Identification of sentinel lymph nodes by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid in patients with breast cancer: a feasibility study in three hospitals

Prospects of perfusion contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CE-US) in diagnosing axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a comparison with lymphatic CE-US

Accurate diagnosis of lymph node (LN) metastasis is vital for prognosis and treatment in patients with breast cancer. Imaging 1modalities such as ultrasound (US), MRI, CT, and 18F-FDG PET/CT are used for preoperative assessment. While conventional US is commonly recommended due to its resolution and sensitivity, it has limitations such as operator subjectivity and difficulty detecting small metastases. This review shows the microanatomy of axillary LNs to enhance accurate diagnosis and the characteristics of contrast-enhanced US (CE-US), which utilizes intravascular microbubble contrast agents, making it ideal for vascular imaging. A significant focus of this review is on distinguishing between two types of CE-US techniques for axillary LN evaluation: perfusion CE-US and lymphatic CE-US. Perfusion CE-US is used to assess LN metastasis via transvenous contrast agent administration, while lymphatic CE-US is used to identify sentinel LNs and diagnose LN metastasis through percutaneous contrast agent administration. This review also highlights the need for future research to clarify the distinction between studies involving "apparently enlarged LNs" and "clinical node-negative" cases in perfusion CE-US research. Such research standardization is essential to ensure accurate diagnostic performance in various clinical studies. Future studies should aim to standardize CE-US methods for improved LN metastasis diagnosis, not only in breast cancer but also across various malignancies.

Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: Integration of postvascular phase of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and predictive nomogram model

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes is critical yet challenging. This study evaluates the postvascular phase of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and develops a user-friendly nomogram integrating demographic, conventional ultrasound, and CEUS features for accurate differentiation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 395 cervical lymph nodes from 395 patients between January 2020 and December 2022. The cohort was divided into training and validation sets using stratified random sampling. A predictive model, based on demographic, ultrasound, and CEUS features, was created and internally validated.

RESULTS

The training set included 280 patients (130 benign, 150 malignant nodes) and the validation set 115 patients (46 benign, 69 malignant). Relative hypoenhancement in the postvascular phase emerged as a promising indicator for MLN, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 96.7 %,52.3 %, 70.0 %, 93.2 %, and 76.1 %, respectively in the training set and 95.7 %, 52.2 %, 75.0 %, 88.9 %, and 74.8 % in the validation set. Age over 50 years, history of malignancy, short-axis diameter greater than 1.00 cm, focal hyperechogenicity, ill-defined borders, and centripetal perfusion were also identified as independent MLN indicators. The nomogram prediction model showed outstanding accuracy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.922 (95 % CI: 0.892-0.953) in the training set and 0.914 (95 % CI: 0.864-0.963) in the validation set.

CONCLUSION

Relative hypoenhancement in the postvascular phase of CEUS, combined with demographics and ultrasound features, is effective for identifying MLNs. The developed prediction model, with a user-friendly nomogram, can facilitate clinical decision-making.

Advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the localization and diagnostics of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are the first station of lymph nodes that extend from the breast tumor to the axillary lymphatic drainage. The pathological status of these LNs can predict that of the entire axillary lymph node. Therefore, the accurate identification of SLNs is necessary for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to replace axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The quality of life and prognosis of breast cancer patients are related to proper surgical treatment after the precise identification of SLNs. Some of the SLN tracers that have been identified include radioisotope, nano-carbon, indocyanine green (ICG), and methylene blue (MB). However, these tracers have certain limitations, such as pigmentation, radiation dangers, and the requirement for costly detection equipment. Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) have good specificity and sensitivity, and thus can compensate for some shortcomings of the mentioned tracers. This technique is also being applied to SLNB in patients with breast cancer, and can even provide an initial judgment on SLN status. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has the advantages of high distinguishability, simple operation, no radiation harm, low cost, and accurate localization; therefore, it is expected to replace the traditional biopsy methods. In addition, it can significantly enhance the accuracy of SLN localization and shorten the operation time.

