Economic and Health Care Burdens of Hepatitis Delta: A Study of Commercially Insured Adults in the United States

Double reflex testing improves the efficacy and cost effectiveness of hepatitis delta diagnosis in southern Spain

This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of undiagnosed hepatitis delta in southern Spain (Andalusia) and assess the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of implementing reflex testing for hepatitis D detection in HBsAg-positive patients. A multicenter ambispective study was conducted in 17 Andalusian hospitals. The retrospective phase (January 2018-June 2022) analyzed diagnostic processes for hepatitis delta in HBsAg-positive patients. The prospective phase (October 2022-March 2023) implemented reflex testing, performing anti-HDV serology on all HBsAg-positive patients without prior testing. HDV RNA testing followed for those who tested anti-HDV-positive. In the retrospective phase, out of 18,583 HBsAg-positive patients, anti-HDV tests were performed on 3,436 (18%), identifying 205 (6%) positive cases. HDV RNA was tested in 158 (77%) anti-HDV-positive patients, with 69 (44%) testing positive. In the prospective phase, out of 2,384 HBsAg-positive patients without prior anti-HDV testing, 2,293 (96%) were tested, identifying 109 (4.7%) positive cases. HDV RNA was analyzed in 97 (89%) anti-HDV-positive patients, with 30 (31%) testing positive. Reflex testing increased anti-HDV detection by 77%, resulting in a fourfold increase in detecting anti-HDV-positive patients and a threefold increase in detecting HDV RNA-positive patients, reducing undiagnosed HDV RNA-positive cases to 4% compared to 45% with clinical practice. Cost analysis indicated a saving of €265,954 with reflex testing. Reflex testing improves HDV detection, reduces costs, and simplifies diagnosis, making it an efficient strategy for managing chronic hepatitis D patients.

Clinical and economic value of bulevirtide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis D

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Bulevirtide (Hepcludex®) is the first drug approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis D (CHD), unlike the current off-label treatment (PEG-IFN-α), limited in clinical practice and associated with post-treatment relapses. In a hypothetical cohort of CHD patients in Spain, the study aim was to compare the efficiency of bulevirtide with PEG-IFN-α in terms of clinical events avoided and associated cost savings.

METHODS

A validated economic model reflecting the natural history of the disease was used to project lifetime liver complications and costs for two hypothetical cohorts treated with bulevirtide or PEG-IFN-α. The model considered progression to complications such as decompensated cirrhosis (DCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver transplantation (LT), and death. The efficacy rates used at 24 and 48 weeks were defined as the combined response rate for bulevirtide and undetectable HDV RNA to PEG-IFN-α. The numbers of clinic events and associated costs were evaluated from the perspective of the National Healthcare System.

RESULTS

In a hypothetical cohort of 3882 patients, bulevirtide reduced the numbers of complications events in comparison to PEG-IFN-α (152 DCC, 113 HCC, 11 LT, and 321 deaths over a lifetime). This was associated with a reduction of event-related costs of €11,837,044 (DCC €1,138,059; HCC €1,503,583; LT €7,834,291; and death €1,361,111).

CONCLUSION

In patients with CHD, bulevirtide could prevent a significant number of clinical events compared to PEG-IFN-α and contribute to cost savings through these reduction in liver complications. Further testing for hepatitis D virus is needed so that more patients can benefit from bulevirtide.

Cost analysis of hidden hepatitis D virus infection in Spain

INTRODUCTION

A significant percentage of patients coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis D virus (HDV) are undiagnosed. Coinfected patients progress to advanced liver disease faster than HBV monoinfected patients, thereby consuming more healthcare resources. The aim was to perform an analysis to determine the cost of hidden HDV infection in Spain.

