1
|
Doganyigit B, Defrancesco M, Schurr T, Steiger R, Gizewski ER, Mangesius S, Galijasevic M, Hofer A, Tuovinen N. Temporal atrophy together with verbal encoding impairment is highly predictive for cognitive decline in typical Alzheimer's dementia - a retrospective follow-up study. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1485620. [PMID: 39628497 PMCID: PMC11611803 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1485620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2024] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 12/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The increasing prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has created an urgent need for rapid and cost-effective methods to diagnose and monitor people at all stages of the disease. Progressive memory impairment and hippocampal atrophy are key features of the most common so-called typical variant of AD. However, studies evaluating detailed cognitive measures combined with region of interest (ROI)-based imaging markers of progression over the long term in the AD dementia (ADD) stage are rare. Method We conducted a retrospective longitudinal follow-up study in patients with mild to moderate ADD (aged 60-92 years). They underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 3 Tesla, MPRAGE) as well as clinical and neuropsychological examination (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease [CERAD] -Plus test battery) at baseline and at least one follow-up visit. ROI-based brain structural analysis of baseline MRIs was performed using the Computational Anatomy Toolbox (CAT) 12. Clinical dementia progression (progression index [PI]) was measured by the annual decline in the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. MRI, demographic, and neuropsychological data were included in univariate and multiple linear regression models to predict the PI. Results 104 ADD patients (age 63 to 90 years, 73% female, mean MMSE score 22.63 ± 3.77, mean follow-up 4.27 ± 2.15 years) and 32 age- and gender-matched cognitively intact controls were included. The pattern of gray matter (GM) atrophy and the cognitive profile were consistent with the amnestic/typical variant of ADD in all patients. Deficits in word list learning together with temporal lobe GM atrophy had the highest predictive value for rapid cognitive decline in the multiple linear regression model, accounting for 25.4% of the PI variance. Discussion Our results show that temporal atrophy together with deficits in the encoding of verbal material, rather than in immediate or delayed recall, is highly predictive for rapid cognitive decline in patients with mild to moderate amnestic/typical ADD. These findings point to the relevance of combining detailed cognitive and automated structural imaging analyses to predict clinical progression in patients with ADD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Doganyigit
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michaela Defrancesco
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Timo Schurr
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ruth Steiger
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Neuroimaging Core Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Elke R. Gizewski
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Neuroimaging Core Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Stephanie Mangesius
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Neuroimaging Core Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Malik Galijasevic
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Neuroimaging Core Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alex Hofer
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Noora Tuovinen
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferreira D, Mohanty R, Murray ME, Nordberg A, Kantarci K, Westman E. The hippocampal sparing subtype of Alzheimer's disease assessed in neuropathology and in vivo tau positron emission tomography: a systematic review. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2022; 10:166. [PMID: 36376963 PMCID: PMC9664780 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-022-01471-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuropathology and neuroimaging studies have identified several subtypes of Alzheimer's disease (AD): hippocampal sparing AD, typical AD, and limbic predominant AD. An unresolved question is whether hippocampal sparing AD cases can present with neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) in association cortices while completely sparing the hippocampus. To address that question, we conducted a systematic review and performed original analyses on tau positron emission tomography (PET) data. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases until October 2022. We also implemented several methods for AD subtyping on tau PET to identify hippocampal sparing AD cases. Our findings show that seven out of the eight reviewed neuropathologic studies included cases at Braak stages IV or higher and therefore, could not identify hippocampal sparing cases with NFT completely sparing the hippocampus. In contrast, tau PET did identify AD participants with tracer retention in the association cortex while completely sparing the hippocampus. We conclude that tau PET can identify hippocampal sparing AD cases with NFT completely sparing the hippocampus. Based on the accumulating data, we suggest two possible pathways of tau spread: (1) a canonical pathway with early involvement of transentorhinal cortex and subsequent involvement of limbic regions and association cortices, and (2) a less common pathway that affects association cortices with limbic involvement observed at end stages of the disease or not at all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ferreira
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics; Center for Alzheimer Research; Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Blickagången 16 (NEO building, floor 7th), 14152, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Rosaleena Mohanty
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics; Center for Alzheimer Research; Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Blickagången 16 (NEO building, floor 7th), 14152, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Agneta Nordberg
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics; Center for Alzheimer Research; Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Blickagången 16 (NEO building, floor 7th), 14152, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Kejal Kantarci
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eric Westman
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics; Center for Alzheimer Research; Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Blickagången 16 (NEO building, floor 7th), 14152, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Neuroimaging, Center for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Birkenbihl C, Salimi Y, Fröhlich H. Unraveling the heterogeneity in Alzheimer's disease progression across multiple cohorts and the implications for data-driven disease modeling. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 18:251-261. [PMID: 34109729 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Given study-specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, Alzheimer's disease (AD) cohort studies effectively sample from different statistical distributions. This heterogeneity can propagate into cohort-specific signals and subsequently bias data-driven investigations of disease progression patterns. METHODS We built multi-state models for six independent AD cohort datasets to statistically compare disease progression patterns across them. Additionally, we propose a novel method for clustering cohorts with regard to their progression signals. RESULTS We identified significant differences in progression patterns across cohorts. Models trained on cohort data learned cohort-specific effects that bias their estimations. We demonstrated how six cohorts relate to each other regarding their disease progression. DISCUSSION Heterogeneity in cohort datasets impedes the reproducibility of data-driven results and validation of progression models generated on single cohorts. To ensure robust scientific insights, it is advisable to externally validate results in independent cohort datasets. The proposed clustering assesses the comparability of cohorts in an unbiased, data-driven manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Birkenbihl