A review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® and Sonazoid™ in non-hepatic organs

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a dependable modality for the diagnosis of various clinical conditions. A judicious selection of ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) is imperative for optimizing imaging and improving diagnosis. Approved UCAs for imaging the majority of organs include SonoVue, a pure blood agent, and Sonazoid, which exhibits an additional Kupffer phase. Despite the fact that the two UCAs are increasingly being employed, there is a lack of comparative reviews between the two agents in different organs diseases. This review represents the first attempt to compare the two UCAs in non-hepatic organs, primarily including breast, thyroid, pancreas, and spleen diseases. Through comparative analysis, this review provides a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the performance characteristics of SonoVue and Sonazoid, with the aim of offering valuable guidance for the clinical application of CEUS. Overall, further clinical evidences are required to compare and contrast the dissimilarities between the two UCAs in non-hepatic organs, enabling clinicians to make an appropriate selection based on actual clinical applications.

Sentinel lymph node identification using contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast cancer: review of the literature

Before breast cancer surgery, sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and biopsy using blue dye, radioisotope (RI) with a gamma probe, or a combination of the two are mainly performed. The dye-guided method requires skilled technique to make an incision in the skin and identify SLNs without damaging the lymphatic vessels. In addition, dye-induced anaphylactic shock has been reported. To use the γ-probe-guided method, the facility must be able to handle RI. However, to overcome the drawbacks of these methods, Omoto et al. developed a new identification modality using contrast-enhanced ultrasound with an ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) in 2002. Since then, many basic experiments and clinical studies using various UCA have been reported. In particular, a number of studies in SLN detection using Sonazoid have been reported and are herein reviewed.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the identification efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) to accurately represent the axillary node status in early-stage breast cancer.

METHOD

In total, 109 consecutive consenting patients with clinically node-negative and T1-2 breast cancer were included in this study. All patients received CEUS to identify SLN before surgery, and a guidewire was deployed to locate SLN in those who were successfully explored by CEUS. The patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and the blue dye was used to trace SLN during the surgery. The decision to perform axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) depended on the intraoperative pathological identification of SLN by CEUS (CE-SLN). The concordance rate of pathological status between CE-SLN and dyed SLN was calculated.

RESULT

The CEUS detection rate was 96.3%; CE-SLN failed in 4 patients. Among the remaining 105 successful identifications, 18 were CE-SLN positive by intraoperative frozen section, and one with CE-SLN micrometastasis was diagnosed by paraffin section. No additional lymph node metastases were found in CE-SLN-negative patients. The concordance rate of pathological status between CE-SLN and dyed SLN was 100%.

CONCLUSION

CEUS can accurately represent the status of axillary lymph nodes in patients with clinically node-negative and small tumor burden breast cancer.

Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid® in visualization of local anesthetic distribution in rectus sheath block: a prospective, clinical study

PURPOSE

Clear visualization of ultrasound (US) images is crucial for successful US-guided nerve block. However, accurate determination of local anesthetic (LA) distribution from US images remains difficult. Sonazoid^®, which comprises perflubutane microbubbles, is used to diagnose hepatic and breast tumors. This study aimed to investigate the visibility of Sonazoid^® in perioperative US-guided nerve block.

METHODS

We performed rectus sheath block (RSB) in patients scheduled for laparoscopic abdominal surgery (n = 10). 10 mL of a mixture containing equal amounts of 0.75% ropivacaine and iohexol with the addition of Sonazoid^® diluted 100-fold was administered. We investigated the correlation and agreement between Sonazoid^® and iohexol distributions. The brightness of the solution and tissues was calculated: a grayscale value between 0 (dark) and 255 (bright) was measured in all pixels of the region of interest. Adverse events were also investigated.

RESULTS

Sonazoid^® was clearly visualized and distinguished from the surrounding tissues both during and after RSB. The spread of Sonazoid® and iohexol was significantly correlated (spearman's ρ = 0.53, p = 0.0004). Bland-Altman analyses revealed significant mean difference between two methods (15.6 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.6, 20.6; standard deviation (SD) 15.65; p < 0.0001). Limits of agreement were - 14.94 to 46.24 mm. Sonazoid^® significantly increased the mean grayscale values at the posterior rectus sheath (93.7 vs. 201.9, p < 0.0001). There were no complications.

CONCLUSION

Sonazoid diluted 100-fold^® was clearly visualized real-time, and the enhancement was sustained and measurable after RSB. Sonazoid^® could potentially be used for the contrast agent of US-guided nerve block.

