1
|
Celis J, Ringborg U. From the creation of the European research area in 2000 to a Mission on cancer in Europe in 2021-lessons learned and implications. Mol Oncol 2024; 18:785-792. [PMID: 38468400 PMCID: PMC10994226 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
In the year 2000, cancer research in Europe had the potential to make a difference as it had several unique strengths, such as a strong foundation in biomedical science, good patient registries, infrastructures that spanned from biological repositories to bioinformatic hubs as well as thriving Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) and basic/preclinical cancer research institutions of high international standing. Research, however, was fragmented and lacked coordination. As a result, Europe could not harness its potential for translating basic research discoveries into a clinical setting for the patients' benefit. What was needed was a paradigm shift in cancer research that addressed the translational research continuum. Along these lines, in 2000, European Union (EU) Commissioner Philippe Busquin established the European Research Area (ERA) and in 2002 the European Cancer Research Area (ECRA), and their political approval was a powerful catalyst for the increased involvement of scientists in science policy in the EU. In this report, we briefly describe the actions embraced by the cancer community and cancer organizations in response to Busquin's proposals that led to the creation of the EU Mission on Cancer (MoC) in Horizon 2020 in 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio Celis
- Danish Cancer SocietyCopenhagenDenmark
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
| | - Ulrik Ringborg
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Cancer Center KarolinskaKarolinska University Hospital SolnaStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ringborg U, von Braun J, Celis J, Baumann M, Berns A, Eggermont A, Heard E, Heitor M, Chandy M, Chen C, Costa A, De Lorenzo F, De Robertis EM, Dubee FC, Ernberg I, Gabriel M, Helland Å, Henrique R, Jönsson B, Kallioniemi O, Korbel J, Krause M, Lowy DR, Michielin O, Nagy P, Oberst S, Paglia V, Parker MI, Ryan K, Sawyers CL, Schüz J, Silkaitis K, Solary E, Thomas D, Turkson P, Weiderpass E, Yang H. Strategies to decrease inequalities in cancer therapeutics, care and prevention: Proceedings on a conference organized by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the European Academy of Cancer Sciences, Vatican City, February 23-24, 2023. Mol Oncol 2024; 18:245-279. [PMID: 38135904 PMCID: PMC10850793 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Analyses of inequalities related to prevention and cancer therapeutics/care show disparities between countries with different economic standing, and within countries with high Gross Domestic Product. The development of basic technological and biological research provides clinical and prevention opportunities that make their implementation into healthcare systems more complex, mainly due to the growth of Personalized/Precision Cancer Medicine (PCM). Initiatives like the USA-Cancer Moonshot and the EU-Mission on Cancer and Europe's Beating Cancer Plan are initiated to boost cancer prevention and therapeutics/care innovation and to mitigate present inequalities. The conference organized by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences in collaboration with the European Academy of Cancer Sciences discussed the inequality problem, dependent on the economic status of a country, the increasing demands for infrastructure supportive of innovative research and its implementation in healthcare and prevention programs. Establishing translational research defined as a coherent cancer research continuum is still a challenge. Research has to cover the entire continuum from basic to outcomes research for clinical and prevention modalities. Comprehensive Cancer Centres (CCCs) are of critical importance for integrating research innovations to preclinical and clinical research, as for ensuring state-of-the-art patient care within healthcare systems. International collaborative networks between CCCs are necessary to reach the critical mass of infrastructures and patients for PCM research, and for introducing prevention modalities and new treatments effectively. Outcomes and health economics research are required to assess the cost-effectiveness of new interventions, currently a missing element in the research portfolio. Data sharing and critical mass are essential for innovative research to develop PCM. Despite advances in cancer research, cancer incidence and prevalence is growing. Making cancer research infrastructures accessible for all patients, considering the increasing inequalities, requires science policy actions incentivizing research aimed at prevention and cancer therapeutics/care with an increased focus on patients' needs and cost-effective healthcare.
Collapse
|
3
|
Schmutz A, Matta M, Cairat M, Espina C, Schüz J, Kampman E, Ervik M, Vineis P, Kelm O. Mapping the European cancer prevention research landscape: A case for more prevention research funding. Eur J Cancer 2023; 195:113378. [PMID: 37924646 PMCID: PMC10697826 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
Despite the strong evidence of prevention as a prime defence against the disease, the majority of cancer research investment continues to be made in basic science and clinical translational research. Little quantitative data is available to guide decisions on the choice of research priorities or the allocation of research resources. The primary aim of the mapping of the European cancer prevention research landscape presented in this paper is to provide the evidence-base to inform future investments in cancer research. Using bibliometric data to identify funders that are active in prevention research in Europe and in the world, we have identified that 14% of cancer research papers had a focus on prevention research and those were funded by 16% of all the European cancer research funders. An important finding of our study is the lack of research on primary prevention with primary prevention funders accounting for 25% of European cancer prevention funders, meaning that less than 4% of all European cancer research funders identified show an interest in primary prevention. An additional analysis revealed that 7% of European cancer prevention research papers are categorised as implementation projects, meaning that only 1% of all cancer research publications are implementation research in cancer prevention. This paper highlights that the narrow focus on biology and treatment in Europe needs to be widened to include such areas as primary prevention and secondary prevention and a larger concentration on implementation research. These data can help support a more policy-focused cancer research agenda for individual European governments and charitable and philanthropic organisations and stimulate joining efforts across Europe to create a more systematic and structured approach to cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Schmutz
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Resource Mobilization Office, 25 Avenue Tony Garnier CS 90627, 69366 Lyon CEDEX 07, France.