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Yasamin Salimi
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Holger Fröhlich
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Duan J, Zhang J, Liu L, Wen Y. A guidance of model selection for genomic prediction based on linear mixed models for complex traits. Front Genet 2022; 13:1017380. [PMID: 36276959 PMCID: PMC9581223 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1017380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain imaging outcomes are important for Alzheimer's disease (AD) detection, and their prediction based on both genetic and demographic risk factors can facilitate the ongoing prevention and treatment of AD. Existing studies have identified numerous significantly AD-associated SNPs. However, how to make the best use of them for prediction analyses remains unknown. In this research, we first explored the relationship between genetic architecture and prediction accuracy of linear mixed models via visualizing the Manhattan plots generated based on the data obtained from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, and then constructed prediction models for eleven AD-related brain imaging outcomes using data from United Kingdom Biobank and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative studies. We found that the simple Manhattan plots can be informative for the selection of prediction models. For traits that do not exhibit any significant signals from the Manhattan plots, the simple genomic best linear unbiased prediction (gBLUP) model is recommended due to its robust and accurate prediction performance as well as its computational efficiency. For diseases and traits that show spiked signals on the Manhattan plots, the latent Dirichlet process regression is preferred, as it can flexibly accommodate both the oligogenic and omnigenic models. For the prediction of AD-related traits, the Manhattan plots suggest their polygenic nature, and gBLUP has achieved robust performance for all these traits. We found that for these AD-related traits, genetic factors themselves only explain a very small proportion of the heritability, and the well-known AD risk factors can substantially improve the prediction model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiefang Duan
- Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Jiayu Zhang
- Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Long Liu
- Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Yalu Wen
- Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.,Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Diez-Cirarda M, Gabilondo I, Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Gómez-Esteban JC, Kim J, Lucas-Jiménez O, Del Pino R, Peña J, Ojeda N, Mihaescu A, Valli M, Acera MA, Cabrera-Zubizarreta A, Gómez-Beldarrain MA, Strafella AP. Contributions of sex, depression, and cognition on brain connectivity dynamics in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2021; 7:117. [PMID: 34916518 PMCID: PMC8677758 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-021-00257-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Alterations in time-varying functional connectivity (FC) have been found in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. To date, very little is known about the influence of sex on brain FC in PD patients and how this could be related to disease severity. The first objective was to evaluate the influence of sex on dynamic FC characteristics in PD patients and healthy controls (HC), while the second aim was to investigate the temporal patterns of dynamic connectivity related to PD motor and non-motor symptoms. Ninety-nine PD patients and sixty-two HC underwent a neuropsychological and clinical assessment. Rs-fMRI and T1-weighted MRI were also acquired. Dynamic FC analyses were performed in the GIFT toolbox. Dynamic FC analyses identified two States: State I, characterized by within-network positive coupling; and State II that showed between-network connectivity, mostly involving somatomotor and visual networks. Sex differences were found in dynamic indexes in HC but these differences were not observed in PD. Hierarchical clustering analysis identified three phenotypically distinct PD subgroups: (1) Subgroup A was characterized by mild motor symptoms; (2) Subgroup B was characterized by depressive and motor symptoms; (3) Subgroup C was characterized by cognitive and motor symptoms. Results revealed that changes in the temporal properties of connectivity were related to the motor/non-motor outcomes of PD severity. Findings suggest that while in HC sex differences may play a certain role in dynamic connectivity patterns, in PD patients, these effects may be overcome by the neurodegenerative process. Changes in the temporal properties of connectivity in PD were mainly related to the clinical markers of PD severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Diez-Cirarda
- Brain Health Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- E.J. Safra Parkinson Disease Program & Movement Disorder Unit, Neurology Division; Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Neurodegenerative Diseases Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
| | - Iñigo Gabilondo
- Neurodegenerative Diseases Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
- IKERBASQUE, The Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Naroa Ibarretxe-Bilbao
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Gómez-Esteban
- Neurodegenerative Diseases Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
- Neurology Department, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Jinhee Kim
- Brain Health Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- E.J. Safra Parkinson Disease Program & Movement Disorder Unit, Neurology Division; Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Olaia Lucas-Jiménez
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Rocio Del Pino
- Neurodegenerative Diseases Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Javier Peña
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Natalia Ojeda
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Alexander Mihaescu
- Brain Health Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- E.J. Safra Parkinson Disease Program & Movement Disorder Unit, Neurology Division; Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mikaeel Valli
- Brain Health Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- E.J. Safra Parkinson Disease Program & Movement Disorder Unit, Neurology Division; Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Angeles Acera
- Neurodegenerative Diseases Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | | | | | - Antonio P Strafella
