Familial cancer risks to offspring from mothers with 2 primary breast cancers: leads to cancer syndromes

Breast cancer genomics based on biobanks

Attempts to find genes contribution to complex diseases, such as cancer, require new study designs which incorporate an efficient use of population resources and modern genotyping technologies. We describe here two approaches, used by us for the study of breast cancer, both of which take the use of biobanks. One uses a cancer registry as a source of case information, which is then linked to a biobank on blood DNA. The biobank provides also samples from matched controls. After genotyping, clinical data are retrieved from hospital records, and the results can be presented for genotype-specific cancer risks, or similarly for genotype-specific clinical and survival parameters. The second approach uses registered data on cancer in families or among twins. On defined groups of patients, paraffin tissue is collected by contacting the pathology departments of the hospitals where the patients were diagnosed. Tumor and healthy tissue is prepared and used for mutation, the loss of heterozygosity, or copy number analysis. We believe that in the era of whole-genome genotyping technologies, the importance of well-characterized sample sets cannot be overemphasized. Samples rather than technologies limit the rate of gene discovery in complex diseases.

Modification of risk for subsequent cancer after female breast cancer by a family history of breast cancer

An increased risk of second primary cancers may depend on many reasons, including therapy for the first cancer and heritable causation. Population level data are not available exploring the risks of subsequent cancers after breast cancer considering a familial history of breast cancers. We used the nation-wide Swedish Family-Cancer Database to investigate such risks, based on 43,398 first invasive female breast cancers. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for the second cancer after breast cancer using rates for first cancer as a reference. Many cancers at discordant sites were increased after breast cancer. SIRs for subsequent neoplasms in women who had a family history of breast cancer were increased for ovarian (2.0) and endometrial (1.8) cancers and for acute lymphoid leukemia (12.7) and myelofibrosis (9.4). The data suggest that the familial aggregation of breast and endometrial cancers may be explained by yet unidentified heritable causes. The remarkably high risks for second acute lymphoid leukemia and myelofibrosis, both characterized by chromosomal aberrations, in women with a family history of breast cancer may signal heritable defects in the ability to process DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation and chemotherapy.

Incidence and Prognosis of Synchronous and Metachronous Bilateral Breast Cancer

Purpose

Because the incidence of breast cancer is increasing and prognosis is improving, a growing number of women are at risk of developing bilateral disease. Little is known, however, about incidence trends and prognostic features of bilateral breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

Among 123,757 women with a primary breast cancer diagnosed in Sweden from 1970 to 2000, a total of 6,550 developed bilateral breast cancer. We separated synchronous (diagnosed within 3 months after a first breast cancer) and metachronous bilateral cancer, and analyzed incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer using Poisson regression models.

Results

The incidence of synchronous breast cancer increased by age and by 40% during the 1970s, whereas the incidence of metachronous cancer decreased by age and by approximately 30% since the early 1980s, most likely due to increasing use of adjuvant therapy. Women who developed bilateral cancer within 5 years and at age younger than 50 years were 3.9 times (95% CI, 3.5 to 4.5) more likely to die as a result of breast cancer than women with unilateral cancer. Women with a bilateral cancer diagnosed more than 10 years after the first cancer had a prognosis similar to that of a unilateral breast cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy of primary cancer is a predictor of poor survival after diagnosis of early metachronous cancers.

Conclusion

We found profound differences in the incidence trends and prognostic outlook between synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer diagnosed at different ages. Adjuvant chemotherapy therapy has a dual effect on metachronous cancer: it reduces the risk, while at the same time it seems to worsen the prognosis.

Prognostic value of BRCA1 mutations in familial breast cancer patients affected by a second primary cancer

The aim of this prospective study is to assess the prognostic value of BRCA1 mutations in familial breast cancer patients affected by a second primary cancer. The study group comprised 19 women having multiple primary breast cancers (breast-breast, breast-other primary) who were either BRCA1 mutation carriers, or not. Appearance of a second primary cancer was recognised as the event and survival and second primary free cancer survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the secondary primary cancer. The results of this study show that the event free survival of women with familial breast cancer affected by a second primary cancer, who are BRCA1 mutation carriers is better, compared with women from the general population with breast cancer selected for second primary cancer sites and all second primary sites -- P = 0.009 and P = 0.0078 respectively. In contrast, the event free survival of women with breast cancer affected by a second primary cancer, without a breast cancer family history, who are not BRCA1 mutation carriers is the same, as for women from the general population with breast cancer selected for second primary cancer sites and all second primary sites -- P = 0.6417 and P = 0.4859 respectively. The median time from diagnosis of the first to second primary cancer in the mutation carrying, and non-carrying, groups was 8,7 and 1,9 years respectively. In the study group, the highest event free survival rates had been observed among those carrying the said mutations -- 66.7% at 5 years, and 33.3% at 10 years -- in contrast with those not carrying the mutations, with rates of 30.8% and 15.4% respectively.

