1
|
Gundavda KK, Patkar S, Varty GP, Shah N, Velmurugan K, Goel M. Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2025; 15:102401. [PMID: 39286759 PMCID: PMC11402310 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a significant global health burden. Surgery remains a cornerstone in the curative treatment of HCC, and recent years have witnessed notable advancements aimed at refining surgical techniques and improving patient outcomes. This review presents a detailed examination of the recent innovations in HCC surgery, highlighting key developments in both surgical approaches and adjunctive therapies. Advanced imaging technologies have revolutionized preoperative assessment, enabling precise tumour localization and delineation of vascular anatomy. The use of three-dimensional rendering has significantly augmented surgical planning, facilitating more accurate and margin-free resections. The advent of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgical techniques has ushered in an era of minimal access surgery, offering patients the benefits of shorter hospital stays and faster recovery times, while enabling equivalent oncological outcomes. Intraoperative innovations such as intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) and fluorescence-guided surgery have emerged as valuable adjuncts, allowing real-time assessment of tumour extent and aiding in parenchyma preservation. The integration of multimodal therapies, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies, has allowed for 'bio-selection' and shown the potential to optimize patient outcomes. With the advent of augmented reality and artificial intelligence (AI), the future holds immense potential and may represent significant strides towards optimizing patient outcomes and refining the standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaival K Gundavda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Gurudutt P Varty
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Niket Shah
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Karthik Velmurugan
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lopez-Lopez V, Kalt F, Zhong JH, Guidetti C, Magistri P, Di Benedetto F, Weinmann A, Mittler J, Lang H, Sharma R, K VM, Tariq S, Sánchez-Velázquez P, Rompianesi G, Troisi RI, Gómez-Gavara C, Dalmau M, Sanchez-Romero FJ, Llamoza C, Tschuor C, Deniz U, Lurje G, Husen P, Hügli S, Jonas JP, Rössler F, Kron P, Ramser M, Ramirez P, Lehmann K, Robles-Campos R, Eshmuminov D. The role of resection in hepatocellular carcinoma BCLC stage B: A multi-institutional patient-level meta-analysis and systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:277. [PMID: 39269544 PMCID: PMC11399194 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03466-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging schema is widely used for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. In the updated recommendations, HCC BCLC stage B can become candidates for transplantation. In contrast, hepatectomy is currently not recommended. METHODS This systematic review includes a multi-institutional meta-analysis of patient-level data. Survival, postoperative mortality, morbidity and patient selection criteria for liver resection and transplantation in BCLC stage B are explored. All clinical studies reporting HCC patients with BCLC stage B undergoing liver resection or transplantation were included. RESULTS A total of 31 studies with 3163 patients were included. Patient level data was available for 580 patients from 9 studies (423 after resection and 157 after transplantation). The overall survival following resection was 50 months and recurrence-free survival was 15 months. Overall survival after transplantation was not reached and recurrence-free survival was 45 months. The major complication rate after resection was 0.11 (95%-CI, 0.0-0.17) with the 90-day mortality rate of 0.03 (95%-CI, 0.03-0.08). Child-Pugh A (93%), minor resection (60%), alpha protein level less than 400 (64%) were common in resected patients. Resected patients were mostly outside the Milan criteria (99%) with mean tumour number of 2.9. Studies reporting liver transplantation in BCLC stage B were scarce. CONCLUSION Liver resection can be performed safely in selected patients with HCC BCLC stage B, particularly if patients present with preserved liver function. No conclusion can done on liver transplantation due to scarcity of reported studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Lopez-Lopez
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Fabian Kalt
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Jian-Hong Zhong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, China
| | - Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Arndt Weinmann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jens Mittler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Rohini Sharma
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Samir Tariq
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Patricia Sánchez-Velázquez
- Division of Hepatobliary and pancreatic Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gianluca Rompianesi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Concepción Gómez-Gavara
- Department HPB and Transplantation Surgery, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mar Dalmau
- Department HPB and Transplantation Surgery, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Jose Sanchez-Romero
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Camilo Llamoza
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Tschuor
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9 Copenhagen Ø, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
| | - Uluk Deniz
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Georg Lurje
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peri Husen
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandro Hügli
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Jan Philipp Jonas
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Rössler
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Kron
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Michaela Ramser
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Pablo Ramirez
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Kuno Lehmann
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Dilmurodjon Eshmuminov
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Soyama A, Hamada T, Adachi T, Eguchi S. Current status and future perspectives of robotic liver surgery. Hepatol Res 2024; 54:786-794. [PMID: 38801309 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.14058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Robotic liver resection has been reported in case series since the early 2000s. The surgical robot is capable of precise operation using articulated forceps with seven degrees of freedom. The robot also eliminates tremors and provides a good surgical field with highly detailed 3D high-definition images. The clinical results demonstrating their usefulness have been increasing year by year. Initially, a shorter hospital stay was observed in comparison with open hepatectomy. Recent reports have also shown lower conversion and complication rates in comparison with laparoscopic hepatectomy. The clamp and crush method with bipolar forceps, sealing devices, ultrasonic shears, and the combined procedure of Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator and robotic forceps as hybrid procedures have been reported as effective methods of parenchymal transection in robotic surgery. Theoretically, the advantages of the robotic platform allow for more complex liver resection around hilar structures and major blood vessels, as well as for vascular reconstruction or biliary reconstruction. The application of robotic liver surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, living donor hepatectomy, and living donor liver transplantation has been reported. Robotic liver surgery is becoming more popular for certain indications; however, it is important to further evaluate its long-term surgical and oncological outcomes and costs in comparison with conventional laparoscopic and open liver surgery, based on accumulated experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiko Soyama
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Takashi Hamada
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Adachi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Susumu Eguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Freeman HD, Mudgway R, Tran Z, Kim R, Lum SS, Namm JP, O'Leary MP, Reeves ME, Wu E, Caba Molina D. Oncologic outcomes and survival of modern surgical approaches for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-11152-8. [PMID: 39179690 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11152-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have demonstrated comparable outcomes between laparoscopic and open resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). We sought to compare outcomes among robotic, laparoscopic, and open resection of gastric GIST in the era of expanding minimally invasive surgery. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed of adult patients with gastric GIST undergoing definitive surgery using the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2020, excluding cases converted to open. Patients were stratified into minimally invasive surgery (MIS), (combined robotic (R) and laparoscopic (L)), and open (O). Hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and margin status were assessed. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate outcomes between R and L cohorts. Entropy balancing was used to adjust for intergroup differences. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to compare unadjusted 5-year survival. RESULTS Of the 15,022 patients (R = 10.4%, L = 44.3%, O = 45.3%), 63.2% were stage I and 70.6% underwent partial gastrectomy. MIS approach was associated with shorter hospital LOS (β: - 2.58; 95% CI: - 2.82 to - 2.33) and lower odds of 30-day (OR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.30-0.68) and 90-day mortality (OR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.39-0.74) compared to O. Likelihood of R0 resection similar between groups (OR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.88-1.14). Hospital LOS (β: + 0.25; 95% CI: - 0.14-0.64), odds of 30-day (OR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.40-2.46) and 90-day mortality (OR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.47-1.70), and rate of R0 resection (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.82-1.27) were comparable between R and L cohorts. Compared to O, MIS approach was associated with improved 5-year OS (log rank p < 0.001). Overall survival was not significantly different between R and L (log rank p = 0.44). CONCLUSION These findings suggest that MIS approach may be considered for resection of gastric GIST in select patients. Among patients receiving an MIS approach, the robotic technique can be considered an oncologically safe alternative to laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadley D Freeman
