The Porto European Cancer Research Summit 2021

Key stakeholders from the cancer research continuum met in May 2021 at the European Cancer Research Summit in Porto to discuss priorities and specific action points required for the successful implementation of the European Cancer Mission and Europe's Beating Cancer Plan (EBCP). Speakers presented a unified view about the need to establish high-quality, networked infrastructures to decrease cancer incidence, increase the cure rate, improve patient's survival and quality of life, and deal with research and care inequalities across the European Union (EU). These infrastructures, featuring Comprehensive Cancer Centres (CCCs) as key components, will integrate care, prevention and research across the entire cancer continuum to support the development of personalized/precision cancer medicine in Europe. The three pillars of the recommended European infrastructures - namely translational research, clinical/prevention trials and outcomes research - were pondered at length. Speakers addressing the future needs of translational research focused on the prospects of multiomics assisted preclinical research, progress in Molecular and Digital Pathology, immunotherapy, liquid biopsy and science data. The clinical/prevention trial session presented the requirements for next-generation, multicentric trials entailing unified strategies for patient stratification, imaging, and biospecimen acquisition and storage. The third session highlighted the need for establishing outcomes research infrastructures to cover primary prevention, early detection, clinical effectiveness of innovations, health-related quality-of-life assessment, survivorship research and health economics. An important outcome of the Summit was the presentation of the Porto Declaration, which called for a collective and committed action throughout Europe to develop the cancer research infrastructures indispensable for fostering innovation and decreasing inequalities within and between member states. Moreover, the Summit guidelines will assist decision making in the context of a unique EU-wide cancer initiative that, if expertly implemented, will decrease the cancer death toll and improve the quality of life of those confronted with cancer, and this is carried out at an affordable cost.

Highlights from the 2016 WIN Symposium, 27-29 June 2016, Paris: personalised therapy beyond next-generation sequencing

The Worldwide Innovative Networking (WIN) consortium is an alliance of academic institutions, pharmaceutical partners, representatives from technology companies and charitable/health payer organisations from across the globe. For the last six years, the consortium’s aims have been to foster communication and collaboration between members, encourage dialogue in an open forum, and deliver clinical trial results that improve the care and outcomes of patients with cancer using the latest advances in genomic-based medicine.

The annual WIN Symposium, held over two days, is a chance for its members to come together and discuss ongoing research, recent announcements, and introduce new developments in personalised medicine. This year’s conference, held in Paris, France 27–29 June, consisted of six dedicated sessions, including two debates, and posters from members and participating organisations, all focusing on the latest therapeutic advances and updates in genomic analysis.

Special highlights from this year included discussion of the MINDACT clinical trial, which uses a gene expression test to identify patients with breast cancer who can safely forego adjuvant chemotherapy, and the reflections on the SHIVA trial. Of particular interest to many speakers was the utilisation of liquid biopsy samples to produce near real time snapshots of tumour mutational profiles and vulnerability.

Abstract 1832: Large variations in clinical and ethical aspects of genomic sequencing initiatives: A Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) survey

Although next generation sequencing (NGS) has expanded our understanding of disease prognostication and cancer treatment, there is heterogeneity regarding its implementation. GA4GH is a not-for-profit organization that promotes and harmonizes responsible and effective data sharing, as unconnected data silos unacceptably stall the advancement of precision medicine. The GA4GH Cancer Task Team conducted a survey of international cancer sequencing activities to evaluate variability in these initiatives and report our findings on clinical/ethical aspects.

A total of 108 sequencing initiatives were approached via a web-based survey, of which 59 responded (55%) (Characteristics: Table 1). Most initiatives (61%) were North American or European based. Genomic-based drug matching occurred in 39 initiatives (66%): unplanned opportunistic matching to existent trials e.g. phase I (n = 29), specifically designed genomics driven trials (n = 10). In matching initiatives, outcome data was collected via RECIST in 24 (62%), time on treatment in 23 (59%), and clinical assessment in 10 (26%). Toxicity data was collected in all clinical trials but in few genomic sequencing programs.

Specific or implied informed consent was identified in 34 (58%) and 7 (14%) initiatives respectively and 36 (61%) allowed re-contacting of patients. However, only 31 (53%) had a protocol for communicating genetic results and 23 (39%) had a policy to handle incidental germline mutations. In total, 63% of initiatives are currently sharing data with an additional 10% partially sharing or planning to share.

