Use of booster inoculations to sustain the clinical effect of an adjuvant breast cancer vaccine: from US Military Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Group Study I-01 and I-02

A Review of Clinical Trials of Cancer and Its Treatment as a Vaccine

BACKGROUND

Cancer and infectious diseases are one of the greatest challenges of modern medicine. An unhealthy lifestyle, poor drug use, or drug misuse contribute to the rise in morbidity and mortality brought on by these illnesses. The inadequacies of the medications now being used to treat these disorders, along with the growing issue of drug resistance, have compelled researchers to look for novel compounds with therapeutic promise. The number of infections and diseases has significantly abated due to vaccine development and use over time, which is described in detail. Several novel vaccines can now be produced by manipulating Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), Ribonucleic acid (RNA), Messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA), proteins, viral vector Recombinant, and other molecules due to advances in genetic engineering and our understanding of the immune defense.

OBJECTIVE

The main topic of discussion is cancer-based vaccinations, which were developed less than a decade ago but have already been used to treat a wide range of both life-threatening and deadly diseases. It contains clinical studies for cancer vaccines against kidney, liver, prostate, cervix, and certain RNA-based cancer vaccines against breast and bladder cancer.

RESULTS

Numerous studies using various DNA and RNA-based methods have been conducted on the basis of cancer, with 9-10 diseases related to DNA and 8-9 diseases associated with RNA. Some of these studies have been completed, while others have been eliminated due to a lack of research; further studies are ongoing regarding the same.

CONCLUSION

This brief discussion of vaccines and their varieties with examples also discusses vaccine clinical trials in relation to cancer diseases in this DNA and RNA-based cancer vaccine that has had successful clinical trials like the cervical cancer drug VGX-3100, the kidney cancer drug Pembrolizumab, MGN-1601, the prostate cancer drug pTVG-HP with rhGM-CSF, the melanoma cancer drug proteasome siRNA, and the lung cancer drug FRAME-001.

Emerging Targeted Therapies for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and the leading cause of death. HER2 overexpression is found in approximately 20% of breast cancers and is associated with a poor prognosis and a shorter overall survival. Tratuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the HER2 receptor, is the standard of care treatment. However, a third of the patients do not respond to therapy. Given the high rate of resistance, other HER2-targeted strategies have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies such as pertuzumab and margetuximab, trastuzumab-based antibody drug conjugates such as trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors like lapatinib and tucatinib, among others. Moreover, T-DXd has proven to be of use in the HER2-low subtype, which suggests that other HER2-targeted therapies could be successful in this recently defined new breast cancer subclassification. When patients progress to multiple strategies, there are several HER2-targeted therapies available; however, treatment options are limited, and the potential combination with other drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cells, CAR-NK, CAR-M, and vaccines is an interesting and appealing field that is still in development. In this review, we will discuss the highlights and pitfalls of the different HER2-targeted therapies and potential combinations to overcome metastatic disease and resistance to therapy.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration without exudative recurrence over 24 months after initial remission

We investigated the characteristics of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which rarely recurs after initial remission. This study retrospectively analyzed 392 neovascular AMD patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). All patients received three monthly loading doses of anti-VEGF injections, followed by a pro re nata (as needed) regimen for 24 months. The baseline characteristics associated with the odds of having no recurrence within 24 months were evaluated using multivariate modeling. After the initial three loading injections over 24 months, 58 (14.8%) eyes showed no exudative recurrence and did not require additional anti-VEGF injections. These patients without exudative recurrence had significantly better best-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.003) and lower central subfoveal thickness (P = 0.035) at 24 months than those with exudative recurrence. Additionally, the incidence of macular atrophy was significantly lower in the former than in the latter (8.6% vs. 21.9%; P = 0.020). Multivariate analysis revealed that younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.901; P = 0.033), smaller lesion size (OR, 0.589; P = 0.016), and absence of fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (PED) (OR, 1.349; P = 0.028) were associated with higher odds of no recurrence during follow-up. Approximately 15% of the neovascular AMD patients showed no exudative recurrence after initial remission during the 24-month follow-up. The infrequent recurrence after initial remission correlated with younger age, smaller lesion size, and absence of fibrovascular PED.

