Sequential therapy in renal cell carcinoma

The Evolving Landscape of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: In Depth Analysis of Recent Research Progress

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are targeted immunoconjugate constructs that integrate the potency of cytotoxic drugs with the selectivity of monoclonal antibodies, minimizing damage to healthy cells and reducing systemic toxicity. Their design allows for higher doses of the cytotoxic drug to be administered, potentially increasing efficacy. They are currently among the most promising drug classes in oncology, with efforts to expand their application for nononcological indications and in combination therapies. Here we provide a detailed overview of the recent advances in ADC research and consider future directions and challenges in promoting this promising platform to widespread therapeutic use. We examine data from the CAS Content Collection, the largest human-curated collection of published scientific information, and analyze the publication landscape of recent research to reveal the exploration trends in published documents and to provide insights into the scientific advances in the area. We also discuss the evolution of the key concepts in the field, the major technologies, and their development pipelines with company research focuses, disease targets, development stages, and publication and investment trends. A comprehensive concept map has been created based on the documents in the CAS Content Collection. We hope that this report can serve as a useful resource for understanding the current state of knowledge in the field of ADCs and the remaining challenges to fulfill their potential.

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of sunitinib and Sutent® in Chinese healthy subjects: an open-label, randomized, crossover study

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics (PK), bioequivalence and safety of generic sunitinib and its original product Sutent® in healthy Chinese subjects through a phase-I clinical trial. Methods: The study selected two groups of 24 healthy Chinese subjects in a 1:1 ratio through random allocation. Each participant received either 12.5 mg of sunitinib or Sutent® per cycle. A total of 15 different time points were employed for blood sample collection during each cycle. Furthermore, a comprehensive assessment of the drugs' safety was consistently maintained throughout the trial. Results: The average adjusted geometric mean ratios (GMR) (90% CI) for the primary PK parameters Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 97.04% (93.06%-101.19%), 98.45% (93.27%-103.91%) and 98.22% (93.15%-103.56%), respectively. The adjusted GMRs for essential pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters all met the requirements for bioequivalence, with values within the acceptable range of 80%-125%. In addition, the two drugs showed comparable results for the other PK parameters. These results indicate that the two drugs were bioequivalent. Furthermore, both drugs showed well safety. Conclusion: The research results proved that the PK and safety profiles of sunitinib in healthy Chinese subjects were comparable to those of Sutent®. These results advocate the clinical application of generic sunitinib as a potential alternative to original product Sutent® in the treatment of certain medical conditions.

The clinicopathological and prognostic significances of EZH2 expression in urological cancers: A meta‑analysis and bioinformatics analysis

The Drosophila zeste enhancer homolog 2 gene (enhancer of zeste homolog 2; EZH2) is an important member of the polycomb group (PcG) gene family, which maintains the homologous gene via chromosome modification during embryonic development. EZH2 is overexpressed in various tumors, is closely related to tumor formation and growth, and has a malignant phenotype that promotes tumor cell proliferation, proliferation and metastasis. In the present study, a meta- and bioinformatic analysis was performed using data from multiple online databases until August 30, 2022. EZH2 upregulation was found in kidney, bladder and prostate cancers. EZH2 expression was negatively related to TNM staging and pathological grade in kidney and prostate cancers (P<0.05), as well as invasion depth and pathological grade in bladder cancer. According to the KM-plotter database, EZH2 expression was inversely associated with poor overall survival in patients with kidney clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and papillary RCC and with favorable survival in bladder cancer. EZH2 expression was negatively related to relapse-free survival in kidney papillary RCC and bladder cancer but positively associated with kidney clear cell RCC. According to GEPIA and UALCAN databases, EZH2 expression was higher in tumor tissue than normal tissue. The TIMER database showed that EZH2 was closely associated with the proportion of seven immune cell infiltrates in kidney, bladder, and prostate cancers. High EZH2 expression may be a potential marker of tumorigenesis and metastasis in patients with urological cancers.

Sunitinib resistance in renal cell carcinoma: From molecular mechanisms to predictive biomarkers

Currently, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most prevalent type of kidney cancer. Targeted therapy has replaced radiation therapy and chemotherapy as the main treatment option for RCC due to the lack of significant efficacy with these conventional therapeutic regimens. Sunitinib, a drug used to treat gastrointestinal tumors and renal cell carcinoma, inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of a number of receptor tyrosine kinases, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), c-Kit, rearranged during transfection (RET) and fms-related receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt3). Although sunitinib has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of patients with advanced RCC, a significant number of patients have primary resistance to sunitinib or acquired drug resistance within the 6-15 months of therapy. Thus, in order to develop more efficacious and long-lasting treatment strategies for patients with advanced RCC, it will be crucial to ascertain how to overcome sunitinib resistance that is produced by various drug resistance mechanisms. In this review, we discuss: 1) molecular mechanisms of sunitinib resistance; 2) strategies to overcome sunitinib resistance and 3) potential predictive biomarkers of sunitinib resistance.

Complete Response to Sorafenib Rechallenge in a Patient with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

A 79-year-old Japanese man underwent a medical examination for hoarseness. Computed tomography revealed a left renal tumor, and radical nephrectomy was performed. The tumor was a clear cell carcinoma. Fourteen months after the operation, the tumor had metastasized to the spleen, right lung, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. We initiated molecular targeted therapy sequentially with sorafenib, sunitinib, and axitinib and then conducted a rechallenge with sorafenib. His metastatic lesions had completely vanished 5 months after initiation of the rechallenge. Ten months after the rechallenge, lumbar vertebral body metastasis appeared. However, we consider that the sorafenib rechallenge was effective because of the very slow growth of the metastatic lesion, with no other metastasis for 30 months, at the time of writing this report. Approximately 7 years after the first local recurrence, he remained alive, with relatively normal daily functioning.