METHODS

An analytical model was developed to estimate the prevalence of hidden HDV infection with/without advanced liver disease at the time of diagnosis. An epidemiological flow chart was established to quantify undiagnosed chronic hepatitis D patients. The percentages of patients with compensated cirrhosis (CC), decompensated cirrhosis (DC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and requiring liver transplantation (LT) and their annual costs were subsequently obtained from the literature. Direct healthcare costs were considered within a time horizon of 1 year. For patients without advanced disease, the consumption of healthcare resources was obtained from an experts panel.

RESULTS

A total of 2180 patients with hidden HDV infection were estimated; of these, 1188 (54%) had advanced liver disease (29%-CC, 57%-DC, and 8%-HCC) or underwent LT (6%), and 992 (46%) patients did not have advanced disease. The total annual cost of hidden HDV would be € 17.8million (€ 16.9million with advanced disease and € 882,400 for those without).

CONCLUSIONS

Hidden HDV infection represents a high economic burden in Spain due to the rapid progression of liver disease in affected patients. These results highlight the importance of early diagnosis to prevent future clinical and economic burden related to liver disease progression.

Hepatitis Delta Virus Testing, Prevalence, and Liver-Related Outcomes Among US Veterans With Chronic Hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is associated with worse liver-related outcomes. We aim to comprehensively evaluate HDV testing, diagnosis, and liver-related outcomes among a national cohort of US Veterans with CHB.

METHODS

US Veterans with CHB from 2010 to 2023 were evaluated to determine trends in HDV testing (anti-HDV antibody, HDV RNA) and proportion positive among those tested. HDV positive patients were 1:2 propensity score matched to CHB patients who were HDV negative to evaluate incidence (per 100,000 person-years) of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, or hepatocellular carcinoma using competing risks Nelson-Aalen methods for estimating cumulative hazards.

RESULTS

Among the 27,548 CHB patients identified, 16.1% completed HDV testing, among whom 3.25% (n = 144) were positive. After excluding patients with cirrhosis or HCC at baseline, 71 patients with HDV (median follow-up 5.3 years, interquartile range 2.5-7.6) were propensity score matched to 140 CHB patients without HDV (median follow-up 4.5 years, interquartile range 2.6-8.1). Compared to CHB patients without HDV, those with concurrent HDV had significantly greater incidence of cirrhosis (4.39 vs 1.30 per 100,000 person-years, P < .01) and hepatic decompensation (2.18 vs 0.41 per 100,000 person-years, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Among a national cohort of US Veterans with CHB, low rates of HDV testing were observed. This is concerning given that patients with concurrent HDV infection had >3 times and >5 times greater risks of cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation, respectively, compared to CHB patients without HDV, highlighting the importance of timely HDV diagnosis and treatment.

Hepatitis Delta Virus Testing and Prevalence Among Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Across Three U.S. Safety-net Health Systems

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Despite a high prevalence of risk factors associated with hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection among safety-net populations, data evaluating HDV testing and prevalence are limited. We aim to evaluate HDV testing practices and HDV prevalence among an ethnically diverse, multi-center cohort of safety-net patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 13,218 patients with CHB (54.2% male, 57.9% non-White minorities, 12.5% human immunodeficiency virus, and 23.0% hepatitis C virus) across 3 United States safety-net health systems from 2010 to 2022 to evaluate proportion tested for HDV and proportion positive among those tested. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression models evaluated for predictors of HDV testing and predictors of anti-HDV positive.

RESULTS

Anti-HDV testing was performed in 6.1% overall and in 4.9% that met American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria for HDV testing. Greater odds of testing were observed in men vs women (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.75), Asian individuals vs White individuals (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.74-2.72), Black/African American individuals vs White individuals (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.56), and patients with Medicare or Medicaid. Among patients with CHB tested for HDV, 15.7% were positive (22.9% among those meeting American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases HDV testing criteria). Only 2 patients (1.6%) had follow-up HDV RNA testing. Greater proportion of anti-HDV positive was observed in patients with baseline cirrhosis (47.4% vs 13.3%; P < .001), and patients with Medicare or Medicaid vs those with commercial insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Among an ethnically diverse, multi-center safety-net cohort of patients with CHB, low rates of HDV testing were observed, even among those with high-risk HDV risk factors. Among those tested, 15.7% were positive, only 2 had follow up RNA testing. This highlights the need for greater awareness, education, and advocacy to improve HDV testing rates.