Advanced diagnostic imaging of sentinel lymph node in early stage breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has been regarded as the standard procedure for early staging breast cancer. One of the key steps is to locate the sentinel lymph node (SLN). The recommended method is the joint use of blue dye and radioisotope. However, due to radionuclide radiation and high cost, it is urgent to develop more convenient and sensitive imaging methods to accurately locate SLN. This article discusses the advancement of accurately locating SLN by isotope tracer imaging, magnetic tracer method, computed tomographic lymphography, and trans-lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound, as well as proposing new propose for clinical diagnosis.

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound enhancement patterns for the diagnosis of sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) can represent the metastasis status of axillary lymph nodes and is a prognostic factor of breast cancer. Preoperative imaging provides information for axillary surgery decision-making, and this meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for SLN status in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, Clinical Trails gov. and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception until 31 March 2020. Two review authors independently screened and selected the relevant studies and extracted data, and the assessment of the methodological quality of studies was according to the QUADAS-2 tool. The diagnostic value of CEUS was assessed by calculating the pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve and hierarchical modeling method was used to conduct the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Five studies with 771 breast cancer patients were included, and the results showed CEUS could provide additional information for SLN preoperative diagnosis. A homogeneous or uniform enhancement pattern suggested a benign lymph node, and a heterogeneous, no pattern, or weak enhancement pattern suggested a node was malignant, demonstrating high sensitivity of 0.960 (95% CI: 0.856, 0.989) and moderate specificity of 0.807 (0.581, 0.926). The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 4.987 (2.104, 11.822) and 0.049 (0.014, 0.168), and 101.294 (31.202, 328.837), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A homogeneous enhancement pattern was highly suggestive of benign lymph nodes with high sensitivity. CEUS could effectively identify the SLN, and facilitate the diagnosis of its metastatic status.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO protocol CRD42020176828.

Preoperative localization of sentinel lymph nodes using percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of preoperative identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

The patients with T1-T2N0M0 breast cancer who were scheduled for primary surgical treatment were recruited. All the patients had received a periareolar intradermal injection of an ultrasonic contrast agent (SonoVue, Bracco, Milan, Italy) followed by an ultrasound to identify contrast-enhanced SLNs. A guidewire was deployed to localize the SLN. Methylene blue stain was used to help trace SLNs during the operation. The identification rate and accuracy rate were recorded. The number of SLNs labeled by two methods was counted and compared using Wilcoxon testing.

RESULTS

A total of 366 SLNs were detected in 72 patients by methylene blue intraoperatively, with a median of 5 lymph nodes [interquartile range (IQR), 4-6] per patient. A total of 95 SLNs were detected in 63 patients (87.5%) by CEUS, with a median of 1 lymph node (IQR, 1-2) per patient. The number of SLNs detected by CEUS was significantly less than that labeled by the methylene blue staining method (Z=-7.362, P=0000). Pathology confirmed 12 single metastases in all the lymph nodes examined, 10 of which were the only lymph node identified by CEUS.

CONCLUSIONS

Periareolar intradermal injection of an ultrasonic contrast agent was an effective and convenient supplementary to localize SLNs. The technique was expected to improve the accuracy of axillary staging with minor surgical trauma and postoperative complications.

Comparison of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare diagnostic efficiency for axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis between lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICEUS) in patients with breast cancer. We also examined whether adding ICEUS to LCEUS could improve the diagnostic accuracy of LCEUS.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with breast cancer were recruited preoperatively. All patients underwent LCEUS followed by ICEUS, and the enhancement pattern of one SLN was analysed for each patient. The targeted SLN was marked with wire and excised during surgery. The imaging diagnosis was compared with the histopathological result. Diagnostic efficiency was compared among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS.

RESULTS

The sensitivity values for LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS were 86.2%, 82.6% and 93.1%, respectively. Specificity values for the three methods were 95.0%, 92.5% and 87.5%, respectively. Accuracy values for the three methods were 91.3%, 88.4% and 89.9%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for LCEUS was 0.906, and there was no significant difference among LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS and ICEUS (p = 0.752).

CONCLUSIONS

LCEUS may represent an accurate method for predicting SLN metastasis preoperatively. Our findings suggest that adding ICEUS to LCEUS for SLN evaluation in patients with breast cancer is unnecessary.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first study in which both LCEUS and ICEUS were performed for the same lymph node and the first to compare the diagnostic efficiency of LCEUS, ICEUS, and the combination of LCEUS + ICEUS.

