Risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema in patients undergoing 3 years of prospective surveillance with intervention

Effectiveness of a lymphedema prevention program for patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial based on the Protection Motivation Theory and Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a lymphedema prevention program based on the Protection Motivation Theory and Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model (PMT-IMB) in patients with breast cancer.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital, enrolling 95 patients treated between December 2022 and June 2023. Participants were randomly assigned to either the control group (n ​= ​47), receiving standard nursing care, or the intervention group (n ​= ​48), receiving a PMT-IMB-based lymphedema prevention program. The intervention was delivered in hospital settings, with follow-up via WeChat and phone after discharge. Outcomes were assessed using the Lymphedema Risk-Reduction Behavior Checklist (LRRB), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, upper limb circumference measurements, and self-lymphatic drainage records at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.

Results

The intervention group demonstrated significantly higher lymphedema prevention behavior scores than the control group after the intervention. Upper limb dysfunction scores improved significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group at three and six months. In the control group, upper limb circumference gradually increased over time, with a significant difference observed at six months. Compliance with self-lymphatic drainage was also significantly better in the intervention group.

Conclusions

The PMT-IMB-based nursing intervention effectively enhances preventive behaviors, reduces lymphedema incidence, improves upper limb function, and increases patient adherence. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing nursing strategies in lymphedema prevention.

Trial registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2300070705.

Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema in Valle del Cauca, Colombia: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Characterization

Background

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) significantly affects patients' quality of life. Prevalence estimates in Latin America, particularly Colombia, remain inconsistent because of the limited research. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of BCRL and characterize its clinical and surgical aspects, as well as potential risk factors, in southwestern Colombia.

Methods

This multicenter case-control study included 334 women diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer between 1997 and 2019. The patients underwent standardized medical interviews, physical examinations, and data collection regarding clinical variables. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, bivariate logistic regression, and multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors.

Results

The prevalence rate of BCRL was 23.9%. Patients with BCRL had a significantly higher body mass index and were more likely to have infiltrating ductal carcinoma. The surgical and treatment characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariate analysis identified body mass index and arm swelling as risk factors for BCRL.

Conclusions

This study provides crucial data on the prevalence and risk factors of BCRL in Colombia, which will guide future research in developing a reproducible, easily accessible method for early lymphedema detection in remote populations. This, in turn, will enable timely referrals to centers equipped for proper management. Additionally, the findings can inform public policies aimed at preventing and improving the treatment of this complication.

The association between allostatic load and lymphedema in breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Allostatic load, a measure of physiological dysregulation secondary to chronic exposure to socioenvironmental stressors, is associated with 30-day postoperative complications and mortality in patients with breast cancer. This study aimed to examine the association between allostatic load (AL) at diagnosis and development of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

METHODS

Patients aged 18 years or older who received surgical treatment for stage I-III breast cancer between 2012 and 2020 were identified from The Ohio State University Cancer Registry. AL was calculated using biomarkers from the cardiovascular, metabolic, renal, and immunologic systems. A high AL was defined as AL > median. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between AL and BRCL, adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment factors.

RESULTS

Among 3,609 patients, 18.86% (n = 681) developed lymphedema. A higher proportion of patients with lymphedema were Black (11.89% vs. 7.38%, p < 0.0001), Medicaid insured (12.19% vs. 6.97%, p < 0.0001), had stage 3 disease (7.05% vs. 1.57%, p < 0.0001), and had a high AL (53.63% vs. 46.90%, p = 0.0018). In adjusted analysis, high AL was associated with higher odds of developing lymphedema than low AL (OR 1.281 95% CI 1.06-1.55). Moreover, a 1-unit increase in AL was associated with 10% higher odds of lymphedema (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.16). There was no statistically significant association between AL and severity of lymphedema (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82-1.23).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort of breast cancer survivors, high AL at diagnosis was associated with higher odds of developing lymphedema. Future research should elucidate the pathways by which AL influences lymphedema.

Commonly Prescribed Chronic Pharmacological Medications as Risk Factors for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: An Observational Retrospective Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a significant complication of breast cancer (BC) treatment, characterized by swelling and fluid accumulation. Many risk factors have already been proven to be related to BCRL; meanwhile, many others are still debated and poorly investigated in the literature. This study investigated the potential involvement of commonly prescribed chronic medications in BCRL development. Methods: This observational retrospective cohort study included 162 post-surgical breast cancer survivors attending an oncological rehabilitation outpatient service between January 2021 and April 2023. BCRL was diagnosed by physicians through clinical evaluation and objective measures (≥2 cm increase in circumferential girth measurements). Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics, and Cox regression models (univariable and multivariable) were employed to analyze risk factors for BCRL. Results: BCRL was observed in 53% of participants. The univariable model identified BMI (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.11), overweight (BMI ≥ 25) (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.95-2.25), and breast prosthesis implantation (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.09-2.80) as potential risk factors for lymphedema. In the multivariable model, overweight (HR 2.90, 95% CI 1.18-7.14), hypertension (HR 5.09, 95% CI 1.88-13.79), radiotherapy (HR 3.67, 95% CI 1.43-9.38), and breast prosthesis implantation (HR 8.93, 95% CI 2.77-28.81) were identified as independent risk factors for BCRL. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the need for further research to understand the role of chronic medications in BCRL risk comprehensively.

