1
|
Mesele M, Asmare G, Ambaw G, Asmamaw M, Abdu M, Chekol E, Tenaw D, Fenta S, Asmamaw T, Aderajew M, Mengist A, Solomon Y, Bantie B, Alebachew W, Atnafu N. Correlates of ART attrition among adults under antiretroviral therapy in Southern Ethiopia, retrospective cohort study. AIDS Care 2023:1-8. [PMID: 38157365 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2023.2293758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
High attrition rates from ART are the primary contributors to morbidity, death, hospitalisation, rising transmission rates, treatment failure, rising burden of opportunistic infections (OIs), and the evolution of HIV-virus resistance (HIVDR). In Sub-Saharan Africa, more than two-thirds of ART patients will not receive continuous care. There is little information about the correlates that contribute to attrition from ART services among ART patients in Southern Ethiopia. Hence, this study aims to identify correlates of attrition from antiretroviral therapy services for adults under antiretroviral therapy at Otona Teaching and Referral Hospital, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. From 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2017, a retrospective cohort analysis was performed. The pre-determined 328 medical records were chosen using a simple random sampling technique using computer-generated random numbers. Epi Info version 3.5.3 was used to enter and clean the data, which were then exported to STATA version 11 for analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model, both bivariate and multivariable, was used. Variables with p-values less than 0.25 in bivariate analysis were considered candidates for multivariable analysis, and variables with p-values less than 0.05 were deemed statistically important in multivariable analysis. The intensity of the correlation and statistical significance were determined using the CHR, AHR, and 95 per cent confidence intervals. The magnitude of attrition from ART service was 21.60% (95% CI: 17.10, 26.10). The distance between home and hospital is more than five kilometres (AHR:3.84;95% CI: 1.99,7.38), no registered phone number (AHR:2.47;95%CI:1.32,4.09), have not taken isoniazid prophylaxis (AHR:2.23;95%CI:1.30,4.09), alcohol consumption (AHR: 1.77; 95% CI:1.01, 3.12), and had no caregiver (AHR: 2.11; 95% CI:1.23, 3.60) were statistically significant in the Cox proportional hazard model. Distance between home and hospital, phone number registration on follow-up chart, having a history of alcohol consumption, isoniazid prophylaxis provision, and having family support were independent correlates of attrition from antiretroviral treatment services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molalegn Mesele
- School of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Getachew Asmare
- Department of Reproductive Health and Nutrition, School of Public Health, Woliata Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Gizachew Ambaw
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Woliata Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Misganaw Asmamaw
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Mohammed Abdu
- Unit of Physiology, Department of Biomedical Science, College of Health Science, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Endeshaw Chekol
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Denekew Tenaw
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Sefineh Fenta
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
| | - Tadesse Asmamaw
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Melkamu Aderajew
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Anteneh Mengist
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Yenealem Solomon
- Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Berihun Bantie
- Department of Comprehensive Nursing, College of Health sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Wubet Alebachew
- Department of Maternal and Neonatal Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Natnael Atnafu
- School of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rahim FO, Jain B, Bloomfield GS, Jain P, Rugakingira A, Thielman NM, Sakita F, Hertz JT. A holistic framework to integrate HIV and cardiovascular disease care in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS 2023; 37:1497-1502. [PMID: 37199570 DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000003604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Faraan O Rahim
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Bhav Jain
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Gerald S Bloomfield
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Pankaj Jain
- Highmark Health, Pittsburgh
- Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Nathan M Thielman
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Francis Sakita
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Julian T Hertz
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shigayeva A, Gcwensa N, Ndlovu CD, Ntumase N, Sabela S, Ohler L, Trivino-Duran L, Kamara EF, Hlophe K, Isaakidis P, Van Cutsem G. Retention on ART and viral suppression among patients in alternative models of differentiated HIV service delivery in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 2:e0000336. [PMID: 36962695 PMCID: PMC10021436 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Differentiated models of HIV care (DMOC) aim to improve health care efficiency. We describe outcomes of five DMOC in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: facility adherence clubs (facility AC) and community adherence clubs (community AC), community antiretroviral treatment (ART) groups (CAG), spaced fast lane appointments (SFLA), and community pick up points (PuP). This retrospective cohort study included 8241 eligible patients enrolled into DMOC between 1/1/2012 and 31/12/2018. We assessed retention in DMOC and on ART, and viral load suppression (<1000 copies/mL). Kaplan-Meier techniques were applied to describe crude retention. Mixed effects parametric survival models with Weibull distribution and clustering on health center and individual levels were used to assess predictors for ART and DMOC attrition, and VL rebound (≥1000 copies/mL). Overall DMOC retention was 85%, 80%, and 76% at 12, 24 and 36 months. ART retention at 12, 24 and 36 months was 96%, 93%, 90%. Overall incidence rate of VL rebound was 1.9 episodes per 100 person-years. VL rebound rate was 4.9 episodes per 100 person-years among those enrolled in 2012-2015, and 0.8 episodes per 100 person-years among those enrolled in 2016-2018 (RR 0.12; 95% CI, 0.09-0.15, p<0.001). Prevalence of confirmed virological failure was 0.6% (38/6113). Predictors of attrition from DMOC and from ART were male gender, younger age, shorter duration on ART before enrollment. Low level viremia (>200-399 copies/mL) was associated with higher hazards of VL rebound and attrition from ART. Concurrent implementation of several DMOC in a large ART program is feasible and can achieve sustained retention on ART and VL suppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ntombi Gcwensa
- Médecins Sans Frontières—South Africa, Eshowe, South Africa
| | | | | | | | - Liesbet Ohler
- Médecins Sans Frontières—South Africa, Eshowe, South Africa
| | | | | | | | - Petros Isaakidis
- Southern African Medical Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa
- Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Gilles Van Cutsem
- Southern African Medical Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Belay YA, Yitayal M, Atnafu A, Taye FA. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation and scale up of differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in Africa: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1431. [PMID: 36443853 PMCID: PMC9703668 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08825-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the face of health-system constraints, local policymakers and decision-makers face difficult choices about how to implement, expand and institutionalize antiretroviral therapy (ART) services. This scoping review aimed to describe the barriers and facilitators to the implementation and scale up of differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for HIV treatment in Africa. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Global Health, Google, and Google Scholar databases were searched. There was no start date thereby all references up until May 12, 2021, were included in this review. We included studies reported in the English language focusing on stable adult people living with human immune deficiency virus (HIV) on ART and the healthcare providers in Africa. Studies related to children, adolescents, pregnant and lactating women, and key populations (people who inject drugs, men having sex with men, transgender persons, sex workers, and prisoners), and studies about effectiveness, cost, cost-effectiveness, and pre or post-exposure prophylaxis were excluded. A descriptive analysis was done. RESULTS Fifty-seven articles fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Several factors influencing DSD implementation and scale-up emerged. There is variability in the reported factors across DSD models and studies, with the same element serving as a facilitator in one context but a barrier in another. Perceived reduction in costs of visit for patients, reduction in staff workload and overburdening of health facilities, and improved or maintained patients' adherence and retention were reported facilitators for implementing DSD models. Patients' fear of stigma and discrimination, patients' and providers' low literacy levels on the DSD model, ARV drug stock-outs, and supply chain inconsistencies were major barriers affecting DSD model implementation. Stigma, lack of model adoption from providers, and a lack of resources were reported as a bottleneck for the DSD model scale up. Leadership and governance were reported as both a facilitator and a barrier to scaling up the DSD model. CONCLUSIONS This review has important implications for policy, practice, and research as it increases understanding of the factors that influence DSD model implementation and scale up. Large-scale studies based on implementation and scale up theories, models, and frameworks focusing on each DSD model in each healthcare setting are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yihalem Abebe Belay
- grid.449044.90000 0004 0480 6730Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia ,grid.59547.3a0000 0000 8539 4635Department of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Mezgebu Yitayal
- grid.59547.3a0000 0000 8539 4635Department of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Asmamaw Atnafu
- grid.59547.3a0000 0000 8539 4635Department of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Fitalew Agimass Taye
- grid.1022.10000 0004 0437 5432Department of Accounting, Finance, and Economics, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Okere NE, Meta J, Maokola W, Martelli G, van Praag E, Naniche D, Gomez GB, Pozniak A, Rinke de Wit T, de Klerk J, Hermans S. Quality of care in a differentiated HIV service delivery intervention in Tanzania: A mixed-methods study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265307. [PMID: 35290989 PMCID: PMC8923447 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differentiated service delivery (DSD) offers benefits to people living with HIV (improved access, peer support), and the health system (clinic decongestion, efficient service delivery). ART clubs, 15-30 clients who usually meet within the community, are one of the most common DSD options. However, evidence about the quality of care (QoC) delivered in ART clubs is still limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods study as part of the Test & Treat project in northwest Tanzania. We surveyed QoC among stable clients and health care workers (HCW) comparing between clinics and clubs. Using a Donabedian framework we structured the analysis into three levels of assessment: structure (staff, equipment, supplies, venue), processes (time-spent, screenings, information, HCW-attitude), and outcomes (viral load, CD4 count, retention, self-worth). RESULTS We surveyed 629 clients (40% in club) and conducted eight focus group discussions, while 24 HCW (25% in club) were surveyed and 22 individual interviews were conducted. Quantitative results revealed that in terms of structure, clubs fared better than clinics except for perceived adequacy of service delivery venue (94.4% vs 50.0%, p = 0.013). For processes, time spent receiving care was significantly more in clinics than clubs (119.9 vs 49.9 minutes). Regarding outcomes, retention was higher in the clubs (97.6% vs 100%), while the proportion of clients with recent viral load <50 copies/ml was higher in clinics (100% vs 94.4%). Qualitative results indicated that quality care was perceived similarly among clients in clinics and clubs but for different reasons. Clinics were generally perceived as places with expertise and clubs as efficient places with peer support and empathy. In describing QoC, HCW emphasized structure-related attributes while clients focused on processes. Outcomes-related themes such as improved client health status, self-worth, and confidentiality were similarly perceived across clients and HCW. CONCLUSION We found better structure and process of care in clubs than clinics with comparable outcomes. While QoC was perceived similarly in clinics and clubs, its meaning was understood differently between clients. DSD catered to the individual needs of clients, either technical care in the clinic or proximate and social care in the club. Our findings highlight that both clinic and DSD care are required as many elements of QoC were individually perceived.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nwanneka Ebelechukwu Okere
- Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), Department of Global Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Judith Meta
- Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), Department of Global Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Werner Maokola
- Department of Strategic Information, National AIDS Control Programme, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | | | - Eric van Praag
- Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), Department of Global Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Denise Naniche
- ISGlobal -Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gabriela B. Gomez
- Department of Global Health and Development London School of Health and Tropical Medicine London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anton Pozniak
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and LSHTM London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tobias Rinke de Wit
- Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), Department of Global Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Josien de Klerk
- Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), Department of Global Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sabine Hermans
- Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), Department of Global Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gumede SB, Venter F, de Wit J, Wensing A, Lalla-Edward ST. Antiretroviral therapy uptake and predictors of virological failure in patients with HIV receiving first-line and second-line regimens in Johannesburg, South Africa: a retrospective cohort data analysis. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054019. [PMID: 35428623 PMCID: PMC9013990 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study described the demographics, treatment information and identified characteristics associated with virological failure and being lost to follow-up (LTFU) for patients with HIV on first-line and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens in a large South African cohort. DESIGN A quantitative retrospective cohort study using secondary data analysis. SETTING Seven Johannesburg inner city facilities. PARTICIPANTS Unique records of 123 002 people with HIV receiving ART at any point in the period 1 April 2004 to 29 February 2020 were included. MEASURES Demographic characteristics, ART status, CD4 count information and retention status were collected and analysed as covariates of outcomes (viral load (VL) and LTFU). RESULTS Of the total study patients, 95% (n=1 17 260) were on a first-line regimen and 5% (n=5742) were on a second-line regimen. Almost two-thirds were female (64%, n=79 226). Most patients (60%, n=72 430) were initiated on an efavirenz-based, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based and emtricitabine-based regimen (fixed-dose combination). 91% (n=76 737) achieved viral suppression at least once since initiating on ART and 60% (n=57 981) remained in care as at the end of February 2020. Patients from the community health centre and primary healthcare clinics were not only more likely to be virally suppressed but also more likely to be LTFU. Patients on second-line regimens were less likely to reach viral suppression (adjusted OR (aOR)=0.26, CI=0.23 to 0.28) and more likely to be LTFU (aOR=1.21, CI=1.09 to 1.35). Being older (≥25 years) and having a recent CD4 cell count≥100 cells/µL were predictors of viral suppression and retention in patients on ART. CONCLUSION Patients on first-line regimens had higher VL suppression rates and were more likely to remain in care than those on a second-line regimen. Being younger and having low CD4 cell counts were associated with poor outcomes, suggesting priority groups for ART adherence support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siphamandla Bonga Gumede
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Ezintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Francois Venter
- Ezintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - John de Wit
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Wensing
