Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in African-American patients: a diagnostic challenge

Multiplex droplet digital PCR for 22q11.2 microdeletions screening and DiGeorge syndrome diagnostics

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

DiGeorge syndrome (DGS) is a genetic disorder manifesting in polymorphic symptoms related to developmental abnormalities of various organs including thymus. DGS is caused by microdeletions in the 22q11.2 region between several low copy repeats (LCR) occurring in approximately 1 in 4000 live births. Diagnosis of DGS relies on phenotypic examination, qPCR, ultrasound, FISH, MLPA and NGS which can be relatively inaccurate, time-consuming, and costly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A novel multiplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay was designed, optimized and validated for detection and mapping 22q11.2 microdeletions by simultaneous amplification of three targets - TUPLE1, ZNF74, D22S936 - within the deletion areas and one reference target - RPP30 - as an internal control.

RESULTS

The assay reliable identified microdeletions when the template concentration was >32 copies per reaction and successfully detected LCR22A-B, LCR22A-C, LCR22A-D, and LCR22B-C deletions in clinical samples from 153 patients with signs of immunodeficiency. In patients with the microdeletions, flow cytometry detected a significant increase in B-cell and natural killer cell counts and percentages, while T-cell percentages and T-cell receptor excision circle (TREC) numbers decreased.

CONCLUSION

The designed ddPCR assay is suitable for diagnosing DGS using whole blood and blood spots.

Multidisciplinary Velopharyngeal Dysfunction Evaluation Helps Detect Non-classic Cases of 22q11.2 Deletion

OBJECTIVE

To explore the role of multidisciplinary velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) assessment in diagnosing 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q) in children.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary VPD clinic at a tertiary pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-five children with genetically confirmed 22q evaluated at the VPD clinic between February 2007 and February 2023, including both previously diagnosed patients and those newly diagnosed as a result of VPD evaluation.

INTERVENTIONS

Comprehensive review of medical records, utilizing ICD-10 codes and an institutional tool for keyword searches, to identify patients and collect data on clinical variables and outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Characteristics of children with 22q, pathways to diagnosis, and clinical presentations that led to genetic testing for 22q.

RESULTS

Of the 75 children, 9 were newly diagnosed with 22q following VPD evaluation. Non-cleft VPI was a significant indicator for 22q in children not previously diagnosed, occurring in 100% of newly diagnosed cases compared to 52% of cases with existing 22q diagnosis (P = .008). Additional clinical findings leading to diagnosis included congenital heart disease, craniofacial abnormalities, and developmental delays.

CONCLUSIONS

VPD evaluations, particularly the presence of non-cleft VPI, play a crucial role in identifying undiagnosed cases of 22q. This underscores the need for clinicians, including plastic surgeons, otolaryngologists, and speech-language pathologists, to maintain a high degree of suspicion for 22q in children presenting with VPI without a clear etiology. Multidisciplinary approaches are essential for early diagnosis and management of this complex condition.

Racial and ethnic disparities in early mortality among patients with inborn errors of immunity

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic disparities in life expectancy in the United States have been widely documented. To date, there remains a paucity of similar data in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEIs).

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to examine racial and ethnic differences in mortality due to an IEI in the United States.

METHODS

We analyzed National Center for Health Statistics national mortality data from 2003 to 2018. We quantified age-adjusted death rate and age-specific death rate as a result of an IEI for each major racial and ethnic group in the United States and examined the association of race and ethnicity with death at a younger age.

RESULTS

From 2003 to 2018, IEIs were reported as the underlying or contributing cause of death in 14,970 individuals nationwide. The age-adjusted death rate was highest among Black patients (4.25 per 1,000,000 person years), compared with 2.01, 1.71, 1.50, and 0.92 per 1,000,000 person years for White, American Indian/Alaska Native, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients, respectively. The odds of death before age 65 years were greatest among Black patients (odds ratio [OR] = 5.15 [95% CI = 4.61-5.76]), followed by American Indian/Alaska Native patients (OR = 3.58 [95% CI = 2.30-5.82]), compared with White patients. The odds of death before age 24 years were greater among Hispanic patients than among non-Hispanic patients (OR = 3.60 [95% CI = 3.08-4.18]).

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights racial and ethnic disparities in mortality due to an IEI and the urgent need to further identify and systematically remove barriers in care for historically marginalized patients with IEIs.

