1
|
Wagenschieber E, Blunck D. Impact of reimbursement systems on patient care - a systematic review of systematic reviews. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2024; 14:22. [PMID: 38492098 PMCID: PMC10944612 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00487-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is not yet sufficient scientific evidence to answer the question of the extent to which different reimbursement systems influence patient care and treatment quality. Due to the asymmetry of information between physicians, health insurers and patients, market-based mechanisms are necessary to ensure the best possible patient care. The aim of this study is to investigate how reimbursement systems influence multiple areas of patient care in form of structure, process and outcome indicators. METHODS For this purpose, a systematic literature review of systematic reviews is conducted in the databases PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The reimbursement systems of salary, bundled payment, fee-for-service and value-based reimbursement are examined. Patient care is divided according to the three dimensions of structure, process, and outcome and evaluated in eight subcategories. RESULTS A total of 34 reviews of 971 underlying primary studies are included in this article. International studies identified the greatest effects in categories resource utilization and quality/health outcomes. Pay-for-performance and bundled payments were the most commonly studied models. Among the systems examined, fee-for-service and value-based reimbursement systems have the most positive impact on patient care. CONCLUSION Patient care can be influenced by the choice of reimbursement system. The factors for successful implementation need to be further explored in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Wagenschieber
- Department of Healthcare Management, Institute of Management, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Dominik Blunck
- Department of Healthcare Management, Institute of Management, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holloway JA, Chestnutt IG. It's not just about the money: recruitment and retention of clinical staff in general dental practice - part 1: dentists. Prim Dent J 2024; 13:38-54. [PMID: 38520198 DOI: 10.1177/20501684241232212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
Increasing difficulties in recruitment and retention of dentists and dental care professionals in general dental practice in the UK is affecting delivery of NHS dental services. Reports of dissatisfaction among the general dental practice workforce indicate there is a significant risk to the future dental workforce supply which will affect access to dental care and worsen oral health inequalities. Understanding the factors related to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction of dental professionals would be useful in managing recruitment and retention issues and ensure a dental workforce exists which is able to meet the needs of the population. The aim of this literature review was to identify factors which contribute to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction of clinical staff in general dental practice. Database searching was conducted systematically through PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Ovid, and the National Grey Literature Collection. Part 1 of this two-part series discusses the factors relating to dentists. Twenty-two relevant articles were identified, which were qualitatively analysed using Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory as an analysis tool. Target-driven and restrictive contractual arrangements are a major factor contributing to dissatisfaction of dentists, as well as time pressures, poor quality equipment, and unfair remuneration. Dental contract reform should aim to minimise factors contributing to dissatisfaction and increase factors which increase satisfaction, if sufficient numbers of dentists are to be persuaded to continue to provide state-funded dentistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Holloway
- Jessica A. Holloway MChD/BChD, MPH, PhD, FHEA Specialty Registrar in Dental Public Health, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
- Ivor G. Chestnutt BDS, MPH, PhD, FDS(DPH)RCSEd, FDS RCSEng, FDS RCPSGlas, FFPH, DDPH RCS ENG, FHEA Professor and Honorary Consultant in Dental Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ivor G Chestnutt
- Jessica A. Holloway MChD/BChD, MPH, PhD, FHEA Specialty Registrar in Dental Public Health, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
- Ivor G. Chestnutt BDS, MPH, PhD, FDS(DPH)RCSEd, FDS RCSEng, FDS RCPSGlas, FFPH, DDPH RCS ENG, FHEA Professor and Honorary Consultant in Dental Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leggett H, Vinall-Collier K, Csikar J, Owen J, Edwebi S, Douglas GVA. A scoping review of dental practitioners' perspectives on perceived barriers and facilitators to preventive oral health care in general dental practice. BMC Oral Health 2024; 24:249. [PMID: 38368349 PMCID: PMC10874524 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04022-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral health has an important role in the general health and well-being of individuals. Dental teams are ideally placed to support patients in preventing ill-health. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to the adoption, promotion and facilitation of preventive advice and treatment is key to improving oral health services. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is a useful psychological framework to help identify individual, interpersonal and environmental issues which could be impacting clinicians' ability to provide preventive advice and care. The aim of this review was to identify the perceived barriers and facilitators to preventive oral health care from the perspectives of the oral healthcare team within the general dental practice. METHODS A search strategy was developed, piloted, and run in: Medline via Ovid, PsycInfo, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and followed PRISMA guidelines. Identified records were screened independently by two researchers. Data were coded using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and analysed using narrative data synthesis. RESULTS 5610 papers were identified, and 19 included in this review. Thirteen papers focussed on dentists. Of the 106 items mapped onto the TDF, 48 were facilitators. The domains most frequently represented were, environmental context and resources, beliefs about consequences, social professional role and identity, skills, beliefs about capabilities and knowledge. Six studies focussed on dental hygienists. There were 47 items mapped onto the TDF, 18 were facilitators. The domains most frequently represented were environmental context and resources, social influences, beliefs about consequences and knowledge. CONCLUSIONS The review identified that the delivery of preventive activities did not focus solely on the patient and dental professional interaction as many previous studies have highlighted. The review found that multiple factors influence whether prevention is delivered to patients. The largest barrier and facilitator for the dental professionals identified in this review was the environmental context and resources. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions that aim to promote preventive oral health care in primary care settings to understand whether they address the barriers identified in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Leggett
- York Trials Unit, The University of York, York, UK.
| | | | - J Csikar
- The School of Dentistry, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J Owen
- The School of Dentistry, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S Edwebi
- The School of Dentistry, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - G V A Douglas
- The School of Dentistry, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Contract reform - the BDA's view. Br Dent J 2022; 233:382-385. [DOI: 10.1038/s41415-022-4918-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
5
|
Henein C, Landes D. NHS dental activity: a population marker for the effectiveness of community water fluoridation in children in England. Br Dent J 2022:10.1038/s41415-021-3822-1. [PMID: 35027686 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-021-3822-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Aim To understand the possible beneficiary effects of artificial and naturally occurring water fluoridation on dental health of children, using routinely collected NHS Dental Statistics.Method A secondary analysis of the NHS Dental Statistics for England 2018-2019 dataset. The proportion of Band 1 courses of treatments are compared with Band 2, Band 3 and urgent treatments collectively, for children attending dental practices in naturally and artificially fluoridated local authorities compared with non-fluoridated authorities who are their statistical peers. Proportions of dental treatments are described by the levels of Index of Multiple Deprivation for the area in which the practice is located.Results The dataset had, 2,001,921 banded paediatric courses of treatment; 1,227,282 provided by dental practices in fluoridated local authorities and 774,639 in non-fluoridated local authorities. Water fluoridation was associated with a significant reduction in dental interventions in the most deprived populations. The proportions of active interventional treatments in the 10% most deprived decile (decile 1) are 0.243 (Cl 0.239-0.247) and 0.188 (Cl 0.184-0.191), in non-fluoridated and fluoridated local authorities, respectively.Conclusion Analysis of routinely collected NHS dental statistics shows potential utility as a tool for demonstrating the effects of community water fluoridation schemes in reducing oral health inequalities among the most deprived socioeconomic populations. The pattern of dental need and intervention is not as expected and therefore, further research is required to control for systematic confounding factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudy Henein
- Health Education North East England, Dental Public Health, Waterfront 4, Goldcrest Way, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 8NY, UK.
| | - David Landes
- Deputy Director of Public Health, NHS County Durham and NHS Darlington, Public Health Team, John Snow House, Durham University Science Park, Durham, DH1 3YG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vernazza CR, Pitts NB, Mayne C, Mazevet ME. Dental Policy Lab 1 - towards a cavity-free future. Br Dent J 2021; 231:754-758. [PMID: 34921272 PMCID: PMC8683374 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-021-3723-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Although many dental professionals argue that prevention of oral diseases, including dental caries, will benefit both the patient and public finances, a paradigm shift has yet to happen in most countries. The literature has demonstrated that caries prevention and control is possible, but authorities have yet to implement health systems that allow patients to stay in a good health state. 'Policy Labs' are an innovative policy-making initiative that allow a positive collaboration between the many stakeholders around a given policy issue. In July 2017, 24 international experts, including representatives of both international and European Chief Dental Officers associations, were gathered for the first Alliance for a Cavity-Free Future/King's College London Dental Policy Lab to identify the main barriers for a change, and concrete actions to facilitate a policy shift towards increased resource allocation in prevention. A comprehensive report and well-received infographic summarising the key recommendations (explored in this paper) were produced to explain the situation and highlight the value of a cavity-free world to policymakers, demonstrating where change is needed. The first Dental Policy Lab proved to be an efficient way to generate new ideas and concrete ways to implement them, and has led to several subsequent initiatives worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Vernazza
- School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Nigel B Pitts
- Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King´s College London, Tower Wing, Guy´s Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Catherine Mayne
- Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King´s College London, Tower Wing, Guy´s Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Marco E Mazevet
- Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King´s College London, Tower Wing, Guy´s Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
CLARKE LORCAN, ANDERSON MICHAEL, ANDERSON ROB, KLAUSEN MORTENBONDE, FORMAN REBECCA, KERNS JENNA, RABE ADRIAN, KRISTENSEN SØRENRUD, THEODORAKIS PAVLOS, VALDERAS JOSE, KLUGE HANS, MOSSIALOS ELIAS. Economic Aspects of Delivering Primary Care Services: An Evidence Synthesis to Inform Policy and Research Priorities. Milbank Q 2021; 99:974-1023. [PMID: 34472653 PMCID: PMC8718591 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Policy Points The 2018 Declaration of Astana reemphasized the importance of primary health care and its role in achieving universal health coverage. While there is a large amount of literature on the economic aspects of delivering primary care services, there is a need for more comprehensive overviews of this evidence. In this article, we offer such an overview. Evidence suggests that there are several strategies involving coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance arrangements which can, if implemented, have positive economic impacts on the delivery of primary care services. These include arrangements such as worker task-shifting and telemedicine. The implementation of any such arrangements, based on positive economic evidence, should carefully account for potential impacts on overall health care access and quality. There are many opportunities for further research, with notable gaps in evidence on the impacts of increasing primary care funding or the overall supply of primary care services. CONTEXT The 2018 Declaration of Astana reemphasized the importance of primary health care and its role in achieving universal health coverage. To strengthen primary health care, policymakers need guidance on how to allocate resources in a manner that maximizes its economic benefits. METHODS We collated and synthesized published systematic reviews of evidence on the economic aspects of different models of delivering primary care services. Building on previous efforts, we adapted existing taxonomies of primary care components to classify our results according to four categories: coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance. FINDINGS We identified and classified 109 reviews that met our inclusion criteria according to our taxonomy of primary care components: coverage, financing, service delivery, and governance arrangements. A significant body of evidence suggests that several specific primary care arrangements, such as health workers' task shifting and telemedicine, can have positive economic impacts (such as lower overall health care costs). Notably absent were reviews on the impact of increasing primary care funding or the overall supply of primary care services. CONCLUSIONS There is a great opportunity for further research to systematically examine the broader economic impacts of investing in primary care services. Despite progress over the last decade, significant evidence gaps on the economic implications of different models of primary care services remain, which could help inform the basis of future research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LORCAN CLARKE
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- Trinity College Dublin
| | | | | | | | | | - JENNA KERNS
- London School of Economics and Political Science
| | | | | | | | | | - HANS KLUGE
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO/Europe)
| | - ELIAS MOSSIALOS
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- Imperial College London
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kerr E, Watson S, McMullan J, Srinivasan M, McKenna GJ. General dentists' attitudes and perceived barriers in providing domiciliary dental care to older adults in long-term care facilities or their homes in Northern Ireland: A descriptive qualitative study. Gerodontology 2021; 39:257-265. [PMID: 34105187 DOI: 10.1111/ger.12565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many older patients, housebound or living in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) have limited access to dental care. This descriptive qualitative study aimed to understand general dental practitioners (GDPs) attitudes and perceived barriers to undertaking Domiciliary Dental Care (DDC) for those patients in Northern Ireland (NI). METHODS Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 12 GDPs in Northern Ireland. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. An iterative coding process using theme-analytic methods was used. RESULTS The data were characterised into four major themes-risk of professional litigation, remuneration for those undertaking DDC, complexity of treatment, and the overall framework of the dental care system in NI. Two minor themes identified were practice culture and reasons for undertaking DDC. The GDPs in the study identified a number of barriers to undertaking DDC including a legal requirement to transport oxygen, lack of organisation and limited oral hygiene care provision in LTCFs, and confusion around their responsibilities for provision of DDC. Those GDPs who were providing DDC indicated that they did so out of kindness and a sense of loyalty to their long-standing patients. CONCLUSION The GDPs in this study identified a number of significant barriers to provision of DDC at organisational, structural and clinical levels. The GDPs indicated that they required clarification of their responsibilities around DDC with clear guidelines necessary given the increase in demand for this service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Kerr
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Sinead Watson
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Julie McMullan
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Murali Srinivasan
- Clinic of General, Special Care, and Geriatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gerald J McKenna
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thomas GM, Newton R, Tolley WJ, Bishop K. Novel tier 2 service model for complex NHS endodontics. Br Dent J 2021:10.1038/s41415-021-2840-3. [PMID: 33883704 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-021-2840-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Aim The use of tier 2 practitioners has been suggested as an intermediate tier in the NHS workforce completing cases of moderate difficulty previously referred to secondary care. Provision of such services varies depending on speciality and local commissioning priorities. This service evaluation investigated reasons for and outcomes of endodontic referrals to an NHS tier 2 service in Powys, Wales.Methods A sample of endodontic referrals was analysed with reasons for referral, referral outcome, requests for consultant support and patient demographic data recorded producing results with frequencies and percentage distributions.Results Of 401 referrals evaluated, common reasons for referral were management of post-treatment disease (56.4%) followed by inability to locate or negotiate root canals (26.9%). Mandibular molar teeth were the most frequently referred. Additionally, 44.1% of patients referred went on to receive treatment. Consultant advice and/or treatment was required in the management of 3.5% of referrals, most frequently relating to referral of traumatic dental injuries, root resorption and immature apices.Conclusions Results demonstrate tier 2 practitioners can effectively manage and treat the majority of NHS endodontic referrals. Remote consultant advice is effective in supporting tier 2 practitioners in the management of complex presentation, allowing effective treatment delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth M Thomas
- Senior Dental Officer in Endodontics, Powys Teaching Health Board, Dental Department, Brecon War Memorial Hospital, Brecon, Powys, LD3 7NS, UK.