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
| | - Ross Mudgway
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Zachary Tran
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Rachael Kim
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Sharon S Lum
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Jukes P Namm
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Michael P O'Leary
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Mark E Reeves
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Esther Wu
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - David Caba Molina
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li H, Meng L, Yu S, Zheng H, Yu L, Wang H, Ren H, Li H, Zhang X, Wang Z, Yu P, Hu X, Yang M, Yan J, Shao Y, Cao L, Ding X, Hong Z, Zhu Z. Efficacy and safety of robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study. Hepatol Int 2024; 18:1271-1285. [PMID: 38740699 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-024-10658-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence concerning long-term outcome of robotic liver resection (RLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is scarce. METHODS This study enrolled all patients who underwent RLR and LLR for resectable HCC between July 2016 and July 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to create a 1:3 match between the RLR and LLR groups. A comprehensive collection and analysis of patient data regarding efficacy and safety have been conducted, along with the evaluation of the learning curve for RLR. RESULTS Following PSM, a total of 341 patients were included, with 97 in the RLR group and 244 in the LLR group. RLR group demonstrated a significantly longer operative time (median [IQR], 210 [152.0-298.0] min vs. 183.5 [132.3-263.5] min; p = 0.04), with no significant differences in other perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was similar between the two groups (p = 0.43), but RLR group exhibited improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) (median of 65 months vs. 56 months, p = 0.006). The estimated 5-year OS for RLR and LLR were 74.8% (95% CI: 65.4-85.6%) and 80.7% (95% CI: 74.0-88.1%), respectively. The estimated 5-year RFS for RLR and LLR were 58.6% (95% CI: 48.6-70.6%) and 38.3% (95% CI: 26.4-55.9%), respectively. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, RLR (HR: 0.586, 95% CI (0.393-0.874), p = 0.008) emerged as an independent predictor of reducing recurrence rates and enhanced RFS. The operative learning curve indicates that approximately after the 11th case, the learning curve of RLR stabilized and entered a proficient phase. CONCLUSIONS OS was comparable between RLR and LLR, and while RFS was improved in the RLR group. RLR demonstrates oncological effectiveness and safety for resectable HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Lingzhan Meng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Simiao Yu
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China
- Department of Hepatology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Haocheng Zheng
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Lingxiang Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Hongbo Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Hui Ren
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Hu Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Xiaofeng Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Zizheng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Peng Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Xiongwei Hu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Muyi Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Jin Yan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Yanling Shao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Li Cao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Xia Ding
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Zhixian Hong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China.
| | - Zhenyu Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yeung KTD, Vellaisamy R, Hussain A, Mingo O, Raobaikady R, Nicol D, Rasheed S, Tekkis P, Cunningham D, Jiao LR. Introduction of day-case robotic liver surgery: a case series from a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:4329-4335. [PMID: 38874609 PMCID: PMC11289181 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10913-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver surgery is associated with a significant hospital stay regardless the type of liver resection. A large incision is essential for open liver surgery which is a major factor in the course of the patient's recovery. For patients with small parenchyma liver lesions requiring surgical resection, robotic surgery potentially offers the opportunity to transform the patient's post-operative course. A day-case robotic liver resection pathway was formulated and implemented at our institution when patients were planned for discharge within 24 h of admission for liver surgery. METHODS Single surgeon case series of cases performed at a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre between September 2022 and November 2023. The inclusion criteria were non-anatomical wedge resections, < 2 anatomical segmental resections, left lateral hepatectomy and minimally invasive surgery. RESULTS This is the first series of robotic day-case minor liver resection in the United Kingdom. 20 patients were included in this case series. The mean operative time was 86.6 ± 30.9 min and mean console time was 58.6 ± 24.5 min. Thirteen patients (65%) were discharged within 24 h of surgery. The main cause of hospitalisation beyond 24 h was inadequate pain relief. There were no Clavien-Dindo grade III or above complications, no 30-day readmission and 90-day mortalities. CONCLUSION This case series demonstrates that robotic day-case liver resection is safe and feasible. Robust follow-up pathways must be in place to allow for the safe implementation of this approach, to monitor for any complications and to allow intervention as required in a timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Tai Derek Yeung
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
- Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BU, UK
| | - Rajendran Vellaisamy
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Aasim Hussain
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Olivia Mingo
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Ravishankar Raobaikady
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - David Nicol
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Shahnawaz Rasheed
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Paris Tekkis
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
- Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BU, UK
| | - David Cunningham
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Long R Jiao
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
- Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BU, UK.
- Department of Academic Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Imperial College London, 203 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang XK, Lu WF, Liu SY, Fu TW, Jin L, Du CF, Gao ZY, Wang KD, Dai MG, Zhong ZH, Ye TW, Xiao ZQ, Cheng J, Shen GL, Liu J, Liu JW, Huang DS, Liang L, Zhang CW. Multicenter propensity score-matched analysis to compare perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic or robotic complex hepatectomy for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:1062-1071. [PMID: 38830783 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative complications are vital factors affecting the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially for complex hepatectomy. The present study aimed to compare perioperative complications between laparoscopic and robotic complex hepatectomy (LCH vs. RCH). METHODS Patients with solitary HCC after complex hepatectomy were collected from a multicenter database. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was adopted to control confounding bias. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors. RESULTS 436 patients were included. After PSM, 43 patients were included in both the LCH and RCH groups. The results showed that compared to LCH, RCH had lower rates of blood loss and transfusion, and lower postoperative 30-day and major morbidity, and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) (all P < 0.05). Additionally, the length of hospital stay was shorter in the RCH group (P = 0.026). Multivariable analysis showed RCH is an independent protective factor for reducing the 30-day morbidity, major morbidity and PHLF. CONCLUSION RCH has advantages over LCH in the minimally invasive treatment of complex HCC, as it can reduce the incidence of postoperative morbidity. Therefore, RCH should be considered for patients with HCC who require complex hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Kun Huang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wen-Feng Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Navy Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Si-Yu Liu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Imaging Diagnosis and Minimally Invasive Interventional Research of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University Lishui Hospital, Lishui, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tian-Wei Fu
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lei Jin
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Cheng-Fei Du
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhen-Yu Gao
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kai-Di Wang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Mu-Gen Dai
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhi-Han Zhong
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tai-Wei Ye
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zun-Qiang Xiao
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jian Cheng
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Guo-Liang Shen
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jie Liu
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jun-Wei Liu