Evolving Immunotherapy Approaches for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) continues to be associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is typically resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and while targeted therapies have activity and prolong progression-free and overall survival, responses are usually not durable. Modulating the immune system with cytokine therapy, vaccine therapy, cell therapy, and checkpoint inhibitors offers hope of prolonged survival. Standard and emerging immune therapy approaches and combinations of immune therapies and other modalities are reviewed.

Novel immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Despite the rapid development of therapeutic modalities for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) over the past decade to include a number of targeted antiangiogenic therapies and traditional immunotherapy, such as high-dose interleukin-2 and interferon-α, mRCC continues to be associated with poor prognosis. Currently, several novel immunotherapy agents, such as cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy, and checkpoint inhibitors, such as programmed cell death-1 (PD-1 present on T cells), one of its ligands (PD-L1 present on antigen-presenting cells and tumor cells), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 pathways, are being studied in mRCC and are showing promise as important steps in the management of this disease. This review summarizes the current landscape of standard and emerging immune therapeutics and other modalities for mRCC.

Renal cell carcinoma: molecular characterization and evolving treatment paradigms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment landscape of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) continues to shift as both new targeted therapies and immunotherapies show efficacy in treating the disease. Contemporary insights into the molecular characterization of RCC are likely to fuel the development of additional therapies. This review summarizes recent advancements in the biologic characterization of RCC and discusses newly approved therapies and ongoing studies in the treatment of advanced RCC.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Cancer Genome Atlas has now completed comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe RCC, providing insights into the biology of these entities. Two new 'targeted' therapies, cabozantinib and lenvatinib, as well as a novel immune checkpoint inhibitor, the programed death 1 inhibitor nivolumab, have recently been approved for the treatment of metastatic RCC. Although some of these newer therapies are associated with prolongation of survival, there are few long-term responders and the quest for more durable treatment strategies continues.

SUMMARY

The addition of several new agents effective in metastatic RCC has resulted in improvements in overall survival; however, there are few avenues to durable responses or cure. Ongoing studies as well advances in our understanding of the molecular alterations underlying distinct forms of RCC promise further therapeutic advances and have the potential to alter the current treatment paradigm.

Recent advances in immuno-oncology and its application to urological cancers

Recent advances in immuno-oncology have the potential to transform the practice of medical oncology. Antibodies directed against negative regulators of T-cell function (checkpoint inhibitors), engineered cell therapies and innate immune stimulators, such as oncolytic viruses, are effective in a wide range of cancers. Immune'based therapies have had a clinically meaningful impact on the treatment of advanced melanoma, and the lessons regarding use of single agents and combinations in melanoma may be applicable to the treatment of urological cancers. Checkpoint inhibitors, cytokine therapy and therapeutic vaccines are already showing promise in urothelial bladder cancer, renal cell carcinoma and prostate cancer. Critical areas of future immuno-oncology research include the prospective identification of patients who will respond to current immune-based cancer therapies and the identification of new therapeutic agents that promote immune priming in tumours, and increase the rate of durable clinical responses.

Challenging the treatment paradigm for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a review of systemic and localized therapies

The current standard of care for the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) revolves around systemic therapy with molecularly targeted agents. Over the last decade, a total of seven targeted drugs have been approved but, altogether, only exploit two molecular targets in this disease: the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) axis and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Introduction of these agents has markedly improved outcomes compared with those in the cytokine era, yet comparatively little progress has been made since registration of the first targeted therapeutics occurred 10 years ago. In this article, we review efforts to improve on this current treatment paradigm. We discuss novel targets in this disease and corresponding new agents under investigation. The article dedicates particular attention to targeted immunotherapeutics, which are rapidly emerging as a new category of interest in this disease. Last, we review current data supporting the use of surgical interventions to improve outcomes in patients with metastatic disease.

Axitinib in sequential therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Efficacy of new molecularly targeted drugs in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), confirmed in clinical studies in relation to survival and prolongation of time to progression, has became a big chance for patients with metastatic renal cell cancer. Axitinib is a potent and selective receptor tyrosine kinase for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFR-1, -2, -3), platelet-derived growth factor β (PDGRF-β) and c-KIT. This is a case report of a 57-year old female patient with a history of left nephrectomy due to clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The patient had received three prior systemic treatments (interferon - sorafenib - everolimus). After consecutive progression the patient was qualified to 4^th line therapy - axitinib at a dose of 5 mg twice daily. Partial response to treatment was achieved. After 6 months therapy was stopped due to the disease progression. The total time to progression was 37.5 months. The total survival time from the disease diagnosis was 45 months. Based on literature date and own experience we showed that sequential treatment RCC is associated with improved survival. In summary, axitinib may be an effective drug after failure of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in previous lines of therapy.

Clinical experience with everolimus in the second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

Everolimus is an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR-I) and is currently approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after failure of first-line vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). In this narrative review, we aim to report the available evidence about the use of everolimus as second-line therapy for mRCC. A literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE and abstracts from major conferences on clinical oncology as sources. We report data from prospective as well as retrospective and real world data studies and we analyze the safety and efficacy profile of everolimus as second-line therapy for mRCC. Although different drugs are currently available for the second-line treatment of mRCC, everolimus represents a feasible and safe option in this setting, especially for patients who have experienced high-grade toxicity or are still carrying TKI-related toxicities from first-line treatment.

Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) promotes tumour cell migration and invasion via epigenetic repression of E-cadherin in renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the molecular mechanism and clinical significance for an oncogenic role of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemistry analyses of EZH2, histone H3 trimethyl Lys27 (H3K27me3) and E-cadherin were performed in tumour tissue samples from 257 patients with RCC. Regulatory effects of EZH2 on E-cadherin expression were examined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, chromatin immunoprecipitation assay and immunohistochemical staining. Migration and invasion assays were performed in RCC cell lines. Tumour xenograft experiments with RCC cells were carried out in nude mice.

RESULTS

EZH2 promoted migration and invasion in RCC cell lines. Silencing EZH2 with short-hairpin EZH2 (shEZH2) or 3-deazaneplanocin A (DZNep) inhibited migration and invasion (P < 0.001), up-regulated the expression of E-cadherin in vitro, inhibited tumour growth, and prolonged survival in vivo (P = 0.022). EZH2 expression accompanied with E-cadherin repression was associated with advanced disease stage (P = 0.004) and poor overall (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EZH2 may contribute to RCC progression and is a potential therapeutic target for advanced RCC.

Efficacy of targeted treatment beyond third-line therapy in metastatic kidney cancer: retrospective analysis from a large-volume cancer center

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Currently, 7 agents are approved for the first- and second-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In contrast, data supporting their use beyond second line are limited. Here we summarize our experience in patients treated with more than 4 lines of therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the outcome of 24 patients treated at our institution with at least 4 lines of therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

Median OS from the initiation of first-line therapy for the whole cohort is 64.7 months. Up to 96% of the patients received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor (mTOR-I) within the first 3 lines of treatment. In the fourth or following lines, patients were treated with TKI, mTOR-I, bevacizumab/interferon, or experimental drugs. Seven patients continued treatment with a sixth-line agent; one has been treated up to the ninth line. Sixteen percent of the patients receiving fourth-line therapy and 13% receiving fifth-line therapy experienced a partial remission, which was independent from response to previous therapies. Median OS from fourth and fifth line was 30.8 and 26.2 months, respectively. Median PFS for fourth-line therapy was 5.8 months. No significant difference in PFS was observed for patients with disease that responded or did not respond to first-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limitations of a retrospective analysis, our study suggests that selected patients benefit from multiple lines of treatment, independent of response to first-line therapy. However, the optimal sequence of treatment with regard to later lines remains to be determined.

Increased risk of everolimus-associated acute kidney injury in cancer patients with impaired kidney function

BACKGROUND

Everolimus was recently introduced as a second-line treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and many other cancers. Several prospective studies have shown that serum creatinine levels are increased in a significant proportion of patients receiving everolimus. However, data on the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) during everolimus treatment in clinical practice are sparse. Here, we report the incidence, risk factors, and clinical significance of AKI associated with everolimus treatment in patients with cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed patients who received everolimus for more than 4 weeks as an anticancer therapy. AKI was defined as increase in creatinine levels from baseline levels greater than 1.5-fold.

RESULTS

The majority of the 110 patients enrolled in this analysis had RCC (N=93, 84.5%). AKI developed in 21 (23%) RCC patients; none of the patients (N=17) with other cancers had AKI. Fourteen of 21 cases were considered to be everolimus-associated AKI, in which there were no other nephrotoxic insults other than everolimus at the onset of AKI. The incidence of AKI increased progressively as baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreased (10% in subjects with eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m2, 17% in subjects with eGFR 60-90 mL/min/1.73 m2, 28% in subjects with eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 100% in subjects with eGFR 15-30 mL/min/1.73 m2; P=0.029 for trend). Baseline eGFR was an independent risk factor for the development of everolimus-associated AKI (hazard ratio per 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 increase, 0.70; 95% confidential interval, 049-1.00; P=0.047). Nine of 14 patients with everolimus-associated AKI continued receiving the drug at a reduced dose or after a short-term off period. Administration of the drug was discontinued in four of 14 patients because of progression of an underlying malignancy. Only one patient stopped taking the drug because of AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper suggests that AKI is a common adverse effect of everolimus treatment, especially in subjects with impaired renal function. However, the occurrence of AKI did not require the discontinuation of the drug, and the treatment decision should be made via a multidisciplinary approach, including the assessment of the oncological benefits of everolimus and other therapeutic options.

Recent advances in the use of therapeutic cancer vaccines in genitourinary malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Despite a recent increase in US FDA-approved treatments, genitourinary malignancies remain a source of significant morbidity and mortality. One focus of research is the use of therapeutic cancer vaccines in these diseases, and a significant body of clinical trial experience now exists for refining vaccine strategies to enhance antitumor efficacy and develop immune-based combination regimens.

AREAS COVERED

In recent years, clinical data from multiple trials in genitourinary malignancies have enhanced our understanding of the potential for immunotherapy in these cancers. There are also emerging clinical strategies that combine cancer vaccines with chemotherapy, radiation, androgen-deprivation therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review is based on a search of relevant literature for data presented over the past 5 years from clinical trials of cancer vaccines in prostate, bladder and renal carcinomas.

EXPERT OPINION

In the coming years, clinical trials informed by decades of preclinical data and emerging clinical data will help to define the role of immunotherapy in genitourinary malignancies. Combination strategies that capitalize on the immune properties of standard treatments will bring greater clinical benefits, and immune-based combinations will likely be moved to the neoadjuvant setting, where they may have optimal clinical impact.

Comparative effectiveness of second-line targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: synthesis of findings from two multi-practice chart reviews in the United States

BACKGROUND

Second-line targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) include mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study compares the effectiveness of these therapies in a multi-practice chart review and synthesizes the findings with those of a similarly designed study.