| | - Richard Newton
- DCT3 in Restorative Dentistry, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, SA6 6NL, UK
| | - Warren J Tolley
- Dental Director Powys Teaching Health Board, Park Street Clinic, Newtown, Powys, SY16 1EG, UK
| | - Karl Bishop
- Dental Director and Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, SA6 6NL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Twelve years with a capitation payment system in Swedish dental care: longitudinal development of oral health. BMC Oral Health 2021; 21:103. [PMID: 33676489 PMCID: PMC7937238 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01463-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since 2007, patients receiving oral health care within the Public Dental Service in Sweden have had the possibility to choose between the traditional fee-for-service (FFS) payment system or the new capitation payment system, ‘Dental Care for Health’ (DCH). Payment models are believed to involve different incentive structures for patients and caregivers. In theory, different incentives may lead to differences in health-related outcomes, and the research has been inconclusive. This 12-year longitudinal prospective cohort study of patients in regular dental care analyzes oral health development and self-reported oral health in relation to the patients’ level of education in the two payment systems, and compares with the results from an earlier 6-year follow-up. Methods Information was obtained through a questionnaire and from a register from n = 5877 individuals who kept their original choice of payment model for 12 years, 1650 patients in DCH and 4227 in FFS, in the Public Dental Service in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden. The data comprised manifest caries prevalence, levels of self-reported oral health and education, and choice of dental care payment model. Analyses were performed with chi square and multivariable regression analysis. Results The findings from the 6-year follow-up were essentially maintained at the 12-year examination, showing that the pre-baseline caries prevalence is the most influential factor for less favorable oral health development in terms of the resulting caries prevalence. Educational level (≥ university) showed an increased influence on the risk of higher caries prevalence after 12 years and differed between payment models with regard to the relation to self-rated oral health. Conclusions Differences in health and health-influencing properties between payment models were sustained from 6 to 12 years. Strategies for making use of potential compensatory mechanisms within the capitation payment system to increase oral health equality should be considered.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Despite the recognized need to change the emphasis of health services by
shifting the balance from treatment to prevention, limited progress
has been made in many settings. This is true in oral health, where
evidence for preventive interventions that work has not been
systematically exploited in oral health services. While reorienting
health services is complex and context specific, economics can bring a
helpful perspective in understanding and predicting the impact of
changes in resource allocation, provider remuneration systems, and
patient payments. There is an increasing literature on the economics
of different prevention approaches. However, much of this literature
focuses on the costs and potential savings of alternative approaches
and fails to take into account benefits. Even where benefits are taken
into account, these tend to be narrowly focused on clinical outcomes
using cost-effectiveness analysis, which may be of little relevance to
the policy maker, patient, and the public. Some commonly used economic
approaches (such as quality-adjusted life years and incremental
cost-effectiveness ratios) may also not be appropriate to oral health.
Using alternative techniques, including wider measures of benefit and
employing priority setting and resource allocation tools, may provide
more comprehensive information on economic impact to decision makers
and stakeholders. In addition, it is important to consider the effects
of provider remuneration in reorienting services. While there is some
evidence about traditional models of remuneration (fee for service and
capitation), less is known about pay for performance and blended
systems. This article outlines areas in which economics can offer an
insight into reorientation of health systems toward prevention,
highlighting areas for further research and consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C R Vernazza
- School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - S Birch
- Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.,Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - N B Pitts
- Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jia L, Meng Q, Scott A, Yuan B, Zhang L. Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 1:CD011865. [PMID: 33469932 PMCID: PMC8094987 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011865.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes to the method of payment for healthcare providers, including pay-for-performance schemes, are increasingly being used by governments, health insurers, and employers to help align financial incentives with health system goals. In this review we focused on changes to the method and level of payment for all types of healthcare providers in outpatient healthcare settings. Outpatient healthcare settings, broadly defined as 'out of hospital' care including primary care, are important for health systems in reducing the use of more expensive hospital services. OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of different payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings on the quantity and quality of health service provision, patient outcomes, healthcare provider outcomes, cost of service provision, and adverse effects. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase (searched 5 March 2019), and several other databases. In addition, we searched clinical trials platforms, grey literature, screened reference lists of included studies, did a cited reference search for included studies, and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. We screened records from an updated search in August 2020, with any potentially relevant studies categorised as awaiting classification. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies, interrupted time series, and repeated measures studies that compared different payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient care settings. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We conducted a structured synthesis. We first categorised the payment methods comparisons and outcomes, and then described the effects of different types of payment methods on different outcome categories. Where feasible, we used meta-analysis to synthesise the effects of payment interventions under the same category. Where it was not possible to perform meta-analysis, we have reported means/medians and full ranges of the available point estimates. We have reported the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the relative difference (as per cent change or mean difference (MD)) for continuous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS We included 27 studies in the review: 12 randomised trials, 13 controlled before-and-after studies, one interrupted time series, and one repeated measure study. Most healthcare providers were primary care physicians. Most of the payment methods were implemented by health insurance schemes in high-income countries, with only one study from a low- or middle-income country. The included studies were categorised into four groups based on comparisons of different payment methods. (1) Pay for performance (P4P) plus existing payment methods compared with existing payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings P4P incentives probably improve child immunisation status (RR 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 1.36; 3760 patients; moderate-certainty evidence) and may slightly increase the number of patients who are asked more detailed questions on their disease by their pharmacist (MD 1.24, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.54; 454 patients; low-certainty evidence). P4P may slightly improve primary care physicians' prescribing of guideline-recommended antihypertensive medicines compared with an existing payment method (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12; 362 patients; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effects of extra P4P incentives on mean blood pressure reduction for patients and costs for providing services compared with an existing payment method (very low-certainty evidence). Outcomes related to workload or other health professional outcomes were not reported in the included studies. One randomised trial found that compared to the control group, the performance of incentivised professionals was not sustained after the P4P intervention had ended. (2) Fee for service (FFS) compared with existing payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings We are uncertain about the effect of FFS on the quantity of health services delivered (outpatient visits and hospitalisations), patient health outcomes, and total drugs cost compared to an existing payment method due to very low-certainty evidence. The quality of service provision and health professional outcomes were not reported in the included studies. One randomised trial reported that physicians paid via FFS may see more well patients than salaried physicians (low-certainty evidence), possibly implying that more unnecessary services were delivered through FFS. (3) FFS mixed with existing payment methods compared with existing payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings FFS mixed payment method may increase the quantity of health services provided compared with an existing payment method (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.76; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effect of FFS mixed payment on quality of services provided, patient health outcomes, and health professional outcomes compared with an existing payment method due to very low-certainty evidence. Cost outcomes and adverse effects were not reported in the included studies. (4) Enhanced FFS compared with FFS for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings Enhanced FFS (higher FFS payment) probably increases child immunisation rates (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.48; moderate-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether higher FFS payment results in more primary care visits and about the effect of enhanced FFS on the net expenditure per year on covered children with regular FFS (very low-certainty evidence). Quality of service provision, patient outcomes, health professional outcomes, and adverse effects were not reported in the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS For healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings, P4P or an increase in FFS payment level probably increases the quantity of health service provision (moderate-certainty evidence), and P4P may slightly improve the quality of service provision for targeted conditions (low-certainty evidence). The effects of changes in payment methods on health outcomes is uncertain due to very low-certainty evidence. Information to explore the influence of specific payment method design features, such as the size of incentives and type of performance measures, was insufficient. Furthermore, due to limited and very low-certainty evidence, it is uncertain if changing payment models without including additional funding for professionals would have similar effects. There is a need for further well-conducted research on payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings in low- and middle-income countries; more studies comparing the impacts of different designs of the same payment method; and studies that consider the unintended consequences of payment interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liying Jia
- Center for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- NHC Key Lab for Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Qingyue Meng
- China Center for Health Development Studies (CCHDS), Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Anthony Scott
- Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Beibei Yuan
- China Center for Health Development Studies (CCHDS), Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Zhang
- Weihai Health Care Security Administration, Weihai, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jevdjevic M, Listl S, Beeson M, Rovers M, Matsuyama Y. Forecasting future dental health expenditures: Development of a framework using data from 32 OECD countries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2020; 49:256-266. [PMID: 33252147 PMCID: PMC8247018 DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective To (1) develop a framework for forecasting future dental expenditures, using currently available information, and (2) identify relevant research and data gaps such that dental expenditure predictions can continuously be improved in the future. Methods Our analyses focused on 32 OECD countries. Dependent on the number of predictors, we employed dynamic univariate and multivariate modelling approaches with various model specifications. For univariate modelling, an auto‐regressive (AR) dynamic model was employed to incorporate historical trends in dental expenditures. Multivariate modelling took account of historical trends, as well as of relationships between dental expenditures, dental morbidity, economic growth in terms of gross domestic product and demographic changes. Results Estimates of dental expenditures varied substantially across different model specifications. Models relying on dental morbidity as one of the predictors performed worst regardless of their specification. Using the best‐fitted model specification, that is the univariate second‐order autoregression [AR(2)], the forecasted dental expenditures across 32 OECD countries amounted to US$316bn (95% forecasted interval, FI: 258‐387) in 2020, US$434bn (95%FI: 354‐532) in 2030 and US$594bn (95%FI: 485‐728) in 2040. Per capita spending in 2040 was forecasted to be highest in Germany (US$889, 95%FI: 726‐1090) and lowest in Mexico (US$52, 95%FI: 42‐64). Conclusions The present study demonstrates the feasibility and challenges in predicting dental expenditures and can serve as a basis for improvement towards more sustainable and resilient health policy and resource planning. Within the limitations of available data sources, our findings suggest that dental expenditures in OECD countries could increase substantially over the next two decades and vary considerably across countries. For more accurate estimation and a better understanding of determinants of dental expenditures, more comprehensive data on dental spending and dental morbidity are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milica Jevdjevic
- Department of Dentistry - Quality and Safety of Oral Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Listl