The diagnostic cascade for patients with hepatitis delta infection in France, 2018-2022: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Chronic hepatitis D infection is the most severe form of viral hepatitis and can rapidly progress to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite recommendations for systematic screening of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive individuals, data from real-world studies have reported a low frequency of hepatitis D (or delta) virus (HDV) screening. Our cross-sectional analysis evaluated the diagnostic cascade for hepatitis D infection in tertiary centres and described the characteristics of HDV-positive patients.

METHODS

A total of 6772 individuals who tested HBsAg positive for the first time between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively included. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 5748 HBsAg-positive individuals (84.9%) were screened for HDV infection. The screening rate varied from 63% to 97% according to the screening strategy used in the centres including or not HDV reflex testing. The prevalence of HDV infection was 6.3%. HDV RNA levels were determined in 285 of the 364 (78.3%) HDV antibody screening-positive patients, and 167 (58.6%) had active HDV infection. 66.8% were males, with a mean age of 44.9 years. A total of 97.5% were born abroad, and 92.9% were HBeAg negative. At the time of diagnosis, HDV RNA levels were 6.0 Log UI/mL; 60.1% had alanine aminotransferase >40 U/L, and 56.3% had significant fibrosis (≥F2), including 41.6% with cirrhosis. The most common genotype was HDV-1 (75.4%). Coinfections were not uncommon: 7.4% were HIV positive, and 15.0% were HCV antibody positive.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study highlights the need for increased screening and monitoring of HDV infection. Reflex testing helps to identify HDV-infected individuals.

Comparison of Clinical Features of HBV and HDV Coinfection with HBV Monoinfection: A Study from the Developing World

Hepatitis B infection remains a significant global health concern, with hepatitis D co-infection observed in approximately 5% of the patients. Treatment options for hepatitis D are currently limited, with most therapies awaiting approval by the FDA. However, there is a lack of comprehensive data on the prevalence and clinical presentation of patients with hepatitis B and D coinfection, particularly in Pakistan. In this study, we aimed to compare demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, laboratory, and endoscopic parameters along with the different treatment options between patients with hepatitis B monoinfection and those with hepatitis B and D coinfection.

How to cite this article

Majid Z, Abrar G, Ahsam S, et al. Comparison of Clinical Features of HBV and HDV Coinfection with HBV Mono-Infection: A Study from the Developing World. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(2):151-155.

Estimating the prevalence of hepatitis delta virus infection among adults in the United States: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Suboptimal awareness and low rates of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) testing contribute to underdiagnosis and gaps in accurate estimates of U.S. HDV prevalence. We aim to provide an updated assessment of HDV prevalence in the U.S. using a comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis approach.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review of articles reporting HBsAg seroprevalence and anti-HDV prevalence was conducted to calculate country-specific rates and pooled prevalence of CHB and HDV using meta-analyses. Country-specific CHB and HDV rate estimates were combined with number of foreign-born (FB) persons in the U.S. in 2022 from U.S. Census Bureau to estimate total numbers of FB with CHB and HDV, respectively. These estimates were further combined with updated estimates of U.S.-born persons with CHB and HDV to yield the total number of persons with CHB and HDV.

RESULTS

In 2022, we estimated 1.971 million (M) (95% CI 1.547-2.508) persons with CHB; 1.547 M (95% CI 1.264-1.831) were FB and 0.424 M (95% CI: 0.282-0.678) were U.S.-born. The weighted average HDV prevalence among FB persons in the U.S. was 4.20% (64 938 [95% CI 33055-97 392] persons), among whom 45% emigrated from Asia, 25% from Africa, and 14% from Europe. When combined with updated estimates of U.S.-born persons with HDV, we estimate 75 005 (95% CI: 42187-108 393) persons with HDV in the U.S.