METHODS

Medical oncologists/hematologists (N = 36) were recruited to review charts for patients aged ≥18 years, received a first-line TKI and initiated second-line targeted therapy in 2010 or later. The primary outcome was time from second-line initiation to treatment failure (TTF; discontinuation, physician-assessed progression, or death, whichever occurred first). TTF was compared among patients receiving second-line everolimus (EVE), temsirolimus (TEM), or TKI as a class, using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for type of initial TKI and response, histological subtype, performance status, and sites of metastasis. Hazard ratios (HRs) for TTF were pooled, in a meta-analysis, with previously reported HRs for progression-free survival from a chart review with a similar design.

RESULTS

A total of 138, 64 and 79 patients received second-line therapy with EVE, TEM or a TKI, respectively. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, EVE was associated with numerical, but not statistically significant, reductions of 28% (HR = 0.72; 95% CI [0.45-1.16]) and 26% (HR = 0.74; 95% CI [0.48-1.15]) in the hazard of TTF compared to TEM and TKI, respectively. After pooling the HRs from both studies, EVE was associated with significantly reduced hazards of TTF compared to TEM and TKI (HR = 0.73; 95% CI [0.57-0.93]; and HR = 0.75; 95% CI [0.57-0.98], respectively).

LIMITATIONS

LIMITATIONS include retrospective analyses with possible missing or erroneous chart data, confounding of unobserved factors due to non-randomization, and limited data for axitinib during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

In pooled results from two independent multi-practice chart reviews of second-line mRCC treatment, EVE was associated with significantly reduced hazards of treatment failure compared to TEM and to TKIs as a class.

Forty-nine-month survival in a metastatic renal cell carcinoma patient across six lines of targeted therapy

A better understanding of the aetiopathogenetic molecular targets in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and the subsequent advent of targeted therapeutic agents have greatly improved the management and prognosis of RCC and patient survival. However, optimising therapeutic outcomes through appropriate sequential or combination therapy remains a challenge. Our 45-year-old male patient presented with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); we effectively managed his aggressive, progressive disease across six lines of treatment, including sequential monotherapy and combination therapy, with targeted agents like sunitinib, everolimus, sorafenib, temsirolimus, and bevacizumab, resulting in a >48-month survival. Appropriate therapy with agents that have non-overlapping target profiles minimised treatment-related toxicities, enabling our patient to tolerate therapy at full doses. This case represents a good example of a significant clinical benefit of targeted therapy beyond the fourth line in mRCC. The survival and prognosis of mRCC patients may thus be significantly improved with the suitable use of newer targeted agents.

Modification of the tumor microenvironment as a novel target of renal cell carcinoma therapeutics

To move forward with immunotherapy, it is important to understand how the tumor microenvironment generates systemic immunosuppression in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) as well as in patients with other types of solid tumors. Even though antigen discovery in RCC has lagged behind melanoma, recent clinical trials have finally authenticated that RCC is susceptible to vaccine-based therapy. Furthermore, judicious coadministration of cytokines and chemotherapy can potentiate therapeutic responses to vaccine in RCC and prolong survival, as has already proved possible for melanoma. Although high-dose interleukin 2 immunotherapy has been superseded as first-line therapy for RCC by promiscuous receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (rTKIs) such as sunitinib, sunitinib itself is a potent immunoadjunct in animal tumor models. A reasonable therapeutic goal is to unite antiangiogenic strategies with immunotherapy as first-line therapy for RCC. This strategy is equally appropriate for testing in all solid tumors in which the microenvironment generates immunosuppression. A common element of RCC and pancreatic, colon, breast, and other solid tumors is large numbers of circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and because MDSCs elicit regulatory T cells rather than vice versa, gaining control over MDSCs is an important initial step in any immunotherapy. Although rTKIs like sunitinib have a remarkable capacity to deplete MDSCs and restore normal T-cell function in peripheral body compartments such as the bloodstream and the spleen, such rTKIs are effective only against MDSCs, which are engaged in phospho-STAT3-dependent programming (pSTAT3+). Unfortunately, rTKI-resistant pSTAT3- MDSCs are especially apt to arise within the tumor microenvironment itself, necessitating strategies that do not rely exclusively on STAT3 disruption. The most utilitarian strategy to gain control of both pSTAT3+ and pSTAT3- MDSCs may be to exploit the natural differentiation pathway, which permits MDSCs to mature into tumoricidal macrophages (TM1) via such stimuli as Toll-like receptor agonists, interferon γ, and CD40 ligation. Overall, this review highlights the mechanisms of immune suppression used by the different regulatory cell types operative in RCC as well as other tumors. It also describes the different therapeutic strategies to overcome the suppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment.

Economic outcomes of sequences which include monoclonal antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor and/or epidermal growth factor receptor for the treatment of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer with wild type Kirsten ras mutational status are eligible for sequential treatments which include monoclonal antibodies as first line (1L), second line (2L), or third line (3L) regimens.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the economic outcomes of different sequences which include monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Individual drug regimens for 1L, 2L, and 3L treatments were compiled according to the clinical studies in the Summary of Product Characteristics for monoclonal antibodies. They were combined into plausible treatment sequences. Health outcomes were approximated using additive median PFS benefit, and economic outcomes were calculated with a treatment sequencing costing tool. Limitations of the analysis include the clinical trial data sources, cost assumptions, and the additive PFS approach.