In conclusion, there is currently no uniform approach for collecting data for precision medicine application. GA4GH is actively leading harmonization efforts (e.g. standardized outcome data, toxicity data collection, policies for returning genetic results and strategies for data sharing) to maximize the value of the increasingly complex datasets generated from NGS. Table 1N (%)Number of initiatives59Regional LocationNorth America20 (34)Europe16 (27)Asia7 (12)Australia3 (5)South America3 (5)Intercontinental10 (17)Regional ScopeInstitutional (local)15 (25)Multi-institutional (regional) / National28 (48)European Union4 (7)International10 (17)Unknown2 (3)Patient Samples per Year1-50022 (37)501-500022 (37)>50007 (12)Unknown8 (14)Purpose of testDiagnostic9 (15)Research22 (37)Diagnostic /Research20 (34)Unknown8 (14)

Citation Format: Jeremy Lewin, Daniel J. Vis, Mark Lawler, Rachel Liao, Mao Mao, Bin Tean Teh, William Sellers, Robyn Ward, Anamaria Aranha Camargo, Fabrice Andre, Richard Schilsky, Denis Lacombe, Tatsuhiro Shibata, Stephen Fox, Christophe Le Tourneau, William S. Dalton, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Charles Sawyers, Emile E. Voest, Lillian L. Siu. Large variations in clinical and ethical aspects of genomic sequencing initiatives: A Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) survey. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 1832.

Recommendations for management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases

Many management strategies exist for neuroendocrine liver metastases. These strategies range from surgery to ablation with various interventional radiology procedures, and include both regional and systemic therapy with diverse biological, cytotoxic, or targeted agents. A paucity of biological, molecular, and genomic information and an absence of data from rigorous trials limit the validity of many publications detailing management. This Review represents the views from an international conference, for which 15 expert working groups prepared evidence-based assessments addressing specific questions, and from which an independent jury derived final recommendations. The aim of the conference was to review the existing approaches to neuroendocrine liver metastases, assess the evidence on which management decisions were based, develop internationally acceptable recommendations for clinical practice (when evidence was available), and make recommendations for clinical and research endeavours. This report represents the final clinical statements and proposals for future research.

FDG-PET lymphoma demonstration project invitational workshop

The proceedings of a workshop focusing on a project to evaluate the use of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) as a tool to measure treatment response in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are described. Sponsored by the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, the Foundation of the National Institutes of Health, and the National Cancer Institute, and attended by representatives of the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and scientists and clinical researchers from academia and the pharmaceutical and medical imaging industries, the workshop reviewed the etiology and current standards of care for NHL and proposed the development of a clinical trial to validate FDG-PET imaging techniques as a predictive biomarker for cancer therapy response. As organized under the auspices of the Oncology Biomarker Qualification Initiative, the three federal health agencies and their private sector and nonprofit/advocacy group partners believe that FDG-PET not only demonstrates the potential to be used for the diagnosis and staging of many cancers but in particular can provide an early indication of therapeutic response that is well correlated with clinical outcomes for chemotherapy for this common form of lymphoma. The development of standardized criteria for FDG-PET imaging and establishment of procedures for transmission, storage, quality assurance, and analysis of PET images afforded by this demonstration project could streamline clinical trials of new treatments for more intractable forms of lymphoma and other cancers and, hence, accelerate new drug approvals.

Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) ± cetuximab for patients (pts) with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (MCRC): CALGB 80203 preliminary results