Effectiveness of Lymphatic Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in the diagnosis of Cervical Lymph node metastasis from papillary thyroid carcinoma

Cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) is common in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), which is responsible for tumor staging and surgical strategy. The accurate preoperative identification of CLNM is essential. In this study, twenty consecutive patients with PTC received a parenchyma injection of Sonazoid followed by contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to identify CLNM. The specific lymphatic CEUS (LCEUS) signs for diagnosing CLNM were summarized, which were further compared with the resected specimens to get the pathological basis. After the injection of contrast agent, lymphatic vessel and lymph node (LN) could be exclusively displayed as hyperperfusion on LCEUS. The dynamic perfusion process of contrast agent in CLNM over time can be clearly visualized. Perfusion defect and interruption of bright ring were the two characteristic LCEUS signs in diagnosing CLNM. After comparing with pathology, perfusion defect was correlated to the metastatic foci in medulla and interruption of bright ring was correlated to the tumor seeding in marginal sinus (all p values < 0.001). The diagnostic efficacies of these two signs were high (perfusion defect vs. interruption of bright ring: AUC, 0.899, 95% CI 0.752–1.000 vs. 0.904, 0.803–1.000). LCEUS has advantages in identifying CLNM from PTC. The typical LCEUS signs of CLNM correlated with pathology.

Sentinel lymph node detection by combining nonradioactive techniques with contrast agents: State of the art and prospects

The status of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has a substantial prognostic value because these nodes are the first place where cancer cells accumulate along their spreading route. Routine SLN biopsy ("gold standard") involves peritumoral injections of radiopharmaceuticals, such as technetium-99m, which has obvious disadvantages. This review examines the methods used as "gold standard" analogs to diagnose SLNs. Nonradioactive preoperative and intraoperative methods of SLN detection are analyzed. Promising photonic tools for SLNs detection are reviewed, including NIR-I/NIR-II fluorescence imaging, photoswitching dyes for SLN detection, in vivo photoacoustic detection, imaging and biopsy of SLNs. Also are discussed methods of SLN detection by magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonic imaging systems including as combined with photoacoustic imaging, and methods based on the magnetometer-aided detection of superparamagnetic nanoparticles. The advantages and disadvantages of nonradioactive SLN-detection methods are shown. The review concludes with prospects for the use of conservative diagnostic methods in combination with photonic tools.

Feasibility and efficiency of contrast enhanced ultrasound real time guided fine needle aspiration for sentinel lymph node of breast cancer

AIM

To assess the feasibility and efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) real-time guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) of breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed 21 breast cancer patients who scheduled for surgical resection performed CEUS real-time guided SLN-FNA and intraoperative SLN biopsy (SLNB). The success rate of CEUS real-time guided SLN-FNA was analyzed. The FNA diagnostic efficiency of SLN metastasis was analyzed compared to SLNB.

RESULTS

Twenty-six SLNs were detected by intradermal CEUS whereas 130 SLNs were detected by SLNB. The median SLNs detected by intradermal CEUS (n = 1) and by SLNB (n = 5) was significantly difference (p < 0.001). All 26 CE-SLNs of 21 patients were successfully performed intradermal CEUS dual image real-time guided SLN-FNA including 5 SLNs of 4 patients which were difficult to distinguish in conventional ultrasound. Compared to SLNB, FNA found 2 of 5 cases of SLN metastasis, the diagnosis sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false negative rate, false positive rate and Yoden index were 40%, 100%, 100%, 84.2%, 60%, 0%and 40%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SLN-FNA real-time guided by dual CEUS image mode was technically feasible. Patients with a positive SLN-FNA should be advised to ALND without intraoperative SLNB according to Chinese surgeon and patients' conservatism attitude. But a negative SLN-FNA did not obviate the need of conventional SLNB because of the high false negative rate.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Locating Axillary Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study

The objective was to explore the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in locating the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in patients with early breast cancer. We screened 143 consecutive patients with breast cancer between July 2017 and August 2019. The number of SLNs identified by CEUS and dual labeling (blue dye and radiolabeled colloid) were recorded. The accuracy of CEUS plus fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was assessed. The rate of identification of SLNs with CEUS was 84.0% (121/144), and that of dual labeling was 97.92% (141/144). There was no significant association between non-enhancement (p = 0.060) or inhomogeneous enhancement (p = 0.468) and lymph node metastasis. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS-SLNs plus FNAC was 78.38% and 100%, respectively. The technique of CEUS is a promising method for locating the axillary SLN. But it is hard to identify lymph node metastasis with CEUS alone. CEUS-SLNs plus FNAC is a sound technique for diagnosis of the metastasis of SLN.

