Renal denervation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (RDT-PEF): a randomized controlled trial

Cardiac sympathetic nerve activity trends after renal denervation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

This case report describes the application of ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) using the Paradise System in a patient with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Initially, the cardiac sympathetic nerve activity of the patient exhibited a late heart/mediastinum (H/M) ratio of 2.00 and a washout rate of 66.0% by cardiac iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) scintigraphy. Subsequently, the patient underwent transfemoral uRDN targeting the left, right upper, and right lower renal arteries. At the 6 month follow-up, no significant change was observed in 123I-MIBG findings; however, the estimated stressed blood volume (eSBV) decreased from 1722 to 1029 mL/70 kg. At 18 months, 123I-MIBG findings improved, with the late H/M ratio reaching 2.76 and the washout rate decreasing to 43.1%. This case report highlights the potential of uRDN in reducing eSBV within 6 months and subsequently improving cardiac sympathetic nerve activity at the 18 month follow-up.

Advances in device-based treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: evidence from clinical trials

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a group of clinical syndromes that exhibit a remarkably heterogeneous phenotype, characterized by symptoms and signs of heart failure, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, elevated levels of natriuretic peptides, and an ejection fraction greater than or equal to 50%. With the aging of the population and the escalating prevalence of hypertension, obesity, and diabetes, the incidence of HFpEF is progressively rising. Drug therapy options for HFpEF are currently limited, and the associated high risk of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure rehospitalization significantly impact patients' quality of life and longevity while imposing a substantial economic burden on society. Recent research indicates that certain device-based therapies may serve as valuable adjuncts to drug therapy in patients with specific phenotypes of HFpEF, effectively improving symptoms and quality of life while reducing the risk of readmission for heart failure. These include inter-atrial shunt and greater splanchnic nerve ablation to reduce left ventricular filling pressure, implantable heart failure monitor to guide diuresis, left atrial pacing to correct interatrial dyssynchrony, cardiac contractility modulation to enhance cardiac calcium handling, as well as renal denervation, baroreflex activation therapy, and vagus nerve stimulation to restore the autonomic imbalance. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms and clinical evidence pertaining to these devices, with the aim of enhancing therapeutic strategies for HFpEF.

Denervation or stimulation? Role of sympatho-vagal imbalance in HFpEF with hypertension

Heart failure (HF) in the elderly is an increasingly large and complex problem in modern society. Notably, the cause of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is multifactorial and its pathophysiology is not fully understood. Among these, hypertension has emerged as a pivotal factor in the pathophysiology and therapeutic targets of HFpEF. Neuronal elements distributed throughout the cardiac autonomic nervous system, from the level of the central autonomic network including the insular cortex to the intrinsic cardiac nervous system, regulate the human cardiovascular system. Specifically, increased sympathetic nervous system activity due to sympatho-vagal imbalance is suggested to be associated the relationship between hypertension and HFpEF. While several new pharmacological therapies, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, have been shown to be effective in HFpEF, neuromodulatory therapies of renal denervation and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) have received recent attention. The current review explores the pathophysiology of the brain-heart axis that underlies the relationship between hypertension and HFpEF and the rationale for therapeutic neuromodulation of HFpEF by non-invasive transcutaneous VNS.

Pathophysiological Rationale and Clinical Evidence for Neurohormonal Modulation in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome resulting from the interaction between cardiac diseases, comorbidities and ageing. HFpEF is characterised by the activation of neurohormonal axes, namely of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system, although to a lesser extent compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This provides a rationale for neurohormonal modulation as a therapeutic approach for HFpEF. Nonetheless, randomised clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a prognostic benefit from neurohormonal modulation therapies in HFpEF, with the sole exception of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction in the lower range of normality, for whom the American guidelines suggest that such therapies may be considered. In this review, the pathophysiological rationale for neurohormonal modulation in HFpEF is summarised and the clinical evidence on pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches backing current recommendations discussed.

Renal denervation in the antihypertensive arsenal - knowns and known unknowns

Even though it has been more than a decade since renal denervation (RDN) was first used to treat hypertension and an intense effort on researching this therapy has been made, it is still not clear how RDN fits into the antihypertensive arsenal. There is no question that RDN lowers blood pressure (BP), it does so to an extent at best corresponding to one antihypertensive drug. The procedure has an excellent safety record. However, it remains clinically impossible to predict whose BP responds to RDN and whose does not. Long-term efficacy data on BP reduction are still unconvincing despite the recent results in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial; experimental studies indicate that reinnervation is occurring after RDN. Although BP is an acceptable surrogate endpoint, there is complete lack of outcome data with RDN. Clear indications for RDN are lacking although patients with resistant hypertension, those with documented increase in activity of the sympathetic system and perhaps those who desire to take fewest medication may be considered.