RESULTS

Seventeen sequences were evaluated. Results of the analysis show that sequences including 1L anti-EGFRs generally have relatively low-to-medium health outcomes at the highest comparative sequence costs compared to sequences including 2L anti-EGFRs, which have lower health outcomes at the lowest cost. Sequences including 3L anti-EGFRs (sequential bevazicumab-based 1L and 2L) have the highest health outcomes, with potential cost savings of €5972-€11,676 if replacing 2L anti-EGFRs or an additional cost of €5909-€12,708 if replacing 1L anti-EGFR regimens.

CONCLUSION

Clinical sequences consisting of 1L and 2L line bevacizumab followed by 3L anti-EGFR potentially yield the greatest health outcomes associated with a reasonable trade-off in additional cost when replacing 1L anti-EGFRs and are potentially cost-saving if replacing 2L anti-EGFRs, per patient per lifetime. To maximize health outcomes, optimal sequences include anti-EGFRs as 3L regimen, with an approximately equivalent trade-off in costs between the most costly (anti-EGFR 2L) and least costly (anti-EGFR 1L) sequences.

Renal cell carcinoma: how to hit the targets?

INTRODUCTION

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a widespread oncourological disease with a tendency towards a slow increase of incidence. In the recent decade, there has been development of numerous effective drugs targeted at different molecules that play a dominant role in RCC carcinogenesis. Understanding of RCC carcinogenesis confirms the key role of angiogenesis in maintaining the viability of renal tumours and their metastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We aimed to systemize numerous medicines, used to inhibit the angiogenesis in patients with advanced RCC according to their targets, and to analyze their efficacy.

RESULTS

There are roughly four main mechanisms of action of the targeted drugs:Blockade of circulating extracellular VEGF molecules.The selective blockade of tyrosine kinase receptors' domains.The simultaneous blockage of the tyrosine kinase receptors' domains and intracellular tyrosine kinases.The blockade of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) which is responsible for support of vital functions of cancer cells. In addition to FDA officially approved drugs, numerous experimental agents have been synthesized, which are currently on initial stages of clinical studies in RCC treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the currently used targeted drugs demonstrate perspectives of metastatic RCC conservative treatment, that are able to prolong cancer-specific survival in previously doomed patients for up to 29 months. The development of schedules for sequential treatment or combination targeted therapy remains a current challenge. The quality of life is an important factor that influences remedy choice. The advantages and disadvantages of neoadjuvant and adjuvant targeted therapy are currently being intensively discussed.

Temsirolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) represent one of the ten leading cancer entities with an increasing incidence especially in the western world. Unfortunately, about 25% of the patients develop metastatic RCC (mRCC) associated with a most unfavorable prognosis. In the recent years, various new agents targeting VEGF or VEGF receptor (VEGFR) or the mTOR pathway have been approved for the treatment of mRCC with significant prolongation of progression-free survival and, in part, of overall survival (OS). Targeting the mTOR kinase is an interesting option for mRCC. Temsirolimus, one of the available mTOR inhibitors, has been approved as a single agent in poor-risk mRCC patients based on the pivotal Phase III trial showing a significant superiority in OS versus IFN-α or temsirolimus + IFN-α, which has been verified by a pivotal Phase III trial. The benefit has been shown for clear cell carcinoma and papillary RCC as well. For poor prognosis patients, temsirolimus improves median survival by 3.6 months. In second-line treatment compared with sorafenib following first-line treatment with sunitinib temsirolimus showed a relative progression-free survival benefit for patients with nonclear cell RCC with temsirolimus. The median OS for the temsirolimus group was 12.27 and 16.64 months for the sorafenib group. In 2007, the US FDA granted approval for temsirolimus for the treatment of advanced RCC.

[Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: primary and follow-up treatment]

Systemic treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has changed fundamentally in recent years. So-called targeted therapy gives patients with incurable renal cell cancer the chance of prolonged survival with acceptable quality of life and manageable side effects. Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors have been evaluated in various clinical settings within prospective trials. Therefore, recent medical guidelines are able to give recommendations for the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma in daily practice. The optimal therapeutic sequence of the available substances has not been defined until now; however recent data recommend the use of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor as the first line treatment. Besides standard treatment, new approaches are currently being evaluated in clinical trials.

[Case of multiple lung metastases of renal cell carcinoma failing to respond to Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and sunitinib but markedly responding to everolimus]

The case pertains to a 47-year-old male. He consulted our institute regarding a tumor in his right kidney. Endoscopic retroperitoneal nephrectomy of the right kidney was conducted to remove the tumor. The postoperative pathology was Renal Cell Carcinoma (Clear cell carcinoma, pT1b, pNx, V (+), Fuhrman grade 4). Multiple lung metastases were observed upon CT scan the following year. Sunitinib was administered following Interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) therapy; however, the lung metastases became larger, so administration of everolimus at 10 mg/day was commenced. The lung metastatic lesion became smaller upon CT scan from 6 weeks following administration, and it was determined that the therapeutic effect was PR. The PR was still maintained upon CT scan 31 weeks following administration but the lung metastatic lesion still remained; therefore, right lower lobe resection and lymph node biopsy were conducted upon obtaining informed consent. The administration of everolimus at 10 mg/day is still subsequently being continued due to viable tumor cells being observed in the lung metastatic lesion and the lymph node. At present, 43 weeks have past since the start of everolimus administration, but no new metastatic lesions have been observed.