- Brain Health Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- E.J. Safra Parkinson Disease Program & Movement Disorder Unit, Neurology Division; Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Salvadó G, Ferreira D, Operto G, Cumplido-Mayoral I, Arenaza-Urquijo EM, Cacciaglia R, Falcon C, Vilor-Tejedor N, Minguillon C, Groot C, van der Flier WM, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Ossenkoppele R, Kern S, Zettergren A, Skoog I, Hort J, Stomrud E, van Westen D, Hansson O, Molinuevo JL, Wahlund LO, Westman E, Gispert JD. The protective gene dose effect of the APOE ε2 allele on gray matter volume in cognitively unimpaired individuals. Alzheimers Dement 2021; 18:1383-1395. [PMID: 34877786 PMCID: PMC9542211 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Harboring two copies of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε2 allele strongly protects against Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the effect of this genotype on gray matter (GM) volume in cognitively unimpaired individuals has not yet been described. METHODS Multicenter brain magnetic resonance images (MRIs) from cognitively unimpaired ε2 homozygotes were matched (1:1) against all other APOE genotypes for relevant confounders (n = 223). GM volumes of ε2 genotypic groups were compared to each other and to the reference group (APOE ε3/ε3). RESULTS Carrying at least one ε2 allele was associated with larger GM volumes in brain areas typically affected by AD and also in areas associated with cognitive resilience. APOE ε2 homozygotes, but not APOE ε2 heterozygotes, showed larger GM volumes in areas related to successful aging. DISCUSSION In addition to the known resistance against amyloid-β deposition, the larger GM volumes in key brain regions may confer APOE ε2 homozygotes additional protection against AD-related cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Salvadó
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Ferreira
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Grégory Operto
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Cumplido-Mayoral
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eider M Arenaza-Urquijo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Raffaele Cacciaglia
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Carles Falcon
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Natàlia Vilor-Tejedor
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Genetics, ERASMUS MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carolina Minguillon
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Colin Groot
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Silke Kern
- Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Centre for Ageing and Health (AgeCap) at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Zettergren
- Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Centre for Ageing and Health (AgeCap) at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ingmar Skoog
- Neuropsychiatric Epidemiology Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Centre for Ageing and Health (AgeCap) at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jakub Hort
- International Clinical Research Centre, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.,Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Erik Stomrud
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Danielle van Westen
- Diagnostic Radiology, Institution for Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Image and Function, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lars-Olof Wahlund
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eric Westman
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Archetti D, Young AL, Oxtoby NP, Ferreira D, Mårtensson G, Westman E, Alexander DC, Frisoni GB, Redolfi A. Inter-Cohort Validation of SuStaIn Model for Alzheimer's Disease. Front Big Data 2021; 4:661110. [PMID: 34095821 PMCID: PMC8173213 DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2021.661110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder which spans several years from preclinical manifestations to dementia. In recent years, interest in the application of machine learning (ML) algorithms to personalized medicine has grown considerably, and a major challenge that such models face is the transferability from the research settings to clinical practice. The objective of this work was to demonstrate the transferability of the Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) model from well-characterized research data set, employed as training set, to independent less-structured and heterogeneous test sets representative of the clinical setting. The training set was composed of MRI data of 1043 subjects from the Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), and the test set was composed of data from 767 subjects from OASIS, Pharma-Cog, and ViTA clinical datasets. Both sets included subjects covering the entire spectrum of AD, and for both sets volumes of relevant brain regions were derived from T1-3D MRI scans processed with Freesurfer v5.3 cross-sectional stream. In order to assess the predictive value of the model, subpopulations of subjects with stable mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and MCIs that progressed to AD dementia (pMCI) were identified in both sets. SuStaIn identified three disease subtypes, of which the most prevalent corresponded to the typical atrophy pattern of AD. The other SuStaIn subtypes exhibited similarities with the previously defined hippocampal sparing and limbic predominant atrophy patterns of AD. Subject subtyping proved to be consistent in time for all cohorts and the staging provided by the model was correlated with cognitive performance. Classification of subjects on the basis of a combination of SuStaIn subtype and stage, mini mental state examination and amyloid-β1-42 cerebrospinal fluid concentration was proven to predict conversion from MCI to AD dementia on par with other novel statistical algorithms, with ROC curves that were not statistically different for the training and test sets and with area under curve respectively equal to 0.77 and 0.76. This study proves the transferability of a SuStaIn model for AD from research data to less-structured clinical cohorts, and indicates transferability to the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano Archetti
- Laboratory of Neuroinformatics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alexandra L Young
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Computer Science, UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neil P Oxtoby
- Department of Computer Science, UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Ferreira
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Gustav Mårtensson
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eric Westman
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniel C Alexander
- Department of Computer Science, UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, London, United Kingdom
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Memory Clinic and LANVIE - Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging, University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Laboratory of Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and Epidemiology - LANE, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alberto Redolfi
