Results of a conservative treatment combining induction (neoadjuvant) and consolidation chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, and external and interstitial irradiation in 98 patients with locally advanced breast cancer (IIIA-IIIB)

Serum Markers and Prognosis in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Background

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) represents a heterogeneous subgroup of breast cancer with an often dismal outcome. Identifying prognostic factors has acquired great significance for the selection of optimal treatment in individual patients.

Methods

Between January 1993 and December 1997, 103 patients were treated in our institution with multimodality treatment consisting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy; tamoxifen was added in hormone receptor-positive cases. In the search for prognostic factors well-established parameters (clinical, pathological and treatment-related) as well as new features with potential value (c-erbB-2, baseline serum levels of CA 15.3 and CEA) were included in the univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

At a median follow-up of 92 months (range, 8-130), the estimated five-year cancer-specific overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 71.34% and 57.7%, respectively. Among the 22 different variables studied, only 10 were significantly correlated with OS and DFS. In multivariate analysis five retained independent prognostic value for both OS and DFS: tumor grade, serum markers, features of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node status. With cutoff values of 35 U/mL for CA 15.3 and 5 ng/mL for CEA, the probability of five-year OS (Cox hazard ratio 3.91, P = 0.0009) and DFS (Cox hazard ratio 2.40, P = 0.02) decreased from 78% to 52% and from 68% to 47%, respectively, when at least one of these markers was abnormal.

Conclusions

Baseline serum levels of CEA and CA 15.3 emerged from this study as strong independent predictors of outcome in LABC, whose value adds to other established prognostic factors such as postoperative nodal status, IBC, histological grade and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Inflammatory Component: A Worsening Factor in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Treated by Radiotherapy and Systemic Therapy

Locally advanced and inflammatory carcinomas of the breast are two distinct entities with clear differential clinical criteria. We described a particular type of locally advanced breast cancer which, during its evolution, developed inflammatory characteristics limited to a small area of the skin. It, therefore, did not meet the common diagnostic criteria of inflammatory carcinoma. In our series, studied from December 1977 to January 1987, we treated 59 cases of locally advanced breast cancer and 105 cases of locally advanced breast cancer with an inflammatory component. The actuarial overall survival was 53.3 % at 5 years and 38.4 % at 7 years. Differences were observed when the two tumor types were compared. Specifically, locally advanced breast cancer with an inflammatory component had a worse prognosis, poorer survival and poorer disease-free rates than locally advanced breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Preliminary Report

Aims and Background

A pilot study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-5-fluorouracil (FEC) was performed on 85 patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Methods and Study Design

Patients received four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, radiotherapy and a treatment with cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil for three cycles.

Results

Major clinical response was obtained in 76 (89%) patients. Complete response was documented in 14 (17%) patients at pathologic examination of surgical specimen. Grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting was the most common (77%) side effect. Grade 2-3 alopecia was 66%. Grade 2-3 neutropenia occurred in 16% of patients. None of the patients developed febrile neutropenia. Sinus tachycardia was observed only in one patient. Three patients had a more than 10% decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction without any clinical signs. Nine patients had progressive or stable disease and 4 did not undergo surgery or receive radiation therapy; thus 13 were excluded from survival analysis. After a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 15-41), disease-free survival and overall survival were 20 (range, 13-32) and 23 months (range, 17-32).

Conclusions

The FEC combination is safe and effective for a neoadjuvant setting in locally advanced breast cancer. A longer follow-up is necessary for the end point results.

Oncoplastic technique in breast conservative surgery for locally advanced breast cancer

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) should be taken into decision making when planning breast conservative surgery, but this procedure should be done on the principle of oncologic safety in order to achieve negative surgical margin and maintain aesthetic result. This procedure should be offered as the choice of treatment in selected patients.

Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast cancer: Focus on chemotherapy and biological targeted treatments' armamentarium

Despite progress achieved in diagnosis and therapy in recent years, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains a major clinical issue. Biological characteristics and clinical behavior varies widely, ranging from indolent to locally aggressive or generalized disease. In depth knowledge of biology of cancer progression and cancer could lead to the identification of tumor characteristics associated with outcome. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) integrated into a multimodality program is nowadays the established treatment in LABC. Although our efforts in this research task are ongoing, of special clinical interest is the integration of anti-HER2 and other biological therapies, as anti-angiogenesis targeted treatments, that may further improve the long term control of LABC. Clinical management of LABC could be modified based on molecular biology and an approach tailored to each patient will optimize therapy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer

Preoperative systemic therapy is the standard of care in locally advanced breast cancer. In this setting, the intent of preoperative systemic therapy is to expand surgical options and to improve survival. Locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer have different biological features, but they share the use of preoperative (primary, neoadjuvant) systemic therapy as the initial treatment of choice. The management of these patients necessitates involvement of a multidisciplinary team from the onset and during therapy. The eradication of invasive cancer from the breast and axillary lymph nodes, pathologic complete response, is a predictor of outcome associated with improved disease-free and overall survival. However, conventional chemotherapy regimens result in pathologic complete response in only a minority of patients. The management of patients with residual invasive disease after preoperative therapy is a common clinical problem for which additional research is necessary. The differential expression of genes and pathways in locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer allows for the exploitation of targeted therapy, and early trials have shown exciting target and tumor effects. Much work remains, and future trials combining targeted and conventional therapies based on molecular subtypes and/or specific targets are needed if we hope to improve survival for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease

PURPOSE

To review the state of the science with respect to preoperative systemic therapy and pathologic assessment in operable breast cancer.

METHODS

This article reviews data presented at the National Cancer Institute State of the Science Conference on Preoperative Therapy in Invasive Breast Cancer as well as supporting published data.

