Discriminating long myelitis of neuromyelitis optica from sarcoidosis

The absence of antibodies in longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis may predict a more favourable prognosis

BACKGROUND

Isolated first episodes of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) have typically been associated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). However, in some cases, serological testing and screening for other aetiologies are negative, a condition referred to as double seronegative longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (dsLETM).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate comparative outcomes of dsLETM, MOGAD-LETM and NMOSD-LETM.

METHODS

Cohort study of LETM cases seen in the UK NMOSD Highly Specialised Service between January 2008 and March 2022.

RESULTS

LETM = 87 cases were identified (median onset age = 46 years (15-85); median follow-up = 46 months (1-144); 47% NMOSD-LETM = 41 (aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-IgG) positive = 36), 20% MOGAD-LETM = 17 and 33% dsLETM = 29). Despite similar Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at nadir, last EDSS was higher in AQP4-IgG and seronegative NMOSD-LETM (sNMOSD) (p = 0.006). Relapses were less common in dsLETM compared to AQP4-IgG NMOSD-LETM and sNMOSD-LETM (19% vs 60% vs 100%; p = 0.001). Poor prognosis could be predicted by AQP4-IgG (odds ratio (OR) = 38.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-1112.86); p = 0.03) and EDSS 3 months after onset (OR = 65.85 (95% CI = 3.65-1188.60); p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

dsLETM remains clinically challenging and difficult to classify with existing nosological terminology. Despite a similar EDSS at nadir, patients with dsLETM relapsed less and had a better long-term prognosis than NMOSD-LETM.

Prevalence of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in the United States

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optic spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare demyelinating, autoimmune disease and the burden in United States is not well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the 2022 US prevalence of NMOSD.

METHODS

We constructed a cross-sectional study using aggregated electronic health record data for 25.7 million patients who had a 2022 clinical encounter. The data originated from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network of 55 healthcare organizations that span all 50 states. NMOSD prevalence was determined by querying for age-interval, sex, and race combinations, with direct standardization to the 2022 US Census data.

RESULTS

There were 1772 NMOSD patients among 25,743,039 patients for a prevalence of 6.88/100,000. Prevalence was the highest in Blacks (12.99/100,000) who represented 27.7% of NMOSD patients, then Asians (9.41/100,000and Whites (5.58/100,000). Among females, the prevalence of NMOSD was 9.48/100,000, and Black and Asian females had a 2.65- and 1.94-times higher prevalence than White females. In males, the prevalence of NMOSD was 3.52/100,000 and it did not differ by race. We observed a 3/5:1 female-to-male ratio in NMOSD. The age- and sex-adjusted 2022 estimate of persons with NMOSD in the United States was 15,413 females and 6233 males.

CONCLUSION

We estimate that there were near 22,000 Americans living with NMOSD in 2022.

Paraneoplastic/autoimmune myelopathies

Paraneoplastic myelopathies are a rare but important category of myelopathy. They usually present with an insidious or subacute progressive neurologic syndrome. Risk factors include tobacco use and family history of cancer. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis usually shows lymphocytic pleocytosis with elevated protein. MRI findings suggest that paraneoplastic myelopathies include longitudinally extensive T2 hyperintensities that are tract-specific and accompanied by enhancement, but spinal MRIs can also be normal. The most commonly associated neural antibodies include amphiphysin and collapsin-response-mediator-protein-5 (CRMP5/anti-CV2) antibodies with lung and breast cancers being the most frequent oncologic accompaniments. The differential diagnosis of paraneoplastic myelopathies includes nutritional deficiency myelopathy (B12, copper) as well as autoimmune/inflammatory conditions such as primary progressive multiple sclerosis or spinal cord sarcoidosis. Patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer may develop myelitis, that can be considered along the spectrum of paraneoplastic myelopathies. Management of paraneoplastic myelopathy includes oncologic treatment and immunotherapy. Despite these treatments, the prognosis is poor and the majority of patients eventually become wheelchair-dependent.

Cerebral enhancement in MOG antibody-associated disease

INTRODUCTION

Limited data exist on brain MRI enhancement in myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) and differences from aquaporin-4-IgG-positive-neuromyelitis-optica-spectrum-disorder (AQP4+NMOSD), and multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we identified 122 Mayo Clinic MOGAD patients (1 January 1996-1 July 2020) with cerebral attacks. We explored enhancement patterns using a discovery set (n=41). We assessed enhancement frequency and Expanded Disability Status Scale scores at nadir and follow-up in the remainder (n=81). Two raters assessed T1-weighted-postgadolinium MRIs (1.5T/3T) for enhancement patterns in MOGAD, AQP4+NMOSD (n=14) and MS (n=26). Inter-rater agreement was assessed. Leptomeningeal enhancement clinical correlates were analysed.

RESULTS

Enhancement occurred in 59/81 (73%) MOGAD cerebral attacks but did not influence outcome. Enhancement was often patchy/heterogeneous in MOGAD (33/59 (56%)), AQP4+NMOSD (9/14 (64%); p=0.57) and MS (16/26 (62%); p=0.63). Leptomeningeal enhancement favoured MOGAD (27/59 (46%)) over AQP4+NMOSD (1/14 (7%); p=0.01) and MS (1/26 (4%); p<0.001) with headache, fever and seizures frequent clinical correlates. Ring enhancement favoured MS (8/26 (31%); p=0.006) over MOGAD (4/59 (7%)). Linear ependymal enhancement was unique to AQP4+NMOSD (2/14 (14%)) and persistent enhancement (>3 months) was rare (0%-8%) across all groups. Inter-rater agreement for enhancement patterns was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhancement is common with MOGAD cerebral attacks and often has a non-specific patchy appearance and rarely persists beyond 3 months. Leptomeningeal enhancement favours MOGAD over AQP4+NMOSD and MS.

Cervical myelitis: a practical approach to its differential diagnosis on MR imaging

BACKGROUND

 Differential diagnosis of non-compressive cervical myelopathy encompasses a broad spectrum of inflammatory, infectious, vascular, neoplastic, neurodegenerative, and metabolic etiologies. Although the speed of symptom onset and clinical course seem to be specific for certain neurological diseases, lesion pattern on MR imaging is a key player to confirm diagnostic considerations.

METHODS

 The differentiation between acute complete transverse myelitis and acute partial transverse myelitis makes it possible to distinguish between certain entities, with the latter often being the onset of multiple sclerosis. Typical medullary MRI lesion patterns include a) longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis, b) short-range ovoid and peripheral lesions, c) polio-like appearance with involvement of the anterior horns, and d) granulomatous nodular enhancement prototypes.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

 Cerebrospinal fluid analysis, blood culture tests, and autoimmune antibody testing are crucial for the correct interpretation of imaging findings. The combination of neuroradiological features and neurological and laboratory findings including cerebrospinal fluid analysis improves diagnostic accuracy.