- Department of Dentistry - Quality and Safety of Oral Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Conservative Dentistry, Translational Health Economics Group, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Morgan Beeson
- School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Maroeska Rovers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Evidence, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yusuke Matsuyama
- Department of Dentistry - Quality and Safety of Oral Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Global Health Promotion, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Obadha M, Chuma J, Kazungu J, Abiiro GA, Beck MJ, Barasa E. Preferences of healthcare providers for capitation payment in Kenya: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy Plan 2020; 35:842-854. [PMID: 32537642 PMCID: PMC7487334 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Provider payment mechanisms (PPMs) are important to the universal health coverage (UHC) agenda as they can influence healthcare provider behaviour and create incentives for health service delivery, quality and efficiency. Therefore, when designing PPMs, it is important to consider providers' preferences for PPM characteristics. We set out to uncover senior health facility managers' preferences for the attributes of a capitation payment mechanism in Kenya. We use a discrete choice experiment and focus on four capitation attributes, namely, payment schedule, timeliness of payments, capitation rate per individual per year and services to be paid by the capitation rate. Using a Bayesian efficient experimental design, choice data were collected from 233 senior health facility managers across 98 health facilities in seven Kenyan counties. Panel mixed multinomial logit and latent class models were used in the analysis. We found that capitation arrangements with frequent payment schedules, timelier disbursements, higher payment rates per individual per year and those that paid for a limited set of health services were preferred. The capitation rate per individual per year was the most important attribute. Respondents were willing to accept an increase in the capitation rate to compensate for bundling a broader set of health services under the capitation payment. In addition, we found preference heterogeneity across respondents and latent classes. In conclusion, these attributes can be used as potential targets for interventions aimed at configuring capitation to achieve UHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melvin Obadha
- Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI|Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O. Box 43640 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jane Chuma
- Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI|Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O. Box 43640 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
- The World Bank, Kenya Country Office, P.O. Box 30577-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jacob Kazungu
- Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI|Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O. Box 43640 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro
- Department of Planning, Faculty of Planning and Land Management, University for Development Studies, Wa, Ghana
| | - Matthew J Beck
- Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, Business School, The University of Sydney, Darlington, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - Edwine Barasa
- Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI|Wellcome Trust Research Programme, P.O. Box 43640 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Peter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3SY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Petersen PE, Baez RJ, Ogawa H. Global application of oral disease prevention and health promotion as measured 10 years after the 2007 World Health Assembly statement on oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2020; 48:338-348. [PMID: 32383537 PMCID: PMC7496398 DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The WHO World Health Assembly established in 2007 a Resolution (WHA60.17) on oral health, which called upon countries to ensure that public health actions for disease prevention and health promotion are established. The objective of the present survey undertaken 10 years later (2017-2018) was to measure the application of such programmes for key population age groups in low-, middle- and high-income countries. METHODS Oral health focal points of ministries of health worldwide (n = 101) answered a structured questionnaire on existing national oral health systems and the actual public health activities. The response rate was 58.4%. The questionnaire was used to collect information about structural factors, country workforce, financial models, provision of preventive services and promotion for oral health, school health programmes, administration of fluoride, national oral health targets and oral health surveillance. The countries were classified by national income for analysis of data. RESULTS Coverage of population groups by primary oral health care and emergency care varied by national income. The gap between countries in delivery of preventive care was strong since low-income countries less often reported preventive activities than middle-income countries and particularly when compared to high-income countries. School oral health programmes were less frequent in low-income than other countries. Moreover, population methods of fluoridation and use of fluoridated toothpaste were unusual in low-income countries. Health education, mass communication and community events were often essential elements in health promotion. In disease prevention, many countries considered the link between oral health and general health conditions and intervention towards shared risk factors of NCDs. The health concern for the consumption of tobacco, unhealthy diet and sugars was particularly emphasized by high-income countries but less highlighted by low-income countries. Finally, while national oral health targets for children and surveillance systems were frequently reported by countries, similar systems for adolescents, adults and older people were rare. CONCLUSIONS The inequities between countries in oral disease prevention and health promotion were substantial. Limited financial resources for preventive care and health promotion; inadequate workforce for oral health, and insufficient coverage in primary health care were observed in low-resource countries. The results of the survey demonstrate the need for building effective oral health systems oriented towards oral disease prevention and health promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poul Erik Petersen
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Community Oral Health Programmes and ResearchUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Ramon J Baez
- University of Texas Health Science CenterSan AntonioTXUSA
| | - Hiroshi Ogawa
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Translation of Oral Health SciencesNiigata UniversityNiigataJapan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ayorinde AA, Williams I, Mannion R, Song F, Skrybant M, Lilford RJ, Chen YF. Publication and related bias in quantitative health services and delivery research: a multimethod study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Bias in the publication and reporting of research findings (referred to as publication and related bias here) poses a major threat in evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making. Although this bias has been well documented in clinical research, little is known about its occurrence and magnitude in health services and delivery research.
Objectives
To obtain empirical evidence on publication and related bias in quantitative health services and delivery research; to examine current practice in detecting/mitigating this bias in health services and delivery research systematic reviews; and to explore stakeholders’ perception and experiences concerning such bias.
Methods
The project included five distinct but interrelated work packages. Work package 1 was a systematic review of empirical and methodological studies. Work package 2 involved a survey (meta-epidemiological study) of randomly selected systematic reviews of health services and delivery research topics (n = 200) to evaluate current practice in the assessment of publication and outcome reporting bias during evidence synthesis. Work package 3 included four case studies to explore the applicability of statistical methods for detecting such bias in health services and delivery research. In work package 4 we followed up four cohorts of health services and delivery research studies (total n = 300) to ascertain their publication status, and examined whether publication status was associated with statistical significance or perceived ‘positivity’ of study findings. Work package 5 involved key informant interviews with diverse health services and delivery research stakeholders (n = 24), and a focus group discussion with patient and service user representatives (n = 8).
Results
We identified only four studies that set out to investigate publication and related bias in health services and delivery research in work package 1. Three of these studies focused on health informatics research and one concerned health economics. All four studies reported evidence of the existence of this bias, but had methodological weaknesses. We also identified three health services and delivery research systematic reviews in which findings were compared between published and grey/unpublished literature. These reviews found that the quality and volume of evidence and effect estimates sometimes differed significantly between published and unpublished literature. Work package 2 showed low prevalence of considering/assessing publication (43%) and outcome reporting (17%) bias in health services and delivery research systematic reviews. The prevalence was lower among reviews of associations than among reviews of interventions. The case studies in work package 3 highlighted limitations in current methods for detecting these biases due to heterogeneity and potential confounders. Follow-up of health services and delivery research cohorts in work package 4 showed positive association between publication status and having statistically significant or positive findings. Diverse views concerning publication and related bias and insights into how features of health services and delivery research might influence its occurrence were uncovered through the interviews with health services and delivery research stakeholders and focus group discussion conducted in work package 5.
Conclusions
This study provided prima facie evidence on publication and related bias in quantitative health services and delivery research. This bias does appear to exist, but its prevalence and impact may vary depending on study characteristics, such as study design, and motivation for conducting the evaluation. Emphasis on methodological novelty and focus beyond summative assessments may mitigate/lessen the risk of such bias in health services and delivery research. Methodological and epistemological diversity in health services and delivery research and changing landscape in research publication need to be considered when interpreting the evidence. Collection of further empirical evidence and exploration of optimal health services and delivery research practice are required.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016052333 and CRD42016052366.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 33. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abimbola A Ayorinde
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Iestyn Williams
- Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Russell Mannion
- Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Fujian Song
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Magdalena Skrybant
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard J Lilford
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Yen-Fu Chen
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Byrne M, O’Malley L, Glenny AM, Campbell S, Tickle M. A RAND/UCLA appropriateness method study to identify the dimensions of quality in primary dental care and quality measurement indicators. Br Dent J 2020; 228:83-88. [DOI: 10.1038/s41415-020-1200-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
18
|
Brocklehurst P, Tickle M, Birch S, McDonald R, Walsh T, Goodwin TL, Hill H, Howarth E, Donaldson M, O’Carolan D, Fitzpatrick S, McCrory G, Slee C. Impact of changing provider remuneration on NHS general dental practitioner services in Northern Ireland: a mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Policy-makers wanted to reform the NHS dental contract in Northern Ireland to contain costs, secure access and incentivise prevention and quality. A pilot project was undertaken to remunerate general dental practitioners using a capitation-based payment system rather than the existing fee-for-service system.
Objective
To investigate the impact of this change in remuneration.
Design
Mixed-methods design using a difference-in-difference evaluation of clinical activity levels, a questionnaire of patient-rated outcomes and qualitative assessment of general dental practitioners’ and patients’ views.
Setting
NHS dental practices in Northern Ireland.
Participants
General dental practitioners and patients in 11 intervention practices and 18 control practices.
Interventions
Change from fee for service to a capitation-based system for 1 year and then reversion back to fee for service.
Main outcome measures
Access to care, activity levels, service mix and financial impact, and patient-rated outcomes of care.
Results
The difference-in-difference analyses showed significant and rapid changes in the patterns of care provided by general dental practitioners to patients (compared with the control practices) when they moved from a fee-for-service system to a capitation-based remuneration system. The number of registered patients in the intervention practices compared with the control practices showed a small but statistically significant increase during the capitation period (p < 0.01), but this difference was small. There were statistically significant reductions in the volume of activity across all treatments in the intervention practices during the capitation period, compared with the control practices. This produced a concomitant reduction in patient charge revenue of £2403 per practice per month (p < 0.05). All outcome measures rapidly returned to baseline levels following reversion from the capitation-based system back to a fee-for-service system. The analysis of the questionnaires suggests that patients did not appear to notice very much change. Qualitative interviews showed variation in general dental practitioners’ behaviour in response to the intervention and how they managed the tension between professional ethics and maximising the profits of their business. Behaviours were also heavily influenced by local context. Practice principals preferred the capitation model as it freed up time and provided opportunities for private work, whereas capitation payments were seen by some principals as a ‘retainer fee’ for continuing to provide NHS care. Non-equity-owning associates perceived the capitation model as a financial risk.
