Unilateral conjunctival Classic Kaposi Sarcoma following a COVID 19 booster

Purpose

We describe a case of Classic Kaposi's sarcoma in a functionally monocular patient following a COVID19 vaccine booster and provide compelling evidence that suggests the booster was a relevant co-factor in the initiation of the disease process.

Observations

The patient presented with red, irritated conjunctival area described as "bubbling" in her right eye. While her past medical history includes hypercholesterolemia and hypertension, she had no history of a compromised immune system. Her ophthalmologic history is more complex including treatment for glaucoma. The patient has 20/20 uncorrected vision OD and LP OS. Due to her ocular co-morbidities, the patient initially received interferon alpha 2-B qid for 6 weeks. However, topical therapy failed to decrease the size of the conjunctival lesions. After referral to Radiation Oncology, the right eye/orbit was treated with electron beam therapy for 1 month which caused a marked decrease in the size and vascularity of the conjunctival lesions. A slow improvement continued during followup.

Conclusion and importance

In that the vaccine booster preceded the cancer, it appears etiologic to the appearance of Kaposi's sarcoma. The patient's monocular vision and glaucoma complicated her treatment. This case expands on current concepts of cofactors needed for the development of Kaposi's sarcoma in that vaccine booster administration was relevant to tumor progression and both clinical and mechanistic evidence is presented to support this hypothesis.

Efficacy and Safety of Glembatumumab Vedotin in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung (PrECOG 0504)

Introduction

Glycoprotein NMB is a transmembrane protein linked with poor prognosis and is expressed in most squamous lung cancer. Glembatumumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting glycoprotein NMB, administered intravenously every 3 weeks in this phase 1 study to determine the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose in patients who had progressed on any number of previous therapies.

Results

A total of 13 patients were enrolled; adverse events (of any grade) including dyspnea, neutropenia, respiratory failure, anemia, increased aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase, diarrhea, and hypophosphatemia were seen in 15% of patients. Grade 5 events included two cases of respiratory failure, either completely or partially attributed to cancer progression. The only other grade 5 event was “disease progression.” The most common adverse events (23%) were decreased appetite, fatigue, rash, and weight loss.

The median overall and progression-free survivals were 5.7 months (90% confidence interval: 2.5–16.8) and 2.5 months (90% confidence interval: 1.6–5.8) respectively.

Conclusions

Glembatumumab vedotin exhibited no serious or unexpected toxicity in this heavily pretreated population, except those caused by disease progression. Modest anticancer activity was observed with a recommendation for a phase 2 dose of 1.9 mg/kg. This portion of the study was not undertaken owing to the company’s decision to discontinue drug development.

Risk Stratification of Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Treated with Chemo-Radiotherapy: An Institutional Analysis

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine which factors predicted survival and to derive a risk prediction model for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT).

Methods

This investigation included 149 patients with locally advanced NSCLC who were treated with cCRT at Stony Brook University Hospital between 2007 and 2015. A finite set of demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were evaluated as independent prognostic factors. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated, and log rank tests were used to evaluate difference in survival between groups. To derive a risk score for mortality, a machine learning approach was utilized. To maximize statistical power while examining replicability, the sample was split into discovery (n=99) and replication (n=50) subsamples. Elastic-net regression was used to identify a linear prediction model. Youden’s index was used to identify appropriate cutoffs. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine mortality risk; model concordance and hazards ratios were reported.

Results

One-quarter of the patients survived for three years after initiation of cCRT. Prognostic factors for survival in the discovery group included age, sex, smoking status, albumin, histology, largest tumor size, number of nodal stations, stage, induction therapy, and radiation dose. The derived model had good risk predictive accuracy (C=0.70). Median survival time was shorter in the high-risk group (0.93 years) vs the low-risk group (2.40 years). Similar findings were noted in the replication sample with strong model accuracy (C=0.69) and median survival time of 0.93 years and 2.03 years for the high- and low-risk groups, respectively.