3509

Background: FOLFIRI or FOLFOX are 1st-line treatments (Rx) for MCRC. Cetuximab is an IgG1 Mab that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and is approved as monotherapy or in combination with irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory, EGFR + pts with MCRC. CALGB 80203 randomized untreated MCRC pts to FOLFOX or FOLFIRI ± cetuximab (independent of EGFR status.) Methods: Pts with performance status 0–1 with tumor blocks available for EGFR analysis received either irinotecan 180 mg/m2 over 1.5 hours (h) or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 over 2h combined with LV 400 mg/m2 over 2h and 5FU 400 mg/m2 bolus, then 46–48h CI 5FU 2400 mg/m2 q o w. Cetuximab dose: 400 mg/m2 loading dose, then 250 mg/m2 qw. Rx continued until progression or toxicity; subsequent Rx was not mandated although information was collected on such rx. Accrual goal was 2200 pts with intended 1° endpt of overall survival (OS). 80203 closed administratively in 1/05 (due to slow accrual) with 238 pts accrued. 2° endpts of response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), duration of R and toxicity are now able to be analyzed. Results: Accrual: FOLFIRI (A) - 61; FOLFIRI + cetuximab (B) - 59: FOLFOX (C) - 60; FOLFOX + cetuximab (D) - 58; approx median follow-up (f/u) is 12 months. RR (CR + PR, not all yet confirmed): A - 34%; B - 42%; C - 32%; D - 55%. RR was similar in the FOLFIRI or FOLFOX arms (A+B v. C+D; 38% v. 43%, p=0.44; chi-square) while C225 containing arms (B+D) v. non-C225 arms (A+C) had a superior RR (49% v. 33%; p=0.014, chi-square) It is too early to tell if there are differences in PFS, duration of response or OS. No significant differences in gr III diarrhea or any gr IV toxicities were seen. Conclusions: These results suggest that FOLFIRI and FOLFOX are similar in efficacy for pts with untreated MCRC and that adding cetuximab to either in1st-line Rx appears to increase response rates. PFS and duration of response do not appear different at this analysis. Further f/u and an analysis of prospective companion correlative studies may help to further clarify these results.

[Table: see text]

A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas in patients with previous colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies in animals and observational studies in humans suggest that regular aspirin use may decrease the risk of colorectal adenomas, the precursors to most colorectal cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to determine the effect of aspirin on the incidence of colorectal adenomas. We randomly assigned 635 patients with previous colorectal cancer to receive either 325 mg of aspirin per day or placebo. We determined the proportion of patients with adenomas, the number of recurrent adenomas, and the time to the development of adenoma between randomization and subsequent colonoscopic examinations. Relative risks were adjusted for age, sex, cancer stage, the number of colonoscopic examinations, and the time to a first colonoscopy. The study was terminated early by an independent data and safety monitoring board when statistically significant results were reported during a planned interim analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 517 randomized patients had at least one colonoscopic examination a median of 12.8 months after randomization. One or more adenomas were found in 17 percent of patients in the aspirin group and 27 percent of patients in the placebo group (P=0.004). The mean (+/-SD) number of adenomas was lower in the aspirin group than the placebo group (0.30+/-0.87 vs. 0.49+/-0.99, P=0.003 by the Wilcoxon test). The adjusted relative risk of any recurrent adenoma in the aspirin group, as compared with the placebo group, was 0.65 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.91). The time to the detection of a first adenoma was longer in the aspirin group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio for the detection of a new polyp, 0.64; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.94; P=0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Daily use of aspirin is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of colorectal adenomas in patients with previous colorectal cancer.

A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase III trial of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, plus or minus trimetrexate, in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Trimetrexate (TMTX) biochemically modulates 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LCV). Two phase II trials demonstrated promising activity for TMTX/5-FU/LCV in patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). This trial was designed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of TMTX/5-FU/LCV as first-line treatment in ACC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients with ACC were randomized in double-blind fashion to receive placebo or TMTX (110 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) followed 24 h later by i.v. LCV 200 mg/m2, and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 plus oral LCV rescue. Both schedules were given weekly for 6 weeks every 8 weeks. Patients were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, quality of life (QoL) and toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 382 eligible patients were randomized. Significant toxicities were noted more frequently with TMTX/5-FU/LCV. Diarrhea was the most common grade 3 or 4 side-effect (41% and 28% on the TMTX and placebo arms, respectively). QoL scores and response rates did not differ between treatment arms. PFS was 5.3 months and 4.4 months in the TMTX and placebo arms, respectively (P = 0.77; Wilcoxon). OS was 15.8 months and 16.8 months, respectively (P = 0.73; Wilcoxon).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of TMTX to a weekly regimen of 5-FU/LCV worsened grade 3 or 4 diarrhea. The inclusion of TMTX did not yield any significant improvements in response rate, PFS or OS.

