1
|
Saito M, McGready R, Tinto H, Rouamba T, Mosha D, Rulisa S, Kariuki S, Desai M, Manyando C, Njunju EM, Sevene E, Vala A, Augusto O, Clerk C, Were E, Mrema S, Kisinza W, Byamugisha J, Kagawa M, Singlovic J, Yore M, van Eijk AM, Mehta U, Stergachis A, Hill J, Stepniewska K, Gomes M, Guérin PJ, Nosten F, Ter Kuile FO, Dellicour S. Pregnancy outcomes after first-trimester treatment with artemisinin derivatives versus non-artemisinin antimalarials: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet 2023; 401:118-130. [PMID: 36442488 PMCID: PMC9874756 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01881-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malaria in the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are a highly effective, first-line treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, except in the first trimester of pregnancy, when quinine with clindamycin is recommended due to concerns about the potential embryotoxicity of artemisinins. We compared adverse pregnancy outcomes after artemisinin-based treatment (ABT) versus non-ABTs in the first trimester of pregnancy. METHODS For this systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Malaria in Pregnancy Library for prospective cohort studies published between Nov 1, 2015, and Dec 21, 2021, containing data on outcomes of pregnancies exposed to ABT and non-ABT in the first trimester. The results of this search were added to those of a previous systematic review that included publications published up until November, 2015. We included pregnancies enrolled before the pregnancy outcome was known. We excluded pregnancies with missing estimated gestational age or exposure information, multiple gestation pregnancies, and if the fetus was confirmed to be unviable before antimalarial treatment. The primary endpoint was adverse pregnancy outcome, defined as a composite of either miscarriage, stillbirth, or major congenital anomalies. A one-stage IPD meta-analysis was done by use of shared-frailty Cox models. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42015032371. FINDINGS We identified seven eligible studies that included 12 cohorts. All 12 cohorts contributed IPD, including 34 178 pregnancies, 737 with confirmed first-trimester exposure to ABTs and 1076 with confirmed first-trimester exposure to non-ABTs. Adverse pregnancy outcomes occurred in 42 (5·7%) of 736 ABT-exposed pregnancies compared with 96 (8·9%) of 1074 non-ABT-exposed pregnancies in the first trimester (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0·71, 95% CI 0·49-1·03). Similar results were seen for the individual components of miscarriage (aHR=0·74, 0·47-1·17), stillbirth (aHR=0·71, 0·32-1·57), and major congenital anomalies (aHR=0·60, 0·13-2·87). The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes was lower with artemether-lumefantrine than with oral quinine in the first trimester of pregnancy (25 [4·8%] of 524 vs 84 [9·2%] of 915; aHR 0·58, 0·36-0·92). INTERPRETATION We found no evidence of embryotoxicity or teratogenicity based on the risk of miscarriage, stillbirth, or major congenital anomalies associated with ABT during the first trimester of pregnancy. Given that treatment with artemether-lumefantrine was associated with fewer adverse pregnancy outcomes than quinine, and because of the known superior tolerability and antimalarial effectiveness of ACTs, artemether-lumefantrine should be considered the preferred treatment for uncomplicated P falciparum malaria in the first trimester. If artemether-lumefantrine is unavailable, other ACTs (except artesunate-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine) should be preferred to quinine. Continued active pharmacovigilance is warranted. FUNDING Medicines for Malaria Venture, WHO, and the Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Saito
- WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network, Oxford, UK; Infectious Diseases Data Observatory, Oxford, UK; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Division of Infectious Diseases, Advanced Clinical Research Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rose McGready
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand
| | - Halidou Tinto
- Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso
| | - Toussaint Rouamba
- Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso
| | | | - Stephen Rulisa
- School of Medicine and Pharmacy, University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Simon Kariuki
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - Meghna Desai
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Eric M Njunju
- Department of Basic Sciences, Copperbelt University, Ndola, Zambia
| | - Esperanca Sevene
- Faculty of Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique; Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Manhiça, Mozambique
| | - Anifa Vala
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Manhiça, Mozambique
| | - Orvalho Augusto
- Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Manhiça, Mozambique
| | | | - Edwin Were
- Department of Reproductive Health, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
| | | | - William Kisinza
- National Institute of Medical Research, Amani Medical Research Centre, Muheza, Tanzania
| | - Josaphat Byamugisha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Mike Kagawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Mackensie Yore
- VA Los Angeles and University of California, Los Angeles National Clinician Scholars Program, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Health Services Research and Development Service Center of Innovation, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anna Maria van Eijk
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ushma Mehta
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Andy Stergachis
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, and Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jenny Hill
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kasia Stepniewska
- WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network, Oxford, UK; Infectious Diseases Data Observatory, Oxford, UK; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Melba Gomes
- UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, Geneva, Switzerland; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Philippe J Guérin
- WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network, Oxford, UK; Infectious Diseases Data Observatory, Oxford, UK; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Francois Nosten
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand
| | - Feiko O Ter Kuile
- WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network, Oxford, UK; Infectious Diseases Data Observatory, Oxford, UK; Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephanie Dellicour
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brummel SS, Stringer J, Mills E, Tierney C, Caniglia EC, Colbers A, Chi BH, Best BM, Gaaloul ME, Hillier S, Jourdain G, Khoo SH, Mofenson LM, Myer L, Nachman S, Stranix-Chibanda L, Clayden P, Sachikonye M, Lockman S. Clinical and population-based study design considerations to accelerate the investigation of new antiretrovirals during pregnancy. J Int AIDS Soc 2022; 25 Suppl 2:e25917. [PMID: 35851758 PMCID: PMC9294861 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pregnant women are routinely excluded from clinical trials, leading to the absence or delay in even the most basic pharmacokinetic (PK) information needed for dosing in pregnancy. When available, pregnancy PK studies use a small sample size, resulting in limited safety information. We discuss key study design elements that may enhance the timely availability of pregnancy data, including the role and timing of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate pregnancy safety; efficacy and safety outcome measures; stand‐alone protocols, platform trials, single arm studies, sample size and the effect that follow‐up time during gestation has on analysis interpretations; and observational studies. Discussion Pregnancy PK should be studied during drug development, after dosing in non‐pregnant persons is established (unless non‐clinical or other data raise pregnancy concerns). RCTs should evaluate the safety during pregnancy of priority new HIV agents that are likely to be used by large numbers of females of childbearing age. Key endpoints for pregnancy safety studies include birth outcomes (prematurity, small for gestational age and stillbirth) and neonatal death, with traditional adverse events and infant growth also measured (congenital anomalies are best studied through surveillance). We recommend that viral efficacy be studied as a secondary endpoint of pregnancy RCTs, once PK studies confirm adequate drug exposure in pregnancy. RCTs typically use a stand‐alone protocol for new agents. In contrast, master protocols using a platform design can add agents over time, possibly speeding safety data ascertainment. To speed accrual, stand‐alone pregnancy trial protocols can include pre‐specified starting rules based upon adequate PK levels in pregnancy; and seamless master protocols or platform trials can include a pregnancy PK and safety component. When RCTs are unethical or cost‐prohibitive, observational studies should be conducted, preferably using target trial emulation to avoid bias. Conclusions Pregnancy PK needs to be obtained earlier in drug evaluation. Timely RCTs are needed to understand safety in pregnancy for high‐priority new HIV agents. RCTs that enrol pregnant women should focus on outcomes unique to pregnancy, and observational studies should focus on questions that RCTs are not equipped to answer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean S Brummel
- Department of Biostatistics, Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Heath, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeff Stringer
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ed Mills
- MTEK Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,MTEK Sciences, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Camlin Tierney
- Department of Biostatistics, Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Heath, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ellen C Caniglia
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Angela Colbers
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin H Chi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brookie M Best
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, San Diego, California, USA.,Pediatrics Department - Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Myriam El Gaaloul
- Product Development, Medicines for Malaria Venture, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sharon Hillier
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh and the Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Saye H Khoo
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lynne M Mofenson
- Research Department, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Landon Myer
- Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sharon Nachman
- Department of Pediatrics, The State University of New York (SUNY), Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Lynda Stranix-Chibanda
- Child and Adolescent Health Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | | | | | - Shahin Lockman
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Heath, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Renaud F, Mofenson LM, Bakker C, Dolk H, Leroy V, Namiba A, Sahin L, Shapiro R, Slogrove A, Thorne C, Vicari M, Low-Beer D, Doherty M. Surveillance of ARV safety in pregnancy and breastfeeding: towards a new framework. J Int AIDS Soc 2022; 25 Suppl 2:e25922. [PMID: 35851994 PMCID: PMC9294858 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction As new antiretrovirals (ARVs), including long‐acting ARVs for treatment and prevention, are approved and introduced, surveillance during pregnancy must become the safety net for evaluating birth outcomes, especially those that are rare and require large numbers of observations. Historically, drug pharmacovigilance in pregnancy has been limited and fragmented between different data sources, resulting in inadequate data to assess risk. The International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network and World Health Organization convened a Workshop which reviewed strengths and weaknesses of existing programs and discussed an improved framework to integrate existing safety data sources and promote harmonization and digitalization. Discussion This paper highlights that although robust sources of safety data and surveillance programs exist, key challenges remain, including unknown denominators, reporting bias, under‐reporting (e.g. in voluntary registries), few data sources from resource‐limited settings (most are in North America and Europe), incomplete or inaccurate data (e.g. within routine medical records). However, recent experiences (e.g. with safety signals) and current innovations (e.g. electronic record use in resource‐limited settings and defining adverse outcomes) provide momentum and building blocks for a new framework for active surveillance of ARV safety in pregnancy. A public health approach should be taken using data from existing sources, including registries of pregnancy ARV exposure and birth defects; observational surveillance and cohort studies; clinical trials; and real‐world databases. Key facilitators are harmonization and standardization of outcomes, sharing of materials and tools, and data linkages between programs. Other key facilitators include the development of guidance to estimate sample size and duration of surveillance, ensuring strategic geographic diversity, bringing partners together to share information and engaging the community of women living with HIV. Conclusions Looking ahead, critical steps to safely introduce new ARVs include (1) adopting harmonized standards for measuring adverse maternal, birth and infant outcomes; (2) establishing surveillance centres of excellence in areas with high HIV prevalence with harmonized data collection and optimized electronic health records linking maternal/infant data; and (3) creating targets and evaluation goals for reporting progress on implementation and quality of surveillance in pregnancy. The platform will be leveraged to ensure that appropriate contributions and strategic actions by relevant stakeholders are implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Françoise Renaud
- Department of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lynne M Mofenson
- Research Department, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Charlotte Bakker
- Seconded National Expert Translational Sciences Office Scientific Evidence Generation Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Helen Dolk
- EUROmediCAT, Institute for Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom
| | - Valeriane Leroy
- Centre d'Epidémiologie et Recherche en Santé des POPulations (CERPOP), Inserm, Université de Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Leyla Sahin
- Division of Pediatrics and Maternal Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Roger Shapiro
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy Slogrove
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Worcester, South Africa
| | - Claire Thorne
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marissa Vicari
- HIV Programmes and Advocacy Department, International AIDS Society, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Low-Beer
- Department of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Meg Doherty
- Department of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kalk E, Heekes A, Slogrove AL, Phelanyane F, Davies MA, Myer L, Euvrard J, Kroon M, Petro G, Fieggen K, Stewart C, Rhoda N, Gebhardt S, Osman A, Anderson K, Boulle A, Mehta U. Cohort profile: the Western Cape Pregnancy Exposure Registry (WCPER). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060205. [PMID: 35768089 PMCID: PMC9244673 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Western Cape Pregnancy Exposure Registry (PER) was established at two public sector healthcare sentinel sites in the Western Cape province, South Africa, to provide ongoing surveillance of drug exposures in pregnancy and associations with pregnancy outcomes. PARTICIPANTS Established in 2016, all women attending their first antenatal visit at primary care obstetric facilities were enrolled and followed to pregnancy outcome regardless of the site (ie, primary, secondary, tertiary facility). Routine operational obstetric and medical data are digitised from the clinical stationery at the healthcare facilities. Data collection has been integrated into existing services and information platforms and supports routine operations. The PER is situated within the Provincial Health Data Centre, an information exchange that harmonises and consolidates all health-related electronic data in the province. Data are contributed via linkage across a unique identifier. This relationship limits the missing data in the PER, allows validation and avoids misclassification in the population-level data set. FINDINGS TO DATE Approximately 5000 and 3500 pregnant women enter the data set annually at the urban and rural sites, respectively. As of August 2021, >30 000 pregnancies have been recorded and outcomes have been determined for 93%. Analysis of key obstetric and neonatal health indicators derived from the PER are consistent with the aggregate data in the District Health Information System. FUTURE PLANS This represents significant infrastructure, able to address clinical and epidemiological concerns in a low/middle-income setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Kalk
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology & Research, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alexa Heekes
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology & Research, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
- Health Intelligence Directorate, Western Cape Department of Health, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Amy L Slogrove
- Ukwanda Centre for Rural Health, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Florence Phelanyane
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology & Research, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
- Health Intelligence Directorate, Western Cape Department of Health, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mary-Ann Davies
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology & Research, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
- Health Intelligence Directorate, Western Cape Department of Health, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Landon Myer
- Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jonathan Euvrard
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology & Research, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
- Health Intelligence Directorate, Western Cape Department of Health, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Max Kroon
- Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
- Neonatal Services, Mowbray Maternity Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Greg Petro
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
- Maternity Services, New Somerset Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Karen Fieggen
- Division of Human Genetics, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
- Medical Genetics Services, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Chantal Stewart
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
- Maternity Services, Mowbray Maternity Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Natasha Rhoda
- Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
- Neonatal Services, Mowbray Maternity Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Stefan Gebhardt
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- Maternity Services, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ayesha Osman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
- Maternity Services, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Kim Anderson
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology & Research, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Andrew Boulle
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology & Research, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
- Health Intelligence Directorate, Western Cape Department of Health, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ushma Mehta
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology & Research, University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|