The role of postoperative chemoradiation for oropharynx carcinoma: A critical appraisal of the published literature and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines

The role of surgery and deescalation for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer

Recently published and ongoing trials are helping to define the role of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer. Evidence to date supports the use of surgery as a valuable tool in the multidisciplinary deescalation of low-risk human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

De-escalated radiation for human papillomavirus virus-related oropharyngeal cancer: evolving paradigms and future strategies

The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma has increased dramatically in recent years reaching epidemic-like proportions. Data has emerged not only showing that these cancers are a unique entity with distinct molecular characteristics but that they also have a significantly improved prognosis as a result of their exquisite radiosensitivity compared to their HPV-negative counterparts. This, it has been increasingly suggested that these tumors can be targeted with de-escalated approaches using reduced doses of radiation. The overriding goal of de-escalation is to maintain the high cure and survival rates associated with traditional approaches while reducing the incidence of both short- and long-term toxicity. Although the exact reason for the improved radiosensitivity of HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma is unclear, prospective studies have now been published demonstrating that de-escalated radiation can successfully maintain the high rates of cure and preserve quality of life for appropriately selected patients with this disease. However, these studies have been complicated by such factors as the relatively limited sample sizes, as well as the variability in treatment, inclusion criteria, and follow-up. As the data continues to mature on de-escalation, it is unquestionable that treatment paradigms for this disease will evolve. The ongoing quest to define a standard regimen comprises the subject of this review.

Robotic lateral oropharyngectomy following diagnostic tonsillectomy is oncologically safe in patients with human papillomavirus-related squamous cell cancer: Long-term results

INTRODUCTION

To report the long-term oncological and functional outcomes of en bloc TORS lateral oropharyngectomy to address the close/involved margin following diagnostic tonsillectomy in HPV-related SCC of unknown primary.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single tertiary center observational cohort over a 4-year period. Primary outcome measures were disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and PSS NOD (Performance Status Scale-Normalcy of Diet) scores.

RESULTS

TORS specimens did not evidence residual carcinoma in 93% of patients. Of 14 patients, 50% received surgery alone (median follow-up 57 months; range 46-96), the remainder surgery and adjuvant therapy (median follow-up of 58 months; range 51-69) with 100% DSS, OS and no deterioration of PSS NOD scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term oncological outcomes confirm TORS lateral oropharyngectomy alone is an oncologically safe treatment. Due consideration of this approach is warranted to mitigate against the morbidity of adjuvant radiotherapy treatment in this group of patients.

Detectable Post-operative Circulating Tumor Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA And Association with Recurrence in Patients with HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

  To determine the rate of detectability of ctHPVDNA after surgery but before adjuvant therapy in patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV(+)OPSCC) and to investigate whether detectable ctHPVDNA at this time point may be associated with risk of recurrence.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

 Prospectively collected samples from patients with OPSCC were examined in a blinded fashion using a multi-analyte PCR assay. 45 samples were collected from HPV(+)OPSCC patients pre-op (prior to any treatment), and 159 samples post-op (before or at the start of adjuvant RT). Samples were identified via the radiation oncology biobank or via participation in a clinical trial. RT consisted of 60 Gy +/- cisplatin or de-escalation (30 Gy to 36 Gy in 20 b.i.d. fractions + docetaxel). 32 patients had paired samples available pre and post-op for the primary analysis. Additional exploratory analyses including associations of patient and tumor characteristics with recurrence were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models for all 159 post-op samples.. Detectability of ctHPVDNA was compared across groups utilizing logistic regression. Estimates of recurrence free survival (RFS) were made using Kaplan-Meier (KM).

RESULTS

In a paired analysis of 32 pre and post-op timepoints, 94% of patients had detectable ctHPVDNA pre-op and 41% post-op. RFS at 18 months was 83% (95% CI: 47-95%) for patients with detectable post-op ctHPVDNA compared to 100% for patients with undetectable post-op ctHPVDNA (p=.094).In an exploratory analysis of non-paired post-op samples, ctHPVDNA was detectable in 26% (41 of 159) of patients (median of 22 days post-op). Age (1.06, p=0.025), LVSI (OR 3.17, p=0.011) and ENE (OR=5.67, p=0.001) were associated with detectable ctHPVDNA after surgery. Detectable post-op ctHPVDNA was significantly associated with RFS (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Amongst patients with detectable pre-op ctHPVDNA, a significant proportion have detectable post-op ctHPVDNA in paired post-op samples, collected prior to the initiation of adjuvant radiation therapy. Future prospective study is warranted to investigate the association of detectable post-op ctHPVDNA with recurrence, including in comparison to established clinical and pathologic risk factors.

Microscopic Extranodal Extension in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer and the Role of Adjuvant Chemoradiation

OBJECTIVE

Pathologic extranodal extension (ENE) is an important adverse feature for human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but the prognostic significance of microscopic ENE (ENEmi) and role of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) for ENEmi remain unclear. This study evaluates (1) the prognostic significance of ENEmi in HPV-negative HNSCC and (2) whether adjuvant CRT is associated with improved overall survival (OS) for these patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Commission on Cancer (CoC)-accredited facilities.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients in the National Cancer Database from 2009 to 2015 with pathologic node-positive (pN+) HPV-negative HNSCC with either pathologic ENEmi or no ENE who had undergone margin-negative surgery. The association of ENEmi with OS was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Analyses were repeated in patients with ENEmi receiving adjuvant therapy to evaluate the association of adjuvant CRT with OS.

RESULTS

We included 5483 patients with pN+ HPV-negative HNSCC, of whom 24% had ENEmi. On multivariable analysis, ENEmi was associated with decreased OS relative to no ENE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.28-1.59). Among patients with ENEmi who received ≥60 Gy of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) (n = 617), adjuvant CRT was not associated with improved OS relative to RT (aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.27).

CONCLUSION

For patients with HPV-negative HNSCC, pN+ with ENEmi is associated with worse OS than pN+ without ENE. However, for patients with ENEmi, concurrent CRT is not associated with improved OS relative to RT. The optimal adjuvant paradigm for ENEmi requires additional investigation.

Extracapsular extension, pathologic node status, and adjuvant treatment in primary surgery patients with human papillomavirus-mediated oropharyngeal cancer: A national hospital-based retrospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

The significance of extracapsular extension (ECE) and adjuvant treatment paradigm in patients with surgically managed human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is debated.

METHODS

National, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study of 2663 patients pN+ HPV+ OPC who underwent primary surgery.

RESULTS

Patients with ECE had a 1.74-times risk of death (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-2.40, p = 0.001) compared to patients without ECE. Among patients with pN1, ECE-positive disease, risk of overall mortality was similar across treatment paradigms (surgery alone: ref; adjuvant radiation therapy [RT]: aHR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.36-1.85; p = 0.62; adjuvant CRT: aHR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.34-1.32; p = 0.24). Patients with pN2 ECE-positive disease treated with adjuvant RT alone exhibited similar risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.24-4.47, p = 0.96) compared to adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT). In patients with advanced, ECE-positive disease (e.g., pT3-T4pN2), adjuvant CRT did not reduce the risk of overall mortality relative to adjuvant RT.

CONCLUSION

Although pathologic ECE negatively predicts for survival in patients with HPV+ OPC, our analyses support expansion of postoperative de-intensification clinical trial eligibility criteria in patients with ECE-positive disease.

Cancer of the Oropharynx and the Association with Human Papillomavirus

Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (OPC) consists of human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative disease caused by tobacco and alcohol use, and HPV-positive disease caused by the sexually transmitted infection HPV. These entities have unique but overlapping risk factors, epidemiologic trends, staging systems, and survival outcomes. HPV-positive tumor status confers a significant survival benefit compared with HPV-negative disease. OPC treatment entails a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Ongoing trials will determine whether treatment of HPV-related disease may be safely deintensified to decrease morbidity. Emerging HPV-related biomarkers are under study as tools to inform screening, diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for HPV-positive OPC.

Survival and toxicity in patients with human papilloma virus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer receiving trimodality therapy including transoral robotic surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients with oropharyngeal cancer who undergo transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and have high-risk features generally receive adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or trimodality therapy (TMT). The notion that TMT leads to high toxicity is largely based on studies that included human papilloma virus (HPV)-negative cancers and/or nonrobotic surgery; we sought to describe outcomes in HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (HPV + OPSCC) undergoing TORS-TMT.

METHODS

In consecutive patients with HPV + OPSCC receiving TMT at an academic center from 2010 to 2017, survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology, and toxicities were ascertained via chart review.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 178 patients, 5-year survival was 93.6%. Feeding tube rates were 25.8% at therapy completion and 0.7% at 1 year. Rates of grade ≥ 3 kidney injury, anemia, and neutropenia in cisplatin-treated patients were 2.7%, 3.4%, and 11.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HPV + OPSCC who underwent TORS-TMT had excellent survival and low rates of toxicity and feeding tube dependence. These outcomes compare favorably to historical cohorts treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Decreasing treatment burden in HPV-related OPSCC: A systematic review of clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Favorable outcomes are observed after treatment with standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients. The consistent growing interest on treatment-related toxicity burden, potentially jeopardizing survivors' quality of life, led clinicians to investigate possible de-escalation strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature search of clinical trials was performed through the EMBASE database to provide an overview of the de-escalation strategies spectrum. Additionally, hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used.

RESULTS

Herein, we report and discuss different approaches to de-escalation of therapy, with respect to both local and systemic strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Several promising de-escalation experiences have been published. However, while further evidence is awaited, no changes in the management nor deviation from the standard of care should be made outside of clinical trials.

Early T1-T2 stage p16+ oropharyngeal tumours. Role of upfront transoral robotic surgery in de-escalation treatment strategies. A review of the current literature

Human papillomavirus is responsible of approximately 70% oropharyngeal tumours and is related with more favourable outcomes. It has led to an increasing interest for de-escalation treatment strategies such as Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS). A literature review was performed searching for the role of TORS as de-escalation modality of treatment in patients with p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Special attention was paid to the potential advantage offered by TORS in reducing adjuvant radiation therapy. Six questions were formulated. 67 studies were selected. Several trials analysing the role of upfront TORS to treat early stage p16+ OPSCC and the possibility of reducing the adjuvant radiotherapy were founded. A lot of studies based on the experience of single centres show promising results. Nevertheless to date no definitive data can be extrapolated. The continued investigation of this line of de-escalation therapy with randomized prospective clinical trials is needed.

Prognostic Significance of Extranodal Extension in HPV-Mediated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic role of extranodal extension (ENE) among patients with human papilloma virus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) through a systematic review and meta-analysis of institutional studies.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed.

REVIEW METHODS

Two independent authors searched the databases on December 3, 2019, to identify studies of HPV+ OPSCC comparing prognostic outcomes stratified by ENE. The I² statistic was used to determine study heterogeneity. Fixed and random effects models were used to determine hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Eighteen observational studies met inclusion criteria, yielding 3603 patients with HPV+ OPSCC (1521 ENE+ and 2082 ENE-) with a median follow-up of 49 months. The presence of pathologic ENE (pENE) and radiologic ENE (rENE) was associated with decreased overall survival (pENE HR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.15-3.13], I² = 35%; rENE HR, 2.64 [95% CI, 1.46-4.78], I² = 75%) and distant recurrence (pENE HR, 3.23 [95% CI, 1.25-8.33], I² = 0%; rENE HR, 3.83 [95% CI, 1.88-7.80], I² = 0%). Neither pENE nor rENE was associated with locoregional recurrence (pENE HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.20-2.84], I² = 0%; rENE HR, 2.03 [95% CI, 0.86-4.79], I² = 0%). pENE was not associated with disease-specific survival (pENE HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.84-2.49], I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

pENE and rENE are moderately associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and recurrence with distant metastasis in a cohort of patients with HPV+ OPSCC. These findings may be used to inform exclusion criteria for deintensification trials and assist in refined risk stratification.

Patterns of local recurrence after curative resection and reconstruction for oropharyngeal and oral cancers: Implications for postoperative radiotherapy target volumes

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the patterns of local recurrence after curative resection and reconstruction for oropharyngeal and oral cancers.

METHODS

One hundred-fourteen patients with oropharyngeal and oral cancers underwent resection and reconstruction. The local recurrences were classified as "intra-flap" (the recurrent tumor was located in the flap tissue), "marginal" (≤5 mm from the flap anastomosis), and "outside" (in the original tissue and >5 mm from the anastomosis) recurrences.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (23.7%) experienced local recurrence, while 32 (28.1%) experienced regional, and nine (7.9%) recurred distantly. Among those who showed local recurrence, one developed "outside" recurrence and the remaining 26 developed "marginal" recurrences. Age >60 years and lymph node metastasis were associated with poor disease-free survival and overall survival (OS), while the perineural invasion was related to poor locoregional failure-free survival and OS.

CONCLUSION

Most recurrences developed at the anastomosis marginal site, while none developed in the flap tissue.

Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Cervical Adenopathy

The management of cancers of the head and neck focuses on primary site and regional (neck) disease control. Many patients are treated with surgery as the principal mode of treatment, and surgery often includes an elective or therapeutic neck dissection. Risk factors assessed for recurrence subsequent to neck dissection include nodal size, number, levels, and the presence of extranodal spread. Adjuvant radiation therapy (with or without chemotherapy) is offered to patients deemed at sufficient risk of recurrence based on assessment of these factors. However, randomized trials have not been performed to test the need and/or benefit of adjuvant postoperative radiation. The necessity of adjuvant radiation has been based on decades of clinical observations, retrospective studies, and indirect randomized trials. The case for postoperative radiation for patients with adverse features in the neck, and recommendations are made in the accompanying article.

De-intensified adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy versus standard adjuvant chemoradiotherapy post transoral minimally invasive surgery for resectable HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

More than 400,000 cases of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC) are diagnosed every year worldwide and this is rising. Much of the increase has been attributed to human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV-positive OPSCC patients are often younger and have significantly improved survival relative to HPV-negative patients. Traditional management of OPSCC has been with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, as this was shown to have similar survival to open surgery but with significantly lower morbidity. Techniques have evolved, however, with the development of computerised planning and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Acute and late toxicities associated with chemoradiotherapy are a significant burden for OPSCC patients and with an ever-younger cohort, any strategies that could decrease treatment-associated morbidity should be investigated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of de-intensified adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in comparison to standard adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in patients treated with minimally invasive transoral surgery (transoral robotic surgery or transoral laser microsurgery) for resectable HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Trials Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 26 April 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with carcinoma of the oropharynx (as defined by the World Health Organization classification C09, C10). Cancers included were primary HPV-positive squamous cell tumours originating from the oropharyngeal mucosa. Tumours were classified as T1-4a with or without nodal spread and with no evidence of distant metastatic spread. The intervention was minimally invasive transoral surgery followed by de-intensified adjuvant therapy (either omission of chemotherapy or reduced-dose radiotherapy). The comparator was minimally invasive transoral surgery followed by standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy or standard-dose radiotherapy. The treatments received were of curative intent and patients had not undergone any prior intervention, other than diagnostic biopsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were overall survival (disease-related survival was to be studied where possible) and disease-free survival, measured at one, two, three and five years. Our secondary outcomes included assessment of swallowing ability and voice, measured at one, six, 12 and 24 months. We planned to use GRADE to assess the quality of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any completed RCTs that met our inclusion criteria. However, three eligible studies are in progress:ADEPT is a phase III trial comparing postoperative radiotherapy with or without cisplatin in HPV-positive T1-4a OPSCC patients. Included patients must have received minimally invasive surgery and demonstrated extra-capsular spread from disease in the neck.ECOG-E3311 is a phase II trial of treatment for HPV-positive locally advanced OPSCC (stages III-IVa + IVb without distant metastasis). Patients are stratified after minimally invasive surgery. Medium-risk patients are randomised to either standard or reduced-dose radiotherapy.PATHOS is a phase III trial of treatment for HPV-positive OPSCC (T1-3, N0-2b). Patients are stratified after minimally invasive surgery. Medium-risk patients are randomised to either standard or reduced-dose radiotherapy. High-risk patients are randomised to radiotherapy with or without concurrent cisplatin.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the current lack of high-quality randomised controlled trials studying treatment de-escalation after minimally invasive surgery in patients with HPV-positive OPSCC. However, trials that will meet the inclusion criteria for this review are in progress with results expected between 2021 and 2023.

Transoral Resection of Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Positive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx: Outcomes with and Without Adjuvant Therapy

BACKGROUND

With the rise of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma associated with human papillomavirus (HPV), appropriate treatment strategies continue to be tailored toward minimizing treatment while preserving oncologic outcomes. This study aimed to compare the outcomes for those undergoing transoral resection with or without adjuvant therapy for HPV-related oropharyngeal carcinoma.

METHODS

A case-match cohort analysis was performed at two institutions on patients with HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. All the subjects underwent transoral surgery and neck dissection. The patients treated with surgery alone were matched 1:1 to those treated with surgery and adjuvant therapy using two groups identified as confounders: T-stage (T1/2 or T3/4) and number of pathologically positive lymph nodes (≤4 or >4).

RESULTS

The study identified 105 matched pairs, with a median follow-up period of 42 months (range 3.1-102.3 months). The patients were staged as T1/T2 (86%) or T3/4 (14%). Each group had five patients with more than four positive lymph nodes. Adjuvant therapy significantly improved disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.067; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.62) and was associated with a lower risk of local and regional recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 0.096; 95% CI 0.02-0.47). No difference in disease-specific survival (HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.02-2.57) or overall survival (HR 0.18; 95% CI 0.01-2.4) was observed with the addition of adjuvant therapy. The risk of the gastrostomy tube was higher for those receiving adjuvant therapy (RR 7.3; 95% CI 2.6-20.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Transoral surgery is an effective approach for the treatment of HPV-related oropharyngeal carcinoma. The addition of adjuvant therapy appears to decrease the risk of recurrence and improve disease-free survival but may not significantly improve overall survival.

The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Surgically Managed, p16-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Importance

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has a favorable prognosis, and p16 immunohistochemistry is a surrogate marker of high-risk HPV infection and strong prognosticator. Given this favorable prognosis, treatment de-escalation for p16-positive OPSCC is now being considered with the goal of decreasing treatment-associated morbidity without compromising tumor control. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting is becoming increasingly unclear.

Objective

To compare survival between surgically managed patients with p16-positive OPSCC who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy alone.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a cohort study of patients with OPSCC diagnosed from June 1996 to June 2010, with follow-up through December 2014, at a single tertiary referral center. One hundred ninety-five surgically managed, p16-positive patients without a history of head and neck cancer or distant metastasis at time of diagnosis were included.

Exposures

Patients were dichotomized into adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy groups.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival was the primary outcome, and disease-free survival was the secondary outcome. Propensity-weighted multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to quantify the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival.

Results

The study included 195 patients with p16-positive, surgically managed OPSCC. Median duration of follow-up was 87 months (interquartile range, 68-116 months). Ninety patients received adjunct chemoradiotherapy (mean age, 54.3 years), 88 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (mean age, 56.4 years), and 17 patients received surgery alone. The 5-year overall survival rate for patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 82% (95% CI, 73%-90%) and 84% (95% CI, 76%-91%) for patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy alone. The 5-year disease-free survival rate for patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 79% (95% CI, 71%-88%) and 79% (95% CI, 70%-88%) for patients who received radiotherapy alone. After weighting cases by the inverse probability of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and controlling for age, comorbidity, smoking, pathological T stage, and pathological N stage, the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was not significantly associated with disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.59-1.42) but was associated with a statistically insignificant yet clinically meaningful increase in all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.91-2.33).

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients with p16-positive OPSCC managed surgically with adjuvant radiotherapy, the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy provided no additional disease-free survival benefit and was associated with worse overall survival. These results should help inform future clinical trials aiming to deescalate treatment for p16-positive patients.

Clinicopathological features, management and outcome of patients with poorly-differentiated oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to explore the clinicopathological features, risk factors, and management of poorly differentiated oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC) patients in the northern Chinese population.

METHOD

A total of 118 poorly differentiated OOSCC patients from 2236 consecutive cases were retrospectively enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

Cox regression analysis showed that site (hazard ratio (HR): 2.561, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.064-6.164, p = 0.036) and lymph node ratio (LNR) (HR: 3.915, 95% CI: 1.797-8.530, p = 0.001) were independent predictive factors for 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS). LNR >0.036, oropharynx site, and advanced clinical stage formulate a model of risk stratification. The patients with a risk score of ≥2 were identified as the high-risk population, and patients with a risk score of 0 or 1 were identified as the low-risk population. Patients in the high-risk population who underwent surgery plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) had markedly better 5-year DSS than those who only underwent surgery (60.0% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.016). However, patients in the low-risk population who underwent surgery alone exhibited a similar 5-year DSS (68.2%) compared with those who received surgery plus radiotherapy (RT) (68.2%) or surgery plus CCRT (50.0%) (p = 0.907).

CONCLUSIONS

High LNR, oropharynx site and advanced clinical stage constitute a model of risk stratification for patients with poorly differentiated OOSCC. If two or more risk factors are present, surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy can give the best prognosis.

Variation in use of postoperative chemoradiation following surgery for T1 and T2 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Primary surgical treatment of patients with early T-classification (T1-T2) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has increased. We sought to determine how often these patients receive postoperative chemoradiation (CRT).

METHODS

Patients with T1-T2 OPSCC in the National Cancer Database who underwent primary surgery were evaluated for receipt of postoperative CRT. Postoperative CRT use was examined among patients with high risk factors (positive margins and/or extracapsular spread [ECS]), intermediate risk factors (negative margins, no ECS, and either pT3-4 and/or N2-N3), and no apparent risk factors.

RESULTS

Of 4833 patients with T1-T2 OPSCC who underwent primary surgery, 43% had high risk pathologic factors, of whom only 63% received postoperative CRT. Another 31% had no apparent risk factors, of whom 16% nonetheless received postoperative CRT. On multivariable analysis, in addition to tumor and demographic factors, patients treated at community hospitals were more likely to receive postoperative CRT (O.R. 1.41 C.I. 1.18-1.87, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in postoperative CRT use indicates a lack of consensus and/or knowledge about its benefits and indications. Usage of postoperative CRT regardless of pathologic risk factors suggests an area where future efforts at implementation of best practices may be targeted.

Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Alone for HPV Related Oropharyngeal Cancers with High Risk Features

Background

Current standard of care for oropharyngeal cancers with positive surgical margins and/or extracapsular extension is adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. It is unknown whether HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer benefits from this treatment intensification.

Objective

To investigate the outcomes of HPV+ patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy alone when chemoradiotherapy was indicated based on high risk pathological features. They were compared with high risk HPV+ patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

All high risk HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer patients (9) who received radiotherapy alone were identified. We also identified 17 patients who received chemoradiotherapy as a comparison group. Median follow up time was 37.3 months.

