Predictive value of the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries

Myocardial ischemia in nonobstructive coronary arteries: A review of diagnostic dilemmas, current perspectives, and emerging therapeutic innovations

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries is a unique presentation of acute coronary syndrome occurring in patients without significant coronary artery disease. Its pathophysiology involves atherosclerotic and nonatherosclerotic mechanisms such as plaque erosion, coronary microvascular dysfunction, vasospasm, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, and myocardial oxygen supply-demand imbalance. A systematic approach to diagnosis is needed due to the diverse range of underlying causes. Cardiac troponins confirm the myocardial injury and coronary angiography rules out significant obstruction. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging differentiates ischemic from nonischemic causes, and additional investigations, such as intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and provocative testing, play a role in identifying the etiology to guide management strategies. Atherosclerotic cases require antiplatelet therapy and statins, vasospastic cases respond to calcium channel blockers, spontaneous coronary artery dissection is typically managed conservatively, and coronary microvascular dysfunction may require vasodilators. Lifestyle modifications and cardiac rehabilitation are essential for improving outcomes. The prognosis of patients experiencing recurrent events despite treatment is uncertain, but long-term outcomes depend on the etiology, highlighting the need for personalized management. Future research should focus on refining diagnostic protocols and identifying optimal therapeutic strategies. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to establish evidence-based treatments for different subtypes of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries evaluated by optical coherence tomography

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary artery (MINOCA) is a heterogeneous disease with different pathophysiological mechanisms and prognosis. In recent years, it has been found that the incidence of major cardiovascular adverse events in MINOCA is similar to that of myocardial infarction with coronary artery disease (MI-CAD), and it is difficult to clarify the pathogenesis of both through coronary angiography (CAG). Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the clinical features, plaque characteristics and prognosis of patients with MINOCA and MI-CAD through optical coherence tomography (OCT). A total of 553 culprit lesions from AMI patients who underwent CAG and OCT were retrospectively analysed. Patients were subsequently divided into two groups: the MINOCA group and the MI-CAD group. The clinical characteristics, plaque characteristics and prognosis of the two groups were compared. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, stroke, and rehospitalisation for angina or heart failure. (1) Patients with MINOCA exhibited a lower incidence of ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) and a less frequent history of combined drug-eluting stent (DES) compared to those with MI-CAD. Additionally, they demonstrated lower levels of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), peak troponin T (peak TnT) and peak creatine kinase (peak CK). The MINOCA group had more lesions in the left anterior descending (LAD) and fewer in the left circumflex (LCX). Additionally, they demonstrated a lower prevalence of multibranch vasculopathy and a diminished post-discharge use of aspirin, P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARBs), and a higher proportion of conservative treatment compared to DES. The frequency of plaque rupture, calcified plaque, cholesterol crystals, macrophages infiltration, microvessels, thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA), and thrombus were found to be lower in the MINOCA group than in the MI-CAD group, with these differences being statistically significant (P < 0.05); (2) No significant difference was observed in the incidence of MACE at 30-days and 1 year between patients in the MINOCA and MI-CAD groups (P > 0.05). Compared with MI-CAD patients, MINOCA patients had fewer high-risk plaques on OCT and were more likely to be treated conservatively, with lower rates of stenting and less post-discharge pharmacological treatment. Both groups had similar rates of MACE at 30-day and 1 year, highlighting the importance of individualising treatment for MINOCA patients. Patients with MINOCA who develop MACE are more likely to exhibit high-risk OCT plaque features, with macrophage infiltration identified as an independent risk factor. OCT plaque features such as plaque rupture, plaque erosion, cholesterol crystals, macrophages, microvessels, TCFA may have played different roles in the progression of the two groups of patients.

Predictive Value of Lung Ultrasound Combined With ACEF Score for the Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Lung ultrasound (LUS) and the ACEF score (age, creatinine, and ejection fraction) have been shown to be pivotal in predicting an unfavorable prognosis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of LUS combined with ACEF score in AMI.

METHODS

The ACEF score and the total number of B-lines in eight thoracic regions of LUS were calculated. Adverse events were recorded during hospitalization and follow-up, defined as all-cause death and other cardiovascular events. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of adverse events during hospitalization. Multivariate Cox regression identified predictors of adverse events during follow-up.

