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotics increase the risk of developing diabetes, but clinical trials are not generalizable with short follow-up, while observational studies often lack important information, particularly hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).

METHODS

We followed two Danish cohorts with schizophrenia. First, using Danish nationwide registers, we identified all individuals diagnosed with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) between 1999 and 2019 (n = 31,856). Exposure was a redeemed prescription for an antipsychotic, and the outcome was diabetes, defined via hospital-based diagnosis and redeemed prescriptions for glucose-lowering drugs. Adjusted Cox regression calculated hazard rate ratios (HRR). Second, using data from the Central Denmark Region, we identified all individuals diagnosed with FES from October 2016 to September 2022 (n = 2671). Using a within-subject design, we analyzed the change in HbA1c during the 2 years after initiation of specific antipsychotics compared to the 2 years before.

RESULTS

In the nationwide cohort, 2543 (8.0%) individuals developed diabetes (incidence rate = 9.39 [95% CI = 9.03-9.76] per 1000 person-years). Antipsychotics, compared to periods without, were associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes (HRR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.75-2.38). We found a dose-response association, particularly for second-generation antipsychotics, and different risk rates for specific antipsychotics. In the Central Denmark Region cohort, a total of 9.2% developed diabetes but mean HbA1c levels remained stable at 37 mmol/mol during the 2 years after initiation of antipsychotic medication.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive real-world two-cohort study emphasizes that diabetes affects almost 10% of patients with FES. Antipsychotics increase this risk, while HbA1c deterioration requires longer treatment. These findings are important for clinicians and young patients with FES.

Antipsychotic Drugs: A Concise Review of History, Classification, Indications, Mechanism, Efficacy, Side Effects, Dosing, and Clinical Application

The introduction of the first antipsychotic drug, chlorpromazine, was a milestone for psychiatry. The authors review the history, classification, indications, mechanism, efficacy, side effects, dosing, drug initiation, switching, and other practical issues and questions related to antipsychotics. Classifications such as first-generation/typical versus second-generation/atypical antipsychotics are neither valid nor useful; these agents should be described according to the Neuroscience-based Nomenclature (NbN). Antipsychotic drugs are not specific for treating schizophrenia. They reduce psychosis regardless of the underlying diagnosis, and they go beyond nonspecific sedation. All currently available antipsychotic drugs are dopamine blockers or dopamine partial agonists. In schizophrenia, effect sizes for relapse prevention are larger than for acute treatment. A major unresolved problem is the implausible increase in placebo response in antipsychotic drug trials over the decades. Differences in side effects, which can be objectively measured, such as weight gain, are less equivocal than differences in rating-scale-measured (subjective) efficacy. The criteria for choosing among antipsychotics are mainly pragmatic and include factors such as available formulations, metabolism, half-life, efficacy, and side effects in previous illness episodes. Plasma levels help to detect nonadherence, and once-daily dosing at night (which is possible with many antipsychotics) and long-acting injectable formulations are useful when adherence is a problem. Dose-response curves for both acute treatment and relapse prevention follow a hyperbolic pattern, with maximally efficacious average dosages for schizophrenia of around 5 mg/day risperidone equivalents. Computer apps facilitating the choice between drugs are available. Future drug development should include pharmacogenetics and focus on drugs for specific aspects of psychosis.

Comparative Effectiveness of Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder

Importance

Antipsychotics are the cornerstone of maintenance treatment in schizophrenia spectrum disorders, but it is unclear which agents should be prioritized by prescribers.

Objective

To investigate the clinical effectiveness of antipsychotics, including recent market entries, in comparison with oral olanzapine in relapse and treatment failure prevention among individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This comparative effectiveness research study with a within-individual analysis included data from Swedish health care registers of inpatient and specialized outpatient care, sickness absence, and disability pensions among all individuals aged 16 to 65 years who were diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2021, including an incident cohort and a prevalent cohort.

Exposures

Specific antipsychotics.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The risks for psychosis relapse hospitalization and treatment failure (psychiatric hospitalization, death, or change in an antipsychotic medication) were adjusted for the temporal order of treatments, time since cohort entry, and concomitant drugs. Comparisons of all antipsychotics with oral olanzapine, the most commonly used antipsychotic, were investigated.

Results

Among the full cohort of 131 476 individuals, the mean (SD) age of the study cohort was 45.7 (16.2) years (70 054 men [53.3%]). During a median follow-up of 12.0 years [IQR, 5.2-16.0 years], 48.5% of patients (N = 63 730) experienced relapse and 71.1% (N = 93 464) underwent treatment failure at least once. Compared with oral olanzapine, paliperidone 3-month long-acting injectable (LAI) was associated with the lowest adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) in the prevention of relapses (AHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86), followed by aripiprazole LAI (AHR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.70-0.84]), olanzapine LAI (AHR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.73-0.86]), and clozapine (AHR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.79-0.86]). Quetiapine was associated with the highest risk of relapse (AHR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.38-1.51]). For prevention of treatment failure, paliperidone 3-month LAI was associated with the lowest AHR (AHR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.31-0.42]), followed by aripiprazole LAI (AHR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.57-0.63]), olanzapine LAI (AHR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.63-0.72]), and paliperidone 1-month LAI (AHR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.68-0.74]).

Conclusions and Relevance

This comparative effectiveness research study demonstrated large differences in the risk of relapse and treatment failure among specific antipsychotic treatments. The findings contradict the widely held conception that all antipsychotics are equally effective in relapse prevention.

Real-World Effectiveness of Menopausal Hormone Therapy in Preventing Relapse in Women With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder

OBJECTIVE

Antipsychotic effectiveness in preventing relapse declines around menopausal age in women with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (SSD). It is not known whether systemic menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) can help to prevent psychosis relapse.

METHODS

A within-subject study design was used to study the effectiveness of MHT in preventing relapse in a Finnish nationwide cohort of women with SSD between 40 and 62 years of age who used MHT during follow-up (1994-2017). Hazard ratios adjusted for age and psychotropic drug use were calculated for psychosis relapse as main outcome and any psychiatric hospitalization as secondary outcome.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 3,488 women using MHT. Use of MHT was associated with a 16% lower relapse risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.84, 95% CI=0.78-0.90) when compared to non-use. Stratified by age, MHT was associated with decreased relapse risks when used between ages 40-49 (aHR=0.86, 95% CI=0.78-0.95) and ages 50-55 (aHR=0.74, 95% CI=0.66-0.83), but not between ages 56-62 (aHR=1.11, 95% CI=0.91-1.37). Similar effectiveness was found for estrogen alone or combined with fixed or sequential progestogens (aHRs between 0.79 and 0.86), transdermal and oral formulations (aHRs 0.75-0.87), and for most specific formulations (aHRs 0.75-0.85), except tibolone (aHR=1.04, 95% CI=0.75-1.44) and formulations with dydrogesterone (aHR=1.05, 95% CI=0.85-1.30). Similar results were observed with any psychiatric hospitalization as outcome measure.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the potential value of MHT in preventing psychosis relapse among women with SSD of menopausal age. These findings translate clinical evidence on the neuroprotective effects of estrogens to real-world settings, encompassing a group of women for whom current antipsychotic treatment options may be insufficient.