- Laboratory of Neuroinformatics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cedres N, Ekman U, Poulakis K, Shams S, Cavallin L, Muehlboeck S, Granberg T, Wahlund LO, Ferreira D, Westman E. Brain Atrophy Subtypes and the ATN Classification Scheme in Alzheimer's Disease. NEURODEGENER DIS 2021; 20:153-164. [PMID: 33789287 DOI: 10.1159/000515322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We investigated the association between atrophy subtypes of Alzheimer's disease (AD), the ATN classification scheme, and key demographic and clinical factors in 2 cohorts with different source characteristics (a highly selective research-oriented cohort, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative [ADNI]; and a naturalistic heterogeneous clinically oriented cohort, Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study [KIDS]). METHODS A total of 382 AD patients were included. Factorial analysis of mixed data was used to investigate associations between AD subtypes based on brain atrophy patterns, ATN profiles based on cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and age, sex, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), cerebrovascular disease (burden of white matter signal abnormalities, WMSAs), and APOE genotype. RESULTS Older patients with high WMSA burden, belonging to the typical AD subtype and showing A+T+N+ or A+T+N- profiles clustered together and were mainly from ADNI. Younger patients with low WMSA burden, limbic-predominant or minimal atrophy AD subtypes, and A+T-N- or A+T-N+ profiles clustered together and were mainly from KIDS. APOE ε4 carriers more frequently showed the A+T-N- and A+T+N- profiles. CONCLUSIONS Our findings align with the recent framework for biological subtypes of AD: the combination of risk factors, protective factors, and brain pathologies determines belonging of AD patients to distinct subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nira Cedres
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Care Sciences, and Society, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Urban Ekman
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Care Sciences, and Society, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Konstantinos Poulakis
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Care Sciences, and Society, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Shams
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Care Sciences, and Society, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lena Cavallin
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Care Sciences, and Society, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sebastian Muehlboeck
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Care Sciences, and Society, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tobias Granberg
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Care Sciences, and Society, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars-Olof Wahlund
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Care Sciences, and Society, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniel Ferreira
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Care Sciences, and Society, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eric Westman
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Care Sciences, and Society, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Birkenbihl C, Salimi Y, Domingo‐Fernándéz D, Lovestone S, Fröhlich H, Hofmann‐Apitius M. Evaluating the Alzheimer's disease data landscape. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (NEW YORK, N. Y.) 2020; 6:e12102. [PMID: 33344750 PMCID: PMC7744022 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Numerous studies have collected Alzheimer's disease (AD) cohort data sets. To achieve reproducible, robust results in data-driven approaches, an evaluation of the present data landscape is vital. METHODS Previous efforts relied exclusively on metadata and literature. Here, we evaluate the data landscape by directly investigating nine patient-level data sets generated in major clinical cohort studies. RESULTS The investigated cohorts differ in key characteristics, such as demographics and distributions of AD biomarkers. Analyzing the ethnoracial diversity revealed a strong bias toward White/Caucasian individuals. We described and compared the measured data modalities. Finally, the available longitudinal data for important AD biomarkers was evaluated. All results are explorable through our web application ADataViewer (https://adata.scai.fraunhofer.de). DISCUSSION Our evaluation exposed critical limitations in the AD data landscape that impede comparative approaches across multiple data sets. Comparison of our results to those gained by metadata-based approaches highlights that thorough investigation of real patient-level data is imperative to assess a data landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Birkenbihl
- Department of BioinformaticsFraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI)Sankt AugustinGermany
- Bioinformatics GroupRheinische Friedrich‐Wilhelms‐Universität BonnBonnGermany
| | - Yasamin Salimi
- Department of BioinformaticsFraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI)Sankt AugustinGermany
- Bioinformatics GroupRheinische Friedrich‐Wilhelms‐Universität BonnBonnGermany
| | - Daniel Domingo‐Fernándéz
- Department of BioinformaticsFraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI)Sankt AugustinGermany
- Bioinformatics GroupRheinische Friedrich‐Wilhelms‐Universität BonnBonnGermany
| | | | | | - Holger Fröhlich
- Department of BioinformaticsFraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI)Sankt AugustinGermany
- Bioinformatics GroupRheinische Friedrich‐Wilhelms‐Universität BonnBonnGermany
| | - Martin Hofmann‐Apitius
- Department of BioinformaticsFraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI)Sankt AugustinGermany
- Bioinformatics GroupRheinische Friedrich‐Wilhelms‐Universität BonnBonnGermany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Petrova T, Orellana C, Jelic V, Oeksengaard AR, Snaedal J, Høgh P, Andersen BB, Naik M, Engedal K, Wahlund LO, Ferreira D. Cholinergic dysfunction, neurodegeneration, and amyloid-beta pathology in neurodegenerative diseases. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2020; 302:111099. [PMID: 32505903 DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Cholinergic dysfunction is central in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). The electroencephalography-based acetylcholine index (EEG-Ach index) has been proposed as a biomarker of cholinergic dysfunction. However, it is unclear how the EEG-Ach index relates to amyloid-beta pathology and neurodegeneration. We investigated the association between the EEG-Ach index and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-beta, CSF total tau, cortical thickness, and hippocampal volume from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cognition. A total of 127 patients with different neurodegenerative diseases were studied. The EEG-Ach index was calculated from quantitative EEG using statistical pattern recognition. The EEG-Ach index was associated with hippocampal volume and cortical thickness in frontal, temporal, and occipital cortices. Cross-sectional sub-analyses based on a small sample suggests that the EEG-Ach index increases the closest to AD dementia, downstream to amyloid-beta pathology, CSF total tau, and hippocampal volume. We conclude that cholinergic dysfunction correlates with atrophy in brain areas important for AD pathogenesis, and this association is more prominent in the dementia stage. These results together with previous studies from this project suggest that the EEG-Ach index may be a useful biomarker for cholinergic dysfunction, with value for differential diagnosis of dementia and monitoring patients at the dementia stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teodora Petrova
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Camila Orellana
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Vesna Jelic
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anne-Rita Oeksengaard
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jon Snaedal
- Geriatric Clinic, Landspitali University Hospital Landakot, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Peter Høgh
- Regional Dementia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Zealand University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Bo Andersen