| | - Michele Matta
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, 25 Avenue Tony Garnier CS 90627, 69366 Lyon CEDEX 07, France
| | - Manon Cairat
- Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations (CESP), U1018, INSERM, Hôpital Paul Brousse Bat 15/16, 16 Av PV Couturier, 94807 Villejuif Cedex, France
| | - Carolina Espina
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, 25 Avenue Tony Garnier CS 90627, 69366 Lyon CEDEX 07, France
| | - Joachim Schüz
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, 25 Avenue Tony Garnier CS 90627, 69366 Lyon CEDEX 07, France
| | - Ellen Kampman
- Wageningen University, PO Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Morten Ervik
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Cancer Surveillance Branch, 25 Avenue Tony Garnier CS 90627, 69366 Lyon CEDEX 07, France
| | - Paolo Vineis
- MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Olaf Kelm
- International Human Frontier Science Program Organization (HFSPO), 67000 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baumann M, Celis J, Ringborg U, Heitor M, Berns A, Albreht T, Arabadjiev J, Boutros M, Brandenburg M, Canhao H, Carneiro F, Chomienne C, De Lorenzo F, Eggermont AMM, Font A, Garralda E, Goulart M, Henrique R, Lawler M, Maier‐Hein L, Meunier F, Oberst S, Oliveira P, Papatriantafyllou M, Schüz J, Solary E, Valencia A, Vargas R, Weiderpass E, Wilking N. Engaging European society at the forefront of cancer research and care: How discussions at the 5 th Gago Conference on European Science policy led to the Heidelberg Manifesto. Mol Oncol 2023; 17:925-945. [PMID: 36938773 PMCID: PMC10257409 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
European cancer research stakeholders met in October 2022 in Heidelberg, Germany, at the 5th Gago conference on European Cancer Policy, to discuss the current cancer research and cancer care policy landscape in Europe. Meeting participants highlighted gaps in the existing European programmes focusing on cancer research, including Europe's Beating Cancer Plan (EBCP), the Mission on Cancer (MoC), Understanding Cancer (UNCAN.eu), and the joint action CRANE, and put forward the next priorities, in the form of the Heidelberg Manifesto for cancer research. This meeting report presents all discussions that shed light on how infrastructures can be effectively shaped for translational, prevention, clinical and outcomes cancer research, with a focus on implementation and sustainability and while engaging patients and the public. In addition, we summarize recommendations on how to introduce frameworks for the digitalization of European cancer research. Finally, we discuss what structures, commitment, and resources are needed to establish a collaborative cancer research environment in Europe to achieve the scale required for innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baumann
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
| | - Julio Celis
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- Danish Cancer Society Research CenterCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Ulrik Ringborg
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- Cancer Center KarolinskaKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Manuel Heitor
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, IN+ @ IS TécnicoUniversity of LisbonPortugal
| | - Anton Berns
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- The Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Tit Albreht
- National Institute of Public Health of SloveniaLjubljanaSlovenia
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of LjubljanaSlovenia
| | - Jeliazko Arabadjiev
- Clinic of Medical OncologyUniversity Hospital Acibadem City Clinic TokudaSofiaBulgaria
- Bulgarian Scientific Society of Immuno‐oncology, and MoC BoardSofiaBulgaria
| | - Michael Boutros
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- Division Signaling and Functional GenomicsGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Heidelberg UniversityGermany
- DKFZ‐Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center MannheimGermany
| | | | - Helena Canhao
- Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA Medical SchoolUniversidade Nova de LisboaPortugal
| | - Fatima Carneiro
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto (Ipatimup)Portugal
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (FMUP)Portugal
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João (CHUSJ)PortoPortugal
| | | | - Francesco De Lorenzo
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- European Cancer Patient CoalitionBrusselsBelgium
| | - Alexander M. M. Eggermont
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- Department Cancer MedicineCSO Princess Máxima Centre Pediatric Oncology, University Medical Center UtrechtThe Netherlands
- Board of the Comprehensive Cancer Center MunichTechnical University MunichGermany
- Ludwig Maximiliaan UniversityMunichGermany
| | | | - Elena Garralda
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)BarcelonaSpain
- Cancer Core EuropeAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Rui Henrique
- Department of Pathology & Cancer Biology & Epigenetics Group – Research Center of IPO Porto (CI‐IPOP)/RISE@CI‐IPOP (Health Research Network)Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO‐Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Centre Raquel Seruca (P.CCC Raquel Seruca)Portugal
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, School of Medicine & Biomedical SciencesUniversity of Porto (ICBAS‐UP)Portugal
| | - Mark Lawler
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- FRCPath Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life SciencesQueen's University BelfastUK
| | - Lena Maier‐Hein
- Intelligent Medical Systems (IMSY)German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Francoise Meunier
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- Belgian Royal Academy of MedicineBrusselsBelgium
| | - Simon Oberst
- Quality and AccreditationOrganisation of European Cancer InstitutesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Pedro Oliveira
- Nova School of Business and EconomicsCopenhagen Business School & Patient InnovationFrederiksbergDenmark
| | | | - Joachim Schüz
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO)LyonFrance
| | - Eric Solary
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- INSERM, U1287 and Department of HematologyGustave Roussy Cancer CenterVillejuifFrance
- Faculté de MédecineUniversité Paris‐SaclayLe Kremlin‐BicêtreFrance
| | - Alfonso Valencia
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC)BarcelonaSpain
- ICREABarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- European Academy of Cancer SciencesStockholmSweden
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO)LyonFrance
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maier D, Vehreschild JJ, Uhl B, Meyer S, Berger-Thürmel K, Boerries M, Braren R, Grünwald V, Hadaschik B, Palm S, Singer S, Stuschke M, Juárez D, Delpy P, Lambarki M, Hummel M, Engels C, Andreas S, Gökbuget N, Ihrig K, Burock S, Keune D, Eggert A, Keilholz U, Schulz H, Büttner D, Löck S, Krause M, Esins M, Ressing F, Schuler M, Brandts C, Brucker DP, Husmann G, Oellerich T, Metzger P, Voigt F, Illert AL, Theobald M, Kindler T, Sudhof U, Reckmann A, Schwinghammer F, Nasseh D, Weichert W, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Bitzer M, Malek N, Öner Ö, Schulze-Osthoff K, Bartels S, Haier J, Ammann R, Schmidt AF, Guenther B, Janning M, Kasper B, Loges S, Stilgenbauer S, Kuhn P, Tausch E, Runow S, Kerscher A, Neumann M, Breu M, Lablans M, Serve H. Profile of the multicenter cohort of the German Cancer Consortium's Clinical Communication Platform. Eur J Epidemiol 2023; 38:573-586. [PMID: 37017830 PMCID: PMC10073785 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-023-00990-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
Treatment concepts in oncology are becoming increasingly personalized and diverse. Successively, changes in standards of care mandate continuous monitoring of patient pathways and clinical outcomes based on large, representative real-world data. The German Cancer Consortium's (DKTK) Clinical Communication Platform (CCP) provides such opportunity. Connecting fourteen university hospital-based cancer centers, the CCP relies on a federated IT-infrastructure sourcing data from facility-based cancer registry units and biobanks. Federated analyses resulted in a cohort of 600,915 patients, out of which 232,991 were incident since 2013 and for which a comprehensive documentation is available. Next to demographic data (i.e., age at diagnosis: 2.0% 0-20 years, 8.3% 21-40 years, 30.9% 41-60 years, 50.1% 61-80 years, 8.8% 81+ years; and gender: 45.2% female, 54.7% male, 0.1% other) and diagnoses (five most frequent tumor origins: 22,523 prostate, 18,409 breast, 15,575 lung, 13,964 skin/malignant melanoma, 9005 brain), the cohort dataset contains information about therapeutic interventions and response assessments and is connected to 287,883 liquid and tissue biosamples. Focusing on diagnoses and therapy-sequences, showcase analyses of diagnosis-specific sub-cohorts (pancreas, larynx, kidney, thyroid gland) demonstrate the analytical opportunities offered by the cohort's data. Due to its data granularity and size, the cohort is a potential catalyst for translational cancer research. It provides rapid access to comprehensive patient groups and may improve the understanding of the clinical course of various (even rare) malignancies. Therefore, the cohort may serve as a decisions-making tool for clinical trial design and contributes to the evaluation of scientific findings under real-world conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Maier
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Janne Vehreschild
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Barbara Uhl
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandra Meyer
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karin Berger-Thürmel
- University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Melanie Boerries
