Combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy in advanced inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The final report of a randomized trial

A randomized, controlled trial to investigate cognitive behavioral therapy in prevention and treatment of acute oral mucositis in patients with locoregional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing chemoradiotherapy

Purpose

Oral mucositis is a common side effect of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). This study aimed to determine whether cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) could help prevent oral mucositis during chemoradiation therapy for locoregional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).

Methods and materials

Between July 15, 2020, and January 31, 2022, a randomized controlled phase II trial was conducted. Eligible patients (N=282, 18-70 years old) with pathologically diagnosed LA-NPC were randomly assigned to receive CBT or treatment as usual (TAU) during CCRT (computer-block randomization, 1:1). The primary endpoints were the incidence and latency of oral mucositis.

Results

The incidence of oral mucositis was significantly lower in the CBT group (84.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 78.7%-90.9%) than in the TAU group (98.6%; 95% CI, 96.6%-100%; P<0.001). The median latency period was 26 days and 15 days in the CBT and TAU groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.12-0.22; P<0.001). CBT significantly reduced ≥ grade 3 oral mucositis (71.9% vs. 22.5%, P<0.001), dry mouth (10.8% vs. 3.7%, P=0.021), dysphagia (18% vs. 5.1%, P=0.001), and oral pain (10% vs. 3.6%, P=0.034) compared with TAU. Patients receiving CBT and TAU during CCRT had similar short-term response rates.

Conclusions

CBT reduced the occurrence, latency, and severity of oral mucositis in patients with LA-NPC during CCRT.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are the most common cancers arising in the head and neck. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients. This review updates one last published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma results in improved overall survival, improved disease-free survival and/or improved locoregional control, when incorporated as either induction therapy given prior to locoregional treatment (i.e. radiotherapy or surgery), concurrent with radiotherapy or in the adjuvant (i.e. after locoregional treatment with radiotherapy or surgery) setting.

SEARCH METHODS

An information specialist searched 4 bibliographic databases up to 15 September 2021 and used additional search methods to identify published, unpublished and ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and that evaluated the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, we assessed the new included trials for their risk of bias and at least two authors extracted data from them. Our primary outcome was overall survival (time to death from any cause). Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (time to disease recurrence or death from any cause) and locoregional control (response to primary treatment). We contacted trial authors for additional information or clarification when necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 100 studies with 18,813 participants. None of the included trials were at low risk of bias.  For induction chemotherapy, we reported the results for contemporary regimens that will be of interest to clinicians and people being treated for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to clearly demonstrate a survival benefit from induction chemotherapy with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil prior to radiotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) for death 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.04, P = 0.11; 7427 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), prior to surgery (HR for death 1.06, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.60, P = 0.77; 198 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence) or prior to concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with cisplatin (HR for death 0.71, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.35, P = 0.30; 389 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to support the use of an induction chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil plus docetaxel prior to CRT with cisplatin (HR for death 1.08, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.44, P = 0.63; 760 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence).  There is insufficient evidence to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy over observation only following surgery (HR for death 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.22, P = 0.67; 353 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Among studies that compared post-surgical adjuvant CRT, as compared to post-surgical RT, adjuvant CRT showed a survival benefit (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03; 1097 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Primary treatment with CRT, as compared to radiotherapy alone,  was associated with a reduction in the risk of death (HR for death 0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83, P < 0.00001; 2852 participants, 24 studies; moderate-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review demonstrate that chemotherapy in the curative-intent treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers only seems to be of benefit when used in specific circumstances together with locoregional treatment. The  evidence does not show a clear survival benefit from the use of induction chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy, surgery or CRT. Adjuvant CRT reduces the risk of death by 16%, as compared to radiotherapy alone. Concurrent chemoradiation as compared to radiation alone is associated with a greater than 20% improvement in overall survival; however, additional research is required to inform how the specific chemotherapy regimen may influence this benefit.

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in squamous cell Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) demonstrated that concomitant chemotherapy (CT) improved overall survival (OS) in patients without distant metastasis. We report the updated results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Published or unpublished randomized trials including patients with non-metastatic carcinoma randomized between 1965 and 2016 and comparing curative loco-regional treatment (LRT) to LRT + CT or adding another timing of CT to LRT + CT (main question), or comparing induction CT + radiotherapy to radiotherapy + concomitant (or alternating) CT (secondary question) were eligible. Individual patient data were collected and combined using a fixed-effect model. OS was the main endpoint.

RESULTS

For the main question, 101 trials (18951 patients, median follow-up of 6.5 years) were analyzed. For both questions, there were 16 new (2767 patients) and 11 updated trials. Around 90% of the patients had stage III or IV disease. Interaction between treatment effect on OS and the timing of CT was significant (p < 0.0001), the benefit being limited to concomitant CT (HR: 0.83, 95%CI [0.79; 0.86]; 5(10)-year absolute benefit of 6.5% (3.6%)). Efficacy decreased as patients age increased (p_trend = 0.03). OS was not increased by the addition of induction (HR = 0.96 [0.90; 1.01]) or adjuvant CT (1.02 [0.92; 1.13]). Efficacy of induction CT decreased with poorer performance status (p_trend = 0.03). For the secondary question, eight trials (1214 patients) confirmed the superiority of concomitant CT on OS (HR = 0.84 [0.74; 0.95], p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The update of MACH-NC confirms the benefit and superiority of the addition of concomitant CT for non-metastatic head and neck cancer.

Biological and Clinical Implications for Multimodality Treatment in Patients Affected by Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Aims and background

Several strategies combining radiotherapy and chemotherapy have been developed for the cure of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN) in an attempt to improve loco-regional control and survival. This overview aims to summarize clinical results of reported randomized trials and to discuss the biological mechanisms underlying the interactive and non-interactive processes promoted when chemotherapy is added to radiotherapy.

Methods

The clinical goals of combined modality therapy and exploitable associations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy that may lead to a therapeutic gain in comparison with radiotherapy alone are reported and reviewed. Clinical applications of the four main ways of combining chemotherapy with radiotherapy (neoadjuvant, concomitant, alternating and adjuvant) are briefly re-analyzed and discussed.

Results and Conclusions

Published evidence suggests that induction chemotherapy (neo-adjuvant) should not be routinely recommended; however, induction chemotherapy increases the likelihood of larynx preservation in patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer and should be offered as a treatment option as an alternative to surgery. Positive results of several randomized studies and a recent meta-analysis show that concomitant use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in unresectable SCCHN is beneficial and should be considered as a potential standard treatment. A complementary biological staging of SCCHN, by evaluating new predictive factors of tumor response, is presently under investigation to better interpretate clinical randomized trials exploring chemo-radiotherapy.

Concurrent Chemotherapy with Carboplatin + 5-Fluorouracil and Radiotherapy in Advanced Squamous Cell Head and Neck Carcinoma: A Retrospective Single Institution's Study

Aims and backround

The purpose of the study was to analyze the long-term follow-up of a single institution's experience with a regimen of concomitant carboplatin + 5-fluorouracil (CBDCA + 5-FU) infusion and radiotherapy.

Study design

Fifty-eight patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer treated with combined chemoradiotherapy between March 1990 and October 1998 were reviewed retrospectively. According to the TNM tumor staging, 6 patients had stage II, 21 stage III and 31 stage IV tumors. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of the combination of 5-FU and CBDCA, for a total of 3 cycles. Both drugs were given as 4-day continuous intravenous infusions during the first and fourth week of radiation therapy: 5-FU at 1000 mg/m2 per day and CBDCA at 75 mg/m2 per day. Radiation was given in single daily fractions of 1.8 to 2 Gy, to a total dose of 66 to 70 Gy.

Results

After the completion of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 34 patients (58.6%) achieved clinical and radiological (computerized tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging) complete remission, 15 patients (25.9%) partial remission >50%, 5 patients (8.6%) partial remission >50%, and 4 patients (6.8%) had no response. Toxicity was intensive but tolerable. After a median follow-up of 25 months, overall survival and recurrence-free survival estimated for the whole patient population was 52% at 3 years, and the median length of recurrence-free survival was 23 months.