An investigational new drug treatment program for patients with gemcitabine: results for over 3000 patients with pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

An Investigational New Drug (IND) treatment program allows patients access to a drug that has shown activity against a serious or life-threatening disease prior to full Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review and approval. This treatment IND program, in which patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma were treated with gemcitabine, began in 1995.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria were < or =1 prior chemotherapy regimen; a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of > or =50; and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Gemcitabine was given at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 weekly x 7 followed by a week of rest, then weekly x 3 every 4 weeks thereafter. In this program, disease-related symptom improvement (DRSI) was defined retrospectively as 1) improvement in pain (on a 7-point scale) and/or analgesic class (e.g., morphine improving to codeine) and/or KPS (> or =20 points), or 2) stability of these three parameters with a 7% increase in weight from baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 3023 patients enrolled. At baseline, 80% of them had Stage IV disease, and 84% had a baseline KPS > or = 70. The median age was 65 years, and 56% of the patients were male. The cumulative DRSI response rate after the fourth cycle was 18.4%. Of 982 patients with tumor response data, there were 14 with complete response and 104 with partial response, for an overall response rate of 12.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0-14.0%). For 2380 patients with survival data, the median survival was 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.5-5.1 months) and the 12-month survival was 15%. Gemcitabine was well tolerated; only 4.6% of discontinuations were due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Notable disease-related symptom improvement and survival were seen with gemcitabine in this large, compassionate-use setting, and these findings were in agreement with those of earlier registration trials.

Concomitant 5-FU, hydroxyurea and cisplatin with external beam radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of alternate week concurrent 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and cisplatin with radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients received 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea and cisplatin with radiotherapy on an alternate week basis. Chemoradiotherapy was given day 1-5, and no therapy given day 6-14 for each 14 day cycle. Chemotherapy doses were as follows: hydroxyurea 1 mg every 12 h starting day 0, 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days starting day 1, and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days every other cycle. A radiation dose of 6000 cGy was prescribed. Acute toxicities were monitored and therapy modified for hematologic toxicity. Nine patients enrolled, however eight were evaluable; one patient expired prior to therapy. The median radiation dose delivered was 5540 cGy. Sixty-three percent required a chemotherapy dose reduction. Fifty percent achieved local control by radiographic imaging after completion of therapy. Median survival was 12 months. Acute toxicity included: 38% grade 2-3 nausea, 37% grade 2-3 vomiting, 63% grade 2-3 mucositis, 63% grade 2-3 neutropenia, and 88% grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Other sequelae included hand-foot syndrome, deep venous thrombosis, hearing loss, seizures, and anorexia. Patients achieved the same median survival as compared to other reported studies of radiation therapy with single agent 5-fluorouracil. We do not recommend this protocol due to the significant toxicity. Future studies to incorporate conformal radiation therapy with more active, less toxic chemotherapeutic agents should be investigated.

Phase III randomized study to compare interferon alfa-2a in combination with fluorouracil versus fluorouracil alone in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of a combination of fluorouracil (5-FU) and recombinant human interferon alfa-2a ([IFN alpha 2a] Roferon-A; Hoffmann-LaRoche, Basel, Switzerland) versus 5-FU alone in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (ACC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 245 previously untreated ACC patients were randomized to receive either IFN alpha 2a (9 million IU) subcutaneously (SC) three times weekly with 5-FU (750 mg/m2/d) by continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion on days 1 to 5 and then, after a 1-week hiatus, as a weekly IV bolus at the same dose (IFN/ 5-FU), or 5-FU alone at the same dose schedule (5-FU).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between IFN/5-FU and 5-FU alone in the overall response rate (24% v 17%, P = .2), duration of response (median, 6.4 v 8.1 months), time to response (plateau at 3 months), time to progressive disease ([PD] median, 4.8 v 4.9 months), or survival duration (median, 13.9 v 13.2 months). Toxicity profiles were not statistically different except for constitutional symptoms, which were more frequent and more severe with IFN/5-FU. More patients interrupted treatment for adverse events (AEs) with IFN/ 5-FU (34%) than with 5-FU alone (21%) (P = .03). The number of deaths (mostly unrelated to drug treatment) during the study (8%) was similar with both regimens.