Conclusion

This novel risk prediction model for overall survival in patients with stage III NSCLC highlights the importance of integrating patient, clinical, and treatment variables for accurately predicting outcomes. Clinicians can use this tool to make personalized treatment decisions for patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with concurrent chemo-radiation.

Severe immune thrombocytopenia induced by a single dose of nivolumab in a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Nivolumab-induced immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare process with few reported cases. We present a 67-year-old man with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who was hospitalized with severe thrombocytopenia. Physical exam was notable for petechiae across his chest and extremities as well as bullae in his oral cavity. The patient initially received high-dose glucocorticoids and intravenous immuno - globulin, but did not respond to treatment. He was then started on weekly rituximab and after three doses, there was complete resolution of his thrombocytopenia. Altogether, his presentation was an extreme case and rare side effect of immune checkpoint therapy, known as nivolumab-induced ITP. Diagnosis of nivolumab-induced ITP is challenging given the lack of specific testing and a wide differential diagnosis. There are few cases reporting severe ITP following nivolumab treatment. We highlight the importance of recognizing and treating this rare complication of immunotherapy.

Survival Outcomes Among Lung Cancer Patients Treated Using a Multidisciplinary Team Approach

BACKGROUND

Evidence favoring a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach in the treatment of lung cancer is scarce, especially in the United States. The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate survival outcomes of lung cancer patients treated with an MDT compared with a traditional care model.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Stony Brook Cancer Center Registry was used to identify all lung cancer cases diagnosed between 2002 and 2016. We compared survival outcomes among 1956 lung cancer patients participating in our institution's Lung Cancer Evaluation Center's (LCEC) MDT program and 2315 lung cancer patients receiving traditional care. Log-ranks tests were used to evaluate differences in the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival outcomes between the 2 groups. To address inherent biases, Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the effects on survival outcomes and adjust for possible confounders. Propensity matching was also performed to account for the effects of selection bias.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rates in the propensity-matched sample were one third greater among LCEC patients compared with those receiving a traditional care approach (33.6% vs. 23.0%; P < .001). After adjusting for potential confounders in the multivariable propensity-matched analyses, the LCEC model demonstrated a significant beneficial effect on 5-year survival outcomes compared with the standard treatment model (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.77).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present investigation suggest an improved survival benefit from usage of an MDT model versus a traditional care model in the treatment of lung cancer. Despite the use of sophisticated statistical methods to mitigate bias in a nonrandomized study, additional research is needed to determine the extent to which an MDT approach for lung cancer influences patient outcomes.

Five-Year Survival Among Stage IIIA Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Two Different Treatment Modalities

Background

Five-year survival rates among stage IIIA lung cancer patients range between 2% and 15%, and there is currently no consensus regarding optimal treatment approaches for these patients. The current investigation evaluated survival outcomes among stage IIIA lung cancer patients receiving 2 different treatment modalities, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection versus chemoradiation alone.

Material/Methods

This retrospective study is based on 127 patients attending the Lung Cancer Evaluation Center at Stony Brook Cancer Center between 2002 and 2014. Patients were treated either with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection or a regimen of chemoradiation alone. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare survival outcomes between groups and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate treatment effects on survival, while adjusting for possible confounders.

Results

Approximately one-fourth (n=33) of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, whereas 94 patients received definitive chemoradiation. Patients in the surgical group were found to be significantly younger than those receiving chemoradiation alone (60.1 vs. 67.9 years, respectively; p=0.001). Five-year survival among patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy followed by resection was significantly higher than that among patients receiving chemoradiation alone (63% vs. 19%, respectively; p<0.001), whereas the hazard ratio (HR) was 3–4 times greater in the latter group (HR=3.77, 95% confidence interval=1.87, 7.61).

