Dynamic modeling of cortisol reduction after inhaled administration of fluticasone propionate

Pharmacodynamic Monitoring of Ciclosporin and Tacrolimus: Insights From Nuclear Factor of Activated T-Cell-Regulated Gene Expression in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND

Although therapeutic drug monitoring of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) concentrations is performed routinely in clinical practice, an identical concentration may lead to different effects in different patients. Although the quantification of nuclear factor of activated T-cell-regulated gene expression (NFAT-RGE) is a promising method for measuring individual CNI effects, CNI pharmacodynamics are as of yet incompletely understood.

METHODS

CNI concentrations and NFAT-RGEs were quantified in 24 healthy volunteers receiving either ciclosporin or tacrolimus in 2 clinical trials. NFAT-RGE was measured using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction tests of whole-blood samples. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were analyzed using compartmental modeling and simulation. In addition, NFAT-RGE data from renal transplant patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average NFAT-RGE during a dose interval was reduced to approximately 50% with ciclosporin, considering circadian changes. The different effect-time course with ciclosporin and tacrolimus could be explained by differences in potency (IC 50 204 ± 41 versus 15.1 ± 3.2 mcg/L, P < 0.001) and pharmacokinetics. Residual NFAT-RGE at the time of maximum concentration (RGE tmax ) of 15% when using ciclosporin and of 30% when using tacrolimus was associated with similar average NFAT-RGEs during a dose interval. Renal transplant patients had similar but slightly stronger effects compared with healthy volunteers.

CONCLUSIONS

Ciclosporin and tacrolimus led to similar average suppression of NFAT-RGE in a dose interval, despite considerably different RGE tmax . Pharmacodynamic monitoring of average NFAT-RGE should be considered. When using NFAT-RGE at specific time points, the different effect-time courses and circadian changes of NFAT-RGEs should be considered.

Transitioning from Basic toward Systems Pharmacodynamic Models: Lessons from Corticosteroids

Technology in bioanalysis, -omics, and computation have evolved over the past half century to allow for comprehensive assessments of the molecular to whole body pharmacology of diverse corticosteroids. Such studies have advanced pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) concepts and models that often generalize across various classes of drugs. These models encompass the "pillars" of pharmacology, namely PK and target drug exposure, the mass-law interactions of drugs with receptors/targets, and the consequent turnover and homeostatic control of genes, biomarkers, physiologic responses, and disease symptoms. Pharmacokinetic methodology utilizes noncompartmental, compartmental, reversible, physiologic [full physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and minimal PBPK], and target-mediated drug disposition models using a growing array of pharmacometric considerations and software. Basic PK/PD models have emerged (simple direct, biophase, slow receptor binding, indirect response, irreversible, turnover with inactivation, and transduction models) that place emphasis on parsimony, are mechanistic in nature, and serve as highly useful "top-down" methods of quantitating the actions of diverse drugs. These are often components of more complex quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models that explain the array of responses to various drugs, including corticosteroids. Progressively deeper mechanistic appreciation of PBPK, drug-target interactions, and systems physiology from the molecular (genomic, proteomic, metabolomic) to cellular to whole body levels provides the foundation for enhanced PK/PD to comprehensive QSP models. Our research based on cell, animal, clinical, and theoretical studies with corticosteroids have provided ideas and quantitative methods that have broadly advanced the fields of PK/PD and QSP modeling and illustrates the transition toward a global, systems understanding of actions of diverse drugs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Over the past half century, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) have evolved to provide an array of mechanism-based models that help quantitate the disposition and actions of most drugs. We describe how many basic PK and PK/PD model components were identified and often applied to the diverse properties of corticosteroids (CS). The CS have complications in disposition and a wide array of simple receptor-to complex gene-mediated actions in multiple organs. Continued assessments of such complexities have offered opportunities to develop models ranging from simple PK to enhanced PK/PD to quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) that help explain therapeutic and adverse CS effects. Concurrent development of state-of-the-art PK, PK/PD, and QSP models are described alongside experimental studies that revealed diverse CS actions.

Application of the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development and therapeutic equivalence: a PEARRL review

Objectives

The objective of this review was to provide an overview of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models, focusing on drug-specific PK/PD models and highlighting their value added in drug development and regulatory decision-making.

Key findings

Many PK/PD models, with varying degrees of complexity and physiological understanding have been developed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug products. In special populations (e.g. paediatrics), in cases where there is genetic polymorphism and in other instances where therapeutic outcomes are not well described solely by PK metrics, the implementation of PK/PD models is crucial to assure the desired clinical outcome. Since dissociation between the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles is often observed, it is proposed that physiologically based pharmacokinetic and PK/PD models be given more weight by regulatory authorities when assessing the therapeutic equivalence of drug products.

Summary

Modelling and simulation approaches already play an important role in drug development. While slowly moving away from ‘one-size fits all’ PK methodologies to assess therapeutic outcomes, further work is required to increase confidence in PK/PD models in translatability and prediction of various clinical scenarios to encourage more widespread implementation in regulatory decision-making.

A quantitative approach to analysing cortisol response in the horse

The cortisol response to glucocorticoid intervention has, in spite of several studies in horses, not been fully characterized with regard to the determinants of onset, intensity and duration of response. Therefore, dexamethasone and cortisol response data were collected in a study applying a constant rate infusion regimen of dexamethasone (0.17, 1.7 and 17 μg/kg) to six Standardbreds. Plasma was analysed for dexamethasone and cortisol concentrations using UHPLC-MS/MS. Dexamethasone displayed linear kinetics within the concentration range studied. A turnover model of oscillatory behaviour accurately mimicked cortisol data. The mean baseline concentration range was 34-57 μg/L, the fractional turnover rate 0.47-1.5 1/h, the amplitude parameter 6.8-24 μg/L, the maximum inhibitory capacity 0.77-0.97, the drug potency 6-65 ng/L and the sigmoidicity factor 0.7-30. This analysis provided a better understanding of the time course of the cortisol response in horses. This includes baseline variability within and between horses and determinants of the equilibrium concentration-response relationship. The analysis also challenged a protocol for a dexamethasone suppression test design and indicated future improvement to increase the predictability of the test.

Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics

In this article, aspects of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion have been described bearing in mind the pathogenesis of allergic diseases and their possible therapeutic opportunities. The importance of the routes of administration of the different therapeutic groups has been emphasized. The classical aspects of drug metabolism and disposition related to oral administration have been reviewed, but special emphasis has been given to intranasal, cutaneous, transdermal, and ocular administration as well as to the absorption and the subsequent bioavailability of drugs. Drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters present in extrahepatic tissues, such as nasal mucosa and the respiratory tract, have been particularly discussed. As marketed antiallergic drugs include both racemates and enantiomers, aspects of stereoselective absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion have been discussed. Finally, a new and promising methodology, microdosing, has been presented, although it has not yet been applied to drugs used in the treatment of allergic diseases.

Evaluation of the administration time effect on the cumulative cortisol suppression and cumulative lymphocytes suppression for once-daily inhaled corticosteroids: a population modeling/simulation approach

Inhaled glucocorticoids continue to be first-line therapy in asthma. To improve improving patient compliance, newer inhaled glucocorticoids have been developed for once-a-day treatment. This study was interested in identifying the optimal time of dosing using 2 surrogate markers of glucocorticoid action. A previously published study on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (cortisol and blood lymphocyte suppression) of the inhaled glucocorticoids budesonide and fluticasone propionate was reanalyzed using a population pharmacokinetic approach. A stochastic numerical simulation using NONMEM assessed the effects of time of dosing on cortisol (side effect parameter) and blood lymphocytes (side effect and effect parameter). The effects on cortisol were more pronounced when the glucocorticoids were given in the morning, whereas the effects on lymphocytes (an effect controlled by endogenous and exogenous glucocorticoids) were maximized when dosing occurred in the late afternoon or evening. Twice-daily dosing of the same dose resulted in smaller differences between maximum and minimal effects. These were of no clinical relevance. Simulations for once-daily dosing support clinical studies that reported a higher antiasthmatic effect and lower cortisol suppression when once-daily dosing occurs in the evening.

Modified-release hydrocortisone for circadian therapy: a proof-of-principle study in dexamethasone-suppressed normal volunteers

BACKGROUND

All existing long-term glucocorticoid replacement therapy is suboptimal as the normal nocturnal rise and waking morning peak of serum cortisol is not reproduced.

AIM

To test whether it is possible to reproduce the normal overnight rise and morning peak in serum cortisol using an oral delayed and sustained release preparation of hydrocortisone (Cortisol(ds)).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Six healthy normal male volunteers attended on two occasions, in a single-dose, open-label, nonrandomized study. Endogenous cortisol secretion was suppressed by administration of dexamethasone. Cortisol(ds) (formulation A or B) was administered at 2200 h on day 1. Blood samples for measurement of cortisol were taken from 2200 h every 30 min until 0700 h, then hourly until 2200 h on day 2. Fifteen body mass index (BMI)-matched control subjects had serum cortisol levels measured at 20-min intervals for 24 h. Serum cortisol profiles and pharmacokinetics after Cortisol(ds) were compared with those in controls.

RESULTS

Formulations A and B were associated with delayed drug release (by 2 h and 4 h, respectively), with median peak cortisol concentrations at 4.5 h (0245 h) and 10 h (0800 h), respectively, thereby reproducing the normal early morning rise in serum cortisol. Total cortisol exposure was not different from controls.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time we have shown that it is possible to mimic the normal circadian rhythm of circulating cortisol with an oral modified-release formulation of hydrocortisone, providing the basis for development of physiological circadian replacement therapy in patients with adrenal insufficiency.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of urinary cortisol suppression after inhalation of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate

AIM

Fluticasone propionate (FP) and mometasone furoate (MF) are inhaled corticosteroids that possess a high ratio of topical to systemic activity. The systemic bioavailability of MF has been claimed to be minimal (1%). FP has been shown to exhibit the same degree of systemic effects, but its systemic availability is between 13 and 17%. We hypothesize that FP and MF have comparable systemic availabilities that can explain their potential to cause systemic effects.

METHODS

Steady-state FP and MF trough plasma samples were determined from a clinical study by Fardon et al. in patients with persistent asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 s = 91%). The percent plasma protein binding of FP and MF was measured using ultracentrifugation. Free FP plasma concentrations were normalized for their differences in receptor binding affinity compared with MF and linked to overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine with an inhibitory E(max).

RESULTS

A plot of steady-state FP and MF total trough plasma concentrations vs. dose showed that both drugs exhibit dose linearity. MF has comparable bioavailability to FP based on the steady-state concentrations observed for the different doses. The free plasma concentration producing 50% of urinary cortisol suppression (IC(50)) for MF was not statistically different from the free, normalized IC(50) for FP.

CONCLUSION

FP and MF have similar pulmonary deposition and the same potential to cause systemic side-effects due to their similar IC(50) values. The observed urinary cortisol suppression of FP and MF is in agreement with their systemic availability, their differences in plasma protein binding and receptor binding affinity.

Evaluation of tests of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function used to measure effects of inhaled corticosteroids

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence supporting the evaluation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function as a measure of systemic exposure and clinical adverse events, discuss factors that affect systemic exposure to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), and review the effects of various ICSs that are currently available or under development on HPA axis function from a therapeutic perspective.

DATA SOURCES

Randomized published clinical trials and review articles on the topic of HPA axis suppression were retrieved in MEDLINE. Searches dating back to 1988 were restricted to human studies published in English.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that evaluated HPA axis function and the methods used to measure its activities and the effects of ICSs (fluticasone propionate, budesonide, beclomethasone dipropionate, mometasone furoate, and ciclesonide) were selected.