Pneumonia Risk, Antipsychotic Dosing, and Anticholinergic Burden in Schizophrenia

Importance

Antipsychotic drugs (particularly clozapine) have been associated with pneumonia in observational studies. Despite studies of the associations between antipsychotic use and incident pneumonia, it remains unclear to what degree antipsychotic use is associated with increased risk of pneumonia, whether dose-response associations exist, and what agents are specifically associated with incident pneumonia.

Objective

To estimate pneumonia risk associated with specific antipsychotics and examine whether polytherapy, dosing, and receptor binding properties are associated with pneumonia in patients with schizophrenia.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study identified patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (hereafter, schizophrenia) aged 16 years or older from nationwide Finnish registers from 1972 to 2014. Data on diagnoses, inpatient care, and specialized outpatient care were obtained from the Hospital Discharge Register. Information on outpatient medication dispensing was obtained from the Prescription Register. Study follow-up was from 1996 to 2017. Data were analyzed from November 4, 2022, to December 5, 2023.

Exposures

Use of specific antipsychotic monotherapies; antipsychotics modeled by dosage as low (<0.6 of the World Health Organization defined daily dose [DDD] per day), medium (0.6 to <1.1 DDDs per day), or high dose (≥1.1 DDDs per day); antipsychotic polypharmacy; and antipsychotics categorized according to their anticholinergic burden as low, medium, and high.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was hospitalization for incident pneumonia. Pneumonia risk was analyzed using adjusted, within-individual Cox proportional hazards regression models, with no antipsychotic use as the reference.

Results

The study included 61 889 persons with schizophrenia (mean [SD] age, 46.2 [16.0] years; 31 104 men [50.3%]). During 22 years of follow-up, 8917 patients (14.4%) had 1 or more hospitalizations for pneumonia and 1137 (12.8%) died within 30 days of admission. Compared with no antipsychotic use, any antipsychotic use overall was not associated with pneumonia (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.99-1.26). Monotherapy use was associated with increased pneumonia risk compared with no antipsychotic use (AHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.02-1.30]; P = .03) in a dose-dependent manner, but polytherapy use was not. When categorized by anticholinergic burden, only the use of antipsychotics with a high anticholinergic burden was associated with pneumonia (AHR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.10-1.45]; P < .001). Of specific drugs, high-dose quetiapine (AHR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.22-2.60]; P = .003), high- and medium-dose clozapine (AHR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.22-1.71]; P < .001 and AHR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.18-1.74]; P < .001, respectively), and high-dose olanzapine (AHR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.05-1.58]; P = .02) were associated with increased pneumonia risk.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that in patients with schizophrenia, antipsychotic agents associated with pneumonia include not only clozapine (at dosages ≥180 mg/d) but also quetiapine (≥440 mg/d) and olanzapine (≥11 mg/d). Moreover, monotherapy antipsychotics and antipsychotics with high anticholinergic burden are associated with increased pneumonia risk in a dose-dependent manner. These findings call for prevention strategies aimed at patients with schizophrenia requiring high-risk antipsychotics.

Genetic and Phenotypic Features of Schizophrenia in the UK Biobank

Importance

Large-scale biobanks provide important opportunities for mental health research, but selection biases raise questions regarding the comparability of individuals with those in clinical research settings.

Objective

To compare the genetic liability to psychiatric disorders in individuals with schizophrenia in the UK Biobank with individuals in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) and to compare genetic liability and phenotypic features with participants recruited from clinical settings.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study included participants from the population-based UK Biobank and schizophrenia samples recruited from clinical settings (CLOZUK, CardiffCOGS, Cardiff F-Series, and Cardiff Affected Sib-Pairs). Data were collected between January 1993 and July 2021. Data analysis was conducted between July 2021 and June 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A genome-wide association study of UK Biobank schizophrenia case-control status was conducted, and the results were compared with those from the PGC via genetic correlations. To test for differences with the clinical samples, polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, and intelligence using PRS-CS. PRS and phenotypic comparisons were conducted using pairwise logistic regressions. The proportions of individuals with copy number variants associated with schizophrenia were compared using Firth logistic regression.

Results

The sample of 517 375 participants included 1438 UK Biobank participants with schizophrenia (550 [38.2%] female; mean [SD] age, 54.7 [8.3] years), 499 475 UK Biobank controls (271 884 [54.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 56.5 [8.1] years), and 4 schizophrenia research samples (4758 [28.9%] female; mean [SD] age, 38.2 [21.0] years). Liability to schizophrenia in UK Biobank was highly correlated with the latest genome-wide association study from the PGC (genetic correlation, 0.98; SE, 0.18) and showed the expected patterns of correlations with other psychiatric disorders. The schizophrenia PRS explained 6.8% of the variance in liability for schizophrenia case status in UK Biobank. UK Biobank participants with schizophrenia had significantly lower schizophrenia PRS than 3 of the clinically ascertained samples and significantly lower rates of schizophrenia-associated copy number variants than the CLOZUK sample. UK Biobank participants with schizophrenia had higher educational attainment and employment rates than the clinically ascertained schizophrenia samples, lower rates of smoking, and a later age of onset of psychosis.

Conclusions and Relevance

Individuals with schizophrenia in the UK Biobank, and likely other volunteer-based biobanks, represent those less severely affected. Their inclusion in wider studies should enhance the representation of the full spectrum of illness severity.

A Nationwide Target Trial Emulation Assessing the Risk of Antidepressant-Induced Mania Among Patients With Bipolar Depression

OBJECTIVE

Antidepressants are commonly used to treat bipolar depression but may increase the risk of mania. The evidence from randomized controlled trials, however, is limited by short treatment durations, providing little evidence for the long-term risk of antidepressant-induced mania. The authors performed a target trial emulation to compare the risk of mania among individuals with bipolar depression treated or not treated with antidepressants over a 1-year period.

METHODS

The authors emulated a target trial using observational data from nationwide Danish health registers. The study included 979 individuals with bipolar depression recently discharged from a psychiatric ward. Of these, 358 individuals received antidepressant treatment, and 621 did not. The occurrence of mania and bipolar depression over the following year was ascertained, and the intention-to-treat effect of antidepressants was analyzed by using Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment for baseline covariates to emulate randomized open-label treatment allocation.