Conclusions

Our regimen combining standard single daily fraction radiation with the conventional dose of CBDCA and 5-FU was given without dose modification regardless of the severity of the adverse effects. It gave a clinical complete response at the primary site in 58.6% of patients. With a 52% projected 3-year overall survival, our series compares favorably with similar studies in the literature. Therefore, our results with concomitant CBDCA/5-FU infusion and radiotherapy are encouraging and suggest that CBDCA can be substituted for cisplatin with a good therapeutic index.

Osteopontin Involves Cisplatin Resistance and Poor Prognosis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background. Osteopontin (OPN) is a multifunctional cytokine involved in cell survival, migration, and adhesion. However, its role in chemosensitivity in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in humans has not yet been investigated. Methods. We enrolled 121 patients with locally advanced stage IVA/B OSCC receiving cisplatin-based IC followed by CCRT from January 1, 2006, through January 1, 2012. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess OPN expression in OSCC patients' biopsy specimens from paraffin blocks before treatment. In addition, MTT/colony formation assay was used to estimate the influence of OPN in an oral cancer cell line treated with cisplatin. Results. Of the 121 patients, 94 had positive OPN findings and 52 responded to IC followed by CCRT. Positive osteopontin immunostaining also correlated significantly with positive N status/TNM stage/male gender and smoking. Univariate analyses showed that patients whose tumors had a low expression of OPN were more likely to respond to chemotherapy and have a significantly better OS than those whose tumors had a high expression of OPN. Multivariate analysis revealed that prolonged survival was independently predicted for patients with stage IVA disease, negative lymph nodes, and negative expressions of OPN and for those who received chemotherapy with Docetaxel/cisplatin/fluorouracil (TPF). An oral cancer line stimulated with OPN exhibited a dose-dependent resistance to cisplatin treatment. Conversely, endogenous OPN depletion by OPN-mediated shRNA increased sensitivity to cisplatin. Conclusions. A positive expression of OPN predicts a poor response and survival in patients with locally advanced stage IVA/B OSCC treated with cisplatin-based IC followed by CCRT.

Oral complications in patients receiving head and neck radiation therapy: a literature review

Oral cancer is a relatively common disease worldwide and its incidence rate has increased over the years. In Brazil, thousands of new cases emerge and the dental surgeon is the professional who diagnoses, prevents, intervenes in and instructs patients in regard to the disease, its treatment and related complications. There is no current form of systemic treatment able to destroy abnormal cells without causing harm or death to normal cells. Surgery combined with radiation is one of the most common treatments for malignant tumors in the head and neck. This modality of treatment has resulted in high rates of cure and survival. There are, however, severe side effects, causing morbidities and reducing patients' quality of life. Hence, this study's aim was to perform a literature review addressing the main complications arising form radiation therapy while emphasizing the conduct of dental surgeons in the face of these changes.

Strategies for non-resectable head and neck cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment of unresectable, locally advanced head and neck cancer consists of many different options, all of them based on radiotherapy. The main variable is represented by chemotherapy, i.e., the way in which chemotherapy is combined with radiation. More recently, the combination of cetuximab and radiotherapy emerged as a new treatment opportunity and induction chemotherapy, with the combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluoruracil, gained a renewed interest. Concurrent chemoradiation is based on the most robust evidence and is regarded as the leading standard of care for unresectable locally advanced head and neck cancer. Unfortunately, chemoradiation is hampered by severe toxicity and patients must be selected carefully before treatment. The experience of the staff (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and nurses), and in particular its familiarity with toxicity management, as well the structural facilities, play an important role in the final outcome. When the patient is unfit for chemoradiation, or when experienced staff or adequate structures are unavailable, induction chemotherapy, cetuximab and radiotherapy, or radiotherapy alone are all evidence-based alternative options. The choice among them will be based on the clinical condition of the patient, the physician's experience, and the patient's preference. Whatever is the treatment of choice, it is important to involve a multidisciplinary staff in the management of these patients. Indeed, also unresectable patients may require supportive surgical interventions before or during treatment, or removal of residual disease after treatment.

Future chemotherapy and radiotherapy options in head and neck cancer

Chemoradiation is a standard approach to advanced unresectable head and neck cancer, although the optimum combination regimen remains controversial. However, in the past few years, chemoradiation has been successfully extended from the treatment of unresectable disease to the postsurgical therapy of high-risk patients and its value as an organ preservation procedure is under evaluation. More recently, molecular-targeted therapies have emerged, which interfere with mechanisms of chemo- and radioresistance, and preliminary data are promising. Their use in the combined treatment of head and neck cancer will hopefully further improve the value of chemoradiation in the clinical setting.

Results of concurrent radio-chemotherapy for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in everyday clinical practice with special reference to early mortality

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials have established concurrent chemo-radiotherapy as the preferred treatment option for inoperable local-regionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Because many patients have multiple co-morbidities and would not fulfill the eligibility criteria of clinical trials, the results need to be re-evaluated in daily clinical practice with special reference to early mortality.

METHODS

167 consecutive patients with HNSCC who received concurrent chemo-radiotherapy at the Basel University Hospital between 1988 and 2006 were analyzed retrospectively with a special focus on early deaths and risk factors for an unfavorable outcome.

RESULTS

In our cohort, the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 54% and 47%, respectively. The therapy was associated with relevant toxicity and an early mortality rate of 5.4%. Patients dying early were analyzed individually for the cause of death. Patients with elevated white blood cell counts (HR: 2.66 p=0,016) and vascular co-morbidities (HR: 5.3, p=0,047) showed significantly worse survival rates. The same factors were associated with a trend toward increased treatment-related mortality. The 3-year survival rate improved from approximately 43% for patients treated before the year 2000 to 65% for patients treated after the year 2000 (Fisher's exact test p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although many patients who received concurrent chemo-radiotherapy would not have qualified for clinical trials, the outcome was favorable and has significantly improved in recent years. However the early mortality was slightly worse than what is described in the literature.

Comparison of sequential chemoradiation with radiation alone in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancers

OBJECTIVES

To compare locoregional control with alternating chemo radiation and radiation alone in patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic referral center.

PATIENTS

50 patients of biopsy proven locally-advanced carcinoma of head and neck.

INTERVENTION

25 patients were kept in Group I or study group (i.e. alternating chemo-radiation) and 25 patients in Group II or control group (i.e. radiation alone). In the study group, patients were given 3 cycles of chemotherapy (Cisplatin 20 mg/m([2]) and Inj. 5-FU 200mg/m([2]) from day 1-5 of each week) during weeks 1,5 and 9 alternated with radiation dose of 10Gy/week was given during weeks 2,3,4 and 6,7,8. In the control group, patients were given a total dose of 60Gy in 6 weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The response rate at the primary site and nodal site was better in study group as compared to control group.

RESULTS

On comparing the response at the primary and nodal site together, 72% (18/25) patients of group I and 44% (11/25) patients of group II showed CR. PR was seen in 28% (7/25) and 36% (9/25) patients in group I and II respectively. No response was seen in 5/25 (20%) of patients in Group II.

CONCLUSION

Our study has revealed that alternating/ sequential chemoradiation is a promising and feasible approach for patients in advanced head and neck cancer.

Induction chemotherapy decreases the rate of distant metastasis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma but does not improve survival or locoregional control: a meta-analysis

The definitive effect of induction chemotherapy (IC) on locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains uncertain and although randomized controlled trials are supposed to provide high levels evidence for clinical guidelines, the data thus far has been conflicted. In an effort to elucidate the potential benefit of IC, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1965-2011) was performed investigating the impact of IC on survival, locoregional control, distant metastasis, and toxicity in HNSCC. Kaplan-Meier curves were read by a digitizing software-Engauge Digitizer. Data combination was performed using the software-RevMan and trial level log hazard ratio (HR) and variance were pooled and presented. Among the 40 eligible trials, 28 trials encompassing 4189 patients receiving locoregional treatment with or without IC were included in the analysis. The cumulative benefit of IC on overall survival and distant metastasis was 6% (HR = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.87-1.01, P = 0.11) and 7% (95%CI = 0-13%, P = 0.05) respectively while for locoregional control a benefit was not observed as seen by the -2% (95%CI = -11% to 8%, P = 0.73) improved control rate. In a subsite analysis specifically for laryngeal preservation, IC did not significantly improve survival (P = 0.47). There was a significant benefit from the cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) protocols with an increase in overall survival of 13% (HR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.78-0.97, P = 0.01), and a reduction in the 5-year distant metastasis rate of 11% (95%CI = 0-21%, P = 0.04). The occurrence of grade 3/4 mucositis, leukopenia and emesis was significantly lower in patients receiving IC compared to patients receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy. In conclusion, there is not a significant benefit of the pooled IC regimens in HNSCC on survival or locoregional control. In contrast, IC does show significant benefit in the reduction of distant metastasis. When protocols using a PF regimen are analyzed independently, a significant improvement in survival and rate of distant metastases is observed while there is not a benefit in locoregional control. The routine use of IC is still debatable. IC could be applied on larynx preservation strategy.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 1st December 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eighty-nine trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias and data were extracted by two or more review authors. The primary outcome was total mortality. Trial authors were contacted for additional information or for clarification.

MAIN RESULTS

There is evidence of a small increase in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone (25 trials), hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00, P = 0.06). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery ± radiotherapy alone (10 trials), HR of mortality 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, P = 0.03), and there is some evidence that this improvement may be greater with concomitant adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (4 trials), HR of mortality 0.84 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03). In patients with unresectable tumours, there is evidence that concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy is associated with improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone (26 trials), HR of mortality 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.83, P < 0.00001). These findings are confirmed by sensitivity analyses based on studies assessed at low risk of bias. There is insufficient evidence to identify which agent(s) and/or regimen(s) are the most effective. The additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy may prolong survival by 8 to 20% and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by up to 16%. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by 10 to 22%. There is insufficient evidence as to which agent or regimen is most effective and the additional toxicity associated with chemotherapy given in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery cannot be quantified.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 28th July 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias using six domains: sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting and other possible sources of bias. Data were extracted using a specially designed form and entered into the characteristics of included studies table and the analysis sections of the review. The proportion of participants in each trial with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are recorded in Additional Table 1.

MAIN RESULTS

There was no statistically significant improvement in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone in 25 trials (hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery +/- radiotherapy alone in 10 trials (HR of mortality 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99), and there was an additional benefit of adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy compared to radiotherapy in 4 of these trials (HR of mortality 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98). Concomitant chemoradiotherapy resulted in improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone in patients whose tumours were considered unresectable in 25 trials (HR of mortality 0.79, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.84). However, the additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy is associated with a 9% increase in survival and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy is associated with a 16% increase in overall survival following surgery. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant chemoradiotherapy showed a 22% benefit in overall survival compared with radiotherapy alone.

Phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with unresectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG0706)

A Phase II study was started in Japan to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with unresectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. This study began in July 2008, and a total of 45 patients will be accrued from 13 institutions within 2 years. The primary endpoint is the clinical complete remission rate. The secondary endpoints are local progression-free survival, overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, proportion of patients who achieve nutritional support-free survival and adverse events.

Influence of weight loss on outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing concomitant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of weight loss on outcome in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT): treatment interruption, infections, mortality, and hospital readmission rate.

METHODS

Forty patients with head and neck cancer were enrolled. All patients were counseled to follow a nutritional program during CCRT. Body weight was evaluated at baseline, at the end, and 30 days after radiochemotherapy.

RESULTS

Ninety percent of compliant patients with nutritional program maintained body weight (mean, 1 +/- 2.4 kg) and 100% of noncompliant patients continued to lose weight (mean, -9 +/- 4 kg; p < .001). A reduction greater than 20% of prediagnosis weight significantly correlated with treatment interruption (p = .003), infections (p = .002), early mortality (p = .011), hospital readmission rate (p = .001), and survival (log-rank test: z = -2.722, p = .006).

CONCLUSION

In patients with head and neck cancer undergoing CCRT, the early nutritional management reduces weight loss and improve outcome.

Chemoradiation therapy using radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and nedaplatin, and intra-arterial infusion using carboplatin for locally advanced head and neck cancer – Phase II study

To improve the treatment results for locally advanced head and neck cancer, chemoradiation therapy by radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and nedaplatin (NDP), and intra-arterial therapy using carboplatin (CBDCA) was performed. Thirty-two patients were entered into the study between July 1997 and August 2002. According to the TNM staging (1997), 14 patients had stage III lesions, and 19 patients had stage IV (M0) lesions. Alternating chemoradiotherapy was performed by the following regimen. Initially, systemic chemotherapy was administered, followed by 4 weeks of radiotherapy (36Gy/20 fractions; wide field irradiation) starting 2 days after chemotherapy, a second course of systemic chemotherapy 2 days after radiotherapy, and a second course of a reduced field radiotherapy (30Gy/15 fractions) 2 days after chemotherapy. Arterial injection therapy was administered in the latter half of radiotherapy after the end of the second course of systemic chemotherapy. For systemic chemotherapy, 5FU at 3500mg/m(2)/120h was intravenously administered for 5 days (Days 1-5), and NDP at 120mg/m(2)/6h was administered on Day 6. An intra-arterial agent using CBDCA was continuously infused by a portable electrical pump for 4 (to 6) weeks. The total dose of CBDCA was AUC 6 as established by Calvert's formula. The 5-year local control rate was 59%. The 5-year overall survival rate was 51%. There were no clinically significant adverse effects. Chemoradiation therapy by radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and intra-arterial chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer may be useful for improving treatment results.

Taxane-based chemoirradiation for organ preservation with locally advanced head and neck cancer: results of a phase II multi-institutional trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal drug schedule and sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation for organ preservation in head and neck cancer has yet to be determined. We undertook a phase II trial of a taxane-based induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by a taxane-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCR) regimen in patients with resectable stage III or IV disease to determine the feasibility, toxicity, and overall efficacy.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with laryngeal or tongue base carcinomas were enrolled. All patients received 3 cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC (area under the curve) 6-7.5 over 30 minutes on days 1, 22, and 43. Responding patients went on to receive radiation (70 Gy/7 weeks) with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) IV on days 1, 22, and 43 and weekly paclitaxel 30 mg/m(2) IV (n = 22). Because of hematologic toxicity, the concurrent regimen was changed to weekly carboplatin AUC 1 plus weekly paclitaxel 30 mg/m(2) (n = 22).

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with stage III and 21 patients with stage IV disease were enrolled. Median follow-up was 3.7 years. Acute toxicity of concurrent cisplatin and paclitaxel was excessive, with significant hematologic toxicity and 2 toxic deaths. Acute toxicities of concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel were tolerable. No patients required permanent percutaneous gastrostomy tubes. The organ preservation rate was 83% (toxic deaths considered failures). Of 42 evaluable patients, 20 patients had complete responses (48%), 17 partial responses (41%), 3 minor responses (11%), 1 stable disease (2%), and 1 progressive disease (2%). Two-year local control, relapse-free survival, and overall survival were 82%, 77%, and 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in relapse-free survival or organ preservation rates between concurrent regimens. Platinum and paclitaxel-based CCR is feasible after ICT and provides a high rate of organ preservation. Substitution of concurrent cisplatin to weekly carboplatin with paclitaxel and radiation has an improved toxicity profile. The ease of administration and low toxicity make this a regimen that is practical for use in the community setting.

FDG-PET in radiotherapy treatment planning of advanced head and neck cancer—A prospective clinical analysis

BACKGROUND

A prospective clinical analysis was carried out to assess the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) on planning radiotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer in AJCC Stages III/IV.

METHODS

From July 1999 to May 2004 FDG-PET was performed in 49 patients prior to radiotherapy for exclusion of systemic disease, synchronous second or unknown primary tumors.

RESULTS

45/49 (91.9%) FDG-PET findings could be confirmed in comparison with conventional imaging and the clinical follow up of 9.5 months. 21/49 FDG-PET (42.8%) yielded new diagnostic information with therapeutic implications in 20/49 (40.8%) cases. The therapy strategy was changed in 14/49 patients, minor modifications in the portal design occurred in 6/49 patients. 9/49 (18.3%) FDG-PET supported a curative strategy, 11/49 (22.4%) a palliative one.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET is a useful and important diagnostic tool mainly for exclusion of systemic disease in advanced head and neck cancer, thus influencing radiotherapy in 20/49 (40.8%) of patients investigated in our study.

Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Final results from a phase II study with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with a four-year follow-up

Encouraging results have recently been reported in patients (pts) with locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) when induction chemotherapy (IC) is used and followed by radiotherapy (RT). The present study assessed the therapeutic response of an aggressive regimen consisting of docetaxel (TXT), cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) as IC and concurrent with RT in pts with locally advanced (stages III and IV) SCCHN. 42 pts (35 male and 7 female) with a mean age of 58 years suffering from stages III and IV (Mo) SCCHN were included to this organ preservation phase II clinical trial. The site of the primary tumors was the anterior mouth in 9 pts, base of tongue and oropharynx in 12, middle third of the face in 8 and larynx in 13. The performance status of the pts was 0-1 according to WHO and above 80% according to Karnofsky classification. IC consisted of TXT (40 mg/m2), CDDP (40 mg/m2) and 5-Fu (350 mg/m2) every two weeks (wks) for a total of four courses and repeated, coupled with RT (66-68 cGys total dose fractionated at 200 Gy per day, 5 days a week), for up to seven wks. In total, pts received eight courses of chemotherapy (CT) at the end of RT treatment. Pts were evaluated at the end of IC, after RT and every six wks thereafter. 41 pts were eligible for evaluation after IC (one died from myocardial infarction) and 39 after completion of treatment (two died during RT). Statistical multivariate analysis was performed using SPSS (11) package. Complications from IC and RT were evaluated according to WHO criteria and included mucositis Grade (Gr) IV in 10% of the pts, Gr III in 50%, Gr II in 20%. Anemia presented in 40% of the pts with Gr II, 40% with Gr I, neutropenia 17% with Gr IV, 20% with Gr III, 30% with Gr II, thrombocytopenia 3% with Gr III, 10% with Gr I and xerostomia up to Gr II in 70% of the pts. The response rate (RR) after IC was complete response (CR) for 10 pts (24.4%), partial response (PR) for 22 (53.7%) and no response (NR) for 9 (21.9%). At the end of the treatment the RR in the intention-to-treat population were CR for 25 pts (64.1%), and PR for 14 (35.9%). Follow up ranges from 18 to 56 months (mts). 14 pts died during follow-up time. The mean survival time is 41 mts and the median 40. 2 pts with CR developed local recurrence and two distant metastases, whereas all pts with PR developed progressive disease (PD) and all but two are dead from disease. It is evident from this phase II study that TXT-CDDP-5Fu based IC followed by the same regimen coupled with RT improves local control. Pts that showed CR after IC continued to maintain disease status during RT (P-value=0.0181). In pts with SD concurrent RT did not alter dramatically disease outcome. Patients who showed complete response after both IC and RT presented a four-year survival rate of 74% compared to a 30% to partial responders (P-value=0.0001). Results are encouraging and further study of the toxicity and follow-up is needed to validate treatment effectiveness.

Alternating Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: An Alternative?

Rapidly alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy (ACR) is a minor variation of concurrent chemoradiation (CCR). This scheduling has been tested in advanced head and neck cancer and has shown superiority over standard radiation in some randomized trials with only marginally greater toxicity. This paper reviews ACR in advanced head and neck cancer. The hypothesis that this approach could have a better toxicity profile than CCR is discussed in light of the published clinical data. Efficacy is also discussed on the basis of available phase III trials. Published data indicate that rapidly alternating chemoradiation adds to toxicity less than CCR and results in comparable 3-year overall survival rates. In conclusion, ACR could be as active as, and possibly less toxic than, CCR. Comparative trials are highly recommended.

Oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiation treatment for head and neck carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current study was conducted to characterize the risks and clinical consequences of oral mucositis (OM) in patients with head and neck carcinoma (HNC) who are receiving radiation therapy.

METHODS

Data regarding 450 HNC patients who had received radiation therapy were collected via chart review from 154 U.S. medical and radiation oncologists. Information obtained included patient characteristics, treatments received, highest recorded grade of OM during radiation therapy (none, mild, moderate, or severe), and outcomes potentially associated with mucosal injury.

RESULTS

The mean age (+/- standard deviation [SD]) of the study subjects was 61.3 years (12.3 yrs); the majority of patients (80%) were men. Primary tumor locations included the oropharynx (26.4%), larynx (26.4%), oral cavity including the lip (24.4%), hypopharynx (13.6%), and nasopharynx (9.1%). The majority of tumors were new and were classified as AJCC Stages III or IV. The majority of patients (83%) received standard radiation therapy; the mean (+/- SD) cumulative dose was 6285 centigrays (cGy) (+/- 1158 cGy). Approximately 33% of the patients received concomitant chemotherapy. The majority of patients (83%) developed OM; 29% developed severe OM. Patients with severe OM were more likely to have nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal tumors (adjusted odds ratio [OR] of 10.1 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.1-49.9] and 6.9 [95% CI, 2.4-19.7], respectively), and to have received cumulative radiation doses > 5000 cGy (OR of 10.4; 95% CI, 2.9-37.1) and concomitant chemotherapy (OR of 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-8.0). Patients with OM had more unplanned breaks in radiation therapy (OR of 3.8; 95% CI, 1.7-8.5) and hospital admissions (OR of 3.5; 95% CI, 1.3-9.5).

CONCLUSIONS

HNC patients with nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal tumors, and those who receive cumulative radiation doses > 5000 cGy or concomitant chemotherapy, are more likely to develop OM. Patients with OM are at a higher risk of unplanned breaks in radiation therapy and hospitalization.

Acute toxicity and preliminary clinical outcomes of concurrent radiation therapy and weekly docetaxel and daily cisplatin for head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine the feasibility and efficacy of concurrent weekly docetaxel and radiation therapy as a definitive treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with primary HNC, who were treated with concurrent weekly docetaxel and radiation therapy, were analysed. The distribution of the disease stage was as follows: Stage II, 18 patients; Stage III, 3 patients; Stage IVA, 7 patients; Stage IVB, 3 patients; the patient of cervical lymph node metastasis with unknown primary tumor was not assessable. The average total dose of radiotherapy was 67.5 Gy. Docetaxel (10 mg/m(2), intravenously, once a week) was given to all patients up to four cycles, and cisplatin (6 mg/m(2), intravenously, five times a week) was also administered to all patients for up to 3 weeks from the beginning of the radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Only in two patients did the radiotherapy need to be temporarily interrupted due to the development of acute mucositis. Grade 3 toxicity was observed in six patients. Grade 4 acute mucositis was seen in one patient. The response rate was 100%, and complete response (CR) was observed in 30 patients (94%). At the time of the analysis, the 2 year local control and relapse-free rates in the 30 patients showing CR were 90 and 76%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent weekly docetaxel and radiation therapy did not affect the compliance of the patients for the radiation therapy, indicating that the acute toxicities were within acceptable limits.