Modern Approaches for the Treatment of Heart Failure: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives

Heart failure (HF) is a progressively deteriorating medical condition that significantly reduces both the patients’ life expectancy and quality of life. Even though real progress was made in the past decades in the discovery of novel pharmacological treatments for HF, the prevention of premature deaths has only been marginally alleviated. Despite the availability of a plethora of pharmaceutical approaches, proper management of HF is still challenging. Thus, a myriad of experimental and clinical studies focusing on the discovery of new and provocative underlying mechanisms of HF physiopathology pave the way for the development of novel HF therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, recent technological advances made possible the development of various interventional techniques and device-based approaches for the treatment of HF. Since many of these modern approaches interfere with various well-known pathological mechanisms in HF, they have a real ability to complement and or increase the efficiency of existing medications and thus improve the prognosis and survival rate of HF patients. Their promising and encouraging results reported to date compel the extension of heart failure treatment beyond the classical view. The aim of this review was to summarize modern approaches, new perspectives, and future directions for the treatment of HF.

Current and future use of neuromodulation in heart failure

Autonomic imbalance is a common finding in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Addressing different targets within the autonomic nervous systems has been evaluated in patients with HF, including renal sympathetic denervation, vagal nerve stimulation, and baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT). Although all are pathophysiologically plausible and promising, only BAT shows sufficient evidence for implementation into clinical practice in randomized controlled trials. Baroreceptor activation therapy can be used in patients with symptomatic HFrEF despite optimal guideline-directed medication and device therapy. This article reviews the current and future use of neuromodulation in HF and provides an overview on current guideline recommendations and clinical practice.

Sympathomodulation in Heart Failure with High vs. Normal Ejection Fraction

Background

Despite recent advances in the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), the overall outcome is poor and evidence-based therapeutic options are scarce. So far, the only evidence-based therapy in HFpEF, sodium glucose linked transporter 2 inhibitors, has only insignificant effects in patients with a high EF (EF > 60%, HEF) when compared to a normal EF (EF 50%-60%, NEF). This could be explained by different biomechanical and cellular phenotypes of HFpEF across the range of EFs rather than a uniform pathophysiology. We aimed to investigate the concept of different phenotypes in the HEF and NEF using noninvasive single-beat estimations and to observe alterations in pressure-volume relations in both groups following sympathomodulation using renal denervation (RDN).

Methods

Patients from a previous study on RDN in HFpEF were stratified by having HFpEF with an HEF or NEF. Single-beat estimations were used to derive arterial elastance (Ea), end-systolic elastance (Ees), and diastolic capacitance (VPED₂₀).

Results

Overall, 63 patients were classified as having an HEF, and 36 patients were classified as having an NEF. Ea did not differ between the groups and was reduced at follow-up in both groups (p < 0.01). Ees was higher and VPED₂₀ was lower in the HEF than those in the NEF. Both were changed significantly at follow-up in the HEF but not in the NEF. Ees/Ea was lower in the NEF (0.95 ± 0.22 vs 1.15 ± 0.27, p < 0.01) and was significantly increased in the NEF (by 0.08 ± 0.20, p < 0.05) but not in the HEF.

Conclusions

Beneficial effects of RDN were observed in the NEF and HEF, supporting the further investigation of sympathomodulating treatments for HFpEF in future trials.

Therapeutic Approaches in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) in Children: Present and Future

For a long time, pediatric heart failure (HF) with preserved systolic function (HFpEF) has been noted in patients with cardiomyopathies and congenital heart disease. HFpEF is infrequently reported in children and instead of using the  HFpEF terminology the HF symptoms are attributed to diastolic dysfunction. Identifying HFpEF in children is challenging because of heterogeneous etiologies and unknown pathophysiological mechanisms. Advances in echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging techniques have further increased our understanding of HFpEF in children. However, the literature does not describe the incidence, etiology, clinical features, and treatment of HFpEF in children. At present, treatment of HFpEF in children is extrapolated from clinical trials in adults. There are significant differences between pediatric and adult HF with reduced ejection fraction, supported by a lack of adequate response to adult HF therapies. Evidence-based clinical trials in children are still not available because of the difficulty of conducting trials with a limited number of pediatric patients with HF. The treatment of HFpEF in children is based upon the clinician's experience, and the majority of children receive off-level medications. There are significant differences between pediatric and adult HFpEF pharmacotherapies in many areas, including side-effect profiles, underlying pathophysiologies, the β-receptor physiology, and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. This review describes the present and future treatments for children with HFpEF compared with adults. This review also highlights the need to urgently test new therapies in children with HFpEF to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of drugs and devices with proven benefits in adults.

Device-Based Sympathetic Nerve Regulation for Cardiovascular Diseases

Sympathetic overactivation plays an important role in promoting a variety of pathophysiological processes in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including ventricular remodeling, vascular endothelial injury and atherosclerotic plaque progression. Device-based sympathetic nerve (SN) regulation offers a new therapeutic option for some CVDs. Renal denervation (RDN) is the most well-documented method of device-based SN regulation in clinical studies, and several large-scale randomized controlled trials have confirmed its value in patients with resistant hypertension, and some studies have also found RDN to be effective in the control of heart failure and arrhythmias. Pulmonary artery denervation (PADN) has been clinically shown to be effective in controlling pulmonary hypertension. Hepatic artery denervation (HADN) and splenic artery denervation (SADN) are relatively novel approaches that hold promise for a role in cardiovascular metabolic and inflammatory-immune related diseases, and their first-in-man studies are ongoing. In addition, baroreflex activation, spinal cord stimulation and other device-based therapies also show favorable outcomes. This review summarizes the pathophysiological rationale and the latest clinical evidence for device-based therapies for some CVDs.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction based on aging and comorbidities

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a leading cause of hospitalizations and mortality when diagnosed at the age of ≥ 65 years. HFpEF represents multifactorial and multisystemic syndrome and has different pathophysiology and phenotypes. Its diagnosis is difficult to be established based on left ventricular ejection fraction and may benefit from individually tailored approaches, underlying age-related changes and frequent comorbidities. Compared with the rapid development in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, HFpEF presents a great challenge and needs to be addressed considering the failure of HF drugs to improve its outcomes. Further extensive studies on the relationships between HFpEF, aging, and comorbidities in carefully phenotyped HFpEF subgroups may help understand the biology, diagnosis, and treatment of HFpEF. The current review summarized the diagnostic and therapeutic development of HFpEF based on the complex relationships between aging, comorbidities, and HFpEF.

Hypertension and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: position paper by the European Society of Hypertension

Hypertension constitutes a major risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HFpEF is a prevalent clinical syndrome with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Specific guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HFpEF is not established due to lack of positive outcome data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and limitations of available studies. Although available evidence is limited, control of blood pressure (BP) is widely regarded as central to the prevention and clinical care in HFpEF. Thus, in current guidelines including the 2018 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Guidelines, blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers provides the backbone of BP-lowering therapy in hypertensive patients. Although superiority of RAS blockers has not been clearly shown in dedicated RCTs designed for HFpEF, we propose that this core drug treatment strategy is also applicable for hypertensive patients with HFpEF with the addition of some modifications. The latter apply to the use of spironolactone apart from the treatment of resistant hypertension and the use of the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor. In addition, novel agents such as sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, currently already indicated for high-risk patients with diabetes to reduce heart failure hospitalizations, and finerenone represent promising therapies and results from ongoing RCTs are eagerly awaited. The development of an effective and practical classification of HFpEF phenotypes and GDMT through dedicated high-quality RCTs are major unmet needs in hypertension research and calls for action.

Current Status of Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Therapy in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a significantly symptomatic disease and has a poor prognosis similar to that of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Contrary to HFrEF, HFpEF is difficult to diagnose, and the recommended diagnostic algorithm of HFpEF is complicated. Several therapies for HFpEF have failed to reduce mortality or morbidity. HFpEF is thought to be a complex and heterogeneous systemic disorder that has various phenotypes and multiple comorbidities. Therefore, therapeutic strategies of HFpEF need to change depending on the phenotype of the patient. This review highlights the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment of HFpEF.

Current Status and Future Perspectives of Renal Denervation

Despite the availability of numerous antihypertensive medications, hypertension treatment and control rates remain low, and uncontrolled hypertension is well-known to be one of the most important cardiovascular risk factors. Endovascular catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) has been developed to be a complementary or alternative treatment option for patients who cannot take medication, poor adherence, or have resistant hypertension despite the use of maximal doses of medications. Recently, several randomized trials for evaluating the efficacy and safety of second-generation RDN devices consistently show solid evidence for their blood pressure-lowering efficacy. This review summarizes the current evidence and future perspectives of RDN.

Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) therapy, a new procedure that uses radiofrequency ablation to interrupt efferent and afferent renal sympathetic nerve fibers, is a complementary or alternative treatment to antihypertensive medications for optimal control of blood pressure (BP). Although several single-arm early proof-of-concept studies showed significant BP reduction, the largest sham-controlled study using the first-generation RDN device (SYMPLICITY HTN-3) failed to significantly reduce BP in patients with resistant hypertension who were taking the guideline-based combination of antihypertensive medications. Since then, new devices and techniques have been developed to improve the efficacy and safety of RDN procedures. Sham-controlled trials using second-generation RDN devices (radiofrequency- and ultrasound-based) have provided solid evidence for their BP-lowering efficacy with and without the use of concomitant antihypertensive medication. Moreover, the safety profile of RDN in several registries and clinical trials appears to be excellent. This review summarizes the current evidence for RDN and discusses its current issues, future trials, Asian perspectives, and potential roles in both hypertension and other morbidities.

AT II Receptor Blockade and Renal Denervation: Different Interventions with Comparable Renal Effects?

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II (Ang II) and the renal sympathetic nervous system exert a strong influence on renal sodium and water excretion. We tested the hypothesis that already low doses of an Ang II inhibitor (candesartan) will result in similar effects on tubular sodium and water reabsorption in congestive heart failure (CHF) as seen after renal denervation (DNX).

METHODS

Measurement of arterial blood pressure, heart rate (HR), renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow (RPF), urine volume, and urinary sodium. To assess neural control of volume homeostasis, 21 days after the induction of CHF via myocardial infarction rats underwent volume expansion (0.9% NaCL; 10% body weight) to decrease RSNA. CHF rat and controls with or without DNX or pretreated with the Ang II type-1 receptor antagonist candesartan (0.5 ug i.v.) were studied.

RESULTS

CHF rats excreted only 68 + 10.2% of the volume load (10% body weight) in 90 min. CHF rats pretreated with candesartan or after DNX excreted from 92 to 103% like controls. Decreases of RSNA induced by volume expansion were impaired in CHF rats but unaffected by candesartan pointing to an intrarenal drug effect. GFR and RPF were not significantly different in controls or CHF.

CONCLUSION

The prominent function of increased RSNA - retaining salt and water - could no longer be observed after renal Ang II receptor blockade in CHF rats.

Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Arterial hypertension is the most common comorbidity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and mediates adverse hemodynamics through related aortic stiffness and increased pulsatile load. We aimed to investigate the clinical and hemodynamic implications of renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) in patients with HFpEF and uncontrolled arterial hypertension.

METHODS

Patients undergoing RDN between 2011 and 2018 in a single-center were retrospectively analyzed and classified as HFpEF (n=99) or no HF (n=65). Stroke volume index and aortic distensibility were measured through cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic properties were assessed echocardiographically.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients with HFpEF had higher stroke volume index (median 40 [interquartile range, 33-48] versus 33 [26-40] mL/m², P=0.002), pulse pressure (69 [63-77] versus 61 [55-67] mm Hg, P<0.001), but lower LV-VPES_100mm Hg (18 [10-28] versus 24 [15-40] mL, P=0.007) and aortic distensibility (1.5 [1.1-2.6] versus 2.7 [1.1-3.5] 10^-3 mm Hg^-1, P=0.013) as compared to no-HF patients. Systolic blood pressure decreased comparable in patients with HFpEF and no-HF patients following RDN (-9 [-16 to -2], P<0.001). After RDN stroke volume index (-3 [-9 to +3] mL/m², P=0.011) decreased and aortic distensibility (0.2 [-0.1 to +1.1] 10^-3 mm Hg^-1, P=0.007) and systolic stiffness (P<0.001) increased in HFpEF patients. LV diastolic stiffness and LV filling pressures as well as NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) decreased after RDN in patients with HFpEF (P=0.032, P=0.043, and P<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HFpEF undergoing RDN showed increased stroke volume index, vascular, and LV stiffness as compared to no-HF patients. Following RDN those hemodynamic alterations and reduced systolic and diastolic LV stiffness were partly normalized, implying RDN might be a potential therapeutic strategy for arterial hypertension and HFpEF.

The current status of renal denervation for the treatment of arterial hypertension

Despite the availability of safe and effective antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure (BP) control to guideline-recommended target values is poor. Several device-based therapies have been introduced to lower BP. The most extensively investigated approach is catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN), which aims to interrupt the activity of afferent and efferent renal sympathetic nerves by applying radiofrequency energy, ultrasound energy, or injection of alcohol in the perivascular space. The second generation of placebo-controlled trials have provided solid evidence for the BP-lowering efficacy of radiofrequency- and ultrasound-based RDN in patients with and without concomitant pharmacological therapy. In addition, the safety profile of RDN appears to be excellent in all registries and clinical trials. However, there remain unsolved issues to be addressed. This review summarizes the rationale as well as the current evidence and discusses open questions and possible future indications of catheter-based RDN.