Comparative study of two contrast agents for intraoperative identification of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with early breast cancer

Background

The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to locate sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer has been studied more and more in recent years. This prospective study aimed to compare periareolar injection of two different contrast agents, SonoVue^® (SNV) and Sonazoid^® (SNZ), followed by CEUS to identify SLNs in breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes.

Methods

A total of 205 patients with T1-2N0M0 breast cancer were divided into the SNV group and SNZ group. All were administered a periareolar injection of SNV or SNZ and underwent US to identify contrast-enhanced SLNs. Each contrast-enhanced SLN underwent a biopsy with blue dye and examined again by CEUS in vitro.

Results

In all cases, contrast-enhanced lymphatic vessels were clearly visualized using US soon after the periareolar injection of SNZ, and the SLNs were easily identified. The SLN identification rates were 75.27% (210/279) for SNV and 93.58% (102/109) for SNZ. Although the accuracy of detecting SLN metastasis was slightly different between the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference between those groups (P=0.615). Moreover, it was possible to identify SLNs in vitro in the SNZ group, and these could be compared with the lymph nodes (LNs) located using SNZ during the preoperative stage and with blue dye during the procedure. This helped in determining the resection requirements.

Conclusions

When comparing the subdermal use of SNV and SNZ, no significant differences in the number of detected SLNs and the diagnosis of metastatic LNs were observed. Because SLNs can be detected for a longer time in living tissues with SNZ, this contrast agent may provide more intraoperative information for complete resection of all preoperative localization of SLN.

Preoperative evaluation and influencing factors of sentinel lymph node detection for early breast cancer with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: What matters

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) is important in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. We aimed to evaluate the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the preoperative evaluation for SLN and potentially influencing factors, to provide evidence to the management of breast cancer.Patients with breast cancer who treated in our hospital from May 2018 to May 2020 were selected. All patients underwent CEUS examination to find SLN and judged whether the lymph node had cancer metastasis. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS in predicting SLN, and its differences in pathological diagnosis results and related influencing factors were also analyzed.A total of 108 patients with breast cancer were included. And a total of 248 SLNs were detected. The sensitivity of CEUS to the preoperative evaluation of SLN was 84.67%, the specificity was 81.14%, the positive predictive value was 76.08%, and the negative predictive value was 89.27%, the positive likelihood ratio was 4.06, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.14. The area under the curve of the preoperative evaluation of SLN in CEUS examination was 0.813 (95% confidence interval: 0.765-0.911), and there was significant difference in the size of SLNs between SLN-negative and SLN-positive groups (P = .043).Preoperative CEUS has good predictive value for the SLN detection in patients with breast cancer, and it is worthy of clinical application.

Combination of Lymphatic and Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Evaluation of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis from Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the value of the combination of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IVCEUS) for the identification of cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) from papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). From November 2018 to March 2019, 24 consecutive patients with PTC were evaluated. All patients underwent routine US, LCEUS and IVCEUS. Pathology was used as the gold standard. After injection of a contrast agent into the thyroid parenchyma, lymphatic vessels and lymph nodes (LNs) could be exclusively displayed as hyper-enhancement on LCEUS. Benign LNs displayed a complete bright ring (100%) and homogeneous perfusion (88.9%) on LCEUS, while displaying centrifugal perfusion (66.7%) and homogenous enhancement (88.9%) on IVCEUS. Perfusion defects (94.9%) and interruption of the bright ring (71.8%) were the two characteristic LCEUS signs for diagnosing CLNM. On IVCEUS, CLNM appeared as centripetal perfusion (59.0%) and heterogeneous enhancement (59.0%). After comparison with pathology, perfusion defect was correlated to the metastatic foci in the medulla and interruption of the bright ring to the tumor seeding in the marginal sinus (all p values <0.05). LCEUS had more value (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.850, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.682-1.000) in diagnosing CLNM than IVCEUS (AUC = 0.692, 95% CI: 0.494-0.890) and routine US (AUC = 0.581, 95% CI: 0.367-0.796). The combination of LCEUS and IVCEUS has the highest diagnostic value (AUC = 0.863, 95% CI: 0.696-1.000). LCEUS had higher diagnostic value than IVCEUS and US for CLNM from PTC. The combination of LCEUS and IVCEUS has the highest diagnostic value for CLNM.