- Danish Dementia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mala Naik
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Knut Engedal
- Norwegian Advisory Unit for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars-Olof Wahlund
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniel Ferreira
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Srinivasan D, Erus G, Doshi J, Wolk DA, Shou H, Habes M, Davatzikos C. A comparison of Freesurfer and multi-atlas MUSE for brain anatomy segmentation: Findings about size and age bias, and inter-scanner stability in multi-site aging studies. Neuroimage 2020; 223:117248. [PMID: 32860881 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Automatic segmentation of brain anatomy has been a key processing step in quantitative neuroimaging analyses. An extensive body of literature has relied on Freesurfer segmentations. Yet, in recent years, the multi-atlas segmentation framework has consistently obtained results with superior accuracy in various evaluations. We compared brain anatomy segmentations from Freesurfer, which uses a single probabilistic atlas strategy, against segmentations from Multi-atlas region Segmentation utilizing Ensembles of registration algorithms and parameters and locally optimal atlas selection (MUSE), one of the leading ensemble-based methods that calculates a consensus segmentation through fusion of anatomical labels from multiple atlases and registrations. The focus of our evaluation was twofold. First, using manual ground-truth hippocampus segmentations, we found that Freesurfer segmentations showed a bias towards over-segmentation of larger hippocampi, and under-segmentation in older age. This bias was more pronounced in Freesurfer-v5.3, which has been used in multiple previous studies of aging, while the effect was mitigated in more recent Freesurfer-v6.0, albeit still present. Second, we evaluated inter-scanner segmentation stability using same day scan pairs from ADNI acquired on 1.5T and 3T scanners. We also found that MUSE obtains more consistent segmentations across scanners compared to Freesurfer, particularly in the deep structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhivya Srinivasan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
| | - Guray Erus
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Jimit Doshi
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - David A Wolk
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Haochang Shou
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Mohamad Habes
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Birkenbihl C, Emon MA, Vrooman H, Westwood S, Lovestone S, Hofmann-Apitius M, Fröhlich H. Differences in cohort study data affect external validation of artificial intelligence models for predictive diagnostics of dementia - lessons for translation into clinical practice. EPMA J 2020; 11:367-376. [PMID: 32843907 PMCID: PMC7429672 DOI: 10.1007/s13167-020-00216-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches pose a great opportunity for individualized, pre-symptomatic disease diagnosis which plays a key role in the context of personalized, predictive, and finally preventive medicine (PPPM). However, to translate PPPM into clinical practice, it is of utmost importance that AI-based models are carefully validated. The validation process comprises several steps, one of which is testing the model on patient-level data from an independent clinical cohort study. However, recruitment criteria can bias statistical analysis of cohort study data and impede model application beyond the training data. To evaluate whether and how data from independent clinical cohort studies differ from each other, this study systematically compares the datasets collected from two major dementia cohorts, namely, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and AddNeuroMed. The presented comparison was conducted on individual feature level and revealed significant differences among both cohorts. Such systematic deviations can potentially hamper the generalizability of results which were based on a single cohort dataset. Despite identified differences, validation of a previously published, ADNI trained model for prediction of personalized dementia risk scores on 244 AddNeuroMed subjects was successful: External validation resulted in a high prediction performance of above 80% area under receiver operator characteristic curve up to 6 years before dementia diagnosis. Propensity score matching identified a subset of patients from AddNeuroMed, which showed significantly smaller demographic differences to ADNI. For these patients, an even higher prediction performance was achieved, which demonstrates the influence systematic differences between cohorts can have on validation results. In conclusion, this study exposes challenges in external validation of AI models on cohort study data and is one of the rare cases in the neurology field in which such external validation was performed. The presented model represents a proof of concept that reliable models for personalized predictive diagnostics are feasible, which, in turn, could lead to adequate disease prevention and hereby enable the PPPM paradigm in the dementia field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Birkenbihl
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.,Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany
| | - Mohammad Asif Emon
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.,Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany
| | - Henri Vrooman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sarah Westwood
- Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Simon Lovestone
- Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Martin Hofmann-Apitius
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.,Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany
| | - Holger Fröhlich
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI), Schloss Birlinghoven, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.,Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.,UCB Biosciences GmbH, Alfred-Nobel Str. 10, 40789 Monheim am Rhein, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mårtensson G, Ferreira D, Granberg T, Cavallin L, Oppedal K, Padovani A, Rektorova I, Bonanni L, Pardini M, Kramberger MG, Taylor JP, Hort J, Snædal J, Kulisevsky J, Blanc F, Antonini A, Mecocci P, Vellas B, Tsolaki M, Kłoszewska I, Soininen H, Lovestone S, Simmons A, Aarsland D, Westman E. The reliability of a deep learning model in clinical out-of-distribution MRI data: A multicohort study. Med Image Anal 2020; 66:101714. [PMID: 33007638 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) methods have in recent years yielded impressive results in medical imaging, with the potential to function as clinical aid to radiologists. However, DL models in medical imaging are often trained on public research cohorts with images acquired with a single scanner or with strict protocol harmonization, which is not representative of a clinical setting. The aim of this study was to investigate how well a DL model performs in unseen clinical datasets-collected with different scanners, protocols and disease populations-and whether more heterogeneous training data improves generalization. In total, 3117 MRI scans of brains from multiple dementia research cohorts and memory clinics, that had been visually rated by a neuroradiologist according to Scheltens' scale of medial temporal atrophy (MTA), were included in this study. By training multiple versions of a convolutional neural network on different subsets of this data to predict MTA ratings, we assessed the impact of including images from a wider distribution during training had on performance in external memory clinic data. Our results showed that our model generalized well to datasets acquired with similar protocols as the training data, but substantially worse in clinical cohorts with visibly different tissue contrasts in the images. This implies that future DL studies investigating performance in out-of-distribution (OOD) MRI data need to assess multiple external cohorts for reliable results. Further, by including data from a wider range of scanners and protocols the performance improved in OOD data, which suggests that more heterogeneous training data makes the model generalize better. To conclude, this is the most comprehensive study to date investigating the domain shift in deep learning on MRI data, and we advocate rigorous evaluation of DL models on clinical data prior to being certified for deployment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustav Mårtensson
