Pattern of striate cortical projections to the pretectal complex in the guinea pig

Response properties of optic flow neurons in the accessory optic system of hummingbirds versus zebra finches and pigeons

Optokinetic responses function to maintain retinal image stabilization by minimizing optic flow that occurs during self-motion. The hovering ability of hummingbirds is an extreme example of this behavior. Optokinetic responses are mediated by direction-selective neurons with large receptive fields in the accessory optic system (AOS) and pretectum. Recent studies in hummingbirds showed that, compared with other bird species, 1) the pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM) is hypertrophied, 2) LM has a unique distribution of direction preferences, and 3) LM neurons are more tightly tuned to stimulus velocity. In this study, we sought to determine if there are concomitant changes in the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the AOS. We recorded the visual response properties of nBOR neurons to large-field-drifting random dot patterns and sine-wave gratings in Anna's hummingbirds and zebra finches and compared these with archival data from pigeons. We found no differences with respect to the distribution of direction preferences: Neurons responsive to upward, downward, and nasal-to-temporal motion were equally represented in all three species, and neurons responsive to temporal-to-nasal motion were rare or absent (<5%). Compared with zebra finches and pigeons, however, hummingbird nBOR neurons were more tightly tuned to stimulus velocity of random dot stimuli. Moreover, in response to drifting gratings, hummingbird nBOR neurons are more tightly tuned in the spatiotemporal domain. These results, in combination with specialization in LM, support a hypothesis that hummingbirds have evolved to be "optic flow specialists" to cope with the optomotor demands of sustained hovering flight.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Hummingbirds have specialized response properties to optic flow in the pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM). The LM works with the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the accessory optic system (AOS) to process global visual motion, but whether the neural response specializations observed in the LM extend to the nBOR is unknown. Hummingbird nBOR neurons are more tightly tuned to visual stimulus velocity, and in the spatiotemporal domain, compared with two nonhovering species.

Galvanic stimulation of the vestibular periphery in guinea pigs during passive whole body rotation and self-generated head movement

Irregular vestibular afferents exhibit significant phase leads with respect to angular velocity of the head in space. This characteristic and their connectivity with vestibulospinal neurons suggest a functionally important role for these afferents in producing the vestibulo-collic reflex (VCR). A goal of these experiments was to test this hypothesis with the use of weak galvanic stimulation of the vestibular periphery (GVS) to selectively activate or suppress irregular afferents during passive whole body rotation of guinea pigs that could freely move their heads. Both inhibitory and excitatory GVS had significant effects on compensatory head movements during sinusoidal and transient whole body rotations. Unexpectedly, GVS also strongly affected the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) during passive whole body rotation. The effect of GVS on the VOR was comparable in light and darkness and whether the head was restrained or unrestrained. Significantly, there was no effect of GVS on compensatory eye and head movements during volitional head motion, a confirmation of our previous study that demonstrated the extravestibular nature of anticipatory eye movements that compensate for voluntary head movements.

The commissural transfer of the horizontal optokinetic signal in the rat: a c-Fos study

We applied the Fos method in rats subjected to horizontal optokinetic stimulation (OKS) to study whether optokinetic information is transferred through the commissural pretectal fibres from one optic tract nucleus (NOT) to the opposite. In binocular as well as in monocular nasalward OKS, the highest Fos immunoreactivity was found in the NOT contralateral to the nasalward stimulation, as expression of the activation either of direction-selective cells and of commissural neurons. Even the opposite NOT showed many Fos-positive cells activated by the opposite nucleus throughout the commissural pretectal pathway. They might be the GABA positive cells, which are thought to allow the activation in one nucleus to be transformed into inhibition of the opposite side. In monocular temporalward OKS, the inhibition on direction-selective cells and the consequent silencing of commissural neurons caused the faint immunoreactivity in the NOT contralateral to eye stimulated. In the opposite nucleus the few Fos-positive cells emerged as a consequence of the lack of the normal tonic commissurally mediated inhibition.