RESULTS

We enrolled 204 patients. The B-lines (adjusted OR 1.08, [95% CI: 1.03-1.13], p < 0.01) and the ACEF score (adjusted OR 2.71 [95% CI: 1.07-6.81], p < 0.05) independently predicted adverse events during hospitalization. The C-index values were 0.81 (p < 0.01) for the ACEF score, 0.81 (p < 0.01) for LUS, and 0.86 (p < 0.01) for their combination. One hundred seventy-one patients were followed up for 12 months (IQR, 8.13-15.93). Both the B-lines (adjusted HR 1.06 [95% CI: 1.03-1.09], p < 0.05) and the ACEF score (adjusted HR 1.95 [95% CI: 1.10-3.43], p < 0.05) remained associated with an increased risk of adverse events during follow-up. The C-index values were 0.74 (p < 0.01) for the ACEF score, 0.73 (p < 0.01) for LUS, and 0.80 (p < 0.01) for their combined predictive ability.

CONCLUSIONS

The B-lines and ACEF score are associated with adverse events in AMI patients. When combined, they provide increasing value in assessing the risk of adverse events, which has significant implications for risk stratification.

ACEF vs PARIS score in Predicting Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the START ANTIPLATELET Registry

Several scores can predict clinical outcomes of patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS). The validated PARIS (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Anti-Platelet Regimen in Stented Patients) score is poorly used in clinical practice because it needs items that are not always easily available. The ACEF (Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction) score is more attractive because it only includes three items. We compared these scores to risk-stratify ACS patients enrolled into the START (Survey on anticoagulated pAtients RegisTer)-ANTIPLATELET registry. ACS patients who completed 1-year follow-up (n = 1171) were grouped in tertiles (low, medium, and high-risk) according to their ACEF/PARIS scores. Primary endpoints were: one-year MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events: death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke or target vessel revascularization) and NACE (net adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events): MACCE plus major bleeding). MACCE incidence was higher in the high-risk tertile (15%) VS low/medium (3/7 %) risk tertiles (P < .001). NACE incidence in the high-risk tertile was 24% VS low/medium (9/15 %) risk tertiles (P < .001), independently of the risk score used. The ACEF score has similar accuracy as the validated PARIS score for the estimation of ischemic/bleeding risk. Thereby, we strongly suggest its use in clinical practice to risk-stratify ACS patients and select optimal therapeutic strategies.

The correlation of atherogenic index of plasma with non-obstructive CAD and unfavorable prognosis among patients diagnosed with MINOCA

BACKGROUND

The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is linked to lipid metabolism and has shown considerable prognostic value in cardiovascular disorders. However, its role in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) has not been investigated. We assessed the relationship between AIP, the severity of coronary stenosis, and prognosis in MINOCA.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients who were diagnosed with MINOCA. AIP was calculated using the base 10 logarithm of the ratio between the levels of TG and HDL-C. The patients were divided into four groups based on their AIP quartiles: Q1 (AIP<-0.145), Q2 (AIP≥-0.145and≤0.049), Q3 (AIP>0.049and≤0.253), and Q4 (AIP>0.253). All patients underwent follow-up for MACE.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 421 patients, with 188 having normal coronaries (0 stenosis) and 233 exhibiting non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (<50 % stenosis). In the multivariate logistic analysis, highest AIP (Q4) group was significantly associated with increased risk of non-obstructive CAD in MINOCA (OR,1.994;95 % CI:1.075-3.698; P = 0.029). During the follow-up period, MACE occurred in 22.8 % of MINOCA patients. Q4 group exhibited a significantly higher rate of MACE (P = 0.021). Furthermore, when both AIP and coronary stenosis status were considered, the results revealed individuals in the Q4 group with non-obstructive CAD had the highest risk of MACE (log-rank P = 0.027). The adjusted Cox analysis indicated that the Q4 group was associated with a 2.052-fold increase in the HR of MACE.

CONCLUSION

AIP exhibits a notable association with the incidence of MACE in MINOCA patients and serves as a substantial marker for non-obstructive CAD in this patient group.

Terminal T-wave concordance is associated with SYNTAX score among left bundle branch block patients suspected of acute coronary syndrome without modified Sgarbossa criteria

BACKGROUND

Timely and precise diagnosis of ischemic cardiac events based on electrocardiogram is challengeable among patients with Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB). The present study aimed to assess the correlation between SYNTAX score and terminal T-wave morphologies among LBBB patients suspected of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) without modified Sgarbossa criteria.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study was conducted on the LBBB patients suspected of ACS without modified Sgarbossa criteria. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the correlation of ischemic heart disease (IHD, SYNTAX score > 0) and SYNTAX score categories with terminal T-wave morphologies including T-wave direction in lead V6 and terminal T-wave concordance in leads I, V5, and V6.