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Daniel Ferreira
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tobias Granberg
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lena Cavallin
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ketil Oppedal
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Stavanger Medical Imaging Laboratory (SMIL), Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Alessandro Padovani
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Irena Rektorova
- 1st Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, St. Anne's Hospital and CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Laura Bonanni
- Department of Neuroscience Imaging and Clinical Sciences and CESI, University G d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Matteo Pardini
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa and Neurology Clinics, Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Milica G Kramberger
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Medical faculty, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - John-Paul Taylor
- Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jakub Hort
- Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jón Snædal
- Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Jaime Kulisevsky
- Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomédiques Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación en Red-Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (U.A.B.), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frederic Blanc
- Day Hospital of Geriatrics, Memory Resource and Research Centre (CM2R) of Strasbourg, Department of Geriatrics, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; University of Strasbourg and French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), ICube Laboratory and Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Team Imagerie Multimodale Intégrative en Santé (IMIS)/ICONE, Strasbourg, France
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua & Fondazione Ospedale San Camillo, Venezia, Venice, Italy
| | - Patrizia Mecocci
- Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Bruno Vellas
- UMR INSERM 1027, gerontopole, CHU, University of Toulouse, France
| | - Magda Tsolaki
- 3rd Department of Neurology, Memory and Dementia Unit, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Hilkka Soininen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Finland; Neurocenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Simon Lovestone
- Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Simmons
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, London, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia, London, UK; Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Eric Westman
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Golriz Khatami S, Robinson C, Birkenbihl C, Domingo-Fernández D, Hoyt CT, Hofmann-Apitius M. Challenges of Integrative Disease Modeling in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Mol Biosci 2020; 6:158. [PMID: 31993440 PMCID: PMC6971060 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2019.00158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Dementia-related diseases like Alzheimer's Disease (AD) have a tremendous social and economic cost. A deeper understanding of its underlying pathophysiologies may provide an opportunity for earlier detection and therapeutic intervention. Previous approaches for characterizing AD were targeted at single aspects of the disease. Yet, due to the complex nature of AD, the success of these approaches was limited. However, in recent years, advancements in integrative disease modeling, built on a wide range of AD biomarkers, have taken a global view on the disease, facilitating more comprehensive analysis and interpretation. Integrative AD models can be sorted in two primary types, namely hypothetical models and data-driven models. The latter group split into two subgroups: (i) Models that use traditional statistical methods such as linear models, (ii) Models that take advantage of more advanced artificial intelligence approaches such as machine learning. While many integrative AD models have been published over the last decade, their impact on clinical practice is limited. There exist major challenges in the course of integrative AD modeling, namely data missingness and censoring, imprecise human-involved priori knowledge, model reproducibility, dataset interoperability, dataset integration, and model interpretability. In this review, we highlight recent advancements and future possibilities of integrative modeling in the field of AD research, showcase and discuss the limitations and challenges involved, and finally, propose avenues to address several of these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepehr Golriz Khatami
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christine Robinson
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Colin Birkenbihl
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Daniel Domingo-Fernández
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Charles Tapley Hoyt
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Hofmann-Apitius
- Department of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Bonn-Aachen International Center for IT, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li H, Sun D, Lu D, Zhang J, Zeng J. Low Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus Volume Associated With Hypertension-Related Cognitive Impairment. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2020; 35:1533317520949782. [PMID: 33043683 PMCID: PMC10624078 DOI: 10.1177/1533317520949782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Hypertension increases the risk of cognitive impairment independent of detectable stroke or cerebral lesions. However, the principal pathophysiological basis of this increase has not been fully elucidated. The present study investigates the relationships among blood pressure, hippocampal subfields volume, and cognitive function in a relatively young non-stroke population. A total of 59 non-stroke non-dementia subjects (mean age, 57.2 ± 4.9 years) were enrolled. All subjects were subjected to complete assessment of vascular risk factors including 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, various neuropsychological tests, and 3D-T1 MR scan. Freesurfer V6.0 was used for segmentation of hippocampal subfields. Our analyses revealed that both 24-hour and daytime mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) were significantly associated with the low volume of the left DG. Higher coefficient of variation (CV) of daytime SBP was significantly associated with lower volume of the left Cornu Ammonis 4 and dentate gyrus (DG) region. Both higher CV of 24-hour mean SBP and daytime SBP were significantly associated with lower performance in both executive and linguistic function. The low volume of the left DG was significantly associated with the low performance in linguistic function. Our findings support that reduced DG volume and increased SBP variability associated with hypertension-related cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huagang Li