RESULTS

Preoperative chemotherapy in operable breast cancer has been shown to improve breast conservation rates as a result of tumor response to therapy. When patients are given preoperative systemic therapy, regimens should be the same as those established as safe and active in the adjuvant setting. At present, there are no data to suggest that systemic treatment should be tailored based on initial tumor response, or based on the extent of residual disease. In operable breast cancer, there seems to be no survival advantage from initiation of systemic therapy before surgery. A variety of clinical, imaging, and pathologic measurements are available to gauge tumor response to treatment. There is a clear correlation between tumor response in the breast and lymph nodes and both disease-free and overall survival. Pathologic complete response and other pathologic measures may be useful as surrogate end points in evaluating and understanding new therapies.

CONCLUSION

In operable breast cancer, preoperative systemic therapy is effective and can improve breast conservation rates. Unless the tumor is large or the patient is in a clinical trial, postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy is the standard of care. To achieve optimal outcomes, preoperative systemic therapy must be administered as part of a coordinated, multimodality treatment program. The preoperative setting provides a unique opportunity to study the impact of systemic therapies on breast cancer biology.

Selective Mastectomy in the Management of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate local control for patients with locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer (LABC) managed by selective mastectomy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1979 and 1996, 176 patients with LABC were prospectively managed by chemotherapy (CT)-irradiation (RT)-CT without routine mastectomy. All surviving patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients (75%) had a T4 tumor and 22 (12.5%) supraclavicular nodal disease. The clinical complete response rate was 91% (160/176), which included 13 patients who underwent mastectomy and 2 an iridium wire implant. The first site of failure was local for 43 patients (breast +/- axilla for 38); 27 of these patients underwent salvage mastectomy and 11 did not for an overall mastectomy rate of 23% (40/176). If all 176 patients had undergone routine mastectomy (136 extra mastectomies), 11 additional patients may have avoided an unsalvageable first local relapse. The others would have either have not had a local relapse or would have suffered local relapse after distant disease. No tumor or treatment related factor was found to predict local disease at death. Median disease-free and overall survival for all patients was 26 and 52 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective mastectomy in LABC may not jeopardize local control or survival.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III Breast Cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer can potentially downstage disease prior to definitive surgery. In this study, a doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant regimen was administered to stage III breast cancer patients to assess 1) primary tumor response, 2) tumor involvement of resection margins, and 3) predictive value in cancer outcome. Eighty-two patients with stage IIIA and IIIB breast cancer diagnosed between 1990 and 2003 were studied. All patients received similar chemotherapy regimens, consisting of doxorubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil, plus surgery and radiation therapy. End points measured include primary tumor response [complete response (CR) = 100%, partial response (PR) >50%, or no response (NR) ≤50%], resection margins for tumor, disease-free, and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were performed. Of the 82 patients studied, 34 received neoadjuvant therapy, 48 received conventional postoperative treatment. Seventy-two per cent of the stage IIIB and 22 per cent of the stage IIIA patients received neoadjuvant therapy. In the neoadjuvant group, 29 (85%) patients demonstrated tumor response, 9 (26%) of which were CR. Tumor-free resection margins were achieved in 94 per cent of the neoadjuvant group. Survival analysis demonstrated no benefit comparing neoadjuvant versus postoperative adjuvant therapy but hints at improved disease-free survival in neoadjuvant CR patients (log-rank test, P = 0.07). Eighty-five per cent of patients with stage III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy experienced clinical response, with 26 per cent CR, and 97 per cent tumor-free resection margins. CR may portend a better cancer outcome.

Significance of histopatholoaical evaluation in primary therapy for breast cancer-recent trends in primary modality with pathological complete response(pCR) as endpoint

In recent years, primary therapy has been used to improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced breast cancer and to expand the indication for breast conserving treatment for patients with a relatively early stage of breast cancer. In addition, the therapeutic efficacy of primary therapy has been evaluated on the basis of pathological findings and pathological complete response (pCR)is considered to be a main target of primary therapy. The results of NSABP protocol B-18 and B-27, and the Aberdeen trials confirmed the prognostic significance of pCR in primary therapy and indicated the significance of minute pathological assessment. However, the criteria of pathological response is not yet universal, but the evaluation of the main invasive tumor, intraductal component and the regional lymph nodes, is thought to be necessary, shown by the "Histopathological Criteria for Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Breast Cancer" compiled by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. Among these criteria, there exist methodological variations as to the evaluation of residual disease of intraductal carcinoma, thus some controversies exist. The presence of intraductal component might be negligible with regard to prognosis, but might be an important risk factor for local recurrence after breast conserving therapy. In the future, participation by the pathologist in the field of primary therapy for breast cancer will be a matter of course in most clinical studies.

Update on locally advanced breast cancer

Locally advanced breast cancer remains a clinical challenge as the majority of patients with this diagnosis develop distant metastases despite appropriate therapy. Patients with locally advanced disease encompass a wide range of clinical scenarios including advanced primary tumors (stage T4), advanced nodal disease (fixed axillary nodes or involvement of ipsilateral supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or internal mammary nodes), and inflammatory carcinomas. The prognoses of women with locally advanced breast tumors are also heterogeneous and depend on tumor size, extent of lymph node involvement, and the presence or absence of inflammatory carcinoma. Women with locally advanced disease require multimodal therapy, and coordinated treatment planning among the medical oncologist, surgical oncologist, and radiation oncologist is necessary to optimize patient care. In this article, the epidemiology, evaluation, prognostic factors, and treatment for locally advanced breast cancer are discussed. Inflammatory cancer is also reviewed, but is considered separately due to its distinct biology and clinical behavior.

Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma: effective clinical downstaging allows breast preservation and predicts outstanding local control and survival

OBJECTIVE

To review the long-term follow-up data from the authors' institutional experience of 62 patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with a uniform multimodality regimen. The authors determined the rate of breast preservation, the disease-free and overall survival, and the factors associated with locoregional and distant recurrent disease.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

It remains a challenge to achieve local and distant control of LABC. Over the last decade, preoperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy has emerged as the standard of care for these patients. Successful tumor downstaging has been associated with increased rates of breast-conserving therapy (BCT), but the overall effect on long-term survival remains to be seen.