Peptides for Vaccine Development

This review discusses peptide epitopes used as antigens in the development of vaccines in clinical trials as well as future vaccine candidates. It covers peptides used in potential immunotherapies for infectious diseases including SARS-CoV-2, influenza, hepatitis B and C, HIV, malaria, and others. In addition, peptides for cancer vaccines that target examples of overexpressed proteins are summarized, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), mucin 1 (MUC1), folate receptor, and others. The uses of peptides to target cancers caused by infective agents, for example, cervical cancer caused by human papilloma virus (HPV), are also discussed. This review also provides an overview of model peptide epitopes used to stimulate non-specific immune responses, and of self-adjuvanting peptides, as well as the influence of other adjuvants on peptide formulations. As highlighted in this review, several peptide immunotherapies are in advanced clinical trials as vaccines, and there is great potential for future therapies due the specificity of the response that can be achieved using peptide epitopes.

Breast Cancer Vaccines: Disappointing or Promising?

Breast cancer has become the most commonly diagnosed cancer globally. The relapse and metastasis of breast cancer remain a great challenge despite advances in chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and HER2 targeted therapy in the past decades. Innovative therapeutic strategies are still critically in need. Cancer vaccine is an attractive option as it aims to induce a durable immunologic response to eradicate tumor cells. Different types of breast cancer vaccines have been evaluated in clinical trials, but none has led to significant benefits. Despite the disappointing results at present, new promise from the latest study indicates the possibility of applying vaccines in combination with anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies or immune checkpoint blockade. This review summarizes the principles and mechanisms underlying breast cancer vaccines, recapitulates the type and administration routes of vaccine, reviews the current results of relevant clinical trials, and addresses the potential reasons for the setbacks and future directions to explore.

Application of HER2 peptide vaccines in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The E75 and GP2 vaccines are the few therapeutic vaccines targeting HER2 currently under clinical research for patients with breast cancer.

Methods

Databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science, were used to retrieve clinical studies on E75 and GP2 vaccines. Retrieval time was from the beginning of database construction until May 31st, 2021.

Results

A total of 24 clinical studies were included in this analysis, including 1704 patients in the vaccinated group and 1248 patients in the control group. For the E75 vaccine, there were significant differences between the vaccinated group and the control group in the delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction (SMD = 0.685 95% CI 0.52–0.85, P_{Heterogeneity} = 0.186, P_DTH < 0.05) and the change in CD8⁺ T-cell numbers (SMD = − 0.864, 95% CI − 1.02 to − 0.709, P_{Heterogeneity} = 0.085, P_{CD8+ T cell} < 0.05) before and after injection. For the GP2 vaccine, there was a significant difference between the vaccinated group and the control group in the change in CD8⁺ T-cell numbers (SMD = − 0.584, 95% CI − 0.803 to − 0.294, P_{Heterogeneity} = 0.397, P_{CD8+ T cell} < 0.05) before and after injection. In addition, the clinical outcomes, including recurrence rate (RR = 0.568, 95% CI 0.444–0.727, P_{Heterogeneity} = 0.955, P_Recurrence < 0.05) and disease-free survival rate (RR = 1.149, 95% CI 1.050–1.256, P_{Heterogeneity} = 0.003, P_DFS < 0.05), of the E75-vaccinated group were different from those of the control group. However, we found that the overall survival rate with the E75 vaccine (RR = 1.032, 95% CI 0.998–1.067, P_{Heterogeneity} = 0.476, P_OS > 0.05) was not different between the two groups. Local and systemic toxicity assessments of the two vaccines showed minimal side effects.

Conclusions

The E75 vaccine was effective and safe in patients with breast cancer. The GP2 vaccine could elicit a strong immune response, but more trials are needed to confirm its clinical efficacy.

Evaluating Nelipepimut-S in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Short Report on the Emerging Data

Vaccine therapies for treatment and prevention of cancer have seen modest degrees of efficacy with wide variation related to the tumor type, vaccine type, adjuvants and clinical setting for their study. Over the course of the last two decades, various peptide vaccines for breast cancer have been studied. The current leading peptide vaccine for human application is a HER2-based vaccine known as Nelipepimut-S, which has demonstrated immune activity and promising clinical activity in some settings. This review covers the development of this newer peptide vaccine for both HER2 amplified and non-amplified breast cancer.

Peptide-Based Vaccines: Current Progress and Future Challenges

Vaccines have had a profound impact on the management and prevention of infectious disease. In addition, the development of vaccines against chronic diseases has attracted considerable interest as an approach to prevent, rather than treat, conditions such as cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and others. Subunit vaccines consist of nongenetic components of the infectious agent or disease-related epitope. In this Review, we discuss peptide-based vaccines and their potential in three therapeutic areas: infectious disease, Alzheimer's disease, and cancer. We discuss factors that contribute to vaccine efficacy and how these parameters may potentially be modulated by design. We examine both clinically tested vaccines as well as nascent approaches and explore current challenges and potential remedies. While peptide vaccines hold substantial promise in the prevention of human disease, many obstacles remain that have hampered their clinical use; thus, continued research efforts to address these challenges are warranted.

