Coordinated induction of cell proliferation and syndecan expression in dental mesenchyme by epithelium: evidence for diffusible signals

Membrane proteome characterization of periodontal ligament cell sets from deciduous and permanent teeth

BACKGROUND

Physiological roles for the periodontal ligament (PDL) include tooth eruption and anchorage, force absorption, and provision of proprioceptive information. Despite the advances in understanding the biology of PDL cells, there is a lack of information regarding the molecular signature of deciduous (DecPDL) and permanent (PermPDL) PDL tissues. Thus, the present study was designed to characterize the membrane proteome of DecPDL and PermPDL cells.

METHODS

Primary PDL cells were obtained (n = 6) and a label-free quantitative proteome of cell membrane-enriched components was performed. Proteome findings were validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot assays in fresh human tissues (n = 8) and primary cell cultures (n = 6). In addition, confocal microscopy was used to verify the expression of target factors in the PDL cell cultures.

RESULTS

Comparative gene ontology enrichment analysis evidenced that most stickling differences involved "endomembrane system" (PICALM, STX4, and LRP10), "hydrolase activity" (NCSTN and XRCC6), "protein binding" (PICALM, STX4, GPNMB, VASP, extended-synaptotagmin 2 [ESYT2], and leucine-rich repeat containing 15 [LRRC15]), and "isomerase activity" (FKBP8). Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD010226. At the transcript level, high PICALM in DecPDL and ESYT2 and LRRC15 in PermPDL were confirmed in fresh PDL tissues. Furthermore, Western blot analysis confirmed increased levels of PICALM, LRRC15, and ESYT2 in cells and/or fresh tissues, and confocal microscopy confirmed the trends for PICALM and LRRC15 expression in PDL cells.

CONCLUSION

We report the first comprehensive characterization of the membrane protein machinery of DecPDL and PermPDL cells, and together, we identified a distinct molecular signature for these cell populations, including unique proteins for DecPDL and PermPDL.

Primordial odontogenic tumor: Subepithelial expression of Syndecan-1 and Ki-67 suggests origin during early odontogenesis

Primordial odontogenic tumor (POT) is composed of variably cellular myxoid connective tissue, surrounded by cuboidal to columnar odontogenic epithelium resembling the inner epithelium of the enamel organ, which often invaginates into the underlying connective tissue. The tumor is delimited at least partially by a thin fibrous capsule. It derives from the early stages of tooth development. Syndecan-1 is a heparan sulfate proteoglycan that has a physiological role in several cellular functions, including maintenance of the epithelial architecture, cell-to-cell adhesion and interaction of cells with extracellular matrix, and with diverse growth factors, stimulating cell proliferation. Ki-67 is considered the gold standard as a cell proliferation marker. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of Syndecan-1 and Ki-67 proliferation index in POT and normal tooth germs to better understand the biological behavior of this tumor. Results showed that Syndecan-1 was more intensely expressed in subepithelial mesenchymal areas of POT, in a pattern that resembles the early stages of tooth development. The cell proliferation index (4.1%) suggests that POT is a slow growing tumor. Syndecan-1 expression in tooth germs in late cap and early bell stages was similar to POT, showing immunopositivity in subepithelial mesenchymal condensed areas. The immunohistochemical findings showed a pattern in which the population of subepithelial mesenchymal cells exhibited greater proliferative activity than the central portion of the dental papilla.

Distribution of syndecan-1 protein in developing mouse teeth

Syndecan-1 is a cell surface proteoglycan involved in the regulation of various biological processes such as proliferation, migration, condensation and differentiation of cells, intercellular communication, and morphogenesis. The extracellular domain of syndecan-1 can bind to extracellular matrix components and signaling molecules, while its intracellular domain interacts with cytoskeletal proteins, thus allowing the transfer of information about extracellular environment changes into the cell that consequently affect cellular behavior. Although previous studies have shown syndecan-1 expression during precise stages of tooth development, there is no equivalent study regrouping the expression patterns of syndecan-1 during all stages of odontogenesis. Here we examined the distribution of syndecan-1 protein in embryonic and post-natal developing mouse molars and incisors. Syndecan-1 distribution in mesenchymal tissues such as dental papilla and dental follicle was correlated with proliferating events and its expression was often linked to stem cell niche territories. Syndecan-1 was also expressed in mesenchymal cells that will differentiate into the dentin producing odontoblasts, but not in differentiated functional odontoblasts. In the epithelium, syndecan-1 was detected in all cell layers, by the exception of differentiated ameloblasts that form the enamel. Furthermore, syndecan-1 was expressed in osteoblast precursors and osteoclasts of the alveolar bone that surrounds the developing tooth germs. Taken together these results show the dynamic nature of syndecan-1 expression during odontogenesis and suggest its implication in various processes of tooth development and homeostasis.