Personalizing Breast Cancer Surgery: Harnessing the Power of ROME (Radiological and Oncoplastic Multidisciplinary Evaluation)

Breast cancer treatment has evolved significantly in recent decades, with personalized care models gaining prominence both for the optimization of oncological outcomes and aesthetic results. At the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS in Rome, Italy, we have developed a multidisciplinary, evidence-based model for the management of breast cancer patients, called ROME (Radiological and Oncoplastic Multidisciplinary Evaluation). This innovative model integrates the expertise of various specialists in a seamless, patient-centered approach to improve treatment planning and outcomes. ROME involves a collaborative framework between radiologists, oncologists, surgeons, pathologists, oncoplastic specialists and psychologists. The process begins with the detailed radiological evaluation of tumors using advanced imaging techniques, which is then complemented by an oncoplastic assessment to evaluate potential surgical approaches that ensure optimal oncological resections while preserving or enhancing breast aesthetics. The combination of these evaluations allows the team to tailor treatment plans according to the patient's specific clinical profile, including tumor characteristics, genetic factors, and aesthetic considerations. A key feature of the ROME model is the continuous integration of evidence-based guidelines with real-time multidisciplinary input. This enables the personalization of surgical strategies, ensuring that each patient receives a treatment plan that balances the need for effective cancer control with the desire for an optimal aesthetic result. Since its implementation, ROME has demonstrated significant improvements in both oncological and cosmetic outcomes, leading to enhanced patient satisfaction and quality of life. The success of ROME underscores the importance of a holistic and collaborative approach to breast cancer treatment, one that integrates clinical, radiological, and aesthetic perspectives to offer a truly personalized and patient-focused care experience. As evidence continues to accumulate, ROME stands as a model for personalized breast cancer surgery, setting a new standard for care in multidisciplinary oncology settings.

The LyBra score: A risk assessment tool to address targeted prevention against breast cancer - Related lymphedema

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, physicians have tools to prevent breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) but there is no consensus on when to apply them. The authors analysed patient- and treatment-related risk factors to create the LyBra score, to identify patients that may benefit the most from BCRL preventive interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were selected from cases of breast cancer treated from January 2019 to July 2022. Inclusion criteria were age above 18, breast cancer diagnosis and surgical treatment with lymph-node biopsy or axillary dissection. Recurrent cancers, inflammatory cancer, previous axillary surgery, bilateral cases and patients with primary lymphedema were excluded. Selected cases were assessed with the LyBra Score. Numerosity and distribution of expected BCRL were compared to the BCRL registered during the minimum follow-up of 2 years.

RESULTS

During an average 41 months follow-up (range, 24-62), 131 cases (14 %) of BCRL were registered in the total 933 patients included in the study. According to LyBra score, expected BCRL cases were 149 (16 %), slightly higher but with no statistical significance. The major incidence of BCRL (40 cases in 47 patients) was registered in the high-risk group that included 5 % of the study population. A ROC curve was used to determine the diagnostic performance of the LyBra score and the AUC was 0.78 corresponding to a good discriminating ability.

CONCLUSION

By sorting patients into risk groups, the LyBra score offers a solution to the actual dilemma of timing and indication of the modern preventive-BCRL microsurgeries.

Limited consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema after head and neck cancer: results from an International Delphi study

PURPOSE

To explore current practice variation and degree of consensus among international clinical experts regarding the diagnosis, classification, measurement, and treatment of head and neck lymphedema (HNL) after head and neck cancer treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an online Delphi study. Eligible participants were clinical researchers who had (co)authored at least one publication on HNL and healthcare professionals who had treated at least five patients with HNL the last two years. The first round was to collect views about current best practices. The second and third rounds delved deeper into these topics using statements with 7-point adjective rating scales.