KEY POINTS

  · The differentiation of medullary lesion patterns, i. e., longitudinal extensive transverse, short ovoid and peripheral, polio-like, and granulomatous nodular, facilitates the diagnosis of myelitis.. · Discrimination of acute complete and acute partial transverse myelitis makes it possible to categorize different entities, with the latter frequently being the overture of multiple sclerosis (MS).. · Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) may start as short transverse myelitis and should not be mistaken for MS.. · The combination of imaging features and neurological and laboratory findings including cerebrospinal fluid analysis improves diagnostic accuracy.. · Additional brain imaging is mandatory in suspected demyelinating, systemic autoimmune, infectious, paraneoplastic, and metabolic diseases..

Typical trident sign and cardiac involvement in a patient suspected to Sarcoidosis despite negative whole-body FDG-PET: a case report

BACKGROUND

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease histologically defined by the non-caseation granulomas formation in different organs, most commonly lungs, liver, skin, gastrointestinal system, eyes, neurologic and cardiac system CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 42-year-old Gilaks woman who presented with myelopathy with characteristic MRI finding called trident sign. By finding this view in axial spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) imaging, a systemic evaluation was performed on the patient, which led to the diagnosis of cardiac involvement in Sarcoidosis with the specific appearance of this disease in cardiac MRI despite the negative Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) scan.

CONCLUSIONS

Sometimes characteristic findings such as the trident sign prompt the physician to high suspicion and wide evaluation of the patient to reveal important organ involvement that changes the treatment decision and saves the patient.

A 28-Year-Old Woman With Left-Sided Weakness and Atypical MRI Lesions: From the National Multiple Sclerosis Society Case Conference Proceedings

A 28-year-old woman presented with subacute relapsing left-sided weakness. MRI demonstrated both enhancing C3-C6 and nonenhancing T2-T4 lesions. Initial provisional diagnosis was inflammatory/autoimmune. Her left-sided weakness progressed despite immunosuppressive therapies. We reassessed our original suspected diagnosis because of an atypical clinicoradiologic course, leading to biopsy and a definitive diagnosis.

Non-demyelinating disorders mimicking and misdiagnosed as NMOSD: a literature review

BACKGROUND

Differentiating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from its mimics is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis, especially in the absence of aquaporin-4-IgG. While multiple sclerosis (MS) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG associated disease (MOGAD) represent major and well-defined differential diagnoses, non-demyelinating NMOSD mimics remain poorly characterized.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review on PubMed/MEDLINE to identify reports of patients with non-demyelinating disorders that mimicked or were misdiagnosed as NMOSD. Three novel cases seen at the authors' institutions were also included. The characteristics of NMOSD mimics were analyzed and red flags associated with misdiagnosis identified.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients were included; 35 (52%) were female. Median age at symptoms onset was 44 (range, 1-78) years. Fifty-six (82%) patients did not fulfil the 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria. The clinical syndromes misinterpreted for NMOSD were myelopathy (41%), myelopathy + optic neuropathy (41%), optic neuropathy (6%), or other (12%). Alternative etiologies included genetic/metabolic disorders, neoplasms, infections, vascular disorders, spondylosis, and other immune-mediated disorders. Common red flags associated with misdiagnosis were lack of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis (57%), lack of response to immunotherapy (55%), progressive disease course (54%), and lack of magnetic resonance imaging gadolinium enhancement (31%). Aquaporin-4-IgG positivity was detected in five patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (n = 2), cell-based assay (n = 2: serum, 1; CSF, 1), and non-specified assay (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The spectrum of NMOSD mimics is broad. Misdiagnosis frequently results from incorrect application of diagnostic criteria, in patients with multiple identifiable red flags. False aquaporin-4-IgG positivity, generally from nonspecific testing assays, may rarely contribute to misdiagnosis.

MRI to differentiate multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease

Differentiating multiple sclerosis (MS) from other relapsing inflammatory autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is crucial in clinical practice. The differential diagnosis may be challenging but making the correct ultimate diagnosis is critical, since prognosis and treatments differ, and inappropriate therapy may promote disability. In the last two decades, significant advances have been made in MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD including new diagnostic criteria with better characterization of typical clinical symptoms and suggestive imaging (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) lesions. MRI is invaluable in making the ultimate diagnosis. An increasing amount of new evidence with respect to the specificity of observed lesions as well as the associated dynamic changes in the acute and follow-up phase in each condition has been reported in distinct studies recently published. Additionally, differences in brain (including the optic nerve) and spinal cord lesion patterns between MS, aquaporin4-antibody-positive NMOSD, and MOGAD have been described. We therefore present a narrative review on the most relevant findings in brain, spinal cord, and optic nerve lesions on conventional MRI for distinguishing adult patients with MS from NMOSD and MOGAD in clinical practice. In this context, cortical and central vein sign lesions, brain and spinal cord lesions characteristic of MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD, optic nerve involvement, role of MRI at follow-up, and new proposed diagnostic criteria to differentiate MS from NMOSD and MOGAD were discussed.

Neurosarcoidosis: The Pan-Neurology Disease

Neurosarcoidosis (NS) is a protean illness with multiple clinical and radiological presentations giving it the moniker of "a chameleon" or the great mimic. NS can present as a wide spectrum of neurological syndromes localizing both to the central and peripheral nervous systems. The absence of a diagnostic serum test makes it difficult to diagnose with certainty and remains largely a histopathological diagnosis and one of exclusion. A high index of suspicion should be there in suspecting NS, and it should always be excluded among patients presenting with acute to subacute neurological deficits.

Neurosarcoidosis: Diagnostic Challenges and Mimics A Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neurosarcoidosis is a rare manifestation of sarcoidosis that is challenging to diagnose. Biopsy confirmation of granulomas is not sufficient, as other granulomatous diseases can present similarly. This review is intended to guide the clinician in identifying key conditions to exclude prior to concluding a diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although new biomarkers are being studied, there are no reliable tests for neurosarcoidosis. Advances in serum testing and imaging have improved the diagnosis for key mimics of neurosarcoidosis in certain clinical scenarios, but biopsy remains an important method of differentiation. Key mimics of neurosarcoidosis in all cases include infections (tuberculosis, fungal), autoimmune disease (vasculitis, IgG4-related disease), and lymphoma. As neurosarcoidosis can affect any part of the nervous system, patients should have a unique differential diagnosis tailored to their clinical presentation. Although biopsy can assist with excluding mimics, diagnosis is ultimately clinical.

Resolution of Possible Neurosarcoidosis With Early Initiation of Glucocorticoids in the Acute Inpatient Setting: A Case Report

Neurosarcoidosis is an autoimmune disorder of unknown etiology. We report a case of a 27-year-old African American male presenting with fever, vomiting, and seizure. Initially, bacterial meningitis was suspected, and empiric antibiotics with dexamethasone were started. Workup revealed negative cultures, leptomeningeal enhancement, and cavitary lung nodules with hilar lymphadenopathy on imaging and elevated angiotensin-converting enzyme levels on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Neurosarcoidosis was then suspected, and a lung biopsy was performed. The results were inconclusive, but the patient's condition improved. He was discharged on prednisone. Our case demonstrates the diagnostic difficulty of neurosarcoidosis while displaying the importance of early initiation of glucocorticoids in the acute inpatient setting.

Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelits optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part I: Diagnosis and differential diagnosis

The term 'neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders' (NMOSD) is used as an umbrella term that refers to aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and its formes frustes and to a number of closely related clinical syndromes without AQP4-IgG. NMOSD were originally considered subvariants of multiple sclerosis (MS) but are now widely recognized as disorders in their own right that are distinct from MS with regard to immunopathogenesis, clinical presentation, optimum treatment, and prognosis. In part 1 of this two-part article series, which ties in with our 2014 recommendations, the neuromyelitis optica study group (NEMOS) gives updated recommendations on the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of NMOSD. A key focus is on differentiating NMOSD from MS and from myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM; also termed MOG antibody-associated disease, MOGAD), which shares significant similarity with NMOSD with regard to clinical and, partly, radiological presentation, but is a pathogenetically distinct disease. In part 2, we provide updated recommendations on the treatment of NMOSD, covering all newly approved drugs as well as established treatment options.

Imaging of Central Nervous System Autoimmune, Paraneoplastic, and Neuro-rheumatologic Disorders

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the imaging modalities used in the evaluation of central nervous system (CNS) autoimmune, paraneoplastic, and neuro-rheumatologic disorders. An approach is outlined for interpreting imaging findings in this context, synthesizing a differential diagnosis based on certain imaging patterns, and choosing further imaging for specific diseases.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The rapid discovery of new neuronal and glial autoantibodies has revolutionized the autoimmune neurology field and has elucidated imaging patterns characteristic of certain antibody-associated diseases. Many CNS inflammatory diseases, however, lack a definitive biomarker. Clinicians should recognize neuroimaging patterns suggestive of inflammatory disorders, as well as the limitations of imaging. CT, MRI, and positron emission tomography (PET) modalities all play a role in diagnosing autoimmune, paraneoplastic, and neuro-rheumatologic disorders. Additional imaging modalities such as conventional angiography and ultrasonography can be helpful for further evaluation in select situations.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Knowledge of imaging modalities, both structural and functional, is critical in identifying CNS inflammatory diseases quickly and can help avoid invasive testing such as brain biopsy in certain clinical scenarios. Recognizing imaging patterns suggestive of CNS inflammatory diseases can also facilitate the early initiation of appropriate treatments to diminish morbidity and future disability.

Advances in the neuroimaging of motor disorders

Neuroimaging is a valuable adjunct to the history and examination in the evaluation of motor system disorders. Conventional imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging depicts important anatomic information and helps to identify imaging patterns which may support diagnosis of a specific motor disorder. Advanced imaging techniques can provide further detail regarding volume, functional, or metabolic changes occurring in nervous system pathology. This chapter is an overview of the advances in neuroimaging with particular emphasis on both standard and less well-known advanced imaging techniques and findings, such as diffusion tensor imaging or volumetric studies, and their application to specific motor disorders. In addition, it provides reference to emerging imaging biomarkers in motor system disorders such as Parkinson disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Huntington disease, and briefly reviews the neuroimaging findings in different causes of myelopathy and peripheral nerve disorders.

Challenging Myelopathy Cases

Misdiagnosis of myelopathies is common and can lead to irreversible disability when diagnosis- and disease-specific treatments are delayed. Therefore, quickly determining the etiology of myelopathy is crucial. Clinical evaluation and MRI spine are paramount in establishing the correct diagnosis and subsequently an appropriate treatment plan. Herein, we review an approach to myelopathy diagnosis focused on the time course of neurologic symptom progression and neuroimaging pearls, and apply them to a variety of inflammatory, structural, and vascular myelopathy cases.

Presumptive isolated neurosarcoidosis involving eloquent structures: An argument for empirical TNF-α inhibition

There are clinical and radiological phenotypes characteristic of neurosarcoidosis. Histopathologic confirmation is preferred, however, biopsy is associated with a significant risk of morbidity when only eloquent neural structures are involved and where there is no systemic disease. We present a series of patients with isolated neurosarcoidosis and suggest circumstances where an empirical, closely monitored, trial of tumour-necrosis-factor-alpha inhibitor therapy can improve outcome and diagnostic confidence.

Identification of specific causes of myelopathy in a large cohort of patients initially diagnosed with transverse myelitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Identifying the etiologic diagnosis in patients presenting with myelopathy is essential in order to guide appropriate treatment and follow-up. We set out to examine the etiologic diagnosis after comprehensive clinical evaluation and diagnostic work-up in a large cohort of patients referred to our specialized myelopathy clinic, and to explore the demographic profiles and symptomatic evolution of specific etiologic diagnoses.

METHODS

In this retrospective study of patients referred to the Johns Hopkins Myelitis and Myelopathy Center between 2006 and 2021 for evaluation of "transverse myelitis", the final etiologic diagnosis determined after comprehensive evaluation in each patient was reviewed and validated. Demographic characteristics and temporal profile of symptom evolution were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 1193 included patients, 772 (65%) were determined to have an inflammatory myelopathy and 421 (35%) were determined to have a non-inflammatory myelopathy. Multiple sclerosis/clinically isolated syndrome (n = 221, 29%) and idiopathic myelitis (n = 149, 19%) were the most frequent inflammatory diagnoses, while spinal cord infarction (n = 197, 47%) and structural causes of myelopathy (n = 108, 26%) were the most frequent non-inflammatory diagnoses. Compared to patients with inflammatory myelopathies, patients with non-inflammatory myelopathies were more likely to be older, male and experience chronic symptom evolution (p < 0.001 for all). Hyperacute symptom evolution was most frequent in patients with spinal cord infarction (74%), while chronic symptom evolution was most frequent in patients with structural causes of myelopathy (81%), arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous malformation (81%), myelopathy associated with rheumatologic disorder (71%), and sarcoidosis-associated myelopathy (61%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients initially diagnosed with "transverse myelitis" are eventually found to have a more specific inflammatory or even non-inflammatory cause, potentially resulting in inappropriate treatment and follow-up. Demographic characteristics and temporal profile of symptom evolution may help inform a differential diagnosis in these patients. Etiological diagnosis of myelopathies would provide better therapeutic decisions.