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dong-Sheng Huang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lei Liang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Cheng-Wu Zhang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pan X, Xu J, Zhou Y. Multifaceted role of FAM210B in hepatocellular carcinoma: Implications for tumour progression, microenvironment modulation and therapeutic selection. J Cell Mol Med 2024; 28:e70031. [PMID: 39198940 PMCID: PMC11358035 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.70031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Revised: 08/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common and lethal liver cancer characterized by complex aetiology and limited treatment options. FAM210B, implicated in various cancers, is noteworthy for its potential role in the progression and treatment response of HCC. Yet, its expression patterns, functional impacts and correlations with patient outcomes and resistance to therapy are not well understood. We employed a comprehensive methodology to explore the role of FAM210B in HCC, analysing its expression across cancers, subcellular localization and impacts on cell proliferation, invasion, migration, biological enrichment and the immune microenvironment. Additionally, we investigated its expression in single cells, drug sensitivity and relationships with genomic instability, immunotherapy efficacy and key immune checkpoints. While FAM210B expression varied across cancers, there was no notable difference between HCC and normal tissues. Elevated levels of FAM210B were associated with improved survival outcomes. Subcellular analysis located FAM210B in the plasma membrane and cytosol. FAM210B was generally downregulated in HCC, and its suppression significantly enhanced cell proliferation, invasion and migration. Biological enrichment analysis linked FAM210B to metabolic and immune response pathways. Moreover, its expression modified the immune microenvironment of HCC, affecting drug responsiveness and immunotherapy outcomes. High expression levels of FAM202B correlated with increased resistance to sunitinib and enhanced responsiveness to immunotherapy, as evidenced by associations with tumour mutation burden, PDCD1, CTLA4 and TIDE scores. FAM210B exerts a complex influence on HCC, affecting tumour cell behaviour, metabolic pathways, the immune microenvironment and responses to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianzhu Pan
- Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic MedicineAnhui Medical CollegeHefeiChina
| | - Jun Xu
- Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic MedicineAnhui Medical CollegeHefeiChina
| | - Yuanqin Zhou
- Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic MedicineAnhui Medical CollegeHefeiChina
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elshaer M. Pioneering the future of robotic liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2024; 13:721-723. [PMID: 39175734 PMCID: PMC11336539 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-24-312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Elshaer
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester, Glenfield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jiang C, Feng Q, Zhang Z, Qiang Z, Du A, Xu L, Li J. Radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:188. [PMID: 39049043 PMCID: PMC11267765 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03473-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the 2 principal minimally invasive surgical approaches and the first line of treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is not clear which one has greater safety and efficacy. In this meta-analysis, we aim to compare the safety and effectiveness of LH versus RFA for patients with HCC, especially where perioperative and postoperative outcomes differrent. METHODS In PROSPERO, a meta-analysis with registration number CRD42021257575 was registered. Using an established search strategy, we systematically searched Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase to identify eligible studies before June 2023. Data on operative times, blood loss, length of stay, overall complications, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS Overall, the present meta-analysis included 8 retrospective and 6 PSM studies comprising 1,848 patients (810 and 1,038 patients underwent LH and RFA). In this meta-analysis, neither LH nor RFA showed significant differences in 1-year and 3-year OS rate and 5-year RFS rate. Despite this, in comparison to the RFA group, LH resulted in significantly higher 1-year(p<0.0001) and 3-year RFS rate (p = 0.005), higher 5-year OS rate (p = 0.008), lower local recurrence rate (p<0.00001), longer length of stay(LOS) (p<0.0001), longer operative time(p<0.0001), more blood loss (p<0.0001), and higher rate of complications (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Comparative studies indicate that LH seemed to provide better OS and lower local recurrence rate, but higher complication rate and longer hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuang Jiang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qingbo Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Zhihong Zhang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zeyuan Qiang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ao Du
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lin Xu
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiaxin Li
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Dafang County People's Hospital, Bijie, Guizhou Province, 551600, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Al Abbas AI, Kuchta K, Talamonti MS, Hogg ME. The minimally invasive approach confers improved outcomes in frail cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:1017-1026. [PMID: 38574963 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Morbidity for liver resection has decreased, and frail patients are undergoing surgery. The effect of minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of MILR on the outcomes in frail patients. METHODS Elective hepatectomies from the 2014-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hepatectomy-specific Participant User File were reviewed. The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) was used. It includes diabetes mellitus, hypertension, functional status, heart failure, and dyspnea. Patients were considered frail if their mFI-5 score was ≥2. RESULTS A total of 3116 patients were included: 2117 (67.9%) in the minor hepatectomy group and 999 (32%) in the major hepatectomy group. There were 2254 open cases and 862 MILRs. Postoperatively, patients in the minor hepatectomy group who underwent MILR had lower rates of prolonged length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge, transfusion, major complications, and minor complications (P < .05). Postoperatively, patients in the major hepatectomy group who underwent MILR had lower rates of prolonged LOS and any complication (P < .05). In the minor hepatectomy group, MILR remained independently predictive of lower rates of prolonged LOS (odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.28-0.42), nonhome discharge (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84), transfusion (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.96), major complication (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-1.00), and any complication (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.92). In the major hepatectomy group, MILR remained independently predictive of prolonged LOS (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.89). CONCLUSION MILR resulted in lower rates of complications in the minor hepatectomy group and shorter LOS in the major hepatectomy group. The minimally invasive approach to hepatectomy may benefit frail patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amr I Al Abbas
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States.
| | - Kristine Kuchta
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, North Shore, Illinois, United States
| | - Mark S Talamonti
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, North Shore, Illinois, United States; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, North Shore, Illinois, United States; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sijberden JP, Hoogteijling TJ, Aghayan D, Ratti F, Tan EK, Morrison-Jones V, Lanari J, Haentjens L, Wei K, Tzedakis S, Martinie J, Osei Bordom D, Zimmitti G, Crespo K, Magistri P, Russolillo N, Conci S, Görgec B, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, D’Souza D, Zozaya G, Caula C, Geller D, Robles Campos R, Croner R, Rehman S, Jovine E, Efanov M, Alseidi A, Memeo R, Dagher I, Giuliante F, Sparrelid E, Ahmad J, Gallagher T, Schmelzle M, Swijnenburg RJ, Fretland ÅA, Cipriani F, Koh YX, White S, Lopez Ben S, Rotellar F, Serrano PE, Vivarelli M, Ruzzenente A, Ferrero A, Di Benedetto F, Besselink MG, Sucandy I, Sutcliffe RP, Vrochides D, Fuks D, Liu R, D’Hondt M, Cillo U, Primrose JN, Goh BK, Aldrighetti LA, Edwin B, Abu Hilal M. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Various Settings: An International Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Study of 10.075 Patients. Ann Surg 2024; 280:108-117. [PMID: 38482665 PMCID: PMC11161239 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic liver surgery (RLS) and laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS) in various settings. BACKGROUND Clear advantages of RLS over LLS have rarely been demonstrated, and the associated costs of robotic surgery are generally higher than those of laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, the exact role of the robotic approach in minimally invasive liver surgery remains to be defined. METHODS In this international retrospective cohort study, the outcomes of patients who underwent RLS and LLS for all indications between 2009 and 2021 in 34 hepatobiliary referral centers were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare both approaches across several types of procedures: (1) minor resections in the anterolateral (2, 3, 4b, 5, and 6) or (2) posterosuperior segments (1, 4a, 7, 8), and (3) major resections (≥3 contiguous segments). Propensity score matching was used to mitigate the influence of selection bias. The primary outcome was textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS), previously defined as the absence of intraoperative incidents ≥grade 2, postoperative bile leak ≥grade B, severe morbidity, readmission, and 90-day or in-hospital mortality with the presence of an R0 resection margin in case of malignancy. The absence of a prolonged length of stay was added to define TOLS+. RESULTS Among the 10.075 included patients, 1.507 underwent RLS and 8.568 LLS. After propensity score matching, both groups constituted 1.505 patients. RLS was associated with higher rates of TOLS (78.3% vs 71.8%, P < 0.001) and TOLS+ (55% vs 50.4%, P = 0.026), less Pringle usage (39.1% vs 47.1%, P < 0.001), blood loss (100 vs 200 milliliters, P < 0.001), transfusions (4.9% vs 7.9%, P = 0.003), conversions (2.7% vs 8.8%, P < 0.001), overall morbidity (19.3% vs 25.7%, P < 0.001), and microscopically irradical resection margins (10.1% vs. 13.8%, P = 0.015), and shorter operative times (190 vs 210 minutes, P = 0.015). In the subgroups, RLS tended to have higher TOLS rates, compared with LLS, for minor resections in the posterosuperior segments (n = 431 per group, 75.9% vs 71.2%, P = 0.184) and major resections (n = 321 per group, 72.9% vs 67.5%, P = 0.086), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS While both produce excellent outcomes, RLS might facilitate slightly higher TOLS rates than LLS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper P. Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tijs J. Hoogteijling