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Le Tourneau N, Germann A, Thompson RR, Ford N, Schwartz S, Beres L, Mody A, Baral S, Geng EH, Eshun-Wilson I. Evaluation of HIV treatment outcomes with reduced frequency of clinical encounters and antiretroviral treatment refills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2022; 19:e1003959. [PMID: 35316272 PMCID: PMC8982898 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Global HIV treatment programs have sought to lengthen the interval between clinical encounters for people living with HIV (PLWH) who are established on antiretroviral treatment (ART) to reduce the burden of seeking care and to decongest health facilities. The overall effect of reduced visit frequency on HIV treatment outcomes is however unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of implementation strategies that reduce the frequency of clinical appointments and ART refills for PLWH established on ART. METHODS AND FINDINGS We searched databases between 1 January 2010 and 9 November 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared reduced (6- to 12-monthly) clinical consultation or ART refill appointment frequency to 3- to 6-monthly appointments for patients established on ART. We assessed methodological quality and real-world relevance, and used Mantel-Haenszel methods to generate pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals for retention, viral suppression, and mortality. We evaluated heterogeneity quantitatively and qualitatively, and overall evidence certainty using GRADE. Searches yielded 3,955 records, resulting in 10 studies (6 RCTs, 3 observational studies, and 1 study contributing observational and RCT data) representing 15 intervention arms with 33,599 adults (≥16 years) in 8 sub-Saharan African countries. Reduced frequency clinical consultations occurred at health facilities, while reduced frequency ART refills were delivered through facility or community pharmacies and adherence groups. Studies were highly pragmatic, except for some study settings and resources used in RCTs. Among studies comparing reduced clinical consultation frequency (6- or 12-monthly) to 3-monthly consultations, there appeared to be no difference in retention (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97-1.04, p = 0.682, 8 studies, low certainty), and this finding was consistent across 6- and 12-monthly consultation intervals and delivery strategies. Viral suppression effect estimates were markedly influenced by under-ascertainment of viral load outcomes in intervention arms, resulting in inconclusive evidence. There was similarly insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on mortality (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.75-1.66, p = 0.592, 6 studies, very low certainty). For ART refill frequency, there appeared to be little to no difference in retention (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.06, p = 0.473, 4 RCTs, moderate certainty) or mortality (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.63-3.35, p = 0.382, 4 RCTs, low certainty) between 6-monthly and 3-monthly visits. Similar to the analysis for clinical consultations, although viral suppression appeared to be better in 3-monthly arms, effect estimates were markedly influence by under-ascertainment of viral load outcomes in intervention arms, resulting in overall inclusive evidence. This systematic review was limited by the small number of studies available to compare 12- versus 6-monthly clinical consultations, insufficient data to compare implementation strategies, and lack of evidence for children, key populations, and low- and middle-income countries outside of sub-Saharan Africa. CONCLUSIONS Based on this synthesis, extending clinical consultation intervals to 6 or 12 months and ART dispensing intervals to 6 months appears to result in similar retention to 3-month intervals, with less robust conclusions for viral suppression and mortality. Future research should ensure complete viral load outcome ascertainment, as well as explore mechanisms of effect, outcomes in other populations, and optimum delivery and monitoring strategies to ensure widespread applicability of reduced frequency visits across settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelle Le Tourneau
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Ashley Germann
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Ryan R. Thompson
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nathan Ford
- Department of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sheree Schwartz
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Laura Beres
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Aaloke Mody
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Stefan Baral
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Elvin H. Geng
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Ingrid Eshun-Wilson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bassett IV, Yan J, Govere S, Khumalo A, Ngobese N, Shazi Z, Nzuza M, Bunda BA, Wara NJ, Stuckwisch A, Zionts D, Dube N, Tshabalala S, Bogart LM, Parker RA. Uptake of community‐ versus clinic‐based antiretroviral therapy dispensing in the Central Chronic Medication Dispensing and Distribution program in South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc 2022; 25:e25877. [PMID: 35077611 PMCID: PMC8789242 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction South Africa's government‐led Central Chronic Medication Dispensing and Distribution (CCMDD) program offers people living with HIV the option to collect antiretroviral therapy at their choice of community‐ or clinic‐based pick‐up points intended to increase convenience and decongest clinics. To understand CCMDD pick‐up point use among people living with HIV, we evaluated factors associated with uptake of a community‐ versus clinic‐based pick‐up point at CCMDD enrolment. Methods We collected baseline data from October 2018 to March 2020 on adults (≥18 years) who met CCMDD clinical eligibility criteria (non‐pregnant, on antiretroviral therapy for ≥1 year and virologically suppressed) as part of an observational cohort in seven public clinics in KwaZulu‐Natal. We identified factors associated with community‐based pick‐up point uptake and fit a multivariable logistic regression model, including age, gender, employment status, self‐perceived barriers to care, self‐efficacy, HIV‐related discrimination, and perceived benefits and challenges of CCMDD. Results and Discussion Among 1521 participants, 67% were females, with median age 36 years (IQR 30–44). Uptake of a community‐based pick‐up point was associated with younger age (aOR 1.18 per 10‐year decrease, 95% CI 1.05–1.33), being employed ≥40 hours per week (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.10–1.83) versus being unemployed, no self‐perceived barriers to care (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.09–1.86) and scoring between 36 and 39 (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.03–2.01) or 40 (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.39–2.63) versus 10–35 on the self‐efficacy scale, where higher scores indicate greater self‐efficacy. Additional factors included more convenient pick‐up point location (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.77–3.04) or hours (aOR 5.09, 95% CI 3.71–6.98) as perceived benefits of CCMDD, and lack of in‐clinic follow‐up after a missed collection date as a perceived challenge of CCMDD (aOR 4.37, 95% CI 2.30–8.31). Conclusions Uptake of community‐based pick‐up was associated with younger age, full‐time employment, and systemic and structural factors of living with HIV (no self‐perceived barriers to care and high self‐efficacy), as well as perceptions of CCMDD (convenient pick‐up point location and hours, lack of in‐clinic follow‐up). Strategies to facilitate community‐based pick‐up point uptake should be tailored to patients’ age, employment, self‐perceived barriers to care and self‐efficacy to maximize the impact of CCMDD in decongesting clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid V. Bassett
- Massachusetts General Hospital Division of Infectious Diseases Boston Massachusetts USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Medical Practice Evaluation Center Boston Massachusetts USA
- Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) Harvard University Boston Massachusetts USA
- Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Joyce Yan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center Boston Massachusetts USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bridget A. Bunda
- Massachusetts General Hospital Medical Practice Evaluation Center Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Nafisa J. Wara
- Massachusetts General Hospital Medical Practice Evaluation Center Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Ashley Stuckwisch
- Massachusetts General Hospital Medical Practice Evaluation Center Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Dani Zionts
- Massachusetts General Hospital Medical Practice Evaluation Center Boston Massachusetts USA
| | | | - Sandile Tshabalala
- South Africa Department of Health Province of KwaZulu‐Natal South Africa
| | | | - Robert A. Parker
- Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) Harvard University Boston Massachusetts USA
- Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center Boston Massachusetts USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Limbada M, Macleod D, Situmbeko V, Muhau E, Shibwela O, Chiti B, Floyd S, Schaap AJ, Hayes R, Fidler S, Ayles H. Rates of viral suppression in a cohort of people with stable HIV from two community models of ART delivery versus facility-based HIV care in Lusaka, Zambia: a cluster-randomised, non-inferiority trial nested in the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial. Lancet HIV 2022; 9:e13-e23. [PMID: 34843674 PMCID: PMC8716341 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3018(21)00242-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-facility-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery for people with stable HIV might increase sustainable ART coverage in low-income and middle-income countries. Within the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial, two interventions, home-based delivery (HBD) and adherence clubs (AC), which included groups of 15-30 participants who met at a communal venue, were compared with standard of care (SoC). In this trial we looked at the effectiveness and feasibility of these alternative models of care. Specifically, this trial aimed to assess whether these models of care had similar virological suppression to that of SoC 12 months after enrolment. METHODS This was a three-arm, cluster-randomised, non-inferiority trial, done in two urban communities in Lusaka, Zambia included in the HPTN 071 trial. The two communities were split into zones, which were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to the three treatment strategies: 35 zones to the SoC group, 35 zones to the HBD group, and 34 zones to the AC group. ART and adherence support were delivered once every 3 months at home for the HBD group, in groups of 15-30 people in the AC group, or in the clinic for the SoC group. Adults with HIV who were receiving first-line ART for at least 6 months, virally suppressed using national HIV guidelines in the last 12 months, had no other health conditions requiring the clinicians attention, live in the study catchment area, and provided written informed consent, were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was viral suppression at 12 months (with a 6 month final measurement window [ie, 9-15 months]), defined as less than 1000 HIV RNA copies per mL, with a non-inferiority margin of 5%. FINDINGS Between May 5 and Dec 19, 2017, 9900 individuals were screened for inclusion, of whom 2489 (25·1%) participants were enrolled into the trial: 781 (31%) in the SoC group, 852 (34%) in the HBD group, and 856 (34%) in the AC group. A higher proportion of participants had viral load measurements in the primary outcome window in the HBD (581 [61%]of 852 participants) and AC (485 [57%] of 856 participants) groups than in the SoC (390 [50%] of 781 patients) group (p=0·0021). Of the 1096 missing observations, 152 (13·8%) were attributable to either deaths (25 [16%] participants), relocations (37 [24%] participants), or lost to follow-up (90 [59%]); 690 (63·0%) participants had viral load results outside the window period; and 254 (23·2%) did not have a viral load result. The prevalence of viral suppression was estimated to be 98·3% (95% CI 96·6 to 99·7) in the SoC group, 98·7% (97·5 to 99·6) in the HBD group, and 99·2% (98·4 to 99·8) in the AC group. This gave an estimated risk difference of 0·3% (95% CI -1·5 to 2·4) for the HBD group compared with the SoC group and 0·9% (-0·8 to 2·8) for the AC group compared with the SoC group. There was strong evidence (p<0·0001) that both community ART models were non-inferior to the SoC group (p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION Community models of ART delivery were as effective as facility-based care in terms of viral suppression. FUNDING National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, The International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Mental Health, and President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Macleod
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Albertus J Schaap
- Zambart, Lusaka, Zambia; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Richard Hayes
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sarah Fidler
- Imperial College and Imperial college National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Helen Ayles
- Zambart, Lusaka, Zambia; Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lopes J, Grimwood A, Ngorima-Mabhena N, Tiam A, Tukei BB, Kasu T, Mahachi N, Mothibi E, Tukei V, Chasela C, Lombard C, Fatti G. Out-of-Facility Multimonth Dispensing of Antiretroviral Treatment: A Pooled Analysis Using Individual Patient Data From Cluster-Randomized Trials in Southern Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2021; 88:477-486. [PMID: 34506343 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000002797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Out-of-facility multi-month dispensing (MMD) is a differentiated service delivery model which provides antiretroviral treatment (ART) at intervals of up to 6 monthly in the community. Limited randomized evidence investigating out-of-facility MMD is available. We evaluated participant outcomes and compared out-of-facility MMD models using data from cluster-randomized trials in Southern Africa. SETTING Eight districts in Zimbabwe and Lesotho. METHODS Individual-level participant data from 2 cluster-randomized trials that included stable adults receiving ART at 60 facilities were pooled. Both trials had 3 arms: ART collected 3-monthly at healthcare facilities (3MF, control); ART provided three-monthly in community ART groups (CAGs) (3MC); and ART provided 6-monthly in either CAGs or on an individual provider-patient basis (6MC). Participant retention, viral suppression and incidence of unscheduled facility visits were compared. RESULTS Ten thousand one hundred thirty-six participants were included, 3817 (37.7%), 2893 (28.5%) and 3426 (33.8%) in arms 3MF, 3MC and 6MC, respectively. After 12 months, retention was non-inferior for 3MC (95.7%) vs. 3MF (95.0%) {adjusted risk difference (aRD) = 0.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.8 to 1.4]}; and 6MC (95.1%) vs. 3MF [aRD = -0.2 (95% CI: -1.4 to 1.0)]. Retention was greater amongst intervention arm participants in CAGs versus 6MC participants not in CAGs, aRD = 1.5% (95% CI: 0.2% to 2.9%). Viral suppression was excellent (≥98%) and unscheduled facility visits were not increased in the intervention arms. CONCLUSIONS Three and 6-monthly out-of-facility MMD was non-inferior versus facility-based care for stable ART patients. Out-of-facility 6-monthly MMD should incorporate small group peer support whenever possible. CLINICALTRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03238846 and NCT03438370.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Lopes
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | | | - Appolinaire Tiam
- Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington DC, United States
| | | | | | - Nyika Mahachi
- Zimbabwe College of Public Health Physicians, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Eula Mothibi
- Right to Care/EQUIP Health, Centurion, South Africa
| | - Vincent Tukei
- Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Maseru, Lesotho
| | - Charles Chasela
- Right to Care/EQUIP Health, Centurion, South Africa
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; and
| | - Carl Lombard
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
- Biostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Geoffrey Fatti
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
- Kheth'Impilo AIDS Free Living, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Okere NE, Lennox L, Urlings L, Ford N, Naniche D, Rinke de Wit TF, Hermans S, Gomez GB. Exploring Sustainability in the Era of Differentiated HIV Service Delivery in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2021; 87:1055-1071. [PMID: 33770063 PMCID: PMC8219088 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000002688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The World Health Organization recommends differentiated service delivery (DSD) to support resource-limited health systems in providing patient-centered HIV care. DSD offers alternative care models to clinic-based care for people living with HIV who are stable on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Despite good patient-related outcomes, there is limited evidence of their sustainability. Our review evaluated the reporting of sustainability indicators of DSD interventions conducted in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). METHODS We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies conducted between 2000 and 2019 assessing DSD interventions targeting HIV-positive individuals who are established in ART in sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated them through a comprehensive sustainability framework of constructs categorized into 6 domains (intervention design, process, external environment, resources, organizational setting, and people involvement). We scored each construct 1, 2, or 3 for no, partial, or sufficient level of evidence, respectively. Interventions with a calculated sustainability score (overall and domain-specific) of >90% or domain-specific median score >2.7 were considered likely to be sustainable. RESULTS Overall scores ranged from 69% to 98%. Top scoring intervention types included adherence clubs (98%) and community ART groups (95%) which comprised more than half of interventions. The highest scoring domains were design (2.9) and organizational setting (2.8). The domains of resources (2.4) and people involvement (2.3) scored lowest revealing potential areas for improvement to support DSD sustainability. CONCLUSIONS With the right investment in stakeholder involvement and domestic funding, DSD models generally show potential for sustainability. Our results could guide informed decisions on which DSD intervention is likely to be sustainable per setting and highlight areas that could motivate further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nwanneka E. Okere
- Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Laura Lennox
- Department of Primary Care and Public health, Imperial College, National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration, North West London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Urlings
- Department of Medicine, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nathan Ford
- Department HIV, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Denise Naniche
- ISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Hospital Clinic-University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tobias F. Rinke de Wit
- Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sabine Hermans
- Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gabriela B. Gomez
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Health and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and
- Department of Modelling, Epidemiology and Data Science, Currently, Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon,France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Limbada M, Zijlstra G, Macleod D, Ayles H, Fidler S. A systematic review of the effectiveness of non- health facility based care delivery of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa measured by viral suppression, mortality and retention on ART. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1110. [PMID: 34112135 PMCID: PMC8194040 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11053-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alternative models for sustainable antiretroviral treatment (ART) delivery are necessary to meet the increasing demand to maintain population-wide ART for all people living with HIV (PLHIV) in sub-Saharan Africa. We undertook a review of published literature comparing health facility-based care (HFBC) with non-health facility based care (nHFBC) models of ART delivery in terms of health outcomes; viral suppression, loss to follow-up, retention and mortality. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of Medline, Embase and Global Health databases from 2010 onwards. UNAIDS reports, WHO guidelines and abstracts from conferences were reviewed. All studies measuring at least one of the following outcomes, viral load suppression, loss-to-follow-up (LTFU) and mortality were included. Data were extracted, and a descriptive analysis was performed. Risk of bias assessment was done for all studies. Pooled estimates of the risk difference (for viral suppression) and hazard ratio (for mortality) were made using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS Of 3082 non-duplicate records, 193 were eligible for full text screening of which 21 published papers met the criteria for inclusion. The pooled risk difference of viral load suppression amongst 4 RCTs showed no evidence of a difference in viral suppression (VS) between nHFBC and HFBC with an overall estimated risk difference of 1% [95% CI -1, 4%]. The pooled hazard ratio of mortality amongst 2 RCTs and 4 observational cohort studies showed no evidence of a difference in mortality between nHFBC and HFBC with an overall estimated hazard ratio of 1.01 [95% CI 0.88, 1.16]. Fifteen studies contained data on LTFU and 13 studies on retention. Although no formal quantitative analysis was performed on these outcomes due to the very different definitions between papers, it was observed that the outcomes appeared similar between HFBC and nHFBC. CONCLUSIONS Review of current literature demonstrates comparable outcomes for nHFBC compared to HFBC ART delivery programmes in terms of viral suppression, retention and mortality. PROSPERO NUMBER CRD42018088194 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Limbada
- Zambart House, PO Box 50697, UNZA-Ridgeway Campus, Lusaka, Zambia.
| | | | - David Macleod
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Helen Ayles
- Zambart House, PO Box 50697, UNZA-Ridgeway Campus, Lusaka, Zambia
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sarah Fidler
- Imperial College and Imperial college NIHR BRC, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Okere NE, Censi V, Machibya C, Costigan K, Katambi P, Martelli G, de Klerk J, Hermans S, Gomez GB, Pozniak A, de Wit TR, Naniche D. Beyond viral suppression: Quality of life among stable ART clients in a differentiated service delivery intervention in Tanzania. Qual Life Res 2021; 31:159-170. [PMID: 34052956 PMCID: PMC8800900 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02889-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With antiretroviral therapy, more people living with HIV (PLHIV) in resource-limited settings are virally suppressed and living longer. WHO recommends differentiated service delivery (DSD) as an alternative, less resource-demanding way of expanding HIV services access. Monitoring client's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is necessary to understand patients' perceptions of treatment and services but is understudied in sub-Saharan Africa. We assessed HRQoL among ART clients in Tanzania accessing two service models. METHODS Cross-sectional survey from May-August 2019 among stable ART clients randomly sampled from clinics and clubs in the Shinyanga region providing DSD and clinic-based care. HRQoL data were collected using a validated HIV-specific instrument-Functional Assessment of HIV infection (FAHI), in addition to socio-demographic, HIV care, and service accessibility data. Descriptive analysis of HRQoL, logistic regression and a stepwise multiple linear regression were performed to examine HRQoL determinants. RESULTS 629 participants were enrolled, of which 40% accessed DSD. Similar HRQoL scores [mean (SD), p-value]; FAHI total [152.2 (22.2) vs 153.8 (20.6), p 0.687] were observed among DSD and clinic-based care participants. Accessibility factors contributed more to emotional wellbeing among DSD participants compared to the clinic-based care participants (53.4% vs 18.5%, p = < 0.001). Satisfactory (> 80% of maximum score) HRQoL scoring was associated with (OR [95% CI], p-value) being male (2.59 [1.36-4.92], p 0.004) among clinic participants and with urban residence (4.72 [1.70-13.1], p 0.001) among DSD participants. CONCLUSIONS Similar HRQoL was observed in DSD and clinic-based care. Our research highlights focus areas to identify supporting interventions, ultimately optimizing HRQoL among PLHIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nwanneka Ebelechukwu Okere
- Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Veronica Censi
- Doctors with Africa (CUAMM), Test & Treat Project Shinyanga, Shinyanga, Tanzania
| | | | - Kathleen Costigan
- Bugisi Health Centre, Catholic Diocese of Shinyanga, Shinyanga, Tanzania
| | - P Katambi
- Ngokolo Health Centre, Catholic Diocese of Shinyanga, Shinyanga, Tanzania
| | - Giulia Martelli
- Doctors with Africa (CUAMM), Test & Treat Project Shinyanga, Shinyanga, Tanzania
| | - Josien de Klerk
- Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sabine Hermans
- Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gabriela B Gomez
- Department of Global Health and Development London School of Health and Tropical Medicine United Kingdom, London, UK
| | - Anton Pozniak
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tobias Rinke de Wit
- Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Denise Naniche
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Marellapudi A, Hussen SA, Brown DN, Fletcher MR, Henkhaus ME, Jones MD, Colasanti J, Kalokhe AS. Understanding and addressing privacy and confidentiality concerns associated with the provision of mobile HIV care: a qualitative study. AIDS Care 2021; 34:575-579. [PMID: 33938335 PMCID: PMC8563507 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2021.1921104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Less than half the people with HIV (PLWH) in the United States (US) are retained in HIV care, underscoring the importance of novel reengagement and retention strategies. Mobile HIV clinics (MHCs) are one such strategy, but privacy and confidentiality concerns have limited their use. As part of a larger mixed-methods study in Atlanta, Georgia, from June 2019- July 2020, we conducted 41 qualitative interviews with key stakeholders to explore confidentiality, privacy and stigma concerns and strategies to address them. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded thematically. Four key themes emerged: 1) the need to understand MHC acceptance in the context of high HIV stigma in the South, 2) the multidimensionality of confidentiality and stigma concerns (e.g., related to exterior labeling, layout, location attracting unwanted attention), 3) the counter perspective: potential for MHCs to positively reframe HIV and reduce stigma, and 4) strategies to overcome stigma and confidentiality concerns, including co-delivery of non-HIV services, unidirectional flow, and non-HIV exterior labeling. In furthering understanding of the breadth of privacy and confidentiality concerns associated with an MHC and strategies for addressing them, this exploratory study lays a critical foundation for the development of an MHC to reengage and retain PLWH in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sophia A Hussen
- Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Devon N Brown
- Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michelle R Fletcher
- Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michelle E Henkhaus
- Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Marxavian D Jones
- Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jonathan Colasanti
- Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ameeta S Kalokhe
- Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Henkhaus ME, Hussen SA, Brown DN, del Rio C, Fletcher MR, Jones MD, Marellapudi A, Kalokhe AS. Barriers and facilitators to use of a mobile HIV care model to re-engage and retain out-of-care people living with HIV in Atlanta, Georgia. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0247328. [PMID: 33705421 PMCID: PMC7951832 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Novel strategies to re-engage and retain people living with HIV (PLWH) who are out of care are greatly needed. While mobile clinics have been used effectively for HIV testing and linkage, evidence guiding their use in providing HIV care domestically has been limited. To guide the development of a mobile HIV clinic (MHC) model as a strategy to re-engage and retain PLWH who are out of care, we aimed to explore stakeholder perceptions of barriers and facilitators to MHC implementation and use. From June 2019-July 2020, we conducted 41 in-depth interviews with HIV clinic providers, administrators, staff, legal authorities, and community advisory board members, PLWH, AIDS service organizations and city officials in Atlanta, Georgia, and domestic and international mobile health clinics to explore barriers and facilitators to use of MHCs. Interviews were transcribed, coded and thematically analysed. Barriers raised include potential for: breach of confidentiality with resulting heightened stigmatization, fractured continuity of care, safety concerns, staffing challenges, and low community acceptance of MHC presence in their locality. Participants provided suggestions regarding appropriate exterior design, location, timing, and co-delivery of non-HIV services that could facilitate MHC acceptance and address the concerns. In identifying key barriers and facilitators to MHC use, this study informs design and implementation of an MHC as a novel strategy for re-engaging and retaining PLWH who are out of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle E. Henkhaus
- Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Sophia A. Hussen
- Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Devon N. Brown
- Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Carlos del Rio
- Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Michelle R. Fletcher
- Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Marxavian D. Jones
- Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Amulya Marellapudi
- Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Ameeta S. Kalokhe
- Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Long L, Kuchukhidze S, Pascoe S, Nichols BE, Fox MP, Cele R, Govathson C, Huber AN, Flynn D, Rosen S. Retention in care and viral suppression in differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a rapid systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc 2020; 23:e25640. [PMID: 33247517 PMCID: PMC7696000 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for antiretroviral treatment (ART) for HIV are being scaled up in the expectation that they will better meet the needs of patients, improve the quality and efficiency of treatment delivery and reduce costs while maintaining at least equivalent clinical outcomes. We reviewed the recent literature on DSD models to describe what is known about clinical outcomes. METHODS We conducted a rapid systematic review of peer-reviewed publications in PubMed, Embase and the Web of Science and major international conference abstracts that reported outcomes of DSD models for the provision of ART in sub-Saharan Africa from January 1, 2016 to September 12, 2019. Sources reporting standard clinical HIV treatment metrics, primarily retention in care and viral load suppression, were reviewed and categorized by DSD model and source quality assessed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Twenty-nine papers and abstracts describing 37 DSD models and reporting 52 discrete outcomes met search inclusion criteria. Of the 37 models, 7 (19%) were facility-based individual models, 12 (32%) out-of-facility-based individual models, 5 (14%) client-led groups and 13 (35%) healthcare worker-led groups. Retention was reported for 29 (78%) of the models and viral suppression for 22 (59%). Where a comparison with conventional care was provided, retention in most DSD models was within 5% of that for conventional care; where no comparison was provided, retention generally exceeded 80% (range 47% to 100%). For viral suppression, all those with a comparison to conventional care reported a small increase in suppression in the DSD model; reported suppression exceeded 90% (range 77% to 98%) in 11/21 models. Analysis was limited by the extensive heterogeneity of study designs, outcomes, models and populations. Most sources did not provide comparisons with conventional care, and metrics for assessing outcomes varied widely and were in many cases poorly defined. CONCLUSIONS Existing evidence on the clinical outcomes of DSD models for HIV treatment in sub-Saharan Africa is limited in both quantity and quality but suggests that retention in care and viral suppression are roughly equivalent to those in conventional models of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence Long
- Department of Global HealthBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Salome Kuchukhidze
- Department of Global HealthBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
| | - Sophie Pascoe
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Brooke E Nichols
- Department of Global HealthBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Matthew P Fox
- Department of Global HealthBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Refiloe Cele
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Caroline Govathson
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Amy N Huber
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - David Flynn
- Alumni Medical LibraryBoston UniversityBostonMAUSA
| | - Sydney Rosen
- Department of Global HealthBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kerschberger B, Schomaker M, Jobanputra K, Kabore SM, Teck R, Mabhena E, Mthethwa-Hleza S, Rusch B, Ciglenecki I, Boulle A. HIV programmatic outcomes following implementation of the 'Treat-All' policy in a public sector setting in Eswatini: a prospective cohort study. J Int AIDS Soc 2020; 23:e25458. [PMID: 32128964 PMCID: PMC7054447 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Treat-All policy - antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation irrespective of CD4 cell criteria - increases access to treatment. Many ART programmes, however, reported increasing attrition and viral failure during treatment expansion, questioning the programmatic feasibility of Treat-All in resource-limited settings. We aimed to describe and compare programmatic outcomes between Treat-All and standard of care (SOC) in the public sectors of Eswatini. METHODS This is a prospective cohort study of ≥16-year-old HIV-positive patients initiated on first-line ART under Treat-All and SOC in 18 health facilities of the Shiselweni region, from October 2014 to March 2016. SOC followed the CD4 350 and 500 cells/mm3 treatment eligibility thresholds. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to describe crude programmatic outcomes. Multivariate flexible parametric survival models were built to assess associations of time from ART initiation with the composite unfavourable outcome of all-cause attrition and viral failure. RESULTS Of the 3170 patients, 1888 (59.6%) initiated ART under Treat-All at a median CD4 cell count of 329 (IQR 168 to 488) cells/mm3 compared with 292 (IQR 161 to 430) (p < 0.001) under SOC. Although crude programme retention at 36 months tended to be lower under Treat-All (71%) than SOC (75%) (p = 0.002), it was similar in covariate-adjusted analysis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.06, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.23). The hazard of viral suppression was higher for Treat-All (aHR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23), while the hazard of viral failure was comparable (Treat-All: aHR 0.89, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.49). Among patients with advanced HIV disease (n = 1080), those under Treat-All (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.44) had a similar risk of an composite unfavourable outcome to SOC. Factors increasing the risk of the composite unfavourable outcome under both interventions were aged 16 to 24 years, being unmarried, anaemia, ART initiation on the same day as HIV care enrolment and CD4 ≤ 100 cells/mm3 . Under Treat-All only, the risk of the unfavourable outcome was higher for pregnant women, WHO III/IV clinical stage and elevated creatinine. CONCLUSIONS Compared to SOC, Treat-All resulted in comparable retention, improved viral suppression and comparable composite outcomes of retention without viral failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Kerschberger
- Médecins Sans Frontières (Operational Centre Geneva), Mbabane, Eswatini.,Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Michael Schomaker
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Kiran Jobanputra
- The Manson Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, London, United Kingdom
| | - Serge M Kabore
- Médecins Sans Frontières (Operational Centre Geneva), Mbabane, Eswatini
| | - Roger Teck
- The Manson Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, London, United Kingdom
| | - Edwin Mabhena
- Médecins Sans Frontières (Operational Centre Geneva), Mbabane, Eswatini
| | | | - Barbara Rusch
- Médecins Sans Frontières (Operational Centre Geneva), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Iza Ciglenecki
- Médecins Sans Frontières (Operational Centre Geneva), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andrew Boulle
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Finci I, Flores A, Gutierrez Zamudio AG, Matsinhe A, de Abreu E, Issufo S, Gaspar I, Ciglenecki I, Molfino L. Outcomes of patients on second- and third-line ART enrolled in ART adherence clubs in Maputo, Mozambique. Trop Med Int Health 2020; 25:1496-1502. [PMID: 32959934 PMCID: PMC7756444 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Adherence clubs (AC) offer patient‐centred access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) while reducing the burden on health facilities. AC were implemented in a health centre in Mozambique specialising in patients with a history of HIV treatment failure. We explored the impact of AC on retention in care and VL suppression of these patients. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in AC receiving second‐ or third‐line ART. The Kaplan–Meier estimates were used to analyse retention in care in health facility, retention in AC and viral load (VL) suppression (VL < 1000 copies/mL). Predictors of attrition and VL rebound (VL ≥ 1000 copies/mL) were assessed using multivariable proportional hazards regression. Results The analysed cohort contained 699 patients, median age 40 years [IQR: 35–47], 428 (61%) female and 97% second‐line ART. Overall, 9 (1.3%) patients died, and 10 (1.4%) were lost to follow‐up. Retention in care at months 12 and 24 was 98.9% (95% CI: 98.2–99.7) and 96.4% (95% CI: 94.6–98.2), respectively. Concurrently, 85.8% (95% CI: 83.1–88.2) and 80.9% (95% CI: 77.8–84.1) of patients maintained VL suppression. No association between predictors and all‐cause attrition or VL rebound was detected. Among 90 patients attending AC and simultaneously having VL rebound, 64 (71.1%) achieved VL resuppression, 10 (11.1%) did not resuppress, and 14 (15.6%) had no subsequent VL result. Conclusion Implementation of AC in Mozambique was successful and demonstrated that patients with a history of HIV treatment failure can be successfully retained in care and have high VL suppression rate when enrolled in AC. Expansion of the AC model in Mozambique could improve overall retention in care and VL suppression while reducing workload in health facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Finci
- Médecins sans Frontières, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - A Flores
- Médecins sans Frontières, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | - A Matsinhe
- Médecins sans Frontières, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - E de Abreu
- Médecins sans Frontières, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - S Issufo
- Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - I Gaspar
- Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | - L Molfino
- Médecins sans Frontières, Maputo, Mozambique
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Grimsrud A, Wilkinson L, Eshun-Wilson I, Holmes C, Sikazwe I, Katz IT. Understanding Engagement in HIV Programmes: How Health Services Can Adapt to Ensure No One Is Left Behind. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2020; 17:458-466. [PMID: 32844274 PMCID: PMC7497373 DOI: 10.1007/s11904-020-00522-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite the significant progress in the HIV response, gaps remain in ensuring engagement in care to support life-long medication adherence and viral suppression. This review sought to describe the different points in the HIV care cascade where people living with HIV were not engaging and highlight promising interventions. RECENT FINDINGS There are opportunities to improve engagement both between testing and treatment and to support re-engagement in care for those in a treatment interruption. The gap between testing and treatment includes people who know their HIV status and people who do not know their status. People in a treatment interruption include those who interrupt immediately following initiation, early on in their treatment (first 6 months) and late (after 6 months or more on ART). For each of these groups, specific interventions are required to support improved engagement. There are diverse needs and specific populations of people living with HIV who are not engaged in care, and differentiated service delivery interventions are required to meet their needs and expectations. For the HIV response to realise the 2030 targets, engagement will need to be supported by quality care and patient choice combined with empowered patients who are treatment literate and have been supported to improve self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Grimsrud
- International AIDS Society, 3 Doris Road, Claremont, Cape Town, 7708 South Africa
- Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925 South Africa
| | - Lynne Wilkinson
- International AIDS Society, 3 Doris Road, Claremont, Cape Town, 7708 South Africa
- Department of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Charles Holmes
- Center for Innovation in Global Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC USA
| | - Izukanji Sikazwe
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Ingrid T. Katz
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Global Health, Boston, MA USA
- Harvard Global Health Institute, Cambridge, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chimukuche RS, Wringe A, Songo J, Hassan F, Luwanda L, Kalua T, Moshabela M, Renju J, Seeley J. Investigating the implementation of differentiated HIV services and implications for pregnant and postpartum women: A mixed methods multi-country study. Glob Public Health 2020; 16:274-287. [PMID: 32726177 PMCID: PMC7612752 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1795221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) for pregnant and postpartum women in sub-Saharan Africa has required adaptations to service delivery. We compared national policies on differentiated HIV service delivery with facility-level implementation, and explored provider and user experiences in rural Malawi, Tanzania and South Africa. Four national policies and two World Health Organization guidelines on HIV treatment for pregnant and postpartum women published between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed and summarised. Results were compared with implementation data from surveys undertaken in 34 health facilities. Eighty-seven in-depth interviews were conducted with pregnant and post-partum women living with HIV, their partners and providers. In 2018, differentiated service policies varied across countries. None specifically accounted for pregnant or postpartum women. Malawian policies endorsed facility-based multi-month scripting for clinically-stable adult ART patients, excluding pregnant or breastfeeding women. In Tanzania and South Africa, national policies proposed community-based and facility-based approaches, for which pregnant women were not eligible. Interview data suggested some implementation of differentiated services for pregnant and postpartum women beyond stipulated policies in all settings. Although these adaptations were appreciated by pregnant and postpartum women, they could lead to frustrations among other users when criteria for fast-track services or multi-month prescriptions were not clear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alison Wringe
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - John Songo
- Malawi Epidemiology & Intervention Research Unit, Karonga, Malawi
| | | | | | - Thoko Kalua
- Department of HIV and AIDS, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Mosa Moshabela
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.,University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Jenny Renju
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Janet Seeley
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Moudachirou R, Van Cutsem G, Chuy RI, Tweya H, Senkoro M, Mabhala M, Zolfo M. Retention and sustained viral suppression in HIV patients transferred to community refill centres in Kinshasa, DRC. Public Health Action 2020; 10:33-37. [PMID: 32368522 DOI: 10.5588/pha.19.0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Setting In 2010, Médecins Sans Frontières set up decentralised community antiretroviral therapy (ART) refill centres ("poste de distribution communautaire", PODI) for the follow-up of stable human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients. Objective To assess retention in care and sustained viral suppression after transfer to three main PODI in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) (PODI Barumbu/Central, PODI Binza Ozone/West and PODI Masina I/East). Design Retrospective cohort study using routine programme data for adult HIV patients transferred from Kabinda Hospital to PODIs between January 2015 and June 2017. Results A total of 337 patients were transferred to PODIs: 306 (91%) were on ART for at least 12 months; 118 (39%) had a routine "12-month" viral load (VL) done, 93% (n = 110) of whom had a suppressed VL <1000 copies/ml. Median time from enrolment into PODI to 12-month routine VL was 14.6 months (IQR 12.2-20.8). Kaplan-Meier estimates of retention in care at 6, 12 and 18 months after enrolment into PODIs were respectively 96%, 92% and 88%. Conclusion Retention in care and viral suppression among patients in PODI with VL results were better than patients in clinic care and national outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Moudachirou
- Projet SIDA, Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Centre of Brussels, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - G Van Cutsem
- Southern Africa Medical Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa.,9 Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - R I Chuy
- Programme National de Lutte contre le VIH/SIDA et les IST, Kinshasa, DRC
| | - H Tweya
- International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France.,The Lighthouse Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - M Senkoro
- National Institute for Medical Research, Muhimbili Centre, Dares-Salaam, Tanzania
| | - M Mabhala
- Department of Public Health and Wellbeing, University of Chester, Chester, UK
| | - M Zolfo
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Okere NE, Urlings L, Naniche D, de Wit TFR, Gomez GB, Hermans S. Evaluating the sustainability of differentiated service delivery interventions for stable ART clients in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033156. [PMID: 32014874 PMCID: PMC7045032 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2015, WHO recommended immediate treatment for people living with HIV (PLHIV). As a result, the number of PLHIV needing antiretroviral therapy (ART) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) doubled from 12 million to over 25 million. This put a strain on already weak health systems and inspired the exploration of innovative service delivery models-differentiated service delivery (DSD). In DSD, services are tailored according to client clinical type and offer much-needed improvement in efficiency. The potential of achieving good outcomes for both clients and the health system plus the promise of sustainability motivates DSD promotion especially in low-income and middle-income countries. This review aims to evaluate the sustainability of DSD interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will systematically review peer-reviewed English literature published between 2000 and 2019 identified by searching PubMed and EMBASE databases. Main inclusion criteria comprise studies describing DSD interventions conducted in SSA focused on stable adult ART clients, whether described alone or compared with clinic-based service delivery. Quality of included studies will be assessed employing the Down and Black's and Joanne Briggs Institute checklists for quantitative and qualitative studies, respectively. We will apply a comprehensive sustainability framework including 40 individual constructs to evaluate, score and rank each intervention for sustainability. Narrative and quantitative synthesis will be conducted as appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION No ethical approval is required for this study as it is a review of published or publicly available data. Review results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019120891.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nwanneka Ebelechukwu Okere
- Global Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa Urlings
- Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Naniche
- Global Health, University of Barcelona, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Tobias F Rinke de Wit
- Global Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gabriela B Gomez
- Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sabine Hermans
- Global Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ford N, Geng E, Ellman T, Orrell C, Ehrenkranz P, Sikazwe I, Jahn A, Rabkin M, Ayisi Addo S, Grimsrud A, Rosen S, Zulu I, Reidy W, Lejone T, Apollo T, Holmes C, Kolling AF, Phate Lesihla R, Nguyen HH, Bakashaba B, Chitembo L, Tiriste G, Doherty M, Bygrave H. Emerging priorities for HIV service delivery. PLoS Med 2020; 17:e1003028. [PMID: 32059023 PMCID: PMC7021280 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Nathan Ford and co-authors discuss global priorities in the provision of HIV prevention and treatment services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Ford
- Department HIV & Global Hepatitis Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
- * E-mail:
| | - Elvin Geng
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Institute for Public Health, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Tom Ellman
- Southern African Medical Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Catherine Orrell
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Peter Ehrenkranz
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Izukanji Sikazwe
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Miriam Rabkin
- ICAP, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, United States of America
| | | | | | - Sydney Rosen
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Isaac Zulu
- Division of Global HIV & TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - William Reidy
- ICAP, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Thabo Lejone
- SolidarMed, Swiss Organization for Health in Africa, Butha-Buthe, Lesotho
| | - Tsitsi Apollo
- Ministry of Health and Child Care Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Charles Holmes
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Ana Francisca Kolling
- Department of Surveillance, Prevention and Control of STIs, HIV/AIDS and Viral Hepatitis, Ministry of Health, Brasilia, Brazil
| | | | - Huu Hai Nguyen
- Treatment and Care Department, Viet Nam Authority of HIV/AIDS Control, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | | | - Ghion Tiriste
- Department HIV, World Health Organization, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Meg Doherty
- Department HIV & Global Hepatitis Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Helen Bygrave
- Southern African Medical Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|