In vitro properties of neurons in the rat pretectal nucleus of the optic tract

The nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) has been implicated in the initiation of the optokinetic reflex (OKR) and in the modulation of visual activity during saccades. The present experiments demonstrate that these two functions are served by separate cell populations that can be distinguished by differences in both their cellular physiology and their efferent projections. We compared the response properties of NOT cells in rats using target-directed whole cell patch-clamp recording in vitro. To identify the cells at the time of the recording experiments, they were prelabeled by retrograde axonal transport of WGA-apo-HRP-gold (15 nm), which was injected into their primary projection targets, either the ipsilateral superior colliculus (iSC), or the contralateral NOT (cNOT), or the ipsilateral inferior olive (iIO). Retrograde labeling after injections in single animals of either WGA-apo-HRP-gold with different particle sizes (10 and 20 nm) or two different fluorescent dyes distinguished two NOT cell populations. One projects to both the iSC and cNOT. These cells are spontaneously active in vitro and respond to intracellular depolarizations with temporally regular tonic firing. The other population projects to the iIO and consists of cells that show no spontaneous activity, respond phasically to intracellular depolarization, and show irregular firing patterns. We propose that the spontaneously active pathway to iSC and cNOT is involved in modulating the level of visual activity during saccades and that the phasically active pathway to iIO provides a short-latency relay from the retina to premotor mechanisms involved in reducing retinal slip.

Development of the Optokinetic Response in Macaques

In macaque monkeys, an optokinetic response (OKR) can be elicited monocularly both in temporonasal and, albeit weaker, in nasotemporal direction very early after birth. The further maturation of equal strengths of OKR in both directions depends on stimulus velocity: at low-stimulus velocities (10-20 degrees /s) symmetry is reached at 3-4 weeks of age, at higher-stimulus velocities (40-80 degrees /s) it is reached only at 4-5 months of age. Retinal slip neurons in the NOT-DTN are direction selective for ipsiversive stimulus movement shortly after birth. Most of these neurons receive input from both eyes; many are dominated by the contralateral eye. Electrophysiological and neuroanatomical evidence suggests that the cortical input to the NOT-DTN starts to become functional by postnatal day 14, at the latest. Based on these behavioral and physiological data, as well as on comparison with data from kittens and human infants, we hypothesize that the very early monocularly elicited bidirectional optokinetic response is due to the direct retinal input from both eyes to the NOT-DTN. As the cortical projection matures, it gains more and more influence upon the response properties of retinal slip neurons in the NOT-DTN, and the retinal influence gradually decreases.

The accessory optic system: basic organization with an update on connectivity, neurochemistry, and function

The accessory optic system (AOS) is formed by a series of terminal nuclei receiving direct visual information from the retina via one or more accessory optic tracts. In addition to the retinal input, derived from ganglion cells that characteristically have large receptive fields, are direction-selective, and have a preference for slow moving stimuli, there are now well-characterized afferent connections with a key pretectal nucleus (nucleus of the optic tract) and the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus. The efferent connections of the AOS are robust, targeting brainstem and other structures in support of visual-oculomotor events such as optokinetic nystagmus and visual-vestibular interaction. This chapter reviews the newer experimental findings while including older data concerning the structural and functional organization of the AOS. We then consider the ontogeny and phylogeny of the AOS and include a discussion of similarities and differences in the anatomical organization of the AOS in nonmammalian and mammalian species. This is followed by sections dealing with retinal and cerebral cortical afferents to the AOS nuclei, interneuronal connections of AOS neurons, and the efferents of the AOS nuclei. We conclude with a section on Functional Considerations dealing with the issues of the response properties of AOS neurons, lesion and metabolic studies, and the AOS and spatial cognition.