Conclusions

Findings from this study indicate that preoperative chemotherapy followed by resection can improve survival outcomes for stage IIIA lung cancer patients compared with chemoradiation alone. The results reflect a select surgical group of patients; thus, the data highlight the need to develop new therapies that may result in more patients being viable surgical candidates.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase II study of the efficacy and safety of apricoxib in combination with either docetaxel or pemetrexed in patients with biomarker-selected non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Overexpression of COX-2 correlates with advanced stage and worse outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), possibly as a result of elevated levels of COX-2-dependent prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Exploratory analyses of studies that used COX-2 inhibitors have demonstrated potentially superior outcome in patients in whom the urinary metabolite of PGE2 (PGE-M) is suppressed. We hypothesized that patients with disease defined by PGE-M suppression would benefit from the addition of apricoxib to second-line docetaxel or pemetrexed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with NSCLC who had disease progression after one line of platinum-based therapy, performance status of 0 to 2, and normal organ function were potentially eligible. Only patients with a ≥ 50% decrease in urinary PGE-M after 5 days of treatment with apricoxib could enroll. Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) once every 21 days per the investigator was administered with apricoxib or placebo 400 mg once per day. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Exploratory analysis was performed regarding baseline urinary PGE-M and outcomes.

RESULTS

In all, 101 patients completed screening, and 72 of the 80 who demonstrated ≥ 50% suppression were randomly assigned to apricoxib or placebo. Toxicity was similar between the arms. No improvement in PFS was seen with apricoxib versus placebo. The median PFS for the control arm was 97 days (95% CI, 52 to 193 days) versus 85 days (95% CI, 67 to 142 days) for the experimental arm (P = .91).

CONCLUSION

Apricoxib did not improve PFS, despite biomarker-driven patient selection.

Phase II trial of bortezomib alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or stomach

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of bortezomib plus irinotecan and bortezomib alone in patients with advanced gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and gastric adenocarcinoma. We also sought to explore the effect of these therapeutics on tumor and normal gene expression in vivo.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with advanced GEJ (89 %) or gastric (11 %) adenocarcinoma received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) days 1, 4, 8, 11) plus irinotecan (125 mg/m(2) days 1, 8) every 21 days as first line therapy (N = 29), or bortezomib alone as second line therapy (N = 12). The trial was designed to detect a 40 % response rate for the combination, and 20 % response rate for bortezomib alone. Affymetrix HU133A gene chip arrays were used for gene expression studies.

RESULTS

Objective response occurred in 3 of 29 patients (10 %, 95 % confidence intervals [CI] 2 %, 27 %) treated with bortezomib plus irinotecan, and in 1 of 12 patients (8 %, 95 % CI 0 %, 39 %) with bortezomib alone. Due to the limited number of responders, there were no significant correlations with response found in the gene expression profiles of 12 patients whose tumors were sampled before and 24 h after therapy with bortezomib alone (N = 2) or the combination (N = 10).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that bortezomib is not effective for the treatment of advanced adenocarcinoma of the GEJ or stomach, whether used alone or in combination with irinotecan, in an unselected patient population.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter phase II study of the COX-2 inhibitor apricoxib (A) in combination with either docetaxel (doc) or pemetrexed (pem) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) selected by urinary PGE-m suppression

7546

Background: Overexpression of COX-2 has been associated with advanced stage and worse outcomes in NSCLC, possibly due to elevated levels of the COX-2 dependent prostaglandin, PGE-2. COX-2 inhibitors in addition to standard therapy has been associated with superior outcome in pts in whom the urinary metabolite of PGE-2, PGE-M is suppressed by the inhibitor. We hypothesized that pts defined by PGE-M suppression would benefit from the addition of apr to doc or pem. Methods: Pts with NSCLC, progressive after one platinum based therapy, PS 0-1, normal organ function, alb ≥2.5, CCr ≥ 45 were eligible for screening. A 5 day run in period with apr 400mg qd was performed. Only pts with a ≥ 50% decrease in urinary PGE-M could actually enroll. Chemotherapy was doc 75 mg/m2 or pem 500 mg/m2 q21 d per the investigator plus apr/placebo (P) 400 mg qd. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 109 pts were screened of whom 72 demonstrated ≥50% suppression and enrolled (table). Toxicity was similar between the arms. No improvement in PFS was seen with apricoxib vs. placebo. By chemotherapy assignment: pem/apr vs. pem/P : 103 days vs. 98 (p =.49); doc/apr vs. doc/P: 75 vs. 97 (p=.18). An adverse interaction between baseline PGE-M and doc was seen in survival (p=.026); each unit increase in urinary PGE-M increased the HR by 1.014 (p < 0.038 ) vs. pem (HR =.990, p=n.s.). There was no correlation between baseline PGE-M or magnitude of PGE-M suppression and benefit from apr. Conclusions: 1. Apr did not improve outcome despite patient selection. 2. There was a trend towards an adverse outcome when apr was combined with docetaxel, that was not evident with pemetrexed. 3. Baseline urinary PGE-M may be an adverse prognostic factor for treatment with doc. [Table: see text]