RESULTS

Factors that influence adverse events caused by ICSs include pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, delivery devices, and therapeutic dose and duration. Basal measurements of blood and urinary cortisol levels, reflecting basal HPA axis function, are the most sensitive markers for assessing systemic ICS bioavailability but, compared with dynamic stimulation tests, are poor clinical predictors of adrenal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Basal serologic and urinary cortisol tests provide the best measures of assessing and comparing systemic ICS exposure. Long-term clinical studies are needed to determine whether such tests are predictive of ICS toxicity.

The systemic safety of inhaled corticosteroid therapy: a focus on ciclesonide

OBJECTIVE

To review the potential systemic activity of ciclesonide and its active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide, by evaluation of the effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE and MEDLINE searches using the keyword ciclesonide, without date restrictions, were conducted to identify published articles that related to clinical trials that included ciclesonide.

STUDY SELECTION

The primary articles that reported systemic safety data for ciclesonide were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ciclesonide (320-1,280 microg/d) demonstrated no detectable, clinically relevant effect on HPA axis function as evaluated by basal cortisol excretion measurements and dynamic stimulation tests. Furthermore, ciclesonide had no effect on the normal diurnal rhythm of endogenous cortisol secretion while simultaneously improving pulmonary function and reducing bronchial hyperresponsiveness. These results suggest that ciclesonide has a low systemic activity that may be attributable to unique pharmacologic properties, including a high degree of serum protein binding, a low oral bioavailability, and rapid systemic elimination, that reduce the level of systemically available pharmacologically active drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Even at the higher doses used to treat more severe cases of asthma, ciclesonide was observed to have no effect on HPA axis function. These data, in conjunction with the observed clinical efficacy, suggest that ciclesonide may have an improved therapeutic margin compared with some other currently available inhaled corticosteroid treatments and, therefore, the potential to improve therapeutic outcomes.

Pharmacologic characteristics and adrenal suppression with newer inhaled corticosteroids: A comparison of ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the most potent anti-inflammatory choice for patients with asthma. Selecting the most appropriate ICS for a patient requires a thorough understanding of the pharmacologic properties of each drug.

OBJECTIVE

This review details the pharmacologic properties of ciclesonide (CIC) and fluticasone propionate (FP) and reviews the available data on suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis as a measure of systemic exposure and safety profile.

METHODS

Clinical studies and case reports were identified through a MEDLINE and EMBASE search of English-language articles. The databases were searched for the years 1990 to April 2005 using the terms ciclesonide, fluticasone, ICS, and adrenal suppression. All studies were clinical trials of pharmacologic properties of the ICSs in humans.

RESULTS

A total of 1082 articles were identified. CIC and FP are 2 of the most potent ICSs. Both have high receptor-binding affinities (12 times and 18 times that of dexamethasone, respectively), and both may provide enhanced respiratory effects through a prolonged pulmonary residence time. The CIC metered dose inhaler dispenses smaller and more highly respirable particles than FP (1.1-2.1 pm vs 2.8-3.2 microm, respectively). Therefore, a greater percentage of administered CIC is topically deposited in the lungs (52% vs 12% to 13% for FP). CIC is delivered as an inactive parent compound, which is converted to its active metabolite, desisobutyryl-CIC (des-CIC), by esterases in the airways. More than 50% of a dose of CIC is deposited and distributed evenly throughout the lungs of healthy adults; lipid conjugation in the lung also may increase lung residence time. On entering the systemic circulation, both corticosteroids are rapidly cleared by the liver (elimination half-life of 3.5 hours for CIC vs 7.8 hours for FP). However, plasma protein binding is greater with CIC/des-CIC (99%/ approximately 99%) than FP (90%), resulting in reduced amounts of des-CIC (<I%) versus FP (10%) circulating free in the plasma. Although studies of low or medium doses of FP have produced conflicting results, high doses of FP (>660 pg/d) may result in adrenal suppression. CIC has not been reported to produce any significant adrenal suppression throughout its studied dose range (up to 1280 micro/d).

CONCLUSIONS

A review of the literature suggests that CIC, as compared with FP, achieves greater pulmonary deposition, causes fewer adverse oropharyngeal effects, deposits less biologically active drug in the systemic circulation, and has less potential for adrenal suppression.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of total lymphocytes and selected subtypes after oral budesonide

In the present pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) evaluation, cortisol, total lymphocytes, and lymphocyte subpopulations were monitored following single oral doses of two oral formulations of 3 mg budesonide (BUD) (Dosage Forms A and B) in order to assess the differential effects that BUD may have on cortisol suppression and the modulation of blood lymphocyte subtypes. On a single occasion, five subjects received one 3 mg capsule of Dosage Form A, four received three capsules of Dosage Form A (single dose of 9 mg), and five received three capsules of Dosage Form B (single dose of 9 mg). Placebo capsules were administered to six subjects in the study. Cortisol concentrations, total lymphocyte counts, and lymphocyte subpopulation counts for the CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, and CD56/16 were fitted to an in direct PK/PD response model that described the effects of BUD on serum cortisol concentrations as well as the combined effects of BUD and cortisol on total lymphocytes and the CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, and CD56/16 subtypes. Data were also analyzed using noncompartmental methods. The PK/PD model fitted the data with the exception of data for CD56/16. The IC(50) value for unbound BUD acting on total lymphocytes was 0.276 ng/ml while the IC(50) values for unbound BUD acting on lymphocyte subtypes ranged from 0.150 ng/ml for CD4 to 0.364 ng/ml for CD8. The IC(50) values for the effects of BUD on serum cortisol were lower (0.079 ng/ml). The results of PK/PD modeling and noncompartmental analysis indicate that BUD has a smaller effect on the CD8 subtype and larger effects on the CD4 and CD19 subtypes, relative to the effect on total lymphocytes, and that cortisol suppression, although not a direct immunological biomarker, may be a more sensitive marker for the systemic effect of corticosteroids.