RESULTS

An expert panel of seventeen participants (7 clinicians, 8 researchers, and 2 others) from 8 countries completed all rounds. Regarding diagnosis, there was limited consensus on most subjects, with palpation being most endorsed. No consensus was reached on the need to use standardized classification systems. As a treatment method, complex decongestive therapy (CDT) was the most commonly used in practice and investigated in the literature. However, no consensus was reached on the importance of aspects of CDT.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial intra- and international practice variation in the management of HNL. This calls for more robust evidence and guidelines.

Risk factors and prediction model of breast cancer-related lymphoedema in a Chinese cancer centre: a prospective cohort study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Lymphoedema is a distressing and long-term complication for breast cancer survivors. However, the reported incidence of lymphoedema varies, and its risk factors remain underexplored. Currently, a well-established risk prediction model is still lacking. This study aims to describe the rationale, objectives, protocol and baseline characteristics of a prospective cohort study focused on examining the incidence and risk factors of breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL), as well as developing a risk prediction model.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is an ongoing single-centre prospective observational cohort study recruiting 1967 patients with breast cancer scheduled for surgery treatment in northern China between 15 February 2022 and 21 June 2023. Assessments will be conducted presurgery and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months postsurgery. Bilateral limb circumferences will be measured by patients at home or by researchers at the outpatient clinics during follow-up visits. The diagnosis of lymphoedema is based on a relative limb volume increase of ≥10% from the preoperative assessment. Self-reported symptoms will be assessed to assist in diagnosis. Potential risk factors are classified into innate personal traits, behavioural lifestyle, interpersonal networks, socioeconomic status and macroenvironmental factors, based on health ecology model. Data collection, storage and management were conducted using the online 'H6WORLD' data management platform. Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier estimate will determine the incidence of BCRL. Risk factors of BCRL will be analysed using log-rank test and COX-LASSO regression. Traditional COX regression analysis and seven common survival analysis machine learning algorithms (COX, CARST, RSF, GBSM, XGBS, SSVM and SANN) will be employed for model construction and validation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-21124) and the Research Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (bc2023013). The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and will be presented at several research conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200057083.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors influencing patient-reported arm symptoms post-breast cancer treatment: Accounting for radiotherapy impact

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review risk factors for patient-reported arm symptoms (AS) in breast cancer (BC), considering radiotherapy (RT) impact, using the EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaire (BR23).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched using the keywords "breast neoplasms", "radiotherapy", and "BR23" up to March 5th, 2024.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

both univariate and multivariate analyses.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

pregnancy, recurrence, distant metastasis BC, reirradiation, or lack of RT. The risk of bias of included papers was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist. Descriptive and meta-analyses were conducted using risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) as effect measures. A random-effects model was applied if I2 > 50 %.

RESULTS

Eighteen out of 734 studies were included, with sample sizes ranging from 172 to 2208. Commonly reported risk factors included axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), mastectomy, chemotherapy (CT), and RT (6, 5, 4, and 4 studies, respectively). In meta-analyses, ALND was a risk factor for arm pain (RR [95 % CI] = 1.75 [1.14; 2.71]), lymphedema (RR [95 % CI] = 5.41 [3.48; 8.39]), and overall AS (SMD [95 % CI] = 0.49 [0.14; 0.83]) compared to sentinel lymph node biopsy. RT was not a risk factor, but axillary RT significantly increased overall AS (SMD [95 % CI] = 0.55 [0.40; 0.70]) compared to no axillary RT.

CONCLUSION

ALND and mastectomy were the primary risk factors for patient-reported AS. Axillary RT was a significant risk factor, whereas general RT was not.

Lymphedema: Current Strategies for Diagnostics and Management

ABSTRACT

Lymphedema (LE) is characterized by the accumulation of lymph in the extremities, impairing functionality and quality of life. Despite its prevalence, accurate diagnoses and management remains complex because of inconsistencies in diagnostic criteria and limited epidemiological studies. This review aims to address this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of LE classifications, diagnostic approaches, and current management strategies. By synthesizing existing knowledge, this study seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of LE for improvement of clinical consistency and education.

Is axillary web syndrome a risk factor for breast cancer-related lymphedema of the upper extremity? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically review the available literature to determine if axillary web syndrome (AWS) is a risk factor for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) of the upper extremity.

METHODS

The study is Prospero-registered (ID CRD42024508169) and follows PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, PubMED, CINAHL, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched February 24, 2024. Original studies including a cohort of females > 18 years of age diagnosed with AWS after breast cancer surgery and assessing BCRL outcome were included. Scoping, mapping, systematic or qualitative reviews, dissertations without peer-review and conference abstracts were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using the Modified Downs and Black Checklist and overall certainty in the body of evidence was assessed using Cochrane's GRADE criteria (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation).