An evidence-based guide to the selection of sequential therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Targeted therapies have introduced a paradigm shift in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Currently, four molecules (sunitinib, pazopanib, bevacizumab plus interferon, temsirolimus) are considered in first-line therapy, and three other molecules for second, or subsequent lines of therapy (everolimus, axitinib, sorafenib). In addition, other molecules and sequencing schemes are being tested in ongoing phase II/III studies. We conducted a systematic review using PubMed and several other databases up to December 2011 of prospective and retrospective studies on treatment management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma using targeted therapies, with a special focus on use of sequential treatment. Based on phase III data, the optimal sequencing scheme for patients with clear cell or even non-clear cell histological subtype appears to consist of sunitinib, followed by axitinib, followed by everolimus. Subsequent treatment options rely on lower evidence studies and could consist of fourth-line sorafenib or sunitinib rechallenge. Such therapies would qualify as last recourse options. In another context, temsirolimus may be used in patients who fulfill the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center poor risk criteria or who have poor performance status. We conclude that in the current setting, sequential therapy represents the cornerstone of effective management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Temsirolimus in overtreated metastatic renal cancer with subsequent use of sunitinib: A case report

During the last decade, we have been developing new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of renal cancer, based on knowledge derived from molecular biology. We report a case of long-term renal metastatic cancer progression despite therapy with sunitinib and interleukin, which are the most active drugs in renal cancer. Disease stabilization for 58 weeks was achieved upon sequential use of temsirolimus, following the occurrence of disease progression during angiogenic therapy. The patient demonstrated excellent tolerance without marked symptoms for 10 months. Hypothyroidism and mumps-related adverse events were present. The survival time from diagnosis to lung metastasis was 8 years. Thus, this case demonstrates promising therapeutic effects of the sequential use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors during different stages of the disease.

[Evaluation of the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapies. retrospective clinical study over six years]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes following targeted therapies in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), through the study of overall survival (OS) and progression-free (PFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included 78 patients treated with targeted therapies for mRCC at the Paul Papin Cancer Institute from 2004 to 2009. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), response to treatment, occurrence of grade III and IV side effects, were analyzed following first and second line treatments.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 33 months [5-236], and 41 patients died (52.6%). Median OS was 36 months [95% CI 29-43]. The median PFS was 14 months [95% CI 6.71-21.29] for sunitinib, 38 months [95% CI 11.41-64.59] for bevacizumab with interferon (IFN), and 8 months [95% CI 0-17.03] for IFN alone. A partial reduction, stabilization or increase in tumor size was observed for 19.2%, 47.4% and 25.6% of cases. A second line treatment was given for 53 patients. They received either sunitinib (n=20, 37.8%), bevacizumab with IFN (n=7, 13.2%), sorafenib (n=17, 32.2%), temsirolimus (n=3, 5.6%) or other molecules (n=6 11.2%). Grade III or IV side effects were observed for 14.1%, 28.3% and 18.2% of the patients following first, second and third line treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of targeted therapies in our center upheld the literature data. These therapies allow a benefit survival versus immunotherapy, with sometimes large side-effect.

Emerging immunotherapies for renal cell carcinoma

In recent years, an improved understanding of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumour biology has resulted in major advances in the treatment of patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC). Although immunotherapy with interleukin-2 and interferon-α was once the standard of care for mRCC, the introduction of novel agents targeting angiogenesis and signal transduction pathways has markedly improved patient outcomes. However, targeted agents rarely induce complete responses, and patients eventually develop resistance to therapy, prompting consideration of novel therapeutic approaches and a resurgence of interest in immunotherapy for RCC. Phase I/II trials of vaccination with allogeneic dendritic cell/tumour fusions in patients with mRCC have demonstrated immunological and clinical responses in some patients, and T-cell modulating agents (e.g. antibodies against programmed death 1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4, or soluble lymphocyte activation gene-3) and dendritic cell-activating toll-like receptor agonists have also shown encouraging evidence of efficacy in early-phase clinical trials. These early studies suggest that immunotherapy may continue to be an effective approach for patients with mRCC. As such, a number of other strategies are currently under investigation, including adoptive cell transfer (ACT) with T cells modified to target proteins expressed by renal tumours such as MAGE-A3/12, DR4 and TRAIL, and ACT with autologous natural killer cells. Results from trials of novel immunotherapies are encouraging, with data from other indications helping to facilitate development. To realise the full benefit for patients, it is likely that immunotherapy will need to be combined with targeted agents or other agents. Novel therapies used in combination or sequentially have the potential to improve outcomes in mRCC, and results from ongoing/planned trials will shape future therapy.

Constitutional genetic variants as predictors of antiangiogenic therapy outcome in renal cell carcinoma

The development of specific angiogenesis inhibitors has drastically improved renal cancer treatment in recent years. Currently, four VEGF receptor inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib and axitinib), one anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (bevacizumab) and two inhibitors of the mTOR pathway (temsirolimus and everolimus) have been approved to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and several other molecules are under investigation. However, lack of response to antiangiogenic drugs and adverse drug reactions leading to treatment suspension are critical clinical problems that need to be solved. Because antiangiogenic drugs act on nonmalignant endothelial cells, the genetic background of the patient may play a crucial role determining the efficacy of these drugs. This article focuses on the identification of polymorphisms associated with antiangiogenic drugs outcome in RCC patients. It reviews and summarizes our current knowledge on this area and discusses future strategies to identify new biomarkers that could be used to personalize RCC management.

Prolonged survival after sequential multimodal treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: two case reports and a review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

In this case series and short review of the literature, we underline the impact of nephrectomy combined with sequential therapy based on cytokines, antiangiogenic factors, and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors along with metastasectomy on overall survival and quality of life in patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma.