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rickmer Braren
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Palm
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Singer
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Mainz and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Juárez
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Federated Information Systems, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pierre Delpy
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Federated Information Systems, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohamed Lambarki
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Federated Information Systems, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hummel
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cäcilia Engels
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Andreas
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicola Gökbuget
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristina Ihrig
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susen Burock
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dietmar Keune
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angelika Eggert
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Keilholz
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hagen Schulz
- University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Büttner
- University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mirko Esins
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Frank Ressing
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Schuler
- West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Brandts
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel P Brucker
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gabriele Husmann
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Oellerich
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Metzger
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frederik Voigt
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna L Illert
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Theobald
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Mainz and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kindler
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Mainz and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ursula Sudhof
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Achim Reckmann
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Mainz and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Schwinghammer
- University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Nasseh
- University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon
- University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Center for Personalized Medicine, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nisar Malek
- Center for Personalized Medicine, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Öznur Öner
- Center for Personalized Medicine, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Schulze-Osthoff
- Center for Personalized Medicine, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Bartels
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Haier
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Hannover (Claudia von Schilling-Zentrum), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Raimund Ammann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Hannover (Claudia von Schilling-Zentrum), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Anja Franziska Schmidt
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Hannover (Claudia von Schilling-Zentrum), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernd Guenther
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Hannover (Claudia von Schilling-Zentrum), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Melanie Janning
- DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Personalized Medical Oncology (A420), DKFZ German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Kasper
- Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sonja Loges
- DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Mannheim University Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Personalized Medical Oncology (A420), DKFZ German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Kuhn
- Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Neu-Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Martin Breu
- University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Martin Lablans
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Federated Information Systems, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hubert Serve
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lawler M, Davies L, Oberst S, Oliver K, Eggermont A, Schmutz A, La Vecchia C, Allemani C, Lievens Y, Naredi P, Cufer T, Aggarwal A, Aapro M, Apostolidis K, Baird AM, Cardoso F, Charalambous A, Coleman MP, Costa A, Crul M, Dégi CL, Di Nicolantonio F, Erdem S, Geanta M, Geissler J, Jassem J, Jagielska B, Jonsson B, Kelly D, Kelm O, Kolarova T, Kutluk T, Lewison G, Meunier F, Pelouchova J, Philip T, Price R, Rau B, Rubio IT, Selby P, Južnič Sotlar M, Spurrier-Bernard G, van Hoeve JC, Vrdoljak E, Westerhuis W, Wojciechowska U, Sullivan R. European Groundshot-addressing Europe's cancer research challenges: a Lancet Oncology Commission. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e11-e56. [PMID: 36400101 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00540-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Cancer research is a crucial pillar for countries to deliver more affordable, higher quality, and more equitable cancer care. Patients treated in research-active hospitals have better outcomes than patients who are not treated in these settings. However, cancer in Europe is at a crossroads. Cancer was already a leading cause of premature death before the COVID-19 pandemic, and the disastrous effects of the pandemic on early diagnosis and treatment will probably set back cancer outcomes in Europe by almost a decade. Recognising the pivotal importance of research not just to mitigate the pandemic today, but to build better European cancer services and systems for patients tomorrow, the Lancet Oncology European Groundshot Commission on cancer research brings together a wide range of experts, together with detailed new data on cancer research activity across Europe during the past 12 years. We have deployed this knowledge to help inform Europe's Beating Cancer Plan and the EU Cancer Mission, and to set out an evidence-driven, patient-centred cancer research roadmap for Europe. The high-resolution cancer research data we have generated show current activities, captured through different metrics, including by region, disease burden, research domain, and effect on outcomes. We have also included granular data on research collaboration, gender of researchers, and research funding. The inclusion of granular data has facilitated the identification of areas that are perhaps overemphasised in current cancer research in Europe, while also highlighting domains that are underserved. Our detailed data emphasise the need for more information-driven and data-driven cancer research strategies and planning going forward. A particular focus must be on central and eastern Europe, because our findings emphasise the widening gap in cancer research activity, and capacity and outcomes, compared with the rest of Europe. Citizens and patients, no matter where they are, must benefit from advances in cancer research. This Commission also highlights that the narrow focus on discovery science and biopharmaceutical research in Europe needs to be widened to include such areas as prevention and early diagnosis; treatment modalities such as radiotherapy and surgery; and a larger concentration on developing a research and innovation strategy for the 20 million Europeans living beyond a cancer diagnosis. Our data highlight the important role of comprehensive cancer centres in driving the European cancer research agenda. Crucial to a functioning cancer research strategy and its translation into patient benefit is the need for a greater emphasis on health policy and systems research, including implementation science, so that the innovative technological outputs from cancer research have a clear pathway to delivery. This European cancer research Commission has identified 12 key recommendations within a call to action to reimagine cancer research and its implementation in Europe. We hope this call to action will help to achieve our ambitious 70:35 target: 70% average 10-year survival for all European cancer patients by 2035.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Lawler
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
| | - Lynne Davies
- International Cancer Research Partnership, International House, Cardiff, UK
| | - Simon Oberst
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kathy Oliver
- International Brain Tumour Alliance, Tadworth, UK; European Cancer Organisation Patient Advisory Committee, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexander Eggermont
- Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands; Princess Máxima Centrum, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anna Schmutz
- International Agency for Cancer Research, Lyon, France
| | - Carlo La Vecchia
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Allemani
- Cancer Survival Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Naredi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Tanja Cufer
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Matti Aapro
- Genolier Cancer Center, Genolier, Switzerland
| | - Kathi Apostolidis
- Hellenic Cancer Federation, Athens, Greece; European Cancer Patient Coalition, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne-Marie Baird
- Lung Cancer Europe, Bern, Switzerland; Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Andreas Charalambous
