Predictors Based on the Radiologic Characteristics for Aggressiveness of Small (< 20 mm) Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To find the association between preoperative computed tomography (CT) features combined with tumor marker and known high-risk factors of small nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETS), thereby selecting appropriate treatment strategy for these patients.

METHOD

One hundred fourteen patients with NF-PNETs< 20 mm who underwent surgical operation were retrospectively analyzed from 2009 to 2023. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to find the relationship between preoperative clinical psychological and CT features and high-risk factors. The overall survival (OS) rates with and without high-risk factors were compared.

RESULTS

Of 114 patients, 29(25%) had at least one of these high-risk factors. Main pancreatic duct dilation (OR, 3.315; 95% CI, 1.079-10.184; p = 0.036), irregular tumor margin (OR, 2.955; 95% CI, 1.021-8.551; p = 0.046), positive tumor marker (OR, 6.047; 95% CI, 1.408-25.963; p = 0.015) were associated with increased odds of having any of these high-risk factors. The time to death differed significantly between patients with and without high-risk factors. Patients combining with high-risk factors were associated with lower 3- and 5-year OS (100% vs. 81.8%, 93.1% vs. 81.8%, respectively; p = 0.035 for both).

CONCLUSION

Main pancreatic duct dilation, irregular tumor margin and positive tumor marker could screen a subset of patients recommended for surgery.

Impact of Regional Metastasis on Survival for Patients with Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the benefit of lymphadenectomy for nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNET).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) published between 1990 and 2021. Studies of functional PNET were excluded. Reported incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival analysis of either disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) were required for inclusion.

RESULTS

Overall, 52 studies analyzing 24,608 PNET met the inclusion criteria. The reported LNM rate for NF-PNET ranged from 7 to 64 % (median 24.5%). Reported LNM rates ranged from 7 to 51% (median 11%) for NF-PNET< 2 cm in 14 studies and 29-47% (median 38%) in NF-PNET > 2 cm. In total, 19 studies (66%) reported LNM to have a negative impact on DFS. Additionally, 21 studies (60%) reported LNM to have a negative impact on OS. Two studies investigating the impact of lymphadenectomy (LND) found LND had the greatest impact for large, high-grade tumors. The overall quality of available evidence was low as assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System.

CONCLUSIONS

Published literature evaluating the impact of regional LNM and LND in PNET is confounded by heterogeneity in practice patterns and the retrospective nature of these cohort studies. Most studies suggest high rates of LNM in NF-PNET that negatively impact DFS and OS. Given the high rate of LNM in NF-PNET and its potential detrimental effect on DFS and OS, we recommend lymphadenectomy be completed for NF-PNET > 2 cm and strongly considered for NF-PNET < 2 cm.

Consensus of clinical diagnosis and treatment for non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with diameter <2 cm

In clinical practice, pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) with a diameter smaller than 2 cm are commonly referred to as small pNENs. Due to their generally favorable biological characteristics, the diagnosis and treatment of small pNENs differ from other pNENs and are somewhat controversial. In response to this, the Chinese Pancreatic Surgery Association, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association have developed a consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of small pNENs, which is based on evidence-based medicine and expert opinions. This consensus covers various topics, including concepts, disease assessment, treatment selection, follow-up, and other relevant aspects.

Prognostic predictors for recurrence following curative resection in grade I/II pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) have an excellent long-term survival after resection, but are associated with a high recurrence rate. Identification of prognostic factors affecting recurrences would enable identifying subgroup of patients at higher risk of recurrences, who may benefit from more aggressive treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing pancreatectomy with curative intent for grade I and II pNETs between July 2007 and June 2021 was performed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 68 resected patients of pNETs were included in this analysis. Fifty-two patients (76.47%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 10 (14.7%) patients had distal pancreatectomy, and 2 (2.9%) patients underwent median pancreatectomy, while enucleation was performed in 4 patients (5.8%). The overall major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III/IV) and mortality rates were 33.82% and 2.94%, respectively. At a median follow-up period of 48 months, 22 (32.35%) patients had disease recurrence. The 5-year overall survival and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 90.2% and 60.8%, respectively. While OS was unaffected by different prognostic factors, multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement, Ki-67 index ≥5%, and presence of perineural invasion (PNI) were independently associated with recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

While surgical resection gives excellent overall survival in grade I/II pNETs, lymph node positivity, higher Ki-67 index, and PNI are associated with a high risk for recurrence. Patients with these characteristics should be stratified as high risk and evaluated for more intensive follow-up and aggressive treatment strategies in future prospective studies.

Prognostic role and predictors of lymph node involvement in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

To define the prognostic role of lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and identify predictors of LNI using a comprehensive multifactor analysis focusing on preoperative radiological features.

METHODS

This study included 236 patients with preoperative computed tomography who underwent radical surgical resection of PNETs at our hospital between 2009 and 2019. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors associated with LNI and tumor recurrence. The disease-free survival (DFS) rates with and without LNI were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-four of the 236 patients (18.6%) had LNI. Biliopancreatic duct dilatation (odds ratio [OR], 2.295; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.046-5.035; p = 0.038), tumor margin (OR, 2.189; 95% CI, 1.034-4.632; p = 0.041), and WHO grade (G2: OR, 2.923; 95% CI, 1.005-8.507; p = 0.049; G3: OR, 12.067; 95% CI, 3.057-47.629; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors of LNI in PNETs. Multivariable analysis showed that LNI (OR, 2.728; 95% CI, 1.070-6.954; p = 0.036), G3 (OR, 4.894; 95% CI, 1.047-22.866; p = 0.044), and biliopancreatic duct dilatation (OR, 2.895; 95% CI, 1.124-7.458; p = 0.028) were associated with PNET recurrence in patients after surgery. Patients with LNI had a significantly worse DFS than those without LNI (3-year DFS: 85.9 vs. 96.7%; p < 0.001; 5-year DFS: 65.1 vs. 93.9%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LNI was associated with decreased DFS. Biliopancreatic duct dilatation, irregular tumor margins, and grades G2 and G3 were independent risk factors for LNI.

Reappraisal of Malignant Risk Assessment for Small (≤20 mm) Non-functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) ≤20 mm is controversial. The biological heterogeneity of these tumors poses challenges when deciding between resection and observation.

METHODS

In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, we analyzed all patients (n = 78) who underwent resection of non-functioning PanNETs ≤20 mm at three tertiary medical centers from 2004 to 2020 to assess the utility of preoperatively available radiological features and serological biomarkers of non-functioning PanNETs in choosing an optimal surgical indication. The radiological features included non-hyper-attenuation pattern on enhancement computed tomography (CT; hetero/hypo-attenuation) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) involvement, and serological biomarkers included elevation of serum elastase 1 and plasma chromogranin A (CgA) levels.

RESULTS

Of all small non-functioning PanNETs, 5/78 (6%) had lymph node metastasis, 11/76 (14%) were WHO grade II, and 9/66 (14%) had microvascular invasion; 20/78 (26%) had at least one of these high-risk pathological factors. In the preoperative assessment, hetero/hypo-attenuation and MPD involvement were observed in 25/69 (36%) and 8/76 (11%), respectively. Elevated serum elastase 1 and plasma CgA levels were observed in 1/33 (3%) and 0/11 (0%) patients, respectively. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, hetero/hypo-attenuation (odds ratio [OR] 6.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-22.2) and MPD involvement (OR 16.8, 95% CI 1.6-174.3) were significantly associated with the high-risk pathological factors. The combination of the two radiological worrisome features correctly predicted non-functioning PanNETs with high-risk pathological factors, with about 75% sensitivity, 79% specificity, and 78% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination of radiological worrisome features can accurately predict non-functioning PanNETs that may require resection.

Development and validation of nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis preoperatively in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

BACKGROUND

Routine lymphadenectomy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is debated. There lacks accurate model to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) preoperatively in pNETs. Therefore, this study aimed at developing a nomogram in predicting LNM in pNETs preoperatively.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (design cohort, n = 2742) and First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (validation cohort, n = 136) were enrolled. Nomogram was developed based on risk factors determined by logistic regression analyses. The performance of nomogram was evaluated by area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

In design cohort, 915 of 2742 patients had LNM. Tumor in the pancreatic head, T stage, and tumor size were significantly associated with LNM (all p < 0.05). Prediction of nomogram was accurate with AUC of 0.776 in design cohort and 0.622 in validation cohort. The nomogram showed good agreement between prediction and observation in the design and validation cohort. Based on nomogram-predicted risk, patients with higher risk of LNM had worse overall survival over patients with lower risk of LNM (log-rank p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel nomogram could accurately predict LNM in pNET preoperatively. For patients with high risk of LNM, lymphadenectomy was recommended.

A Single-center Prospective Observational Study Investigating the Accuracy of Preoperative Diagnostic Procedures in the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of preoperative imaging, including contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and 68 Gallium-DOTATOC positron emission tomography ( 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET), in identifying nodal metastases (N+) in sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs).

BACKGROUND

An accurate preoperative identification of N+ in NF-PanNETs is critical for surgical planning. The accuracy of different imaging techniques in detecting lymph node (LN) metastases in NF-PanNETs has been poorly investigated.

METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing surgery for sporadic NF-PanNETs (2018-2021) were enrolled in a prospective study (DETECTYON; NCT03918759). The accuracy of preoperative imaging techniques in detecting N+ was assessed through sensitivity, specificity positive and negative predictive values.

RESULTS

Overall, 100 patients with NF-PanNETs underwent CE-CT, EUS, and 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET before pancreatic resection. LN metastases were found in 42 cases (42%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of different imaging techniques were 26%, 95%, 79%, 64% for CE-CT, 19%, 98%, 89%, 63% for EUS, and 12%, 95%, 63%, 60% for 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET, respectively. Radiologic tumor size >4 cm and the presence of radiologic N+ at ≥1 imaging were independent predictors of N+ at pathology. The identification of N+ at ≥1 imaging technique was associated with a higher number of positive LNs compared with negative imaging (4 vs 2) ( P =0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

CE-CT, EUS, and 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET are poorly sensitive in predicting nodal status in NF-PanNETs despite a high specificity.

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Distant and Lymph Node Metastasis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

PURPOSE

Metastases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) can be found at the time of diagnosis in 20-50% of cases. Small asymptomatic tumors may be left for observation; however, they can metastasize. The aim of the study was to evaluate risk factors for distant and lymph node metastases of pNETs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and fourteen patients with postoperatively confirmed pNET were analyzed retrospectively in a single ENETS Center of Excellence. The relationship between location, size, differentiation of the tumor, and occurrence of lymph node and distant metastases was analyzed.

RESULTS

pNETs' location was pancreatic head - 38 (33.3%), body or tail - 68 (59.7%), and 8 (7.0%) involved the entire organ. Fifty-six (49.1%) tumors were graded G1, 50 (43.9%) G2, and 8 (7.0%) G3. Seventy-two (63.2%) tumors were ≥2 cm in diameter, and 42 (36.8%) <2 cm. Twenty-two (19.3%) patients had distant metastases and 47 (41.2%) had lymph node metastases. In ≥2 cm tumors distant and lymph node metastases were more frequent (p < 0.05). Distant metastases incidence was significantly higher in distally located tumors (p = 0.01) and in G2 and G3 tumors (p < 0.01). In 9.5% of <2cm tumors, distant metastases were present at diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Distant metastases are more often found in larger, distally located pNETs grade G2 and G3, while a higher occurrence of lymph node metastases seems to be associated only with larger tumor size. A considerable number of tumors <2 cm in size have distant metastases already at the diagnosis, which might indicate the need for careful qualification of smaller lesions for observation.

Impact of Surgery on Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ≤2 cm: Analyses With Propensity Score–Based Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting

Purpose

The impact of surgery on non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) ≤2 cm is controversial. This study sought to demonstrate the impact of surgery on the prognosis of NF-PNETs ≤2 cm with different biological behaviors.

Methods

Patients with NF-PNETs ≤2 cm from 2004 to 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were included in this study. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce the selection bias. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate the effect of surgery on the prognosis.

Results

In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, surgery improved the cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the overall cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 0.187; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.102–0.343; p < 0.001), patients with poorly differentiated or undifferentiated tumor grades (HR, 0.238; 95% CI, 0.105–0.64; p < 0.001), patients with distant metastasis (HR, 0.102; 95% CI, 0.021–0.496; p = 0.005), and patients with local invasion (HR, 0.059; 95% CI, 0.005–0.683; p = 0.002). Surgery did not improve the CSS in patients with lymph node metastasis only (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.0462–1.461; p = 0.126) or patients with well or moderate differentiation while without distant and lymph node metastasis (HR, 0.387; 95% CI, 0.146–1.028; p = 0.057).

Conclusions

Among patients with NF-PNETs ≤2 cm, different biological behaviors correlate with different prognostic impacts of surgery. As long as distant metastasis does not occur and the grade is well–moderately differentiated, these patients will not benefit from surgery no matter whether lymph node metastasis occurs or not. However, when local invasion appears in this group of patients, surgery should be performed. Moreover, patients with a tumor grade of poorly differentiated or undifferentiated or those with distant metastases may benefit from surgery.

Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Although PNENs generally have a better prognosis than pancreatic cancers, some PNENs display malignant behavior including lymph node (LN) metastasis. Complete tumor resection can be the only potentially curative treatment for patients with resectable PNENs. However, the indications for LN dissection are still controversial. Over the last decade, minimally invasive surgery such as laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LPS) has been increasingly performed for pancreatic tumors including PNENs.

AIM

To investigate the risk factors for LN metastasis in PNENs and to select appropriate patients for limited surgery by LPS.

METHODS

From April 2001 to December 2019, 92 patients underwent pancreatic resection for PNENs at Kumamoto University Hospital. Finally, 82 patients were enrolled in this study. Using perioperative factors, we examined the predictive factors for LN metastasis in PNENs.

RESULTS

Among the 82 patients, the percentage of LN metastasis according to the pathological findings was 12% (10/82 cases). The median tumor size was 12 mm (range: 5-90 mm). The median tumor size in the LN-positive group (37 mm) was significantly larger than that in the LN-negative group (12 mm) (P = 0.0001). Multivariate analyses revealed that larger tumor size (≥ 20 mm) was an independent risk factor for LN metastasis (odds ratio 16.8, P = 0.0062). In patients with small tumors (≤ 10 mm), LN metastasis was not found.

CONCLUSION

Larger tumor size (≥ 20 mm) is an independent risk factor for LN metastasis in PNENs. In smaller PNENs (≤ 10 mm), we may be able to choose limited surgery without LN dissection.

Value of lymphadenectomy in patients with surgically resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Although some factors that predict the prognosis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) have been confirmed, the predictive value of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in the prognosis of pNETs remains conflicting and it is not clear whether regional lymphadenectomy should be performed in all grades of tumors.

METHODS

We included pNET patients undergoing surgery in Shanghai pancreatic cancer institute (SHPCI). The risk factors for survival were investigated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. We evaluated the predictors of LNM using Logistic regression.

RESULTS

For 206 patients in the SHPCI series, LNM was an independent prognostic factor for entire cohort suggested by multivariate Cox regression analysis. LNM (P = 0.002) predicted poorer overall survival (OS) in grade 2/3 cohort, but there is no significant association between LNM and OS in grade 1 cohort. Grade (P < 0.001) and size (P = 0.049) predicted LNM in entire cohort. Grade (P = 0.002) predicted LNM while regardless of size in grade 2/3 cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our own retrospective data obtained from a single center series, LNM seems to be associated with poorer outcome for patients with grade 2/3 and/or grade 1 > 4 cm tumors. On the other way, LNM was seems to be not associated with prognosis in patients with grade 1 tumors less than 4 cm. Moreover, tumor grade and tumor size seem to act as independent predictors of LNM. Thus, regional lymphadenectomy should be performed in grade 2/3 patients but was not mandatory in grade 1 tumors < 4 cm. It is reasonable to perform functional sparing surgery for grade 1 patients or propose a clinical-radiological monitoring.

Preoperative risk stratification of lymph node metastasis for non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: An international dual-institutional study

BACKGROUND

/Objectives: Although the presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) defines malignant potential, preoperative prediction of LNM has not been established for non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (NF-PNEN). We sought to develop a prediction system using only preoperatively available factors that would stratify the risk of LNM for NF-PNEN.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent R0/1 resection of NF-PNEN at Kyoto University (2007-2019) and the University of California, San Francisco (2010-2019). Risk stratification of LNM was developed using preoperative factors by the logistic regression analysis. Long-term outcomes were compared across the risk groups.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were included in this study. Lymph nodes were pathologically examined in 116 patients, 23 (20%) of whom had LNM. Radiological tumor size [1.5-3.5 cm (odds ratio: 13.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.77-398) and >3.5 cm (72.4, 9.06-2257) against ≤1.5 cm], <50% cystic component (8.46 × 10^6, 1.68 × 10^106-), and dilatation of main pancreatic duct ≥5 mm (31.2, 3.94-702) were independently associated with LNM. When patients were classified as the low-risk (43 patients), intermediate-risk (44 patients), and high-risk groups (29 patients), proportions of LNM differed significantly across the groups (0%, 14%, and 59%, respectively). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the low- and intermediate-risk groups were significantly better than that of the high-risk group (5-year RFS rates of 92.2%, 85.4%, and 47.1%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction system using preoperative radiological factors stratifies the risk of LNM for NF-PNEN. This stratification helps to predict malignant potential and determine the surgical procedure and necessity of regional lymphadenectomy.

Prognostic factors for relapse in resected gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neoplasms (GEP-NENs)can potentially be cured through surgical resection, but only 42-57% achieve 5-year disease-free survival.There is a lack of consensus regarding the factorsassociated withrelapse followingresection ofGEP-NENs.

METHODS

Asystematic review identified studies reporting factors associated with relapse in patients with GEP-NENs following resection of a primary tumour. Meta-analysis was performed to identify the factors prognostic for relapse-free survival (RFS)oroverall survival (OS).

RESULTS

63 studies comprising 13,715 patients were included; 56 studies reported on pancreatic NENs (12,418 patients), 24 reported on patients with grade 1-2 tumours (4,735 patients). Median follow-up was 44.2 months, median RFS was 32 months. Pooling of multivariable analyses of GEP-NENs (all sites and grades) found the following factors predicted worse RFS (all p values < 0.05): vascular resection performed, metastatic disease resected, grade 2 disease, grade 3 disease, tumour size > 20 mm, R1 resection, microvascular invasion, perineural invasion, Ki-67 > 5% and any lymph node positivity. In a subgroup of studies comprising exclusively of grade 1-2 GEP-NENs, R1 resection, perineural invasion, grade 2 disease, any lymph node positivity and tumour size > 20 mm predicted worse RFS (all p values < 0.05). Few OSdata were available for pooling; in univariableanalysis(entire cohort), grade 2 predicted worse OS (p = 0.007), whileR1 resectiondid not (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The factors prognostic for worse RFS following resection of a GEP-NEN identified in this meta-analysis could be included in post-curative treatment surveillance clinical guidelines and inform the stratification and inclusion criteria of future adjuvant trials.

New Nodal Staging for Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-institutional and National Data Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic role of metastatic lymph node (LN) number and the minimal number of LNs for optimal staging of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).

BACKGROUND

Prognosis relative to number of LN metastasis (LNM), and minimal number of LNs needed to evaluate for accurate staging, have been poorly defined for pNETs.

METHODS

Number of LNM and total number of LN evaluated (TNLE) were assessed relative to recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in a multi-institutional database. External validation was performed using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry.

RESULTS

Among 854 patients who underwent resection, 233 (27.3%) had at least 1 LNM. Patients with 1, 2, or 3 LNM had a comparable worse RFS versus patients with no nodal metastasis (5-year RFS, 1 LNM 65.6%, 2 LNM 68.2%, 3 LNM 63.2% vs 0 LNM 82.6%; all P < 0.001). In contrast, patients with ≥4 LNM (proposed N2) had a worse RFS versus patients who either had 1 to 3 LNM (proposed N1) or node-negative disease (5-year RFS, ≥4 LNM 43.5% vs 1-3 LNM 66.3%, 0 LNM 82.6%; all P < 0.05) [C-statistics area under the curve (AUC) 0.650]. TNLE ≥8 had the highest discriminatory power relative to RFS (AUC 0.713) and OS (AUC 0.726) among patients who had 1 to 3 LNM, and patients who had ≥4 LNM in the multi-institutional and SEER database (n = 2764).

CONCLUSIONS

Regional lymphadenectomy of at least 8 lymph nodes was necessary to stage patients accurately. The proposed nodal staging of N0, N1, and N2 optimally staged patients.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) and neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs)

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are relatively rare neoplasms with 6.4-times increasing age-adjusted annual incidence during the last four decades. NENs arise from neuroendocrine cells, which release hormones in response to neuronal stimuli and they are distributed into organs and tissues. The presentation and biological behaviour of the NENs are highly heterogeneous, depending on the organ. The increased incidence is mainly due to increased awareness and improved detection methods both in the majority of sporadic NENs (non-inherited), but also the inherited groups of neoplasms appearing in at least ten genetic syndromes. The most important one is multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), caused by mutations in the tumour suppressor gene MEN1. MEN-1 has been associated with different tumour manifestations of NENs e.g. pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, thymus and pituitary. Pancreatic NENs tend to be less aggressive when arising in the setting of MEN-1 compared to sporadic pancreatic NENs. There have been very important improvements over the past years in both genotyping, genetic counselling and family screening, introduction and validation of various relevant biomarkers, as well as newer imaging modalities. Alongside this development, both medical, surgical and radionuclide treatments have also advanced and improved morbidity, quality of life and mortality in many of these patients. Despite this progress, there is still space for improving insight into the genetic and epigenetic factors in relation to the biological mechanisms determining NENs as part of MEN-1. This review gives a comprehensive update of current evidence for co-occurrence, diagnosis and treatment of MEN-1 and neuroendocrine neoplasms and highlight the important progress now finding its way to international guidelines in order to improve the global management of these patients.

Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Lymph Node Metastases of Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical strategy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is unknown. However, current guidelines recommend a watch-and-wait strategy for small nonfunctional PNETs (NF-PNETs). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk stratification and prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis (LNM) of PNETs to guide decision-making for lymphadenectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies reporting either risk factors of LNM in resected PNETs or survival of patients with LNM. The weighted average incidence of LNM was calculated according to tumor characteristics. Random-effects metaanalyses were performed, and pooled hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to determine the impact of LNM on overall survival (OS). In subgroup analyses, NF-PNETs were assessed.

RESULTS

From a total of 5883 articles, 98 retrospective studies with 13,374 patients undergoing resection for PNET were included. In all PNETs, the weighted median rates of LNM were 11.5% for small (≤ 2 cm) PNETs and 15.8% for G1 PNETs. In NF-PNETs, the rates were 11.2% for small PNETs and 10.3% for G1 PNETs. LNM of all PNETs (HR 3.87, 95% CI 3.00-4.99, P < 0.001) and NF-PNETs (HR 4.98, 95% CI 2.81-8.83, P < 0.001) was associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

LNM is potentially prevalent even in small and well-differentiated PNETs and is associated with worse prognosis. A watch-and-wait strategy for small NF-PNETs should be reappraised, and oncologic resection with lymphadenectomy can be considered. Prospective and controlled studies are needed in the future.

Role of Lymph Node Resection and Histopathological Evaluation in Accurate Staging of Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: How Many Are Enough?

BACKGROUND

Nodal involvement has been identified as one of the strongest prognostic factors in patients with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs). Sufficient lymphadenectomy and evaluation is vital for accurate staging. The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) required for accurate staging.

METHODS

The SEER database was used to identify patients with resected NF-PanNETs between 2004 and 2014. The distributions of positive lymph nodes (PLN) ratio and total lymph nodes were used to develop a mathematical model. The sensitivity of detecting nodal disease at each cutoff of ELN was estimated and used to identify the optimal cutoff for ELN.

RESULTS

A total of 1098 patients were included in the study of which 391 patients (35.6%) had nodal disease. The median ELN was 12 (interquartile range [IQR]: 7-19.5), and the median PLN was 2 (IQR: 1-4) for patients with nodal disease. With an increase in ELN, the sensitivity of detecting nodal disease increased from 12.0% (ELN: 1) to 92.2% (ELN: 20), plateauing at 20 ELN (< 1% increase in sensitivity with an additional ELN). This sensitivity increase pattern was similar in subgroup analyses with different T stages.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of detecting nodal disease in patients with NF-PanNETs increases with an increase in the number of ELN. Cutoffs for adequate nodal assessment were defined for all T stages. Utilization of these cutoffs in clinical settings will help with patient prognostication and management.

Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs)

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of lymph node metastasis in patients with PNETs is controversial. Understanding the effect of lymph node metastasis on prognosis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is helpful for surgery and follow-up. The purposes of this study are to identify predictors of lymph node metastasis among patients with PNETs and determine its prognostic associations.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database was performed. Patients with PNETs that underwent surgery and pathologic nodal staging were identified. Logistic regression and Cox regression were performed to identify independent predictors and prognostic factors, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 1956 patients (age: 56.8 ± 13.4 years, 53.3% males), 748 (38.2%) had lymph node metastasis. On multivariable analysis, tumor located in pancreas head, distant metastasis, and poorly differentiated, undifferentiated, and unknown differentiated histology grades were three independent risk factors of lymph node metastasis. In the entire cohort, lymph node metastasis indicated a worse overall survival (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.17-1.88, p < 0.001) and disease-specific survival (HR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.41-2.48, p < 0.001) on multivariable analysis. Lymph node metastasis was associated with worse overall (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.08-1.93, p = 0.012) and disease-specific survival (HR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.48-3.05, p < 0.001) in patients without distant metastasis on multivariate analysis. Lymph node metastasis was also independently associated with worse disease-specific survival among patients in well differentiation (HR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.35-3.46, p = 0.001) and moderately differentiation (HR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.28-5.56, p = 0.009) groups on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor located in pancreas head, distant metastasis, and poorly differentiated, undifferentiated, and unknown differentiated histology grades were three independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis. Lymph node metastasis was an independent prognostic factor of worse OS and DSS in patients with tumor located in pancreas head. Lymph node metastasis was an independent prognostic factor of worse OS and DSS in patients without distant metastasis. Lymph node metastasis was an independent prognostic factor of worse DSS in well differentiation and moderately differentiation groups.

The Landmark Series: Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms arising from pancreatic islet cells that remain relatively rare but are increasing in incidence worldwide. While significant advances have been made in recent years with regard to systemic therapies for patients with advanced disease, surgical resection remains the standard of care for most patients with localized tumors. Although formal pancreatectomy with regional lymphadenectomy is the standard approach for most PNETs, pancreas-preserving approaches without formal lymphadenectomy are acceptable for smaller tumors at low risk for lymph node metastases. Furthermore, observation of small, asymptomatic, low-grade PNETs is a safe, initial strategy and is generally recommended for tumors < 1 cm in size. In this Landmark Series review, we highlight the critical studies that have defined the surgical management of PNETs.

Tumor burden score predicts tumor recurrence of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after curative resection

BACKGROUND

To investigate the feasibility of Tumor Burden Score (TBS) to predict tumor recurrence following curative-intent resection of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs).

METHOD

The TBS cut-off values were determined by a statistical tool, X-tile. The influence of TBS on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was examined.

RESULTS

Among 842 NF-pNETs patients, there was an incremental worsening of RFS as the TBS increased (5-year RFS, low, medium, and high TBS: 92.0%, 73.3%, and 59.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). TBS (AUC 0.74) out-performed both maximum tumor size (AUC 0.65) and number of tumors (AUC 0.5) to predict RFS (TBS vs. maximum tumor size, p = 0.05; TBS vs. number of tumors, p < 0.01). The impact of margin (low TBS: R0 80.4% vs. R1 71.9%, p = 0.01 vs. medium TBS: R0 55.8% vs. R1 37.5%, p = 0.67 vs. high TBS: R0 31.9% vs. R1 12.0%, p = 0.11) and nodal (5-year RFS, low TBS: N0 94.9% vs. N1 68.4%, p < 0.01 vs. medium TBS: N0 81.8% vs. N1 55.4%, p < 0.01 vs. high TBS: N0 58.0% vs. N1 54.2%, p = 0.15) status on 5-year RFS outcomes disappeared among patients who had higher TBS.

CONCLUSIONS

TBS was strongly associated with risk of recurrence and outperformed both tumor size and number alone.

Comparison of morphological features in lymph node metastasis between pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Various studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the use of lymph node size for the prediction of metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Further, there is even less information in pNENs. Thus, the clinical accuracy and utility of using lymph node size to predict lymph node metastasis in pNENs has not been fully elucidated OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine differences in lymph node morphology between pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) to create more accurate diagnostic criteria for lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

We assessed 2139 lymph nodes, 773 from pNEN specimens and 1366 from PDAC specimens, surgically resected at our institute between 1994 and 2016. We evaluated the number, shape, size, and presence of metastasis.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight lymph nodes from 16 pNEN patients and 109 lymph nodes from 33 PDAC patients were metastatic. There were more lymph nodes sampled per case in the PDAC group than in the pNEN group (31.8 vs. 18.0). Metastatic lymph nodes in pNEN patients were larger and rounder than those in PDAC patients (minor axis: 5.15 mm vs. 3.11 mm; minor axis/major axis ratio: 0.701 vs. 0.626). The correlation between lymph node size and metastasis was stronger in pNENs (r = 0.974) than in PDACs (r = 0.439).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node status and morphology are affected by differences in tumor histology. The lymph node minor axis is a reliable parameter for the prediction of lymph node metastasis and has more utility as a predictive marker in pNENs than in PDACs.

Prognostic Value and Clinical Predictors of Lymph Node Metastases in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the correlation between lymph node metastasis (LNM) and various clinicopathological features of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) and its impact on prognosis.

METHODS

We searched the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (2004-2015) for patients with surgically treated pNETs. Factors correlated with LNMs were analyzed by logistic regression and by Cox analysis.

RESULTS

For tumors of 1 to 4 cm, age (P < 0.001, P = 0.014), grade (P < 0.001, P < 0.001), LNMs (P = 0.008, P < 0.001), and size (P = 0.038, P = 0.002) predicted overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). For tumor greater than 4 cm, age (P < 0.001, P = 0.001) and grade (P = 0.011, P = 0.048) were independent prognostic factors of OS and DSS. Lymph node metastasis modestly predicted DSS (P = 0.028) but not OS (P = 0.218).

CONCLUSIONS

In pNETs greater than 4 cm, LNM is not a predictor of OS and modestly predicts DSS, and lymphadenectomy may be unhelpful in these patients. For pNETs 1 to 4 cm, LNM predicts poor OS and DSS, which supports lymphadenectomy in these patients. Pancreas-sparing resection with only limited peripancreatic node sampling needs to be questioned.

Propensity score-matched analysis of clinical outcome after enucleation versus regular pancreatectomy in patients with small non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVES

The effectiveness of enucleation in treatment for low-grade (G1, G2) small (≤2 cm) non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (sNF-pNETs) remains controversial. This study investigated short- and long-term outcome of enucleation comparing with regular pancreatectomy in patients with sNF-pNETs.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with sNF-pNETs who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2000 to December 2017 were retrospectively collected. Short- and long-term outcomes of two operations were analyzed. The propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce potential selection bias.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients with sNF-pNETs were enrolled with 62 males, 69 G1, and median age was 56.91 ± 10.04 years old. During the follow-up period (mean 87 ± 58.1 months), 9(7.32%) disease progressed (recurrence or metastasis) and 2 died (1.62%), 5-years OS was 100%, 5-years DFS was 91.4%. Both lymph node metastasis (p = 0.117) and pathological grade (p = 0.050) were not prognostic factors for sNF-pNETs. The propensity score-matched cohort comprised 27 patients with enucleation and 44 patients with regular pancreatectomy. Enucleation was noninferior to regular pancreatectomy in terms of DFS, before or after PSM. The surgical duration (P < 0.01) and blood loss (P < 0.01) significantly decreased in enucleation compared with regular pancreatectomy. The other postoperative complications tended to occur in regular pancreatectomy than in enucleation, but no statistically significant difference (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Enucleation seems to be an effective option for the treatment of sNF-pNETs with a lower total rate of postoperative complications and similar long-term prognosis, compared with regular pancreatectomy.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This manuscript is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The group reviewed a series of questions of specific interest to surgeons taking care of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and for each, the available literature was reviewed. What follows are these reviews for each question followed by recommendations of the panel.

Trends in the Number of Lymph Nodes Evaluated Among Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States: A Multi-Institutional and National Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of routine lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) remains poorly defined. The objective of the current study was to investigate trends in the number of lymph nodes (LN) evaluated for pNET treatment at a nationwide level.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for pNET between 2000 and 2016 were identified in the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group (US-NETSG) database as well as the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The number of LNs examined was evaluated over time.

RESULTS

The median number of evaluated LNs increased roughly fourfold over the study period (US-NETSG, 2000: 3 LNs vs. 2016: 13 LNs; SEER, 2000: 3 LNs vs. 2016: 11 LNs, both p < 0.001). While no difference in 5-year OS and RFS was noted among patients who had 1-3 lymph node metastases (LNM) vs. ≥ 4 LNM between 2000-2007 (OS 73.5% vs. 69.9%, p = 0.12; RFS: 64.9% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.39), patients who underwent resection and LN evaluation during the period 2008-2016 had an incrementally worse survival if the patient had node negative disease, 1-3 LNM and ≥ 4 LNM (OS 86.8% vs. 82.7% vs. 74.9%, p < 0.001; RFS: 86.3% vs. 64.7% vs. 50.4%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a more recent year of diagnosis, pancreatic head tumor location, and tumor size > 2 cm were associated with 12 or more LNs evaluated in both US-NETSG and SEER databases.

CONCLUSION

The number of LNs examined nearly quadrupled over the last decade. The increased number of LNs examined suggested a growing adoption of the AJCC staging manual recommendations regarding LN evaluation in the treatment of pNET.

Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies

Introduction: Recent advances in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic agents have raised the importance of prognostic factors in predicting overall survival, as well as predictive factors for surgical outcomes, in tailoring therapeutic strategies of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs).Areas covered: Numerous recent studies of panNEN patients report the prognostic values of a number of clinically related factors (clinical, laboratory, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors on long-term survival. In addition, an increasing number of studies showed the usefulness of various factors, specifically biomarkers and molecular makers, in predicting recurrence and mortality related to surgical treatment. Recent findings (from the last 3 years) in each of these areas, as well as recent controversies, are reviewed.Expert commentary: The clinical importance of prognostic and predictive factors for panNENs is markedly increased for both overall outcome and post resection, as a result of recent advances in all aspects of the diagnosis, management and treatment of panNENs. Despite the proven prognostic utility of routinely used tumor grading/classification and staging systems, further studies are required to establish these novel prognostic factors to support their routine clinical use.

Evaluation of the Site and Frequency of Lymph Node Metastasis with Non-Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

BACKGROUNDS

The optimal lymph node dissection range in patients with non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is not yet clear. In this study, we investigated the site and frequency of lymph node metastasis and the significance of lymph node dissection in patients with non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 74 patients who underwent a curative pancreatectomy for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors between 2000 and 2016. The site and frequency of lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

The rate of synchronous lymph node metastasis was 17.6%, with 11.1 and 29.4% for tumors with diameters of 10-19 mm and ≥20 mm, respectively. Lymph node metastasis was not observed for tumors with a diameter <10 mm. Lymph node metastasis was observed along the anterior (17a: 13.3%, 17b: 12.5%) and posterior (13a: 5.9%, 13b: 26.7%) surfaces of the pancreatic head and the superior mesenteric artery (14p: 12.5%, 14d: 7.7%) in patients with non-functioning pancreatic head neuroendocrine tumors, in the common hepatic (8a: 5.3%), splenic (10: 14.3%, 11p: 17.6%, 11d: 12.5%), and super mesenteric artery (14d: 14.3%) in patients with non-functioning pancreatic body neuroendocrine tumors, and only in the splenic artery (11p: 8.3%, 11d: 7.7%) in patients with non-functioning pancreatic tail neuroendocrine tumors. Grade 2 (HR = 6.21) and synchronous lymph node metastasis (HR = 10.4) were significant risk factors for disease-free survival. The 5-year disease-free survival was 95.7, 72.6, and 0% in patients with 0, 1, and 2 prognostic factors, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study clarified the site and frequency of lymph node metastasis and the optimal range of lymph node dissection in patients with non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors: Somewhere between the pancreas and small bowel?

BACKGROUND

While sub-2 cm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are often observed, small bowel-NETs undergo resection and lymphadenectomy regardless of size. Aim was to define the natural history of duodenal (D-NETs), determine the role of resection, and define the factors associated with overall survival (OS) after resection.

METHODS

National Cancer Database (2004-2014) was queried for the patients with nonmetastatic/nonfunctional D-NETs. Local resection (LR): local excision/polypectomy/excisional biopsy. Anatomic resection (AR): radical surgery. Tumor size was divided into less than 1 cm, 1 to 2 cm, and ≥2 cm. Propensity score weighting was used to create balanced resection and no-resection cohorts. The primary endpoint was OS.

RESULTS

Among 5502 patient, the median age was 65 years. The median follow-up was 49 months. The median tumor size was 0.8 cm. Resection was performed in 72% (n = 3954; LR: 61%, AR: 39%). Lymph node (LN) resection was performed in 26% (43% had metastasis). A total of 74% had negative margins. Resection and no-resection cohorts were propensity score weighted for age/sex/race/Charlson-Deyo score/tumor grade (all independently associated with OS on multivariable analysis). Resection was associated with improved median OS compared to no resection in all sizes (<1 cm: median not reached vs 194 months; 1-2 cm: median not reached vs 56 months; >2 cm: median not reached vs 90 months; all P < .01). Subset analysis of each resection size cohort demonstrated that neither type of resection, LN retrieval, LN positivity, or margin status was associated with OS (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with nonmetastatic and nonfunctional D-NETS should be considered for resection regardless of tumor size. Given the lack of prognostic value, the resection type and extent of LN retrieval should be tailored to each patient's clinical picture and safety profile.

Association of preoperative monocyte-to-lymphocyte and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with recurrence-free and overall survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (US-NETSG)

BACKGROUND

Preoperative systemic inflammatory response plays a crucial role in tumorigenesis, progression, and prognosis; and neutrophil, monocyte, and lymphocyte counts serve as important biomarkers. An altered monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported to be associated with a favorable prognosis for certain hematologic malignancies and breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of MLR, NLR in patients with resectable PNETs.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for PNETs between 2000 and 2016 were identified using a large, multi-center database. NLR and MLR were calculated and Contal and O'Quigley analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff value.

RESULTS

A total of 620 patients were included in the analytic cohort. The prognostic implications of blood count parameters were evaluated in both univariate and multivariate analysis. The univariate analysis revealed that low MLR and NLR is associated with significantly improved overall survival (OS; P < .01) and recurrence-free survival (RFS; P < .01). On multivariate analysis, in addition to tumor size and grade, NLR was an independent predictor of improved OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

In addition to established tumor-specific factors, preoperative NLR levels can serve as a valuable biomarker that can be used as a predictor of OS and RFS after resection of PNETs.

The conundrum of < 2-cm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A preoperative risk score to predict lymph node metastases and guide surgical management

BACKGROUND

Management of <2-cm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is controversial. Although often indolent, the oncologic heterogeneity of these tumors particularly related to lymph node metastases poses challenges when deciding between resection versus surveillance.

METHODS

We analyzed all patients who underwent resection of primary nonfunctional <2-cm with curative-intent at 8 institutions of the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group from 2000 to 2016. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with poor differentiation and Ki-67 > 20% were excluded. Our primary aim was to create a lymph node risk score that predicted lymph node metastases accurately for <2-cm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, utilizing readily available preoperative data.

RESULTS

Of 695 patients with resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, 309 were <2 cm. Of these small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, 25% were proximal (head/uncinate), 23% had a Ki-67 > 3%, and only 8% were moderately differentiated. Also, only 9% of all <2-cm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were lymph node (+). Indeed lymph node positivity was associated with worse 5-year recurrence-free survival compared with lymph node (-) disease (80% vs 96%; P = .007). Factors known preoperatively to be associated with lymph node metastases were proximal location (odds ratio 4.0; P = .002) and Ki-67 ≥3% (odds ratio 2.7; P = .05). Moderate differentiation was not associated with lymph node (+) disease. Location and Ki-67 were assigned a value weighted by their odds ratio: (distal= 1, proximal= 4, and Ki-67 < 3% = 1 and Ki-67 ≥ 3% = 3), which formed a lymph node risk score ranging 1-7. Scores were categorized into low (1-2), intermediate (3-4), and high (5-7) risk groups. Incidence of lymph node metastases increased progressively based on risk group, with low = 3.2%, intermediate = 13.8%, and high = 20.5%. Only 3.4% of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with a Ki-67 < 3% in the distal pancreas were lymph node (+) compared with 21.4% of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with a Ki-67 ≥ 3% in the head/uncinate.

CONCLUSION

This simple and novel lymph node risk score utilizes readily available preoperative factors (tumor location and Ki-67) to stratify risk of lymph node metastases accurately s for < 2-cm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and may help guide management strategy.

Indications for resection and perioperative outcomes of surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in Germany: an analysis of the prospective DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas registry

PURPOSE

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are rare, and their surgical management is complex. This study evaluated the current practice of pNEN surgery across Germany, including its adherence with guidelines and its perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for pNENs (April 2013-June 2017) were retrieved from the prospective StuDoQ|Pancreas registry of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients (53.7% male) with a mean age of 59.2 ± 14.2 years old underwent pancreatic resection for pNENs. Tumors were localized in the pancreatic head (40.4%), body (23%), or tail (36.6%). A total of 239 (83.3%) patients underwent formal resection with lymphadenectomy, 40 (14%) parenchyma-sparing resection, and 8 (2.8%) only exploration. Fifty (17.4%) patients underwent a minimally invasive approach. Among the 245 patients with complete pathological information, 42 (17.1%) had distant metastases, 78 (31.8%) had stage I tumors, 74 (30.2%) stage II, and 51 (20.8%) stage III. A total of 112 (45.7%) patients had G1 tumors, 101 (41.2%) G2, and 24 (9.8%) G3. Nodal involvement on imaging was an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis according to the multivariable analysis (odds ratio: 0.057; 95% confidence interval: 0.016-0.209; p < 0.01). R0 resection was reported in 240 (83.6%) patients. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 2.8% and 4.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In Germany the rate of potential curative resection for pNEN is high. However, formal pancreatic resection seems to be overrepresented, while minimally invasive resection is underrepresented.

Defining the Role of Lymphadenectomy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Eight-Institution Study of 695 Patients from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group

BACKGROUND

Preoperative factors that reliably predict lymph node (LN) metastases in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are unclear. The number of LNs needed to accurately stage PanNETs has not been defined.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection of non-functional PanNETs at eight institutions from 2000 to 2016 were analyzed. Preoperative factors associated with LN metastases were identified. A procedure-specific target for LN retrieval to accurately stage patients was determined.

RESULTS

Of 695 patients who underwent resection, 33% of tumors were proximal (head/uncinate) and 67% were distal (neck/body/tail). Twenty-six percent of patients (n = 158) had LN-positive disease, which was associated with a worse 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS; 60% vs. 86%; p < 0.001). The increasing number of positive LNs was not associated with worse RFS. Preoperative factors associated with positive LNs included tumor size ≥ 2 cm (odds ratio [OR] 6.6; p < 0.001), proximal location (OR 2.5; p < 0.001), moderate versus well-differentiation (OR 2.1; p = 0.006), and Ki-67 ≥ 3% (OR 3.1; p < 0.001). LN metastases were also present in tumors without these risk factors: < 2 cm (9%), distal location (19%), well-differentiated (23%), and Ki-67 < 3% (16%). Median LN retrieval was 13 for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), but only 9 for distal pancreatectomy (DP). Given that PD routinely includes a complete regional lymphadenectomy, a minimum number of LNs to accurately stage patients was not identified. However, for DP, removal of less than seven LNs failed to discriminate 5-year RFS between LN-positive and LN-negative patients (less than seven LNs: 72% vs. 83%, p = 0.198; seven or more LNs: 67% vs. 86%; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size ≥ 2 cm, proximal location, moderate differentiation, and Ki-67 ≥ 3% are preoperative factors that predict LN positivity in resected non-functional PanNETs. Given the 9-23% incidence of LN metastases in patients without such risk factors, routine regional lymphadenectomy should be considered. PD inherently includes sufficient LN retrieval, while DP should aim to remove seven or more LNs for accurate staging.

Predictive Value of Chromogranin A and a Pre-Operative Risk Score to Predict Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

INTRO

Chromogranin A (CgA) may be prognostic for patients with neuroendocrine tumors; however, the clinical utility of this test is unclear.

METHODS

Patients undergoing resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) were selected from the eight institutions of the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group database. Cox regression was used to identify pre-operative variables that predicted recurrence-free survival (RFS), and those with p < 0.1 were included in a risk score. The risk score was tested in a unique subset of the overall cohort.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort of 287 patients, median follow-up time was 37 months, and 5-year RFS was 73%. Cox regression analysis identified four variables for inclusion in the risk score: CgA > 5x ULN (HR 4.3, p = 0.01), tumor grade 2/3 (HR 3.7, p = 0.01), resection for recurrent disease (HR 6.2, p < 0.01), and tumor size > 4 cm (HR 4.5, p = 0.1). Each variable was assigned 1 point. Risk-score testing in the unique validation cohort of 63 patients revealed a 95% negative predictive value for recurrence in patients with zero points.

DISCUSSION

This simple pre-operative risk scoring system resulted in a high degree of specificity for identifying patients at low-risk for tumor recurrence. This test can be utilized pre-operatively to aid informed decision-making.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: MR imaging features preoperatively predict lymph node metastasis

PURPOSES

Predictive factors of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are not well established. We sought to identify the value of MR imaging features in preoperatively predicting the lymph node metastasis of pNETs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we enrolled 108 consecutive patients with pNETs between January 2009 and June 2018. MR morphologic features and quantitative data were evaluated. Predictors of LNM were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients with pNETs were finally enrolled, including 82 LNM-negative and 26 LNM-positive patients. Features significantly related to the LNM of pNETs at univariate analysis were tumor size > 2 cm (P = 0.003), Ki-67 > 5% (P = 0.002), non-enhancement pattern (P < 0.001), apparent diffusion coefficient value (P < 0.001), main pancreatic duct dilation (P < 0.001) and pancreatic atrophy (P = 0.032) and extrapancreatic tumor spread (P = 0.001), CNRs during arterial, portal and delay phase (P = 0.005, 0.047, and 0.045, respectively), and histological classification (P = 0.006). At multivariate analysis, non-enhancement pattern (P = 0.019; odds ratio, 6.652; 95% CI 1.369, 32.321) and main pancreatic duct dilation (P = 0.018; odds ratio, 6.745; 95% CI 1.379, 32.991) were independent risk factors for predicting the LNM of pNETs.

CONCLUSION

The non-enhancement characteristic and main pancreatic duct dilation appear to be linked with LNM in pNETs. These radiological predictors can be easily obtained preoperatively, and may help to avoid missing pNETs with a high risk of LNM.

Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: high-resolution cross-sectional imaging features with clinico-pathologic correlation

PURPOSE

To describe the high-resolution cross-sectional (MDCT/MRI) features of mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) of the pancreas with clinico-pathologic correlation; to identify imaging predictors of high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma; and to estimate MCN growth rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two women (mean age: 46; range, 25-79 years) with resected MCN who underwent preoperative MDCT (n = 20) or MRI (n = 12) examinations over a 14-year period were included. Two radiologists examined retrospectively in consensus the following MDCT/MRI features: MCN location, size/volume, presence of capsule and thickness of the capsule, and presence of mural nodules, enhancing septations, calcifications, chronic pancreatitis, and main pancreatic duct dilation. Imaging features were correlated with clinical symptoms, biochemistry results, and histopathologic features. A univariate model was analyzed for the prediction of high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma. Preoperative MCN growth rate was assessed using a subset of patients with more than one imaging study available (n = 6).

RESULTS

Twenty-five (78%) patients presented with symptoms and 8 (25%) patients had abnormal serum biochemical values. Mean MCN maximum dimensions were 48 × 45 × 45 mm with a mean volume of 169 mL. MCN were located in the tail (n = 18), body (n = 10), neck (n = 2), and (head = 2); 30 (93.5%) MCN were encapsulated, 3 (9%) had calcifications, 4 (12%) showed enhancing nodules, 9 (28%) had enhancing septations, and 5 (15%) had main pancreatic duct dilation. Associated chronic pancreatitis was observed in 4 (12%) patients. The only predictors for high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma were MCN size and volume. Using a cut-off size greater than 8.5 cm, the specificity and sensitivity for high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma were 97 and 60%, respectively (p = 0.003; OR 81, 95% CI 3.9-1655.8). Mean MCN growth rate was estimated at 4.2 mm/year with a doubling time of 8.23 years.

CONCLUSION

MCN size (> 8.5 cm) and volume are the only features on MDCT/MR imaging that correlate with high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma. The average growth rate for MCNs is slow at approximately 4 mm per year.

Intrinsic Contact Between T and N Classifications in Resected Well-Moderately Differentiated Locoregional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

The role of N classification is controversial in several prognostication systems proposed for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). The widely accepted modified European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (mENETS) system suggests this contradiction may be related to T classification.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from 981 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2012; cohort 1) and 140 patients from the Pancreatic Cancer Institute of Fudan University (2006-2016; cohort 2). All patients had resected well- to moderately differentiated locoregional pNENs, whereby the mENETS system was adopted. Factors related to N1 classification and the association between N and T classifications were analyzed, and N classification prognosis based on T classification was assessed.

RESULTS

In cohorts 1 and 2, tumor size (2-4 cm: p < 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively; > 4 cm: p < 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively) and tumors extending beyond the pancreas (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively), which are factors for T classification, affected N1 classification. For tumors limited to the pancreas, the N1 classification was associated with tumor size (p < 0.001 and p = 0.046, respectively) and predicted poor disease-specific survival (DSS), while for tumors extending beyond the pancreas, the N1 classification did not affect patient outcomes. Findings obtained with data from the SEER database were reproducible with our institutional data.

CONCLUSIONS

N classification is associated with T classification, limiting the value of N1 classification for the pNENs tumor-node-metastasis system. A new risk model is necessary to predict patient outcomes and guide clinical practice for the prognosis of pNENs.

Predictive Effect of the Total Number of Examined Lymph Nodes on N Staging and Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

We aim to examine the predictive effect of the total number of examined lymph nodes on N stage and survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) and to determine the optimal threshold.

METHODS

A pNENs data set from 2004 to 2013 was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards model were used to identify predictive factors associated with N stage and survival, respectively.

RESULTS

Totally, 1280 pNENs were analyzed. The 11 to 15 lymph nodes examined showed a strong association with the N1 stage (6-10 vs 11-15: odds ratio, 0.672; P = 0.042; 11-15 vs 16-20: odds ratio, 1.049; P = 0.840). However, it failed to show any survival benefit in pNENs with or without lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Examining at least 11 lymph nodes may be useful to accurately classify the N stage for pNENs.

Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and tumor-related factors to predict lymph node metastasis in nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The lymph node (LN) status is very important for the survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Therefore, the investigation of factors related to LN metastases has a great clinical significance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and possible clinical parameters on the LN metastases in nonfunctional PNETs (NF-PNETs). A retrospective review of 101 NF-PNET patients following curative resection and lymphadenectomy was conducted. The associations between clinicopathological factors and LN metastases and prognosis were determined. Twenty-seven (26.7%) patients had LN metastases. LN metastases was independently associated with disease-free survival (P = 0.009). Ideal cutoff values for predicting LN metastases were 1.80 for NLR, 168.25 for PLR and 2.5 cm for tumor size according to the receiver operating characteristic curve. On multivariable analysis, NLR (P = 0.017), symptomatic diagnosis (P = 0.028) and tumor size (P = 0.020) were associated with LN metastases. These results indicate that preoperative NLR ≥ 1.80, tumor size ≥2.5 cm and symptomatic diagnosis are independently associated with LN metastases for patients undergoing resection of NF-PNETs. It is anticipated that these findings are useful for further planning of lymphadenectomy before surgery.

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive system

The authors evaluated the role of endoscopic techniques in the diagnosis and in the potential treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) localized in the gastro-entero-pancreatic system, on the basis of their experience and of the international literature. NET are rare tumors that arise from neuroendocrine cells of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. It is a possibility that both the digestive endoscopy and EUS play an important role in the diagnosis, staging and surveillance of this disease. In some cases, especially in the early stages, surgical endoscopy allows the treatment of such tumors.

Significance of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

PURPOSE

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) is relatively rare and has a generally better prognosis than does pancreatic cancer. However, as its prognosis in patients with lymph node metastasis (LNM) is unclear, lymph node dissection for PNET is controversial. Our study aimed to clarify the significance of LNM in PNET.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 83 PNET patients who underwent pancreatic resections with lymph node dissection at Kumamoto University Hospital, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, and Kumamoto Regional Medical Center from April 2001 to December 2014. Their clinicopathological parameters were analyzed by the absence or presence of LNM, and with regard to the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A predictive score of LNM was also made using the age, tumor size, primary tumor location, and tumor function.

RESULTS

Although the 5-year OS was 74.8% for LNM⁺ and 94.6% for LNM^- (P = 0.002), LNM was not an independent risk factor for the OS in a multivariate analysis. However, tumors larger than 1.8 cm were found to be an independent prognostic factor, and the cut-off value for the predictive score was 1.69.

CONCLUSIONS

Although LNM was not an independent prognostic factor, lymph node dissection is recommended for patients whose predictive score is larger than 1.69.