RESULTS

Nine cohort studies representing 3218 participants were included. The median incidence of AWS and BCRL was 31.79% (IQR 8.90%) and 14.29% (IQR 19.01%), respectively, across all studies. Pooled analysis indicated an odds ratio of 1.19 (95% confidence interval 0.60,2.37), with substantial heterogeneity across studies (Chi2 p < 0.0001, I2 = 82%). Methodological quality of the included studies was poor to fair, and there was very low certainty evidence indicating no difference in AWS for BCRL risk. The strongest study included, found that AWS more than doubles BCRL risk in the upper extremity.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence base cannot definitively determine whether AWS imparts risk of BCRL. AWS should be considered a potential risk factor for BCRL, until definitive conclusions from future research are available.

Multi-omics characterization of lymphedema-induced adipose tissue resulting from breast cancer-related surgery

Secondary lymphedema (LE) following breast cancer-related surgery is a life-long complication, which currently has no cure. LE induces significant regional adipose tissue deposition, requiring liposuction as a treatment. Here, we aimed to elucidate the transcriptional, metabolomic, and lipidomic signature of the adipose tissue developed due to the surgery-induced LE in short- and long-term LE patients and compared the transcriptomic landscape of LE adipose tissue to the obesity-induced adipose tissue. Adipose tissue biopsies were obtained from breast cancer-operated females with LE from the affected and non-affected arms (n = 20 patients). To decipher the molecular properties of the LE adipose tissue, we performed RNA sequencing, metabolomics, and lipidomics combined with bioinformatics analyses. Differential gene expression data from a cohort of lean and obese patients without LE was used for comparisons. Integrative analysis of functional genomics revealed that inflammatory response, cell chemotaxis, and angiogenesis were upregulated biological processes in the LE arm, indicating a sustained inflammation in the edematous adipose tissue; whereas, epidermal differentiation, cell-cell junction organization, water homeostasis, and neurogenesis were downregulated in the LE arm. Surprisingly, only a few genes were found to be the same in the LE-induced and the obesity-induced adipose tissue expansion, indicating a different type of adipose tissue development in these two conditions. In metabolomics analysis, we found reduced levels of a branched-chain amino acid valine in the LE arm and downregulation of the mRNA levels of its transporter SLC6A15. Lipidomics analyses did not show any significant differences between the LE and non-LE arms, suggesting that other factors affect the lipid composition of the adipose tissue more than the LE in these patients. Our results provide a detailed molecular characterization of adipose tissue in secondary LE after breast cancer-related surgery. We also show distinct differences in transcriptomic signatures between LE-induced adipose tissue and obesity-induced adipose tissue, but only minor differences in metabolome and lipidome between the LE and the non-LE arm.

Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI) and the incidence of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 1464 breast cancer patients treated at The Third Hospital of Nanchang between 2018 and 2021. Patients were categorized based on BMI (<25, 25 to < 30, ≥ 30 kg/m²). Variables such as axillary lymph node dissection, infections, radiotherapy, and comorbidities were taken into account.

RESULTS

The incidence of BCRL was 23.4%. Higher BMI was associated with increased risk of BCRL, with significant incidence rates observed at 1, 2, and 3 years in the higher BMI groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed BMI as an independent risk factor for BCRL.

CONCLUSION

Elevated BMI is associated with increased BCRL risk and decreased BCRL-free survival, underscoring the significance of weight management in breast cancer care.

Evidence-based recommendations regarding risk reduction practices for people at risk of or with breast cancer-related lymphedema: consensus from an expert panel

Several recent studies have investigated the validity of precautionary practices for lymphedema risk reduction after breast cancer treatment, such as avoidance of blood pressure measurements, skin puncture, blood draws, and use of prophylactic compression during air travel. Other studies have elucidated risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema, such as axillary lymph node dissection and skin infection (cellulitis). Combining the current evidence base with the consensus opinion of lymphatic experts assembled at the American Cancer Society/Lymphology Association of North America Summit in October 2023, updated evidence-based risk reduction recommendations are presented for those with or at risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Recommendation topics include prospective surveillance, patient education, individual risk factors, exercise, blood pressure, skin care and hygiene, skin puncture and blood draws, surgical procedures, prophylactic compression, air travel, and hot climate and sauna. These recommendations will help inform education and medical choices for individuals treated for breast cancer who are at risk of or diagnosed with breast cancer-related lymphedema. More high-quality evidence is required to allow the development of risk reduction recommendations for other cancer types such as gynecological, melanoma, and head and neck. It is recommended that clinicians and organizations serving people at risk of or with lymphedema align risk reduction guidelines with the evidence-based recommendations provided within this consensus document and companion manuscripts from the American Cancer Society/Lymphology Association of North America Lymphedema Summit: Forward Momentum: Future Steps in Lymphedema Management.