Risk of venous thromboembolism with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Venous thromboembolism is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Concerns have arisen regarding the risk of venous thromboembolism with the novel antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor that is widely used in cancer treatment. Currently, the role of bevacizumab in venous thromboembolism is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the overall risk of venous thromboembolism associated with the use of bevacizumab, a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials was performed.

DATA SOURCES

The databases of PubMed and Web of Science were searched for articles published in the English language from January 1966 until January 2008 and abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology conferences held between January 2000 and January 2008 were searched to identify relevant clinical trials.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Eligible studies included prospective randomized controlled trials in which standard antineoplastic therapy was used with and without bevacizumab and data on venous thromboembolism were available. Summary incidence rates, relative risks (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of included studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 7956 patients with a variety of advanced solid tumors from 15 randomized controlled trials were identified and included for analysis. Among those patients receiving bevacizumab, the summary incidences of all-grade and high-grade venous thromboembolism were 11.9% (95% CI, 6.8%-19.9%) and 6.3% (95% CI, 4.8%-8.3%), respectively. Patients treated with bevacizumab had a significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism with an RR of 1.33 (95% CI, 1.13-1.56; P < .001) compared with controls. The risk was significantly increased for both all-grade and high-grade venous thromboembolism. In addition, the risk was similarly increased for bevacizumab at 2.5 mg/kg per week (low dose; RR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.08-1.60]; P = .007) and 5 mg/kg per week (high dose; RR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.02-1.68]; P = .04).

CONCLUSION

The use of bevacizumab was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients receiving this drug.

Phase II study of PS-341 (bortezomib) with or without irinotecan in patients (pts) with advanced gastric adenocarcinomas (AGA)

14040

Background: We are conducting a phase II trial of the proteasome inhibitor, PS-341, with or without irinotecan in pts with AGA. The combination of PS-341 and irinotecan has been studied in preclinical tumor models including a murine xenograft model of colon cancer, where the combination achieved significantly more tumor shrinkage than either agent alone. The primary objective of this study is to determine response rates, toxicities, progression-free survival, and overall survival in pts with AGA receiving PS-341 alone or in combination with irinotecan. Methods: All pts had gastric adenocarcinoma beyond the scope of surgical resection, measurable disease, and normal bone marrow, hepatic and renal function. All gave informed consent. In previously untreated patients, PS-341 was administered at 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 as IV bolus every 21 days. Irinotecan was administered IV at 125 mg/m2 over 90 mins on days 1 and 8 every 21 days (Arm A). For previously treated patients, PS-341 was administered as a single agent at 1.3mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, 11 as an IV bolus every 21 days (Arm B). Radiologic evaluation and tumor measurements were performed every 8 weeks. Results: Thirty-seven pts have been enrolled; 29 are evaluable (4 never treated, 4 TETE). Twenty-two pts were treated in Arm A, and 11 in Arm B. All pts were eligible and the 29 treated pts were fully evaluable. Median age 58 (33–87); 26 males/7 females; median number of cycles received was 2.0. Most common toxicities: Grade 4 cardiac arrest (1), stomach perforation (1), leukopenia (2), diarrhea (1), edema (1); Grade 3 nausea (6), vomiting (7), diarrhea (4), febrile neutropenia (3), thrombocytopenia (6), anemia (6); Grade 5 death (3). Severe toxicities likely attributed to disease progression. Response rate was 33% for Arm A, 9% for Arm B. Progression-free survival was 1.8 mo. in Arm A, 1.4 mo. in Arm B. Median overall survival was 4.8 mo. in Arm A, 5.4 mo. in Arm B. Conclusions: The combination of PS-341 and irinotecan, a non-cisplatin containing therapy, is active in AGA and should be considered a key regimen. Monotherapy with PS-341 has a 9% response rate in this population of pre-treated patients with advanced disease. Accrual to this study is continuing.

[Table: see text]

Surgical Resection for Residual N2 Disease After Induction Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Induction therapy is a common treatment modality for patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although mediastinal nodal downstaging after induction therapy is generally considered a favorable prognostic feature, the benefit of resection in the presence of residual N2 disease is controversial. In this study we analyzed our experience with resection after induction chemotherapy in patients with residual N2 disease to more precisely define the role of surgical resection in this group of patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed the records of 78 patients with N2 disease who received induction therapy with preoperative intent between 1990 and 2003. All patients had potentially resectable disease. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate multiple prognostic factors.

RESULTS

There were 78 patients (39 men) with a median age of 64 years. Sixty had nonsquamous histology. Resection was performed in 52 patients (47 R0). Hospital mortality was 1.9%. A complete pathologic response occurred in 2 of 52 (3.8%) patients and 19 of 52 (36%) patients had no residual N2 disease. Overall 5-year survival for resected patients was 23%. Overall 5-year survival was 30% for N0-N1 patients and 19% for those with residual N2 disease. Multivariable analysis identified clinical response to therapy (p = 0.0007) and histology (p = 0.01), but not residual N2 disease (p = 0.65), as important prognostic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection may be a viable option for patients with residual N2 disease after induction chemotherapy, provided an R0 resection can be performed.

Failure of higher-dose paclitaxel to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B trial 9342

PURPOSE

Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9342 was initiated to determine the optimal dose of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks to women with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred seventy-four women with metastatic breast cancer who had received one or no prior chemotherapy regimens were randomly assigned to one of three paclitaxel dosing regimens-175 mg/m(2), 210 mg/m(2), or 250 mg/m(2)-each administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Women completed self-administered quality of life and symptom assessment questionnaires at baseline and after three cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

No evidence of a significant dose-response relationship was demonstrated over the dose range assessed. Response rates were 23%, 26%, and 21% for the three regimens, respectively. A marginally significant association (P =.04) was seen between dose and time to progression; however, in a multivariate analysis, the difference was even less apparent. No statistically significant difference was seen in survival. Neurotoxicity and hematologic toxicity were more severe on the higher dose arms. There was no significant difference in quality of life on the three arms.

CONCLUSION

Higher doses of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion to women with metastatic breast cancer did not improve response rate, survival, or quality of life. There was a slight improvement in time to progression with higher dose therapy, which was offset by greater toxicity. When a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel is administered every 3 weeks, 175 mg/m(2) should be considered the optimal dose.

Positron emission tomography scanning poorly predicts response to preoperative chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The ability to accurately predict pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy may have a significant impact on the treatment strategy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in predicting the pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy in the primary tumor and draining lymph nodes.

METHODS

A total of 25 patients were enrolled in two separate phase II trials investigating induction chemotherapy for NSCLC. All patients underwent pre-treatment and post-treatment PET scans followed by surgical resection. A significant PET scan response was defined as a reduction in the standard uptake value by 50% or more. We defined a major pathologic response as either no disease or microscopic disease only in the primary tumor. The percentage change in standard uptake value was then calculated and correlated with pathologic response in the primary tumor. In addition, the presence or absence of nodal metastases as determined by the postchemotherapy PET scan was compared with final pathologic nodal stage.

RESULTS

The positive and negative predictive values for PET detection of major pathologic response in the primary tumor were 43% and 100%, respectively. Positron emission tomography did not accurately predict nodal status in 52% of patients. The positive and negative predictive values of PET to detect node-positive disease were 73% and 64%, respectively. For N2 disease the positive predictive value of PET scans was less than 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Positron emission tomography scanning does not reliably predict pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy in NSCLC in either the primary tumor or the draining lymph nodes.

A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas in patients with previous colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies in animals and observational studies in humans suggest that regular aspirin use may decrease the risk of colorectal adenomas, the precursors to most colorectal cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to determine the effect of aspirin on the incidence of colorectal adenomas. We randomly assigned 635 patients with previous colorectal cancer to receive either 325 mg of aspirin per day or placebo. We determined the proportion of patients with adenomas, the number of recurrent adenomas, and the time to the development of adenoma between randomization and subsequent colonoscopic examinations. Relative risks were adjusted for age, sex, cancer stage, the number of colonoscopic examinations, and the time to a first colonoscopy. The study was terminated early by an independent data and safety monitoring board when statistically significant results were reported during a planned interim analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 517 randomized patients had at least one colonoscopic examination a median of 12.8 months after randomization. One or more adenomas were found in 17 percent of patients in the aspirin group and 27 percent of patients in the placebo group (P=0.004). The mean (+/-SD) number of adenomas was lower in the aspirin group than the placebo group (0.30+/-0.87 vs. 0.49+/-0.99, P=0.003 by the Wilcoxon test). The adjusted relative risk of any recurrent adenoma in the aspirin group, as compared with the placebo group, was 0.65 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.91). The time to the detection of a first adenoma was longer in the aspirin group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio for the detection of a new polyp, 0.64; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.94; P=0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Daily use of aspirin is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of colorectal adenomas in patients with previous colorectal cancer.

A phase II trial of interferon alpha-2A, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin has moderate antitumor activity in the treatment of metastatic epidermoid carcinoma of the esophagus. The authors have recently shown activity for the combination of 5-FU and interferon-alpha 2a (IFN-alpha) in both esophageal epidermoid and adenocarcinoma. A Phase II trial, therefore, was undertaken to evaluate the antitumor activity of the three-drug combination of IFN-alpha, 5-FU, and cisplatin in unresectable or metastatic esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the esophagus were treated. No prior chemotherapy was allowed. Twelve patients had epidermoid carcinoma (44%) and 15 patients had adenocarcinoma (56%). Patients received IFN-alpha at a dose of 3 x 10(6) units/day given daily by subcutaneous injection on days 1 to 28, 5-FU at a dose of 750 mg/m2/day for 5 days by continuous intravenous infusion on days 1 to 5, and cisplatin at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 1. Treatment was recycled every 28 days, and after the first three cycles, cisplatin was administered only on alternate cycles. Twenty-seven patients completed a median of 4 cycles (range, 1-13 cycles), and 26 patients were evaluable for response.

RESULTS

Major responses were observed in 13 patients (50%, 95% confidence intervals, 31-69%), including two complete responses (8%). The response proportion in epidermoid carcinoma (8 of 11 patients, 73%) was higher than the response proportion in adenocarcinoma (5 of 15 patients, 33%). The median duration of response was 29 weeks (range, 11-74 weeks), similar in epidermoid carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Toxicity was moderately severe but manageable with dose attenuations. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was observed in 41% of patients and grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed in 26% of patients. IFN-alpha was reduced to either a 3- or 5-day a week schedule because of fatigue and/or myelosuppression in 12 patients (44%). There were two treatment-related deaths (7%).

CONCLUSION

In this Phase II trial, the combination of IFN-alpha, 5-FU, and cisplatin had substantial antitumor activity in esophageal carcinoma with apparently greater antitumor activity in epidermoid carcinoma than adenocarcinoma. A larger confirmatory trial comparing this treatment to conventional 5-FU and cisplatin is warranted for epidermoid carcinoma. In future chemotherapy trials, the response assessment for epidermoid and adenocarcinoma should continue to be stratified.