METHODS

This study examines a cohort of 62 patients with LABC treated at the authors' institution from 1992 to 1998. The uniform treatment regimen consisted of neoadjuvant doxorubicin (Adriamycin), followed by operation (BCT if sufficient clinical downstaging), followed by non-cross-resistant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil, followed by radiation therapy. Treatment was both dose-intensive and time-intensive, with a total treatment time of 32 to 35 weeks.

RESULTS

In this patient population, the median age was 44 years, with approximately two thirds white patients and one third African American. Eighty-two percent of patients were clinical stage III at presentation, 13 patients had T4d inflammatory cancers, and 3 patients were stage IV at diagnosis. Eighty-four percent of patients demonstrated a significant clinical response to doxorubicin. Twenty-eight patients had sufficient clinical downstaging to attempt BCT, and 22 (45%) of 49 noninflammatory patients underwent successful BCT. Pathologic complete response was seen in 15% of patients. Median follow-up for the cohort was 70 months. The local recurrence rate was 14%, including two ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (10%) in the BCT patients. Seven (12%) patients developed a new primary cancer in the contralateral breast. Distant metastases occurred in 18 (31%) patients, and the 5-year overall survival rate for the cohort was 76%. Furthermore, in the patients who underwent an attempt at BCT, the survival rate was 96% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-intensive and time-intensive multimodality neoadjuvant therapy was successfully administered to a mixed racial group over shortened times. Patients who had sufficient clinical downstaging to allow BCT have the best long-term outcome. Patients who required mastectomy are at a higher risk of relapse, as well as the development of new contralateral cancers, yet have 5-year survival rates of over 50%.

Locoregional treatment outcomes for inoperable anthracycline-resistant breast cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the therapeutic outcomes and treatment-related morbidity of patients treated with radiation for inoperable breast cancer resistant to anthracycline-containing primary chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed the medical records of breast cancer patients treated on five consecutive institutional trials who had been designated as having inoperable locoregional disease after completion of primary chemotherapy, without evidence of distant metastases at diagnosis. The cohort for this analysis was 38 (4.4%) of 867 patients enrolled in these trials. Kaplan-Meier statistics were used for survival analysis, and prognostic factors were compared using log-rank tests. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 6.1 years.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (84%) of the 38 patients were able to undergo mastectomy after radiotherapy. For the whole group, the overall survival rate at 5 years was 46%, with a distant disease-free survival rate of 32%. The 5-year survival rate for patients who were inoperable because of primary disease extent was 64% compared with 30% for those who were inoperable because of nodal disease extent (p = 0.0266). The 5-year rate of locoregional control was 73% for the surgically treated patients and 64% for the overall group. Of the 32 who underwent mastectomy, the 5-year rate of significant postoperative complications was 53%, with 4 (13%) requiring subsequent hospitalization and additional surgical revision. Preoperative radiation doses of >or=54 Gy were significantly associated with the development of complications requiring surgical treatment (70% vs. 9% for doses <54 Gy, p = 0.0257).

CONCLUSION

Despite the poorer prognosis of patients with inoperable disease after primary chemotherapy, almost one-half remained alive at 5 years and one-third were free of distant disease after multidisciplinary locoregional management. These patients have high rates of locoregional recurrence after preoperative radiotherapy and mastectomy, and the morbidity associated with this approach may limit dose-escalation strategies. Alternative therapeutic strategies such as novel systemic agents, use of planned myocutaneous repair for closure, or radiation combined with radiosensitizing agents, should be considered in this class of patients.

Multidisciplinary Management of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

The treatment of locally advanced breast cancer is aimed at achieving long-term local control with local surgery and/or radiation therapy and at improving disease-free and overall survival through the application of systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Studies of local therapy alone with surgery or radiotherapy have demonstrated high rates of local recurrence and low rates of long-term survival. The application of anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy has resulted in rates of response ranging from 72% to 97%, clinical complete responses of 12-52%, and pathologic complete responses of 4-33%. Multidisciplinary treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, followed by local surgery and/or radiation therapy, followed by additional chemotherapy, has resulted in rates of local control that exceed 80%, and 5-year survival rates exceeding 50% are not unusual. The use of anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer is thus now firmly established. Research in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer is needed to further define the optimal method of local therapy and the role of new agents such as the taxanes.

Neoadjuvant Moderately High-Dose Chemotherapy with rh-G-CSF in Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma

Aims and Background

The poor results of local treatment for locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC) justify the use of chemotherapy as primary treatment. Retrospective studies have shown a positive correlation between dose and response rate in advanced breast cancer. G-CSF has shown efficacy in achieving optimal dose intensity and ameliorating chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of a moderately high-dose chemotherapy regimen in terms of response rate, disease-free and overall survival and to assess the role of G-CSF in induced neutropenia.

Methods

Inclusion criteria were the following: age <65 years, WHO performance status <2, histologically proven breast carcinoma, adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function, stage IIIA or IIIB disease, and no metastatic disease. No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy was allowed. Three cycles of the following chemotherapy were used preoperatively: epirubicin (100 mg/m2 on day 1), cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days) and rh-G-CSF (5 μg/kg/die from day 4 to day 12 every 14 days). After mastectomy or quadrantectomy plus radiotherapy, all patients were treated with 4 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the CMF 1-8 schedule (methotrexate, 40 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2; fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2; all on days 1 and 8, with recycle every 4 weeks).

Results

From May 1992 to June 1996, 57 patients with histologically proven LABC were preoperatively treated. Forty-four patients were premenopausal and 13 postmenopausal; the median age was 45 years (range, 29-64). Thirty-five patients had stage IIIA and 22 patients stage IIIB disease (7 with inflammatory disease). Forty-seven patients underwent radical mastectomy and 10 conservative surgery. A clinical response was noted in 93% (95% confidence interval, 83-98%) of patients (12% complete responses and 81% partial responses); 2 pathological complete remissions (3.5%) were obtained. No toxic deaths were observed. All patients had a follow-up of at least 42 months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 76% (standard error - SE), 6%) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 68% (SE, 6.3%).