Application of facial analysis Technology in Clinical Genetics: Considerations for diverse populations

Facial analysis technology in rare diseases has the potential to shorten the diagnostic odyssey by providing physicians with a valuable diagnostic tool. Given that most clinical genetic resources focus on populations of European descent, we compare craniofacial features in genetic syndromes across different populations and review how machine learning algorithms perform on diagnosing genetic syndromes in geographically and ethnically diverse populations. We also discuss the value of populations from ancestrally diverse backgrounds in the training set of machine learning algorithms. Finally, this review demonstrates that across diverse population groups, machine learning models have outstanding accuracy as supported by the area under the curve values greater than 0.9. Artificial intelligence is only in its infancy in the diagnosis of rare disease in diverse populations and will become more accurate as larger and more diverse training sets, including a wider spectrum of ages, particularly infants, are studied.

Clinical characterization of 72 patients with del(22)(q11.2q11.2) from different ethnic backgrounds

Background

DiGeorge syndrome (DGS), caused by a deletion del(22)(q11.2q11.2), is the most frequently observed microdeletion syndrome. There is a vast clinical heterogeneity in DGS, and several studies suggested also heterogeneity of clinical signs and phenotypic appearance to be related to ethnic differences. Here, clinical characteristics of 72 patients with molecular diagnosed deletion del(22)(q11.2q11.2) derived from different countries from Europe, America, Africa, and Asia are summarized and compared.

Results

Unless ethnic differences, the expected major clinical signs were present in all cases. Frequent clinical manifestations found in this study were congenital heart disease with 68% (49/72), followed by dysmorphic features found in 61% (44/72); neurodevelopmental disorders were present in 43% (31/72) and thymus hypoplasia/aplasia in 32% (23/72). However, clinical features of the patients appeared/were recognized at different times during their lives. Within the group, under 2 years predominated heart disease, dysmorphic features, and hypocalcemia and/or hypoparathyroidism. In the group older than 2 years, the following combination of clinical findings was most frequent: dysmorphic features, congenital heart disease, intellectual disability, and immunological disorders. In the eight cases detected prenatally, abnormal sonographic findings were the major clinical signs (cardiovascular malformations and renal malformations).

Conclusions

Despite the heterogeneous nature of the sample analyzed, a number of clinical findings could be highlighted to be useful for the clinical delineation of this DGS. Interestingly, diagnostic indicators may vary depending on the age at diagnosis. Finally, apparent differences in DGS patients from different regions seem to be rather due to applied test systems than to real differences in patients from different ethnicities.

Ocular findings in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: A systematic literature review and results of a Dutch multicenter study

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a multisystem disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1:3000 live births. Manifestations show a marked variability in expression and include speech‐ and language delay, intellectual disability, and neuropsychiatric disorders. We aim to provide an overview of ocular findings in 22q11.2DS in order to optimize recommendations for ophthalmic screening. We combined results from a systematic literature review with results from a multicenter cross‐sectional study of patients with 22q11.2DS who were assessed by an ophthalmologist. Our systematic literature search yielded four articles, describing 270 patients. We included 132 patients in our cross‐sectional study (median age 8.9 [range 0–56] years). Most reported ocular findings were retinal vascular tortuosity (32%–78%), posterior embryotoxon (22%–50%), eye lid hooding (20%–67%), strabismus (12%–36%), amblyopia (2%–11%), ptosis (4%–6%), and refractive errors, of which hyperopia (6%–48%) and astigmatism (3%–23%) were most common. Visual acuity was (near) normal in most patients (91%–94%). Refractive errors, strabismus, and amblyopia are treatable conditions that are frequently present in patients with 22q11.2DS and should be corrected at an early stage. Therefore, in 22q11.2DS, we recommend ophthalmic and orthoptic screening at the age of 3 years or at diagnosis, and a low‐threshold referral in adults.

Ontogeny of the facial phenotypic variability in Mexican patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

Background

22q11.2 deletion syndrome is a medical condition that results from genomic loss at chromosome 22. Affected patients exhibit large variability that ranges from a severe condition to mild symptoms. In addition, the spectrum of clinical features differs among populations and even within family members. The facial features related to this syndrome are not an exception, and although part of its variation arises through development, few studies address this topic in order to understand the intra and inter-population heterogeneities. Here, we analyze the ontogenetic dynamics of facial morphology of Mexican patients with del22q11.2 syndrome.