The pretectum: connections and oculomotor-related roles

Research over the past two decades in mammals, especially primates, has greatly improved our understanding of the afferent and efferent connections of two retinorecipient pretectal nuclei, the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) and the pretectal olivary nucleus (PON). Functional studies of these two nuclei have further elucidated some of the roles that they play both in oculomotor control and in relaying oculomotor-related signals to visual relay nuclei. Therefore, following a brief overview of the anatomy and retinal projections to the entire mammalian pretectum, the connections and potential roles of the NOT and the PON are considered in detail. Data on the specific connections of the NOT are combined with data from single-unit recording, microstimulation, and lesion studies to show that this nucleus plays critical roles in optokinetic nystagmus, short-latency ocular following, smooth pursuit eye movements, and adaptation of the gain of the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex. Comparable data for the PON show that this nucleus plays critical roles in the pupillary light reflex, light-evoked blinks, rapid eye movement sleep triggering, and modulating subcortical nuclei involved in circadian rhythms.

Telencephalic projections to the nucleus of the basal optic root and pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali in pigeons

In birds, the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the accessory optic system (AOS) and the pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM) are involved in the analysis of optic flow and the generation of the optokinetic response. In several species, it has been shown that the AOS and pretectum receive input from visual areas of the telencephalon. Previous studies in pigeons using anterograde tracers have shown that both nBOR and LM receive input from the visual Wulst, the putative homolog of mammalian primary visual cortex. In the present study, we used retrograde and anterograde tracing techniques to further characterize these projections in pigeons. After injections of the retrograde tracer cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) into either LM or nBOR, retrograde labeling in the telencephalon was restricted to the hyperpallium apicale (HA) of the Wulst. From the LM injections, retrograde labeling appeared as a discrete band of cells restricted to the lateral edge of HA. From the nBOR injections, the retrograde labeling was more distributed in HA, generally dorsal and dorso-medial to the LM-projecting neurons. In the anterograde experiments, biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) was injected into HA and individual axons were reconstructed to terminal fields in the LM and nBOR. Those fibers projecting to the nBOR also innervated the adjacent ventral tegmental area. However, tracing of BDA-labeled axons revealed no evidence that individual neurons project to both LM and nBOR. In summary, our results suggest that the nBOR and LM receive input from different areas of the Wulst. We discuss how these projections may transmit visual and/or somatosensory information to the nBOR and LM.

Telencephalic Input to the Pretectum of Pigeons: An Electrophysiological and Pharmacological Inactivation Study

The pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM) and the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the avian accessory optic system (AOS) are retinal-recipient visual nuclei involved in the analysis of optic flow that results from self-motion, and in the generation of the optokinetic response. Neurons in these nuclei show direction selectivity in response to large-field motion and are tuned in the spatiotemporal domain. In addition to retinal afferentation, both the nBOR and LM receive afferents from the Wulst, which is thought to be the avian homolog of the primary visual cortex. We examined the effects of Wulst electrical stimulation on the activity of LM neurons and recorded the directional and spatiotemporal tuning of LM neurons in pigeons before, during, and after the Wulst was temporarily inactivated by lidocaine injection. In response to Wulst electrical stimulation, LM neurons showed either short-latency excitation followed by longer-latency inhibition (W+ cells), or only a longer-latency inhibition (W– cells). The average response latencies for W+ and W– cells were 13.5 and 28.3 ms, respectively. The effects of Wulst stimulation did not correlate with either the directional or spatiotemporal tuning of the LM neurons. Injection of lidocaine into the nBOR reduced the longer-latency oscillations of W+ and W– cells. When the Wulst was temporarily inactivated by lidocaine neither the directional nor spatiotemporal response properties of LM neurons were affected. The possible functions of the projection from the Wulst to the LM are discussed.