Rapid Generation of Sustainable HER2-specific T-cell Immunity in Patients with HER2 Breast Cancer using a Degenerate HLA Class II Epitope Vaccine

PURPOSE

Patients with HER2⁺ breast cancer benefit from trastuzumab-containing regimens with improved survival. Adaptive immunity, including cytotoxic T-cell and antibody immunity, is critical to clinical efficacy of trastuzumab. Because Th cells are central to the activation of these antitumor effectors, we reason that HER2 patients treated with trastuzumab may benefit by administering vaccines that are designed to stimulate Th-cell immunity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We developed a degenerate HER2 epitope-based vaccine consisting of four HLA class II-restricted epitopes mixed with GM-CSF that should immunize most (≥84%) patients. The vaccine was tested in a phase I trial. Eligible women had resectable HER2⁺ breast cancer and had completed standard treatment prior to enrollment and were disease free. Patients were vaccinated monthly for six doses and monitored for safety and immunogenicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-two subjects were enrolled and 20 completed all six vaccines. The vaccine was well tolerated. All patients were alive at analysis with a median follow-up of 2.3 years and only two experienced disease recurrence. The percent of patients that responded with augmented T-cell immunity was high for each peptide ranging from 68% to 88%, which led to 90% of the patients generating T cells that recognized naturally processed HER2 antigen. The vaccine also augmented HER2-specific antibody. Immunity was sustained in patients with little sign of diminishing at 2 years following the vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Degenerate HLA-DR-based HER2 vaccines induce sustainable HER2-specific T cells and antibodies. Future studies, could evaluate whether vaccination during adjuvant treatment with trastuzumab-containing regimens improves patient outcomes.

Immunotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: state of the art and future perspectives

Breast cancer (BC) is a complex disease with primary or acquired incurability characteristics in a significant part of patients. Immunotherapeutical agents represent an emerging option for breast cancer treatment, including the human epidermal growth factor 2 positive (HER2+) subtype. The immune system holds the ability to spontaneously implement a defensive response against HER2+ BC cells through complex mechanisms which can be exploited to modulate this response for obtaining a clinical benefit. Initial immune system modulating strategies consisted mostly in vaccine therapies, which are still being investigated and improved. However, the entrance of trastuzumab into the scenery of HER2+ BC treatment was the real game changing event, which embodied a dominant immune-mediated mechanism. More recently, the advent of the immune checkpoint inhibitors has caused a new paradigm shift for immuno-oncology, with promising initial results also for HER2+ BC. Breast cancer has been traditionally considered poorly immunogenic, being characterized by relatively low tumor mutation burden (TMB). Nevertheless, recent evidence has revealed high tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in a considerable proportion of HER2+ BC patients. This may translate into a higher potential to elicit anti-cancer response and, therefore, wider possibilities for the use and implementation of immunotherapy in this subset of BC patients. We are herein presenting and critically discussing the most representative evidence concerning immunotherapy in HER2+ BC cancer, both singularly and in combination with therapeutic agents acting throughout HER2-block, immune checkpoint inhibition and anti-cancer vaccines. The reader will be also provided with hints concerning potential future projection of the most promising immutherapeutic agents and approaches for the disease of interest.

Final analysis of a phase I/IIa trial of the folate-binding protein-derived E39 peptide vaccine to prevent recurrence in ovarian and endometrial cancer patients

BACKGROUND

E39, an HLA-A2-restricted, immunogenic peptide derived from the folate-binding protein (FBP), is overexpressed in multiple malignancies. We conducted a phase I/IIa trial of the E39 + GM-CSF vaccine with booster inoculations of either E39 or E39' (an attenuated version of E39) to prevent recurrences in disease-free endometrial and ovarian cancer patients(pts). Here, we present the final 24-month landmark analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

HLA-A2 + patients receiving E39 + GM-CSF were included in the vaccine group (VG), and HLA-A2- pts (or HLA-A2 + patients refusing vaccine) were followed as the control group (CG). VG group received 6 monthly inoculations as the primary vaccine series (PVS) and were randomized to receive either E39 or E39' booster inoculations. Demographic, safety, immunologic, and disease-free survival (DFS) data were collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were enrolled; 29 in the VG and 22 in the CG. Fourteen patients received <1000 μg and 15 received 1000 μg of E39. There were no clinicopathologic differences between VG and CG or between dose groups. E39 was well tolerated. At the 24 months landmark, DFS was 55.5% (VG) vs 40.0% (CG), P = 0.339. Patients receiving 1000 μg and boosted patients also showed improved DFS (P < 0.03). DFS was improved in the 1000 μg group after treatment of primary disease (90.0% vs CG:42.9%, P = 0.007), but not in recurrent patients. In low-FBP expressing patients, DFS was 100.0% (1000 μg), 50.0% (<1000 μg), and 25.0% (CG), P = 0.029.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase I/IIa trial reveals that E39 + GM-CSF is safe and may be effective in preventing recurrence in high-risk ovarian and endometrial cancer when optimally dosed (1000 μg) to FBP low patients being treated for primary disease.