Conclusions

The 14-day regimen was well tolerated and effective in LABC patients, although not superior to standard-dose chemotherapy. To improve results the use of new drugs in controlled clinical trials seems warranted.

Locally advanced breast cancer: is surgery necessary?

A retrospective analysis of the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) was undertaken at Stanford Medical Center to assess the outcome of patients who did not undergo surgical removal of their tumors. Between 1981 and 1998, 64 patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated with induction chemotherapy, radiation with or without breast surgery, and additional chemotherapy. Sixty-two (97%) patients received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) induction chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy was followed by local radiotherapy in 59 (92%) patients. Based on the clinical response to chemotherapy and patient preference, 44 (69%) patients received no local breast surgery. Radiotherapy was followed by an additional, non-doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy in all patients. The mean age of patients was 49 years. Of the 65 locally advanced breast cancers in 64 patients, 26 (41%) were stage IIIA, 35 (55%) were stage IIIB, and 4 (6%) were stage IV (supraclavicular lymph nodes only). Response to induction chemotherapy was seen in 59 patients (92%), with 29 (45%) achieving a complete clinical response and 30 (47%) a partial clinical response. With a mean follow-up of 51 months (range 7-187 months), 43 patients (67.2%) have no evidence of recurrent disease. Eight (12.5%) have recurred locally, and 21 (32.8%) have recurred with distant metastasis. Actuarial 5-year survival is 75%, disease-free survival is 58%, and local control rate is 87.5%. These data indicate that the routine inclusion of breast surgery in a combined modality treatment program for LABC does not appear necessary for the majority of patients who experience a response to induction chemotherapy.

The feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA breast carcinoma patients after tumor downstaging with induction chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Induction chemotherapy (IC) has become the standard of care for locally advanced breast carcinoma, frequently downstaging both the primary tumor and the axilla, and making patients eligible for less invasive surgical procedures. The usefulness of IC in earlier stage operable breast carcinoma is now being considered.

METHODS

This study involved a subset of 129 patients from a series of 174 with T2-3, N0-1, M0 or T1, N1, M0 breast carcinoma (Stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA ) who were registered in a prospective IC trial using paclitaxel or a combination of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC). The subset included patients who had received no preoperative radiation therapy but had completed 3-5 cycles of induction chemotherapy and had undergone a Level I-II axillary lymph node dissection. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel or FAC in downstaging the primary tumor and axillary metastases in these early stage breast carcinoma patients.

RESULTS

The median initial tumor size was 4 cm (range, 0.6-10.0); after IC, tumor size was downstaged to 1.6 cm (range, 0.0-7.0) (P < 0.0001). Clinical response to IC was complete in 24% of patients and partial in 36%. Primary tumor shrinkage was similar with paclitaxel and FAC. Among patients clinically classified as N1, 34% became histologically negative and 38% had only 1-3 positive lymph nodes after induction chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

IC with paclitaxel or FAC resulted in effective downstaging of primary tumors and axillary metastases in patients with Stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA breast carcinoma. However, a significant proportion of patients still had residual but low volume microscopic disease; such disease status may allow minimally invasive surgical approaches to locoregional therapy.

The role of radiation therapy for primary breast cancer

Radiation therapy for breast cancer has gone through two revolutions in the last two decades: the routine use of radiation therapy in conjunction with breast-conserving surgery as an equivalent treatment to mastectomy, and the use of radiation therapy following mastectomy in advanced or node-positive disease. Indeed, the perception of postmastectomy radiation has gone full circle: from having no benefit when used for all cases, to being detrimental because of cardiac irradiation, to the present in which the selective use of irradiation in high-risk patients provides both an improvement in local control and an improvement of 8% to 10% in the survival rate. Improvements in radiation technique have reduced complications, in particular late cardiac deaths. The major issues still to be resolved are the targets for postmastectomy irradiation, determining which patients do not need radiation therapy for DCIS and for node-negative disease, and the efficacy of delivering radiation to just the affected quadrant rather than to the whole breast. At present, most patients approach radiation therapy for breast cancer with the knowledge that it has a very high probability of being successful.

Role of axillary lymph node dissection after tumor downstaging with induction chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Induction chemotherapy has become the standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and currently is being evaluated in prospective clinical trials in patients with earlier-stage disease. To better gauge the role of axillary lymph node dissection in patients with LABC this study was performed to assess initial axillary status on physical and ultrasound examination, axillary tumor downstaging following induction chemotherapy, and the accuracy of physical examination compared with axillary sonography in predicting which patients will have axillary lymph node metastases found on pathologic examination.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 1996, 147 consecutive patients with LABC were registered in a prospective trial of induction chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. Physical and ultrasound examinations of the axilla were performed at diagnosis and after induction chemotherapy. Segmental resection with axillary lymph node dissection or modified radical mastectomy was performed, followed by postoperative chemotherapy and irradiation of the breast or chest wall and regional lymphatics.

RESULTS

Following induction chemotherapy, 43 (32%) of the 133 patients with clinically positive lymph nodes on initial examination had axillary tumor downstaging as assessed by physical and ultrasound examination. The sensitivity of axillary sonography in identifying axillary metastases was significantly higher than that of physical examination (62% vs. 45%, P=.012). The specificity of physical examination (84%) was higher than that of sonography (70%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Among the 55 patients in whom the findings of both physical and ultrasound examination of the axilla were negative following induction chemotherapy, 29 patients (53%) were found to have axillary lymph node metastases on pathologic examination of the axillary contents. However, 28 (97%) of these patients had either 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes or only micrometastases 2 to 5 mm in diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative clinical assessment of the axilla by physical examination combined with ultrasound examination is not completely accurate in predicting metastases in patients with LABC following tumor downstaging. However, patients with negative findings on both physical and ultrasound examinations of the axilla may be potential candidates for omission of axillary dissection if the axilla will be irradiated because minimal axillary disease remains. Patients who have positive findings on preoperative physical or ultrasound examinations should receive axillary dissection to ensure local control. A prospective randomized trial of axillary dissection versus axillary radiotherapy in patients with a clinically negative axilla following induction chemotherapy is currently underway.