Methods

Frontal facial photographs of 37 patients (mean age = 7.65 ± 4.21 SE) with del22q11.2DS and 200 control subjects (mean age = 7.69 ± 4.26 SE) were analyzed using geometric morphometric methods. Overall mean shape and size differences between patients and controls were analyzed, as well as differences in ontogenetic trajectories (i.e. development, growth, and allometry).

Results

We found that Mexican patients show typical traits that have been reported for the Caucasian population. Additionally, there were significant differences between groups in the facial shape and size when all the ontogenetic stages were considered together and, along ontogeny. The developmental and allometric trajectories of patients and controls were similar, but they differed in allometric scaling. Finally, patients and controls showed different growth trajectories.

Conclusion

The results suggest that the typical face of patients with del22q11.2DS is established prenatally; nonetheless, the postnatal ontogeny could influence the dysmorphology and its variability through size-related changes.

Diversity and dysmorphology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dysmorphic features result from errors in morphogenesis frequently associated with genetic syndromes. Recognizing patterns of dysmorphic features is a critical step in the diagnosis and management of human congenital anomalies and genetic syndromes. This review presents recent developments in genetic syndromes and their related dysmorphology in diverse populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical findings in patients with genetic syndromes differ in their heterogeneity across different population groups. Some genetic syndromes have variable features in different ethnicities, in part due to specific background exam characteristics such as flat facial profiles or nasal differences; however, other genetic syndromes are similar across different ethnicities. Facial analysis technology is accurate in diagnosing genetic syndromes in populations around the world and is a powerful adjunct to conventional clinical examination. This accuracy also reinforces the concept that genetic syndromes can and should be diagnosed in any ethnicity.

SUMMARY

The increasing amount of data from studies on genetic syndromes in diverse populations is significantly improving our knowledge and approach to dysmorphic patients from various ethnic backgrounds. Optimal management of genetic syndromes requires early diagnosis, including in developing countries.

Elucidating the diagnostic odyssey of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

Clinical molecular testing has been available for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) for over two decades yet under-recognition and diagnostic delays are common. To characterize the "diagnostic odyssey" in 22q11.2DS we studied 202 well-characterized unrelated adults, none ascertained through an affected relative. We used a regression model to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with length of time to molecular diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared time to diagnosis for the molecular testing era (since 1994) and earlier birth cohorts. The results showed that the median time to molecular diagnosis of the 22q11.2 deletion was 4.7 (range 0-20.7) years. Palatal and cardiac anomalies, but not developmental delay/intellectual disability, were associated with a shorter time to molecular diagnosis. Non-European ethnicity was associated with longer time to diagnosis. Inclusion of a cohort from another 22q11.2DS center increased power to observe a significantly earlier diagnosis for patients born in the molecular testing era. Nonetheless, only a minority were diagnosed in the first year of life. On average, patients were seen in seven (range 2-15) different clinical specialty areas prior to molecular diagnosis. The findings indicate that even for those born in the molecular testing era, individuals with 22q11.2DS and their families face a diagnostic odyssey that is often prolonged, particularly in the absence of typical physical congenital features or for those of non-European ancestry. The results support educational efforts to improve clinical recognition and testing, and ultimately newborn screening as a means of maximizing early detection that would provide the best opportunity to optimize outcomes.

Prevalence of Pathogenic Copy Number Variation in Adults With Pediatric-Onset Epilepsy and Intellectual Disability

Importance

Copy number variation (CNV) is an important cause of neuropsychiatric disorders. Little is known about the role of CNV in adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability.

Objectives

To evaluate the prevalence of pathogenic CNVs and identify possible candidate CNVs and genes in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cross-sectional study, genome-wide microarray was used to evaluate a cohort of 143 adults with unexplained childhood-onset epilepsy and intellectual disability who were recruited from the Toronto Western Hospital epilepsy outpatient clinic from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014. The inclusion criteria were (1) pediatric seizure onset with ongoing seizure activity in adulthood, (2) intellectual disability of any degree, and (3) no structural brain abnormalities or metabolic conditions that could explain the seizures.