Limitations
The active NHS pilot period was only 1 year, which may have limited the scope for meaningful change. The number of sites was restricted by the financial budget for the NHS pilot.
Conclusions
General dental practitioners respond rapidly and consistently to changes in remuneration, but differences were found in the extent of this change by practice and provider type. A move from a fee-for-service system to a capitation-based system had little impact on access but produced large reductions in clinical activity and patient charge income. Patients noticed little difference in the service that they received.
Future work
With changing population need and increasing financial pressure on the NHS, research is required on how to most efficiently meet the expectations of patients within an affordable cost envelope. Work is also needed to identify and evaluate interventions that can complement changes in remuneration to meet policy goals.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN29840057.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin Tickle
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen Birch
- Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth McDonald
- Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tanya Walsh
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Harry Hill
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- F. Schwendicke
- Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - W.V. Giannobile
- Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Biointerfaces Institute, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Emrani R, Sargeran K, Grytten J, Hessari H. A Survey of Common Payment Methods and Their Determinants in Dental Clinics, in Tehran, 2018. Eur J Dent 2020; 13:535-539. [PMID: 31891971 PMCID: PMC6938431 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective
It is believed that the payment method to dentists may affect their treatment decisions. Although payment systems may enhance job satisfaction, reduce the costs, and make better treatment decisions, there is little information about how to achieve these objectives. The aim of the present study was to survey the payment methods and the related factors in dental clinics of Tehran.
Materials and Methods
Using the latest list published by the Iranian Ministry of Health, we visited all dental clinics located in Tehran, and used a checklist to collect the data of the type of management, geographical location of the clinic in Tehran, payment method and its amount, history of payment method changes in the last decade, relationship between the amount of payment and the position of technical supervisor dentist, any difference in the amount of payment to male and female dentists and to young and experienced dentists. Then, the relationship between the amount of payment and the above-mentioned variables was investigated.
Results
The governmental sector tends to use fixed salary methods and the private sector usually uses the fee-for-service (FFS) method. Geographical location, type of management, date of establishment, and having the position of technical supervisor dentist had a significant relationship with the amount of payment. The dentist’s gender and years of experience did not have any relationship with the amount of payment.
Conclusion
According to the results of the present study, the method and amount of payment to dentists were related to the date of clinic establishment, having the position of technical supervisor dentist, and geographical location of the clinic. These factors could be considered as the main elements in balancing costs in clinics and improving job satisfaction among dentists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Emrani
- Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Katayoun Sargeran
- Research Center for Caries Prevention, Dentistry Research Institute and Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Justein Grytten
- Institute of Community Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hossein Hessari
- Research Center for Caries Prevention, Dentistry Research Institute and Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
This paper sets out a conceptual framework by which quality improvement in primary dental care can be approached. We argue that seeking a unified definition for quality in dentistry is a distraction to the more important end of quality improvement. An approach to quality improvement that interfaces Donabedian's domains of structure, process and outcome with various dimensions of quality gives a rational approach by which quality can be assessed and improved. The importance of valid, evidence driven indicators and methods for their implementation in primary dental care is described. Further work is required in order to identify which dimensions of dentistry are most important, but the Institute of Medicine's dimensions of safety, effectiveness, patient centreedness, timeliness, equity, efficiency are a good starting point. Trying to develop an absolute list of dimensions of quality should not distract from implementing an approach-based paradigm of quality improvement. Bioinformatics offers new solutions by which quality measures may be implemented and reported in the primary care setting. The focus of future research should be in implementing data-driven quality indicators at the level of the primary care practitioner.
Collapse
|
22
|
Robinson PG, Douglas GVA, Gibson BJ, Godson J, Vinall-Collier K, Pavitt S, Hulme C. Remuneration of primary dental care in England: a qualitative framework analysis of perspectives of a new service delivery model incorporating incentives for improved access, quality and health outcomes. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031886. [PMID: 31585977 PMCID: PMC6797242 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to describe stakeholder perspectives of a new service delivery model in primary care dentistry incorporating incentives for access, quality and health outcomes. DESIGN Data were collected through observations, interviews and focus groups. SETTING This was conducted under six UK primary dental care practices, three working under the incentive-driven contract and three working under the traditional activity-based contract. PARTICIPANTS Observations were made of 30 dental appointments. Eighteen lay people, 15 dental team staff and a member of a commissioning team took part in the interviews and focus groups. RESULTS Using a qualitative framework analysis informed by Andersen's model of access, we found oral health assessments influenced patients' perceptions of need, which led to changes in preventive behaviour. Dentists responded to the contract, with greater emphasis on prevention, use of the disease risk ratings in treatment planning, adherence to the pathways and the utilisation of skill-mix. Participants identified increases in the capacity of practices to deliver more care as a result. These changes were seen to improve evaluated and perceived health and patient satisfaction. These outcomes fed back to shape people's predispositions to visit the dentist. CONCLUSION The incentive-driven contract was perceived to increase access to dental care, determine dentists' and patients' perceptions of need, their behaviours, health outcomes and patient satisfaction. Dentists face challenges in refocusing care, perceptions of preventive dentistry, deployment of skill mix and use of the risk assessments and care pathways. Dentists may need support in these areas and to recognise the differences between caring for individual patients and the patient-base of a practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Robinson
- School of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Barry J Gibson
- School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jenny Godson
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Dental Public Health, Public Health England, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Sue Pavitt
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire Hulme
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bele S, Mohamed B, Chugh A, Haverman L, Santana MJ. Impact of using patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical care of paediatric patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027354. [PMID: 30928963 PMCID: PMC6475156 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic diseases among children are associated with lower health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and higher utilisation of healthcare services. Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) in routine clinical care has been shown to reduce utilisation of healthcare services while improving patient outcomes. The objectives of our study are to: (1) identify previously implemented and evaluated PROMs for chronic conditions in paediatric settings; (2) consolidate the evidence to evaluate the impact of using PROMs on HRQOL, healthcare utilisation, patient outcomes (eg, symptoms control) and quality of care among paediatric patients with chronic conditions. The findings from this review will inform the future integration of PROMs in paediatric clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will systematically search the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Cochrane library. Reference lists of included studies will also be searched in Web of Science (Thomson Reuters) database to ensure more complete coverage. Two reviewers will independently screen the studies and abstract the data using standardised form. Extracted data will be analysed and synthesised. Finally, a narrative synthesis of summarised data will be presented. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required, as the proposed systematic review will use data from published research articles. The results of this study will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and meetings, and the lead author's doctoral dissertation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018109035.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumedh Bele
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bijan Mohamed
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ashton Chugh
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lotte Haverman
- Psychosocial Department, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria-Jose Santana
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pegon-Machat E, Jourdan D, Tubert-Jeannin S. [Oral health inequalities: Determinants of access to prevention and care in France]. SANTE PUBLIQUE 2018; 30:243-251. [PMID: 30148312 DOI: 10.3917/spub.182.0243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oral diseases are unequally distributed according to a social gradient, which now constitutes a major public health problem. Acting against oral health inequalities requires a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms in order to identify the appropriate solutions to improve access to oral health promotion and dental care for deprived populations. METHODS A patient-centered model of health care access, describing the ideal interactions between individuals and the health care system was applied to the field of oral health in the French context. This model defines access to health care as the result of interactions between individuals and the health care system, in which health needs are perceived, health care is sought, health care structures are accessed and effectively used. Analysis is based on quantitative and qualitative bibliographic data acquired through an explanatory sociological approach. RESULTS Socially deprived populations face many barriers preventing their access to dental care: the need for dental care is not necessarily perceived, and, when perceived, dental care is not immediately sought, accessibility to dental care structures is difficult and dental attendance is erratic. CONCLUSION This review provides information to decision-makers in order to support regional health policies and to help implement public health strategies according to the principle of proportionate universalism. Two axes for action were identified, namely to integrate oral health promotion interventions within health promotion programmes and to gradually reorganize the dental care system to make it more accessible to everyone.
Collapse
|
25
|
Gnich W, Sherriff A, Bonetti D, Conway DI, Macpherson LMD. The effect of introducing a financial incentive to promote application of fluoride varnish in dental practice in Scotland: a natural experiment. Implement Sci 2018; 13:95. [PMID: 29996868 PMCID: PMC6042272 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0775-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial incentives are often used to influence professional practice, yet the factors which influence their effectiveness and their behavioural mechanisms are not fully understood. In keeping with clinical guidelines, Childsmile (Scotland's oral health improvement programme) advocates twice yearly fluoride varnish application (FVA) for children in dental practice. To support implementation Childsmile offered dental practitioners a fee-per-item payment for varnishing 2-5-year-olds' teeth through a pilot. In October 2011 payment was extended to all dental practitioners. This paper compares FVA pre- and post-roll-out and explores the financial incentive's behavioural mechanisms. METHODS A natural experimental approach using a longitudinal cohort of dental practitioners (n = 1090) compared FVA pre- (time 1) and post- (time 2) financial incentive. Responses from practitioners who did not work in a Childsmile pilot practice when considering their 2-5-year-old patients (novel incentive group) were compared with all other responses (continuous incentive group). The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to measure change in behavioural mechanisms associated with the incentive. Analysis of covariance was used to investigate FVA rates and associated behavioural mechanisms in the two groups. RESULTS At time 2, 709 74%, of eligible responders, were followed up. In general, FVA rates increased over time for both groups; however, the novel incentive group experienced a greater increase (β [95% CI] = 0.82 [0.72 to 0.92]) than the continuous incentive group. Despite this, only 33% of practitioners reported 'always' varnishing increased risk 2-5-year-olds' teeth following introduction of the financial incentive, 19% for standard risk children. Domain scores at time 2 (adjusting for time 1) increased more for the novel incentive group (compared to the continuous incentive group) for five domains: knowledge, social/professional role and identity, beliefs about consequences, social influences and emotion. CONCLUSIONS In this large, prospective, population-wide study, a financial incentive moderately increased FVA in dental practice. Novel longitudinal use of a validated theoretical framework to understand behavioural mechanisms suggested that financial incentives operate through complex inter-linked belief systems. While financial incentives are useful in narrowing the gap between clinical guidelines and FVA, multiple intervention approaches are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Gnich
- Community Oral Health Section, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences (MVLS), University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK.
| | - Andrea Sherriff
- Community Oral Health Section, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences (MVLS), University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK
| | - Debbie Bonetti
- Dental Health Services Research Unit, Dundee Dental Education Centre, Frankland Building, Small's Wynd, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK
| | - David I Conway
- Community Oral Health Section, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences (MVLS), University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK
| | - Lorna M D Macpherson
- Community Oral Health Section, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences (MVLS), University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ghotane SG, Harrison V, Radcliffe E, Jones E, Gallagher JE. Enhanced skills in periodontology: evaluation of a pilot scheme for general dental practitioners and dental care professionals in London. Br Dent J 2018; 222:700-707. [PMID: 28496255 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Background The need for periodontal management is great and increasing; thus, the oral and dental workforce should be suitably equipped to deliver contemporary care. Health Education London developed a training scheme to extend the skills of dentists and dental care professionals (DCPs).Aim To examine the feasibility of assessing a skill-mix initiative established to enhance skills in clinical periodontology involving the views of patients, clinicians and key stakeholders, together with clinical and patient outcomes in London.Methods This mixed methods feasibility and pilot study involved four parallel elements: a postal questionnaire survey of patients; analysis of clinical logbooks; self-completion questionnaire survey of clinicians; and semi-structured interviews of key stakeholders, including clinicians.Results Twelve of the 19 clinicians participated in the evaluation, returning completed questionnaires (63%) and providing access to log diaries and patients. Periodontal data from 42 log-diary cases (1,103 teeth) revealed significant improvement in clinical outcomes (P = 0.001 for all). Eighty-four percent (N = 99) of the 142 patients returning a questionnaire reported improved dental health; however, responses from hospital patients greatly exceeded those from dental practice. Interviews (N = 22) provided evidence that the programme contributed to professional healthcare across four key domains: 'service', 'quality care', 'professional' and 'educational'. Clinicians, while supportive of the concept, raised concerns regarding the mismatch of their expectations and its educational and service outcomes.Discussion The findings suggest that it is feasible to deliver and evaluate inter-professional extended skills training for dentists and dental care professionals, and this may be evaluated using mixed methods to examine outcomes including clinical log diaries, patient questionnaires and stakeholder interviews. This inter-professional course represents a positive development for patient care using the expertise of different members of the dental team; however, its formal integration to the health and educational sectors require further consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S G Ghotane
- King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas's Hospitals, Division of Population and Patient Health, Denmark Hill Campus, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9RS
| | - V Harrison
- King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas's Hospitals, Division of Population and Patient Health, Denmark Hill Campus, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9RS.,King's College London DI
| | - E Radcliffe
- King's College London, Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Guy's Campus, Addison House, London, SE1 1UL
| | - E Jones
- London Dental Education and Training, Health Education England, Stewart House, 32 Russell Square, London, WC1B 5DN
| | - J E Gallagher
- King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas's Hospitals, Division of Population and Patient Health, Denmark Hill Campus, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9RS
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ross A, Sherriff A, Kidd J, Gnich W, Anderson J, Deas L, Macpherson L. A systems approach using the functional resonance analysis method to support fluoride varnish application for children attending general dental practice. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2018; 68:294-303. [PMID: 29409648 PMCID: PMC5817000 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Revised: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND All children attending General Dental Practice in Scotland are recommended to receive twice-yearly applications of sodium fluoride varnish to prevent childhood caries, yet application is variable. Development of complex interventions requires theorizing and modelling to understand context. This study applies the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to produce a sociotechnical systems model and identify opportunities for intervention to support application. METHODS The FRAM was used to synthesise data which were: routine monitoring of fluoride varnish application in 2015/16; a longitudinal survey with practitioners (n = 1090); in-depth practitioner and key informant interviews (n = 43); and a 'world café' workshop (n = 56). RESULTS We describe a detailed model of functions linked to application, and use this to make recommendations for system-wide intervention. CONCLUSIONS Rigorous research is required to produce accessible models of complex systems in healthcare. This novel paper shows how careful articulation of the functions associated with fluoride varnish application can support future improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Al Ross
- Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK.
| | - Andrea Sherriff
- Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK.
| | - Jamie Kidd
- Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK.
| | - Wendy Gnich
- Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK.
| | - Janet Anderson
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, UK.
| | - Leigh Deas
- Public Dental Services, NHS Lanarkshire, Hospital Street, Coatbridge, ML5 4DN, UK.
| | - Lorna Macpherson
- Glasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
A Competition between Care Teams Improved Recording of Diagnoses in Primary Dental Care: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study. Int J Dent 2017; 2017:3080957. [PMID: 29225624 PMCID: PMC5684576 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3080957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2017] [Revised: 09/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction A playful competition was launched in a primary dental health care system to improve the recording of diagnoses into an electronic patient chart system and to study what diagnoses were used in primary dental care. Methods This was a longitudinal follow-up study with public sector primary dental care practices in a Finnish city. A one-year-lasting playful competition between the dental care teams was launched and the monthly percentage of dentists' visits with recorded diagnosis before, during, and after the intervention was recorded. The assessed diagnoses were recorded with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Results Before the competition, the level of diagnosis recordings was practically zero. At the end of this intervention, about 25% of the visits had a recorded diagnosis. Two years after the competition, this percentage was 35% without any additional measures. The most frequent diagnoses were dental caries (K02, 38.6%), other diseases of hard tissues of teeth (K03, 14.8%), and diseases of pulp and periapical tissues (K04, 11.4%). Conclusions Commitment to the idea that recording of diagnoses was beneficial improved the recording of dental diagnoses. However, the diagnoses obtained did not accurately reflect the reputed prevalence of oral diseases in the Finnish population.
Collapse
|
29
|
Niederman R, Huang SS, Trescher AL, Listl S. Getting the Incentives Right: Improving Oral Health Equity With Universal School-Based Caries Prevention. Am J Public Health 2017; 107:S50-S55. [PMID: 28661798 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2016.303614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Despite significant financial, training, and program investments, US children's caries experience and inequities continued to increase over the last 20 years. We posit that (1) dental insurance payment systems are not aligned with the current best evidence, exacerbating inequities, and (2) system redesign could meet health care's triple aim and reduce children's caries by 80%. On the basis of 2013 to 2016 Medicaid and private payment rates and the caries prevention literature, we find that effective preventive interventions are either (1) consistently compensated less than ineffective interventions or (2) not compensated at all. This economic and clinical misalignment may account for underuse of effective caries prevention and subsequent overuse of restorative care. We propose universal school-based comprehensive caries prevention to address this misalignment. Preliminary modeling suggests that universal caries prevention could eliminate 80% of children's caries and cost less than one fifth of current Medicaid children's oral health spending. If implemented with bundled payments based on cycle of care and measurable outcomes, there would be an alignment of incentives, best evidence, care, and outcomes. Such a program would meet the Healthy People Oral Health goals for children, as well as health care's triple aim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Niederman
- Richard Niederman and Shulamite S. Huang are with the Department of Epidemiology & Health Promotion, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY. Anna-Lena Trescher and Stefan Listl are with the Translational Health Economics Group, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. Stefan Listl is also with the Department of Quality and Safety of Oral Health Care, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Shulamite S Huang
- Richard Niederman and Shulamite S. Huang are with the Department of Epidemiology & Health Promotion, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY. Anna-Lena Trescher and Stefan Listl are with the Translational Health Economics Group, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. Stefan Listl is also with the Department of Quality and Safety of Oral Health Care, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Anna-Lena Trescher
- Richard Niederman and Shulamite S. Huang are with the Department of Epidemiology & Health Promotion, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY. Anna-Lena Trescher and Stefan Listl are with the Translational Health Economics Group, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. Stefan Listl is also with the Department of Quality and Safety of Oral Health Care, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Stefan Listl
- Richard Niederman and Shulamite S. Huang are with the Department of Epidemiology & Health Promotion, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY. Anna-Lena Trescher and Stefan Listl are with the Translational Health Economics Group, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. Stefan Listl is also with the Department of Quality and Safety of Oral Health Care, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Herbst T, Emmert M. Characterization and effectiveness of pay-for-performance in ophthalmology: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:385. [PMID: 28583141 PMCID: PMC5460462 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2333-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2015] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To identify, characterize and compare existing pay-for-performance approaches and their impact on the quality of care and efficiency in ophthalmology. Methods A systematic evidence-based review was conducted. English, French and German written literature published between 2000 and 2015 were searched in the following databases: Medline (via PubMed), NCBI web site, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, Econlit and the Cochrane Library. Empirical as well as descriptive articles were included. Controlled clinical trials, meta-analyses, randomized controlled studies as well as observational studies were included as empirical articles. Systematic characterization of identified pay-for-performance approaches (P4P approaches) was conducted according to the “Model for Implementing and Monitoring Incentives for Quality” (MIMIQ). Methodological quality of empirical articles was assessed according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists. Results Overall, 13 relevant articles were included. Eleven articles were descriptive and two articles included empirical analyses. Based on these articles, four different pay-for-performance approaches implemented in the United States were identified. With regard to quality and incentive elements, systematic comparison showed numerous differences between P4P approaches. Empirical studies showed isolated cost or quality effects, while a simultaneous examination of these effects was missing. Conclusion Research results show that experiences with pay-for-performance approaches in ophthalmology are limited. Identified approaches differ with regard to quality and incentive elements restricting comparability. Two empirical studies are insufficient to draw strong conclusions about the effectiveness and efficiency of these approaches. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2333-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Herbst
- nordBLICK Augenklinik Bellevue, Lindenallee 21-23, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Martin Emmert
- Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, School of Business and Economics, Institute of Management (IFM), Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hill H, Birch S, Tickle M, McDonald R, Donaldson M, O'Carolan D, Brocklehurst P. Does capitation affect the delivery of oral healthcare and access to services? Evidence from a pilot contact in Northern Ireland. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:175. [PMID: 28264677 PMCID: PMC5339966 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2117-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In May 2009, the Northern Ireland government introduced General Dental Services (GDS) contracts based on capitation in dental practices newly set up by a corporate dental provider to promote access to dental care in populations that had previously struggled to secure service provision. Dental service provision forms an important component of general health services for the population, but the implications of health system financing on care delivered and the financial cost of services has received relatively little attention in the research literature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the policy effect capitation payment in recently started corporate practices had on the delivery of primary oral healthcare in Northern Ireland and access to services. Methods We analysed the policy initiative in Northern Ireland as a natural experiment to find the impact on healthcare delivery of the newly set up corporate practices that use a prospective capitation system to remunerate primary care dentists. Data was collected from GDS claim forms submitted to the Business Services Organisation (BSO) between April 2011 and October 2014. Health and Social Care Board (HSCB) practices operating within a capitation system were matched to a control group, who were remunerated using a retrospective fee-for-service system. Results No evidence of patient selection was found in the HSCB practices set up by a corporate provider and operated under capitation. However, patients were less likely to visit the dentist and received less treatment when they did attend, compared to those belonging to the control group (P < 0.05). The extent of preventive activity offered and the patient payment charge revenue did not differ between the two practice groups. Conclusion Although remunerating NHS primary care dentists in newly set up corporate practices using a prospective capitation system managed costs within healthcare, there is evidence that this policy may have reduced access to care of registered patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2117-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Hill
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. .,Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. .,Centre for Health Economics, Institute of Population Health Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Room 4.311, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Stephen Birch
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Martin Tickle
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Ruth McDonald
- Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | | | | | - Paul Brocklehurst
- NWORTH Clinical Trials Unit, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Interprofessional enhanced skills training in periodontology: a qualitative study of one London pilot. BDJ Open 2017; 3:17001. [PMID: 29607074 PMCID: PMC5831016 DOI: 10.1038/bdjopen.2017.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Revised: 11/16/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/AIMS: Health Education England (HEE) London developed an innovative 2-year pilot educational and training initiative for enhancing skills in periodontology for dentists and dental hygienists/therapists in 2011. This study explores the perceptions and experiences of those involved in initiating, designing, delivering and participating in this interprofessional approach to training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of key stakeholders including course participants (dentists and dental hygienists and/or therapists), education and training commissioners, and providers towards the end of the 2-year programme. Interviews, based on a topic guide informed by health services and policy literature, were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed based on framework methodology, using QSR NVivo 9 software to manage the data. RESULTS: Twenty-two people were interviewed. Although certain challenges were identified in designing, and teaching, a course bringing together different professional backgrounds and level of skills, the experiences of all key stakeholders were overwhelmingly positive relating to the concept. There was evidence of ‘creative interprofessional learning’, which led to ‘enhancing team working’, ‘enabling role recognition’ and ‘equipping participants for delivery of new models of care’. Recommendations emerged with regard to future training and wider health policy, and systems that will enable participants on future enhanced skills courses in periodontology to apply these skills in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The interprofessional approach to enhanced skills training in periodontology represents an important creative innovation to build capacity within the oral health workforce. This qualitative study has provided a useful insight into the benefits and tensions of an interprofessional model of training from the perspectives of different groups of key stakeholders and suggests its application to other areas of dentistry.
Collapse
|
33
|
Petersson GH, Twetman S. Relationship between risk assessment and payment models in Swedish Public Dental Service: a prospective study. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17:40. [PMID: 28077122 PMCID: PMC5225535 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-016-0327-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To a) compare risk categories in patients selecting a capitation payment (CP) model with those in fee-for-service (FFS), b) determine the 3-year caries increment in the two groups, and c) compare the amount of delivered preventive care in the two groups. Methods A comprehensive risk assessment was carried out in 1295 young adults attending eight Public Dental Clinics in the Scania region and 75% could be re-examined after 3 years; 615 had selected the CP model and 310 the traditional FFS. Caries was scored according to WHO and data concerning preventive care was extracted from the dental records. Results More patients in the low risk category preferred the CP model (74% vs. 26%) while >80% with high risk selected FFS. The baseline caries level was significantly higher in the FFS group as well as the 3-year caries increment (1.6 vs. 0.8 DFS: p < 0.05). The amount of additional preventive care delivered to each patient was generally lower in the FFS model; it was most frequent among patients with “some” risk in the CP model (83.8%) while the lowest delivery rates were found among low risk patients in the FFS system (32.4%). Conclusions Young adults in public dental care with low risk preferred the prepaid model while those in the higher risk categories selected fee-for-service. As more additional preventive care was delivered to patients in the subscribed care, oral health planners and decision makers should be aware of the fact that capitation payment models may enhance inequalities in dental health over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Svante Twetman
- Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Grytten J. Payment systems and incentives in dentistry. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2016; 45:1-11. [DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Accepted: 10/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jostein Grytten
- Department of Community Dentistry; University of Oslo; Oslo Norway
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jauhar P, Mossey PA, Popat H, Seehra J, Fleming PS. A survey of undergraduate orthodontic teaching and factors affecting pursuit of postgraduate training. Br Dent J 2016; 221:487-492. [PMID: 27767152 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Background Undergraduate orthodontic teaching has been focused on developing an understanding of occlusal development in an effort to equip practitioners to make appropriate referrals for specialist-delivered care. However, there is a growing interest among general dentists in delivering more specialised treatments, including short-term orthodontic alignment. This study aimed to assess the levels of knowledge of occlusal problems among final year undergraduate dental students, as well as their interest in various orthodontics techniques and training.Methods A 36-item electronic questionnaire was sent to all final year undergraduate students in four dental institutes in the UK (Barts and the London, Kings College London, Cardiff and Dundee). The questionnaire explored satisfaction with undergraduate orthodontic teaching; students' perception of knowledge, based on General Dental Council learning outcomes; perceptions of the need for specialist involvement in the management of dental problems; interest in further training in orthodontics; and potential barriers to undertaking specialist training.Results The overall response rate was 66% (239/362). The majority of students (84.1%) were aware of GDC guidance in terms of undergraduate teaching. Students reported a preference for case-based and practical teaching sessions in orthodontics, with less interest in lectures or problem-based learning approaches. A high percentage were interested in further teaching in interceptive orthodontics (60.3%) and fixed appliance therapy (55.7%). Further training including specialist orthodontic training (36.4%), Invisalign (59%) and Six Month Smiles (41%) courses appealed to undergraduates. Levels of student debt, course fees and geographical issues were seen as potential barriers to formal, specialist training pathways.Conclusions Satisfaction with undergraduate orthodontic teaching is high and interest in further training, including specialist training pathways, continues to be high. While short-term orthodontics is not taught at undergraduate level, there appears to be an appetite to undertake alternatives to conventional orthodontics among dental students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Jauhar
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AD
| | | | - H Popat
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne University, Australia
| | - J Seehra
- King's College London, Department of Orthodontics, Dental Institute, Strand, London, WC2T 2LS
| | - P S Fleming
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AD
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Leggett H, Duijster D, Douglas GVA, Eaton K, van der Heijden GJMG, O'Hanlon K, Whelton H, Listl S. Toward More Patient-Centered and Prevention-Oriented Oral Health Care: The ADVOCATE Project. JDR Clin Trans Res 2016; 2:5-9. [PMID: 30938642 DOI: 10.1177/2380084416668167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
ADVOCATE (Added Value for Oral Care) is a project funded by the European Commission's Horizon 2020 program, which aims to develop strategies for a system transition toward more patient-centered and prevention-oriented oral health care delivery within health care systems. This system should balance the restorative and preventive approaches in dental and oral health care. ADVOCATE is a partnership among 6 European Union member states, which involves collaboration among universities, state-funded health care providers, and private insurance companies in Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Aridhia, a biomedical informatics company based in Scotland. There are 6 interrelated work packages, which aim to address the following objectives: 1) in-depth evaluation of oral health care systems in European Union member states to identify best system designs for oral disease prevention, 2) development of a set of measures to provide information on oral care delivery and oral health outcomes, 3) evaluation of a feedback approach in dental practice that aims to facilitate a change toward preventive oral health care delivery, and 4) economic evaluation of strategies to promote preventive oral health care and development of policy recommendations for oral health care systems. The project is novel in its use of data that are routinely collected by health insurance organizations, as well as the engagement of key stakeholders from dental teams, insurers, patients, and policy makers in guiding the development and progress of the project. This article outlines in detail the objectives and research methodology of the ADVOCATE project and its anticipated impact. Knowledge Transfer Statement: This commentary describes the development of policy options to promote a greater focus on disease prevention in general dental practice. The approach builds on identifying the comparative effectiveness of alternative incentive schemes, as well as methods to monitor clinical and patient-derived measures of success in creating health for patients. The article describes the development and application of the measures and the evaluation of their success in orienting clinical practice more toward disease prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Leggett
- 1 School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D Duijster
- 2 Department of Social Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit University, and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G V A Douglas
- 1 School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - K Eaton
- 1 School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - G J M G van der Heijden
- 2 Department of Social Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit University, and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K O'Hanlon
- 3 Aridhia Informatics Ltd., Hobart House, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - H Whelton
- 1 School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S Listl
- 4 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Translational Health Economics Group, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.,5 Department of Quality and Safety of Oral Healthcare, Radboud University, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Brocklehurst P, O'Malley L, Hill H, Ozaki T, Nomura M, Matsuda R. The development and piloting of a leadership questionnaire for general dental practitioners: preliminary results from the North West of England and Tokyo. Br Dent J 2016; 217:E17. [PMID: 25377846 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Key reforms in England and Japan have called for greater clinical leadership from general dental practitioners to deliver improvements in the quality of care for patients. In England, the reorganisation of the National Health Service has led to the development of Local Professional Networks to ensure services are clinically led, patient and outcome focused. In Japan, the rapidly changing demographics have led to calls for general dental practitioners to become more active in meeting the emerging population health challenges. Both require engagement at a strategic and a local level. However, little is known about what is meant by clinical leadership in dentistry or what training needs exist. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot a questionnaire to understand what general dental practitioners feel is important about clinical leadership and how they rate themselves. METHODS A 61-item questionnaire was developed from the literature, an earlier qualitative study and refined through cognitive interviews. Questionnaires were distributed to general dental practitioners across the North West of England and Tokyo, using random sequence generation. For each item, the participant had to record whether they thought the statement was an important component of clinical leadership and how they rated themselves. Both were rated using a seven-point Likert scale. Data reduction was undertaken using principal component analysis to examine for factor loadings within the questionnaire. Differences in mean scores were also used to highlight substantive differences in how general dental practitioners rated the different components of leadership and how they rated themselves. RESULTS The response rate for the pilot was low (22.9% and 7.5% for North West and Tokyo respectively). The items that were considered to be important in leadership reduced to two components in the North West (accounting for 62.1% of the total variance): 'How to lead' and 'How not to lead'. In Tokyo, 56.4% of the total variance was explained by three components: 'Demonstrating personal qualities', 'Working with others' and 'How not to lead'. When the self-rated items were reduced, three factors were found to be important in the North West: 'Working with others', 'Setting direction' and 'Managing services' (55.1% of the variance). 'Working with others', 'Demonstrating personal qualities', 'Pragmatism', 'Setting direction' and 'Improving services' were found to be important in Tokyo (52.8% of the variance). The questionnaire items relating to integrity, team-working and having a positive attitude during difficult times were rated highly by both groups. Items relating to providing vision for team, being assertive and having a positive attitude had the greatest mean difference, suggesting possible areas of training need. CONCLUSION The nature of the pilot study and the poor response rate makes any conclusion difficult to infer. Among those that participated, leadership was understood to be more important at a practice level rather than at a strategic level. The questionnaire should be refined further based on the results of the pilot and the data reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Brocklehurst
- Department of Dental Public Health, University of Manchester
| | - L O'Malley
- Department of Dental Public Health, University of Manchester
| | - H Hill
- Department of Dental Public Health, University of Manchester
| | - T Ozaki
- Nihon University Dental School, Japan
| | | | - R Matsuda
- College of Social Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hulme C, Robinson PG, Saloniki EC, Vinall-Collier K, Baxter PD, Douglas G, Gibson B, Godson JH, Meads D, Pavitt SH. Shaping dental contract reform: a clinical and cost-effective analysis of incentive-driven commissioning for improved oral health in primary dental care. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e013549. [PMID: 27609858 PMCID: PMC5020665 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a new blended dental contract incentivising improved oral health compared with a traditional dental contract based on units of dental activity (UDAs). DESIGN Non-randomised controlled study. SETTING Six UK primary care dental practices, three working under a new blended dental contract; three matched practices under a traditional contract. PARTICIPANTS 550 new adult patients. INTERVENTIONS A new blended/incentive-driven primary care dentistry contract and service delivery model versus the traditional contract based on UDAs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was as follows: percentage of sites with gingival bleeding on probing. Secondary outcomes were as follows: extracted and filled teeth (%), caries (International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS)), oral health-related quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14)). Incremental cost-effective ratios used OHIP-14 and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-3L. RESULTS At 24 months, 291/550 (53%) patients returned for final assessment; those lost to follow-up attended 6.46 appointments on average (SD 4.80). The primary outcome favoured patients in the blended contract group. Extractions and fillings were more frequent in this group. Blended contracts were financially attractive for the dental provider but carried a higher cost for the service commissioner. Differences in generic health-related quality of life were negligible. Positive changes over time in oral health-related quality of life in both groups were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS This is the first UK study to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a blended contract in primary care dentistry. Although the primary outcome favoured the blended contract, the results are limited because 47% patients did not attend at 24 months. This is consistent with 39% of adults not being regular attenders and 27% only visiting their dentist when they have a problem. Promotion of appropriate attendance, especially among those with high need, necessitates being factored into recruitment strategies of future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hulme
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - P G Robinson
- School of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - E C Saloniki
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - P D Baxter
- Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - G Douglas
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - B Gibson
- Unit of Dental Public Health, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - J H Godson
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D Meads
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S H Pavitt
- Director of the Dental Translational and Clinical Research Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Brocklehurst P, Birch S, McDonald R, Hill H, O’Malley L, Macey R, Tickle M. Determining the optimal model for role substitution in NHS dental services in the UK: a mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundMaximising health gain for a given level and mix of resources is an ethical imperative for health-service planners. Approximately half of all patients who attend a regular NHS dental check-up do not require any further treatment, whereas many in the population do not regularly attend. Thus, the most expensive resource (the dentist) is seeing healthy patients at a time when many of those with disease do not access care. Role substitution in NHS dentistry, where other members of the dental team undertake the clinical tasks previously provided by dentists, has the potential to increase efficiency and the capacity to care and lower costs. However, no studies have empirically investigated the efficiency of NHS dental provision that makes use of role substitution.Research questionsThis programme of research sought to address three research questions: (1) what is the efficiency of NHS dental teams that make use of role substitution?; (2) what are the barriers to, and facilitators of, role substitution in NHS dental practices?; and (3) how do incentives in the remuneration systems influence the organisation of these inputs and production of outputs in the NHS?DesignData envelopment analysis was used to develop a productive efficiency frontier for participating NHS practices, which were then compared on a relative basis, after controlling for patient and practice characteristics. External validity was tested using stochastic frontier modelling, while semistructured interviews explored the views of participating dental teams and their patients to role substitution.SettingNHS ‘high-street’ general dental practices.Participants121 practices across the north of England.InterventionsNo active interventions were undertaken.Main outcome measuresRelative efficiency of participating NHS practices, alongside a detailed narrative of their views about role substitution dentistry. Social acceptability for patients.ResultsThe utilisation of non-dentist roles in NHS practices was relatively low, the most common role type being the dental hygienist. Increasing the number of non-dentist team members reduced efficiency. However, it was not possible to determine the relative efficiency of individual team members, as the NHS contracts only with dentists. Financial incentives in the NHS dental contract and the views of practice principals (i.e. senior staff members) were equally important. Bespoke payment and referral systems were required to make role substitution economically viable. Many non-dentist team members were not being used to their full scope of practice and constraints on their ability to prescribe reduced efficiency further. Many non-dentist team members experienced a precarious existence, commonly being employed at multiple practices. Patients had a low level of awareness of the different non-dentist roles in a dental team. Many exhibited an inherent trust in the professional ‘system’, but prior experience of role substitution was important for social acceptability.ConclusionsBetter alignment between the financial incentives within the NHS dental contract and the use of role substitution is required, although professional acceptability remains critical.Study limitationsOutput data collected did not reflect the quality of care provided by the dental team and the input data were self-reported.Future workFurther work is required to improve the evidence base for the use of role substitution in NHS dentistry, exploring the effects and costs of provision.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen Birch
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ruth McDonald
- Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Harry Hill
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lucy O’Malley
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Macey
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Martin Tickle
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hulme C, Robinson P, Douglas G, Baxter P, Gibson B, Godson J, Vinall-Collier K, Saloniki E, Meads D, Brunton P, Pavitt S. The INCENTIVE study: a mixed-methods evaluation of an innovation in commissioning and delivery of primary dental care compared with traditional dental contracting. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundOver the past decade, commissioning of primary care dentistry has seen contract currency evolving from payment for units of dental activity (UDAs) towards blended contracts that include key performance indicators such as access, quality and improved health outcome.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate a blended/incentive-driven model of dental service provision. To (1) explore stakeholder perspectives of the new service delivery model; (2) assess the effectiveness of the new service delivery model in reducing the risk of and amount of dental disease and enhancing oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL) in patients; and (3) assess cost-effectiveness of the new service delivery model.MethodsUsing a mixed-methods approach, the study included three dental practices working under the blended/incentive-driven (incentive) contract and three working under the UDAs (traditional) contract. All were based in West Yorkshire. The qualitative study reports on the meaning of key aspects of the model for three stakeholder groups [lay people (patients and individuals without a dentist), commissioners and the primary care dental teams], with framework analysis of focus group and semistructured interview data. A non-randomised study compared clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatment under the two contracts. The primary outcome was gingivitis, measured using bleeding on probing. Secondary outcomes included OHQoL and cost-effectiveness.ResultsParticipants in the qualitative study associated the incentive contract with more access, greater use of skill mix and improved health outcomes. In the quantitative analyses, of 550 participants recruited, 291 attended baseline and follow-up. Given missing data and following quality assurance, 188 were included in the bleeding on probing analysis, 187 in the caries assessment and 210 in the economic analysis. The results were mixed. The primary outcome favoured the incentive practices, whereas the assessment of caries favoured the traditional practices. Incentive practices attracted a higher cost for the service commissioner, but were financially attractive for the dental provider at the practice level. Differences in generic health-related quality of life were negligible. Positive changes over time in OHQoL in both groups were statistically significant.LimitationsThe results of the quantitative analysis should be treated with caution given small sample numbers, reservations about the validity of pooling, differential dropout results and data quality issues.ConclusionsA large proportion of people in this study who had access to a dentist did not follow up on oral care. These individuals are more likely to be younger males and have poorer oral health. Although access to dental services was increased, this did not appear to facilitate continued use of services.Future workFurther research is required to understand how best to promote and encourage appropriate dental service attendance, especially among those with a high level of need, to avoid increasing health inequalities, and to assess the financial impact of the contract. For dental practitioners, there are challenges around perceptions about preventative dentistry and use of the risk assessments and care pathways. Changes in skill mix pose further challenges.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Hulme
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Robinson
- School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Gail Douglas
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Baxter
- Division of Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Barry Gibson
- School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jenny Godson
- Division of Population Health and Care, Health and Wellbeing Directorate, Public Health England, London, UK
| | | | - Eirini Saloniki
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David Meads
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Brunton
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sue Pavitt
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Richardson M, Garner P, Donegan S. Cluster Randomised Trials in Cochrane Reviews: Evaluation of Methodological and Reporting Practice. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0151818. [PMID: 26982697 PMCID: PMC4794236 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2016] [Accepted: 03/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Systematic reviews can include cluster-randomised controlled trials (C-RCTs), which require different analysis compared with standard individual-randomised controlled trials. However, it is not known whether review authors follow the methodological and reporting guidance when including these trials. The aim of this study was to assess the methodological and reporting practice of Cochrane reviews that included C-RCTs against criteria developed from existing guidance. Methods Criteria were developed, based on methodological literature and personal experience supervising review production and quality. Criteria were grouped into four themes: identifying, reporting, assessing risk of bias, and analysing C-RCTs. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was searched (2nd December 2013), and the 50 most recent reviews that included C-RCTs were retrieved. Each review was then assessed using the criteria. Results The 50 reviews we identified were published by 26 Cochrane Review Groups between June 2013 and November 2013. For identifying C-RCTs, only 56% identified that C-RCTs were eligible for inclusion in the review in the eligibility criteria. For reporting C-RCTs, only eight (24%) of the 33 reviews reported the method of cluster adjustment for their included C-RCTs. For assessing risk of bias, only one review assessed all five C-RCT-specific risk-of-bias criteria. For analysing C-RCTs, of the 27 reviews that presented unadjusted data, only nine (33%) provided a warning that confidence intervals may be artificially narrow. Of the 34 reviews that reported data from unadjusted C-RCTs, only 13 (38%) excluded the unadjusted results from the meta-analyses. Conclusions The methodological and reporting practices in Cochrane reviews incorporating C-RCTs could be greatly improved, particularly with regard to analyses. Criteria developed as part of the current study could be used by review authors or editors to identify errors and improve the quality of published systematic reviews incorporating C-RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marty Richardson
- Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Paul Garner
- Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Donegan
- Department of Biostatistics, Block F Waterhouse Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Birch S. Paying for prevention in clinical practice: Aligning provider remuneration with system objectives. BMC Oral Health 2015; 15 Suppl 1:S7. [PMID: 26390928 PMCID: PMC4580826 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-s1-s7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence on the efficacy of preventive procedures in oral health care has not been matched by uptake of prevention in clinical practice. Reducing oral disease in the population reduces the size of the future market for treatment. Hence a provider's intention to adopt prevention in clinical practice may be offset by the financial implications of such behaviour. Effective prevention may therefore depend upon prevention-friendly methods of remuneration if providers are to be rewarded appropriately for doing what the system expects them to do. This paper considers whether changing the way providers are paid for delivering care can be expected to change the utilisation of preventive care in the population in terms of the proportion of the population receiving preventive care, the distribution of preventive care in the population and the pattern of preventive care received. A conceptual framework is presented that identifies the determinants of rewards under different approaches to provider remuneration. The framework is applied to develop recommendations for paying for prevention in clinical practice. Literature on provider payment in dental care is reviewed to assess the evidence base for the effects of changing payment methods, identify gaps in the evidence-base and inform the design of future research on dental remuneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Birch
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Canada
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Brocklehurst P, Macey R. Skill-mix in preventive dental practice--will it help address need in the future? BMC Oral Health 2015; 15 Suppl 1:S10. [PMID: 26391730 PMCID: PMC4580825 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-s1-s10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population health needs are changing. The levels of dental caries and periodontal disease across the population as a whole is falling. The proportion of adults with a functional dentition in many developed countries has increased substantially and edentulous rates have dropped to some of their lowest levels. Despite this, a pronounced social gradient still exists, many adults do not attend dental services regularly and disease in young children remains intransigent amongst the poorest. New challenges are emerging too as the growing number of older people, above sixty-five years of age, retain their teeth. METHODS Ensuring "the right number of people with the right skills are in the right place at the right time to provide the right services to the right people" is critical for future dental service provision, both to meet the new challenges ahead and to ensure future services are cost-effective, efficient and reduce health-inequalities. Greater use of "skill-mix" models could have a substantial role in the future, as dentistry moves from a "cure" to a "care" culture. DISCUSSION The provision of dental services in many countries currently adopts a "one-size-fits-all", where the dentist is the main care-giver and the emphasis is on intervention. As needs change in the future, the whole of the dental team should be utilised to deliver primary, secondary and tertiary prevention in an integrated model. Growing evidence suggests that other members of the dental team are effective in providing care, but introducing this paradigm shift is not without its challenges. The provision of incentives within funding systems and social acceptability are amongst the key determinants in producing a service that is responsive to need, improves access and delivers equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Brocklehurst
- NWORTH, Y Wern, The Normal Site, Bangor University, Holyhead Road, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Richard Macey
- School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Affiliation(s)
- Liying Jia
- Shandong University; Center for Health Management and Policy, Key Lab for Health Economics and Policy Research, Ministry of Health; Jinan Shandong China 250012
- Ministry of Health; Key Lab for Health Economics and Policy Research; Shandong China
| | - Beibei Yuan
- Peking University; China Center for Health Development Studies (CCHDS); 38 Xueyuan Road Beijing Beijing China 100191
| | - Qingyue Meng
- Peking University; China Center for Health Development Studies (CCHDS); 38 Xueyuan Road Beijing Beijing China 100191
| | - Anthony Scott
- The University of Melbourne; Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research; Level 7, Alan Gilbert Building Barry Street Carlton, Melbourne VIC Australia 3053
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Malone A, Conway DI. Payment methods may influence behaviour of primary care dentists. Evid Based Dent 2015; 16:4-5. [PMID: 25909927 DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
DATA SOURCES The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase, EconLit the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) and the Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED). STUDY SELECTION Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled clinical trials (NRCTs), controlled before-after (CBA) studies and interrupted time series (ITS) studies were considered. Study selection was undertaken independently by three reviewers. Fee-for-service payments, fixed salary payments, capitation payments of combinations thereof included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Standard Cochrane methodological procedures were followed. RESULTS Two cluster-RCTs, with data from 503 dental practices, representing 821 dentists and 4771 patients, met the selection criteria. The risk of bias for the two studies was considered to be high and the overall quality of evidence for the outcomes was low/very low for all outcomes, as assessed using the GRADE approach.One study conducted in the four most deprived areas of Scotland used a factorial design to investigate the impact of fee-for-service and an educational intervention on the placement of fissure sealants. The authors reported a statistically significant increase in clinical activity in the arm that was incentivised with a fee-for-service payment. Measures of health service utilisation or patient outcomes were not reported. The second study used a parallel group design undertaken over a three-year period to compare the impact of capitation payments with fee-for-service payments on primary care dentists' clinical activity. The study reported on measures of clinical activity, patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Teeth were restored at a later stage in the disease process in the capitation system and the clinicians tended to see their patients less frequently and tended to carry out fewer fillings and extractions, but also tended to give more preventive advice.There was insufficient information regarding the cost-effectiveness of the different remuneration methods. CONCLUSIONS Financial incentives within remuneration systems may produce changes to clinical activity undertaken by primary care dentists. However, the number of included studies is limited and the quality of the evidence from the two included studies was low/very low for all outcomes. Further experimental research in this area is highly recommended given the potential impact of financial incentives on clinical activity, and particular attention should be paid to the impact this has on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ailsa Malone
- Glasgow Dental Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cunha-Cruz J, Milgrom P, Shirtcliff RM, Bailit HL, Huebner CE, Conrad D, Ludwig S, Mitchell M, Dysert J, Allen G, Scott J, Mancl L. Population-centered Risk- and Evidence-based Dental Interprofessional Care Team (PREDICT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16:278. [PMID: 26091669 PMCID: PMC4475615 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0786-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2015] [Accepted: 05/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To improve the oral health of low-income children, innovations in dental delivery systems are needed, including community-based care, the use of expanded duty auxiliary dental personnel, capitation payments, and global budgets. This paper describes the protocol for PREDICT (Population-centered Risk- and Evidence-based Dental Interprofessional Care Team), an evaluation project to test the effectiveness of new delivery and payment systems for improving dental care and oral health. Methods/Design This is a parallel-group cluster randomized controlled trial. Fourteen rural Oregon counties with a publicly insured (Medicaid) population of 82,000 children (0 to 21 years old) and pregnant women served by a managed dental care organization are randomized into test and control counties. In the test intervention (PREDICT), allied dental personnel provide screening and preventive services in community settings and case managers serve as patient navigators to arrange referrals of children who need dentist services. The delivery system intervention is paired with a compensation system for high performance (pay-for-performance) with efficient performance monitoring. PREDICT focuses on the following: 1) identifying eligible children and gaining caregiver consent for services in community settings (for example, schools); 2) providing risk-based preventive and caries stabilization services efficiently at these settings; 3) providing curative care in dental clinics; and 4) incentivizing local delivery teams to meet performance benchmarks. In the control intervention, care is delivered in dental offices without performance incentives. The primary outcome is the prevalence of untreated dental caries. Other outcomes are related to process, structure and cost. Data are collected through patient and staff surveys, clinical examinations, and the review of health and administrative records. Discussion If effective, PREDICT is expected to substantially reduce disparities in dental care and oral health. PREDICT can be disseminated to other care organizations as publicly insured clients are increasingly served by large practice organizations. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02312921 6 December 2014. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Advantage Dental Services, LLC, are supporting the evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Cunha-Cruz
- Department of Oral Health Sciences, Northwest Center to Reduce Oral Health Disparities, University of Washington, Box 357475, Seattle, WA, 98195-7475, USA.
| | - Peter Milgrom
- Department of Oral Health Sciences, Northwest Center to Reduce Oral Health Disparities, University of Washington, Box 357475, Seattle, WA, 98195-7475, USA.
| | - R Michael Shirtcliff
- Advantage Dental Services, LLC, 442 SW Umatilla Ave, Suite 200, Redmond, OR, 97756, USA.
| | - Howard L Bailit
- Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, UConn Health, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT, 06030-6325, USA.
| | - Colleen E Huebner
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Box 357230, Seattle, WA, 98195-7230, USA.
| | - Douglas Conrad
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Box 357230, Seattle, WA, 98195-7230, USA.
| | - Sharity Ludwig
- Advantage Dental Services, LLC, 442 SW Umatilla Ave, Suite 200, Redmond, OR, 97756, USA.
| | - Melissa Mitchell
- Advantage Dental Services, LLC, 442 SW Umatilla Ave, Suite 200, Redmond, OR, 97756, USA.
| | - Jeanne Dysert
- Advantage Dental Services, LLC, 442 SW Umatilla Ave, Suite 200, Redmond, OR, 97756, USA.
| | - Gary Allen
- Advantage Dental Services, LLC, 442 SW Umatilla Ave, Suite 200, Redmond, OR, 97756, USA.
| | - JoAnna Scott
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Washington, Box 354915, Seattle, WA, 98195-4915, USA.
| | - Lloyd Mancl
- Department of Oral Health Sciences, Northwest Center to Reduce Oral Health Disparities, University of Washington, Box 357475, Seattle, WA, 98195-7475, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mejàre IA, Klingberg G, Mowafi FK, Stecksén-Blicks C, Twetman SHA, Tranæus SH. A systematic map of systematic reviews in pediatric dentistry--what do we really know? PLoS One 2015; 10:e0117537. [PMID: 25706629 PMCID: PMC4338212 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/26/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To identify, appraise and summarize existing knowledge and knowledge gaps in practice-relevant questions in pediatric dentistry. Methods A systematic mapping of systematic reviews was undertaken for domains considered important in daily clinical practice. The literature search covered questions in the following domains: behavior management problems/dental anxiety; caries risk assessment and caries detection including radiographic technologies; prevention and non-operative treatment of caries in primary and young permanent teeth; operative treatment of caries in primary and young permanent teeth; prevention and treatment of periodontal disease; management of tooth developmental and mineralization disturbances; prevention and treatment of oral conditions in children with chronic diseases/developmental disturbances/obesity; diagnosis, prevention and treatment of dental erosion and tooth wear; treatment of traumatic injuries in primary and young permanent teeth and cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Abstracts and full text reviews were assessed independently by two reviewers and any differences were solved by consensus. AMSTAR was used to assess the risk of bias of each included systematic review. Reviews judged as having a low or moderate risk of bias were used to formulate existing knowledge and knowledge gaps. Results Out of 81 systematic reviews meeting the inclusion criteria, 38 were judged to have a low or moderate risk of bias. Half of them concerned caries prevention. The quality of evidence was high for a caries-preventive effect of daily use of fluoride toothpaste and moderate for fissure sealing with resin-based materials. For the rest the quality of evidence for the effects of interventions was low or very low. Conclusion There is an urgent need for primary clinical research of good quality in most clinically-relevant domains in pediatric dentistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingegerd A. Mejàre
- Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment, Stockholm, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| | - Gunilla Klingberg
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Frida K. Mowafi
- Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christina Stecksén-Blicks
- Department of Odontology, Section for Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Svante H. A. Twetman
- Department of Odontology, Section for Cariology, Endodontics, Pediatric Dentistry and Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sofia H. Tranæus
- Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Suga USG, Terada RSS, Ubaldini ALM, Fujimaki M, Pascotto RC, Batilana AP, Pietrobon R, Vissoci JRN, Rodrigues CG. Factors that drive dentists towards or away from dental caries preventive measures: systematic review and metasummary. PLoS One 2014; 9:e107831. [PMID: 25296335 PMCID: PMC4189795 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2013] [Accepted: 08/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dental caries is a serious public health concern. The high cost of dental treatment can be avoided by effective preventive measures, which are dependent on dentists' adherence. This study aimed to evaluate the factors that drive dentists towards or away from dental caries preventive measures. METHODS AND FINDINGS This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42012002235). Several databases as well as the reference lists and citations of the included publications were searched according to PRISMA guidelines, yielding 18,276 titles and abstracts, which were assessed to determine study eligibility. Seven qualitative studies and 41 surveys (36,501 participants) remained after data extraction and interpretation. A total of 43 findings were abstracted from the reports and were grouped together into 6 categories that were judged to be topically similar: education and training, personal beliefs, work conditions, remuneration, gender, place of residence and patients. The main findings for adherence based on their calculated frequency effect sizes (ES) were teamwork (21%) and post-graduation (12%), while for non-adherence were biologicism (27%), and remuneration for preventive procedures (25%). Intensity ES were also calculated and demonstrated low prevalence of the findings. Quality assessment of the studies demonstrated that the methodological quality, particularly of surveys, varied widely among studies. CONCLUSIONS Despite the questionable quality of the included reports, the evidence that emerged seems to indicate that further education and training coupled with a fairer pay scheme would be a reasonable approach to change the balance in favor of the provision of dental caries preventive measures by dentists. The results of this review could be of value in the planning and decision making processes aimed at encouraging changes in professional dental practice that could result in the improvement of the oral health care provided to the population in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Mitsue Fujimaki
- Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil
| | | | - Adelia Portero Batilana
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Ricardo Pietrobon
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - João Ricardo N. Vissoci
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Faculdade Ingá, Maringá, Brazil
| | - Clarissa G. Rodrigues
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul - Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (IC-FUC), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Brocklehurst P, Birch S, McDonald R, Tickle M. Determining the optimal model for role-substitution in NHS dental services in the United Kingdom. BMC Oral Health 2013; 13:46. [PMID: 24063247 PMCID: PMC3849722 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2013] [Accepted: 09/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Role-substitution describes a model of dental care where Dental Care Professionals (DCPs) provide some of the clinical activity previously undertaken by General Dental Practitioners. This has the potential to increase technical efficiency, the capacity to care and reduce costs. Technical efficiency is defined as the production of the maximum amount of output from a given amount of input so that the service operates at the production frontier i.e. optimal level of productivity. Academic research into technical efficiency is becoming increasingly utilised in health care, although no studies have investigated the efficiency of NHS dentistry or role-substitution in high-street dental practices. The aim of this study is to examine the barriers and enablers that exist for role-substitution in general dental practices in the NHS and to determine the most technically efficient model for role-substitution. Methods/design A screening questionnaire will be sent to DCPs to determine the type and location of role-substitutive models employed in NHS dental practices in the United Kingdom (UK). Semi-structured interviews will then be conducted with practice owners, DCPs and patients at selected sites identified by the questionnaire. Detail will be recorded about the organisational structure of the dental team, the number of NHS hours worked and the clinical activity undertaken. The interviews will continue until saturation and will record the views and attitudes of the members of the dental team. Final numbers of interviews will be determined by saturation. The second work-stream will examine the technical efficiency of the selected practices using Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Modeling. The former is a non-parametric technique and is considered to be a highly flexible approach for applied health applications. The latter is parametric and is based on frontier regression models that estimate a conventional cost function. Discussion Maximising health for a given level and mix of resources is an ethical imperative for health service planners. This study will determine the technical efficiency of role-substitution and so address one of the key recommendations of the Independent Review of NHS dentistry in England.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Brocklehurst
- School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|