Modification of the ultrafiltration technique to overcome solubility and non-specific binding challenges associated with the measurement of plasma protein binding of corticosteroids

Plasma protein binding (PPB) methodology suitable for application in the lead optimisation of a corticosteroid series known to demonstrate non-specific binding (NSB) and poor solubility has been established. The method involved a modification to standard ultrafiltration (UF) techniques. In parallel with each experimental plasma sample, a control plasma sample was also processed by ultrafiltration. The retentate from experimental and control plasma samples were mixed back into the filtrate of the partner sample. The resulting regenerated plasma samples, one representing the experimental filtrate and one representing the experimental retentate, were then analysed by LC/MS/MS. Varying degrees of NSB were demonstrated with a number of corticosteroids, and this effect was eliminated using the modified method. Validation using a panel of established corticosteroids showed good agreement with published PPB figures. The published PPB figure for fluticasone propionate (FP) was, however, found to be an underestimate, and this was subsequently confirmed, at clinically relevant plasma concentrations, to be 99.3%. The modified method was particularly suited to lead optimisation because it provided samples in a consistent matrix compatible with standard high throughput LC/MS/MS analysis.

Adrenal Suppression with Dry Powder Formulations of Fluticasone Propionate and Mometasone Furoate

Mometasone furoate (MF) and fluticasone propionate (FP) are high potency inhaled corticosteroids. The systemic bioavailability of MF is claimed to be negligible, leading to a minimal potential for systemic adverse effects. We assessed the overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine as the primary outcome of adrenal suppression in 21 patients with persistent asthma (mean FEV1 = 91%). Patients were randomized in a crossover fashion to receive 2 weekly consecutive doubling incremental doses of either FP Accuhaler (500, 1,000, and 2,000 microg/day) or MF Twisthaler (400, 800, and 1,600 microg/day). For the 21 per protocol completed patients, there was significant suppression of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine with high and medium doses of both drugs-as geometric mean fold suppression (95% confidence interval) from baseline: FP 2,000 microg, 1.85 (1.21-2.82, p = 0.002); FP 1,000 microg, 1.45 (1.07-1.96, p = 0.02); MF 1,600 microg, 1.92 (1.26-2.93, p = 0.001); and MF 800 microg, 1.39 (1.04-1.88, p = 0.02). For secondary outcomes of 8:00 A.M. plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and early morning urinary cortisol/creatinine, there was significant suppression with MF and FP at the highest dose. Our data refute the assertion that MF has negligible systemic bioavailability and a lower potential for systemic adverse effects compared with FP.

Risk-benefit value of inhaled glucocorticoids: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective

Inhaled glucocorticoids induce therapeutic and adverse systemic effects via the same types of receptors. Analysis of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of inhaled glucocorticoids generates a risk-benefit value (RBV). Targeted efficacy with minimal adverse effects helps to quantify an appropriate RBV. High lung deposition/targeting, high receptor binding, longer pulmonary retention, and high lipid conjugation are among the pharmacokinetic parameters to be considered for improved efficacy of the compound. Low or negligible oral bioavailability, small particle size and inactive drug at the oropharynx, high plasma protein binding, rapid metabolism, high clearance, and lower systemic concentrations are associated with low risks for adverse effects. Inhaled glucocorticoid potency is enhanced by solution inhalers, which result in higher pulmonary deposition and minimize local adverse effects. These properties, among others, determine the efficacy and safety of inhaled glucocorticoids. Currently available inhaled glucocorticoids do not provide the complete pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters to optimize RBV, leaving room for improvement in the development of future agents.

Inhaled corticosteroids: past lessons and future issues

Inhaled corticosteroids play a pivotal role in the treatment of asthma. Inhalation permits effective delivery of the corticosteroid in high concentration to target sites within the lung while minimizing systemic exposure. Consequently, the safety profile of inhaled corticosteroids is markedly better than that of oral corticosteroid therapy. However, although it was first thought that direct delivery might eliminate systemic adverse effects, this has not been confirmed by clinical trials and experience. Inhaled corticosteroids are absorbed from the lungs into the systemic circulation, in which they can acutely decrease growth velocity in children, an effect that fortunately appears to be temporary and might have no effect on final adult height. In sufficient dosages, they also produce bone mineral loss leading to osteoporosis and might increase the risk of cataracts, glaucoma, skin atrophy, and vascular changes that increase the risk of ecchymoses. Effective evaluation of the severity and significance of these complications is challenging because highly sensitive tests do not reliably predict clinically significant events, and short-term observations do not predict long-term consequences. Also, compliance wanes with long-term treatment, and susceptibility to a particular adverse event can vary over time, even in the same individual, because of developmental or hormonal changes. This journal supplement will review what has been learned about the safety of inhaled cortico-steroids during the past decade, discussing some of the questions that remain and considering the characteristics of an "ideal" inhaled corticosteroid: one with high local activity in the lung and minimal or no adverse systemic effects.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ciclesonide

Ciclesonide is a novel glucocorticoid that is converted into ciclesonide--active principle (CIC-AP) in the lung. The study objectives were to identify a structural model for population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of CIC-AP using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, assess the influence of select covariates on PK and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, and investigate the effects of CIC-AP on endogenous cortisol. Pooled concentration data from nine phase I studies (dose: 400-3600 micrograms) involving healthy and asthmatic patients were included in the PK analysis. There were 151 subjects (3300 observations) for the CIC-AP population PK analysis. Various models examined inter- and intrasubject variability for the PK parameters. Population estimates of the PK parameters of clearance and volume of distribution were 396 L/h (64.8% co-efficient of variation [CV]) and 1190 L (41.2% CV), respectively. Pharmacodynamic population estimates included maximum cortisol release rate, 3140 ng/h (5.4% CV). The EC50 of CIC-AP was 0.88 ng/mL. Ciclesonide is a safe corticosteroid that causes negligible cortisol suppression. The disposition and effect of CIC-AP can be described using mixed-effect modeling. The estimated EC50 is similar to mean Cmax from an 800-micrograms dose, further suggesting CIC-AP has little effect on cortisol suppression.