The accessory optic system contributes to the spatio-temporal tuning of motion-sensitive pretectal neurons

The nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the accessory optic system (AOS) and the pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM) are involved in the analysis of optic flow that results from self-motion and are important for oculomotor control. These neurons have large receptive fields and exhibit direction selectivity to large moving stimuli. In response to drifting sine wave gratings, LM and nBOR neurons are tuned to either low spatial/high temporal frequencies (SF, TF) or high SF/low TF stimuli. Given that velocity = TF/SF, these are referred to as "fast" and "slow" neurons, respectively. There is a heavy projection from the AOS to the pretectum, although its function is unknown. We recorded the directional and spatio-temporal tuning of LM units in pigeons before and after nBOR was inactivated by tetrodotoxin injection. After nBOR inactivation, changes in direction preference were observed for only one of 18 LM units. In contrast, the spatio-temporal tuning of LM units was dramatically altered by nBOR inactivation. Two major effects were observed. First, in response to motion in the preferred direction, most (82%) neurons showed a substantially reduced (mu = -67%) excitation to low SF/high TF gratings. Second, in response to motion in the anti-preferred direction, most (63%) neurons showed a dramatically reduced (mu = -78%) inhibition to high SF/low TF gratings. Thus the projection from the nBOR contributes to the spatio-temporal tuning rather than the directional tuning of LM neurons. We propose a descriptive model whereby LM receives inhibitory and excitatory input from "slow" and "fast" nBOR neurons, respectively.

Innate visual object recognition in vertebrates: some proposed pathways and mechanisms

Almost all vertebrates are capable of recognizing biologically relevant stimuli at or shortly after birth, and in some phylogenetically ancient species visual object recognition is exclusively innate. Extensive and detailed studies of the anuran visual system have resulted in the determination of the neural structures and pathways involved in innate prey and predator recognition in these species [Behav. Brain Sci. 10 (1987) 337; Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 128 (2001) 417]. The structures involved include the optic tectum, pretectal nuclei and an area within the mesencephalic tegmentum. Here we investigate the structures and pathways involved in innate stimulus recognition in avian, rodent and primate species. We discuss innate stimulus preferences in maternal imprinting in chicks and argue that these preferences are due to innate visual recognition of conspecifics, entirely mediated by subtelencephalic structures. In rodent species, brainstem structures largely homologous to the components of the anuran subcortical visual system mediate innate visual object recognition. The primary components of the mammalian subcortical visual system are the superior colliculus, nucleus of the optic tract, anterior and posterior pretectal nuclei, nucleus of the posterior commissure, and an area within the mesopontine reticular formation that includes parts of the cuneiform, subcuneiform and pedunculopontine nuclei. We argue that in rodent species the innate sensory recognition systems function throughout ontogeny, acting in parallel with cortical sensory and recognition systems. In primates the structures involved in innate stimulus recognition are essentially the same as those in rodents, but overt innate recognition is only present in very early ontogeny, and after a transition period gives way to learned object recognition mediated by cortical structures. After the transition period, primate subcortical sensory systems still function to provide implicit innate stimulus recognition, and this recognition can still generate orienting, neuroendocrine and emotional responses to biologically relevant stimuli.

Cortical and subcortical influences on the nucleus of the optic tract of the opossum

In the present work we propose a new phylogenetic hypothesis for the role played by cortical and subcortical afferents to the nucleus of the optical tract, the main visual relay station of the horizontal optokinetic reflex in mammals. The hypothesis is supported by anatomical and physiological data obtained in the South American opossum (Didelphis aurita) using the following experimental approaches: (i) single-unit recordings in the nucleus of the optic tract and simultaneous electrical stimulation of the contralateral nucleus of the optic tract; (ii) single-unit recordings in the nucleus of the optic tract and simultaneous electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral striate cortex; (iii) injection of cholera toxin subunit B into the striate cortex and subsequent immunohistochemical reaction to reveal the presence of the marker in the thalamus and mesencephalon; and (iv) single-unit recordings in the nucleus of the optic tract both before and after ablation of the ipsilateral visual cortex. The main results are: (i) there is a strong inhibitory reciprocal effect upon the nucleus of the optic tract following stimulation of its contralateral counterpart; (ii) electrophysiological and anatomical data imply that the visual cortex does not project directly to the nucleus of the optic tract. Rather, cortical terminals seem to target the nearby anterior and posterior pretectal nuclei and orthodromic latencies in the nucleus of the optic tract following stimulation of the visual cortex were twice as large as in the superior colicullus; and (iii) ablation of the entire visual cortex did not have any effect upon binocularity of cells in the nucleus of the optic tract. These results strengthen the model proposed here for the role of the interactions between the nuclei of the optic tract under optokinetic stimulation. The hypothesis in the present work is that the cortical influences upon the nucleus of the optical tract, in addition to the subcortical ones, appeared only recently in phylogenesis. In more primitive mammals, such as the opossum, subcortical interactions are thought to play a relatively important role. With the emergence of retinal specializations, such as the fovea, one might suppose that there followed the appearance of new ocular movements, such as the smooth pursuit and certain types of saccades, that came to join the pre-existent optokinetic reflex.