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Davit Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Surgery, Ringerike Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ek-Khoon Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Victoria Morrison-Jones
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Jacopo Lanari
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, General Surgery 2, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Louis Haentjens
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Kongyuan Wei
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - John Martinie
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | | | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Kaitlyn Crespo
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Conci
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Burak Görgec
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Daniel D’Souza
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gabriel Zozaya
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Clinic, Universidad de Navarra, Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cèlia Caula
- Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ricardo Robles Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Roland Croner
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Shafiq Rehman
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Adnan Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, CA
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Miulli Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of Digestive Minimally Invasive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epatobiliare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department for Clinical Science, Division of Surgery, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jawad Ahmad
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridges Road, Coventry, UK
| | - Tom Gallagher
- St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Åsmund Avdem Fretland
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Steven White
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Santi Lopez Ben
- Servei de Cirurgia General i Digestiva, Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Clinic, Universidad de Navarra, Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pablo E. Serrano
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, General Surgery 2, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - John N. Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Brian K.P. Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Surgery Academic Clinical Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Luca A. Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fukumori D, Tschuor C, Hamada T, Penninga L, Hillingsø J, Svendsen LB, Nørgaard Larsen P. Efficacy and safety of robotic liver surgery for the elderly: A propensity-score matched analysis of short-term outcomes with open liver surgery at a single center in Denmark. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2024. [PMID: 38866728 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.12015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of liver tumors requiring surgical treatment continues to increase in elderly patients. This study compared the short-term results of robotic liver surgery (RLS) versus open liver surgery (OLS) for liver tumors in elderly patients. METHODS A prospective database including all patients undergoing liver surgery at Copenhagen University Hospital between July 2019 and July 2022 was managed retrospectively. Short-term surgical outcomes of the two main cohorts (OLS and RLS) and subgroups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) in elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with liver tumors. RESULTS A total of 42 matched patients from each group were investigated: the RLS group had significantly larger tumor diameters, less blood loss (821.2 vs. 155.2 mL, p < .001), and shorter hospital stays (6.6 vs. 3.4 days, p < .001). Overall morbidity was comparable, while operative times were longer in the RLS group. The advantages observed with the robotic approach were replicated in the subgroup of minor liver resections. CONCLUSIONS In patients ≥70 years, RLS for liver tumors results in significantly less blood loss and shorter hospital stays than OLS. RLS, especially minor liver resection, is safe and feasible in elderly patients with liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Fukumori
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoph Tschuor
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Takashi Hamada
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Luit Penninga
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Hillingsø
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Bo Svendsen
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- CAMES, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Nørgaard Larsen
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mu F, Hu LS, Xu K, Zhao Z, Yang BC, Wang YM, Guo K, Shi JH, Lv Y, Wang B. Perioperative remedial antiviral therapy in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma resection: How to achieve a better outcome. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:1833-1848. [PMID: 38764825 PMCID: PMC11099449 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the benefits of antiviral therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been proven, researchers have not confirmed the differences in patient outcomes between patients who received preoperative antiviral therapy for a period of time (at least 24 wk) and patients who received remedial antiviral therapy just before radical resection for HBV-related HCC. AIM To investigate the efficacy of perioperative remedial antiviral therapy in patients with HBV-related HCC. METHODS A retrospective study of patients who underwent radical resection for HBV-related HCC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2016 to June 2019 was conducted. Considering the history of antiviral therapy, patients were assigned to remedial antiviral therapy and preoperative antiviral therapy groups. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in overall survival (P < 0.0001) and disease-free survival (P = 0.035) between the two groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a history of preoperative antiviral treatment was independently related to improved survival (hazard ratio = 0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.08-0.88; P = 0.030). CONCLUSION In patients with HBV-related HCC, it is ideal to receive preoperative long-term antiviral therapy, which helps patients tolerate more extensive hepatectomy; however, remedial antiviral therapy, which reduces preoperative HBV-DNA levels to less than 4 Log10 copies DNA/mL, can also result in improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Mu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Liang-Shuo Hu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Kun Xu
- Department of Anaesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Zhen Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Bai-Cai Yang
- Department of Gynaecology, Wenzhou Medical University Affiliated Jiaxing Women and Children Hospital, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yi-Meng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Kun Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Jian-Hua Shi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Yi Lv
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Bo Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yao WF, Huang XK, Fu TW, Jin L, Du CF, Gao ZY, Wang KD, Dai MG, Liu SY, Liu JW, Zhang CW, Liang L, Huang DS. Precise planning based on 3D-printed dry-laboratory models can reduce perioperative complications of laparoscopic surgery for complex hepatobiliary diseases: a preoperative cohort study. BMC Surg 2024; 24:148. [PMID: 38734630 PMCID: PMC11088180 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02441-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Complications after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) are important factors affecting the prognosis of patients, especially for complex hepatobiliary diseases. The present study aimed to evaluate the value of a three-dimensional (3D) printed dry-laboratory model in the precise planning of LLR for complex hepatobiliary diseases. METHODS Patients with complex hepatobiliary diseases who underwent LLR were preoperatively enrolled, and divided into two groups according to whether using a 3D-printed dry-laboratory model (3D vs. control group). Clinical variables were assessed and complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) scores were calculated and compared for each patient. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the risk factors of postoperative complications. RESULTS Sixty-two patients with complex hepatobiliary diseases underwent the precise planning of LLR. Among them, thirty-one patients acquired the guidance of a 3D-printed dry-laboratory model, and others were only guided by traditional enhanced CT or MRI. The results showed no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characters. However, compared to the control group, the 3D group had a lower incidence of intraoperative blood loss, as well as postoperative 30-day and major complications, especially bile leakage (all P < 0.05). The median score on the CCI was 20.9 (range 8.7-51.8) in the control group and 8.7 (range 8.7-43.4) in the 3D group (mean difference, -12.2, P = 0.004). Multivariable analysis showed the 3D model was an independent protective factor in decreasing postoperative complications. Subgroup analysis also showed that a 3D model could decrease postoperative complications, especially for bile leakage in patients with intrahepatic cholelithiasis. CONCLUSION The 3D-printed models can help reduce postoperative complications. The 3D-printed models should be recommended for patients with complex hepatobiliary diseases undergoing precise planning LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Feng Yao
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao-Kun Huang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Postgraduate Training, Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tian-Wei Fu
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lei Jin
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Cheng-Fei Du
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhen-Yu Gao