Supradose Intra-Arterial Cisplatin and Concurrent Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Stage IV Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Is Feasible and Efficacious in a Multi-Institutional Setting: Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9615

Purpose

To determine the feasibility of high-dose intra-arterial (IA) cisplatin and concurrent radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the multi-institutional setting (Multi-RADPLAT).

Patients and Methods

Eligibility included T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. Patients received cisplatin (150 mg/m2 IA with sodium thiosulfate 9 g/m2 intravenous [IV], followed by 12 g/m2 IV over 6 hours, weekly for 4 weeks) and concurrent RT (70 Gy, 2.0 Gy/fraction, daily for 5 days over 7 weeks). Between May 1997 and December 1999, 67 patients from three experienced and eight inexperienced centers were enrolled, of whom 61 were eligible for analysis.

Results

Multi-RADPLAT was feasible (ie, three or four infusions of IA cisplatin and full dose of RT) in 53 patients (87%). The complete response (CR) rate was 85% at the primary site and 88% at nodal regions, and the overall CR rate was 80%. At a median follow-up of 3.9 years for alive patients (range, 0.9 to 6.1 years), the estimated 1-year and 2-year locoregional tumor control rates are 66% and 57%, respectively. The estimated 1-year and 2-year survival rates are 72% and 63%, respectively. The estimated 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival rates are 62% and 46%, respectively. The rates of grade 4 and 5 toxicities at the experienced and the inexperienced institutions were 14% and 0% v 47% and 4%, respectively.

Conclusion

This intensive treatment regimen for head and neck cancer is feasible and effective in a multi-institutional setting.

Estimation of an optimal external beam radiotherapy utilization rate for head and neck carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy is used commonly in the treatment of patients with head and neck carcinoma. The benchmark radiotherapy utilization rates for head and neck carcinoma largely are unknown. The objective of the current study was to determine the optimal radiotherapy utilization rate for patients with head and neck carcinoma and to compare this optimal rate with actual utilization rates where actual utilization data were available.

METHODS

An optimal radiotherapy utilization tree was constructed that depicted all patients with head and neck carcinoma in whom radiotherapy was indicated according to evidence-based treatment guidelines. The proportions of patients with clinical attributes that indicated possible benefit from radiotherapy were obtained from epidemiological data and were inserted into the utilization tree. The optimal proportion of patients with carcinoma of the head and neck who should receive radiotherapy was calculated by merging the evidence-based recommendations with the epidemiological data in the tree. Optimal rates of radiotherapy utilization were compared with actual rates obtained from population-based studies.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy was indicated at some point during their illness in 74% of all patients with head and neck carcinoma. By subsite, the optimal radiotherapy utilization rates were oral cavity, 74%; lip, 20%; larynx, 100%; oropharynx, 100%; salivary gland, 87%; hypopharynx, 100%; nasopharynx, 100%; paranasal sinuses, 100%; and unknown squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, 90%. All treatment recommendations were based on Level III or IV evidence. Assessment of actual radiotherapy utilization rates indicated an increased use of radiotherapy over time for head and neck carcinoma. However, there also were some decreases in the use of radiotherapy for some carcinoma subsites over the past 20 years, despite the lower actual rates compared with the optimal rates. The reasons for these reductions in use were not identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The actual radiotherapy utilization rate for patients with head and neck carcinoma corresponded reasonably closely to the optimal rate for some populations but also identified some shortfalls for other patient groups. The results of this study provide a way of assessing shortfalls in radiotherapy.

Systemic chemotherapy for squamous cell head and neck cancer

Squamous cell head and neck cancer is a relatively uncommon malignancy in North America. Nonetheless, it has been of considerable interest to medical oncologists because of its remarkable sensitivity to systemic chemotherapy. Even in patients with relapsed or metastatic disease, meaningful tumour shrinkage can be achieved with systemic therapy. This has led to the performance of carefully conducted clinical trials exploring the role of systemic chemotherapy, not only in the palliative setting, but as part of definitive multi-modality treatment. Chemotherapy has been used as the initial (or induction) treatment, as an adjuvant treatment after definitive surgery and/or radiation, and concurrent with both definitive and adjuvant radiation therapy. Evidence-based conclusions have been drawn from these clinical trials and have led to significant changes in the current standards of care for this disease. In this article, the available data supporting the use of systemic chemotherapy as palliative treatment, and as part of the definitive management for this disease will be reviewed.

Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy and Concomitant Cisplatin for Locally Advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Carcinomas

SUMMARY

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to achieve locoregional control of locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma, survival, and organ preservation using split hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy and cisplatin concomitantly. This study was a phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy with split hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy, 1.6 Gy per fraction given twice per day to a total dose of 64 to 67.2 Gy for a total of 6 weeks with a 2-week gap, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2, days 1 to 5, in continuous perfusion, concomitantly. Seventy-three patients were treated (stage IV, 64%). At a median follow-up of 55 months for living patients, median survival was 44 months, and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 42% and 39%, respectively. Toxicities included mucositis (grade III, 40%; grade IV, 28%), epithelitis (grade III, 28%). Of the 73 patients, 32 (44%) have continued with their larynx free of disease. Split hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy and concomitant cisplatin has been demonstrated to be an active treatment for locally advanced laryngeal carcinomas, but more active combinations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, without increase of toxicity, are necessary to increase the rate of locoregional control, organ preservation, and survival.

Management of chemo- and radiotherapy induced oral mucositis with low-energy laser: initial results of A.C. Camargo Hospital

Background. Oral mucositis is a common complication of some malignancies treatment, causing therapeutic modifications due to patient's debilitation, which often interferes with the prognosis of the disease. Many attempts have been made to find an optimal treatment or preventive method to minimize the severity of oral mucositis. Several studies have shown good results with the use of low-energy laser, with the aim of accelerating the process of wound healing and promoting pain relief. Methods. Patients (n=18) who developed oral mucositis during chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were submitted to low-energy laser applications until cessation of symptoms. Mucositis severity was scored by an oral mucositis scale based on clinical features and by an oral toxicity scale from the National Cancer Institute based on the ability to swallow; pain severity was scored by subjects on a visual analogue scale before and after the applications. Results. Immediate pain relief was achieved in 66.6% of the patients after the first application. Based on the functional scale, mucositis grade III (not capable to eat solids) was reduced in 42.85% of the cases. According to the scale based on the clinical features, mucositis grade IV (ulcerative lesions) was reduced in 75% of the patients that presented this grade of mucositis at the beginning of laser therapy. Conclusions. Low-energy laser was well-tolerated and showed beneficial effects on the management of oral mucositis, improving the quality of life during the oncologic treatment.

Who merits a neck dissection after definitive chemoradiotherapy for N2-N3 squamous cell head and neck cancer?

BACKGROUND

The role of neck dissection (ND) after definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell head and neck cancer is incompletely defined. We retrospectively reviewed 109 patients with N2-N3 disease treated with chemoradiotherapy to identify predictors of a clinical complete response in the neck (CCR-neck), pathologic complete response after ND (PCR-neck), and regional failure.

METHOD

All patients were given 4-day continuous infusions of 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2/d) and cisplatin (20 mg/m2/d) during the first and fourth weeks of either once daily (n = 68) or twice daily (n = 41) radiation therapy. ND was considered for all patients after completion of chemoradiotherapy and was performed in 32 of the 65 patients achieving a CCR-neck after chemoradiotherapy and in all 44 patients with residual clinical evidence of neck disease. CCR-neck, PCR-neck, and regional failure were then correlated with potential predictors, including T, N, largest lymph node size (<3 cm, > or =3 cm), primary tumor site, and radiation fractionation schedule.