CONCLUSIONS

Including both FB and U.S.-born persons, we estimated that 1.971 M and 75 005 persons were living with CHB and HDV, respectively, in the U.S. in 2022.

An updated assessment of hepatitis delta prevalence among adults in Canada: A meta-analysis

Foreign-born (FB) persons represent a large proportion of adults with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in Canada due to higher prevalence rates in countries of birth for FB persons. Suboptimal awareness and low rates of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) testing contribute to underdiagnosis and gaps in accurate estimates of Canada HDV prevalence. We aim to provide an assessment of CHB and HDV prevalence in Canada using a comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature review of articles reporting HBsAg seroprevalence and anti-HDV prevalence was conducted to calculate country-specific rates and pooled prevalence of CHB and HDV using meta-analyses. Country-specific CHB and HDV rate estimates were combined with number of FB persons in Canada in 2021 from Statistics Canada to estimate total numbers of FB with CHB and HDV, respectively. These estimates were combined with estimates of Canada-born persons with CHB and HDV to yield the total number of persons with CHB and HDV. In 2021, we estimated 0.550 million (M) (95% CI 0.488-0.615) persons with CHB; 0.344 M (95% CI 0.288-0.401) were FB and 0.206 M (95% CI: 0.200-0.214) were Canada-born. The weighted average HDV prevalence among FB persons in Canada was 5.19% (17,848 [95% CI 9611-26,052] persons), among whom 50% emigrated from Asia and 31% from Africa. When combined with estimates of Canada-born persons with HDV, we estimate 35,059 (95% CI: 18,744-52,083) persons with HDV in Canada. In conclusion, we estimate 0.550 M and 35,059 persons living with CHB and HDV, respectively, in Canada in 2021.

Prevalence and characteristics of hepatitis delta virus infection in patients with hepatitis B in the United States: An analysis of the All-Payer Claims Database

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

HDV leads to the most severe form of viral hepatitis; however, the prevalence of HDV is not well understood. Using real-world data from the All-Payer Claims Database, this study estimates the prevalence of HBV/HDV infection among the chronic HBV population and describes patient/clinical characteristics for adults with HBV/HDV infection in the United States.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Adults (≥18 years) with ≥1 inpatient claim or ≥2 outpatient claims for HDV infection or HBV in the All-Payer Claims Database from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, were identified. HDV prevalence was calculated as the proportion of patients with HBV/HDV infection among total patients with HBV infection. Patient characteristics, socioeconomic status, advanced liver complications (eg, cirrhosis, HCC), and comorbidities were assessed. A total of 6719 patients were diagnosed with HBV/HDV among 144,975 with HBV and 12 months of continuous data, for a prevalence of 4.6%. At diagnosis, 31.7% of patients with HBV/HDV had advanced liver complications, including compensated cirrhosis (16.3%) and decompensated cirrhosis (10.4%). Diabetes (50.5%), hypertension (49.8%), and HIV infection (30.9%) were the top 3 comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large database capturing approximately 80% of the US-insured population, HBV/HDV infection prevalence was 4.6% among adults infected with HBV. Patients infected with HDV had high rates of baseline liver complications and other comorbidities at the time of diagnosis, suggesting potentially delayed diagnosis and/or treatment. Earlier identification of HBV/HDV infection among the population with HBV may provide opportunities to improve linkage to care and treatment, thereby reducing the risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality.