Expression of cytokeratin 8, vimentin, syndecan-1 and Ki-67 during human tooth development

Spatio-temporal immunolocalizations of cytokeratin 8 (CK8), vimentin, syndecan-1 and Ki-67 were analyzed in ten human incisors and canine tooth germs between the 7th and 20th developmental weeks. CK8 expression was mild to moderate in the epithelial tooth parts, while it shifted from absent or mild in its mesenchymal parts, but few cells, sparsely distributed throughout the tooth germ, strongly expressed CK8. As development progressed, CK8 expression increased to strong in preameloblasts, while expression of vimentin increased to moderate in the epithelial and mesenchymal tooth parts, particularly in the dental papilla and sac. Co-expression of CK8 and vimentin was observed in some parts of the tooth germ, and was increasing in the differentiating preameloblasts and preodontoblasts. Syndecan-1 showed characteristic shift of expression from epithelial to mesenchymal tooth parts, being particularly strong in dental papilla, sac and cervical loops, while co-expression of Ki-67/syndecan-1 was strong in the dental papilla. Our study demonstrated spatio-temporal expression and restricted co-expression of the investigated markers, indicating participation of CK8 and vimentin in cell proliferation and migration, and differentiation of preodontoblasts and preameloblasts. Our data also suggest involvement of syndecan-1 in morphogenesis of the developing tooth crown and cervical loops, and together with CK8 and vimentin in differentiation of preameloblasts and preodontoblasts.

Syndecan-1 - A new piece in B-cell puzzle

Syndecans are transmembrane proteoglycans, with core proteins mainly decorated with heparan sulfate chains. Syndecan-1 is expressed in a tissue-, cell-and differentiation-specific manner. Its extra-cellular domain can bind via HS chains to matrix elements, to growth factors (especially "heparin-binding" proteins) and to certain biological agents. The ectodomain released by proteolysis can also be functionally active. The cytoplasmic domain can take part in signaling processes as well as in modifying cell shape. In hematopoietic cells syndecan-1 is expressed in normal pre-B-cells and plasma cells, as well as in plasmocytoid and lymphoplasmocytoid malignancies. According to our study syndecan-1 is expressed in B-CLL cells both in tissue environment and in circulation.

Expression pattern of Sox2 during mouse tooth development

The transcription factor Sox2 plays important roles in maintaining the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells and adult progenitors. However, whether Sox2 is involved in odontogenesis has not been reported. In this study, we examined the expression pattern of Sox2 during mouse incisor and molar development using real-time PCR, in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Sox2 mRNA was expressed in the dental epithelium and mesenchyme while Sox2 protein was mainly detected in the epithelium from embryonic day (E) 11.5 to postnatal (PN) day 20. In the case of incisor, Sox2 mRNA and protein were expressed in most of dental epithelial cells from E11.5 to E14.5, and they were both highly expressed in the labial cervical loop area from E16.5 to PN20. During molar development, we observed an asymmetrical distribution of Sox2 protein in the epithelium from E13.5 to E16.5, with stronger signals in the lingual side. From E18.5 to PN2, Sox2 was expressed within the cervical loop area, and the stellate intermediate layer. From PN6 to PN14, Sox2 expression was confined mainly to the apical end of hertwig's epithelium root sheath (HERS) cells. Sox2 was also detected within the perivascular region of the dental pulp at PN14 and PN20. Our results suggested that: (1) Sox2 was involved in mouse odontogenesis, and (2) it might participate in maintaining the pluripotency of the epithelial stem cells of labial cervical loop in mouse incisor development and the epithelium progenitors during molar development, (3) Sox2 might be regulated at post-transcription level during mouse odontogenesis.

Analysis of syndecan-1 gene promoter during mouse tooth development

OBJECTIVE

Syndecan-1 plays an important role in cell proliferation in dental papilla during tooth development. This study aimed to clarify the transcription mechanisms that regulate syndecan-1 gene expression in dental papilla.

DESIGN

We analysed genomic conservation and putative transcriptional factor binding sites of syndecan-1 gene loci using the bioinformatics tool VISTA. To identify the region responsible for syndecan-1 gene expression in mouse dental papilla cells (MDPCs) in vitro, the 1.5-kb upstream region of the mouse syndecan-1 coding region was inserted upstream of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) or luciferase gene, and promoter activity was examined by transient reporter gene expression assay in cultured MDPCs. To examine the binding of the upstream binding factor, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay.

RESULTS

VISTA analysis showed that the 1.5-kb upstream region was highly conserved amongst species, and three GC-rich motifs, as well as a TATA-box-like motif, were identified in this region. Reporter gene assay showed that the 1.5-kb upstream region of mouse syndecan-1 induced reporter gene expression in MDPCs. Deletion of the promoter from the 5'-end to 339 bp upstream reduced luciferase activity by nearly half vs. the 1.5-kb sequence. Further deletion up to 68 bp resulted in further loss of luciferase activity. On ChIP assay, we found direct recruitment of Sp3 transcription factor to the GC-rich motif region.

CONCLUSION

The 1.5-kb upstream region of the syndecan-1 gene was sufficient to induce its expression in dental papilla, and binding of Sp3 transcription factor may play a pivotal role in this syndecan-1 induction.