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Postgraduate Training, Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kai-Di Wang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of the Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Mu-Gen Dai
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, Zhejiang, China
| | - Si-Yu Liu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Imaging Diagnosis and Minimally Invasive Interventional Research of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University Lishui Hospital, Lishui, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jun-Wei Liu
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Cheng-Wu Zhang
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lei Liang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Dong-Sheng Huang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang H, Sheng S, Qiao W, Sun Y, Jin R. Nomogram built based on machine learning to predict recurrence in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with ablation. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1395329. [PMID: 38800405 PMCID: PMC11116608 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1395329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction To analyze the risk factors affecting recurrence in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with ablation and then establish a nomogram to provide a clear and accessible representation of the patients' recurrence risk. Methods Collect demographic and clinical data of 898 early-stage HCC patients who underwent ablation treatment at Beijing You'an Hospital, affiliated with Capital Medical University from January 2014 to December 2022. Patients admitted from 2014 to 2018 were included in the training cohort, while 2019 to 2022 were in the validation cohort. Lasso and Cox regression was used to screen independent risk factors for HCC patients recurrence, and a nomogram was then constructed based on the screened factors. Results Age, gender, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, tumor size, globulin (Glob) and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT) were finally incorporated in the nomogram for predicting the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients. We further confirmed that the nomogram has optimal discrimination, consistency and clinical utility by the C-index, Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC), calibration curve and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Moreover, we divided the patients into different risk groups and found that the nomogram can effectively identify the high recurrence risk patients by the Kaplan-Meier curves. Conclusion This study developed a nomogram using Lasso-Cox regression to predict RFS in early-stage HCC patients following ablation, aiding clinicians in identifying high-risk groups for personalized follow-up treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honghai Zhang
- Interventional Therapy Center for Oncology, Beijing You’an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shugui Sheng
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenying Qiao
- Interventional Therapy Center for Oncology, Beijing You’an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Changping Laboratory, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Sun
- Interventional Therapy Center for Oncology, Beijing You’an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ronghua Jin
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Changping Laboratory, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yang T, Liu DQ, Qiu W, Fan ZQ, Sun LY, Wang NY, Wang H, Yang YF, Li J, Zhou YH, Chen TH, Wang XM, Gu WM, Liang YJ, Gu LH, Xu JH, Wang MD, Sun XD, Lv GY. The Barthel Index predicts surgical textbook outcomes following hepatectomy for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study. Am J Surg 2024:S0002-9610(24)00269-1. [PMID: 38777717 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burgeoning demand for hepatectomy in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) necessitates improved perioperative care. Geriatric populations frequently experience functional decline and frailty, predisposing them to adverse postoperative outcomes. The Barthel Index serves as a reliable measure for assessing functional capacity, and this study evaluates its impact on surgical textbook outcomes (TOs) in elderly HCC patients. METHODS A multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed elderly patients (≥70 years) following hepatectomy for HCC between 2013 and 2021. Utilizing a Barthel Index cut-off value of 85, patients were divided into two groups: with and without preoperative functional decline and frailty. The primary outcome was the rate of TO, encompassing seven criteria. TO rates were compared between groups, and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent risks for achieving TOs. RESULTS Of 497 elderly patients, 157 (31.6 %) exhibited preoperative functional decline and frailty (Barthel Index score <85). The overall TO rate was 58.6 %. Patients with preoperative Barthel Index score <85 had significantly lower TO rates compared to patients with score ≥85 (29.3 % vs. 72.1 %, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative Barthel Index score <85 as an independent risk for achieving TO (odds ratio 3.413, 95 % confidence interval 1.879-6.198, P < 0.001). Comparable results were observed in the subgroups of patients undergoing open and laparoscopic hepatectomy. CONCLUSION Preoperative Barthel Index-based assessment of functional decline and frailty significantly predicts TOs following hepatectomy in elderly HCC patients, enabling identification of high-risk patients and informing preoperative management and postoperative care within geriatric oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Naval Medical University), Shanghai, China.
| | - Da-Qun Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Wei Qiu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Zhong-Qi Fan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Li-Yang Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Nan-Ya Wang
- Phase I Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Hong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Liuyang People's Hospital, Liuyang, Hunan, China
| | - Yi-Fan Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, Anhui, China
| | - Ya-Hao Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Pu'er People's Hospital, Pu'er, Yunnan, China
| | - Ting-Hao Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Ziyang First People's Hospital, Ziyang, Sichuan, China
| | - Xian-Ming Wang
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Wei-Min Gu
- The First Department of General Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Harbin, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Ying-Jian Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Li-Hui Gu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Naval Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Hao Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Naval Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Ming-Da Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University (Naval Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Guo-Yue Lv
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Birgin E, Heibel M, Téoule P, Reißfelder C, Rahbari NN. Robotic sectionectomy versus robotic hemihepatectomy for anatomic liver resection: a comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:197. [PMID: 38703346 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01751-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
Sectionectomy is a parenchma-sparing alternative to (extended) right or left hemihepatectomy. However, the effectiveness and safety of robotic sectionectomy (RS) versus robotic (extended) hemihepatectomy (RH) for the treatment of liver tumors remains unclear. We reviewed our prospective database for consecutive patients who had undergone robotic hepatectomies between March 2021 and July 2023 and included all patients with RS and RH. Demographic data, perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes were analyzed and compared between both groups. Thirty patients met our inclusion criteria, of whom 16 patients underwent RS as opposed to 14 patients who underwent RH. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the study groups. The duration of Pringle maneuver was significantly longer in the RS group, while the remaining operative details were comparable. There were no significant differences in posthepatectomy outcomes between the study groups. All patients had negative resection margins. RS is a safe and effective parenchyma-sparing treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emrullah Birgin
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marie Heibel
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Patrick Téoule
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Reißfelder
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Niu C, Zhang J, Okolo PI. Liver cancer wars: plant-derived polyphenols strike back. Med Oncol 2024; 41:116. [PMID: 38625672 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-024-02353-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Liver cancer currently represents the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The majority of liver cancer arises in the context of chronic inflammation and cirrhosis. Surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy have been the guideline-recommended treatment options for decades. Despite enormous advances in the field of liver cancer therapy, an effective cure is yet to be found. Plant-derived polyphenols constitute a large family of phytochemicals, with pleiotropic effects and little toxicity. They can drive cellular events and modify multiple signaling pathways which involves initiation, progression and metastasis of liver cancer and play an important role in contributing to anti-liver cancer drug development. The potential of plant-derived polyphenols for treating liver cancer has gained attention from research clinicians and pharmaceutical scientists worldwide in the last decades. This review overviews hepatic carcinogenesis and briefly discusses anti-liver cancer mechanisms associated with plant-derived polyphenols, specifically involving cell proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, angiogenesis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and metastasis. We focus on plant-derived polyphenols with experiment-based chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic properties against liver cancer and generalize their basic molecular mechanisms of action. We also discuss potential opportunities and challenges in translating plant-derived polyphenols from preclinical success into clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengu Niu
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, 1425 Portland Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14621, USA.
| | - Jing Zhang
- Rainier Springs Behavioral Health Hospital, 2805 NE 129th St, Vancouver, WA, 98686, USA
| | - Patrick I Okolo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, 14621, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
He ZQ, Mao YL, Lv TR, Liu F, Li FY. A meta-analysis between robotic hepatectomy and conventional open hepatectomy. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:166. [PMID: 38587718 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01882-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Current meta-analysis was performed to compare robotic hepatectomy (RH) with conventional open hepatectomy (OH) in terms of peri-operative and postoperative outcomes. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were all searched up for comparative studies between RH and OH. RevMan5.3 software and Stata 13.0 software were used for statistical analysis. Nineteen studies with 1747 patients who received RH and 23,633 patients who received OH were included. Pooled results indicated that patients who received RH were generally younger than those received OH (P < 0.00001). Moreover, RH was associated with longer operative time (P = 0.0002), less intraoperative hemorrhage (P < 0.0001), lower incidence of intraoperative transfusion (P = 0.003), lower incidence of postoperative any morbidity (P < 0.00001), postoperative major morbidity (P = 0.0001), mortalities with 90 days after surgery (P < 0.0001), and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.00001). Comparable total hospital costs were acquired between RH and OH groups (P = 0.46). However, even at the premise of comparable R0 rate (P = 0.86), RH was associated with smaller resected tumor size (P < 0.00001). Major hepatectomy (P = 0.02) and right posterior hepatectomy (P = 0.0003) were less frequently performed in RH group. Finally, we concluded that RH was superior to OH in terms of peri-operative and postoperative outcomes. RH could lead to less intraoperative hemorrhage, less postoperative complications and an enhanced postoperative recovery. However, major hepatectomy and right posterior hepatectomy were still less frequently performed via robotic approach. Future more powerful well-designed studies are required for further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Qiang He
- Department of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Ya-Ling Mao
- Day Surgery Center, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Tian-Run Lv
- Department of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Fu-Yu Li
- Department of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sambommatsu Y, Lee SD, Imai D, Savsani K, Khan AA, Sharma A, Saeed M, Cotterell AH, Kumaran V, Levy MF, Bruno DA. 'Burn and Push' technique: A novel robotic liver parenchymal transection technique. Int J Med Robot 2024; 20:e2631. [PMID: 38642395 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver parenchymal transection during robotic liver resection (RLR) remains a significant challenge due to the limited range of specialised instruments. This study introduces our 'Burn and Push' technique as a novel approach to address these challenges. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 20 patients who underwent RLR using the 'Burn and Push' technique at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System from November 2021 to August 2023. The study evaluated peri- and post-operative outcomes. RESULTS The median operation time was 241.5 min (range, 90-620 min), and the median blood loss was 100 mL (range, 10-600 mL). Major complications occurred in one case, with no instances of postoperative bleeding, bile leak, or liver failure. CONCLUSIONS The 'Burn and Push' technique is a viable and efficient alternative for liver parenchymal transection in RLR. Further research with larger sample sizes and consideration of the learning curve is necessary to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzuru Sambommatsu
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Seung Duk Lee
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Daisuke Imai
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Kush Savsani
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Aamir A Khan
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Amit Sharma
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Muhammad Saeed
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Adrian H Cotterell
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Vinay Kumaran
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Marlon F Levy
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - David A Bruno
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wu S, Boyuan L, Zeng T, Ma B, Lin Z, Hu M. Feasibility and safety of robotic liver resection for huge (≥10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma in a single centre: A propensity score-matched single-surgeon study. Int J Med Robot 2024; 20:e2628. [PMID: 38517689 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The applicability of robot-assisted resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of ≥10 cm remains contentious with limited available data. METHODS This retrospective analysis involved 337 patients who underwent robotic liver resection for HCC by a single surgeon. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare perioperative indicators between patients with regular and huge HCC. RESULTS The regular HCC group exhibited a shorter median operative duration than the huge HCC group. The IWATE criteria revealed higher scores in the huge HCC group than in the regular HCC group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in Pringle time, drainage tube removal, duration of hospital stays, blood loss volume, blood product transfusion, margin status, conversion rate to open surgery, bile leakage, in-hospital mortality, and reoperation rate. CONCLUSION Robotic liver resection is feasible for huge HCC, with effective perioperative risk management potentially improving outcomes for subsequent minimally invasive surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shurui Wu
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Liu Boyuan
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Zeng
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ben Ma
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhaoyi Lin
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Minggen Hu
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chen XP, Zhang WJ, Cheng B, Yu YL, Peng JL, Bao SH, Tong CG, Zhao J. Clinical and economic comparison of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for primary hepatolithiasis: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:1896-1903. [PMID: 38668654 PMCID: PMC11020016 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for hepatolithiasis confers better clinical benefit and lower hospital costs than open hepatectomy (OH). This study aim to evaluate the clinical and economic value of LH versus OH. METHODS Patients undergoing OH or LH for primary hepatolithiasis at Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College between 2015 and 2022 were divided into OH group and LH group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline data. Deviation-based cost modelling and weighted average median cost (WAMC) were used to assess and compare the economic value. RESULTS A total of 853 patients were identified. After exclusions, 403 patients with primary hepatolithiasis underwent anatomical hepatectomy (OH n=143; LH n=260). PSM resulted in 2 groups of 100 patients each. Although LH required a longer median operation duration compared with OH (285.0 versus 240.0 min, respectively, P<0.001), LH patients had fewer wound infections, fewer pre-discharge overall complications (26 versus 43%, respectively, P=0.009), and shorter median postoperative hospital stays (8.0 versus 12.0 days, respectively, P<0.001). No differences were found in blood loss, major complications, stone clearance, and mortality between the two matched groups. However, the median overall hospital cost of LH was significantly higher than that of OH (CNY¥52,196.1 versus 45,349.5, respectively, P=0.007). Although LH patients had shorter median postoperative hospital stays and fewer complications than OH patients, the WAMC was still higher for the LH group than for the OH group with an increase of CNY¥9,755.2 per patient undergoing LH. CONCLUSION The overall clinical benefit of LH for hepatolithiasis is comparable or even superior to that of OH, but with an economic disadvantage. There is a need to effectively reduce the hospital costs of LH and the gap between costs and diagnosis-related group reimbursement to promote its adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Peng Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui Province
| | - Wen-Jun Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui Province
| | - Bin Cheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Huangshan City People’s Hospital, Huangshan City
| | - Yuan-Lin Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui Province
| | - Jun-Lu Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui Province
| | - Sheng-Hua Bao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui Province
| | - Chao-Gang Tong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chaohu Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Jun Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui Province