Percutaneous Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography combined with in vitro verification for detection and characterization of sentinel lymph nodes in early breast cancer

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of percutaneous Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasound and in vitro verification for identification sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and diagnosis of metastatic SLNs in patients with early breast cancer (BC).

Methods

Sixty-eight patients with early BC were enrolled finally. After the induction of general anesthesia, 0.4 ml of Sonazoid (SNZ), a new second-generation tissue-specific ultrasound contrast agent (UCA), mixed with 0.6 ml of methylene blue, was injected intradermally. The lymphatic vessels and connected SLNs were immediately observed and marked. After being resected, these SLNs were soaked in saline water and examined still in the mode of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in vitro. This procedure could ensure that all the enhanced nodes had been removed as much as possible. The numbers of SLNs detected by UCA and blue dye were recorded. The enhancement patterns of SLNs were compared with the final pathological results.

Results

SLNs detection rate by SNZ-CEUS was 100%, which was higher than that by blue dye (95.59%). CEUS identified a median of 1.5 nodes, while blue dye identified a median of 1.9 nodes per case (p = 0.0012). When homogeneous high perfusion and complete annular high perfusion were regarded as negative nodes, the sensitivity and negative predictive value were 92.31% and 96.79% respectively, while the specificity was 84.21%.

Conclusions

Percutaneous SNZ-enhanced ultrasonography combined with in vitro verification is a feasible and reliable method for SLNs identification intraoperatively. Enhancement patterns can be helpful in determining the status of SLNs.

Key Points

• CEUS with percutaneous injection of Sonazoid can successfully identify SLNs with the rate of 100% in early breast cancer patients, higher than 95.59% of blue dye.

• Sonazoid, with high affinity with reticuloendothelial cells, increases the imaging time of SLNs and facilitates biopsy intraoperatively better than Sonovue as a lymphatic tracer.

• Homogenous high and complete annular high perfusions have a sensitivity of 92.31% and a negative predictive value of 96.79% in the prediction of uninvolved SLNs.

Ultrasonographic Algorithm for the Assessment of Sentinel Lymph Nodes That Drain the Mammary Carcinomas in Female Dogs

The status of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) is decisive in staging, prognosis, and therapeutic approach. Using an ultrasonographic examination algorithm composed of B-mode, Doppler technique, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and elastography, this study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the four techniques compared to histopathological examination. 96 SLNs belonging to 71 female dogs with mammary gland carcinomas were examined. After examinations, mastectomy and lymphadenectomy were performed. Histopathological examination confirmed the presence of metastases in 54 SLNs. The elasticity score had the highest accuracy-89.71%, identifying metastases in SLNs with 88.9.9% sensitivity (SE) and 90.5% specificity (SP), ROC analysis providing excellent results. The S/L (short axis/long axis) ratio showed 83.3% SE and 78.6% SP as a predictor of the presence of metastases in SLN having a good accuracy of 81.2%. On Doppler examination, the resistivity index(RI) showed good accuracy of 80% in characterizing lymph nodes with metastases versus unaffected ones; the same results being obtained by CEUS examination. By assigning to each ultrasonographic parameter a score (0 or 1) and summing up the scores of the four techniques, we obtained the best diagnostic performance in identifying lymph node metastases with 92.2% accuracy. In conclusion, the use of the presented algorithm provides the best identification of metastases in SLNs, helping in mammary carcinoma staging and appropriate therapeutic management.

Does Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) of Normal/Benign Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Breast Cancer Identify Significant Axillary Nodal Burden?

PURPOSE

Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the axilla allows preoperative identification and biopsy of the sentinel lymph node. Our aims were to evaluate the accuracy of the CEUS procedure for identifying axillary lymph node metastases preoperatively and compare the volume of axillary metastases in patients with malignant versus benign CEUS guided core biopsy at end of primary surgical treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on patients with breast cancer with normal axillary ultrasound or benign axillary FNAC undergoing preoperatively CEUS guided sentinel lymph node biopsy between 2013 and 2018.