- European Cancer Organisation Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus; Department of Oncology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Michel P Coleman
- Cancer Survival Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | - Csaba L Dégi
- Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Federica Di Nicolantonio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Sema Erdem
- European Cancer Organisation Patient Advisory Committee, Europa Donna, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Marius Geanta
- Centre for Innovation in Medicine and Kol Medical Media, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Jan Geissler
- Patvocates and CML Advocates Network, Leukaemie-Online (LeukaNET), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Beata Jagielska
- Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Daniel Kelly
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Olaf Kelm
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Tezer Kutluk
- Faculty of Medicine & Cancer Institute, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Grant Lewison
- Institute of Cancer Policy, School of Cancer Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Thierry Philip
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, Brussels, Belgium; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Richard Price
- European Cancer Organisation Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Beate Rau
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Peter Selby
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Jolanda C van Hoeve
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, Brussels, Belgium; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Eduard Vrdoljak
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Willien Westerhuis
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, Brussels, Belgium; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, School of Cancer Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vaz-Luis I, Masiero M, Cavaletti G, Cervantes A, Chlebowski RT, Curigliano G, Felip E, Ferreira AR, Ganz PA, Hegarty J, Jeon J, Johansen C, Joly F, Jordan K, Koczwara B, Lagergren P, Lambertini M, Lenihan D, Linardou H, Loprinzi C, Partridge AH, Rauh S, Steindorf K, van der Graaf W, van de Poll-Franse L, Pentheroudakis G, Peters S, Pravettoni G. ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on Cancer Survivorship: promoting high-quality survivorship care and research in Europe. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1119-1133. [PMID: 35963481 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increased number of cancer survivors and the recognition of physical and psychosocial challenges, present from cancer diagnosis through active treatment and beyond, led to the discipline of cancer survivorship. DESIGN AND METHODS Herein, we reflected on the different components of survivorship care, existing models and priorities, in order to facilitate the promotion of high-quality European survivorship care and research. RESULTS We identified five main components of survivorship care: (i) physical effects of cancer and chronic medical conditions; (ii) psychological effects of cancer; (iii) social, work and financial effects of cancer; (iv) surveillance for recurrences and second cancers; and (v) cancer prevention and overall health and well-being promotion. Survivorship care can be delivered by structured care models including but not limited to shared models integrating primary care and oncology services. The choice of the care model to be implemented has to be adapted to local realities. High-quality care should be expedited by the generation of: (i) focused and shared European recommendations, (ii) creation of tools to facilitate implementation of coordinated care and (iii) survivorship educational programs for health care teams and patients. The research agenda should be defined with the participation of health care providers, researchers, policy makers, patients and caregivers. The following patient-centered survivorship research areas were highlighted: (i) generation of a big data platform to collect long-term real-world data in survivors and healthy controls to (a) understand the resources, needs and preferences of patients with cancer, and (b) understand biological determinants of survivorship issues, and (ii) develop innovative effective interventions focused on the main components of survivorship care. CONCLUSIONS The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) can actively contribute in the efforts of the oncology community toward (a) promoting the development of high-quality survivorship care programs, (b) providing educational material and (c) aiding groundbreaking research by reflecting on priorities and by supporting research networking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Vaz-Luis
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif; UMR 981, Prédicteurs moléculaires et nouvelles cibles en oncologie, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
| | - M Masiero
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan; Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan
| | - G Cavaletti
- Experimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA, Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan; Division of Early Drug Development, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - E Felip
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon; Catolica Medical School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - P A Ganz
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J Hegarty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - J Jeon
- Exercise Medicine Center for Cancer and Diabetes Patients (ICONS), Department of Sport Industry, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Shinchon Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - C Johansen
- Centre for Cancer Late Effect Research (CASTLE), Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - F Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, U1086 Anticipe, Unicaen Normandy Universtity, Caen, France
| | - K Jordan
- Department for Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital, Potsdam; Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B Koczwara
- Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - P Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - D Lenihan
- International Cardio-Oncology Society, Tampa, USA
| | - H Linardou
- Fourth Oncology Department & Comprehensive Clinical Trials Center, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - A H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - S Rauh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch, Esch, Luxembourg
| | - K Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - W van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam
| | - L van de Poll-Franse
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, Department of Psycological Research, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht; CoRPS-Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - S Peters
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - G Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan; Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brachytherapy for Pediatric Patients at Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus: A Model of International Cooperation for Highly Specialized Treatments. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:602-613. [PMID: 35278672 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Childhood cancer is rare, and treatment is frequently associated with long-term morbidity. Disparities in survival and long-term side effects encourage the establishment of networks to increase access to complex organ-conservative strategies, such as brachytherapy. We report our experience of an international cooperation model in childhood cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS We examined the outcome of all children referred to our center from national or international networks to be treated according to a multimodal organ-conservative approach, including brachytherapy. RESULTS We identified 305 patients whose median age at diagnosis was 2.2 years (range, 1.4 months to 17.2 years). Among these patients, 99 (32.4%) were treated between 2015 and 2020; 172 (56.4%) were referred from national centers; and 133 (43.6%) were international patients from 31 countries (mainly Europe). Also, 263 patients were referred for primary treatment and 42 patients were referred for salvage treatment. Genitourinary tumors were the most frequent sites, with 56.4% bladder/prostate rhabdomyosarcoma and 28.5% gynecologic tumors. In addition to brachytherapy, local treatment consisted of partial tumor resection in 207 patients (67.9%), and 39 patients (13%) had additional external radiation therapy. Median follow-up was 58 months (range, 1 month to 48 years), 93 months for national patients, and 37 months for international patients (P < .0001). Five-year local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 90.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.3%-94.4%), 84.4% (95% CI, 80.1%-89.0%), and 93.3% (95% CI, 90.1%-96.5%), respectively. Patients referred for salvage treatment had poorer disease-free survival (P < .01). Implementation of image guided pulse-dose-rate brachytherapy was associated with better local control among patients with rhabdomyosarcoma referred for primary treatment (hazard ratio, 9.72; 95% CI, 1.24-71.0). At last follow-up, 16.7% patients had long-term severe treatment-related complications, and 2 patients (0.7%) had developed second malignancy. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective series shows the feasibility of a multinational referral network for brachytherapy allowing high patient numbers in rare pediatric cancers. High local control probability and acceptable late severe complication probability could be achieved despite very challenging situations. This cooperation model could serve as a basis for generating international reference networks for high-tech radiation such as brachytherapy to increase treatment care opportunities and cure probability.