Phase Ib trial of folate binding protein (FBP)-derived peptide vaccines, E39 and an attenuated version, E39': An analysis of safety and immune response

In this randomized phase Ib trial, we tested combining the E39 peptide vaccine with a vaccine created from E39', an attenuated version of E39. Patients with breast or ovarian cancer, who were disease-free after standard of care therapy, were enrolled and randomized to one of three arms. Arm EE received six E39 inoculations; arm EE' received three E39 inoculations followed by three E39'; and arm E'E received three E39' inoculations, followed by three E39. Within each arm, the first five patients received 500 μg of peptide and the remainder received 1000 μg. Patients were followed for toxicity, and immune responses were measured. This initial analysis after completion of the primary vaccination series has confirmed the safety of both vaccines. Immune analyses suggest incorporating the attenuated version of the peptide improves immune responses and that sequencing of E39 followed by E39' might produce the optimal immune response.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02019524.

Primary analysis of a prospective, randomized, single-blinded phase II trial evaluating the HER2 peptide GP2 vaccine in breast cancer patients to prevent recurrence

GP2 is a HER2-derived, HLA-A2+ restricted peptide. Phase I studies showed GP2 administered with GM-CSF to be safe and immunogenic. Here we report the primary analysis of a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II adjuvant trial conducted to determine the vaccine's efficacy. The trial enrolled HLA-A2+, clinically disease-free, node-positive and high-risk node-negative breast cancer patients with tumors expressing HER2 (immunohistochemistry[IHC] 1+-3+). Patients were randomized to GP2+GM-CSF versus GM-CSF alone. Disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed in intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-treatment cohorts; pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed for patients with IHC 3+ or FISH+ disease. The trial enrolled 180 patients; 89 received GP2+GM-CSF and 91 received GM-CSF alone. The groups were well-matched for clinicopathologic characteristics. Toxicities have been minimal. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year DFS rate in the ITT analyses was 88% (95% CI:78-94%) in vaccinated vs. 81% (95% CI:69-89%) (P = 0.43) in control patients after a 34 month median follow-up. In the per-treatment analysis, the estimated 5-year DFS rates were 94% (95% CI:83-98%) and 85% (73-92%) (P = 0.17). In IHC 3+/FISH+ patients, the estimated 5-year DFS rate was 94% (82-98%) in vaccinated patients (n = 51) vs. 89% (71-96%) in control patients (n = 50), (P = 0.86) in the ITT analyses and 100% vs. 89% (71-96%) in vaccinated vs. control patients in the per-treatment analyses (P = 0.08). While the overall ITT analysis did not demonstrate benefit to vaccination, this trial confirmed that the GP2 vaccine is safe and suggests that vaccination may have clinical activity, particularly in patients with HER2 overexpression who received the full vaccine series (ie per-treatment group).

Immunotherapy for breast cancer: past, present, and future

Immunotherapy has shown promise in many solid tumors including melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer with an evolving role in breast cancer. Immunotherapy encompasses a wide range of therapies including immune checkpoint inhibition, monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, vaccinations, antibody-drug conjugates, and identifying other emerging interventions targeting the tumor microenvironment. Increasing efficacy of these treatments in breast cancer patients requires identification of better biomarkers to guide patient selection; recognizing when to initiate these therapies in multi-modality treatment plans; establishing novel assays to monitor immune-mediated responses; and creating combined systemic therapy options incorporating conventional treatments such as chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. This review will focus on the current role and future directions of many of these immunotherapies in breast cancer, as well as highlighting clinical trials that are investigating several of these active issues.