Induction of syndecan-1 expression in stromal fibroblasts promotes proliferation of human breast cancer cells

Infiltrating carcinomas characteristically elicit a reactive stromal response, and accumulating evidence indicates that tumor stroma fibroblasts reciprocally promote tumor development and growth. The cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan, syndecan-1 (Sdc1), is thought to function as a coreceptor for growth factor and extracellular matrix interactions, and Sdc1 expression is induced in reactive stromal cells in both mice and man. Mice with a targeted mutation in Sdc1 show reduced tumor development in response to oncogene expression and altered responses to other pathological stimuli that are associated with the induction of stromal Sdc1. Here, we test the hypothesis that Sdc1 is required for the growth-promoting activities of reactive stroma. We found that when highly invasive carcinoma cells (MDA-MB-231) were placed in contact with mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) in a coculture model, Sdc1 expression was induced. Sdc1 was not induced by less invasive or normal cell lines (T47D and NMuMG). Furthermore, the growth of MDA-MB-231 cells was enhanced by 42% when cocultured with Sdc1+/+ MEFs compared with Sdc1-/- MEFs. When T47D cells were cocultured with fibroblasts that expressed transfected Sdc1, these Sdc1-positive fibroblasts stimulated growth of the breast epithelial cells by 85% compared with untransfected controls. The growth-promoting effect was completely abolished when fibroblasts were transfected with mutant Sdc1 lacking heparan sulfate attachment sites. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that a growth-promoting loop exists between breast cancer cells and their stroma that depends on the activity of glycanated Sdc1.

Role of syndecan in the elongation of postoral arms in sea urchin larvae

Ac-SYN is the core protein of a cell surface proteoglycan of the sea urchin Anthocidaris crassispina. To examine the functions of Ac-SYN, embryos were cultured in the presence of affinity-purified antibody against Ac-SYN. At the late pluteus stage, severe inhibition of elongation of the postoral arms was seen in treated embryos compared with control embryos. Blastocoeleic microinjection of the antibody did not affect morphogenesis. The relationship between the number of cells in the postoral arms and the length of the postoral rods was investigated in normal embryos. This showed that postoral arm elongation has two phases: the first phase accompanies the increase in cell numbers while the second does not. The syndecan antibody inhibited the increase in cell numbers in the postoral arms. Furthermore, in the treated embryos, cell numbers continued to increase normally until 31 h post fertilization (hpf), while cell division stopped after 31 hpf. These results suggest that Ac-SYN participates in postoral arm formation via cell division in sea urchin embryos.

Proximal promoter-independent activation of the far-upstream FGF-inducible response element of syndecan-1 gene

Far upstream enhancers are predicted to act by looping and activating general transcription factors on core promoters and to require proximal promoter sequences for appropriate gene activation in time and space. We have previously described an FGF-inducible response element (FiRE) located far upstream on the syndecan-1 gene. The FiRE is activated specifically by members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family in NIH3T3 cells. Here we describe the requirements of syndecan-1 proximal promoter for the activation of FiRE by FGF-2. Transient and stable transfections revealed that neither proximal promoter SP1 sites nor TATA-box are required for the FGF-2 induced activation of FiRE. Notably, the enhancer is activated in both orientations by FGF-2 even in the absence of proximal promoter. Importantly, removal of the promoter did not affect the growth factor specificity of FiRE. Proximal promoter independent activation of syndecan-1 gene by FGF-2 might be required during development when syndecan-1 proximal promoter needs to be largely attenuated but simultaneous transient and rapid FGF-2 induced transcription is required.

Cloning and characterization of cDNA for syndecan core protein in sea urchin embryos

The cDNA for the core protein of the heparan sulfate proteoglycan, syndecan, of embryos of the sea urchin Anthocidaris crassispina was cloned and characterized. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used with total ribonucleic acid (RNA) from late gastrula stage embryos and degenerate primers for conserved regions of the core protein, to obtain a 0.1 kb PCR product. A late gastrula stage cDNA library was then screened using the PCR product as a probe. The clones obtained contained an open reading frame of 219 amino acid residues. The predicted product was 41.6% identical to mouse syndecan-1 in the region spanning the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains. Northern analysis showed that the transcripts were present in unfertilized eggs and maximum expression was detected at the early gastrula stage. Syndecan mRNA was localized around the nuclei at the early cleavage stage, but was then found in the ectodermal cells of the gastrula embryos. Western blotting analysis using the antibody against the recombinant syndecan showed that the proteoglycan was present at a constant level from the unfertilized egg stage through to the pluteus larval stage. Immunostaining revealed that the protein was expressed on apical and basal surfaces of the epithelial wall in blastulae and gastrulae.

Responsiveness of developing dental tissues to fibroblast growth factors: expression of splicing alternatives of FGFR1, -2, -3, and of FGFR4; and stimulation of cell proliferation by FGF-2, -4, -8, and -9

To elucidate the roles of fibroblast growth factors (FGF) in tooth development, we have analyzed the expression patterns of fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) in mouse teeth by in situ hybridization and studied the effects of FGF-2, -4, -8, and -9 on cell proliferation in vitro by local application with beads on isolated dental mesenchymes. mRNAs of FGFR-1, -2, and -3 were localized by probes specific for the alternative splice variants IIIb and IIIc. The expression patterns of FGFR1 -2, and -3 were completely different, and the two splicing variants of FGFR1 and 2 exhibited different expression domains. FGFR4 was not expressed in the developing teeth. The IIIb splice forms of FGFR1 and -2 were expressed in the dental epithelium during morphogenesis. The IIIc splice form of FGFR1 was expressed both in epithelium and mesenchyme whereas FGFR2 IIIc was confined to the mesenchymal cells of the dental follicle. Both splice forms of FGFR3 were expressed in dental papilla mesenchyme. None of the FGF-receptors was detected in the primary enamel knot, the putative signaling center regulating tooth morphogenesis. This may explain the fact that enamel knot cells do not proliferate, although they express intensely mitogenic FGFs. Beads releasing FGF-2, -4, -8, or -9 proteins stimulated cell proliferation in cultured dental mesenchymes. These data, together with our earlier data on FGF expression [Kettunen and Thesleff (1998): Dev Dyn 211:256-268] suggest that FGF-8 and -9 mediate epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during tooth initiation. During advancing morphogenesis FGF-3, -4, and -9 may act both on mesenchyme and epithelium. Finally, the intense expression of FGFR1 in odontoblasts and ameloblasts and FGFR2 IIIb in ameloblasts suggests that FGFs participate in regulation of their differentiation and/or secretory functions.

Transcriptional regulation of Syndecan-1 expression by growth factors

Syndecan-1 is a prototype member of a family of transmembrane heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Syndecan-1 binds extracellular matrix components and fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and modifies the function of FGFs. Syndecan-1 is constitutively expressed by several epithelial cells, but expression is also induced during many biological phenomena, such as tissue regeneration and the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during organ development. Growth factors have been the prime candidates to induce syndecan-1 expression in these situations. In fibroblasts syndecan-1 is induced by FGF-2 and in keratinocytes by epidermal growth factor (EGF) and keratinocyte growth factor (KGF). The search for cis-acting elements regulating the growth factor-induced syndecan-1 expression has led to identification of a novel FGF-inducible response element (FiRE). FiRE is activated in fibroblasts and keratinocytes by the same growth factors that induce syndecan-1 expression in these cells. In adult tissues the activation of FiRE is restricted to migrating keratinocytes of healing wounds. The composition of the transcription factor binding to FiRE differs depending on the cell type and the activating growth factor. The FiRE provides a powerful tool for studies on growth factor specificity and regeneration of tissues. Moreover, it implies a novel transcriptional link that creates an FGF action-controlling autoregulatory loop between the heparan sulfate proteoglycans and the heparin-binding FGFs.

Proline-rich antimicrobial peptide, PR-39 gene transduction altered invasive activity and actin structure in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells

PR-39 is an endogenous proline-rich antimicrobial peptide which induces the synthesis of syndecan-1, a transmembrane heparan sulphate proteoglycan involved in cell-to-matrix interactions and wound healing. Previously, we revealed that the expression of syndecan-1 was reduced in human hepatocellular carcinomas with high metastatic potential and speculated that syndecan-1 played an important role in inhibition of invasion and metastasis. It is assumed that a modification of this process with PR-39 and syndecan-1 may result in a new strategy by which it can inhibit the invasion and metastasis. Therefore, we transduced a gene of PR-39 into human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HLF, which shows a low expression of syndecan-1 and a high in vitro invasive activity, and examined whether this procedure could reduce the invasive activity of tumour cells. In two transfectants with PR-39 gene, the syndecan-1 expression was induced and the invasive activity in type I collagen-coated chamber was inhibited. Moreover, these transfectants showed the suppression of motile activity assayed by phagokinetic tracks in addition to the disorganization of actin filaments observed by a confocal imaging system. In contrast, five transfectants with syndecan-1 gene in the HLF cells revealed suppression of invasive activity but did not alter the motile activity and actin structures of the cell. These results suggest that PR-39 has functions involved in the suppression of motile activity and alteration of actin structure on human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in addition to the suppression of invasive activity which might result from the induction of syndecan-1 expression.

Syndecan-1 expression in malignant mesothelioma: correlation with cell differentiation, WT1 expression, and clinical outcome

Syndecan-1 binds basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), modulates neovascularization, plays a role in epithelial differentiation and is up-regulated by WT1. Malignant mesothelioma of the pleura is one of the most aggressive tumours known and expresses high levels of angiogenic growth factors. This study has analysed syndecan-1 expression in mesothelioma tumours and cell lines by immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting, using anti-syndecan-1 antibody directed against the core protein, and has examined its relation to morphology, bFGF, WT1, and intra-tumoural microvascular density (IMD). Shedding of syndecan-1 in the conditioned medium of mesothelioma cell lines was detected in variable amounts. These studies indicate that (1) there is no correlation of syndecan-1 with either bFGF expression or IMD in mesotheliomas in vivo; (2) syndecan-1 is strongly expressed in the epithelial type of mesothelioma and in the epithelial component of biphasic mesotheliomas and the expression is reduced or lost in sarcomatoid differentiation; together with the finding that (3) syndecan-1 correlates with WT1 immuno-expression, this suggests that syndecan-1 might relate to the differentiation state of mesothelial/mesothelioma cells; and (4) syndecan-1-positive tumours are associated with a longer survival (p = 0.02) than mesotheliomas with no or little syndecan-1 expression, on univariate analysis. These findings therefore indicate that syndecan-1 can be an important prognostic indicator in mesotheliomas and its loss may be important in the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of mesothelioma cells.

Expression and function of FGFs-4, -8, and -9 suggest functional redundancy and repetitive use as epithelial signals during tooth morphogenesis

To elucidate the roles of fibroblast growth factors (FGF) in the regulation of tooth morphogenesis we have analyzed the expression patterns of Fgf-4, -8, and -9 in the developing mouse molar and incisor tooth germs from initiation to completion of morphogenesis by in situ hybridization analysis. The expression of these Fgfs was confined to dental epithelial cells at stages when epithelial-mesenchymal signaling regulates critical steps of tooth morphogenesis. Fgf-8 and Fgf-9 mRNAs were present in the oral epithelium of the first branchial arch at E10 and 1 day later expression became more restricted to the area of presumptive dental epithelium and persisted there until the start of epithelial budding. Fgf-8 mRNAs were not detected later in the developing tooth. Fgf-4 and Fgf-9 expression was upregulated in the primary enamel knot, which is a putative signaling center regulating tooth shape. Subsequently, Fgf-4 and Fgf-9 were expressed in the secondary enamel knots at the sites of tooth cusps. Fgf-9 expression spread from the primary enamel knot within the inner enamel epithelium where it remained until E18. In the continuously growing incisors Fgf-9 expression persisted in the epithelium of the cervical loops. The effects of FGFs were analyzed on the expression of the homeobox-containing transcription factors Msx-1 and Msx-2, which are associated with tissue interactions and regulated by the dental epithelium. Locally applied FGF-4, -8, and -9 stimulated intensely the expression of Msx-1 but not Msx-2 in the isolated dental mesenchyme. We suggest that the three FGFs act as epithelial signals mediating inductive interactions between dental epithelium and mesenchyme during several successive stages of tooth formation. This data suggest roles for FGF-8 and FGF-9 during initiation of tooth development, and for FGF-4 and FGF-9 during regulation of tooth shape. FGF-9 may also be involved in differentiation of odontoblasts. The coexpression of Fgfs with other signaling molecules including Shh and several Bmps and their partly similar effects suggest that the FGFs participate in the signaling networks during odontogenesis.

Activation of an enhancer on the syndecan-1 gene is restricted to fibroblast growth factor family members in mesenchymal cells

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) induce a variety of biological effects on different cell types. They activate a number of genes, including immediate-early genes, such as the transcription factors Fos and Jun, which are also common targets for other tyrosine kinase receptor-activating growth factors. Here we describe a secondary far-upstream enhancer on the syndecan-1 gene that is activated only by members of the FGF family in NIH 3T3 cells, not by other receptor tyrosine kinase-activating growth factors (e.g., epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, insulin-like growth factor, or serum). This FGF-inducible response element (FiRE) consists of a 170-bp array of five DNA motifs which bind two FGF-inducible Fos-Jun heterodimers, one inducible AP-2-related protein, a constitutively expressed upstream stimulatory factor, and one constitutive 46-kDa transcription factor. Mutational analysis showed that both AP-1 binding motifs are required, but not sufficient, for FiRE activation. Moreover, agents such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, okadaic acid, or forskolin, which are known to activate AP-1 complexes and AP-1-driven promoters, fail to activate FiRE. However, FiRE can be activated by the tyrosine kinase phosphatase inhibitor orthovanadate. Taken together, this data implies a differential activation of growth factor-initiated signaling on AP-1-driven regulatory elements.

Light and electron microscopical immunohistochemical localization of large proteoglycans in human tooth germs at the bell stage

The immunohistochemical localization of large hyaluronate-binding proteoglycans has been studied in human tooth germs at the bell stage using a monoclonal antibody, 5D5, which is derived from bovine sclera and specifically recognizes the core protein of large proteoglycans, such as versican, neurocan and brevican, but not that of aggrecan. In the early bell stage before predentine secretion, when the enamel organs consisted of the inner and outer enamel epithelia, stratum intermedium and stellate reticulum, the enamel organs were not stained by 5D5, but the dental papillae and follicles stained strongly. Concomitant with the secretion of predentine, dentine and subsequent enamel matrix, strong 5D5 immunostaining distributed over the entire cell surfaces of secretory ameloblasts was observed. The forming enamel matrix showed strong staining. While most of the inner and outer enamel epithelia and stratum intermedium lacked staining, the cervical loop region and stellate reticulum showed weak staining. Although the forming dentine and odontoblasts appeared to lack 5D5 affinity, the predentine, dental papilla and dental follicle demonstrated moderate to strong reactivity. At the ultrastructural level, specific immunoreaction by immunogold particle deposition was clearly detected over the basal lamina of presecretory ameloblasts, secretion granules of secretory ameloblasts and the forming enamel matrix. These results indicate that a marked increase in the large proteoglycan associated with secretory ameloblasts may correlate with cell differentiation and enamel matrix biosynthesis.

The genetic control of early tooth development

Most vertebrate organs begin their initial formation by a common, developmentally conserved pattern of inductive tissue interactions between two tissues. The developing tooth germ is a prototype for such inductive tissue interactions and provides a powerful experimental system for elucidation of the genetic pathways involved in organogenesis. Members of the Msx homeobox gene family are expressed at sites of epithelial-mesenchymal interaction during embryogenesis, including the tooth. The important role that Msx genes play in tooth development is exemplified by mice lacking Msx gene function. Msxl-deficient mice exhibit an arrest in tooth development at the bud stage, while Msx2-deficient mice exhibit late defects in tooth development. The co-expression of Msx, Bmp, Lefl, and Activin beta A genes and the coincidence of tooth phenotypes in the various knockout mice suggest that these genes reside within a common genetic pathway. Results summarized here indicate that Msxl is required for the transmission of Bmp4 expression from dental epithelium to mesenchyme and also for Lefl expression. In addition, we consider the role of other signaling molecules in the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions leading to tooth formation, the role that transcription factors such as Msx play in the propagation of inductive signals, and the role of extracellular matrix. Last, as a unifying mechanism to explain the disparate tooth phenotypes in Msxl- and Msx2-deficient mice, we propose that later steps in tooth morphogenesis molecularly resemble those in early tooth development.

Periodontal ligament cell population: the central role of fibroblasts in creating a unique tissue

BACKGROUND

Fibroblasts are the predominant cells of the periodontal ligament (PL) and have important roles in the development, function, and regeneration of the tooth support apparatus. Biological processes initiated during the formation of the PL contribute to the long-lasting homeostasic properties exhibited by PL fibroblast populations.

DEVELOPMENT

The formation of the PL is likely controlled by epithelial-mesenchymal and epithelial hard tissue interactions, but the actual mechanisms that contribute to the development of cellular lineages in the PL are unknown. Fibroblasts in the normally functioning PL migrate through the tissue along collagen fibres to cementum and bone and in an apico-coronal direction during tooth eruption. ADULT TISSUE: Cell kinetic experiments have shown that PL fibroblasts comprise a renewal cell system in steady-state and the progenitors can generate multiple types of more differentiated, specialized cells. Progenitor cell populations of the PL are enriched in locations adjacent to blood vessels and in contiguous endosteal spaces. In normally functioning periodontal tissues, there is a relatively modest turnover of cells in which apoptotic cell death balances proliferation. Large increases of cell formation and cell differentiation occur after application of orthodontic forces or wounding. As PL cells comprise multiple cellular phenotypes, it has been postulated that after wounding, the separate phenotypes repopulating the site will ultimately dictate the tissue form and type.

CONCLUSIONS

PL fibroblasts play an essential role in responses to mechanical force loading of the tooth by remodelling and repairing effete or damaged matrix components. In consideration of the important roles played by fibroblasts in PL homeostasis, they could be described as "the architect, builder, and caretaker" of the periodontal ligament.

Molecular mechanisms of cell and tissue interactions during early tooth development

BACKGROUND

Morphogenesis and cell differentiation during the development of all organs, including the tooth, are regulated by interactions between cells and tissues. The developing tooth is one of the organs in which the molecular mechanisms of such interactions are starting to be elucidated.

RESULTS

Homotypic cell interactions take place between cells of the same developmental history, and they are a central mechanism in the formation of mesenchymal cell condensates during the bud stage of tooth development. Syndecan-1, a cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan, is transiently expressed in the dental mesenchyme and may regulate dental mesenchymal cell condensation. It binds tenascin, a matrix glycoprotein abundant in dental mesenchyme, suggesting involvement of cell-matrix interactions. Syndecan also binds growth factors, and its association with cell proliferation in the dental mesenchyme suggests roles in the regulation of cell number in the condensing cells. Inductive interactions between the epithelial and mesenchymal tissues regulate tooth development at all stages. In the early dental mesenchyme, the expression of several molecules, including syndecan and tenascin, are regulated by the epithelium. There is evidence that growth factors act as diffusible signals mediating these interactions. BMP-2 and BMP-4 (bone morphogenetic proteins), which belong to the TGF beta superfamily, are expressed in the early dental epithelium, and their effects on the dental mesenchyme mimic those of the epithelium. In particular, BMPs induce the expression of the homeobox-containing transcription factors Msx-1 and Msx-2 in the dental mesenchyme.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current knowledge about the molecular changes accompanying tooth development and the results of experimental studies, we present a model for molecular regulation of early tooth development.

Application of immunocytochemistry for detection of proliferating cell populations during tooth development

BACKGROUND

The production of monoclonal antibodies to cell cycle-related molecules provides the basis for immunochemical studies on cell kinetics.

METHODS

Immunocytochemistry permits the tissue localization of replicating cells, whereas flow cytometry defines the exact position of immunoreactive cells in the cell cycle and ensures a quantitative analysis of the growth fraction. Bromo-deoxyuridine-antibody can be used to reveal S phase-traversing cells, whereas the immunoreactivity for the Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen defines the G1, S, and G2-M subpopulations of the cell cycle.

RESULTS

Odontogenic cells produce secretory products (e.g., enamel and dentine matrix proteins and growth factors) and express receptors and oncogenes during specific stages of their differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The simultaneous detection of cell cycle-related antigens and differentiation markers using double immunochemical staining may be useful to clarify the role of putative regulatory molecules in the control of cell growth during odontogenesis, thus unveiling molecular mechanisms that regulate developmental dynamics.

Gene defect in hypodontia: exclusion of EGF, EGFR, and FGF-3 as candidate genes

Hypodontia, congenital absence of one or a few permanent teeth without any systemic disorders, is regarded as an autosomally inherited dominant condition with varying expression and incomplete penetrance. Many studies have reported that the prevalence of hypodontia varies from 5% to 10% among European and Asian populations. The teeth most often missing are second premolars, upper lateral incisors, and lower central incisors. Consequently, we call this trait incisor-premolar hypodontia. Peg-shaped or strongly mesio-distally reduced upper lateral incisors demonstrate variation in the expression of the trait. The gene or genes causing incisorpremolar hypodontia are not known. We have begun the genetic mapping of hypodontia by using linkage analyses in seven Finnish three-generation families with 77 individuals, 31 affected with incisor-premolar hypodontia. As the first step, we studied the possibility of linkage between hypodontia and some candidate genes which have been suggested to have important functions during tooth development. Here we report the exclusion of EGF, EGFR, and FGF-3 loci as possible sites for gene mutation causing incisor-premolar hypodontia in our family material. Because of the close location of the FGF-3 and FGF-4 genes, the results also suggest the exclusion of the FGF-4 locus.

Embryonic expression of glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) suggests multiple developmental roles in neural differentiation and epithelial-mesenchymal interactions

We describe the cloning of the mouse glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) gene and its expression during embryogenesis. GDNF is a distant member of the superfamily of TGF-beta related genes that was originally identified on the basis of its striking neurotrophic activity. GDNF is expressed in a highly dynamic pattern in the anterior neuroectoderm during early stages of neurogenesis between E7.5 and E10.5. Beginning at E10.5 GDNF is also expressed in several organs that develop through inductive epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. In those organs, GDNF expression is strictly confined to mesenchymal tissues and is not found in epithelia. Our results suggest multiple roles for GDNF during early stages of neuronal development and in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions.

Syndecan family of cell surface proteoglycans: developmentally regulated receptors for extracellular effector molecules

Syndecans are a family of integral membrane proteoglycans with conserved membrane-spanning and intracellular domains but with structurally distinct extracellular domains (ectodomains). They are known to function as heparan sulphate co-receptors in fibroblast growth factor signalling as well as to link cells directly to the extracellular matrix. These and other biological activities of syndecans involve specific interactions of the heparan sulphate side chains of syndecans with cytokines and extracellular matrix proteins. Four different vertebrate syndecans, designated as syndecans 1-4 (or syndecan, fibroglycan, N-syndecan and amphiglycan, respectively), are known. During embryonic development, syndecans have specific and highly regulated expression patterns that are distinct from the expression in adult tissue, suggesting an active role in morphogenetic processes. The developmental expression of syndecans is particularly intense in mesenchymal condensates and at epithelium mesenchyme interfaces, where a number of heparan sulphate-binding cytokines and matrix components are also expressed in a regulated manner, often spatially and temporally co-ordinated with the syndecan expression. Recent evidence indicates that the regulation of heparan sulphate fine structure (mainly the number and arrangement of sulphate groups along the polymer) provides a mechanism for the cellular control of syndecan-protein interactions. Furthermore, morphogenetically active cytokines such as fibroblast growth factor-2 and transforming growth factor-beta participate in the regulation of syndecan expression and glycosaminoglycan structure. This review discusses the developmental expression and binding functions of syndecans as well as the molecular regulation of specific heparan sulphate-protein interactions.

Epithelial-mesenchymal signaling during tooth development

Classic studies on experimental embryology have shown that organ development in an embryo is largely regulated by so called inductive tissue interactions which mostly take place between epithelial and mesenchymal tissues. Also in the developing tooth, both morphogenesis and cell differentiation are governed by such interactions. Characteristic features of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are that they are sequential and reciprocal, i.e. "induction" appears to consist of a chain of signaling events between the tissues. During the last decade, the expression patterns of numerous molecules have been studied in developing organs by in situ hybridization and immunohistology. Many of them have been associated with epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, and it is apparent that same molecules participate in regulation of morphogenesis in a number of different organs. Transcription factors such as Msx-1, Msx-2 and Egr-1, growth factors, including TGF beta's, BMPs, and FGFs, and structural proteins such as syndecan and tenascin are expressed in transient, time and space-specific patterns in many organ rudiments, including the tooth. We have shown by tissue recombination studies that the expression of certain molecules is indeed regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the early tooth germ. In particular, during the early stages of morphogenesis, when the dental epithelium induces the condensation of mesenchymal cells around the epithelial bud, the expression of many genes is upregulated in the condensed mesenchyme. Previous experimental tissue recombination studies have indicated that at the same time the capacity to instruct tooth morphogenesis shifts from the dental epithelium to the dental mesenchyme.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cultured incisors display major modifications in basal lamina deposition without further effect on odontoblast differentiation

Matrix-mediated epithelio-mesenchymal interactions play a crucial role in the control of dental cytodifferentiations. Ultrastructural observation of the epithelio-mesenchymal junction in cultured embryonic mouse molars showed discrete zones with duplicated or multilayered basal laminae. The use of synthetic peptides demonstrated that the process was RGD*-independent, did not involve the YIGSR* sequence present on laminin and could occur spontaneously. Cultured incisors showed a similar but much more dramatic multiplication of the basal laminae. Furthermore, the deposition of multilayered basal laminae was specific for the labial aspect of the tooth and could be detected after 6 h of culture. Despite these alterations, preodontoblasts differentiated and gradients of differentiation were maintained, suggesting that among basement membrane constituents, the basal lamina itself does not play a critical role. More important is the inner dental epithelium which may still control odontoblast differentiation by means of diffusible molecules able to reach surface receptors expressed by preodontoblasts or matrix receptors underlying the basal lamina. Gradients of odontoblast differentiation could result from a progressive acquisition of competence by preodontoblasts.

Distal-less and other homeobox genes in the development of the dentition

The mammalian tooth develops through an interaction between two tissue layers of different embryologic origin. A number of transcription factors and as well as two members of the Msx class of homeobox genes have been shown to be involved in the histogenesis of the mammalian tooth. This raised the possibility that other homeobox genes might be involved in dental morphogenesis. We have amplified mouse tooth germ cDNA from three different gestational ages by the polymerase chain reaction with degenerate primers for 18 classes of homeobox genes. Members of several classes have been isolated, including the Msx genes, two Dlx genes, and the Dbx, MHox, Mox2A genes. One of the Dlx genes, Dlx-7, had not previously been reported in mammals, and some details are presented of its cDNA sequence. This work plus that of other investigators has shown that at least six Dlx genes are expressed in developing teeth or in first branchial arches, suggesting the possibility that these genes are involved in specifying complexity within or between teeth. The screening approach with degenerate primers is a successful way to identify new as well as previously known regulatory genes expressed in developing tooth embryos.

Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are required for msx 1 and msx 2 gene expression in the developing murine molar tooth

Duplication of the msh-like homeobox gene of Drosophila may be related to the evolution of the vertebrate head. The murine homologues of this gene, msx 1 and msx 2 are expressed in the developing craniofacial complex including the branchial arches, especially in regions of epithelial-mesenchymal organogenesis including the developing tooth. By performing in vitro recombination experiments using homochronic dental and non-dental epithelial and mesenchymal tissues from E10 to E18 mouse embryos, we have found that the maintenance of homeobox gene expression in the tooth is dependent upon tissue interactions. In homotypic recombinants, dental-type tissue interactions occur, leading to expression of both genes in a manner similar to that seen during in vivo development. msx 1 is expressed exclusively in mesenchyme, both in the dental papilla and follicle. msx 2 is expressed in the dental epithelium and only in the mesenchyme of the dental papilla. In heterotypic recombinants, the dental epithelium is able to induce msx 1 expression in non-dental mesenchyme, this potential being lost at the bell stage. In these recombinants msx 2 was induced by presumptive dental epithelium prior to the bud stage but not thereafter. The expression of msx 1 and msx 2 in dental mesenchyme requires the presence of epithelium until the early bell stage. However, whereas non-dental, oral epithelium is capable of maintaining expression of msx 1 in dental mesenchyme throughout tooth development, induction of msx 2 was temporally restricted suggesting regulation by a specific epithelial-mesenchymal interaction related to the inductive events of tooth formation. msx 1 and msx 2, as putative transcription factors, may play a role in regulating the expression of other genes during tooth formation. We conclude that expression of msx 1 in jaw mesenchyme requires a non-specific epithelial signal, whereas msx 2 expression in either epithelium or mesenchyme requires reciprocal interactions between specialized dental cell populations.