RESULTS

SLN was successfully identified by CEUS in 186 (90.7%) of patients with definitive diagnosis obtained in 163 (87.6%). Overall sensitivity was 55.77%, but significantly higher for high volume disease (77.78%) than for low volume disease (32.00%, odds ratio = 7.44, 95% CI = 2.16 to 25.62, p = .001) Specificity was 100%. NPV was 82.84% overall, 86.72% for low volume disease and 94.87 % for high volume disease. 72.4% of patients with initial malignant CEUS guided SLN core biopsy had two or more macrometastases at end of surgical treatment compared to 4.47% of patients with initial benign CEUS guided core biopsy.

CONCLUSION

When disease was present, CEUS guided sentinel lymph node core biopsy identify nodal metastases in 55.77% of patients with normal axillary grey scale ultrasound. This study suggests that the likelihood of extensive axillary disease at end of surgical treatment is low with an initial benign CEUS guided SLN core biopsy.

Accuracy of CEUS-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: a study review and meta-analysis

Objective

To investigate whether preoperative localization of sentinel lymph node (SLN) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can further improve the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).

Method

Collect published literatures or conference reports by searching electronic databases. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) evaluation method is used to evaluate the quality of the screened literatures. The pooled risk ratio of cancer metastasis of SLN identified by CEUS (CE-SLN) compared with SLN not identified by CEUS (nonCE-SLN) is calculated, and the pooled diagnostic accuracy of CE-SLN for pathological status of all SLNs is also evaluated.

Result

Through search and screening, a total of 16 studies were included, of which five and seven studies, respectively, entered the meta-analysis of metastatic risk ratio and diagnostic accuracy. The localization rate of preoperative CEUS for sentinel lymph nodes was 70 to 100%. The meta-analysis shows that the risk of metastasis of SLN identified by CEUS is significantly higher than that not identified by CEUS, 26.0% vs 4.6%, and risk ratio (RR) is 6.08 (95% CI 4.17–8.85). In early-stage breast cancer, the pathological status of CE-SLN is a good representative of all SLNs, with a pooled sensitivity of 98% (95% CI 0.94–1.00), pooled specificity of 100% (95% CI 0.99–1.00), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 2153.18 (95% CI 476.53–9729.06), and area under the subject receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve of 0.9968.

Conclusion

In early-stage breast cancer, preoperative localization of SLN by CEUS is expected to further improve the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).

Three Decades of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Review of the Past, Present and Future Improvements

Initial reports from the 1960s describing the observations of ultrasound contrast enhancement by tiny gaseous bubbles during echocardiographic examinations prompted the development of the first ultrasound contrast agent in the 1980s. Current commercial contrast agents for echography, such as Definity, Optison, Sonazoid and SonoVue, have proven to be successful in a variety of on- and off-label clinical indications. Whereas contrast-specific technology has seen dramatic progress after the introduction of the first approved agents in the 1990s, successful clinical translation of new developments has been limited during the same period, while understanding of microbubble physical, chemical and biologic behavior has improved substantially. It is expected that for a successful development of future opportunities, such as ultrasound molecular imaging and therapeutic applications using microbubbles, new creative developments in microbubble engineering and production dedicated to further optimizing microbubble performance are required, and that they cannot rely on bubble technology developed more than 3 decades ago.

Real-Time Visualization of Lymphatic Flow to Sentinel Lymph Nodes by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography with Sonazoid in Patients with Breast Cancer

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid (SNZ) enables real-time visualization, resulting in more precise identification of lymphatic flow to sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). This study aimed to classify lymphatic drainage patterns to SLNs. Patients (n = 75) with T1-2 N0 M0 breast cancer received a periareolar injection of SNZ to identify SNZ-enhanced SLNs (SNZ-SLNs), followed by SLN biopsy with blue dye. The lymphatic drainage patterns were classified into four types: type A, single lymphatic route/single SLN; type B, multiple lymphatic routes/single SLN; type C, single lymphatic route/multiple SLNs; and type D, multiple lymphatic routes/multiple SLNs. SLNs were successfully identified in all patients using both blue dye and SNZ. The drainage lymphatic pathways identified were as follows: type A in 53 cases (70.7%), type B in seven (9.3%), type C in eight cases (10.7%) and type D in seven (9.3%). SNZ-SLN biopsy is a technically simple method with a 100% identification rate, enabling the real-time visualization of lymphatic flow to SNZ-SLNs.