Myelitis features and outcomes in CNS demyelinating disorders: Comparison between multiple sclerosis, MOGAD, and AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD

Inflammatory myelopathies can manifest with a combination of motor, sensory and autonomic dysfunction of variable severity. Depending on the underlying etiology, the episodes of myelitis can recur, often leading to irreversible spinal cord damage and major long-term disability. Three main demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system, namely multiple sclerosis (MS), aquaporin-4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (AQP4+NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG associated disease (MOGAD), can induce spinal cord inflammation through different pathogenic mechanisms, resulting in a more or less profound disruption of spinal cord integrity. This ultimately translates into distinctive clinical-MRI features, as well as distinct patterns of disability accrual, with a step-wise worsening of neurological function in MOGAD and AQP4+NMOSD, and progressive disability accrual in MS. Early recognition of the specific etiologies of demyelinating myelitis and initiation of the appropriate treatment is crucial to improve outcome. In this review article we summarize and compare the clinical and imaging features of spinal cord involvement in these three demyelinating disorders, both during the acute phase and over time, and outline the current knowledge on the expected patterns of disability accrual and outcomes. We also discuss the potential implications of these observations for patient management and counseling.

Neuroimaging features in inflammatory myelopathies: A review

Spinal cord involvement can be observed in the course of immune-mediated disorders. Although multiple sclerosis (MS) represents the leading cause of inflammatory myelopathy, an increasing number of alternative etiologies must be now considered in the diagnostic work-up of patients presenting with myelitis. These include antibody-mediated disorders and cytotoxic T cell-mediated diseases targeting central nervous system (CNS) antigens, and systemic autoimmune conditions with secondary CNS involvement. Even though clinical features are helpful to orient the diagnostic suspicion (e.g., timing and severity of myelopathy symptoms), the differential diagnosis of inflammatory myelopathies is often challenging due to overlapping features. Moreover, noninflammatory etiologies can sometimes mimic an inflammatory process. In this setting, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming a fundamental tool for the characterization of spinal cord damage, revealing a pictorial scenario which is wider than the clinical manifestations. The characterization of spinal cord lesions in terms of longitudinal extension, location on axial plane, involvement of the white matter and/or gray matter, and specific patterns of contrast enhancement, often allows a proper differentiation of these diseases. For instance, besides classical features, such as the presence of longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions in patients with aquaporin-4-IgG positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4+NMOSD), novel radiological signs (e.g., H sign, trident sign) have been recently proposed and successfully applied for the differential diagnosis of inflammatory myelopathies. In this review article, we will discuss the radiological features of spinal cord involvement in autoimmune disorders such as MS, AQP4+NMOSD, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), and other recently characterized immune-mediated diseases. The identification of imaging pitfalls and mimics that can lead to misdiagnosis will also be examined. Since spinal cord damage is a major cause of irreversible clinical disability, the recognition of these radiological aspects will help clinicians achieve a correct and prompt diagnosis, treat early with disease-specific treatment and improve patient outcomes.

Neurosarcoidosis: Phenotypes, Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an update of clinical presentation, diagnosis, differential diagnoses, and treatment according to recent evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neurosarcoidosis remains a diagnosis of exclusion, with infectious and malignant etiologies recognized as important mimickers. Corticosteroids remain as first-line therapy. In recent years, however, studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in the treatment of neurosarcoidosis, leading to improved outcomes. Neurosarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease with protean manifestations that may affect any part of the central and peripheral nervous system. It has many mimickers, and potentially devastating complications necessitating long-term follow-up. Early initiation of treatment, particularly with anti-TNF therapy, may lead to better outcomes and fewer relapses. There is an unmet need for randomized controlled trials that provide robust data to guide therapy and the long-term management of neurosarcoidosis patients.

Neurosarcoidosis presenting as longitudinally extensive myelitis: Diagnostic assessment, differential diagnosis, and therapeutic approach

Neurosarcoidosis is an uncommon and multiform clinical entity. Its presentation as an isolated longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) is rare and challenging to identify. We report a case of LETM in a 60-year-old patient with no significant systemic symptoms nor relevant medical history. The peculiar spinal magnetic resonance imaging finding characterized by a posterior and central canal subpial contrast enhancement, the so-called “trident sign,” together with chest computed tomography scan and lymph node biopsy led to the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. We also discuss the main differential diagnoses of LETM and therapeutic options for sarcoidosis-related myelitis.

The prevalence, incidence, and clinical assessment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in patients with demyelinating diseases

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is characterised by recurrent attacks of optic neuritis and transverse myelitis. The purpose of this work was to identify the incidence and prevalence of NMOSD and its clinical characteristics in the population treated for demyelinating diseases in Western Mexico.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A descriptive, retrospective study was carried out in the Department of Neurology, at the Sub-specialty Medical Unit, Specialties Hospital (known by its Spanish abbreviation UMAE-HE), of the National Western Medical Center (CMNO), Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS). A review of the electronic files for all patients with a diagnosis of NMOSD in 2019, was carried out in the State of Jalisco, Mexico.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients with NMOSD were included in the study. The incidence was 0.71/100 000 (CI 0.60-0.85) and the prevalence was 1.09/100 000 (CI 0.84-1.42). There were 79.3% women, and 20.6% were men (P = .01). All (100%) patients presented with anti-aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G, and 89.6% showed seropositivity for anti-aquaporin-4 (CI 82.6-94.9). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 100% of patients, where 34.4% were normal, and 65.5% (38) abnormal, presenting with non-specific subcortical lesions (P = 0.04). The initial clinical presentation was optic neuritis (ON) in 58.6%; where 31.0% was bilateral ON, 20.7% was left ON, and 6.9% were right ON; transverse myelitis in 26.0%, area postrema syndrome (APS) in 10.3%, among others.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of NMOSD exceeds 0.71/100 000, the prevalence is low at 1.09/100 000, and NMOSD is predominantly found in women.

Prognostic Factors and Treatments Efficacy in Spinal Cord Sarcoidosis: An Observational Cohort With Long-term Follow-up

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord sarcoidosis is a rare manifestation of sarcoidosis with a consequent risk of neurological sequelae for the patient. We investigated prognostic factors and efficacy of immunosuppressive treatments in a longitudinal cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients with spinal cord sarcoidosis followed between 1995 and 2021 in seven centers in France. Patients with a definite, probable or possible spinal cord sarcoidosis according to the Neurosarcoidosis Consortium Consensus Group criteria and with a spinal cord involvement confirmed by MRI were included. We analyzed relapse or progression rate with a Poisson model, initial Rankin score with a linear model and change in the Rankin score during follow-up with a logistic model.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients were followed for a median of 7.8 years. Overall mean relapse or progression rate was 0.17 per person-year and decreased over time. At last visit, 46 (47.4%) patients had a loss of autonomy (Rankin score ≥ 2). The main prognostic factors significantly associated with relapse or progression rate were gadolinium enhancement (relative rate [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.4, 0.95]) or meningeal involvement (relative rate [95% CI]: 2.05 [1.31, 3.19]) on spinal cord MRI, and cell count (relative rate [95% CI] per 1 log increase: 1.16 [1.01, 1.33]) on CSF analysis. Relapse or progression rate was not significantly associated with initial Rankin score or EDSS. TNF α antagonists significantly decreased relapse or progression rate compared with corticosteroids alone (relative rate [95% CI]: 0.33 [0.11, 0.98]). Azathioprine was significantly less effective than methotrexate on relapse or progression rate (relative rate [95% CI]: 2.83 [1.04, 7.75]) and change in Rankin score (mean difference [95% CI]: 0.65 [0.23, 1.08]).

