The NIH-led research response to COVID-19

Investment, collaboration, and coordination have been key.

Benefits of Streamlined Point-of-Care Trial Designs: Lessons Learned From the UK RECOVERY Study

This Viewpoint discusses the benefits of streamlined point-of-care trial designs in clinical research, using lessons learned from the UK RECOVERY study of dexamethasone dosing for patients with COVID-19 and hypoxia.

1079 USE OF AN ADVANCE CARE PLAN CHECKLIST TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT ON HOSPITAL READMISSIONS

Introduction

Advance care planning (ACP) is a vital part of holistic and person-centred care. It allows formalising of an individual’s wishes and best interests, and avoids unnecessary or unwanted interventions including, potentially, hospital admissions. It is crucial that any decisions or recommendations are communicated to all relevant healthcare professionals to ensure peoples’ wishes are upheld. We developed this project to review and improve documentation and communication on discharge when a decision had been made to limit care to the community and avoid admission.

Method

A checklist was developed comprising 11 criteria to be documented in the discharge letter and actions to disseminate information including; updating the ReSPECT form and alerting the hospital frailty and community out of hours teams. We carried out a closed loop audit of patients where admission should be avoided and reviewed discharge letters against the criteria. Where patients were readmitted we reviewed the notes to determine whether the admission was appropriate.

Results

We compared patients discharged between February 2020–February 2021 and then from March–September 2021. 161 and 27 patients were identified respectively. Average age was 84.6 and 87.3 years respectively. In cohort 2 48.1% of patients were readmitted, up from 8.7% during the previous cycle. 33% of admissions in cohort 2 and 38.9% of readmissions in cohort 1 were deemed appropriate. Documentation improved in 10 of the 11 criteria. Average length of stay for readmissions was reduced from 16.7 to 5.7 days.

Conclusion

As evidenced by our study utilising a checklist has improved documentation and dissemination of ACPs to the Community. This did not lead to a reduction in hospital admissions but this may have been skewed by factors relating to the Covid-19 pandemic. We did find a significant reduction in length of stay for those subsequently readmitted.

Update on and Future Directions for Use of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: National Institutes of Health Summit on Treatment and Prevention of COVID-19

As the fourth wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic encircles the globe, there remains an urgent challenge to identify safe and effective treatment and prevention strategies that can be implemented in a range of health care and clinical settings. Substantial advances have been made in the use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to mitigate the morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19. On 15 June 2021, the National Institutes of Health, in collaboration with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, convened a virtual summit to summarize existing knowledge on anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and to identify key unanswered scientific questions to further catalyze the clinical development and implementation of antibodies.

Racial and Ethnic Representation in US Clinical Trials of New Drugs and Biologics, 2015-2019

This study reviews the participation of racial and ethnic populations at US sites in 2015-2019 to understand the extent to which US trial participation represents the diversity of the US population.

The Built Environment and Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Review on Quantitative Health Impact Assessments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Features and attributes of the built environment (BE) impact positively and negatively on health, especially in cities facing unprecedented urban population growth and mass motorization. A common approach to assess the health impacts of built environment is health impact assessment (HIA), but it is rarely used in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where urbanization rates are fastest. This article reviews selected HIA case studies from LMICs and reports the methods and tools used to support further implementation of quantitative HIAs in cities of LMICs.

RECENT FINDINGS

In total, 24 studies were reviewed across Algeria, Brazil, China, India, Iran, Kenya, Thailand, Turkey, and Mauritius. HIAs examine specific pathways through which the built environment acts: air pollution, noise, physical activity, and traffic injury. Few HIAs of BE addressed more than one exposure pathway at a time, and most studies focused on air pollution across the sectors of transport and energy. A wide number of tools were used to conduct exposure assessment, and different models were applied to assess health impacts of different exposures. Those HIAs rely on availability of local concentration data and often use models that have set exposure-response functions (ERFs). ERFs were not adapted to local populations except for HIAs conducted in China. HIAs of BE are being successfully conducted in LMICs with a variety of tools and datasets. Scaling and expanding quantitative health impact modeling in LMICs will require further study on data availability, adapted models/tools, low technical capacity, and low policy demand for evidence from modeling studies. As case studies with successful use of evidence from modeling emerge, the uptake of health impact modeling of BE is likely to increase in favor of people and planet.