RESULTS

Achievement of a CCR-neck was predicted by N, N2 vs N3 (53 of 80 vs 12 of 29, p =.019) and by largest lymph node size, <3 cm vs > or =3 cm (19 of 25 vs 46 of 84, p =.06). Achievement of a PCR-neck could not be predicted by any clinical parameter. Regional failure occurred both in patients undergoing ND and those not dissected (5 of 76 vs 4 of 33, p =.33) and proved more likely only in the ND patients with residual positive pathology compared with those achieving a PCR-neck (5 of 25 vs 0 of 51, p <.001). Primary site was not a useful predictor of CCR-neck, PCR-neck, or regional failure. Most importantly, CCR-neck (vs <CCR-neck) did not predict either a PCR-neck (24 of 32 vs 27 of 44, p =.21) or regional failure (5 of 65 vs 4 of 44, p =.80).

CONCLUSIONS

After chemoradiotherapy, clinical parameters do not identify those patients with residual neck node disease or those at risk for regional failure, suggesting that ND be considered for all N2-N3 patients.

Radiochemotherapy in head and neck cancer

The present paper is based on a talk given, during the meeting of the EORTC Radiotherapy Group, held in Arona (Italy) on April 19-20, 2002. This review analyses many still open questions on combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer, on the basis of the available data. The paper may help to point out future directions for novel clinical researches on combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Prevention of radiation-induced oral cavity mucositis by plasmid/liposome delivery of the human manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2) transgene

Oral cavity mucositis is a major toxicity of radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. In the present mouse model studies, we evaluated intraoral administration of SOD2-PL complexes 24 h before single-fraction 30-Gy irradiation for the prevention of oral cavity mucositis. Expression of the human SOD2 transgene in the oral cavity of C3H/HeNsd mice was demonstrated by nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Mice treated intraorally with bacterial beta-galactosidase gene-plasmid/liposome (LacZ-PL) or hemagglutinin (HA)-manganese superoxide dismutase-plasmid/liposome (HA-SOD2-PL) demonstrated LacZ or HA-SOD2 expression, respectively, 24 h after injection. In a second strain of mouse, SOD2-PL-treated female athymic nude mice demonstrated significantly decreased ulceration at day 5 after 30 Gy, compared to LacZ-PL-injected, irradiated mice or irradiated controls. No further reduction in radiation-induced ulceration was detected in mice treated with both SOD2-PL and 10 mg/kg of amifostine (WR-2721) 30 min before 30 Gy compared to SOD2-PL alone. No significant protection of orthotopically transplanted murine squamous cell carcinoma (SCC-VII) tumors was detected in mice that received SOD2-PL treatment before 18 Gy. Thus overexpression of human SOD2 in the oral cavity mucosa can prevent radiation-induced mucositis with no detectable compromise in the therapeutic response of orthotopically transplanted tumors.

An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The Head and Neck Intergroup conducted a phase III randomized trial to test the benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiation in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned between arm A (the control), single daily fractionated radiation (70 Gy at 2 Gy/d); arm B, identical radiation therapy with concurrent bolus cisplatin, given on days 1, 22, and 43; and arm C, a split course of single daily fractionated radiation and three cycles of concurrent infusional fluorouracil and bolus cisplatin chemotherapy, 30 Gy given with the first cycle and 30 to 40 Gy given with the third cycle. Surgical resection was encouraged if possible after the second chemotherapy cycle on arm C and, if necessary, as salvage therapy on all three treatment arms. Survival data were compared between each experimental arm and the control arm using a one-sided log-rank test.

RESULTS

Between 1992 and 1999, 295 patients were entered on this trial. This did not meet the accrual goal of 362 patients and resulted in premature study closure. Grade 3 or worse toxicity occurred in 52% of patients enrolled in arm A, compared with 89% enrolled in arm B (P <.0001) and 77% enrolled in arm C (P <.001). With a median follow-up of 41 months, the 3-year projected overall survival for patients enrolled in arm A is 23%, compared with 37% for arm B (P =.014) and 27% for arm C (P = not significant).

CONCLUSION

The addition of concurrent high-dose, single-agent cisplatin to conventional single daily fractionated radiation significantly improves survival, although it also increases toxicity. The loss of efficacy resulting from split-course radiation was not offset by either multiagent chemotherapy or the possibility of midcourse surgery.

Cisplatin, raltitrexed, levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II randomized study

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin (CDDP) is among the most active single agents against squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), and it is still the reference drug in the induction chemotherapy setting, when used in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Raltitrexed has been shown to be devoid of clinical activity against SCCHN when used alone; however, both preclinical and early clinical data regarding the combination raltitrexed-CDDP hold promise. Thymidylate synthase is the target enzyme of both raltitrexed and 5-FU; however, the two drugs have distinct sites of action on the enzyme and the combination of the two agents may be synergistic. We have previously shown that the combination of raltitrexed, levofolinic acid (LFA) and 5-FU has clinical activity against SCCHN; in a subsequent phase I study, cisplatin was added, and the combination of CDDP plus raltitrexed on day 1, followed by LFA and 5-FU on day 2, was judged feasible and active, since a 67% response rate was shown across all dose levels, with a 100% response rate at the recommended dose for phase II.

METHODS

Patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN, not pretreated with chemo- or radiotherapy were randomized to receive either CDDP 60 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1 and LFA 250 mg/m2 and 5-FU 900 mg/m2 on day 2 (arm A) or CDDP 65 mg/m2 and methotrexate 500 mg/m2 on day 1, and LFA 250 mg/m2 and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 on day 2 (arm B). Both treatments were repeated every 2 weeks. Evaluation for tumor response was performed after four cycles. According to Simon two-stage design, with a target complete response (CR) rate (p1) of 35%, at least 7 CR among the first 31 treated patients and 16 CR among the final sample size of 52 patients were required.

RESULTS

An interim analysis was performed when 36 patients were evaluable in each arm. In arm A, 10 CR (28%) and 19 partial responses (PR) (53%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 81%. In arm B, 3 CR (8%) and 12 PR (34%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 42%. The difference in both CR and overall response rate between the two arms was statistically significant (p = 0.03 and <0.001, respectively). Therefore, the accrual was stopped in arm B and continued only in arm A. Overall, 13 CR (21%) and 34 PR (56%) were observed among the 61 patients who were accrued in arm A, for an overall response rate of 77% (95% confidence interval 64-87%). Neutropenia was the main side effect in both arms (grade 3-4 in 45 and 23 patients in arm A and B, respectively). Extrahematologic toxicity was mild in both arms; however, 2 patients in arm B died due to toxicity (grade 4 mucositis in one case, grade 4 renal toxicity in the other).

CONCLUSIONS

Although response data for our experimental treatment look encouraging, the hypothesis of a 35% activity, expressed as capability to induce a CR, cannot be accepted. The results obtained in this study are not substantially different from those of other trials of CDDP-5-FU-based regimens, and our combination is unlikely to represent a major breakthrough when used in this setting.

Unresectable primary tumor of head and neck: does neck dissection combined with chemoradiotherapy improve survival?

A study regarding patients with primary and previously untreated advanced histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was performed to compare two treatment modalities: neck dissection followed by chemoradiotherapy (Group I) versus chemoradiotherapy alone (Group II). Fifty-four patients were randomly chosen to receive Group I or II treatment. Our results demonstrate that Group I treatment has a higher and statistically significant disease-specific survival rate. We suggest that an association of neck dissection plus chemoradiotherapy can be useful in the event of unresectable advanced carcinomas.

[Concomitant bifractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in locally progressive, non-resectable epidermoid carcinomas of the pharynx: ten years experience at the Antoine Lacassagne center]

PURPOSE

Patients suffering from locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx treated with radiotherapy alone have a poor prognosis. More than 70% of patients die within 5 years mainly due to local recurrences. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center's experience in a treatment by concomitant bid radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Evaluation was based on analysis of the toxicity, the response rates, the survival, and the clinical prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1992 to 2000, 92 consecutive patients were treated in our single institution. All of them had stage IV, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx and they received continuous bid radiotherapy (two daily fractions of 1.2 Gy, 5 days a week, with a 6-h minimal interval between fractions). Total radiotherapy dose was 80.4 Gy on the oropharynx and 75.6 Gy on the hypopharynx. Two or three chemotherapy courses of cisplatin (CP)-5-fluorouracil (5FU) were given during radiotherapy at 21-day intervals (third not delivered after the end of the radiotherapy). CP dose was 100 mg/m2 (day 1) and 5-FU was given as 5-day continuous infusion (750 mg/m2/day at 1st course; 430 mg/m2/day at 2nd and 3rd courses). Special attention was paid to supportive care, particularly in terms of enteral nutrition and mucositis prevention by low-level laser energy.