- Department of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Dong Sun
- Department of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Dongwei Lu
- Department of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Junjian Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Junjie Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vangberg TR, Eikenes L, Håberg AK. The effect of white matter hyperintensities on regional brain volumes and white matter microstructure, a population-based study in HUNT. Neuroimage 2019; 203:116158. [PMID: 31493533 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 08/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Even though age-related white matter hyperintensities (WMH) begin to emerge in middle age, their effect on brain micro- and macrostructure in this age group is not fully elucidated. We have examined how presence of WMH and load of WMH affect regional brain volumes and microstructure in a validated, representative general population sample of 873 individuals between 50 and 66 years. Presence of WMH was determined as Fazakas grade ≥1. WMH load was WMH volume from manual tracing of WMHs divided on intracranial volume. The impact of age appropriate WMH (Fazakas grade 1) on the brain was also investigated. Major novel findings were that even the age appropriate WMH group had widespread macro- and microstructural changes in gray and white matter, showing that the mere presence of WMH, not just WMH load is an important clinical indicator of brain health. With increasing WMH load, structural changes spread centrifugally. Further, we found three major patterns of FA and MD changes related to increasing WMH load, demonstrating a heterogeneous effect on white matter microstructure, where distinct patterns were found in the proximity of the lesions, in deep white matter and in white matter near the cortex. This study also raises several questions about the onset of WMH related pathology, in particular, whether some of the aberrant brain structural and microstructural findings are present before the emergence of WMH. We also found, similar to other studies, that WMH risk factors had low explanatory power for WMH, making it unclear which factors lead to WMH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torgil Riise Vangberg
- Medical Imaging Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; PET Center, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Live Eikenes
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Asta K Håberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Oppedal K, Ferreira D, Cavallin L, Lemstra AW, Kate M, Padovani A, Rektorova I, Bonanni L, Wahlund L, Engedal K, Nobili F, Kramberger M, Taylor J, Hort J, Snædal J, Blanc F, Walker Z, Antonini A, Westman E, Aarsland D. A signature pattern of cortical atrophy in dementia with Lewy bodies: A study on 333 patients from the European DLB consortium. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 15:400-409. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ketil Oppedal
- Centre for Age‐Related MedicineStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Department of RadiologyStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
| | - Daniel Ferreira
- Division of Clinical GeriatricsDepartment of NeurobiologyCare Sciences and SocietyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Lena Cavallin
- Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of RadiologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Afina W. Lemstra
- Department of Neurology and AlzheimercenterVU Universisty Medical CenterAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Mara Kate
- Department of Neurology and AlzheimercenterVU Universisty Medical CenterAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Alessandro Padovani
- Neurology UnitDepartment o Clinical and Experimental SciencesUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Irena Rektorova
- 1st Department of NeurologyMedical FacultySt. Anne's Hospital and CEITECMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
| | - Laura Bonanni
- Department of Neuroscience Imaging and Clinical Sciences and CESIUniversity G d'Annunzio of Chieti‐PescaraChietiItaly
| | - Lars‐Olof Wahlund
- Division of Clinical GeriatricsDepartment of NeurobiologyCare Sciences and SocietyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Knut Engedal
- Norwegian Advisory Unit for Ageing and HealthVestfold Hospital Trust and Oslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Flavio Nobili
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI)University of Genoa and Neurology ClinicsPolyclinic San Martino HospitalGenoaItaly
| | - Milica Kramberger
- Department of NeurologyUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaMedical facultyUniversity of LjubljanaSlovenia
| | - John‐Paul Taylor
- Institute of NeuroscienceNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUnited Kingdom
| | - Jakub Hort
- Memory ClinicDepartment of NeurologyCharles University2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University HospitalPragueCzech Republic
- International Clinical Research CenterSt. Anne's University Hospital BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
| | - Jon Snædal
- Landspitali University HospitalReykjavikIceland
| | - Frederic Blanc
- Day Hospital of GeriatricsMemory Resource and Research Centre (CM2R) of StrasbourgDepartment of GeriatricsHôpitaux Universitaires de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
- University of Strasbourg and French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)ICube Laboratory and Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS)Team Imagerie Multimodale Intégrative en Santé (IMIS)/ICONEStrasbourgFrance
| | - Zuzana Walker
- University College LondonLondon & Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustUnited Kingdom
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Department of NeuroscienceUniversity of PaduaPadua & Fondazione Ospedale San CamilloVeneziaVeniceItaly
| | - Eric Westman
- Division of Clinical GeriatricsDepartment of NeurobiologyCare Sciences and SocietyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of NeuroimagingCentre for Neuroimaging SciencesInstitute of PsychiatryPsychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Centre for Age‐Related MedicineStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Institute of PsychiatryPsychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Veitch DP, Weiner MW, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Cairns NJ, Green RC, Harvey D, Jack CR, Jagust W, Morris JC, Petersen RC, Saykin AJ, Shaw LM, Toga AW, Trojanowski JQ. Understanding disease progression and improving Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: Recent highlights from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 15:106-152. [PMID: 30321505 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 283] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The overall goal of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is to validate biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. ADNI is a multisite, longitudinal, observational study that has collected many biomarkers since 2004. Recent publications highlight the multifactorial nature of late-onset AD. We discuss selected topics that provide insights into AD progression and outline how this knowledge may improve clinical trials. METHODS We used standard methods to identify nearly 600 publications using ADNI data from 2016 and 2017 (listed in Supplementary Material and searchable at http://adni.loni.usc.edu/news-publications/publications/). RESULTS (1) Data-driven AD progression models supported multifactorial interactions rather than a linear cascade of events. (2) β-Amyloid (Aβ) deposition occurred concurrently with functional connectivity changes within the default mode network in preclinical subjects and was followed by specific and progressive disconnection of functional and anatomical networks. (3) Changes in functional connectivity, volumetric measures, regional hypometabolism, and cognition were detectable at subthreshold levels of Aβ deposition. 