CASE PRESENTATION

In the first of two cases reported here, a 53-year-old Caucasian man underwent a radical left nephrectomy for renal cell cancer and relapsed with a bone metastasis in his right humerus. He was treated with closed nailing and cytokine-based chemotherapy. For 5 years, the disease was stable and he had great improvement in quality of life. Subsequently, the disease relapsed in his lymph nodes, lung, and thorax soft tissue. He was then treated with antiangiogenic factors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. The disease progressed until September 2009, when he died of allergic shock during a blood transfusion, 9 years after the initial diagnosis of renal cell cancer.In the second case, a 54-year-old Caucasian man underwent a radical left nephrectomy for renal cell cancer. A year later, the disease progressed to his neck lymph nodes, and cytokine-based chemotherapy was initiated. While he was on cytokines, a solitary pulmonary nodule appeared and he underwent a metastasectomy. Nine months later, magnetic resonance imaging of his brain revealed a focal right occipitoparietal lesion, which was resected. After two years of active surveillance, the disease relapsed as a pulmonary metastasis and he was treated with an antiangiogenic factor. Further progressions presenting as enlarged axillary lymph nodes, chest soft tissue lesions, and thoracic spine bone metastases were sequentially observed. He then received a first-generation mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, an antiangiogenic factor, and later a second-generation mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and palliative radiotherapy. Ten years after the initial diagnosis of renal cell cancer, his disease is stable and he is on a third antiangiogenic factor and leads an active life.

CONCLUSIONS

One multidisciplinary approach to patients with metastatic renal cell cancer combines nephrectomy, metastasectomy, and radiotherapy (when feasible) with medical therapy based on cytokines and targeted treatment employing agents inhibiting angiogenesis, other receptor tyrosine kinases, and mammalian target of rapamycin. This approach could prolong survival and improve quality of life.

Rapid angiogenesis onset after discontinuation of sunitinib treatment of renal cell carcinoma patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the angiogenic changes in primary tumor tissue of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with VEGF-targeted therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Phase II trials of VEGF pathway-targeted therapy given before cytoreductive surgery were carried out with metastatic RCC patients with the primary tumor in situ to investigate the necessity of nephrectomy. Primary tumor tissues were obtained and assessed for angiogenesis parameters. Results were compared with similar analyses on untreated tumors.

RESULTS

Sunitinib or bevacizumab pretreatment resulted in a significant reduction of microvessel density in the primary tumor. Also, an increase in vascular pericyte coverage was found in sunitinib-pretreated tumors, consistent with efficient angiogenesis inhibition. Expression of several key regulators of angiogenesis was found to be suppressed in pretreated tissues, among which VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 and platelet-derived growth factor-B. In addition, apoptosis in tumor and endothelial cells was induced. Interestingly, in sunitinib-pretreated tissues a dramatic increase of the number of proliferating endothelial cells was observed, which was not the case in bevacizumab-pretreated tumors. A positive correlation with the interval between halting the therapy and surgery was found, suggesting a compensatory angiogenic response caused by the discontinuation of sunitinib treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study describes, for the first time, the angiostatic response in human primary renal cancers at the tissue level upon treatment with VEGF-targeted therapy. Discontinuation of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors leads to accelerated endothelial cell proliferation. The results of this study contribute important data to the ongoing discussion on the discontinuation of treatment with kinase inhibitors.

Genome-wide RNA interference analysis of renal carcinoma survival regulators identifies MCT4 as a Warburg effect metabolic target

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common pathological subtype of kidney cancer. Here, we integrated an unbiased genome-wide RNA interference screen for ccRCC survival regulators with an analysis of recurrently overexpressed genes in ccRCC to identify new therapeutic targets in this disease. One of the most potent survival regulators, the monocarboxylate transporter MCT4 (SLC16A3), impaired ccRCC viability in all eight ccRCC lines tested and was the seventh most overexpressed gene in a meta-analysis of five ccRCC expression datasets. MCT4 silencing impaired secretion of lactate generated through glycolysis and induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Silencing MCT4 resulted in intracellular acidosis, and reduction in intracellular ATP production together with partial reversion of the Warburg effect in ccRCC cell lines. Intra-tumoural heterogeneity in the intensity of MCT4 protein expression was observed in primary ccRCCs. MCT4 protein expression analysis based on the highest intensity of expression in primary ccRCCs was associated with poorer relapse-free survival, whereas modal intensity correlated with Fuhrman nuclear grade. Consistent with the potential selection of subclones enriched for MCT4 expression during disease progression, MCT4 expression was greater at sites of metastatic disease. These data suggest that MCT4 may serve as a novel metabolic target to reverse the Warburg effect and limit disease progression in ccRCC.

Copyright © 2012 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

How to select targeted therapy in renal cell cancer

Treatment of renal cell carcinoma has dramatically changed in the past 5 years, with the approval of six new drugs since 2006. Although treatment algorithms have been reported and updated every year since 2006, the choice of targeted therapy is not always easy. Selecting a targeted agent in metastatic renal cell carcinoma should take into account various parameters, including the status of the disease, the histology, the status of the patient and finally the availability of the drugs in each country. In addition, in front of every patient, the physician will need to raise important questions such as whether the patient should be treated, should receive surgery and also what is his prognosis. The different options are described here.

A phase II study of presurgical sunitinib in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal carcinoma and the primary tumor in situ

OBJECTIVE

To investigate response rate (RR) of the primary tumor after presurgical sunitinib before planned cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Secondary endpoints were safety and if this strategy can be used to identify patients who progress rapidly and may not benefit from CN.