Interaction between CHEK2*1100delC and other low-penetrance breast-cancer susceptibility genes: a familial study

BACKGROUND

The allele CHEK2*1100delC doubles the risk of breast cancer in unselected women, but could confer a greater risk in women with a family history of the disease, particularly of bilateral breast cancer. Our aim was to measure the risk of breast cancer in relatives of women with bilateral breast cancer who were carriers of this allele.

METHODS

A population-based series of 469 bilateral breast cancer cases ascertained through English cancer registries were genotyped for CHEK2*1100delC. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and cumulative risks were calculated for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and all other cancers in the first-degree relatives of carriers and non-carriers.

FINDINGS

The relatives of bilateral cases who were wild-type for CHEK2 had three times the population risk of female breast cancer (145 cases: SIR 3.48 (95% CI 2.96-4.09), twice the risk of prostate cancer (34 cases: SIR 2.41, 1.67-3.36) and a large excess of male breast cancer (five cases: SIR 15.06, 4.92-35.36). Relatives of those who were carriers of CHEK2*1100delC had a substantially higher risk of breast cancer (eight cases: SIR 12.11, 5.23-23.88) and possibly prostate cancer (two cases: SIR 9.87, 1.20-35.67).

INTERPRETATION

These data suggest a multiplicative interaction between CHEK2*1100delC and other unknown susceptibility genes. In women with a family history of bilateral disease, CHEK2*1100delC confers a high lifetime risk and might be useful for predictive testing. Bilateral breast cancer cases and their families are likely to provide an efficient basis for identification of additional low-penetrance breast-cancer genes.

Risks of second primary breast and urogenital cancer following female breast cancer in the south of The Netherlands, 1972–2001

A cohort of 9919 breast cancer patients from the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry was followed for vital status and development of second cancer. Person-year analysis was applied to determine the risk of second primary breast or urogenital cancer among breast cancer patients and to assess its correlation with age, treatment and time since the first breast cancer diagnosis. Women with previous breast cancer have an elevated risk of overall second breast or urogenital cancer. The largest relative risk was observed for second breast cancer (SIR (standardised incidence ratio) 3.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-3.8) and second ovarian cancer (SIR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.3). The absolute excess risk was highest for second breast cancer (64/10,000 patients/year). However, breast cancer has an inverse relationship to risk of cervical cancer. Changes in behavioural risk factors are important for lowering the risk of second cancer after breast cancer.

Primary Malignancy after Primary Female Breast Cancer in the South of the Netherlands, 1972–2001

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk of second primary cancers among women with previous breast cancer and calculate the excess burden of second cancer in the population.

METHODS

A population-based longitudinal study was conducted using the Eindhoven cancer registry data on 9919 breast cancer patients diagnosed in the period 1972-2000 and followed until 2001. Standardised incidence ratios (SIR) and absolute excess risks (AER) were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 1298 (13%) women developed a second primary cancer. The risk of overall second cancer was higher among breast cancer patients compared to the general population (SIR: 2.8; 95% CI: 2.6-2.9), with an AER of 115 second cancers for every 10,000 breast cancer patients per year. High SIR and AER were observed for breast cancer (SIR: 4.1; 95% CI: 3.8-4.4; AER: 64/10,000 patients/year) and ovarian cancer (SIR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.5-2.7; AER: 4.5/10,000 patients/year).

CONCLUSIONS

Our recent data show that women with previous breast cancer have an elevated risk of developing a second cancer compared to the general population. Excess burden for the population is especially high for second cancers of the breast, ovary and colon. Screening may only be justified for breast, ovary and colon cancer in certain groups of patients.

Sex hormone-binding globulin polymorphisms in familial and sporadic breast cancer

Ovarian steroids are one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) binds and transports sex steroids in the blood, regulating their bioavailable fraction and access to target cells. It can also inhibit the estradiol-induced proliferation of breast cancer cells through its membrane receptor. Three coding-region polymorphisms, which lead to an amino acid change, have been reported. We studied the influence of these three polymorphisms on breast cancer risk in three different populations: Polish familial breast cancer cases, 27% of them carrying a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation, Nordic familial and sporadic breast cancer cases. The reported G to A polymorphism in exon 1 was not found in the 423 analyzed samples. Instead, we found a C to T transition causing an arg to cys amino acid change within the same codon in one Polish breast cancer patient and her daughter. Both of them were heterozygotes for the exon 8 G to A polymorphism as well. They were diagnosed for bilateral breast cancer and carried a BRCA1 mutation (5382insC). Analysis of the tumor samples showed that they had lost the wild-type allele both at exons 1 and 8 of the SHBG gene. Analysis of the other Polish samples showed no correlation of the exon 8 polymorphism to breast cancer, bilateral breast cancer, BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations or age at diagnosis. No association of the exon 8 polymorphism with breast cancer in the Nordic familial or sporadic cases was found. The C to T polymorphism located in exon 4 was rare in all the studied populations (overall allele frequency 0.011). However, in each of the study populations there was a trend for a lower variant allele frequency in cancer cases than in controls. Variant allele frequency in all the breast cancer cases was significantly lower than in all the controls (chi(2) = 5.27, P-value 0.02; odds ratio = 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.84).