RESULT

This study was done on 93 patients with the mean age of 62.4 ± 9.6 years. More than half of the patients were female (58.1%, 95% CI: 47.4% to 68.2%). Among the participants with IHD, the SYNTAX score categories were correlated to discordant terminal T-wave in leads I, V5, and V6 (OR = 5.71, 95% CI: 1.04 to 31.28, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Among the LBBB patients with acute ischemic cardiac events without modified Sgarbossa criteria, those with discordant terminal T-waves in leads I, V5, or V6 had higher SYNTAX scores and might require more invasive coronary revascularization techniques such as Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery.

Performance of Prognostic Scoring Systems in MINOCA: A Comparison among GRACE, TIMI, HEART, and ACEF Scores

Background: the prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is not benign; thus, prompting the need to validate prognostic scoring systems for this population. Aim: to evaluate and compare the prognostic performance of GRACE, TIMI, HEART, and ACEF scores in MINOCA patients. Methods: A total of 250 MINOCA patients from January 2017 to September 2021 were included. For each patient, the four scores at admission were retrospectively calculated. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at 1-year follow-up. The ability to predict 1-year all-cause death was also tested. Results: Overall, the tested scores presented a sub-optimal performance in predicting the composite major adverse event in MINOCA patients, showing an AUC ranging between 0.7 and 0.8. Among them, the GRACE score appeared to be the best in predicting all-cause death, reaching high specificity with low sensitivity. The best cut-off identified for the GRACE score was 171, higher compared to the cut-off of 140 generally applied to identify high-risk patients with obstructive AMI. When the scores were tested for prediction of 1-year all-cause death, the GRACE and the ACEF score showed very good accuracy (AUC = 0.932 and 0.828, respectively). Conclusion: the prognostic scoring tools, validated in AMI cohorts, could be useful even in MINOCA patients, although their performance appeared sub-optimal, prompting the need for risk assessment tools specific to MINOCA patients.

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: Etiology, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is responsible for 10% of myocardial infarctions. Previously, patients were thought to have good prognosis, but evidence-based management and treatment strategies were scarce. Today, researchers and physicians recognize MINOCA as a condition with non-trivial mortality and morbidity. Therapeutic strategies are highly dependent on the underlying disease mechanism in each patient. However, to reach a diagnosis of MINOCA, a multimodal approach is required and, even with an optimal work-up, the cause remains unknown in 8-25% of patients. Research has been growing and position papers from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology have been published, and MINOCA has been included in the more recent ESC guidelines on myocardial infarction. Nonetheless, some clinicians still assume that the absence of coronary obstruction excludes the possibility of acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, in the present paper, we aim to compile and present the available data on the etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of MINOCA.

Association of stress hyperglycemia ratio and poor long-term prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) is a novel biomarker of true acute hyperglycemia condition and is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). However, the effects of SHR in the setting of MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) have not been investigated. This study aimed to explore the association between SHR and long-term clinical outcomes among MINOCA patients.

METHODS

A total of 410 MINOCA patients were included in the final analysis of this study. The patients were divided into three groups based on the SHR tertiles: [SHR1 group (SHR ≤ 0.73), (n = 143); SHR2 group (SHR 0.73-0.84), n = 131; and SHR3 group (SHR ≥ 0.84), n = 136]. Follow-up for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was conducted on all patients. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between SHR and MACE. The receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was applied to obtain the optimal cut-off value of SHR for predicting clinical MACE.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients developed MACE during the mean 34 months of follow-up. A significant increase in MACE was observed in the SHR3 group compared to the SHR1 and SHR2 groups (35.3% vs. 15.4% and 16.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrate that SHR3 patients had the highest MACE risk compared to SHR1 and SHR2 patients (log-rank P < 0.001). In addition, when both SHR tertiles and diabetes status were considered, those with SHR3 and diabetes had the highest hazard of MACE (log-rank P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the SHR3 is associated with a 2.465-fold increase in the risk of MACE (adjusted HR, 2.465; 95% CI 1.461-4.159, P = 0.001). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal SHR cut-off value for predicting clinical MACE among MINOCA was 0.86.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicates, for the first time, that SHR is independently associated with poor long-term prognosis in patients suffering from MINOCA. The optimal SHR cut-off value for predicting clinical MACE among MINOCA patients was 0.86. These findings suggest that SHR may play a potential role in the cardiovascular risk stratification of the MINOCA population.