RESULTS

Acute toxicity was marked and included WHO grade III/IV mucositis (89%, 16% of them being grade IV), WHO grade III dermatitis (72%) and grade III/IV neutropenia (61%). This toxicity was significant but manageable with optimised supportive care, and never led to interruption of treatment for more than 1 week, although there were two toxic deaths. Complete global response rate at 6 months was 74%. Overall global survival at 1 and 2 years was 72% and 50% respectively, with a median follow-up of 17 months. Prognostic factors for overall survival were the Karnofsky index (71% survival at 3 years for patients with a Karnofsky index of 90-100% versus 30% for patients with a Karnofsky index of 80% versus 0% for patients with a Karnofsky index of 60-70%, p = 0.0001) and tumor location (55% at 3 years for oropharynx versus 37% for panpharynx versus 28% for hypopharynx, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

These results confirm the efficacy of concomitant bid radiotherapy and chemotherapy in advanced unresectable tumor of the pharynx. The improvement in results will essentially depend on our capacity to restore in a good nutritional status the patients before beginning this heavy treatment.

Altered fractionation in the treatment of head and neck cancer

Several altered fractionation schemes have evolved to exploit different aspects of head and neck cancer growth kinetics and normal tissue repair. Hyperfractionation schedules exploit the differential repair abilities of tumor and normal tissue, whereas accelerated fractionation regimens minimize the time of tumor repopulation. Significant clinical data have accumulated that indicate an improvement between 15% and 20% in locoregional control from altered fractionation. Preliminary analysis of a randomized Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial testing four fractionation schemes confirms the benefit of one altered fractionation approach. Several promising concurrent chemoradiation treatments involving altered fractionation have been reported. Future trials will determine whether the addition of chemotherapy to altered fractionation schemes is warranted in light of the factor of added toxicity.

Prophylaxis of oral mucositis in irradiated head-and-neck cancer patients: a proposed classification scheme of interventions and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To identify, classify, and evaluate agents used in the prophylaxis of oral mucositis in irradiated head and neck cancer patients.

METHODS

Data sources included multiple databases and manual citation review of relevant literature. Based on the eligibility criteria, 59 studies were independently reviewed by two reviewers. Forty-two studies were included in the classification scheme, of which 15 met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Data were extracted by duplicate independent review, with disagreement resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

Overall, the interventions reduced the odds of developing severe oral mucositis, when assessed by clinicians, by 36% (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.88). Subgroup analysis suggested that only the narrow-spectrum antibacterial lozenges were effective (OR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.86); however, the power of the aggregated data in the other classes may have been insufficient to detect differences. When the outcome was assessed by patients, no significant difference was seen in the outcome between the treatment and the control groups (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.56-1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, interventions chosen on a sound biologic basis to prevent severe oral mucositis are effective. In particular, when oral mucositis is assessed by clinicians, narrow-spectrum antibiotic lozenges appear to be beneficial. Methodologic limitations were evident in many of the studies. Further research using validated measurement tools in larger, methodologically sound trials is warranted.

Recurrent head and neck cancer: retreatment of previously irradiated areas with combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy-results of a prospective study

PURPOSE

To prospectively test the effectiveness of combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy for recurrent head and neck cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 32 patients, external-beam radiation therapy (2 Gy/d) was administered as a 5-day course with simultaneous hydroxyurea (1.5 g/d orally) and 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m(2)/d bolus), followed by 9 days of rest. This cycle was repeated until a cumulative soft-tissue radiation dose of 110 Gy (including prior radiation therapy) was reached.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 18 months, three patients were alive, and 29 had died. The overall 1-year survival rate was 39%. The overall response rate was 41% (13 patients). Acute toxicity was low. According to World Health Organization and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria, there were three cases of grade 3 mucositis or dermatitis and three cases of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Three patients had grade 3 late effects: one oral trismus, one jugular venous thrombosis, and one cerebral stroke.

CONCLUSION

The combination of simultaneous 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea infusion and local reirradiation is feasible for retreatment of recurrent head and neck tumors. This regimen provides short-term tumor control in most patients and long-term control in a few patients.

Randomized trial of radiation therapy versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We designed a randomized clinical trial to test whether the addition of three cycles of chemotherapy during standard radiation therapy would improve disease-free survival in patients with stages III and IV (i.e., advanced oropharynx carcinoma).

METHODS

A total of 226 patients have been entered in a phase III multicenter, randomized trial comparing radiotherapy alone (arm A) with radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (arm B). Radiotherapy was identical in the two arms, delivering, with conventional fractionation, 70 Gy in 35 fractions. In arm B, patients received during the period of radiotherapy three cycles of a 4-day regimen containing carboplatin (70 mg/m(2) per day) and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2) per day) by continuous infusion. The two arms were equally balanced with regard to age, sex, stage, performance status, histology, and primary tumor site.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy compliance was similar in the two arms with respect to total dose, treatment duration, and treatment interruption. The rate of grades 3 and 4 mucositis was statistically significantly higher in arm B (71%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 54%-85%) than in arm A (39%; 95% CI = 29%-56%). Skin toxicity was not different between the two arms. Hematologic toxicity was higher in arm B as measured by neutrophil count and hemoglobin level. Three-year overall actuarial survival and disease-free survival rates were, respectively, 51% (95% CI = 39%-68%) versus 31% (95% CI = 18%-49%) and 42% (95% CI = 30%-57%) versus 20% (95% CI = 10%-33%) for patients treated with combined modality versus radiation therapy alone (P =.02 and.04, respectively). The locoregional control rate was improved in arm B (66%; 95% CI = 51%-78%) versus arm A (42%; 95% CI = 31%-56%).

CONCLUSION

The statistically significant improvement in overall survival that was obtained supports the use of concomitant chemotherapy as an adjunct to radiotherapy in the management of carcinoma of the oropharynx.

High rate of clinical complete response to weekly outpatient neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oral carcinoma patients using a new regimen of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and bleomycin alternating with methotrexate and epirubicin

BACKGROUND

A Phase II trial was initiated to evaluate the response to and toxicity of a new regimen of weekly outpatient neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with oral carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity were eligible for this trial. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy was comprised of cisplatin, 25 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m2, and bleomycin, 10 mg/m2, mixed in normal saline as a 24-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion, alternating with methotrexate, 30 mg/m2, and epirubicin, 30 mg/m2, as an i.v. bolus (PFB/ME) on a weekly schedule for 8-12 weeks. In patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IV disease who completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery was preferred to radiotherapy, unless patients refused surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients (82.5% with Stage IV disease) with previously untreated oral carcinoma were enrolled. The median size of the primary tumor was 7 cm (range, 3-13 cm). Fifty percent of patients had tumor penetrating through the oral mucosa to the cheek skin and 62.5% had bony destruction. Detectable cervical lymph nodes were noted in 77.5% of patients. After neoadjuvant weekly chemotherapy, 22 patients (55%) showed complete response (CR) and 15 patients (37.5%) showed partial response, for an overall response rate of 92.5%. World Health Organization Grade 3/4 toxicity included mucositis (7.5%), leukopenia (25%), anemia (10%), and thrombocytopenia (2.5%). Eleven of 33 patients with Stage IV disease underwent surgery, and pathologic CR (2 patients) or microscopic residual tumor (4 patients) was noted (54.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study indicate that a weekly PFB/ME neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen is highly effective for the treatment of patients with oral carcinoma. In addition, this regimen has low toxicity. The authors believe that implementation of this regimen into a multimodality therapy protocol deserves further study.