Cancer risks in women with 2 breast or ovarian cancers: clues to genetic cancer susceptibility

Women diagnosed with 2 cancers of the breast and/or ovary are at higher risk of developing subsequent cancers. Using registrations from the Thames Cancer Registry, we quantified the risks at different cancer sites. Increased risks were found for cancers that are part of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumour spectrum: oropharyngeal cancer, malignant melanoma of the skin (BRCA2) and colon cancer (BRCA1). We also found significantly increased risks of myeloid leukaemia (probably due to radiotherapy) and of cancer of the corpus uteri (which may be due to hormonal factors).

Genetic epidemiology of multistage carcinogenesis

It is commonly believed that cancer is a multistage, polygenic disease. Even though conceptually appealing, the evidence supporting the multistage theory remains limited. Most known tumor suppresser genes are associated with monogenic dominant cancers following a two-hit pathway. We review results from a recent twin study on 90000 individuals that give support to the multistage theory. Statistically significant heritability estimates were shown for cancers of the colorectum (35%), breast (27%), and prostate (42%). These estimates are much higher than those obtained from family studies in which parents and offspring, or sibs are compared. The difference can be accounted for by the involvement of many genes. A polygenic cancer would show small effects in family studies but large effects in twin studies. We present calculations on the decrease in familial risks when the number of genes involved increases or when the penetrance decreases. We test the apparent number of stages involved in the main cancers from the Swedish Family-Cancer Database. The logarithms of the slopes suggest large differences in the apparent numbers of mutations involved in different cancers. The number of mutations required appears to be less in familial breast cancer compared to sporadic breast cancer. Study designs for gene identification should be revised to accommodate polygenic cancers.

Multiple primary cancers of the colon, breast and skin (melanoma) as models for polygenic cancers

To assess the role of family history in the development of multiple primary cancer, the Swedish Family-Cancer Database was used to analyze second primary cancer in patients born in 1935 to 1996 with an initial primary cancer of the colon, breast and skin (melanoma) by familial cancer in first-degree relatives. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated from site-, sex- and age-specific rates for all persons (offspring) born in 1935 to 1996. Familial risk (SIR) was calculated for the first and second primary cancers in offspring. A Poisson regression analysis was also performed to assess the risk factors for occurrence of second primary cancer. The familial proportion of multiple primary cancers was 29.0% (9/31) for colon, 16.3% (122/747) for female breast and 14.5% (17/117) for melanoma. Compared with all offspring, patients with family history were at a much higher and significantly increased risk for subsequent primary cancer at colon (SIR = 59.1), skin (SIR = 48.2) and female breast (SIR = 7.9). The corresponding SIRs in patients without family history were 13.8, 10.5 and 5.2 at the three sites. The ratios for incidence of second primary to first primary were highest when diagnosis age was less than 40 years. A Poisson regression analysis showed that family history was one of the major risk factors for occurrence of multiple primary cancers at colon, breast and skin. The high risk of second cancer, even in the absence of family history, would be consistent with a polygenic model of carcinogenesis.

Risk factors and age-incidence relationships for contralateral breast cancer

The nation-wide Swedish Family-Cancer Database was used to analyze the risk of contralateral breast cancer among 72,092 women with unilateral breast cancer. Contralateral breast cancer, defined as being diagnosed 6 months or more after the first breast cancer, affected 2,529 women (3.5%). In a young age group the incidence of contralateral breast cancer was 50 times higher than the incidence of first breast cancer; for all contralateral breast cancer the difference was 5-fold. Because only 1 breast was at risk for contralateral breast cancer, the true differences to unilateral cancer were 2 times higher. The age-incidence relationship was unusual, exhibiting a high incidence (800/10(5) person-years) component at an early age (25 to 49 years) and a lower incidence (460/10(5) person-years) component at a later age (50-80 years). The discrete components suggest population heterogeneity. Age at diagnosis of the first breast cancer and family history of breast cancer associated with the risk of contralateral breast cancer. Other, weaker risk factors were birth cohort, age at first childbirth, parity and interval between first and second breast cancer. The incidence of familial contralateral breast cancer was 1. 5 times higher than that of sporadic disease, and its age-incidence curve also exhibited 2 separate components. The age-incidence relationships of contralateral breast cancer suggest that the disease affects a small and heterogeneous susceptible population.