METHODS

Prospective study to detect a 25% response evaluation criteria in solid tumors RR (RECIST-RR) in the primary tumor (Simon two-stage design). CN was performed after 2 cycles of sunitinib 50 mg/d. Response in the primary tumor and metastatic sites, change of longest diameter of the primary tumor (Δ-LDT), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with primary mRCC were included. The trial did not enter the second stage because only 1 primary tumor responded partially in the first stage (4.5%). Median Δ-LDT was -9.5% (range 2.2 to -36%). A >10% Δ-LDT was significantly associated with a high probability to survive 2 years (P = .01). At metastatic sites, 7 patients developed a partial response (31.8%), 7 stable disease (31.8%), and 8 progressive disease (36.4%). Subsequently 3 (13.6%) developed a complete response after CN and continued taking sunitinib. Median PFS is 7 months (range 0-41). Median follow-up is 23 months (range 2-41). Median overall survival has not been reached.

CONCLUSIONS

Downsizing of primary tumors after 2 cycles of sunitinib is modest but associated with long-term survival. Patients with progression of metastases after pretreatment have short survival and are unlikely to benefit from CN.

Combination or sequencing strategies to improve the outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a critical review

The introduction of novel anti-angiogenic therapies has greatly improved the outcome of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The use of these therapies in combination or sequentially is proposed to provide greater efficacy. We have reviewed completed and ongoing clinical trials in mRCC that have reported efficacy and/or safety data of novel therapies used in combination or sequentially. Bevacizumab appears to be a useful partner when combined with interferon (IFN), while controversial results have been reported when combined with temsirolimus and everolimus. Other combinations appear to have unacceptable tolerability or require dose or schedule optimization. Sequencing data provide a clear indication that multiple lines of treatment may extend survival. The 'ideal' sequence, however, is still unknown. In conclusion, novel therapies used in combination or sequentially have potential to provide optimised treatment and patient outcomes in mRCC. The results from ongoing/planned trials are expected to help shape future therapy.

ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Kidney Cancer 2010: treatment of metastatic disease

CONTEXT

Until the development of novel targeted agents directed against angiogenesis and tumour growth, few treatment options have been available for the treatment of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC).

OBJECTIVE

This review discusses current targeted therapies for mRCC and provides consensus statements regarding treatment algorithms.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Medical literature was retrieved from PubMed up to April 2011. Additional relevant articles and abstract reviews were included from the bibliographies of the retrieved literature.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Targeted treatment for mRCC can be categorized for the following patient groups: previously untreated patients, those refractory to immunotherapy, and those refractory to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy. Sunitinib and bevacizumab combined with interferon alpha are generally considered first-line treatment options in patients with favourable or intermediate prognoses. Temsirolimus is considered a first-line treatment option for poor-risk patients. Either sorafenib or sunitinib may be valid second-line treatments for patients who have failed prior cytokine-based therapies. For patients refractory to treatment with VEGF-targeted therapy, everolimus is now recommended. Pazopanib is a new treatment option in the first- and second-line setting (after cytokine failure). Sequential and combination approaches, and the roles of nephrectomy and tumour metastasectomy will also be discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing clinical evidence is clarifying appropriate first- and second-line treatments with targeted agents for patients with mRCC. Based on phase 2 and 3 trials, a sequential approach is most promising, while combination therapy is still investigational. The role of nephrectomy in mRCC is being evaluated in ongoing phase 3 clinical trials.

Clinical experience and critical evaluation of the role of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma

The efficacy of sequential everolimus, an orally administered inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), was proven in a placebo-controlled phase III study, where median progression-free survival was 4.9 vs 1.9 months for placebo (hazard ratio: 0.33, P < 0.001). Placebo crossovers (80%) contaminated overall survival data. Adverse event discontinuation rate was of only 10% and health-adjusted quality-of-life was sustained. These data represent the first placebo-controlled evidence of efficacy for a sequentially used targeted agent. Everolimus resulted in the strongest hazard ratio ever recorded for progression-free survival, despite it being tested in a population with the most aggressive natural history ever recorded in all available phase III metastatic renal cell carcinoma trials. Everolimus use after exclusively one prior antivascular endothelial growth factor failure resulted in an even longer progression-free survival time (5.4 months) than in the entire population (4.9 months). These benefits should also be considered in the light of sustained and unimpaired health-related quality of life. Use in first line other than second or subsequent lines remains to be validated.

Clinical results and pharmacokinetics of sorafenib in chronic hemodialysis patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a single center

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the safety and feasibility of sorafenib in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis by examining the influence of pharmacokinetic parameters to their benefit and also the occurrence of drug-related adverse events of sorafenib.

METHODS

Ten patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing hemodialysis received sorafenib. Initial dose was 200 mg once daily, and the dose was increased up to the maintenance dose of 200 mg twice daily. The pharmacokinetic study was performed after a steady state was reached with 200 mg twice daily in six patients.

RESULTS

Complete response occurred in one patient, partial response in three, stable disease in four and progressive disease in two. Median progression-free survival was 6.3 months. Serious adverse events were found in nine patients, including a Grade 5 subarachnoid hemorrhage and a Grade 4 cerebellar hemorrhage. In the pharmacokinetic study, the geometric mean of maximum concentration and area under the curve from 0 to 10 h of plasma concentration were similar on the day of hemodialysis and the day off hemodialysis. These data were lower than those from Japanese people with healthy kidneys and normal kidney function. There was no association between objective response or the occurrence of serious adverse events and pharmacokinetic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with sorafenib of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing hemodialysis appears to be feasible, but we express some concern about the higher incidence of serious adverse events even with the reduced dose. However, clinical efficacy was not compromised.