RESULTS

The fully adjusted analyses revealed no statistically significant associations between treatment with an antidepressant and the risk of mania in the full sample (hazard rate ratio=1.08, 95% CI=0.72-1.61), in the subsample concomitantly treated with a mood-stabilizing agent (hazard rate ratio=1.16, 95% CI=0.63-2.13), and in the subsample not treated with a mood-stabilizing agent (hazard rate ratio=1.16, 95% CI=0.65-2.07). Secondary analyses revealed no statistically significant association between treatment with an antidepressant and bipolar depression recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the risk of antidepressant-induced mania is negligible and call for further studies to optimize treatment strategies for individuals with bipolar depression.

Efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics in the treatment of patients with early-phase schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) have advantages over oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in preventing relapse and hospitalization in chronically ill patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSDs), but evidence in patients with first-episode/recent-onset, that is, early-phase-SSDs is less clear.

Objectives

To assess the relative medium- and long-term efficacy and safety of LAIs versus OAPs in the maintenance treatment of patients with early-phase SSDs.

Method

We searched major electronic databases for head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LAIs and OAPs for the maintenance treatment of patients with early-phase-SSDs.

Design

Pairwise, random-effects meta-analysis. Relapse/hospitalization and acceptability (all-cause discontinuation) measured at study-endpoint were co-primary outcomes, calculating risk ratios (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses sought to identify factors moderating differences in efficacy or acceptability between LAIs and OAPs.

Results

Across 11 head-to-head RCTs (n = 2374, median age = 25.2 years, males = 68.4%, median illness duration = 45.8 weeks) lasting 13-104 (median = 78) weeks, no significant differences emerged between LAIs and OAPs for relapse/hospitalization prevention (RR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.58-1.06, p = 0.13) and acceptability (RR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.80-1.05, p = 0.20). The included trials were highly heterogeneous regarding methodology and patient populations. LAIs outperformed OAPs in preventing relapse/hospitalization in studies with stable patients (RR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.45-0.92), pragmatic design (RR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.54-0.82), and strict intent-to-treat approach (RR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.52-0.80). Furthermore, LAIs were associated with better acceptability in studies with schizophrenia patients only (RR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.79-0.95), longer illness duration (RR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.80-0.97), unstable patients (RR = 0.89, 95%CI = 0.81-0.99) and allowed OAP supplementation of LAIs (RR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.81-0.99).

Conclusion

LAIs and OAPs did not differ significantly regarding relapse prevention/hospitalization and acceptability. However, in nine subgroup analyses, LAIs were superior to OAPs in patients with EP-SSDs with indicators of higher quality and/or pragmatic design regarding relapse/hospitalization prevention (four subgroup analyses) and/or reduced all-cause discontinuation (five subgroup analyses), without any instance of OAP superiority versus LAIs. More high-quality pragmatic trials comparing LAIs with OAPs in EP-SSDs are needed.

Trial registration

CRD42023407120 (PROSPERO).

Precision psychiatry: predicting predictability

Precision psychiatry is an emerging field that aims to provide individualized approaches to mental health care. An important strategy to achieve this precision is to reduce uncertainty about prognosis and treatment response. Multivariate analysis and machine learning are used to create outcome prediction models based on clinical data such as demographics, symptom assessments, genetic information, and brain imaging. While much emphasis has been placed on technical innovation, the complex and varied nature of mental health presents significant challenges to the successful implementation of these models. From this perspective, I review ten challenges in the field of precision psychiatry, including the need for studies on real-world populations and realistic clinical outcome definitions, and consideration of treatment-related factors such as placebo effects and non-adherence to prescriptions. Fairness, prospective validation in comparison to current practice and implementation studies of prediction models are other key issues that are currently understudied. A shift is proposed from retrospective studies based on linear and static concepts of disease towards prospective research that considers the importance of contextual factors and the dynamic and complex nature of mental health.

Influence of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 on side effects of aripiprazole and risperidone: A systematic review

Variability in hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes such as 2C19 and 2D6 may influence side-effect and efficacy outcomes for antipsychotics. Aripiprazole and risperidone are two commonly prescribed antipsychotics, metabolized primarily through CYP2D6. Here, we aimed to provide an overview of the effect of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 on side-effects of aripiprazole and risperidone, and expand on existing literature by critically examining methodological issues associated with pharmacogenetic studies. A PRISMA compliant search of six electronic databases (Pubmed, PsychInfo, Embase, Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) identified pharmacogenetic studies on aripiprazole and risperidone. 2007 publications were first identified, of which 34 were included. Quality of literature was estimated using Newcastle-Ottowa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) and revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The average NOS score was 5.8 (range: 3-8) for risperidone literature and 5 for aripiprazole (range: 4-6). All RCTs on aripiprazole were rated as high risk of bias, and four out of six for risperidone literature. Study populations ranged from healthy volunteers to inpatient individuals in psychiatric units and included adult and pediatric samples. All n = 34 studies examined CYP2D6. Only one study genotyped for CYP2C19 and found a positive association with neurological side-effects of risperidone. Most studies did not report any relationship between CYP2D6 and any side-effect outcome. Heterogeneity between and within studies limited the ability to synthesize data and draw definitive conclusions. Studies lacked statistical power due to small sample size, selective genotyping methods, and study design. Large-scale randomized trials with multiple measurements, providing robust evidence on this topic, are suggested.

Prevalence of multimorbidity in people with and without severe mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

People with severe mental illness, such as schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and bipolar disorder, face poorer health outcomes from multiple chronic illnesses. Physical multimorbidity, the coexistence of two or more chronic physical conditions, and psychiatric multimorbidity, the coexistence of three or more psychiatric disorders, are both emerging concepts useful in conceptualising disease burden. However, the prevalence of physical and psychiatric multimorbidity in this cohort is unknown. This study aimed to estimate the absolute prevalence of both physical and psychiatric multimorbidity in people with severe mental illness, and also compare the odds of physical multimorbidity prevalence against people without severe mental illness.

METHODS

We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, and PsycINFO from inception until Feb 15, 2024, for observational studies that measured multimorbidity prevalence. To be included, studies had to have an observational study design, be conducted in an adult population (mean age ≥18 years) diagnosed with either schizophrenia-spectrum disorder or bipolar disorder, and include a measurement of occurrence of either physical multimorbidity (≥2 physical health conditions) or psychiatric multimorbidity (≥3 psychiatric conditions total, including the severe mental illness). From control studies, a random-effects meta-analysis compared odds of physical multimorbidity between people with and without severe mental illness. Absolute prevalence of physical and psychiatric multimorbidity in people with severe mental illness was also calculated. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses tested an array of demographic, diagnostic, and methodological variables.