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Magistri P, Guidetti C, Catellani B, Caracciolo D, Odorizzi R, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V, Guerrini GP, Di Sandro S, Di Benedetto F. Robotic ALPPS for primary and metastatic liver tumours: short-term outcomes versus open approach. Updates Surg 2024; 76:435-445. [PMID: 38326663 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01680-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is one of the strategies available for patients initially unresectable. High risk of peri-operative morbidity and mortality limited its application and diffusion. We aimed to analyse short-term outcomes of robotic ALPPS versus open approach, to assess safety and reproducibility of this technique. A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia on patients that underwent ALPPS between January 2015 and September 2022 was conducted. The main aim of the study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of robotic approach, either full robotic or only first-stage robotic, compared to a control group of patients who underwent open ALPPS in the same Institution. 23 patients were included. Nine patients received a full open ALPPS (O-ALPPS), 7 received a full robotic ALPPS (R-ALPPS), and 7 underwent a robotic approach for stage 1, followed by an open approach for stage 2 (R + O-ALPPS). PHLF grade B-C after stage 1 was 0% in all groups, rising to 58% in the R + O-ALPPS group after stage 2 and remaining 0% in the R-ALPPS group. 86% of R-ALPPS cases were discharged from the hospital between stages 1 and 2, and median total in-hospital stay and ICU stay favoured full robotic approach as well. This contemporary study represents the largest series of robotic ALPPS, showing potential advantages from full robotic ALPPS over open approach, resulting in reduced hospital stay and complications and lower incidence of 90-day mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Barbara Catellani
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Daniela Caracciolo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberta Odorizzi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Llovet JM, Pinyol R, Yarchoan M, Singal AG, Marron TU, Schwartz M, Pikarsky E, Kudo M, Finn RS. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:294-311. [PMID: 38424197 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00868-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Liver cancer, specifically hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The development of effective systemic therapies, particularly those involving immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has substantially improved the outcomes of patients with advanced-stage HCC. Approximately 30% of patients are diagnosed with early stage disease and currently receive potentially curative therapies, such as resection, liver transplantation or local ablation, which result in median overall survival durations beyond 60 months. Nonetheless, up to 70% of these patients will have disease recurrence within 5 years of resection or local ablation. To date, the results of randomized clinical trials testing adjuvant therapy in patients with HCC have been negative. This major unmet need has been addressed with the IMbrave 050 trial, demonstrating a recurrence-free survival benefit in patients with a high risk of relapse after resection or local ablation who received adjuvant atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In parallel, studies testing neoadjuvant ICIs alone or in combination in patients with early stage disease have also reported efficacy. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current approaches to manage patients with early stage HCC. We also describe the tumour immune microenvironment and the mechanisms of action of ICIs and cancer vaccines in this setting. Finally, we summarize the available evidence from phase II/III trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches and discuss emerging clinical trials, identification of biomarkers and clinical trial design considerations for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep M Llovet
- Liver Cancer Translational Research Group, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Divisions of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Roser Pinyol
- Liver Cancer Translational Research Group, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mark Yarchoan
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Thomas U Marron
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Divisions of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Myron Schwartz
- Department of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eli Pikarsky
- The Lautenberg Center for Immunology and Cancer Research, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada (IMRIC), Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Richard S Finn
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Vitale A, Angelico R, Sensi B, Lai Q, Kauffmann E, Scalera I, Serenari M, Ginesini M, Romano P, Furlanetto A, D'Amico F. What Is the Role of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery in Treating Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Cirrhosis? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:966. [PMID: 38473327 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) has been slowly introduced in the past two decades and today represents a major weapon in the fight against HCC, for several reasons. This narrative review conveys the major emerging concepts in the field. The rise in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)-related HCC means that patients with significant cardiovascular risk will benefit more profoundly from MILS. The advent of efficacious therapy is leading to conversion from non-resectable to resectable cases, and therefore more patients will be able to undergo MILS. In fact, resection outcomes with MILS are superior compared to open surgery both in the short and long term. Furthermore, indications to surgery may be further expanded by its use in Child B7 patients and by the use of laparoscopic ablation, a curative technique, instead of trans-arterial approaches in cases not amenable to radiofrequency. Therefore, in a promising new approach, multi-parametric treatment hierarchy, MILS is hierarchically superior to open surgery and comes second only to liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Vitale
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Roberta Angelico
- Transplant and HPB Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Transplant and HPB Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Quirino Lai
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, AUO Policlinico I of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Kauffmann
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Pisa University, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Irene Scalera
- Unità di Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianti di Fegato, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Matteo Serenari
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Michael Ginesini
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Pisa University, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Romano
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Furlanetto
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco D'Amico
- Unità di Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianti di Fegato, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rocca A, Avella P, Scacchi A, Brunese MC, Cappuccio M, De Rosa M, Bartoli A, Guerra G, Calise F, Ceccarelli G. Robotic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases in a "referral centre Hub&Spoke learning program". A multicenter propensity score matching analysis of perioperative outcomes. Heliyon 2024; 10:e24800. [PMID: 38322841 PMCID: PMC10844024 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical resection is still considered the optimal treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Although laparoscopic and robotic surgery demonstrated their reliability especially in referral centers, the comparison between perioperative outcomes of robotic liver resection (RLR) and open (OLR) liver resection are still debated when performed in referral centers for robotic surgery, not dedicated to HPB. Our study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of perioperative outcomes after RLR and OLR for CRLM in an HUB&Spoke learning program (H&S) between a high volume center for liver surgery and high volume center for robotic surgery. Methods We analyzed prospective databases of Pineta Grande Hospital (Castel Volturno) and Robotic Surgical Units (Foligno-Spoleto and Arezzo) from 2011 to 2021. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed according to baseline characteristics of patients, solitary/multiple CRLM, anterolateral/posterosuperior location. Results 383 patients accepted to be part of the study (268 ORL and 115 RLR). After PSM, 45 patients from each group were included. Conversion rate was 8.89 %. RLR group had a significantly lower blood loss (226 vs. 321 ml; p=0.0001), and fewer major complications (13.33 % vs. 17.78 %; p=0.7722). R0 resection was obtained in 100% of OLR (vs.95.55%, p =0.4944. Hospital stay was 8.8 days in RLR (vs. 15; p=0.0001).Conclusion: H&S represents a safe and effective program to train general surgeons also in Hepatobiliary surgery providing R0 resection rate, blood loss volume and morbidity rate superimposable to referral centers. Furthermore, H&S allow a reduction of health mobility with consequent money saving for patients and institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy
| | - Pasquale Avella
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Scacchi
- General Surgery Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Micaela Cappuccio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| | - Alberto Bartoli
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| | - Germano Guerra
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Fulvio Calise
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nigam A, Hawksworth JS, Winslow ER. Minimally Invasive Robotic Techniques for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Resection: How I Do It. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2024; 33:111-132. [PMID: 37945137 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
The adoption of minimally invasive techniques for hepatocellular resection has progressively increased in North America. Cumulative evidence has demonstrated improved surgical outcomes in patients who undergo minimally invasive hepatectomy. In this review, the authors' approach and methodology to minimally invasive robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aradhya Nigam
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road, NW, 4PHC, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Jason S Hawksworth
- Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH14-105, New York, NY 20032, USA.