A nano-liposome vaccine carrying E75, a HER-2/neu-derived peptide, exhibits significant antitumour activity in mice

E75 (HER-2/neu-369-377), is an immunogenic peptide which is highly expressed in breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to develop an effective vaccine delivery/adjuvant system by attachment of this peptide to the surface of liposomes consisting of phospholipids including distearoylphosphocholine (DSPC) and distearoyl phosphoglycerol (DSPG) with high transition temperature (Tm) and dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) (a pH-sensitive lipid for cytosolic antigen delivery) to improve antitumour immune activity against the E75 peptide. For this purpose, the E75 peptide was incorporated into liposomes consisting of DSPC/DSPG/cholesterol (Chol)/DOPE (15/2/3/5 molar ratio) through conjugation with distearoylphosphoethanolamine-N-[maleimide(polyethylene glycol)-2000] (maleimide-PEG₂₀₀₀-DSPE). Immunization of BALB/c mice was performed three times with different forms of liposomal formulations at 2-week intervals and antitumour immunity responses were evaluated. Results of ELISpot and flow cytometry analysis showed that mice vaccinated with DSPC/DSPG/Chol/DOPE/E75 have significantly enhanced the antigen-specific IFN-γ response of CD8⁺ T cells and generated cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) antitumour responses. CTL responses induced by this formulation resulted in inhibition of tumour progression and longer survival time in the mice TUBO tumour model. The results revealed that the liposomes consist of DSPC/DSPG/Chol/DOPE could be suitable candidates for vaccine delivery of E75 peptide for the prevention and therapy of HER2-positive breast cancer and merit further investigation.

The development and use of the E75 (HER2 369-377) peptide vaccine

E75 (nelipepimut-S) is an immunogenic peptide derived from the HER2 protein. When combined with the immunoadjuvant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), nelipepimut-S has been used as a vaccine that is capable of eliciting a robust anti-HER2 immune response. Early-phase clinical trials that enrolled women with node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer who had been rendered disease free with standard of care therapy but were at risk for recurrence, demonstrated the vaccine to be safe with a suggestion of clinical benefit. Nelipepimut-S is currently being evaluated in a Phase III clinical trial. This article covers the preclinical and clinical development of nelipepimut-S.

Clinical Development of the E75 Vaccine in Breast Cancer

E75 is an immunogenic peptide derived from the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein. A large amount of preclinical work evaluated the immunogenicity of E75, after which phase I trials investigated using E75 mixed with an immunoadjuvant as a vaccine. Those studies showed the vaccine to be safe and capable of stimulating an antigen-specific immune response. Subsequent to that, our group conducted trials evaluating E75 + granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in the adjuvant setting. The studies enrolled node-positive and high-risk node-negative breast cancer patients, with the goal being to determine if vaccination could decrease the recurrence risk. The studies included 187 evaluable patients: 108 vaccinated ones and 79 controls. The 5-year disease-free survival for the vaccinated patients was 89.7% compared to 80.2% for the control patients, a 48% reduction in relative risk of recurrence. Based on these data, E75 + GM-CSF, now known as NeuVax™, is being evaluated in a phase III trial. In this article, we review preclinical data and results of the early-phase trials and provide an update on the ongoing phase III study. We also present additional strategies for employing the vaccine to be included as a component of combination immunotherapy as well as in the setting of ductal carcinoma in situ as an initial step towards primary prevention.

A Therapeutic Her2/neu Vaccine Targeting Dendritic Cells Preferentially Inhibits the Growth of Low Her2/neu-Expressing Tumor in HLA-A2 Transgenic Mice

PURPOSE

E75, a peptide derived from the Her2/neu protein, is the most clinically advanced vaccine approach against breast cancer. In this study, we aimed to optimize the E75 vaccine using a delivery vector targeting dendritic cells, the B-subunit of Shiga toxin (STxB), and to assess the role of various parameters (Her2/neu expression, combination with trastuzumab) in the efficacy of this cancer vaccine in a relevant preclinical model.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We compared the differential ability of the free E75 peptide or the STxB-E75 vaccine to elicit CD8(+) T cells, and the impact of the vaccine on murine HLA-A2 tumors expressing low or high levels of Her2/neu.

RESULTS

STxB-E75 synergized with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factors and CpG and proved to be more efficient than the free E75 peptide in the induction of multifunctional and high-avidity E75-specific anti-CD8(+) T cells resulting in a potent tumor protection in HLA-A2 transgenic mice. High expression of HER2/neu inhibited the expression of HLA-class I molecules, leading to a poor recognition of human or murine tumors by E75-specific cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells. In line with these results, STxB-E75 preferentially inhibited the growth of HLA-A2 tumors expressing low levels of Her2/neu. Coadministration of anti-Her2/neu mAb potentiated this effect.

CONCLUSIONS

STxB-E75 vaccine is a potent candidate to be tested in patients with low Her2/neu-expressing tumors. It could also be indicated in patients expressing high levels of Her2/neu and low intratumoral T-cell infiltration to boost the recruitment of T cells-a key parameter in the efficacy of anti-Her2/neu mAb therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(16); 4133-44. ©2016 AACR.

Peptide-Based Cancer Vaccine Strategies and Clinical Results

Active cancer immunotherapy is an exciting and developing field in oncology research. Peptide vaccines, the use of isolated immunogenic tumor-associated antigen (TAA) epitopes to generate an anticancer immune response, are an attractive option as they are easily produced and administered with minimal toxicity. Multiple TAA-derived peptides have been identified and evaluated with various vaccine strategies currently in clinical testing. Research suggests that utilizing vaccines in patients with minimal-residual disease may be a more effective strategy compared to targeting patients with widely metastatic disease as it avoids the immune suppression and tolerance associated with higher volumes of more established disease. Clinical trials also suggest that vaccines may need to be tailored and administered to specific cancer subtypes to achieve maximum efficacy. Additionally, numerous immunomodulators now in research and development show potential synergy with peptide vaccines. Our group has focused on a simpler, single-peptide strategy largely from the HER2/neu protein. We will discuss our experience thus far as well as review other peptide vaccine strategies that have shown clinical efficacy.

Adjuvant HER2/neu peptide cancer vaccines in breast cancer

Active cancer immunotherapy remains an exciting and rapidly advancing field in oncology. Peptide cancer vaccines are an attractive therapeutic option as they are safe and easily produced and administered. Peptide cancer vaccines may be most effective in patients with a lower disease burden, when cancer tolerance is minimized. Our experience with three peptide cancer vaccines, E75, GP2 and AE37, in clinically disease-free breast cancer patients provides encouraging results that this method may be effective. Furthermore, the combined results of the initial trials suggest that the vaccine administered may need to be tailored to the specific subtype of cancer and tumor antigen expression level to achieve maximum effectiveness. The results also suggest that combining peptide vaccines with other immunotherapy may lead to a synergistic effect.

Peptide vaccines in breast cancer: The immunological basis for clinical response

This review discusses peptide-based vaccines in breast cancer, immune responses and clinical outcomes, which include studies on animal models and phase I, phase I/II, phase II and phase III clinical trials. Peptide-based vaccines are powerful neoadjuvant immunotherapies that can directly target proteins expressed in tumor cells, mainly tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). The most common breast cancer TAA epitopes are derived from MUC1, HER2/neu and CEA proteins. Peptides derived from TAAs could be successfully used to elicit CD8 and CD4 T cell-specific responses. Thus, choosing peptides that adapt to natural variations of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes is critical. The most attractive advantage is that the target response is more specific and less toxic than for other therapies and vaccines. Prominent studies on NeuVax - E75 (epitope for HER2/neu and GM-CSF) in breast cancer and DPX-0907 (HLA-A2-TAAs) expressed in breast cancer, ovarian and prostate cancer have shown the efficacy of peptide-based vaccines as neoadjuvant immunotherapy against cancer. Future peptide vaccine strategies, although a challenge to be applied in a broad range of breast cancers, point to the development of degenerate multi-epitope immunogens against multiple targets.

The HER2 peptide nelipepimut-S (E75) vaccine (NeuVax™) in breast cancer patients at risk for recurrence: correlation of immunologic data with clinical response

Nelipepimut-S (formerly known as E75) is an immunogenic peptide from the HER2 protein that is highly expressed in breast cancer. The NeuVax™ (Galena, OR, USA) vaccine, nelipepimut-S plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, is designed for the prevention of clinical recurrences in high risk, disease-free breast cancer patients. Although cancer vaccines such as NeuVax represent promising approaches to cancer immunotherapy, much remains to be elucidated regarding their mechanisms of action: particularly given that multiple cancer vaccine trials have failed to demonstrate a correlation between immunologic data and clinical outcome. Here, we briefly discuss our clinical trial experience with NeuVax focusing on immunologic response data and its implication on how the immune system may be affected by this peptide vaccine. Most importantly, we demonstrate the potential capability of certain immunologic assays to predict clinical benefit in our trials.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines: a long and winding road to success

Harnessing the immune system to achieve therapeutic efficacy in cancer has been a milestone in immuno-oncology. Tumor-induced suppression works as an obstacle for the effectiveness of immunotherapies. Advances in our understanding of the interrelationship between cancer immunoediting and immunotherapy led to successful manipulation of anticancer immunity; this provided the platform for combining cancer vaccines with chemotherapies counteracting, to some extent, tumor-induced suppressive entities and demonstrating clinical efficacy. Targeting co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory receptors with immunostimulatory antibodies has also shown clinical promise and its combined use with vaccines is a promising new approach of immunotherapy for cancer. Recent evidence supporting vaccine administration in patients with early and less aggressive disease should be additionally placed to select the appropriate patient population and to identify earlier markers of clinical benefit and immunological parameters that correlate with survival. This review focuses on promising vaccination platforms and essential perspectives in the treatment of cancer.