Association of hepatitis delta virus with liver morbidity and mortality: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Studies have suggested that patients with chronic hepatitis B, either co- or superinfected, have more aggressive liver disease progression than those with the HDV. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis examined whether HDV RNA status is associated with increased risk of advanced liver disease events in patients who are HBsAg and HDV antibody positive.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

A total of 12 publications were included. Relative rates of progression to advanced liver disease event for HDV RNA+/detectable versus HDV RNA-/undetectable were extracted for analysis. Reported OR and HRs with 95% CI were pooled using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random-effects models. The presence of HDV RNA+ was associated with an increased risk of any advanced liver disease event [random effect (95% CI): risk ratio: 1.48 (0.93, 2.33); HR: 2.62 (1.55, 4.44)]. When compared to the patients with HDV RNA- status, HDV RNA+ was associated with a significantly higher risk of progressing to compensated cirrhosis [risk ratio: 1.74 (1.24, 2.45)] decompensated cirrhosis [HR: 3.82 (1.60, 9.10)], HCC [HR: 2.97 (1.87, 4.70)], liver transplantation [HR: 7.07 (1.61, 30.99)], and liver-related mortality [HR: 3.78 (2.18, 6.56)].

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with HDV RNA+ status have a significantly greater risk of liver disease progression than the patients who are HDV RNA-. These findings highlight the need for improved HDV screening and linkage to treatment to reduce the risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality.

Hepatitis Delta Virus Reporting Requirements in the United States and Territories: A Systematic Review

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) is a rare coinfection with hepatitis B virus. Currently, HDV is not a nationally notifiable disease in the United States. Only 55% of states and territories require HDV reporting, and most lack defined case definitions. Standardization of reporting requirements is crucial for monitoring HDV epidemiology.

Diagnosis and Management of Hepatitis Delta Virus Infection

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) depends on hepatitis B virus (HBV) to enter and exit hepatocytes and to replicate. Despite this dependency, HDV can cause severe liver disease. HDV accelerates liver fibrosis, increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, and hastens hepatic decompensation compared to chronic HBV monoinfection. The Chronic Liver Disease Foundation (CLDF) formed an expert panel to publish updated guidelines on the testing, diagnosis, and management of hepatitis delta virus. The panel group performed network data review on the transmission, epidemiology, natural history, and disease sequelae of acute and chronic HDV infection. Based on current available evidence, we provide recommendations for screening, testing, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatitis D infection and review upcoming novel agents that may expand treatment options. The CLDF recommends universal HDV screening for all patients who are Hepatitis B surface antigen-positive. Initial screening should be with an assay to detect antibodies generated against HDV (anti-HDV). Patients who are positive for anti-HDV IgG antibodies should then undergo quantitative HDV RNA testing. We also provide an algorithm that describes CLDF recommendations on the screening, diagnosis, testing, and initial management of Hepatitis D infection.

Hepatitis D double reflex testing of all hepatitis B carriers in low-HBV- and high-HBV/HDV-prevalence countries

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection occurs as a coinfection with hepatitis B and increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensated cirrhosis, and mortality compared to hepatitis B virus (HBV) monoinfection. Reliable estimates of the prevalence of HDV infection and disease burden are essential to formulate strategies to find coinfected individuals more effectively and efficiently. The global prevalence of HBV infections was estimated to be 262,240,000 in 2021. Only 1,994,000 of the HBV infections were newly diagnosed in 2021, with more than half of the new diagnoses made in China. Our initial estimates indicated a much lower prevalence of HDV antibody (anti-HDV) and HDV RNA positivity than previously reported in published studies. Accurate estimates of HDV prevalence are needed. The most effective method to generate estimates of the prevalence of anti-HDV and HDV RNA positivity and to find undiagnosed individuals at the national level is to implement double reflex testing. This requires anti-HDV testing of all hepatitis B surface antigen-positive individuals and HDV RNA testing of all anti-HDV-positive individuals. This strategy is manageable for healthcare systems since the number of newly diagnosed HBV cases is low. At the global level, a comprehensive HDV screening strategy would require only 1,994,000 HDV antibody tests and less than 89,000 HDV PCR tests. Double reflex testing is the preferred strategy in countries with a low prevalence of HBV and those with a high prevalence of both HBV and HDV. For example, in the European Union and North America only 35,000 and 22,000 cases, respectively, will require anti-HDV testing annually.