FINDINGS

From 11 144 citations we included 82 observational studies featuring 1 623 773 individuals with severe mental illness (specifically schizophrenia-spectrum disorder or bipolar disorder), of which 21 studies featured 13 235 882 control individuals without severe mental illness (descriptive data for the entire pooled cohorts were not available for numbers of males and females, age, and ethnicity). This study did not feature involvement of people with lived experience. The odds ratio (OR) of physical multimorbidity between people with and without severe mental illness was 2·40 (95% CI 1·57-3·65, k=11, p=0·0009). This ratio was higher in younger severe mental illness populations (mean age ≤40 years, OR 3·99, 95% CI 1·43-11·10) compared with older populations (mean age >40 years, OR 1·55, 95% CI 0·96-2·51; subgroup differences p=0·0013). For absolute prevalence, 25% of those with severe mental illness have physical multimorbidity (95% CI 0·19-0·32, k=29) and 14% have psychiatric multimorbidity (95% CI 0·08-0·23, k=21).

INTERPRETATION

This is the first meta-analysis to estimate physical alongside psychiatric multimorbidity prevalence, showing that these are common in people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and bipolar disorder. The greater burden of physical multimorbidity in people with severe mental illness compared with those without is higher for younger cohorts, reflecting a need for earlier intervention. Our findings speak to the utility of multimorbidity for characterising the disease burden associated with severe mental illness, and the importance of facilitating integrated physical and mental health care.

FUNDING

None.

On the Road to Individualizing Pharmacotherapy for Adolescents and Adults with Schizophrenia - Results from an Expert Consensus Following the Delphi Method

Introduction

Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness that usually begins in late adolescence or early adulthood. Current pharmacological treatments, while acceptably effective for many patients, are rarely clinically tailored or individualized. The lack of sufficient etiopathological knowledge of the disease, together with overall comparable effect sizes for efficacy between available antipsychotics and the absence of clinically actionable biomarkers, has hindered the advance of individualized medicine in the treatment of schizophrenia. Nevertheless, some degree of stratification based on clinical markers could guide treatment choices and help clinicians move toward individualized psychiatry. To this end, a panel of experts met to formally discuss the current approach to individualized treatment in schizophrenia and to define how treatment individualization could help improve clinical outcomes.

Methods

A task force of seven experts iteratively developed, evaluated, and refined questionnaire items, which were then evaluated using the Delphi method. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize and rank expert responses. Expert discussion, informed by the results of a scoping review on personalizing the pharmacologic treatment of adults and adolescents with schizophrenia, ultimately generated recommendations to guide individualized pharmacologic treatment in this population.

Results

There was substantial agreement among the expert group members, resulting in the following recommendations: 1) individualization of treatment requires consideration of the patient's diagnosis, clinical presentation, comorbidities, previous treatment response, drug tolerability, adherence patterns, and social factors; 2) patient preferences should be considered in a shared decision-making approach; 3) identified barriers to personalized care that need to be overcome include the lack of actionable biomarkers and mechanistic similarities between available treatments, but digital tools should be increasingly used to enhance individualized treatment.

Conclusion

Individualized care can help provide effective, tailored treatments based on an individual's clinical characteristics, disease trajectory, family and social environment, and goals and preferences.

Racial Disparities Among Clinical High-Risk and First-Episode Psychosis Multisite Research Participants: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The NIH has mandated equal representation of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) individuals in clinical research, but it is unclear whether such inclusion has been achieved in multisite research studies of individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis or with first-episode psychosis (FEP). An assessment of inclusion rates is important for understanding the social determinants of psychosis and psychosis risk that specifically affect BIPOC individuals.

METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature published between 1993 and 2022 of multisite research studies of clinical high risk for psychosis and FEP in North America to determine ethnoracial inclusion rates. Using an online systematic review tool, the authors checked 2,278 studies for eligibility. Twelve studies met all inclusion criteria. Data were extracted, and demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, study design, and recruitment strategies used by each study were analyzed.

RESULTS

Most (62%) of the participants in studies of clinical high risk for psychosis were White. Compared with national data, the demographic characteristics of individuals with clinical high risk were representative across most ethnoracial groups. Black participants (43%) made up the largest ethnoracial group in FEP studies and were overrepresented compared with their representation in the U.S. population. FEP studies were more likely to recruit participants from community mental health centers than were the studies of clinical high risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Although these results suggest high representation of BIPOC individuals in psychosis research, opportunities exist for an improved focus on ethnoracial representation. The authors offer recommendations for practices that may increase ethnoracial diversity in future psychosis study samples.

First generation antipsychotic-associated serious adverse events in women: a retrospective analysis of a pharmacovigilance database

BACKGROUND

Women have been under-represented in trials of antipsychotic medications.

AIM

Our primary objective was to evaluate five adverse events (AE) associated with first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) among women relative to men through an analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHOD

We queried 24.6 million AE reports from 2000 to 2023 involving FGAs. The study cohort consisted of chlorpromazine (n = 3317), fluphenazine (n = 1124), haloperidol (n = 16,709), loxapine (n = 3151), perphenazine (n = 816), thioridazine (n = 665), thiothixene (n = 244), and trifluoperazine (n = 360). Cases of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), tardive dyskinesia (TD), Torsades de Pointes (TdP), agranulocytosis (AG), and cerebrovascular adverse events (CVAE) were identified. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with logistic regression for each AE among women relative to men.

RESULTS

A total of 2,857 serious AEs were evaluated in the study cohort (NMS = 1810, TD = 434, TdP = 260, AG = 149, CVAE = 204). The ROR for women compared to men was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.71-0.87) for NMS, 0.83 (0.68-1.01) for TD, 1.21 (0.94-1.53) for TdP, 0.71 (0.51-0.98) for AG, and 0.91 (0.68-1.19) for CVAE. A secondary analysis revealed a higher odds in women compared to men of hospitalization associated with reports of TD (ROR = 1.95, 1.29-2.94) and death associated with reports of AG (ROR = 2.46, 1.15-5.24). A subgroup analysis of haloperidol revealed an ROR = 1.67 (1.26-2.21) for women relative to men for TdP.

CONCLUSION

The subgroup analysis of haloperidol AEs revealed a significantly higher reporting odds ratio for TdP. Additionally, the secondary study findings suggest that women were more vulnerable to worse outcomes associated with certain AEs of FGAs.