Therapeutic significance of distal airway inflammation in asthma

Inflammation in asthma is not merely confined to the large central airways but also extends to the small peripheral airways. Distal lung inflammation can be observed even in patients with asthma with mild disease and normal spirometric readings. Subjects with asymptomatic asthma can exhibit significant increases in peripheral airway resistance, likely the result of distal lung inflammation. As determined from measurements of eosinophilic and other cellular infiltrates, the inflammatory response in the distal lung can exceed that in the large airways. Nocturnal asthma, a natural model of cyclic asthma worsening, is associated with an increase in nighttime distal lung inflammation, as evidenced by the accumulation of alveolar tissue eosinophils. Distal lung disease appears to increase the risk of recurrent asthma exacerbation, whereas disease-related anatomic changes in the small airways of the distal lung are prominent in fatal asthma. The clinical significance of distal lung disease makes this region an important therapeutic target. Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-based preparations of inhaled corticosteroids used to treat airway inflammation produce aerosols of relatively large particle size (approximately 4 microm); such aerosols have poor access to the distal lung. New formulations of inhaled corticosteroids that use hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellants can have smaller particle sizes (approximately 1 microm). Extrafine HFA aerosols have better access to the distal lung, with less oropharyngeal deposition. Imaging studies suggest that anti-inflammatory medication delivered as an extrafine aerosol produces beneficial changes in distal lung function. In one study, an HFA formulation of an inhaled corticosteroid reduced air trapping to a greater degree than a CFC formulation of the same corticosteroid. By extending the delivery of anti-inflammatory medication to the distal lung, the new HFA-based corticosteroids have the potential to treat asthma more effectively and at reduced steroid doses.

Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of therapeutically clinically equivalent doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide, given as Diskus or Turbohaler dry-powder inhalers to healthy subjects

Direct comparisons of the pharmacokinetic (PK) and systemic pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of inhaled corticosteroids after single and multiple dosing in the same subjects are scarce. The objective of this study was to compare thePK/PDproperties of clinically equivalent, single, and multiple doses of dry-powder formulations of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP 200 and 500 microg via Diskus) and budesonide (BUD, 400 and 1,000 microg via Turbohaler). Fourteen healthy subjects completed a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, five-way crossover study consisting of a single dose administered at 8 a.m. on day 1 followed by 4 days of twice-daily dosing at 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. on days 2 to 5. Serum concentrations of FP and BUD were measured using validated liquid chromatography/ mass spectrometry assays. The 24-hour cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) in serum was monitored as the pharmacodynamic surrogate marker. Peak serum concentrations following single and multiple dosing were observed 10 to 30 minutes after inhalation for BUD and 30 to 90 minutes afterinhalation of FP with no influence of dose ordosingregimen. After a single dose of 1000 microg BUD and 500 microg FP the median estimates of terminal half-life and mean residence time were 3.5 and 3.9 hours for BUD and 10.1 and 12.0 hours for FP, respectively. Using previously reported intravenous data, the mean absorption times (MAT) were calculated to be around 2 hours and 7 hours for BUD and FP respectively. On average, the area under the curve (A UC) at steady state (day 5) was up to 30% higher for BUD compared to that over a 12-hour period following the first dose on day 1, whereas A UC estimates were 50% to 80% higherforFP at steady state, indicating accumulation. However, the steady-state Cmax values were seven to eight times and AUC values three to four times higher for BUD than for FP. Comparison of active treatment data with placebo showed that CCS after a single dose was not pronounced for any of the doses/drugs studied. On day 5, both doses of BUD caused statistically significant suppression (CCS of 19% for the 400 microg dose and 36% for the 1,000 microg dose). For FP only the high dose had a statistically significant effect on serum cortisol (CCS of 14% for the 200 microg dose and 27% for the 500 microg dose). Compared to BUD, FP has slower pulmonary absorption and slower elimination kinetics. However, following inhalation of therapeutically equipotent, multiple twice-daily doses in healthy subjects, the systemic effects of FP delivered via Diskus on AUC24 serum cortisol were relatively low and similar to those of BUD delivered via Turbohaler.

Pharmacokinetics and systemic activity of fluticasone via Diskus and pMDI, and of budesonide via Turbuhaler

AIMS

To determine the basal pharmacokinetics, lung uptake and plasma cortisol suppression for two commonly prescribed inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

Twenty-one subjects (13 healthy and 8 mild asthmatic patients) received fluticasone propionate via a chlorofluorocarbon-propelled pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) (healthy subjects only) and Diskus and budesonide via Turbuhaler, 1000 microg twice daily for 7 days. Intravenous doses (200 microg) of both compounds were used as references. Plasma concentrations of fluticasone and budesonide were determined during 48 h by liquid chromatography plus tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). Plasma concentrations of cortisol were determined by LC-MS every second hour for 24 h at baseline, and following each treatment.

RESULTS

The volume of distribution was found to be larger and the elimination half-life and mean absorption time longer for fluticasone than for budesonide. The systemic availability of budesonide via Turbuhaler (39%) was significantly higher than that of fluticasone via Diskus (13%) (ratio 3.0 [2.5, 3.6] with 95% confidence interval [CI]), and via pMDI (21%) (ratio 1.8 [1.3, 2.3]). In addition, at steady state the systemic availability of fluticasone via pMDI was significantly higher than via Diskus (ratio 1.6 [1.1, 2.2]). The lung deposition of budesonide via Turbuhaler was 2.2-fold [1.7, 2.9] higher than that of fluticasone pMDI and 3.4-fold [2.8, 4.0] higher than that of fluticasone Diskus. In addition, the lung deposition of fluticasone via pMDI was 1.5-fold [1.1, 2.9] higher than that via the Diskus inhaler. Plasma cortisol (24 h) was significantly reduced vs baseline for all three treatments. The cortisol concentration vs baseline was 12% for fluticasone pMDI, which was significantly lower (ratio 0.32 [0.24, 0.42]) than that for fluticasone Diskus (39%), and for budesonide Turbuhaler (46%) (ratio 0.27 [0.21, 0.37]). The plasma cortisol concentration did not differ significantly between treatments with fluticasone Diskus and budesonide Turbuhaler (ratio 0.87 [0.65; 1.15]).

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide and fluticasone differ in their pharmacokinetic properties in that although clearance is the same, the rate of uptake and elimination is slower for fluticasone. Despite a significantly higher pulmonary availability of budesonide via Turbuhaler, the plasma cortisol suppression is less than that of fluticasone via pMDI and similar to that of fluticasone via Diskus. There is no indication of any difference between healthy subjects and mild asthmatic patients in the pharmacokinetics and plasma cortisol suppression of fluticasone and budesonide.

Pharmacokinetics of epimeric budesonide and fluticasone propionate after repeat dose inhalation--intersubject variability in systemic absorption from the lung

AIMS

Pharmacokinetic variability is likely to be a significant factor contributing to the interindividual differences in dose requirements, anti-inflammatory response and side-effects with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), but there is limited information about the disposition of ICS during regular dosing with a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI). This study uses a mixed effects modelling approach to quantify and compare the interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics of epimeric budesonide (BUD) and fluticasone propionate (FP) after repeat-dose inhalation.

METHODS

This pharmacokinetic substudy was part of a previously published open-label, randomised, placebo-controlled, 7-period crossover study to evaluate the short-term effects on plasma cortisol levels of inhaled BUD (400, 800, 1600 microg twice daily) and FP (375, 750, 1000 microg twice daily) via pMDI in a group of healthy male volunteers. On the fifth day of each high-dose treatment period (BUD 1600 microg twice daily and FP 1000 microg twice daily), venous blood samples were collected in nine subjects prior to the last dose and at 15 min, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h postdose for measurement of plasma drug concentrations to determine the pharmacokinetics of epimeric BUD and FP following inhalation. Non-compartmental analysis and a mixed effects model were used to characterize the disposition profiles.

RESULTS

Both drugs had a rapid absorption half-life (BUD 10 min vs FP 11.3 min), but quite different elimination half-lives (BUD 2.4 h vs FP 7.8 h). Although there were intraindividual differences in the handling of the 22R-and 22S-epimers of BUD, there were no consistent pharmacokinetic differences between the two enantiomers in the group as a whole. Consistent with previous reports of FP's higher volume of distribution (V) and lower systemic bioavailability (F), the V/F ratio was lower for BUD than FP (498 l vs 8100 l). The parameter with the greatest interindividual variability for both BUD and FP was the rate of systemic absorption from the lung.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report describing the pharmacokinetics of epimeric BUD and FP after repeat dose inhalation via pMDI. Three observations may be of clinical relevance: (1) there is considerable intersubject variability in the rate of absorption of both drugs from the lung; (2) in some individuals there was a long t(1/2),z for BUD, resulting in higher and more sustained plasma drug levels in the 4-12 h postdose period than would be predicted from single-dose pharmacokinetic data; and (3) there is evidence of diurnal variation in FP pharmacokinetics, with higher-than-expected plasma drug concentrations in the morning compared with the evening.

An interactive algorithm for the assessment of cumulative cortisol suppression during inhaled corticosteroid therapy

The objective of the study was to develop an algorithm based on a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling approach to quantify and predict cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) as a surrogate marker for the systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Two Excel spreadsheets, one for single dose and another for steady-state multiple doses of inhaled steroids, were developed for predicting CCS. Four of the commonly used inhaled steroids were chosen for the purposes of simulation: fluticasone propionate (FP), budesonide (BUD), flunisolide (FLU), and triamcinolone acetonide (TAA). Drug-specific PK and PD parameters were obtained from previous single- and multiple-dose studies. In cases in which multiple-dose data were not available, the single-dose data were extrapolated. The algorithm was designed to calculate CCS based on 5 input parameters: name of drug, dose, dosing interval, time(s) of dosing, and type of inhaler device. In addition, a generalized algorithm was set up to calculate CCS based on clearance, volume of distribution, absorption rate, protein binding, pulmonary deposition, oral bioavailability, and unbound EC50 of the corticosteroid of interest. The spreadsheet allowed predictions of CCS for single doses as well as steady-state conditions. A simple method has been developed that facilitates comparisons between various drugs and dosing regimens and has the potential to significantly reduce the number of comparative clinical trials to be performed for evaluating the short-term systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroids.

Algorithm for application of Fourier analysis for biorhythmic baselines of pharmacodynamic indirect response models

The change of an indirect pharmacological response R(t) can be described by a periodic time-dependent production rate kin(t) and a first-order loss constant kout. If kin(t) follows some biological rhythm (e.g., circadian), then the response R(t) also displays a periodic behavior. A new approach for describing the input function in indirect response models with biorhythmic baselines of physiologic substances is introduced. The present approach uses the baseline (placebo) response Rb(t) to recover the equation for kin(t). Fourier analysis provides an approximate equation for Rb(t) that consists of terms (usually two or three) of the Fourier series (harmonics) that contribute most to the overall sum. The model differential equation is solved backward for kin(t), yielding the equation involving Rb(t). A computer program was developed to perform the square L2-norm approximation technique. Fourier analysis was also performed based on nonlinear regression. Cortisol suppression after inhalation of fluticasone propionate (FP) was modeled based on the inhibition of the secretion rate kin(t) using ADAPT II. The pharmacodynamic parameters kout and IC50 were estimated from the model equation with kin(t) derived by the new approach. The proposed method of describing the input function needs no assumption about the behavior of kin(t), is as efficient as methods used previously, and is more flexible in describing the baseline data than the nonlinear regression method.

Soft drug design: general principles and recent applications

Soft drug design represents a new approach aimed to design safer drugs with an increased therapeutic index by integrating metabolism considerations into the drug design process. Soft drugs are new therapeutic agents that undergo predictable metabolism to inactive metabolites after exerting their therapeutic effect. Hence, they are obtained by building into the molecule, in addition to the activity, the most desired way in which the molecule is to be deactivated and detoxified. In an attempt to systematize and summarize the related work done in a number of laboratories, including ours, the present review presents an overview of the general soft drug design principles and provides a variety of specific examples to illustrate the concepts. A number of already marketed drugs, such as esmolol, remifentanil, or loteprednol etabonate, resulted from the successful application of such design principles. Many other promising drug candidates are currently under investigation in a variety of fields including possible soft antimicrobials, anticholinergics, corticosteroids, beta-blockers, analgetics, ACE inhibitors, antiarrhythmics, and others. Whenever possible, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties are briefly summarized and compared to those of other compounds used in the same field.

Modeling interactions between adrenal suppression and T-helper lymphocyte trafficking during multiple dosing of methylprednisolone

A physiologic pharmacodynamic model was developed to jointly characterize the effects of corticosteroid treatment on adrenal suppression and T-helper cell trafficking during single and multiple dosing in asthmatic patients. Methylprednisolone (MP), cortisol, and T-helper cell concentrations obtained from a previously published study during single day and 6 days of multiple dosing MP treatment were examined. The formation and disposition kinetics of MP were described with a compartmental model. The biorhythmic profile of basal cortisol secretion rate was analyzed using a recent Fourier approach based on circadian harmonics. A three-compartment loop model was proposed to represent three major T-helper cell pools: blood, extravascular site, and lymph nodes. T-helper cell synthesis and degradation rate constants were obtained from the literature. The suppressive effects of cortisol and MP on T-helper cell concentrations were described with a joint additive inhibition function altering the cell migration rate from lymph nodes to blood. The model adequately described both plasma cortisol profiles and T-helper cells in blood after single and multiple doses of MP. The potency of MP for suppression of cortisol secretion was estimated as IC50 = 0.8 ng/ml. The biorhythmic nature of the basal T-helper cells in blood was well described as under the influence of basal circadian cortisol concentrations with IC50 = 79 ng/ml. The model fitted potency of MP for suppression of T-helper cells was IC50 = 4.6 ng/ml. The observed rebound of T-helper cells in blood can also be described by the proposed model. The rhythm and suppression of plasma cortisol and T-helper cells before and during single and multiple dose MP treatment were adequately described by these extended indirect response models.

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach to predict the cumulative cortisol suppression of inhaled corticosteroids

The suppression of endogenous cortisol release is one of the major systemic side effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma. The circadian rhythm of the endogenous cortisol release and the resulting plasma concentrations as well as the release suppression during corticosteroid therapy could previously be described with an integrated PK/PD model. Based on this model, a PK/PD approach was developed to quantify and predict the cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) as a surrogate marker for the systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. The presented method was applied to predict CCS after single doses and during short-term multiple dosing of the inhaled corticosteroids flunisolide (FLU), fluticasone propionate (FP), and triamcinolone acetonide (TCA), and after oral methylprednisolone as systemic reference therapy. Drug-specific PK and PD parameters were obtained from previous single-dose studies and extrapolated to the multiple-dose situation. For single dosing, a similar CCS within the range of 16-21% was predicted for FP 250 micrograms, FLU 500 micrograms, and TCA 1000 micrograms. For multiple dosing, a respective CCS of 28-33% was calculated for FLU 500 micrograms bid, FP 250 micrograms, bid, and TCA 1000 micrograms bid. Higher cortisol suppression compared to these single and multiple dosing regimens of the inhaled corticosteroids was predicted after oral doses of only 1 mg and 2 mg methylprednisolone, respectively. The predictive power of the approach was evaluated by comparing the PK/PD-based simulations with data reported previously in clinical studies. The predicted CCS values were in good correlation with the clinically observed results. Hence, the presented PK/PD approach allows valid predictions of CCS for single and short-term multiple dosing of inhaled corticosteroids and facilitates comparisons between different dosing regimens and steroids.

Modeling of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships: concepts and perspectives

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD)-modeling links dose-concentration relationships (PK) and concentration-effect relationships (PD), thereby facilitating the description and prediction of the time course of drug effects resulting from a certain dosing regimen. PK/PD-modeling approaches can basically be distinguished by four major attributes. The first characterizes the link between measured drug concentration and the response system, direct link versus indirect link. The second considers how the response system relates effect site concentration to the observed outcome, direct versus indirect response. The third regards what clinically or experimentally assessed information is used to establish the link between concentration and effect, hard link versus soft link. And the fourth considers the time dependency of pharmacodynamic model parameters, distinguishing between time-variant versus time-invariant. Application of PK/PD-modeling concepts has been identified as potentially beneficial in all phases of preclinical and clinical drug development. Although today predominantly limited to research, broader application of PK/PD-concepts in clinical therapy will provide a more rational basis for patient-specific dosage individualization and may thus guide applied pharmacotherapy to a higher level of performance.

Mathematical modeling of circadian cortisol concentrations using indirect response models: comparison of several methods

Six mathematical functions to describe the chronobiology of cortisol concentrations were assessed. Mean data from a dose-proportionality study of inhaled fluticasone propionate were fitted with an indirect response model using various biorhythmic functions (single cosine, dual ramps, dual zero-order, dual cosines, and Fourier series with 2 and n-harmonics) for production rate. Data with known parameters and random variation were also generated and fitted using the ADAPT II program. Fitted parameters, model estimation criteria, and runs tests were compared. Models with preassigned functions: the dual ramps, the dual zero-order and the dual cosines provide maximum and minimum times for cortisol release rate, were suitable for describing asymmetric circadian patterns and yielding IC50 values. Fourier analysis differs from the other methods in that it uses the placebo data to recover equations for cortisol secretion rate rather than by postulation. Nonlinear regression for Fourier analysis, instead of the L2-norm method, was useful to characterize the baseline cortisol data but was restricted to a maximum of two harmonics. Apart from the single cosine function, which predicts symmetrical cortisol concentrations, all methods were satisfactory in describing the baseline and suppressed cortisol concentrations. On the other hand, Fourier series with L2-norm produced the best unbiased estimate for baseline patterns. The Fourier method is flexible, accurate, and can be extended to other drug-induced changes in normal periodic rhythms.

Review article: issues in oral administration of locally acting glucocorticosteroids for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases are treated in some cases by local administration of anti-inflammatory drugs. Local delivery of drugs in the colon following oral administration may lead to improved efficacy/side-effect profiles and may improve patient compliance. This review covers a number of issues important in the design of oral delivery systems of glucocorticosteroids for local therapy of colonic inflammation. The choice of specific glucocorticosteroids is based on the drug's physicochemical and pharmacological properties. The conditions under which an orally administered glucocorticosteroid (or other drug) must be delivered to treat ulcerative colitis are also discussed. These conditions include variations in local pH, transit throughout the gastrointestinal tract, the potential role of gut microflora, and drug dissolution in both the healthy and diseased large intestine. The effective delivery of topically-active glucocorticosteroids in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis patients is complex, but if successful could improve their usefulness.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled corticosteroids

There are significant differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of inhaled corticosteroids currently used in medical practice. All are rapidly cleared from the body but they show varying levels of oral bioavailability and more importantly variation in the rate of absorption after inhalation. Oral bioavailability is lowest for fluticasone propionate, indicating a low potential for unwanted systemic corticosteroid effects. Mathematical modeling has shown pulmonary residence times to be longest for fluticasone propionate and triamcinolone acetonide but shortest for budesonide and flunisolide. These properties appear to relate to pulmonary solubility, which appears to be the rate-limiting step in the absorption process.

Characteristics of indirect pharmacodynamic models and applications to clinical drug responses

This review describes four basic physiologic indirect pharmacodynamic response (IDR) models which have been proposed to characterize the pharmacodynamics of drugs that act by indirect mechanisms such as inhibition or stimulation of the production or dissipation of factors controlling the measured effect. The principles underlying IDR models and their response patterns are described. The applicability of these basic IDR models to characterize pharmacodynamic responses of diverse drugs such as inhibition of gastric acid secretion by nizatidine and stimulation of MX protein synthesis by interferon alpha-2a is demonstrated. A list of other uses of these models is provided. These models can be readily extended to accommodate additional complexities such as nonstationary or circadian baselines, equilibration delay, depletion or accumulation of a precursor pool, sigmoidicity, or other mechanisms. Indirect response models which have a logical mechanistic basis account for time-delays in many responses and are widely applicable in clinical pharmacology.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of inhaled corticosteroids in relation to efficacy and safety

There are significant differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of inhaled corticosteroids currently available for use in treatment of asthma and this can result in differences in pharmacodynamic activity. All currently used inhaled corticosteroids are rapidly cleared from the body, but show varying levels of oral bioavailability, with fluticasone propionate having the lowest. Following inhalation, there is also considerable variability in the rate of absorption from the lung, and pulmonary residence times are greatest for fluticasone propionate and triamcinolone acetonide, and shortest for budesonide and flunisolide. Cortisol suppression is frequently used as a surrogate marker of systemic corticosteroid activity. Cortisol release displays a circadian rhythm, which can be mathematically modelled and the effects of exogenous corticosteroids on cortisol suppression established. However, when interpreting the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on cumulative cortisol suppression, it is important to take into consideration the pharmacokinetic properties of each particular drug, together with the study design and the time of administration.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of systemic effects of flunisolide after inhalation

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of flunisolide were studied in healthy volunteers after inhalation. In the morning on the day the study began, volunteers inhaled 0.5 mg of flunisolide with and without oral administration of charcoal, or 1 mg, 2 mg, and 3 mg of flunisolide with concomitant administration of charcoal. A placebo group was used to assess the endogenous cortisol, granulocyte, and lymphocyte baseline levels. Flunisolide plasma levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography using a tandem mass spectrometer as detector (HPLC/MS/MS). Cortisol plasma levels and differential white blood cell counts were obtained over 12 hours. An integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was applied to link the flunisolide plasma concentrations with the effects on lymphocytes, granulocytes, and cortisol. Maximum concentration levels of 3 to 9 ng/mL of flunisolide were observed after 0.2 to 0.3 hours for all of the investigated doses. The terminal half-life ranged from 1.3 to 1.7 hours. There was no statistical difference between treatments in the presence or absence of orally administered charcoal. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models satisfactorily described the time-courses of the effects on granulocytes, lymphocytes, and cortisol suppression. The resulting E50-values (concentrations to induce 50% of the maximum effect) concurred with the reported values of in vitro receptor binding affinities. The duration of the systemic effects were short because of the short half-life of the drug. Cumulative cortisol suppression increased with dose administration and ranged from 20% to 36%. The PK/PD simulations resulted in a smaller degree of cortisol suppression for the drug administered at 10 PM. The cumulative change from baseline was slightly smaller for the effects on granulocytes and lymphocytes than those on cortisol. This information promotes the comparison with other inhaled glucocorticoids.

Dependency of cortisol suppression on the administration time of inhaled corticosteroids

Endogenous cortisol suppression is one of the major systemic side effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma. A previously developed pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic approach was used to evaluate the influence of administration time on the cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) after single doses of the inhaled corticosteroids flunisolide and fluticasone propionate. Administration time-dependent simulations of CCS were performed with drug-specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters obtained from previous clinical trials. Both drugs showed similar diurnal variation in CCS, dependent on the administration time, with maximum suppression when administered in the early morning at approximately 3 AM. The optimum administration time for minimized CCS was in the afternoon but was shifted from 3 PM for fluticasone propionate to later time points around 7 PM for flunisolide, probably because of the shorter terminal elimination half-life of flunisolide. Regarding peak to trough fluctuation, however, CCS after fluticasone propionate showed only half the administration time dependency as after flunisolide. Therefore, the ratio between CCS after flunisolide and after fluticasone propionate also followed administration time-dependent variations. This led to the conclusion that administration time has to be considered as a pivotal influential factor in clinical studies comparing CCS among different inhaled corticosteroids.