Use of extracorporeal circulation (ECLS/ECMO) for cardiac and circulatory failure -A clinical practice Guideline Level 3

Microaxial pump-supported coronary surgery without CPB to optimize outcome in severely impaired left ventricles

AIMS

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is the standard approach for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in advanced ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Microaxial pump support has been envisioned to allow for beating-heart CABG without CPB (MPCAB), thereby avoiding CPB-inherent complications. This study aims to compare the in-hospital and follow-up outcome of MPCAB versus CPB-CABG in patients with severely impaired left ventricular function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eleven patients suffering from three-vessel coronary artery disease with median ejection fraction of 27% and deemed appropriate for CABG according to a heart team decision underwent MPCAB (support up to 5.5 L/min). Propensity score matching generated a CPB-CABG control group (n = 33). The primary endpoint was defined as death from any cause by the end of the follow-up (up to 4 years). MPCAB enabled continuous intraoperative and postoperative haemodynamic stabilization and complete myocardial revascularization. After CPB-CABG, additional mechanical circulatory support was required in 45.5% (vs. 9.1% in MPCAB; P = 0.0363). The follow-up all-cause mortality after MPCAB amounted to 0% (vs. 33.3% after CPB-CABG; P = 0.0414; NNT = 3). MPCAB patients showed a significantly decreased occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: 0% vs. 39.4%; P = 0.0189).

CONCLUSIONS

MPCAB allows for complete surgical revascularization without the necessity of extracorporeal circulation in spite of severely impaired left ventricular function. This first comparative study on the outcome after MPCAB versus CPB-CABG demonstrates a significantly decreased risk of death as well as MACE in MPCAB patients. The MPCAB concept expands the spectrum of patients eligible for CABG without CPB towards patients with severely impaired left ventricular function.

ECLS-SHOCK and DanGer Shock: Implications for Optimal Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Use for Cardiogenic Shock Due to Acute Myocardial Infarction

Despite concerted efforts to rapidly identify patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and provide timely revascularization, early mortality remains stubbornly high. Although artificially augmenting systemic flow by using temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices would be expected to reduce the rate of progression to multiorgan dysfunction and thereby enhance survival, reliable evidence for benefit has remained elusive with lingering questions regarding the appropriate selection of both patients and devices, as well as the timing of device implantation relative to other critical interventions. Further complicating matters are the resource-intensive multidisciplinary systems of care that must be brought to bear in this complex patient population. Until recently, studies of tMCS were extremely heterogeneous in design, populations treated, and timing of device implantation with regard to shock onset and revascularization. Attempts at summarizing the available data had resulted in a lack of clear benefit for any type of tMCS modality. On this background, 2 landmark trials of tMCS in the setting of AMI-CS---ECLS-SHOCK and DanGer Shock---have recently been published with divergent results that deserve detailed consideration. Thus, we provide a detailed narrative review of the current state of knowledge regarding tMCS for AMI-CS. The most common types of tMCS and related evidence are presented, as well as evidence for organizational considerations, such as the shock team. We also provide some insight into how this new evidence may be incorporated into practice and influence future research.

2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery

Clinical practice guidelines consolidate and evaluate all pertinent evidence on a specific topic available at the time of their formulation. The goal is to assist physicians in determining the most effective management strategies for patients with a particular condition. These guidelines assess the impact on patient outcomes and weigh the risk-benefit ratio of various diagnostic or therapeutic approaches. While not a replacement for textbooks, they provide supplementary information on topics relevant to current clinical practice and become an essential tool to support the decisions made by specialists in daily practice. Nonetheless, it is crucial to understand that these recommendations are intended to guide, not dictate, clinical practice, and should be adapted to each patient's unique needs. Clinical situations vary, presenting a diverse array of variables and circumstances. Thus, the guidelines are meant to inform, not replace, the clinical judgement of healthcare professionals, grounded in their professional knowledge, experience and comprehension of each patient's specific context. Moreover, these guidelines are not considered legally binding; the legal duties of healthcare professionals are defined by prevailing laws and regulations, and adherence to these guidelines does not modify such responsibilities. The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) and the European Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion (EBCP) constituted a task force of professionals specializing in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management. To ensure transparency and integrity, all task force members involved in the development and review of these guidelines submitted conflict of interest declarations, which were compiled into a single document available on the EACTS website (https://www.eacts.org/resources/clinical-guidelines). Any alterations to these declarations during the development process were promptly reported to the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP. Funding for this task force was provided exclusively by the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, without involvement from the healthcare industry or other entities. Following this collaborative endeavour, the governing bodies of EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP oversaw the formulation, refinement, and endorsement of these extensively revised guidelines. An external panel of experts thoroughly reviewed the initial draft, and their input guided subsequent amendments. After this detailed revision process, the final document was ratified by all task force experts and the leadership of the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, enabling its publication in the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, the British Journal of Anaesthesia and Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. Endorsed by the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, these guidelines represent the official standpoint on this subject. They demonstrate a dedication to continual enhancement, with routine updates planned to ensure that the guidelines remain current and valuable in the ever-progressing arena of clinical practice.