Food and Drug Administration Beyond the 2001 Government Accountability Office Report: Promoting Drug Safety for Women

A 2001 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report indicated 8 of 10 drugs withdrawn from the U.S. market between 1997 and 2000 posed greater risk to women than men. We examined drugs withdrawn from the market for safety-related reasons from January 1, 2001, to January 1, 2018. To be included, drugs must be listed as discontinued on Drugs@FDA and either listed in the Federal Register or cited in literature as being withdrawn for safety-related reasons. Biologics, over-the-counter products, and medical devices were excluded. During the 17-year time span, 19 drugs were withdrawn from the market for safety-related reasons, fewer drugs per year compared to the 3-year period examined in the GAO report. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not recommended the market removal of any drug approved since 2005 due to the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave (QT) interval prolongation resulting in torsades de pointes (TdP) or other abnormal heart rhythms. Furthermore, no drugs approved after the implementation of FDA's 2009 guidance on drug-induced liver injury (DILI) have been withdrawn because of hepatoxicity. All, but one of the drugs discontinued from the market for safety-related reasons during the period examined were approved between 1957 and 2002. TdP and DILI are two relevant examples of drug-induced adverse events posing greater risk to women than men. FDA has made measurable progress incorporating consideration of sex and gender differences into drug trial development and FDA review of these data, supporting inclusion of women in clinical trials, providing a comprehensive drug safety review, and advancing postmarket surveillance and risk assessment, thus strengthening FDA's ability to protect public health.

Patient-Centered Approach to Benefit-Risk Characterization Using Number Needed to Benefit and Number Needed to Harm: Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

This work summarizes the benefit and risk of the results of clinical trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration of therapies for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using number needed to benefit (NNB) and number needed to harm (NNH) metrics. NNB and NNH metrics have been reported as potentially being more patient centric and more intuitive to medical practitioners than more common metrics, such as the hazard ratio, and valuable to medical practitioners in complementing other metrics, such as the median time to event. This approach involved the characterization of efficacy and safety results in terms of NNB and NNH of 30 clinical trials in advanced NSCLC supporting US Food and Drug Administration approval decisions from 2003 to 2017. We assessed trends of NNB over time of treatment (eg, for programmed death 1 inhibitors) and variation of NNB across subpopulations (eg, characterized by epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, programmed death ligand 1 expression, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, age, and extent of disease progression). Furthermore, the evolution of NNB of treatments for advanced NSCLC was charted from 2003 to 2017. Across subpopulations, NNB, on average, was 4 patients for approved targeted therapies in molecularly enriched populations, 11 patients for approved therapies in nonmolecularly enriched populations, and 23 patients for withdrawn or unapproved therapies. Furthermore, the NNB analysis showed variation for attributes of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, level of programmed death 1 expression, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, etc. When considering the best-case subpopulations and available drugs, the NNB frontier reduced from an estimated value of 7.7 in 2003 to an estimated value of 2.5 in 2017 at the estimated median overall survival-equal to 6 months-of an untreated patient.

Quality Testing of Difficult-to-Make Prescription Pharmaceutical Products Marketed in the US

IMPORTANCE

Health care practitioners and patients must have information to support their confidence in the quality of prescription pharmaceuticals.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there were clear and substantive differences in major quality attributes between difficult-to-make solid oral dosage form pharmaceutical products marketed in the US.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This quality improvement study analyzed US Food and Drug Administration-collected samples of 252 drug products marketed in the US and manufactured in the US, Canada, Europe, India, and the rest of Asia. These drug products were immediate-release solid oral dosage forms considered difficult to make on the basis of product quality history. This sampling included 35 innovator and 217 generic drug samples manufactured by 46 different firms containing 17 different active ingredients. Statistical analysis was performed from February to November 2019.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All products were tested within their shelf life on the basis of the legally recognized tests of the US Pharmacopeia for the major quality attributes of dosage unit uniformity and dissolution. These tests measure dosage consistency and drug release, respectively. The consistency of either attribute was used to calculate a process performance index to describe the variability in manufacturing.

RESULTS

All 252 drug product samples met the US market standards for dosage unit uniformity and dissolution, although the process performance index (Ppk) for dissolution fell below the level of 4-sigma capability (ie, <1 error per 1600) for 11 different manufacturers and for generics in 4 of 5 regions, including the US. As part of a retrospective analysis, manufacturers performing above the median Ppk for either dissolution or dosage unit uniformity submitted fewer product quality defect reports (mean field alert reports of 0.22 and 0.63, respectively) than those falling at or below the median Ppk for these attributes (mean field alert reports of 2.1 and 1.7, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

All samples met the US market standards for dosage unit uniformity and dissolution, indicating acceptability for use by patients regardless of manufacturer or region. To our knowledge, this is the largest sampling study of pharmaceutical manufacturers for the US market and these data provide objective insight into the quality of prescription drugs with high manufacturing risks.

FDA Initiative for Drug Facts Label for Over-the-Counter Naloxone

BACKGROUND

The opioid crisis highlights the need to increase access to naloxone, possibly through regulatory approval for over-the-counter sales. To address industry-perceived barriers to such access, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) developed a model drug facts label for such sales to assess whether consumers understood the key statements for safe and effective use.

METHODS

In this label-comprehension study, we conducted individual structured interviews with 710 adults and adolescents, including 430 adults who use opioids and their family and friends. Eight primary end points were developed to assess user comprehension of each of the key steps in the label. Each of these end points included a prespecified target threshold ranging from 80 to 90% that was evaluated through a comparison of the lower boundary of the 95% exact confidence interval.

RESULTS

The results for performance on six primary end points met or exceeded thresholds, including the steps "Check for a suspected overdose" (threshold, 85%; point estimate [PE], 95.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 94.0 to 97.1) and "Give the first dose" (threshold, 85%; PE, 98.2%; 95% CI, 96.9 to 99.0). The lower boundaries for four other primary end points ranged from 88.8 to 94.0%. One exception was comprehension of "Call 911 immediately," but this instruction closely approximated the target of 90% (PE, 90.3%; 95% CI, 87.9 to 92.4). Another exception was comprehension of the composite step of "Check, give, and call 911 immediately" (threshold, 85%; PE, 81.1%; 95% CI, 78.0 to 83.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Consumers met thresholds for sufficient understanding of six of eight components of the instructions in the drug facts label for naloxone use and came close on two others. Overall, the FDA found that the model label was adequate for use in the development of a naloxone product intended for over-the-counter sales.

Blood-based systems biology biomarkers for next-generation clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD)-a complex disease showing multiple pathomechanistic alterations-is triggered by nonlinear dynamic interactions of genetic/epigenetic and environmental risk factors, which, ultimately, converge into a biologically heterogeneous disease. To tackle the burden of AD during early preclinical stages, accessible blood-based biomarkers are currently being developed. Specifically, next-generation clinical trials are expected to integrate positive and negative predictive blood-based biomarkers into study designs to evaluate, at the individual level, target druggability and potential drug resistance mechanisms. In this scenario, systems biology holds promise to accelerate validation and qualification for clinical trial contexts of use-including proof-of-mechanism, patient selection, assessment of treatment efficacy and safety rates, and prognostic evaluation. Albeit in their infancy, systems biology-based approaches are poised to identify relevant AD "signatures" through multifactorial and interindividual variability, allowing us to decipher disease pathophysiology and etiology. Hopefully, innovative biomarker-drug codevelopment strategies will be the road ahead towards effective disease-modifying drugs.
.

Participation of Women in Clinical Trials Supporting FDA Approval of Cardiovascular Drugs

BACKGROUND

Concerns exist that women are underrepresented in trials of cardiovascular medications.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to examine women's participation and the reported safety and efficacy by gender for pivotal cardiovascular disease (CVD) trials submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) supporting marketing applications.

METHODS

On the basis of publicly available FDA reviews, the authors assessed enrollment of women in trials supporting 36 drug approvals from 2005 to 2015. Prevalence-corrected estimates for the participation of women were calculated as the percentage of women among trial participants divided by the percentage of women in the disease population (participation to prevalence ratio [PPR]), with a range between 0.8 and 1.2 reflecting similar representation of women in the trial and disease population. Sex differences in efficacy and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

The proportion of women enrolled ranged from 22% to 81% (mean 46%). The calculated PPR by disease area was within or above the desirable range for atrial fibrillation (0.8 to 1.1), hypertension (0.9), and pulmonary arterial hypertension (1.4); PPR was <0.8 for heart failure (0.5 to 0.6), coronary artery disease (0.6), and acute coronary syndrome/myocardial infarction (0.6). The authors found little indication of clinically meaningful gender differences in efficacy or safety. Gender differences in efficacy or safety were described in labeling for 4 drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Women were well represented in trials of drugs for hypertension and atrial fibrillation, and overrepresented for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Representation of women fell below a PPR of 0.8 for trials in heart failure, coronary artery disease, and acute coronary syndrome. Minimal gender differences in drug efficacy and safety profiles were observed.

Using a Benefit-Risk Analysis Approach to Capture Regulatory Decision Making: Melanoma

Drug regulators seek to make decisions regarding drug approvals based on analysis of the relevant benefits and risks. In this work, 25 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decisions on melanoma drugs were identified and analyzed based on clinical trial results published between 1999 and 2017. In each case, the benefits and risks of the new drug in each clinical trial relative to a comparator (typically the control arm of the same clinical trial) were quantified. The benefits and risks were analyzed using a common scale to allow for direct comparison. A sensitivity analysis was conducted using vemurafenib to explore the magnitude of uncertainty in the quantitative assessments. The associated FDA decision outcomes of the new drugs were consistent with the benefits and risks quantified in this work.

The FDA's Approach to the Prescription Opioid Problem

Our nation's ongoing prescription opioid abuse crisis, amounting to over 78 billion dollars in health and social costs annually,¹ is a critical priority for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). As a part of our mission to support the safe and effective use of prescription medicines, the FDA is taking a fresh look at potential scientific and regulatory actions we can take to address this crisis.

Considerations for Developing Targeted Therapies in Low-Frequency Molecular Subsets of a Disease

Advances in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of disease have spurred the development of targeted therapies and the use of precision medicine approaches in patient care. While targeted therapies have improved our capability to provide effective treatments to patients, they also present additional challenges to drug development and benefit-risk assessment such as identifying the subset(s) of patients likely to respond to the drug, assessing heterogeneity in response across molecular subsets of a disease, and developing diagnostic tests to identify patients for treatment. These challenges are particularly difficult to address when targeted therapies are developed to treat diseases with multiple molecular subtypes that occur at low frequencies. To help address these challenges, the US Food and Drug Administration recently published a draft guidance entitled "Developing Targeted Therapies in Low-Frequency Molecular Subsets of a Disease." Here we provide additional information on specific aspects of targeted therapy development in diseases with low-frequency molecular subsets.

Facilitating Antibacterial Drug Development in a Time of Great Need

The continued development of new antibacterial drugs is critical to meet patient and public health needs. In this editorial, authors from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency reflect on the role of public-private partnerships and the development of clinical trials networks as agents to guide and perform quality studies of antibacterial drugs.

A Benefit-Risk Analysis Approach to Capture Regulatory Decision-Making: Multiple Myeloma

Drug regulators around the world make decisions about drug approvability based on qualitative benefit-risk analysis. In this work, a quantitative benefit-risk analysis approach captures regulatory decision-making about new drugs to treat multiple myeloma (MM). MM assessments have been based on endpoints such as time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) which are different than benefit-risk analysis based on overall survival (OS). Twenty-three FDA decisions on MM drugs submitted to FDA between 2003 and 2016 were identified and analyzed. The benefits and risks were quantified relative to comparators (typically the control arm of the clinical trial) to estimate whether the median benefit-risk was positive or negative. A sensitivity analysis was demonstrated using ixazomib to explore the magnitude of uncertainty. FDA approval decision outcomes were consistent and logical using this benefit-risk framework.

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Perspective on Quality in Clinical Trials

Clinical trial quality is essential to bringing effective treatments to patients as quickly as possible. Clinical trials that answer important questions, yield meaningful data, and protect trial participants can provide data that support both regulatory and clinical decision making. The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) encourages stakeholders to improve clinical trial quality and efficiency. CDER believes that a systematic approach to clinical trial quality-one that builds in quality up front and focuses on the most critical aspects of study conduct-contributes to successful trials. Beyond FDA's regulatory requirements for clinical trial quality, CDER is an active participant in multiple efforts to advance clinical trial quality, including the addendum to ICH E6 (Good Clinical Practice) and the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative project on quality-by-design for clinical trials. These efforts aim to move clinical drug development to a desired state that centers on efficient and agile clinical development programs that reliably produce high-quality data and adhere to important ethical standards.

The US regulatory and pharmacopeia response to the global heparin contamination crisis

The contamination of the widely used lifesaving anticoagulant drug heparin in 2007 has drawn renewed attention to the challenges that are associated with the characterization, quality control and standardization of complex biological medicines from natural sources. Heparin is a linear, highly sulfated polysaccharide consisting of alternating glucosamine and uronic acid monosaccharide residues. Heparin has been used successfully as an injectable antithrombotic medicine since the 1930s, and its isolation from animal sources (primarily porcine intestine) as well as its manufacturing processes have not changed substantially since its introduction. The 2007 heparin contamination crisis resulted in several deaths in the United States and hundreds of adverse reactions worldwide, revealing the vulnerability of a complex global supply chain to sophisticated adulteration. This Perspective discusses how the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) and international stakeholders collaborated to redefine quality expectations for heparin, thus making an important natural product better controlled and less susceptible to economically motivated adulteration.

Review of the Drug Trials Snapshots Program of the US Food and Drug Administration: Women in Cardiovascular Drug Trials

This review of FDA’s Drug Trials Snapshots Program evaluates the sex-specific findings reported as part of the approval process for all cardiovascular drugs that the FDA approved in 2015.