Collapse
|
9
|
Horgan D, Curigliano G, Rieß O, Hofman P, Büttner R, Conte P, Cufer T, Gallagher WM, Georges N, Kerr K, Penault-Llorca F, Mastris K, Pinto C, Van Meerbeeck J, Munzone E, Thomas M, Ujupan S, Vainer GW, Velthaus JL, André F. Identifying the Steps Required to Effectively Implement Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology at a National Level in Europe. J Pers Med 2022; 12:72. [PMID: 35055387 PMCID: PMC8780351 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12010072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may enable more focused and highly personalized cancer treatment, with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines now recommending NGS for daily clinical practice for several tumor types. However, NGS implementation, and therefore patient access, varies across Europe; a multi-stakeholder collaboration is needed to establish the conditions required to improve this discrepancy. In that regard, we set up European Alliance for Personalised Medicine (EAPM)-led expert panels during the first half of 2021, including key stakeholders from across 10 European countries covering medical, economic, patient, industry, and governmental expertise. We describe the outcomes of these panels in order to define and explore the necessary conditions for NGS implementation into routine clinical care to enable patient access, identify specific challenges in achieving them, and make short- and long-term recommendations. The main challenges identified relate to the demand for NGS tests (governance, clinical standardization, and awareness and education) and supply of tests (equitable reimbursement, infrastructure for conducting and validating tests, and testing access driven by evidence generation). Recommendations made to resolve each of these challenges should aid multi-stakeholder collaboration between national and European initiatives, to complement, support, and mutually reinforce efforts to improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Horgan
- European Alliance for Personalised Medicine, Avenue de l’Armee/Legerlaan 10, 1040 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (E.M.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Olaf Rieß
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72070 Tuebingen, Germany;
| | - Paul Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, University of Côte d’Azur, FHU OncoAge, Biobank BB-0033-00025, Pasteur Hospital, 30 Avenue de la voie Romaine, CEDEX 01, 06001 Nice, France;
| | - Reinhard Büttner
- Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Pierfranco Conte
- The Veneto Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Gattamelata, 64, 35128 Padua, Italy;
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35124 Padua, Italy
| | - Tanja Cufer
- Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - William M. Gallagher
- School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland;
| | - Nadia Georges
- Exact Sciences, Quai du Seujet 10, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland;
| | - Keith Kerr
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK;
| | - Frédérique Penault-Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, 58, Rue Montalembert, CEDEX 01, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
- Department of Pathology, University of Clermont Auvergne, INSERM U1240, 49 bd François Mitterrand, CS 60032, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Ken Mastris
- Europa Uomo, Leopoldstraat 34, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium;
| | - Carla Pinto
- AstraZeneca, Rua Humberto Madeira 7, 1800 Oeiras, Portugal;
| | - Jan Van Meerbeeck
- Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Wijlrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium;
| | - Elisabetta Munzone
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (E.M.)
| | - Marlene Thomas
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Sonia Ujupan
- Eli Lilly and Company, Rue du Marquis 1, Markiesstraat, 1000 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Gilad W. Vainer
- Department of Pathology, Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Kalman Ya’akov Man St, Jerusalem 91905, Israel;
| | - Janna-Lisa Velthaus
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Fabrice André
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ryan KM. In the spotlight: Julio Celis, the Founding Editor of Molecular Oncology. Mol Oncol 2022; 16:3-7. [PMID: 34989122 PMCID: PMC8732337 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M. Ryan
- Molecular OncologyFEBS PressCambridgeUK
- Cancer Research UK Beatson InstituteGlasgowUK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Future care for long-term cancer survivors: towards a new model. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 24:350-362. [PMID: 34716541 PMCID: PMC8555713 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02696-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The increase in the prevalence "long-term cancer survivor” (LCS) patients is expected to increase the cost of LCS care. The aim of this study was to obtain information that would allow to optimise the current model of health management in Spain to adapt it to one of efficient LCS patient care. Methods This qualitative study was carried out using Delphi methodology. An advisory committee defined the criteria for participation, select the panel of experts, prepare the questionnaire, interpret the results and draft the final report. Results 232 people took part in the study (48 oncologists). Absolute consensus was reached in three of the proposed sections: oncological epidemiology, training of health professionals and ICT functions. Conclusion The role of primary care in the clinical management of LCS patients needs to be upgraded, coordination with the oncologist and hospital care is essential. The funding model needs to be adapted to determine the funding conditions for new drugs and technologies.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ringborg U, Berns A, Celis JE, Heitor M, Tabernero J, Schüz J, Baumann M, Henrique R, Aapro M, Basu P, Beets‐Tan R, Besse B, Cardoso F, Carneiro F, van den Eede G, Eggermont A, Fröhling S, Galbraith S, Garralda E, Hanahan D, Hofmarcher T, Jönsson B, Kallioniemi O, Kásler M, Kondorosi E, Korbel J, Lacombe D, Carlos Machado J, Martin‐Moreno JM, Meunier F, Nagy P, Nuciforo P, Oberst S, Oliveiera J, Papatriantafyllou M, Ricciardi W, Roediger A, Ryll B, Schilsky R, Scocca G, Seruca R, Soares M, Steindorf K, Valentini V, Voest E, Weiderpass E, Wilking N, Wren A, Zitvogel L. The Porto European Cancer Research Summit 2021. Mol Oncol 2021; 15:2507-2543. [PMID: 34515408 PMCID: PMC8486569 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Key stakeholders from the cancer research continuum met in May 2021 at the European Cancer Research Summit in Porto to discuss priorities and specific action points required for the successful implementation of the European Cancer Mission and Europe's Beating Cancer Plan (EBCP). Speakers presented a unified view about the need to establish high-quality, networked infrastructures to decrease cancer incidence, increase the cure rate, improve patient's survival and quality of life, and deal with research and care inequalities across the European Union (EU). These infrastructures, featuring Comprehensive Cancer Centres (CCCs) as key components, will integrate care, prevention and research across the entire cancer continuum to support the development of personalized/precision cancer medicine in Europe. The three pillars of the recommended European infrastructures - namely translational research, clinical/prevention trials and outcomes research - were pondered at length. Speakers addressing the future needs of translational research focused on the prospects of multiomics assisted preclinical research, progress in Molecular and Digital Pathology, immunotherapy, liquid biopsy and science data. The clinical/prevention trial session presented the requirements for next-generation, multicentric trials entailing unified strategies for patient stratification, imaging, and biospecimen acquisition and storage. The third session highlighted the need for establishing outcomes research infrastructures to cover primary prevention, early detection, clinical effectiveness of innovations, health-related quality-of-life assessment, survivorship research and health economics. An important outcome of the Summit was the presentation of the Porto Declaration, which called for a collective and committed action throughout Europe to develop the cancer research infrastructures indispensable for fostering innovation and decreasing inequalities within and between member states. Moreover, the Summit guidelines will assist decision making in the context of a unique EU-wide cancer initiative that, if expertly implemented, will decrease the cancer death toll and improve the quality of life of those confronted with cancer, and this is carried out at an affordable cost.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ifrah N, Bloch G, Salomon J. Faced with the challenges of prevention, French institutions mobilize for population health intervention research. Glob Health Promot 2021; 28:70-72. [PMID: 33843355 DOI: 10.1177/1757975920987100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Ifrah
- President of the French National Cancer Institute (INCa), Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Gilles Bloch
- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm), Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lawler M, De Lorenzo F, Lagergren P, Mennini FS, Narbutas S, Scocca G, Meunier F. Challenges and solutions to embed cancer survivorship research and innovation within the EU Cancer Mission. Mol Oncol 2021; 15:1750-1758. [PMID: 34053182 PMCID: PMC8253087 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We have reached a watershed moment in Europe in our efforts to ensure increased survival and better outcomes for cancer patients. The EU Cancer Mission and the European Beating Cancer Plan together provide an unrivalled opportunity to make significant inroads into a disease that kills over 1.7 million European citizens annually. Harnessing these twin pillars of cancer research and cancer control can be transformative for the European cancer community and in particular for the European cancer patient. However, from a research perspective, in order to fully realise these benefits, we need to ensure that all aspects of the cancer continuum are addressed. Previous research efforts have focussed more on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, whereas cancer survivorship, to date, has been overlooked. Here, we aim to redress this balance, by identifying the key challenges in cancer survivorship research that need to be addressed and proposing a series of recommended solutions, which, if acted upon, would deliver significant benefits for the nearly 20 million cancer survivors in Europe. To achieve this, we propose the development of a clearly articulated and sustainably funded European Cancer Survivorship Research and Innovation Plan. Embedding this plan within the framework of the EU Cancer Mission would be transformative for cancer survivors and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Lawler
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer ResearchQueen's University BelfastUK
- European Cancer OrganisationBrusselsBelgium
| | - Francesco De Lorenzo
- European Cancer Patient CoalitionBrusselsBelgium
- Italian Federation of Cancer Patients OrganisationsRomeItaly
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Surgical Care ScienceDepartment of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College LondonUK
| | - Francesco S. Mennini
- EEHTA CEIS, DEF DepartmentFaculty of EconomicsUniversity “Tor Vergata” RomeItaly
- Institute of Leadership and Management in HealthKingston UniversityLondonUK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Espina C, Yared W, Ritchie D, Lipponen S, Anttila A, Tamminiemi K, Schüz J. Sustainability and monitoring of the European Code Against Cancer: Recommendations. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 72:101933. [PMID: 33838462 PMCID: PMC8140405 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As part of the third European Commission's Joint Action on Cancer (Innovative Partnership for Action Against Cancer, iPAAC), the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) was commissioned to produce a report on recommendations to sustain and monitor future updates of the European Code Against Cancer (ECAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS A co-creational consultation process, including a virtual workshop, was carried out. More than 100 experts in cancer prevention, public health, communication and representatives of European authorities provided input on the scope of future editions of the ECAC, including updating the scientific evidence and its maintenance, and on strategies for its implementation and dissemination across Europe. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Overwhelming support for the need of the ECAC and its continuous updating, optimization and wider dissemination was expressed by all the stakeholders. Eight recommendations and four research needs summarise the assessment and pave the way for the future of the ECAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Espina
- Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon CEDEX 08, France.
| | - Wendy Yared
- Association of European Cancer Leagues (ECL), Chaussée de Louvain 479, Brussels, 1030, Belgium
| | - David Ritchie
- Association of European Cancer Leagues (ECL), Chaussée de Louvain 479, Brussels, 1030, Belgium
| | - Satu Lipponen
- Cancer Society of Finland (CSF), Unioninkatu 22, Helsinki, 00130, Finland
| | - Ahti Anttila
- Cancer Society of Finland (CSF), Unioninkatu 22, Helsinki, 00130, Finland
| | - Kaarina Tamminiemi
- Cancer Society of Finland (CSF), Unioninkatu 22, Helsinki, 00130, Finland
| | - Joachim Schüz
- Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon CEDEX 08, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lawler M, Oliver K, Gijssels S, Aapro M, Abolina A, Albreht T, Erdem S, Geissler J, Jassem J, Karjalainen S, La Vecchia C, Lievens Y, Meunier F, Morrissey M, Naredi P, Oberst S, Poortmans P, Price R, Sullivan R, Velikova G, Vrdoljak E, Wilking N, Yared W, Selby P. The European Code of Cancer Practice. J Cancer Policy 2021; 28:100282. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
17
|
Tralongo P, Gebbia V, Mercadante S, Bordonaro R, Ferraù F, Barni S, Firenze A. Cancer: New Needs, New Models. Is It Time for a Community Oncologist? Another Brick in the Wall. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1919. [PMID: 33923380 PMCID: PMC8071576 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last few decades, thanks to early detection, effective drugs, and personalized treatments, the natural history of cancer has radically changed. Thanks to these advances, we have observed how survival of cancer patients has increased, becoming an ever more important goal in cancer care. Effective clinical governance of survivorship care is essential to ensure a successful transition between active and post-treatment life, identifying optimization of healthcare outcomes and quality of life for patients as the primary objectives. For these reasons, potential intervention models must consider these differences to rationalize the available resources, including economic aspects. In this perspective, analyzing the different models proposed in the literature to manage this type of patients, we focus on the possible role of the so-called "community oncologist". As a trained health professional, also focused on longevity, he could represent the right management solution in all those "intermediate" clinical conditions that arise between the hospital specialist, frequently overworked, and the general practitioner, often biased by the lack of specific expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Tralongo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Umberto I, RAO, 96100 Siracusa, Italy
| | - Vittorio Gebbia
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
- Medical Oncology Unit, La Maddalena Clinic for Cancer, 90100 Palermo, Italy
- GSTU Foundation for Cancer Research, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Mercadante
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Pain Relief and Palliative Care Unit, La Maddalena Cancer Center, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| | | | - Francesco Ferraù
- Medical Oncology Unit, San Vincenzo Hospital, 98039 Taormina, Italy;
| | - Sandro Barni
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio, Italy;
| | - Alberto Firenze
- Risk Management Unit, AOUP P. Giaccone, University of Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kehrloesser S, Oberst S, Westerhuis W, Wendler A, Wind A, Blaauwgeers H, Burrion JB, Nagy P, Saeter G, Gustafsson E, De Paoli P, Lovey J, Lombardo C, Philip T, de Valeriola D, Docter M, Boomsma F, Saghatchian M, Svoboda M, Philip I, Monetti F, Hummel H, McVie G, Otter R, van Harten W. Analysing the attributes of Comprehensive Cancer Centres and Cancer Centres across Europe to identify key hallmarks. Mol Oncol 2021; 15:1277-1288. [PMID: 33734563 PMCID: PMC8096787 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a persistent variation in cancer outcomes among and within European countries suggesting (among other causes) inequalities in access to or delivery of high‐quality cancer care. European policy (EU Cancer Mission and Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan) is currently moving towards a mission‐oriented approach addressing these inequalities. In this study, we used the quantitative and qualitative data of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes’ Accreditation and Designation Programme, relating to 40 large European cancer centres, to describe their current compliance with quality standards, to identify the hallmarks common to all centres and to show the distinctive features of Comprehensive Cancer Centres. All Comprehensive Cancer Centres and Cancer Centres accredited by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes show good compliance with quality standards related to care, multidisciplinarity and patient centredness. However, Comprehensive Cancer Centres on average showed significantly better scores on indicators related to the volume, quality and integration of translational research, such as high‐impact publications, clinical trial activity (especially in phase I and phase IIa trials) and filing more patents as early indicators of innovation. However, irrespective of their size, centres show significant variability regarding effective governance when functioning as entities within larger hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Kehrloesser
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, UK
| | - Simon Oberst
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, Brussels, Belgium.,Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Willien Westerhuis
- the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid Wendler
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, UK
| | - Anke Wind
- Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Harriët Blaauwgeers
- the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Péter Nagy
- National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gunnar Saeter
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, Brussels, Belgium.,Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva Gustafsson
- Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - József Lovey
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, Brussels, Belgium.,National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Thierry Philip
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, Brussels, Belgium.,Institut Curie, Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Dominique de Valeriola
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, Brussels, Belgium.,Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Femke Boomsma
- Radiotherapeutisch Instituut Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Mahasti Saghatchian
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| | - Marek Svoboda
- Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Henk Hummel
- the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wim van Harten
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes, Brussels, Belgium.,Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.,The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many drugs approved for other indications can control the growth of tumor cells and limit adverse events (AE). DATA SOURCES Literature searches with keywords 'repurposing and cancer' books, websites: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, for drug structures: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. AREAS OF AGREEMENT Introducing approved drugs, such as those developed to treat diabetes (Metformin) or inflammation (Thalidomide), identified to have cytostatic activity, can enhance chemotherapy or even replace more cytotoxic drugs. Also, anti-inflammatory compounds, cytokines and inhibitors of proteolysis can be used to control the side effects of chemo- and immuno-therapies or as second-line treatments for tumors resistant to kinase inhibitors (KI). Drugs specifically developed for cancer therapy, such as interferons (IFN), the tyrosine KI abivertinib TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor inhibitors, may help control symptoms of Covid-19. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY Better knowledge of mechanisms of drug activities is essential for repurposing. Chemotherapies induce ER stress and enhance mutation rates and chromosome alterations, leading to resistance that cannot always be related to mutations in the target gene. Metformin, thalidomide and cytokines (IFN, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-2 (IL-2) and others) have pleiomorphic activities, some of which can enhance tumorigenesis. The small and fragile patient pools available for clinical trials can cloud the data on the usefulness of cotreatments. GROWING POINTS Better understanding of drug metabolism and mechanisms should aid in repurposing drugs for primary, adjuvant and adjunct treatments. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH Optimizing drug combinations, reducing cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutics and controlling associated inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine H Schein