Bulevirtide and emerging drugs for the treatment of hepatitis D

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) causes acute and chronic liver disease that requires the co-infection of the Hepatitis B virus and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Bulevirtide is a recently introduced entry inhibitor drug that acts on the sodium taurocholate cotransporting peptide, thereby preventing viral entry to target cells in chronic HDV infection. The mainstay of chronic HDV therapy prior to bulevirtide was interferon alpha, which has an undesirable side effect profile.

AREAS COVERED

We review bulevirtide data from recent clinical trials in Europe and the United States. Challenges to development and implementation of bulevirtide are discussed. Additionally, we review ongoing trials of emerging drugs for HDV, such as pegylated interferon lambda and lonafarnib.

EXPERT OPINION

Bulevirtide represents a major shift in treatment for chronic HDV, for which there is significant unmet need. Trials that compared bulevirtide in combination with interferon alpha vs interferon alpha monotherapy demonstrated significant increase in virologic response. Overall, treatment with different doses of bulevirtide were comparable. Bulevirtide was generally well tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred. Understanding the true prevalence of HDV, as well as continued studies of emerging drugs will prove valuable to the larger goal of eradication of Hepatitis D.

Low Performance of Hepatitis Delta Virus Testing Among 2 National Cohorts of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in the United States

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate hepatitis delta virus (HDV) testing patterns among US adults with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

HDV testing was evaluated among CHB patients using Quest Diagnostics (2016-2020) and Veterans Affairs (2010-2020) data.

RESULTS

Among 157,333 CHB patients (Quest), 6.7% received HDV testing, among which 2.2% were positive. HDV testing was higher in male patients, younger individuals, and patients with advanced liver disease. Among 12,002 CHB patients (Veterans Affairs), 19.7% received HDV testing, among which 3.1% were positive. HDV testing was higher in younger individuals and Asians.

DISCUSSION

Low HDV testing was observed among 2 large US cohorts of adults with CHB.

Molecular epidemiology and clinical characteristics of hepatitis D virus infection in Canada

Background & Aims

HDV affects 4.5-13% of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients globally, yet the prevalence of HDV infection in Canada is unknown. To investigate the prevalence, genotype, demographics, and clinical characteristics of HDV in Canada, we conducted a retrospective analysis of (1) HDV antibody and RNA positivity among referred specimens, and (2) a cross-sectional subset study of 135 HDV seropositive +/-RNA (HDV+) patients compared with 5,132 HBV mono-infected patients in the Canadian HBV Network.

Methods

Anti-HDV IgG-positive specimens collected between 2012 and 2019 were RNA tested and the genotype determined. Patients enrolled in the Canadian HBV Network were >18 years of age and HBsAg-positive. Clinical data collected included risk factors, demographics, comorbidities, treatment, fibrosis assessment, and hepatic complications.

Results

Of the referred patients, 338/7,080 (4.8%, 95% CI 4.3-5.3) were HDV seropositive, with 219/338 RNA-positive (64.8%, 95% CI 59.6-69.7). The HDV+ cohort were more likely to be born in Canada, to be White or Black/African/Caribbean than Asian, and reporting high-risk behaviours, compared with HBV mono-infected patients. Cirrhosis, complications of end-stage liver disease, and liver transplantation were significantly more frequent in the HDV+ cohort. HDV viraemia was significantly associated with elevated liver transaminases and cirrhosis. Five HDV genotypes were observed among referred patients but no association between genotype and clinical outcome was detected within the HDV+ cohort.

Conclusions

Nearly 5% of the Canadian HBV referral population is HDV seropositive. HDV infection is highly associated with risk behaviours and both domestic and foreign-born patients with CHB. HDV was significantly associated with progressive liver disease highlighting the need for increased screening and surveillance of HDV in Canada.