CONCLUSION

The combination IFN/5-FU produced a response rate, response duration, and survival duration similar to that of 5-FU alone. The addition of IFN to 5-FU in the doses and schedules used in this study did not provide any further benefit over 5-FU alone and cannot be recommended for patients with metastatic ACC. This study confirms the value of large prospective randomized clinical trials to determine the clinical value of regimens that emerge from smaller single-center phase II studies.

Phase-I trial of Thiotepa, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and prednisone or pentoxifylline in patients with refractory solid tumors

In a phase I trial, 13 patients with refractory solid tumors received thiotepa, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and either prednisone or pentoxifylline (PTX) on alternate cycles. The prednisone and PTX were administered in an attempt to ameliorate toxicity related to GM-CSF. Of the first six patients treated at a thiotepa dose of 60 mg/m(2), five experienced grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and four grade 2 or greater leukopenia. One of these patients died secondary to E. coli sepsis. Seven patients received a thiotepa dose of 50 mg/m(2), with one experiencing grade 3 thrombocytopenia and another grade 3 leukopenia. The latter patient died secondary to presumed sepsis. The five remaining patients at the 50 mg/m(2) dose did not experience greater than grade 1 hematologic toxicity. Serum tumor necrosis factor levels were not increased by GM-CSF. Patients in this trial were not evaluable for amelioration of GM-CSF toxicity as too few received a second cycle of treatment. We conclude that thiotepa doses greater than 50 mg/m(2) are not tolerated due to severe thrombocytopenia which is not diminished by the administration of GM-CSF.

Vascular events in patients receiving high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy: the University of Chicago experience

In a retrospective review, 22 of a total of 244 patients (9%) patients with head and neck or gastrointestinal cancer who were treated with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimens experienced thrombotic vascular events. These events occurred concurrently with treatment or several months following the completion of therapy and consisted mainly of cardiac arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, sudden death, and thromboembolism. The temporal relationship of these vascular events to the time of treatment suggests that infusional 5-FU may have been the underlying cause.

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B

The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) utilized a randomized phase II trial design to evaluate two cisplatin-based combinations, cisplatin-cytarabine (ara-C) and cisplatin-vinblastine, in 151 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Patients entered on study had not received prior chemotherapy. Platinum doses were equivalent in the two treatment programs. The total response rate (complete response, partial response, regression of evaluable disease) for the cisplatin-vinblastine group was 22% (16/73). Failure-free survival at six months for this group was 41%, survival at six months was 63%. The cisplatin-ara-C group had a total response rate of 9% (7/78) with a failure-free survival at six months of 14% and a six-month survival of 47%. Severe or life-threatening toxicity was seen in 73% of cisplatin-vinblastine cases and 59% of cisplatin-ara-C patients. Neither regimen is active enough to warrant designation as "standard therapy" for patients with M1 disease.

Toxic effects of cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II) in man

Administration of cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II) may be associated with a number of serious side effects, including nephrotoxicity, gastroeintestinal side effects (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea), myelosuppression, and occasional transient elevations in liver function tests. In addition, ototoxicity (tinnitus and hearing loss), anaphylactic reactions, peripheral neuropathies, and hypomagnesemia with resulting tetany may also be encountered. The toxic potential of this new agent necessitates careful clinical monitoring during treatment.

Chemotherapy for testicular cancer: current status of the National Cancer Institute Combined Modality Trial

Twenty-five previously untreated patients with advanced testicular carcinoma were treated with a five-drug combination chemotherapy program containing cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II). This drug regimen was used as part of a trial testing the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (15 patients) and in ten additional patients not eligible for the combined modality study. Eleven of 25 (44%) patients had a complete response and 11 of 25 (44%) patients had a partial response. Nine of 11 (82%) patients with minimal tumor burden upon initiation of chemotherapy had a complete response. With a median followup of 12+ months, none have relapsed. Complete remissions in patients with very advanced bulky disease were rare (two of 14 [14%] patients) and of short duration, with both patients relapsing. In addition to the usual hematologic toxicity, 14 of 25 (56%) patients developed hypomagnesemia and five of 25 (20%) patients developed systemic reactions to cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II) which prevented further drug administration.