A Phase II trial of neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, primary surgical therapy is considered unsuitable for the treatment of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC). Multiple reports have documented the efficacy of primary chemotherapy in this group of patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a multimodality treatment program in reducing distant and local disease relapses in patients with LABC.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with large operable or inoperable Stage III breast carcinoma, median tumor greatest dimension 7 x 8 cm, were treated with neoadjuvant MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) to achieve maximum clinical response, followed by modified radical mastectomy, adjuvant MVAC for six courses, and chest wall radiation. Of these patients, 37 had Stage IIIA disease and 18 had Stage IIIB or inflammatory breast carcinoma.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients achieved overall responses to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including 16 complete clinical remissions. Histopathologic evaluation was performed for all patients; nine were pathologically free of disease and six had residual intraductal carcinoma only. After a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 8-76 months), 24 patients had relapsed: 6 locoregional and distant, and 18 distant only. The median disease free and overall survival have not been reached; the 5-year disease free and overall survival rates are 51% and 63%, respectively. The number of lymph nodes with metastases was found to be an independent predictor of relapse in univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This multidisciplinary approach produced an excellent local control rate and a respectable 5-year distant relapse free rate. Axillary lymphadenectomy after primary chemotherapy provides crucial prognostic information, which can be important in planning multimodality treatment of patients with LABC.

Original p53 status predicts for pathological response in locally advanced breast cancer patients treated preoperatively with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil and radiation therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

1) To test feasibility of preoperative continuous infusion (c.i.) 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiation (RT) in locally advanced breast cancer. 2) To study clinical and pathological response rates of 5-FU and radiation. 3) To attempt preliminary correlations between biological probes and pathological response.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Previously untreated, locally advanced breast cancer patients were eligible: only patients who presented with T3/T4 tumors that could not be resected with primary wound closure were eligible, while inflammatory breast cancer patients were excluded. The protocol consisted of preoperative c.i. infusion 5-FU, 200 mg/m2/day with radiotherapy, 50 Gy at 2 Gy fractions to the breast and regional nodes. At mastectomy, pathological findings were classified based on persistence of invasive cancer: pathological complete response (pCR) = no residual invasive cells in the breast and axillary contents; pathological partial response (pPR) = presence of microscopic foci of invasive cells in either the breast or nodal specimens; no pathological response (pNR) = pathological persistence of tumor. For each patient pretreatment breast cancer biopsies were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for nuclear grade, ER/PR hormonal receptors, her2/neu and p53 overexpression.

RESULTS

Thirty-five women have completed the protocol and are available for analysis. 5-FU was interrupted during radiation in 10 of 35 patients because of oral mucositis in 8 patients, cellulitis in 1, and patient choice in another. Objective clinical response rate before mastectomy was 71% (25 of 35 patients): 4 CR, 21 PR. However, in all 35 patients tumor response was sufficient to make them resectable with primary wound closure. Accordingly, all patients underwent modified radical mastectomy: primary wound closure was achieved in all patients. At mastectomy there were 7 pCR (20%), 5 pPR (14%) and the remaining 23 patients (66%) had pathological persistence of cancer (pNR). Variables analyzed as potential predictors for pathological response (pPR and pCR) were: initial TNM clinical stage, clinical response, nuclear grade, hormonal receptor status, p53 overexpression, and Her2/neu overexpression in the pretreatment tumor biopsy. Only initial p53 status (lack of overexpression at immunohistochemistry) significantly correlated with achievement of a pathological response to this regimen (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

The combination of c.i. 5-FU and radiation was well tolerated and generated objective clinical responses in 71% of the patients. With the limitation of the small sample size, the complete pathological response achieved (20%) compares favorably with that reported in other series of neoadjuvant therapy for similar stage breast cancer. These preliminary data suggest that initial p53 status predicts for pathological response (pPR and pCR) to the combination of c.i. 5-FU and radiotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Multimodality treatment of noninflammatory stage IIIb breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The 1990s have established the contribution of multimodality therapy in the management of IIIb noninflammatory breast cancer (IIIb NIBC), by reducing the odds of recurrence and death.

METHODS

A total of 300 women with IIIb NIBC received a multimodality therapy. The treatment consisted of neoadjuvant chemotherapy [FAC (5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide) regimen], radical (Halsted) mastectomy or modified (Patey mastectomy), postoperative radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemohormone therapy [FAC regimen + cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate (CMF) regimen or Tamoxifen].

RESULTS

Complete or partial clinical response (CR or PR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was obtained in 83% patients. Ninety-nine patients (33%) survived 5 years without evidence of disease (NED). The uni- and multivariate analyses factors that had significant influence on the treatment results were: clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological tumor size, and microscopical status of the axillary lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that neoadjuvant FAC regimen chemotherapy is very effective in producing objective tumor regression and offers the benefit of radical mastectomy to patients with previously unresectable IIIb NIBC.