Results

No local failures developed in adjuvant radiotherapy group. There was 1 distant recurrence in this cohort and 3 in CRT cohort. Regarding toxicity, 8 (47.1%) chemoradiotherapy patients had >10 lb. weight loss (p = 0.013), despite 75% of them having a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placed. No individuals in radiotherapy group experienced a >10 lb. weight loss and none required a gastrostomy tube.

Conclusions

This series provides preliminary evidence suggesting that the omission of concurrent chemotherapy to adjuvant radiotherapy may offer comparative local control rates with a lower toxicity profile in the setting of HPV+ patients with traditional high risk features.

Pretreatment predictors of adjuvant chemoradiation in patients receiving transoral robotic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: a case control study

Background

The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative patient characteristics associated with the incidence of positive surgical margins or lymph node extracapsular extension (ECE), which necessitate adjuvant chemoradiation after transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

Methods

We conducted a single institution retrospective study of 34 consecutive patients with primary oropharyngeal cancer who underwent TORS. All imaging was reviewed by a single neuroradiologist. Surgical margins and ECE status were determined by a single head and neck pathologist. Associations of preoperative patient characteristics with positive surgical margins and lymph node ECE were examined using univariate analysis. Independent predictors of these outcomes were determined using logistic regression.

Results

Preoperatively, the majority of patients had early-stage disease (7 cT1 and 21 cT2; 10 cN0). Positive margins occurred in 4 (12 %) patients. A clinically positive lymph node was seen in 23 (68 %) patients. Neck dissection was performed in 29 (85 %) patients, among whom 19 had a pathologically positive lymph node and 15 had nodal ECE. Logistic regression showed that larger preoperative lymph node size was an independent predictor of ECE (odds ratio, 13.32 [95 % CI, 1.46–121.43]). Among the 21 patients with a clinically positive lymph node who underwent neck dissection, ECE was present more often in patients with a preoperative node size ≥ 3.0 vs. < 3.0 cm (92 % vs. 44 %, P = 0.046). There was no patient characteristic associated with positive margins.

Conclusions

Patients with a larger preoperative lymph node appear more likely to have ECE, and thus be treated with chemoradiation after TORS, with a potentially higher rate of toxicity. Lymph node size should be taken into account when deciding upon treatment approaches. Further research is needed to validate these results.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41199-016-0008-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Inter- and intra-observer variability in the classification of extracapsular extension in p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma nodal metastases

OBJECTIVE

Discern inter- and intra-observer variability in the classification of extracapsular extension (ECE) in p16+ oropharyngeal (OP) SCC comparing pathologists' own criteria versus those of a well-defined classification system.

METHODS

Five pathologists reviewed 50 digitally scanned nodal metastasis slides in three Rounds. Round One was by their own criteria as ECE present or absent, and Rounds Two and Three were with a defined ECE system: Grade 0 (no ECE), 0c (no ECE - thick capsule; no infiltration), 1 (ECE - cells beyond capsule), and 2 (soft tissue metastasis - cells in soft tissue without residual node). Round Three assessed intra-observer variability after an 8 month washout period.

RESULTS

In Round One, all five agreed on only 48% of cases (n=24). Fleiss's Kappa value was 0.508 (95% CI: 0.357-0.644). For Rounds Two and Three, Grades 0 and 0c and Grades 1 and 2 were separately grouped as ECE absent or present. In Round Two, all five agreed on 68% of cases (n=34). Fleiss' Kappa was 0.635 (95% CI: 0.472-0.783), indicating statistically significantly better agreement. In Round Three, all five agreed on 64% of cases (n=32) giving a Fleiss's Kappa of 0.639. Pathologists agreed with their prior reads in approximately 90% of cases (average n=45.4, range n=42-49), an average intra-observer Cohen's Kappa of 0.8 (range: 0.68-0.95). Inter- and intra-observer variability rates for classification of soft tissue metastasis (ECE2) were substantially worse.

CONCLUSION

There is substantial inter-, and modest intra-, observer variability among head and neck pathologists for ECE in p16+ OPSCC, which is modestly improved by a defined system.