Final report of the phase I/II clinical trial of the E75 (nelipepimut-S) vaccine with booster inoculations to prevent disease recurrence in high-risk breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

E75 (nelipepimut-S) is a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2/A3-restricted immunogenic peptide derived from the HER2 protein. We have conducted phase I/II clinical trials vaccinating breast cancer patients with nelipepimut-S and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in the adjuvant setting to prevent disease recurrence. All patients have completed 60 months follow-up, and here, we report the final analyses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The studies were conducted as dose escalation/schedule optimization trials enrolling node-positive and high-risk node-negative patients with tumors expressing any degree of HER2 (immunohistochemistry 1-3+). HLA-A2/3+ patients were vaccinated; others were followed prospectively as controls. Local and systemic toxicity was monitored. Clinical recurrences were documented, and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves; groups were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Of 195 enrolled patients, 187 were assessable: 108 (57.8%) in the vaccinated group (VG) and 79 (42.2%) in the control group (CG). The groups were well matched for clinicopathologic characteristics. Toxicities were minimal. Five-year DFS was 89.7% in the VG versus 80.2% in the CG (P = 0.08). Due to trial design, 65% of patients received less than the optimal vaccine dose. Five-year DFS was 94.6% in optimally dosed patients (P = 0.05 versus the CG) and 87.1% in suboptimally dosed patients. A voluntary booster program was initiated, and among the 21 patients that were optimally boosted, there was only one recurrence (DFS = 95.2%).

CONCLUSION

The E75 vaccine is safe and appears to have clinical efficacy. A phase III trial evaluating the optimal dose and including booster inoculations has been initiated.

CLINICAL TRIALS

NCT00841399, NCT00584789.

Vaccination for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer with special focus on Her-2/neu peptide vaccines

Immunologic interventions in a subset of breast cancer patients represent a well-established therapeutic approach reflecting individualized treatment modalities. Thus, the therapeutic administration of monoclonal antibodies targeting tumor-associated antigens (TAA), such as Her-2/neu, represents a milestone in cancer treatment. However, passive antibody administration suffers from several drawbacks, including frequency and long duration of treatment. These undesirables may be avoidable in an approach based on generating active immune responses against these same targets. Only recently has the significance of tumors in relation to their microenvironments been understood as essential for creating an effective cancer vaccine. In particular, the immune system plays an important role in suppressing or promoting tumor formation and growth. Therefore, activation of appropriate triggers (such as induction of Th1 cells, CD8+ T cells, and suppression of regulatory cells in combination with generation of antibodies with anti-tumor activity) is a desirable goal. Current vaccination approaches have concentrated on therapeutic vaccines using certain TAA. Many cancer antigens, including breast cancer antigens, have been described and also given priority ranking for use as vaccine antigens by the US National Cancer Institute. One of the TAA antigens which has been thoroughly examined in numerous trials is Her-2/neu. This review will discuss delivery systems for this antigen with special focus on T and B cell peptide vaccines. Attention will be given to their advantages and limitations, as well as the use of certain adjuvants to improve anti-cancer responses.

Breast cancer immunobiology driving immunotherapy: vaccines and immune checkpoint blockade

Breast cancer is immunogenic, and infiltrating immune cells in primary breast tumors convey important clinical prognostic and predictive information. Furthermore, the immune system is critically involved in clinical responses to some standard cancer therapies. Early breast cancer vaccine trials have established the safety and bioactivity of breast cancer immunotherapy, with hints of clinical activity. Novel strategies for modulating regulators of immunity, including regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells and immune checkpoint pathways (monoclonal antibodies specific for the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 or programmed death), are now available. In particular, immune checkpoint blockade has enormous therapeutic potential. Integrative breast cancer immunotherapies that strategically combine established breast cancer therapies with breast cancer vaccines, immune checkpoint blockade or both should result in durable clinical responses and increased cures.

SYT-SSX breakpoint peptide vaccines in patients with synovial sarcoma: a study from the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group

In the present study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of SYT-SSX-derived peptide vaccines in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma. A 9-mer peptide spanning the SYT-SSX fusion region (B peptide) and its HLA-A*2402 anchor substitute (K9I) were synthesized. In Protocols A1 and A2, vaccines with peptide alone were administered subcutaneously six times at 14-day intervals. The B peptide was used in Protocol A1, whereas the K9I peptide was used in Protocol A2. In Protocols B1 and B2, the peptide was mixed with incomplete Freund's adjuvant and then administered subcutaneously six times at 14-day intervals. In addition, interferon-α was injected subcutaneously on the same day and again 3 days after the vaccination. The B peptide and K9I peptide were used in Protocols B1 and B2, respectively. In total, 21 patients (12 men, nine women; mean age 43.6 years) were enrolled in the present study. Each patient had multiple metastatic lesions of the lung. Thirteen patients completed the six-injection vaccination schedule. One patient developed intracerebral hemorrhage after the second vaccination. Delayed-type hypersensitivity skin tests were negative in all patients. Nine patients showed a greater than twofold increase in the frequency of CTLs in tetramer analysis. Recognized disease progression occurred in all but one of the nine patients in Protocols A1 and A2. In contrast, half the 12 patients had stable disease during the vaccination period in Protocols B1 and B2. Of note, one patient showed transient shrinkage of a metastatic lesion. The response of the patients to the B protocols is encouraging and warrants further investigation.

Immunotherapy of breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy of breast cancer has been shown to prevent recurrence, improve survival and eliminate breast cancer in humans.

AREAS COVERED

The reason for this review is to present the current information and the prospects for the future of immunotherapy of breast cancer in humans to include tumor antigens for vaccines and targets for monoclonal antibodies and adoptive T-cell therapy, and immune modulatory agents, such as adjuvants to stimulate the immune response and inhibitors of checkpoint blockade to prevent downmodulation of activated lymphocytes, to enhance these modalities. The research discussed and the literature search undertaken is of the clinical immunotherapy of breast cancer in humans, from 2000 to September, 2011.

EXPERT OPINION

The key message of the paper is that one reason for the failure of the immune system to control macroscopic disease is that the immune escape mechanisms involving both tumor and the tumor stroma prevent the immune system from destroying the tumor. Changing the tumor microenvironment is necessary to eliminate macroscopic tumors. Prospects for improvement are proposals for combining current modalities of therapy with type 1 cellular immunity-inducing agents, all targeting multiple tumor antigens and in the context of minimal disease.

Clinical trial results of the HER-2/neu (E75) vaccine to prevent breast cancer recurrence in high-risk patients: from US Military Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Group Study I-01 and I-02

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted exploratory phase 1-2 clinical trials vaccinating breast cancer patients with E75, a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) A2/A3-restricted HER-2/neu (HER2) peptide, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. The vaccine is given as adjuvant therapy to prevent disease recurrence. They previously reported that the vaccine is safe and effective in stimulating expansion of E75-specific cytotoxic T cells. Here, they report 24-month landmark analyses of disease-free survival (DFS).

METHODS

These dose escalation/schedule optimization trials enrolled lymph node-positive and high-risk lymph node-negative patients with HER2 (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1-3(+) ) expressing tumors. HLA-A2/A3(+) patients were vaccinated; others were followed prospectively as controls for recurrence. DFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves; groups were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Of 195 enrolled patients, 182 were evaluable: 106 (58.2%) in the vaccinated group and 76 (41.8%) in the control group. The 24-month landmark analysis DFS was 94.3% in the vaccinated group and 86.8% in the control group (P = .08). Importantly, because of trial design, 65% of patients received a lower than optimal vaccine dose. In subset analyses, patients who benefited most from vaccination (vaccinated group vs control group) had lymph node-positive (DFS, 90.2% vs 79.1%; P = .13), HER2 IHC 1+-2+ (DFS, 94.0% vs 79.4%; P = .04), or grade 1 or 2 (DFS, 98.4% vs 86.0%; P = .01) tumors and were optimally dosed (DFS, 97.3% vs 86.8%; P = .08). A booster program has been initiated; no patients receiving booster inoculations have recurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The E75 vaccine has clinical efficacy that is more prominent in certain patients. A phase 3 trial enrolling lymph node-positive patients with HER2 low-expressing tumors is warranted.

AE37: a novel T-cell-eliciting vaccine for breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy, including vaccines targeting the human EGFR2 (HER-2/neu) protein, is an active area of investigation in combatting breast cancer. Several vaccines are currently undergoing clinical trials, most of which are CD8(+) T-cell-eliciting vaccines. AE37 is a promising primarily CD4(+) T-cell-eliciting HER-2/neu breast cancer vaccine currently in clinical trials.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews preclinical investigations as well as findings from completed and ongoing Phase I and Phase II clinical trials of the AE37 vaccine.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials have shown the AE37 vaccine to be safe and capable of generating peptide-specific, durable immune responses. This has been shown in patients with any level of HER-2/neu expression. Early clinical findings suggest there may be benefit to AE37 vaccination in preventing breast cancer recurrence.