Multi-registry analysis of patients with multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica to improve capture of demographic data and compare visual outcomes

IMPORTANCE

The American Academy of Neurology Axon Registry® provides real-world data for patients with multiple sclerosis and neuro-myelitis optica. However, some data are incomplete (e.g. demographics) and some relevant outcomes are not systematically captured in neurology documentation (e.g. visual acuity). The American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) contains demographic and visual function data that may complement Axon Registry-derived data to enhance understanding of real-world visual outcomes in neurological disease.

OBJECTIVE

To combine Axon Registry and IRIS Registry data to reduce missingness of demographic information and characterize visual outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis and neuro-myelitis optica.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Outpatient neurology and ophthalmology clinical practices.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients participating in both registries between January 1, 2014 through December 10, 2021 were included if they had repeat ICD-9/10 codes for with multiple sclerosis or neuro-myelitis optica in the Axon registry.

EXPOSURE

Diagnosis (multiple sclerosis or neuro-myelitis optica).

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

Age, sex, race and ethnicity were assessed in the individual registries and classified as conflicting, missing, or not missing in the combined data set. The IRIS Registry contributed visual acuity data.

RESULTS

Among 60,316 patients with multiple sclerosis and 1,068 patients with neuro-myelitis optica in the Axon Registry, 14,085 and 252 had temporal overlap in the IRIS Registry. Combining data reduced missing or conflicting data for race and ethnicity by 15-19 % (absolute reduction, all p ≤ 0.0005), but not age (p = 1.0) or gender (p = 0.08). 10,907 patients with MS and 142 with NMO had visual acuity data in the IRIS Registry. Visual acuity averaged between eyes was worse in patients with NMO after adjusting for age and gender (0.17 logMAR, 95 %CI 0.12,0.21, p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Using data from two registries reduced missing data for race and ethnicity and enabled examination of outcomes captured in the IRIS Registry for conditions that are diagnosed more frequently in the Axon Registry, demonstrating the utility of a multi-registry analysis.

Real-World Effectiveness of High-Dose Olanzapine and Clozapine for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia in Japan: A Retrospective Bidirectional Mirror-Image Study

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is considered the gold standard medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). However, given that clozapine treatment is associated with the burden of regular blood monitoring and the risk of life-threatening adverse effects, high-dose olanzapine can serve as an alternative treatment. We conducted a bidirectional mirror-image study to evaluate the effectiveness of high-dose olanzapine compared with clozapine.

METHODS

We included patients with TRS who switched from olanzapine to clozapine or switched from clozapine to olanzapine, and received high-dose (>20 mg/d) olanzapine treatment for ≥4 weeks at Yamanashi Prefectural Kita Hospital. We obtained data on hospitalization, seclusion, and modified electroconvulsive therapy (mECT) during the clozapine phase and the olanzapine phase.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were included. When patients switched from high-dose olanzapine to clozapine (n = 32), significant reductions were found in the total days of seclusion, the total number of mECT, and the number of patients who received mECT at least once. When patients switched from clozapine to high-dose olanzapine (n = 12), a significant reduction was found in the number of patients who received mECT at least once. When data from both directions of treatment were combined, significant reductions were found in the total days of seclusion, the total number of mECT, and the number of patients who received mECT at least once in favor of clozapine.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that high-dose olanzapine may not be as effective as clozapine for patients with TRS in real-world practice. However, it should be noted that there are unique circumstances that restrict the use of clozapine in Japan.

Comprehensive evaluation of 45 augmentation drugs for schizophrenia: a network meta-analysis

Background

Antipsychotics are the gold standard treatment for schizophrenia, but many patients who receive treatment experience persistent symptoms. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of augmentation drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Methods

In accordance with the PRISMA statement, the PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CENTRAL, clinical trial and EUDRACT databases were searched from inception to May 15th, 2023. To ensure the robustness of the results, only double-blind randomised controlled trials with a low risk of bias (measured by the Risk Of Bias v2 (ROB2) tool) were included. The studies were categorised according to the background regimen: participants were treated with risperidone, mixed antipsychotics or clozapine. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. PROSPERO register: CRD42023420964.

Findings

A total of 44 trials (comprising 45 augmentation drugs and 3358 participants) were included in the analysis. One-third of the drugs (16 drugs) demonstrated significant efficacy vs. placebo for at least one outcome. The most notable effect sizes (ESs) were observed for the use of tropisetron (standard mean difference: -0.83 [95% interval confidence -1.12 to -0.55]), memantine (-0.50 [-0.66 to -0.32]) and minocycline (-0.56 [-0.72 to -0.39]) to treat negative symptoms among patients treated with risperidone (moderate-to-high ESs). Studies involving mixed antipsychotics yielded lower ESs (small-to-moderate). Sodium benzoate (-0.41 [-0.60 to -0.21]) and memantine (-0.23 [-0.36 to -0.11]) were found have significant effects on positive symptoms, while memantine demonstrated efficacy for negative symptoms (-0.32 [-0.45 to -0.19]) and general psychopathology (-0.32 [-0.44 to -0.20]). Studies focusing exclusively on patients treated with clozapine revealed that duloxetine produced the best results (negative symptoms: -1.12 [-1.35 to -0.91]). Sodium benzoate was the only augmentation drug that demonstrated efficacy in relieving persistent positive symptoms (-0.32 [-0.59 to -0.08]) among patients treated with clozapine. Treatment with clozapine in combination with antipsychotics yielded small-to-moderate ESs.

Interpretation

The GRADE framework indicated that the quality of the evidence among the included studies was moderate, primarily due to the limited number of randomised controlled trials with a low risk of bias. Important drugs did not appear in these results due to insufficient low-risk-of-bias data for these medications. These results highlight new pathways for treating schizophrenia that should be incorporated into future guidelines after further validation.

Funding

No funding.

Efficacy and effectiveness of antipsychotics in schizophrenia: network meta-analyses combining evidence from randomised controlled trials and real-world data

BACKGROUND

There is debate about the generalisability of results from randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to real-world settings. Studying outcomes of treatments for schizophrenia can shed light on this issue and inform treatment guidelines. We therefore compared the efficacy and effectiveness of antipsychotics for relapse prevention in schizophrenia and estimated overall treatment effects using all available RCT and real-world evidence.