Lay summary

Evidence of HDV infection was observed in approximately 5% of Canadians who were infected with HBV referred to medical specialists. HDV-positive patients were more likely to be male, born in Canada, or White or Black/African/Caribbean compared to Asian, and to have reported high-risk activities such as injection or intranasal drug use or high-risk sexual contact compared with patients infected with only HBV. Patients infected with HDV were also more likely to suffer severe liver disease, including liver cancer, compared with HBV mono-infected patients.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis D Virus in the United States: A UNOS Study on Outcomes in the MELD Era

BACKGROUND

Without available curative therapies for delta hepatitis (hepatitis delta virus [HDV]), hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among HDV patients often necessitates liver transplantation (LT). The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of LT among hepatitis B virus (HBV)/HDV patients in the United States.

METHODS

We performed the first US-based retrospective study of patients who underwent LT for HDV compared with HBV (monoinfection) in the years 2002-2019. We evaluated posttransplant survival and predictors of survival.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 152 HBV/HDV and 5435 HBV patients who underwent LT. HDV patients were younger at transplant (52 versus 55, P < 0.001), less commonly Asian (16% versus 36%, P < 0.001), more likely to be HCV Ab positive (42% versus 28%, P < 0.001), and less likely to be listed for LT with HCC (38% versus 51%, P = 0.001), more likely to have ascites (73% versus 64%, P = 0.019), had worse coagulopathy (mean INR 2.0 versus 1.82, P = 0.04), and were more likely to receive a HCV-positive donor organ (7% versus 3%, P = 0.001). Post-LT overall survival and graft survival were similar between HDV and HBV patients, including among patients with HCC. Older age, HCV coinfection, HCC, and higher model for end-stage liver disease at transplant were associated with higher posttransplant mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

HDV patients were sicker and more likely to be listed for LT for decompensated disease compared with HBV patients. Post-LT survival was similar between HDV and HBV patients, in contrast to prior international studies that suggested worse post-LT survival in HBV patients due to higher rates of HBV reactivation.

Characteristics of Hepatitis B and D Co-infection: A Descriptive Study

: About 5% of cases with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) are co-infected with hepatitis D virus (HDV), and this co-infection possesses a high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis. We aimed to evaluate the epidemiological and histopathological characteristics ‎and response to treatment in patients with HBV and HDV co-infection in a hepatitis clinic in Tehran, Iran. In this study, 80 patients were enrolled and evaluated for age, sex, degree of liver fibrosis, virologic status, and response rate. The incidence of co-infection of hepatitis B and D was 4.9% (80/1,631 HBV-infected cases) in our clinic. Thirty-seven (46.25%) patients had liver cirrhosis, and four (5%) patients had HCC. Besides, HDV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive for 31 (38.75 %) patients. Among 30 patients, 14 (46.6%) completed interferon therapy (for equal to or more than 48 weeks) and had a response with undetectable HDV RNA PCR after treatment. According to our results, for cirrhotic patients in HBV/HDV co-infection that was about 46%, it seems that the early detection of HDV antibody (Ab) plays a significant role in the prevention of progressive liver failure, and treatment with interferon can help these patients by improving the prognosis.

Epidemiology, Natural History, and Treatment of Hepatitis Delta Virus Infection in HIV/Hepatitis B Virus Coinfection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Limited data exist on the prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection among HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected persons. This review provides current evidence on the epidemiology, natural history, and treatment of HDV infection in patients with HIV/HBV coinfection and highlights future research needs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cross-sectional studies in Europe, Africa, South America, and Asia show that the prevalence of HDV among HIV/HBV-coinfected patients ranges from 1.2 to 25%. No studies have evaluated the prevalence of HDV infection among HIV/HBV-coinfected patients in the USA. HDV infection increases the risk of hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma among HIV/HBV-coinfected patients. HDV treatment remains limited to pegylated interferon-alpha, which results in sustained virologic response in fewer than 25%. Data on the epidemiology, natural history, and treatment of HDV among HIV/HBV-coinfected persons remain limited. More research is needed to address these knowledge gaps in order to better manage HDV coinfection in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients.