Growth-Correcting the Bioconcentration Factor and Biomagnification Factor in Bioaccumulation Assessments

Low Dietary Uptake Efficiencies and Biotransformation Prevent Biomagnification of Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) and Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) in Rainbow Trout

With octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) being considered for evaluation under the UN Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, which specifically acknowledges risks of biomagnification of persistent organic pollutants in traditional foods, a study into the mechanism of the biomagnification process of D4 and D5 in Rainbow trout was conducted by combining the absorption-distribution-metabolism-excretion for bioaccumulation (ADME-B) approach to determine intestinal and somatic biotransformation rates and radiochemical analyses to identify metabolite formation. High rates of intestinal biotransformation of D4 and D5 (i.e., 2.1 (0.70 SE) and 0.88 (0.67 SE) day-1, respectively) and metabolite formation [i.e., 52.0 (17 SD)% of D4 and 56.5% (8.2 SD)% of D5 were metabolized] were observed that caused low dietary uptake efficiencies of D4 and D5 in fish of 15.5 (2.9 SE)% and 21.0 (6.5 SE)% and biomagnification factors of 0.44 (0.08 SE) for D4 and 0.78 (0.24 SE) kg-lipid·kg-lipid-1 for D5. Bioaccumulation profiles indicated little effect of growth dilution on the bioaccumulation of D4 and D5 in fish and were substantially different from those of PCB153. The study highlights the importance of intestinal biotransformation in negating biomagnification of substances in organisms and explains differences between laboratory tests and field observations of bioaccumulation of D4 and D5.

Dietary Uptake of Highly Hydrophobic Chemicals by Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss)

Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) was exposed through the diet to a mixture of non-ionic organic chemicals for 28 d, followed by a depuration phase, in accordance with OECD method 305. The mixture included hexachlorobenzene (HCB), 2,2',5,5'-tetrachlorobiphenyl (PCB-52), 2,2',5,5'-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB-153), decachlorobiphenyl (PCB-209), decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE209), decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE), bis-(2-ethylhexyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromophthalate (TBPH), perchloro-p-terphenyl (p-TCP), perchloro-m-terphenyl (m-TCP), and perchloro-p-quaterphenyl (p-QTCP), the latter six of which are considered highly hydrophobic based on n-octanol/water partition coefficients (KOW) greater than 108. All chemicals had first-order uptake and elimination kinetics except p-QTCP, whose kinetics could not be verified due to limitations of analytical detection in the elimination phase. For HCB and PCBs, the growth-corrected elimination rates (k2g), assimilation efficiencies (α), and biomagnification factors (BMFL) corrected for lipid content compared well with literature values. For the highly hydrophobic chemicals, elimination rates were faster than the rates for HCB and PCBs, and α's and BMFLs were much lower than those of HCB and PCBs, i.e., ranging from 0.019 to 2.8%, and from 0.000051 to 0.023 (g-lipid/g-lipid), respectively. As a result, the highly hydrophobic organic chemicals were found be much less bioavailable and bioaccumulative than HCB and PCBs. Based on the current laboratory dietary exposures, none of the highly hydrophobic substances would be expected to biomagnify, but Trophic Magnification Factors (TMFs) > 1 have been reported from field studies for TBPH and DBDPE. Additional research is needed to understand and reconcile the apparent inconsistencies in these two lines of evidence for bioaccumulation assessment.

Statistical Post-Processing Method for Evaluating Bioaccumulation in Fish Due to Dietary Exposure in Japan

In 2018, the dietary exposure bioaccumulation fish test of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Test Guideline No. 305 was introduced into Japan's Chemical Substances Control Law. The Japanese government has adopted a single definitive testing criterion for the absence of high bioaccumulation: the growth-corrected kinetic dietary magnification factor (BMFKg) must be less than 0.007. The aim of this study was to decrease regulatory restrictions in order to increase newly developed chemical substances and their subsequent approval of their manufacture and import, i.e., the present study was motivated by concerns over the criterion being too restrictive, rather than scientific concerns, such as uncertainty in criterion. We used statistical post-processing to assess the possibility of expanding the criteria for not being highly bioaccumulative. Based on our results, we proposed the criterion that the test substance should be considered not highly bioaccumulative if the following two conditions are met: (1) The ratio of the maximum to the minimum measured 5% lipid-standardized biomagnification factor at the end of the uptake phase (BMF5%, n = 5) for the test substance and reference substance should be less than 3.0, and (2) For the measured BMF5% of the test substance (n = 5), the probability that the next (the sixth) BMF5% is below 0.0334 should exceed 95% based on statistical post-processing. It is worth noting that the BMF5% values should only be applied for non-ionizable lipid soluble compounds. Application of our suggested approach to Japan implies that the criterion for chemical substances that are not highly bioaccumulative in the dietary exposure bioaccumulation fish test would be increased from 0.007 to 0.0149.

A weight of evidence approach for bioaccumulation assessment

Bioaccumulation assessments conducted by regulatory agencies worldwide use a variety of methods, types of data, metrics, and categorization criteria. Lines of evidence (LoE) for bioaccumulation assessment can include bioaccumulation metrics such as in vivo bioconcentration factor (BCF) and biomagnification factor (BMF) data measured from standardized laboratory experiments, and field (monitoring) data such as BMFs, bioaccumulation factors (BAFs), and trophic magnification factors (TMFs). In silico predictions from mass-balance models and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) and a combination of in vitro biotransformation rates and in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) models can also be used. The myriad bioaccumulation metrics and categorization criteria and underlying uncertainty in measured or modeled data can make decision-making challenging. A weight of evidence (WoE) approach is recommended to address uncertainty. The Bioaccumulation Assessment Tool (BAT) guides a user through the process of collecting and generating various LoE required for assessing the bioaccumulation of neutral and ionizable organic chemicals in aquatic (water-respiring) and air-breathing organisms. The BAT includes data evaluation templates (DETs) to critically evaluate the reliability of the LoE used in the assessment. The DETs were developed from standardized testing guidance. The approach used in the BAT is consistent with OECD and SETAC WoE principles and facilitates the implementation of chemical policy objectives in chemical assessment and management. The recommended methods are also iterative and tiered, providing pragmatic methods to reduce unnecessary animal testing. General concepts of the BAT are presented and case study applications of the tool for hexachlorobenzene (HCB) and β-hexachlorocyclohexane (β-HCH) are demonstrated. The BAT provides a consistent and transparent WoE framework to address uncertainty in bioaccumulation assessment and is envisaged to evolve with scientific and regulatory developments. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:1235-1253. © 2022 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (D4, D5, and D6) as the emerging pollutants in environment: environmental distribution, fate, and toxicological assessments

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have now become a subject of environmental contamination and risk assessment due to their widespread use and occurrence in different environmental matrices. Due to their exceptional physio-chemical properties, these compounds are diversely used for formulations of consumer products and others implying their continuous and significant release to environmental compartments. This has captured the major attention of the concerned communities on the grounds of potential health hazards to human and biota. The present study aims at comprehensively reviewing its occurrence in air, water, soil, sediments, sludge, dusts, biogas, biosolids, and biota and their environmental behavior as well. Concentrations of cVMS in indoor air and biosolids were higher; however, no significant concentrations were observed in water, soil, and sediments except for wastewaters. No threat to the aquatic organisms has been identified as their concentrations do not exceed the NOEC (maximum no observed effect concentration) thresholds. Mammalian (rodents) toxicity hazards were not very evident except for the occurrence of uterine tumors in very rare cases under long-term chronic and repeated dose exposures in laboratory conditions. Human relevancy to rodents were also not strongly enough established. Therefore, more careful examinations are required to develop stringent weight of evidences in scientific domain and ease the policy making with respect to their production and use so as to combat any environmental consequences.

A review of bioaccumulation of volatile methylsiloxanes in aquatic ecosystems

Volatile methylsiloxanes (VMSs) are found in a broad range of industrial and consumer products. They are categorized as "high production volume chemicals" by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and listed as candidates of substances of very high concern in 2018, by the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Industrial wastewater and treated effluents may contain VMSs in different amounts, which can be discharged in the receptor media and may lead to environmental contamination. This can result in direct exposure to aquatic receptors in the water column or to benthic invertebrates from contact and/or ingestion of sediments, and indirect exposures through the aquatic food chain. The possible toxicological effects of VMSs for the aquatic biota and human ecology are not very well known since published information regarding this topic is scarce. VMSs have been subjected to regulatory scrutiny for environmental concerns and have already been screened to determine their environmental risk and ecological harm. This paper aims to assess VMSs bioaccumulation and potential biomagnification on food webs, using several bioaccumulation metrics. The result is a high-level overview of all the collected data, comparing the findings and the experimental conditions applied during the assessments. Several studies present conflicting results regarding the bioaccumulation categorization. Some aquatic organisms demonstrated a high bioconcentration and bioaccumulation of these contaminants. Trophic magnification factors (TMFs) have been suggested as the most reliable tool to assess a chemical behaviour in food webs. However, bioaccumulation studies in food webs provided mixed information, with some studies indicating trophic dilution and others presenting a potential of trophic biomagnification of VMSs. Efforts should be directed to obtain field-based levels of VMSs at different trophic levels and a wider range of linear VMSs should be analysed, since most studies focused on D4, D5 and D6.

Residue and Risk Assessment of Imidacloprid and Chlorantraniliprole in Open Field and Greenhouse Celery

ABSTRACT

The residue levels and risk assessment of imidacloprid (IMI) and chlorantraniliprole (CAP) in celery grown under open field and greenhouse cultivation were investigated. Both pesticides were used through foliar application and soil drench application at the recommended dose (RD) and 10-fold recommended dose (10RD). The half-lives of IMI and CAP in celery were 1.9 to 5.8 days and 4.3 to 6.5 days after foliar application, respectively, and the dietary risk quotients of IMI and CAP were 14.8 to 18.3% and 1.0 to 1.2%, respectively. For soil drench application, the half-lives of IMI and CAP in soil were 17.5 to 28.5 days and 15.1 to 23.7 days, respectively. Celery plants were able to absorb both insecticides from the soil. The highest concentrations of IMI in celery plants were 0.12 to 0.24 mg kg-1 (RD) and 0.34 to 0.39 mg kg-1 (10RD), and those for CAP were 0.0081 to 0.015 mg kg-1 (RD) and 0.028 to 0.057 mg kg-1 (10RD). Based on the highest residues of IMI and CAP in celery, the dietary risk quotients of IMI and CAP were 15.0% (RD) to 15.6% (10RD) and 1.0% (RD and 10RD) after soil drench application, respectively. The observed bioconcentration factors were 1.38 to 2.11 (IMI) and 0.35 to 0.48 (CAP), indicating that celery accumulated IMI more easily than CAP. The foliar and soil applications of IMI and CAP in celery at the RD and 10RD do not pose a safety risk to consumers.

HIGHLIGHTS

Bioaccumulation and depuration of TiO2 nanoparticles by zebrafish through dietary exposure: Size- and number concentration-resolved analysis using single-particle ICP-MS

The bioaccumulation and depuration of TiO₂ nanoparticles (TiO₂NPs) by zebrafish via the dietary exposure following the OECD Test Guideline 305 (OECD TG305) was evaluated using particle size- and number concentration-resolved analysis based on single-particle ICP-MS (spICP-MS). We found that using enzymatic digestion without H₂O₂ or excessive heating can recover 84.0 ± 4.0% and 94.5 ± 3.5% of TiO₂NP mass and number concentrations from fish tissue, respectively, without altering the size distribution of parent TiO₂NPs. OECD TG305 can allow for the evaluation of bioaccumulation and depuration of TiO₂NPs by fish based on the particle mass and number dose metrics. The toxicokinetic modeling can reasonably describe the mass- and number-based measurement data with the derived absorption efficiency α at ~0.2, depuration rate at ~0.5 d^-1, and kinetic biomagnification factor (BMF_k) at ~0.007 comparable with available data. The mass concentration- and number concentration-based bioaccumulation metrics including body burdens are correlated for TiO₂NPs that remained nano-sized in vivo and exhibited marginal physicochemical alterations upon uptake by fish. The result indicates that the traditional mass concentration metric may be used to represent the fish bioaccumulation potential for chemically inert NPs like TiO₂.

Normalizing the Biomagnification Factor

Following a recent proposal of normalizing the experimentally derived biomagnification factor (BMF) to a 5% lipid content in fish, we explore the normalization of the BMF of lipophilic chemicals in fish. We illustrate with theoretical models and experimental data that the BMF of lipophilic chemicals is a function of the lipid content of the diet and that poorly metabolizable, lipophilic chemicals biomagnify in organisms to a greater degree when present in higher-lipid content food. The proposed normalization of the laboratory BMF to the lipid content of the fish and subsequent standardization to a 5% fish lipid content, which is numerically identical to normalizing the BMF to a 5% dietary lipid content, has the potential to underestimate the biomagnification potential of lipophilic substances in aquatic food webs. The BMF normalized to both the lipid content of the fish and the lipid content of the diet, which is the biomagnification metric included in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's bioaccumulation testing guideline 305, better represents real-world biomagnification than the proposed BMF normalized and standardized to a 5% lipid content in fish. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1204-1211. © 2020 SETAC.

Comparison of a simple and a complex model for BCF prediction using in vitro biotransformation data

A promising approach for bioaccumulation assessment with reduced animal use is the prediction of bioconcentration factors (BCFs) using in vitro biotransformation data. However, it has been recognized that the BCFs predicted using current models often are in poor agreement with experimental BCFs. Furthermore, extrahepatic biotransformation (e.g. in gill or GIT) is usually not accounted for. Here, we compare two BCF prediction models: a simple one-compartment and a more advanced multi-compartment model. Both models are implemented in a two-in-one calculation tool for the prediction of BCFs using in vitro data. Furthermore, both models were set up in a way that in vitro data for extrahepatic biotransformation can be easily considered, if desired. The models differ in their complexity: the one-compartment model is attractive because its simplicity, while the multi-compartment model is characterized by its refined closeness to reality. A comparison of the results shows that both models yield almost identical results for the presently evaluated cases with plausible physiological data. For regulatory purposes, there is thus no reason not to use the simple one-compartment model. However, if it is desired to represent special in vivo characteristics, e.g. first-pass effects or the direct GIT-to-liver blood flow, the multi-compartment model should be used.

A Toxicokinetic Framework and Analysis Tool for Interpreting Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guideline 305 Dietary Bioaccumulation Tests

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development guideline 305 for bioaccumulation testing in fish includes the option to conduct a dietary test for assessing a chemical's bioaccumulation behavior. However, the one-compartment toxicokinetic model that is used in the guidelines to analyze the results from dietary bioaccumulation tests is not consistent with the current state of the science, experimental practices, and information needs for bioaccumulation and risk assessment. The present study presents 1) a 2-compartment toxicokinetic modeling framework for describing the bioaccumulation of neutral hydrophobic organic chemicals in fish and 2) an associated toxicokinetic analysis tool (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion [ADME] B calculator) for the analysis and interpretation of dietary bioaccumulation test data from OECD-305 dietary tests. The model framework and ADME-B calculator are illustrated by analysis of fish dietary bioaccumulation test data for 238 substances representing different structural classes and susceptibilities to biotransformation. The ADME of the chemicals is determined from dietary bioaccumulation tests and bioconcentration factors, biomagnification factors, and somatic and intestinal biotransformation rates. The 2-compartment fish toxicokinetic model can account for the effect of the exposure pathway on bioaccumulation, which the one-compartment model cannot. This insight is important for applying a weight-of-evidence approach to bioaccumulation assessment where information from aqueous and dietary test endpoints can be integrated to improve the evaluation of a chemical's bioaccumulation potential. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;39:171-188. © 2019 SETAC.