Early Versus Bail-Out Left Ventricular Unloading During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Left ventricular (LV) unloading has demonstrated favorable outcomes in patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). However, the optimal timing for LV unloading during VA-ECMO remains controversial. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies comparing early versus bail-out LV unloading in patients undergoing VA-ECMO. We computed mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.2.3. Six studies comprising 1,556 participants were included in the meta-analysis, of whom 936 (60%) were referred to early LV unloading. There were no significant differences between groups in weaning from VA-ECMO (MD 1.07; 95% CI 0.86 - 1.33; p = 0.55; I² = 26%), in-hospital mortality (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.86 - 1.05; p = 0.28; I² = 0%), 30-day mortality (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.52 - 1.10; p = 0.14; I² = 64%), or duration of VA-ECMO (MD 0.37; 95% CI -1.57 - 2.32; p = 0.71; I² = 20%). Sepsis (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.63 - 1.11; p = 0.22; I² = 0%), stroke (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.52 - 1.56; p = 0.70; I² = 48%), and bridge to heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device (RR 1.20; 95% CI 0.90 - 1.62; p = 0.22; I² = 0%) also did not differ significantly between the groups. In patients undergoing VA-ECMO, early LV unloading was not associated with improved efficacy and safety outcomes when compared to the bail-out strategy for LV unloading.

Variability in triggers for mechanical left ventricular unloading in VA-ECMO: A literature search

BACKGROUND

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a means of supporting the lungs or the heart and lungs in patients with hemodynamic compromise that is refractory to conventional measures. VA-ECMO is most commonly deployed in a percutaneous fashion with femoral arterial and venous access. While VA-ECMO, particularly in a femoral-femoral configuration, provides both hemodynamic and ventilatory support, it also causes increased afterload on the left ventricle (LV) which in turn may result in LV distension (LVD). LV thrombus formation, ventricular arrhythmias, pulmonary edema, and pulmonary hemorrhage are clinical manifestations of LVD. LV unloading is a means of preventing LVD and its sequelae. If less invasive methods fail to achieve adequate LV unloading, invasive mechanical methods are pursued such as intra-aortic balloon pump counter-pulsation, atrial septostomy, surgical venting, left atrial cannulation, and percutaneous transvalvular micro-axial pump placement.

METHODS

We sought to review indicators of LVD, thresholds, and options for mechanical venting strategies. A Pubmed search was performed to identify current literature about LV unloading for VA ECMO. This was categorized and summarized to determine commonly reported thresholds for mechanical LV unloading.

RESULTS

Multiple physiologic and radiographic indicators were reported without uniformity. Common indicators included increased pulmonary artery catheter pressures, decreased Aortic Line Pulse Pressure, as well as multiple Echocardiographic, and radiographic indicators.

CONCLUSION

Although there has been significant interest in the topic, there is currently limited uniformity in thresholds for when to initiate and escalate mechanical LV unloading. While the method of LV unloading is an active area of investigation, the threshold for which to initiate invasive venting strategies is largely unexplored.

Buttock ischemia in adults with femoral venoarterial-extracorporeal membranoxygenation - A single center experience

INTRODUCTION

Femoral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used as an ultima ratio to maintain circulation in patients with refractory cardiorespiratory failure, but is also associated with vascular and ischemic complications. Buttock ischemia appears to be an underreported complication in these patients. Methods: In this retrospective single-center case series over a five-year period, all patients who received femoral VA-ECMO and survived for more than 24 hours were screened for buttock ischemia. Buttock ischemia was diagnosed using a two-step approach, which involved identifying characteristic skin lesions and CT scans suggesting hypoperfusion of the ipsilateral internal iliac artery.

RESULTS

Over the five-year period, 264 patients were assessed for buttock ischemia, which occurred in seven patients, with an average annual incidence of 2.7%. Unilateral buttock ischemia was observed in six patients, while bilateral buttock ischemia was seen in one patient and led to multiple surgeries in three patients. The CT scans showed that, in all cases, the arterial ECMO cannula covered the origin of the internal iliac artery and revealed additional bilateral atherosclerotic lesions in the iliac arteries.

CONCLUSION

Buttock ischemia is a rare and not fully understood complication of femoral VA-ECMO but may lead to clinically significant sequelae. Widespread knowledge and awareness are therefore important to recognize buttock ischemia, followed by individualized strategies for selecting and positioning the arterial cannula.

Impact of hospital volume on in-hospital outcomes for patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation post-cardiac surgery: Evidence from nationwide inpatient sample

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the impact of hospitals' extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) procedure volume on inpatient outcomes in patients receiving ECMO after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

The records of patients in the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample database ⩾18 years old who underwent cardiac surgery and received ECMO postoperatively from 2005 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Associations between hospital ECMO volume, demographical and clinical variables, and in-hospital mortality, non-routine discharge, hospital costs, acute organ failure, and infection/sepsis were examined.

RESULTS

Data of 1465 patients hospitalized in 892 hospitals were analyzed. There were 102 high ECMO-volume hospitals and 790 low ECMO-volume hospitals. Patients treated in high ECMO-volume hospitals (n = 317) had a significantly decreased risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR (aOR) = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.94) compared to those treated in low ECMO-volume hospitals (n = 1148). In contrast, patients treated in high-volume hospitals had a significantly increased risk of non-routine discharge (aOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.03-2.25, p = 0.034) than those who stayed in the low-volume hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

High hospital ECMO volume is associated with a lower risk of in-hospital death among patients receiving ECMO after cardiac surgeries, indicating the need for policies that guide patient referrals to institutions with more extensive ECMO experience.

Outcome and complications in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock treated with extracorporeal life support - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) in cardiac surgery is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Beside other therapeutic measures (e.g. intraaortic balloon pump (IABP)), extracorporeal life support is being increasingly used in this particular form of shock. Objectives of this meta-analysis were to determine mortality and complications of extracorporeal life support treatment (ECLS) in cardiac surgery patients, and if outcomes were influenced by a preexisting cardiovascular risk profile.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies in English, published between January 1st 2000 and January 16th 2023, reporting mortality and morbidity in patients aged ≥ 18 treated with ECLS for PCCS. Supplementary data were requested from the respective corresponding authors. Outcomes were weaning from extracorporeal life support, hospital survival and complications.

RESULTS

Two thousand, seven hundred seventy-four papers were screened, of which 132 full text articles were assessed for suitability. 70 remaining studies were included for further evaluation and data analysis. Five studies could be included in the final analysis since the corresponding authors provided additional necessary information. Successful weaning from extracorporeal life support was accomplished in 52.8% (30.8%-57.4%) and 31.1% were discharged alive (mortality of 25.0 - 56.2% after weaning). 95.1% of all treated patients suffered from at least one complication. Diabetes mellitus and obesity seem to be independent risk factors for poor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal life support for PCCS is associated with a substantial mortality and complication rate. Diabetes mellitus and obesity seem to be independent risk factors. Therefore, until future work has elucidated which patients benefit at all, the risks of ECLS-treatment must be critically weighed up against a possible benefit.

Risk factors for mortality in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

OBJECTIVE

Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are often complex and have a high mortality rate. Currently, risk assessment and treatment decisions for patients receiving ECMO are controversial. Therefore, we sought to identify risk factors for mortality in patients receiving ECMO and provide a reference for patient management.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 199 patients who received ECMO support from December 2013 to April 2023. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors. The cutoff value was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 199 patients were selected for this study, and the mortality rate was 76.38%. More than half of the patients underwent surgery during hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) implantation (OR = 2.994; 95% CI, 1.405-6.167; p = 0.004) and age (OR = 1.021; 95% CI, 1.002-1.040; p = 0.032) were the independent risk factors for mortality. In the ROC curve analysis, age had the best predictive effect (AUC 0.646, 95% CI 0.559-0.732, p = 0.003) for death when the cutoff value was 48.5 years. Furthermore, in patients receiving combined CRRT and ECMO, lack of congenital heart disease and previous surgical history were the independent risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

CRRT implantation and age were independent risk factors for patients with ECMO implantation in a predominantly surgical cohort. In patients receiving a combination of CRRT and ECMO, lack of congenital heart disease and previous surgical history were independent risk factors for mortality.

Prevalence and risk factors for in-hospital mortality of adult patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize quantitative research findings on the prevalence and risk factors for in-hospital mortality of patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted for the period from May 2008 to December 2023 by searching the five electronic databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The meta-analysis estimated the pooled odds ratio or standard mean difference and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of twenty-five studies with 10,409 patients were included in the analysis. The overall in-hospital mortality of patients on VA-ECMO was 56.7 %. In the subgroup analysis, in-hospital mortality of VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest was 49.2 % and 75.2 %, respectively. The number of significant factors associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in the pre-ECMO period (age, body weight, creatinine, chronic kidney disease, pH, and lactic acid) was greater than that in the intra- and post-ECMO periods. Renal replacement, bleeding, and lower limb ischemia were the most significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients receiving VA-ECMO.

CONCLUSION

Early detection of the identified risk factors can contribute to reducing in-hospital mortality in patients on VA-ECMO. Intensive care unit nurses should provide timely and appropriate care before, during, and after VA-ECMO.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Intensive care unit nurses should be knowledgeable about factors associated with the in-hospital mortality of patients on VA-ECMO to improve outcomes. The present findings may contribute to developing guidelines for reducing in-hospital mortality among patients considering ECMO.

Toward an Adjustable Blood Pump for Wide-Range Operation: In-Vitro Results of Performance Curve and Hydraulic Efficiency

Rotary blood pumps in Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) applications are optimized for a specific design point. However, in clinical practice, these pumps are usually applied over a wide range of operation points. Studies have shown that a deviation from the design point in a rotary blood pump leads to an unexpected rise of hemolysis with corresponding clinical complications. Adjustable pumps that can adapt geometric parameters to the respective operation point are commonly used in other industrial branches, but yet not applied in blood pumps. We present a novel mechanism to adjust the impeller geometry of a centrifugal blood pump during operation together with in-vitro data of its hydraulic performance and efficiency. Three-dimensionalprinted prototypes of the adjustable impeller and a rigid impeller were manufactured and hydraulic performance and efficiency measured (n = 3). In a flow range of 1.5-9.5 L/min, the adjustable pump increased pump performance up to 47% and hydraulic efficiency by an average of 7.3 percentage points compared with a fixed setting. The adjustable pump allows customization of the pump's behavior (steepness of performance curve) according to individual needs. Furthermore, the hydraulic efficiency of the pump could be maintained at a high level throughout the complete flow range.

A Descriptive Analysis of Hybrid Cannulated Extracorporeal Life Support

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is pivotal for sustaining the function of failing hearts and lungs, and its utilization has risen. In cases where conventional cannulation strategies prove ineffective for providing adequate ECLS support, the implementation of an enhanced system with a third cannula may become necessary. Hybrid ECLS may be warranted in situations characterized by severe hypoxemia of the upper extremity, left ventricular congestion, and dilatation. Additionally, it may also be considered for patients requiring respiratory support or experiencing hemodynamic instability.

METHOD

All hybrid ECLS cases of adults at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, between January 2007 and December 2019 with initial triple cannulation were included. Data were collected via a retrospective review of patient records and direct export of the clinical information system.

RESULTS

28 out of 903 ECLS cases were initially hybrid cannulated (3.1%). The median age was 57 (48.2 to 60.8) years, and the sex was equally distributed. The in-hospital mortality of hybrid ECLS was high (67.9%). In-hospital mortality rates differ depending on the indication (ARDS: 36.4%, refractory cardiogenic shock: 88.9%, cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 100%, post-cardiotomy: 100%, others: 75%). Survivors exhibited a lower SAPS II level compared with non-survivors (20.0 (12.0 to 65.0) vs. 55.0 (45.0 to 73.0)), and the allogenic transfusion of platelet concentrate was observed to be less frequent for survivors (0.0 (0.0) vs. 1.8 (2.5) units).

CONCLUSION

The in-hospital mortality rate for hybrid ECLS was high. Different indications showed varying mortality rates, with survivors having lower SAPS II scores and requiring fewer platelet concentrate transfusions. These findings highlight the complexities of hybrid ECLS outcomes in different clinical scenarios and underline the importance of rigorous patient selection.

Differential effect of left ventricular unloading according to the aetiology of cardiogenic shock

AIMS

Evidence for the effectiveness of left ventricular (LV) unloading in patients who received venoaterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or non-AMI induced cardiogenic shock (CS) is limited. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of LV unloading in AMI-induced and non-AMI-induced CS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a single-centre retrospective observational study of patients with CS undergoing VA-ECMO from January 2011 to March 2019. Patients were classified as AMI-induced and non-AMI-induced CS. The association of LV unloading with 90-day mortality in both groups was analysed using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 128 CS patients, 71 (55.5%) patients received VA-ECMO due to AMI-induced CS, and the remaining 57 (44.5%) received VA-ECMO due to non-AMI-induced CS. The modality of LV unloading was predominantly with IABP (94.5%). In the AMI-induced CS group, LV unloading did not reduce 90-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.96, 95% confidence interval 0.90-4.27, P = 0.089). However, in the non-AMI-induced CS group, LV unloading combined with VA-ECMO significantly reduced 90-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.96, P = 0.041; P for interaction = 0.029) as compared with those who received VA-ECMO alone.

CONCLUSIONS

LV unloading with VA-ECMO may reduce 90-day mortality compared with VA-ECMO alone in patients with non-AMI-induced CS, but not in AMI-induced CS.

Recipient Pericardial Apolipoprotein Levels Might Be an Indicator of Worse Outcomes after Orthotopic Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

End-stage heart failure (ESHF) leads to hypoperfusion and edema formation throughout the body and is accompanied by neurohormonal and immunological alterations. Orthotopic heart transplantation (HTX) has been used as a beneficial option for ESHF. Due to the shortage of donor hearts, the ideal matching and timing of donors and recipients has become more important.

PURPOSE

In this study, our aim was to explore the relationship between the clinical outcomes of HTX and the cytokine and apolipoprotein profiles of the recipient pericardial fluid obtained at heart transplantation after opening the pericardial sac.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical data and the interleukin, adipokine, and lipoprotein levels in the pericardial fluid of twenty HTX recipients were investigated. Outcome variables included primer graft dysfunction (PGD), the need for post-transplantation mechanical cardiac support (MCS), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade ≥2R rejection, and mortality. Recipient risk scores were also investigated.

RESULTS

Leptin levels were significantly lower in patients with PGD than in those without PGD (median: 6.36 (IQR: 5.55-6.62) versus 7.54 (IQR = 6.71-10.44); p = 0.029). Higher ApoCII levels (median: 14.91 (IQR: 11.55-21.30) versus 10.31 (IQR = 10.02-13.07); p = 0.042) and ApoCIII levels (median: 60.32 (IQR: 43.00-81.66) versus 22.84 (IQR = 15.84-33.39); p = 0.005) were found in patients (n = 5) who died in the first 5 years after HTX. In patients who exhibited rejection (n = 4) in the first month after transplantation, the levels of adiponectin (median: 74.48 (IQR: 35.51-131.70) versus 29.96 (IQR: 19.86-42.28); p = 0.039), ApoCII (median: 20.11 (IQR: 13.06-23.54) versus 10.32 (IQR: 10.02-12.84); p = 0.007), and ApoCIII (median: 70.97 (IQR: 34.72-82.22) versus 26.33 (IQR: 17.18-40.17); p = 0.029) were higher than in the nonrejection group. Moreover, the pericardial thyroxine (T4) levels (median: 3.96 (IQR: 3.49-4.46) versus 4.69 (IQR: 4.23-5.77); p = 0.022) were lower in patients with rejection than in patients who did not develop rejection.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that apolipoproteins can facilitate the monitoring of rejection and could be a useful tool in the forecasting of early and late complications.

Analysis of 24-hour Death Risk Factors in Circulatory Failure Patients Treated with Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

OBJECTIVE

To explore the factors affecting short-term prognosis of circulatory failure patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) treatment.

METHODS

A total of 136 patients undergoing VA-ECMO were enrolled in this study and subsequently divided into the death group (n=35) and the survival group (n=101) based on whether death occurred during hospitalisation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) running time, length of intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay, costs, and ECMO complications were then compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The average age of all patients undergoing ECMO was 47.64±16.78 years (53.2±16.20 years in the death group and 45.713±16.62 years in the survival group) (P=0.022). Patients in the survival group exhibited a clear downward trend in lactic acid value following ECMO treatment compared to those in the death group. Total hospitalisation stay was longer in the survival group (35 days) than in the death group (15.5 days) (P<0.001). In the analysis of ECMO complications, the incidence of neurological complications, renal failure, limb complications, and infection were higher in the death group than in the survival group (P<0.05 for all). Specifically, as a risk factor for patient survival and discharge, the occurrence of infection will lead to increased hospitalisation stays and costs (P<0.05 for both).

CONCLUSION

Complications such as kidney failure and infection are associated with in-hospital death, and ECMO-related complications should be actively prevented to improve the survival rate of VA-ECMO treatment.

Association between Case Volumes of Extracorporeal Life Support and Clinical Outcome in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AIM

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is increasing. There is little evidence identifying the association between hospital ECLS case volumes and outcomes in different populations receiving ECLS or conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The goal of this investigation was to identify the association between ECLS case volumes and clinical outcomes of OHCA patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional observational study used the National OHCA Registry for adult OHCA cases in Seoul, Korea between January 2015 and December 2019. If the ECLS volume during the study period was >20, the institution was defined as a high-volume ECLS center. Others were defined as low-volume ECLS centers. Outcomes were good neurologic recovery (cerebral performance category 1 or 2) and survival to discharge. We performed multivariate logistic regression and interaction analyses to assess the association between case volume and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 17,248 OHCA cases, 3,731 were transported to high-volume centers. Among the patients who underwent ECLS, those at high-volume centers had a higher neurologic recovery rate than those at low-volume centers (17.0% vs. 12.0%), and the adjusted OR for good neurologic recovery was 2.22 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-4.28) in high-volume centers compared to low-volume centers. For patients who received conventional CPR, high-volume centers also showed higher survival-to-discharge rates (adjusted OR of 1.16, 95%CI: 1.01-1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

High-volume ECLS centers showed better neurological recovery in patients who underwent ECLS. High-volume centers also had better survival-to-discharge rates than low-volume centers for patients not receiving ECLS.

[Extracorporeal Life Support in Critical Care Medicine]

Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) may be indicated in patients with refractory heart failure. The list of conditions in which ECLS is successfully used is growing and includes cardiogenic shock following myocardial infarction, refractory cardiac arrest, septic shock with low cardiac output and severe intoxication. Femoral ECLS is the most common and often preferred ECLS-configuration in the emergency setting. Although femoral access is usually quick and easy to establish, it is also associated with specific adverse haemodynamic effects due to the direction of blood flow and access-site complications are inherent. Femoral ECLS provides adequate oxygen delivery and compensates for impaired cardiac output. However, retrograde blood flow into the aorta increases left ventricular afterload and may worsen left ventricular stroke work. Therefore, femoral ECLS is not equivalent to left ventricular unloading. Daily haemodynamic assessments are crucial and should include echocardiography and laboratory tests determining tissue oxygenation. Common complications include the harlequin-phenomenon, lower limb ischaemia or cerebral events and cannula site or intracranial bleeding. Despite a high incidence of complications and high mortality, ECLS is associated with survival benefits and better neurological outcomes in selected patient groups.

The efficacy of venous-arterial membrane oxygenation for emergency extracorporeal life support: results from a single-center large series over 6 years

The efficacy of venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in supporting cardio-pulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest is still debated. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients treated with VA-ECMO positioned according to different clinical indications. The method is retrospective data analysis from patients admitted to a tertiary referral center for VA-ECMO in 6 years. The study population was divided into three groups based on the VA-ECMO indication: patients with refractory cardiac arrest (CA group), cardiogenic shock after return of spontaneous circulation (CS-ROSC group), and cardiogenic shock without cardiac arrest (CS group). Seventy-nine patients underwent emergency VA-ECMO, 49 patients (62.0%) were in the CA group, 14 (17.7%) in the CS-ROSC group, and 16 patients (20.3%) in the CS group. The overall survival at 28 days was different between the three groups (6.1% in the CA group, 64.2% in the CS-ROSC group, and 50.0% in the CS group, p < 0.001) and remained significant at 12 months (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the Cerebral Performance Category at 12 months differed between groups with good outcomes in 4.1% of patients in CA, 50.0% in CS-ROSC, and 31.2% in CS groups (p < 0.001). In the studied population, emergency VA-ECMO had negligible efficacy in refractory cardiac arrest, while it was correlated with a good outcome in cardiogenic shock after cardiac arrest, such as in cardiogenic shock alone. Patients with ROSC appear to benefit from VA-ECMO in the setting of persistent shock at rates comparable to cardiogenic shock patients who never sustained cardiac arrest.

Research progress of portable extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is primarily used for the supportive treatment of patients suffering from severe cardiopulmonary failure. With the continued development of ECMO technology, the relevant scenarios also extend pre-hospital and inter-hospital. In order to meet the needs of emergency treatment in communities, disaster sites and battlefields, inter-hospital transfer and evacuation; miniaturized and portable ECMO has become a current research hotspot.

AREA COVERED

The paper first introduces the principle, composition and common modes of ECMO and summarizes the research status of portable ECMO, Novalung and wearable ECMO, analyzes the characteristics and shortcomings of existing equipment. finally, we discussed the focus and development trend of portable ECMO technology.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, portable ECMO has many applications in interhospital transport and there are various studies on portable and wearable ECMO devices, but the development of portable ECMO still faces many challenges. In the future, research related to integrated components, rich sensor arrays, Intelligent ECMO system and lightweight technology can make future portable ECMO more suitable for pre-hospital emergency and interhospital transport.

Akute Herzinsuffizienz und kardiogener Schock – Bedeutung der ECLS

Der kardiogene Schock (CS) stellt den schwersten Verlauf einer akuten Herzinsuffizienz (AHF) mit exzessiven Letalitätsraten von bis zu 50% dar. Bei refraktärem Verlauf bieten temporäre mechanische Kreislaufunterstützungssysteme eine wertvolle Therapieoption. Insbesondere die ECLS-Therapie (extracorporeal life support) wird dem klinischen Bedarf entsprechend, trotz bislang fehlender Evidenz aus randomisiert-kontrollierten Studien, zunehmend häufiger bei CS eingesetzt. Vor diesem Hintergrund muss die ECLS-Indikation weiterhin unter kritischer Nutzen-Risiko-Abwägung und unter Berücksichtigung objektiver hämodynamischer sowie patientenbezogener klinischer Parameter gestellt werden. Aktuelle Leitlinien empfehlen ferner die Etablierung von CS-Zentren mit strukturierten Therapiekonzepten und eingespielten Teams. In diesem Artikel werden grundlegende pathophysiologische Konzepte und Therapieansätze der AHF und des CS beleuchtet und der Stellenwert der ECLS in diesem Setting eingeordnet.

Arterial and venous vascular complications in patients requiring peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of arterial and venous complications in patients requiring peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) and its risk factors at the time of cannulation and during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and to assess vascular complications in association with decannulation.

Material and methods

Between January 2010 to January 2020, out of 1,030 eligible patients requiring VA-ECMO, 427 with analyzable vascular screening were included. Duplex sonography and/or CT scan after decannulation were used to screen for thrombosis and pulmonary embolism as well as arterial complications. Near-infrared spectrometry (NIRS) was established at the time of cannulation and was continuously monitored during the ECMO therapy.

Results

The prevalence of venous complications was 27%. Thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were observed in 21 and 7% of patients, respectively. Pulmonary embolism was more frequently diagnosed in patients with thrombosis (22 vs. 3%, p &lt; 0.001). In multivariate analysis, cannulation in the jugular vein was determined as a risk factor for venous thrombosis in contrast to the extent of anticoagulation. The prevalence of arterial complications was 37%, mainly ischemia followed by bleeding, dissection, and compartment syndrome. Vascular surgery was necessary for 19% of the patients, of whome 1% required major amputations. A distal perfusion cannula (DPC) was implanted at cannulation in 24% of patients and secondarily in 16% of patients after cannulation as required during ECMO support. In the multivariate analysis, risk factors for leg ischemia at the time of cannulation were elevated D-dimers, lower NIRS on the cannulated leg, and lack of a DPC. The best discriminative parameter was the difference in NIRS between the non-cannulated leg and the cannulated leg. In contrast, during ECMO support, only the lack of a DPC was associated with leg ischemia. A similar rate of complications associated with decannulation, mainly arterial thrombosis, ischemia, or bleeding, was seen with percutaneous and surgical approaches (18 vs. 17%, p = 0.295).

Conclusion

Patients requiring VA ECMO should be routinely screened for vascular complications. The decision to insert a DPC should be evaluated individually. However, NIRS monitoring of the cannulated leg and the non-cannulated leg is essential to identify the legs at risk for critical ischemia. As complications associated with decannulation were equally distributed between percutaneous and surgical approaches, the applied method may be chosen according to local experience.

A Standardized Multimodal Neurological Monitoring Protocol-Guided Cerebral Protection Therapy for Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Supported Patients

Background

The main objective of this study was to investigate the role of a multimodal neurological monitoring (MNM)-guided protocol in the precision identification of neural impairment and long-term neurological outcomes in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) supported patients.

Methods

We performed a cohort study that examined adult patients who underwent VA-ECMO support in our center between February 2010 and April 2021. These patients were retrospectively assigned to the “with MNM group” and the “without MNM group” based on the presence or absence of MNM-guided precision management. The differences in ECMO-related characteristics, evaluation indicators (precision, sensitivity, and specificity) of the MNM-guided protocol, and the long-term outcomes of the surviving patients were measured and compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 63 patients with VA-ECMO support were retrospectively assigned to the without MNM group (n = 35) and the with MNM group (n = 28). The incidence of neural impairment in the without MNM group was significantly higher than that in the with MNM group (82.1 vs. 54.3%, P = 0.020). The MNM group exhibited older median ages [52.5 (39.5, 65.3) vs. 31 (26.5, 48.0), P = 0.008], a higher success rate of ECMO weaning (92.8 vs. 71.4%, P = 0.047), and a lower median duration of building ECMO [40.0 (35.0, 52.0) vs. 58.0 (48.0, 76.0), P = 0.025] and median ECMO duration days [5.0 (4.0, 6.2) vs. 7.0 (5.0, 10.5), P = 0.018] than the group without MNM. The MNM-guided protocol exhibited a higher precision rate (82.1 vs. 60.0%), sensitivity (95.7 vs. 78.9%), and specificity (83.3 vs. 37.5%) in identifying neural impairment in VA-ECMO support patients. There were significant differences in the long-term outcomes of survivors at 1, 3 and 6 months after discharge between the two groups (P < 0.05). However, the results showed no significant differences in ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, survival to discharge, or 28-day mortality between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The MNM-guided protocol is conducive to guiding intensivists in the improvement of cerebral protection therapy for ECMO-supported patients to detect and treat potential neurologic impairment promptly, and then improving long-term neurological outcomes after discharge.