Scoring oral mucositis

Oral mucositis is a common, dose limiting and potentially serious complication of both radiation and chemotherapy. Both these therapies are non-specific, interfering with the cellular homeostasis of both malignant and normal host cells. An important effect is the loss of the rapidly proliferating epithelial cells in the oral cavity, gut and in the bone marrow. Within the mouth, the loss of these cells leads to mucosal atrophy, necrosis and ulceration. Although post-treatment healing is generally uneventful, severe mucositis can be life threatening, especially if complicated by dehydration or secondary infection. Accurate and reproducible evaluation of oral mucositis is important in order to monitor patient toxicity during therapy, to document the toxicity of conventional therapy and to critically assess the effects of alternative therapies. A number of oral toxicity scoring systems have been described, but direct comparisons have rarely been undertaken and little data exist regarding inter- and intra-user reliability. This paper reviews a number of oral mucositis scoring systems that are commonly used and will also discuss, briefly, the biological basis of its development and management.

Messages from completed randomized trials in head and neck cancer

During the last three decades numerous randomized trials have been conducted in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The issue of pre- vs post-operative radiotherapy in advanced cancers was settled in the late 70s in favour of the latter approach and new fractionation schemes are currently being investigated, with no definite answers as yet. There is no uniform policy regarding the problem of elective neck dissection in early stage anterior oral cavity carcinoma. Often some chemotherapeutic regimen is involved in clinical trials in an attempt to improve on the standard of surgery and radiotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has never been proven to benefit patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck despite being able to decrease the rate of distant metastases. Chemotherapy given prior to or simultaneously with definite radiotherapy seems to offer the best chances for preserving vital organs, such as the larynx. Methotrexate is still the least toxic and most potent drug in recurrent or metastatic disease. The chemoprotective effect of low-dose isotretinoin on multiple primaries in the head and neck has yet to be evaluated.

Ongoing trials in patients with head and neck cancer

Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck has recently undergone several important changes. New approaches to treating these tumours are now being evaluated. An overview of the surgical, radiotherapeutic and chemotherapeutic therapies or multimodality approaches currently under study are described. In addition, the design of ongoing chemoprevention trials is reported.

The role of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer

We studied the effect of cytoreductive chemotherapy in head and neck cancer and analyzed it in terms of efficacy, remission rates, and duration, as well effect on survival. Single-agent chemotherapy, which formerly was used as a palliative therapy in recurrent and metastatic disease, had little affect on survival. More recently, multi-agent chemotherapy trials have shown significantly higher response rates, but this success has not translated into an added survival benefit. These findings led to the introduction of multi-agent chemotherapy into the induction (neoadjuvant) clinical setting. In these clinical circumstances, better objective response rates were found, particularly in the previously untreated patient. Although this therapy has resulted in better control of local disease, the impact on survival is not yet clear. Adjuvant chemotherapy is most useful in patients who have a high risk of relapse. Therapy appears to decrease its incidence, particularly at distant sites. Finally, chemoradiation trials have shown that this treatment provides a survival advantage, but at the cost of a significant increase in toxicity.

Radiotherapy and concomitant weekly 1-hour infusion of paclitaxel in the treatment of head and neck cancer--results from a Phase I trial

PURPOSE

To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) by describing the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly paclitaxel (PAC) given as a 1-h I.V. infusion in patients with head and neck cancer concomitant to irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with unresectable or incompletely resected head and neck cancer were enrolled into a prospective, dose-escalating Phase I study. Toxicity was graded according to the WHO toxicity score. MTD dose was defined when two out of six patients developed DLT. The starting dose of PAC was 20 mg/m2 once weekly I.V. over 60 min, with a subsequent dose escalation of 10 mg/m2 in cohorts of three new patients. Radiation therapy was administered in three field technique over 6-7 weeks in 2.0 Gy/daily fractions for 5 consecutive days/week up to total doses of 60-70 Gy.

RESULTS

From 1994-1996, 18 patients completing three dose levels were included into the study. Altogether, 101 courses of chemotherapy were evaluable for toxicity. On the second dose level (30 mg/m2) one of three patients experienced DLT with Grade IV mucositis. On the next dose level with 40 mg/m2 PAC weekly one patient experienced DLT being prolonged Grade III mucositis. From the following three patients required, two patients showed no DLT. The third patient showed mucositis of WHO Grade 4 and died from hemorrhage caused by a rupture of the a pharyngeal wall. Dose level 2 (30 mg/m2) was repeated and one of the three newly treated patients again suffered from mucositis WHO Grade 4.

CONCLUSION

When PAC is given weekly as a 1-h infusion concomitant to radiotherapy, MTD is 30 mg/m2 with mucositis being DLT; hematological and further nonhematological toxicity is mild.

Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy (cisplatin, methotrexate, and peplomycin)

Between 1985 and 1990, 20 patients with stage 2 and 3 esophageal cancer without esophagopulmonary fistulas were treated with alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy (cisplatin, methotrexate, and peplomycin). Patients given the combined therapy received courses of chemotherapy during weeks 1 and 6 and radiotherapy during weeks 2-5 and 7-9. Chemotherapy consisted of i.v. cisplatin (80 mg/ m2 of body surface area) on day 1, i.v. methotrexate (40 mg/ m2) on day 2, and s.c. peplomycin (10 mg/day) continuously from day 2 to day 5. Radiotherapy was external irradiation with or without intracavitary irradiation. In seven cases, external irradiation alone was administered at 65-70 Gy, and in 13 cases, external irradiation (50-55 Gy) was combined with intracavitary irradiation (14-20 Gy). At the end of treatment, the rate of complete response was 60% with an overall response rate of 95%. Five-year total survival was 25%; cause-specific survival was 36.8%. The most common acute toxicities were bone marrow suppression, hepatic and renal damage, pneumonitis, and esophagitis. There was no life-threatening toxicity.

Preoperative simultaneous chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx

Combined chemoradiotherapy (CT/RT) treatments appear to yield better results for advanced tumours of the head and neck than do conventional therapies. In the present study, CT/RT was used preoperatively in unresectable tumors of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Forty patients were entered prospectively into a phase II study. Treatment consisted of three cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-day infusion of fluorouracil (FU), and the addition of simultaneous radiotherapy (30 Gy) from the second to third cycles. Patients with resectable residual disease or complete clinical response underwent surgery. All patients later received a second phase of irradiation (30 Gy) and two cycles of chemotherapy only in responders. During the first phase of treatment, 22 (55%) patients presented mucositis grades III-IV. Mean weight loss was 7%. Twelve patients were admitted for parenteral nutrition. Thirty-six (90%) patients obtained clinical response, which was complete in 15 (37%). Thirty-two of the 40 underwent surgery. The percentage of pathologic complete responses (PCR) was 35% (14 patients). With a median follow-up of 21 months, the median survival of patients was 23 months, and 19 (47%) of them are disease-free. A high PCR rate was attained with this treatment regimen. Toxicity was significant, but tolerable with adequate support measures.

Regrowth resistance as a likely significant contributor to treatment failure in drug-sensitive neoplastic diseases

Attempts to improve the effectiveness of therapy for neoplastic diseases have largely focused on increasing the cytotoxic efficacy of therapy. While this approach is logical, there is another approach, based on the concept of regrowth resistance, which offers an alternate means of improving treatment outcome. The term "regrowth resistance" refers to the reduction in treatment efficacy resulting from the regrowth of neoplastic cells between courses of therapy or even between doses of radiation therapy. Regrowth resistance is likely to play a significant role in determining the outcome of treatment in rapidly proliferating neoplasms. A reduction in the rate of tumor regrowth would increase the net effectiveness of cytotoxic therapy and would also inhibit the development of resistance to cytotoxic therapies.