METHODS

We conducted network meta-analyses using individual participant data from Swedish and Finnish national registries and aggregate data from RCTs. The target population was adults (age >18 and <65 years) with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder with stabilised symptoms. We analysed each registry separately to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for relapse within 6 months post-antipsychotic initiation as our main outcome. Interventions studied were antipsychotics, no antipsychotic use, and placebo. We compared HRs versus a reference drug (oral haloperidol) between registries, and between registry individuals who would be eligible and ineligible for RCTs, using the ratio of HRs. We synthesised evidence using network meta-analysis and compared results from our network meta-analysis of real-world data with our network meta-analysis of RCT data, including oral versus long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations. Finally, we conducted a joint real-world and RCT network meta-analysis.

FINDINGS

We included 90 469 individuals from the Swedish and Finnish registries (mean age 45·9 [SD 14·6] years; 43 025 [47·5%] women and 47 467 [52·5%] men, ethnicity data unavailable) and 10 091 individuals from 30 RCTs (mean age 39·6 years [SD 11·7]; 3724 [36·9%] women and 6367 [63·1%] men, 6022 White [59·7%]). We found good agreement in effectiveness of antipsychotics between Swedish and Finnish registries (HR ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·88-1·08). Drug effectiveness versus no antipsychotic was larger in RCT-eligible than RCT-ineligible individuals (HR ratio 1·40 [1·24-1·59]). Efficacy versus placebo in RCTs was larger than effectiveness versus no antipsychotic in real-world (HR ratio 2·58 [2·02-3·30]). We found no evidence of differences between effectiveness and efficacy for between-drug comparisons (HR ratio vs oral haloperidol 1·17 [0·83-1·65], where HR ratio >1 means superior effectiveness in real-world to RCTs), except for LAI versus oral comparisons (HR ratio 0·73 [0·53-0·99], indicating superior effectiveness in real-world data relative to RCTs). The real-world network meta-analysis showed clozapine was most effective, followed by olanzapine LAI. The RCT network meta-analysis exhibited heterogeneity and inconsistency. The joint real-world and RCT network meta-analysis identified olanzapine as the most efficacious antipsychotic amongst those present in both RCTs and the real world registries.

INTERPRETATION

LAI antipsychotics perform slightly better in the real world than according to RCTs. Otherwise, RCT evidence was in line with real-world evidence for most between-drug comparisons, but RCTs might overestimate effectiveness of antipsychotics observed in routine care settings. Our results further the understanding of the generalisability of RCT findings to clinical practice and can inform preferential prescribing guidelines.

FUNDING

None.

Long-Acting Injectable Second-Generation Antipsychotics vs Placebo and Their Oral Formulations in Acute Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled-Trials

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Long-acting injectable antipsychotic drugs (LAIs) are mainly used for relapse prevention but could also be advantageous for acutely ill patients with schizophrenia.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled-trials (RCTs) comparing the second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics (SGA-LAIs) olanzapine, risperidone, paliperidone, and aripiprazole with placebo or their oral counterparts in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia. We analyzed 23 efficacy and tolerability outcomes, with the primary outcome being overall symptoms of schizophrenia. The results were obtained through random effects, pairwise meta-analyses, and subgroup tests. The study quality was assessed using the Cochrane-Risk-of-Bias-Tool version-1.

STUDY RESULTS

Sixty-six studies with 16 457 participants were included in the analysis. Eleven studies compared second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics (SGA-LAIs) with a placebo, 54 compared second-generation oral antipsychotics (SGA-orals) with a placebo, and one compared an SGA-LAI (aripiprazole) with its oral formulation. All 4 SGA-LAIs reduced overall symptoms more than placebo, with mean standardized differences of -0.66 (95% CI: -0.90; -0.43) for olanzapine, -0.64 (-0.80; -0.48) for aripiprazole, -0.62 (-0.76; -0.48) for risperidone and -0.42 (-0.53; -0.31) for paliperidone. The side-effect profiles of the LAIs corresponded to the patterns known from the oral formulations. In subgroup tests compared to placebo, some side effects were less pronounced under LAIs than under their oral formulations.

CONCLUSIONS

SGA-LAIs effectively treat acute schizophrenia. Some side effects may be less frequent than under oral drugs, but due to the indirect nature of the comparisons, this finding must be confirmed by RCTs comparing LAIs and orals head-to-head.

Relapse in clinically stable adult patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: evidence-based criteria derived by equipercentile linking and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on defining relapse in schizophrenia, and scale-derived criteria with unclear clinical relevance are widely used. We aimed to develop an evidence-based scale-derived set of criteria to define relapse in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

METHODS

We searched the Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, and obtained individual participant data on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S), Personal and Social Performance (PSP), and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). Our main outcomes were PANSS-derived criteria based on worsening in PANSS total score. We examined their relevance using equipercentile linking with CGI-S and functioning scales, and their test-performance in defining relapse with diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis against CGI-S worsening (≥1-point increase together with a score ≥4 points) and psychiatric hospitalisation.

FINDINGS

Based on data from seven RCTs (2354 participants; 1348 men [57·3%] and 1006 women [42·7%], mean age of 39·5 years [SD 12·0, range 17-89]; 303 Asian [12.9%], 255 Black [10.8%], 1665 White [70.7%], and other or unspecified 131 [5.6%]), an increase of 12 points or more in PANSS total (range 30-210 points) corresponded to clinically important deterioration in global severity of illness (≥1 point increase in CGI-S, range 1-7) and functioning (≥10 points decline in PSP or SOFAS, range 1-100). The interpretation of percentage changes varied importantly across different baseline scores. An increase of 12 points or more in PANSS total had good sensitivity and specificity using CGI-S as reference standard (sensitivity 82·1% [95% CI 77·1-86·4], specificity 86·9% [82·9-90·3]), as well as good sensitivity but lower specificity compared to hospitalisation (sensitivity 81·7% [74·1-87·7], specificity 69·2% [60·5-76·9]). Requiring either an increase in PANSS total or in specific items for positive and disorganization symptoms further improved test-performance. Cutoffs for situations where high sensitivity or specificity is needed are presented.

INTERPRETATION

An increase of either 12 points or more in the PANSS total score, or worsening of specific positive and disorganisation symptom items could be a reasonable evidence-based definition of relapse in schizophrenia, potentially linking symptoms used to define remission and relapse. Percentage changes should not be used to define relapse because their interpretation depends on baseline scores.

FUNDING

German Research Foundation (grant number: 428509362).

Challenges, unmet needs and future directions - a critical evaluation of the clinical trial landscape in schizophrenia research

INTRODUCTION

Developing novel antipsychotic mechanisms of action and repurposing established compounds for the treatment of schizophrenia is of utmost importance to improve relevant symptom domains and to improve the risk/benefit ratio of antipsychotic compounds. Novel trial design concepts, pathophysiology-based targeted treatment approaches, or even the return to old values may improve schizophrenia outcomes in the future.