Predictive Value of the Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction (ACEF) Score in Cardiovascular Disease among Middle-Aged Population

PURPOSE

To explore the predictive value of ACEF scores for identifying the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population.

METHODS

A total of 8613 participants without a history of CVD were enrolled in the follow-up. The endpoint was CVD incidence, defined as stroke or coronary heart disease (CHD) diagnosed during the follow-up period. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with respect to the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) scores and CVD. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyze the probability of CVD in different quartiles of ACEF. Restricted cubic spline was used to further explore whether the relationship between ACEF and CVD was linear. Finally, we assessed the discriminatory ability of ACEF for CVD using C-statistics, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 4.66 years, 388 participants were diagnosed with CVD. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that ACEF was associated with CVD, and participants with high ACEF scores were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with CVD compared to participants with low ACEF scores in the general population. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the adjusted HRs for four quartiles of ACEF were as follows: the first quartile was used as a reference; the second quartile: HR = 2.33; the third quartile: HR = 4.81; the fourth quartile: HR = 8.00. Moreover, after adding ACEF to the original risk prediction model, we observed that new models had higher C-statistic values of CVD than the traditional model. Furthermore, the results of both NRI and IDI were positive, indicating that ACEF enhanced the prediction of CVD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the ACEF score was associated with CVD in the general population in northeastern China. Furthermore, ACEF could be a new tool for identifying patients at high risk of primary CVD in the general population.

Metabolic syndrome and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metabolic syndrome (MeS) is recognized as a significant predictor of poor outcomes in coronary artery disease. However, its prognostic implications in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) have not been examined. We aimed at investigating the role of MeS on the clinical outcomes in MINOCA patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients diagnosed with MINOCA between 2015 and 2019 were included. MeS was defined according to modified NCEP-ATPIII criteria. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between MeS and the hazard of MACE. The integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification index (NRI) were performed to assess MeS incremental predictive value. Of 281 MINOCA patients, 83 (29.5%) patients satisfied the MeS criteria. During a median follow-up duration of 28 months, MINOCA patients with MeS had a notably higher rate of MACE than those without MeS (30.1% vs. 17.6%, respectively P = 0.020). Cox regression analysis revealed that MeS was associated with an increased hazard of MACE (adjusted HR 2.126; 95% CI: 1.193-3.787, P = 0.010). When each component of MeS was analyzed as a categorized variable separately, only high fasting blood glucose and BMI ≥25 kg/m² were associated with an increased hazard of MACE. Moreover, MeS had an incremental predictive ability for MACE when added to a model with clinical risk factors.

CONCLUSION

MeS is relatively common in patients with MINOCA. The presence of MeS significantly increased the hazard of MACE among the MINOCA population.

Predictive value of the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

Little is known about risk stratification in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). We investigated whether the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score (age [years]/ejection fraction [%] + 1 [if creatinine >176 μmol/L]) might predict long-term outcomes after MINOCA.

HYPOTHESIS

The ACEF score enables accurate risk prediction in patients with MINOCA.

METHODS

A total of 1179 patients with MINOCA were enrolled and divided based on their ACEF score tertile levels. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed. Discrimination was defined as the area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up of 41.7 months, patients with MINOCA with higher ACEF score tertiles had a significantly higher incidence of MACE (6.3%, 12.5%, and 23.8%, respectively; p < .001). The adjusted risk of MACE increased with the rising ACEF score tertiles (1st tertile as reference; 2nd tertile: HR 2.70, 95% CI: 1.38-5.29, p = .004; and 3rd tertile: HR 5.35, 95% CI: 2.72-10.51, p < .001). Moreover, an elevated ACEF score was closely associated with an increased risk of MACE overall (HR 4.23, 95% CI: 3.37-5.30, p < .001) and in subgroups (all p < .05). The ACEF score also yielded a good predictive value (AUC 0.79) for MACE.

CONCLUSION

Elevated ACEF scores were strongly associated with a poor prognosis after MINOCA. This simple and valid risk score may facilitate risk stratification and decision making in the population with MINOCA.