Brachytherapy and breast cancer

Brachytherapy has been an important component of radiation therapy for breast cancer. It played a historical role in the development of breast-conserving techniques for early-stage breast cancer. The primary use for brachytherapy in this setting has been to deliver a localized boost dose of radiation to the lumpectomy bed after whole breast radiation therapy. In recent years, there has been less utilization of brachytherapy as a boost technique. This is predominantly related to wider availability of electrons for delivering a boost dose. Another significant factor for the decline is the controversy of whether routine boosting of the tumor bed is necessary for all early-stage breast cancer patients after conservative surgery and whole breast radiation therapy. Despite this, brachytherapy is still the preferred boost technique in certain subsets of patients. Newer applications of brachytherapy for the treatment of breast cancer have emerged and have shown promise. For early-stage breast cancer, these include brachytherapy as the sole radiation modality after lumpectomy and in combination with local excision as an alternative to mastectomy for treatment of local recurrences after conservative surgery and radiation therapy. In selected locally advanced cases of breast cancer, brachytherapy has been used as part of a technique that attempts breast conservation. At this time, these newer uses of brachytherapy for the treatment of breast cancer remain investigational.

S-phase fractions of breast cancer predict overall and post-relapse survival

We studied the correlation of S-phase fraction (SPF) with clinical outcome in 127 pre- or perimenopausal patients with breast cancers treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy from October 1986 to June 1990. When the patients were analysed using the median value of the SPF as a threshold, there was a small but non-significant difference in favour of low SPF tumours for metastasis-free survival. SPF was the only parameter predicting overall survival in multivariate analysis (P < 0.002) which included T, N, histopathological grade and steroid hormone receptors. The results of metastasis-free survival contrasted with previous analyses with shorter follow-up, so we tested the time-dependent influence of SPF on prognosis. It was thus shown that SPF significantly predicts metastasis-free survival only during the first 30 months, whereas the relative risk of cancer-related death according to SPF remains significant for 56 months. In order to find an explanation for the difference in predictivity between metastasis-free survival and overall survival, we studied the post-relapse survival. Significantly shorter survival (median 12 months) was associated with tumours presenting pre-treatment high SPF values, compared to the low SPF group for which 60% of the patients were still alive after 30 months of metastasis phase (P = 0.002). Our current results, in a homogeneous series with a median follow-up of over 5 years, emphasise the importance of proliferation-related parameters for breast cancer management.

[Role of radiotherapy in the management of adenocarcinoma of the breast accessible to conservative surgery]

Standard treatment for limited stage adenocarcinoma of the breast includes lumpectomy (or a quadrantectomy), axillary node dissection, regional radiation therapy and, if the prognostic factors are unfavourable, chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy. This is supported by the results of American and European randomised trials. There have been many attempts at improving the modalities of conservative surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in order to maximize local control and minimize late sequellae. It is also likely that induction chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy applied in selected cases increase the proportion of patients who can be offered conservative surgery.

Morphologic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer

The use of chemotherapy as primary treatment in early and locally advanced breast cancer is rising. As a result, many resected tumors were exposed to cytotoxic drugs in vivo. To study resulting histopathologic changes, we examined 61 patients with locally advanced stage III breast cancer who had been treated with a standardized neoadjuvant polychemotherapy regimen before undergoing surgical resection 3 months later. Matched pairs of pre- and posttherapy breast tissue were evaluated for morphologic changes in the residual malignant and benign breast tissue compartment. A potential correlation between changes and the original p53 immunophenotype was examined as well. In 11 cases (18%), complete pathologic remission with no residual tumor in the mastectomy specimen was achieved. This response was not correlated to the original p53 status. The remaining 50 cases showed residual tumor. The most prominent histologic change was an increase in nuclear atypia of tumor cells (51% of the cases). This effect was independent of the presence or absence of nuclear p53 accumulation in the pre-treatment specimens. Nuclear atypia was frequently accompanied by tumor cell enlargement (in 49% of the cases). Most commonly, a tumor with relatively small cells presented with large epithelioid apocrine features after treatment. In 6 cases (13%), the mitotic rate decreased significantly, while in 12 cases (26%) the mitotic rate increased after chemotherapy. Elston histogrades remained unchanged in 70% of the cases but increased in 17% and decreased in 13%, mainly due to changes in mitotic rates. Extensive tumor cell vacuolization, a common change seen after radiotherapy, was a minor finding but was seen focally. Within the non-malignant compartment, lobular atrophy with hyalinization and minimal epithelial atypia of lobules and ducts were common. We conclude that changes in residual tumor and normal breast are common following systemic cytotoxic therapy. As neoadjuvant chemotherapy becomes mainstream management for locally advanced breast cancer, pathologists are required to recognize treatment induced changes. For correct histopathologic assessment, therapy induced morphologic alterations need to be distinguished from tumor-intrinsic morphologic features.

Inflammatory breast cancer

Multimodal therapy with induction chemotherapy has improved significantly local disease control and overall survival in patients with IBC. This is now considered standard therapy for patients with this disease. Although survival has been improved, well over 50% of these patients will succumb to this disease. Ongoing and future investigations may better define the optimal approach for local control, the optimal duration of maintenance chemotherapy, and the possible role of biologic response modifiers and growth factors in further improving the outcome for patients with this disease.

Conservation surgery after primary chemotherapy in large carcinomas of the breast

OBJECTIVE

The authors evaluated the utility of preoperative chemotherapy in patients with large size breast carcinoma, with a view to rendering a conservative surgical approach possible or easier.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Two hundred twenty-six of 227 patients with breast cancer involving a tumor larger than 3 cm at greatest dimension were candidates for mastectomy. They were treated with various primary preoperative chemotherapies and evaluated for surgery.

METHODS

After administering various chemotherapeutic regimens, the authors reevaluated the patients' conditions clinically and radiologically to plan definitive surgical treatment. If the tumor diameter was sufficiently reduced, quadrantectomy was planned; otherwise, mastectomy was performed. Complete axillary lymph node dissection was done in all cases.