AREAS COVERED

In this review of the clinical trial landscape in schizophrenia, we present an overview of the challenges and gaps in current clinical trials and elaborate on potential solutions to improve the outcomes of people with schizophrenia.

EXPERT OPINION

The classic parallel group design may limit substantial advantages in drug approval or repurposing. Collaborative approaches between regulatory authorities, industry, academia, and funding agencies are needed to overcome barriers in clinical schizophrenia research to allow for meaningful outcome improvements for the patients.

Oral and long-acting injectable antipsychotic discontinuation and relationship to side effects in people with first episode psychosis: a longitudinal analysis of electronic health record data

Background

Discontinuation of treatment in people with first episode psychosis (FEP) is common, but the extent to which this is related to specific adverse effects of antipsychotic medications is unclear.

Objectives

To investigate whether antipsychotic discontinuation is associated with the prescription of particular antipsychotics and particular adverse effects.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

We assembled de-identified electronic health record (EHR) data from 2309 adults with FEP who received care from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust between 1st April 2008 and 31st March 2019. Associations between antipsychotic medications, clinician-recorded side effects and treatment discontinuation were investigated across a mean follow-up period of 34.2 months using Cox regression.

Results

The mean age of patients was 26.7 years and 1492 (64.6%) were male. Among first prescribed antipsychotic medications, discontinuation occurred earlier with haloperidol [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.69-4.60] and quetiapine (HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.16-1.80) than with olanzapine. Discontinuation occurred sooner when there was evidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.08-1.64) or sexual dysfunction (HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.03-2.46). Among antipsychotics prescribed at any point during treatment, lurasidone (HR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.10-1.78) and aripiprazole (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01-1.19) were associated with earlier discontinuation than olanzapine. Conversely, clozapine (HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41-0.73) and paliperidone 1-monthly (PP1M) long-acting injectable (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.68-0.94) were associated with later discontinuation. Unexpectedly, for antipsychotics prescribed at any stage of treatment, sedation (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81-0.97), weight gain (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.64-0.83), and multiple side effects (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.76-0.90) were associated with later discontinuation.

Conclusion

Earlier treatment discontinuation associated with sexual or extrapyramidal side effects could be related to their rapid onset and poor tolerability. Later treatment discontinuation associated with clozapine and PP1M could be related to the relative efficacy of these treatments. These findings merit consideration when selecting antipsychotic therapy for people with FEP.

Assessing the validity of a self-reported clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia

Background

Diagnoses in psychiatric research can be derived from various sources. This study assesses the validity of a self-reported clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Methods

The study included 3,029 clinically ascertained participants with schizophrenia or psychotic disorders diagnosed by self-report and/or research interview and 1,453 UK Biobank participants with self-report and/or medical record diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder depressed-type (SA-D). We assessed positive predictive values (PPV) of self-reported clinical diagnoses against research interview and medical record diagnoses. We compared polygenic risk scores (PRS) and phenotypes across diagnostic groups, and compared the variance explained by schizophrenia PRS to samples in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC).

Results

In the clinically ascertained sample, the PPV of self-reported schizophrenia to a research diagnosis of schizophrenia was 0.70, which increased to 0.81 when benchmarked against schizophrenia or SA-D. In UK Biobank, the PPV of self-reported schizophrenia to a medical record diagnosis was 0.74. Compared to self-report participants, those with a research diagnosis were younger and more likely to have a high school qualification (clinically ascertained sample) and those with a medical record diagnosis were less likely to be employed or have a high school qualification (UK Biobank). Schizophrenia PRS did not differ between participants that had a diagnosis from self-report, research diagnosis or medical record diagnosis. Polygenic liability r2, for all diagnosis definitions, fell within the distribution of PGC schizophrenia cohorts.

Conclusions

Self-report measures of schizophrenia are justified in research to maximise sample size and representativeness, although within sample validation of diagnoses is recommended.

The Direct and Long-Term Effects of Raloxifene as Adjunctive Treatment for Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Several studies suggest that raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, improves symptoms and cognition in post-menopausal women with Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders (SSD). We aimed to assess the effects of adjunctive raloxifene in women and men with SSD.

STUDY DESIGN

This parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included adult SSD patients across the Netherlands and Belgium. Participants were stratified by age, sex, and global functioning and randomly assigned 1:1 to 12-week add-on raloxifene or placebo. Primary outcomes were symptom severity at 6, 12, and 38 weeks and cognition at 12 and 38 weeks, as measured with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, respectively. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed using linear mixed-effect models.

STUDY RESULTS

We assessed 261 patients for eligibility, of which 102 (28% female) were assigned to raloxifene (n = 52) or placebo (n = 48). Although we found no main effect of raloxifene, secondary sex-specific analysis showed that in women, raloxifene had beneficial effects on negative symptoms at week 6 (LSM -2.92; adjusted P = 0.020) and week 12 (LSM -3.12; adjusted P = 0.030), and on working memory at week 38 (LSM 0.73; adjusted P = 0.040), while having negative effects on working memory at week 38 in men (LSM -0.53; adjusted P = 0.026). The number of adverse events was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not support the use of raloxifene in patients with SSD in general, but suggest female-specific beneficial effects of raloxifene on negative symptoms and working memory. Our findings encourage further research on sex-specific pharmacotherapeutic treatment.

Expanded access to investigational drugs in psychiatry: A systematic review

Some psychiatric patients have exhausted all approved treatment options. Numerous investigational drugs are currently being developed and tested in clinical trials. However, not all patients can participate in clinical trials. Expanded access programs may provide an opportunity for patients who cannot participate in clinical trials to use investigational drugs as a therapeutic option outside of clinical trials. It is unknown to what extent expanded access occurs in psychiatry. We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, and PscyInfo, with additional information from ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and FDA/EMA approvals, in order to find all expanded access programs ever conducted, globally, in the field of psychiatry. This resulted in a total of fourteen expanded access programs ever conducted in psychiatry. Given the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, the activity in clinical research in psychiatry, the regulatory framework enabling expanded access, and the impact of psychiatric disorders on patients, their families, and society, we had expected a higher utilization of expanded access. We propose that the psychiatric community, with pharmaceutical industry, should consider establishing and optimizing expanded access programs.

Digital Phenotyping in Adults with Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As care for older adult patients with schizophrenia lacks innovation, technology can help advance the field. Specifically, digital phenotyping, the real-time monitoring of patients' behaviors through smartphone sensors and symptoms through surveys, holds promise as the method can capture the dynamicity and environmental correlates of disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Few studies have used digital phenotyping to elucidate adult patients' experiences with schizophrenia. In this narrative review, we summarized the literature using digital phenotyping on adults with schizophrenia. No study focused solely on older adult patients. Studies including all adult patients were heterogeneous in measures used, duration, and outcomes. Despite limited research, digital phenotyping shows potential for monitoring outcomes such as negative, positive, and functional symptoms, as well as predicting relapse. Future research should work to target the symptomology persistent in chronic schizophrenia and ensure all patients have the digital literacy required to benefit from digital interventions and homogenize datasets to allow for more robust conclusions.