Main Outcomes and Measures

DNA screening was performed using genome-wide microarray platforms. Pathogenicity of CNVs was assessed based on the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines. The Residual Variation Intolerance Score was used to evaluate genes within the identified CNVs that could play a role in each patient's phenotype.

Results

Of the 2335 patients, 143 probands were investigated (mean [SD] age, 24.6 [10.8] years; 69 male and 74 female). Twenty-three probands (16.1%) and 4 affected relatives (2.8%) (mean [SD] age, 24.1 [6.1] years; 11 male and 16 female) presented with pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs (0.08-18.9 Mb). Five of the 23 probands with positive results (21.7%) had more than 1 CNV reported. Parental testing revealed de novo CNVs in 11 (47.8%), with CNVs inherited from a parent in 4 probands (17.4%). Sixteen of 23 probands (69.6%) presented with previously cataloged human genetic disorders and/or defined CNV hot spots in epilepsy. Eight nonrecurrent rare CNVs that overlapped 1 or more genes associated with intellectual disability, autism, and/or epilepsy were identified: 2p16.1-p15 duplication, 6p25.3-p25.1 duplication, 8p23.3p23.1 deletion, 9p24.3-p23 deletion, 10q11.22-q11.23 duplication, 12p13.33-13.2 duplication, 13q34 deletion, and 16p13.2 duplication. Five genes are of particular interest given their potential pathogenicity in the corresponding phenotypes and least tolerability to variation: ABAT, KIAA2022, COL4A1, CACNA1C, and SMARCA2. ABAT duplication was associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and KIAA2022 deletion with Jeavons syndrome.

Conclusions and Relevance

The high prevalence of pathogenic CNVs in this study highlights the importance of microarray analysis in adults with unexplained childhood-onset epilepsy and intellectual disability. Additional studies and comparison with similar cases are required to evaluate the effects of deletions and duplications that overlap specific genes.

22q11.2 deletion syndrome in diverse populations

22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2 DS) is the most common microdeletion syndrome and is underdiagnosed in diverse populations. This syndrome has a variable phenotype and affects multiple systems, making early recognition imperative. In this study, individuals from diverse populations with 22q11.2 DS were evaluated clinically and by facial analysis technology. Clinical information from 106 individuals and images from 101 were collected from individuals with 22q11.2 DS from 11 countries; average age was 11.7 and 47% were male. Individuals were grouped into categories of African descent (African), Asian, and Latin American. We found that the phenotype of 22q11.2 DS varied across population groups. Only two findings, congenital heart disease and learning problems, were found in greater than 50% of participants. When comparing the clinical features of 22q11.2 DS in each population, the proportion of individuals within each clinical category was statistically different except for learning problems and ear anomalies (P < 0.05). However, when Africans were removed from analysis, six additional clinical features were found to be independent of ethnicity (P ≥ 0.05). Using facial analysis technology, we compared 156 Caucasians, Africans, Asians, and Latin American individuals with 22q11.2 DS with 156 age and gender matched controls and found that sensitivity and specificity were greater than 96% for all populations. In summary, we present the varied findings from global populations with 22q11.2 DS and demonstrate how facial analysis technology can assist clinicians in making accurate 22q11.2 DS diagnoses. This work will assist in earlier detection and in increasing recognition of 22q11.2 DS throughout the world.

Facial dysmorphism is influenced by ethnic background of the patient and of the evaluator

The evaluation of facial dysmorphism is a critical step toward reaching a diagnostic. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability to interpret facial morphology in African children with intellectual disability (ID). First, 10 experienced clinicians (five from Africa and five from Europe) rated gestalt in 127 African non-Down Syndrome (non-DS) patients using either the score 2 for 'clearly dysmorphic', 0 for 'clearly non dysmorphic' or 1 for 'uncertain'. The inter-rater agreement was determined using kappa coefficient. There was only fair agreement between African and European raters (kappa-coefficient = 0.29). Second, we applied the FDNA Face2Gene solution to assess Down Syndrome (DS) faces. Initially, Face2Gene showed a better recognition rate for DS in Caucasian (80%) compared to African (36.8%). We trained the Face2Gene with a set of African DS and non-DS photographs. Interestingly, the recognition in African increased to 94.7%. Thus, training improved the sensitivity of Face2Gene. Our data suggest that human based evaluation is influenced by ethnic background of the evaluator. In addition, computer based evaluation indicates that the ethnic of the patient also influences the evaluation and that training may increase the detection specificity for a particular ethnic.