RESULTS

In 90% of the cases, the size reduction was sufficient to justify breast conservation; in 10%, tumor size did not decrease enough or increased, thus mastectomy was performed. In 11.8% of the cases, the tumor was no longer identifiable at surgical inspection, and in 3.5% no tumor was found on microscopic examination. Axillary lymph nodes were free of metastases in 39% of cases. Twelve local recurrences occurred among the 203 patients treated with breast conservation (5.9%) and five among the 23 patients treated with mastectomy (21.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary chemotherapy can expand the indication for breast conservation to large tumors; careful attention, however, must be paid to surgical technique. The position of the tumor should be marked with tattoo points on the skin before chemotherapy. The macroscopic extent of the tumor regression must be evaluated carefully, and multiple frozen section biopsies may be needed. The margins of the resected breast should be evaluated microscopically. All microcalcifications present before treatment must be resected. The skin incision and mammary resection must fulfill criteria of radicality as well as good cosmetic outcome.

The prognosis of stage III breast cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy and adriamycin-based chemotherapy with and without tamoxifen. Eight year follow-up results of a randomized trial

Sixty-one patients with primary node positive stage III breast cancers were randomized to receive postoperative radiotherapy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (eight cycles of CAFt: cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, oral ftorafur) with or without tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment. The five-year overall survival for all patients was 49% (with tamoxifen 48% and without tamoxifen 50%) and disease-free survival 33% (with tamoxifen 27% and without 39%). Local control for all patients was only 64% despite the postoperative radiotherapy. There was no significant difference between these two treatment groups in overall and disease-free survival or local control. The prognosis of stage III breast cancer remains grim despite modern adjuvant therapy. In addition to more effective systemic treatment more effective local therapy is also needed in order to obtain satisfactory local control. The most important studies in stage III breast cancer with 5-year survival results are reviewed here.

Primary chemotherapy for early and advanced breast cancer

While locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) represents a small fraction of patients with breast cancer in industrialized nations, in developing countries it might constitute up to 50% of incident cases. The definition includes patients with stage IIB, III, and some with limited stage IV breast cancer. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is part of LABC, but it is often reported separately, because of its dismal prognosis. LABC can be considered technically operable (stage II and IIIA), or inoperable (stage IIIB, IV and IBC). For the last two decades, patients with inoperable LABC and IBC have been treated with increasing frequency with systemic therapy first, followed by regional therapy, either surgical resection or radiotherapy. Most treatment programs also included adjuvant systemic therapy. The majority of patients with LABC and IBC respond to primary chemotherapy, and most can be rendered disease-free initially. Local control rates exceed 80% with modern combined-modality treatment strategies. Since most tumors are downstaged, some patients can be treated with breast-conserving treatments. The optimal sequence of local and systemic treatments has not been defined. Combined-modality therapies improve the treatment and the outcome for patients with LABC. Whether the sequence of utilization of various treatments influences outcome remains to be established. The administration of systemic therapies first also provides a useful biological model to assess the effects of systemic treatments on the primary tumor and regional metastases, since these are available for serial non-invasive evaluation and sampling of tumor tissue.

Multidisciplinary management of advanced primary and metastatic breast cancer

Combined modality therapy has become the treatment of choice for patients with primary breast cancer, including those with locally advanced breast cancer. Primary or induction chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiation therapy or both, and adjuvant systemic therapy is a generally accepted strategy. Most tumors respond with a more than 50% decrease in tumor size, and approximately 70% of patients experience down-staging through primary chemotherapy. Breast conservation is possible for many patients with locally advanced breast cancer, and almost all patients initially are rendered disease free. Primary chemotherapy should be the initial choice of treatment for patients with locally advanced tumors, but it is unclear what the optimal sequence of subsequent therapies should be, or whether one or two local treatment modalities are necessary. The most dramatic example of the efficacy of these regimens was demonstrated in patients with inflammatory breast cancer. Previously a universally fatal condition, the natural history of this disease has been changed dramatically by the introduction of these combined modality therapies. Five-year survival rates of 35-60% commonly are reported, and it is likely that about one third of patients with this highly aggressive form of disease will survive beyond 10 years without recurrence. Combined modality therapy that includes primary chemotherapy provides appropriate local control, the possibility of breast conservation therapy, and, probably, an increased survival rate, at least for some subsets of patients with locally advanced breast cancer. The use of similar treatment strategies for early breast cancer is currently under evaluation. Hormone therapy and combination chemotherapy represent the main treatment approaches to metastatic breast cancer. Radiotherapy is also a useful palliative tool, especially for control of painful bone metastases and central nervous system involvement. Patient and tumor characteristics help in the optimal selection of systemic therapy. Palliative therapy for symptomatic control and prolongation of life also preserves a good quality of life. Dose-intensive chemotherapy is being evaluated as a treatment to increase complete response rates and cause remission consolidation. Clinical trials on several new and effective cytotoxic agents, as well as new hormonal compounds, are being completed and are showing encouraging preliminary results.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Management of locally advanced carcinoma of the breast. I. Noninflammatory

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients with locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer has evolved substantially over the past 30 years. From 1968 to 1989, 281 women were treated at Mallinckrodt Radiation Oncology Center with four different treatment methods. Median follow-up was 6.2 years (range 3-22 years); no patient was lost to follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective review of records and analysis of data on a computer file were carried out. Thirty-five patients were treated with irradiation alone, 33 with irradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy, 81 with mastectomy and irradiation, and 132 with mastectomy, irradiation, and chemotherapy (triple-modality).

RESULTS

Actuarial 5- and 10-year disease free survival (DFS) rates were 45% and 36%, respectively, with triple-modality therapy, 31% and 10% with irradiation and chemotherapy, 32% and 19% with irradiation and mastectomy, and 19% and 11% with irradiation alone. Cause specific survival (CSS) paralleled DFS in the four groups. Locoregional tumor control at 5 years was 91% for irradiation, mastectomy, and chemotherapy, 80% for irradiation and mastectomy, 54% for irradiation and chemotherapy, and 31% for irradiation alone. Systemic therapy and/or irradiation given before mastectomy yielded better locoregional tumor control, DFS, and CSS (not statistically significant). No difference in results was noted with radical, modified radical, or total mastectomy. In the triple-modality group, no chest wall failures occurred with chest wall doses greater than 5040 cGy. Grade 2 or higher treatment sequelae were noted in 10-42% of patients, depending on treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple-modality therapy yielded improved locoregional tumor control, DFS, and CSS compared with other modalities. Patients treated with surgery had better locoregional tumor control than those who received irradiation alone or in combination with chemotherapy, but the impact on DFS and CSS was less impressive. Additional clinical trials are needed to define further the role and optimal use of the various therapeutic modalities in the management of locally advanced breast cancer.

Locally advanced breast cancer: defining an optimum treatment regimen

PURPOSE

This retrospective review examines response, local control and freedom from distant failure for patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated by chemotherapy and radiotherapy without routine surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

67 patients were treated between January 1980 and December 1988 at Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 56 months. Four successive protocols evolved, each with three phases induction chemotherapy (adriamycin or novantrone, cyclophosphamide) (three cycles), radiotherapy then chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) of progressively shorter duration. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were concurrent in the fourth regimen.

RESULTS

Clinical complete response (disappearance of all known disease) after chemotherapy, radiotherapy and additional chemotherapy was 18%, 55% and 79% respectively. Seven additional patients subsequently underwent mastectomy (N = 2), local excision (N = 1) or a radiation boost (N = 4) for a total complete response rate of 90%. Twenty one patients (31%) failed to achieve a complete response (N = 7) or recurred locally (N = 14). The crude 2-year rate of local recurrence was 50% for tumors > 10 cm (N = 10) and 14% for smaller tumors (n = 57) and was not influenced by protocol. Two-year actuarial freedom from distant failure was 67% at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Local control can be achieved for patients with locally advanced breast cancer with a primary tumor < 10 cm using chemotherapy and radiotherapy without routine mastectomy.

Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery: preliminary results of a randomised trial: S6

The aim of this study was to assess a potential advantage in survival by neoadjuvant as compared to adjuvant chemotherapy. 414 premenopausal patients with T2-T3 N0-N1 M0 breast cancer were randomised to receive either four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil), followed by local-regional treatment (group I) or four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy after primary irradiation +/- surgery (group II). Surgery was limited to those patients with a persisting mass after irradiation, and aimed to be as conservative as possible. 390 patients were evaluable. With a median follow-up of 54 months, we observed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.039) in survival in favour of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. A similar trend was seen when the time to metastatic recurrence was evaluated (P = 0.09). At this stage, no difference in disease-free interval or local recurrence between these two groups could be observed. The mean total dose of chemotherapy administered was similar in both groups. On average, group I had more intensive chemotherapy regimes (doxorubicin P = 0.02) but fewer treatment courses (P = 0.008) as compared to the treated patients in group II. Haematological tolerance was reduced when chemotherapy succeeded to exclusive irradiation. Breast conservation was identical for both groups at the end of primary treatment (82 and 77% for groups I and II, respectively). Of the 191 evaluable patients in the neoadjuvant treatment arm, 65% had an objective response (> 50% regression) following four cycles of chemotherapy. The objective response rate to primary irradiation (55 Gy) was 85%. Improved survival figures in the neoadjuvant treatment arm could be the result of the early initiation of chemotherapy, but we cannot exclude that this difference might be attributable to a slightly more aggressive treatment. So far, the trend in favour of decreased metastases was not statistically significant. The local control appeared similar in both subgroups.

Central small size breast cancer: how to overcome the problem of nipple and areola involvement

For centrally located small tumours we have sought, with the aid of a plastic surgeon, to achieve the same radicality as in the other quadrants, while achieving a good cosmetic result. We considered 37 patients with small centrally located breast carcinoma, in whom we performed a new surgical technique. From analysis of this series it emerged that a high percentage (54.1%) had nipple and areolar involvement, suggesting their removal; it is no problem to sacrifice these when a good cosmetic result can be achieved by plastic remodelling.

Feasibility of breast-conservation surgery after induction chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma

To determine whether preoperative chemotherapy sufficiently downstages disease in patients with locally advanced breast cancer to allow breast-conservation surgery, the clinical, mammographic, and histologic responses were analyzed after three cycles of preoperative vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone that were administered to 143 patients with 1988 American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IIB (17%), IIIA (36%), or IIIB (41%) disease or positive supraclavicular lymph nodes (6%) who had a complete (16%) or partial (84%) clinical response and underwent total mastectomy and axillary node dissection. Thirty-three (23%) were potential breast-conservation candidates based on criteria of complete resolution of skin edema, residual tumor size less than 5 cm, and absence of known tumor multicentricity or extensive intramammary lymphatic invasion. Of these 33, the initial tumor size decreased from a median of 5 cm to less than 1 cm, with 42% having no residual tumor in the mastectomy specimen and 45% having negative nodes. No tumor was found in any other quadrant of the breast, and no patient had a recurrence in the chest wall. After a median follow-up of 34 months, only three patients had distant metastases; two of these died of disease.

Stage III breast cancer: is neoadjuvant chemotherapy always necessary?

Optimal management of locally advanced breast cancer is controversial. Claims of superiority for neoadjuvant systemic therapy are based on comparisons with outdated historical control groups who received no chemotherapy. Between 1978 and 1987, 118 patients with locally advanced breast cancer underwent treatment and follow-up at the Medical College of Virginia. Median follow-up was 44 months (range 3-119 months). Actuarial 5-year survival for the entire group was 54%. This compares favorably with recent series using neoadjuvant chemotherapy in which 5-year survival rates of 40-65% have been reported. Primary tumor size larger than 9 cm, metastases to more than 50% of regional lymph nodes, and the presence of inflammatory disease were significant prognostic indicators. This series represents a contemporary control group of patients with locally advanced breast cancer in whom conventionally accepted guidelines for local and postoperative systemic adjuvant therapy were used. Until the optimal sequence of therapy is determined by prospective randomized trials, series such as this may serve as more appropriate controls to which the results of new therapies could be compared.