Sexual Dysfunction in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

In individuals with schizophrenia, antipsychotic-induced dysfunctions are frequent but often underexplored in clinical practice.

Objective

To synthetize the data of observational studies exploring the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders as well as associated factors.

Data Sources

A systematic literature search without language or time restrictions was conducted in Google, Google Scholar, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, and Université Sorbonne Paris Cité for studies published up to June 8, 2022.

Study Selection

All observational studies reporting a prevalence of sexual dysfunction in schizophrenia-spectrum disorder were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The MOOSE guidelines with independent extraction by 2 observers and random-effects models were used.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The prevalence of sexual dysfunction and each specific dysfunction.

Results

A total of 72 of 1119 studies from 33 countries on 6 continents published from inception to June 2022 were included with a total of 21 076 participants with schizophrenia. The pooled global prevalence of sexual dysfunctions was 56.4% (95% CI, 50.5-62.2), with a prevalence of 55.7% (95% CI, 48.1-63.1) for men and 60.0% (95% CI, 48.0-70.8) for women. The most frequent sexual dysfunction was erectile dysfunction in men (44%; 95% CI, 33.5-55.2), followed by loss of libido in men (41%; 95% CI, 30.7-51.4), ejaculation dysfunction in men (39%; 95% CI, 26.8-51.8), orgasm dysfunction in women (28%; 95% CI, 18.4-40.2), and amenorrhea in women (25%; 95% CI, 17.3-35.0). Factors associated with heterogeneity were study design, time and location, sociodemographic data, alcohol use disorder, psychiatric diagnosis, illness severity, and the use of antidepressants and anxiolytics. Sexual dysfunctions were more frequent in schizophrenia vs schizoaffective disorders, and erectile disorders were less frequent in individuals with longer illness duration. Antidepressant and mood stabilizer prescriptions were associated with lower rates of erection disorders (β, -6.30; 95% CI, -10.82 to -1.78); P = .006 and -13.21; 95% CI, -17.59 to -8.83; P < .001, respectively) and ejaculation disorders (β, -6.10; 95% CI, -10.68 to -1.53; P = .009 and β, -11.57; 95% CI, -16.34 to -6.80; P < .001, respectively). No obvious improvements in the rates of sexual dysfunction at other times were found, and there were conflicting results regarding antipsychotic classes.

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review and meta-analysis found a high prevalence of sexual dysfunction among individuals with schizophrenia, with considerable heterogeneity in associated factors. The findings also suggest that some dysfunctions may be explained by schizophrenia. The association between lower rates of dysfunction and antidepressant use suggests that treating comorbid depression could be an effective strategy to improve sexual health. A lack of data on metabolic parameters and physical health in general was also noted, while these issues are frequent in the care of schizophrenia.

Intestinal permeability and low-grade chronic inflammation in schizophrenia: A multicentre study on biomarkers. Rationale, objectives, protocol and preliminary results

BACKGROUND

Altered intestinal permeability and low-grade chronic inflammation disrupt the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (microbiota-gut-brain axis), probably playing a role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. However, studies assessing the microbiota-gut-brain axis are inconsistent. This article describes the rationale, objectives, protocol, and presents descriptive results for a new project.

METHODS

The sample of this study came from an observational, cross-sectional and multisite study including four centers in Spain (PI17/00246) recruiting adult patients with DSM-5 schizophrenia-spectrum disorders at any stage of the disease. The aims of the project are to assess the interrelation between intestinal permeability and low-grade chronic inflammation in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and the role of peripheral biomarkers, diet, exercise, metabolic syndrome, disease severity and functioning as well as cognition. Assessments included the following variables: (1) anthropometric, (2) intestinal permeability, diet, and physical exercise, (3) clinical and functional, (4) neuropsychological and cognitive reserve, and (5) peripheral biomarkers from blood.

RESULTS

A total of 646 patients were enrolled (257, 39.7% female). Mean age was 43.2±13.6 years, illness duration 15.1±11.5 years. 55.8% consumed tobacco. Positive PANSS score was 13.68±6.55, and 20.38±8.69 in the negative symptoms. CGI was 4.16±2.22 and GAF was 60.00±14.84.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained by this project are expected to contribute toward the understanding of the physiopathology of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. This will likely aid to personalize treatments in real-world clinical practice, potentially including variables related to intestinal permeability and inflammation.

Comparative effectiveness study of paliperidone palmitate 6-month with a real-world external comparator arm of paliperidone palmitate 1-month or 3-month in patients with schizophrenia

Background

The paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) long-acting injectable formulation is currently the longest dosing interval available for schizophrenia treatment.

Objective

To compare treatment outcomes between a real-world external comparator arm (ECA; NeuroBlu database) and the PP6M open-label extension (OLE) clinical trial arm.

Methods

The ECA comprised patients receiving PP 1-month (PP1M) or PP 3-month (PP3M) for ⩾12 months without a relapse. The PP6M OLE arm included patients with PP1M treatment prior to randomization who completed the 12-month double-blind PP6M study on either PP3M or PP6M relapse-free. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to study time-to-relapse (primary outcome) and change in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score (secondary outcome).

Results

At 24 months, 3.9% (7/178) of patients in the PP6M cohort experienced a relapse versus 15.6% (26/167) in the ECA. Time-to-relapse was longer in the PP6M cohort versus the ECA at 12-, 18-, and 24-months across the different weighting methods; median time-to-relapse was not reached in both cohorts. Hazard ratio (HR) for relapse was significantly lower for the PP6M cohort versus the ECA throughout the duration of the study [HR at 24 months: 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08-0.42), p < 0.001]. At 24 months, change in CGI-S score for the PP6M cohort was 0.76 points lower than the ECA (p < 0.001). Results were similar in a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching (PSM); IPTW resulted in larger sample sizes in balanced dataset than PSM.

Conclusion

Consistent findings across weighting and matching methods suggest PP6M efficacy in reducing and delaying relapses and long-term symptom control compared to PP1M/PP3M in usual-care settings. Additional confounds, such as greater illness severity and more frequent comorbidities and comedications in the ECA, were not fully controlled by the applied statistical methods. Future real-world studies directly comparing PP6M with PP3M/PP1M and adjusting for these confounders are warranted.