| | - Emily R Winslow
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road, NW, 2PHC, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dopazo C, Søreide K, Rangelova E, Mieog S, Carrion-Alvarez L, Diaz-Nieto R, Primavesi F, Stättner S. Hepatocellular carcinoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:107313. [PMID: 38086315 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
An update on the management of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is provided in the present article for those interested in the UEMS/EBSQ exam in Surgical Oncology. The most recent publications in HCC, including surveillance, guidelines, and indications for liver resection, liver transplantation, and locoregional or systemic therapies, are summarised. The objective is to yield a set of main points regarding HCC that are required in the core curriculum of hepatobiliary oncological surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Dopazo
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, HPB unit, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of HPB Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elena Rangelova
- Section of Upper GI Surgery at Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sven Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Lucia Carrion-Alvarez
- Department of General Surgery, HPB Unit, Fuenlabrada University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergut Klinikum, OÖG, Dr. Wilhelm Bock Strasse 1, 4840, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergut Klinikum, OÖG, Dr. Wilhelm Bock Strasse 1, 4840, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Magistri P, Guerrini GP, Di Sandro S, Di Benedetto F. Modern surgical approach to hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2023; 12:953-955. [PMID: 38115938 PMCID: PMC10727823 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-23-535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Roldan GA, Blomker J, Aby ES. Hepatocellular Carcinoma from a Hepatologist's Perspective. Semin Intervent Radiol 2023; 40:524-535. [PMID: 38274218 PMCID: PMC10807972 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of primary liver cancer, represents a growing health challenge worldwide. The incidence of HCC is rising, which, in turn, has led to a corresponding increase in the associated number of deaths. HCC will become the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States by 2030. HCC usually develops in the setting of chronic liver disease. Individuals at increased risk of HCC are recommended to undergo surveillance with ultrasound every 6 months along with serum α-fetoprotein testing. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are considered alternatives based on specific patient factors. Lesions suspicious for HCC are recommended to undergo a diagnostic testing, which includes contrast-enhanced multiphase CT or MRI and liver biopsy when findings are indeterminate. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy is the most used assessment for patients with HCC ( Fig. 2 ). Curative therapies include resection, liver transplantation, and ablation. Locoregional therapies, such as transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization, can be used for patients with intermediate-stage HCC. For patients with advanced-stage HCC, systemic therapy is often used. This review aims to provide an overview of HCC from a hepatologist's perspective, including epidemiology, screening, surveillance, diagnosis, and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni A. Roldan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jacquelin Blomker
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Elizabeth S. Aby
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Singal AG, Kanwal F, Llovet JM. Global trends in hepatocellular carcinoma epidemiology: implications for screening, prevention and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:864-884. [PMID: 37884736 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00825-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 79.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mortality rates are increasing globally, and particularly in the Western world. Cirrhosis remains the predominant risk factor for HCC. However, epidemiological shifts in the incidence of HCC from patients with virus-related liver disease to those with non-viral aetiologies, including alcohol-associated and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, have important implications for prevention, surveillance and treatment. Hepatitis B vaccination and antiviral therapy for hepatitis B and C are effective for primary prevention of virus-related HCCs, but chemoprevention strategies for non-viral liver disease remain an unmet need. Emerging data suggest associations between aspirin, statins, metformin and coffee and reduced HCC incidence, although none has been proved to be causally related. Secondary prevention of HCC via semi-annual surveillance is associated with improvements in early detection and thus reduced mortality; however, current tools, including abdominal ultrasonography, have suboptimal sensitivity for the detection of early stage HCC, particularly in patients with obesity and/or non-viral liver disease. Promising blood-based or imaging-based surveillance strategies are emerging, although these approaches require further validation before adoption in clinical practice. In the interim, efforts should be focused on maximizing use of the existing surveillance tools given their prevalent underuse globally. Remarkable advances have been made in the treatment of HCC, including expanded eligibility for surgical therapies, improved patient selection for locoregional treatments and increased systemic treatment options, including immune-checkpoint inhibitors. In this Review, we discuss trends in the epidemiology of HCC and their implications for screening, prevention and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Fasiha Kanwal
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- VA Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Houston, TX, USA
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Josep M Llovet
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Translational Research in Hepatic Oncology, Liver Unit, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Magistri P, Pang NQ, Guidetti C, Caracciolo D, Odorizzi R, Catellani B, Guerrini GP, Di Sandro S, Di Benedetto F. Robotic approach for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: from Bismuth 1 to vascular resection. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107002. [PMID: 37599146 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation of minimally invasive surgical approaches for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) has been relatively slow compared to other indications. This is due to the complexity of the disease and the need of advanced skills for the reconstructive phase. The robot may contribute to close the gap between open and minimally invasive surgery in patients with Klastkin tumors. STUDY DESIGN We report details of our experience with robotic approach in patients affected by pCCA. In particular selection criteria, ERAS management, technical tips and robotic setup are discussed. Finally, results from our cohort are reported. A video clip of a patient that underwent left hepatectomy with en-bloc caudatectomy and portal vein resection at the confluence with end-to-end reconstruction for a pCCA 3-b according to Bismuth-Corlette classification with full robotic approach is enclosed. RESULTS Fourteen patients underwent robotic resection of pCCA over the three-year interval with a median follow-up interval of 18.7 months. The pre-operative Bismuth-Corlette classification was 1 for two patients (14.2%) and 2 for one patient (7.1%), 3-a for three (21.4%) patients, 3-b for four (28.6%) patients and 4 for four (28.6%) patients. Median estimated blood loss was 150 ml (range 50-800 ml) and median operative time was 490 min (range 390-750 min). The median length of hospital stay after the index operation was 6 days (range 3-91). Final histology revealed a median of 19 (range 11-40) lymph nodes retrieved, with 92.9% R0 resections. 90-days mortality was nihil and 3-year survival exceeds 50%. CONCLUSION With adequate preparation, outcomes of robotic approach to pCCA can be safe and in line with the current international benchmark outcomes, as showed in this study, when performed in expert high volume centers for complex major hepatectomy and robotic HPB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ning Qi Pang
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Daniela Caracciolo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberta Odorizzi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Barbara Catellani
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yu H, Wei X. Robotic vs Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:984-985. [PMID: 37163278 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Henghai Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Xiaoping Wei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Di Benedetto F, Magistri P, Di Sandro S. Robotic vs Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Reply. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:986. [PMID: 37163239 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Huang J. Robotic vs Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:985-986. [PMID: 37163298 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Varghese CT, Chandran B, Sudhindran S. Approach to minimally invasive donor hepatectomy: Laparoscopic, robotic, or bit of both! Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:696-697. [PMID: 37663971 PMCID: PMC10472382 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christi Titus Varghese
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ TransplantationAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research CentreKochiIndia
| | - Biju Chandran
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ TransplantationAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research CentreKochiIndia
| | - S. Sudhindran
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ TransplantationAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research CentreKochiIndia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lippert T, Lim-Dy A, Sucandy I. The future of minimally invasive liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma BCLC stage 0-A. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2023; 12:601-603. [PMID: 37600996 PMCID: PMC10432291 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-23-295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Trenton Lippert
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Allyson Lim-Dy
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Horch RE, Kesting MR, Kersting S, Fichtner-Feigl S, Arkudas A. Editorial: Interdisciplinary surgical strategies for complex tumor defects in modern oncology. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1146719. [PMID: 36845693 PMCID: PMC9950763 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1146719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R. E. Horch
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany,*Correspondence: R. E. Horch,
| | - M. R. Kesting
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - S. Kersting
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - S. Fichtner-Feigl
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - A. Arkudas
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|