Current evidence on patient precautions for reducing breast cancer-related lymphedema manifestation and progression risks

Risk management and self-management strategies for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) must balance best-evidence guidelines and associated risk factor knowledge. There is an evidence-based practice gap in the understanding of whether a change in education about risk factors and whether behavioral changes actually influence BCRL manifestation or progression. The purpose of this study was to (1) review if current evidence supports or refutes patient precautions to prevent the manifestation and/or progression of BCRL, (2) review if behavioral changes result in the prevention or reduction of BCRL, and (3) identify related gaps of knowledge for future research. Evidence map methodology was used to systematically review literature related to reducing the risk of BCRL. Literature searches were conducted in Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane for the categories of trauma, blood pressure, temperature, air travel, and behavior change. One hundred and forty-eight articles were included for full-text review, of which 37 articles were included in this study. Within the confines of limb and trunk circumferential and/or volume enlargement, a 'just in case' approach to patient education on risk factors may not be appropriate for breast cancer survivors at risk of manifesting lymphedema. Patient education about precautionary risks for the onset of BCRL needs to align with research evidence. There is scant evidence about the risks of BCRL progression suggesting a need for future research.

Timing of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Development Over 3 Years: Observations from a Large, Prospective Randomized Screening Trial Comparing Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS) Versus Tape Measure

BACKGROUND

The PREVENT randomized control trial monitored progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (cBCRL) following intervention for subclinical breast cancer-related lymphedema (sBCRL) assessed by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) versus tape-measure (TM). This multi-institutional trial demonstrated a 92% risk reduction of developing cBCRL. This secondary analysis reviews the timing of sBCRL and cBCRL following breast cancer (BC) treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women at risk of cBCRL (n = 919) were screened regularly up to 36 months after BC treatment using either BIS or TM. Following diagnosis of sBCRL, patients underwent a 4-week compression sleeve intervention. The time in months from BC treatment to detection was reviewed at 3-month intervals.

RESULTS

In total 209 patients developed sBCRL (BIS: n = 89, TM: n = 120) and were eligible for intervention. 30 progressed to cBCRL postintervention (BIS: 7, TM: 23). More than half of patients had measurements consistent with sBCRL within 9 months of BC treatment. Patients continued to have initial detections of sBCRL, regardless of screening method, with rates remaining consistent in years two and three (p > 0.242) post surgery. Additionally, 39 patients progressed to cBCRL without developing sBCRL or receiving intervention across the 3-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

The timing of sBCRL detection demonstrates that patients continue to be at risk years after treatment and may continue to progress to cBCRL years after surgery. Early detection of sBCRL allows for early intervention decreasing the likelihood of progression to cBCRL. Patients should continue to be monitored for a minimum of 3 years following completion of cancer treatment. Specifically, careful targeted monitoring over the initial 9-month period is important.

Risk of Lymphedema After Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients With Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Although numerous studies have identified potential risk factors for ipsilateral lymphedema development in patients with breast cancer following axillary node dissection, the risk factors for lymphedema in patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy without axillary dissection remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the real-world incidence and risk factors for lymphedema in such patients.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of medical records of patients with breast cancer who underwent sentinel node biopsy alone. The development cohort (5,051 patients, January 2017-December 2020) was analyzed to identify predictors of lymphedema, and a predictive model was subsequently created. A validation cohort (1,627 patients, January 2014-December 2016) was used to validate the model.

RESULTS

In the development cohort, 49 patients (0.9%) developed lymphedema over a median follow-up of 56 months, with most cases occurring within the first three years post-operation. Multivariate analysis revealed that a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m² or above, radiation therapy (RTx), chemotherapy, and more than three harvested lymph nodes significantly predicted lymphedema. The predictive model showed an area under the curve of 0.824 for systemic chemotherapy, with the number of harvested lymph nodes being the most significant factor. Patients were stratified into four risk groups, showing lymphedema incidences of 3.3% in the highest-risk group and 0.1% in the lowest-risk group. In the validation cohort, the incidences were 1.7% and 0.2% for the highest and lowest risk groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The lymphedema prediction model identifies RTx, chemotherapy, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m², and more than three harvested lymph nodes as significant risk factors. Although the overall incidence is low, the risk is notably influenced by the extent of lymph node removal and systemic therapies. The model's high negative predictive value supports its application in designing tailored lymphedema surveillance programs for early intervention.

Advances in Microsurgical Treatment Options to Optimize Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction

Introduction: Reconstructive plastic surgeons have made great strides in the field of breast reconstruction to achieve the best results for patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer. As microsurgical techniques have evolved, these patients can benefit from additional treatment modalities to optimize the results of the reconstruction. Free tissue transfer from alternative donor sites for breast reconstruction is routinely performed, which was not possible in the past. Neurotization is now possible to address the numbness and lack of sensation to the reconstructed breast. For those patients who develop lymphedema of the upper extremity as a result of their breast cancer care, supermicrosurgical options are now available to treat and even to prevent the development of lymphedema. This study presents a narrative review regarding the latest microsurgical advancements in autologous free flap breast reconstruction. Methods: A literature review was performed on PubMed with the key words "autologous free flap breast reconstruction", "deep inferior epigastric perforator flap", "transverse upper gracilis flap", "profunda artery perforator flap", "superior gluteal artery perforator flap", "inferior gluteal artery perforator flap", "lumbar artery perforator flap", "breast neurotization", "lymphovenous bypass and anastomosis", and "vascularized lymph node transfer". Articles that specifically focused on free flap breast reconstruction, breast neurotization, and lymphedema surgery in the setting of breast cancer were evaluated and included in this literature review. Results: The literature search yielded a total of 4948 articles which were screened. After the initial screening, 413 articles were reviewed to assess the relevance and applicability to the current study. Conclusions: Breast reconstruction has evolved tremendously in recent years to provide the most natural and cosmetically pleasing results for those patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer. As technology and surgical techniques have progressed, breast cancer patients now have many more options, particularly if they are interested in autologous reconstruction. These advancements also provide the possibility of restoring sensibility to the reconstructed breast as well as treating the sequela of lymphedema due to their cancer treatment.

Incidence of lymphedema related to various cancers

Cancer-related lymphedema (CRL) lacks internationally accepted definition and diagnostic criteria. The accurate incidence of CRL is therefore a challenge and the condition is likely underreported. Patients treated for cancer can develop CRL as a result of surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy, which can lead to considerable psychosocial and physical morbidity, and decreased quality of life. Determining CRL incidence is crucial to inform care access and resource allocation, to best support patients affected by this lifelong condition. This review aimed to provide the latest CRL incidence estimates. Using four core databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library), a literature search was performed to capture publications dated between 2015 and 2023. A total of 48 articles (33 prospective studies, 15 systematic reviews) met inclusion criteria, providing a sample size of 234,079 cancer patients. Findings revealed CRL incidence across cancer types varied, reported 2-74% in breast, 8-45% in gynecological and urological, 71-90% in head and neck and 2-29% in melanoma cancers. CRL incidence varied between 3 and 21% in preventative lymphedema surgery patients. Projected increases in cancer incidence and improved survival rates are expected to further escalate CRL incidence. Healthcare systems and professionals alike must therefore prepare to meet the growing needs of CRL patients.

Prognostic Factors and Outcomes Associated With Neck Lymphedema in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to determine the predictors of neck lymphedema and to explore its association with symptoms and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients who underwent non-operative treatment.

METHODS

This study involved a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent radiation therapy (±chemotherapy). Patients with visits <6 weeks or >2 years following completion of radiation and those with recurrent or metastatic cancer were excluded. Presence of post-treatment lymphedema, demographics, clinical characteristics, health-related behaviors, and symptoms were collected. PROs were obtained using validated questionnaires that assessed depression, anxiety, swallowing dysfunction, and quality of life (QOL). Multivariable regression models were used to examine the relationship between lymphedema with predictors and symptoms.

RESULTS

Of the 203 patients included, 88 (43.4%) developed post-treatment lymphedema. In multivariable analysis, pre-treatment Body Mass Index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.01, 1.14] p = 0.016) and N stage (OR = 1.96, 95% CI [1.06, 3.66], p = 0.032) were found to be independently associated with lymphedema. Regarding PROs, lymphedema was associated with greater swallowing dysfunction (3.48, 95% CI [0.20, 6.75], p = 0.038), decreased mouth opening (-3.70, 95% CI [-7.31, -0.10], p = 0.044), and increased fatigue (1.88, 95% CI [1.05, 3.38], p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Higher pre-treatment BMI and greater N stage are identified as independent predictors for lymphedema development in non-operative HNC patients. Additionally, patients experiencing lymphedema reported worsening swallowing dysfunction and increased symptoms related to trismus and fatigue. Recognizing patients at elevated risk for lymphedema allows for early intervention, alleviation of symptom burden, and optimization of health care resources.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:3656-3663, 2024.

The Impact of Obesity on Success of Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction for Prevention of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BRCL) is a potential sequela of high-risk breast cancer treatment. Preventive treatment with immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has emerged as the standard of care; however, there is relatively little known about factors that may contribute to procedural failure.

METHODS

A retrospectively maintained, institutional review board-approved study followed patients who underwent ILR at the time of ALND at our tertiary care center between May 2018 and May 2023. Patients who presented for at least one follow-up visit in our multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic met the criteria for inclusion. Patients who developed lymphedema despite ILR and potential contributing factors were further explored.

RESULTS

349 patients underwent ILR at our institution between May 2018 and May 2023. 341 of these patients have presented for follow-up in our multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic. 32 (9.4%) patients developed lymphedema despite ILR. This cohort was significantly more likely to be obese (56% vs 35%, P = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrates increased odds of procedural failure in patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (odds ratio 2.6 [1.2-5.5], P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These data comment upon our institutions outcomes following ILR. Patients who develop lymphedema despite ILR tend to have a higher BMI, with a significantly increased risk in patients with a BMI of 30 or greater. Consideration of these data is critical for preprocedural counseling and may support a BMI cutoff when considering candidacy for ILR going forward, as well as when optimizing failures for secondary lymphedema procedures.

Preoperative Risk Factors for Lymphedema in Inflammatory Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

 Prophylactic lymphatic bypass or LYMPHA (LYmphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach) is increasingly offered to prevent lymphedema following breast cancer treatment, which develops in up to 47% of patients. Previous studies focused on intraoperative and postoperative lymphedema risk factors, which are often unknown preoperatively when the decision to perform LYMPHA is made. This study aims to identify preoperative lymphedema risk factors in the high-risk inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) population.

METHODS

 Retrospective review of our institution's IBC program database was conducted. The primary outcome was self-reported lymphedema development. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify preoperative lymphedema risk factors, while controlling for number of lymph nodes removed during axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), number of positive lymph nodes, residual disease on pathology, and need for adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

 Of 356 patients with IBC, 134 (mean age: 51 years, range: 22-89 years) had complete data. All 134 patients underwent surgery and radiation. Forty-seven percent of all 356 patients (167/356) developed lymphedema. Obesity (body mass index > 30) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7, confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-6.4, p = 0.02) and non-white race (OR: 4.5, CI: 1.2-23, p = 0.04) were preoperative lymphedema risk factors.

CONCLUSION

 Patients with IBC are high risk for developing lymphedema due to the need for ALND, radiation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study also identified non-white race and obesity as risk factors. Larger prospective studies should evaluate potential racial disparities in lymphedema development. Due to the high prevalence of lymphedema, LYMPHA should be considered for all patients with IBC.

Lymphedema Surveillance and Prevention

ABSTRACT

Lymphedema is a chronic condition, which can impact a person's quality of life and function. Identifying lymphedema at an early stage is key to preventing a person from developing chronic lymphedema. Physiatry can play an important role in education, identification of risk factors, performing prospective lymphedema surveillance programs, and prevention/treatment of lymphedema. Incorporating lymphedema surveillance programs into routine cancer care provides physiatry with the opportunity to assess additional rehabilitation and functional needs of a cancer patient.

Radiation-induced angiosarcoma of the breast: retrospective analysis at a regional treatment centre

BACKGROUND

Radiation-induced angiosarcoma (RIA) is an uncommon but morbid complication after radiotherapy for breast cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of breast RIA patients at Cambridge University Hospital (CUH), a regional treatment centre in the East of England.

RESULTS

22 patients were identified between 2010 and 2022. Median age of diagnosis was 65 years (range 41-78). Median time from breast radiotherapy to RIA diagnosis was 6.5 years (range 2.4-16.0)-this interval has decreased over the last 24 years (r2 = 0.6601). 9% had metastasis at presentation. All patients underwent surgery (55% at CUH, 45% at local hospitals). 27% received peri-operative pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the first-line setting. 62% relapsed following their primary curative-intent treatments after a median of 28 months. Metastases occurred in 36%, the commonest sites being lung (100%) and lymph node (50%). 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for all patients were 73% and 60%, respectively. No correlation between progression-free survival (PFS) and OS was found with tumour size, margin, peri-operative chemotherapy, and whether surgery was performed at CUH. Patients with multifocal disease on their breasts had shorter PFS following surgery compared to single-lesion disease (median 10 vs 65 months; HR = 4.359 [95% CI 1.342-14.16]; P = 0.0143). Patients aged > 72 years had a median OS of 45 months vs 102 months for those ≤ 72 years (HR = 7.129 [95% CI 1.646-30.88]; P = 0.0086).

CONCLUSION

RIA has high rates of recurrence and mortality and appears to be occurring sooner after breast radiotherapy. Further studies on its pathogenesis and effective treatment are warranted.

Axillary Treatment and Chronic Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Implications for Prospective Surveillance and Intervention From a Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

The PREVENT randomized trial assessed progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (cBCRL) after intervention triggered by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or tape measurement (TM). This secondary analysis identifies cBCRL risk factors on the basis of axillary treatment.