DISCUSSION

Regarding the relapse or progression rate, meningeal localization of sarcoidosis was associated with a worse prognosis; TNF α antagonists resulted in a significant decrease compared to corticosteroids alone; and methotrexate was more effective than azathioprine.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that in individuals with spinal cord neurosarcoidosis, TNF α antagonists were associated with decreased relapse or progression rate compared to corticosteroids alone, but other therapies showed no significant benefit.

Uncommon inflammatory/immune-related myelopathies

The differential diagnosis for immune-mediated myelopathies is broad. Although clinical manifestations overlap, certain presentations are suggestive of a particular myelopathy etiology. Spine MRI lesion characteristics including the length and location, and the pattern of gadolinium enhancement, help narrow the differential diagnosis and exclude an extrinsic compressive cause. The discovery of specific antibodies that serve as biomarkers of myelitis such as aquaporin-4-IgG and myelin-oligodendrocyte -glycoprotein-IgG (MOG-IgG), has improved our understanding of myelitis pathophysiology and facilitated diagnosis. In this review we will focus on the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, imaging findings and treatment and outcomes of uncommon immune-mediated myelopathies.

Images of the month 1: Trident sign and neurosarcoidosis

A 36-year-old woman presented with a subacute, relapsing myelitis, manifesting as bilateral ascending lower limb paraesthesia, partially responsive to steroids. Imaging demonstrated a longitudinal spinal cord lesion, with a unique and characteristic sign (the 'trident sign') on axial views, which is specific to a diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis. This case highlights the importance of using this feature to distinguish a longitudinal cord lesion of sarcoidosis from other differentials.

Utility of MRI Enhancement Pattern in Myelopathies With Longitudinally Extensive T2 Lesions

Objective

To determine whether MRI gadolinium enhancement patterns in myelopathies with longitudinally extensive T2 lesions can be reliably distinguished and assist in diagnosis.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 74 Mayo Clinic patients (January 1, 1996–December 31, 2019) fulfilling the following criteria: (1) clinical myelopathy; (2) MRI spine available; (3) longitudinally extensive T2 hyperintensity (≥3 vertebral segments); and (4) characteristic gadolinium enhancement pattern associated with a specific myelopathy etiology. Thirty-nine cases with alternative myelopathy etiologies, without previously described enhancement patterns, were included as controls. Two independent readers, educated on enhancement patterns, reviewed T2-weighted and postgadolinium T1-weighted images and selected the diagnosis based on this knowledge. These were compared with the true diagnoses, and agreement was measured with Kappa coefficient.

Results

Among all cases and controls (n = 113), there was excellent agreement for diagnosis using postgadolinium images (kappa, 0.76) but poor agreement with T2-weighted characteristics alone (kappa, 0.25). A correct diagnosis was more likely when assessing postgadolinium image characteristics than with T2-weighted images alone (rater 1: 100/113 [88%] vs 61/113 [54%] correct, p < 0.0001; rater 2: 95/113 [84%] vs 68/113 [60%] correct, p < 0.0001). Of the 74 with characteristic enhancement patterns, 55 (74%) were assigned an alternative incorrect or nonspecific diagnosis when originally evaluated in clinical practice, 12 (16%) received immunotherapy for noninflammatory myelopathies, and 2 (3%) underwent unnecessary spinal cord biopsy.

Conclusions

Misdiagnosis of myelopathies is common. The gadolinium enhancement patterns characteristic of specific diagnoses can be identified with excellent agreement between raters educated on this topic. This study highlights the potential diagnostic utility of enhancement patterns in myelopathies with longitudinally extensive T2 lesions.

[A case of primary intramedullary spinal cord lymphoma diagnosed by spinal cord biopsy of long spinal cord lesions showing persistent gadolinium contrast enhancement]

An 82-year-old man presented with subacute bilateral lower limb paralysis, deep sensory disturbance, and vesico-rectal disturbance. MRI of the spinal cord revealed a large gray matter-dominant lesion extending from the medulla oblongata to the lower thoracic spinal cord. The patient was treated with steroid-pulse therapy for myelitis, but without symptomatic improvement. A spinal cord biopsy was performed for treatment-resistant myelopathy, and histopathology revealed a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, that was diagnosed as a primary intramedullary spinal cord lymphoma because systemic examination didn't show any other findings suggestive of malignant lymphoma. A spinal cord biopsy is necessary for the definitive diagnosis of this disease, but in the case of poor response to treatment and a progressive course, intramedullary malignant lymphoma should be considered if there is a persistent elevation of CSF IL-10 or a prolonged contrast effect.

Neurosarcoidosis mimicry of MS: Clues from cases with CNS tissue diagnosis

The clinical picture of neurosarcoidosis (NS) shares many aspects with multiple sclerosis (MS). I examine whether or not clinical measures can reliably distinguish NS mimicking MS from NS coexisting with MS, and the informative role biopsy and autopsy evidence may play in understanding these two disorders. Uniquely challenging, I explore the rare patients presenting with the differential of MS or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) versus NS, including MS or ADEM as an associated illness in patients with systemic sarcoidosis. In most but not all NS patients, red flags against a diagnosis of MS are strong enough to rule out this more common disorder. Biopsy and autopsy findings indicate a tendency of NS granulomatous changes in the CNS to involve the same deep white matter perivascular spaces as expected to occur in MS, and hence correlate with a tendency of NS involving white matter to produce classic MRI findings of MS. The spectrum of NS includes some cases limited to a single anatomical site, including sites classically involved in demyelinating CIS (optic nerve, brainstem, and transverse myelitis). Asymptomatic "non-specific" periventricular MRI changes are described in many studies as "MS-like". No biopsied or autopsied cases have yet proven associated classic pathological changes of MS in patients with NS.

Evaluation and Management of Acute Myelopathy

Acute myelopathies are spinal cord disorders characterized by a rapidly progressive course reaching nadir within hours to a few weeks that may result in severe disability. The multitude of underlying etiologies, complexities in confirming the diagnosis, and often unforgiving nature of spinal cord damage have always represented a challenge. Moreover, certain slowly progressive myelopathies may present acutely or show abrupt worsening in specific settings and thus further complicate the diagnostic workup. Awareness of the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of different myelopathies and the specific settings where they occur is fundamental for a correct diagnosis. Neuroimaging helps distinguish compressive etiologies that may require urgent surgery from intrinsic etiologies that generally require medical treatment. Differentiation between various myelopathies is essential to establish timely and appropriate treatment and avoid harm from unnecessary procedures. This article reviews the contemporary spectrum of acute myelopathy etiologies and provides guidance for diagnosis and management.

Acute Neurologic Manifestations of Systemic Immune-Mediated Diseases

Systemic autoimmune diseases can affect the peripheral and central nervous system. In this review, we outline the common inpatient consultations for patients with neurological symptoms from rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, immunoglobulin G4-related disease, Behçet's disease, giant cell arteritis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis, polyarteritis nodosa, and ankylosing spondylitis. We discuss the symptoms, diagnostic strategies, and treatment options.

Neurosarcoidosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Although often regarded as a protean illness with myriad clinical and imaging manifestations, neurosarcoidosis typically presents as recognizable syndromes that can be approached in a rational, systematic fashion. Understanding of neurosarcoidosis has progressed significantly in recent years, including updated diagnostic criteria and advances in treatment. The diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis is established by the clinical syndrome, imaging and histopathological findings, and exclusion of other causes. Mounting evidence supports the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors as an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium, along with glucocorticoids and steroid-sparing cytotoxic immunosuppressants. In this narrative review, we summarize recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of neurosarcoidosis.

MRI Patterns Distinguish AQP4 Antibody Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder From Multiple Sclerosis

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are inflammatory diseases of the CNS. Overlap in the clinical and MRI features of NMOSD and MS means that distinguishing these conditions can be difficult. With the aim of evaluating the diagnostic utility of MRI features in distinguishing NMOSD from MS, we have conducted a cross-sectional analysis of imaging data and developed predictive models to distinguish the two conditions. NMOSD and MS MRI lesions were identified and defined through a literature search. Aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody positive NMOSD cases and age- and sex-matched MS cases were collected. MRI of orbits, brain and spine were reported by at least two blinded reviewers. MRI brain or spine was available for 166/168 (99%) of cases. Longitudinally extensive (OR = 203), "bright spotty" (OR = 93.8), whole (axial; OR = 57.8) or gadolinium (Gd) enhancing (OR = 28.6) spinal cord lesions, bilateral (OR = 31.3) or Gd-enhancing (OR = 15.4) optic nerve lesions, and nucleus tractus solitarius (OR = 19.2), periaqueductal (OR = 16.8) or hypothalamic (OR = 7.2) brain lesions were associated with NMOSD. Ovoid (OR = 0.029), Dawson's fingers (OR = 0.031), pyramidal corpus callosum (OR = 0.058), periventricular (OR = 0.136), temporal lobe (OR = 0.137) and T1 black holes (OR = 0.154) brain lesions were associated with MS. A score-based algorithm and a decision tree determined by machine learning accurately predicted more than 85% of both diagnoses using first available imaging alone. We have confirmed NMOSD and MS specific MRI features and combined these in predictive models that can accurately identify more than 85% of cases as either AQP4 seropositive NMOSD or MS.

Retinal optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and MOG-antibody associated disorders: an updated review

INTRODUCTION

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein IgG antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD) comprise two groups of rare neuroinflammatory diseases that cause attack-related damage to the central nervous system (CNS). Clinical attacks are often characterized by optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and to a lesser extent, brainstem encephalitis/area postrema syndrome. Retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive technique that allows for in vivo thickness quantification of the retinal layers. Apart from OCT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an increasingly important role in NMOSD and MOGAD diagnosis based on the current international diagnostic criteria. Retinal OCT and brain/spinal cord/optic nerve MRI can help to distinguish NMOSD and MOGAD from other neuroinflammatory diseases, particularly from multiple sclerosis, and to monitor disease-associated CNS-damage.

AREAS COVERED

This article summarizes the current status of imaging research in NMOSD and MOGAD, and reviews the clinical relevance of OCT, MRI and other relevant imaging techniques for differential diagnosis, screening and monitoring of the disease course.

EXPERT OPINION

Retinal OCT and MRI can visualize and quantify CNS damage in vivo, improving our understanding of NMOSD and MOGAD pathology. Further efforts on the standardization of these imaging techniques are essential for implementation into clinical practice and as outcome parameters in clinical trials.

Comparative analysis of clinical and imaging data between patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease and patients with aquaporin 4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the clinical data, laboratory findings, and imaging characteristics of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) and aquaporin 4 antibody (AQP4)-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), as detailed comparative analyses of laboratory data for both diseases are rare.

METHODS

Our retrospective study compared the clinical data, laboratory findings, and imaging characteristics of 118 AQP4-positive patients with first-episode NMOSD and 25 patients with first-episode MOGAD. Logistic regression was used to determine the factors that differentiated MOGAD and AQP4-positive NMOSD.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in age, symptoms, recurrence rate, laboratory indicators, and imaging examinations between patients with MOGAD and patients with AQP4-positive NMOSD. Patients with MOGAD were younger and had higher levels of uric acid than those with AQP4-positive NMOSD. The proportion of cortical gray matter/juxtacortical white matter lesions was significantly higher in the MOGAD group than in the NMOSD group. Logistic regression revealed that young age [odds ratio (OR) = 0.947, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.905-0.99], high uric acid level (OR = 1.016, 95% CI = 1.006-1.027), and cortical gray matter/juxtacortical white matter involvement (OR = 3.889, 95% CI = 1.048-14.442) were significantly related to MOGAD.

CONCLUSION

The multivariate analysis of the present study demonstrated that age, uric acid level, and the presence of lesions in the cortical gray matter/juxtacortical white matter can aid in distinguishing patients with AQP4-positive NMOSD from those with MOGAD. These factors may also aid in determining which patients should be tested for antibodies.

Comparisons of clinical phenotype, radiological and laboratory features, and therapy of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder by regions: update and challenges

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) associated with autoantibody (ab) to aquaporin-4 (AQP4). There is obvious variation between regions and countries in the epidemiology, clinical features and management in NMOSD. Based on published population-based observation and cohort studies, the different clinical pattern of NMOSD has been seen in several geographical regions and some of these patients with NMOSD-like features do not fully meet the current diagnostic criteria, which is needed to consider the value of recently revised diagnostic criteria. At present, all treatments applied in NMOSD have made great progress, however, these treatments failed in AQP4 ab negative and refractory patients. Therefore, it is necessary to turn into an innovative idea and to open a new era of NMOSD treatment to develop novel and diverse targets and effective therapeutic drugs in NMOSD and to conduct the trails in large clinical samples and case-control studies to confirm their therapeutic effects on NMOSD in the future, which still remain a challenge.

Comparison of MRI Lesion Evolution in Different Central Nervous System Demyelinating Disorders

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There are few studies that compare lesion evolution across different CNS demyelinating diseases, yet knowledge of this may be important for diagnosis and understanding differences in disease pathogenesis. We sought to compare MRI T2-lesion evolution in myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein-IgG-associated disorder (MOGAD), aquaporin-4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-IgG-NMOSD), and multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

In this descriptive study, we retrospectively identified Mayo Clinic patients with MOGAD, AQP4-IgG-NMOSD, or MS and: 1) brain or myelitis attack; 2) available attack MRI within 6 weeks; and 3) follow-up MRI beyond 6 months without interval relapses in that region. Two neurologists identified the symptomatic or largest T2-lesion for each patient (index lesion). MRIs were then independently reviewed by two neuroradiologists blinded to diagnosis to determine resolution of T2-lesions by consensus. The index T2-lesion area was manually outlined acutely and at follow-up to assess variation in size.

RESULTS

We included 156 patients (MOGAD, 38; AQP4-IgG-NMOSD, 51; MS, 67) with 172 attacks (brain, 81; myelitis, 91). The age (median [range]) differed between MOGAD (25 [2-74]), AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (53 [10-78]) and MS (37 [16-61]) (p<0.01) and female sex predominated in the AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (41/51 [80%]) and MS (51/67 [76%]) groups but not among those with MOGAD (17/38 [45%]). Complete resolution of the index T2-lesion was more frequent in MOGAD (brain, 13/18[72%]; spine, 22/28[79%]) than AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (brain, 3/21[14%]; spine, 0/34[0%]) and MS (brain, 7/42[17%]; spine, 0/29[0%]), p<0.001. Resolution of all T2-Lesions occurred most often in MOGAD (brain, 7/18[39%]; spine, 22/28[79%]) than AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (brain, 2/21[10%]; spine, 0/34[0%]), and MS (brain, 2/42[5%]; spine, 0/29[0%]), p< 0.01. There was a larger median (range) reduction in T2-lesion area in mm² on follow-up axial brain MRI with MOGAD (213[55-873]) than AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (104[0.7-597]) (p=0.02) and MS, 36[0-506]) (p< 0.001) and the reductions in size on sagittal spine MRI follow-up in MOGAD (262[0-888]) and AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (309[0-1885]) were similar (p=0.4) and greater than MS (23[0-152]) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The MRI T2-lesions in MOGAD resolve completely more often than AQP4-IgG-NMOSD and MS. This has implications for diagnosis, monitoring disease activity, and clinical trial design, while also providing insight into pathogenesis of central nervous system demyelinating diseases.

Challenging Mimickers in the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis: A Case Study

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown cause characterized by a wide variety of presentations. Its diagnosis is based on three major criteria: a clinical presentation compatible with sarcoidosis, the presence of non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples, and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. Many conditions may mimic a sarcoid-like granulomatous reaction. These conditions include infections, neoplasms, immunodeficiencies, and drug-induced diseases. Moreover, patients with sarcoidosis are at risk of developing opportunistic infections or lymphoma. Reliably confirming the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and better identifying new events are major clinical problems in daily practice. To address such issues, we present seven emblematic cases, seen in our department, over a ten-year period along with a literature review about case reports of conditions misdiagnosed as sarcoidosis.

Clinical characterization and outcomes of 85 patients with neurosarcoidosis

To analyze the frequency and clinical phenotype of neurosarcoidosis (NS) in one of the largest nationwide cohorts of patients with sarcoidosis reported from southern Europe. NS was evaluated according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Central Nervous System and Peripheral Nervous System Sarcoidosis recently proposed by Stern et al. Pathologic confirmation of granulomatous disease was used to subclassify NS into definite (confirmation in neurological tissue), probable (confirmation in extraneurological tissue) and possible (no histopathological confirmation of the disease). Of the 1532 patients included in the cohort, 85 (5.5%) fulfilled the Stern criteria for NS (49 women, mean age at diagnosis of NS of 47.6 years, 91% White). These patients developed 103 neurological conditions involving the brain (38%), cranial nerves (36%), the meninges (3%), the spinal cord (10%) and the peripheral nerves (14%); no patient had concomitant central and peripheral nerve involvements. In 59 (69%) patients, neurological involvement preceded or was present at the time of diagnosis of the disease. According to the classification proposed by Stern et al., 11 (13%) were classified as a definite NS, 61 (72%) as a probable NS and the remaining 13 (15%) as a possible NS. In comparison with the systemic phenotype of patients without NS, patients with CNS involvement presented a lower frequency of thoracic involvement (82% vs 93%, q = 0.018), a higher frequency of ocular (27% vs 10%, q < 0.001) and salivary gland (15% vs 4%, q = 0.002) WASOG involvements. In contrast, patients with PNS involvement showed a higher frequency of liver involvement (36% vs 12%, p = 0.02) in comparison with patients without NS. Neurosarcoidosis was identified in 5.5% of patients. CNS involvement prevails significantly over PNS involvement, and both conditions do not overlap in any patient. The systemic phenotype associated to each involvement was clearly differentiated, and can be helpful not only in the early identification of neurological involvement, but also in the systemic evaluation of patients diagnosed with neurosarcoidosis.

Immune-Mediated Myelopathies: A Review of Etiologies, Diagnostic Approach, and Therapeutic Management

Myelopathy is a broad term used to describe a heterogeneous group of disorders that affects the spinal cord; the focus of this article will be a subgroup of these disorders with an autoimmune and inflammatory-based pathology. Symptoms typically develop over hours or days and then worsen over a matter of days to weeks, but sometimes can have a more insidious or subacute presentation, which can make the diagnosis more puzzling. Despite relatively low incidence rates, almost a third of affected patients are left with severely disabling symptoms. Prompt recognition of the underlying etiology is essential so that a specific targeted therapy can be implemented for optimal outcomes. The authors discuss a systematic approach to immune-mediated myelopathies, with a focus on the unique characteristics of each that may aid in diagnosis.

A window into the future? MRI for evaluation of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder throughout the disease course

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing, inflammatory disease of the central nervous system marked by relapses often associated with poor recovery and long-term disability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recognized as an important tool for timely diagnosis of NMOSD as, in combination with serologic testing, it aids in distinguishing NMOSD from possible mimics. Although the role of MRI for disease monitoring after diagnosis is not as well established, MRI may provide important prognostic information and help differentiate between relapses and pseudorelapses. Increasing evidence of subclinical disease activity and the emergence of newly approved, highly effective immunotherapies for NMOSD adjure us to re-evaluate MRI as a tool to guide optimal treatment selection and escalation throughout the disease course. In this article we review the role of MRI in NMOSD diagnosis, prognostication, disease monitoring, and treatment selection.

Spine MRI: A Review of Commonly Encountered Emergent Conditions

Over the last 2 decades, the proliferation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) availability and continuous improvements in acquisition speeds have led to significantly increased MRI utilization across the health care system, and MRI studies are increasingly ordered in the emergent setting. Depending on the clinical presentation, MRI can yield vital diagnostic information not detectable with other imaging modalities. The aim of this text is to report on the up-to-date indications for MRI of the spine in the ED, and review the various MRI appearances of commonly encountered acute spine pathology, including traumatic injuries, acute non traumatic myelopathy, infection, neoplasia, degenerative disc disease, and postoperative complications. Imaging review will focus on the aspects of the disease process that are not readily resolved with other modalities.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Myelopathy: 2021 Update

Myelopathy is a clinical diagnosis with localization of the neurological findings to the spinal cord, rather than the brain or the peripheral nervous system, and then to a particular segment of the spinal cord. Myelopathy can be the result of primary intrinsic disorders of the spinal cord or from secondary conditions, which result in extrinsic compression of the spinal cord. While the causes of myelopathy may be multiple, the acuity of presentation and symptom onset frame a practical approach to the differential diagnosis. Imaging plays a crucial role in the evaluation of myelopathy with MRI the preferred modality. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Autoimmune Neurologic Emergencies

Over the past decade, understanding of autoimmune neurologic disorders has exponentially increased. Many patients present as a neurologic emergency and require timely evaluation with rapid management and intensive care. However, the diagnosis is often either missed or delayed, which may lead to a significant burden of disabling morbidity and even mortality. A high level of suspicion in the at-risk population should be maintained to facilitate more rapid diagnosis and prompt treatment. At present, there is no all-encompassing algorithm specifically applicable to the management of fulminant autoimmune neurologic disorders. This article discusses manifestations and management of various autoimmune neurologic emergencies.

Overcoming the Elusiveness of Neurosarcoidosis: Learning from Five Complex Cases

The involvement of the central nervous system in sarcoidosis can manifest with a variety of neurological symptoms, and most of them can be nonspecific. The diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis (NS) can therefore be very challenging without a tissue biopsy. Both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are important imaging modalities in the diagnosis of NS, and MRI is the modality of choice due to its superior soft-tissue contrast resolution. We present a case series of NS with interesting neuroimaging features, complex neurological presentations, and clinical courses. We identify five cases presenting with clinically isolated neurosarcoidosis (CINS) without any other signs or symptoms of systemic disease which were diagnosed as NS on biopsy. In the first case, we describe a patient with an intramedullary cervical spinal cord lesion. In the second case we describe a patient presenting with inflammatory changes and enhancement in the orbit. The third case demonstrates a lesion with calcification around the region of the foramen of Monro. The fourth case shows multiple ring-enhancing lesions. Lastly, the fifth case exhibits unusual findings with both optic neuritis and a cerebellar nodule. We aim to describe the complicated clinical course with neurological workup, neuro-imaging, and eventual diagnosis and treatment of these challenging cases to highlight the variable presentations of NS. This case series will remind clinicians that NS should always be in the differential diagnosis when a patient presents with nonspecific neurological symptoms with unusual neuroimaging findings.

Early factors associated with later conversion to multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with isolated myelitis

OBJECTIVE

To identify early clinical and paraclinical factors that may help predict later conversion to multiple sclerosis (MS) in patients presenting with isolated myelitis (ie, 'transverse myelitis' without clinical or radiological evidence of inflammation/demyelination elsewhere in the central nervous system).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with isolated myelitis who were followed clinically and radiologically at our specialised myelopathy clinic. We excluded patients with MS at the onset, aquaporin-4-IgG seropositivity, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG seropositivity or other identified aetiology. Logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of conversion to MS (defined by the 2017 McDonald criteria).

RESULTS

We included 100 patients, followed for a median of 4.3 years. Conversion to MS occurred in 25 of 77 patients (32%) with short-segment myelitis (longest lesion spanning <3 vertebral segments on MRI) as compared with 0 of 23 patients (0%) with longitudinally extensive myelitis (p=0.002). Among patients with short-segment myelitis, factors identified as highly predictive of conversion to MS using multivariate logistic regression included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-restricted oligoclonal bands (OCB) (OR (OR) 9.2, 95% CI 2.1 to 41.0, p=0.004), younger age (OR 1.1 for each year younger, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.1, p=0.04) and longer follow-up (OR 1.3 for each year longer, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.6, p=0.04). Conversion to MS occurred at a median of 2.8 years after myelitis onset.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-segment MRI cord lesion(s), CSF-restricted OCB, younger age and longer follow-up are all factors predictive of conversion to MS in patients presenting with isolated myelitis.

[Inflammatory spinal cord diseases and transverse myelitis]

Hintergrund

Entzündliche Rückenmarkerkrankungen zeigen MR-morphologisch recht einheitliche Bilder, dennoch sind deren richtige Zuordnung zu einer Krankheit für die Therapie und weiteren Verlauf entscheidend.

Fragestellung

Welche Merkmale der Läsionen erlauben eine richtige Einordnung?

Material und Methode

Recherche von Artikeln in pubmed.gov, die Myelitiden verschiedener Ätiologie beschreiben.

Ergebnisse

Die Länge der Läsionen, deren Lokalisation im Rückenmark sowohl bezüglich Höhe als auch im Myelonquerschnitt, und das Kontrastmittelverhalten erlauben in vielen Fällen zumindest eine Eingrenzung der Differenzialdiagnosen. Zum Überblick werden die wichtigsten Charakteristika in einer Tabelle zusammengefasst.

Schlussfolgerung

Eine sichere Zuordnung ist nur in Ausnahmefällen möglich, da sich viele Entitäten überlappen. Besonders schwierig ist dies bei Erkrankungen, die seltener vorkommen, und deswegen diesbezüglich wenig Erfahrung vorhanden ist.

Neuroimaging of Spinal Cord and Cauda Equina Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the neuroimaging of disorders of the spinal cord and cauda equina, with a focus on MRI. An anatomic approach is used; diseases of the extradural, intradural-extramedullary, and intramedullary (parenchymal) compartments are considered, and both neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions are covered. Differentiating imaging features are highlighted.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although T2-hyperintense signal abnormality of the spinal cord can have myriad etiologies, neuroimaging can provide specific diagnoses or considerably narrow the differential diagnosis in many cases. Intradural-extramedullary lesions compressing the spinal cord have a limited differential diagnosis and are usually benign; meningiomas and schwannomas are most common. Extradural lesions can often be specifically diagnosed. Disk herniations are the most commonly encountered mass of the epidural space. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy can cause a characteristic pattern of enhancement, which may be mistaken for an intrinsic myelopathy. A do-not-miss diagnosis of the extradural compartment is idiopathic spinal cord herniation, the appearance of which can overlap with arachnoid cysts and webs. Regarding intrinsic causes of myelopathy, the lesions of multiple sclerosis are characteristically short segment but can be confluent when multiple. Postcontrast MRI can be particularly helpful, including when attempting to differentiate the long-segment myelopathy of neurosarcoidosis and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and when characterizing spinal cord tumors such as primary neoplasms and metastases. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula is another do-not-miss diagnosis, with characteristic MRI features both precontrast and postcontrast. Tract-specific white matter involvement can be a clue for diseases such as subacute combined degeneration, paraneoplastic myelopathy, and radiation myelitis, whereas gray matter-specific involvement can suggest conditions such as cord infarct, viral myelitis, or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG associated disorder.

SUMMARY

Knowledge of the neuroimaging findings of the many causes of spinal cord and cauda equina dysfunction is critical for both neurologists and neuroradiologists. A structured approach to lesion compartmental location and imaging feature characterization is recommended.