Performance of Molecular Lymphosonography for Detection and Quantification of Metastatic Involvement in Sentinel Lymph Nodes

OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of molecular lymphosonography with dual-targeted microbubbles in detecting and quantifying the metastatic involvement in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) using a swine melanoma model.

METHODS

Targeted microbubbles were labeled with P-selectin and αV β3 -integrin antibodies. Control microbubbles were labeled with immunoglobulin G antibodies. First lymphosonography with Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) was used to identify SLNs. Then dual-targeted and control microbubbles were injected intravenously to detect and quantify metastatic disease in the SLNs. Distant non-SLNs were imaged as benign controls. All evaluated lymph nodes (LNs) were surgically removed, and metastatic involvement was characterized by a histopathologic analysis. Two radiologists blinded to histopathologic results assessed the baseline B-mode images of LNs, and the results were compared to the histologic reference standard. The mean intensities of targeted and control microbubbles within the examined LNs were measured and compared to the LN histologic results.

RESULTS

Thirty-five SLNs and 34 non-SLNs from 13 Sinclair swine were included in this study. Twenty-one SLNs (62%) were malignant, whereas 100% of non-SLNs were benign. The sensitivity of B-mode imaging for metastatic LN diagnosis for both readers was relatively high (90% and 71%), but the specificity was very poor (50% and 58%). The sensitivity and specificity of molecular lymphosonography for metastatic LN detection were 91% and 67%, respectively. The mean intensities from dual-targeted microbubbles correlated well with the degree of metastatic LN involvement (r = 0.6; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular lymphosonography can increase the specificity of metastatic LN detection and provide a measure to quantify the degree of metastatic involvement.

Axillary Nodal Staging with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Purpose of Review

Axillary staging in the context of breast cancer is a contentious topic due to the varied practices across UK, Europe, and America. The ACOSOG Z0011 trial has questioned the role of axillary ultrasound in women with breast cancer. Published data has shown that women with ultrasound-positive lymph nodes have a worse prognosis than those with ultrasound-negative lymph nodes. Axillary ultrasound is limited as the sentinel lymph node (SLN) cannot be identified using B-mode ultrasound; however, with the advent of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), this has now changed.

Recent Findings

The published literature has shown that the sentinel lymph node can be identified using CEUS. The rates are equivalent to blue dye alone but currently inferior to the dual technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy. There are several different contrast agents that can be used and the agents that remain in the sentinel lymph node for longer can identify areas of poor enhancement, allowing for targeted biopsy.

Summary

CEUS has the potential to revolutionize the way we manage the axilla in the future and may even replace surgical staging.

Identification of sentinel lymph nodes by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid in patients with breast cancer: a feasibility study in three hospitals

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of periareolar injection of the contrast agent Sonazoid (SNZ) followed by ultrasonography (US) for the identification of sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast cancer patients with clinically negative node. Patients (n = 100) with T1-2N0M0 breast cancer received a periareolar injection of SNZ followed by US to identify contrast-enhanced SLN. Each contrast-enhanced SLN underwent fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) followed by SLN biopsy with a conventional method using blue dye and/or radiocolloid (B/R). In almost all cases, contrast-enhanced lymphatic vessels were clearly visualized by US soon after the periareolar injection of SNZ and the SLNs were easily identified with an identification rate of 98% (98/100) for SNZ and 100% (100/100) for B/R. The number of SLNs identified by SNZ (SNZ-SLN) (mean per patient, 1.52) was significantly lower than that identified by B/R (B/R-SLN) (2.19) (P < 0.0001). Twenty-five patients with positive SLNs had at least one positive SNZ-SLN. On a node-by-node basis, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FNAC for SNZ-SLNs (n = 149) were 33.3%, 99.2%, and 85.9%, respectively. Identification of SLN by periareolar injection of SNZ is a technically simple method with an identification rate as high as 98%. SNZ-SLN thus seems to be a good target for FNAC, but sensitivity of FNAC for SNZ-SLNs needs to be improved.