METHODS

Between June 2014 and September 2018, 881 patients received sentinel node biopsy (SNB; n = 651), SNB + regional node irradiation (RNI; n = 58), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND; n = 85), or ALND + RNI (n = 87). The primary outcome was the 3-year cBCRL rate requiring complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 32.8 months (IQR, 21-34.3), 69 of 881 patients (7.8%) developed cBCRL. For TM, 43 of 438 (9.8%) developed cBCRL versus 26 of 443 (5.9%) for BIS (P = .028). The 3-year actuarial risk of cBCRL was 4.4% (95% CI, 2.7 to 6.1), 4.2% (95% CI, 0 to 9.8), 25.8% (95% CI, 15.8 to 35.8), and 26% (95% CI, 15.3 to 36.7). Rural residence increased the risk in all groups. For SNB, neither RNI (SNB, 4.1% v SNB + RNI, 3.4%) nor taxane (4.4%) increased cBCRL, but risk was higher for patients with a BMI of ≥30 (6.3%). For SNB + RNI, taxane use (5.7%) or supraclavicular fossa (SCF) radiation (5.0%) increased cBCRL. For ALND patients, BMI ≥25 or chemotherapy increased cBCRL. For ALND + RNI, most patients received SCF radiation and taxanes, so no additional risk factors emerged.

CONCLUSION

The extent of axillary treatment is a significant risk factor for cBCRL. Increasing BMI, rurality, SCF radiation, and taxane chemotherapy also increase risk. These results have implications for a proposed risk-based lymphedema screening, early intervention, and treatment program.

Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy: Long-Term Follow-Up, Surveillance Recommendations, and Multidisciplinary Risk Factors

BACKGROUND

Early detection and intervention for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) significantly decreases progression to persistent BCRL (pBCRL). We aimed to provide long-term follow-up on our early detection with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and early home intervention demonstrating reduced pBCRL to guide surveillance recommendations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 148 female patients with breast cancer who had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) from November 2014 to December 2017 were analyzed. Baseline BIS measurements and postoperative follow-up occurred every 3 months for 1 year, biannual for 1 year, and then annually. An elevated BIS triggered evaluation and initiation of at-home interventions with reassessment for resolution versus persistent BCRL (pBCRL). High-risk factors and timing were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 55 months, and 65 (44%) patients had an abnormal BIS. Of these, 54 (82%) resolved with home intervention. The overall pBCRL rate was 8%. Average time to first abnormal BIS was 11.7 months. None of the stage 0 patients (0/34) and only 5/25 (20%) of stage 1 patients had pBCRL. All of stage 2 and stage 3 patients (7/7) had pBCRL. pBCRL correlated with number of positive nodes, percentage of positive nodes, stage of lymphedema at diagnosis, and recurring abnormal BIS measurements (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that patients undergoing ALND with early BCRL identified by BIS who performed home interventions had an 8% pBCRL rate. Patients at high risk for pBCRL should have routine surveillance starting at 9 months postoperatively to identify an opportunity for early intervention.

Advances in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema

PURPOSE

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a lifelong risk for breast cancer survivors and once acquired becomes a lifelong burden. This review summarizes current BCRL prevention and treatment strategies.

FINDINGS

Risk factors for BCRL have been extensively studied and their identification has affected breast cancer treatment practice, with sentinel lymph node removal now standard of care for patients with early stage breast cancer without sentinel lymph node metastases. Early surveillance and timely management aim to reduce BCRL incidence and progression, and are further facilitated by patient education, which many breast cancer survivors report not having adequately received. Surgical approaches to BCRL prevention include axillary reverse mapping, lymphatic microsurgical preventative healing (LYMPHA) and Simplified LYMPHA (SLYMPHA). Complete decongestive therapy (CDT) remains the standard of care for patients with BCRL. Among CDT components, facilitating manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) using indocyanine green fluorescence lymphography has been proposed. Intermittent pneumatic compression, nonpneumatic active compression devices, and low-level laser therapy appear promising in lymphedema management. Reconstructive microsurgical techniques such as lymphovenous anastomosis and vascular lymph node transfer are growing surgical considerations for patients as well as liposuction-based procedures for addressing fatty fibrosis formation from chronic lymphedema. Long-term self-management adherence remains problematic, and lack of diagnosis and measurement consensus precludes a comparison of outcomes. Currently, no pharmacological approaches have proven successful.

CONCLUSION

Progress in prevention and treatment of BCRL continues, requiring advances in early diagnosis, patient education, expert consensus and novel treatments designed for lymphatic rehabilitation following insults.