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Faculty, Institute for Human Infections and Immunity (IHII), University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, Texas 77555, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Godman B, Hill A, Simoens S, Selke G, Selke Krulichová I, Zampirolli Dias C, Martin AP, Oortwijn W, Timoney A, Gustafsson LL, Voncina L, Kwon HY, Gulbinovic J, Gotham D, Wale J, Cristina Da Silva W, Bochenek T, Allocati E, Kurdi A, Ogunleye OO, Meyer JC, Hoxha I, Malaj A, Hierländer C, Sauermann R, Hamelinck W, Petrova G, Laius O, Langner I, Yfantopoulos J, Joppi R, Jakupi A, Greiciute-Kuprijanov I, Vella Bonanno P, Piepenbrink JH, de Valk V, Wladysiuk M, Marković-Peković V, Mardare I, Fürst J, Tomek D, Obach Cortadellas M, Zara C, Pontes C, McTaggart S, Laba TL, Melien Ø, Wong-Rieger D, Bae S, Hill R. Potential approaches for the pricing of cancer medicines across Europe to enhance the sustainability of healthcare systems and the implications. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2021; 21:527-540. [PMID: 33535841 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1884546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: There are growing concerns among European health authorities regarding increasing prices for new cancer medicines, prices not necessarily linked to health gain and the implications for the sustainability of their healthcare systems.Areas covered: Narrative discussion principally among payers and their advisers regarding potential approaches to the pricing of new cancer medicines.Expert opinion: A number of potential pricing approaches are discussed including minimum effectiveness levels for new cancer medicines, managed entry agreements, multicriteria decision analyses (MCDAs), differential/tiered pricing, fair pricing models, amortization models as well as de-linkage models. We are likely to see a growth in alternative pricing deliberations in view of ongoing challenges. These include the considerable number of new oncology medicines in development including new gene therapies, new oncology medicines being launched with uncertainty regarding their value, and continued high prices coupled with the extent of confidential discounts for reimbursement. However, balanced against the need for new cancer medicines. This will lead to greater scrutiny over the prices of patent oncology medicines as more standard medicines lose their patent, calls for greater transparency as well as new models including amortization models. We will be monitoring these developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Godman
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.,Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Andrew Hill
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gisbert Selke
- Wissenschaftliches Institut Der AOK (WIdO), Berlin, Germany
| | - Iva Selke Krulichová
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec, Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Carolina Zampirolli Dias
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Postgraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.,SUS Collaborating Centre for Technology Assessment and Excellence in Health (CCATES), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Antony P Martin
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Liverpool, UK.,QC Medica, Sim Balk Lane, York UK
| | - Wija Oortwijn
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Angela Timoney
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.,NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lars L Gustafsson
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Hye-Young Kwon
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.,Division of Biology & Public Health, Mokwon University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jolanta Gulbinovic
- Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Janet Wale
- Independent Consumer Advocate, Brunswick, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wânia Cristina Da Silva
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Postgraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.,Data and Knowledge Integration Center for Health(CIDACS), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)/ Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Tomasz Bochenek
- Department of Nutrition and Drug Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri' IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Amanj Kurdi
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.,Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.,Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
| | - Olayinka O Ogunleye
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria.,Department of Medicine, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Johanna C Meyer
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Iris Hoxha
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine, Tirana, Albania
| | | | - Christian Hierländer
- Department of Pharmaceutical Affairs, Federation of Social Insurances, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Sauermann
- Department of Pharmaceutical Affairs, Federation of Social Insurances, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Guenka Petrova
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ott Laius
- State Agency of Medicines, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Irene Langner
- Wissenschaftliches Institut Der AOK (WIdO), Berlin, Germany
| | - John Yfantopoulos
- School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
| | - Roberta Joppi
- Pharmaceutical Drug Department, Azienda Sanitaria Locale of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Arianit Jakupi
- Faculty of Pharmacy, UBT - Higher Education Institution, Prishtina, Kosovo
| | | | - Patricia Vella Bonanno
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Vincent de Valk
- National Health Care Institute (ZIN), XH, Diemen, Netherlands
| | | | - Vanda Marković-Peković
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Pharmacy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ileana Mardare
- Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Management Department, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Jurij Fürst
- Health Insurance Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dominik Tomek
- Faculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | - Corinne Zara
- Drug Department, Catalan Health Service, Catalan Health Service, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Caridad Pontes
- Drug Department, Catalan Health Service, Catalan Health Service, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma De Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Tracey-Lea Laba
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Sydney, NSW
| | - Øyvind Melien
- Reviews and Health Technology Assessments, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Durhane Wong-Rieger
- Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, Liverpool, Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - SeungJin Bae
- College of Pharmacy, Ewha Woman's University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ruaraidh Hill
- Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, Whelan Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ifrah N, Bloch G, Salomon J. Ante los desafíos de la prevención, una movilización de los institutos franceses para la investigación de intervención en salud de las poblaciones. Glob Health Promot 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/1757975920987114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Ifrah
- Presidente del Institut national du cancer (INCa), Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Gilles Bloch
- Presidente-Director General del Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (Inserm), Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ifrah N, Bloch G, Salomon J. Face aux défis de prévention, la mobilisation des institutions françaises pour la recherche interventionnelle en santé des populations. Glob Health Promot 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/1757975920986780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Ifrah
- Président de l’Institut national du cancer (INCa), Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Gilles Bloch
- Président-Directeur-Général de l’Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (Inserm), Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gillmann C, Pajor G, Ramadori P, Albers P, Mons U, Steindorf K, Kentner S, Baumann M. Solving problems is smart, preventing them is wise: Lessons learned from the 2nd International DKFZ Conference on Cancer Prevention. Int J Cancer 2021; 148:3086-3096. [PMID: 33544875 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The 2nd International DKFZ Conference on Cancer Prevention (CCP2020) organized by the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) was held as a virtual event on 17-18 September 2020. The event gathered experts on cancer prevention from around the world with the aim of generating a stimulating interchange of opinions between clinicians and basic researchers working in the field. The talks and posters of the conference fueled exciting discussions and debates about the state of the art of cancer prevention and provided a comprehensive outlook on the many aspects of the field. The program was divided into three main sessions, illustrating the most recent methodological approaches and interventions in primary, secondary and tertiary prevention, enriched by introductory lectures depicting the most relevant aspects of each session. The key concepts covered in this meeting were risk factors, early detection, improving life after cancer, cancer prevention in Europe and personalized prevention. The importance of the latter was expressly highlighted, many presentations emphasizing that in the era of personalized medicine, prevention also needs to be based on the unique genetic, epigenetic, social and behavioral characteristics of the individual to achieve maximal efficacy. In this article, we summarize the key messages emerging from each section, with particular attention on the most important challenges yet to be met in the field of cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Gillmann
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gabor Pajor
- Department of Molecular Hematology/Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pierluigi Ramadori
- Division of Chronic inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.,Division of Personalized Prevention of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ute Mons
- Cancer Prevention Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karen Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susan Kentner
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Corrigendum to: Towards a cancer mission in Horizon Europe: recommendations. Mol Oncol 2020. [PMCID: PMC7530772 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|