4. Tau positron emission tomography imaging studies detailed a specific temporal and spatial pattern of tau pathology dependent on prior Aβ deposition, and related to subsequent cognitive decline. 5. Clustering studies using a wide range of modalities consistently identified a "typical AD" subgroup and a second subgroup characterized by executive impairment and widespread cortical atrophy in preclinical and prodromal subjects. 6. Vascular pathology burden may act through both Aβ dependent and independent mechanisms to exacerbate AD progression. 7. The APOE ε4 allele interacted with cerebrovascular disease to impede Aβ clearance mechanisms. 8. Genetic approaches identified novel genetic risk factors involving a wide range of processes, and demonstrated shared genetic risk for AD and vascular disorders, as well as the temporal and regional pathological associations of established AD risk alleles. 9. Knowledge of early pathological changes guided the development of novel prognostic biomarkers for preclinical subjects. 10. Placebo populations of randomized controlled clinical trials had highly variable trajectories of cognitive change, underscoring the importance of subject selection and monitoring. 11. Selection criteria based on Aβ positivity, hippocampal volume, baseline cognitive/functional measures, and APOE ε4 status in combination with improved cognitive outcome measures were projected to decrease clinical trial duration and cost. 12. Multiple concurrent therapies targeting vascular health and other AD pathology in addition to Aβ may be more effective than single therapies. DISCUSSION ADNI publications from 2016 and 2017 supported the idea of AD as a multifactorial disease and provided insights into the complexities of AD disease progression. These findings guided the development of novel biomarkers and suggested that subject selection on the basis of multiple factors may lower AD clinical trial costs and duration. The use of multiple concurrent therapies in these trials may prove more effective in reversing AD disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dallas P Veitch
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Francisco, CA, USA; Northern California Institute for Research and Education (NCIRE), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael W Weiner
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Paul S Aisen
- Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Laurel A Beckett
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Nigel J Cairns
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Danielle Harvey
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - William Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Leslie M Shaw
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Arthur W Toga
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging, Institute of Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John Q Trojanowski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Institute on Aging, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Alzheimer's Disease Core Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Udall Parkinson's Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Madan CR. Advances in Studying Brain Morphology: The Benefits of Open-Access Data. Front Hum Neurosci 2017; 11:405. [PMID: 28824407 PMCID: PMC5543094 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|
20
|
Ferreira D, Machado A, Molina Y, Nieto A, Correia R, Westman E, Barroso J. Cognitive Variability during Middle-Age: Possible Association with Neurodegeneration and Cognitive Reserve. Front Aging Neurosci 2017. [PMID: 28649200 PMCID: PMC5465264 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Increased variability in cognition with age has been argued as an indication of pathological processes. Focusing on early detection of neurodegenerative disorders, we investigated variability in cognition in healthy middle-aged adults. In order to understand possible determinants of this variability, we also investigated associations with cognitive reserve, neuroimaging markers, subjective memory complaints, depressive symptomatology, and gender. Method: Thirty-one 50 ± 2 years old individuals were investigated as target group and deviation was studied in comparison to a reference younger group of 30 individuals 40 ± 2 years old. Comprehensive neuropsychological and structural imaging protocols were collected. Brain regional volumes and cortical thickness were calculated with FreeSurfer, white matter hyperintensities with CASCADE, and mean diffusivity with FSL. Results: Across-individuals variability showed greater dispersion in lexical access, processing speed, executive functions, and memory. Variability in global cognition correlated with, reduced cortical thickness in the right parietal-temporal-occipital association cortex, and increased mean diffusivity in the cingulum bundle and right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. A trend was also observed for the correlation between global cognition and hippocampal volume and female gender. All these associations were influenced by cognitive reserve. No correlations were found with subjective memory complaints, white matter hyperintensities and depressive symptomatology. Across-domains and across-tasks variability was greater in several executive components and cognitive processing speed. Conclusion: Variability in cognition during middle-age is associated with neurodegeneration in the parietal–temporal–occipital association cortex and white matter tracts connecting this to the prefrontal dorsolateral cortex and the hippocampus. Moreover, this effect is influenced by cognitive reserve. Studying variability offers valuable information showing that differences do not occur in the same magnitude and direction across individuals, cognitive domains and tasks. These findings may have important implications for early detection of subtle cognitive impairment and clinical interpretation of deviation from normality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ferreira
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics-Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden.,Faculty of Psychology, University of La LagunaLa Laguna, Spain
| | - Alejandra Machado
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics-Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden.,Faculty of Psychology, University of La LagunaLa Laguna, Spain
| | - Yaiza Molina
- Faculty of Psychology, University of La LagunaLa Laguna, Spain.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa CanariasLas Palmas, Spain
| | - Antonieta Nieto
- Faculty of Psychology, University of La LagunaLa Laguna, Spain
| | - Rut Correia
- Faculty of Psychology, University of La LagunaLa Laguna, Spain.,Facultad de Educación, Universidad Diego PortalesSantiago, Chile
| | - Eric Westman
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics-Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
| | - José Barroso
- Faculty of Psychology, University of La LagunaLa Laguna, Spain
| |
Collapse
|