Renal Denervation to Treat Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a global pandemic with a poor prognosis after hospitalization. Despite HF syndrome complexities, evidence of significant sympathetic overactivity in the manifestation and progression of HF is universally accepted. Confirmation of this dogma is observed in guideline-directed use of neurohormonal pharmacotherapies as a standard of care in HF. Despite reductions in morbidity and mortality, a growing patient population is resistant to these medications, while off-target side effects lead to dismal patient adherence to lifelong drug regimens. Novel therapeutic strategies, devoid of these limitations, are necessary to attenuate the progression of HF pathophysiology while continuing to reduce morbidity and mortality. Renal denervation is an endovascular procedure, whereby the ablation of renal nerves results in reduced renal afferent and efferent sympathetic nerve activity in the kidney and globally. In this review, we discuss the current state of preclinical and clinical research related to renal sympathetic denervation to treat HF.

Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): Current Perspectives and Recommendations

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a major global public health problem. Diagnosis of HFpEF is still challenging and built based on the comprehensive echocardiographic analysis. Currently, there are no universally accepted therapies that alter the clinical course of HFpEF. This review attempts to summarize the current advances in the diagnosis of HFpEF and provide future directions of the patients´ management with this very widespread, heterogeneous clinical syndrome.

Therapeutic approaches in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: past, present, and future

In contrast to the wealth of proven therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), therapeutic efforts in the past have failed to improve outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Moreover, to this day, diagnosis of HFpEF remains controversial. However, there is growing appreciation that HFpEF represents a heterogeneous syndrome with various phenotypes and comorbidities which are hardly to differentiate solely by LVEF and might benefit from individually tailored approaches. These hypotheses are supported by the recently presented PARAGON-HF trial. Although treatment with LCZ696 did not result in a significantly lower rate of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes among HFpEF patients, subanalyses suggest beneficial effects in female patients and those with an LVEF between 45 and 57%. In the future, prospective randomized trials should focus on dedicated, well-defined subgroups based on various information such as clinical characteristics, biomarker levels, and imaging modalities. These could clarify the role of LCZ696 in selected individuals. Furthermore, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors have just proven efficient in HFrEF patients and are currently also studied in large prospective clinical trials enrolling HFpEF patients. In addition, several novel disease-modifying drugs that pursue different strategies such as targeting cardiac inflammation and fibrosis have delivered preliminary optimistic results and are subject of further research. Moreover, innovative device therapies may enhance management of HFpEF, but need prospective adequately powered clinical trials to confirm safety and efficacy regarding clinical outcomes. This review highlights the past, present, and future therapeutic approaches in HFpEF.

Therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current status, unique challenges, and future directions

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most common form of HF. Among elderly women, HFpEF comprises more than 80% of incident HF cases. Adverse outcomes-exercise intolerance, poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations, and reduced survival-approach those of classic HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). However, despite its importance, our understanding of the pathophysiology of HFpEF is incomplete, and despite intensive efforts, optimal therapy remains uncertain, as most trials to date have been negative. This is in stark contrast to management of HFrEF, where dozens of positive trials have established a broad array of effective, guidelines-based therapies that definitively improve a range of clinically meaningful outcomes. In addition to providing an overview of current management status, we examine evolving data that may help explain this paradox, overcome past challenges, provide a roadmap for future success, and that underpin a wave of new trials that will test novel approaches based on these insights.

Renal denervation in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure despite resynchronization therapy - a pilot study

Introduction

Renal denervation (RD) has been shown to decrease sympathetic function in patients with hypertension. Its efficacy in symptomatic chronic heart failure (CHF) patients not responding to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has not been evaluated.

Aim

To assess whether a less invasive treatment method – renal denervation – is safe in symptomatic heart failure patients despite optimal medical treatment and resynchronization therapy and whether it is associated with an improvement in clinical status, exercise capacity and hemodynamic parameters.

Material and methods

The study was an open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients were divided into an intervention (RD) and a control group. Clinical data collection, blood pressure (BP) measurements, echocardiography, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and laboratory tests were performed before, 6 and 12 months after RD. The patients were followed-up to 24 months.

Results

We included 20 patients aged 52.0 to 86.0 years (median age: 71.5 years), 15 males and 5 females with median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 32.5%, body mass index 31.3 kg/m². Renal denervation was safe, no significant adverse effects were registered. There were no significant differences in LVEF, BP, 6MWT and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration 6 and 12 months after RD or control.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that RD in CHF patients not responding to CRT is safe and does not worsen exercise capacity and hemodynamic parameters.

[Heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction]

Heart failure remains the number one diagnosis among patients receiving inpatient treatment in Germany. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) needs to be verified by signs and symptoms of HF, echocardiographic parameters as well as cardiac biomarkers. Based on etiological and pathophysiological considerations, a classification into systolic and diastolic heart failure and later heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HFpEF was proposed. The inhomogeneous group of patients with HFpEF accounts for half of all heart failure cases in the population. Effective treatment options are limited. This article discusses which verified treatments may help or may even be harmful. A glimpse is taken into the future and those substances that are in advanced stages of clinical trials are described.

Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction and with preserved ejection fraction

The annual "heart report" published by the German Heart Foundation (Deutsche Herzstiftung) in December 2017 indicates that heart failure (ICD I50) remains the number one diagnosis of in-hospital-treated patients throughout Germany. For some time, the clinical diagnosis of heart failure has been verified by echocardiographic parameters as well as cardiac biomarkers that assist the clinician to rule in or rule out the presence of a failing heart, when used wisely. By introducing the term "heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction" (HFmrEF), the 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) heart failure guidelines established a third heart failure entity, which was not necessarily seen as an improvement by the heart failure community. Nevertheless, half of all patients suffering from heart failure are now classified as having HFmrEF or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but the etiology and treatment options differ substantially. To elucidate this issue, the current review aims to highlight the key findings published to date. This should minimize the confusion that may have been generated by the new term "HFmrEF".

Beyond pharmacological treatment: an insight into therapies that target specific aspects of heart failure pathophysiology

Heart failure is a common syndrome associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The management of symptoms and the strategies for improving prognosis have largely been based on pharmacological treatments. The pathophysiology of heart failure is complex because of the multiple causes responsible for this syndrome. This Series paper presents some examples of advances in heart failure management, in which the treatment specifically targets the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the symptoms. These treatments include treatment of electromechanical dyssynchrony and dysrhythmia by cardiac resynchronisation and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators; neurohumoral modification by baroreflex and vagal stimulation; prevention of adverse cardiac remodelling by interatrial shunts; and finally targeting the myocardium directly by cell therapy in an attempt to regenerate new myocardial cells.

Renal denervation improves cardiac function by attenuating myocardiocyte apoptosis in dogs after myocardial infarction

Background

Myocardial apoptosis is important in the pathogenesis and progression of myocardial infarction-induced heart failure (MI-HF). Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has become a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of HF. Previous studies have shown that RDN could improve heart function Yao et al. (Exp Ther Med 14:4104-4110, 2017). However, whether and how RDN regulates myocardial apoptosis in MI-HF is unclear. This study sought to evaluate the effects of RDN on cardiac function and apoptosis-related gene expression in MI-HF dogs.

Methods

Eighteen healthy mongrel dogs were randomly divided into control group(n = 6), model group(n = 6) and treatment group(n = 6). MI-HF was established in model group and treatment group by anhydrous alcohol embolization, after heart failure dogs in the treatment group and model group proceeded bilateral renal artery ablation and bilateral renal arteriography, respectively. The cardiac function parameters were evaluated by echocardiographic; the serum NT-BNP level was detected by ELISA; the degree of myocardial fibrosis was observed through masson staining; the expression of MMP-2, MMP-9 in the cardiac were got by immunohistochemistry. TUNEL method was used to observe cardiomyocyte apoptotsis and calculate the apoptosis index (AI). Relative expression of Bcl-2 and Bax, Caspase3 and GRP78 were detected using RT-PCR and Western Blot. Renal artery H&E staining and serum creatinine were conducted to access the efficacy and safety of RDN.

Results

Four weeks after RDN, the LVEDD, LVESD and LVEDP decreased, and the LVEF and LVSP increased in the treatment group compared with those in the control group (all P < 0.05). Moreover, NT-BNP, an indicator of cardiac function was decreased. Additionally, MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels in the myocardium decreased significantly in the treatment group. Furthermore, the levels of Bax, and caspase 3 decreased, while the level of Bcl-2 increased. Thus, myocardial apoptosis was attenuated in RDN treated dogs. We also found that the level of GRP78 which is activated in response to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, was decreased. However, serum creatinine levels were not significantly different between the RND-treated dogs and the control dogs.

Conclusion

Cardiac function was improved by RDN treatment through regulating apoptosis and ER stress in cardiomyocytes in dogs after MI.

Percutaneous renal artery denervation in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) is as an effective treatment for heart failure (HF), but its effects on cardiac function of patients with HF are not well documented. Here, the aim was to investigate RDN's effect on patients with chronic systolic HF, by conducting a single-center, prospective, randomized, and controlled study.

METHODS

Sixty patients with chronic systolic HF were randomly assigned to the RDN or control groups, receiving percutaneous catheter-based RDN with radiofrequency ablation and drug treatment, respectively. All patients performed a 6-minute walk test, echocardiography, blood pressure measurement, and biochemical test, at both baseline and in a 6-month follow up.

RESULTS

Over 6-month follow up, patients in RDN group showed a decrease in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (440.1 ± 226.5 pg/mL vs. 790.8 ± 287.0 pg/mL, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.14), an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (39.1 ± 7.3% vs. 35.6 ± 3.3%, p = 0.017, Cohen's d = 0.61), improved New York Heart Association class assessment (p = 0.01, Cohen's d = 0.66), and decreased blood pressures (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.91), without reporting hypotension and syncope amaurosis. No significant between-group difference was observed for glomerular filtration rate and heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal denervation which effectively and safely improves patient's cardiac function as well as exercise tolerance, could be considered as an effective treatment for chronic systolic HF.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents a heterogeneous collection of conditions that are unified by the presence of a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, evidence of impaired diastolic function and elevated natriuretic peptide levels, all within the context of typical heart failure signs and symptoms. However, while HFpEF is steadily becoming the predominant form of heart failure, disease-modifying treatment options for this population remain sparse. This review provides an overview of the diagnosis, management and prevention of HFpEF for general physicians.

Effects of Renal Denervation on Cardiac Structural and Functional Abnormalities in Patients with Resistant Hypertension or Diastolic Dysfunction

The aim of the present study is to systematically evaluate the impact of RDN on cardiac structure and function in patients with resistant hypertension (RH) or diastolic dysfunction. We retrieved Pubmed, Embase and Cocharane Library databases, from inception to April 1^st, 2016. Studies reporting left ventricular mass (LVMI) or left ventricular (LV) diastolic function (reflected by the ratio of mitral inflow velocity to annular relaxation velocity [E/e’]) responses to RDN were included. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 3 controlled studies and 11 uncontrolled studies were finally identified. In observational studies, there was a reduction in LVMI, E/e’ and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) at 6 months, compared with pre-RDN values. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) elevated at 6 months following RDN. In RCTs, however, no significant change in LVMI, E/e’, BNP, left atrial volume index or LVEF was observed at 12 months, compared with pharmaceutical therapy. In summary, both LV hypertrophy and cardiac function improved at 6 months after RDN. Nonetheless, current evidence failed to show that RDN was superior to intensive (optimal) drug therapy in improving cardiac remodeling and function.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current management and future strategies : Expert opinion on the behalf of the Nucleus of the "Heart Failure Working Group" of the German Society of Cardiology (DKG)

About 50% of all patients suffering from heart failure (HF) exhibit a reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤ 40%), termed HFrEF. The others may be classified into HF with midrange EF (HFmrEF 40-50%) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, EF ≥ 50%). Presentation and pathophysiology of HFpEF is heterogeneous and its management remains a challenge since evidence of therapeutic benefits on outcome is scarce. Up to now, there are no therapies improving survival in patients with HFpEF. Thus, the treatment targets symptom relief, quality of life and reduction of cardiac decompensations by controlling fluid retention and managing risk factors and comorbidities. As such, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, diuretics, calcium channel blockers (CBB) and beta-blockers, diet and exercise recommendations are still important in HFpEF, although these interventions are not proven to reduce mortality in large randomized controlled trials. Recently, numerous new treatment targets have been identified, which are further investigated in studies using, e.g. soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, inorganic nitrates, the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ 696, and SGLT2 inhibitors. In addition, several devices such as the CardioMEMS, interatrial septal devices (IASD), cardiac contractility modulation (CCM), renal denervation, and baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) were investigated in different forms of HFpEF populations and some of them have the potency to offer new hopes for patients suffering from HFpEF. On the basic research field side, lot of new disease-modifying strategies are under development including anti-inflammatory drugs, mitochondrial-targeted antioxidants, new anti-fibrotic and microRNA-guided interventions are under investigation and showed already promising results. This review addresses available data of current best clinical practice and management approaches based on expert experiences and summarizes novel approaches towards HFpEF.

The autonomic nervous system as a therapeutic target in heart failure: a scientific position statement from the Translational Research Committee of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Despite improvements in medical therapy and device-based treatment, heart failure (HF) continues to impose enormous burdens on patients and health care systems worldwide. Alterations in autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity contribute to cardiac disease progression, and the recent development of invasive techniques and electrical stimulation devices has opened new avenues for specific targeting of the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the ANS. The Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology recently organized an expert workshop which brought together clinicians, trialists and basic scientists to discuss the ANS as a therapeutic target in HF. The questions addressed were: (i) What are the abnormalities of ANS in HF patients? (ii) What methods are available to measure autonomic dysfunction? (iii) What therapeutic interventions are available to target the ANS in patients with HF, and what are their specific strengths and weaknesses? (iv) What have we learned from previous ANS trials? (v) How should we proceed in the future?

Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of patients with heart failure: summary of the available evidence

Heart failure syndrome results from compensatory mechanisms that operate to restore - back to normal - the systemic perfusion pressure. Sympathetic overactivity plays a pivotal role in heart failure; norepinephrine contributes to maintenance of the systemic blood pressure and increasing preload. Cardiac norepinephrine spillover increases in patients with heart failure; norepinephrine exerts direct toxicity on cardiac myocytes resulting in a decrease of synthetic activity and/or viability. Importantly, cardiac norepinephrine spillover is a powerful predictor of mortality in patients with moderate to severe HF. This provided the rationale for trials that demonstrated survival benefit associated with the use of beta adrenergic blockers in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Nevertheless, the MOXCON trial demonstrated that rapid uptitration of moxonidine (inhibitor of central sympathetic outflow) in patients with heart failure was associated with excess mortality and morbidity, despite reduction of plasma norepinephrine. Interestingly, renal norepinephrine spillover was the only independent predictor of adverse outcome in patients with heart failure, in multivariable analysis. Recently, renal sympathetic denervation has emerged as a novel approach for control of blood pressure in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. This article summarizes the available evidence for the effect of renal sympathetic denervation in the setting of heart failure. Key messages Experimental studies supported a beneficial effect of renal sympathetic denervation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Clinical studies demonstrated improvement of symptoms, and left ventricular function. In heart failure and preserved ejection fraction, renal sympathetic denervation is associated with improvement of surrogate endpoints.

Renal Denervation to Modify Hypertension and the Heart Failure State

Sympathetic overactivation of renal afferent and efferent nerves have been implicated in the development and maintenance of several cardiovascular disease states, including resistant hypertension and heart failure with both reduced and preserved systolic function. With the development of minimally invasive catheter-based techniques, percutaneous renal denervation has become a safe and effective method of attenuating sympathetic overactivation. Percutaneous renal denervation, therefore, has the potential to modify and treat hypertension and congestive heart failure. Although future randomized controlled studies are needed to definitively prove its efficacy, renal denervation has the potential to change the way we view and treat cardiovascular disease.

Efficacy and Safety of Inter-Atrial Shunt Devices for Heart Failure With Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: Early Experiences

BACKGROUND

Elevated left atrial (LA) pressure is thought to be the common final pathological way in decompensated heart failure (HF). We aimed to gather currently available clinical evidence to evaluate the feasibility of inter-atrial shunt devices in HF patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Cochrane Library databases through 23rd April 23, 2016. Data were extracted by two investigators independently. We pooled outcomes of interest in Revman 5.2 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom).

RESULTS

A total of four records were identified in the final review, involving HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and those with preserved EF. Pooled analysis showed that pulmonary capillary wedge pressure significantly reduced after inter-atrial shunt devices implantation, with a mean difference (MD) of -3.54mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI]=-5.63 to -1.45mmHg) and low heterogeneity (I²=16%), 6-minute walk distance significantly increased, with a MD of 36.84m (95% CI=3.52 to 70.16m) and low heterogeneity (I²=0%), and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score significantly improved (MD=-22.99 with 95% CI -44.45 to -1.52) following shunting. No evidence of worsening pulmonary hypertension was observed in these studies. No device-related deaths, thrombo-embolic or cardiac events were recorded during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that inter-atrial shunting might be a potential and promising therapy for HF, regardless of the ejection fraction.

Effects of renal denervation on vascular remodelling in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A randomised control trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of renal denervation (RDT) on micro- and macro-vascular function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

DESIGN

A prospective, randomised, open-controlled trial with blinded end-point analysis.

SETTING

A single-centre London teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five patients with HFpEF who were recruited into the RDT-PEF trial.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Macro-vascular: 24-h ambulatory pulse pressure, aorta distensibilty (from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), aorta pulse wave velocity (CMR), augmentation index (peripheral tonometry) and renal artery blood flow indices (renal MR). Micro-vascular: endothelial function (peripheral tonometry) and urine microalbuminuria.

RESULTS

At baseline, 15 patients were normotensive, 9 were hypertensive and 1 was hypotensive. RDT did not lower any of the blood pressure indices. Though there was evidence of abnormal vascular function at rest, RDT did not affect these at 3 or 12 months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

RDT did not improve markers of macro- and micro-vascular function.