Development of the optokinetic system in macaque monkeys

Optokinetic nystagmus in response to horizontal movement of a whole field random dot pattern was measured in infant macaque monkeys from the first week to about 5 months after birth using electrooculography. During monocular and binocular viewing conditions stimulus velocities were varied between 10 and 120 degrees/s. Monocular stimulation in the temporonasal direction yielded slow phase gain of the optokinetic system which was relatively constant for a given stimulus velocity over the whole period of observation. Gain during nasotemporal stimulation was also clearly present but significantly lower at early stages and increased during further development. This asymmetry of monocular horizontal optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) clearly depended on the stimulus velocity. At lower stimulus velocities (10-20 degrees/s) OKN was largely symmetrical at 2-5 weeks of age. At higher stimulus velocities (40 degrees/s) symmetry was reached at about 12 weeks of age or even much later (80-120 degrees/s).

Projections from visual areas of the cerebral cortex to pretectal nuclear complex, terminal accessory optic nuclei, and superior colliculus in macaque monkey

The purpose of this study was to analyze the projections from visually related areas of the cerebral cortex of rhesus monkey to subcortical nuclei involved in eye-movement control; i.e., the pretectal nuclear complex, the terminal nuclei of the accessory optic system (AOS), and the superior colliculus (SC). The anterograde tracer 3H-leucine was pressure injected bilaterally into the cortex of six monkeys (for a total of 12 cases) involving the primary visual cortex (area 17); the medial prestriate cortex (medial 18/19); dorsomedial area 19; the caudal portion of the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus, upper bank (cytoarchitectural area OAa) and lower bank (area PGa); the lower bank of the caudal lateral intraparietal sulcus (area POa); and the inferior parietal lobule (area 7). The results revealed that the pretectal nucleus of the optic tract received inputs from medial prestriate cortex, dorsomedial part of area 19, OAa, and PGa. The posterior pretectal nucleus received sparse projections from area 7 and the cortex lining the intraparietal sulcus (dorsomedial part of area 19 and POa). The pretectal olivary nucleus was targeted by neurons in cortex of dorsomedial area 19, and the anterior pretectal nucleus was targeted by neurons in both dorsomedial 19 and area 7. The nuclei of the AOS (dorsal terminal; lateral terminal; and interstitial nuclei of the superior fasciculus, posterior and medial fibers) received projections exclusively from areas OAa and PGa. Furthermore, in one case with PGa injection, the medial terminal nucleus, dorsal portion, was also labeled. The visual cortical areas studied projected differentially upon the SC laminae. The primary visual area 17 projected only to the superficial laminae, i.e., stratum zonale (SZ), stratum griseum superficiale (SGS), and stratum opticum (SO). On the other hand, the medial portion of the prestriate cortex and caudal OAa and PGa targeted the superficial and intermediate laminae, i.e., SZ, SGS, SO, and stratum griseum intermediale (SGI), whereas caudal area POa projected primarily to the intermediate layer SGI. Rostral area 7 (mainly 7b) neurons terminated in the stratum album intermediale (SAI); no SC terminals were found in a case in which caudal area 7 (mainly 7a) was injected.