Medical genetics and genomic medicine in Rwanda

Medical genetics and genomic medicine in Rwanda.

Array-CGH analysis in Rwandan patients presenting development delay/intellectual disability with multiple congenital anomalies

Background

Array-CGH is considered as the first-tier investigation used to identify copy number variations. Right now, there is no available data about the genetic etiology of patients with development delay/intellectual disability and congenital malformation in East Africa.

Methods

Array comparative genomic hybridization was performed in 50 Rwandan patients with development delay/intellectual disability and multiple congenital abnormalities, using the Agilent’s 180 K microarray platform.

Results

Fourteen patients (28%) had a global development delay whereas 36 (72%) patients presented intellectual disability. All patients presented multiple congenital abnormalities. Clinically significant copy number variations were found in 13 patients (26%). Size of CNVs ranged from 0,9 Mb to 34 Mb. Six patients had CNVs associated with known syndromes, whereas 7 patients presented rare genomic imbalances.

Conclusion

This study showed that CNVs are present in African population and show the importance to implement genetic testing in East-African countries.

Under-recognition of 22q11.2 deletion in adult Chinese patients with conotruncal anomalies: implications in transitional care

22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a multi-systemic disorder with high phenotypic variability. Under-diagnosis in adults is common and recognition of facial dysmorphic features can be affected by age and ethnicity. This study aims to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed 22q11.2DS in adult Chinese patients with conotruncal anomalies and to delineate their facial dysmorphisms and extra-cardiac manifestations. We recruited consecutively 156 patients with conotruncal anomalies in an adult congenital heart disease (CHD) clinic in Hong Kong and screened for 22q11.2DS using fluorescence-PCR and fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Assessment for dysmorphic features was performed by a cardiologist at initial screening and then by a clinical geneticist upon result disclosure. Clinical photographs were taken and childhood photographs collected. Eighteen patients (11.5%) were diagnosed with 22q11.2DS, translating into 1 previously unrecognized diagnosis of 22q11.2DS in every 10 adult patients with conotruncal anomalies. While dysmorphic features were detected by our clinical geneticist in all patients, only two-thirds were considered dysmorphic by our cardiologist upon first assessment. Evolution of facial dysmorphic features was noted with age. Extra-cardiac manifestations included velopharyngeal incompetence or cleft palate (44%), hypocalcemia (39%), neurodevelopmental anomalies (33%), thrombocytopenia (28%), psychiatric disorders (17%), epilepsy (17%) and hearing loss (17%). We conclude that under-diagnosis of 22q11.2DS in Chinese adults with conotruncal defects is common and facial dysmorphic features may not be reliably recognized in the setting of adult CHD clinic, referral for genetic evaluation and molecular testing for 22q11.2DS should be offered to patients with conotruncal defects.

Psychiatric disorders in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome are prevalent but undertreated

BACKGROUND

Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is a common genetic disorder with high rates of psychosis and other psychopathologies, but few studies discuss treatment. Our aim was to characterize the prevalence and treatment of major psychiatric illnesses in a well-characterized sample of individuals with 22q11DS.

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional study of 112 individuals aged 8 to 45 years with a confirmed diagnosis of 22q11DS. Each participant was administered a modified Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS) and the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS). Phenotypes assessed were threshold and subthreshold psychosis, depression, mania, generalized and separation anxiety, obsessions/compulsions, inattention/hyperactivity and substance use. Histories of mental health care and current psychotropic treatment were obtained.

RESULTS

Psychopathology was common, with 79% of individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for a disorder at the time of assessment. Diagnoses of psychosis were made in 11% of cases, attenuated positive symptom syndrome (APS) in 21%, and 47% experienced significant subthreshold symptoms. Peak occurrence of psychosis risk was during adolescence (62% of those aged 12-17 years). Criteria for a mood disorder were met by 14%, for anxiety disorder 34% and for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) 31%. Mental health care had been received by 63% of individuals in their lifetime, but only 40% continued therapy and 39% used psychotropics. Antipsychotics were used by 42% of participants with psychosis and none of the participants with APS. Half of those at risk for psychosis were receiving no mental health care.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychopathology is common in 22q11DS but is not adequately treated or clinically followed. Particular attention should be paid to subthreshold psychotic symptoms, especially in adolescents.